Town Board - Regular Meeting
The Town Board addressed concerns regarding Dr. Kelt's medical practice, actively seeking solutions to retain services. Discussions also focused on proposed updates to the wetlands code, including a 100-foot setback, and clarifying permit requirements for sheds and other structures.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Town Board
- Meeting Type
- Town Board
- Location
- Shelter Island, NY
- Meeting Date
- September 1, 2026
Transcript
94 sections
Namaste, My name is Julie Brenham.
I know that you are going to talk about the wetlands code update later.
I wanted to know if there was any other way to get her to listen to Sarvalink. When we talk about this, maybe we will reach a conclusion. Hello, who is Judy? I have come here as a worried citizen. Recently, a friend of mine, a doctor, In Kelt's office, he received a notice stating that he had requested the town board for help to continue his work on Shelter Island to secure the position of a major corporate hospital. I want to clarify that I am not here on behalf of Dr. Kelt. I have not spoken to them. I have not spoken to them. So you may have other information. I just wanted to tell you as a worried citizen that you know that we do not have a medicine shop and doctor. Potter's time is also getting shorter. Why don't you want to lose the game? He has been in the hospital for a long time and I don't want to lose it. That's why I want to make sure that the town board knows and see if you can do anything to help in this situation. And I also want to tell you that I have posted this on Facebook. so that I can see if anyone else has heard anything. Lu Birkua contacted me. He said that recently, along with the medical center at Pikunik, she was sitting with some members of the board. He said that if they can do something for her, then you should be free to contact them. So that's what I'm keeping in front of you and I hope you can help to fix it. Thank you. Talking about this, when the doctor
When I received that email, I informed the rest of the town board. I have also contacted Stony Brook and Northwell and have spoken directly to the head of Bay Medical Center through Lupa Connection. That's why I'm waiting for his response. So when I found out about it, I sent an email to find out what was going on. I talked to Dr. Kilt today because when I saw it on Facebook, I wasn't sure if he had put it there before telling it clearly or not. Because it wasn't our story. I wanted to respect him until he said he was fine. And he said he was fine. I hope. Yes, but I couldn't believe it. So, yes, we are trying to find a solution to this because we understand that the community does not want to lose them if they are willing to remain and want to get rid of that administrative burden under which they are under pressure. If the community wants to make some kind of support letter for them and wants to sign it, then I will provide it to Stony Brook and Northwell. Just to see if it gets any help that they are deeply connected to the community. And as I have already told them, they bring a client base. This is going on from Stony Brook. This can be a good option for them or it can be a base for Northwell. I did not contact NYU Langone because they had recently closed the Greenport workshop. So I did not think that they would want to close a very busy workshop. Because I used to go there and I was transferred to Riverhead. So do they want to start with Shelby Island workshop?
Understood. So, maybe you are saying that the support letter will be available to those who show their support.
To give them a little more support when they talk to their senior officials.
And I know that they have set a deadline for December and it is coming very soon. I know. I am hoping that somehow they will move forward.
Yes, I hope that something can happen. Or they can wait a little longer if they know that something is going on.
Okay. Thank you for your time.
Is there anyone else in the audience who wants to say something? Is there anyone on Zoom? Sylvester, I will be in the office for their site plan.
We have Katlyn with us. You gave us two and three parts of the short environmental assessment form, right? If you want to say something on this, then I think this was the last information that we were waiting for after the end of the sarvajanik hearing. I have the last information for the department. That is why I am ready to answer any question. To repeat this, it has been categorized as an unlisted action. Its visualization is in part 2 and 3 of the short AAF. Along with that, there are also negative announcements in your packet. The conclusion is that there is no significant negative impact. That is why there is no need for any AAF. I am ready to discuss on any part according to the need. Or if you want me to tell you in detail about every impact issue in part 3, then you can do as the board wishes. We can proceed with the questions as long as you don't want to listen to the lecture.
I mean, I read it again yesterday.
Yes, but I don't know if it's right to listen to it for the public. I don't know. Whatever it is, it was posted on the website.
