Common Council - Regular Meeting
The Syracuse Common Council approved minutes from June 29th and discussed public hearings from July 6th regarding the naming of the Homer Wheaton Park concession stand and the McChesney Community Center basketball court. A significant debate occurred over proposed legislation concerning right-of-way closures, which ultimately passed with a 5-4 vote. The Council also held discussions on various other items, including the Westminster staircase repair funds and an increase in boot fees.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Common Council
- Meeting Type
- Common Council
- Location
- Syracuse, NY
- Meeting Date
- July 13, 2026
Transcript
338 sections
Everything good with you?
Yes, everything's great with me. How about with you? Yeah, everything good. Thank you. Oh, it is 1 o'clock. All right, it is 1 o'clock. We're going to start our regular meeting. Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, Thank you. Now we invite Pastor Bill Turner to bless our meeting.
We humble ourselves in your presence, thanking you for this session. We pray that your spirit would preside We pray for the council who have given up their time, their willingness to work. We pray that you be with us. Give us sound thinking and sound minds as we go about the work of this municipality. Keep them well, that their work would be pleasing in thy sight and that the people of this community would be blessed by their work. As we pray in your precious name and the people of God said, amen.
Amen. I'll give you two minutes to get to the other side. Thank you. And it's your turn to do the closing of the roll call. One second.
Councilor Cotwell. Present. Councilor Machoke. Here. Councilor Enright. Here. Councilor Hudson. Here. Councilor Nave. Here. Councilor Moore. Here. Councilor Williams. Here. Councilor Jones-Rouser. Here. Councilor Jones-Rouser. Present. Councilor Matto.
Here. All present. Excellent. So let's move to approve the minutes. for June 29th. All in favor? Aye.
Opposed?
Thank you. All right. We had two public meetings on July 6th, I believe. Let me get the notes. Councilor Culver, do you want to take that?
It's fine. You just basically said
So the public hearings occurred in July 6th, 5.30 p.m. relative to authorize the naming of the Homer Wheaton Park concession stand to the Alfonsi Gunn concession stand pursuant to the revised general ordinance of the City of Syracuse, Chapter 17, Article 5, and then authorize the naming of the McChesney Community Center basketball court to the Dennis by Danette Volkart, pursuant to the revised general ordinance of the City of Syracuse, Chapter 17, Article 5. And with that said, any petitions? No, Madam President. Any committee reports?
Yes, Madam President. Parks, Hannah Ehrenreich, Parks Committee Chair, we had a meeting on Wednesday, 7-1-26 at 9 a.m., TO REVIEW THE PARKS BONDS THAT ARE BEFORE THE COUNCIL TODAY.
EXCELLENT. ANY OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS? OKAY. ANY COMMUNICATIONS? NO, MADAM PRESIDENT. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 10 IS BEING WITHDRAWN, CORRECT? NO RESOLUTION?
NO RESOLUTION. OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON. COUNCILOR COTWELL.
THANK YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT. BLESSINGS TO ALL TODAY. 11 and 12, and I'd like to introduce them. No, that's... Oh, yeah. I didn't see that. I'd like to introduce them and urge their adoption.
Thank you. Item 11, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye.
Opposed?
Item 12, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor. Opposed.
Thank you.
Councilor Mitchell. Thank you madam president I have item 13 to 42. Item 40, we'll vote on it, and then we'll hold item 41 and 42. Right, Madam Clark? Is that correct?
That's correct. Can you make notice that item 40 has been changed to application only?
And item 40, the agreement has been removed, leaving the application portion of it. Yes, and Deputy Clark just passed it around.
So 39 was okay, right?
Yeah. 39 is okay.
I was holding 41 and 42. Yes.
Okay.
So 40 agreement is removed and- Application is going through.
And then we will hold item 41, which is the bond side of the portion, and then hold 42 as well.
Okay?
The rest of them are ready. I would like to introduce them and urge the adopters. Thank you.
Item 13, any objections? Any discussion?
