City Council - Regular Meeting

32. On the 2nd of June, 26th July, the meeting minutes are accepted. Are there any changes to be made? illa sheri

Thank you.

I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you to accept the meeting minutes on August 7th. I request you Kelsey and Holly and I met this week. We discussed some of the needs in the last meeting. In addition, we made an announcement to you in advance. Is there anything left to discuss about it? I believe that most of its basis will continue to be the same. That is, again the need for investigation. We have investigated some things related to the heart. That is, continue. That is, the change from our area will start in six months instead of three months. That is, twice a year. So, once in the first six months of the first year, it will be a test again. Correct. Correct. Then, I would like to ask you a question about what you have found or examined about cardiac testing. Currently, we are not doing cardiac screening for the Army. We are conducting cancer screening for the Army. I was researching, and Brandon felt that there would be some information about this. We reviewed the legislation that you suggested. That is, issues related to the heart that occur within 8 hours after the shift will be covered through the CET Workcase Compensation. So, that is the law. We will cover that claim. That is, only if you have tested Cardiac Stress. That is all.

It is mandatory to get that permission. To claim. That was our... Yes, Cleet, Cleet, is what Abhil wrote. In other words, there are certain conditions for applying for that opportunity. You need to be an officer for 5 years. Also, you need to have a certificate that you have undergone a stress test and that you are healthy in your medical file. Then it covers the 8 hours after the shift. But again, those two requirements are still in place. That is why, if there is a mandatory facility for Siddhik for physical assistance, it is our requirement that the cost of conducting stress tests for officers who receive those facilities should be reduced. I feel that one part of my wish list is 607.5.2. In this sub-chapter, it talks about physical examination that can't be seen due to illness or illness. So, does that physical examination have any symptoms? I don't see that you need a sonogram of the heart in your brain. I don't know what the symptoms of that examination are. So, shall I show you that? Yes, there are no such tests that are legally mandatory. The most important thing is to prove that the doctor is heart healthy. For that, a scan test is required in a way that the doctor can say with confidence. In Abilene, they conducted a stress test with the doctor who signed up. Yes. There is a pulmonary function test and electrocardiogram in the fire department screening. That is, 1 kg. But I don't think this is what you need. That is what is done to benefit those who prevent fire. It's a little different in their case, because it contains cancer. I can understand that. But I think you have discussed the tests conducted by the Abilene Army. Right? Yes, yes, that's right. We also need the same heart test given to the Abilene Army.

We used it because there was such a language in Abilene's curriculum. Of course, we have to make it clear what needs to be examined here. That is why it was only given as a medicine, not as a last resort. Yes. But what you just said is that EKG and stress tests are needed. That is what I also need. Yes, sir. Okay. We can examine it more, but it will be more expensive for the city. The police council has just announced a certain amount of money. So, we will have to find a fund for it. Have you informed the council about what we actually need during these discussions?

In my knowledge, the principal salary is given to the council.

I want a small coke to eat with it. Sure. Sure. Let's have a coke at 2 o'clock at night.

Okay, let's start the meeting again after 2 pm, 11 minutes. Thank you. We can now move on to the third topic to discuss about the last Friday's workshop. I remember that Veronica took this meeting to talk about the results of the previous workshop. Although the subcommittee and probationary status are important, the biggest reason for coming here is financial matters. So, can we do it?

Of course. We also talked about it. We are happy that we are working on the same thing. Okay. The fourth topic is about the talks and events regarding the Meet and Confer of 2027. So, I will leave it to you. Yes, we agree with what we discussed last time. We do not want to increase the salary. Instead, it is necessary with the help of the department. In particular, it is a big deal that it is 16% behind Sharashiri. We thought that we could decide things after discussing the offer from the Municipal Assembly. Council joined on Wednesday. They agreed to pay the salary. They agreed to give the staff three years to pay the salary. The police department is paying 16% of the salary within three years. The current salary will not be deducted after three years, and the staff has agreed to increase the living expenses per year. Therefore, the increase in living expenses per year will help us to continue to increase the income in the coming years. I have the results of the consultation given by the consultant on how the three-year plan will be. Forgive me. Jonathan, let me spread this. Can you remind me how much is the first layer? I think there is enough oil. If not, we can add more.