It was posted on the website so that it would be available. On the attachment of part 3, I had one question. I don't want to find it. This was footnote number 1. So yes, Sapok County Dwar Anmodit Spachchata Yojana. 26th November 2025 and 12th June 2025. And then you said that there was a mistake in the Anmodit days. Now I just wanted you to clarify why we are with this.
Okay, but... So I believe that the mistake was that because it was announced on November 26, 2025 and the Health Department of Suffolk County had updated it, they did not update it on June 25, 2026. But when you look at the final date of the announcement, it is still three years from the beginning of November. So this is just a small administrative discussion, but I wanted to record it like this.
I just wanted to be safe with it. I just wanted to be safe with it. I just wanted to be safe with it. I just wanted to be safe with it. I just wanted to be safe with it. I just wanted to be safe with it. If this is the case, let's discuss what we want to include in the resolution for conditions. I know that Thomas, I think you started a bill at one time. I don't know if you still have that bill. And then we finally opened it again for the public.
Yes, I mean to say that I think I already had most of the conditions.
Yes, I had.
Teresa Mason had included... This was for the proposed fire access road, even though they were going to be outside the city's wetland permit area. So I just want to connect it there so that there is a little more security during construction. Yes, ordinary things, so that they remain cut and controlled. And I think I also had this when we started discussing this for the first time. And during the public hearing, during construction, the internal maintenance will be arranged in such a way that the construction is separated from the regular site users and visitors, in which the independent landlord will be included in the road and parking space. And I always wanted to keep it for delivery. For delivery, big trucks come from behind. I mean, what about a small delivery like Amazon, where just the stuff is kept. Yes, I think you are talking about the big ones. Delivery.
I think so. Once you have a fire apparatus load, then elders should not have any problem.
Yes, I was thinking the same. Let me just take fire access for them. Let me see this. 20 feet wide, tamar apron. This light is troubling me. On the existing farm road, 20 feet wide, Prablit Bajri.
So he was coming from there.
Manhattan. Just look. 20 feet wide, Prablit Bajri. I can see this. So this is grass here.
It looks like this.
Right, because it is an area like a wetland. I have kept it close to the wetland. In fact, when I am looking at it with color coding. Okay, I think this is better. Yes, I think that once everything is done and they have the entry rate and access rules ready, it will be better to come for delivery. Now that we have this, so this came after the first discussion. It was good to have a file inspection.
It was good. And then we got a letter from the fire commissioner that they think they should be a part of the site plan. I think it's good.
I think when we get that code, we have to ensure that we need to be a part of it. That's all I have. So, Thomas, if you can make it positive, for 21st December, because we don't have any work for the next week, I won't be here on the 15th, but you know, I can consult on it. We don't consult on it. When it is published, don't give any tip to Thomas, and give it to him on the 21st. This is good.
Yes, I didn't have any problem, like after the memo came from the grocer.
No, the evidence is his.
Are you going to be able to get rid of Ludwig?
Um, okay. We can ask Louis to come back. Yes, you guys were in Bastav. Last night, we started listening to Sarvajanik on 43 and ended it with a joke. To give up shade and to apply for a building permit, there is no permission to give up the bar. So I know that I can have a problem with this one.
I actually called Raid last night because my question was, what is a shade? Is there a shade in those plastic pop-up containers? And she said yes. So I said, for example, your building spot box will be considered a shade. So now we need a permit. We need to get it registered. We need to make sure that we don't have to talk to Cedric.
But then he was also explaining that the building code of the New York branch says that this is also a shade. So there should be a tie down to avoid a storm in it. That's why he's looking at it because I think we need to define it clearly. What are we talking about? Because otherwise it is so vague that I think it will create some uncertainty in the permit process. So, I think we just need to take a minute. I just need to sit and read again. And I just need to limit it. What does this mean in terms of shade? Because it can be very difficult if we mix it with a coat. So he is looking at it, he is thinking about it. Okay? I have the same thoughts. Because I don't have any problem in doing this. I think that the shades that people make in wrong places, they are very close to the property line. They are in wetland setback and such other things. I understand why they don't want to get a permit for them. But then there are many other small things. Maybe I am not, you know, if you can take it anywhere by holding it with a handcart. Is there a need for a tie-down to avoid a storm?
