About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Council
- Meeting Type
- City Council
- Location
- Sandy, UT
- Meeting Date
- May 12, 2026
Transcript
1023 sections (from 1,161 segments)
Madam chair, we're ready whenever you're ready.
Good evening, everyone. Thank you for joining us. This is the Sandy City Council meeting of Tuesday, 05/12/2026. We will start with prayer and a pledge. Miss Christiansen, can I count on you for the prayer? Thank you. Absolutely.
Our dearest heavenly father, we are so grateful to be gathered together this evening. We ask thee to watch over and protect us and the citizens of Sandy as we are dealing with the issues that face us and particularly with the budget and how to best spend our residents hard earned money. Please bless us that we would be able to have thy spirit with each of us and that we would be able to understand those things presented to us and to be able to ask the questions that are needed and to come to the solutions that will best benefit Sandy. Are so grateful for all the many blessings thou has given us, and we say these things in the name of thy son, Jesus Christ. Amen.
Amen. Thank you. And let's rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. Introductions. Mr. Fratto, starting with you.
Thank you, Madam Chair. My name is Dustin Fratto. I'm with the city council office. There are a couple other council staff members in the back of the room, Justin Sorenson and Liz Theriault.
Good evening I'm Tracy I'm counsel for the council.
Chris Edwards with the council office.
Chris Nichol District 3 Marcy Houseman District 4 Brooke Christensen district one
Cindy Sharkey, at large. Allison Stroud, District 2. Brooke D'Souza, at large.
Aaron DeKaiser, at large.
I am Sandy Mayor Monica Zlotansky.
I'm Shane Pace, city administrator.
Lynn Pace, city attorney.
All right. We have two information items. One public hearing, just one item on consent, and two council voting items. We'll be taking public comment, general citizen comment, at 6PM. We also will be taking public comment on the two council voting items later as they come up in the agenda. Okay. I am ready to go if you guys are. First up is budget departmental reports. Brian, can you lead us off here?
Yes. Good evening, counsel. So tonight for our presentations, we have my department, administrative services, then I'll cover non departmental. We have police fire community development and RDA and then as you know next week will be our last round of remaining departments for presentations so to start out with my department administrative services
oh hey Brian did somebody put the dongle back in that remote
That?
Sorry. Liz is going come grab it.
Alright. Thanks. So administrative services encompasses four main divisions. We have finance, HR, IT, and facilities. So I'll be covering all those divisions.
Most of those are general fund, but our IT fund is a proprietary internal service fund. So overall, we have a decrease in our general fund of 112,000. So we're one of the areas in the in the general fund where we looked really hard at our 24% cuts, and we did some targeted cuts. I'll step through through those with you. And with the some of the savings of those decreases, we I'm recommending that we reallocate to backfill some of our line items that we've cut in the past years.
To missus Houseman's point in the past, retaining and having a good culture of employees isn't just pay. So we're trying to fill in some areas where we've reduced in the past, like training and and conference travel and and then also providing some other helps because of our staffing reduction but administrative services administration we're eliminating the software project manager position which that's one area we're generating a lot of savings and then we're reallocating that to some of the savings to meetings travel and equipment expenses so the net impact is a 163,000 in savings in that cost center In the finance services cost center, right now we're trying to underfill this position of treasurer with an accountant position. We're seeking some operational efficiency there. Just so you know, we are kind of struggling with our accounting positions being competitive and keeping staffing where we need to be. So I'm not sure if this attempt is going to work but it's what we're trying.
But we're going through some turnover right now. And then I'd like like to because of these reductions I'd like to up our seasonal staffing so in the past we've cut out all our internship positions and I'm liking to restore that that's what the seasonal pay goes towards for us And then also increasing travel training and having some professional services just in case we need to call on some consultants to help us out because we are going to be pretty thin on our staffing. So the net impact savings for this cost center is $3,000 savings.
Can I ask a question?
Yes.
Okay. What is the audit services for $65,000 Which audit?
That's the general external financial audit.
So how often do we have to do that?
Every year.
I just didn't see it in the past years.
It's because we're moving it from non departmental.
Okay.
So when I get to non departmental I'll show you there's probably four or five major items that we're moving to departments that generally manage them just to kind of clean up non departmental because that's been a request from the council in the past is if we can move some of that out to departments that manage those projects or those services. So I'll go over those. But that's one of them. We're moving audit services out of non departmental into finance. It's also covered in a few other enterprise funds as well. So that total cost isn't just that amount. It's it also hits, like, the waste fund, the recreation center, the water fund, and
so how much the total is
roughly? I can get I it's, upwards to 150, but I can get you the exact number.
It's okay. Where does the Workday software come? Does it come, is it in the same thing?
It's in IT, I'll get to that. Okay. Yeah, it's under software, the software line item in IT.
Brian, what did we switch from to Workday? What was the old one called?
It was called Harris City Suite. Harris is the parent company, the product's called City Suite.
Okay. Thank you.
Before you go on, Brian, as far as the treasurer position goes, so we are not required to keep a treasurer
on Yes, we are. Glade Jardine is functioning as a treasurer. He's been the treasurer before.
Isn't that a position though that needs to that would require advice and consent in state law? I thought it did.
It is. It's a statutory position. Glade has been the treasurer prior And he's assuming those responsibilities until we figure out what we're going to do long term.
So he was named interim treasurer then? Is that like the technical aspect? Wasn't there
who's treasurer?
Wasn't it Corey?
Yeah, we had an employee that has separated. He's no longer here.
Okay. Well, maybe that's a question that we can follow-up on. If going the treasurer position and we're required by statute to have a treasurer, then how is that playing out? And if that's an advice and consent position, it should be at the council at some point. Maybe follow-up with us on that.
So in human resources we have we're adding some funding for employee engagement and wellness. One of the things is the Health Center Theater Holiday Luncheon where we host that have that held. When we've owned the building we have had no cost they've covered that now that we don't own the building they're charging us they're heavily discounting our fee but it's I think it's going to be like $1,200 So we had to budget that to rent the facility. We're increasing the employee gym reimbursement to match. This is part of our health and wellness program.
We give some employee reimbursements for participating in healthy activities. And we're increasing that a little bit to match what the participating in other activities like if people, employees or family members run a five k or participate in sporting activities they can get reimbursed $25 per person or $75 per family and we're just matching the gym reimbursement to that amount.
Do we still is Alta Canyon not Alta Canyon, Sandy Rec Center memberships for employees, is that still a thing?
Yeah. We pay a corporate membership for that and employees are allowed to participate in that.
So we're doing both?
Yeah. We've done that. Yeah. And then we have some increased costs to WorkMed is our provider of they do our drug testing. And our costs have gone up a little bit on that.
So our net increase to this cost center is 8,100. And okay and facilities we're trying to use some of our savings you'll see this increase is going up $46,800 So we're using some of our savings and focusing it here. We're increasing our utility budget to align with actual power and gas prices. Gas has been a bit lower the last year or two. So we're lowering that one a little bit.
We're increasing power. And both of those utility costs have had a 4.8% roughly. I think one slightly different. So they've had some increases that we're also adjusting for we're increasing our seasonal staffing to allow to be able we've been all going over that budget these are the people that clean our buildings in the evenings are seasonal employees and we've been underfunded in that and then we haven't had a uniform allowance and we're installing that in place And we're adding a little bit of training money for existing staff. As far as one time and capital for facilities, in equipment, we want to replace a small utility truck.
And we'll be replacing it with the same type of a truck and then we have a really old full size truck that we want to replace with a utility van so the total cost of that is $115,000 for both of those vehicles And then our municipal building capital account, 6 and 75,000. You'll find that in the consolidated capital schedule. Some of the big ticket items in there to replace the west stairs because we have we're having those stairs are failing the crews are recoating them like three times a year we have some safety issues and the snow melt system isn't functioning properly and then the skylight replacement in City Hall has been on our list for a long time and it's failing we need to replace that both of those items we're estimating to be over 200,000 to $2.50 and then we have just continued capital replacement of the plumbing lines alarms door upgrades and etcetera.
Brian can I ask a question about the stairs? In this replacement, are we talking about ripping out the stairs and pouring new concrete for the stairs?
Yes, that's what this would include
in that.
So when you say it's failing, like the stairs themselves are failing or the coating that we keep putting on is failing? And does that really requires an entire stair tear out replacement?
Yeah the stairs are crumbling as well as the and there's water that's coming surfacing up through the ground into the stairs which is causing them to crumble And it's got a boiler type system in it now. We want to go to electric. So we've repaired and tried to repair the heating system multiple times. And it's just not worth the cost. And so to do all that we would rip out the entire system just like has been done on the North Side we did that several years ago and we need to do that here.
Okay and we aren't planning on recoating them after that?
I'm not sure if we will or not. I think yeah I'd have to double check on that. It'd be similar to the North Stairs and I can't recall if there's a coating on that or not.
Okay I just wondered if the coating had any contributed to the failing of the stairs and the water that collects underneath and if that's
No, in fact the
we're
trying to of band aid it and keep it nice with the coating. It's not causing the issues.
Right. Thank you.
Brian, I've got a question for you about capital projects. On page 132, I think it talks about a projected expense for professional services, due diligence work, a $50,000 expense for Crescent Middle School. Can you tell me when in the cycle that is projected to be spent? I mean, I know we have this coming up on a city council agenda soon to revisit this subject. So when I mean, we're going to put more effort into talking about that. So when is this projected to be spent?
It'll be after July 1 is what we're anticipating. It's my understanding. So the due diligence period from what I remember goes through next January. Okay, so this slide just goes over the highlights. Essentially, we're trying to streamline, save some money where we can, trying to reinstate some of our line items, focus on the facilities and just better align our operating costs with our needs okay now I'm going to move on to those are our three general fund cost centers.
In information technology, we're also reducing a position here, a GIS administrator. So it will result in some salary savings and some benefit savings we want to restore some line items here as well and professional services the software line items one that's where workdays is at and you can see that in your budget book.
Is that all 1,400,000 or is there other software?
No that's the entire pretty much most of the software in the city so that's Microsoft Office suites another big one there Our utility billing software, our CityWorks, all the GranaKiss products, all the grandma software. Like there's Oodles, quite a few office software.
Do think that,
and I know we're new into this, the Workday, do you think it's actually saving money? I know that's a big question.
Yeah, do. And I still think it's a good decision in the long run. Definitely, it's an increase in costs in software. But we're going to see some of these salary savings that we're capturing now are, I think, possible because of that in a way. And I think we might be able to realize some more. And it's touching every employee. I mean, there's definitely anytime you do a software conversion, there's some rough times. And we're in the middle of that right now. We're still trying to stabilize things. And it might take us I think it'll take us another year to stabilize.
But we should be seeing and from what I'm hearing, we are seeing efficiencies in departments. It's much faster for every employee to log their time and get approval on their time than it was before. There's less steps involved. They can do any updates they need to do for their personal profiles in system. For example, changing an address or changing their direct deposit the biweekly payroll all those things are more efficient for them there's a learning curve definitely if you talk to some some employees have had a harder time with it I'm not saying it's been perfect because but we have been optimizing it and we'll continue to optimize it.
So there's a period of transition but I think it is a good still financial decision and it integrates with our all the the HR and the finance systems integrate together. Before that, we had separate HR, separate finance, and we we had a separate learning management system. We had a separate evaluation system. We had to build integrations between those. And if you're familiar with usually integrations, there's always some problems.
They break sometimes, anytime there's an update. And so we were battling those types of issues before. We wanted to go to a system that was fully integrated and that's what we did with Workday. And we're seeing some savings even though it's still a tremendous effort cause we're still building out reports as you've seen the financial reports we're still making better and optimizing that so it's going to take a little more time but I think it's a good long term decision still.
Thank you. Brian, this statement about investment in operational technology support. So talking about things like software licenses, maintenance, things like that, are these contracts that we're entering into are these contractually are we contractually obligated to enter these contracts for support and maintenance or are we making a discretionary decision to do that?
On all the software contracts? Yeah. Generally it's part of the yeah it's usually a requirement. If you go without it you have zero support and so that's not yeah, that wouldn't be a wise move, I don't think.
So we're signing contracts that we in some cases, that we don't have to because we would prefer to pay maintenance costs for outside support than do it in house.
Well, we can't maintain these systems in house. Most of these systems are cloud based nowadays. And you have to pay the support and maintenance costs even to be on their cloud system. They're not gonna let yeah. So I shouldn't say you you can opt now.
There's some of our old legacy systems that we host on premise that we own and it's installed here on-site. Some of those really old systems that were on a license based we haven't renewed because like operating or maintenance and at times because we've made a decision to phase out of them like our old system. Any system you want to be actively on, you're going to want to have that support. And most of the time, it's required. These companies are updating it usually at least six month intervals or annual.
And you have to be paying their subscriptions for operating to be on their system. Yeah. The exceptions would be old legacy systems that you're hosting on premise. And we had some security issues with our old system as well. Our former company wasn't keeping up on to our standards. So that's another reason that we moved. Okay, any other questions there?
Madam Chair can I ask a follow-up question to that?
Sure.
Along the same vein Brian would you say the majority of increases citywide to software this year are they ones that we were contractually obligated to make? Like for example there's a 5% increase this year or would you say that there's a good chunk of them that were discretionary?
I think they're all contractual. I can't think of any that are discretionary. I mean if for example your Grannica software that does your meetings here and our Zoom software you have to have a subscription to those. If you don't, you have no support. And there's only so much that our in house people like bugs that they can fix.
And you're not gonna have support if you need it. And don't think Zoom or Granite Kits, they wouldn't even allow you to have that unless you're paying their maintenance fees and their support. It's my understanding. Okay. So as far as our equipment investments going into IT this year, the big ones we generally put away about $100,000 in general equipment for things that may come up during the year that are unforeseen.
So that's $100,000 of that. And then we have thin client replacements of servers. Fortinet is our security package and we need to replace some servers there and our battery backups replacing and data switches and that's what makes up the $3.98 but you can see overall in our IT equipment the overall costs are going down from last year Okay and then these are just the highlight review of the IT fund and then moving on to non departmental do you have any other questions on administrative services before I do that?
Yeah The IT fund looks like it keeps operating year over year at a deficit. Do you see any change coming to that trend line?
Yeah we've been we've had a we had built up a healthy fund balance to be able to go to a new enterprise resource planning system which is Workday so we're just drawing down that fund balance and we'll be stabilizing and it'll start to grow again to build up. So yeah, I see that trend reversing. Okay, moving on to non departmental then. So we've had, like I mentioned, several programs and expenditures were reassigned to non departmental accounts in other departments that are managing those. So the examples are the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program.
We moved that to police because they're the ones that use it. This is the traffic enforcement. And that's $100,000 So that's being moved out of non departmental into the police special programs line item. Employee tuition reimbursement, dollars 18,000 is being moved to human resources. The employee recognition program a lot of this is the annual recognition for employees that meet certain milestones, like their five, ten, fifteen, twenty, thirty year milestones.
And we host that luncheon forum, the holiday luncheon. And they receive longevity awards. That's to cover that twenty two thousand. The building and safety peer review, that has been in non departmental. And that's being moved to community development, 20000. And then the audit services portion, the general fund portion, 56. And just to follow-up on your question, Ms. Christensen, the total is 114.
Okay. Thank you. Did employee tuition move? I missed that.
Yes, that moved to HR. That was $18,000
Under special programs, what's general government?
It's just kind of a catchall of things. That's why it's called general government. It's used for community engagement. The Sandy Ambassadors, I believe, is paid out of there. Those are some examples.
No I think they're lower. And community engagement.
Oh yeah that's a separate line.
Sorry I just I just wasn't sure like what.
Yeah I can get you some more detail on that. Okay
Brian, instead of just putting it in another category in a different department, can we actually have the neighborhood safety as a line item so we know how much we're drawing on that specifically and we don't have to guess what other special projects are?
Yeah that's possible. Yeah it's the balance that we're it's hard to you know make everybody happy with how we present this You remember some Carrie Nakamura that was here? She made the statement that our budgets are way more detailed than she usually sees. And that's my experience. If you look at a lot of other city budgets, they roll it up to like maybe four line items.
But then people have questions well what's in that line item so they must be providing management reports like the monthly or quarterly reports and we could provide that but that's something we've debated here is are we breaking this out too much Some of you want it broken out more. Some of you maybe not care. But this is
You do a great job. Can do for transparency. I just think it's cleaner to have
Yeah. We can do that. It just causes GREGORY the budget doctrine to get DELL: Get larger. Yeah, more pages.
What's grant acquisitions?
Lobbyists.
Just like general lobbyists, not actual grants?
Well, we hire lobbyists to help us get grants. That's why it's called grant acquisition. But this one in particular is for one. It's a Curtis contract.
I had a question, Brian, about so the risk management charges went up by like $303,150,000
dollars Yes. Two main factors there. One is we're spreading out our risk costs across all the funds. And the Water Fund last year had a higher portion. And we use a five year smoothing average on allocating the risk charges out.
And some of their claims dropped off that five year smoothing average, which caused some of the redistribution to come onto the general fund. Plus, we've also had some high police claims come on. And that's also causing in the general fund accounts for all or in non departmental we capture all general fund risk charges here and so this is going up a lot because of those two factors water portion is coming off the books or off that five year smoothing average and police has had some claims hit in the last two years. So that's what's driving it up so much.
On the CWC I thought we moved that to the water fund.
All except for this 1900.
Yeah. Why? Just curious.
This is what one of the this was kind of I believe a balancing of the reductions last year the council did and they cut back this amount to fund this other things and this is what was left here. It's my recollection.
Total cost of. It increased. Was it 95?
75 I think is the total that we have in this proposed budget. It has been higher than that in the past and I think at one point it was 37.
Think the past is 95
this year.
It was like 65 before. Something like that.
Yeah, we'll confirm that.
Okay, thank you.
I've got a question about the Boys and Girls Club. Are we not reducing the amount they get based on the CDBG funds they're getting?
We don't normally
do No, is we haven't done that. This 113 has been status quo for many years.
Yeah so now we're okay so now they're just getting in addition to you.
They don't always apply to CPG. I just heard they did.
Yeah. Okay.
Okay, that's all I have on that unless there's any other questions.
Any final questions for Brian on these two departments? No? Alright.
Thanks, Brian. Okay. Thank you. I'll move on to police. Just to follow-up on your CWC. Current year had the total of 75.
The
upcoming year is 75. 60.
Thank you. Good
evening from the police department. We're grateful to be here with you tonight. I'm chief Jeff Nyber of the Sandy City Police Department. I have with me deputy chief Corey Hess, who is going to me be my phone a friend if there's any historical questions or anything like that. So I'm grateful to have him there. Also, just wanted to take a quick moment. And it is police week this week, so it's kind of poignant. And just want to thank all of our officers for all the great work that they do and the dedication that they show on a daily basis. So just wanted to thank them.
I think it's supposed to work the other way. I think we're supposed to thank you.
I know.
So thank you, and happy police.
Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Jumping into the budget, this was a good educational experience for me, and I kinda wanted to look at all the grants and kinda what we're spending and stuff like that. So this may be a little bit more informational for everybody, but something I thought that was important kind of on the grants that we're using, trying to be creative and pulling from different funding streams to to to be able to make things work in the end and and kinda get good results. So as far as as far as kinda the grants that the PD is dipping into, the first one I just wanted to highlight, and I'll make a change here.
The the slides always change after a week, it seems like. But bullet point three and four on the JAG grant, you could just cross those out. We got that figured out, and I'll talk about cell phones a little bit later on. But in that JAG grant, that's $27.07 is what we have in that JAG grant, and we're gonna use 50 15,000 of that for 14 body worn cameras, download bacon mounts. Our detectives don't have, body worn cameras, so we wanna, get those cameras where they need to go and, kind of those areas.
