Plan Commission - Regular Meeting

plan commission meeting. Can we get a roll call, please? Tammy Bailey here. James here. Logan Zuber here. Chris Lamb here. Michael Carow here. Daryl McConnell here. Deon Bolan here. Susan [clears throat] Mag here. Straw here. Joseph Schultz here. John Good here. Suzanne Davis here. I can confirm that we do have a quorum. Um, we have no items underneath organizational business. You should have all had access to the October 14th, 2025 minutes. You've had a chance to review those. Um, any questions, comments, or concerns about the minutes? I'd like to make a motion to approve the minutes from the October 14th, 2025 meeting.

Second. Motion and a second. Any discussion? All in favor signify by saying I opposed. Motion carries. Um there's no need to modify the agenda. Is there staff or?

Nope. Okay. So, we'll continue on. We have nothing underneath old business. New business. We do have three items. The first item on the agenda today is development plan 2025-9, the YMCA Child Care and Early Learning Center expansion. I'll go ahead and open the public hearing and turn it over to staff. Thank you, sir. Jim Kataret, city planner for Auburn. For this request, um was filed uh by Bob Craft on behalf of Young Men's Christian Association of Decal County. They're requesting uh development plan approval for a building expansion to the YMCA Child Care and Early Learning Center uh which is located at 2858 County Road 36A. It's the property the entire property is outlined on the map in in yellow. A development plan requires public hearing was advertised in the STAR on October 17th and we notified uh 13 property owners uh in the vicinity of the facility. Uh the property itself uh the northern part of the property where the existing facility is located at is zoned is which is institutional. the southern portion which is a property they recently acquired um is owned I1 light industrial the uh addition itself if you scroll further that's proposed the is what's highlighted in yellow uh that you can see here so the existing facility is on the north they're proposing an addition to uh go to the southern um portion of the building and it'll connect to the existing building that's um on the uh uh property to the to the south. Again, the YMCA has acquired the entire property.

The connection will be made as part of this phase. I think future phase would be some potential improvements to the building. Used to be the building Signature Construction was located in. I think the theater was there many years ago. um that property has been purchased and uh and will be part of this plan and I'll get into those details here in a moment. But the the highlighted portion is what the addition is requested for this evening. They did provide some building elevations, the architecture of the building will match what's uh existing with the facility and as well as show a floor plan uh for the property. A few photographs of the property. This is uh from the parking lot. We're looking east. This is showing uh it's an existing playground area, but it will be where the building expansion will go. This is looking in the opposite direction from the west. Um and I'm looking west at the property. And this is from the parking lot of that property to the uh to the south. That's 500 North Street is the property. That was to the south. This is a parking area showing where the building will expand. And this is just an aerial shot. the uh there is a there was a a garage pole building between the existing child care facility and the 500 North Street property that's been removed uh in order for anticipation of the expansion. We didn't receive any uh public comments um as part of our notifications. We also placed our typical uh public notice signs on the property. uh routing committee has reviewed this and all the departments have approved uh the final plan. Project advisory met on November 6th. So the uh the uh addition itself is a little over uh 6700 square ft and uh the expansion is going to occur again to the

south side of the building. The primary the main building is currently just under 12,000 square foot. The main entrance to the facility will remain the same as you enter the facility. Now for the parking lot, there will be additional entrances, staff entrances. Uh, one of the specific things they're doing with this project is adding staff parking area on that 500 North Street property. Um, the addition itself is going to have five classrooms and there's uh what's referred to as a large motor space for uh children activities. The again I mentioned the parking area um being added is uh to the south of the addition. So there'll be a new entrance for employees on the south side of this building addition. Um and then again um space is reserved for employees. The playground area that was on the south side of the building shifts to the west side of the building. Um, it'll have access to each of the classrooms that are are on the west part of the new addition. I mentioned parking. Right now, there's 37 parking spaces uh for the facility. Um, and uh with the building expansion area, they're required to have a total of 75 spaces for the facility. And the additional parking area being added uh to the south will accommodate the 75 required spaces. So, they do meet all of our parking spaces and that property at 500 North Street has additional land area for parking for any activities that would occur there. So, uh, shared parking is also available, but at this time, not knowing the exact intended use of the 500 North Street property, we can't determine how many spaces that would require, but we know there's more than adequate spaces for this addition

