City Council - Regular Meeting

Thursday, September 10, 2026

The St. Cloud City Council approved final tax millage and budget rates, discussed school safety zone camera enforcement, and handled various lease and zoning matters.

About this meeting

Government Body
City Council
Meeting Type
City Council
Location
St. Cloud, FL
Meeting Date
September 10, 2026

Transcript

1044 sections

6:01 – 6:58Speaker 15

We'll go ahead and call this meeting to order. This is City of St. Cloud Council meeting, Thursday, September 10th, 2026. And welcome to our council meeting. In the interest of time efficiency and ensuring that everyone who wishes to address the council is given the opportunity to do so, the following will apply to all comments made by the public. If you desire to be recognized by the chair, please fill out a request form and present it to the city clerk present in the council chambers. Each speaker shall be allotted three minutes to address the council unless such time is extended by the mayor or requests or questions from council. Group shall designate a spokesperson to avoid repetition of comments. Every effort will be made to avoid interrupting speakers. Thank you all for participating in our city government. Please silence all electronic devices. And can we all please stand for the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance? And I believe we have the invocation from Pastor Jay McKay from the Crossroad Baptist Church. And he's got to be impressed that I pronounced his name correctly.

6:58 – 7:34Speaker 21

Please join me in prayer. Father God, we thank you for the privilege that we have to be able to come before you in prayer, Father. Father, we pray for our council members. We pray, Father, that you'll give them wisdom. discernment, unity as they make decisions, Father. Father, we also pray for our community, that you keep our community strong and healthy, focused upon the betterment of each other and not just the betterment of ourselves. Father, help us to live a life that edifies others. Father, we just pray that everything that's done here tonight will be done rightly and in order and bring honor and glory to you. For it's in Jesus' name we pray. Amen.

7:53Speaker 15

Thank you, Pastor McKay. All right, and will the clerk please call the roll?

7:59Speaker 22

Mayor Robertson?

8:00Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert?

8:02Speaker 22

Council Member Paul? Here. Council Member Urban? Here. Council Member Fletcher?

8:05 – 8:51Speaker 15

Here. All right, thank you. Also, let's take a moment to remember those lives lost 25 years ago, September 11, 2001. Obviously, those were families. Those were men, women, fathers. I mean, those were Americans that lives were lost, firefighters, police, horrific, horrific day. And it taught us so much as a country on how to unite and come back together. And I think those are lessons that we should always continue to go back and learn from and how we can always be one and find ways to find peace and get along and find unity. So I did want to go ahead and recognize that. Agenda update, city manager.

8:53 – 10:13Speaker 6

Thank you. I have several. First, I'm going to need to remove the employee of the month presentation and reschedule it to a later date. He had a conflict. I need to ask that we remove consent item number 10, which is resolution number 2026-142R. We'll put it on the September 17th agenda. And I remove public hearing number six, resolution number 2026-071R. We will re-advertise it for a future date. I'd like to ask to continue public hearing number three, ordinance 2026-33, which was the Walker property, to October 8th. i will um need to ask for the council to take action on the continuance if you want to do that now you want to do your update first on the uh sure i have one other item that has a continuation also um council action request to continue council action resolution 2026-104r which was the krabby bill's lease also to the october 8th city council meeting

10:13Speaker 10

And Mayor, we'll need the clerk to read both of those items in and take separate motions to continue each one.

10:18Speaker 15

OK, which is the first one? That one. Which resolution number? Public hearing three, ordinance 23.

10:23Speaker 9

Is that three fingers you got up there?

10:25Speaker 15

Yeah, I'm sorry. Yes, will the clerk please read resolution number three?

10:31 – 11:00Speaker 22

Final public hearing for ordinance number 2026-33, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, amending a local and multipurpose trail connection to Chisholm Park, adopted by ordinance number 2024-12, for approximately plus minus 25.59 acres identified as Walker property. Project PUD 26-00004, located north of Old Oak Trail, west of South Narcoossee Road, south of Chisholm Park Trail, providing for approval of the amended PUD preliminary master plan, and proof of publication, servability, and effective date.

11:03Speaker 15

All right, and you can read them both in the record. We can do one at a time. And can I get a motion on that?

11:09Speaker 11

Mayor may have a motion for Ordinance 2633 to continue, please. Second.

11:14Speaker 15

We have a motion from the Deputy Mayor, second from Council Member Urban. Until October 8th.

11:18Speaker 11

October 8th, I'm sorry.

11:19Speaker 15

Thank you. All right, yep, as stated, and second from Council Member Urban. Will the clerk please call the roll?

11:25Speaker 22

Council Member Paul?

11:26Speaker 22

Council Member Urban?

11:28Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert? Aye. Council Member Fletcher?

11:30Speaker 22

Mayor Robertson? Aye.

11:33Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0.

11:33Speaker 10

If you could read Resolution 2026-104R. Yes, please.

11:39 – 12:01Speaker 22

Resolution number 2026-104R, a resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, approving a new lease agreement with Krabby Bills of St. Cloud, LLC, for the Marina Building premises on 1104 Lakeshore Boulevard, St. Cloud, providing for a new lease for an initial term of 10 years, an initial rent of $10,000 per month, effective September 1st, 2026, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the new agreement and providing an effective date.

12:03 – 12:14Speaker 15

And can I get a motion? Motion to approve. Motion approved. Council Member Paul. Second. Second. Council Member Fletcher. So that's a motion to continue to October 8th? Yes. Motion to continue. Will the clerk please call the roll?

12:14Speaker 22

Council Member Urban.

12:16Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert. Aye. Council Member Fletcher.

12:18Speaker 22

Council Member Paul.

12:19Speaker 22

Mayor Robertson.

12:20Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0.

12:21Speaker 15

All right. Moving on to, did you want to bring up the cloud carriers at the end?

12:28Speaker 6

I was going to do it at the end. Okay.

12:32 – 14:22Speaker 15

All right, so you're good on that. Back to my turn. All right, we have presentations here. We have a proclamation recognition of Constitution Week. I'm a little sweaty on the way out here. I dropped my whole cup of coffee trying to grab on my laptop and also was a little frantic getting out here. So that's why I was a few minutes late. So here we have a proclamation. Whereas September 17th, 2026 marks the 230. We have somebody from the Daughters of the American Revolution. Come on up here. This is Liz Daly from the DAR. Thanks for joining us. So whereas September 17, 2026 marks the 239th anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention, and whereas it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary and to the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate the occasion, Whereas public law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America, designated September 17th through 23rd is Constitution Week. Now, therefore, I, Christian B. Robertson, Mayor, along with the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, do hereby proclaim September 17th through 23rd, 2026 to be Constitution Week. Would you like to get a picture?

14:22 – 14:55Speaker 17

Would you like to say a few words? I thank you for this. The Joshua Stevens chapter of NSDAR has asked for this proclamation. We celebrate Constitution every week. The DAR is an organization that works for the preservation of history, for patriotism, and educating others about our history, and that's what we do during Constitution Week. Thank you.

15:19 – 15:50Speaker 15

And I'll tell you something else. The Daughters of the American Revolution, if y'all were here, I believe it was the last council meeting, and through the St. Cloud Veterans Council and this city council, we've authorized the Daughters of the American Revolution. They voluntarily purchased a plaque to be placed, and they're building a monument out there at Veterans Park here. And if y'all have noticed, we brought that park back to life over the past year with honoring our veterans and having those soldier city markets out there. If you've seen the new paint job out there, it's looking great and the lights at night. So thank you for being great partners with City of St. Cloud and honoring our veterans as well.

15:51Speaker 10

So thank you.

15:54 – 16:44Speaker 15

And we had a presentation for Employee of the Month, but we have rescheduled that to a later date. All right, next up is the consent agenda. Next portion of tonight's meeting is the consent agenda, which contains items that have been determined to be routine and non-controversial. If anyone in the audience wishes to address a particular item on the consent agenda, now is the opportunity for you to do so. Additionally, if staff or members of the city council wish to speak on a consent item, they have the same opportunity.

16:56Speaker 15

All right, anyone in the audience like to speak on the consent agenda?

17:00Speaker 21

Yeah, come on up.

17:04 – 21:13Speaker 5

Okay. Hello. Good evening, mayor and council members. My name is Jennifer Harmon, and I am the current president of St. Cloud Youth Football. I think we're item number two, resolution thing. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak tonight. We are asking the council to reconsider one tiny portion of the agreement regarding the ability to charge a small gate fee at our home football games. We completely understand why our agreement was modeled after Little League, and we appreciate the city's effort to create consistency among youth sports organizations. However, our program and our financial circumstances are very different from Little League. We only charge a gate fee during our fall season, which is our tackle season, and that is typically just for regular home games. We charge $3 for adults and $1 for teenagers, which is about half the cost of attending an actual high school game right now. We do not charge gate fees to our own families, just the visiting teams, rostered coaches, athletes, and children under five are all free. This isn't revenue that goes towards profit or unnecessary expenses. The gate money helps us pay our game day officials, which costs the organization now with as many teams as we have approximately $1,500 to $1,600 on a game day. We do everything we can to keep those costs from being passed on to our families, but our concession stand is a great source of support, but we don't have the same volume of people coming through our facility that Little League does. Little League has about approximately three times as many athletes as we have. They have a lot more fields and all their games are in their facility where we travel. Essentially, every home game for them until All-Star season is a way to get revenue. We simply just don't have the opportunity to generate the same revenue. That's important because we don't want to raise registration fees. Tackle football and competitive cheer are already expensive activities. When we calculate what is actually costing our organization to put an athlete on the field, including insurance, equipment, equipment certification, uniforms, competition fees, etc., etc., we roughly spend more than $100 per athlete than we get in registration fees, so we're already operating at a negative. So when we ask to keep the $3 gate fee, we're not asking the city to help us make money. We're asking permission to help ourselves keep our program affordable. Our organization has been part of St. Cloud since 1987. Generations of local families have come through this program, and our goal is to continue providing children in this community with a safe, structured, competitive, and positive place to play. We have genuinely appreciated the conversations we've had with the city throughout this transition and the opportunity to work together In our first agreement, we feel very positive about our partnership. We're not asking for a lot or a long list of exceptions. We're just asking for one concession that we believe is reasonable, limited, and directly tied to the cost of operating actual games. We ask that you please reconsider allowing St. Cloud Youth Football to continue charging our modiscape fee at our home games. It may seem like a small amount for the $3 to $1 ratio, but when you're trying to keep registration affordable for hundreds of families while absorbing thousands of dollars in game day facility expenses, It adds up. Additionally, previously with the county, they took care of most of the expenses at the field. And so now with the transition, we are going to be accruing a lot of expenses that we didn't have before. So this first, I guess, inaugural season with the city would be adding a lot of finances to us with no way outside of pounding the concrete to get sponsorships to help us deflect some of that from our families. Thank you.

21:13 – 21:32Speaker 15

Okay. Yes, ma'am. Thank you very much. Yeah, and that was the question. We talked about this probably today. I spoke with staff, and I guess this kind of came up after this was advertised and you guys have already sat down with staff. Yes, sir. Thank you for clarifying where the money goes towards. So it's towards referees.

21:32 – 22:28Speaker 5

Yes, sir. Our game days, depending on how many flag games we have before tackle, are between fifteen and sixteen hundred dollars the majority of that is got is received through the gate fee and like i said it's only during the fall season our flag season is in-house we don't charge our own families they all have gate passes in the fall um it's literally just to pay that um and now we're pop warner so we travel all over sorry all over central florida all the time all over central florida so we're not just going to just our fields all the time um and like i said we're really excited for you know stephanie has been great um talking with her and her team we're really excited about the partnership we're just really nervous that um we're going to be bankrupt after the first year well we don't want to do that obviously we want a smooth transition we know that obviously these types of agreements are the hardest especially for us up here because we grew up here and

22:29Speaker 15

And I played at the little league fields. My dad was a football coach there. My little brother played, so I totally understand. And Council Member, sorry, Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

22:39 – 23:12Speaker 11

Thank you for all you do, firstly. I had the opportunity to coach for 26 years in both varsity football and Pop Warner football with Kissimmee and the St. Cloud Bulldogs. Two questions I have, and I don't know what the legal portion is, but you traveled eight games, four games are traveled. The other four places you go, is there a gate fee for those? And what is that average gate fee for? Because it might be Ocoee. I don't know exactly what your schedule looks like, but I know. You do travel to different cities?

23:12 – 23:48Speaker 5

Yes, sir. So it depends on the season. This year we travel as far as the villages, but Pop Warner, especially in mid-Florida, all of us charge the exact same gate fees. It's $3 and $1, anybody rostered. We personally don't charge our families. I don't know how anybody else does, but we don't want to make our kids' parents pay to watch them play after they've already paid. We don't charge them. They have the pass, but we go to the villages. We go to Lake Howell. Like you said, Ocoee, we were just at Winter Springs. We're all over Central Florida.

23:49 – 24:57Speaker 11

I get that because I did it for quite some time with that because we had Mighty Mites, Junior Pee Wees, Pee Wees, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. I think it was five different programs through the weekend and I apologize, I didn't pay, but I always coach, so I didn't know how the gate fees worked. But is there an opportunity, and again, I don't know, for a season pass for these families to help support it? We've done that in other venues where you can buy the full four games as a volunteer or as a sponsorship to go in and you just show that pass, and that would use that same money for those games. Because referees, I don't know what they were then, but they're probably $7,500 an hour now. And there's three to five, depending on the venue. These are just questions I'm asking. I don't know the legality of it, but I do know the city has to charge for... We can't do one without doing the other, so... Those are just questions I have for the council and ask for y'all, but thank you very much for what you do. Youth sports are very important for the social growth of our children. I yield back to you, Mayor.

24:57 – 25:15Speaker 3

Council Member Irvin. So is the, I was just thinking about, because I grew up out there, played football out there as well, is the gate fee just to get into the football game? Can other, my concern is just somebody from the general public wants to go

25:16 – 25:37Speaker 5

to the park or something will they have to pay that fee to go do that to be honest we've never really just had somebody randomly show up to be on the park um usually when it's busy like that we don't have random people showing up um so i don't really know how to answer that question but i mean i guess they would have to pay to get in um i don't know yeah did you play out there

25:38 – 26:08Speaker 15

harmony is a harmony trigger what do you charge the harmony kids uh ten dollars sir we actually just played harmony it was very it was very peaceful it was fun the one thing that came to mind when deputy mayor brought that idea up was A pass, these are the guests. The guests only. So to do a pass, that would have to be a league-wide pass.

26:09Speaker 5

It would have to be a mid-Florida league-wide. I think there's like 28 associations in mid-Florida right now, and I honestly don't know how that would work at all.

26:20 – 26:43Speaker 11

You might have one to cover the four home games at. Again, I'm out of turn, and I apologize for interrupting, but we used to do, when I was coaching at high school football, we would have passes through the boosters club that would, you know, a certain amount would give you four passes, a certain amount would give you three. I'm just trying to look for alternatives to make it work for everybody, and I don't have the answer.

26:43Speaker 15

Well, what she's saying is these are different people each Saturday. Yeah.

26:46Speaker 11

We don't charge our own. They're not charging us.

26:50Speaker 5

Our home teams don't get guests. Yeah, only guests.

26:54Speaker 11

You're like, if I go to France, I have to pay to go to the bathroom. Exactly, but here you're good. Okay, now I get it.

27:00Speaker 5

You just show your pass to get in.

27:01Speaker 11

I'm sorry. Now I get it.

27:03Speaker 15

Yeah, that's why I was like, well, they only go once.

27:05Speaker 11

Well, I thought it was for all attendees. Because high school football is for all attendees. Yeah, that's true.

27:10Speaker 15

We all got to pay for high school. Even Harmony.

27:15Speaker 14

Council Member Paul.

27:17Speaker 4

The other locations that you guys play at, are they also on city property or at schools?

27:23 – 28:06Speaker 5

Most of them are at schools. I think there's a couple that are at city properties. I actually looked that up because I wanted to be a little bit more knowledgeable on that. And it basically just says it depends on their contract with their city. So it doesn't tell me who's allowed to play. Everybody that we've played since I've been a president has charged us to get in, including Orlando when we play. Was that South Central? South Central. And they play sometimes at Jones and sometimes at the facility right there by Camping World. So it would just depend on who we're playing and, I guess, who runs their governing fields.

28:07Speaker 4

Okay. Thank you.

28:09 – 28:20Speaker 7

Council Member Fletcher. I did not play out there, but I can make noise with the saxophone. There you go. Come on out. We have a home game. We'll take it. Council Member Paul asked my question, so thank you.

28:26Speaker 15

So you say, and even those fees don't cover the cost of the refs. Like you, you have to pay generate other revenue to, to cover those.

28:33 – 28:53Speaker 5

So the gate fee is what has, um, paid for the rest of the majority of the portion. Sometimes if a team doesn't travel as well, like if they're coming from really far away or they're, I guess I no other way to say it, they just don't travel well. Um, we've had to supplement a little bit with concessions, but for the majority of the amount, it comes from our gate fees.

28:54 – 29:06Speaker 15

Okay. All right. I mean, I'm okay with allowing that to continue if it covers. It's not going into anybody's pocket, obviously. This is not. This isn't a money-making program.

29:06Speaker 5

Zero money goes to my pockets.

29:08 – 29:21Speaker 15

Zero. Dan, we spoke about this. So when the city took the park over. Mm-hmm. You all still have the concession stand. You have the equipment. You've got the means to still have this Saturday. Yes, sir.

29:21 – 30:08Speaker 5

So we have the ability to do everything that we have so far. We just now are fiscally responsible for some of that stuff that we haven't been in the past. So, for example, we just had to buy a new fridge and freezer because it – broke right when we're transitioning, and so they wouldn't replace it, and so we just had to spend a lot of money on that. But there are certain things, like little things you wouldn't even think about, like the gas bill. We've never had to pay a gas bill before, and so now we're like, oh, there's a gas bill. And like the HUD system, stuff like that, when it goes down, that's our responsibility now to take care of. And we've just never had to do that before. So we're nervous because we don't know what that's going to cost in the future. And although we have a little bit of reserve so we don't ever go under, it still costs a lot of money to run a tackle program.

30:10Speaker 15

And I trust you're not going to hit these folks up with too much of an entry fee to see their kids play? No, sir.

30:17Speaker 5

That's all governed by Mid-Florida Pop Warner.

30:19Speaker 15

Oh, is it? So it's the same rate?

30:21Speaker 5

Yeah, the same rate across the board. We don't make that up. They do.

30:25 – 30:36Speaker 15

I'm okay with that, guys. What do you all think? I mean, we're not. They're already covering some costs that you weren't before, right? Yes, sir. Deputy Mayor.

30:36Speaker 11

May I ask the attorney legally what is our- You have a-

30:43 – 31:03Speaker 10

Generally, there's a general prohibition on charging for admission to public parks, and this is basically now a public park. Now it's going to be taken over. However, you are entering into a specific user agreement with this particular organization, so you could authorize as part of this agreement to allow them for the limited purposes that have been explained to you to charge those fees.

31:03Speaker 6

And tell them that the little kids use the playground if they come to use it? Yes, of course. They'll come look for you if they get charged?

31:09Speaker 15

They've got to go in and go around the whole backside, right? That playground's still in the same spot.

31:13Speaker 5

Well, right now it's not. The new improved one provided by the city comes soon.

31:17Speaker 15

Oh, that's right. We're going to get a new playground. I haven't been out there since.

31:21Speaker 5

Right now it's like a little bulldozer. So if you want to play on that.

31:25Speaker 11

We used to call them talk-a-toys and army men. That's what we played for before the internet. We actually played with those kind of toys.

31:33Speaker 15

Exactly. So how many home games? Eight days?

31:36 – 31:48Speaker 5

Four home games. So there's always four home games. Half the season is your home game. Sometimes there's a jamboree. And then in the off-chance, we do really well. We have a playoff game opportunity. We're not guaranteed a playoff game home.

31:48Speaker 15

So we're talking about seven, eight Saturdays throughout the year? In the fall only. In the fall only. Yep. There's another league?

31:56Speaker 5

We have flag football in this ring, but it's all in-house, and we don't charge anybody to get in. Okay.

32:02Speaker 15

I mean, Dan, if we're allowed to do that just for those days.

32:05Speaker 10

Well, yeah, you just need to add it to this agreement because, again, you have a specific agreement you're working on right now. Okay.

32:11Speaker 15

So we'd have to... You just adopt it with that change.

32:15 – 32:27Speaker 3

Okay. Council Member Urban. I motion to approve item number two with that amendment added, however the wording needs to be.

32:27Speaker 10

It's $3 for adults and $1 for teens.

32:30Speaker 5

Anybody over five, that's not playing.

32:33Speaker 10

Because the ones under five are just going to the playground.

32:36Speaker 15

Dan, we have to read that into the record first, right? Since we're pulling that for a separate vote.

32:41 – 32:57Speaker 10

It's not an advertised item, so you don't have to read it into the record. But we're talking about, we're just referring to Resolution 2026-123R for purposes of the record. Okay. So I think Mr. Urban made the motion.

32:57Speaker 15

We have a motion from Council Member Urban. Second. Second from Council Member Fletcher. Will the clerk please call the roll?

33:05Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert? Aye. Council Member Fletcher? Aye. Council Member Paul? Aye. Council Member Urban?

33:11Speaker 22

Mayor Robertson?

33:12Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0.

33:22Speaker 11

If you went to St. Cloud High School, you can get in for free.

33:41Speaker 6

Some Longhorns are city residents. And Nova Lakes now, too.

33:46 – 34:27Speaker 15

We won't hold that against them. Yeah, we have another high school in our city now. Which I went out there for lunch a couple days ago. Beautiful facility. Beautiful, yes. All right, so that was just number... That was item number two on the consent agenda. That was item number two, so we've already done that one, so... All right, council. We're going to get a motion on the consent agenda. Or any discussion?

34:28Speaker 14

And I'll ask again anyone else in the audience to speak on the consent agenda.

34:33Speaker 15

All right, council. Motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion approved. Council Member Urban. Second. Second. Council Member Paul. Will the clerk please call the roll?

34:42Speaker 22

Council Member Fletcher.

34:43Speaker 22

Council Member Paul.

34:45Speaker 22

Council Member Urban.

34:46Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert. Aye. Mayor Robertson.

34:48Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0.

34:53 – 35:32Speaker 15

All right, next up, we have a citizen's forum. Any person who desires to comment on any item not on this agenda is provided this opportunity to address the city council. Each person is requested to complete a sign-in form to be provided to the presiding officer prior to or as soon as practical thereafter the person addresses the council. And first up on the consent agenda, I'm sorry, that's the consent agenda, on the citizen's forum, we have Teresa Mailhot. You're first up. You don't want to be first? It really doesn't matter. Okay. Okay.

35:34 – 38:42Speaker 2

It's free. Smell hot two, nine, two, four cool breeze circle. St. Cloud, Florida. Um, there's a local group called the dirty fingernail club. Um, and basically, were plant people, all kind of plants, like plumerias, staghorn ferns. And every year, twice a year, we would go to Chisholm Park and have a plant swap. People would propagate their plants, people would plant seedlings, and then we would just go. And usually it would be on a Saturday morning from 8 to noon, be out of there by noon, and We've never had a complaint. Last year's was on October the 11th, the fall one. This spring one was on April 26th. We never made a reservation before. We just went out there and pulled out all our plants and pots if people wanted to take some, pots to grow their plants in. I want to say that I got my first Plumerias from there because they also have door prizes. You don't have to bring anything to get a plant. Anyway, what I was going to ask is, due to the new, and I think they talked to somebody at Parks and Rec, and it was going to be, I think, The lady told me between six or a thousand dollars for us to use it on a Saturday morning, which we do not, we're not like a club where we pay dues. We're just local people that like plants that go out there. you know, and like to share our plants, like to learn new things about plants, get new plants, trade plants, whatever. And so what I would like, what I'm asking is if the council could see fit to waive the fees for the large pavilion at Chisholm Park, because that's where we always had. And I even had a video from one in 2000, well, years ago. So you could see people are roaming around because you get the As your number's called, then you can go pick a plant. You get a number when you go, and then they do that several rounds, so everybody gets plants, everybody that comes out there, whether you bring anything or not. And if you could waive the fees for us to do that still, I would appreciate it. They were looking at October the 11th. Last year's was on October the 10th, but... which this year it's not Saturday morning. I don't know if it's available. I would appreciate if the council, we are clean people. We will sweep up the place. The only thing that might be there would be a few stray leaves or plants and maybe a little bit of potting soil or dirt. But I would even bring a broom out there and sweep the floor. We've never had a complaint. Nobody drinks. Nobody does anything. You just come out there and you You try to scoop up and get some free plants. That's all we do, you know.

38:43Speaker 15

We have a new buzzer.

38:44Speaker 2

I hear that. Am I the first person it got used on? I feel privileged. We put that in for you. Oh, just for me. Okay. See? No, you're good.

38:54Speaker 15

Keep talking.

38:55Speaker 2

So anyway, I would. You know, I think even some people that might be in this room might even be in that group, maybe.

39:06Speaker 6

I don't want to. She means me because we talked earlier.

39:09 – 39:24Speaker 2

She's in there. I was going to look up all the council members to see if their wives or their significant others were in there. Maybe I'll even like look up his to see. So I can say, oh, if the council didn't do this, I'll say, well, we can't have it because your husband or your...

39:25 – 39:41Speaker 6

Your wife said no, you know? It's a great group. I've learned so much being a member of the group on what's wrong with plants, and you learn identification, and it is a really good cause. Ms. Melhot did ask me if I could waive it, and I said I don't have the authority.

39:41Speaker 2

I contacted her first instead of coming here.

39:44Speaker 15

I've known you for many years. I've never heard about this.

39:46Speaker 2

You've never heard of it? We're out there twice a year, every year.

39:49Speaker 15

Who doesn't like plants? You know, that's... You could use some plants to decorate your...

39:55Speaker 2

The guard building out there. Yeah.

39:57Speaker 15

Well, you know, is this a Saturday or Sunday? Saturday. All right. Cause the 11th is a Sunday, right?

40:03Speaker 2

Not this year. October.

40:06Speaker 15

It is. Yeah. I was just looking at the calendar.

40:09Speaker 2

Oh, oh, I have my phone.

40:10Speaker 15

I just want to make sure we got OK. OK.

40:13 – 40:30Speaker 2

There are several of the 10th. I have it written down October 10th. This is Saturday. So I mean, I know October 3rd, the 10th, the 17th, the 24th. Any if any of those days are available, we will. Be so happy.

40:30Speaker 15

Please share the video on social media. Obviously, we've got a lot of stuff here tonight, but I'd love to see the video. Oh, okay.

40:36Speaker 2

And I know they're watching the meeting tonight because they knew I was going to come.

40:40Speaker 6

That's cool. She asked them earlier today. Yes, I did. Oh, you saw the thing.

40:44 – 41:06Speaker 2

If they wanted me to come tonight still because they hadn't found a place that could hold air. Because somebody said, well, could we go out there and use the smaller ones and just say we had like 20 people here and 20 people there? And we don't want to do that. There's a great amount of interest in this, and a lot of people go. So if you're free Saturday morning... I mean, it's it is more than St.

41:06Speaker 6

Cloud. It's of Central Florida.

41:08 – 41:22Speaker 2

But now they changed the names. It was it was Dirty Fingernail Club of St. Cloud. Now they changed it to Central Florida because people are driving here from Polk County in the coast Melbourne area to come to our plant swap.

41:22Speaker 15

So everybody brings different plants, and then they say, hey, I want one of these.

41:26 – 42:04Speaker 2

Or whatever they have, or if they don't have any this time, because I know the Arctic freeze we had, the brutal Arctic freeze, people lost a lot of plants, me included. I lost my Christmas tree palms, you know, and I'm sure you all lost, you know, plants too. Yeah. In fact, they're the ones that told me to go ahead and cut down my Christmas tree palms because they weren't going to survive, and they did not. But anyway, we're just plant people. And you do get people come here and see our beautiful Chisholm Park, and they may want to pay for it, unlike us who have no money but plans to swap.