And we're also, out of that grant, spending 6,000 for some computer towers for our real time crime center, which their current computers are just underpowered. As you can imagine, there's a lot of software running on their their computers, they just need more powerful computers. I think the Nakamura's actually mentioned this at our training as well, but the alcohol sales tax is also a pot of money that we have access to. And with any of these grants, are boundaries, there are guidelines, there are certain things we can use the money for, and there are certain things that we can't use the money for. So just kinda keep that in mind.
But out of that, alcohol sells tax money. There's a 140 k pot there. What we're gonna do, this year with it is buy an additional K9 vehicle. We have two K9 vehicles that are extremely old, the Chevy Silverados. They're just getting really old and non serviceable. So I'll go into our fleet stuff here a little bit later on as well and kind of explain what we're doing with that.
How many K9s does the department have?
We have five. Five.
Five handlers, different handlers? Yes.
Five pounds, five handlers.
Thank you.
And then we're also going to purchase some additional license plate readers, ALPRs. We have 20 of those throughout the city in strategic locations. The new LPRs are actually they're they're better. They're upgraded. They actually can see more of or more of traffic, more lanes of traffic. So what we're going do is take some of those older ones down, put those on kind of smaller roadways, and then put the new ones up on bigger roadways like State Street and different things to that effect.
For the public, can you identify what ALRP REPORTER: is?
Yes. An ALRP is a license plate reader, also known as LPR. And then we'll make some additional purchases out of that this year as well. We also dip out of the first responder mental health grant as well, 42,000. Grant was 42,000.
We currently have 17,000. So if an officer has a significant event on duty, responds to a shooting, or whatever the case may be, a death or anything of that nature and is struggling with that, the mental health part of that, they have the ability to go get some counseling and see a therapist. So that is an awesome grant, one we definitely take advantage of. These other ones are just kind of by way of information. We have a VOCA grant or a Victims of Crime Act Victims Assistance grant.
That actually pays for forty one percent of three victim advocates that we have. As you can imagine, as COLAs increase and stuff like that, that forty one percent tends to shrink, and we just cover that. I wanted you to be aware of that. They are doing some amazing work. Our victim advocates, they they do an awesome job. They just reported to us, I think, last week. We also have an ICAC grant. Doesn't have a lot of money in it, but we use that for Celebrite, is a technology that dives into phones and images and captures all that kind of stuff. It also pays for some equipment and some overtime as well. We have a Bulletproof Vest partnership, which I don't know a lot about yet, but I'm diving into that a little bit.
Our UDOT Canyon enforcement money, we can use that for paying for equipment as well as overtime and snow days and enforcement at the mouth of the canyon and everything that comes with that. We also have a homeless mitigation grant, which I think you guys are aware of, especially council member Christensen and district one. That pays for our homeless liaison officers to a certain extent and provides us those positions. And then I won't get into the federal forfeiture, a DAT grant or state assets forfeiture, but those are very well boundaried and etcetera. Etcetera.
Where do you get your grants from? Like how do you like is someone in your department applying for them? Is someone in the city applying for them? Who does that for you?
Go ahead. Nicole Varela, our senior analyst, does most of those. But some of them are just long term ones that we've had, like the VOCA grant. We just apply every year. The victim advocates themselves handle it. But Nicole Varella is kind of our catchall for, looking out for grant opportunities and applying for them.
Okay.
Thank you. There's federal websites you can watch, and they have COPS grants and different things of that nature. But you do have to apply for them between a certain time frame.
Is that, like, not her full time job, though? It's, like, just a portion of her job, or is it her full time job?
No. Just a portion of her Yeah.
Okay. Yeah. Cool.
Yeah. She's one of our real time crime center analysts and does an excellent job. So kinda jumping into our budget just a little bit more in in talking to members of the council, kinda asking what what did you guys wanna see, any changes to our line items. So that's kinda what I did right here. And just we'll talk about Trulio. Actually, deputy chief Corey Hess will talk about our software at the real time crime center, drone upgrades, training, dispatch service contract, and our SET team as well, which is our South Valley Enforcement Team that we're a part of, and I'll go over that, ammunition, cell phones. And then Brian already hit on the NTSP, that that 100 k that's coming into our budget instead of the city's. So deputy chief?
Yeah. So chief Severson obviously started this process looking for an AI assisted report writing software. Most of the agencies in the Valley are running something along those lines, so we started looking out for different opportunities. We're limited a little bit in what we can do because we actually store our body worn cams on premises here, which is kind of an anomaly in the policing world. Most are cloud based.
But we found Trulio. It actually is a an AI platform that provides a lot more than just report writing aspects. It actually provides all the officers an AI assistant. So they can we uploaded our our policy manual into it, state laws into it, and different things. And they can ask it questions on the street, and it will the AI will go out and search those resources and provide them answers and direction.
Also, from a command point of view, it offers us the ability to automatically it watches all of our body camera footage, and it flags different things for different things. So language is one that'll flag, de escalation that'll flag, discussions of force that'll flag, professionalism will flag, and it just is a real time saver for our command staff. It's automatically reviewing all those body cams. It provides us a a notification if there's something that it wants the human eyes to verify, then we can go out and just pull up and see, was this a problem? Is this just an AI misinterpretation?
And it does that. And then it also provides us the ability to analyze from the detective side of the house. We can put case data in it. One of the things we haven't been able to try yet because we're still in its infancy, but we can put our cold cases in it. The AI can analyze those cold cases and figure out if we're missing something or if there's another lead that we can follow-up on or something. So really new, really special technology. This company is really nice. They've been great to work with. And one of the things I wanted to point out about them is their fee structure is based on per user. Every military veteran they pay is free. So any officer that we have that is a veteran of a military branch gets this service for free.
So
this is the Trilio analyst page that we can see as commanders with the commander thing. And you can just kind of see it automatically flags all those videos. So even though we've only been operational on this for we've been teeny ing it for about three months. It's already analyzed twenty four thousand hours of body worn camera video from our officers that have been teeny, we had about 15 officers that were on the original T and E. So you can see the high composure.
It's it's flagged 28 times, 111 professionalism. In that top left hand corner, a 100% professional interactions, is which pretty spectacular for our guys on that. But this is a we can pull this up at any point in time and see where we're at on any given moment. And we can also ask it to provide a shift summary or a weekly summary for us. And it will analyze every call for service from that body worn cameras that have been operated in that time period.
It will flag any high incidences and it will give it a brief synopsis of what the call was, who was on it, how it was handled And then it also automatically tags those videos that if we wanna see the actual call, here, we just click on a button. It pulls up the video, and we can run watch the video right from there. Spectacular system. So just to
add emphasis to that, I mean, come from a department that doesn't have this type of AI. And, literally, you're asking a sergeant or a supervisor to spot check videos. So you'll you'll literally go through the system and go, okay. I'll choose that one. And it takes hours and hours to do. So this is pretty incredible, and kudos to deputy chief test for for pushing that through and Greg Severson as well.
So I see all of your savings there. Do you feel like this I know they use times. And sometimes they're 100% accurate and sometimes they're more estimates. Do you feel like this is allowing you, based on what you've seen so far, to be able to not have to have additional personnel to do these things that you can reallocate those resources more efficiently?
Yeah, absolutely. So we were similar to them where we would ask our supervisors to spot chick body worn camps for compliance with policy. And it's a crapshoot, right? Depending on which video you pull up, it could be either good or bad. So absolutely, this takes that piece out of our supervisors' hands altogether.
And it's just automated and being done over the whole course of all the officers' interactions rather than just taking a random shot at one. So yeah, when you're about supervisors and the hours of time spent reviewing body worn cam, we would ask them to our protocol was normally to ask them to do two to three a month on their officers. So if you've got a sergeant that's running an eight man crew trying to analyze and watch 16, Even if it's just a traffic stop, you're you're talking about fifteen minutes of video real time to kinda watch. So having this go through and don't and and I've played with it quite a bit just on this piece in particular. And what it can do is actually pretty spot on.
It actually flagged one of our officers was just in Desh Carr, was listening to a song that had profanities on it. And their body cam was on. Their body cam wasn't on, but the car was on. And it flagged it. And I was like, oh, Blake, what's this? And I pull it up. And it was just music in the car. So it's pretty spot on with what it does.
And I don't think it suggests that we get rid of people. It just allows our people to be more efficient. So it allows our supervisors to go actually be out there and supervise and be with their officers. So I think that's pretty I
think another really good piece that I would like to point out about this is it allows us to actually identify and reward good police work as well. So oftentimes, we focus on we get a complaint or negative, but this actually goes out and and shows, hey. This guy deescalated this call or high professionalism on here. And I can pull up that video and go, wow. That is outstanding. And then we can reward them for positive work as well.
Okay. All
right. Next next topic, real time crime center software. And before I dive into that $47,000 that we're requesting be added or a budget, I just wanted to kind of highlight the great work that the Real Time Crime Center has been able to do. Again, coming from a department that doesn't necessarily have some of these tools, it's been incredible to see what they're able to do and what they're able to solve and how a crime comes together, working with detectives, working with patrol officers out in the field, and bringing cases to a finality. And on bullet point three, you can see all the things that they pull into the real time crime center at once.
And this is live. This is all happening when when the call comes into 911. We're already sending up a drone or we're already tracking LPR looking for a suspect's vehicle. This happens instantly. As you can see in 2025, the real time crime center assisted patrol with over a thousand calls, and we're up to four ten at least till April. We had four ten calls that they assisted with. So kinda keep that in mind. Just a little graph that kinda kinda shows that as well. When we talk about real time crime center, I just wanted to go over again, this was a learning experience for me just to kinda kinda dive into their operations and what they're working through and what they're working on. But the first three softwares I'm talking about have nothing to do with that 47 k.
I just kinda wanted to highlight. So they use several different softwares at the real time crime center. First one is First two. That's a a kind of a mapping system that allows you to, if you need to, call out a neighborhood and close down the neighborhood and say shelter in place, that allows you to get phone numbers and and call people and say, hey. This incident's going on in your neighborhood. Go down to the basement, you know, shelter in place, which is which is really cool. That's $13.08 a year. Live 911 allows us to listen to 911 as the call comes in. As soon as that person makes that call to 911, our RTCC can hear it and actually launch the drone. It gets rid of that delay so we can respond to crisis faster.
We also have IDI, which allows us it's a database to look up last known locations of suspects that we have, like where did they last live, etcetera, etcetera. But where the 47 ks does come into effect is FUSIS. FUSIS is an Axon product, and it takes all these different parts, the information that's coming into the real time crime center, and puts it all into one place. It has mapping on it. So our folks in the center can see where our officers are.
They can see where the fire department is and how far they are out. They can see where the drone is, you know, as it's heading to this particular call. And then it pulls LPR into it. And all all that kind of stuff gets pulled into this this FUSIS center and allows them to do their job. So as you can see, that 47 will go into, our annual contract.
It won't quite pay all of it at $49.09 20, but we can just absorb that. And that is, talking about contracts, that is a five year contract, it has a 4% annual increase. And the 2026 software cost is just kind of of give you an idea of the software costs that we have there. Again, nothing to do with the 47 k for for FUSIS. And then just know that there are escalations of costs that have to do with that software and the contracts that we sign.
So kind of moving on with the RTCC. Again, when you think of the the real time crime center and you think of police and you think of these drones, we're using drones for so much more than just police stuff. It's pretty incredible what they do. There were 21 major success stories where they utilized a drone to locate suspects. I've got a picture here in the next slide that I'll talk about here in a sec.
We've also used it to assist, Sandy City Fire on some of their incidents. The drone was also utilized in a water main break and then also utilized to find a horse that had bucked its rider off and guide search and rescue officers to that. So it's been pretty incredible, and it's amazing to see how these these drones work. So our drone upgrades, the 127 k, what will we use that for? First and foremost, the current system that we have that you can see in that picture is outdated.
What we're gonna do with that 127 k is replace that dock one and m 30 system that we have up near the Sandy Amphitheater, and we're gonna upgrade it to a dock three with an m four drone. And then that will also we'll buy another set of that new drone system and put one down on the West Side of the city as well. Most of our calls come on the West Side of the city. It can go up there, but it only has a battery life. And I think it's only, like, twenty or twenty minutes to a half hour of battery life. So we can have the drone up there, but then it has to land at some point and recharge. So to be able to have two, we can have one come up, and then it can go through its battery life. And then we can replace it with the other, and then charge the other. And we can go back and forth like that.
What's the difference between an interior and exterior drone?
Yes. Great question. So that picture is the drones that sit on top of the building and respond to calls. Right? So our two Aveda, two interior drones, when you're talking search warrants and searching houses, it's very difficult to get a drone inside a residence. Right? You're hitting walls. I've actually tried it before at my previous agency, and we we crashed it horribly. But these are really quite a lot smaller and more compact, and you fly them with VR goggles. So say there's a suspect in the house, you're not sure if he's in a bedroom, if you're not sure if he's in a bathroom or whatever the case may be, you can fly the drone in there.
And it can go down the hallways and make those turns and go up the stairs. And then we can actually see where the individual is or where we think he is, it kind of gives us an idea of where that suspect is. Other other options are throwing a dog in there and just have him go throughout the house and try to find somebody. Right? So it gives us a good opportunity to to go into houses and and find those individuals. Or even if it's something to do with a chemical spill or something like that, you can send in the drone rather than have a fire do it or an individual. So there's some safety stuff there too. And then we're also purchasing three m four exterior drones. So those are a little bit bigger. These will be used by patrol and SWAT, both these drones.
But one of the things that I wanted to mention, the company that we're buying them from is also providing Skybrows, which is a $30,000 cost for free just based off of this purchase here. And really what Skybrow does, there's a system that sits on a tripod and it has a big box on top and called a pharaoh scanner. And you can take it to crime scenes and vehicle reconstructions and it'll literally scan your scene for you digitally. And then you can take that and do all your investigative stuff for court. But they're very expensive.
They're like $8,090,000 dollars. They're super expensive. So to be able to have this software and that $30,000 cost as part of this purchase would be huge for us. So we can crashes better. We can scan crime scenes better and for a lot cheaper
as well.
Is it ongoing free service, or are you gonna have to pay for it at some time?
Yeah. So that is the the the drawer replacement is through would be a three year contract that we would be signing. So that 127,000 would be a $127,000 a year, and that piece would come with it for those three years. And it's a three d mapping software is what it actually does. And it allows any video. So even our officers with their cameras can create a three d map of a scene with this software in addition to the It's
compatible with our cameras? It's compatible with our cameras that we body worn cameras that we Yeah.
We can use our body worn. Body worn cameras aren't necessarily the best piece for it, but we can use the body worn camera piece for that. And it can basically, any video, it can take any existing video from almost any format and create a three d model. So you could three d model a house on a search warrant or something in case we have to go back there, then we would have a natural to scale three d model of that structure.
Awesome. Thanks. Where is this line item in here? Like, I sorry. I'm totally missing it. Like, what is it part of? This hundred and twenty seven thousand.
Yeah. Probably in the technology piece.
Don't have
my Software and license maintenance? Part Is of the 02/60000?
Yes. I'm getting a yes from Zach. Thank you. DAVID
Absolutely. Before you move on. So in terms of outdated and replacements, replacement schedules, technology is advancing fairly quickly. And so it probably might not take long for some of the technology or docs to be updated you know new systems. Do you have any sense of what kind of a future replacement schedule or you know when we can expect to need to do these like hardware upgrades?
You have an answer? Yeah. So you're kind of looking at two different pieces with the drones. You actually have the the apparatus that flies and then you've got the payload. So the apparatus itself that flies you're looking that with proper maintenance and everything you you know three to ten years. It's it's really the the payload, the camera system, and everything. So the we bought the drone that we got that is currently operational as a little over three years. This new version, the camera and everything is way more sophisticated. The FLIR is way more the zoom capabilities has AI tracking. So our our current drone, like, say, if we got somebody that's running, they would have to manually fly and keep up with that.
With the new camera system, they can just click on it and it will automatic the AI will pick it up and then automatically track it for us so you're looking three years is kind of where that technology will advance as it advances so we're seeing significant increase technology wise from three years ago so that would we anticipate the same in about the same three years.
Okay that's helpful thank you and then this isn't a budget question more of a procedural question but from an interior drone standpoint I am assuming that you would still need a search warrant to execute that type of technology?
Yes, typically. Picture on the PDF. I apologize. But I had kind of a drone picture of kind of some bodies and kind of the night vision mode. This particular incident happened a few weeks ago. But we had that hit and run crash at 1300 East and and 9400 South, where the three individuals ran off, if you recall. So that drone is particularly in that area. And the RTCC, or Real Time Crime Center, was able to pull up video of the crash. You can actually see the crash happen and three individuals, which direction they ran. So he immediately launched the drone in the direction that they went.
And you can actually see him in the picture and the little clip of the video of the suspect hiding in a tree because it's on hot. Right? So you can see that contrast. And then you can see our four officers rock walking along the path near the amphitheater, and our RTCC is guiding him in directly to him. At some point, he just gives up and goes, okay. That drone can see me. He comes out, we take him into custody. Much safer way to do it. Super huge advantage for us.
The drone that is currently at the amphitheater, didn't we get that one in a grant? Am I wrong about that? I thought we did. I could have sworn that Greg said that.
I don't remember if we got that in a grant. I think we paid at least a portion of it. I know we paid for some of that. I'm not 100% sure if we offset it with a grant.
Yeah. I'll be looking for, obviously, this kind of investment for police, hardware and software technology to assist with public safety, crime solving, all that kind of stuff. This seems like a growing expense that where all departments are going to face. And so with very little ability by cities to adapt, right? So I'm just kind of wondering about what's coming for us in terms of financial support, grants or help from the state or whomever on this kind of stuff.
Because it does seem pretty transformative, but obviously justifiable. And so how are we all going to get there and continue to get there? I think that's the question that Councilmember D'Souza is also asking.
I don't know if there's a good answer for that other than just technology is advancing. I think one of the really nice things about SkyBrows and the new drone is there's applicable features that can be shared with the fire department. It can be shared with parks and rec. It can be I mean, it can map out things for GIS and and different things. And so there is ability for us to extend beyond just our department and share that resource.
We haven't really explored that too much yet just we're in the infancy of trying to get it. But I know it's a significant expense, but there are practical applications that can be shared citywide that would be advantageous. But it's not going to save you from having to write a check. Get that.
Is there downtime, though? Is there downtime on these drones where you could share them with other departments for other I mean, are they not all No. GREGORY so consistently deployed?
GREGORY Yeah, not really. Because there's limitations in where they can go with the battery life. So you're talking forty minutes of battery depending on how far you have to fly. So in flight time, hovering versus actually going somewhere. So to try let's say, we partnered with Draper or something to try and get our drone all the way over to Draper City. The battery would be exhausted by the time it got on scene. It would provide no benefit. So it's not really a great asset to be able to share that that way.
I think on top of that, madam chair, just the reason why I kinda shared the the grant slide, we'll continue to look at ways to try to kinda fund side. Because you're right, it will change every three years, and it will be outdated, right? So we need to figure out a way to do that. And as always, if any city agency needs some help with something, we're willing to throw it up and help them out. Think in that one slide, we kind of talked about that a little bit. So we can use it for a lot of different things.
I just want
to ask a
clarifying question. Are we moving from one drone to seven drones? Is that correct?
No. So let me clarify that. So the two big drones, which was in the picture right there, that's the one that sits on top of Sandy Amphitheater. So as you can imagine, again, it only has a twenty to thirty minute battery. So it has a hard time getting to certain places. And you have to bring it back, and then a link can stay up for a minute over the scene, which some of the officers and some of my one on ones have kind of explained to me. So what we're doing is we're going to replace that one with a new technology. Then we're going to buy a second one that's going to go on the West Side Of The Valley where we typically see most of our calls. And then those will be the other drones below will be in cars. Does that make sense?
So we're moving from one to five. Is that right?