But if it is a shade and if we define it as a shade, then it should be according to the New York state constitution. How do you think you will prepare it?
I want to talk to him more about this because we started the discussion and then I realized that it could be more complicated. So I need to look at different code sections and solve it. But I didn't get a chance to do this last night and in the morning. But I will work on it and by the time we meet on the 15th, I will have something. Okay? We will meet next time. But yes.
A good thought.
It was just for my explanation.
No problem. Like last night when I was driving here, I was looking at everyone's courtyard and thinking, is that a shade? Is that a shade? We are trying to issue and regulate so many permits and then there is also the aspect of movement. That's why I think I just want to ensure that it is absolutely clear that we are giving permits to someone and not to someone else. Okay. So I called him and he said, oh, I didn't even think about it.
Because I'm telling him all these different situations.
He said, okay, I understand what you're saying. Okay, that's fine. So we'll discuss this. Okay. We'll think about it together. So maybe we can work again for the 15th.
My beach swimming pool, which is less than 24 inches, had a question on it. I agree that there is no kind of erosion in it for which electricity is needed. I just had a question that I had in my mind.
Can you tell me? Oh, so this is the size of 40 sheikhs.
I think they are like pop-up pools. Like a small pop-up pool for kids that you can buy from Costco and blow out of the air. I understand. I understand.
But what's in the ground that's less than 24 inches? That was the question. Yes, this.
It says that it was built...
So if we can see it on the 15th, then we can repeat it.
We have to do the subgenic hearing again.
So we can keep that subgenic hearing on the 21st. So it looks like a plan.
So I will work on it for you. Is everything okay now? Earth.
There is a lot to say about this. I don't know. I met Megan and just talked to her. But the surprising thing is that the near-shore overlay is in my mind. Maybe it's in other people's minds too. You and I are just thinking about how other communities handle such issues. Right? Just to understand how things are going. And you know that in reality, what we have found is that many of our neighbors are handling these issues from which we deal with the near shore overlay. They handle it in their environmental code. Right? The one who was making a setback in a way. So in the local communities, somewhere between 100 and 200, like some people were in the 150 zone, right? So, with any speciality, with a certain amount of feedback, whether it is a rectangle or an ardubhumi, you know, which they are trying to map, right? I feel that the biggest thing for me is that when I am looking at this ardubhumi code, then thinking about that 100-foot setback and how it actually does two things, which I feel that Nearshore is also overlaying, So this is very complete. And it is also an interesting thing because we are thinking about the Ashore overlay to think about how these two things work together. And as I said, how do other communities keep them together? This is also important to see. And then the second thing that came out is that a resident contacted me and we, Megan and I were talking about this this morning. Think about this. If we move forward and set a 100-foot setback, then we will make a few huts unsuitable for construction. So this will affect the value of their property.
This morning, we were talking to the owner of a house or property about one of them. And how to handle that situation from the beginning, right? Do you know? Before the wetlands code, right? You know, when we used to cross it, they used to have a pond of water. It used to be a plot of the age, which was of a definite zodiac. And after that, they might have been able to make something. And that too with the permission of the ZBA. So how do we How can we, as citizens, handle such situations independently and without any pressure? And that's why I don't have any clue. But since this is something that I am talking about with people, I thought I would keep it in front of all of us. I still feel that this is a great way to move forward, and it is generally the right direction, but it is important to think about those influential assets, whose wealth can fall quite a bit. So how do we handle it? As I said, it is independent for them. No, this was one of those things that came out. And in reality, I have only thought about it since the beginning of this program. Because as soon as we make that limit from 75 feet to 100 feet, we make about 540 unique properties. I don't know how many people will lose their right to purchase, but we know that we have already had an issue. And I am sure that this is not the only one. There are a lot of private properties that are private, especially in the areas like Silver Beach and other such areas. So it will be the next round that I will do, but it is something that we have to think about. That is why there should be some kind of discrimination or something like that so that people do not lose the ability to use their property. But there should be some direction in this. So this is something we have to think about. Sometimes when we are doing something like zoning, and this... Jason, I think. What kind of priority do we have for this? EIS should be done. This is all type 2. According to the New York government, voice production is a type 2 procedure, so there is no need for any secret consultation for this.