42:05Speaker 15

It sounds like a great community event. Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

42:11 – 43:26Speaker 11

I don't have a green thumb. If I try something, it's just I have to hire somebody because it just doesn't work. But this is not a for-revenue venue, I believe. And the first certificate I gave out when I became a councilperson almost four years ago was for our tree planting folks. We planted... Tree Advisory Committee. Tree Advisory Committee. And we plant trees all the time. And you don't know... what you know until you find out. And that was such a great advisory, planting 50,000 trees. And these were, again, volunteers, and we gave certificates out from the city. That was the first thing I did when I became a councilman. I don't have a problem, and Council can tell me different, as long as it's not a revenue source. No money. But I do think that if we look at the green and what we're doing in the population, I think this is a great way to plant and replant. Again, I can't do it, but there are people like you. My fingernails are... Are dirty anyway? Yes, I know, I know. But I do get manicures, but I won't tell anybody that. Men get manicures.

43:26Speaker 15

It lives forever on the Internet.

43:28 – 43:56Speaker 11

Yes. But I do think this council is something that we give back to the community, not only to the environment, also in planting. There's not many people that do that. So I'm going to yield back to you, Councilman Mayer. But this is the first I heard it, and this is really, really a great thing and I don't know how we can get it to become larger as we grow, but I'll leave that up to you, Teresa, because I know you do a lot for the community. So thank you for all you do. Mayor, I yield back at this time.

43:57 – 44:08Speaker 15

Yes. Councilmember, sorry, city clerk, who is that one? City clerk. Oh, Scott, what are you doing up here? Because I was like, Jeff Perry's not here.

44:09 – 44:32Speaker 8

Yes. No, I think it sounds like a wonderful conversation. I just want to point out, because obviously I see where this is going, that this will qualify as a special event, so that would need to be part of whatever motion is made, that it's also waiving the special event application of fees, if that's the... And time frame. Right. Do we have a time frame?

44:32Speaker 6

Which I have the ability to waive that, but... Right. It's cleaner if you also waive the special event time frame, too.

44:38 – 44:57Speaker 8

Yes, and I think that this is something also that... The Hopkins Heroes Group has the community garden, especially when Hopkins Park is redone. This may be a great opportunity to combine with that group to do an even larger event, get more people, do something, and combine all those resources there in the future as well.

44:59 – 45:38Speaker 2

I mean, the whole time we've been doing this twice a year, I don't think there's ever been one complaint. No fights. Nobody fights over the plume area. Well, I'm not going to say exactly. But we never had the police call. We never leave it dirty. Nothing. We probably leave it cleaner than when we found it, you know. So, and... If October the 10th is available, I think that's the morning we would choose, just so we're kind of staying in the same rotation. And I only had to come speak because nobody else was brave enough to do it. So I was kind of volunteering.

45:38Speaker 15

You know, if it's not available, you could come out and join the veterans, the Soldier City. market out there and do it. But I know you need a pavilion.

45:46 – 46:13Speaker 2

We need tables because a lot of them are seedlings, you know, and things and we set them on the table, spread it out. So when your number is called, when you get a number like say your number five, you can go through in the first round. They usually let you pick one plant. The second round, they usually like to pick two. So we get them all done really quick. So by noon, we would be out of there. You know, we've always been out there. So eight people can start coming and bringing their stuff, you know.

46:13Speaker 15

Well, like I said, if it's not available, we'll be out there at Soldier City Market, and we do have a bunch of tables and chairs. Okay. A whole trailer full of them.

46:21Speaker 2

Well, I'm sure some people are watching because they put the link for this meeting.

46:25Speaker 15

Well, I saw you made a post on social media. I'm like, okay, what is this, dirty what? Fingernail club. Teresa, what are you bringing to us?

46:33 – 47:02Speaker 2

It's a great group. I've learned so much. And you know what? It helps beautify our city, too. You have people like me that didn't have any plants in my yard the first time I went, and I got two plume areas. I got a bunch of other, you know, like houseplants and other things. Some people bring vegetables, but it's a good thing. Beautify your house, you know, inside and out. You know, it doesn't cost people anything. So I think it's a worthwhile thing.

47:03Speaker 15

I support that. Folks, do we need a motion on that? Consensus. They can work with city manager on the time and everything.

47:11Speaker 6

I'll work with you. She'll probably be there.

47:14Speaker 2

I figured she would see that post of mine. Thank you all so much. This was probably the easiest thing I had to come speak on ever.

47:22Speaker 2

And I like that I got to be the first one to get the buzzer.

47:25Speaker 15

That's an amazing community event. What were you going to press it again? No, no, you're good. I don't have that. I have no control over that.

47:35Speaker 2

All right. So we're done.

47:36Speaker 15

Yes, you're good. Thank you. Thank you. So thank you, Teresa.

47:41Speaker 15

Next up, we have Chastity Shaw.

47:53 – 50:27Speaker 1

Hello, Chastity Shaw, 212 California Avenue. Good evening, mayor and council members. My name is Chastity Shaw, and I serve as one of the local volunteer location coordinators for Wreaths Across America at Mount Peace Cemetery. Wreaths Across America carries a mission that is simple and sacred, remember, honor, and teach. Here in St. Cloud, that mission was started in 2011 by the VFW Auxiliary, the American Legion Auxiliary, and the City of St. Cloud, and has since grown into one of our community's most heartfelt traditions. Before anything else, I want to recognize the people who make this ceremony possible. Our parks and recreation staff, our cemetery staff, and the city employees who support this event. Their work is not small and never invisible. We are also grateful for the Second Florida Light Artillery Battery B, the Daughters and Sons of Union Veterans, and the Osceola County Veterans Council. These groups remind us that service continues through every generation, that remembrance is something we live, not just say. More than 1,500 veterans rest at Mount Peace Cemetery. Each wreath costs $17. That means more than $25,000 must be raised every single year. We are grateful for the support from Orlando Health, Toho Water Authority, and the City of St. Cloud. But even with that help, there are years we cannot cover every grave. Families notice, and they call us and ask, why didn't my loved one receive a wreath? Did you forget him? Did she not matter? These are not complaints. They are grief. They come from people who simply want to know that their hero is still remembered. We received a community empowerment grant, and every dollar went directly to Reese sponsorships. We do not know that some of the grants should have been allocated to the event fees, and that is why I'm here tonight. With Council's possible help by making this a partner event, we can remove barriers that take funding away from Reese and ensure this ceremony remains a true community effort. We would also welcome aligning this ceremony with the St. Cloud Veterans Council to strengthen coordination. I'm respectfully asking that the event fees for Wreaths Across America at Mount Peace Cemetery be reviewed and possibly eliminated. Together, we can ensure no veteran is left without a wreath and no family is ever left to wonder whether their loved one mattered. Thank you for your time.

50:28 – 50:42Speaker 15

Yes, thank you very much, ma'am. Deputy Mayor Gilbert just passed out some information for us, so we appreciate you. If he can just stay right there, we're going to read through this real quick. And I think Deputy Mayor, well, first, Council Member Fletcher has something to say on this.

50:43 – 52:11Speaker 7

Thank you for your speech and thank you, Mayor. Partially what had happened was I had a conversation with the organization regarding the number of wreaths after attending the event last year. And I think some of us were actually out there. At the end of the event, you notice that there wasn't enough wreaths. So my thought was, let's let me allocate some funds to be able to make up that difference. Well, what had happened was, is that has to go off to purchase the wreaths, and then the wreaths then come down, and then they're placed by volunteers at this event. Right after that, there basically was these costs came up. And, you know, we've been going through and trying to identify, you know, what are the costs being spent on different events. Had, you know, I kind of knew in advance, you know, hold back some money, let's go ahead and pay that and then we'll allocate the rates to it. So it's partly important. my fault here, so I was wondering, since it's not necessarily trying to find money to be able to do this, it's more of our awesome staff doing what they've done for several years to get this across the finish line. So I believe that's what Chastity is asking the council this evening.

52:13Speaker 15

Did this come from you? I'm sorry. Or did it come from you?

52:15 – 52:26Speaker 6

No, staff prepared it. We knew. I saw Ken hanging it out. I thought you were going to speak on this. So you know, we just passed out the costs for the application. I have that all here, too.

52:26Speaker 15

All right. Yeah, Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

52:30 – 53:20Speaker 11

Well, we all are allotted, as council, a certain amount of dollars for special functions to go. And I have not allocated any of the dollars that I have. I have gone to the event. I think all of us were out there, or at least I've asked. And it's amazing. I mean, it's heartwarming. It's cool. And we're Soldier City. These are things that should be in our bodies and our souls as veterans that serve our country. So I don't know if I can donate part of my thing, because I don't know if two council people can... Before you do that, let's... Okay. But it's quite an event. So I'll yield back, but I don't know the legal ramifications of two council people supporting one event. So let's go through our motions and then we'll go over there.

53:20 – 53:40Speaker 6

So I spoke earlier today with Deputy Mayor and explained to him that the current policy only allows one council member to provide the community empowerment grant. However, council is the judge of council, so council could this evening. I'm sorry?

53:40Speaker 10

It's their policy.

53:41Speaker 6

Yeah, it's your policy. So council could this evening say that you agree to modify in this situation and allow an additional grant to the event.

53:50 – 54:45Speaker 15

Yeah, and I think that, first of all, thank you all for what you do with that. Thank you. And everything at the VFW as well. And I know Councilmember Fletcher, at the VFW, you spend a lot of time with those folks. And, of course, you know I'm with the Museum of Military History. I'm with the veterans all the time as well. And we've got the great Soldier City. We've got the Veterans Council. We've got, you know, everything we've been doing. And I think that was an amazing experience. Choice to for a council member Fletcher to allocate that $1,500 towards an amazing event The other fees though, I think I don't think it should just come out of another council members allotment I think that we as a council can go ahead and do that Correct and waive those the the permit the application fee and the permit fee That's got you said the event trailer with the tables and chairs the tent now the one thing It includes staff. What's the staff cost on that, Scott?

54:47Speaker 8

I believe Stephanie may still be here who could give the actual cost for the staff.

54:54Speaker 15

And I see full day of AV, so is that Jay? Yes, sir.

55:07 – 55:22Speaker 16

Stephanie Holkamp, Parks and Recreation. Hi, Chastity. And there's actually, the staff cost is included in when we drop the trailer off in the tent. We do have two cemetery employees that work on Saturday at the cemetery, so they're already there. Okay.

55:23 – 55:45Speaker 15

All right. I'm fine. On my side, just waiving those, the $1,070 for this event. I think it's... You know, they're not out there throwing a big party or they're not doing, there's no money exchanging hands. They're going in and honoring these veterans and that's what we're all about here in our community, so.

55:49Speaker 7

City Manager.

55:50 – 56:04Speaker 6

So I think it was clear that there was consensus. I just want to clarify further, you specifically used the dollar value that we estimated. So I just wanted clarification. Are we waiving the fees or only the specific amount?

56:04Speaker 15

So you haven't had the DRC meeting yet? Correct.

56:10Speaker 15

Is this a pretty good...

56:13Speaker 6

It's safe. It's a safe number. If it ends up being...

56:16Speaker 15

Anything up to $1,500 of our permit fees, event fees.

56:23 – 56:56Speaker 7

One of the things I did speak to Chaski about and the organization is obviously we've been going through these different fees. And that's really going to change here, you know, with next year's budget. So, you know, I don't want to get in the situation where we're like keep waiving fees, waiving fees, right? So they're going to make adjustments to their stuff so that they have the fundraising efforts. And then I also mentioned to her to work with the St. Cloud Veterans Council to push, you know, the event for next year. And then they'll have the resources of everybody coming together so that it's a lot smoother.

56:56 – 57:15Speaker 15

um next year for them because it is a lot of work for chastity we have a meeting one o'clock tomorrow if you'd like to come and talk about priests across america i think i could make it i'll take my lunch break i work remotely awesome thank you yeah we have it actually it's once a month and it's the day after council meeting we have is it here second floor building department conference room okay one o'clock

57:15Speaker 1

Yep, absolutely.

57:16 – 57:27Speaker 15

They would all love to hear about it. And you've got the president of the hospital, Brian Wetzel, is on that. We've got someone from Representative Stark's office, Senator Arrington's office. So it's a great group of folks in that room.

57:27 – 57:51Speaker 1

No, that's awesome because I don't think a lot of people in our community know. They come out to the cemetery for, and I apologize for speaking out of turn or anything, but we don't get a lot of sponsorships, and a lot of people come to the event, but I don't think people actually understand that we need sponsorships in order to get these wreaths. They're not given to us for free.

57:52Speaker 15

Yeah. Last year we've, we had it on our calendar of the year before we didn't even know. And that's where, and that's my fault. And we saw it, we got, you know, of course, you know, people said things, I'm like, well, I didn't even know what was happening.

58:02 – 58:25Speaker 1

No, that that's my fault. I've been trying to like, kind of get, get it out there more and everything. So I've had a lot of people helping me and just give me advice and things like that. I've, I've only been the location coordinator for five years. You know, it started in 2011, so I've only been doing it for five years. So I'm starting to get it going a lot more.

58:25 – 58:37Speaker 15

Yeah, and I know Daryl and Charlotte Bass, they're involved in that as well with the American Legion. Yeah, not as much anymore. Oh, really? They're not? Okay. I saw them the other day at lunch over at the Legion. Council Member Paul.

58:37Speaker 4

I just asked if we can have Council Member Fletcher fill out the form like we did with the other ones just so it's documented. Thank you.

58:49Speaker 15

Just for his, right?

58:50Speaker 4

Well, for the fees.

58:52Speaker 15

Oh, even for the waiver of the fee? I think city manager can... Is this not coming out of ours?

58:58Speaker 15

It's a council collective thing. Okay. Right? Is that... There's not another form that...

59:06 – 59:31Speaker 6

Ms. Paul requested I create a form when council wanted to waive fees for special events. So far, only Ms. Paul has been using the form, so I think she was trying to encourage other council members to complete the form. I didn't know the form was there, so I'm sorry. But can I get- We're still learning this. Can I get head nods on the 1,500 amount? I don't think it's going to be that much.

59:31 – 59:42Speaker 15

That's the max, but that puts it. Okay, thank you. I got consensus on that. There's plenty of breathing room there to make the event happen. Thank you very much. Absolutely, yeah. Anything we can do, obviously, we'd love to see you tomorrow with the Veterans Council.

59:42Speaker 1

No, I will try my best to go. I don't think I have any meetings, so I think I'll be good to go for lunch.

59:47 – 1:00:05Speaker 15

In everything you've been seeing in Veterans Park, Obviously, the city, they put up the money. They just painted the band shell, if y'all saw that. There was an Eagle Scout that came out and refurbished the cannons. Needs new tires still. We're out there every other week. If the VFW would love to set up out there, we'd love to have y'all.

1:00:06Speaker 1

Can we just go and just bring a table and set up?

1:00:10 – 1:00:23Speaker 15

Absolutely, yeah. Okay. It's free for veteran organizations. Okay. That's the whole idea is to get veteran resources out there and have a community day. Okay. I had no idea. Thank you. Food items. Council Member Urban.

1:00:23 – 1:00:59Speaker 3

One of the things just that the tent set up kind of reminded me is, you know, we have this is an amazing event. And we also have, I think, one of the best Memorial Day events in the entire state of Florida. Every year they got to set up that tent and everything. One thing I think this council should consider in the future, and I know with legislation coming up, we might not have the financial ability to do this, but to do a permanent shade structure there at the cemetery. for these amazing events I think would be helpful and would help encourage more people to come to these events and have shade and everything. So something to consider.

1:01:00 – 1:01:17Speaker 15

I agree. The tent out there sometimes is too short or too small for everybody to gather under during Memorial Day. It's a hot day, Memorial Day. Thank you all very much for bringing this forward. Thank you. I appreciate it. What is the date of Wreaths Across America? December 19th, Saturday. Thank you very much.

1:01:19Speaker 1

And if anybody wants to volunteer, we're flagging the weekend before.

1:01:23Speaker 15

Absolutely. Yep. And please ask for volunteers tomorrow from the Veterans Council.

1:01:26Speaker 1

I will. Thank you.

1:01:27 – 1:01:46Speaker 15

Awesome. Thank you. All right. Anyone else in the audience like to address the council during Citizens Forum? Okay. We are moving on to public hearings. Will the clerk please read public hearing number one?

1:01:47 – 1:02:02Speaker 22

First, the two public hearings for resolution number 2026-061 are a resolution of the City Council of City of St. Cloud, Florida, establishing a final ad valorem tax millage for the City of St. Cloud for the fiscal year 2026-2027, the same being adopted prior to the adoption of the final budget for said period.

1:02:05 – 1:05:32Speaker 20

Good evening, Jeff Cooper, Finance Director. This is the first of two public hearings for the final ad valorem tax millage, as well as the budget. As per Florida Statute 200.065, two public hearings are required in order to adopt a final ad valorem tax millage of 5.1128. which is 3.45% above the rollback rate of 4.9423. And as a reminder, the rollback rate is the rate that would generate the same tax dollars assessed as the previous tax year, not including new construction So some key takeaways, one mill equals $1 in tax per $1,000 of assessed taxable value. And property taxes are calculated by multiplying the assessed taxable property value by the millage rate and dividing by 1,000. So as an example, so first let me point out this is the 14th consecutive year that we've kept our millage rate the same, 5.1128. So as an example of about the average taxable value in the City of St. Cloud, 250,000. Their City of St. Cloud ad valorem taxes would be $1,278.20. And of course that's not your, entire tax bill as the county charges a millage rate of six point seven zero zero zero and then you've got the school board and your non ad valorem taxes on top of that so here's the general fund budget highlights of which ad valorem property taxes fund 48 new firefighter positions through a safer grant that's Staffing for adequate fire and emergency response for $5.15 million, 65% of that is funded through a federal grant. The public safety union contracts, that's police and fire. Pay and benefit increases basically to keep us competitive with the county and the city of Kissimmee. for all other staff outside of the public safety unions it's a 1% market adjustment and a 2% pay adjustment eight hundred ten thousand and there's seven new positions five of those being public safety and two legal and that's seven hundred thirty five thousand Here are the general fund new positions, and that is for communications operators. So as we open new fire stations, we need new communications operators to support those fire stations and the associated responses. Fire captain of training, we have 48. New staff are soon to be 48, still in the process of hiring those, so they need to be trained. And city attorney as well as a legal assistant. Staff recommendation is approval of resolution 2026-061R, and we're requesting city council approval of 2026-061R.

1:05:36 – 1:05:52Speaker 15

All right. Thank you, Coop. Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item? And City Council? Motion to approve. Motion to approve. Council Member Urban? Second. Second. Council Member Fletcher? Will the clerk please call the roll?

1:05:53Speaker 22

Council Member Paul? Aye. Council Member Urban?

1:05:56Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert? Aye. Council Member Fletcher? Aye. Mayor Robertson? Aye. Motion carries 5-0.

1:06:04 – 1:06:21Speaker 20

That brings us to the final fiscal year, 2026, 2027 budget resolution. Uh, as per Florida statute one 66.2 for one, the city is required to adopt a budget each fiscal year by ordinance or resolution. The amount available from taxation.

1:06:21Speaker 15

Let me have Ivy read this into the record for discussion. That's all right. I'm on a roll.

1:06:29Speaker 20

I'm in budget mind.

1:06:30Speaker 15

Sorry. You're already going to number two. Please read out number two.

1:06:35 – 1:06:49Speaker 22

First, the two public hearings for resolution number 2026-062 are a resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, establishing a final budget for the City of St. Cloud for fiscal year 2026-2027. The same be adopted following the adoption of the final millage rate for said period.

1:06:51Speaker 15

Do we have anything to say on that?

1:06:54 – 1:08:49Speaker 20

No. So the amount available from taxation and other sources, including balances brought forward from prior fiscal years, which for the general fund will be zero. We'll get to that momentarily. Must equal the total appropriation for expenditures and reserves. In other words, the adopted budget must balance. So the total citywide budget increase of 7.7%, that is all funds, compared to the current fiscal year, original budget, the majority of which pertains to the aforementioned 48 new firefighters, and to two significant road projects that are funded with mobility impact fees, and that being the LaSalle Avenue Extension and Massachusetts Avenue Extension. And except for fire, legal, and finance, boo, all general fund operating budgets decreased from the current fiscal year original budget for a total decrease, operational budgets now, of 9.6%. And here's a breakdown of those. So you see all the red, those are the good ones. And the few black are the ones that increased slightly. I want to point out fire did increase, but not very much considering they added 48 new staff positions. Legal, of course, is getting new positions, so they require training and so forth, so that makes sense. And the finance excuse is we're going to have a new auditor contract, could be the same auditor, but a new contract, so our costs are likely to go up, and it wasn't very much. But we were unable to do a decrease because we were already lean and mean.

1:08:52Speaker 15

I think Coop added dinners.

1:08:54 – 1:11:06Speaker 20

In my opinion. So how did we do this? So we designated seven non-public safety positions to be held vacant for salary savings, so we don't normally do that. One of those positions was finance, so we're doing our part. Only approved five new public safety positions and two new legal department positions, so other positions were requested, but in order to get us off of using prior year fund balance, which we'll get to momentarily, we didn't fund any other positions. We reduced advertising and promotional items. We reduced travel and training. We reduced our tuition reimbursement and sponsorship programs. We reduced chamber and other memberships. We reduced community grants. We eliminated food for council meetings. So next year, eat before you come, I guess. Workshops and other city events. And we utilized this year's budget to purchase some needed capital items so we didn't have to fund it for the upcoming year. So here's the cool one. So for the last 31 years, the city of St. Cloud has relied on prior year fund balance to balance its budget. Prior year fund balance for the citizens, I would equate it to your savings account. So the city has been using its savings account to balance its budget, so actual revenues and actual expenditures have never been equal for 31 years. This year they are. This was a stated city manager goal from when she took over the job. We intended to pare it down over the next couple, two or three years. Last year was 4.8 million, so initially we were gonna go to 3.8 million and pare it down from there. However, with the possibility of property tax reform looming, she made the decision, along with you, to not utilize prior year fund balance to balance this year's budget.

1:11:07Speaker 6

Rip off the Band-Aid.

1:11:09Speaker 15

So what you're saying, Coop, is for the first time in 31 years, we're operating within our means.

1:11:15Speaker 20

That is correct.

1:11:17Speaker 15

Now I understand.

1:11:18 – 1:14:18Speaker 20

And that's going to be particularly important if property tax reform passes because we're going to potentially lose significant amounts of money. Okay, here's a recap of the fiscal year budget, $231.3 million. Lord, I'm gonna have to see my notes. My eyes are fading, sorry. So the general fund is 41% of that, or 94.5 million. The special revenue funds are a significant portion, also 59.7 million. That's like the gas tax fund, utility tax fund, the 1% surcharge fund, community development block fund, mobility impact fees and so forth. And then the capital projects fund is self-explanatory, the debt service fund is self-explanatory. Enterprise funds for us, that's sanitation, storm water, and the building fund are our enterprise funds. Internal service funds, the light blue slice, that is our, we're self-insured for medical as well as workman's comp. And the other internal service fund is the motor pool. And if there's any questions as we go through this, feel free to stop me. General fund revenue breakdown, and this is noteworthy, ad valorem is 36.4%. That is 39% of the entire general fund revenue, by far our largest funding source. After that, we have intergovernmental revenues. Those are like grants and sales tax. And then we also have the other financing sources. Those are transfers from the other funds, such as the OUC Interlocal Fund. That's our second largest funding source. Toho Water Interlocal, utility tax, as well as 5% of impact fees are also transferred to the general fund. And then there's some miscellaneous ones. The charges for services, the orange slice, those are like the parks and rec fees, the ambulance transport charges. General fund expenditures, this is also noteworthy. As you can see, put the police in blue and the fire in red, they account for $53.2 million of our $94.5 million, or 58%. They are an ever-growing portion of our budget. Due to the fact that we're growing, 48 new firefighters, we're adding four communications operators. So in future years, this will be well above 60%.

1:14:18Speaker 15

Coop, I have a question. So with police and fire, you said it's 54 million?

1:14:25Speaker 20

53.2 million and 58%.

1:14:27Speaker 15

And what do we generate in ad valorem tax now?

1:14:32 – 1:14:49Speaker 20

For this year, it's $36.4 million. So that's a good note. So we are barely covering our police and not even coming close to covering our fire at this time.

1:14:51Speaker 20

So our public revenue at this moment is $36.4 million.

1:14:57Speaker 15

And obviously, I've known those numbers. But I think it's important for you to say that out loud. I think everybody needs to know that.

1:15:04 – 1:15:21Speaker 20

That is important. Now, all communities are different. So we may not be the same as someone else. So when they say, like, oh, you're only going to be able to spend ad valorem on public safety, okay, we're not even covering our costs.

1:15:23 – 1:15:35Speaker 15

And I believe in this budget we're already trimming down five new police officers that we were wanting to hire. So we're already kind of behind where we want to be without Amendment 3.

1:15:36 – 1:16:12Speaker 6

Correct. We've been catching up on public safety. I'm going to jump in. Since I became city manager, we have been catching up on the number of public safety positions. When I took over, we were using more prior year fund balance and we didn't have enough public safety. We had a fire squad truck on its way, but we didn't have the funds to even pay for the employees for their salaries to be on that truck. We have been putting everything towards public safety for the past few years, trying to catch up to be at the numbers where we should be for our population. We still had work to do to get there.

1:16:13Speaker 15

And Coop, can I pause you for a second? We have Council Member Fletcher and Deputy Mayor Gilbert that have some words here.

1:16:18 – 1:17:13Speaker 7

I just wanted to say, Coop, thank you, and thank you to every department director, the leadership of the city manager, and the the council's direction to basically put forward um the leanest budget i think that the at least since my time on council forward possible you know not using the prior year fund balance is an extreme effort i think it will affect every single employee in the organization every single department will be doing their part to save the taxpayers' and citizens' money. And I think everybody in the community, in the city, this council, directors, staff, should be proud of the budget that has been put forward, considering the things that are coming down the pipe from the state. So thank you to each and every one of you.

1:17:14Speaker 15

Yes, sir. Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

1:17:17 – 1:17:38Speaker 11

Just a few questions. Self-insured, when you talk about workman's comp, is there a cap on that, or is that because I don't want to go into it, but we're self-insured at one of my companies, but it's up to a certain cap, and then insurance companies take over after that. Is that where we're at, or are we 100% fully self-insured?

1:17:38 – 1:17:52Speaker 20

There's a stop-loss policy, but a human resource is just in here. If he might want to come up, I'm not a workman's comp expert. Okay. if you want more information. We do have a policy.

1:17:52 – 1:18:35Speaker 11

Usually there's a cap on those kind of insurance policies, self-insured until X, Y, Z, for hazards and emergencies and things such as that. So I just want to be clear. We still do have to pay insurance, but it's such a lower event because it's kind of like a deductible, you know, a million or $2 million deductible before we go into that insurance policy, which lowers that insurance policy by quite some bit. I just want any clarification on that, if I will. And thank you very much. What percentage of prior fund balance do we need to keep versus the Florida law? I know there's a law we have to have so much money for emergencies, catastrophes, or things such as that in the fund balance. Is that correct or not?

1:18:35 – 1:19:20Speaker 20

Well, our own city code requires that you keep 12.5% of the prior year expenditures as a minimum fund balance. That equates to somewhere around $10 million right now. Of course, that increases every year as expenditures grow. And the Government Finance Officers Association recommends 16.67%, which is two months worth of operating expenditures. And that's just short of $13 million now. Okay. And at present, we're projecting our unassigned general fund fund balance to be approximately $17 million. So it sounds like a lot, but it's really not, because we have those minimum fund balances to continue.

1:19:20 – 1:21:08Speaker 11

Yeah, you still have to run a city through catastrophes or things like that. the folks here have been through that. You talked about 9-11. There's some folks that weren't even born 25 years ago, but this is something that we all know through COVID and things like that, that we have to keep a balance to keep the city operating for that. So thank you for those clarifications. I understand the police and fire are 53 to 50. I don't know how many times I tell everybody, you know, for our population, we're the safest city in the state of Florida. And for me, that's a great place to live. If you feel safe, work, play, and have fun, that's awesome. We'll talk about it later, but there's some... This is a whole separate area, but sometimes the tail's wagging the dog with flocks and safety cameras and stuff like that, but we'll talk about that later, which is also putting a burden on our safety when these cameras are taken away because of... one or two lawyers that say that we shouldn't have them out there. I know it saves a lot of people. People with Alzheimer's, we can find them. There's people that we can find them through these cameras. So safety, I think, is the number one thing that I'm sitting here on council for. I support 100%. And we're taking some of the tools away from our safety Areas with with police and fire, but that's that's another story. I'm gonna yield back to you mayor Those are just questions. I had how you keep costs down and how you do keep costs down or technology in some a Few that the tail wagging a dog are trying to take some of our safety issues down But I'll yield back to you that's a whole nother story about budget, but thanks So we're at 17% and it's twelve point six percent through Florida law for our fund balance

1:21:09 – 1:21:39Speaker 20

We're projecting to be at 17 million, which will put us somewhere in the neighborhood of 20, 21%. So we're, in addition to reducing the use of fund balance, we've endeavored to increase Our unassigned fund balance as well, you know to get To more 20 to 25 percent, which is where we're at right now, and I'm gonna echo Councilman Fletcher's yeah Comments you guys do a great job.