plus the uh anything that would happen at the 500 North Street property. Uh, they are [clears throat] making some adjustments to storm water control. Um, with the uh the new addition, there's going to be some additional storm sewers uh pipes installed, but it all gets directed to the north where there's an existing small detention area along the county road. Um, and that was approved, that plan was approved by the drainage board uh as required. I mentioned the architectural design of the building matches the current building. Um, and I also want to mention uh the 500 North Street property that's zoned industrial, there is an active petition to reclassify the zoning of that property to institutional. Um, when when the request came in and now that the property is officially transferred, we requested staff requested that the zoning be all consistent and to change the 500 North Street to institutional to match. And so that will be on your agenda at your next meeting. Uh so with that uh staff does feel that all the development standards of our UDO have been met and we do request that you accept the staff proposed findings and approve this development plan subject to three our three standard conditions uh that we place on development plans uh being erosion control in place before they start site work, the construction design release issued by the state and that all the work be done in accordance with the approved plans. Uh that concludes staff report. [clears throat]

Thank you, Jim. Any questions from the commission to staff? Uh the one question I do have is related to the zoning. Um given zoning hasn't been updated to date, um does this plan still meet the thresholds of the current zoning?

It it does, you know, because the the addition We're approving the addition because we know we know it's a child care center, but the addition does extend onto the adjacent property, but we can approve a development plan for a building addition. We're not necessarily approving it for a childcare center. We're approving it for any use that could that would be allowed to go on there. And there are certain office and other uses that are allowed on that property. So that's why we wanted to have the it's more of a technicality. We wanted to have this southern property reclassified to institutional. So there's no question especially as they go to use that new building uh you know in the future. But at this point in time, no. From our standpoint, it's not a reason to oh, you have to reclassify the zoning of that property first. [clears throat] That will be in place prior to this building being occupied for any use.

Yeah. the the only delta I really saw between the plan and the the current standard is the approved uses for the lot based on the zoning criteria which wouldn't come into play at this time. Yeah. But that that was the only two things that I had noticed kind of into that plan. And it's if they still meet the thresholds of whether it's an IS or an I1, then that that's kind of the major question. They they do that's we look at parking, we look at setbacks and all of that, architectural standards, all of that. Um that's part of this process tonight. So they met all those requirements. Thank you. Yeah. Any further questions? Okay. Thank you. Um would anybody from the petitioner like to come forward and speak to the commission? [clears throat]

Please state your name and address.

Evening. Uh my name is Scott Karst. I'm with engineering resources. We're civil engineer on the project. Um I think Jim did a great job explaining the intent of the purpose intent and purpose of the project. um it's just fulfilling a need of the community and repurposing an existing facility to help out that solution. So um like he did say um we're providing adequate parking for staff. We're not adding any hard surface area. We're actually subtracting hard surface area because of the playgrounds and the grass and stuff like that. Uh we're not altering drainage paths or anything like that. We're taking everything to the existing storm water basin and um so um yeah, we're just looking for any questions you guys might have on the technical [clears throat] side.

Any questions? All right. Okay. Thank you. We may call you back up here in a minute. We'll see. Great. Thank you.

Um before I turn over to the public, I would like to remind you if you've come in late or I didn't remind you earlier, please make sure you've signed in in the back. And if at this time I going to turn it over to the public. Anybody wants to speak on or against us can come forward and speak, please come up to the microphone, state your name and address before you address us. And please also address the commission and we will forward the questions and comments on to either the petitioner or staff from there. So does would anybody from the public like to come up and speak on or against this project? Anybody from the public like to speak? Seeing none, I'll go ahead and close the public hearing and turn it over to discussion. Any further discussion amongst commission members.

Um, I'm going to start off. I am a member of the YMCA board and so I'm not going to vote on this one. Um, but I do want to comment is that uh the uh this is a a good use for the building. Um what's actually happening is we're moving our school age child care um which is over in the shopping center right now um beside uh Jalapenos and we're bringing that over to this and be able to double the size of the number of kids we're servicing. Um a great benefit of this is then those kids are going to be more accessible to the YMCA and also the soccer park across the street. So it's just kind of a good use. Um the community needs this. Um we're short on child care already desperately. Um, we have a waiting list of 150 kids in the YMCA right now. So, this is something that is desperately needed and so definitely in favor of it. Um, but again, I won't be voting on it.