We need a short period of time to examine this. There is no objection. Then, from yesterday's Yoga, the process in front of you is 1.1 million or 1.112,000. Or 6,666,000 or 606,000. I will say that number one more time. Please forgive me. The numbers are confusing. One dollar, twelve, sixty-six. Whether this is the third year or the first year, it is the first year of that plan. Thank you.

The numbers given to you by Jonathan include benefits and salary growth along with overtime growth. Nani? There were some other things that were accepted by the council. It was left for the police department. So, Jonathan will also participate.

Yes, there were some things related to the exam. And also, there were a lot of problems related to the exam. If we talk about the salary benefits, the numbers I shared a while ago and the health insurance fund for the entire city of the police department were found. I don't have the exact number of police officers in my hands, but that system is still in place and it has helped us. The questionnaires, chiefs, assistant chiefs, deputy chiefs, are they all included in this? Is this all for the police department or is it only for what we need? Yes, all of that is for the police department. Therefore, the deputy chiefs and assistant chiefs are included in that group. The chief should also be included in that group. So, how much is the amount they don't have? The reason is that we are not paying for them. Of course, that's right. Yes, I don't have that group in my hands. I want to know what the accounts of the deputy chiefs and assistant chiefs without chiefs are. We will now have to go back to the plan and check it. When I checked those numbers, it reached 91%. 25% out of 101. When I looked at the chart in front of you, yes, how much did it increase in your calculation? Out of 86. Up to 901. That is approximately 5% increase. Then every year, more than 5% increase is given.

2% increase in living expenses is included in that. That is our instruction. That will bring you to that 100%. That is my wish. We will be 4% less. Because of October 1st, others will get 4% from our salaries. That's what we see. We see that 2% of the cost of living is not increased in the public security sector. I check the numbers every year because there are complaints. I check it every year. Even if there is a high wage increase, we are going back. So I think that 91% will be 87 or 86% on the first day itself. That's why we have problems. Moreover, no matter how things turn out, we have earned a lot of money this time. I understand about the consequences. But we have earned more money this time than expected in the future. That's why I want to say this. In addition to this, a union equal to the underground. In the next two years,

I don't understand how we can move forward in that way. Any advice from the Council in that way, Yes, I would like to clarify one more thing. Here, we are talking about about 5% increase. If we calculate it correctly, then 5% increase and 2% allowance will increase in the coming years. So, if we are talking about 4% increase, then we are definitely taking advantage of it. There is no reason for me to believe that you are not close to the end of the war. That's why this ship was built. That's why.

I fully understand what you are saying. Unfortunately, we can't fix this in a year. This is not a mistake that happened in a year. We have been behind for many years. So we will need a few more years to fix this. Unfortunately, the legislation has not made things easy for us this year, especially to bring a big change. I think that the Council is working very hard to remove these violations. They have made it clear that their main priority is income. So this year they are showing their response to the removal of these violations. They know that this is not just a one-year plan. Have you included the removal of the evictions in the documents as part of the budget?

Yes, I didn't pay attention to that. Six officers in the state are in a state of oblivion. They have ordered six officers to fund the council's budget for Wednesday. I think that amount is $569. $5,69,000. That is why the forecast ahead of you and the previous years will increase the cost of living. Also, the re-establishment of the six properties that were forgotten. Let me ask you to understand this clearly. This cycle is expected to last for three years from 2007, 2008, and 2009. Is that what I have to understand, or was it at the wrong time?

Excuse me, can you repeat that?

Are you expecting us to agree to this cycle within the next three years? I think we will all have a three-year agreement. Yes, I agree completely. Yes.

Let me remind you that the pay plan in front of you has not included the living expenses of the previous year. Therefore, if you are an accountant, please understand that it has not been included in this because the council of debt has to be decided. No, I am more interested in the first year. Because without living expenses, it is only 5%. That is, in reality, 1% of the salary increases. In addition, 4% of the living expenses increase. So, when things are decided, we get stuck there. I am a member of the Meet and Confer Committee. Since 2015, Earlier, when we received loans for several years, we did not have enough funding for the next year, so we were in debt. Then, the problem was how to find the money for that loan, so we had to look for the remaining income. It was not the way to make the loan go through and then calculate the profits. So, it is also a desire. But, we cannot continue to lose people. There is no benefit for our members with 6 certificates. So, there is no use. Especially in a situation where we cannot legislate or stop people, because people are leaving their jobs.