So I don't think so.
I'm just thinking about doing an impact analysis. But I think if you are going to work with Christina, then do the lines again. How is the inner space from here to there? So that you can see on the screen how it looks.
The second interesting thing is that T.P.
has studied all the eastern parts of Suffolk County and how they handle the Ardra Bhoomi law. And I think I had given it to everyone a while ago. This is a blue-covered book and it was collected with the grant. And that's why they went and examined all the town courts in the east. I have to take them home. I will bring them and give them to you again so that you have a representation. But there have been many good suggestions about how to handle the Ardra Bhoomi. The different rules are influential and the rules are not influential. And that's why this is something that we can see for guidance when it comes to how we want to handle some of the more challenging conversations. The second thing is that DEC has refined its rules on the environment of fresh water. And that's why they have become more difficult now. So whatever is around fresh water, you will have to call DEC. They will have to make an application for Jal Nikah. They will tell you how much it will be regulated on the basis of existing plants and animals in Jal Nikai. Tunnel pools, which are only seasonal, can be dry for half a year and then become a pit in the rainy season. This is also something that can start to be regulated in the Ardra Bhoomi code of DC Sweetwater. I know that our Ardra Bhoomi code looks at Kharay and Sweetwater. We should think about it while looking at it, because DEC is going to tell us a lot about what is going to be done, what are the setbacks for some areas, and whether this is in accordance with their new law in the form of fresh water. Do you have an idea when it will come? It has come. They just lack employees. So when you send them a request, it takes a lot of time to answer them. You know that like all good things, This is going to tire you out a little. But this is a big change. So, some of it is according to other rights, like Southampton and East Hampton do some things, but their government organizations are also very different in comparison to us. So they have a planning department. They have a person like Southampton. I believe that there is a person who is the main influence of all the other countries. And he is a environmental specialist who looks at it.
He does his job and tells you to a great extent what you can do. We really don't have anyone like that.
That's why we need to keep those solutions in the code. So I think there is something that we all have to think about. There are some big questions here. I don't think we need it because it is already under it. I think we just don't want anything that is struggling with this first-group. But I think that the way we have prepared the list of activities for which you can only take a permit, I think that it is more clear somewhere. I think I should make this.
I like to understand that yes, I am in Kishkhand.
I think the part where we need to work on is that where to draw the line, how to handle the line, and how to give the vigilant variants to those who have no option. And to keep them made, they have to go between 75 and 100 feet to make the envelope.
What kind of promise is this? Like, do you have any... Sandar Bhai's other municipality, how do they handle these kinds of things?
Yes, you know, my research was done in East Hampton. Their rule is that a special permit is required for construction within 150 feet. So for septic, it is 200 feet. But a special permit means that if you fulfill the conditions, for example, you will not do anything harmful to the economy, then you are entitled to the permit. Once you come inside 100 feet, then you need a witchland variance and this is considered a witchland. And then there are the factors of fluctuation, like what is the benefit, what is the necessity, is it too much, is there any harm to the environment, is it too harsh and difficult? But yes, there are a lot of holes like this, which are completely within 100 feet. And this becomes a challenge, that okay, this is the hole of construction, like this thing has to go somewhere. So the main challenge on that point is that you move back as much as possible and make a buffer, i.e. a buffer with vegetation. So yes, they do that. I think that East Village also does this kind of analysis for wetlands permit within 100 feet. So yes, I think that I have seen that usually if you are within 100 feet, then it is harder, like Manak. Apart from that, it is like a special permit, where you get less or less rights, unless you are harming the wetlands. Albert, what do you think about this? How can we handle this?