1:21:39 – 1:21:50Speaker 11

I'm gonna yield back to you mayor. Those are just questions you have Running a city that those are things we need to know what costs are and how much it cost to run a city So, thank you very much Cooper. I'm gonna yield back to you mayor. Thank you.

1:21:50Speaker 15

All right city manager

1:21:52 – 1:22:07Speaker 6

I just wanted to further answer your question about the stop loss. It was actually on our consent agenda this evening. So the deductible for every claim is $225,000. So we pay $225,000 before the stop loss insurance takes over.

1:22:07Speaker 15

All right. Coop, you can continue. I'm sure we'll have more questions and comments.

1:22:15Speaker 20

That's fine. I actually enjoy this.

1:22:24 – 1:27:53Speaker 20

So far, so good. This is my seventh go-around, so I'm used to it by now. This is your FY26-27 capital projects, which includes the LaSalle Avenue extension previously mentioned, $7.75 million. That is funded with mobility impact fees. The Massachusetts Avenue extension, $4,020,000, also mobility impact fees. the downtown development project, $1.3 million of community redevelopment agency fund. And I'm proud to say, thanks to you all and city manager and a lot of forethought, we're going to be accomplishing that project without the use of debt. Cooper hates debt. In most cases. We have our master plan paving project. That's the annual project that we do our paving projects out of. That's a million dollars of the gas tax fund. And then we have new enterprise resource planning system. That's the new finance HR procurement tool that we're putting another one million dollars towards that. That's the 1% surcharge fund. And then we have our paving project, which is funded with franchise fees collected in the previous year, and that is $471,343. So then we have our strategic key focus areas. So we have four of those, and the projects that fall under diverse and magnetic economic development is the Downtown Development Project and Centennial Park Improvements. Under effective community safety, and you can clearly see that that is a focus of the city, the five new positions, four communications operators and one fire captain training. Construction of the public safety complex, which was funded in last fiscal year, 24-25. Construction of Fire Station 35, also funded in 24-25, as well as Fire Station 22. They keep changing the numbers on me, so hopefully I got those right. Purchase of a replacement fire engine, purchase of a replacement ambulance, and replacement of 16 public safety vehicles. key focus area of high-performing government-funded projects, incorporation of the new police department union contract, the citywide 1% market adjustment and 2% pay adjustment, the enterprise resource management planning project, and a citywide watershed master plan, which is actually on this agenda. I believe it was funded in this fiscal year. And finally, effective transportation network funded projects, Creekwood Drive Extension, that was funded in 24-25. So these are just, this is additional funding like this year. 17th Street Extension, the initial design funded in 23-24. Rummel Road Roundabout funded this fiscal year. Master Plan Paving and additional paving franchise fee funding. And before I get to our neat little QR code, thank you, Mary Emma, I want to pass along my thanks to the directors, you as city council, the city manager, the deputy city manager. So for the citizens, we had our budget basically done the first part of June. And then the prospect of property tax reform came and, again, about gave me a heart attack and we have to start over. So we've gone through several iterations of this. We've literally gone through this with a fine-tooth comb. All the directors, their staff, I get to be up here and be the spokesperson, but truly all the work is the ones that are still here. So I want to thank them and you all. You were in several workshops to discuss this issue, so this was the most challenging budget in the seven years that I've been here. However, I also feel like it was the most rewarding because where we stand right now is the most efficient budget, like, in my seven years. So anyway, so the staff recommendation is approval of Resolution 2026-062R. City Council requested action is also approval of 2026-062R. And the QR code was... We'll take you to the draft budget, so if you want additional details, like also I'm going to go back to my office and get some cards that I'll leave out. So if you want to take a card and you have questions, I'm always open to talk to citizens. I'm always talking to them about their property tax bills anyway, but anything about our budget, just I'm there to answer any questions.

1:27:53Speaker 15

He even talked to a reporter one time.

1:27:56Speaker 20

Yeah, she never did come back.

1:27:58Speaker 15

I've been waiting. Yeah, city manager.

1:28:02 – 1:29:03Speaker 6

Thank you. I just want to thank Coop and the city council because this was a team effort from everyone. We could have waited until November to see what happens, but you all were willing to work with me to do what we could this year. So I appreciate that. It was painful. And our employees... Coop showed a lot of places where we cut. They cut so much more than that. Those were just the easy things to categorize. But there was lots of individual cuts within each department, division. And so I just want to thank everybody for such a hard work. And this next year is going to be pretty hard on staff. They're going to be doing the same work, if not more, due to our growing population. without a lot of the resources that they currently have helping them. So, you know, everybody, please be nice to our staff next year. Well, every day. Thank you.

1:29:05Speaker 3

Yeah, Coop said he enjoys this stuff. When I'm having trouble sleeping at night, I'll just turn on our budget hearings and replay them on YouTube just to fall asleep.

1:29:14Speaker 20

Oh, believe me, November 3rd is going to be sleepless for me.

1:29:18 – 1:30:11Speaker 3

Well, I just, I truly wanted to say I really appreciate what our city manager, finance director, and every single department has done to make this. This is my fifth time going through this budget process, and what the general public doesn't understand is all of the work that goes into every single department and every staff member at this city to put this together, and this has definitely been the most challenging budget year that I have had to deal with, and I'm sure there's a lot of challenges ahead, but I encourage all the residents to go through our budget, look at this QR code, take a look at how our city runs, because I think we're a very efficient city, and we run very conservatively financially, so I just really appreciate everything that our finance staff and city manager has done to make that happen. Thank you.

1:30:14 – 1:33:31Speaker 11

Thank you, Councilman Urban. Going through budgets is my life, and it's not pretty, it's not fun, it's difficult. I don't want to be lying to this, but I do know that there are services that we will not be able to provide after November 3rd if this amendment goes through. I don't want to press the panic button. I don't want to do that. But we have to realize as human beings that some of the services we have provided is because we've been able to provide them. And cuts are just that. And we were just talking about the police budget and cutting those officers, well, that's real stuff. And fire, that's real stuff. That's stuff that, you know, you can look at a spreadsheet, but when you need them, that's real stuff. That takes care of parks and rec, cutting the grass. I mean, that's real stuff coming up. I mean, but you guys did a great job. And a lot of businesses are cyclical. That may have a good year and a down year. but we're planning, and people say, well, if you make so much money, why aren't you doing this or that? You could do it. You're cutting the budget. Why haven't it been that way always? Well, we're cutting services, too, and we're cutting employees also. It's a reality check. It just is, and it's okay. I'm willing to stand up here and take it on my shoulders, and I think the council is also, but these are reality checks that we're going to see November 3rd if Amendment 3 goes through. It's just, it is, and I'm not here to be lightest. It's not going to rain every day, but Florida probably does. But we have to look at that as a community, as a city of St. Cloud. There will be services that we provide that the public is used to that are no longer be that in a timely fashion or some things that we'll just, we take for granted as citizens that we can't provide any longer. Tough thing. I agree with council member urban. Uh, we're, we're going at it. And, and, and one thing I will tell you, I'm not a news guy. I'm not a Facebook guy. I'm not all that, but we were, we were so proactive in our budgets. I'm looking at the news on, on channel seven or whatever, nine, whatever it is. And they said, well, council's media can't take credit for it. And maybe some of the other council that you guys, you guys started when you heard this coming up, you that you guys, Oh yeah. City manager, city attorney, you, police chief, all your directors, but if you look at the, oh, council had this uncut. You look at Winter Park or any other, and I'm not specifying Winter Park, but we looked at this in June. So your proactiveness has really helped the City of St. Cloud adjust to these budget cuts. But I don't want to be a down guy, but there will be services that we're used to as citizens that will maybe take a little longer or not quite be there at time, even mowing the lawns at every park. I mean, those kind of things. So I appreciate what you do. I've ate Beanie Weenies, and I've ate steaks. So we're at Beanie Weenies right now. That's fine. We'll get through it. Thank you and your staff and all the directors and everybody for doing this. It's not easy. I yield back to you, Mayor, and budgets are not fun, but they're necessary, and I think the staff has done a great job. I yield back to you on this, Mayor. Thank you. Thank you, Coop.

1:33:32Speaker 15

Yes, sir. Scott. Thank you, Mayor. Sorry, Deputy City Manager. Thank you.

1:33:38 – 1:35:45Speaker 8

No, I just wanted to point out and make sure. everyone really understands the tremendous lift really that it was to eliminate the use of fund balance for 31 years and for the city manager's direction and the council support and the work of our staff to be able to get that done really is a tremendous effort and a tremendous accomplishment for the city council to be able to approve a budget and move forward with that. And it really shows the city's intent and the direction of the city to be very forward-thinking, to prepare the city to be in the best possible financial situation that we can be both now and in the future. I think that's really an important thing to point out. Another point I want to, you know, Coop and Maryam did a fabulous job with the QR code that's up there. You know, one of the other things that has been very important here in the city is transparency. and for everyone to see this. And sometimes, you know, the budgets and people talk about what's in there, what's not in there. You know, everything is out there and available for people to see. They can go on there. They can see the line items. This City Council has done a phenomenal job of, I think we've had five meetings now, Coop, where we've gone over. every single line item in the budget. That doesn't happen everywhere, and I think that that really shows the city's commitment to transparency and openness. I think that's something that's very, very important. And this was done, you know, Coop mentioned it, the city manager really pointed out that, you know, our city staff is what makes this a wonderful place to be, and they have a lot of pride in what they do and the level of service that we're able to provide. And even with this, and it's going to be difficult to keep that level of service, our employees really have that pride in the city, and that's really important, and you don't see that everywhere.

1:35:46Speaker 6

They need some plantings from the Dirty Fingernail Club to help keep up.

1:35:52 – 1:37:52Speaker 15

No, you all hit the nail on the head. It's the staff that deserves all the credit, city manager, department heads, even Doug, the police chief. He stands through every one of our meetings and puts up with us over here. It's strange to say, but we've got the easiest job in the building. I mean, we get called all the names in the book on social media, but it's the staff that does all the work. And they're the ones that are going to have to work twice as hard this year because we've made those steep cuts. And the city manager is going to ensure that we can still get through this next year, regardless of what happens in Amendment 3. We're prepared. We've got the most amazing police force, the most amazing fire department. We've got our staff top notch. What are we swearing? 13 new firefighters just last night. Um, and our chief has been preparing for this for four years now, ever since the day he got here. So he, right. You knew this day would come. Now, we really do have an amazing team here, every department, everyone else. So thank you very much, Coop. Thanks for putting up with us, because I know sometimes we question every single line item, and it drives you nuts. But folks, that's our job. Not at all. We work for every one of y'all, and we do our jobs. So when people say, oh, they're lining pockets, who the hell is lining a pocket around here? it's some of the oddest comments that come out there because we just sit up here and we just, all our job is to hold our government accountable for you. That's our job. We don't touch the books. We don't touch the money. We don't get to do that. Everything, every decision happens here. In broad view, everybody gets to see it. It's the staff that works behind the scenes and does all of the hard lifting, and they've done an amazing job this year, and that's why we have the confidence that they can pull through this next year, no matter what happens with Amendment 3. Thank you, Coop. Amazing job, you and your team, everybody.

1:37:52 – 1:38:05Speaker 20

And this will be advertised in the Orlando Sentinel. Our budget summary ad is required by Florida statute, so it'll be in Sunday's paper. So if you're interested, pick up Sunday's paper, and you will see our budget summary ad. Just saying.

1:38:06 – 1:38:18Speaker 15

And I was here when the CFO came to town, and he did say our cities are not a problem. We are actually doing a better job than others.

1:38:22 – 1:38:39Speaker 15

All right. Do we have to vote on this? I think we do. Anyone from the audience like to comment on everything that Coop had to say? Or on this agenda item number two? Motion to approve. We have a motion to approve. Council Member Fletcher. Second. Second. Deputy Mayor Gilbert. Will the clerk please call the roll?

1:38:41Speaker 22

Council Member Urban.

1:38:43Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert. Aye. Council Member Fletcher.

1:38:45Speaker 22

Council Member Paul. Aye. Mayor Robertson.

1:38:48Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0. All right.

1:38:50Speaker 15

We're going to take a five-minute break.

1:38:52Speaker 20

Thank you and see you next Thursday.

1:38:54Speaker 8

See you next Thursday again?

1:50:33Speaker 15

Being back to order. All right, now, and will the clerk please read item number four, public hearing.

1:50:42 – 1:50:59Speaker 22

Final public hearing for ordinance number 2026-27. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, amending Chapter 3 performance and citing standards. Article 14, use regulation section 3.14.5, alcoholic beverage establishments, providing for conflicts of ability, administrative corrections, codification, publication, effective date.

1:51:01 – 1:55:54Speaker 12

Good evening, Council. Geoffrey Ball, Community Development Director. Tonight before you is the Alcohol Beverage Establishment Amendment for DRC case CDA 26-0004, resolution number 2026-27. On April 16, 2026, City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance amending section 3.14.5, alcohol beverage establishments. On August 20, 2026, City Council directed staff to meet with business owners to discuss the proposed changes. On September 2nd, staff met with several restaurant and bar owners within the entertainment district. They are in support of the proposed changes as amended. The proposed amendment supports operational flexibility for local businesses, promotes economic activity and investment within the city and their entertainment district, and enhance the overall experience for the residents and visitors. So the proposed changes, and this would be citywide, this is section 3.145E, removes restrictions on restaurants having entertainment activities, and it removes pool tables, video games, a stage, live entertainment, illuminated or non-illuminated signs, advertising, alcoholic beverages, permits dancing, or which has live music or plays music at a level of above 70 decibels, measured six inches from the source. and shall not be considered a full service restaurant. Continuing on the proposed change, the dining area shall contain tables and chairs or booths of standard table height, counters and tables of cocktail height shall not be permitted. All tables shall meet or exceed minimal acceptable standards of 256 square inches of table space per patron. So this is being removed from the current ordinance. So the proposed changes as dictated here, section 3.145L adds the following language. Establishments in the entertainment district, the provisions of 3.145A through 3.145C and 3.145E Above shall not apply to establishments located within the entertainment district as established pursuant to section 3.13.3 provided. So these are the additional changes. So the establishment is in full compliance with the conditions and requirements of the alcohol license to sell alcoholic beverages issued by the state of Florida for the establishment. The establishment does not charge a cover charge at any time. The establishment does not contain illuminated or non-illuminated signs advertising alcoholic beverages visible outside of the establishment. And if the establishment is licensed as a full service restaurant by the state of Florida, it shall have direct access to a permanent kitchen facility to service food items other than prepared items. Establishments food service shall remain open and available to customers at all times. The establishment is open and there is some wordsmithing that's gone on. This is the latest draft being proposed. So staff recommendation is approval of ordinance 2026-27. Planning commission recommendation was approval and the requested action by city council is approval of ordinance 2026-27. So I do want to bring up during the meeting that city staff had with the local business owners, I wanted to talk about the mobile food dispensing vehicles that was brought up. This is not part of this ordinance change, but they wanted to bring this up to put this the direct staff to amend this section of the code. But during staff's meeting with the business owners, the owners requested the mobile food dispensing vehicles, food trucks, and an entertainment district with the following conditions. Must be fully enclosed area and contained within the property, must not be visible from a named street, and must be in conjunction with the existing businesses and entertainment district. And for businesses in the entertainment district not meeting the previous conditions, the city manager has authority to grant a temporary use of MFDV for a maximum of three months if an existing restaurant or bar is undergoing reservations and or active constructions. I'd be happy to answer any questions. Thank you.

1:55:55Speaker 15

Jeffrey, City Attorney.

1:55:56 – 1:56:25Speaker 10

I just wanted to point out there was a slight typo in the slide that Jeff showed when he was talking about the change proposed forward to Section 4. The slide left out the word internal when it says with regard to the thing. If you look at it real quick, go back, see where it reads. shall have direct access, it's actually direct internal access, which is an important distinction. So that's in the ordinance form, it was just incorrect on the slide.

1:56:25Speaker 15

Thank you. City Manager? Thank you.

1:56:28 – 1:56:44Speaker 6

I just also wanted to clarify that the recommendations about the food truck, that's not what you'll be voting on this evening when you make a motion. I will need direction from you on how you want me to proceed about that. Okay.

1:56:44Speaker 15

Anyone in the audience like to speak on this side? Okay, Council Member Fletcher.

1:56:52 – 1:57:36Speaker 7

The only thing that I wanted to say is, well, one, I appreciate staff working with the business owners. I know that we've spent a lot of time talking about this. I see folks here in the audience, well, at least one of them from our downtown establishments. At the last meeting, I was like, oh, man, we're continuing this again. I'm like, oh, my gosh, can we just, you know, get this across the finish line? But obviously the extension one more time did generate a bunch of discussion that I think has, we finally got it. I think we finally got it there. Unless anybody in the audience or council member has any other concerns that would like to be pointed out, I'm happy where we're at with this. Those are my comments.

1:57:37Speaker 15

Yeah. Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

1:57:39 – 1:58:43Speaker 11

Thank you, Mayor. I was at lunch the other day, and there was prominent business owners gathering together and talking about these ordinances that actually met. And to me, that's great, because these are our citizens, these are our business owners, these are our business operators that actually were meeting on this specific ordinance. I think some of the stuff was antiquated that was in here before, and I think we cleaned it up well. I just, it's so good when you see a community come together of business owners that have the same interest in working together for the best for the community. So I'd like to thank you and thank the other business owners for actually meeting and talking about this and coming back to us with something that they all could agree upon that makes it, because we, I don't know if you go there, but we box with my grandchildren every Friday at Pennsylvania Avenue 11, and then we go to downtown area. I saw you at the pizza establishment a few weeks ago, and I was out. And St. Cloud's booming. It's going well.

1:58:43Speaker 15

Council Member Fletcher, you.

1:58:44Speaker 11

Yeah, I've seen him. It's a really good place to go.

1:58:48Speaker 15

City Manager of Kissimmee. Kissimmee's there.

1:58:50 – 1:59:40Speaker 11

He comes there, and Brian from Orlando Health St. Cloud. But it's not just for adults. It's a whole establishment. I bring my grandchildren and children. It's a great environment to be in. But it really comes from the business owners and the citizens. So I just have to thank them again for getting together, helping us figure it out, and make St. Cloud you know, the best place to be, which I truly believe it is. I'm biased because I'm a citizen, but we're down in St. Cloud at least three out of four weeks, weekends, enjoying dinner with my grandchildren at average age from 3 to 16. So it's a great thing. I think we made the right moves, and I don't know what else to say about it, but I'm just so glad it did continue as Council Member Fletcher did because I think it's in the right place at the right time. I yield back to you, Mayor. Thank you.

1:59:40Speaker 15

Council Member Urban.

1:59:41 – 2:00:09Speaker 3

Yeah, I'll say exactly what the Deputy Mayor and Council Member Fletcher said. I'm glad that everybody worked together to make this happen. I look at government as our role as getting out of the way so businesses can succeed, and I think this helps do that. I just wanted to say that I would be in favor of those food truck provisions, but it's my understanding we got to bring that back at another meeting. But I would be in favor in looking at that, and I know that the downtown businesses are in favor of that as well.

2:00:10 – 2:00:29Speaker 15

Yeah, I think that's a bigger topic, obviously, for food trucks around our entire city as well. I just want to point out, I think this accomplishes everything that, that needs to be done to differentiate between a liquor license and a 51%, you know, the five, what is that?

2:00:30Speaker 15

The, uh, four COP SFR.

2:00:32Speaker 10

Is that what it's called?

2:00:33 – 2:01:54Speaker 15

Um, cause that's what the intent when a business owner comes to us and that's where sometimes we get put in the middle of a fight and we're the bad guy because we're trying to fix a problem that comes to us that, that has not been resolved for a number of years. And I'll, I'll be honest with you. It came right to me and I'm sure it went to others and And I stood up for somebody, and then they backed away. And then, you know, all of a sudden it's a fight, and everybody's pointing the fingers at us, and we're just here trying to fix a problem and make it fair for everybody. So I do want to thank the... the businesses downtown for getting together as a deputy mayor alluded to, and the city manager, I know she walked in on that and saw y'all out there, Jim, thank you for, uh, w we had a conversation at another pizza place, uh, a couple of weeks ago. And that's what I said. Look, I said, look, I'm not stuck on this 1159, but there has to be a solution. And if everybody would come together and come up with a solution, we can make this work. And I think this did it. So congratulations on that one, Jim, I do want to say though, if we can go back to that slide about the mobile, um, and I, and I think there's in the case of a restaurant wanting to do a renovation, I think we can go ahead and allow that now if they just need to temporarily use something, because we don't want them to wait on us, say it's months down the road, before we can come up with something, right?

2:01:55 – 2:02:12Speaker 10

Not necessarily, because if they bring in a food truck that they can use as a cooking facility, even if it's a mobile unit at all, the fire department's going to have to get involved and they're going to have to look at certain issues. You know, kitchens have grease traps, so there has to be all that accommodation.

2:02:13Speaker 6

I think what the mayor is asking is if I can grant the waiver that's being mentioned in the next slide.

2:02:19Speaker 15

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. We can go ahead and throw that in. That's just a temporary, if somebody's under construction.

2:02:24Speaker 10

So yeah, I think you're right. Staff can move forward and grab a temporary permit as part of the as part of whatever permit they're doing.

2:02:32Speaker 15

Because that's an existing restaurant. They're just saying, is that something that's come up before where restaurants want to do...

2:02:38 – 2:03:02Speaker 6

It did come up specifically. Mr. Shrek, I'm not sure what your last name is. Jim? He had approached me a little while ago wanting to do a renovation of his kitchen, and no, it's not currently allowed. So if the council is supporting it, as long as it's clear in the minutes that you're okay with me granting that waiver, but I would like to... document that in the code in the future.

2:03:02Speaker 15

Yeah. And that's why I just want to bring that up because that's not a permanent thing.

2:03:05 – 2:03:23Speaker 9

This is just something that will be something that we have to, we have to re renovate the kitchen. The floor is, we're having trouble with the floor again. Um, so I was just asking like if I'm, instead of being closed down for a week, can I have the food truck out there out back to, you know, cook for us and for breeze of course.

2:03:23Speaker 15

Okay. Yeah. I mean, we include that in this code or how do we do this?

2:03:29Speaker 6

That would be direction. I need it to be in the next code. Not part of this. Not part of this. Okay. It would need to be direction to come back with that as a change.

2:03:38Speaker 9

Are you looking to renovate soon? It's probably after the first of the year.

2:03:42Speaker 15

Okay. Well, that way, if we don't have everything else worked out with the food truck stuff, then this is already scored away for a temporary. Yeah, then we can get an exception. Okay.

2:03:51 – 2:04:08Speaker 10

If we could, since there's a little bit of time on it, we can do a little bit of research, figure out if there's a way existing within the current codes related to the city for the city manager to administratively do that. It sounds like the council is in support of it. So, and if we have to, if we can't do that, then we'll figure out a way to codify it so it can be done quickly.

2:04:08Speaker 15

Ken wants to still eat there at fire within those three months. So, you know, if I do too.

2:04:13 – 2:04:28Speaker 9

So now that we're staying open late, I'm doing a late night menu, and I'm putting an item on there in honor of you because of the conversations we had about pizza. It's going to be called the Mayor's Flatbread Pizza. The Mayor's Flatbread Pizza.

2:04:28Speaker 15

Love it. Thank you, Jim. That's awesome, man. Congratulations to everybody working together.

2:04:33Speaker 9

I bet you're glad to get done with this as I am too.

2:04:36 – 2:04:51Speaker 15

And something I didn't know, actually, that restaurant that they stay open sometimes past 1 o'clock, the Crust and Crumb over there. Yes. That's an amazing pizza place. Yeah, they got good pizza. And a new pizza place too. Good pizza, good people. Great restaurants downtown. Thank you, sir. Thank you.

2:04:52Speaker 10

If you ever want to sponsor a council, I'm joking.

2:04:59 – 2:05:17Speaker 15

Attorney, I'm not. That's a joke. All right. Any other comments on this item? All right. Council? Motion to approve. Second. Motion approved. Council Member Fletcher. Second. Council Member Urban. Will the clerk please call the roll?

2:05:18Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert?

2:05:19Speaker 22

Council Member Fletcher? Aye. Council Member Paul? Aye. Council Member Urban? Aye. Mayor Robertson? Aye. Motion carries 5-0.

2:05:25Speaker 15

That was easy.

2:05:30 – 2:05:44Speaker 6

Mayor, can I ask for direction on the other part of the recommendation from the group that we met with, which was regarding food trucks in the entertainment district, the language that Mr. Ball

2:05:45 – 2:06:04Speaker 15

I would like to talk to businesses around the restaurants and get a better understanding. So, yeah, maybe give some time to... I don't want to just do piecemeal things, maybe make it part of a bigger... Because we may want to say there's... Write it in that code for special events with food trucks.

2:06:07Speaker 6

So if Council wants to give us direction, we can write that code and bring it back to you, and that's when you would have the opportunity to have the businesses.

2:06:14 – 2:06:25Speaker 15

Well, we don't know what it looks like yet. I mean, I can't give you input on that yet. I think we need to talk to the citizens or the business owners, the restaurants, and find that out.

2:06:25Speaker 6

So staff's on hold until you come back and tell us to do it?

2:06:27Speaker 15

I mean, I don't think that's a major thing right now, is it?

2:06:31Speaker 6

It was a pretty big deal.

2:06:32Speaker 15

Yeah, Jim, come on up.

2:06:33Speaker 6

It was a pretty big deal in the meeting. Yeah.

2:06:42 – 2:07:00Speaker 9

It was kind of a big deal in the meeting about the food truck. And it wasn't so we can have food trucks all up and down the streets. We were looking at being able to have a food truck that's within the business. You know exactly where I'm talking about to have a food truck there.

2:07:00Speaker 15

Is it just for one person? Is that where it's coming from?

2:07:04 – 2:07:20Speaker 9

Yeah, but it was kind of an agreement that... we would look into this to being able to let garage bar have a food truck in the back like it, like it always used to. There's really no logical reason it can't. It's enclosed.

2:07:20Speaker 15

That was to make him happy. Okay.

2:07:22Speaker 9

I understand it. It is. And also like there's another business that wanted to have a food truck. They have an enclosed back area. Um, none of us saw a problem with that as business owners.

2:07:33 – 2:07:47Speaker 15

Um, does that include, so any alleyway, What is enclosed? I mean, we're going to find a lot of the trucks backed into these. I mean, there's going to be a bunch of them, I think.

2:07:47Speaker 6

Well, so that's why we said that we could support it not being visible from a main road. So the first person request, can we say the business?

2:07:57Speaker 5

Is there an issue saying the business?

2:07:58 – 2:08:47Speaker 6

You already said it. okay garage bar garage bar he's already he's his back area is walled in so that's why we said enclosed um but then we also said not visible from a named street so that way he may have to screen it with some type of tall landscaping so that you can't see it from like new york because the point was for it to be ancillary to the primary use of an existing business his existing primary business is a is a bar and the ancillary use was going to be the food truck to support the people that were already, and yes, he might have a few people come in to choose the food truck, but the, I think the intent was that the people that were already at his establishment would be able to use the food truck. And the other, the other location that's interested, um, as I understand it is, um, the black squirrel. Um, and they would also have to find a way to screen it and enclose it.

2:08:48Speaker 15

Um, okay. Uh, deputy mayor.