Yeah. So we currently have one DFR, which is the drone first responder. So we would actually be replacing that one drone. We would be adding a second DFR that's going to be stationary on the court building. And we would add one more drone that that can be mobile in a vehicle. And then those two interior drones,
which
would also be in police cars to be able to deploy on scene. So that this would allow us to add five more drones. We which is some of we have drones already, but our drones are outdated, the ones that we had, the smaller ones. To your question, it's size. That's the difference between interior and exterior and payload. But yes, so we're looking at five, which would increase our capability for deploying more frequently.
So are there instances where the current drone is running out of battery and it's affecting our police response? Is that a big issue?
Yeah. Because there's a finite amount of time that a drone can be in the air. And so depending on the reason why we chose the amphitheater was that was kind of a central part in the city that we felt like would get the most coverage. But what we're finding out is if it has to go to, you know, a hundred and tenth, it's going to use a certain percentage of its battery life just to get there. And then by the time it gets there, it only can stay on scene before it has to come back and charge.
So the drone actually works. It flies, and then it has a certain level that it hits battery wise where it says I have to return to home, and it automatically automatically shoots shoots back. Back. So So it it calculates how much battery life it's gonna take to get back to home to charge, and then it it will tell the operator, you know, you've got here. Now you've got this many minutes on scene, and then it will come back automatically. So adding the additional drones just expands our coverage area of where we'll be able to reach, if that answers the question.
So I'm noticing your training's gone way up, which I think is amazing. It looks like we just we you guys just took your money out of all of your meetings and supplies to And do so are you concerned about having enough badges for the kids?
No. We're not.
Okay. Just
checking. We're we're we're totally good.
We've got some
concerned about dropping our ammunition cost by $256,000 dollars? I'm concerned by that. Should I not be?
So so you're getting ahead of me.
Sorry. Sorry.
So I got a slide coming up that is purely on ammunition. So let let me let me hit that for you. Just real quick, wanted to talk about training, just kind of leadership. You know, mentorship and leadership is huge in a police department. We have a lot of liabilities in the police department responding to calls and civil rights and all that kind of stuff that comes with it.
And training is a huge part of what we do to be competent, confident professional, which are my goals. In that right hand corner, you can kind of see my future strategic plan for Sandy City Police Department in probably the worst AI photo that you've ever seen. But it is what it is. And in those those pillars that kinda uphold this house is personal preparation, internal performance, and external service. And then my result that I want to have is competent, confident professional officers.
So more focusing on professional preparation, preparation, their personal preparation, education, training, getting our officers where they need to be and trained in in competent, confident professional. So we have been operating off a a $23,000 training budget. As you can imagine, some of the trainings are very, very costly. Right? So if you send somebody for a week long training, depending on what it is, the room and board and the cost of the class and registration could be several thousand dollars.
And I'll kinda go through some examples here. So kinda from an outside perspective and coming into the PD, kinda what I've seen, we're really relying on, hey. Will you come do your training at our facility, And will you give us two free spots? And then we'll put our officers into those two free spots because we can't send them elsewhere. And I think we've kind of been relying on that a little bit. So when we're talking mentorship and leadership, International Association of Chiefs of Police, IACP, is a great organization. They are currently talking about many, many hot topic police hot topics, right? Like AI and automated drivers. Like, if somebody gets in a crash and they're not driving, who do you cite? Right?
And we're having these conversations at the national level, but we're not able to be a part of those conversations and and and have those conversations. There's The FBI National Academy and Command College are great training opportunities, especially for our leadership, our lieutenants and captains and deputy chiefs that they can attend. The FBI National Academy is free, you have to fly out there. And the command college, have to pay for it. It's a couple days long.
Northwestern Staff and Command is a great course for sergeants. It allows them to talk about budgeting, about personnel issues. It's ten weeks long. You can imagine a hotel and food and and registering for this course can be several thousand dollars. When I went through, I think it was around $1,213,000 dollars for the full ten weeks.
So that gets very costly very quickly. There's crash reconstruction courses, TAR one, TAR two, that are expensive. There's DRE, direct recognition export training that is very costly. There's investigative courses, metro gang unit courses, SWAT training courses, motors, task force, and crime scene trainings that we we we really need to get our people out to out to to focus on that personal preparation and make sure they're a confident, competent professional. So just in talking about the budget and the request for the 100,000 would would be very helpful in being able to that and kind of mentoring and setting our department apart. Any questions on that?
If you've been paying attention to some of my previous questions,
you probably I knew you were won't asking be a question.
Okay, can you read my mind?
Maybe. A little bit.
I've hinted at this previously, so I probably will not take you by surprise here. But I mean, I 100% support what you're asking for here with the training. But the question I've asked previously that I am still not quite satisfied and I've been waiting for your presentation so I
could specifically ask
it We are considering this additional increase in compensation on top of step in grade, etcetera. And the question I've been asking is, what are we not able to do in of training and tools that we could do? So you've somewhat answered here. No, we're still doing training, Marci. We're doing 100,000. You spelled it out. But I'm looking at all of that. And I'm thinking, does that even touch? What percentage of our police force will benefit from that? You described how costly all of these are.
And so I just want us to really think about the potential of what are we missing out on that could actually be of a huge benefit in terms of culture building, knowing that we are investing in their training, investing in their tools. And I don't know that this is enough for training.
Sure. And I can definitely see that argument, Councilmember Hausman. And I know you're big into leadership and mentoring and etcetera, etcetera. And and I know you talked about the step and grade a little bit. It's kind of an interesting battle to to kinda fight as a chief. I I went to lunch with the South Valley chiefs today and had lunch with them. And I and I talked to one of them and he said, yeah, we're gonna propose a 7% increase for our officers. Also what I worry about is falling behind, right, and losing officers. I had Lieutenant Tyson get get for me how many lateral officers we have hired in the last six months, and it's, like, 16, because we're able to attract that kind of talent over to our department, which is incredible and I love. And we don't have to put them through posts.
Don't We have to put them through training. So we save that cost. But that's a big part of it. To your point, so is training, right? And obviously, that's why we have the request there. So will 100,000 cover everything we want to do? No, probably not. But it's definitely a start and we'll mitigate that the best way that we can, but we're going to start somewhere. Our next line item is dispatch contract increase for 33 k. As you're well aware, we switched to Salt Lake 911 from Beck.
And to my understanding, Beck was a huge increase as far as cost and something that we weren't able to do. So which is why we ended up in Salt Lake 911. There was not an increase in 2025. However, in 2026, within, you know, inflation and COLAs and raises for dispatchers, do know coming from the state that we were having those same I don't know if wage wars is the best way to call it, but even dispatchers, they're fighting for good dispatchers. So even with those increases, that would be our costs for for this year.
So a 7.12 increase in that. So I think that's pretty self explanatory. Okay. I hit a button, apparently. Come on. There we go. Alright. I also wanted to talk about this set team, the South Valley enforcement team. This has been a great success for us. Really, what it is is it it's a force multiplier.
Most of the Valley's resources typically go to Salt Lake City, you know, kinda some of those bigger cities, West Valley, and stuff like that. So we we were able to get with the South Valley agencies and really kinda increase this force multiplier. So then the 19,000 that we're asking for in this is today our portion of being a part of the SET team or the South Valley enforcement team. And it's based off of population for each individual city, and then we pay into that, and we're a part of that. And and and when it when we have significant event, say it's a a shooting or something gone really awry, when we when I talk about that force multiplier, we immediately we have a supervisor and three detectives on it, but we gain all of those other supervisors and detectives.
Right? And we can really get down into the nuts and bolts of the case in searching for an individual and bringing that person into custody. So we've we've had a lot of success with it from July to December. We worked as a team, worked 63 cases resulting in 66 arrests, 10 recovered stolen vehicles, 27 search warrant services, and 41 seized firearms. What light is in?
What light is that in?
I'm seeing page 29. That should be in special programs, which also includes the NTSP, the 100 ks from the NTSP. So that's why you've seen it increase so
much. Thank you.
Yes. So huge success there. Again, we have three detectives and a supervisor on there. But it's an incredible resource. We really like being a part of that.
Okay. Councilmember Christensen, this is your slide. Ammunition, an additional 10,000. There's all our stats on how much we're using, 110,000 rounds of handgun practice a year, 30,000 rounds of rifle practice. We also do a lot of semunition training, which I think some of you have done, and I've seen the welts on your arms, so I appreciate that. But we use a lot of ammunition. That's gone up. Both have gone up actually 7.5%, which is kind of typical depending on the year. We use ammunition in a lot of different ways. I don't have to go into too much detail on it, but for a monthly handgun and rifle training for officers, it's a huge liability. We've got to know how to shoot and we've got to know how
to shoot
proficiently. We have monthly SWAT and sniper trainings, also shooting competitions, which I'm super proud of. We actually participate participate in the sheriff's office shooting competition, and we win that. We've got some really good shooters and some really good people that train our people. And we also have annual firearms qualifications, which is mandated and we have to participate in to be able to keep our police certifications. Any questions on that?
So in 2025, our costs were $67,000 Is $41,000 enough?
We use a lot of ammunition. There's other ways to kind of fund that and absorb that a little bit. But again, we understand this is a tight budget year.
I know. I just have a little stress from, I don't know, when Chris and I were on here before and they came one year and said they were out of ammunition. And so we had to find money for that.
We're not in that situation. No, we're not in that situation at all. Yeah. Their ammo during COVID went
through the There's a roof
factory issues.
Just checking.
Went through the roof. Yeah. So we're we're in a good position right now, and, that just adds to our ability to train and get the ammunition that we need. So I appreciate that. And then cell phones, I won't dive into this. Cell phones is an interesting one. We have, officers that, go around and investigate crime and sometimes take pictures, you know, evidentiary pictures. We just can't do that. We have to be able to provide cell phones so they can take pictures, so they can connect to FUSIS, connect to Internet based software that we use. There's also some GPS tracking capabilities there as well. I think council member Nick will ask a question.
I do. I see the line item non city network phones. Mhmm. What is that?
Is that the one on page 29 still?
Yeah. Yep, 29. The budget book. It's It's
we've cell
non cell phones, and then we've got additional cell phones.
So the cell phones are we recently, within the last few weeks, outfitted our entire patrol division with cell phones. What we did have before was we had a small bank where the officers would check them in and out, and it just wasn't sufficient. So what we did is outfitted each officer with their own cell phone so they would always have one. So that's where the increase is is we just gave them all cell phones to have.
Okay. So is that going to be ongoing for actual hardware? This an ongoing request.
This is an ongoing item.
Yes. Okay.
Yes. So we're gonna have two lines that include cell phones or can we just combine those in in think we totally non city?
Yeah. Okay.
I think we talked about this at the last budget deal. It's something weird.
I think there's only one line. It's the non city network phone line. That's where the cell phones are at.
Gotcha. Alright.
I think it's just the increase that we asked for, and that's just because we outfitted patrol. So it's just an increase into that ongoing line item.
Okay.
Okay. Last but not least, we've got some good data for you on our fleet. But for our standard fleet replacement this year, we're looking at three patrol cars, one patrol k nine vehicle, one unmarked. And then for some onetime appropriation, we have one patrol vehicle and one patrol motorcycle that we'll replace to kinda give you an idea of what our kinda where our fleet looks like right now. So our our marked patrol vehicles, average age is six and a half or six and a quarter years.
14 have over a 100,000 miles, and 14 are between 80,000 and a 100 miles. For our unmarked fleet, average age is eight and a half years. Eight have over a 100,000 miles, and 16 are between 80 a 100,000 miles. And 53 of the vehicles are, 2023 or newer. So, again, you know, I've I've been talking with my one on ones with the officers. They really appreciate everything we've been able to do with thus far, and we're making progress. And they see that, but maybe some type of regular replacement schedule or or or something like that. Again, I haven't looked into the nuts and bolts of that. But but yeah. Any any we're always looking for improvement on fleet. So
What make and model vehicle are are patrol vehicles?
So we're we have Ford f one fifties. We have purchased I don't know if
it's half. Is that half
maybe or a quarter of pickup trucks?
We're probably a little more than half, and then we have the Ford Explorer. Are
they the hybrid ones?
No. The hybrid ones actually didn't work out too well for us.
Okay.
Yeah. So we're back to the what's that about?
Power issues? Or
Just overall efficiency in use, and the shops were having some issues with them as well. It just wasn't we had high aspirations for them, and they just didn't materialize. And it was just they were going down and having problems, and we just opted for the regular gas.
So the patrol vehicles are, again, they are Ford
Explorers and Ford f one fifties are the truck version. So and again, we have a couple old canine Chevy Silverados that we're trying to replace as well.
How many unmarked vehicles do we have? Or is that is that a top secret?
No. It's not. Okay.
Don't know how many we have off the top of my head. I would probably say we probably have somewhere in the neighborhood of about 35.
Pardon me?
About 35.
35 unmarked?
30 or 35, somewhere around there. Yeah.
K. And why
do we
have so many unmarked?
So your unmarks are all your lieutenants are in them. All of the command staff is in them. Each of our detectives have them. Our super secret narcotics unit has a few different options there. So those are outfit all of those.
Okay.
So can you go back one slide to 31?
I do have one
more question. So what does this mean? Standard fleet replacement, one time appropriation. So what does that mean?
The way I understand it is the standard fleet replacement is typically what we would replace every year, just kind of the ongoing version of that. And then the one time is an additional appropriation to replace one patrol car and one patrol motorcycle to my understanding. Do you want to take
this one? Yes.
I think I can answer the question for you. So fleet presents their budget, and it includes vehicles for the entire city. So our allotment out of that fleet purchase price or purchase amount was those vehicles. And then the one time was allotted to us.
Okay. Yeah. In your budget, I see a decrease in fleet O and M charges, dollars 100,000 projected over last year of savings. And I'm curious, I'm hoping that the answer as to why there's a reduction there would be because we've been doing fleet replacement and we're experiencing the savings because we have newer vehicles. Is that what we're seeing here?
Yeah, that's what we're seeing. Yeah, it's based off the mileage and the repair costs of the vehicles they have in their fleet tied to police. It's based on we update that study every year, and that's what's driving that cost. And I would anticipate that's why is because of newer fleet.
We got rid of the Impalas.
The NHF-four That took repair went Florida.
We got rid of those things.
I'd say our I don't know. We got rid of the Impala's and went to explore hybrids that we like either. So I don't know. Let's get it right. Maybe. That would be nice.
I did have one question. There is some movement to I know this is going to devastate PD to get rid of motorcycles. Their proof of worth is getting harder to prove because we've got additional vehicles side by sides utilize those a lot more how many motor cycles do we have
think six. Right?
Someone said six back there.
But
I think we have six plus we have a couple of trainers that we use for motor skills.
These are haul
cars so they don't come home. Yeah. I think I think we have six actual motorbikes that are
They're BMWs?
Well, we have they're not all being used at the moment because our motor unit is Okay. Not staffed a 100% yet. So we've got four that are being operational right now.
And they're BMWs or
Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah. I didn't hear your question. Yes. Yeah. We have gone to BMWs, for patrol motorcycles.
Just kind of a heads up. I think I'm gonna start talking about phasing them out. Sorry. They're they're
super useful. Than me. He was an old motor guy. Well,
out of respect for you, councilman Michael, I I think motors are super useful, especially from an enforcement perspective.
Yeah. I I just I just I they have very limited
three complaints on traffic stuff that we'll be able to use motors for. And then on top of that, the from the COP perspective or the community oriented policing perspective, everybody wants to come talk to the motor officers. And it allows us to kind of connect to the community. We have further discussions on it. But it's kind of how I feel about them. And I'm a motor guy for eighteen years.
I know who will do the parades at the Old
National know, right? Uh-huh.
I know.
Well, we can have
a special division
GREGORY They're
a huge enforcement tool as well.
GREGORY Thank you, Madam Chair.
I had a question on the fleet.
Sorry,
is that echoing? Maybe. And I think a lot of this comes from at least when I've been on the council in the first couple of years, we held back with COVID concerns, finances. And it put us in a pretty dire position with fleets. And then it was this huge push.
Oh my goodness, we are really upside down with fleets. We've neglected through all of our departments, but police being the largest, these vehicles. And so I'm just curious with this, where we stand. Did we cover enough ground in the past couple of years to where we're only replacing five on our regular fleet schedule and then a couple more on the one time appropriation? Have we gotten to that point where we've been able to kind of back off a little bit with everything that we've done over the past couple of years?
Well, Cory can back me up on this. But I think with COVID, it held back. We just couldn't find cars during COVID. Right? They they were just weren't available. They weren't making them, and and we couldn't get on the replacement list, and and I remember that. I I I think I think, fleet is a lot like compensation packages. Right? You get in a hole, it's very difficult to get out of. And again, I don't want to seem like we're not grateful. I talked to the officers one on one, and they all say we've made a ton of progress on our fleet and are very appreciative of it. But again, I want to get in a hole either to where we have to continue to make that up.
And that's my concern, I guess. Mean, have we hearing that we've got x amount of vehicles, especially within the department, to say, Okay, we're replacing five I mean, a couple of years ago, we were putting hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Well, one, two, three, I was saying five. We were replacing 15 of them at a clinic?
Oh, yes. Yes. So each year, were looking at it was hundreds of thousands of dollars replacing 15. And for that to be reduced down to just a handful of them, are we going to end up in a couple of years going, oh, boy, we've gotten upside down? Is that something in the fire department?
Chief McConaughey is included, which was with that management studies. And it has over a ten year period of what needs to be replaced in order to stay on top of things. And I'm just wondering, I don't want to get upside down where we're panicking trying to to find several because 100,000 our vehicles are vapor locking and they're not able to get to the east side in those east benches or whatever that is. So have we reached that point? Have we gotten there? Or
Yeah. Fleet's always a concern. We try, especially with our patrol vehicles, to not have them more than five years ish. They they go through a lot of wear and tear, the patrol side, that the unmarked, we can stretch a little more. But, yeah, we we probably need to be closer between twelve and fifteen vehicles a year to be able to stay on a consistent rotation where we're constantly rotating out those five and six year vehicles for the newer ones to stay on top of things. So, yes, I would probably say that we would need a few more vehicles to get on that nice comfortable cycle where we're rotating out what we need to.
Okay so we we didn't reach that point yet we're just looking at tight budget years.
Yeah so we made it up right that you guys all felt and talked about where we bought a lot of additional vehicles and then we were able to supplement that several of those vehicles with salary savings over the years that's where we really were able to make up the catch up. It was with our salary savings and getting vehicles beyond what was allocated in the budget. That's where we made our headway. But we don't have that luxury anymore. So we hired two individuals yesterday, and we are fully staffed. We will not have those luxuries going forward.
Okay.
I'm not
sure I like that answer, but I and I'm just concerned knowing that panic that we had. Have we ever looked at leasing versus purchasing? I mean, that's because I know at least when I was leasing a vehicle, you kind of had, oh, here it is at this year. And then it was just turned in and it kind of had that built in rotation cycle.
I don't know what we've done historically. I'll let Corey kind of answer that. But that's kind of a in talking to other agencies, they typically do that. And surrounding agencies, they'll typically lease vehicles that way. And that includes kind of maintenance costs and whatnot. Draper actually does a point system, I think, similar to us and replaces vehicles at five years, depending on their point cycle and kind of where they get to. But I don't know what we've done historically.
Yeah, we've never leased historically, but I know a lot of agencies do.
Don't have Yeah. Bad idea. The
main reason we haven't done that is the leasing costs, the interest you pay versus paying cash. So we've always favored paying cash. We could relook at that again and look at the trade offs, but that's why.
I'd be curious to see what the cost difference is, just more of as an informational item.
Okay. We can certainly do that.
That's my questions with fleets.
Thank you. I have a really quick question. And so in the last four years, the city has done a community event with our autism community and first responders where the police department is kind of the primary point person for that event. And I just wanted to know if that was planned going forward. And if so, where might that be reflected in the budget?
