Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

I don't know if I heard Thank you.

Good evening, everyone. I'd like to call the June 22nd Eden Prairie Planning Commission meeting to order. If you could stand and follow us in the pledge, please.

I pledge allegiance to the flag,

Thank you. All right, we have agenda before us. Anyone have any changes to the agenda? Otherwise, I would look for a motion to approve the agenda as it stands.

Move to approve the agenda.

Thank you, we have a motion by Commissioner Schumacher. Do we have a second?

Second.

Second by Commissioner Palmesano. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Those opposed, same sign, motion carries. All right, we have minutes before us from our last meeting on June 8th. Any additions or changes to the minutes? Otherwise, I'd also look for a motion to approve the minutes from the June 8th meeting.

So moved.

We have a motion by Commissioner Sherwood. Do we have a second?

Second.

Second. Second by Commissioner Palmesano. All those in favor of the minutes, please say aye.

Aye.

Opposed? Motion prevails. All right, moving on to our agenda items for this evening. It looks like we have one public hearing, two public hearings tonight. The first one is we have an applicant that is requesting approvals necessary to redevelop the northern portion of the parking lot at 11609 Leona Road. A new drive-through Shake Shack is proposed to be constructed in the northwest corner of the site, and a new Valvoline Instant Oil change is proposed to be constructed in the northeast corner of the site. The developer is proposing to plat, so each building is contained on its own parcel. The proposed PUD requires waivers for front yard setbacks, side yard setbacks, sign area, and a sign setback. All right, we have an applicant who will give us an overview, and then we'll have staff and have the public hearing. Go ahead, if you could state your name and address for the record, please.

Good evening, my name is Gary Dreyer. My address is 200 Southdale Center, Edina. Thank you very much, Madam Chair, members of the Planning Commission. We're delighted to be here today. As you all know, the initial stage of the redevelopment of the site took place in 2024 with a partial demolition of the old office depot. So what we're in front of you today for is the completion of the project, as indicated, including Shake Shack and Valvoline. AS YOU KNOW, THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 11609 LEONA ROAD. AND AS INDICATED THE PLAN AT FITNESS OPENED IN 2025. WE AT THAT TIME HAD APPROVALS ALSO FOR STARBUCKS WHERE THE SHAKE SHACK NOW IS LOCATED. UNFORTUNATELY, DUE TO COST OVERRUNS, THAT FULLY NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT WENT AWAY. But we're delighted to have Shake Shack. They're a great tenant, obviously a great national name, and a great amenity for the project. So here's the past condition. As you can see, the office depot, pretty run down when we bought it, but we knew it was going to be a redevelopment opportunity. This is the CURRENT EXISTING CONDITIONS. AS INDICATED, THE OFFICE DEPOT BUILDING WAS 31,000 SQUARE FEET. WE DEMOLISHED ABOUT 12,000 SQUARE FEET OF IT. THE PARKING LOT TO THE EAST WAS COMPLETED IN THAT FIRST PHASE. SO NOW WE'RE JUST FOCUSING AGAIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. AGAIN, IN THESE AREALS, YOU CAN SEE THE PARKING LOT ON THE LEFT PHOTO. has been completed. The new access drive off of Den has been completed. And now we move to the final phase. So this shows the site plan indicates the area where the actual construction will take place. So that's what you see in the dotted lines. Again, as we indicated, the east-west access road off of Den was completed in the past. And then there's currently a curb cut on Den Road north, almost to Leona, which will be shut down. So really, I think a huge benefit with circulation through this parking lot. As we all know, right now, it's kind of confusing to maneuver through. You have in your packet, too, these elevations. We worked with staff. The tenants worked with staff. to come up with design that integrated in with the current building. So the materials are consistent for all three. Each are a little different, but we like a little differentiation in trade dress. So it was a good process working with staff. Here are the renderings of Shake Shack. Again, the dark brick will match, and the wainscot on the bottom will match the Planet Fitness building. Then you can see kind of a lighter brick and trade dress, very nice building. And here's Valvoline, pretty straightforward, but again, same materials throughout. Renderings. So from the standpoint of the overall project, it's a hugely beneficial project, I think, to us as owners and to the city as well. We put in a large amount. We had to redo the watershed, had a requirement to redo the ponding, and we did some underground ponding at a substantial cost. But it really purified the water coming off the site and brought it up to a very high standard. As you saw before with the site plan, now where we have the access off of Leona, there's a sidewalk that's going to come all the way up to Planet Fitness and tie in with the other uses. So much better connectivity. This east-west drive is a big improvement. Really, I think you can see it just improves the circulation, makes it intuitive when people come on the site. ENHANCED LANDSCAPING, SHAKE SHACK WILL HAVE A COUPLE OF EV CHARGING STATIONS, AS WE INDICATED, REUSING MATERIAL, ESPECIALLY IN THE SIGNAGE, AND THEN REDUCTION OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, SO THERE'S MORE GREEN SPACE THAN IN THE PAST FROM A PERCENTAGE STANDPOINT. That's it for us. I'm happy to answer any questions. We also have our civil engineer here if there's any specific questions that are above my pay grade.