This is difficult. I know.
This is a good question. This is a difficult situation. I don't know. I think that every asset will be different and its effects will also be different. According to that, I don't know. It will depend on the board how to move it forward. With honesty. It needs more analysis. And input. This is not an easy task.
We have a lawyer from the planning board who was working on this. He has done some modeling. Southampton? Pardon me? Didn't the lawyer from the planning board model this code on Southampton? There was a lot of work on this. Some part of it.
But due to the way the government of Southampton is structured, this is actually... As you know, they are not available. So we had to make some changes and improvements to make it suitable for the conditions here.
What do you think, which experiences like wetlands, permit processing are important?
As you were talking about the environmental characteristics in some municipalities. What do you think about wetlands? Which part of the code do we need to pay special attention to in this draft? Anyway, let me tell you what is different.
Administrative permits are handled differently in Southampton and Eastampton because they have the Interior Planning Board and the Environment. There are advisors who consult these permits and issue them without going to the town board. But we don't have anyone to do that. I mean, otherwise, this responsibility will be on the read and it doesn't seem appropriate. So, the wetlands permit application, which comes to the town board as a administrative certificate, and it is handled in the same way as we are handling a 100-foot chute. This is an administrative permit. It is like an application where we can put conditions or restrictions on whatever we are submitting, but without a complete sanitary hearing process, because maybe this is a This is just a small demand. So we have attached it to help organize the process for small things, so that everything is heard fully and not for everything. Because we have a lot of small demands, which later become a big thing. So we have attached it, which I hope will do a good job. But I think the biggest change is the setback of 100 feet. So we may need extra guidance on how to handle things between 75 and 100 feet. Like if people do not have any other option other than construction, Are there any things that we should make necessary? For example, we need drywall for your gutter so that runoff can be reduced. But are there any things that should be practiced in every veterans application that we can make a part of the requirements of the permit? That we can make a part of the requirements of the permit? That's an interesting thought.
So, first of all, keep in mind that if you have the ability to construct for that lot, which we are talking about, right? Just arrange it in such a way that
And a lot of things are included in it because you also have a flood plain building code, right? Yes. So it is used for some of these properties. It is possible that you have a lower property where 100 feet is quite high, but it is also in a flood plain. And then that house will have to be built on the pillars. There will be many different rules on how to build them. So as we go into those more challenging lots that have not been built yet, because maybe this is not the best built lot, then a lot of things will be included in it. And as the water level of the ocean is increasing, because it is increasing, we have evidence that it is increasing, whether we like it or not, it will be more difficult to build some of those lots. So, you know, there is a lot that is included in this, which we... And this is an interesting subject to talk about as we talk about the water level of the ocean. Looking at the codes of other cities, I found it very interesting that to regulate development, the wetlands code should be something that has a setback of a certain distance. Instead of making an overlay map, which is fixed and every time there is a change in the wetlands or the level of the sea increases, then you have to make the whole map again, right? Because these things are not much, then at least 10 to 20 years of age, these boundaries change. So your overlay, you are understanding that it will often be in the wrong place, right? Because these things are not stable. I felt that doing Vinayam in this way is a very interesting specialty. Because instead of making an overlay zone, you always measure from where the natural specialty is present in the present. Isn't it? So I feel that it really provides more security. That's why I found it very interesting. Yes, because in front of us, there was a situation like Ram Island Wetlands Avedan, where a map was made at one time and then there was a debate that we should use this map, the map of HAL and the map of HAL did not go to the internal areas. Yes, and at that time it was actually the same thing.