Yes, may I? So I really want to thank my fellow councillors, especially the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. that I put work in, and that is Jimmy Manto, Rashida Caldwell, Helen Hudson, am I forgetting? And myself. Myself. I forgot myself. So four of us, in addition to all the counselors as well that have added comments and suggestions to really get this legislation to this point. I also want to thank our council staff, Nathan and Neda, who have put in tons of work to this point. It has been a couple of months that have taken a lot of time. So second thing would go to the Corporation Council. for the work with us, as well as Eric Ennis, as well as Department of Public Works, crew under Commissioner Robinson and , as well as engineering. There's a lot of people that have been involved in this, and it's not perfect at all. By no means is it perfect. But I think it got us to a point where finally we are able to stand as a city and be able to be a little bit efficient. This version is a little bit efficient than the previous version. So I'm happy to introduce it and urge for everyone adoption to get it through. Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes, I as well want to echo what Councilor McJuck has said because I know there was a lot of work put into this. I still have my skepticism on some of the things because I'm still stuck on the square footage. I'm still stuck on the fact that the monitoring and how we're going to be able to do it with the staff that we have. So This one is a tough one. But I do appreciate all the work that was put in on this.
Thank you.
Anybody else?
Yes, Madam President. I would like to echo the sentiments of Councilman Hudson and Majoke over there with, you know, extending gratitude to everyone who worked on this project. In the proposed legislation, there's a couple of fundamental concepts. For areas of higher density, if you close right of way, you'll pay more. For closures that extend or that Pardon me, for closures that extend for a longer duration, for a longer period of time, you pay more. But similar to what Councillor Hudson mentioned, if you close a greater portion of the right-of-way, your fee does not increase under the proposed legislation. Square footage is one of the underlying aspects of the 2025 ordinance that we passed. It follows the basic premise. If you close more of a road, you pay more. This may have led to an overly complicated calculation, but the proposed changes swing the pendulum too far in the other direction. We are being asked to turn an area-based fee structure into an administrative fee structure. We are going from overly complicated to overly simplified. I think that this legislation builds on a lot of the council's ideas and requests. And for that, I am grateful. And I think that it comes very close to being a piece of legislation I could support. However, I still have my reservations.
Thank you. Anybody else?
I just want to echo what Corey said. I appreciate the work that's gone into this. I know it's taken a lot of time and effort, and I still have my reservations.
Okay. Any additional discussion? Please call the roll. Oh, I'm sorry.
Where's Joe Berry?
Oh, he's not here. Anybody from law department?
Anybody from law?
Right in front of you. Oh, Megan is right here.
So, Megan, with this item number 13, and I know we have, I know Eric is here too as well, and I know there's some movement that needs to go on. If it is not passed today, or if we don't move forward, if it's held, where does that put us?
You want to go to the mic if you want to speak, please?
Good afternoon, counselors. Megan Ryan, Senior Corporation Counsel. So if this legislation doesn't move forward today, we would operate under the existing legislation that was last amended, I believe it was in 2025.
Or it would, so you're saying business would go as normal and we would operate under what we had, it wouldn't stop business?
Oh, yes, that's correct, yes.
There is a there is a item that's on the waiver agenda, three months extension, of course, it won't stop.
Thank you.
Please call the roll. Codwell?
Yes. Councilor Machoke?
Yes.
Councilor Enright? Opposed? Councilor Hudson?
Councilor Navi? Yes. Councilor Moore? No. Councilor Williams?
Councilor Jones-Rouser? Yes. Councilor Matto?
Yes.
The item passes with a five to four.
Okay, moving on. Item number 14, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye.
Opposed?
Item number 15, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Synonymous. Item number 16, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item number 17, any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item number 18, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Shenanigans?
Item number 19, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye.
Opposed? Shenanigans?
Item number 20, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye.
Opposed?
Shenanigans?
Item number 22, any objections? Oh, 21. Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Anonymous. Item number 22, any objections?
Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Item number 23, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye.
Opposed? Anonymous.
Item 24, any objections? Discussion?
Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Anonymous. Item 25, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Anonymous.