I would like to say that one of the main objectives of this budget is to ensure sustainability for years to come. So, we are working hard to implement this plan for the next three years. So, I believe that we will be able to implement the E-Pay plan for the next three years from the Municipal Assembly. Again, let me say this. The aim of this salary review is to prevent people from leaving the E-Pay plan for the purpose of appointing people and providing them with a decent salary. Certainly. God, I need another caucasus. We can go out. It will take less time. Okay.

We will reach the caucasus after 2 pm. Take him out. We are ready. Thank you. Okay. Let's start the yoga again after two hours and thirty minutes. Yes. and take into account the things that have been predicted, and so on. After listening to the budget workshop, it has become clear that it is more important to support the living in the state than to legislate new people. They stated that they are willing to pay $5,70,000 of that money to support the living in the country. Therefore, I suggest that only one year's salary is enough. Next year, let's think about CCPD. If it passes, we can reach 100% of the target. And if I take 1.1% according to my calculations, and then you take it, the remaining 5,69,000, this will reach us. All certificates will reach 94%. Okay. Do you need a one-year contract to use the six documents you forgot to clarify your wish and increase your income? Okay. Then? The council believes that this will be accepted, and we will be doing these things within the specified limits. That's why nothing much will happen. In the last episode, we talked about the possibility of CCPD. So, it's not a big secret whether it will happen next year or not. So, make it clear that you are not intending to say that CCPD must exist. Because there are many reasons for it. Shady. No, we just need a year's plan. Let's see what happens next year. Because it can only be decided by ballot proceedings this month.

By then, we will be able to prepare anything related to the budget or for discussions. Okay. Um, I can write, or... Or you can look at the calculations I have prepared. Then you can calculate how much the actual salary will be. If you send me an email, I will be grateful. Also, we don't think we can give you a new estimate of how much you can earn during the caucus meeting. But we can definitely test what we can do. This is the most important thing. We made it clear in the last meeting that this is the last opportunity we can see. Because we have to vote from our side. This has to go to the council twice, right? So,

Only once.

I think we should go to the council only once. Okay. Yes, that's right. Only once? We'll have to go twice for both the budget and the compensation.

No.

So we have to complete it in time. But we... We might need another meeting with the council. I don't know if this will affect the 1st and the 15th. Yes. That's right. Moreover, the budget is only to keep aside the cost of the money.

So, we can decide how to use that money after we have decided on the budget and budget. We have done that in the past few years. So we have a little more time. If we get the money that the council allows, we can use it to operate. Four people can't do anything special about it. But we can move forward for a while until we agree on how you want to use it and discuss it with the authorities. I don't think we'll be in trouble if we get to a decision by October or September.

When he sent that email, I would like to clarify that it was from the recruiter to the lieutenant. The majority of what we are asking is included in the number 1.1.1. I will clarify what is included in the number 1.1.1 by talking to Jonathan about whether the assistant chiefs have included it in the grant. We are talking about five people. It will be a very small crowd. Shall we begin? Yes, we are ready for the caucus meeting at 2 p.m. 36 minutes later.