Which event specifically? What are you referring to?
No, no, no, no. It's our autism community and first responder event that the fire department has joined in on.
Yeah. Yeah, we usually do that annually. And I don't think we have a line item for it that we've just
We just done We just that.
Just put that in put that on. And we've done it we've tried to do it on our double back days. So we have officers that are able to attend. And that does actually cover one of the state mandated training requirements as well for having that autism event and I think our guys really enjoy it our officers really enjoy it but there's not a specific line item for it.
Okay I thought that there was one created because we had received some grants I had gone out.
We've paid for out of grants a special purpose fund So it rolls up into our special purpose funds. It's not in their line item.
So it's not in the police department's
It's not in the police department's
Budget?
Like operating budget.
Okay. Because I know Waste Management has donated funds for that event specifically I just wanted to make sure that
it's restricted in a special purpose fund for that.
Okay is that it's not broken out.
It's not like in non departmental or anything?
No. It's in a there's a whole bunch of special purpose funds that are restricted in cases like that.
One thirty.
One thirty. Page one thirty in your budget document. But you'll just see a large roll up number there. It's not broken out but it is in our dashboard and the monthly reports you can find the detail on that but in the budget document we just roll all those together.
Okay I just you know it's a it's it's an event that has been very, I think, important to our autism community. And I'd like to see that continue. And I've tried to be as helpful as I can in trying to find outside funds to fund that event so that we don't have to take other resources to hold it. And so I just wanted to you know ask about that and see if there is an event planned. It typically is held in August every year.
And if not you know I know that we like I said waste management has donated funds for that that I think are restricted in that way for that event. And I think that last year's event was paid for even outside of that had already been funded with like I think Healthy Sandy's gave some money or something to it. And so I think that there's money there for the event and I just wanted to call that to your attention if it wasn't
I talked to Amy Bryant about just kind of our calendar moving forward with community oriented policing and we did talk about that. So I know we're planning on it.
Okay. I was going to say otherwise, I'm an advocate for that and would like to help you find money to fund it if we needed to. And so this is like the great time to have that conversation.
I appreciate it. You. Brian, will you put that on our budget?
That's all I have.
K. Thank you. Alright. Brian already talked about the 100 k that's going back into special programs from the grid traffic safety program, I'll skip that. And then last slide of the deck, just wanna talk about just some future future challenges that we've discussed kind of in a as an administration.
Again, we know times are tight, but equipment comes up a lot in our one on ones. And and what I mean by that is laptops, guns, tasers, body cameras, dash cameras, you know, different things of that nature. They get old. Their battery life, you know, degrades, all that kind of stuff. And we've talked a lot about just, you know, maybe potentially if we could find some type of, you know, regular equipment cycle, you know, that we can maybe get those costs and then include them in in a light item and get those get those important things replaced when they need to be replaced.
We're already talking about building space. You guys know what our building situation, so I won't spend too much time on that. Motorola to additional vendors is something we've always talked about. And basically, what I mean by that is we have a lot of different vendors that we work with from Motorola to Axon. And as you can imagine, trying to get their equipment and technology to connect can be kind of difficult.
Like, I know for a fact right now that some of our officers are just having a really difficult time uploading body cam to evidence.com. It actually takes a really long time to get that to upload into that system. Again, it's a Motorola camera on an Axon product. This is more of a three to five year kind of strategy that we're talking about. But is there something out there that has everything that we need that we pay an ongoing cost for? And it all works. And it's all more efficient, similar to Trulio, which is kind of what we found. So that's some subscription based stuff that we've talked about. Again, basic equipment cycles and keeping up with technology. Madam Chair, you brought up the drones.
It changes every three years. Right? And once you buy it, it seems to be out outdated. So some type of cycle to kinda keep that equipment where it needs to be. And then just the last thing. I know in last year's budget, think we were budgeted 175 k for overtime. I think we overspent that by 60 or $70,000 if I remember correctly. Sandy City has a lot of awesome events and great events for the public and a lot of those need kind of that police security there. Right? And from detective callouts to SWAT callouts to advocate callouts to crime scene callouts and city events, it just seems to be getting busier and busier to that point for this FIFA visit that we're having.
That's going to be at the RSL Stadium. We're having seven watch parties out in the plaza, right? And they need police officers to be able to do that, which is absolutely awesome and we love it, but we need to be able to staff some of those things. So that's one of the discussions we've had. Again, that 60,000 or 70,000 has to come from somewhere. But we're just seeing more and more events and with call outs and everything that can get very expensive. Just future challenges.
Tell me about and maybe this is a discussion for later, but just I'm interested in, like, in that difference of, like, some of that pay gap, how, you know, 50,000 ish over dollars, like, what would that decrease if there was another, like, FTE? Or will we still have a you know what I mean? Not all of it, but, like, would the overages that we're not expecting, would those go away? Like, is that a You know what I'm saying?
Yeah. Say we added an FTE, we would still have to call somebody out. Like, they would either go over shift or we'd have to call them out from a day off to be able to provide security for whatever event or this call out. So I think they would to answer your question, I think it would still come out of the overtime budget, even if we did add two or three FTEs.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Just
looking at the laptop rotation, so 22 a year. And it jogged a memory that I had. I was out with an officer last year, something like that. And it was interesting because the officer had two computers. Because one of them, the backlight had gone out, and the other one, the touch screen, didn't work. And so trying to get this and the entire shift of juggling back and forth, where do we stand with I mean, do we have a fleet vehicle, but do we have a laptop rotation with the GTEx?
We do not currently. And I've heard similar stories in my one on ones. One of my officers told me that she was on her way to a priority one call and the computer died. Luckily, knew where the address was, so she was able to get there. But in talking to Matt, our IT guy, he suggested the 22 laptops. That's where it came from each year. If we could cycle those out, that would get us, you know, new and updated equipment. As far as a rotating budget that we have for that, we just pull it out of whatever we can. For example, we do have some salary savings this year. And I just purchased 33 laptops last week that will come up and replace some of those really old ones that have no battery life and don't work.
We'll be able to kind of scrub some of those. But again, some type of ongoing replacement cycle would be really great.
And are they currently in the IT charges? Like right now, there's not a specific item here for it, a line item.
For what? For the laptops?
For laptops.
The technology brand? The citywide IT budget? Is that what you're
talking Well, I'm just wondering where
Our contributions to the city IT budget does not include our laptops. We buy those out of our own money. The salaries
are GREGORY Yeah, just come out of the equipment line item. So they would just be overspending the equipment line item.
By how much, roughly?
Yeah. Like traditionally, they've used salary savings like they're mentioning and it drops to carryover. And then they come to you and say, can we buy some more vehicles, some more laptops? But they have so many needs. But that's what we've relied on as a city in the past is carryover savings. And that's throughout not just police. All departments rely
on Basically, we just bought 33
of them? Yeah. I bought those with salary savings. They didn't come out of the line.
But they expense it to equipment.
Yeah. Okay. So it just won't be coming in carryover.
Right. Okay. Yeah.
Okay. I mean, kind of goes with my next question. And maybe it's not even really a question, but just a comment of the tech and the technology and a little bit what Marcy brings up. Criminals are savvy. They're using technology.
So I appreciate the emphasis that you have with RTCC, the drones, looking at this tech and staying on top of it, supporting our officers with what we from the background to make sure that they're still safe, that they're able to do their jobs. All this technology. I know that there was last year, there was some discussion on a reduction with crime, like 13%. I asked Chief Severson exactly, wow, reduction 13%. And in a heartbeat, he said, it's cameras.
It's cameras. It's ring cameras, and it's that technology. So as criminals are using that technology, I know it's important for you guys and primarily for your safety, but also to solve some of these crimes. And it's super exciting to hear at least some of these cold cases, knowing that our detectives down there have between forty and eighty cases that they're working on. I mean, is I can't imagine being somebody that maybe was assaulted, sexually assaulted, and hearing that the person that's working on your case has 40 cases.
So looking at that technology component, thank you. I mean, that's for placing that emphasis there. And I love that part of it.
That ends our presentation, unless you have any more questions.
Anybody talking about animal services?
Mm-mm. There's no changes to their line items, So I didn't I didn't include that.
So I have a question.
You might
have to get back to me about that. Are we char I we obviously are not charging enough in our licenses and fees to cover our costs, which would be impossible. Right? So I'm wondering, like, how those fees are being set right now. Are they, like, compared to other cities? Is there, like, a standard? Do we need to increase them to cover additional costs that need to be offset? And then also, why are credit card fees processing going down? I know it's a small amount, but I noticed it across a couple departments. I was just curious about that.
I'm going have to phone a friend on that one.
Actually redid that last year. We went out and did an audit for those fees and adjusted them. And everything you mentioned is pretty much what is done. It's comparison shopping and seeing. But we did that last year. I think John Arnold was the champion of that, getting all those numbers and figures in for adjusting our fees. And we did adjust them last year.
And adjusted them up, I'm assuming.
Yeah, adjusted them up. Not significantly, obviously, but it was adjusted up a little bit.
And then just an overall question like the credit card processing fees. I noticed they're decreasing across a lot of departments. Why?
Yeah, that was a council policy. The council member of Bruck de Sousa kind of headed up that we implemented a surcharge for credit card usage. So it deters usage of those.
So people are paying more of their own. So this is just what's left over?
Yeah. A merchant fee, if somebody uses a credit card, it's a rewards card. Yeah, we pay the merchant fee. So we're discouraging those use. So if people pay with a debit, then the merchant fees go down. Or if they pay with a check Okay. Or Yeah. So that's why we're seeing a decrease across. Thanks.
Historically,
vet spay and neuter program has been in animal services budget up to $10,000 I believe. Since we only have one year historical look in this year's budget, why was that removed?
I don't have an answer for that.
I don't either.
Will you get back with me?
Yes. Have to get with the animal services director and see.
Maybe Brian knows.
The spay and neuter program is a special purpose fund where we restrict those. So it's not in their operating budget.
Can we put it in there?
So it's in '29.
It'd be in that roll up, that page I mentioned earlier. But we can give you a breakout. We don't want to put it in there because we want it to be restricted and not used for any other purpose. So we don't want it to be in their operating.
Got you. Because sometimes there have been reasons as it's not in our budget to do. And technically, that's not in the budget. But I've always seen that as a line item before. So cool. I know where it's at, and it's being funded.
Broken record here. I just heard Brian say they have so many needs on the heels of computers dying on the way to a call. To me that is a tool that is getting in the way of our officers being able to be safe and do the job effectively. If I were to ask you, I know your advocacy is in line with what's been presented. This is the tentative budget.
That is your advocacy. What has been presented. If I were to ask you for a potential out of the box scenario where we think just a little differently about still doing an increase because we don't want to lose people and I completely understand that but what might a just not increase it by quite as much what might that unlock in terms of tools and training that's why I keep asking the question because I keep seeing evidence of us having needs and an opportunity to fill that need could exist if we get outside the box just a little bit. I understand this is what's been presented and this is what you are tasked with advocating for. And maybe it's not a question for you.
Maybe it's a pose for my colleagues. But I can't help but worry that we're robbing Peter to pay Paul, so to speak. I want to make sure we are competitive let me say that 300 times I want to be competitive I love that we are getting lateral team members and I love that we are now fully staffed like all kind I don't want to go backwards I hear that and yet I feel like we are overlooking an opportunity to invest a little more in training a little more in tools not push some of these things down the road and and maybe come down off like how how much let's give an increase on top of step and grade but what might that look like where we do a little dance, think a little differently, and make sure we're not having officers' laptops die on the way to a call? Like, I don't want to kick that down the road. And you may or may not be able to answer my question.
But I'm saying, what if?
I'll take a crack at it.
don't think you'll like the answer.
That's fine.
Historically, my twenty five years, compensation is key. If you forego that for other pieces of equipment, we're gonna lose guys, and we've seen it. It's I'm really happy to report that we're fully staffed. That's a that's a milestone we have reached for a long, long, long time. And a lot of that was digging ourselves out of a hole when we weren't competitive with compensation.
And any decrease in that is going to put us behind because everybody else is going step in step. And the the current work environment and the employees, they will chase the dollar, and we've seen it historically. And I think they say history is the best predictor of the future. You are on a slippery slope in my opinion. Withdrawing that piece, it's going to it'll be costly personnel.
And I think that's really important context to hear. And maybe my request then would be, how are you going to message the fact that when they are frustrated because a laptop dies on the way to a call, or because the drones are already outdated, or as frustration gets expressed, and they are clamoring for I want to go to this I want to receive this training but you won't you won't send me or I have archaic stuff and you won't replace it how will you message that to say our counsel to the council was pay comes first so you'll just have to deal with equipment.
If I may I'll take this one the biggest tool that I can put in another officer's belt is a backup beyond anything else And when you start talking about staffing numbers, I will take staff over technology every day of the week. And so if my option is, do I run a laptop but you get a back on that domestic versus having somebody that's already on a call that may have to clear and come, I will take staff all day long. And that's an easy sell for me, is you have a backup and you have the properly staffed shifts. I will take that every day of the week over any technology.
And I think that's a great answer. So my request would be, and you're saying, Marcy, that's what I would say to an officer who asks. Would say, Okay. That's what I'm asking. Because good leadership is you make the hard call, and then you own the call. And don't defer up the chain and say, well, shame on counsel for not giving us the money we need for our equipment. So it sounds like you would own it. And that's all I'm asking.
Yeah. Yeah.
Okay. Thank you.
I think I'd just add to that. Council member Hausman is, you know, coming from an agency that was twenty third in the state in pay. We bled people, and and they left. They have us family support. Gas is really expensive. They've gotta drive, and and and is a is a big deal to them. I don't blame them. I've been there twenty five years ago. I made $11.70 an hour, and I thought I was the richest man in the world. But yeah. You know, I I hope I hope we're just not holding one hostage. You know, they're they're they're both very important. Right? They really are. And I've seen the importance of leadership and mentorship and training and creating good officers. That's our ultimate goal. Honestly,
I really love this dialogue. This is fantastic. This is good governance. This is back and forth and I raise my concerns and you share honestly this is my preferred route. And this is what I will say to officers. I'm reading a book by Adam Grant right now called Think Again. And I love it because it's talking about the way to debate productively and be a task decision oriented debate rather than making things personal or whatever. It's such a great, great read. And that's what I feel like this interchange was. It was just I have my concerns.
I voice them. And you're like, I understand your concerns. But here's what you'd actually also need to consider. This was a great discussion. And I appreciate it.
And I feel like I've now broken record done. I have verbalized my concerns. I have asked the hard questions of what if, could we, etcetera, etcetera. Because I do keep hearing like you have so many needs. But to hear what you just said, it reminds me honestly of this huge moment I had years ago with with fire staffing and and trying to understand the three two staffing and and and it came down to a narrative that was shared with me that helped paint a picture and put it into context because I don't live in the day to day that you do.
And so this reminds me of that just just continue communication and sharing context and acknowledging, sure, Marcy, yeah. I mean, that's a legitimate concern. We are choosing this because of ABC. And when we hear frustrations expressed, here's how we defend or acknowledge the frustration and say we chose this over this and that's leadership. So I just had to like you know say thank you and maybe if I ever see Adam Grant I'll say you two did the debate the way that Adam Grant would have us do debate. It was great. Thank you.
So sorry. Homeless mitigation funds, is that in the special purpose fund as well? Where is that?
The revenue side is gonna be reflected kind of in the operating grants, and you'll see in the line items. So that's gonna be primarily the forgetting the name of the grant. Starts with an o.
But it doesn't come into the police funds.
Even though
the office I just don't see it. We only see I only see a 190,000 in grants, which is we've already accounted for. And so I don't see any homeless mitigation funds in police.
Yeah.
Just a regular. Yeah.
I may need to get back to you on that.
Madam Chair. I
funds come in quarterly after we have submitted a report of our expenses.
So they're not part of the budget?
Well, you won't see the revenue until it comes in. So for instance, this year, we're in the first quarter of the we might have received one by now.
But we don't, like, account for it anywhere in the budget? That it's expected revenues or projected revenues.
We do. I believe it is that one ninety. So on that top line items you have two intergovernmental revenues. You have one which is about 770,000. That's our contract with the school district for our resource officers.
Yeah.
And then the one ninety, I do believe, is the homeless mitigation funds we're receiving.
Well, yeah, 140,000 of it's alcohol sales tax, 27,000 is JAG grant, 42,000 is the mental health one. Yes. Like, there's no way it could be that.
No. No. No. So that is where there is a little bit of blending of lines. So a lot of the grants the chief mentioned are stored in the special purpose funds slash we are actually working to set up an operating grants fund because there are so many of these miscellaneous grants that are scattered all over the place we'd like to reconcile a little bit.
So so
How much did we get last year? 400 and something thousand?
I would have to look it up, but that sounds potentially about right. I know. Yeah. So, yeah, if that's the amount reflecting in the 25 column, I believe that should be that piece.
The 409,000 is what we think we got from mitigation funds. In '25, we got 232,000 in '26 minus the last one that hasn't come in yet. What's the one or we got
more than
we We may have an issue with our the data pulling in the actuals from prior years like we talked about last week. So we'll we'll verify that and get back to you. Because how much are
supposed to get?
It seems low. It should be in the 300 range.
So how much are we supposed to get this year?
That's what we're expecting.
300,000?
Well, it's not exactly. We'll have
to get
back to you with that number.
And how because you said it covered part of our two homeless liaisons. And three firefighters. And three firefighters? Yeah.
Three three fire officers, two police officers.
Yes. So that could be the other confusing piece too is
the grant we're reflecting in. Yeah.
But the grant yeah. I don't think it's gonna cover the full amount, but that's what it
So do we
need to look
at reducing the amount of support we're giving to the homeless shelter in terms of police? Like, we only have one liaison to cover that they're willing to cover, or they don't do they only cover, like
No. I don't think that's the route we wanna go because we get reimbursed based on the expenses we produce. So
Up to 300,000.
It's not don't quote me on that number. Let us get let us get back to
you with
the details on that.
The other item I would note is this grant is obviously for police and fire. So we'll have fire coming up. But if you look at the revenue line items in fire, that state grant line item item is there, and it's about 248,000 in the current year and is anticipated for February in the upcoming year. So those two pieces together
So if I
might be the number we're kinda
So it might may all be basically in fire?
Portions of it in fire. Obviously, it's we have officers that are kinda being funded through that.
Because if there's 285,000 in fire Yes. That we think is that?
I believe so. Again, I doubt
Then that means you get $15,000 for two police officers?
No. The $1.90 is still in police for officers. And then there's an additional $2.85 in fire.
But that's way more than 300,000. So that's what we're checking is
We can check. There's again, grants can get a little messy just depending on where the money's coming from. We can
There check and was legislation in the past session that increased that. I don't know specific. It decreased it, it was but it was it was ongoing funding where it wasn't ongoing before. It was
I don't think so. That got cut too.
I don't know. Our grant
We're still thinking.
Yeah. Sorry, Shane.
Our grant for 2020 for the 2026 fiscal year is $4,438,431 and 91¢.
Okay. And so we're seeing roughly $2.85 of that is for fire? Yes. Yeah. And the rest is for police?
Yes. So because of the way the staffing works even maybe
Hey, Zach, could you
talk into the mic if you're going to talk just for the
GREGORY Sorry. McConaughey can correct me. But I believe that we do have three FTEs that are being funded out of fire with that grant. And then I believe it's two officers in place that are being funded with that grant. So we reflect the higher amount of the grant in fire just to show that that's a funding source for those staff members.
Then
So it's pretty close to covering it then?
Yes, I would say so. Yeah, talked to Zach the other day about it. I think we're in the 90% to 95% range is where we were.
That's perfect. That's just what I
wanted to check out. Yes.