Thank you very much. Any questions from the commissioners for the applicant? Otherwise, I'll turn it over to Jeremy for a staff report.

Madam Chair, sorry, just a quick question about the Valvoline project. What's the purpose of the easternmost driveway parallel to Den Road?

It's basically a service drive. So the nice thing about Valvoline now is that they have trucks that come in and actually kind of hook their hoses, if you will, to the building and take out all of the dirty solvents and oil, et cetera. So that's really all it's used for. Secondarily, you know, it could be used for a bypass if people, you know, decided not to wait.

Okay, just wanted to make sure. Very minimal use.

Yeah, okay, thank you. You bet.

Anyone else? Go ahead, Jeremy. I assume you'll walk us through the waivers as well.

Yes, thank you, Chair, Commissioners. As you described, there are four entitlement requests or applications to be reviewed tonight, all part of this project. They were requesting a PUD concept review, PUD district review with waivers, a preliminary plat to create the three lots and the out lot, and then site plan review. There is no zone change, there's no comp plan amendment. We see those often, but not in this situation. The developer did mention the proposed Shake Shack in the north northwest corner and then the Valvoline in the northeast corner. And then the third lot will be the existing Planet Fitness building that was improved a couple years ago. The waivers requested are the front yard setback waivers for both the Shake Shack and the Valvoline site. The Shake Shack is proposing an 18 and a half foot setback off of Leona Road where 35 feet is required. And then the Valvoline is looking at a 21.3 foot setback off of Den Road where 35 feet is required. Staff can support these front of your setback waivers because what they do is they kind of bring the buildings closer to the outside property lines and then allowing additional parking internal to the site. So they kind of create an edge where those buildings are located and then the internal and a network and circulation provides the circulation and the parking for that area. So the waivers for front yard setback were just described there. In terms of sign waivers, there's an existing sign in the northwest corner of the property. They're gonna reuse much of that sign base, but they would like to enlarge the sign area. Kind of does a couple things. One, the sign base is located in the required fire yard setback of 15 feet. They're asking for a waiver to 10 and a half feet. And then what they're proposing to do also is combine two of the freestanding signs that would be allowed in this development and put all that signage into one freestanding sign at the corner. Very prominent corner off of Flying Cloud Drive and Leona Road. A lot of, unfortunately a lot of folks sitting at that stoplight waiting for the light to change and we'll get some good visibility there. They're looking to consolidate the signage onto this location or two other signage in this location. With really a four lot subdivision in this area, there's opportunity for many more freestanding signs and they're choosing to consolidate existing signs or permissible signs into one kind of facility. So that staff can support that to try to avoid a sign proliferation issue because you could dot a lot of signage in this area without the waiver. And the sign size issue, again, a lot on a corner with two street frontages could have two freestanding signs, and so they could have two, one at 80 square feet and the other at 36. They're combining those, again, same size, just in one location. and the sign set back off of Leona Road, we can support that because using the existing materials, the sign that's there has kind of two legs with the signage kind of sign copy kind of above. The alternative would be one big solid base, which would create quite a bit of mass and may be detrimental from a view perspective. And so we see that opening and then the existing sign bases advantageous to reuse that based on the kind of character of this development. So staff can support that. those two sign waivers. I should also point out that this sign there has already an agreement with the Qdoba and the Caribou lot that they can have signage on that lot. So we'll work into the development agreement as part of the PUD that the sign that's on the corner that's on the Shake Shack lot can also advertise for the Planet Fitness and for the Valvoline, again, to address a sign proliferation concern. During the review of the project, excuse me, there's quite a bit of work on and access and parking and circulation and make sure how all that worked. And the developer working with staff proposes to shift the driveway off of Leona Road and I have the site plan on the screen or it will shortly here. The driveway off of Leona Road will shift to the east to provide the Shake Shack lot to be a little bit bigger than what the existing driveway allows. So basically what that does is shifts the driveway to the east enlarges the Shake Shack lot so that Shake Shack can meet all of its parking requirements on site. Same thing with the Valvoline. The Valvoline can meet all of