We are ready to resume the meeting after 3 minutes after 4 pm. So, we agreed and discussed. We have also prepared a few numbers and a suggestion. We are suggesting that the first two years of the class and comp plan should be in the middle of the first three years and that the market rate should increase by 2% in the first year. For that, those 6 documents will have to be forgotten. Again! Umma! In the second year, there will be a two-year curfew or a two-year curfew to be imposed. Yes, I know you all have it. Next year, the ACCPD will come. That's why, if that's the case, we'll be in charge. We won't limit it to two percent. We're only saying that what we've given you is two percent guaranteed. And then... Let's stop there for now. Let's start there. This year. I don't think so. Therefore, we are saying that the balance of two years and the amount of money I have given will be more than 2% in the first and second year. Is it correct to use the income from the savings? We use the small amount of money from the savings. That's right. Do you know what the real numbers are for each step? So, if you give me a few minutes, I can make it for you. She was very interested in it. Okay, so it will be equal to 69. Oh, I'm sorry. The recruitment is over. Let's go to the top. Okay, so it will reach 6533 from 64 to 6533. 65533. I'm very sorry. It will increase your police officer basic salary to 70,626. In this, there are some exceptions, so you can come one dollar here or there. Yes, it is actually rounded to 70,627. Your intermediate will be at 78,744. Your advance will be in 86,862. Your master will be in 94,979. Going down, we are in 94,333 in the intermediate test of Sergeant rank. Your sergeant advance is in 1,1138. Your sergeant master is at 1,07,944. You are... To the lieutenant's advance, you are at 1,15,644. Your lieutenant master is at 124. You are... Then 2 dollars. Give us a minute to think about this. What is the sum of your contributions? What is it? We used about 30%.

Is that correct? Because I used 1,298,35,267. Below that, I got it from you. My total sum is 1.46. It is very different from 1.7.

Okay.

So, one of the things we are trying to do using this plan is to make the plan sustainable, especially in terms of waste management. So, we are able to make this system sustainable for other departments in the city, using some funds that have not been received. We would like to bring equal income and class income to all regions. Isn't that right? But the other departments in the city are not leaving any of their documents. They don't care. My intention is that other public safety organizations don't care either. They haven't left anything. In reality, the main thing we need is the salary. Today, we are only five percent behind them. So, yes, More than 5% of that is invested in salary. Since you are behind, you will have to earn a lot of money and get classes. As stated in the Budget Workshop, within 3 years, both Fire Force and we will earn 2.1 billion rupees in salary. In the beginning, we were able to get a little more, but according to the slides, they will get more than us in two to three years. It should be related to the number of lives at that time.

Most of the Fire Force living in the back are those in the upper class, not those in the lower class. Therefore, the number of lives in the first year is less, but in two to three years they will get more. We have not come here to discuss the cost of the Fire Force. Jonathan is right. The more you are behind, the more money you will get every year. So you have more support in your part. I would like to invite you to join a caucus to investigate new organizations.

We can start the conference again after four hours and thirty-two minutes. Yes. We discussed it. We also investigated the percentage of it. So, even now, there is a huge gap between the various objects. Some of them are 92% and some are 96%. So, when we examined them, we found different groups. There is not much difference. Aagya chilavu ekadesham 1.56 aayi verunnu. Ade. Vali oru thuga. Thudakathil kooduthal lebikadhe, adhe. Ennali aashayathode. On the one hand, it can be through CCPD or other funding efforts. On the other hand, if we are talking about a two-year plan, I think it is better to limit it to one year than to come back and discuss it again if there is a CCPD. It will help you to clearly understand where we stand next year. Do you think you understand that?

Are you planning to make a change in the salary gap here? Yes. Okay. Will those numbers be able to meet?

Certainly. Yes. That is, in the Recruits Statement 65,926.85. In the Basis Statement, 71,497.

One minute. I'm not getting this right. 65,927. 9. Yes. 9,268. 92,685. Okay. That's a round. I'm sorry. Officer Basic. 71,498. Let's do a round. Okay. Intermediate Testicle. 79,363. Next 87229 Then 95100 Or forgive me, 101, I had to round that one Ok, Intermediate Surgeon Also 96218 advanced sergeant testicle one lakh two thousand two hundred and eighty-three master one lakh eight thousand three hundred and forty-nine then lieutenant advanced one lakh twelve thousand five hundred and three that was one lakh twelve thousand five hundred and three yes then

Master Lieutenant, 1,24,926. 9,026? Yes, correct. 1,24,926. According to our calculations, it will reach 93.5%. Because it is a little difficult to talk about the number of cells. That's a big deal. That is, it is easier to say that this is 91.12% plus 2% of the cell than to say that it is 2%.

So you are changing everyone to 93% on the ground, right? 93.5%. Yes. 93.5%. Shady. Yes.