Yes, because I thought that looking at it again, as we all have a near-shore overlay in our minds, but to think that in the cities where there are such vineyards, they need a current survey, right? Current survey. And then with that current survey, you measure the existing natural characteristics so that you can know that this is correct. And I thought, oh, this is to do,
It's a very smart way. Anyway, I found it interesting. Apart from this, I like the idea that for Bhukhando lots, a different experience should be thought about. Maybe this should also be written that if you have any plot, like this new code will make it useful. It will make it useful. You know that
Neuntam aavshaktay hain. Ye nirmaan karne ke liye kisi bhi istati mein neuntam aavshaktay hain. Toh mera matlab hai, mujhe lagta hai ki humara sawal ye hoga ki yadi hum aisa kuch lagu karne ke chhuk hain toh hume un sampatti maalikon ke liye kisi vikalp ya upay ke baare mein sochna hoga. We sharte kya hongi jine hum wahan shamil karna chahenge Like this clearly, not more than 75 feet. You know, I don't know if anyone has any thoughts about this, what other things can happen. Anyway, one more thing that we talked about is with ones.
So in the past, people have come to us and they said that we will use the virtue of neem. So you know that if we keep only this much part of the building, then it is only reconstruction. But you know that this point has been reversed many times. So I want to think about doing something like Vidhwans according to the definition. If you are dropping a certain part of the structure, then you will have to take it to a place of more maintenance. I think that saying that we will use the existing foundation and then saying that there is a gap in the foundation and we cannot use it does not make any sense. If you are making a new foundation by destroying the entire house. I don't think that you know us.
He had said this in South that this was not based on values. Like those values that you are removing. Those values that you are removing.
So I think that according to the definition, science will also be an interesting subject. Yes, because if you 90% of a building is being demolished and a new one is being built, so you can do more maintenance with it.
Which might also mean that for those holes, you know, you will put some of them in a non-maintenance state. So then it will be more important to include that hole more than 75 to 100 feet or more. Because you will force a lot of people to step back. Because that is what we want. Is there any other topic about which we should now make a plan? No, I think it is enough to go back and think a little, but these are the only things that have come up recently. Recently and you know that. I am thinking about it.
But I mean, when you look at the wetlands code, you are actually looking at a dirty area. You know that our wetlands code also touches the wetlands of sweet water, but I think that the main focus is on fresh water because it always changes and stays in place. And usually we get our majority votes for wetlands of fresh water. And I feel that they are very challenging. I feel that most of the time, with the red lines of sweet water, you can get away from your wealth. Where to keep things? In this case, you have a little more laziness. With all the water, it often happens that half of your wealth is included in it naturally. That's why I feel that this is the place where we actually face the challenge, like water assets. I am trying to think of a way. I think the Wetlands Upsamiti that was working on it may be very detailed. Please support yourself and maybe come back on the 15th with your thoughts and we will talk more about it. Do we need to choose something certain? I don't know. I think everyone should just take it back and think about those things and information. Then we will bring it back on the 15th. Maybe some of us,
I think we have it as a starting point. But I think the big thing to think about is what are the restrictions? Will we think from 75 to 100?
I mean, we can say anything to make a memo on it, like what other cities are doing or suggestions to start. And I think that there are many of those conditions that we are putting on every wetlands application. If we put them in the code, then it will be very easy. You know that you need this property buffer. You know that you need some things. That's why I think that we can definitely do this. We will keep it back in the agenda on the 15th. Anything else from the board? So I think about the time of Julius, in the answer to the previous question, that if we are keeping it back for the 15th, then I don't think that we will have anything ready by the end of September or the beginning of October. So in November, before October comes, we will decide the year of birth, before we actually do the year of birth. The tips and reports of the board members. The Aachar-Sahitha board meeting took place on 19th August. I don't know if you saw the last week's work session, that's why I don't know. Last year, we had a discussion at the four corners of the table.
I was going to say that I don't remember.
He was there with me. But he has issued his simple English guide for political science ethics. Therefore, we are going to distribute it to all the department heads and committee members so that they can deliver it to the workers and the people of the committee and then are available to meet the Duff department heads or the committee members. And I hope that in the near future, there will be a department head and committee members in the department at some time. So, it can be a topic of the agenda. I got a chance to meet Phil Siegel in that meeting, who is a new Ethics Board attorney. It's a good relationship. I think it's a little old because I forgot to put the dates on it, but basically it was my PEP meeting. There is so much that I don't know how to explain it. It is very long. Yes, this is really very interesting.