the parking requirements on their lot. So no parking waivers are requested or required. The Planet Fitness site does exceed the parking requirements based on their size. I think there's 93 required based on the size of that building and they provide 105 on their parcel. There will be a cross parking and access easement for all of the parcels that parking can be shared between uses because they will have differing peaks. Obviously the Cordova and Shake Shack, they will be lunchtime peak heavy. So there will be a parking premium on the, we'll call it the west parking lot, but they do meet the requirements. There's no waivers from our parking requirement and there's opportunity to park further to the east in that kind of vacant space, or the space between the driveway and the Valvoline, there's 40, 45 spaces in a parking lot there. People can park there within a relatively easy walk to the Shake Shack and the Planet Fitness. The developer did mention an onsite pedestrian improvements in circulation, and there are additional sidewalks through the site to connect the kind of parking areas so that folks can walk through the development in a safe and efficient manner in a logical way so that they're not crossing haphazard through crossings and things like that. So we did look very carefully at the parking, and a parking study was done, and a traffic study was done, and we're comfortable that the proposal that you see in front of you is consistent with the city code and city standards in terms of parking requirements. One comment that we had as a staff reviewing the project was the architecture, and the developer shared, you know, The developer shared some of the elevations, which were also included in your packet. The buildings meet the requirements from a material percentage, material variety requirement. Staff did have a comment that generally what we try to do in developments where you're part of an existing PUD or you're part of a PUD, there should be some I'm gonna use the word communication between the buildings that they don't necessarily all have to match, but there's some central theme architectural building material-wise that kind of carries through. The Shake Shack here on your screens does share that. They have a wainscot kind of level here. kind of in the lower portion of the building that uses kind of a thinner stacked type stone similar to the existing Planet Fitness building. They also show, and it's very subtle in pictures, but you can see it more clearly in the elevations, there is a band of kind of soldier course brick that emulates what's in the major, or the main Planet Fitness building. Our only comment there is it's very, very subtle and maybe there could be a tweak to the color of that row of brick to help kind of bring it out a little bit more from a visibility perspective. That's a really main comment on the Shake Shack building. In terms of, here I'm just looking at the elevations here, the renderings show the colors, the darker brick that matches the kind of this band on the Planet Fitness building and then this, lighter colored brick here somewhat matches the the front entry feature of the planet fitness so there's some communication between those two buildings there and Here you don't really see that soldier course that I described earlier that just it's a difference in texture on the building and we recommend that maybe that color be tweaked a little bit before City Council to help draw that out of it and And then the Valvoline does a very good job of kind of bringing some of the same features from the Planet Fitness and the Cordova building out. They use the same, very similar wainscoting on the lower level. and then they use a band of darker color in the middle. I recognize the Planet Fitness building is an older building and we don't wanna just copy it because it's there. That's why we're looking for some sort of feature to help communicate some of those characteristics between project in this development. But as I said, there's no waivers required for architecture or building materials. They do meet that requirement. They do meet parking requirement. They exceed the landscaping requirement for both landscaping and tree replacement. And so staff is recommending approval of this project subject to the conditions outlined in the staff memo. I stand for any questions.

Thank you, Jeremy, for that overview. Commissioners, do we have any questions for Jeremy before we open the public hearing?

I'm sure, sorry, go ahead. Just a clarification, Jeremy. I want to make sure I heard you right when you were talking about the traffic study update and you were talking about the shared parking between the lots in anticipation of at least looking at the numbers because there's two lunchtime rushes right now, restaurants with the Qdoba and now the Shake Shack, and you were talking about the sharing of parking I thought I heard you say that the Cordova restaurant, which is offsite, but within this PUD, can also have the benefit of sharing some of that excess parking that is between the driveway and the Valvoline. Will that be memorialized? Is that true? Are they going to share parking with that Caribou Cordova building as well?