Instead of one entity standing at 96% and the other at 92%, the reason is your numbers.

Our numbers. On the ground.

They are your benchmarks, right? They are not the benchmarks in our plan. They are the benchmarks we discussed. Last time and before that, it was about 11 cities. And... For me... Yes, there is one thing that I am afraid of.

When I use some of it, I remember you saying in the previous meeting that there has been a slight difference in the benchmarks in our plan. I also know that. We had a desire to continue with the consultant's goodwill. The council had asked us to do it with a consultant who has a negative opinion. So I don't want to change from the instructions given by that consultant. If your goal is that everyone needs 93.5%, we can definitely test how it will be. But I think we have to stand firm in the goodwill of the consultant.

Before making that decision, does the council know that the benchmark of the consultant is wrong?

I use the word wrong. At that time, it was made based on the information obtained directly from each city. So it is not taken only from the website. Those numbers were collected by them and conducted by the government in each of the cities. It is also true that the same was done to the other cities. Are we being punished for not giving back to a city consultant? I think that all of us have given back. The numbers I sent you earlier are the numbers of October 1, 2025.

Today, they are suffering from this. From October 1st, 2025. So, there are some differences between the places where they started to follow and walk. They didn't walk because they didn't have the Lieutenant rank. They have the Commander rank, which is similar to the Lieutenant. When you read it, 1, 2, 3. 1st is officer, 2nd is sergeant, 3rd is commander, 4th is assistant chief. They don't have a deputy chief. But... Then there was a mistake in the temple. And then... Which is the other one? Which is the other one? The reason is that there are police officers and police officers in the follow-up. But the consultant used only one police officer. More than that for the officers. When you get more than 13,000, it counts as the maximum amount. Yes, they had a meeting with the consultant and Veronica, didn't they? I thought they had made some adjustments. Some of it was edited, but not all of it. After I sent the details, we got it from open sources. We shared it with the consultants.

They re-examined it and edited the changes. They did things that they were aware of and were able to examine. I have a question to ask. Does the council know that we are still conducting discussions? They know. Okay.

We have an alternative suggestion. We can avoid the one-kill auction in 2027 and move on to the financial year 2028. From this period onwards, it will come into effect. In addition, we can make a two-year contract for 28 to 29 years. In that period, we will also be interested in a two-year contract. Or, if the Municipal Assembly can tell you how much is the total amount allowed for you to pay as a salary, we can decide how to distribute it to our members. It's been one year. So, do you want to move to FY28 plan instead of FY27 plan? Yes, ma'am.

If the Municipal Assembly wants a two-year plan, our suggestion is to remove the FY27 plan and move to FY28. So, the two-year plan you gave will be from FY28 to FY29, and this plan will be from FY27 to FY28. There is no funding for that. Is that so? or we need to know how much is the total amount provided by the council. Instead of counting each number, we can clearly understand how much is the total amount granted by the council. The council has not granted anything so far, but they have given us instructions on the amount to be included in the budget.

We will pay you for that. They accepted $1.1 million, which was included in the first year of payments and benefits. Sorry, we didn't accept it, we gave them the instructions. At a cost of approximately $5,69,000, they intended to restore the documents of six police officers. If the police are in the department, they have already agreed to use those documents. so that we can reach an agreement through discussions. So, whatever decision we make here today, we have to accept it through the budget process through the CET Council. So, we can try to reach a reasonable agreement between the two parties in those two areas. That is why we tried to include 2% of COLA and COLA beyond the first year. What do you think? If you take it,

We don't know how much you have changed from the total amount of overtime adjustments. When we talk about overtime adjustments, are you referring to the second year of the plan? No, you said earlier that one part of that 1.7 billion is for overtime adjustments. That's right. Then we understand that. But we don't know how much that debt is. So, when we think about how to spend it on our salary... That's right.

So, it will change according to the amount of the increase in the debt. That debt. So, no matter how much the increase is, we will have to change the debt over time. But what is that? What is that?