Any further discussion? I mean, I I agree. It's definitely needed. We've needed something for a long period of time and even with the expansion, we still need more child care in the in the city. So, that's for sure. Yep. Anything else? Okay. Um, let's take a look at the findings of facts. We do have findings of facts that we need to approve for this and there are five of them. [clears throat] So, they're pretty standard for our development plan. Does anybody um see an issue with these or if not, I'll entertain a motion to approve the findings of facts as presented.

No issue. I would move to approve the findings of fact for BC development plan 2025009 as presented by staff. I'll second. We have a motion and a couple seconds. Any comments further? All in favor of approving the findings of facts. Signify by saying I. I. Opposed? Motion carried. Okay. Now we need to approve the plan as presented uh with the staff recommendation. Remember there's three of those as well. So unless there's further discussion, I'll entertain a motion to approve.

Move to approve PC development plan 2025009 with the three findings of fact as presented by staff. Three conditions or sorry three conditions as presented by staff. Second. We have a motion couple seconds again. Um, any further discussion? Okay. All in favor signify by saying I. I oppose. Motion carried. Thank you very much and good luck. Thank you. [clears throat]

Next item underneath new business is the Fortify 11 apartments. Uh, this is PC Development Plan 2025-10. I know we need to table this, but we still need to open the the public hearing first. So, I'll go ahead and open the public hearing and turn it over to staff to just discuss where we stand and the fact we need to continue the public hearing and um table this to the December 9th meeting.

Yes, this was a project that was going through our routing uh review comments. There were some documents that were needed to be submitted to staff and and uh the applicant um wasn't able to get those to us in a timely fashion. So, we did reach out, staff reached out to the applicant and advised that we would request uh tableabling of the item tonight. We still needed to open the public hearing in case anybody was wanted to speak on this because we did advertise for this. Um, and they were they were fine. They understood the reasons for it. They're they're working on getting the information to us. So, they'll be ready for your December 9th meeting. So, we do ask that you um allow anybody that may want to speak on this case tonight and then just continue the the case to your December 9th meeting. Thank you. And I will I'll turn it over to anybody from the public that would like to speak on or against the Fortify 11 apartments. Um keep in mind we will be having another public hearing. This is continuing at the next meeting as well and we will present everything at that time. But you're more than welcome to if you've looked at things ahead of time and have something you want to say now, please step up to the microphone. Again, please state your name and address. Anybody from the public to speak? Seeing none at this time, um, at this point, I'd like to entertain a motion. Remember, we need to make this motion so that we continue the public hearing and table this numbered ordinance, which is or ordinance. Sorry, I'm used to city council. uh the development plan 2025-10 to the December 9th meeting. So it does need to be meeting specific.

Make a motion to table this to the December 10th. December 9th. Continue the public hearing. Continue the public hearing. Continue the public hearing. I'll second. We have a motion, a second. Any uh discussion? All in favor signify by saying I. I. Opposed. Motion carried. Third item, East Auburn Estates um detailed development plan. This is a primary plat. It's PC primary plat 2025-00002. I'll go ahead and open the public hearing and turn it over to staff.

Thank you. Uh Keith uh Dedric on behalf of the property owner Toby Buck requesting approval of a detailed development plan which also serves as the primary plat uh for East Auburn Estate Subdivision. This is a development proposed at the southwest corner of Auburn Drive and County Road 46A highlighted in red on the screen. Again, this uh request requires public hearing advertised in the star on October 17th and there were 12 adjacent property owners notified uh on this request. The property itself is zoned uh PD which was our plan development district at a previous meeting. you modified that uh plan district um as was requested by the applicant and that was approved uh by the council. Couple of photographs of the property. You should uh all be familiar with this property as it came before you before. Um just a few photographs that show nothing's really changed. The um out buildings that you saw and the house that you saw is actually part of out lot three on this development proposed development. We'll show the this is the approved establishment plan. So the overall zoning is PD which is a plan district. Within that district there are three different land uses. Um most of the property on the southern part is the seagull family residential area. There are two different commercial areas. One is uh C2 which is our general commercial area. Those are the uh the tract of land that's along Auburn Drive. And then where the existing house and two out buildings are at, that properties proposed for neighborhood commercial. Uh this request was routed for review on