2:08:51 – 2:10:58Speaker 11

Yeah, I, uh, thank you mayor. Uh, and thank you, uh, city manager. hard to describe this, but I've been to areas that food trucks have taken over and a hurt brick and mortar and just threw out picnic tables and games on and parties on and people would bring in alcohol by themselves and things like that. So I think this really needs a better look at it. An enclosed area, we mentioned the garage part, that makes sense. It's a walled-in cemented area. It's part of their infrastructure that they can do. It's not advertised outside that. I want to protect their brick and mortar. so they're not setting up food trucks. But there are some ideas, and this is, again, a gray area, Mayor and City Council, that there could be some temporary food trucks that want to move into brick and mortar that want their start. So, you know, we want to encourage businesses to come down here to do restaurants, but they could be temporary food trucks to... establish full-time brick-and-mortar restaurants. So I think it needs more than just one look at it, but I do agree with the garage bar being that there's a wall there and they could do that, but I really would like the council to consider. We don't want to become a food truck city. Not mentioning, but there's places on OBT that they just go in unpermitted and they get there at 10 or 11, and they're until 4 o'clock in the morning with hundreds of people playing music and eating, and it's not controllable for the police department in those areas. So I understand it, but I would like us to consider as council just what establishments and what needs to be done in a food truck or a temporary food truck. Renovations, of course. If you need to renovate, we don't want to stop your business. We don't want to have you lose any money as you're upgrading your business to provide to the citizens of St. Cloud a great experience, and even better if that kitchen would do that in expansion. But I just don't want to look at temporary folks come in here to take business away of our brick-and-mortar established businesses.

2:10:58Speaker 9

MR. We don't want that either.

2:10:59 – 2:11:21Speaker 11

CHAIRMAN BRYANT L. Okay. And I just wanted to put that on record, sir, and I don't know, but I just wanted to put that on record. A lot of things we have to put on record, so as we move forward, but I'd like to do this under a separate record. umbrella, if we could, city manager and attorney. So we have specific requirements for food trucks in the city of St. Cloud. I yield back to you, but those are things I've seen from the outside looking in at different establishments. Thank you, Mayor.

2:11:21 – 2:11:54Speaker 15

And that was my concern, and it's not that I'm opposed to that one particular one. Obviously, it's fully enclosed. It's been there before. I've eaten at that food truck when you had it there. It's not that I'm opposed to that. It's when we're talking about putting it into the code and leaving it so loose that we just need to look at it. Cause I can see with these alleys, let's just say somebody owns a whole block. You can stack about 12 of them in there and just, all you gotta do is shield the sides. And all of a sudden you got a whole row of them city manager.

2:11:54Speaker 6

So that's why it says it had to be in conjunction with an existing business, so that wasn't happening. And really, if you give staff direction...

2:12:02Speaker 15

If there's a business in there, then they can do it. I mean, what does that mean?

2:12:06Speaker 6

You're not just going to... I guess I see what you're saying.

2:12:10Speaker 15

How do you say one business can do it and one can't?

2:12:13 – 2:13:06Speaker 6

I can say within 24 hours, sell a real estate in one building and have a food truck. To be clear, what we're asking for is direction to come back with a proposed ordinance. We have food trucks already in our code. We have a conditional use process. We have amenities that we already require. when you're putting in a food truck. This was just the additional points that we were seeing within the entertainment district. But again, it would require two public hearings. It would be going to the Planning Commission meeting, DRC meeting. We're not just... approving anything tonight. I'm just looking for direction. Does council want to consider this? Staff can start working on something and bring it back. If you don't want to consider it, that's great. Just let us know.

2:13:06Speaker 15

Well, no, that's where we're talking out loud. That's where we're talking out loud.

2:13:10Speaker 6

I mean, if you want, so from my direction, I just need direction that is staff's on hold until you as council bring it up.

2:13:18Speaker 15

Let us keep talking about this, and we'll give you direction one way or the other. Council Member Fletcher, we still have lights lit on here.

2:13:24 – 2:15:00Speaker 7

Thank you, Mayor. I think we actually might be headed in a good direction with this based on the conversations that you guys had. I wasn't there. You know, I've heard some things and whatnot. So the CRA, I mean, this is obviously we can't talk about, I mean, the purview. This isn't under the purview of the CRA, but the alleyway improvement project that we put on hold through the CRA program because we basically funded the parking garage and whatnot. I would recommend that we would let staff go and create something, like give us a basis. And then how we normally do, we just rip it apart as soon as they give it to us. I apologize. But you're going to have setback requirements. You're going to have facade requirements. You're going to have fence requirements. You're going to have access requirements, fire department requirements. So there could be a potential to improve some of those alleyway areas through private investment on a limited basis. So like, I mean, I wouldn't see I mean, you do have to keep it from, like, all right, do you want every real estate office to have a food truck? I would say no. I mean, if you're already serving some type of food, have a liquor license, there's all kinds of different stuff. But I do think it would help with some of that, enhancing some of that alleyway to make it look better. So I would be in favor of staff taking a look at it and then bringing it back. I wouldn't say, oh, just wait for a sec. That's my thoughts. So you got it.

2:15:02 – 2:15:15Speaker 6

I think I saw two, oh, I saw three nods. Yeah, they are. Okay, so we are, we're going to bring you back a food truck ordinance. It will not look just like this, and we'll have opportunity for more discussion at that time. Thank you.

2:15:16Speaker 15

Thank you, Jim. Appreciate you guys. All right, we have not voted on this yet, right?

2:15:20Speaker 10

That's correct.

2:15:20Speaker 15

All right. Anyone else in the audience like to speak on this item?

2:15:24Speaker 6

Yeah, they did. I waited until after the vote. Oh, to talk about that? Yeah, I waited until after the vote.

2:15:30Speaker 10

Oh, let's talk about food made me hungry.

2:15:32 – 2:15:45Speaker 15

Yeah, but I'm here. All right, moving on. All right, will the clerk please read item number, are we at number five? Five. We left that one on, right?

2:15:47 – 2:16:21Speaker 22

Final public hearing for ordinance number 2026-35. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, providing a zoning amendment, a zoning map, with a land development code of the City of St. Cloud, Florida, specifically changing the zoning designation of approximately plus minus 5.01 acres, identified as MG3 Old Canoe, LLC Project ZMA 26-00005 from R3 Multifamily to NB Neighborhood Business, generally located north of Nolte Road, east of Old Canoe Creek Road, south of King Oak Circle, west of Pine Chase Circle, providing for entering the designation of the official zoning map, funding the Planning Commission's recommendations, proof of publication, durability, and effect.

2:16:23 – 2:18:16Speaker 12

Good evening, Council. This project is MG3 Old Canuck LLC. This is DRC case ZMA 26-0005, Ordinance 2026-35. This is a zoning map amendment. The current future land use is commercial. The existing zoning is R3, which is a multifamily dwelling zoning district. The proposed zoning is neighborhood business. And B, development would be compatible with the surrounding area. There's no adverse impacts on city facilities. The approximate acreage of the property is 5.01 acres. Just a sample of the permitted uses allowed in neighborhood business, public, private schools, which if you're familiar with the area, there is one to the north of the property, artists and photographic studios, restaurants, barber and beauty shops, professional and government offices, convenience stores without gas pumps, and various general retail stores. Conditional uses that would require public hearing, would be adult daycare, childcare facilities, convenience stores with gasoline pumps, dance studios, gymnastics, residential uses, and utility buildings with facilities. So this is the future land use map of the property. It is designated as commercial. The current zoning is R3, which you can tell by the brown color. Staff recommendation is approval of ordinance 2026-35. Planning Commission recommendation was approval of ordinance 2026-35. Staff is requesting City Council approval of ordinance 2026-35. I'll be happy to answer any questions that you might have.

2:18:16Speaker 15

Thank you, Jeff. Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item? The applicant?

2:18:24Speaker 14

Good evening, counsel. I'm Chris McNeil on behalf of the applicant, and I'm here to answer any questions.

2:18:29 – 2:18:50Speaker 15

I thought Steph did a great job explaining the case, and I'm just here to answer any questions you have. Appreciate it. Yes, sir. Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item? All right. I'd like to be the first to say that any time residential wants to change their use to commercial, I'm 100% in favor of that. So thank you for doing that. Obviously, that increased our tax base.

2:18:51Speaker 11

If I may, Mayor, can we have approval on 2026-35, a motion to approve it?

2:18:57Speaker 15

We have a motion to approve. Deputy Mayor Gilbert, second. Council Member Urban, will the clerk please call the roll?

2:19:03Speaker 22

Council Member Fletcher?

2:19:05Speaker 22

Council Member Paul? Aye. Council Member Urban?

2:19:08Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert? Aye. Mayor Robertson?

2:19:10Speaker 22

Motion carries 5-0.

2:19:13Speaker 11

Sir, thank you for staying here and watching our council meeting. I know that's exciting. You might have missed reach or something like that, but this is much more than that TV program.

2:19:23Speaker 15

Thank you, sir All right, well the court please read item number seven

2:19:29 – 2:19:55Speaker 22

Public hearing for resolution number 2026-097R, a resolution of the City Council of City of St. Cloud, Florida, granting conditional use for clairvoyant use in the highway business HB zoning districts on plus minus 1.69 acres, known as divine guidance. Project CNU 26-00002, located at 213th Street, Suite 8, allowing the applicant to provide palm and card reading services, as described in the body of this resolution.

2:19:56 – 2:21:54Speaker 12

Good evening, once again, Geoffrey Ball, Community Development Director. The application is conditional use for divine guidance, DRC case CNU 26-0002, resolution 2026-097R. This is a request of approval of a conditional use for a clairvoyant fortune teller. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. The applicant is requesting a conditional use approval for clairvoyant fortune teller services in the highway business zoning district. There are no structural changes to the site at this time. The applicant is to operate in an existing suite with an existing structure with limited client visitation on site. So this is the current land use designation as commercial. the current zoning district of Highway Business, just on the north side of 8th Street. So staff recommendation is approval with conditions. First condition of approval is the approval of the request of conditional use does not constitute approval of any on-site changes or improvements to the site. Changes to the site will require approval of a site development plan, and any additional approval is required by the Land Development Code. This approval is for clairvoyant services, divine guidance, and is only valid only while the initial certificate of use remains active. If the certificate of use expires or the business changes ownership, the new operator must apply for a conditional use permit to continue operating. Uh, this was heard at the, uh, August 18th planning commission with a recommendation of approval. Staff is requesting city council approval of resolution 2026-097R. Staff is available for any questions that you might have. Thank you.

2:21:55 – 2:22:08Speaker 15

Thank you, Jeffrey. Uh, would the applicant like to speak on this item? Yes, ma'am. Yeah, please. You gotta come to the microphone. Can we get your name and address for the record, please?

2:22:09Speaker 15

Your name and address for the record, please.

2:22:10Speaker 13

Oh, Michelle Miller, 213th Street, St. Cloud.

2:22:16 – 2:22:38Speaker 13

I just wanted to explain that it's mostly online and phone. What I do, I counsel people. I do do the palmistry, and it's just basically counseling. But it's mostly phone. And I would like to have this as an opportunity to do my business here.

2:22:38Speaker 15

Okay. So you do have walk-in traffic? Is it advertised? Yes. As walk-in traffic?

2:22:43 – 2:22:55Speaker 13

Yes. I would be having some, maybe, could be four to eight people in a month would be coming in on average. Yeah.

2:22:56Speaker 15

Okay. All right. Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item? Any council comment from the applicant?

2:23:04Speaker 11

I would just like to ask for parking if there is going to be drive-up.

2:23:07Speaker 15

Yeah, is it in that building? Yes. There's only one building on that property, or is there a house, another structure?

2:23:17Speaker 12

There's one building.

2:23:18Speaker 14

It's only one building.

2:23:19Speaker 15

Okay. I know it's a big piece property there, larger than this. Okay. And there's ample parking for that one business?

2:23:27Speaker 6

I mean, there is parking out front. I've never seen all the parking full. Okay.

2:23:40Speaker 15

Okay. Still had to phone her then. Okay. What is the, the advertising look like? I mean, it's a conditional use.

2:23:46Speaker 13

So what is the, um, well, what I would be doing is Google.

2:23:52Speaker 15

No, I mean like on the, like on the windows, the doors.

2:23:54 – 2:24:20Speaker 13

Oh, I'll have a signage. What the city of St. Cloud allows me, um, to be outside the building. Just saying, you know, my business, it'll be name or yeah, it'll be my business name and, maybe what I do. I haven't figured that part fully out yet, but yeah. It'll be a sign outside the building up in the corner is what me and the owner were planning.

2:24:21Speaker 15

Okay. No, like neon lights? No. Okay. And that's kind of what we want to... I wouldn't say... We want to discourage that kind of signage, right?

2:24:32Speaker 6

The neon lights along the highway and... You can condition no electronic variable message boards. You could condition no neon lights...

2:24:42Speaker 13

Can I do a solar light? Like for nighttime? I don't know what that looks like.

2:24:49 – 2:25:23Speaker 10

Well, from a signage perspective and what you typically see in conditional use firms, there's two types of signage. There's backlit signage, which basically puts off more of an obtrusive, for lack of a better expression. And then there's a light, a sign that has a light, like a spotlight on it, like an overhang light that comes on it. So if you could condition this on not having a lighted sign at all, or you could limit it to a non-backlit light if you wanted to do that. What are the hours of operation?

2:25:23 – 2:25:35Speaker 13

I need a little idea. The hours would be Monday through Saturday, 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Till 9 p.m. Yeah.

2:25:35 – 2:25:46Speaker 15

Yeah, and that's what I'm trying to not... I wouldn't like to see it like an entertainment area. Yeah. Of novelty entertainment. Yeah. I'm not saying that that's what that is. No, I understand.

2:25:46Speaker 13

You know what I'm... To bring a large crowd or congestion. No, I understand.

2:25:53 – 2:26:23Speaker 13

It doesn't usually. It's mostly... It does bring people, but they usually call in for phone services, like they'll get a reading or a session over the phone. Sometimes they'll call, but it's mostly by appointment, and I do do more phone. So I need the signage, though, and a business place in order to advertise on Google. Google won't allow me to advertise unless I have an office with signage. for this type of business.

2:26:24 – 2:26:42Speaker 12

Mayor, if I may. Yeah. So, any sign permit that, or any new sign that the applicant would like to construct would have to meet the land development code requirements for signage. Neon colors are not allowed per our current regulations. Okay. Deputy Mayor.

2:26:43 – 2:28:02Speaker 11

I would not discourage any business, but I would recommend if the council would consider front lighting only, not back. This way, the front lighting goes onto the facility itself versus projecting onto the streets or somewhere that. But that's what I would say. The front lighting, usually you'll have a marquee, and you'll have a spotlight spotting that light, directing it towards the facility itself. Backlighting usually projects onto the public venues. So it's on the building? Well, if you have it in the front yard and you have a, a spotlight hitting that it will go on to the building. If you have backlit, it goes on to the streets and the public facilities such as that. So that was the only thing I'd ask council to consider a front lighting that that's lit from the front and usually that's a spotlight or, or some kind of a solar lighting or whatever. Yeah. Just some front lighting backlighting is usually a backlit that, usually illuminates through a plexiglass or something like that that projects onto the public area. I'd like that lighting to be projected onto the facility itself. But 9 o'clock is a pretty good lighting area where that could be shut off at that time, not to disturb any of the other businesses around it. I would just suggest that if we are to put that in part of the approval process. Council, I know we don't get to talk much, but that's the difference between backlighting and frontlighting. I yield back to you, Mayor. Thank you.

2:28:04Speaker 15

Dan, is this the first of this type of business to come into the city? Have you seen this before? I think it's pretty interesting.

2:28:14Speaker 10

As far as I can remember, yes, sir.

2:28:17Speaker 11

Mayor, have you ever been to Talladega?

2:28:19Speaker 15

I have never. Talladega? What's that place?

2:28:22Speaker 11

Cassadega. Cassadega. I've never been. No, I haven't. I'm sorry. Have you? Some Dega. Yeah.

2:28:27Speaker 10

So if you do, some Dega.

2:28:28Speaker 11

No, I don't. There are people I know. Yeah.

2:28:30 – 2:28:48Speaker 10

So this is a conditional use permit, and you can impose reasonable conditions on it. So if a condition related to the signage is, as Deputy Mayor pointed, you would like it to be frontlit or at least not backlit, and if you'd like the lighting to be shut off at a particular time, you can include that in the condition, meaning the lighted sign.

2:28:48Speaker 15

Yeah, and mine, I like the idea of that, obviously. And you said it had, like, your business name, Divine...

2:28:55Speaker 13

Yes, Divine Guidance of the Art of Palmistry. Yeah, palm and card reading.

2:29:01Speaker 15

But no, like, pictures or anything, right? Because that's what I, it's the...

2:29:07Speaker 13

You don't want, well, I was, he may be able to put a logo, but if I'm, I would rather just the names of what you're doing.

2:29:13Speaker 15

And that's kind of, okay.

2:29:15Speaker 13

Cause I did want to put a logo, but right.

2:29:17 – 2:29:36Speaker 15

But okay. That's the, that's the, that's just my view on the condition where it's that you're, you're talking about changing the identity of that area when you start putting that type of stuff and that impacts your neighbors. And that's my concern is it's the, the neighbors. That's fine. But I do believe in a business being able to advertise.

2:29:36Speaker 15

Here's my business. Here's what I do.

2:29:39Speaker 13

Yes, that's fine.

2:29:40Speaker 15

Is that... What are y'all's thoughts on this? This is a condition.

2:29:45Speaker 10

This is something... Yeah, you got to formulate it for us.

2:29:47Speaker 15

Yeah. We have to come up with the...

2:29:51 – 2:30:09Speaker 7

CHRIS RODGERS. GO AHEAD. COUNCILMEMBER FLEISCHER. YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON, RIGHT? SO THE SIGN REGULATIONS, AND OBVIOUSLY I LOVE WORKING WITH EVERYBODY UP HERE, WHAT MAKES IT A DIFFERENT BUSINESS THAN ANOTHER BUSINESS, RIGHT?

2:30:10Speaker 15

BECAUSE IT'S A CONDITION.

2:30:11 – 2:30:46Speaker 7

WELL, IT'S A CONDITION. WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO IT. WE DO, RIGHT. SO MY THING IS, IT'S AN OFFICE THAT SOMEBODY GOES AND MEETS WITH SOMEBODY what makes it, like, I mean, we already have sign regulations in our code. I don't think, because I believe our sign regulations in our code are actually pretty strict for what we have. Years ago, the council really put some heavy restrictions on signage. I don't think what we have in the code would be necessarily, you know, devastating to that particular area with what we have, but those are my comments.

2:30:47 – 2:31:03Speaker 15

And that is really the shape and the type of sign. But it's the imagery. That was my concern, is the imagery can change an area, right? And that's what I was asking, what is that? Yes. Is there going to be a big old palm on the window?

2:31:06Speaker 13

I don't know. I've never been to one, so I don't know what.

2:31:08Speaker 15

Yeah, I understand what you're saying. It's a novelty entertainment thing, right? Yes, I got you. Is it entertainment? I don't know what the proper term is.

2:31:15 – 2:31:34Speaker 13

No, it is. Some people come for entertainment, but it's mainly just to counsel people, to advise them. I'm intuitive, but I use the angel cards and I use the palmistry to tell them what I'm picking up. But mainly it turns into a counseling session. I've been doing it for so many years.

2:31:35Speaker 15

And I'm not opposed to the business itself. What is that look?

2:31:41Speaker 13

For the sign? I should have brought some sketches.

2:31:43 – 2:31:54Speaker 15

Yeah, and that's really what the look is. It really starts changing the identity of an area when you start changing the outside. What you do inside, people won't know unless they go to get their palm read.

2:31:54Speaker 13

No, I understand. Let me see if I have. I might have something.

2:32:00Speaker 15

Ken may be your first customer. Okay.

2:32:05Speaker 13

There was images.

2:32:07Speaker 15

He's going to end up in Talladega. May I show you?

2:32:12Speaker 10

May I show you?

2:32:13 – 2:32:28Speaker 10

Hold on one second, ma'am. Before she tries to show you anything, we need to make sure we can get a copy of it. Okay. Because we have to keep it for the record. So email it? I don't know how you want to address this, if she wants to show you something on her phone, unless she wants to give you the phone.

2:32:28 – 2:32:47Speaker 13

Okay, this is like an image of... Well, I was going to show you some of the things we were going to think about doing, but I could remove the image if you don't agree. Like, just to give you an idea, or... Yeah, and I wish we had that included in our... I didn't have it. I should have. Yeah, go ahead.

2:32:47Speaker 15

Can you put it on the screen? Is that able?

2:32:48Speaker 13

That's what Dan's saying. Can I?

2:32:52 – 2:33:03Speaker 10

If she could email the images to somebody so we can get them, then that's good. I just want to make sure we do that before she shows it to you. Or at least we have a method to do that because the clerk has to get a copy of whatever she shows.

2:33:06Speaker 15

Okay, so... Can you show her on that and you can email it?

2:33:10Speaker 10

She can email it after. She can email it to the clerk right now or after. I'm okay with after doing it.

2:33:15Speaker 15

Ma'am, can you also email that image to the city clerk?

2:33:18Speaker 20

Okay, can you...

2:33:21Speaker 15

And because it's a conditional use, that's where it, more information the better because that's the.

2:33:26 – 2:34:15Speaker 13

Okay. Let me, I'd have to get, I'm sorry, I have to kind of edit them or just send them. Okay, hold on. These do have the images, but I can, hold on. or just to get an idea, email. It's not letting me email, hold on. They're not in my email, they're text messages. If I can, I know what to do.

2:34:19Speaker 1

I can take this.

2:34:20Speaker 10

Can you describe it? Well, maybe, ma'am, do you have an image you can pull up and show it to me real quick?

2:34:27Speaker 13

I think I can do it.

2:34:28Speaker 15

Dan knows how to describe things for us. I'm just going to take a picture of it. Okay.

2:34:32Speaker 13

You want me to just show it to you? Let me see if I can do it real quick through here and then.

2:34:38Speaker 11

Just bring it to the attorney. He'll take care of it. He's sharp.

2:34:41Speaker 15

Well, and that's.

2:34:41Speaker 13

Or if you want to swipe to the next.

2:34:59Speaker 15

And the fact that it's a conditional use is that... All right, you can put it up.

2:35:04Speaker 10

I have copies, so you can put it on the screen, and we'll be able to have some for the record. Yeah.

2:35:24Speaker 15

Oh, that's nothing. Some cards?

2:35:28 – 2:35:44Speaker 13

And then there's another image. I wasn't sure. So those are the different things I was thinking on.

2:35:48Speaker 15

Okay, how big is this sign?

2:35:50Speaker 13

I was told I'm allowed five foot by two, if I'm not mistaken.

2:35:56Speaker 15

Okay, and you're just one or the other?

2:35:58Speaker 13

One or the other, something similar to that. Yeah.

2:36:03Speaker 13

One or the other, yeah.

2:36:04Speaker 15

When we say something similar, so this is a conditional use, so this is how we give the approval. That's all part of a conditional use.

2:36:10Speaker 10

The size of the sign would be driven by the sign code and what's available on the bill.

2:36:17Speaker 15

I was just wanting a visual of what that size is. How big is this image?

2:36:24Speaker 13

Five by two, they told me. I don't know. I didn't go through it all yet.

2:36:29Speaker 11

Can you put that back up, please?

2:36:34Speaker 15

And what is that? That's just some, what do they call them, tarot cards? I've never, it's stuff I don't know.

2:36:41Speaker 13

I would do more the cards, not that one, the other image. That's more what I'd like to do.

2:36:51Speaker 15

I'm okay with that. You okay with that?

2:36:55Speaker 7

Because it's just going to be right next to another sign. It's just going to blend in.

2:36:58Speaker 15

It'll blend right in. Yeah. What I was thinking was, like, on the window, you're not putting a huge hand in.

2:37:04Speaker 15

Because I just see that in Kissimmee.

2:37:06Speaker 15

Nothing wrong with Kissimmee. I love Kissimmee folks. And it's like tactical. That's my image, you know, that I'm trying not to have. No, I understand. And it's not the business.

2:37:17Speaker 15

It's what's allowed, what's been allowed in the past in other areas. I agree. I agree. There's a way to do it, and I think you've done it the right way with this sign.

2:37:25Speaker 13

Yes, I just like it classy, you know, to the point, and yeah.

2:37:29Speaker 15

And you speak Spanish as well?

2:37:32Speaker 15

All right, if we can make that as a condition on that, you're good with that sign?

2:37:37Speaker 13

Okay, I'm good. I like it. I like it.

2:37:42Speaker 15

All right, we got a motion to approve with that condition of that sign. There's two other conditions.

2:37:46 – 2:38:00Speaker 10

Yeah, and the other conditions that staff recommended. Okay. Yeah, the ones that has the part, and the other two from the staff presentation, right? That would be included in the motion.

2:38:00Speaker 15

Yes, for those conditions approval. Yeah.

2:38:07Speaker 14

And it's for this company.

2:38:08Speaker 15

That's for the condition. And that's most, right? Correct.

2:38:12Speaker 7

Motion to approve with the conditions set forth by staff and the sign that was showed on the overhead projector as part of the record.

2:38:19Speaker 15

We have a motion from Council Member Fletcher.

2:38:23Speaker 10

Yeah, we need to get public input.

2:38:25Speaker 15

Oh, yeah. I'm so sorry. Anyone from the audience like to speak on this item? I think we have Teresa.

2:38:32Speaker 2

I'd like to speak on this item. I love your hair. Okay, thank you.

2:38:39Speaker 15

Oh, yeah. She needs to, ma'am. She's got the podium.

2:38:42 – 2:40:16Speaker 2

Teresa Malhot, 2924 Colbury Circle. I will speak on this business because, you know, they kind of have a negative... image around this, and not just lately, but on financial exploitation of people. They bring them in for maybe a $10 reading, like, and then she says she gets phone calls, and then it grows and grows and grows, the money. Psychological manipulation, widespread lack of scientific validity, So is this going to be, if it's a business, are there any regulations or consumer protections if it's a business? Like most businesses do have to follow certain rules and laws, or is it purely going to be like an arcade? You're going to list it like an arcade or something where it's just... entertainment, but not, you know. I just think there's a lack of regulations over these kind of businesses. And I'm sure if you Google, you're going to find a lot of different things around the country that have happened with some of these businesses. And I'm not saying she is. I don't know her. I don't know her business. I'm just saying... Do you know how this is going to go tonight?

2:40:16Speaker 15

Teresa, you have to address that. Oh, okay. But she should already know.

2:40:21 – 2:41:33Speaker 2

We can ask the questions that you asked as well. I just think as a business, it lacks consumer protections. There's no protections. People have been taken financially. It's sometimes for hundreds of thousands of dollars. I'm not joking. I'm not exaggerating. You can find out for yourself if you dig into this topic. So, you know, it's up to you all. I mean, but I'm just saying a business like this, is this the way St. Cloud's going to go then, like, toward these things? I mean, I just think the citizens deserve some protections and the lack of regulations. All businesses usually have regulations they need to follow, whether it's a bar, a restaurant, or a hairdressing salon, or even retail. I mean, so I just wanted to put that in your office thoughts, too, before you voted.

2:41:33Speaker 15

Yes, ma'am. Thank you, Teresa. Dan, the applicant said that it's consulting. I'm sorry. Counseling.

2:41:43Speaker 10

She used the word counseling.

2:41:44Speaker 15

Counseling. And that was something that stuck in my head is if it's counseling, that's a regulated industry. That's correct.

2:41:52 – 2:42:25Speaker 10

But I don't – I'm not sure she intended to say counseling in the sense that we think of – by, you know, health care professionals or... So I'm not sure that's what she was referring to. But there... And I'm not as familiar with this as you are, but there are, of course, regulatory issues out there, and there are laws that prohibit fraud, especially fraud on the elderly and financial stuff. All that is all in place, regardless of whether... this business does business here in St. Clair.

2:42:25Speaker 15

Dan's been here 28 years, so this is the first we've had this. So this is a new one, right? Yes, sir.

2:42:31 – 2:42:49Speaker 13

No, I know, but it's not, I understand, but there's bad and good in every business. I've heard of doctors that have hurt people. It's discriminating to accuse me of something. I've been doing this. I have this business in Philadelphia.

2:42:49 – 2:43:10Speaker 15

Nobody's accusing. Yeah. No, no, we're not. Nobody's gone down these allegations. No, no, nobody's allegating anything. Um, hold on Teresa. So I think we need to understand, is it entertainment or is it counseling? Well, I think when you, when you blend the two that, that I think that's where the concerns come in and not accusations, but there's concerns with that.