These are interesting things. This was basically the update of every organization. I met with the task force of Chief Read. And basically, I prepared a roadmap and a guide. Um toh bahut acha tha, aur humne saath mil kar kuch tayar kiya aur maine unhe kuch antim sampadan wapas bhaj diye. Isliye mujhe lagta hai ki shayad iss saptan sabhi ke input ke liye bahar chala jayega. Hum bas samay seema par kuch antim badlaon ka pata laga rahe the.
Um, dekhte hain.
Megan and I met with the colonel and we were talking to their guide and just near shore overlay and were asking questions about the most safe methods. They were really very helpful and they also gave their advice on the code of the other city, right? Just in a way. Yes, I don't know. Start with science. Just get some vision cones. Which city works best? So they were really very interested. And in our call, some of their scientists were included. And they said that they will be available as a tool to answer other questions, which is very good. Like we are thinking about the near shore and wetlands. So it was very helpful. And then what else? And what? Oh, about the film coming on Netflix. I contacted almost all those local businesses, about whom I could think. I messaged the owners. I made them aware about the hours of work, especially about those days when the teacher was going to be on leave. Sometimes these people are closed on Sunday and Sunday. That's why I wanted our local businesses to just think that maybe you can think about changing your day off. So they were talking very well. And then I also prepared a small sheet for Netflix, in which all the details of the businesses, their price range, and according to my information, it was time for them to open. So I sent it to their production team. Tomorrow. What's the time? What's the time?
A lot of people are going to come who won't know where to go or what to do.
Absolutely right.
So we did that. Shelby, I was also thinking that maybe you must have done this before. But I was talking to some production staff that can we send them the beach map of Shelter Island? Is it like this? If you have a flyer, then I don't want to send it either. Can you experience the beauty of Shelter Island? So anyway, I mainly wrote all this. I want to go back two weeks. Green options are still working on RFP for their solar recycling. So they are answering questions related to it. That work is still going on. I want to thank all those who came to the Craft Fair and Green Expo. I think a lot of people came. All our town councils, various organizations and people had a very good conversation and people were really connected. I think this was a very amazing event. I know that many people went to the fire department and the country fair. In all, I think this is a wonderful event. I want to thank everyone who came that day. Last Wednesday, on Wednesday, the Wizzle of Hope was organized. And because of the weather, it took place in the community center, which was another beautiful event. But it was very impressive. It was really good to hear about some people's journey and the support they have received from the community. We know that we have a really good, strong and loving community. So it was really amazing to see this. I feel like I'm here. Last time, I sat in a lot of committees. I know that they are very calm. I was the seat of the creek keepers. So they are all trying to upgrade their septic system so that we do not put nitrogen in the fields and ponds. But yes, we are in this situation now.
Yes, I am busy with the budget of various departments and committee heads with Ashley. So we are in this process. This week we have something else. I am collecting information on the budget and then I will start working on it. So it is being made. Someone asked me the last day, in which direction does the budget seem to be going? I said I am very busy right now. I am stuck in a very deep work. I have no idea how it will be in the end.
But I have the update of the program. So this weekend, in Heaven House, the last farmer is in the market. The program to weigh the snapper derby will start at 4 p.m. in the plot next to the town hall. The American Legion is organizing its sixth annual barbecue competition. You can buy tickets for it online at MitchellPost281.com. And the last thing I wanted to say, because we have mentioned Netflix, is that there was a post of the Walden Casting Company on Facebook, and we contacted Netflix Production to know if it is real or not. Because in the age of AI posters, everything seems a bit complicated. So they said that this is real and they are looking for extra artists. So if you are interested, then contact that casting company. I have thought, I think two or one.
Two others are casting. That's why I started doubting again. Like which one is it?
What is that one with the ball-train?
I think that we will propose to go into the field of work for the employment history of an experienced worker and a special employee.
I thank you.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.