Madam Chair, Commissioners, there is an existing agreement that allows shared parking between the Cordova Building and the subject parcel. There's a limitation of how many spaces that they can use, but that's enforced privately. But from a planning perspective, each of the lots meets the requirements for parking, but in reality, what will happen in the real world will be many of the businesses, or the patrons of these businesses will park where they can find a spot close by.

Sure, okay, all right. And there was a comment either in the staff report or maybe it was in the applicant's letter saying that in the future it's possible that these lots may get sold off instead of just being owned by the applicant. And so the parking easements will survive those lot sales, correct? That's correct. Fantastic, okay. I appreciate your comment about the not trying to force too much consistency with an older building on the site, maybe maintaining just some nuggets of some of those architectural features and I certainly share that and then some. I think that the 1980s were the 1980s and I really appreciate the newer design, especially of the Shake Shack building and they should do something contemporary and not necessarily embrace older buildings despite the fact that it's a PUD. My two cents, but great development, thanks. Appreciate it, Chair.

Thank you. Go ahead, Commissioner Schumacher.

Madam Chair, just a quick question about I know the My biggest concern, and I think this is a great project, my biggest concern has just been around the potential traffic congestion around the Shake Shack area. And I know that there's access to park on the east side of that, on that entryway. What is the best way, and I'm thinking about winter time, the best way for people who are working at the Shake Shack to be able to get to that location? Will they have to travel south and then cut over and then cut back? Because again, I think people will just tend to go where the easiest place is to park, and they might not utilize that from a parking perspective. So is there any plan to be able to open up an area to either walk down Leona to get into the Shake Shack or cutting across in any other way, shape, or form?

I'll take a stab at that, Madam Chair, Commissioners. So there's a couple paths from, call it east side of the main driveway to the Shake Shack. And I have the site plan up if we could show that up there, perfect. So you're referring to this parking area here? So there's a couple paths. One, there's a sidewalk along the front of the building here that patrons can walk to this sidewalk and then connect to a north-south sidewalk that connects to the Shake Shack property. So depending on where they park, they can navigate to that path fairly easily. Another option, and may require some modification to the plan, but to still work their way to this sidewalk and then across and then to this sidewalk to get to the Shake Shack. There's a couple paths. We do anticipate perhaps there might be some snow storage or something here that will have to be managed as part of the applicant's operations of the site. But there are, call it paved ways to get to Shake Shack and to Valvoline and to the other businesses within the site. Thank you.

Any other questions, otherwise I have a couple. Just a couple questions regarding the signage. I think I questioned site line issues, and I think I heard you mention that staff is okay with the site line, especially if the sign's gonna be larger than what we require at Leona and Flying Cloud Drive, is that correct?

Staff is comfortable with the size waiver as proposed. We're not concerned from a site visibility perspective in terms of sight lines for the traveling public. And we're comfortable with this because the sign is there. So that helps from a what's the impact type of perspective. And the sign will be higher than what's there now.

Got it. And then there's other locations that will have signage throughout the site, correct?

could, yes. Yeah, I'm sorry, Madam Chair. There will be obviously wall signage on the buildings. And then there's a sign at the southeast corner of the site. There's an existing sign there. And then there's a potential for another one located on the Den Road side. So there's a couple other options. Right now they're just, this application is proposing the new one here at the northwest corner.

So it's possible there could be future signage in the locations that you mentioned that would be for Shake Shack or Valvoline?

I would call it for the shopping center globally.

Globally, okay. That's helpful, thank you. And then the access along Den Road, so it's basically closing the existing access and moving it further away from the intersection, is correct?

Yeah, Madam Chair. So there's two driveways off of Den. There's this existing one here on the screen, and then there's another one kinda closer to the corner. That one will be removed, and then this one will be the main in and out. So it'll be the one off of Dent Road and the one off of Leona Road. Those will be the two ways into the site.

Perfect, so essentially both of these access changes are moving the access further away from the intersections, which is helpful in my opinion.

Yeah, Leona Road is moving away from the Flying Cloud Drive intersection. Right, correct. And closer towards the Den Road, but yeah. Correct. More central.

Okay. All right. I think that's all I have. Any other, go ahead.