Item number 26, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Anonymous.
Item number 27, Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Synonymous. Item number 28. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item 29. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item number 30. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. Item 31, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item 32, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item 33, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item 34, any objection? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Synonymous. Item 35, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye.
Opposed? Synonymous. Item 36, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye.
Opposed?
It's unanimous. Item 37, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? It's unanimous. Item 38, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye.
Opposed?
It's unanimous. Item 39, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Anonymous.
Item 40, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Anonymous. Item 41 will be held. Item 42 will be held.
All right, can we go back to 40? Yes. Did you need to state that it was changed from the application?
So he did already, but the item number 40 is put in front of the council, separating the application from the agreement. Right.
Yeah, as the council president said, it's a new piece of legislation in front of each one of you, just the application.
Thank you for checking it.
Councillor Aaron Red. Thank you, Madam President. I have items 43 through 61. I would like to introduce them and urge their adoption.
Thank you. Number 43. Any discussion? Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous? 44. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? It's unanimous. Number 45, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? It's unanimous.
Number 46, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? It's unanimous. Number 47, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye.
I'm sorry.
Okay. Councilor Padwell? No. Councilor Machoke? Yes. Councilor Enright?
Yes. I'm sorry.
Okay. Councilor Hudson?
Councilor Navi? Yes. Councilor Moore? Yes. Councilor Williams?
Yes.
Councilor Jones-Rouser?
I'm sorry. I was going to object to this, but that part didn't get to the floor yet.
You're going to what? Object. Okay. All right. If you object, everything is, I mean, that was the beginning of it. We can, if that's what you're going to do, you can say it now.
I object. I have a statement.
Okay.
Go ahead. And it stands for 47 and 48. As the only counselor who has been on the Board of Historic Preservation and one who pushes for preservation when it makes sense, I have to say there comes a time when preservation and feasibility no longer go hand in hand. As all good things must come to an end, the Westminster staircase has reached this point and it would be best to ask DASNY to reallocate the 600K to encapsulate or memorialize these steps. Directing the proposed 3 million repair funds to youth programming creates a better impact These funds can build new playgrounds, fund sports leagues, support summer camps, nature classes, and after-school programming, while creating safe spaces for youth and families. This also opens the doors to young adult job creation. Nearly 20 years ago, Kirk Park's pedestrian bridge was closed down, and it was deemed unsafe. A few years later, once the Creek Walk was created and through that space in lower Onondaga, the same bridge was reopened with no repairs. To me, it seems like one neighborhood should not take precedence over another neighborhood. Further, directing these funds to the possibility of the development of housing will help tackle the city's housing shortage. $3 million allows the development of 10 to 12 three-bedroom houses to be built, which supports families rather than a single walkway to utilize by a very niche group of individuals. The shift turns infrastructure money into stable, long-term shelter for local residents with growing families. So for me, there's multiple options where this money can be utilized that will make a greater impact throughout Syracuse and its entire community versus a specific niche group of individuals for a set of steps that lead to nowhere other than a parking lot.
Point of order, Madam Chair. I BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE ALREADY MOVED PAST OBJECTION, PAST DISCUSSION, AND WE WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF A ROLL CALL VOTE. AM I RECOGNIZED TO SPEAK? SO THE POINT OF ORDER IS, IF MY FELLOW COUNSELOR WOULD LIKE TO OPPOSE THE MOTION, THEY ARE WELCOME TO DO SO IN THE ROLL CALL VOTE, CORRECT? IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY OBJECTING, I BELIEVE WE HAVE PASSED THAT POINT.
WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN THROUGH THE VOTES, AND THAT'S WHY IF SHE WANTED TO OBJECT, SHE CAN OBJECT.
So the point of order that I'm asking for clarification on is, we had already passed the objection. She would have to amend her motion? We hadn't passed the objection.
We hadn't completed the vote. If we would have completed the vote, if the voting was done, we would go back. I would like, you have to make a motion. Being that we hadn't completed the vote, it's still out there on the table.