2:43:11 – 2:43:43Speaker 13

Well, I mean, it ends up sometimes people come in for fun with a bunch of friends just to kind of get a feel of things. Sometimes people really come concerned, you know, wanting questions about their life decisions. So that's where it becomes counseling, because if I'm feeling something and then we'll talk about it. And I advise people, you know, with just from what the cards and palm is saying. So it's it can be both. It depends on the person coming.

2:43:44Speaker 15

All right. Deputy Mayor. Yeah.

2:43:52Speaker 11

If you go to a restaurant and you order a beer and you drink 12, is it the restaurant's problem or is it your problem?

2:44:00Speaker 15

Well, some would say it's the restaurant. There's dram shop laws.

2:44:03Speaker 10

You don't want to open that door.

2:44:05Speaker 11

Different analogy.

2:44:07 – 2:44:29Speaker 11

I understand what you're saying. User beware. Ms. Leo or whatever her name was, Cleo. I just don't know, and again, this is not my bailiwick. I would not do this because of my beliefs, but that's something I wouldn't do, but I don't know how you regulate on this council business. I don't have that answer.

2:44:30Speaker 15

Well, that's why it's a condition.

2:44:31Speaker 11

Yeah. So that is how we... Again, I don't have that answer. I just...

2:44:35 – 2:45:08Speaker 10

I don't know how you regulate that. It's regulated federally, I think. Well, no, you're doing it. This is a zoning-related regulation. This isn't a regulatory relation with regard to the practice, anything associated. So please focus on that. As I said, there are different provisions in the state statute that every business has to be compliant with, not just this woman's business, but other businesses, especially how they deal with their customers and stuff. That's already in there already, so just focus on the use issue.

2:45:08 – 2:45:22Speaker 11

I got one more. My wife goes to beauty salon to get cut and color. Next thing you know, it's cut and color and she gets her eyebrows done. I just, I don't, I'm sorry.

2:45:22Speaker 15

No, you're right. Council Member Paul.

2:45:27Speaker 13

How long have you been in business? I started this business in 1990. Okay.

2:45:35Speaker 4

Is this your first location?

2:45:36 – 2:45:47Speaker 13

Actual location in St cloud or Osceola County or, um, that I've had a license. Yes. This is the first in Florida. Okay. Yes. All right.

2:45:48Speaker 15

This is a license. Is it like under DVPR is a clairvoyant?

2:45:53 – 2:46:12Speaker 13

Um, I have an LLC for that. Um, I do have a permit of use in Philadelphia. I am going to go, I think, to the Florida State to get to cover my license through Florida State. But I didn't get to all of that yet. Okay.

2:46:12Speaker 15

There's nothing. I don't think there's anything under DBPR for this. I'm not sure.

2:46:16Speaker 10

I'm not sure. There may be.

2:46:18Speaker 15

You know, they do, like, nails and real estate. Yeah. All kinds of other things. Okay.

2:46:24Speaker 13

I don't think that's required for what I do. No, and that's... Yeah. I don't know.

2:46:29 – 2:46:46Speaker 15

But I think... To Teresa's point, I do understand what she's saying, is that if people go in there, do they have the full understanding, is this entertainment or is this, well, divine? Like, is this the, you know?

2:46:49 – 2:47:12Speaker 13

Well, it depends. They know that they're coming in for a reading and then they can, you know, they go from there. Some are just coming, like I said, for fun. And then some really, I have many clients that come for many years, old clients that keep getting readings that I've had for years. So it just depends, you know, it's different.

2:47:12Speaker 15

I've led a sheltered life, so I don't understand this.

2:47:16 – 2:47:33Speaker 13

But I, yeah, I do care about the people I work with. I, you know, I help advise them the best that I can. And I've never had a problem or complaint or anything of that nature. with working with people. But, you know.

2:47:34Speaker 15

Okay. Is it per the hour? Is that how this... Usually, no.

2:47:38 – 2:48:00Speaker 13

It's not per hour. It'll usually be per session. Yeah. Like, I'll charge $65 for some of the card readings. With the card and POM, it would be $120. So, you know, I give a little bit right there. And, yeah. And for the POM alone, sometimes it's just $50. Yes.

2:48:00Speaker 15

Okay. Council Member Urban.

2:48:03 – 2:48:26Speaker 3

Yeah, I mean, kind of like what Deputy Mayor was saying, the cool thing about America is you can, there's a lot of different businesses. You can choose to patronize a business or not based on what you believe and what you want to support. So as the city attorney said, this is pretty much a zoning matter. So I would go ahead and second Council Member Fletcher's motion.

2:48:28 – 2:48:46Speaker 15

That's with the three conditions, the two from staff and the one about the sign. All right. We have a motion from Council Member Fletcher, second from Council Member Urban. Will the clerk please call the roll? Oh, did you have something to say? Oh, you already talked. Yes. I just remembered you had your light and you did speak. City Clerk.

2:48:47Speaker 22

Council Member Paul.

2:48:49Speaker 22

Council Member Urban.

2:48:50Speaker 22

Deputy Mayor Gilbert.

2:48:52Speaker 22

Council Member Fletcher.

2:48:53Speaker 22

Mayor Robertson. Aye. Motion carries 5-0.

2:48:57Speaker 11

Did you know that coming in?

2:49:01Speaker 13

We knew that joke was coming. We knew that joke was coming from him.

2:49:06Speaker 1

Thank you all. Yes, ma'am.

2:49:08Speaker 1

Again, that was a joke.

2:49:09 – 2:49:38Speaker 15

Thank you for hanging in there with all the questions. All right, on to council action. Next up, the main event we've all been waiting for all night, our police chief, Gerke.

2:49:41 – 2:52:20Speaker 18

Good evening, council. Doug Gerke, police chief. We're going to be going over the school safety zone program. It is mandatory that we report to you the findings and the actual activity that we had for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. This is required by statute that we do a presentation. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle requires this report to be sent to them no later than October 1st. So it's interesting that we seem to be the first one reporting on this to have it done in the right time frame. As you know, we do have a program in place. The cameras were deactivated or we're not actively enforcing the data right now as of November 8th, 2025. We do have cameras set up. Throughout the city in our school zones at St. Cloud High School, St. Cloud Middle School, Michigan Avenue Elementary School, Canoe Creek K-8, St. Cloud Elementary School, and Lakeview Elementary. Again, the violation activity is running from July 1st through June 30th. So again, it was a short period of time from when school started on Monday, August 11th through November 8th when they were stopped. But even in that time frame, that short time frame, we had 7,207 violations issued. Now, as a reminder, these are vehicles that are exceeding the speed limit by 11 miles an hour over the posted speed limit, whether it be during the beacon times when they come down to 15 miles an hour or during the posted speed limits during school times. So 11 miles an hour over the speed limit would trigger something like this that would generate a violation. There was 32 of those violations were contested. Eight of them were upheld with zero dismissed. Now, that is at the magistrate level. 405 of these citations were not paid, so they moved into a uniform traffic citation, and they're in various stages of moving through the process right now at the courthouse. There were 5,325 violations paid at the time of this report. So as a reminder how these are broken down, $20 goes to the Florida Department of Revenue's general fund. $60 comes to the City of St. Cloud to administer the speed detection systems in the school zones and other public safety initiatives. $3 go to the Department of Law Enforcement Criminal Justice Standards and Training Trust Fund. $12 go to Osceola County School District, and it must be used for school security initiatives, student transportation, or to improve the safety of student walking conditions. Fund from this amount of money must also be shared with charter schools based on a formula that's developed by the schools. $5 also goes to the Crossing Guards Recruitment and Retention Program.

2:52:21Speaker 15

Chief, before you move on. Yes, I'm sorry. The school safety one, does that mean SROs too, that $12 can go towards SROs?

2:52:30 – 2:52:43Speaker 18

What they do with the funds once they get them, I don't know. I'm not sure. That might translate back into in their budget when they pay us. They get the money and they spend it how they see fit. Correct. It goes to the school board, and that's how it's actually broken down and what it can be used for.

2:52:43Speaker 15

The School Crossing Guards goes back to us.

2:52:46Speaker 18

That is correct. It goes into a fund specifically for school crossing guards. It could be used for uniforms, more high visibility signs, and things like that.

2:52:53Speaker 15

Okay. Thank you.

2:52:54 – 2:54:39Speaker 18

So moving forward, I did... Did two interviews today, and they seemed to jump right on the money, which was the total funds collected were $562,940. Now, I'll remind you that this is in various stages. So people are paying these citations even from years prior. It's taking time for the monies to come in. So some of the monies did collect $562,940. I did send you a breakdown of that. But of that, the City of St. Cloud received $337,764. The Department of Revenue received $112,588. The Crossing Guards got $28,147. The School Board collected $67,552.80. And FDLE Standards and Training Commission got $16,880.20. I will remind you also that While that's a big number, it does. We do have to pay for the services of the system that we have in place. And just for context and give you just a little bit of normally and how this is paid for is we have 11 cameras throughout the city, two violations per camera times 30 days. That's what they collect. And that comes out to 660 citations at $60 each. So normally, in a monthly period, at the very minimum, the cost would be about $39,600. So before everyone looks at that number and thinks, we do have to pay for the services of. Now, it's important to note also that This system does not cost us any money, and that was one of the things that I also heard quite a bit also is, you know, we're getting a lot of money on this, and it's a money grab. I've said this numerous times that I hope we make zero dollars on this program, absolutely zero, and that would mean that people are not speeding in our school zones. I think that is the most important part of this. The fact that people are continuing to pay these fines mean that they are continuing to speed in our school zones.

2:54:41Speaker 15

I'm sure the school district loves it, not just the 67,000, but it's safer. In that area, for the students in that area, obviously.

2:54:48 – 2:58:50Speaker 18

Yes, yes. And when I move to this, this is a trending slide, and it's a little bit difficult to view here, but basically what we had was we started to see a slight decrease noted from September 25 to November 25 when the cameras started to go in and people started to receive the violations. It does take about 30 days, then we can send them violations. So we started to see a trend lower, and the event and citation count started to trend higher. So the event counts were continuing to travel higher and higher, meaning that even though the school program was in place and school was back in session, some of these speeds started to go up. So if you notice on November 2025, that's when we discontinued enforcing the school zones. Now the cameras were still active, so we were still getting data, but we were not sending out citations because we're still working through some challenges. But if you look at this, the event count was still going higher and higher. And that's the concerning part of, again, on the bottom one is the event average speed citations. You can see that we were starting to get a little bit of a decrease. Then once we made the announcement in November that we were discontinuing the use of the cameras, you could see them starting to increase again and the speeds were starting to go higher. Definitely wanted to bring something to your attention. So, obviously, in some of those numbers, what you're seeing, we're still missing some citations. There is about 1,468 citations that are still in some various stages that have not been paid yet. Nine violations. I wanted to bring this to your attention. During these times, we captured 40 miles an hour or more during school beacon times. So, you're talking about the speed limit being at 15 miles an hour. Specifically, cameras on Michigan Street near St. Cloud High School, we saw max speeds of 60, 51, and 50 in a posted 15 mile an hour school zone. So obviously, the system is definitely working. And as requested, what we did do, I'm sorry, let me forward back to where we were. Um, what we did do for the first two weeks of the start of the school year, and I told you we would have officers in the school zones in place of that. Now, mind you, I want to remind you that it's a hundred dollars civil fine when you get a speeding ticket in a school zone currently with no points on your license. And obviously you saw how that's broken down. Um, when the police officers are in the school zones, you're getting $168, if not more plus three points on your license. So we do have that. We did do a significant detail. Uh, we have 13 overtime detail officers working traffic enforcement in the school zones in the first week, and we conducted a total of 51 selective traffic enforcement patrols in the school zones. Then, on the second week, all members of our traffic unit and the community engagement unit conducted proactive enforcement the following weeks. Our traffic unit continues to stay in the school zones, and we're continuing to write citations. But in those two-week periods, we gave out 215 citations. 215 tickets of various different speeds and other equipment violations. We also gave out 130 warnings, but most of those were based on motorists making wrong turns or improper turns based on school traffic patterns, and it was not related to speed. And again, this was authorized by the statute that I have to give this presentation. But again, I can give you some other information and I'll just leave you with this. In the month of November, and this is coming straight from the trending data that we have, the month of November, we had 2,400 events, 2,700 in December, 3,300 that would have generated citations. And this is across all school zone cameras that we do have. In January, I think 30, sorry, 3,200 February, 3,700 approximately. In March, about 1,300. April, 5,223. And then coming into the May area, 4,794. So we're still seeing people speed in our school zones. We are getting the data. We're just not acting on it right now until we can come to a rightful conclusion on this. But I would like to have these reactivated when we can.

2:58:51Speaker 18

I'm open to answer any questions you may have.

2:58:52Speaker 15

All right. First, would anyone in the audience like to speak on this item? Deputy Mayor.

2:59:00 – 3:00:12Speaker 11

Thank you, Chief, and thank you for all you do. This is something that I was proponent of as soon as I got on council because I have a nephew that runs charter schools. there was a fatality at one of the schools before the cameras came out and since the cameras, and these are volunteer teachers that sometimes do this versus crossing guards in person. And one of the volunteer teachers was walking someone across and they got hit and killed. And then next thing you know, while we put the cameras and they would go in place. So we got them working. And then I think the tail started wagging a dog because somebody complained, well, these cameras aren't in the actual zone, but the pictures are taken in the zone. I met with Metro Plan. I was on the Metro Plan board. And I met with them, and we were talking about our safety zone issues all the time. We were talking about e-bikes and what they're allowing or not allowing in Orange County. And please forgive me, Council, if I get a little elongated on this, but I wanted to report this to you during my time of reporting. But with these going on, and I met with Commissioner Crabby, who's appointed by the governor, I don't know if you know him.

3:00:12Speaker 18

Mike Crabby, of course, I know him very well from Orange County.

3:00:14 – 3:01:55Speaker 11

Because I mentioned your name, he goes, and Micah is putting together a bill for this specific thing, but it has to go through legislators, so that's not going to be that way. So I asked the... I asked the board if we could set up a commission with Osceola County, Seminole County, and Orange County to get together with all the law enforcement agencies. And Mayor Demings and a bunch of mayors and council said, yes, we want the sheriff's office, we want the Florida Highway Patrol, and we want all the police officers there. Because what's happening now is these folks travel through this internet process. They know they're not getting in trouble for it, so they're back up to speeding again. uh so we're trying to get something together with all these three there's 1.2 million people in orange county i think 550 000 in seminole and oslo county has a little over 500 000 so you're talking over 2 million people in school zones in that area and all these cameras are shut down because of a lawyer or two saying well they're not putting these cameras in the right place for that but the citations are in the right place the pictures are in the right place um There's three major vendors for these school cameras. There's others, but there's three major ones. Vero Mobility is the ones we use here at St. Cloud, and I think they use them in some other areas. I'm not sure, but I'm not going to go on record as saying who's there. But talking to them, they would be more than happy to pay for any legal ramifications if somebody was to protest the ticket. Now I know and I don't know, sorry that was terrible, I do believe that you have to verify these in your law enforcement agency. So each one of these citations, don't they have to be verified some way?

3:01:55 – 3:02:10Speaker 18

Yes, sir. Yes, right now we're using our traffic officers that are watching the videos to verify the license plate, the speed, to ensure that it was actually checked and it was quantified. So, yes. And then we issue the violation.

3:02:10 – 3:03:35Speaker 11

And I know there's costs to do with that, but I think that, again, you and I had agreed upon, we don't want to... get one penny. We just want it to be safe. We don't want to have to revisit this after a kid gets hit or, God forget it, school crossing guard or multiple people. But I don't know, and I'm asking you because I think you're the best chief in Florida, probably in the United States, but I don't know that. But is this possible that we get these cameras back on and let the people, Vero Mobility, whoever, handled any of the legal issues, which I think they're doing. But I don't know the whole story. But I do know that I met with Mayor Demings. I met with Commissioner Krabbe. I met with seven of them on the sidebar at Metro Plan. And every one of these folks want to put these things back on. And I want to do the right thing. But you're the police chief, and I want to make sure that we're doing it the right way your way. All the things I've taken is that none of these contested tickets have really gone through, and I don't know that that's hearsay, and I don't want to be a hearsay guy, but I do know these have helped the safety and slowed down in zones. If you look at your graph, when they were on, it went very slow. So I don't know how. I've been investigating this. We have a separate committee with Metro Plan, and it's the three counties. And we're dealing with this, but you know how government takes.

3:03:36Speaker 11

It just takes long. So I don't know. Can you give me advice? Would it be possible to turn these back on and do that? Or do we need to wait?

3:03:43 – 3:04:18Speaker 18

So this is akin to, if you recall, when we had the red light cameras, and I know Dan can probably speak to this too, there was intense legislation. There was a lot of battling back and forth in court documents and everything else. We actually have one of our hearings that were heard in the Uniform Traffic Court is actually going through appeals right now because of, I believe, a misinterpretation. of a law or of the rule that actually restricts these cameras to a certain list. So we're working through that right now, too. So currently, we're still appealing certain things. And Dan, I don't know if you want to speak to that without... Well, that's right.

3:04:18 – 3:06:12Speaker 10

That's a little different issue than the issue that the Deputy Mayor was bringing out, brought up. So just I don't think we really want to get into the whole analysis about what the interpretation of the statute is and what's going on in the appeal court because that's in the court proceedings at this point. But again, We've talked about this on two significant occasions recently. The first occasion, we advised that we would reach out to Vera Mobility and we would ask them to do exactly what the deputy mayor said, which is will they basically take care of all the legal expenses associated with challenges for these citations. And they have said that they would do that. After that, there was a follow-up discussion in the council meeting where we were instructed and directed to essentially send a letter to Vera Mobility saying, move the cameras to be as some folks are, to be consistent with how some folks are interpreting the statute, right? We also included in there that they needed to put up a supplemental camera to ask them to capture the beacon, which, as the chief explained, deals with the difference between the yellow flashing beacon, basically. They have not agreed to do that at this point. We are working to having a meeting with them so that we can talk through this issue a little bit more in the very near future. If the council wants to turn them back on, the council can give us that direction. We can do that. But I do think it would be prudent to wait for this meeting to occur so that we can have a discussion with your mobility. I know, Deputy Mayor, you've been invited to participate. And then so we can hear a little bit more about what they're, What I want to know is I want to try to understand their logistic issue about not being able to do what we've asked them to do.

3:06:12 – 3:09:09Speaker 11

And if I may comment on that, and thank you. You all right over there? I did ask for that meeting with Viral Mobility and the law enforcement agencies that we work with here and I took it a step further and did that with Metro Plan with all the counties that are involved and all the agencies because there are the county, there are the sheriff's departments, there are the police forces that are all kind of combined and everyone's looking at, and I truly believe it's another the tails wagging the dog, but I also believe in our police chief of his knowledge of law and what it takes, so I like his recommendation, but if we're not at any additional cost to us, and we're deterring people from speeding, and as the police chief said, we don't want to collect the money, which if you look at it, it's a bunch of money, but you'll see that lower down as soon as people find out I can't speed through it, because a lot of them are repeat offenders. A lot of people that don't wake up at 6, they wake up at 7, got to get to work at 8 or speak. Once they get caught, they start waking up at 6.30. I'm not saying how it happens, but this is not just a St. Cloud issue. This is not just an Osceola County issue. This is an Osceola-Seminole-Orange County issue and also a state of Florida issue. I have to recommend to give us, I let the police chief recommend what we do, but I want to make everybody aware these things work and nobody, to my knowledge, has won a case by protesting it where the cameras are situated. I don't know that for a fact. I just know that from the information. So I'm going to rely on the chief for this, but I think program, which I was behind from the day I got involved with the city in my position, was one of the things I wanted because of my nephew running those charter schools and seeing fatalities and seeing them stop when school zone cameras were put in place. So again, I don't get to talk to you all much, but I spent over an hour afterwards on a sidebar with Mayor Demings and a bunch of mayors and a bunch of commissioners to say what we want to do. And every one of them wants to. GO FORTH WITH IT, BUT PUT THE ONUS ON THE VENDOR, AND THERE'S THREE LARGE VENDORS THAT TAKE CARE OF MOST OF THEM. I CAN'T SAY ALL THE CAMERAS, BUT THERE'S THREE MAJOR VENDORS IN THESE THREE COUNTIES THAT TAKE CARE OF THAT STUFF. I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER. I RELY ON THE CHIEF, BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE HE'S OUR CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, KNOWS THE LAW BETTER THAN ANY OF US SITTING HERE. I KNOW HIM AND DAN PROBABLY KNOW THE LAWS AND STATUTES, BUT THESE ARE GOOD THINGS, AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE, WHAT DIRECTION WE WANT TO GO IN. I JUST KNOW it cringes me to know that if something happens, if we go, man, if those darn cameras were on, it may have stopped the injury or the fatality. And, and, and we'll talk about later and we'll talk about e-bikes later, but this is something that we can provide prevent with these cameras. And I don't, I, yeah, deputy mayors.

3:09:09 – 3:10:10Speaker 18

And actually, since you brought that up, there is one of the other large camera vendors that do this also that they're located inside the school zone. They're on the other side of the flashing beacon. Um, you know, and again, I, I have to obviously warn us that when these move to a uniform traffic citation, there is something clearly that there's a hurdle that we are trying to get across right now that is clearly, I believe it's a misinterpretation. However, we have to work through that process too, because every one of these that move to a UTC will most likely be dismissed. And that's a challenge. That's a huge challenge that we're dealing with right now. So that's why I said it's very, very important that we set this up the right way. So when we do turn these back on, it's going to be bulletproof and there won't be anything that's, you know, we will stand by what we do. So I would just ask that we have a little bit more time to work through this process. I understand that our officers will stay in there and unfortunately people will be getting citations with points on their license as opposed to just a $100 fine. And I will beg again, please do not speed in our school zones. And again, this is not a moneymaker for us. I'm not even trying to do that. I hope we make zero and then we don't have to worry about it. That means everyone is following the law and they're not speeding in our school zones where our kids are.

3:10:10 – 3:10:21Speaker 11

Correct me if the definition is wrong. A UTC is when an officer pulls somebody over, then they know who's driving. With the cameras, they cannot put it on the driver because they can't identify the person operating that vehicle. Is that correct?

3:10:21Speaker 18

That is correct, and that's hence the reason why it just goes to the actual registered owner of the vehicle, and there's no points assessed on a speeding violation.

3:10:28 – 3:10:48Speaker 11

Okay. I need counsel's, any input counsel has, I'd really like to have it, and I really, our chief, is on top of this as well, and those are the folks I met with, Chief, and I know we didn't get a chance to speak, and I don't know I didn't get a chance to speak to counsel on this, but this is big. This is something we need to do.

3:10:48Speaker 15

And I trust the Chief's advice now and what it was in the past. I think we just keep holding tight. They're going to get it right because this is a problem plaguing a lot of folks.

3:10:57 – 3:11:24Speaker 18

And these are the stumbling blocks that we went through with the red light cameras a considerable time ago. And case law came out on it that basically kind of did a lot of guidance on this. So unfortunately this is a new initiative and it's a very effective one. And again, it's not a money grab, it's clearly not. People are still speeding. You heard some of the numbers, some of the violations, they're significant. So people are still doing it. As much as we can, we will be in those school zones to ensure that people aren't speeding through there. So, but again.

3:11:24Speaker 15

Sometimes they get hit by two speed zones when they go down Michigan.

3:11:29Speaker 18

That goes from one to the next, yes. It leaves one and goes into the next one. That is correct.

3:11:34 – 3:12:09Speaker 3

Sorry, Council Member Urban. Yeah, thank you, Chief, for your presentation. My jaw dropped when I heard that somebody was going 60 in a 15 on Michigan because that's an extremely busy school zone. And I know you guys have been out there physically. I've seen you pulling people over, so I appreciate that. I mean, Deputy Mayor, I absolutely agree. This is vitally important. We've got to get this back online as soon as possible. And I'm glad to hear that. Are you joining in the meeting with this company?

3:12:09 – 3:12:35Speaker 11

Yeah, I requested the meeting, Council Member, if I can, Mayor. I requested the meeting with the folks, with the chief involved, and I've also been part of the subcommittee with Metro Plan to address that through all three counties. So I volunteered on both bases to be involved with it because I believe time is of the essence, and the reason why is because if one person gets injured or one fatality, That's too many.

3:12:36 – 3:13:02Speaker 3

Yeah. No, I just wanted to say, I mean, hopefully you can report back to us at our next meeting after you meet with them, and we can have a little bit more guidance if they're wanting to pay for legal fees or whatever, but I'm glad that you're... taking the lead on this to get this prioritized. So I just look forward to hearing from you at the next meeting.

3:13:02 – 3:13:20Speaker 11

Well, thank you. I haven't got a chance to ask Chief to be a part of these meetings also. Commissioner Krabbe was designated by the governor, and Mayor Demings, of course, is the next police officer. So we're trying to get the right people in line to take care of these issues.

3:13:20Speaker 18

I know Mike very well, so.

3:13:21Speaker 11

Okay, good. He just got appointed, I guess, did District 1 in Orange County or something like that?

3:13:26Speaker 18

Is it 1 or 2? Yes.

3:13:27 – 3:13:46Speaker 11

Yeah, I think Uribe's 2, so he should be 1, but... 1. Thank you, Councilmember Irvin. Don't have the answer. I don't get to talk to you all about this, but... These are one of, you know, we all have certain things we go after. These are one of the big things that I think is important to the city of St. Cloud and also all of Osceola County and all of Florida.

3:13:46Speaker 18

I truly do believe we have a solution moving forward, and I think at that meeting we'll be able to finalize that.

3:13:51 – 3:14:16Speaker 15

Yeah, but we need to be clear on what's going to come of this meeting. We just want them to, if they're going to move the cameras, that's a whole different, that's what we really want. If they're not going to move the cameras... We don't want to entertain, okay, well, you guys are going to pay the legal fees if we get sued. I don't think we go down in those dark waters. Either they move them or we wait until legislation corrects it.

3:14:16Speaker 11

With Mike, the legislation, I'm sorry to interrupt you, Mayor, I respect you very much, but with the registration, it's going to be until next session. and we're trying to do a stopgap.

3:14:25 – 3:15:06Speaker 15

I understand, but you trust our police chief. 100%. And I believe that's what he's saying. Let's do this right. And I don't think we just let Veritas... Wag the dog. Whoever they are. Because what's happening is if we just let them lead us down a dark path and say, no, no, we'll be fine. We'll cover your lawsuits. We're going to keep them planted right there. We've already told them we want them to move them. I think we enforce that. And if they don't move them, we tell them to take them out. And then we get a company in that will put them in the right spot. And if we don't do that, then we wait until February until they go back into session.

3:15:06Speaker 11

And, again, I agree with you.

3:15:08Speaker 15

There's a process.

3:15:09 – 3:15:21Speaker 11

I'm looking at the chief's experience and expertise in the law. And that's where he's coming from. I just wanted to bring it to you as a counsel what research and what I've been working at. I'm not going to answer any questions here about what we should or shouldn't do.

3:15:21 – 3:15:33Speaker 15

You're in a great room with highly educated elected officials, the mayors, the other folks. Are there law enforcement agencies turning them on?

3:15:33 – 3:16:22Speaker 11

that's the meeting to have and that's what they did mayor demings uh wants to turn him back on the just mr crabby he was was he with florida i'll see orange county sheriff's office yes so they do but they don't have those answers yet so i i might be premature but i'm reporting to council of what the conversations are because i don't get to talk to you guys on a daily basis So they all are for getting it done. The process ease to get it done, Mayor, I don't have those yet. I, like you, would like to rely on our police chief to make those decisions for us as a leader of our community here. and also get involved and communicate. I just found out yesterday, Chief, I didn't get a chance to sidebar with you. Yes, I'll be happy to be there. But I agree with you, Mayor.

3:16:22 – 3:16:38Speaker 15

I love these cameras, and it breaks my heart that they're not. Obviously, it was working. I believe it obviously was effective. That company, I don't know why they haven't moved them. Did they pull a permit yet? Have they attempted to do anything?

3:16:39Speaker 10

They submitted plans. As part of the permit application process, I believe they were approved and the permit was ready to be picked up.

3:16:46Speaker 15

Then that's the path they need to go down and not just say, hey, we'll cover any lawsuits.