Sorry. I just need to go
back to drones because I didn't do a good enough job of getting to the heart of the matter. You have information about how many calls the drone failed to complete its mission because it ran out of battery? Or what number of situations the city has had where we could have had two instead of three. Well, they're not I'm going wondering what exactly the metrics you have in terms of the effectiveness of our drones.
So the drone's going to come back. It's not going to run out of battery, right?
It's going to I understand. Goes back because it runs out of battery.
So I can check with the RTCC and see maybe how many times early it had to come back and kind of stayed longer.
Yeah. I'm just curious on the instances in police responses where the drone has been insufficient to accomplish its mission.
That's something we might have to get back
to you on. That'd be great. Thank you. Yeah, no problem.
I'm curious if you could for a drone.
Such that, I don't know.
Yeah, so they're kind of based to return to its own home. So, like, if you were to just buy one drone and have docks all over the city, I don't think that's feasible. You would have to have the the drones are specific to respond or return to one specific location. So they the only option that we have for that is what we call a hot swap on the batteries where the if we know it's gonna be somewhere they can land it on the ground and then swap it out, a battery. But I don't think we could just have one drone and docks all over the city where it could land and charge. I don't think they work that way.
How long does it take for a drone to charge? Yeah,
maybe next year. You're right.
How long does it take for a drone to charge? Or the big one up at the amp?
I think twenty five, thirty minutes ish to get back to full charge, somewhere around there. The new ones are a little bit more efficient. I think they're like fifteen or twenty.
Any more questions, counsel, for police department?
I hope not. I'm gonna have to take a knee if there is. But I compliment you. Thanks. I just meant a knee for rest. I
Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate it.
Thanks.
Fire department is up to bat next.
Good evening, madam chair and counsel. Thank you for the opportunity to present the fire department annual budget fiscal year 2027. So I'm just, for your convenience, bringing one page of the budget book, page six, because I will reference that. We neglect to get that onto the slide deck. But it is in your page six of your budget book.
Going through just overview, we'll just hit these four bullet points. I anticipate it will be a little quicker than the previous presentation. But we're going to go over the city council budget priorities. And then this page that I handed out will go over the under citywide goals, specifically goals one and eight that I'll reference during this. Also, we'll go through the cost savings grant funding and then get into the proposed budget requests and with the future needs.
So as mentioned, we just wanted you guys to be aware that we did consider the city council budget priorities community safety, fiscal health, economic development, infrastructure, and quality of life with an emphasis, of course, in community safety, which is kind of what we do both for fire and police. So we just wanted you to know that that's something we did consider in looking through this and getting everything ready. To start out, I think it's probably good and nice just to point out all the things that we have done for savings through the year, just like the police did as well. But I think that we realize, I guess is my point, that what we do is both important and very, very expensive. So I think that it's good to point out that we're trying to do our part to offset the extreme costs of engines and trucks and ambulance and personnel to reduce that cost to the general budget and to the citizens.
So I'll go over these. I've also circled that one circle there where it says strategic plan. And we do get grants every year. But in updating our strategic plan in the last couple of years and many of you may have been present for the original strategic plan when we went through that. But in updating that in the last couple of years, we added a couple more grant writers to our grant program.
And this is what I think we're seeing and where it's paying off big time. So I don't know if everybody left, but we have some of the grant writers that are here present tonight. So one of the big ones that we're really excited about is the Wildland Urban Interface Mitigation Grant that is a three year grant. And it goes just under half $1,000,000. But that gives us additional money that otherwise we wouldn't have to go through several areas of the city, education, getting supplies, equipment, and just working hard to lessen the risk of a wildland fire within the boundaries of Sandy City.
And if I'm not mistaken, I'm not quite sure, but I think that we have the grant writer present here tonight for that. So that's a big one. So Whitney, yeah. But that's a huge one, and that will continue over the next couple of years. But even just today and yesterday and then a couple more days this week, they're working on projects. Yes?
How do you do your grants? It's not like police where Nicole does them. Like, it's just whoever sees a cool one writes it? Or do you have some people assigned to look for them?
Yes. Yeah. So there's a team. Then for me, it's magical because I say, I'd like to get more grants. And then these people just start writing them, and they start coming in. It's really special how it works. But yeah, there's a group that have gone through training and worked together to get all those done. And our deputy chief, Chris Aston, who is also here, has done a lot of the grant writing this year, too. But moving on, our per capita grant, we receive and that's probably not it. We'll probably get another tranche of money from that.
But that goes to offset the cost of the two people that we sent to paramedic school each year, which we do have a budget for. But this helps overall, just offsetting that cost. And then, as mentioned, we did talk a little bit with the police in their presentation about the homeless mitigation funding that we have for the three personnel on the fire and the two on police. The Utah Firefighter Assistance Grant that we just recently received, just under $10,000 that we use for some additional uniforms and PPE. And then a Rural Readiness Bureau of Land Management grant that we got three wild land radios that are in the amount of $6,000 And then if you did attend the grand opening or come through the station recently, you've seen the air pack washing machine.
That's the SCBA. It's the air packs that we wear. But it is a big machine that washes that, which is the first that I've seen of its kind. Of course, for Sandy City, it's new. But that was through the Gary Sinise Foundation in the amount of $36,000 also written by Whitney.
Thank you, Whitney. And that, of course, reduces the risk of cancer by washing those machines. You just don't have the carcinogens that are floating after a fire. And so it's nice to have that in addition to all the other machines that we have to wash the PPE and equipment. Then, of course, we have the license plate grant at the end there that we received $5,000 to buy more air packed bottles.
So largely, I think that's hugely what my vision was and very successful year. And I'm happy to say that this has all come in this year to offset those things and make things possible that otherwise wouldn't have been, just based solely off of the general budget that we have. One more that we have pending and we'll see, but it's through the AFG grant, assisting firefighters grant for $160,000 towards a wild land truck. That's a type six wild land truck. So we'll advise if that comes through.
We'd have our fingers crossed, but that would be great as well. Additional costs that I think we've talked about before but worth mentioning is the in house training and certifications that we do. You may not be aware, but several of our employees work through Utah Fire and Rescue Academy or have other jobs that are in training. And so that they are able to help out. They go to other departments as well and do pass offs and certifications.
But we are able to use them also in house to help us. And then we have technical specialties, whether it be wildland or hazmat in other areas. And so we use them internally and then also invite others from other department to participate in some of these trainings and certifications. And it's a great way to offset some of the costs that we would otherwise accrue, you know, incur from having to have that sent out. And additionally, the National Fire Academy and, hazmat technical schools that are, federally reimbursed.
And so we can send people nationally out to these schools and then get complete reimbursement for flights, lodging, and everything. So that's awesome we take advantage of. And then locally, our stakeholders within Valley Training Alliance that we all play a part in, whether it's on the trainings for Hot Tuesdays or other symposiums and different trainings. And then, as you're aware, we do have participation
the Salt Lake City Recruit Academy. Excuse me. Something new that we just started in the current testing process that we're in the under recruiting is the public PSA. It's Public Safety Answers. But it's free testing that previously we paid a fee for, which is now being passed on to the candidates for a small amount. They're able to pay and then come in for the testing. Kind of skin in the game is now the standard statewide. And I say nationally. But it's for a fee, they're able to come in and do an online test. And in this case, with this particular company, do a video recording.
So it bypasses some of the interview process. So it does a lot of savings in the testing process overall and otherwise having to call back people to come and do some of that training and testing. So we're excited about that. And then some savings in inventory management through Envy, which is a medical inventory tracking, and a new software that we have. It's first due. And then we've added the asset modules so that we can limit and keep track of all of equipment, the medical supplies, things like that to prevent loss.
I have a question. Is the first due the medical billing?
No, it is not. Okay. No. That's what we use to track hydrants. We do business inspections, even part of our response. But one of the modules is assets. So we've just added that recently.
What's the recovery rate on the ambulance billing?
So we use Gold Cross for the ambulance billing. The actual percentage, I can get back with you on. I don't know off top of my head.
Thank you.
I think that they collect I want to say it's five and a quarter off of everything that we bring in. But that's what they take.
Just the amount of recovery is the critical part.
Okay. Let me look into that.
Thanks.
Something that's kind of interesting that I'm really excited about is this cost sharing that we have. It's a wild land urban interface chipper, And it's part of the grant. So as part of the equipment that we're purchasing with that grant, we needed a chipper because we're taking down a lot of timber, a lot of wood, trees, etcetera, that need to be chipped up. So we knew we were going to buy it. We knew that we had to get other equipment as well.
But we found out in the process that Parks was going to be asking for a chipper this year. They're about $100,000 So working with Parks Department, Director Hill, and Jeremy Garcia, we decided to do some cost sharing where they would provide the catch truck and we would order the new chipper. And so then we'd be driving around the fire department chipper with the park's catch truck. And then we can both use that and mutually benefit from that. So I thought a great way to save.
And they didn't have to put that into a line item this year. So big deal there. And then just follow-up with all the cost sharing. I just thought I'd throw in the revenue increase. Just recently, we presented our annual report.
And you may recall that we have pushed past 10,000 calls this year. And we're creeping up on about 4,000 transports, which is about $1,000 or 1,000 transports more than about three years ago. And that's equating to just shy of about $1,000,000 more revenue coming in from transport. So it's really a lot more work on the men and women that are out there day to day responding on the emergencies. But it's bringing in more money to the general budget, plus I'll read kind of some of the asks that we have tie into that those increased in the call. Yes.
What's driving that? I mean, are city populations decreasing? It is aging more. Is that like what's the driver?
So several things, that included. But you will recall maybe two years ago, we talked about we had kind of a contract with Gold Cross, the ambulance side, to where they were taking a lot of our minor low acuity type calls and responses, which would result in transports.
And in their facility, right?
Sorry?
And interfacility transports, right? Or do
GREGORY So we still have that contract, where they do part, and we do part. We do the high acuity. They do the low acuity on the inter facilities. But just the general population calls, we took over all of those. And so that's increasing our call volume and our transport volumes. Add into there, in the last few years, have the MVP and some of the responses there. And I think overall, to your point, you have an aging population and other factors that are just increasing in spite of the fact that we aren't growing in population. So yes, all of those combined. Okay. So let's get into the budget requests.
The first thing that we have, and this is ongoing, are we're looking for a part time personnel a front desk receptionist. As you walk into the new station, if you've been there, you're aware geographically the officers are upstairs. And then you have the combat personnel downstairs. So looking for that friendly face smile to point you in the right direction as they walk in through the front door. As you know, with our new training room, we have a lot of different classes and trainings, meeting with the fire marshal and on and on.
To have somebody there, I think, is invaluable and I think expected for the department that we are that somebody is there to point you in the right direction. Everything else on here, noticed in the asterisks below, really related to those increased calls and transports. It's driven up all of our costs, as you would expect. So state Medicaid assessment with increased transports, that has gone up. So we're asking for 65,000 there.
Ambulance billing with more calls, as you would expect. We're asking for 20,000 there. Dispatch services chief Nyber explained how that seven point whatever it was, 7.5% increase for them translated to about $33,000 For us, it translates to 10,500 So that's what we have from the fire department portion of that. And then an increase in equipment maintenance contracts for cardiac monitors and stretchers, which we're looking for $65,000 there. As far as fleet goes, we're looking for an ambulance.
And as noted in the management study that's recommendation number nine I had presented to you previously, and as you can see in the packet, this apparatus replacement schedule. So first, I just want to congratulate you. Because with this ambulance coming this year, we will be on schedule. Now, in some cases, we had to buy a fleet car with carryover, which is fine. If we have the money available, we'll do whatever we can to stay on schedule.
But you can see those first two years, we've gotten what we needed. And this is all at the recommendation of that management study. So love the fact that we can continue and hopefully continue in the future to stay on schedule so that we don't get upside down into a position where we have engines or trucks or ambulances that are so far over the mileage or they're just constantly breaking down that it gets hard to manage. So I appreciate your support on that. And then the last slide I have are just the ongoing needs.
If you asked me if I had a wish list, I do. Everybody does. It's a mile long. But we understand that money is limited. And so what we have as part of the tentative budget is what we're asking for this year.
Additional needs, always there's personnel. Training and travel increases that we would ask for in the future, uniform allowance increases that just continue to go up from year to year because of inflation and software costs that we're always fighting. And then, as mentioned, the ongoing fleet replacement in that schedule that we need to stick to. So appreciate your support on that. Now, before I conclude, I wanted to just mention the one thing.
And some of it's been talked to already. Because I think that it's not an ask. It's part of just the general overall budget. But I feel confident and want to just address that please support the compensation plan. Please support that extra 2% for the market adjustment.
As I think Corey mentioned, in my twenty five years, I've lived through it as well. And the institutional knowledge when people go looking elsewhere that you lose. And the cost of having to replace them and start all over with going to camp and buying new uniforms that fit them, the loss associated with them leaving and then having to rebuild that is so much more than I think that we may save for some laptops or that that we chip away at every year anyway. So I am confident that if we went through both police and fire and asked,
where's your preference?
That's where it is. Absolutely. And I can justify it. And I can report back and say, is me saying this is for the best. And if you recall from back when it was presented from Katrina and Brian, that 2% doesn't even reach the slippage that we've experienced. So back when we did the original market adjustment, I want to say three, four years ago, we see departments creep up here and there. Because whatever it is, tax increases and things of that nature, that they're able to boost up and boost up. And our messages to our people are, be patient. Just hold on. We'll correct.
It'll be Okay. Don't leave. And so we're able to encourage them to stay and be a part of that. And so to see that market adjustment now is comforting because we can say, Okay, that's what we're talking about. So really, it's much more expensive to have people leave, not to count the institutional knowledge that we miss. So I appreciate your support on that. Hopefully, that's helpful. And lastly, just thank you for your support. We've received in 2025 a big ticket item with Station thirty one. Long time needed and much, much appreciated.
So it's really built a sense of pride. We love that it's just basically a billboard when people are driving down the freeway. And it's so good to have the extra space for offices, for bays, and on and on. So I appreciate your support in that project and having closed that out in the year 2025. So with that, I will take questions if there are any.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Are you searching for a compliment like I gave earlier around proactive, healthy, vigorous debate?
I'm always searching for a compliment.
Proactive like, Marci, I'm going to cut you off at the knees. No.
That I'm not searching for. No.
No, I'm kidding. I appreciate that. I appreciate the added layer of context and your confidence that I wanted to make sure I ask the questions that are important to ask. I wanted to make sure that I do the what if. Like have we thought about?
And it's clear that both police and fire have thought about that and are doing what they believe our personnel would want done which is that extra 2% and if the trade off is we delay a little bit further some investment and some training and some tools they understand the why behind that. So I really appreciate the opportunity to voice that and ask the questions. I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't ask those questions. And I appreciate the fierceness with which you said and look straight at me.
Didn't feel like it was fierce.
Sorry. I'm kidding. No. Very, very I understand and you have my support. The only other thing I really have is I want to acknowledge your effort to continually reflect back to the management study and point back to we're doing this because it recommended in the management study and and here's like the fleet update that you gave us.
Honestly feel like that management study has given us such a good roadmap but it would be it would not have happened were it not for your leadership in embracing the roadmap and continuing like it's it's a living breathing roadmap it's not just something that Okay here's the management study it's parked up on a shelf. And we never talk about it again. You are making that ROI, the investment the council made in that management study. You are making that investment pay off. Because you are continuing to think about everything relative to the recommendations and the strengths.
Because the management study was not just things we need to fix. It was also things we need to celebrate. And you've done such a great job of really shaping everything we are doing in the department for the good and helping us remember. And you even embedded it into your presentation. So all teasing aside, I really appreciate your effort to have that be a living, breathing, ongoing conversation.
And if I may, to your point, it isn't all about money. But were it not for the management study that pointed out a lot of items, equipment, training, on and on and on, which since then we've been able to augment to the point where I do now feel comfortable saying, let's focus on the compensation plan. Because we've touched on all those items. So thanks to the management study. Okay.
So remind me about uniforms and PPE. We didn't have any PPE expenses in 2025. Was it included in the uniforms budget?
So we Yeah. Okay. Sorry.
I hate seeing head noise.
Okay. But we did move from a different kind of moved things around from us providing all the uniforms to a star card where each person has an allotted amount and things.
So there was a little
bit of shift. So I don't know if that has anything to do with where the money shifted. But it sounds like Brian answered it.
Okay. So we've got like 102 employees. And your $81,000 in uniforms is for just uniforms.
Yeah. So we'll give a specific amount to each $100
person, Yeah. And so then they're able to go to SKAGs, a local uniform supplier, and get whatever it is boots and pants. Now, there's a separate line item for PPE that we use to replace. As you know, we have two sets per person. And so we're kind of on a schedule to buy so many 20 sets per year that will kind of offset between that line item and carry over if there is any to keep buying those 20 sets per year.
How much is the set?
$4,000
Okay. So their $800 really doesn't do much.
Well, they're not buying that. We are buying that of PPE. The uniforms is a separate line item.
Okay. That's why I'm checking. So uniforms is like
Yeah. The $4,000 set of PPE is separate. We're replacing that. We're going through and buying 20 sets every year so we can stay on top of that because they expire after so many years.
So that amount decreased by, like, $12,000 this year. So will you be buying
three plus uniforms? That was one time money that we had allotted last year. And so it didn't it did decrease, but it's just the expiration of that one time money. So it's back to where
it was.
Okay. So it's still 20¢.
And it was for the purpose of catching up with some extra people that we hired.
Okay. So then sorry. Tell me what is included in the uniform.
So you get your pants, your shirt.
Yeah. Got it. So Okay. Your software licenses and maintenance went from $93,000 to $36,000 to 36,000 was the big drop off?
So part of that is, I we had I want to say and Mike can correct me, but I want to say that we have the I can't remember if we had the Zoll contract in there. But yeah, we have a bunch of different things that were kind of scattered around in different things. And we've since compiled them all into one. So it might be a little shuffling of where the money was. But we're trying to get it all into the correct line item. So I can get back with you on that. I apologize. I don't have a better answer for you.
Because I'm wondering, then your equipment maintenance contracts went from 83,000 to $184,000
That's the ZOLL contract. So we did a ten year cardiac monitor. ZOLL is a cardiac monitor. So we did a ten year contract to where we're paying for those. And then we get the maintenance and everything along with that. But it is $120,000 per year. So we had an increase. And that's part of what we are trying to match that because we got the first half of that done. And so the additional 65,000 that we have asking for this year will match that for a total of 120 on top of what we already had in there because there's other items too. There's ladder testing, pump testing. There's a lot more than just that. So we've included all those into the equipment maintenance. But it's kind of an ongoing struggle, making sure that everything's put into the right bucket.
Okay. Thank you.
Any more questions, counsel? I don't see anything. Thank you.
Thank you.
Community development.
Alright. Thank you for the opportunity for the community development to present their budget this evening. We appreciate that, and I appreciate the time that you take to, go over our budget with us. I just want to, before we start, give a couple of thanks to some staff members in our department who have done a lot of work on budget throughout the year and keep our budget straight. And that goes to Brian here and Willie in building and safety and Rob Durfee have done quite a bit of work in looking at some of our needs and some of the things that we need to help our building officials and so forth.
So grateful for them. I just wanted to give an overview at the beginning of what we have done in the budget this year. Overall, we've looked at the budget, and we have made reductions in two well, a couple areas. The first was, meeting the 2% was, a position that we had vacant from some retire retirement that we had. And as we move people up, that that position was vacant.
In that position, we put 75,100 into the general fund through that position. Also, one of you brought up the credit card earlier too. We also have reallocated and used our credit card, which that has provided some savings, by fixing that issue that we had talked about over the previous years, and that, freed up $18,000. So everything that we're presenting in our budget tonight and the line items that we're we'll go through are just moving away, moving around internal funds that we have. We haven't added anything to the budget.