So to object?
Yeah, to object. Now, what's going to happen is that this is going to stay on the agenda. Yeah, it's going to stay on the agenda. It's going to be on the next agenda. And you guys, whether you guys are going to have more discussion on it or whatever, it's not moving off the agenda.
Then, Madam President, I would like to make a motion to hold all of the items on the agenda today for my committee, and we will have another committee meeting to discuss passage of the bonds.
Are you sure you want to do that, Counselor? Because the other ones are, I mean, like, it only can get objected one time, you know? So it gotta come back to the next meeting, come back to the next meeting, and then can't get objected. It can't get objected.
She can put a motion to the floor for what she wants, and then we can vote on it. I'm sorry, I wasn't hearing.
Why would we hold everything for one thing?
If this is objected, this is part of what- She can put a motion to the floor for what she wants, and we can vote on that.
She can do that. I'm just asking. I'm just saying that, you know, being that that's the only item, it's only going to be one word.
I understand. To the counselor's points, however, these items were crafted specifically to meet the needs across the city. This is not for a particular niche demographic. It's not for a particular part or segment of the city. These items were meant to go together, and they were meant to demonstrate our commitment across the city to all of our parks and all of our recreation opportunities. So we've already had one committee meeting on it. I regret that we were not able to answer the councilor's concerns at that time. I'd like to have another committee meeting where we might be able to do so.
Only for one item?
Well, I don't know if there are other items.
I put in a motion to keep moving.
I think that you should keep the others moving.
I put in a motion to keep moving the rest of these. Why hold up everything else?
There's a motion on the floor. I second. I mean, we can entertain a motion unless... We got a second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? All right, we keep forward. All right, so...
I'm sorry, did we vote on my motion to hold the items? Point of order again?
We just motioned to not hold them.
We didn't vote on my motion, which I had made. You didn't put it to the floor.
Are you making a motion? Okay. Are you going to get a motion?
Again, I just want to keep a clean meeting here. I don't think I had a second, so it's very possible that my motion did not advance. Did we ask for a second?
I didn't really hear a motion. You didn't put it to the floor. Are you making a motion? I mean, like, we can just make the motion. Let's keep it moving. We all know the process. You want to make a motion?
I would like to make a motion to hold the items. And I would ask for a second if people feel that they have other questions on the items.
Which item?
On any of the items, yeah.
All of them? To hold all of them?
Which ones? Which ones? There is a motion on the floor. I need all in favor. Excuse me, clerk.
To hold what number? She has to say the numbers. So sorry. To hold items 47 through 61.
Okay, so there's a motion on the floor to hold item 47 through 61. Is there a second?
I will second it.
All in favor? No. All right. Okay, let's see here. No. Okay. All right. Okay, so Councilor Codwell. No. Councilor Machoke. Yes. Councilor Ehrenreich. Yes. Councilor Hudson? No. Councilor Navi?
Councilor Moore? No. Councilor Williams?
Yes.
Councilor Jones-Rouser? No. Councilor Matto? No. The item failed. All right, so we had already voted on no motion.
All right, so items, just to be clear, items 47 and 48 will be held for the next agenda.
Yes, exactly. All right.
It's an objection.
There's an objection.
So there was an objection to 47. Correct.
Yeah, there's objection to the 47 and 48.
Okay, I would just call 48. Just Yes, yes, we haven't got we haven't gotten to 48 yet. So I would finish 47 and then move to 48 because 47 was objected.
Okay.
Okay, and then hold 48.
Yeah, when a bond is involved, that's the best route.
Okay. We are passing 47, and we're going to hold 48.
No, we objected to 47. No, we objected to 47, and we're holding 48. Okay, 49. Any objections?
No. Any discussion?
Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymously. 50.
Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. 51. Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. 52. Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
53. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Shenanigans. 54. Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Shenanigans. 55. Any objections? Any discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? Shenanigans. 56. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
57, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
58, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. 59, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. 60, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
61. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
President.
Councilor. Madam President. I'm sorry. I need to go back to item 50, please.