3:16:50Speaker 11

We keep them going down that path.

3:16:52Speaker 18

March of February. Because that's the comfortable path for us, right? That's when they pulled the permits, March of 26th.

3:16:56Speaker 11

Again, I don't have those answers. I'm just reporting back to council. Yeah.

3:17:01Speaker 15

We want them to move them. That's if... And if they don't move them, we wait till the law changes.

3:17:07 – 3:17:51Speaker 18

When we are ready to turn them on. And I think that's the issue. Unfortunately, the statute says one thing. And I think when they make the laws, unfortunately, sometimes we have to go back and address them, massage them a little bit based on what The interpretation of that law is when it's actually put into place. So I know that's an issue, but we have not seen anything yet at the legislature level to amend that statute at all to allow them to sit outside the school zone and shoot in. And that would be a simple language change if that was something that the legislature could do. But unfortunately, we don't have that. And that's why the other large company that you're referring to, puts them inside on the other side of the flashing beacon, and that's where they capture all the vehicles.

3:17:51 – 3:18:03Speaker 11

With Micah, he's putting them together. We're working together. I don't have a stopgap for you, but that is something that is for legislation, but that's against the next legislation's areas.

3:18:03Speaker 15

Have we spoken with our government affairs lobbyists on this issue?

3:18:08 – 3:18:55Speaker 10

I think we did during the session when we were trying to determine whether there was going to be any movement to address the issue. I did have conversations with them and not nobody wanted to bring it up this year. Nobody, nobody. There were no bills submitted to address the issue, although he did say that a lot of the a lot of their clients, great Robinson's clients were had the same issue and were interested in getting something cleaned up on the statute. And I think it's important to remember because We don't want to get this message out there. There has, as the Deputy Mayor pointed out, there has not been a court that has made a decision that the current placement of the cameras is incorrect or violates the statute. That has not been made.

3:18:55Speaker 18

That is correct also.

3:18:56 – 3:19:30Speaker 10

So it's important to know that. And I want to make sure it's clear that there is an issue, as the Chief pointed out, When the legislators draft things, unfortunately, they use attorneys to draft them, and they don't always get it right. And it has to be tweaked, and there have to be bills that fix it. So there is some issue that's going to need to be clarified. But right now there has not been a court that has said the current placement of these cameras is in violation of the statute.

3:19:30Speaker 15

How many agencies do we know that have kept them on when they are outside of the school zone?

3:19:36 – 3:19:58Speaker 10

Well, that's... That's a very good question, which the folks... Who's taking the risk? The folks from Vera Mobility have told us that there are numerous agencies that have done that, but they haven't told us who. And that's one of the questions that we were hoping to get an answer in this meeting that we have with them.

3:19:59Speaker 6

They also said that there's several entities who are putting out bids for cameras with the same setup that we have, including Orange County.

3:20:08Speaker 10

And they told us Orange County was too. Well, Orange County was one of them.

3:20:13 – 3:20:27Speaker 6

And I believe our lobbyist actually works with them with Vera Mobility also. He contacted us when we were talking about turning them off.

3:20:30Speaker 15

says they're safe in their interpretation.

3:20:36 – 3:21:41Speaker 11

The only thing I'm confident is they said they're safe enough that they would spend any financial liability in that. But again, I agree with you 1,000%, Mayor. I'm going to rely on our police chief and his knowledge and his knowledge of the law and his connections. to advise us as council of what actions to take next. I just wanted to bring up to council what I've been doing on the separate entity of the Metro Plan, which is mostly safety zones with e-bikes and different things like that. So I just had to bring that up, too, of what I did. in the meeting so so there's frustrated agencies out there there's so many agencies in in mr crabby that's who was vaccinated uh mr demmings they all want him back on but i don't know who's going to pull that trigger and i'm just going to ask the chief to rely on his expertise but get involved on the bigger group because a lot of times when you get more people involved you get things done a little quicker sometimes it's a little slower That's all I have to report. I don't have an answer.

3:21:42 – 3:22:00Speaker 15

We've already taken public comment. Anyone else from council want to? All right. Chief, do you have anything else to add? No, sir. Thank you very much for the presentation and for answering our questions. All right. Next up, first reading and introduction. We have absolutely no first reading and introductions.

3:22:02 – 3:23:06Speaker 10

City attorney. And I have two items I'd like to get some direction from the council on. the first time is a couple meetings ago we talked about the 2020 media agreement we uh at that time we our office had asked the council to let us move forward with whatever was necessary to enforce the terms of the now expired agreement with 2020 media we did try to go a more less aggressive route by working with code enforcement and when we started looking into the issue realized that the code enforcement process is not going to assist the city with what needs to be done to address the fact that the 2020 media agreement has expired. This December, it will be two years since that agreement is expired, and that agreement says when that agreement expires that these bus shelters and bus benches need to be removed. So again, I would ask the council for authority to move forward with whatever we need to do to enforce this. We are not getting any sort of response from 2020 meeting on.

3:23:06Speaker 15

Are we getting any revenue? It expired two years ago, but are we getting the revenue?

3:23:10Speaker 6

Yes, they've paid.

3:23:13Speaker 11

Let the city manager tell you how much they paid. Take me a minute. I got it.

3:23:21Speaker 15

For what? 2025? Why did we collect that if the agreement expired?

3:23:30 – 3:23:43Speaker 10

We sent the letter basically saying, back then, that the agreement is expired, there is no agreement, and you also haven't paid us. And without asking for it, they sent us the check.

3:23:43 – 3:23:57Speaker 15

We should have mailed it back. I was... What was it, $225? A little less than $300. $268, okay. And what do these things rent? I mean, there's signage all over it.

3:23:57 – 3:24:42Speaker 10

These agreements are very old, so they don't have... in them the language that you'd want to see in an agreement like that, some sort of auditing response, some sort of ability to address things. There is no ability to restrict whether the pricing of it all or addressing it all. So remember, this agreement goes back a long way. So our initial intent was to see if we can get the 2020 media folks to come back to us and talk to us about maybe a new agreement. Mrs. Miller has had some contact with them. They said, yeah, we'll come back, but we haven't heard. So I'd like to just raise the stakes a little bit and try to move forward. Deputy Mayor.

3:24:42 – 3:26:34Speaker 11

I apologize, but this is another thing I've been working on. The agreement was in 1996 when the original agreement became an agreement with 2020 Media. In 1997, there's an addendum to that agreement, and I don't have it with me, but I'm sure the city manager and council can get it to you. And with that, they're supposed to put shelters on the bus benches, and they're supposed to be starting shelters that actually... We're working with LINCS right now and Metro Plan. We have two designated grants for shelters on 192 that they're gonna be building with their agreement with LINCS. No part of that agreement has been fulfilled. As you know, if you look around the bus stations, there are bus stops, there are benches, and some of them are on sidewalks, which are not ADA compliant. There's benches that bus transportation doesn't even go there, and so they're using as an advertisement area and a place for people to sit and throw garbage at. But it's... I want every business, Council Member Urban tells me this, and I agree, we want businesses to succeed. But we also want us to be a part of those businesses in partnership. But if you read the addendum in the agreement, I do not believe, and I'm not a lawyer, so I'd have to refer to our attorney, but those agreements and the addendum have not been fulfilled, and the bus, and there have been benches in these locations that there are no bus stops at. Now, I did find out through my investigations, and I don't know if this is still true, there's another company out there that's got bus stops. I did not know that until I investigated it, so I'd ask to say who these folks are also.

3:26:34Speaker 15

We have to address those as well.

3:26:35 – 3:26:46Speaker 10

Yes, exactly. And that would be part of this process. But whether they put aside the issue, and I agree with you, Deputy Mayor, that they haven't lived up to the terms of the agreement, the agreement's expired.

3:26:47Speaker 11

Right, period.

3:26:48 – 3:27:03Speaker 10

So it doesn't, that issue is an issue that's gone. The agreement's expired. We've offered or at least made, and you know, options to basically talk to us about a process and have no response. So I don't, I think that's what we have to do next.

3:27:05Speaker 15

City Manager. I just wanted to clarify about the payment. The last payment was $246.60, and it was for the time period of January to December 2025. So he typically pays us

3:27:28Speaker 6

Every year, but in arrears.

3:27:29Speaker 15

His agreement expired in December of 24.

3:27:32Speaker 10

That's correct.

3:27:32Speaker 15

Yeah, that's why I would not receive another... If we get one in, ship it right back.

3:27:37Speaker 10

Again, we did not ask for the money.

3:27:39Speaker 15

Right, I know, but you're acknowledging. The moment you cash that check, you're saying, okay, we can continue on.

3:27:44Speaker 10

But this council didn't do that.

3:27:47Speaker 15

Somebody's cashing checks.

3:27:48 – 3:28:05Speaker 10

Well, we did... Well, you know, he did have the benches there. He did have advertising on it. So there was money that would be owed to the city for that until he gets those out. Under one theory is he should be paying the city its share until those things are removed because he is collecting revenue associated with them.

3:28:06Speaker 15

So, again, we— Well, at this point, it's 100 percent because there is no agreement. And, you know, thanks for doing the work for us. So the next step is— For the taxpayers, so—

3:28:14 – 3:28:36Speaker 10

We just want to get counsel's direction so we can just get a little bit more aggressive to try to address this issue. Again, the code enforcement process is not going to work as well in this situation, so we're going to have to go with probably looking at threatening an ejectment action, which is basically going at the court and saying get the stuff out if he doesn't remove it on his own.

3:28:37Speaker 15

You sent plenty of letters, you said.

3:28:39Speaker 10

So we've done that. So I think I got enough direction on that.

3:28:45Speaker 11

Just one more comment. I did call the owner of the business, or he called me to ask for a meeting. We had set up a meeting, and he no-showed.

3:28:55Speaker 15

So it didn't go well?

3:28:56Speaker 11

It wasn't good for me. It just took the shortest meeting I ever had. All right.

3:29:03 – 3:30:07Speaker 10

The other item I'd like some direction from the council is I sent you the email regarding the property at 1401 New York Avenue about what happened earlier this last week on it. The way it is situated right now, I do think the city has a right to enforce the terms of that contract, as I said in the email. However, I think that the only way the city would be able to force that contract is if the city agrees to continue forward and pay the full purchase price that's in that agreement, which is 700,000. As you recall at the last meeting, when the direction came from the city council was to extend the due diligence period. Part of it was because the council wanted us to see how much repairs needed to be done, either to get the seller to fix those or to renegotiate the purchase price to accommodate the additional costs that would be needed. So at this point, if the city council wants to move forward with this deal, the legal interpretation would say we'd have to agree to buy. the property for the $700,000 place.

3:30:08 – 3:30:52Speaker 15

Right. And I mean, nothing's really changed other than they entered into, I'm not going to use the word illegal, inappropriate agreement with somebody else while we still have it under contract. Right. So we're still within the due diligence time. We're still just moving forward on how we gave direction last meeting right yes october 20th october 20th we still have due diligence for another month and i don't even know what day it is september 11th a month and a week and a half um so i say we just keep moving forward and get real numbers on on renovations and and we don't have to drop it until october 20th well

3:30:53Speaker 10

Yeah, we would have to notify the, yeah, we could take them.

3:30:58Speaker 15

If we decided not to, we have a whole other council meeting next month.

3:31:02Speaker 10

So what you're asking for is some more information about the repair costs so you can make a better decision.

3:31:07Speaker 15

Yeah, have we had anybody go in there and do any estimates since three and a half weeks?

3:31:12 – 3:31:30Speaker 10

Well, my understanding is that that's how this whole thing arose, is that city staff and the city's project managers, is that Michael's title, were on site. Mm-hmm. And we're told by the realtor for the intake, we don't know why you're here. We don't have a contract with the city anymore. That's how I found out.

3:31:30Speaker 15

But we know we do.

3:31:32Speaker 15

All right. So do we have a roof number yet? Because that doesn't need inside access. Do we have a roof number? Do we have any numbers in the past three and a half weeks? I don't know.

3:31:40Speaker 10

other than the original.

3:31:41Speaker 15

And we should have just kept moving forward like business as usual because we still have it under contract.

3:31:45 – 3:31:56Speaker 6

Well, but I think staff was also under the impression that council made it clear that we were not going to pay for the additional repairs, so with the... That's not exactly what happened.

3:31:56 – 3:32:16Speaker 15

What we said was we were going to ask for due diligence time to do more investigation on the estimates for the repairs, and if they granted it to us, that's when we'll do the estimates, and they granted it to us. Well, so if they weren't, they were going to drop it that day. That's what that's what we agreed on. And so we're three and a half weeks later and we have nothing.

3:32:18Speaker 10

Well, I still think there's there's adequate time, as you pointed out, Mary, to get additional numbers to see that.

3:32:23 – 3:32:50Speaker 15

Yeah, I just don't want to sit. If we know your legal interpretation is we still have it under agreement. Why would we wait three and a half weeks to come back to us and say. Well, what do you want us to do? Well, I mean, you got us the 60 days. Let's get some estimates. Well, I think it's important as long as the council understands that. Because I think those numbers, I mean, how do you go from, well, it's going to take $60,000 to $400,000 to repair this. What the hell does that mean?

3:32:51 – 3:33:03Speaker 10

And I think one of the things that I was looking for direction on is, in the event that you go through these numbers, right, is the council willing to pay $700,000 for that property, or can you not make that decision tonight? as to the $700,000.

3:33:05Speaker 15

I think we would have made that last meeting. I think that's why we extended it out. We asked for the extension. They granted it to us. We still have that extension until October 20th.

3:33:14Speaker 6

Can we check the motion from the last meeting? Because I'm not sure that that was what the motion was.

3:33:22Speaker 15

We said, because it was one day prior, we said if they don't grant, drop it. That's what we said. If they grant it, let's go get estimates, get real numbers, and then we'll make a decision.

3:33:35Speaker 6

I don't remember it clearly. That's why I was asking for the motion. That's why we asked for more time and due diligence.

3:33:40Speaker 10

And I'll admit, I was taken aback by the realtor's position because it was clear to me on August 1st.

3:33:46Speaker 15

We have to act like that part didn't happen.

3:33:49Speaker 15

Because it's not real. They can do that all they want and have their own opinion, but we do have it under agreement.

3:33:54 – 3:34:17Speaker 10

Well, in theory, there wasn't anything in our agreement that prohibited them from getting backup contracts, which they could have done. So, you know, so, but if, you know, again, tonight, you're right. The cause of action to force them to buy the property does not expire until October 20th. Right. Or sell the property.

3:34:18Speaker 15

I'd just like to see real numbers. I mean, we get real numbers on everything else.

3:34:24 – 3:34:35Speaker 10

Well, I think that's probably a good course because... Yeah, you can probably do the roof, but if you want to have real numbers, we'll need some access to the building, which the realtor.

3:34:35Speaker 15

We can get window numbers. We can get roof numbers. We can get gutter numbers. I mean, there's a lot, and those are the big ticket items.

3:34:43 – 3:35:01Speaker 10

But I think once we're on the property, we're probably going to hear from the realtor, and we're going to see that's going to probably flesh out some of their position on this, which I don't think, I don't understand what their position is, frankly. Well, I don't understand it. I can't respond to it.

3:35:02Speaker 8

Mayor, if I may. Yes, Scott. Part of the problem was that they were not granting access to the property.

3:35:12Speaker 15

Well, that's a whole other legal issue.

3:35:14 – 3:35:31Speaker 8

So that was part of the problem with getting real numbers is that they were – that's how we've – as – Dan had pointed out, that was how we found out because we were attempting to gain access to the property to bring the contractors on site to be able to get real numbers.

3:35:31Speaker 10

So maybe one way to do it is to reach out to them, ask for access to the property and see how they respond, because you're right, that is another whole issue.

3:35:38Speaker 15

It's a serious issue. Time is money.

3:35:42 – 3:35:57Speaker 10

Well, but under the terms of the contract, they're required to give us access for the due diligence period. So that's probably what we should do. We should probably set up a team to go out there and see if the owner of the property is representative.

3:35:57Speaker 15

So they have declined access already?

3:36:00Speaker 10

They did that one day.

3:36:01Speaker 8

They did that one day. And that was how we came up. It was the broker?

3:36:06Speaker 10

It wasn't the owner. It was the realtor.

3:36:09Speaker 8

Correct. She's been the manager of that for 40 something years.

3:36:11Speaker 10

Well, the owner lives out of state.

3:36:13 – 3:36:28Speaker 8

And we're just looking here at the consensus from that item that the clerk just handed me. And it was council consensus was to extend the inspection period and ask the current owner to make the repairs where the city would not proceed with the purchase. Correct.

3:36:29Speaker 15

but we were gonna get estimates too. I mean, we'll play the actual video, because that's what we asked for, actual numbers in the meantime.

3:36:38 – 3:37:01Speaker 10

So I think the day when we found out about this was, September 2nd, maybe? Approximately. Yeah, and I think that's when staff, after the council meeting, was getting out there to get the numbers that you were talking about. So staff was trying to move quickly to get the numbers, and that was, frankly, this is the first I heard of it denied access.

3:37:02 – 3:38:02Speaker 15

Because I talked to the inspector, and it wasn't as serious as it was. in the council meeting as it was relayed to us. There's no extensive termite damage upstairs. There were pellets. That's why he recommended a tent because there was evidence of WDO. But there was not, he did not see termite damage in the trusses where he saw the pellets. So let's not, we have to clear that up because that's what was said from the podium from our staff. That's not accurate. So that, that really makes it sound a lot worse. Oh yeah. It's all extensive termite damage up there, whatever, however it was said, that's not the case. Um, we all know it's a 20 year old roof, but we all know if it were a newer roof, if it were newer windows, it would appraise out for 900 or a million dollars. So it's all based on the appraisal came in. Exactly what it is. Actually, it came in higher than what we got under contract for.

3:38:02 – 3:38:22Speaker 15

Yeah. We know it's an old roof. We know there's all this. So I just want to, let's get a more realistic number, because obviously those estimates that we got from staff were not real. How do you go from, oh, this costs between $20,000 and $80,000? I think there's a number somewhere in between. There's many numbers somewhere in between, a real number.

3:38:22 – 3:38:38Speaker 10

All right. So I think we have I mean, if that's the consensus of the council, we'll reach out to the agent. It doesn't cost us a dollar to wait until October 20th. Well, we can reach out to the agent and explain that we still consider this under contract. We're going to send our folks out there, let us have access to the grounds.

3:38:39Speaker 6

Is there consensus? Is there consensus?

3:38:45Speaker 15

Colby's out of the room right now. Is he? What are your thoughts?

3:38:49Speaker 15

We have time. Of course we have time. It doesn't cost us a dollar.

3:38:52 – 3:39:45Speaker 11

But we really have to do it. I'm sorry. I'd like to see what you'd ask for is a specific... evaluation of in and out while we need access to the facility also which i did not know that we are denied access right so we've been sitting for three and a half weeks and nothing and we're under if you go and tie a piece of property under contract and they don't grant your access you're going to get pretty mad it usually takes me about you know 14 days to get the inspectors, to get the contractors, to get the real numbers before I buy a property. Not saying that's the magic number because sometimes it's less or more depending on their ability, but I ask all electricians, plumbers, roofers, every contractor to go in and evaluate And then they get it back and what the cost is. We didn't get any real numbers. We're going to have to bring it up to ADA standards also.

3:39:45Speaker 6

There's a third nod, so we're good.

3:39:48 – 3:39:59Speaker 15

And that was my concern with last meeting is the numbers were so far apart of reality. I don't have that answer. How do we go, it's going to cost $100,000, but we put $200,000 of contingency?

3:39:59Speaker 10

I'm like, what does that even mean?

3:40:02Speaker 15

Let's get estimates, because that's what we do in the contract in construction. You get estimates, here's what it's actually going to cost.

3:40:08 – 3:40:23Speaker 10

So, from a scheduling perspective, assuming the agent doesn't prohibit access for the inspection, We can have this on the agenda for the October 8th meeting, and we can have numbers back as real as possible, and then the council can decide where they want to go with it.

3:40:23Speaker 7

What is the process if they don't come to a security?

3:40:26 – 3:40:43Speaker 10

So if they don't give us access, they're- I've never even heard of it. It's crazy. If they don't give us access, then they're basically in breach of the existing agreement, right? And then the city has a right to pursue the seller to say, sell us your property.

3:40:44Speaker 6

At full price.

3:40:45 – 3:40:58Speaker 10

At the $700,000 price. Right? So we would do it based on the value of the property. On the appraised. I'm sorry, based on the appraised value of the property.

3:40:58Speaker 11

You saw the movie Money Pit, haven't you?

3:41:00 – 3:41:27Speaker 15

Oh, yeah. But that's why we had an inspection already. There has been inspection. And I spoke with the inspector on the long train ride back from Florida League of Cities down there. And I went through the whole inspection report. prior to the last meeting. And that's why I was asking questions. Everything that was coming back to me did not add up to the conversation with the actual inspector. It was made to be bigger problems than what actually came from the inspector's mouth.

3:41:29Speaker 6

But to defend staff, I think they were going on the written inspection report. So I just want to defend staff there.

3:41:37 – 3:42:36Speaker 15

I'm not going after staff. Let me tell you. My point is the appraisal was done on the actual condition of the property. There's that. The inspection's done on the actual condition of the property. The numbers that came at us were not real numbers. You can't go from 100,000, between 100 and 400,000. I don't know if that's exactly the numbers that were said. But how can anybody make up a decision sitting up here with those kind of numbers? They don't mean anything. That's not real work. That's just, I can come up with those numbers in five minutes. We can get a roof an estimate there. I bet Sean can go out there in five minutes and do a roof estimate. You know roofs, right? I mean, it's not hard. And that's what I was saying. I don't understand why we're a few months into this and we don't even have the cost to replace a roof. But anyway, we're good till October 20th.

3:42:37 – 3:42:52Speaker 10

Right. And so we're going to, again, we'll reach out to the realtor. If they do not, we'll do it before next week. If we get a response back that says we're not going to give you access to the property, we'll bring this back up next week and we can talk some more about it.

3:42:53Speaker 15

All right. Coop's got something to say. He said we got a lot of extra money somewhere.

3:42:57 – 3:43:22Speaker 20

I'm not trying to complicate this discussion, but as of October 1st, there is zero funding for this item. So I would need to know if you want to put on a budget amendment for October 8th. Otherwise, you can't close until after the November 12th meeting, and I would have to know how much. So the funding that was via the budget amendment this fiscal year disappears in three weeks.

3:43:23Speaker 15

After the October what day meeting?

3:43:27Speaker 10

So we did talk about this.

3:43:30Speaker 15

Because the inspection is October 20th. So the closing, what's the November meeting?

3:43:36Speaker 20

You couldn't close until November 13th, the day after the budget amendment on November 12th.

3:43:42Speaker 15

That's within 30 days of after due diligence.

3:43:46 – 3:44:11Speaker 10

I'll have to look. We did, and I don't have it in front, but I have to find it. We did push the closing date back in relation to the expiration of the due diligence period. I believe the closing date would have been after the November 13th, but I'll have to verify that. If that is not the case, then you could have a budget amendment on the October 8th agreement. Just because you budget something doesn't mean you have to spend it. Right.

3:44:11Speaker 20

We are doing budget amendment number one October 8th.

3:44:14Speaker 10

There's already something else on it. You could put the money and move the money into a budget for this item and still decide on the 8th that you don't

3:44:23 – 3:44:49Speaker 20

know you don't want to buy it so that's the safest that you do so if you so we should put it in the budget amendment on october 8th if we're continuing to do this due diligence that that would be my recommendation i'll put the same amount as we did on this year's budget amendment for now and we if we're going to do the repairs ourselves then we would need an additional budget amendment later for the additional amount

3:44:52 – 3:45:31Speaker 15

It's just good to see all the numbers when we make decisions up here. That's all I'm asking for. And I'm not blaming staff, obviously, or I would have said that. They're not qualified to do roof estimates. Kevin's not a roofing guy, right, Kevin? You don't do roofs? You don't do plumbing? You don't do electrical? That's not your wheelhouse. You're an engineer, right? So that's where I just want somebody to give me real numbers so we actually make sound decisions for the With our tax dollars, I mean, I didn't think that was too much to ask. All right, city attorney, is that all? That's all I have, thank you. City manager, give us good news.

3:45:32 – 3:45:51Speaker 6

Well, we're under contract for the property on 900 Ohio, so I'm asking the city council if you would like to provide the extension to the lease to CloudCare that they requested of two months. Okay, that was three weeks. Yes, 100%. I got consensus, thank you.

3:45:53Speaker 15

That's two months from the expiration of the release, right?

3:45:56Speaker 10

October 31st, so it'll go until the end of the year, basically. Okay.

3:45:59Speaker 6

You want the bad news or the good news?

3:46:01Speaker 15

And we're going to still move forward on designing during that process, right? We still have access.

3:46:07Speaker 6

Public Works is working on that.

3:46:08Speaker 10

Well, actually, we'll make sure that in the extension agreement that we get access when we want it. That's it. That's a good point.

3:46:16Speaker 6

And then I have a bad news and a good news. Which one do you want next? Bad.

3:46:19Speaker 10

Would you say bad?

3:46:20Speaker 15

Yeah. I like the bad first.

3:46:21 – 3:46:53Speaker 6

They make us feel good. So we had a really bad rain event while we've been in this room, if anybody didn't notice. Yeah, I know. I spilled my coffee halfway through. So the Cypress Tree Trail washed out again. I just want... Council to know that we have moved to a new consultant because, not consultant, contractor, because the first contractor did not give us the price quotes for the repair that we needed. So we have moved on to another contractor.

3:46:54Speaker 15

It's not the guy that did the breaks, is it?

3:46:56 – 3:47:31Speaker 6

No, it's not the guy that did the bricks. And staff has already gone out there and repaired the road while we've been in here, and it's open again. So just giving you an update on that. Okay, so then the good news is- When's the permanent fix? How long does that- That's the contractor that we're waiting on. Well, they were already working the permanent- We were trying to get prices from the contractor that we normally do work with, and we waited. thought we were gonna get a price from them, and they just never provided the price. Right, Kevin, that was still the latest update?

3:47:33 – 3:48:02Speaker 19

Sorry, yeah, I would love for it to be repaired right now. Um, but unfortunately, yeah, like I said, we, they kept on promises, you know, they're like, you know, a couple of days when you were give it to you, we'll give it to you. And they never did. And we gave them a hard deadline of last Friday, um, to be able to give the stuff and we did not receive that. So we did move forward. We did meet this afternoon, uh, with, uh, Terry Roberts. Um, like I said, we met with them this afternoon and they said that they, that we should have a price and a timeline for getting it repaired on Monday is what they told us. Sweet.

3:48:03Speaker 6

So we're going to treat it like an emergency repair?

3:48:05Speaker 15

Was that the bad news or the good news?

3:48:07 – 3:48:22Speaker 6

That was the bad news. Oh, OK. So I just want to be clear. We're going to treat it like an emergency repair, even if it's above my authority. And we'll come back and bring that back to the council to ratify it afterwards so we don't hold up the repair, if that's OK with everyone.

3:48:23 – 3:48:51Speaker 6

Okay, I saw nods, thank you. And then the good news was just I got a very nice letter from the supervisor of elections, Mary Jane Arrington, thanking us for being a community partner and allowing them to use the St. Cloud Civic Center and the St. Cloud Community House during the August primary election and wanting to continue the partnership moving forward. So that was everything.

3:48:51Speaker 15

And that's at a no cost to them? Is that how we offer it up? Correct.

3:48:55Speaker 6

Well, they're technically doing our election for us, so we need to let them have it at no cost. That was all.

3:49:05Speaker 4

Thank you. That's it? Mm-hmm.

3:49:08Speaker 15

All right. On to Councilmember Paul.