a couple of occasions. The final review comments um that are identified in your staff report uh have been addressed. So that was uh this report was put out last Wednesday and uh since that time the uh engineer for the project has submitted a revised plan that both uh engineering department had comments and the planning department had comments and those have been addressed. The project advisory again met on November 6 on this project. We did receive some interest on this property from the public. A couple of residents did call in requesting the project file be sent to them. We had uh four residents visit the department again wanting to look at the plan and having some questions. We did receive one letter of objection um that's in your in the folder um for you to look at and we did place the public notice signs on the property back on October 10th. So the property itself again it is within the city limits. It was annexed back in August on August 5th. Um the current plan development zoning designation was approved back on August 19th and uh there were a number of conditions um that pertain to that approval uh that do have to be held either with this plan as submitted to you this evening or in the future. The applicant at this point is uh requesting approval of the detailed development plan. So this is step two of the process. Step one was establishing that ordinance and the zoning and the uses that would be allowed. Step two is the primary uh plat that the development plan for the project. Step three would be recording a secondary plat which establishes all the lots within the subdivision.

For any development that might occur on the commercial lots, it would be there' be an additional step of a formal development plan for any commercial building that would be constructed on the lots. that would be a public hearing that so if anybody um received direct notice as part of that or we'll put the signs back out so you'll know when a commercial development comes in and proposed on one of those two lots you'll know that it's being discussed by the planning commission. There are in this development plan there are 58 single family residential lots now and there are three commercial lots again the two which are undeveloped along Auburn Drive and the one that's currently developed with buildings along 46A. The uses that we approve for the property again the only residential uses are either uh sightuilt single family dwellings or modular dwellings. Um both of those have to comply with our one and two family dwelling code. The same code applies whether it's modular or a site built. Uh we have we do not allow in this property manufactured homes or mobile homes. Those are not permitted uses or special exception uses. The neighborhood commercial district um is our C1 district. Again, that's where the existing buildings are are at. don't anticipate a change in the use of that property at this time, but it would be restricted to neighborhood commercial uh uses. And then the two lots on Auburn Drive would be general commercial, which is what we typically see and know of commercial. It's does allow more intensive commercial uses. uh site utilities. Uh there are utilities to the property now, but there'll be some ex extension of those utilities to serve all the lots within

the subdivision as well as be continued um to the west to county road 31 to allow future extension and improvements south of this development. Storm water runoff's always an issue. Again, this property is field now, so we're talking about some development on the property. The intent is to create a wet detection pond in the middle of the property and the uh all the storm water from the lots and the new roads that are on the lots will go to the detention basin in the middle of the property. the uh release of that uh the storm water from that initially when there was discussion was going to go to an old field tile that was somewhat suspect on how uh viable that uh field inlet would be for this development. So the development now shows a new storm sewer uh constructed um from the detention basin all the way to the existing storm sewer Auburn Drive which is further to the west. So pretty extensive plan, but it's certainly a more reliable outlet for storm water. So we won't have a concern of of a failure of the system. So that is proposed for storm water. The drainage board doesn't officially act on it until secondary plat. The surveyor's office has reviewed the plan and so they're familiar with the storm water plan that's proposed. Um it's just that the drainage board won't act on it until a secondary plat. The other requirements of the UDO open space the connectivity uh index requirement which shows connectivity of the street system have all been met. The perimeter landscaping requirement which is landscaping at the entryways to the subdivision

um uh has been met. So, as staff looked at it, uh this primary plaque complies with all of our requirements. Uh the developer did incorporate uh the required changes that the planning commission made with the ordinance. So, you've required uh all the streets to be public. So, all the streets now have the public rideway and width of a public street. All the streets interior now have sidewalks because that's a requirement for city streets. All the lots had the 60 foot minimum lot width. Um that was um one of the requirements and uh the trail system which is the 8 foot wide trail is required is shown along Alurn Drive and 46A and then the the sidewalk requirement along County Road 31 is provided. So all the conditions um that applied to the plat have been met. There were additional conditions. Minimum home size at 1350 square foot. Uh each lot shall have a onecar attached garage. Each uh lot shall have a door facing the street. Those aren't part of the primary plat, but there are conditions that get carried on and the developer obviously is fully aware of those.

[snorts]

Um so I think all the conditions from your or from the uh last public hearing and the ordinance have been met. Staff has submitted proposed findings of fact on this request for your consideration. Um and we do recommend that you approve this uh detailed development plan primary plan for the subdivision subject to uh there are now five conditions. Condition number one that's identified list has been taken care of. they've submitted the uh revised drawing. That now complies and has addressed all routing comments. So, we don't need to include condition one, but conditions two through six, we request that you uh include and and I just want to briefly go over those. Um condition two, we don't want to allow direct access from these residential lots to either county road 46A or 31. So that condition requires all those lots even though they have dual frontage they have to be accessed from the interior street. Um and the other conditions deal more with as I mentioned the sidewalks the perimeter landscaping and its signage. So we do recommend uh approval and we've submitted findings of fact for your consideration.