Item 50?
Yes.
Item 50 was voted on, so in order to go back to item 50, we need a motion.
A motion to the floor to?
Second. She wants to introduce it.
What did you say, Councilor?
You want me to put the motion?
Yeah, you got to make a motion to go back. It was already voted on.
I put a motion on the floor to revisit item number 50.
Second the motion.
All in favor?
Aye.
Opposed? Opposed.
Opposed to revisiting? So we're going back to it. So we're back at 50. Councilor, go ahead.
Okay. I just want to put on a record that I am a no vote. for item 50. And because when we first originally discussed this, there was, there was some confusion with who was supposed to be paying for it, but also the fact that this particular section of parking would be gated, and not allow for parking, local residents to be able to park after removing the pump track and relocating it the agreement originally was discussed with the residents who started that and who utilize it and i think there was some confusion around this this new gated area the agreement with the parking lot in the plaza right on jettis does not have is not gated. So it's confusing as to why this area needs to be gated. So I'm a no for that one.
Okay. All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
All right. Thank you. The item passes with an eight to one. Okay. Councillor Hudson.
Thank you. I have item 62 through 65. I would like to introduce them and urge their adoption.
Thank you. Item 62, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. Item 63, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. Item 64, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor?
Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous.
Item 65, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Councilor Moore.
Madam President, I have items 66 through 69. I would like to introduce and urge their adoption.
Thank you. Item 66, any objection? Discussion? Please call the roll. Item 67, any objections?
Discussion?
Please call the roll. Item 68, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
Item 69, any objections?
Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Councilor Williams.
Thank you, Madam President. I have items 70 through 81 today. I would like to introduce and urge their adoption. And prior to the vote, I would like to point out to the council that the deputy clerk provided updated legislation for item number 70. The short title should now read total cost not to exceed $75.
Councilor Williams, do we have it in there? No, I know that. I read that part, but do we have it in here for how long this is going to be set for?
It's a one-year term.
Okay, thank you.
You're welcome.
Are you okay, Councillor?
Yes. Councillor, item 70. Any objections? Discussions?
Yes. Thank you. So, as we know that, you know, I'm not voting no against it, but I just have to make a statement that It really dear to me about all the taxes and the fees and the fines that were given our community and in the lives of what's going on in our city. So no, I'm not going to vote no against it. It is a $25 increase, but we have increased multiple things throughout this time that I've been on the council taxes, water, red light, school bus. Sidewalk, taxes, taxes. We keep increasing more and more bills to our taxpayers. So that is a concern of mine when people are living paycheck to paycheck. So I just want to say that. But I'm not going to vote no against. I just want to make sure it's clarified that, you know, we are continuing to hammer on our community, you know, when they are already suffering. Thank you.
Thank you. Anybody else?
I would like the discussion point. Sure. Syracuse has a revenue issue. It's an incredible revenue issue. And it has nothing to do with boot fines. It has to do with tax base. We have a preponderance of city services that need to be funded from somewhere. And again, not from boot fees. What we're talking about here today is just about trying to create a financial model with the boot fees where we can enforce parking violations without losing more than $100 per enforcement activity. So we do have a revenue issue. It cannot come from the citizens who are currently and residents who are currently paying taxes. It has to come from our nonprofit partners. It has to come from creativity. It has to come from innovation. But we also have a financial duty to make sure that we are using city services and enforcing city laws appropriately. So I am voting for this.
Thank you. Anybody else? All right. Item 17. Any additional discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye.
Opposed? Seeing none. Item 71. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Seeing none.
Item 72, any objections? Discussion? Please vote.
I have a discussion point, sorry. I just wanted to be clear. Are we on 72? So sorry, yes, on 72. The items had to be updated from the study session. Were those updated, Madam Clerk?
Yeah.
In terms of the time record keeping? Yeah.
Have they been corrected? Yeah. Yes? As far as, from what you have in your packet, that's what's correct.
Okay.
Was it updated from last week? Last week? Only Councilor Machok. Anything else? Everything else was updated as is.