Can I circle back, Madam Chair? Sorry about the signage. When you were talking about the signage and we understand the waiver and consolidating the signs at the corner, at the northeast corner, does that come with a restriction to the property owners and future property owners if it's subdivided that they can't install their own monument sign, which would basically take away the benefits that we see in this consolidation waiver? so that we don't end up later after a land sale, somebody else changing the use or saying, I don't need my name at the corner there, I'm gonna put up my own sign and then all of a sudden we get a signage application and it defeats the purpose of consolidated signs.

Immediately, no, it doesn't restrict that ability, but our ordinance does have certain requirements in terms of location and separation within the same lot. If that's a concern of the commissioner, we can certainly bring that recommendation forward.

Okay, I have that concern, so if the commissioners share that, that could be passed along. Thank you, thank you.

Anyone else? Otherwise I'll open the public hearing. If there's anyone here that would like to come before us. to address the issues, the project before us, please come forward and state their name and address for the record. Public hearing is open. I don't have a list of anyone that was wishing to speak. If that's the case, we'll motion to, I'd look for a motion to close the public hearing.

So moved.

We have a motion by Commissioner Grody to close the public hearing. Do I have a second? Second by Commissioner Palmesano. All those in favor to close the public hearing say aye. Aye. Opposed? All right, motion prevails, thank you. Commissioner's discussion wishes this evening.

Sure, I'm very impressed with this project. I support it wholeheartedly. I think it's a good completion of the project we looked at a few years ago. We knew this was coming, and even though they switched users for that one parcel in the northwest corner, I think it follows relatively consistency with what we expected. I support the waivers of the yard setbacks, as well as the consolidated sign in the northwest corner. to achieve what they're trying to do. I really like the circulation off Leona Road with that reconstructed driveway that you have to pull all the way into that T intersection at the Office Depot, which I think will alleviate a lot of the challenges of navigating through the parking lot. So I think this is successful on a number of levels, and I really like the design of that Shake Shack building. Thank you.

Thank you, Commissioner Farr. Anyone else? I also agree with those sentiments. I think this development is very well done. Thank you for all your work that you've done to do with this as well as the water investment. Appreciate that as well. I would be voting in favor of this project as it stands. Otherwise, I'll look for a motion if there is no other comments. Go ahead, Commissioner.

I'll go ahead and make that motion, Madam Chair. I move to recommend approval for PUD concept plan review, PUD district review with waivers, preliminary plan, and site plan, all on 3.44 acres as recommended by staff and represented in the June 22nd, 2026 staff report.

Thank you, Commissioner Farr. Do I have a second? Second. Second by Commissioner Grody. All those in favor of the motion presented, say aye.

Aye.

Opposed? All right, motion prevails. Thank you very much. Good luck at City Council.

Thank you very much.

All right, next item we have before us is the city is actually requesting approval of a zone change from public to R1-22 on two parcels, totaling 1.2 acres. at 6345 Eden Prairie Road, which contains a single-family home, and there is no proposed change in use with the application. The parcels have been inadvertently zoned public since 1969, and the zone change to R1-22 is consistent with the neighborhood and the current and planned use of the parcels. Assuming the city's the applicant, Jeremy, will you take us through the staff report?

Yes, I will, Chair, Commissioners. As you summarized, this is a a city-initiated application. During the review of a building permit for the subject property for a deck, we learned that the property is zoned public, which requires a significantly deeper setback than the residential zoning district. In fact, there's not a buildable portion of the property because the setback from the north overlaps the setback from the south. In reviewing the history of the zoning in this property, We learned that the property has been zoned public since really 1969, which is one of our first zoning ordinances, and in guided low-density residential. So our goal here is to have the zoning match the comprehensive plan and the use of the property. The use of the property is single-family residential. The property owners wish to improve the property. They recently purchased it. It was held by the same family for a number of decades, so not a lot of projects going on the property requiring us to do some research into it. So when we learned of an issue, we tried to correct that, tried to bring the property in more compliance with the intended use for the property. We did put a development sign on the property. is our standard practice with comp plan amendments, zone changes, new developments. We put a sign up on the property to try to, again, be more transparent and get people to provide feedback or questions on a project. While this isn't a development per se, this is a rezoning, so we did put a sign up. And that did generate some calls and some questions. People were worried about a new development going in, a subdivision or what have you. In this situation, it's a... It's a correction of our zoning map error. So we're fixing that as an issue. There's no development proposed. You're not asked to approve any development, any subdivision, any site plan. You're not asked to do any of that, just to change our map to make it R-122. We also heard from neighbors about some tree removal. Every property owner in Neen Prairie is allowed to remove and landscape their property and allowed to remove some trees. This developer, this property owner may have exceeded that allowance and our forestry staff is working with the property owner to address that as a correction issue. but no reaction or no action necessary from the Planning Commission on that issue. Just know that we got some comments about tree removal. Generally what we receive a lot of calls on the property is they don't want to see any development. And that's understandable. The property isn't really conducive to redevelopment. It's a single family lot. It's relatively small and deep. Not a lot of frontage and we don't see it likely that a property will be subdivided in the future for more single family homes. We are recommending approval of the zone change for both parcels, both parcels because the property owner owns both, and the property to the north is too small to be R-122, so we need to combine them both to be, to meet them, or to make them conforming to our zoning ordinance. As I said before, it's very, It's a cleanup of an issue, trying to correct an issue for a private property owner, and we don't see any issue with recommending approval of that zone change as proposed.