3:49:13 – 3:54:42Speaker 4

So I wanted to share some important thoughts. I believe a healthy community depends on our ability to discuss city issues with honesty, accountability, and respect. Residents hold different perspectives, ask hard questions, and can challenge decisions without resorting to personal name calling. As elected officials, we were elected to serve the people, not to engage in extreme or demeaning name calling. Public service requires us to listen, remain accessible, and be accountable to the people we represent. We do our part, making ourselves available and meeting with individuals. At the same time, respectful civic discourse is a shared responsibility. Criticism is appropriate and necessary, but it should focus on issues, decisions, and outcomes rather than personal attacks such as low IQ toddler, because at the end of the day, I, Jennifer A. Paul, know who I am and whose I am. Serving in public office does not mean surrendering the basic expectation of being treated with respect. Meaningful conversations is possible when our conversations are grounded in facts and directed towards solutions. I was once told that when you conduct yourself poorly in public while connected to a business, school, or organization in the community, your behavior reflect on that business, school, or organization. Public conduct can influence how people view not only an individual, but also the organization's causes and communities they represent. That same principle applies to the conversations we lead in our community. Individuals and organizations that speak publicly about local issues have a responsibility to be honest about the reasons behind the resentment toward the leaders of City of St. Cloud. We must be willing to be honest conversations about decisions and experiences that have contributed to the frustration we see today. That honesty also requires us to recognize that changes affecting our community's small town feel that most of us have grew up here for a very long time did not begin with the current council. Many of the ideas, plans and developments we see today were established or set in motion years and some cases decades ago. Understanding that does not eliminate the need for accountability, but it does help ensure that accountability is directed appropriately. Accountability is essential, but it must be fact-based. It should not be driven by assumptions, incomplete information, or rhetoric that hides where responsibility truly belongs. When we take the time to understand the facts and direct concerns to the appropriate officials, we can create a better opportunity from meaningful solutions. Let's have the conversation, let's ask the hard questions, let's hold one another accountable, but let's do so with facts, understanding, honesty, and respect. And my next item on there brings me to, which you guys all received the nonprofit funding, where there was comments suggesting that the city does not provide funding to nonprofit organizations. And I want to thank staff for putting together. It was a time consuming task, but they did a great job with putting that information together. And I reviewed those records for the past six years. And what I found, there were numerous organizations that received government funding through the city. One individual stated that he never received government funding during the past five years. Based on the records I reviewed, that statement is inaccurate. I want to ensure that when information is publicly put out there, it's put out there correctly. I'm not going to announce the organization, but I just want to pick that out there as well. um secondly i did resign from the saint cloud main street um sent my email to um the secretary over there on 8 21. um i don't know if someone if we're going to have the discussion to have someone replaced on there but i just want to make the council known that i did resign on 8 21. um rick did ask me to reconsider because i originally sent it on 8 19 but After 820, I just said, you know, I was done. So just wanted to pit that out there. And then I also met with the BMX organization on 8-26, and just for the record, I just wanted to pick that I met with them regarding their lease proposal, and our deputy city manager, Scott, was there, and Parks and Recreation Stephanie Holtkamp was also there to discuss the concerns regarding their proposal, which Scott then also noted that on there. And next, I wanted to get approval for a proclamation for President Dirk Webb from the St. Cloud Chamber of Commerce. As you all know, he is retiring the end of this year. So I wanted to respectfully, because we are a business partner with them, to respectfully give him the honor of leading that organization. up until his retirement. So if the board is OK with that, I would like to. And you have the proclamation in front of you.

3:54:42Speaker 15

So this would be a proclamation that you give directly to him?

3:54:45Speaker 15

Not in a council meeting?

3:54:46Speaker 4

Yes, it will be next week.

3:54:48Speaker 15

Oh, yeah, next week we have a meeting.

3:54:50 – 3:55:08Speaker 6

He's doing a presentation. Actually, he's doing the invocation, and then he's doing the annual presentation for the chamber. So I think as much as we can keep things a secret, I think that's Councilman Paul's intent. Yes, 100%.

3:55:08Speaker 11

I'm in favor of that. And I think October 1st is the last day, so that would be perfect.

3:55:14 – 3:55:51Speaker 4

Yes. All right. And then I, just for the record, I did meet with Bill Filson on September 3rd regarding their lease proposal and like to see when we will have a conversation about that because I know He's waiting patiently to hear back on what direction they would like to go because he has already invested into the pit and doing capital improvements as well. And he has future capital improvements he would like to do, but he just needs a decision on that lease proposal. So just wanted to bring that up. Is that your light for this? Yes.

3:55:51 – 3:56:49Speaker 6

Okay. So Goldman York has been tasked with working with him on an agreement. I think that the biggest issue that we're trying to work through is the fact that they're requesting a 70-year lease extension. And they also don't want to pay for the water on the site. So there's some bigger conversations that have to be had. Toho Water because of their bonds can't give free water. We did finally get that answer. So they have provided a It's not a scenario. They have a bulk rate for big golf course users. So, Goldman York has those numbers so that the golf course can look at that during the negotiations. So, they have met.

3:56:51 – 3:57:05Speaker 15

Yeah, on that, I love the golf course. Love Bill. Great group of people. I mean, but at 70 years, I mean, we're essentially selling the golf course. None of us are going to be alive in 70 years.

3:57:07Speaker 15

And that's where we have to look at it.

3:57:09Speaker 6

We have big concerns.

3:57:10Speaker 15

We're selling the golf course, but not really. We're selling it through a lease. And so what are we getting out of revenue?

3:57:18Speaker 6

What are we getting out of it? That's the big concern. That's how I look at things. He's wanting to reduce the amount.

3:57:23Speaker 15

This is the last deal we'll ever make on this thing.

3:57:25 – 3:58:03Speaker 6

They want to reduce the amount that they're paying, and they want a 70-year lease. They say they're going to make improvements. They said they're going to make improvements, and I think Goldman York is trying to get them to detail what those improvements might be, because... There was conversations about certain dollar values that could be invested, which is great. Let us, you know, the Goldman York just wants those details so that they can recommend to us a better position. But, yes, so we tasked Goldman York with it because this is a really big issue.

3:58:03Speaker 15

There's smoke coming out of his ear, so I really wanted to say something.

3:58:06Speaker 11

Well, I just think we don't need to be Ray Kroc.

3:58:14 – 3:58:54Speaker 11

Explain. I'll bring it by short detail. Ray Kroc went to San Diego one day and saw the McDonald's brothers making McDonald's the first time there's ever been industrialized burgers. So he stole their idea and then he bought their company. And the way Ray Kroc and McDonald's made the money was not by the building itself, was by buying the land and leasing it to the buildings and the franchisees. So Ray Kroc, the founder of McDonald's, made most of his money by 99 year leases for McDonald's to be put on him. So I don't think we need to be in that business.

3:58:55Speaker 6

If council wants to give direction right now that you don't want to see a 70 year lease, that would probably empower us in this negotiation.

3:59:05 – 3:59:55Speaker 3

I mean, I'm probably in the minority on this. Actually, I know I'm sure I'm in the minority on this because I'm an avid golfer, but I think having a golf course in your community is an amenity that not every city can say they have. And if you look at other cities like Orlando, like Dubstrad, other places that have municipally owned golf courses, they don't pay anything. It's an amenity that the city offers to the residents of the people. I'm in favor of the seven-year lease, but that's... Dubs Dread's free? Free? What do you mean, Dubs Dread? I don't know if it's Dubs Dread specifically, but there are many examples throughout the state of Florida where... My understanding of the way Dubs Dread works is the city considers it a park.

3:59:58 – 4:00:13Speaker 10

and as they so because they consider it a park they do not expect to make revenue off of the park so they do lose revenue on the golf course operation, as I understand it, especially with all the things that they have to give out.

4:00:13Speaker 15

Who owns the clubhouse and the event? That's a different issue. They do make money.

4:00:18Speaker 10

I'm sure that the city does well on the taproom.

4:00:20Speaker 15

And Winter Park's in a much better situation than we are financially. That's Orlando. Oh, Orlando. It's not quite in the Winter Park? No, it's in Orlando.

4:00:31Speaker 10

Winter Park has the Winter Park Pines Golf Course. I'm not the Winter Park part. It's in College Park. Yeah, sorry.

4:00:39Speaker 6

And I think they pay for water.

4:00:40Speaker 15

You've been there? He's like the president of all of them.

4:00:44 – 4:01:48Speaker 10

I lived in College Park for 30 years. It's a beautiful course. It is. It's a great course. But the... I want to point out to you that the lease negotiations, and if we can get direction, it would be great, because I think this would move this thing forward quickly, and whether you want to do it tonight or not, or we can talk about it later. But as I sent you a memo back in May that explained the two different lease agreements that are out there, the golf course lease proper agreement, the agreement where the golf course exists, on which the golf course was built, they do have a right to renew that agreement. And they have a right to renew it at the current terms, which is renewing that agreement with the water to be on it, and them not having to pay for the water. They have that right in the current lease. They have initial term at 30 years, and then there are renewal terms of, I think there's two 10-year renewals on it.

4:01:48Speaker 15

So they had a 50- Didn't you just say that they can't get the free water from Toho?

4:01:53Speaker 6

It depends on how they do it. Listen to Mr. Van Fares.

4:01:58 – 4:02:51Speaker 10

So the second lease agreement, which is the lease agreement that the golf course operator has been paying the city for, let me just guess, the current rent is about- 5,000 a month, I think they're paying for the lease of the structures out there that were built by the city or owned by the city and are on city property. And they are the city's tenant in those structures, right? The clubhouse, literally the parking lot, and the cart barn where the golf carts are. does not have an automatic renewal in it, it has a renewal right in it to be negotiated at the time of renewal on the lease rent, right? They, in theory, could say, okay, we don't want to renegotiate our lease for the buildings, and we want to keep the golf course and live on our existing lease with the golf course.

4:02:51Speaker 6

But that's not what they want. That's not what they want. They want the building renegotiated. He feels that they've basically bought the building with all their payments.

4:02:57 – 4:03:13Speaker 10

So the offer that they made was to take both of those lease agreements and put it into one lease agreement where they would have the same access to the golf course property, the same free water that's out there, the access and right to use the buildings, and to pay a total of $5,000 a year. Yeah.

4:03:16Speaker 15

I'm sorry, how much a year?

4:03:17Speaker 10

$5,000 a year.

4:03:18Speaker 15

Oh, that's a year. That's what they want to pay?

4:03:21Speaker 10

That's their offer for the board.

4:03:22Speaker 15

Right now they're paying $5,000 a month?

4:03:24 – 4:04:36Speaker 15

Okay. And here's the problem. We are not like Winter Park. We're not like anybody else. We can't even afford to hire five new police officers that are much needed next year, or the 25 that's needed. We cannot sell ourselves short on anything. We own two buildings that can be restaurants. That one at the lake, which that's up right now, and we're limited in what we can make on that. So to go backwards and collect less, that's a disservice. Especially signing up, it's beyond our terms. I mean, that's really, I get it right now, it'd be great to, Bill's great. Golf course is great. Love the place. But these are decisions that impact. I'm on here for two more years. That affects the future. I mean, if we're just saying, okay, a two-year deal, now we're talking. But they're not going to do a two-year deal. I would feel comfortable and responsible. only making decisions where, you know, I'm here, you know, if it's something like that. But I just don't, they're not wanting that. They want 50, 60, 70 years.

4:04:36Speaker 6

And that's why it was so great to bring them to New York.

4:04:38Speaker 15

We might as well sell it to them.

4:04:40 – 4:04:58Speaker 6

That's why it was so great to bring in Goman York because they're familiar with these type of leases, with these types of situations, and they're able to, I think, to help us with these negotiations and to bring back, hopefully, what's going to be a better agreement.

4:04:59 – 4:05:27Speaker 15

That neighborhood Walmart down there, they're paying $25,000 a month. And that's a hundred year deal. That's a 20 year five, you know, with four extensions, four 20 year extensions. That's a hundred year deal, which essentially they're asking for almost that 70. So, you know, I can understand a lease like that because that's all that. That's a ground lease. And, um, Yeah, I just can't. The numbers don't make sense.

4:05:28 – 4:05:52Speaker 6

So I think I saw consensus that- We would deserve to be hung in the streets, shot in the streets if we do that. So I believe I had consensus to not move forward with such a long-term lease, right? Can I see nods? I see one, two, and I think the mayor made it clear, so that's three. I've got consensus to tell Goldman York that we're not going to consider such a long-term lease.

4:05:53 – 4:06:27Speaker 15

I mean, if they want to pay us $25,000 a month, now we're talking some real numbers. Now we can hire some police officers. Now we can take care of our city and our residents. But that's going backwards. That's not helping us any. Love the golf course. I go out once a year with the Chamber Golf Tournament. It's fun. Our police chief won't ever go out and play with us. Dangerous or not. That's it. I mean, it's really, it is an amazing thing out there, and it's just, we just, we have limited sources of revenue in our city. Yes, sir.

4:06:27Speaker 11

I was listening to Colby. I didn't know if he had anything else.

4:06:30 – 4:07:10Speaker 3

I'm sorry, Colby. I mean, listen, I made my peace. I understand I'm not in the majority here, but I would just warn if... If they don't do a long-term lease, this golf course, which has invested a lot into this as a capital investment that they've made, is probably not going to stick around. And then we've got this property. Is it going to be apartments? Is it going to be... It's not going to be a golf course. Well, we've determined that. I mean, if we don't want apartments, we don't... I'm just saying, it's an open space. It's basically a park, an amenity for the residents. and it might not be a golf course in the future if we don't do a long-term lease.

4:07:11Speaker 4

I would ask if we can bring it back and wait for Gorman to decide rather than just making a decision tonight.

4:07:19Speaker 4

Oh, yeah, we're not bringing a decision tonight.

4:07:20Speaker 10

But I would say, having been involved in negotiations like this at the step level... Oh, you just brought it up in this conversation.

4:07:27Speaker 10

This is very good discussion for the staff to pass on to Gohmann when we're talking about it.

4:07:35 – 4:07:53Speaker 15

I didn't even talk to Bill about carving off some land and taking that out of the deal and saying, hey, Gohmann, look at this. Would this be a good hotel site? Some other use. Let us throw another restaurant out there. I don't know.

4:07:54Speaker 6

So I think direction changed. Direction changed, so you are willing to consider 70 if Gohmann recommends it?

4:08:04Speaker 15

Obviously not. Before one moment.

4:08:08 – 4:08:23Speaker 15

The golf course, where are we at right now with them? Do we know where we're at with them, where Gohmann is? Because Bill told me he was willing to cut out all that land. Is that... dealing, is that idea in the trash? Did he ever bring that up? So he didn't even care about my comments.

4:08:23 – 4:08:40Speaker 6

They've had a one-on-one meeting, and Gohmann, I believe, has received the data from the golf course regarding financials and things. That's also another reason why it was great that we could have Gohmann doing it, so it's not public record. And Mr. Davidoff looks like he had more on that.

4:08:41 – 4:09:08Speaker 8

Yes. Gohmann York said meetings with them... Uh, they have asked a number of questions that they need to be able to provide information back to the council for council to make a good decision. There is some, there is still some information that they have not yet provided that Goman York is waiting on from them. They've provided some of it, but not all of it. Goman York has gone back to them again and requested additional information.

4:09:09 – 4:09:58Speaker 15

Yeah. And my concern amendment three is polling. We've seen the polling numbers. this is an important decision because if we don't, if we lose an ad valorem tax base, we've got to make up for it somewhere. And that golf course that we have to look at this as a business, you know, it's, it's love golf, love the sport. If you can call it a sport, call me. I don't know. I'm just, it's the hardest sport I've ever played. No, it's great. It really is. But we have to look at the numbers. Is it financially sound? If you own that piece of property, would you do that deal? That's how we have to look at it. Is it a good deal? And I just have to be determined.

4:09:58Speaker 6

I think I got consensus back to it was not a 70-year lease, but you guys want to see a deal is what I hear.

4:10:05Speaker 11

I think we just need more information. If Goldman's asking the question, is there a representation, let's push this, and I don't like pushing things.

4:10:11Speaker 6

Well, they don't support 70 years.

4:10:13Speaker 11

No, I'm saying there's more information that Goldman Young's waiting for. Let's wait for that before we make a decision on this council.

4:10:19Speaker 15

They're still waiting from the Gulf Force for more numbers, you said?

4:10:22Speaker 6

Just to negotiate the rest of it.

4:10:24Speaker 6

Just to negotiate the rest of it.

4:10:26Speaker 11

Let's put it on the table and get a full package, as the mayor said, even just like this building. Let's get a full package before we talk about it.

4:10:34Speaker 6

Because they're concerned that it's going to get sold.

4:10:39Speaker 6

We are? Goeman, with a 70-year lease that the operators are going to, they're trying to get the best lease they can to sell it to somebody else.

4:10:47Speaker 15

It's like the neighborhood Walmart. John Joyce built it and sold it. It was purchased the day it opened. Yep. April 2014.

4:10:54Speaker 11

I don't know if anybody knows this, but the financiers for the St. Cloud Golf Course is the founder of Discover Park.

4:11:03Speaker 6

He passed away recently.

4:11:04Speaker 11

Well, he's trusted.

4:11:06 – 4:11:17Speaker 6

Yes. His son is currently now in charge, and what we're being told is he's going to continue to allow Mr. Filson to be the operator.

4:11:17 – 4:11:37Speaker 11

Perfect. Can we just wait for more information? And, Kobe, I get it. Municipalities are great. Golf course is great. My kid's been out there. I think it's a great links course. There's very few links course also, and it's 27 holes, which is another valuable. I don't want to lose it, but I don't want to give away the farm. But I think we do really benefit from having a golf course here.

4:11:37Speaker 3

I completely understand that. Somebody's got to knock out this power bill. I would like to get some more information and have a more educated decision in the future.

4:11:50Speaker 3

We're on to you now, Colby.

4:11:51Speaker 15

It's your time. No, I'm still. I'm sorry. Sorry, Council Member Ball. Oh. Yes.

4:11:55Speaker 4

So lately I've been downtown.

4:11:57Speaker 15

I'm sorry. City Attorney, are you down? You good? Oh, yeah. I'm sorry. All right.

4:12:03 – 4:13:11Speaker 4

When I go downtown to the businesses, because I do shop at some of them, eat down there, and hang out as well, I always speak with the business owners. And recently, one of the concerns from a business owner, and I know Tisha has also met with the downtown business group. And some of them used to have, like, sidewalk sales and a pop-up shop, a tent where people would come and put the tent in front of their business. And then also, as a group, they used to have events as well. One of the concerns was the special event, I think, where is it each business have to do the special event or is it under the downtown business group that they can do the special event? Getting clarification on that and also what a business owner can do. Because I know there were multiple businesses that they used to have a revival and they stopped doing that because of the... issues downtown, so I told them that we did have a meeting and I would bring it up just to get clarification on that, so.

4:13:11 – 4:15:04Speaker 6

City Manager. So this is something that I think we've gone in cycles for years with the downtown businesses. The monthly market actually started, but it wasn't following city processes, city policies, and so the city stepped in and tried to help get it through the approval process. I know there's been recent conversation because we've had conversations that you can't do an outdoor sale without an outdoor sale permit or a special event. That's in the land development code. So, for instance, I'll use a specific upcoming event as an example, which was the Small Business Saturday. So, Main Street sets up on Small Business Saturday. They set up a tent. And, you know, talking with – I brought in Mr. Manzaris to ensure he agreed with my interpretation. And it was that if they were operating on private property and not doing a sale and they were not going to require any city services, then they didn't need a special event or a sales permit. Cuz they're planning on just giving away free things for a couple hours and they're not going to impact anybody. But if you're going to be an individual business and have an outdoor sale, That's prohibited by our land development code without going through that process. And then the other option is to do a special event. And yeah, you can have, I think the easiest thing would be if the downtown business group did a special event for these bigger events like they do for the monthly market. And that way multiple businesses can participate. So I think that, I don't know if that helps.

4:15:04 – 4:15:37Speaker 4

I mean, it helps that I can relay it back to them, but I just told them I would bring it up because they do watch the meetings and they can go back and hear from themselves of what actually was said in the meeting. But I just wanted to bring that up. And the last thing I have is that Just for the record, we did all receive the email from Ms. Erin Jinks regarding the St. Cloud Citizens Foundation. I know Dan responded to the city council, and then our city manager responded back to Ms. Erin Jinks, but I just wanted to put that on record, and I'm done. Thank you.

4:15:40Speaker 15

City Manager, you good?

4:15:42Speaker 6

Oh, I'm sorry, yes.

4:15:43Speaker 15

All right. Council Member Urban.

4:15:47 – 4:16:27Speaker 3

Yeah, I just had the opportunity to meet with the South Florida Water Management and their field office over there. Great meeting, great group of people. It brought me back to the, was it Hurricane Irma or Ian? One of those where we had the flood risks and all throughout the city and all the pumps and everything that had to be set up. and it's just great to have a great partner there. They work year-round to do a lot of things, not just that, but especially during hurricane season and the floods. It was very educational and great, and I would encourage the city council, if you haven't already, to go meet with them. Other than that, that's all I have.

4:16:28 – 4:17:00Speaker 15

Yeah, I believe Council Member Paul and myself, we've gone out. Have you all been out there yet in South Florida? No. I went out there, oh God, what year are we in? When it was under construction. I knew the contractor out there, Dutch McGinnis is his name. But yeah, what a cool facility. Nicole gave you the tour and that whole crew. I sit on the East Central Florida Regional Planning, it's a long, Regional Planning Commission with her as well. All right, Council Member Fletcher.

4:17:02 – 4:17:23Speaker 7

Um, I just want to reiterate, um, thank you to staff again for all the budget work. Um, and then also to the council for the wreaths across America. That was a big help. Um, I did want to bring up, um, I believe that I had asked for a resolution to be brought back for the mobility fees and I'm wondering why it's not here again.

4:17:24 – 4:20:33Speaker 10

And I apologize. I wrote myself a note to bring that up under my time. So after discussion, we had a lot of discussion on the staff side about that. And there's some recent court development that has addressed something that I think the city has to move in a different path. As you know, there is currently a discount offered on mobility fees across the board. The direction we understood that the Council wanted to move forward with regard to its impact fees and mobility fees was twofold. It was to remove the discount on residential impact fees, so basically start charging 100 percent, and also to determine how to figure out a way to basically eliminate or at least put a moratorium on mobility fees for commercial projects, right? So we looked into that issue and we, the case law and the research that we did determined that when you actually put a discount in place and you remove the discount, when you basically, you are basically increasing the fee at that point. So you put the discount in place, when you remove the discount, now you are increasing the fee. so you have to go through the process like you're increasing the fee i thought you already approved the fee and we didn't put a discount we did so why wouldn't that i don't understand i thought you can move around there's there and when we looked at it and we did more like a salary range right you can but the case law says that now what you've done is you've told the world you've got a you here's our fee that we're going to adopt it we're going to reduce it by 15 for now we're going to charge you 85 so when you When you take away the discount, now you're taking it back to the 100 percent amount on the collection rate, so now you've increased the applicable fee. There's a court case that talks specifically about that. The other problem with it is the discount was across the board. If you're going, there is a manner in which you can have different discounts with regard to different uses, meaning a different discount or no discount for residential and a discount for commercial. However, it has to go through a different process. So we simply couldn't just adopt a resolution to remove the discount of 85 percent. because we are now increasing the fee and we'd have to do it by ordinance. That's the first step which we can work through. The second step of that is if you did it, you couldn't just do it for residential unless you redo an entire study. So staff and our office have been working towards determining a way to do that. Now, the way that that has to be done is to take the data that shows that commercial mobility fees really haven't been collected here in the city. You look at the disproportion between residential permits and commercial permits and say that it's an unreasonable disproportionate relation between those two uses. And that's how you come in and say, look, our commercial isn't anywhere near what our residential is, so that's why we can afford to discount the commercial rate.

4:20:34Speaker 15

Which is, I think, why we've been talking about it.

4:20:36Speaker 10

Right, which is what we're trying to do is make sure we can enforce this.

4:20:39 – 4:21:31Speaker 7

Sorry, Sean, I was just commenting. So my thing is, so we had a discussion several meetings ago, and we added the, we were talking about commercial, and then I asked for the residential portion. Then at another meeting, I asked, let's bring back the residential portion only. I don't care right now about the commercial. I want the residential brought back to raise it back to the 100%. When we're looking at the budget with the mobility fees and we're trying to generate revenue, going back to the 100% makes sense. When we had our joint meeting with Osceola County, the first thing they said was, hey, you adopted at a 15% discount, raise it back up. So I don't understand, like I understand there's, when did we find out that we couldn't do this? Because it's been 60 days.

4:21:33 – 4:22:24Speaker 10

Since I asked for this specific- We started working it up for the 17th meeting and when we started doing the research and working on it. There's also a recent case out of, is Jeff here? Palm Coast. Palm Coast, thank you. Where the court in Palm Coast threw out their increase on mobility fees because it violated Senate Bill 180, basically making it more restrictive. It wasn't as simple an issue as we thought it was. When we looked further in it, we thought the better course of action was to move forward in a more cautious way to adopt the changes, the increase, the removal of the discount by ordinance, and then move forward with a greater discount on the commercial side.

4:22:25 – 4:22:46Speaker 7

Because I think with the You know, it was advertised. It was advertised, it was approved at a discount. The development community, all of the associations, they were all aware that this was a temporary discount and it could come back at any other time. And I don't think it's more restrictive. They all are aware.

4:22:46 – 4:23:07Speaker 10

I don't disagree, but we have this Palm Coast case where the court has basically said it is that increasing impact fees is more restrictive during this period that Senate Bill 180 applies. And that's what they've done there. So we are trying to move forward to get it done as quickly as possible. I think there's just a different process.

4:23:07Speaker 7

So what happens if we move forward anyways? Because we don't necessarily have to follow every county, every city, every jurisdiction.

4:23:14 – 4:23:46Speaker 10

In my professional opinion, you want to risk of having your whole mobility fee structure thrown out. Because I believe, and when we went through the mobility fee analysis, one of the reasons why the from the residential home builders did not object as strenuously as they initially said were because the council said, well, okay, we're going to discount them. And that was part of the discussion we had with the attorneys that were representing. So if you take away that discount, there's a chance that they're going to come back in and say, okay, we're going to challenge the mobility fees again.

4:23:47Speaker 15

Can I ask a question?

4:23:48Speaker 10

It's your turn.

4:23:52 – 4:24:10Speaker 15

And I don't have a light. So what's the point of, why not just say, here's what the fee is? Like what's the point of having a discount and playing all those, the numbers game when you just say, here's what the fee is. And then if you got to raise it, you do another study. But now.

4:24:11 – 4:24:23Speaker 10

No, I'm not saying you have to do another study, right? Or what we're, what we we'd have to do is you couldn't do it by resolution, right? Again, there's, there's, there's a couple of components to the discount piece.

4:24:25 – 4:24:56Speaker 10

And what we've done, the research we've done, we do not think you can do a discount. You can remove the discount for residential and not remove the discount for commercial. Again, the discount of 85% was across the board. It wasn't done for residential only, right? So you would have to eliminate the discount for commercial and eliminate the discount for residential. That can be done by ordinance. And then we started actually drafting an ordinance to be able to do that.

4:24:56Speaker 7

So the 15% applied to both commercial and residential, not just commercial?

4:25:02 – 4:26:03Speaker 10

Yes, sir. It was across the board discount. Not just residential? Yes, sir. So that's how it is. Now, these discounts have been in place, and St. Cloud has discounted its impact for years because years ago, frankly, the experts that, We're doing the studies. As I told you before, the whole analysis behind an impact fee and mobility fee study is the expert going to make the determination that these are the right numbers for your future capital improvements for whatever you're doing. The discounts were built in, frankly, as a belt and suspenders for when the impact fee payers wanted to challenge the analysis that was being used for the cost. So they basically would say, okay, here's our 100%. Well, we're going to build in a little cushion and we're going to say we're not going to charge that 100%, we're going to charge it at less than 100% so that we can justify our number meets the rational nexus test that's required. And that's why they came in, and that's why they were in place, right?

4:26:03Speaker 15

I do think a better... Because the formula, their methodology is challenged. Exactly, right, yeah. It's all based on the methodology. Now I understand why the need for a discount.

4:26:13Speaker 10

Right. That was the first part.

4:26:16 – 4:26:28Speaker 7

So the way that the discount came about back when we were going through the seed study and all that stuff is they were threatening lawsuits because of what they considered too much of a price.

4:26:29Speaker 15

Residential builders?

4:26:31 – 4:27:06Speaker 7

All of them. All of them. They were fighting it. So working with the Homeowners Association and all the other entities, the thought was like, all right, let's discount 15%. Let it all work in. Let it all get under play, you know, so that there wasn't such a big hit. And then come back at a later date, and raise it. So now that we've adopted, at a 15 percent discount, everything is in play, now we can't raise it back up, is what we're being told.