Thank you Jim. Any questions from the commission? Jim. So are u trailers allowed on this project? Trailers absolutely not. Are manufactured housing? No. Can you define what modular is? Modular home I mean it's constructed in a factory constructed to the same codes as a sightuilt home and because a manufactured home is a different set of codes. So that's an important distin distinguishment between the two. Modular homes do get transported to the site. they are placed on a permanent foundation and in essence not movable at that point in time. I mean any house can be moved right but um once it's placed on the foundation it is just like a safe built home.

So they don't have an I beam like a manufacturer. Gotcha. Any further questions? Yeah, Jim, real quick on number two, you're talking about the residential lots, but the two out lots along Auburn Drive physically could do a direct connection, even though we know their intent is come off the new street, but we don't mention that in here. We don't mention that. I think that's more determined at the time. We know what the, you know, what the plan is coming in. So, I don't think we want to necessarily restrict that at this point. But yes, the condition reads no direct access of single family lots. So those

they'd have to recome and do another development plan to to be able to develop those and they will the commercial lots will. Yes. So we'll determine where access could be at that point. Any anything further? Thank you. Thank you. Would anybody from the petitioner standpoint like to come up and speak? Please come up and state your name, address.

Justin Hoffman, 6525 Ardmore Avenue, Fort Wayne, Indiana. Um, I'm with Brooks Construction. I'm the civil engineer for the project. Um, Jim did a great job of explaining the project and all the uh things that we're going through. So I other than answering questions, I really don't have anything else to add, but like to thank everyone for their time and reviewing questions from the commission. No, sir. All right. Thank you. We may call you back up.

Okay. At this time, I'm going to open it to the public. Um, again, as I said before, please come up and state your name and address. If you have any comments that you would like to direct, please make sure you direct them to the commission and we will forward them on, whether it be comments or questions. There are a lot of people out in the audience, so I'm going to limit this to begin with with three minutes. So, I'm going to please give you three minutes to speak. I'm not saying you can't come back up and speak again a second time, but we'll see because a lot of you I I'm sure have the same concerns. So, I will now open the floor to any public comment. If you have any um thing you would like to ask or um discuss about this, please free feel free to come to the microphone. Thank you. I'm John Stoops, 5113 Conor Road 31. I have the uh bordering property along the fence line and uh I'm we're concerned about uh earth moving that might be done on that project, but I understand there's what a 60 foot setback. And uh would if they do any excavating along there, would there any be uh earth move over to the fence line? And [clears throat] that type of thing is what we're kind of concerned with. Another thing that I'm concerned with is the traffic flow. If you've ever been on 31 and you try to go towards Auburn, you'll find that the traffic is heavy between 46A and 31. So now you've got another road and and you've got these other outlets. Anybody going to Auburn is going to have to make lefthand turns, which means you have to cross the lanes of traffic. So I think a traffic study would be an interesting thing to find out on that. Um,

other than that, you know, that's the main thing that I'm kind of concerned with. And, uh, having been a farmer and lived in this neighborhood all my life, um, I was a little disappointed in the way the property looks at the moment. I have never seen weeds on that property to the height of this. And I would have thought might have taken a little better care of that, but that's it. Thank you.

Thank you. Appreciate it. And I'll go ahead and ask questions before we have somebody else come up. Two main concerns there were traffic and I and I understand the traffic issue, but traffic study. I understand the idea behind that. That corridor over the years is going to really boom. I have a feeling. So, at some point, yes, we're going to have to do something along that corridor with the traffic study potentially because I mean that that road, Auburn Drive, was built for a lot of traffic on it. Um, a lot more than currently on there, but I understand the county roads on the sides as well. Um, but the earth moving, I don't know if um anybody would like to talk about the earth moving. I know it's still we're on the primary pl, not the secondary. So, anything about earth moving either the developer, can you let him speak and then you can come back up and finish? you had a couple like 30 seconds to go on your time.

So to be clear, you're talking about on the south property line of the development. Yeah. Right.