Additionally, we have put back into the general fund after looking at our line items and some of the needs we have that I'll address. We were able to also put an additional 7,750 back into the general fund through our line item savings that we had as well. Looking at the first, we've just included the items that we tried to match them with, what you could see on the same page, the the, budget book as well to show exactly where those items are placed and where they're coming from. I can go over each of the line items if you like. They're fairly minor, but the first one is our planning commission meetings, with inflation and simply just trying to do what we do at the planning commission.
We're asking to put an additional thousand dollars into their into their budget so we can keep up. We were about already about $800 over this year. So we we feel that that's a really close number that we can manage with an additional thousand dollars there. Also, equipment maintenance, we need additional $2,000. And when I say maintenance, that is things that we are locked into.
Those are our big pieces of copier and equipment that we have to pay a maintenance fee. That's not something that we really have a choice. I mean, they give us what the fee is when they do it to maintain them, and that has went up considerably over the years. So we are trying to get enough to just cover that. Probably the bigger ask is one time money we're looking at trying to replace the bus. You've all been in the bus, and it's always not my driving fault. The way the way it goes.
She had a
comment on that one.
But we are looking at trying to replace that. But what we would like to do is not replace it with another 24 passenger bus. We'd like to go with something that's a little more efficient and cheaper to run. We really a 15 passenger for what we need would be great. And it also reduces the the permitting that we have to do with our staff and makes it easier.
They changed recently over the years, the last two years, qualifying for a CDL, and that's what you currently have to have to drive the bus we have now. If we had a 15 passenger, you wouldn't have to do that, and they're requiring something from our staff that they require from large truck driving all equipment. All we do is drive maybe once a month the bus, and it requires right now like forty hours of time to do that. So we would that's another reason we'd like to do something different with with our bus system and something better for the planning commission on that. You.
Can I ask a question And about the I don't know if this question is for you? I think it might be for our staff, Chris Edwards. I'm going call your attention really quick. So we're talking about replacing the bus that community development has, right and I know and I think that you're
Several use it yeah.
Right I know that the reason I want to say that I agree that the reasons that you're looking at replacing it with something else make absolute sense in my opinion but I know that like the city the the Sandy Youth Council uses it like once a year at this point for getting students up to the capital for that. And so I don't necessarily know that this needs to be discussed right now. But while it's relevant in this conversation, know, and thinking about some of the other funding needs that we may have for some of those programs, making sure that we are adequately addressing some of the changes in shifts in budgets to be able to still accommodate our youth council getting up for these events. And so I'm assuming that it's going to have an effect on us being able to do that, right? It would be replacing this bus without having it?
Yes. And Babe mentioned that they were going to replace that bus. When we first funded the youth council, we included funding of about $1,000 for a bus to take the kids up to the capital. And we just haven't used that fund or that amount of funds. So that just went back to carryover.
But we've kept it in there. And then James mentioned that they were going to probably, at some point, get rid of the bus and get a smaller bus. So then we would have to rent a bus and that's about I haven't looked into it but about a thousand to $1,200 and so that would just be an added cost
to the youth council
the youth council but it already funded for that we just don't use it.
Okay. Okay. Thank you. I just thought it was an appropriate moment to maybe cross reference some of the domino effects of this decision though I ultimately don't think that it's worth one trip for the youth council to maintain a bus So and a thank you. Go ahead.
And then the last item on administration was just a $500 increase that we're looking at on the line item for equipment. Community under the planning, there were a couple items there. We wanted to look at increasing training and travel only by $500 each. That would allow us to, without going over budget, would allow us to send two people rather than one to some of the places because we're always about $250 short, not very much. But that's really staying within what we pretty efficient cost, what we're trying to accomplish there.
And then we have a a software which is funded currently at about, what, 15,000 that has increased, and we're asking for an additional $750 to just meet that increase that they have given on us. I think that's it on that one. And then on building and safety, this is a little bigger ask. And the reason I heard the the police chief mention this as well, but we have really been living off of our certifications happening at Sandy City. We've offered them here, and we've done that for the last few years because we get it free if we have it here.
But other cities have now caught on to that. Mhmm. And they're wanting now to rotate that and put that in different spots so they have that same opportunity. So that's really increasing our costs. And so we're looking at bumping our really trying to bump our training by $3,000 in each of those categories to further give us more money for certification.
I can explain really, but I don't think I need to take too much time on why we need our building inspectors fully certified and structural and what they do for their jobs. It's critical. And that that, I think, speaks for itself. But I think that's a pretty modest increase for what they actually do at the city. I think the other one that I wanted to mention was peer review.
That's, that has always, been in non departmental, but some of the shifts have taken where they're putting that's that's something that we have solely pretty much just used our department. And it's been in non departmental, but they're shifting some of those into finance that we've been they've been asked to do into the departments who are actually over them. But what that's gonna do is we'll have to watch that closely because that's really based on $20,000. We use that for structural review for a third party. And when we have some of the bigger buildings come in, it requires us to use that fund to have a third party a specialist look at the structural review and engineer a structural engineer look at that and make sure that, you know, what we're looking at, what the developer is turning in is exactly right and safe.
So if we get a lot of buildings that come in, that may go over that 20,000, which is now in my budget, which would create an issue if we go far over that. So we'll just watch that and if we get a lot in there we may have to ask for more but for now it's okay. But I just want to bring that up that that's something in the future that we're definitely going to be watching and and needing to look at. We're also online to replace one of our vehicles, and that's the $55,000 that you see in there to replace. And I just wanted to take a second.
The ALJ process, administrative law process, has been working for just over a year now. We started it a year ago just last January, so a year and a few months. And we just wanted to take a minute and thank the city council for funding that, working through that because it has been a big success. We've had some great responses. I think the last count we had, we've through that process, we've been able to move over 44 cars, junk vehicles.
And we're just really getting it down to where we know what. The judge knows that we know what to expect and what we can take to him, and we're starting to take harder cases to him as or more cases to him as well to decide. But I just threw a some of the excess. This is one that we've had that you can see, and then this was a a cleanup after that that was ordered by our administrative law judge. So we thank you for that process and for funding that. It has worked well. And we look for much more success in that and then years to come on that.
Where is that in budget, James?
The administrative?
Law, judge. Yeah. Yeah.
It's under a special purpose fund.
Yes. Yeah.
So it doesn't show up in ours.
Fund. Yeah. Do you remember what fund it is?
$1.30. And
that one, I
believe. 130.
If you go to that special purpose fund section, this is one we actually have broken out to show just the ALJ costs. And I believe it is page 130, if I'm remembering correctly. If not, maybe 131. Yes. That
one. Yep.
That's it.
Do you ever think and I know it's newish, I'm not expecting it to cover the cost. But do you ever think that it'll cover itself?
I do. I think with the finance I mean, when we looked at this, we figured the first year or two years it would take to get rolling and that we would start seeing it run cleaner in less time than we would need. I think eventually I mean, I can give you I mean, so far we've recovered just over $14,000 in the in
I think we're about even right now. In the first
year. Little over a year it took us, though. Yeah. So if you get into the next year, we think that'll start balancing out as we we have get better at doing that and become more efficient at it. I think it'll it'll cover its costs. It's never gonna be a great moneymaker because all we're really looking for is compliance, and we really want to just cover the cost. But get compliance is our goal.
Cool. Thank you.
Oh, yeah. There's the one more that Brian I forgot this was on there, but just another thank you on funding and working through our first of all, getting our general plan updated, which made it possible for us to get our working on our, code update. And that's gonna be a longer process, but already we've started. I think it's working very positive so far in what we've seen so far. And we're excited for that and thank the council for funding that as well. These are two projects, obviously, that hadn't been done in a long time that were well overdue to to be done. And, thank you for helping us, move that along as well. Any other questions?
No. Thank you, guys. Okay. Thanks. RDA.
Good evening, Madam Chair and Council. Thank you for the opportunity to present to the economic development RDA budget tonight. I'm going to go through the first couple of slides rather quickly and just get to the meat of the budget. But this first slide, just wanted to touch upon. This is the fourth straight year that I'm looking to cut the RDA budget.
As you recall, we talk about this every year. But as our project areas continue to expire, that's going to continue to decrease the revenues that we have to support economic development and our department. And again, I'm going to talk a little bit more about this. But I do want to say with the caveat that that's coming as these project areas expire. But 2,034 is really the year to keep in mind.
Our Civic Center North, that's the year that that project area expires. That's right down here where City Hall is and just between City Hall and the Southtown Mall for the most part. But that expires in 2034. That's really what we call our bigger revenue producer as far as administration. So we have some time. And we are looking ahead. And we've been planning for that for some time. My predecessor you know was planning for that when I took over. Know myself Rob were planning for that as well. So we do have a plan for that.
I've been working with the finance department. But just another reminder with those things coming up as project areas expire that eventually with the way we budget things that you know it could be a little bit longer than '24 or 2034 but that's the big date to keep in mind that the budget will drastically be cut as far as economic development. Just a few highlights of what some of the funding has been spent on this year as far as the RDA budget. If you recall the RDA purchased three properties one of them was a property over off at 90th South that we combined with other properties that the city or the RDA owns and and we'll be bringing that back with planning to discuss that in early June. The other one is the Arbor Building and then Lot 3 that is adjacent to the Wasatch Shadows property.
We have put that out to market working with Dan Nelson, our property manager, to do that. And we're marketing both of those properties, as you can see in that picture. But depending on what offers we get on those properties, obviously, the RDA board will make the decision on Lot 3 as RDA funds were purchased with that or used to purchase that lot. Just a couple other things I wanted to touch upon. As James said, planning and community development you know finalized the general plan.
That was a big big feat and that hadn't been done for years and years. One thing we've started is the economic development strategic plan. We put that out for RFP. We do have a consultant selected. We're working through the contract on that with them. And we're hoping to kick that off hopefully within the next couple of weeks to month at the latest. That hasn't been done in twenty years. So that's another big undertaking for you know you as a city council and for the city administration and the stakeholders to go through. So we look forward to that. But that'll be a big undertaking.
That's a you know a budget item that we budgeted for partly for this year and then I budgeted for FY '27. A couple other things just to give you a heads up on that we're working on that impact the budget are development agreements, participation agreements. So hopefully within the next month or so, maybe two at the most. But we have and you'll see in the budget, we budgeted for fiscal year 'twenty seven. But participation agreements with the Gardner Group and Wasatch Group that's behind the Hilton Garden Hotel, That's called the LARA Development.
We're working with them on a participation agreement with RDA funds and HTRZ funds. Similarly with Volk's development, that's Red Sky. That's behind Target. We're working on a participation agreement with them that hoping to bring back very soon on that. As you're aware and I'll be talking again later tonight about the RADM project and that participation. And then DB Urban, they're looking to purchase the property behind the post office. We're pretty much there and finalized the development agreement with them. But we're looking to have a participation agreement on HTRZ funds. So as you'll see, the next bullet point is the HTRZ. We got that approved in September.
And that's really significant as far as the budget because that's really a tool that's going to allow us to move some of these developments forward. And as I said, you'll be seeing these. Hopefully, I'll be bringing these to you in the next couple of months as far as participation and discussing more of the budget impact on that. And then, of course, a lot of the things we do in our department is our small business retention and expansion of our small business programs and outreach and working directly with the chamber on how we can support our small businesses in Sandy. So I've already kind of touched on most of this.
But again, the ongoing is just the future funding of economic development. Like I said, Civic Center North, it's the big one that expires in 2034. We did have Civic Center South. That is the auto mall. That was another one of our big revenue producer as far as tax increment and helping to pay for ongoing administration.
That actually sunset this year. So this spring was our last payment on that. And so we're really down to Civic Center North as far as the one project area that's creating tax increment that's helping us pay for economic development administration moving forward. One thing I've worked with the budget department on is Civic Center South, with expiring, there's not a whole lot of major needs in that project area. We've already prepaid all the bonds with the tax increment in that project.
So we've actually forecasted in the next couple of years to use some of that tax increment to continue to help pay for administration and ongoing costs with economic development. And that's how we've kind of stretched that out a little bit longer to alleviate trying to just put the huge burden on Civic Center North quickly. So with that expiring we'd push that out a couple of years and that'll alleviate putting all the burden on one of the project areas or at least two of the project areas for that.
That why it's $35,000 in 2027? Is that why it's such a low number? Is that just like leftover? In Right. It's at Civic Center South. It expired in 2026?
Yes. Yep.
So the 35,000 just Yeah.
That's just the interest income. So the 35,000 is just based on the fund balance sitting there. Okay. So that's just based on interest that the fund balance is accrued. But as you'll see in '27, the haircut. So we've only been getting haircut. So the the it was a pre '93 project area. So it was a twenty five year. And then if you had qualifying projects, could get seven more years. And that seven more years was additional haircut, is what it was called. And we got 100% of that. Well, that seven years is what we've been getting. And that actually expired this year. So that was the last payment of that haircut this year. That's why you'll see it in 2027.
That's been to zero. Yeah. Again, I've already touched on the economic development strategic plan, the Red Sky agreement, the Gardner agreement. One other thing that Rob and I have been working on, working on with administration, but I think that's something extremely important to as we've done these business visitations and talked, we worked with Dave Edmunds. We worked with Jim Herron at the SBDC, Beth Klausmo when she was still at the mill.
But we're looking to do a small business loan. There's other cities out there that do it, Mid Bell and others. We've spent a lot of time and a lot of effort researching that and coming up with a plan. So that's something that we're looking to fund this next budget year. But I will need to bring that back to you as an RDA board, go over that presentation with you, and then move forward on that. But that is, we'd be looking to fund that out of a city center project area. That's a sunset project area with just fund balance. The reason why we're able to use that is because those funds have already been spent by prepaying bonds. And then we paid ourselves back. So that's money just kind of sitting there. And that's what we would be looking to use that money for.
Sorry. That's the city center, the $533,000 or
That is the city center. It's the 700,000 on the grants thing on the grants line item under RDA city center increment. But did you say That's just another number we plugged in for right now. But
But did you say the city center sunset?
Yeah. It sunset back in 2022. Okay. And then it just had haircuts. So right now, it just has fun balance in there. And that's another good reminder. I appreciate the question, Councilmember Christensen. That's a good reminder that because of new legislation a couple years ago, any project area that had sunset, they basically put a deadline that when you had to use your fund balance. So they put five years on that. So you only had five years and when a project area is sunset to use that fund balance.
This last year, were looking at making changes to basically say, when a project area is sunset or any project area that sunset you couldn't use, you had to basically either give the money back, or do you have to use it within six months? We were able to work with legislation on that and keep the five years. But that still means you know most of these project areas the start date was five years. So that was two years ago. So they have three years. So we need to start using some of this money. And that's why City Center, as you'll see, we've programmed in I'll be bringing that back as a discussion with Red Sky's participation agreement to move that project forward and get that under construction. And then potential small business loan program with that. So the
533,000 estimated that's going to be left over in that fund at the 2027, we have to spend that somewhere, right?
Yeah. Well, you have to spend it within three years. Yes. So you have three more years to spend it, but we have to use it with either in the project area, a qualifying project, or you can use it for administration because that's a pre-ninety three, or you can use it for affordable housing.
So could is the Chamber of Commerce a qualifying use? It
really just depends. Yeah, we can talk more about that. But I mean, depends. Because if it's inside a project area, you can use it. If it's outside a project area for administrative costs and that, yes, you can.
Well, I think it's inside the project area.
If it's in city if it's in a pre 93 with city center, then, yes, we can use it for that.
You could use it for chamber of commerce to, like, offset some costs for the next three years there and possibly. Potentially. And, like, free up that money for other projects.
Potentially. K. Yes. Potentially. Yep. And then the only other thing I have is just, again, the 4% reduction. And that's really coming out of book subs and memberships, marketing, and professional services. But I've just we've been slowly trying to cut every year as these project areas sunset and our revenues decrease.
That's all
I have.
Do you have any questions? Sorry, I got a few. Okay.
It's because I'm remembering. Okay. Civic Center South. The Civic Center North, when does that expire?
That's 2034 is the final year on tax increment for Civic Center North.
And then the Southtown Ridge?
Southtown Ridge is expired. That one's expired? Yes. So we have
three twenty years. Thousand dollars within
Three years.
Just from now. Mhmm. So 2029? Mhmm. Okay.
And then ninety four hundred South.
I believe that sunsets in 2031, but that was primarily to pay off the TRT bond and the tax increment bond. And I believe that the last payment on the TIP bond or the TIP bond, I think, is 2028 or 2029. I'll have to double check on that.
Okay.
But that money is basically it has to go
Go towards
straight to that?
Either yeah. Something with stadium improvements construction or something or So the
we will have some money left over for stadium improvements?
Potentially. The way the way the agreement is drafted is there's a waterfall effect on that. Okay. And basically if there's money left over it really has to go to basically three things first. It has to go back to pay the mortgagee if there's debt on the property or the stadium or the bonds and then stadium improvements and costs. So there's kind of a waterfall effect there. But one thing I know that that we've put revenue and Brian or Zach probably could explain this a little bit more but there we do we will be short one payment between the TRT and then when the TIF expires. So there is some of that money left over that's going to cover that last payment that the TRT won't cover.
Okay. And then 114 South?
I cannot remember when that expired Rob. Do you remember by chance? It was a twenty year. So, yeah. So, yeah. Probably 2032, 2033. It was a twenty year project area. Okay. And I think we did that one in 2012.
Okay. And then the transit oriented?
Yeah, the TOD, I believe that's 2037, if I recall. And that is another project area that we do actually get some administration for that actually can go to help pay for administrative costs in our administrative budget. And another thing with the HTRZ, we get 2% admin for that. But there's no money coming in yet. But as projects get developed and that comes in, there will be some administrative revenue coming in to be used for that as well.
And then Union Heights?
Union Heights I believe expires next
It's pretty quick isn't
it? Yeah.
2028? Remember? Yeah it's in
Like 2028 or 2027
roughly?
'27. Okay. Yes.
'27.
Then not listed on here in all of these is the H T R Z Zone.
Yes.
Because we don't have anything coming in yet, and we haven't set up a fund.
Exactly. Yep. And that's one thing that Rob and I will be coming back to you as an RDA board to do is we need to amend Civic Center North because project area cannot overlap with an HT or Z project area. So we'll have to amend that boundary, take out those properties at a Civic Center North. They're vacant right now. And then we will amend that and put that in the htrz. And then we'll set up that htrz fund just like we do with our project area or other project area funds.
Okay. When we're thinking about the small business support, another option in addition to the South Valley Chamber would be like the small business accelerator, like sponsoring it. If we have extra money a year there, that would be under the rules. So just a thought.
Yeah. And we meet I meet with Jay and Corey quarterly. And we discuss how we can help each other. And that's one thing. So when I talk about we sponsored Sandy businesses because that's what we have to ask be Sandy businesses, of course. That line of can we give it just to the chamber, as long as we can prove it's supporting Sandy specific businesses, that's kind of what we have to look for. Yeah.
Thank you.
Any more questions? Counsel, go ahead.
Just as we're talking about this HTRZ, really wanted to acknowledge you and Rob. During that process, you guys did an outstanding job working with one of the stakeholders that was very resistant and very reluctant. And hearing those conversations, you know I just you guys both did really exceptional job there so I want to acknowledge that
thank you
all right thank you
thank you
all right That wraps up agenda item number one. Let's go to general citizen comment, and then we'll take a quick break, counsel. Okay? I don't have any blue cards. Do you, Dustin? Justin, anything up there?
No Madam Chair.
Okay will you invite online participants?
Certainly. If you're joining us virtually this evening and you'd like to comment on any city business now's the time. Go ahead click the raise hand button on your screen. I'll call your name in the order in which you raised your hand. And you'll have three minutes.
Not seeing any hands raised madam chair
I'll close general citizen comment and we'll take a short recess of about five minutes.
Recording stopped.
Madam chair, we're gonna go ahead and restart the recording.
Recording in progress. Okay, ready for agenda item number two. Ms. Houseman, this is yours.