4:27:06Speaker 10

Well, no, that's not what I'm saying.

4:27:07Speaker 7

As easy as was initially... We can't simply, yes.

4:27:12 – 4:27:27Speaker 10

It was, when we did the research, simply drafting a resolution that eliminated the discount for residential could not be done by that way. We have recommended and we've talked to staff, but we could draft an ordinance that eliminates that 15% discount.

4:27:28Speaker 15

I do believe that- But that also brings the commercial up.

4:27:30 – 4:28:17Speaker 10

I think you'd have to do a commercial and you run the risk of a challenge on it. The analysis that happened in the Palm Coast case, which is on appeal there, as I understand it, basically saying that Senate Bill 180 prohibited them from passing an increased mobility fee. I think that's going to be resolved through the courts, but I think that's going to take a little while to do that. But it is out there as an issue that we had to look at when we were recommending what's the next course of action here. So if the council wants to move forward with this, you could eliminate by the ordinance that we can have drafted and we can have it on for first reading very soon and get it approved.

4:28:17Speaker 15

Next week, is that-

4:28:20Speaker 6

I think an ordinance can't go until October.

4:28:25Speaker 10

Well, the first reading piece could be on the 17th.

4:28:31Speaker 15

Is that what we're talking about on this? The mobility piece?

4:28:34Speaker 10

Yes. You have the draft. For next week? Yeah, you have the draft. Oh, not everybody has this? No, I don't have the draft. That's a draft.

4:28:40Speaker 15

Can I share it?

4:28:42Speaker 10

Yeah, I don't know. It's just a draft.

4:28:45Speaker 7

Is that on my desk maybe? I've never seen a draft.

4:28:49Speaker 10

I've never seen that. Yeah, so that's the draft for the- That's what I was wondering. I've never seen a draft agenda.

4:28:57Speaker 6

We went over them during briefings. You didn't have a briefing this week?

4:28:59Speaker 15

Right. Okay, that's why I just caught up with them the rest of the week.

4:29:03 – 4:31:13Speaker 10

We can continue on that path, however, our recommendation is going to be is that you remove the discount for both residential and commercial. Now, that doesn't mean you can't come back in later on and establish an even greater discount for the commercial side, which is the analysis I think you need to do that needs to be done by an expert that goes back to the number of commercial permits that have been issued over historically in the last few years versus the number of residential permits. That's it. If that's the approach you want to take, we certainly can put that in place. I don't know what that's going to mean. There is, as you know, there's still the 90-day provision in the statute regarding an increase in mobility fees would still be applicable for removing the discount, so a commercial piece of property that came in within the first 90 days or submit an application for a permit within the first 90 days after that ordinance was adopted would still be able to avail themselves of the discount. So there would be a break period where we could work on the discount, an additional discount for commercial properties to be put in place immediately. And again, the statute says You have to put a 90-day period in if you're going to increase the fees, but if you're going to lower them, you can do it immediately, right? So I'm just off the top of my head from a calendar perspective. You could adopt this in October and move the discounters across the board. There'd be a 90-day waiting period before those numbers kick in. And during that 90-day period, you could work on another discount for the commercial property and implement that immediately. very soon after that 90-day period expired, right? So we're looking at January before a... Before it takes effect, yeah, because you've got to, you've got to, I still think you have to do the 90-day waiting period because you're telling folks you, instead of paying, if you owed a dollar, instead of paying, you know, instead of paying 85 cents, now you're paying a dollar.

4:31:14Speaker 6

I don't think we've had the consultant agree to do the commercial piece yet.

4:31:19 – 4:32:14Speaker 10

Well, we've had some more contact with that, and I don't necessarily think we need the consultant on the discount for the commercial side. I think we can generate enough data internally. I know I've talked to staff about it. And again, it all goes back to what I was saying earlier, the number of residential permits compared to the number of commercial permits, right? And the concept is, yeah, you have commercial mobility fees, but you're really not getting anything in dollars because you're not getting commercial development. So the system on which the mobility fees is created to generate the dollars to support the capital improvements, you're not getting any of those dollars from commercial now. or you're not getting anywhere near where you should, right, because you're not getting as much. You're getting a lot from residential, but you're not getting it from commercial.

4:32:14 – 4:32:25Speaker 15

So that's where the... And you can't treat it like the building permit fees where you just vote to reduce it like we do. If they were collecting too much money, we can't just start collecting less?

4:32:26Speaker 10

No, you can't.

4:32:27Speaker 15

Say, no, we don't want your money.

4:32:29Speaker 10

Well, it's somewhat of... We're not going to cash the check.

4:32:31Speaker 15

All right, we're not cashing it.

4:32:32 – 4:33:00Speaker 10

It's somewhat of a similar analysis, but much more involved because the building fees are supposed to be based on the actual expenses associated with, you know, the building permits and do that. The mobility fees and all your impact fees are based on what's the cost of capital improvement, what's the anticipated time you want to do this, what's the per unit cost, and then these folks that do math figure it out. That's why I went to law school.

4:33:01Speaker 15

I'm glad this council started having that discussion months ago. At least we've got a path forward.

4:33:07 – 4:33:29Speaker 10

And I apologize. I did write myself a note to bring that up under my time, but I got sidetracked. Um, so we can work quickly, uh, some Ivy and Stacy don't throw anything at me to get it on for the 17th is for first reading. We have, we have, we've already worked on the ordinance to be able to do that because you saw it on the, on the draft agenda.

4:33:31Speaker 11

You're up next. Okay. I'm just paying attention.

4:33:36Speaker 15

You're still up council member Fletcher.

4:33:38Speaker 7

You have, um, that's all I have. Thank you, man. All right.

4:33:42 – 4:35:30Speaker 11

Thank you, Mayor. Just so you know, the Florida Turnpike expansion is ahead of schedule. It's all the way from here to Miami. I know it sounds slow, but we're about a year ahead of schedule for completion of it. Go to Florida Turnpike FDOT and look at where we're going, but it is ahead of schedule. Just FYI, four years ago, A ton of asphalt was $400. Today it's $1,200. Just so if you want to know why costs are associated with it, it's the cost of materials. We do have $1.5 billion already allocated for Osceola County for new streets and roads and things such as that through the Metro Plan area. However, with that, we've got eight or nine projects moving at the same time, so that's why you see a lot of congestion. So I can't say there's going to be relief, but we're trying to push forward with all that. I'm fighting every day to get different areas to go on. when they choose ahead of schedule and also note the road entrance. When they say ahead of schedule, it is as of now. It's a priority, both of those are priorities, but I don't know, you know, when they get done. If you guys go on the road, you'll see that they're working, but it takes a while. I just wanted to update you on that. We have, October 15th, if you want to put it on your schedule, we have an experience that we do each year with Metro Planets called the Blind Experience, and what they do is they put blindfolders on you in a cane, and they have you walk around intersections with that, and they have a helper help you to explain how it is to... to be blind and what we need to do for the disabled people and that kind of thing. But everyone's invited. It's October 15th, and this year it's in Winter Park. It's 9.30 to 11.30.

4:35:31Speaker 15

Oh, it's not like right by the Florida Mall with all that traffic.

4:35:33 – 4:35:47Speaker 11

No, no, but you have somebody walking you, but you actually have a blind experience where you're going and your centuries pick up. It's wild because then your hearing gets better and your feeling gets better, but it's a blind experience, but everybody here is invited to do that.

4:35:48Speaker 15

That's scary. Are you doing it?

4:35:50 – 4:36:26Speaker 11

I've done it. Oh, you've done it? Yeah. I just want to invite everybody because it's interesting. It's like, whoa, because close your eyes and walk across the street and hear the horns and hear everything gets magnified because of our census. But that happens, and everybody here is there. The Lake to Lake Trail, we're meeting with Osceola County, and it's going to go through Okeechobee. I'm fighting for it to come through St. Cloud because it will be the last stop, and I talked to the city manager about that. before this really desolate area to bring the bike trail from lake to lake. There's a meeting in Oslo County. I've asked to attend that, so I'll be part of that.

4:36:26Speaker 15

Is this a concrete asphalt?

4:36:29Speaker 11

Yes, asphalt lane. And then it'll be incorporated in what we have here. And it'll go through St. Cloud all the way down to the lake. From Okeechobee going up? All the way north, yeah, to Ocala.

4:36:40Speaker 6

It would go through Walker.

4:36:42Speaker 11

Walker Ranch is probably, that's part of the reason we're doing Walker Ranch. That's a Walker property?

4:36:46Speaker 6

The project that was continued this evening?

4:36:48Speaker 15

That sidewalk's going to cut all the way down to Okeechobee? It's going to come through. What I'll do is once the- I remember you talking about connectivity, but I didn't realize it's- Yeah.

4:36:58 – 4:37:11Speaker 6

There's two paths, and Deputy Mayor's fighting for St. Cloud to get the path that will come through to our lakefront. The other path goes through Sunbridge, and we get skipped.

4:37:12 – 4:40:29Speaker 11

We won't have that tourism, that bike tourism. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN ON WEST ORANGE TRAIL. THERE'S DEFINITELY SOME TOURISM THERE, SO WE'RE TRYING TO WORK HARD. SO I VOLUNTEERED TO MEET WITH USVILLE COUNTY AS ONE OF THE METRO PLAN MEMBERS ON THAT SUBCOMMITTEE. SO I'LL UPDATE YOU THEN. GET US A TRAIN, MA'AM. GET US A SUNRAIL. I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH SOTO. I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH CONGRESSMAN SOTO TO DO THAT, AND WE MET WITH METRO PLAN. SOTO MET WITH THEM, AND I MET WITH THEM. SO WE'VE GOT THE INITIAL AND THE CITY BROUGHT IT OUT ALL THE WAY FROM THE AIRPORT THROUGH ORANGE COUNTY DOWN THERE, COUSY ROAD, OR OFF CENTER TO NOVA ROAD AND BRUNA TRAIL THAT WAY FOR MASS TRANSIT. WE WON'T BE ON COUNCIL BY THAT TIME, BUT IT IS IN THE WORKS, AND I'M SPAREHEADING THAT WITH CONGRESSMAN SOTO. Our next disabled Transportation Board which I'm the chair of is next week and it's going well But with this amendment 3 there will be cuts in transportation And we're doing an audit now I'll be going to the new reservation system because it asked for them to do better studies On the pros and cons of that so I'll report back to you when that's done, but that'd be next week I'll be at that committee Last night was phenomenal. We had a bunch of firefighters that were initiated into the firefighting degree. We had the youngest firefighter in the city's history. I think he was still in college as he was going through this. High school. I'm sorry, high school as he was going through that. And I'd like to thank the city manager for inviting me to go on stage and greet them. Thank you very much for inviting me to do that. Vision Zero, from December 2018 to 2024, there's a 30% decrease in fatalities and major accidents. I know it sounds bad, but there are, and we're working for 2050 to be zero. There's a lot of things we're putting in place that's helping transportation. It just takes a lot of time to do that. We have, like I said earlier, we've got $1.5 million in Orange County. 550 in seminole 500 some change in in oslo county but we have 12 million to 17 million visitors that use those same roads and uh and walkways and ways so we're working very hard with vision zero to have no no fatalities uh e-bikes are killing us right now they're absolutely killing us where there's a seminar we went to and uh There's two trauma doctors that said 74% of the people that come in with injuries have not wore helmets. And with that, there's been more fatalities. And then secondly, when they're wearing helmets and wearing bike helmets, they've clocked one of these e-bikes at 83 miles an hour because they're jazzing them up and they're taking them and they're flying down the road. We're working again with the tri-counties to have a special session. I'm not in on that, but there's five people that are needing an e-bike to put regulations in place for the three counties. So I'll update you as that goes along, but we're not waiting for legislation. But we got to... hardest thing to say, we've got to bite this thing and hold on to it because that is the most incidence of raising in fatalities and major injuries in trauma centers.

4:40:30Speaker 15

Tallahassee didn't want to touch it.

4:40:31 – 4:40:51Speaker 11

Well, they didn't, and I don't know why. And other than that, I would just like to say thank you guys. I think we're getting a lot done, and I think this council I appreciate letting me report to. I don't get to talk to you about that, but that's what I've been doing over this past month, and I'll continue to do so. So thank you guys very much, and I yield back to you on this, Mayor.

4:40:54 – 4:41:29Speaker 15

All right. Well, hopefully we'll have four more years of you on that board. I think you love that thing. You're making progress, I'll tell you. Yeah, also, I was at the firefighter soaring in ceremony. Thank you, Chief Miller. Amazing job, as always. Yeah, you got to hold the baby. I know the city manager was jealous of that. A little jelly. I want the baby. No, that was so cool, especially with the firefighter had his two sons up there, and when the families are a part of it, that's a special moment for those folks.

4:41:29Speaker 6

Brother and sister were sworn in together.

4:41:31 – 4:41:49Speaker 15

Oh, I saw even more family members. The dad was explaining, you know, that's my daughter over there, that's my son. You hear that, Chief? Well, the other side, you're not green. I mean, green, green, green, green.

4:41:51Speaker 18

Chief one day they'll grow up and be a real hero. It's okay.

4:41:56Speaker 11

Hey, but it's 11.

4:41:59 – 4:42:20Speaker 15

Let's get it on. Um, no. What a great experience. Always. Uh, I wasn't able to make the last one. The deputy mayor was the last one. And I know you had a bunch of them coming in and, uh, we're pretty much there at the 48. Are we pretty close? Sorry, I didn't mean it. I know you're playing Bejeweled or something over there. Something else other than that.

4:42:23Speaker 14

I don't know, Ant Farm or something. Who knows?

4:42:25Speaker 15

What is your rank?

4:42:27 – 4:43:25Speaker 14

It's Fire Chief. You wouldn't know because I forgot my badge. I had a senior moment when I was trying to get ready in the middle of a lightning storm. So just a little clarity, by the way, on that lightning storm first that just passed through earlier. We got over two inches of rain on the south side of the city there, almost three right near that subdivision. Um, we had another little water issue where lightning strike hit a fire hydrant, blew a water main out. So it was an interesting afternoon today. All the safer grant personnel except for 12 have been hired. We currently have five on a wait list, and we're interviewing four the week of the 26th, 27th. And you had a number of paramedics in the morning. Last night, I believe nine out of the 13 were paramedics. On that holding list we're currently holding that are waiting for January for a hire date, all are paramedics. So we're hoping to fulfill the rest of them. We may be plus one or two paramedics at the end. which is good for us because paramedics are hard to come by in this market.

4:43:26Speaker 15

Fireboat's coming online. Can you show me some video of that?

4:43:29 – 4:44:34Speaker 14

Yep. Fireboat, we're working on the whole training packet. We have all the information from the manufacturer. We're moving from the Stone Ages to the Jetsons, so we're going from Fred to, what is it, Elroy? Is that it? i'm trying to reach back in time george george okay isn't elroy the sun it was yes okay at least i got the characters right um but literally our our boat now that we retired um it's definitely fred flintstone era it was from the early to mid 80s um and it just it's done uh thousands of dollars to get it fixed it just wasn't worth it we got this new one in a lot of technology on it it's going to have you know night vision so just like the helicopters, the FLIR camera being able to see at night, we'll have, we have that on there. We have side scan radar, see under the water. Um, we'll have some rescue capabilities, has a fire pump on it. It's gonna take a while to get everybody trained on that properly because it's a high liability item. It's a half a million dollars. And the last thing I wanna do is have to come back and explain to you why one of our guys ran it into something they shouldn't have run it into. So lots of training ahead.

4:44:34Speaker 15

What do we get? We, we got three 50 from the state for that.

4:44:39Speaker 6

We got money. I don't remember how much.

4:44:41Speaker 15

It was a good amount.

4:44:42Speaker 14

I thought it was 180.

4:44:46Speaker 15

Of the 500, really? I think so.

4:44:48Speaker 6

I don't remember. Are we going to ribbon cut with a bottle of champagne?

4:44:52 – 4:45:16Speaker 14

I'm not buying a bottle of champagne on my CDP card. Somebody else can do that. No, I believe I can buy some sparkling water, but I will not be buying champagne. And they actually, yes, we are supposed to christen it. And how we do that, we're going to come up. We have a whole... fire department tradition for fire boats, of course. It's different than everything else, so we're gonna do one of those. That'll be a first for us.

4:45:17 – 4:45:40Speaker 15

Yeah, and if you just go back to like the past five years, and you know, that's probably when you ordered the ladder truck, and now you get the fire boat, and we got three new fire stations, and so we're gonna break ground on the public safety complex. I mean, we are really putting the money where our mouths are. We're really taking it serious when it comes to public safety.

4:45:40 – 4:46:19Speaker 14

Interestingly enough, it's coming up on our research time. December is our research for our EMT and paramedic licenses. We pulled some numbers from last time for our research, and there was, I believe, 53 paramedics on the department and 21 EMTs. On this renewal cycle, we're looking, I believe, mid-80s for the paramedics, and 45 for the EMTs. So just the sheer volume increase over the last two years of personnel. We were only sitting at 75 on shift before total. Right now we're at 123. So we've grown a little bit in two years.

4:46:19 – 4:47:13Speaker 15

Yeah, and as our city grows, obviously, you know, you can't stop the growth. We all know that. And we all say, well, we can manage the growth. This is part of managing the growth, is keeping up with the public safety. And I don't think the public really sees that. That's a huge part of managing the growth. It's keeping the crime down. Chief, did you want to add to it? Oh, you're walking up. That's right. I am now. Would you agree? That's a major component of managing the growth in our community. It's not just voting on this development or that development, annexing this one, that one. Ensuring we have proper public safety in place, the stations in the right areas. I know you spend time in his office, and it's like a beautiful mind on his wall there. Yeah.

4:47:13 – 4:47:31Speaker 14

A previous city manager referred to me as Rain Man for some reason, or Propeller Head or something like that. You guys took your job serious, and we appreciate that. You know your stuff. With Chief Gerke's support, it's all coming together, right? Because we have to work hand-in-hand every day to make the city as safe as we can.

4:47:31Speaker 15

First advocate with the drones. Orlando had to copy us, right?

4:47:35Speaker 18

Yes, that's correct.

4:47:37Speaker 15

And then gave you credit for it.

4:47:39Speaker 18

Absolutely. On the news. That's right.

4:47:41Speaker 15

Absolutely. Used our footage. Yes. St. Cloud's footage. That is correct.

4:47:45 – 4:48:07Speaker 18

It's a very successful program. And not only for law enforcement, but for the fire department, too. We can actually go to house fires on our behalf with the drones, share live video footage for hot spots, car accidents. We can share that video feeds with hospitals. So in real time, the trauma center can actually see the extrication that Chief Miller and his team are doing. So they understand what they're going to be waiting on. So it's very, very, very important.

4:48:07Speaker 15

And these are long-term investments, especially the fire headquarters we're about to open, right? I believe the week of October.

4:48:16 – 4:48:49Speaker 6

We were, but now there's two council members not here that week. We were looking to do the Hopkins Park groundbreaking The admin ribbon cutting both the week that is Florida government week, which we were trying to do something every day. But Mayor, you'll be at the FRA conference and Deputy Mayor has another event. So we're now looking to see how many we can do on Monday. You want to go back to back?

4:48:50Speaker 14

That's fine. Yeah, Monday's right. Throw it on there. What day? Let me know the date. We will do our best to have everything buttoned up and ready to go.

4:49:00Speaker 6

We were hoping to do it that week because it just means it's a little more special doing it that week.

4:49:05 – 4:49:35Speaker 15

Yeah. And Dan knows this. It's cyclical. The development of these projects... You remember when you did city hall here and you essentially in those five years you did lakefront city hall, the PD, there were a number of projects that became the turnpike. I mean a lot of capital improvement projects and fast forward 20, 25 years later, now we're at it again with, you know, we've got the public safety complex, we've got the new fire headquarters, we've got how many, how many fire stations in the past five years?

4:49:35 – 4:49:49Speaker 14

So we had temporary 34, which we'll have to build a permit for one eventually. But we've had the rebuild of 32. We have 35 and then 36, which we renumbered to 22, which we'll have a more firmer decision on after November.

4:49:50Speaker 6

A squad truck, a ladder truck.

4:49:53Speaker 14

The squad was a while ago. We have a ladder, and we've replaced an engine every year for the last five years, including this one that we just.

4:49:59Speaker 6

The squad showed up.

4:50:00Speaker 14

Yeah, the squad.

4:50:02Speaker 6

Four years ago, less than four years ago. We just didn't have staff on it?

4:50:06 – 4:50:18Speaker 14

No, long story, but the ladder truck. Yeah, different situation. Remember, we're also replacing ambulances every year, too. And we've replaced snack vehicles.

4:50:18Speaker 15

We've got the first ladder truck. I mean, it's just an amazing time to sit on council here.

4:50:23Speaker 18

We have a mobile command vehicle that's going to be coming in that will help public safety all across every aspect.

4:50:28Speaker 15

And RoboDog's coming, too, right? Sorry? RoboDog?

4:50:31Speaker 18

Yes, that was a UAC project. It was another grant project that we put in for. Our barricades for our special events. Yes, another grant project.

4:50:37 – 4:50:51Speaker 15

Look at all these amazing things we've got. And it's just so cool to be a part of that. Because five years from now, I think it's just going to be kind of flatlined again. And then another 10 years after that, it's going to go right into another round of these type of projects.

4:50:52Speaker 14

Well, except for his project. That thing's going to go on for a decade.

4:50:57Speaker 18

The public safety complex. It's going to take a while.

4:50:59Speaker 15

Yeah, because there's many phases of that. Okay. I just want to thank you guys.

4:51:03 – 4:51:21Speaker 14

Thank you. Appreciate it. Appreciate you guys being there last night. Um, we have three, three more fresh faces starting mid October and then we're probably gonna do the rest in January. Very cool. One question though. Robo dogs had be as big as George's. No. Okay.

4:51:21 – 4:53:03Speaker 18

Um, if I may, deputy mayor, I know you mentioned the, uh, LPR is the license plate readers. I just, I just want to tell you that we are looking at everything. We're, we're looking at our policies and our procedures now that I have you all in the same room. Once we feel that we are confident in everything that we're doing, which I'm very confident that we are, we will look to basically reactivate them in the areas that we are permitted to do so. So I can't tell you some of the things that we are missing right now are missing individuals. And some of the things that we've actually solved using these cameras are absolutely amazing. And again, I know I spoke to A lot of you, but Matty Soto and Stefan Stearns. We would not have found that vehicle driving on our roads if it were not for our license plate readers. A lot of the hot list items, which are stolen vehicles and missing cars and missing people, a lot of those things are not... They would automatically load into the license plate reader system and notify us. So I have countless... cases that I've already relayed to our city manager that we've actually solved using these, which are armed robbery suspects. We've actually had burglary suspects that are coming in with stolen vehicles. And right now, we're not getting the amber alerts, the silver alerts, the blue alerts. We're not getting them. We're reviewing all of our policies and procedures right now. We tightened it up considerably where it has to go to one source and it has to be a two person redundant system where if somebody wants to look at something, there has to be a case, a case number and everything else. And we've been doing that the entire time. But again, I was looking for best practices and everything I'm talking to. We're going to basically make sure our policies are in place and everything's good. And we will look to activate those cameras again in the areas that we're allowed to, which is be off the state roads until we get better guidance from the legislature from Tallahassee.

4:53:05Speaker 15

Yeah, the age of cameras, it's interesting, isn't it?

4:53:09 – 4:53:33Speaker 18

I would say it's the future of public safety because it does aid us. And again, when we have manpower, when we're strained with manpower to hire people, and that's usually one of the highest costs, we can leverage some of that with technology. It certainly keeps us safe. We can use them, especially when we use them effectively and safely with transparency. They do work. And they work well. Yes, sir.

4:53:33Speaker 11

Thank you. Yes. They're walking around with these.

4:53:50 – 4:54:13Speaker 18

so and i just again i want to just reiterate you know if you violate the law i will hold you accountable especially in our department and we have had a case where we made arrests so that is one thing that we do do very well we certainly do not allow people to wear our uniform and do bad things and if they do they're gone we don't want them they can go harm somebody else's agency but with that being said we certainly have we have good use of our technology so

4:54:14Speaker 15

Thank you, sir.

4:54:15 – 4:56:06Speaker 15

Appreciate you. Um, I just want to point out the, um, obviously y'all know the past month in August, we had some issues with St. Cloud mobile home park, uh, OUC city of St. Cloud stepped up, um, made sure that the power, everything was operating correctly and everything the city has done. I know the city manager and staff have done everything they can up to this point. Um, along with the city, uh, at the city attorneys, uh, with his advice, Council Member Paul, myself, we've been out there. City Manager brought some food out there. We went out there a number of times. Even I think the second time they lost power, before they got it back on, Council Member Gilbert offered it, the pizza event out there. But I want to give a shout out to Osceola Response Team, Richard Hare from over in Kissimmee. He drove over four nights in a row. and delivered food to these folks. Just an amazing guy and his whole team over there, all volunteers. You know, they get food, donate from Chick-fil-A or Publix, Village Inn. And I want to obviously give a shout out to those organizations, I mean, those companies. How cool is that? That's a community taking care of our citizens. And just with the basics, food, water, let's get them through this thing. And they're not expecting to get fed forever. It's You know, when they get their power, the power's off for four or five days, they lose all the food in the fridge. Power's on for five days, then the power goes out for another five days. They lose all the food again. It's a money thing, and we need to do everything we can to get these folks through this issue. I think they're okay right now. I think there may be a few that still have some issues going on over there, but I just want to thank our council and our city manager, and I know Kelly went out there as well with the food, so that was very cool.

4:56:07 – 4:56:44Speaker 6

And just to clarify, we had an employee appreciation event. I talked to a couple of the people on the spirit squad. They didn't know about what was happening, because they weren't in one of the departments that had been dealing with it. I let them know about the community. And they chose, they could have kept all the leftover food for employees. you know, to have for lunch for today. And instead they chose to bring all the leftovers. And it was about 200 half sandwiches, chips, drinks to the community. So that was, I was really proud of staff for that.

4:56:44 – 4:56:55Speaker 15

Yeah. And when I, you say staff, the chiefs, both of them assisted with everything. I know you were out there, chief Miller, Bob Detheridge was out there as Pete chief filling a bunch.

4:56:57 – 4:58:13Speaker 15

And I just played my role. We all have different roles here and we all come together. And when we have situations like this, I, I wouldn't say we weren't prepared for this. I think that we just all kind of had to come together and figure it out and to help our folks out. But I think maybe we need to discuss. if this happens again in the future. We obviously know we've got the fire chief, and he knows his roles. I'm glad that we have Richard over at Osceola Response Team now as a tool in our chest, that something like this happens, we can pick up the phone, we know he'll be there. That's something we know we can count on. And it takes outside organizations to be part of that team, because you know we can't do it all. The city cannot just do a lot of that stuff. I wanted to just kind of bring that up and give thanks to those folks and let the folks know at that mobile home park that we still continue to care about them as we get them through that issue. Other than that, tomorrow I'm throwing out the first pitch for fall ball. I think a couple other council members are joining us as well. Danielle from Little League was here for the first couple hours of the meeting, and then I think after Ken's time to talk. Great night. It's an honor to serve with you folks.

4:58:13Speaker 14

I think we truly accomplished great things for our citizens here.

4:58:17 – 4:58:30Speaker 15

With that being said, we have an information section here for everybody. I know everybody loves to hear this stuff. Friday, September 11, 2026, Veterans Council meeting. Wait a minute. September 12th, right? No, September 11th.

4:58:31Speaker 11

Tomorrow's the 11th.

4:58:33Speaker 15

That's right. Sorry. Tomorrow.

4:58:36Speaker 10

If you wait 35 minutes, you can see.

4:58:38 – 4:59:19Speaker 15

Gotcha. We're almost there. Yes, Friday, September 11, 2026, Veterans Council Meeting, 1 p.m., City Hall. Thursday, September 17, 2026, Special City Council Meeting, 6.30 p.m., City Hall, Council Chambers. Thursday, October 1, 2026, Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting, 3 o'clock, City Hall, Council Chambers. Thursday, October 8th, 2026, City Council Meeting, 6.30 p.m., City Hall, Council Chambers. Reports weren't listed. Number 11, Fiscal Year 26, Community Redevelopment Agency Minutes, May 7th, 2026, Economic Development Advisory Committee Recommendations Letter. And with that, this meeting is adjourned.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.