So currently there's there's a large tree line and it and it's kind of up on a hill. Um we we have started some preliminary grading and that grading for the rear of those lots is actually going to go down 8 to 10 feet from the elevation that uh the ground is at the property line or at the fence. So in essence the the homes that are along that south line are going to have an 8 foot earth and burm plus the trees. We're we're doing it so we don't disturb any of the trees. We want to leave that trees and that fence line as they are. Is that's our intent. Um and and so if I mean if you're standing on the south property looking over, [clears throat] you're going to be looking at the at the tops of roofs, not into people's homes uh from that perspective. So that's that's the intent at least at this time and and how we're moving forward with it. Thank you.

Any did that answer your question? I take it. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Anybody else like to come and speak? [clears throat]

Well, we pretty Oh, I'm Sus Stoops, John's wife, 5113 County Road 31, Auburn. And I do thank you for leaving the tree line alone. And we when we went up to talk up at the office, it looked like there's about a 60 foot setback where there's no nothing can be built. So, because I think if there's we're going to have 58 families, we might have 100 kids. And kids like to play in the trees, fall out and break their arms. The other thing is John mentioned going to Auburn from the subdivision, but going to Fort Wayne across the railroad tracks. You guys ever waited on a train on 31

for hours? So, what I'm asking has nothing to do with this project, but keep on the railroad to get that overpass built. Yep. I mean, really keep on them. We've had drainage problems where we have a stack of letters this high over years to get it done. I'll comment on that real quick. Yeah, go ahead. So, the railroad overpass is in the works. It's just a process. We've got federal funding. I believe it's scheduled for 2029 if I think I'm thinking right. So, it's it's in the works, but it's gonna be it's gonna be on Wayne Street. It's not going to be on County 31. I know, but keep on them. [laughter]

Yeah. Thank you. Anybody else from the public like to speak? [clears throat]

Uh, Greg Wolf, 3320 kind of road, 46A. And I'm concerned about the drainage again. I went and talked to the county and they said they would help looking at that. And right now if I got pictures to show him of water in this southeast corner over the road just three years ago from because it can't get away that way. So looking to work with them and see if they can help us make sure we get the water away so we don't have water coming to us all day.

I had that concern the first time they came and presented the the plan the other part of this the first part. But today they said they're going to attach at least storm drain to the storm system. So that should help alleviate some of it. But again in that corner correct. Okay. I mean, well, I didn't mean correct for that, but I mean that should help and hopefully elimin alleviate some of the stuff that does come down to that area. So, drainage board will take care of that, but that's the next step. Okay. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. I shared your concern on that one, by the way.

Any anybody else? Anyone else from the public that would like to speak? Okay, hearing none, I'll go ahead and close the public hearing. Um, open it up to discussion from the commission. Any further discussion from the commission members or questions? No.

Yeah, I'm very happy with the change of added adding the storm drain runoff. That's excellent addition. Um, so we do have findings of facts. Can you scroll to those, please? So again, there are four this time. All of these would need to be in the affirmative. Um is any discussion on findings of facts? Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion to approve the findings of facts. Move to approve PC primary plat 2025- 0002 findings of fact in the affirmative.

Second. I have a motion to second. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying I. I. Opposed. Motion carried. [clears throat] Um we need to do the approval but I have a question for councel. So, um there are six um primary plaque conditions on the or conditions for this and we only need to approve two through six. Should we make a motion to formally remove number one and then renumber two through six as one through five or just

I mean honestly you could approve all six since they've already complied with number one then it it's something they had to do have to do. They've the fact that they've already done it doesn't mean that we can't just keep it simple and and keep it on there. Okay. Any discussion on that? Want to just leave it on and approve with the six? Yeah, sure. It's just easier that way. Okay. Then I'll entertain a motion on PC development pian 2025-2. Motion to accept the staff recommendations for PC primary plat 2025- Z002 with the six conditions. Second.

We have a motion, a second. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying I. Opposed. Motion carried. Thank you. On to reports. Address report. None. Anything from board members? Anything from city county layers on? No meeting last week. No meeting. Okay. Project advisory. Anything coming up? Nothing. Anything further from city staff? We'll have, of course, the case continue for this. We'll of course have the case continue for this evening. And there's two additional cases on your agenda. So, okay. We'll have a meeting. Thank you. Anything from the city attorney? No.

Any further public comment? You have one more chance. Okay. Seeing none, um, just remember, uh, December 9th, 6 PM, it will be on a Tuesday. So, I'll entertain a motion. Motion to second. [laughter] Have a motion, a second. All in favor signify by saying I. I. Oppos. [laughter]