Thank you madam chair I'm gonna reference my computer here just because I have lots of notes I want to make sure I get everything right So it is a first reading and I just want to preface by saying I know I've said this before. I love that that's a part of our policy. I think I think it's again I've said good governance once tonight I'll say it again I think that's appropriate to have a first reading where we're bringing ideas forward and then together we work to sharpen those ideas make them better before it comes back for a second reading. So thank you for that. Thank you also those of you who responded and provided feedback just based on what was already in the packet asking good questions making recommendations etc.
So I appreciate that. All right so before I move into my prepared remarks I want briefly acknowledge something at 04:30 this afternoon roughly forty five minutes before this meeting council members received a legal memo from the city attorney that was commissioned by our chief administrative officer addressing two specific questions about this ordinance that's before us tonight. I've reviewed it and I've seen the questions raised. They deserve careful analysis and I will I'll address some of that during my remarks because it's stuff I had already prepared for my remarks. I also want to note just for the record that the timing of the receipt of this memo email whatever you want to call it did not allow for independent legal review.
So I am going to ask our city council attorney to review that. He did not have time obviously it was it came in so late. So I'm going to request that he review that and we connect prior to a second reading of this ordinance this draft ordinance. So with that let me go ahead and turn to the ordinance itself. Get I have some lengthy I usually try to keep it brief but I feel like this is pretty important. So I want to make sure I'm thorough in my introductory remarks. So this ordinance is about applying structure we've already applied elsewhere. You're very familiar with this likely. This We've defined the functions and duties of the Human Resources Division. We've defined the functions and duties of the city recorder.
Both of those are divisions. Tonight we're doing the same thing for the division of communications. Again this is the first reading but if this were to pass we would have three divisions of city government that will have functions and duties spelled out in our code and I think that is a great summary of what's in front of you. To quote just our code title 10 of the Utah code is very explicit about our role as a city council. That code empowers the council to create and abolish departments and divisions and to set the functions and duties of each.
It also requires the council to review municipal administration. This is not a discretionary authority or power it is our statutory duty. Many of the reporting items in this ordinance such as the annual strategic plan the periodic performance reporting the visibility into how communications resources are allocated across departments exist because we cannot meaningfully review municipal administration without them back to our statutory duty. We are not creating new authority tonight. We are giving ourselves the information we need to discharge an authority we already have.
So we have the authority to do this. We're just putting in place the process by which we receive the information we need to fulfill this duty. To quote Section four-four-2C of our existing city code says quote the council retains the sole authority to create consolidate or abolish departments and divisions and to define or alter the functions and duties of each end quote. That language is in our code. We've exercised it continuously throughout our city's history.
So some of the questions obviously common questions that came from all of you as I sort of reached out to see if you did. I want to kind of front load sort of those the question that came to the surface as most common from from several of you and that is what problem are you trying to solve Marcy which is a good question it's a question we ask about a lot of things that we bring forward. So I've identified what I see as three problems that this ordinance this draft ordinance proposes to solve. First when one division supports work across the entire city such as human resources such as communications such as the recorder's office across the entire city the council which approves the budget that funds that decision that division has no way to see how that support is being allocated. So it's a visibility problem.
Second we have no written plan against which to evaluate the division's performance even though other operational areas produce plans for our review. So it's an accountability piece. So visibility and accountability piece of a plan for that accountability. And then third to ensure our residents hear a unified voice from the city I believe we must formalize how the communication team supports both branches. The team is very talented clearly doing a phenomenal job but I think it's important to establish clear expectations with the administration so that we are moving away from heroic efforts and toward a sustainable codified division of labor that ensures a shared voice and you've heard me say outcomes a bazillion times equitable outcomes for the council.
So this is about equal branches of government, shared voice equal outcomes not the same outcomes but equal access to the production of outcomes on behalf of both branches so before I describe the provisions and sort of how I have already folded in some of the feedback I've received just since this was published I do want to say something about our communications team. Our council we think very highly of the staff so I do not want this to be interpreted as anything other than than that. They the communications team the division definitely serves our city well. This ordinance is not a comment on their performance. It is about setting institutional expectations for the division as a whole.
Expectations that should remain stable regardless of who occupies any individual role including the director including the mayor including any of us. This is about stability and consistent expectations. Public communications are no longer peripheral administrative functions. We know that we've seen that over the years it's become more and more important. They directly affect transparency public trust emergency response civic engagement and the dissemination of official governmental information.
The director of communications speaks on behalf of the city to our residents and that is a role with broad reach across the entire community. So again because of that broad reach I think that is why it's critical for the same reason we have advice and consent for the human resources director because of that far, far reaching impact that that role has. This role, the communications division director, also has a far reaching impact, very broad. And I think that makes it appropriate to mirror what we've already have in place for the Human Resources Division. So for that the same way that advice and consent applies to HR director I think this position warrants that as well.
When a single position has institutional impact on every resident and every department the council needs to be comfortable with the person who will occupy that role and advice and consent is how we become a part of the process and become comfortable with the person whose impact will be so far reaching. And that's consistent with the structure we have as I've mentioned. So really the provisions of this ordinance kind of track against those three problems that I've identified I think we have an opportunity to solve the annual strategic communication plan that addresses the first problem I mentioned the visibility the reporting provision addresses the second and the equitable legislative support provision addresses the third that ensures that when the council needs communication support the division is able to provide it on the same terms as it offers support to the executive branch So I want to be specific about the flexibility and this is where a lot of your feedback already has come into play because obviously first draft and then we and then we you know refine and do things. So I I definitely understand a few pieces that I think already need to come back in a different form.
So the reporting cadence is currently drafted as monthly. I've heard that might feel a little too laborious and so I would absolutely be prepared to kind of adjust that language maybe move to quarterly written summaries and then of course the full performance picture as part of the annual review. So I also heard some feedback around the two hour. And again that was meant more for very last minute like urgent things. But I understand that that may not have been as clear.
My intent was that two hour time frame was like a floor, like kind of a minimum. But I understand that there's maybe a better approach. And Councilwoman Christensen made a really good recommendation. And so I've sort of morphed that and will bring this back in the second reading but the idea of kind of the simultaneity principle wherein when the mayor's office notified about a planned press release or a media event the council is notified at the same time. So just notifications happen at the same time.
So it kind of removes that I think what some of you felt was a little like arbitrary perhaps and didn't feel like a good fit sort of removes that artificial timeline and it's more just about you know equal notification happens at the same time. So I will I will definitely be bringing that language back changes there. So just in conclusion I know this is a lot but it's a it's it's brought up a lot of feedback so I wanted to be very thorough. I want to make sure I am stressing for everyone watching and for all of us as we deliberate what this ordinance does not do because I've tried to explain what I'm trying to do but it's also important to point out what it does not do. It does not attempt to supervise employees or intrude on day to day executive administration.
That's not our role. It does not direct any executive officer as to how they perform their duties. State law prohibits that so that's not that's not what I'm trying to do here. It does not change the director's reporting line. The director remains accountable to the city administrator who reports to the mayor.
It does not eliminate the need for dedicated council communication staff. That is a separate discussion and it deserves you know its own its own council's staffing decision. It does not single out communications for unique treatment because as I said earlier this same approach has already been applied to human resources and to the recorder. The ordinance recognizes a principle our attorney has articulated clearly both the executive and legislative branches engage in official governmental communications on behalf of the city. Legislative communications concerning ordinances public hearings budgeting matters and constituent engagement are legitimate governmental functions within a council mayor system.
So I want to be in addition to being transparent about some of the feedback I've felt or heard from you as my colleagues I do want to share that my original version was shared with administration was shared with city attorney. There was a lot of back and forth to make sure that we were hearing their concerns that the version before us tonight is quite honestly significantly different from the original version taking into account feedback from administration. So I do want to make sure everyone knows that and and I incorporated that feedback and I do not believe that there is anything in this current version that in any way in goes against the executive function. It is entirely within our legislative authority. And I have vetted that on numerous occasions, Mr.
Caddell, you. Thank you. Again, first reading, eager see what additional ideas you have for refinement and want to make sure that as we continue to deliberate and cool. Oh I also want to say Councilwoman Nickel has brought forward some suggestions of additions too. In revision recommended revisions have been brought to me she's got some things that perhaps layer in so we're going to work on that together between now and the second reading And so we'll sort of together present that in the second reading.
So thank you again for the feedback the questions that have occurred so far. I think it's already made the draft better even though what's in the packet is obviously still the current but you can tell by what I've shared tonight I hope that I'm already thinking about revisions and what will happen in the second reading. So for tonight I'm asking for your support obviously we can continue to answer questions tonight but would love to move this to a second reading and in the interim get our council review and further refinement. So there you go and I will turn it back to you, Doctor. Chirp.
Council members, do we have questions or comments for Council Member Hausman? Ms. Nicholl?
I have with regards to who the state says we have to have advice and consent for, that's the minimum. We have the ability to write our own policy to advise and consent to people from divisions. Yes. Yes. So I just wanted to point that out that we just haven't given because it's not expressly written in our code, but we have the right to do that
as well. And I've got some language right. Okay. And I'm happy to elaborate that on a little bit here. I've got if it would if it would be helpful.
So so based on our legal review I say our yours who advised me the answer can we do advice and consent the answer is yes the strongest evidence is in our own city code which I think is what you're referencing it's also in state statute so section four of the Sandy City code already requires advice and consent for the human resources director. I've mentioned that already state statute requires advice and consent for the city recorder so both are roles with broad reach across our city the director of communication speaks on behalf of the city to every resident supports every department that is comparable broad reach and I've got more code that I can cite if you're interested but but yes does that
Ms. Christianson, go ahead.
I mean, I sent you most of my questions just so sorry, As I lose them all. Just so they're, like, known. I was definitely like, a lot of the things you thought were already doing this for in, like, section four forty seven. So for HR, but two through seven just haven't been defined yet by the council. So it is definitely something we can do.
I did talk to you about g four, a question I had about in section four eighty two, does this open the door to allocating the communications department by percent to each department like we do for administrative services. Future question, not good or bad, just a question. And then also about the monthly reporting. Yep. We talked about that and the time frames.
Advising consent and then, yeah, the adjustments if that would make any on that. So those were just my basic questions. I also talked with Shane about it last night. I don't know if you are open to inviting back some feedback from him. He had some concerns as well that he wanted to bring up. They were very similar to mine, I think. I don't know. What do you think?
Well, first I want to answer the question you just asked. I already said that we've received a memo, and I want legal review before.
I don't think any of them and maybe I'm wrong. It's up to you. But advising consent, I would say, is an open question. Lynn's already weighed in. Tracy's going to weigh in. So that's not even something. I think it was more about the timing was the question and the reporting aspect, like how it affects staff or Shane's questions.
I don't know. Can I answer that? Yes please. All right. So the question about allocation like admin services. Great question. And I anticipated that. And hopefully I addressed it but I'll share it with everyone else. I think what this does is it creates data that helps us know how those resources are allocated which then if after review of that data and if any type of a pattern emerges that we are like oh wait a minute this this percentage of allocation seems like something we would like to explore further. So the answer is it could lead to that but that's not the intent.
The intent is giving us visibility into how things are allocated and it gives us data and data helps us make informed decisions.
And I don't think it's a if it did lead to that, I don't think that's a bad thing either. I just it's just something that might be a result later. Yeah.
Ms. D'Souza.
Well I was just thinking on the question that council member Christensen raised about the proportion being disseminated across divisions that may utilize communications ultimately those things are reflected in the budget and the budget is ultimately ours and I don't know that right now that it is completely a 100% uniform in that principle being applied consistently across all divisions in all ways that it could be right. And so I think you're right to consider it but I don't know that that even if that is made by the budget committee is one that we necessarily have to take up because ultimately the budget is ours and we can decide how we'd like to show that stuff. But I think it's an appropriate question to ask absolutely. You know even from the this is kind of off topic but you know I've brought up multiple times when we've talked about the council chamber remodel that there are other boards like the Planning Commission that uses this office allocation to that department. Sorry James.
You know for the cost of remodeling the chambers or the technology that the Planning Department also uses the Planning Commission or the Board of Adjustment when they do. And so anyway but to council member Hausman's proposal you know I read through it and I think that it seemed pretty me it seemed pretty self explanatory. Know I also worked in marketing for eight years when I was at the bank and it was very common that we had different reports that needed to be tailored and put together that measured whatever the outcome was we were in again your word, it's a very appropriate word. Our
word. Our word.
To be able to determine what kind of a budget that we got and where that money was allocated. And depending on the information the data that we receive from the campaigns that we did and how we did it the different deliverables that we had to meet. So I think that it this personally I think that this the city should be doing more of this you know I just as good practice, I think that it puts us into a better position of making better budgetary decisions overall. I think that the one thing that frustrates me in politics is the politics of it. And so when I think we can eliminate some of those instances and come back to how can we effectively efficiently utilize the tax dollars that are becoming more and more precious as resources and the economy change and wane, that we go back to these data driven known approaches that work to be able to help us make those decisions and figure out where the priority in the budget should be.
I think that communications is absolutely an important part of what we do. Is different. I had a conversation with another council member about private and public and the role in private and a communications marketing department is very different because you're looking for increased sales or you know new customers and things like that. And so the metrics that maybe would be applied to a communications department of a public or excuse me yeah public organization would definitely be different but still absolutely you know achievable, identifiable and should be measured. You know it is the council's duty you know we have the authority to but it is our duty to provide appropriate legislative oversight of the administrative functions.
And I do think like I said that we could be doing more of this. I do think that there could be more proactivity from the administration standpoint to provide the information that comes up time and time again in council meetings as we're deliberating and talking about the budget. At the same time the legislation and statute gives us the authority to do that when it's not maybe proactively being provided or we have a different idea of what would be helpful for us. And so overall I support this. The recommendation that council member Christianson made about the timing and how to notice I think sounds totally appropriate.
I do think it was you know trying to figure out how you come to something but that seemed like a really good suggestion. Overall
The actual language if you want to hear the language for that specific
I don't think it matters. Think that I understand the gist and I know I think that if that's the what you're trying to achieve is that like I would agree that that would be the goal is to just make sure that the council is being notified at the same time the mayor's office is being notified when something is known because I can't really understand why there would be like a difference in notice time frame outside of maybe more political reasons. And so again I think that we could do a better job to create more collaboration. I think sometimes we're being stripped down to the letter of the law. And that's Okay.
It is what it is and we have law for that purpose but I think that that takes away the spirit of collaboration and cooperation that I think that both branches are always talking about. You know I overall I support this and think that this is good policy. I'm very focused on policy and I have a lot of things coming up that are very policy focused. So thank you. Those are my comments. You. Ms. Straub? Thank you, Madam Chair.
A couple of questions that I have and then kind of feedback we weren't able to completely connect. A little bit of texting back and forth. But I spoke with a couple other council members. And it sounds like my ideas kind of filtered through to you through them. A question I had and then also a little bit of a suggestion.
But I want to start with just saying, I think Barb and her team and now Susan and her team are doing an incredible job. I mean, I've always had a great relationship with Susan and appreciate when I've had questions that she's been open and honest and forthright and very available. So I mean, is I think you're doing a wonderful job. And I think that maybe some of what the counsel part of this, the equitable component to it, that maybe the counsel isn't reaching out as often and having comms do stuff for us. And maybe that's something that we need to look at if we want more of that.
I know that when Parker has come in and done some of the videos or they're sharing agenda items and things that Ms. Terrio puts out and that has happened. But maybe that's something that we need to look at to say, Okay, what all do we want to make sure that we're including comms? And we're not separate but equal, but we're also funding the budget. And those employees up there are receiving money that we have funded.
So if there is something there, then we need to also be reaching out and making our wants known as well, if that hasn't happened in the past. But yeah, so that was a little bit of a question there. The press conference release time frame, it seems like that's kind of been adjusted. But probably unpopular opinion to say this, but I think to acknowledge in this is that could be written to look and go both ways. That if we were doing something so it is more of a two way street of saying, hey, if the council is going to be sending out a press release, is that we're acknowledging and sending that information onto administration as well.
That way we are on the same page. And then a question about kind of the advice and consent with that. If the division level, is that something that we feel we should have as all division levels? Or is it just kind of like specific ones that we're hitting at? We have other divisions. Do we need to do advice and consent at that? And you've made a very strong argument for it. I guess I just look at once again and going, Okay, is it kind of like an all or nothing thing? Do we feel that we need to have that oversight? Or do we trust that the person being put in the comms?
That's, I think, the past couple of people. I mean, Barb was solid. I mean, that's a stellar background.
I mean,
her history, her resume. And Susan, same thing. So they've made some very excellent choices. And then, I mean, Eric even before. So I was kind of wondering on that if we need to. And I'm really not sticking on one or the other. Just once again, it's kind working I mean, what all are we looking to accomplish? Is it broad? Kind of these broad strokes. But that would be something different because this is more of kind of comms.
But yeah. So that's, I think, just kind of the going both ways with press release and then time frame on that. And then just wondering if the Equitable that we're kind of working and maybe defining some more as a council of what we would like and then going to them with that ask. Because once again, anything that I've questioned or whatever, Susan's been outstanding with, been able to give me a response. And I've had a very positive relationship. I think that that would be something that she would be able to let us know. Wanted to make sure I got that out there. But other than that, so.
Go ahead.
Thank you for that. And you actually reminded me of something I left out that I didn't mean to leave out in my kind of opening remarks but absolutely the idea the idea here is is so back to our communication like whatever communications role within our city office. The vision is that absolutely this is this is they are working lockstep. And so I agree like the whatever notification needs to happen it should be simultaneous notification. Notification.
But definitely this this this this idea of of our our communications individual working with communications and and making sure that they are working together on not just not just crafting messaging but brainstorming together. Like I I I don't see this as as separate and to your point of maybe maybe we as we think about this position even though we're so that losing Liz as we think about that is there an opportunity to to really be even more proactive about through our through our communications person saying, this is what the council needs. We need your help with this instead of that falling just squarely on the shoulders of our coms person. So you reminded me that I meant to say that earlier.
Appreciate all the effort you've put into this. I appreciate the deep dive you've gone into asking for everyone's opinion and weaving it into changes as well. I think that I see this as another step toward breaking down the silos. We've had some budget presentations that have talked about how we've done that, sharing. Cost sharing, it leads to better outcomes.
This should be another thing that leads to better outcomes. If communications doesn't include the city council perspective, is it fully informing the public? If our goal in communications is fully informing the public, then this should be included. And there are many, many things that are rote. I mean, we see announcements all the time about events and gathering and all that kind of stuff.
And obviously, we do have people that are very, very good at pumping out information through established channels that are growing all the time. And that's part of the effort, right? I don't know if Ms. DeSouza noticed, but a couple of times she used the word marketing. And I wish I could think of the communications that we do as being informational.
Our role is to get out information and seek information from public as well. Two way communication that is very honest, that is very open, that is fully expressed so the public can know what we're thinking and give us feedback that's material and actionable and vice versa. In terms of advice and consent, unless one is thinking that this position is lesser than others, Why would we not? I rank it as being very important. Communication with the public is very, very, very important.
I don't think of it as being less so than some of the other positions that we already provide advice and consent on. I don't think of it as being threatening for department head positions. I don't recall ever turning down, ever saying no to advice and consent on department head level positions. So I think it gives us the opportunity to get to know people. I'm sure you guys have always found it very valuable, as do I, because we get the opportunity to interview these people that were coming in and serving our constituents and very robust opportunities to exchange ideas and ask questions.
What kind of person? How do you think? What caliber of person are you? And my bottom line, are you good enough for Sandy? So I like what you've done. I support what you've done. I do see it in the way you've described it as a productive collaboration toward a common goal. Why are we operating separately? We should be operating together. We all serve with the same dedication to the same constituents.