Thank you, Jeremy. Any questions for Jeremy before we open the public hearing? From the commissioners. All right, seeing none, I will open the public hearing. For those of you that are interested in speaking, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. I do not have a list of anyone wishing to speak either, so feel free to come forward and state your name and address for the record.

My name is Mal Fay. I live at 15600 North Lawn Road.

Can you spell your name for us, please?

Mal, M-A-L. Last name Fay, F-A-Y. Thank you. And I live at 15600, which is just on the west side of Eden Prairie Road. My question didn't relate directly to this, but I understand then there's no development proposed, so the house is going to remain as is? No improvement gonna be done or, because it's been a derelict property for the 40 years that I've lived across the road. Is that true?

That is correct.

Okay.

Madam Chair, if I could supplement that. Yeah, go ahead. There's no development proposed. I can't speak to what their plans are for the exterior of the property, landscaping or anything like that because those don't require permits typically, but this came to our attention because they're doing some internal remodel and adding a deck.

Okay. So the property will still be vacant, but my question relates to the speed limit on Eden Prairie Road, because to the south of us, that bend is pretty much blind when we're at our intersection. And then to the north, as Eden Prairie Road goes south, the road dips, so cars drop right out of sight going the other direction. Eden Prairie Road goes from County Road 5 to Valley View Road is 40 miles an hour. From Valley View to Town Line, it's 45. And then once you cross into Minnetonka past Town Line, it drops to 35. And my question is, could the speed limit be rationalized to 35 from Town Road 5 all the way to Excelsior Boulevard. That way I would get people going 45 miles an hour instead of 55 as they come past my intersection. That's it.

Thank you, Mr. Fay. Since that is not relative to the project before us, I would ask that maybe City Engineer Carter could take that up with you after the meeting. All right. Thank you. All right, I don't have anyone else that signed up to speak. If there is anyone else in the audience that is wishing to speak, I would look for a motion to close the public hearing.

I move to close the public hearing.

Thank you, Commissioner Palmesano. Do I have a second?

Second.

Second by Commissioner Schumacher. All those in favor to close the public hearing, say aye. Aye. Opposed? All right, motion prevails, thank you. Commissioners, any thoughts or questions for Jeremy? I personally appreciate the city bringing this forward as not putting that burden on the applicant to put forward a zoning change, so I am in favor of this, although I do appreciate the comments that have been received by the neighbors as well. If there aren't any other comments or questions, I would look for a motion on this item before us.

Madam Chair, I will move to recommend approval for the zone change from public to R1-22 on 1.22 acres as recommended by staff and represented in the June 22nd, 2026 staff report.

Thank you, Commissioner Schumacher. Do I have a second on that motion?

Second.

Second by Commissioner Palmesano. All those in favor of the motion, say aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion prevails. Thank you very much. All right, next on the agenda, our Planner's Report. Jeremy, do we have anything?

I do not.

Thank you. Commissioners, do you have anything before that you would like to address? Otherwise, I would look for a motion to adjourn the meeting.

Motion to adjourn.

Second.

All those in favor to adjourn the meeting, signify by saying aye. Aye. Those opposed? Meeting adjourned. Thank you, commissioners.