Thank you very much.
Any additional discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Item 73. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Item 74. Any objections? Discussion?
Please call the roll.
Item 75. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll. Item 76. Any objections?
Discussion? Yes, Madam President. Okay. I have a discussion on this item. I've been a longtime member of the Anadolu Historical Association for many, many years. And I've always supported their efforts to preserve and protect the history of our city, our historical documents, all the artifacts. But I also believe in supporting and preserving our monuments. And sometimes, in my opinion, the OHA can get politically involved. And the objective has to be to preserve all of our monumentations, all of our monuments. And for those who were created in memory of those who gave so much to our country, to much our city, all of our immigrants, all of our immigrants participated in the building of the city. And throughout the city, you do see monuments that were supported, not from tax dollars, but the dollars of those who earned few dollars at that time. So I would urge and ask the Onondaga Historical Association to continue to defending and protecting all of our historical monuments. They are a part of our history. And I respect those who might have a disagree with maybe some of the monuments, but they are part of our history. And as a proud Italian-American, second generation, and I know for those who are proud Irish-Americans, German-Americans, Polish-Americans, and for those who are coming to our country now, is the new Americans. It includes them. Because someday, some of our new Americans from Vietnam, parts of Africa, Middle East, won't want to honor someone who meant so much to them. And that too, someday, will be part of their heritage, their history, and part of our great city's heritage and history. Thank you. Thank you.
Any additional discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Synonymous. Item 77. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Synonymous.
Item 78. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Unanimous. Item 79, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Unanimous.
Item 80, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Unanimous. Item 81, any objections? DISCUSSION, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. ALL IN FAVOR?
AYE.
COUNSELOR JONES-RAUSER.
THANK YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT. I HAVE ITEM 82 AND 83. BOTH ITEMS ARE CURRENTLY READY. 183, WE GOT THE UPDATED INFORMATION WITH THE COMMERCIAL ONLY OR COMMERCIAL AND LARGER ITEMS. introduce and urge the adoption of these two items.
Thank you. Item 82, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor?
Aye. Opposed? It's unanimous. Item 83, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye.
Opposed? Do we have a discussion? No, I'm in opposition. Oh, okay.
All right, the item passes with an 8-1 vote. Councilor Enright voting no.
Okay. Thank you. Councilor Montauk.
Thank you, President Paniagua. I have items 84 through 88. I will introduce them and urge their adoption.
Item 84, any objection? Discussion? Please go. 84. Okay.
My biggest issue with, and I love that, nothing against our convenience stores, because our convenience stores in our city of Syracuse has done, there's a lot of great convenience store owners in our community, and they do a lot for our community to give back, but then there is some that are not. And anytime we have illegal things going on at stores, and it's close to a school where children are, and where they are selling illegal things, or a drug, or tobacco, or alcohol near the school, is something I will always reject even as though I know it's not a. Something that I can push here in the city of Syracuse is all the way to the state. I'm hoping that our state assemblyman centers are listening to this that we need to change the law of how stores are so close to our schools where our children have accessibility to get tobacco and alcohol.
Thank you any other discussion. Please call the roll.
All in favor?
No. No.
You're going to have to call it. Councilor Caldwell? No. Councilor Machoke? Yes. Councilor Enright? Opposed. Councilor Hudson? No. Councilor Navi?
Yes.
Councilor Moore? No. Councilor Williams?
Yes.
Councilor Jones-Rouser?
Councilor Montauk?
The item fails with a four to five vote.
All right. Item 85. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Anonymous? Item 86. Any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Shenanigans? Item 87, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Shenanigans? Item 88, any objections? Discussion? Please call the roll.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
Shenanigans? And Councilor Machado. Thank you, Madam President. I have item 89. I would like to waive the rules first. Madam Clark, waive the rules. Second.
All in favor? Aye. Opposed?
We'd like to introduce item 89.
Item 89. Any objection? Discussion? Please call the roll. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? This concludes our meeting. Motion to adjourn. Second. All in favor? Aye.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.