Let's share our voice. Let's share resources. We've got expertise. I see it as being beneficial all the way around in every aspect. So I support the good work that you've done, and I support your proposal. Thank you.
I loved Allison's comments about reciprocal kindness. That's a must. And I think that shared information will build trust between our branches of government. And I wanted to include some of this policy, make sure it adheres to other policies in our book. And we kind of talked about it. We both agreed we could possibly intertwine policy, existing policy with this policy to enforce that importance of it.
Ms. DeSouza. Thank you.
I wanted to say one more thing. I feel like this is more of a disclaimer because I want to make sure that my inclusion or exclusion of certain comments weren't taken out of context maybe. But I've intentionally kept from calling out certain individuals, right? Because I do get concerned. It makes me a little uncomfortable when we talk about, we trust this person, and this person's doing a good job.
Yes, I think I want to acknowledge that I do think that our current and previous communications staff have done a really good job. But I've intentionally chosen to keep the person out of it because I feel concerned that the conversation and the decision may then be perceived as personal. And for me that is not at all where this comes from. I really am looking at this from a governance standpoint, from a good policy standpoint. And so again, just my choice in keeping that out was intentional. But that wasn't to diminish the good work that our employees have done. So thank you.
Do you feel you have what you want? Do you have more questions or more comments?
No. I was just going to say I feel like I have good direction. And it sounds like there's support for bringing it back up for a second reading. Obviously, in the interim, we'll do some additional legal review and some additional collaboration on your ideas and
so are you open to feedback from the administration
is it different than what was put in the memo that came at 04:30PM yes okay
So first, I'm not aware of any preview from the council member to discuss this or workshop this issue before it was included in the packet. May I you councilmember chair if I would have that opportunity I would love to sit down and talk with you about this because I think there are some practical considerations that we could resolve through conversation and collaboration and that's my hope and goal to achieve that. I do appreciate council member houseman the intent behind your proposal. I share the goal of transparency. I share the goal of coordinated communicating a coordinated message with our residents.
I believe we want our residents informed and up to date with clear professional responsive measurable communication. That's essential to public service and accountability. At the same time, I do have concerns about, again, this week, separation of powers. And it bodes our focus and discussion in efforts to resolve this. In Sandy's
Madam
Chair, Councilmember Hausman, I'm the chief executive of the city.
You need to first be recognized. You must be recognized by the chair in order to
Would you please
recognize me, Madam Chair.
The request first was for Mr.
Pace's remarks. I'm directing Mr. Pace to reserve his remarks after my comment.
Mr. Pace, I'd like to call on you to give your comments, please.
Madam Chair, that's not going to proceed. I have a
Then I shirt that withdraw my withdraw my I have what I need from my counsel colleagues.
Okay. So you don't want to hear from the staff that you're attempting
attempting to share this this? I with Lynn Pace weeks ago.
Lynn Pace is working for the council independently is not representing the administration's point of view.
Oh I disagree.
Well I'm telling you that wasn't proved reviewed by me or approved by me his response Well
then you can I did my duty? I shared him with Lynn Pace.
No. Not fair. That's not fair. It's not transparent. It's not a holistic conversation.
Madam. Mr. Pace can I ask you a question? When we seek your opinion, does it have to be approved by the mayor before you can give your opinion to us? I think that's what you just said. That his opinion given wasn't reviewed by you. So I think that's what you just said. I wanted to get that
established. Madam Chair, if respond I more fully. I often get inquiries from individual elected officials. I regard those inquiries with confidentiality unless I'm asked to share them more broadly. So for instance, the email that you received this afternoon was in response to a legal inquiry I received from Shane. I did not share that with everyone until he asked me to do so. So. I received an inquiry from Dustin and from Marcy a couple of weeks ago, a month ago, whenever it was. But I was not asked to share that with the administration, so I did not. And so, anyway, so I treat all of those appropriately unless I'm asked to share it more broadly.
So the mere fact that you send it to me doesn't mean that the mayor of Shane ever saw what you sent to me because I don't share your information unless you ask me to.
Alright.
I I have what I need.
Okay.
I I am to be very very honest madam mayor. Every item that seems to have been brought forward by council member you claim we are trying to usurp your authority. It's an exhaust exhaustive argument. I disagree. I have received legal review. Our legal
review Is this an might exchange? Or are you going to lecture me? Because if this is an exchange, I'd like to offer feedback so we could have a productive discussion.
I'm done. Thank you, Madam Chair.
We'll move on. Okay. Next item on the agenda is the public hearings for the Lekai II annexation. Is that Brian McHouston presenting?
Yes. Thank you. This is the public hearing for the Lacay annexation. And as you can see on the map, this is property that we've already considered a portion of. You can see there's two different colors on this map. The area under the yellow highlight is an area that we've already talked about. We've already had the public hearing. We're working on that part of Le Kai's property. The rest of the properties in the red shaded area are the properties still owned by the property owner, Kevin Gates. There's a couple other entities that are shown by the ownership.
But in total, there's eight different parcels that are included in this area. So we've had the property owner sign a consent to annex the remainder of his properties. Those are addressed at 9561, 9563, and the remainder of 9565 South Wasatch Boulevard. So these properties currently have a a couple different zones in the county, R 143, C 2, and a c two slash z c, which is a zoning condition, which is related to their alcohol cells. In Sandy, we would propose them to be zoned R140 and community commercial, or CC.
The Planning Commission did review this, and they're affording a positive recommendation on the Lekai II annexation. Happy to answer any other questions.
Ms. D'Souza?
I don't know. I have a question, but maybe it's a silly one. But I'm just trying to think about the zoning. So this is let's see never mind I've resolved it in my head so I don't have to sound silly thank you
Well, me ask about the zoning then. Does the CC zone wrap in, as a permitted use or a conditional use, all the businesses that are operated? Or does this only include the residential parcels and not the commercial parcel? You address that?
Yeah. By the time we're done with both, we'll cover all of the properties and all of the uses that are on the property.
Okay.
And so whether it's permitted or conditional in Sandy zoning, it's he's gonna be legal nonconforming no matter what, so he can continue to operate as he is. There will be no issues with the different uses that he has currently on the property. And then, you know, there has been discussion that we could look at a possible SD zone that we would include all that he wants to do now and in the future.
So If they felt that they want it reconciled?
Correct. Yeah.
Okay. And take it from a legal nonconforming to To
a permitted use.
Ms. DeSouza.
Thank you. I was trying to figure out this was just like the residential, the commercial, and I got a little anyway, in my head. But had asked my question. You got at the heart of it. And my thought was legal nonconforming works for now. But should there be any future you know changes or improvement to the business model or whatnot then if it's not allowed then you have to stick with what you have otherwise you're non conforming right. So any changes would require us to consider maybe an SD zone and so does it make sense to consider that initially? Or how would that process best play out?
I think it's best just to take in what we have or what we're proposing and then have a discussion with the property owner and his attorney and kind of figure out what their future plans are for the area if they want to change it. And then we can wrap that all into an ASD zone and cover that all at once.
Okay. Because I also think about the context of the context of the time is right now. We're all very familiar with the business and with the uses. And so if it comes in at this community commercial and at some point the business changes and they're not able to perform something that they may be beneficial to our city right then having a council that's really familiar also with the whole thing may make sense but maybe not.
we've had several meetings with Kevin Gates and with his attorney that's here tonight and talking through this and the process that they're going to follow and want to follow. We need to get the annexation done so we can actually work on the other zone. Okay. So he's in the city because he we can't really do that type of work until they're actually functioning in our city. Once they're in our city, we can do that. We totally have agree with them that we will sit down. And I suppose that they're going to want to do that sooner than later once they're annexed in. We sit down and create an SD zone with them, something that works for them that we bring to you to approve. So making sure that you're Okay with that as well.
Okay. So the recommendation is more of a first step to get in that allows for the conversation to exist Exactly. Beyond Okay. That makes sense. Thank you.
think the root of the questions are we just want to make sure that LaChay is Okay, right? We love their business, too. And we want to make sure they're allowed to conduct it in the way they're conducting it. But it does make sense to get the annexation done and then make any changes that might be necessary. Any So more questions, counsel? All right. This is a public hearing, so I'll open the public hearing. I have no blue cards, but if anyone here in the room would like to speak to this issue, please step up to the podium. We'll get your contact information. And since I'm not seeing that happening, Dustin, go ahead and invite the online audience.
Thank you, Madam Chair. If you're joining us virtually this evening and you'd like to comment on tonight's public hearing item number three, go ahead and click the raise hand button on your screen now. Not seeing any hands raised madam chair
all right I'll close the public hearing and we'll bring it back to the council for action.
Madam Chair, I'm ready with the motion.
Please go.
Motion to approve the Lekai II annexation, and it be zoned R140 and CC commercial. I will second.
Do you want the ordinance number cited, Dustin?
I don't know that we have an ordinance
with it.
I think it's 26 dash 46.
that it?
I wasn't sure if it was the final one or not.
Yeah. It's 26 dash dash 46 is the ordinance.
We've got a motion and a second.
Yeah.
Alright. Miss Edwards.
Madam chair, was miss Houseman the second? Yes. Thank you. Miss nickel
yes
miss houseman
yes miss sharky
yes miss christiansen yes miss de Souza yes miss strap
yes
madam chair that motion carried six to zero
all right thank you moving on to agenda item number four that's community development oh I'm sorry that's our consent item
motion to approve consent calendar
I need a second second all in favor aye any opposed all right moving on to number five okay this is CDBG Jake.
Thank you counsel madam chair this item was presented to the council two weeks ago the draft annual action plan including the fiscal year 2027 program year 2026 annual action plan including the funding allocation for the use of CDBG funds. Since that time, city's budget process continues to move forward. We had a $21 tweak. So we've adjusted $21 in, I believe, was risk management or IT funds. And the Habitat for Humanity line item is the balancing line item for some of those tweaks.
Staff is presenting to you Resolution 20 six-56C to approve the 2026 annual action plan. There is a condition in there that would allow me as administrator to continue to make those changes as necessary to reconcile the CDBG budget with the city budget depending on what is approved by you as the city council. So with that, staff is recommending approval of resolution 26 dash 56 c.
Council, any questions for Jake?
All of the projects that were in the entities we're giving money to are going to use it in San Diego. Those projects are going stay in San Diego, right?
So we do some monitoring. We do audits of these organizations.
They have
to have intake forms. They have to demonstrate that they are benefiting Sandy residents. And these funds are reimbursement funds. They're not a grant that is given up front. And so we require quarterly reports. As I mentioned we do monitoring and we do ensure that we have a beneficiary a Sandy resident that's a beneficiary before any funds go out to these organizations. Most of our all but one of our public service agencies are not located in Sandy, but they have facilities that serve the region. And they do have to document that Sandy residents are being benefited by
the funds being given to them.
I was just concerned about the Habitat for Humanity contribution. I mean, they do amazing things. But I just working within a budget in Sandy with that, it's going be tough. But I wish them the best of luck.
So they have multiple programs. This particular program would be more for housing rehab. They would go in and do an assessment of the home, lead, radon, different assessments. And then they would work with the homeowner and come up with a budget to do
For the recreation of that.
Exactly. So for the housing activities, those would be specifically directed towards housing in Sandy City. The public service agencies are a little different because their facilities, for the most part, are not located in Sandy. So they have to demonstrate that Sandy residents are being benefited. But all of the housing activities that are being funded would be specific to serving in Sandy City.
Perfect. Thank you.
All right. This is a council voting item. So I'll seek public comment on this. If there's anyone here who'd like to speak to this item, I have no blue cards, but you're welcome to step up to this podium and speak. We'll get your contact information. And Dustin, if you'll go ahead and make the same invitation to our online audience to speak.
Thank you Madam Chair. If you're joining us virtually and you'd like to comment on item number five on this evening's agenda which is the CDBG annual action plan go ahead and click your raise hand button now. I don't see any hands raised madam chair.
Alright I'll close public comment on this item and bring it down back to the council for action. Someone like to make a motion on resolution 20 six-58C.
Is it 58 or 56?
I had
2656C. Maybe I wrote it down wrong. Was it fifty eight? Fifty eight. Okay. I'd like to make a motion. Motion to approve 20 six-58C.
Madam chair I
think it's 56 c.
It's 56.
Okay. I had 56. I'd like to make a motion to approve 26 Dash 56 c.
Second.
I was on the wrong item. All right, a motion and a second. We're ready for a roll call vote.
Ms. Stroud. Yes. Ms. Christensen.
Yes. Ms. D'Souza.
Yes.
Miss Nichol yes miss houseman yes miss Sharkey yes madam chair that motion carried six to zero
all right Item number six, we need to convene a meeting of the RDA. So I'll go ahead and make that motion to recess the city council meeting and convene a meeting of the Sandy City RDA. Second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed?
I'm back. Thank you Madam Chair. A couple items on the RDA agenda tonight. The first one is consideration of resolution RD 26 dash zero five. This is having to do with the omnibus agreement that was discussed last week.
As you found in your packet, I included two options of the agreement as we just also discussed and was requested by board member D'Souza last week. One includes exhibit B that has a right of first refusal option in it. That is the option B and then there's a first option A that does not have the right of first refusal. Other than that, there was no other changes from what was included in the packet last week. So I'm here if there's any other discussion or if you have any questions.
Any questions first for Casey? All right.
Oh, you're going to motion? Yeah. Okay. B option I have.
I move that we approve resolution number RD 26 dash zero five with agreement B which includes the right of first refusal.
And that it gives specifics on costs as well so all of those things through that motion okay yeah covered yep second
all right we have motion and a second this is a voting item so we'll take public comment if there is any on this item I have no blue cards so once again if anyone would like to comment step up to the podium and we will offer the public the chance to do the same Dustin go ahead.
Thank you, Madam Chair. If you are interesting in commenting on tonight's RDA agenda item, which is agenda item number six, go ahead and click the raise hand button on your screen now. Not seeing any hands raised madam chair
all right we'll close public comment on that item and bring it back to the council is there any discussion to the motion council don't see any all right we have a motion and a second So Casey will take a roll call vote.
Board member D'Souza? Yes. Board member Nickel?
Yes.
Board member Stroud?
Yes.
Madam Chair?
Yes.
Board member Christensen?
Yes.
And Board member Hausman?
Yes.
Thank you Madam Chair that one passes six to zero. The next item on the agenda is just approval of minutes for 03/10/2026.
Do we have a motion on that council?
I'll make a motion to approve those minutes.
Second.
All in favor. Oh is that you?
You can. All in favor. Aye. Any opposed? That's all I have.
That's it. All right That was fast. So we will adjourn the meeting of the RDA and reconvene as the city council. Do I have a second? Second. All right. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? All right. We're at the bottom of our agenda. That takes us to standing reports. Dustin, you got a report for us?
Yes, Madam Sherry. Let me get my notes pulled up here really quickly.
Apologies.
Okay, just a reminder that the employee luncheon is tomorrow. Obviously, you're all invited. We have your lunch passes for the trucks. We've learned to keep them here because otherwise, sometimes they get lost. So just stop by and grab them. And we're happy to hand it to you as soon as you get here, Okay? Another reminder, Friday we've got the beam signing at the new rec facility. So looking forward to that. Hope that you can all come. And then the big announcement, I've prepared our job specs for the Council of Communications Director, gone through the HR process.
And we are going to post the position tomorrow afternoon. It's going to be open until filled, essentially. My hope is to have somebody start near the beginning of the
fiscal
year. The request that I'll have for all of you is that you please share it far and wide. If you have somebody who you have in mind or if you have a network you'd like to share it with, that would be very helpful. And then just a note that as we start gathering the applications, what I would like to do and you don't all have to participate, but any of you who are interested, please let me know. I'd like after HR does the initial review for that it meets minimum qualifications, I'd like to pass those along to those of you who are interested so that you can take a look and then send me back and say, hey, here's the top three to five folks in my opinion.
And we'll take that into account as we're kind of going through our review and interview processes and such. So let me know if you're interested in participating in that. No hard feelings if you're not, but I want to make sure you have the opportunity. And that's it for me, Madam Chair. Thank you.
Council member business. No. Okay. Ms. Halsman.
More of just sort of a sharing. So I will not be at next week's meeting. I'll be on vacation. And the week after that, will be and I will have to be online. So I will be joining just online.
I just wanted to congratulate and thank the Mountain West Valley for their performance of Coppelia at Sandy Amphitheatre. My family was able to go last week. And thank you for all the staff members who answered my million and a half budget questions. And then thank you, Allison and Chris and Liz, for letting me come to the Sandy Youth Council tour of the rec center and for Ben and your staff for doing such a great job.
I also got to attend the ballet. I'm blown away by the venue every single time I go there. We're so lucky to have the amphitheater there. And the ballet was wonderful as well. I was also able to attend the Creek Road Open House for transportation.
Ms. Stroud was there as well. Supposed to be focused on pedestrians, but there were a lot of bicyclists there and automobile drivers there too who also wanted to weigh in so we got kind of a lot of feedback on that but it'll be interesting to see what comes of that information yeah it's always interesting to have it distilled down from the mountain of requests that you get from the public to what's doable, productive, all that. It'll be interesting to see what comes back. I also just want to say that I find myself noticing I mentioned this to James over the weekend, but Doug Wheel writes fingerprints on things.
I sent him a text telling him how much I thank him for I still see the fruits of his efforts in Sandy today. I was sitting at the Zions Bank I think it's like six months ago, the drive through on 94th. And I'm just sitting there in the drive through and I'm looking at and I'm going, that is like the best looking Jiffy Lube I've ever seen. It's a Jiffy Lube and I'm admiring admiring how beautiful it is. And I reach out to Jane oh, yeah, it was Doug.
And then I'm noticing that Mountain America Credit Union branch. I got to say, I just I respect I notice those touches, those finishes that kind of define us as a city. And I so appreciate Doug's efforts. And I told him that, that we'll continue to see and I'll continue to admire his efforts that he put into there. I miss Doug, but I appreciate what he did for us for so many years.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Yes, the Creek Road pedestrian study. I was able to kind of slide in at the very end because beforehand, the Youth Council was up at our Sandy Recreation Center. So thank you, Mr. Hill, for taking them around. And I can't believe how much it changes. There's been the past three months that I've been able to go once a month, you're just like, oh my goodness. It's very, very different, getting that complete track up on the top and seeing that view and realizing that it's just going to be even more incredible. So thank you for offering that and getting those kids up there. And they were super excited and providing feedback of, oh, what about this type of equipment? Are you going to offer this?
And so getting a getting those kids in there and involved it was great you know the next year the applications for youth council are closes this Friday so you know continue to share you know encourage our high schoolers in grades ten, eleven, and 12, as long as they live in Sandy. But a wonderful opportunity. It'll be a loss to not have Ms. Terrio, but Ms. Edwards is rock star at it. So I know that she can get that handled. And I think that is all that I have. So thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you. I don't really have anything. I was going to mention the Youth Council only because you know I was watching the application deadline for my son who enters the tenth grade next year and has been kind of excited about his opportunity to apply. But Council Member Straub mentioned it which is great. And maybe the communication of the deadline coming up can be something that our administrative communication department can help us with try to get that last push out to really amp up those applications so thank you
all right on to the marriage report
thank you well we'd be happy to help with that communication like we are happy to help with counsel messaging on so many other issues newsletters
A lot of all the good work, but it just is what it is.
So the counsel knows and what we've talked with administration is that the beam plate will be what we're signing. They'll actually raise that beam, plate just in front, like a 10 foot high thing. That's not where it's gonna stay. It later will be put up into the field house pretty high up. Maybe when you're walking the track, you'll be able to see it. So Marce, maybe if we can get organized here, can get you to come over and sign it before it goes too high. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. I
so appreciate
that. You.
Anyone feel like making a motion to adjourn? Motion to adjourn. First time I've heard three seconds on that. All in favor? Aye. Have a really good night, everyone. Thanks for hanging in there with us.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.