What would be the basis for that? The reason. That gives us a number. The reason. When the rate of growth increases significantly, i.e. more than 1.5 million, 1.1 million, more overtime allocation will be required. If it is more expensive, we think it will be more expensive after overtime. If you give us one minute, we will try to find that number. Okay. Um, I don't think this has come under the rules of this meeting. But how much is the total income from the city's street use fees? The street use fees were going to be granted to the general fund. I'll take that number with me. I don't want to lie to you. The average overtime is $6,56,766. That's our total overtime. Can I say one more thing? Forgive me. $6,56,766. $7,66. By 2027, the right-way fees will add up to $6.7 million to the general fund. The funds allocated for the previous streets and bridges will be used as special funds through the right-way fees. Adyade. Is what I say in the overtime calculations right? Will it increase by any percentage? Approximately $8,500. When it comes to overtime, the reason is that 1% is 6567. Then if it is multiplied by 1.3, am I calculating it wrong? Let me check again if the numbers I gave you are correct or not. Okay. Yes, I don't think so. But I want to ask you something.

When he was picking it up, what did the council say? I want to make sure that I am using my words correctly. What did the council say to you to raise the rest of the money in the city?

So, the council gave everyone the same instruction to run the COMP and CLASS plan for three years. In addition, all residents in the Fire and Fire Department are affected by the COST, CLASS, COMP, and PLAN. Some civil servants who are not affected. So, they only get 2% of their living expenses, while others get what is in their compound class. Just like the Fire and PD.

That association has not provided any benefits.

Yes, it is very close to the association that you have calculated. That is, about 6%, that is, if it is a total of 6%, it will come up to 51,000. Yes, that's what I'm getting. This is our research on the Klaas and Kompu story. We have been doing benchmarks for the last 10 years. We are using the same kind of science. When we talk to our members, we tell them to look at the benchmarks we always follow. We make sure that everyone gets the same percentage. We can't say this. The city appointed this consultant. They know more than we do. The reason. They got some unprofessional things. But that's it. Websites are available in other places. People have various information. They will not post about the salary on the website of their city. They may have old information. But we check all the information we get every year. So when we say that we pay our debts to everyone, We calculated it accordingly. That is how we have been doing it all year round. I know that the council has suggested to make the details given by the consultant as the basis and to make a plan B or a compensation plan. You gave it. I know that we have spent 5% of what the council has suggested for the rest of the city in the past. We were also involved in that. But... I don't know if there was a different suggestion this time than last time. No.

I think that's exactly what Tina spoke about earlier. There are six documents, including the one billion and one billion that were highlighted in the PowerPoint. In the past, the council had allowed us to use those funds together to conduct discussions. That's what we intended to reveal. What we told you before your return is what we can do with that money. We have a simple method that can be ensured for two years or three years. So, there is nothing wrong with the fact that it can be ensured. Isn't it? That's why we looked at the numbers. We were able to ensure 2% growth in the first two years outside these groups.

Two years in a row. Because of the successful activities this year, the finance department is sure that the funding for the next year can be guaranteed. So we can assure you that you will receive funds this year and next year. So if we want, do you know? If you want to change some grades, I don't mind making small changes, but I can't say that I don't use the compound class. It is very similar. That is, we are a little different in three cities. There were unions, as I thought.

Okay. So, take the proposal you gave me and check the numbers for me. Yes. A little more. That is, if you just look at the master of the lieutenant, it costs at least $2500 per person. So, if you add 2% of the income next year, you can assure me that the numbers will not be checked again. I promise to fund it next year, and I don't want to finance it in a situation where it is impossible to do so. Because I'm a Lieutenant Master. It's only $9,024. What's different from what you announced? Oh, I'm looking forward to two percent. I'm sorry. Let me put this aside for a minute. Yes, it's not too far from what we meant. Some are less in our area. Do you know an example?

One minute.

Let me put the two things right next to each other. Because there are a lot of spreadsheets open here. The reason you said is right. I took it earlier. Usually you look at all three screens, right? Yes. Okay. Which spreadsheet do I have? Yes, because our company was less than what you gave us. Because if you look at what you gave us, it was 96%. According to the benchmark we tested. Then it... I want to say one more thing. I'm not sure. We...

When we talk about funding, are we talking about the same organizations? In that whole funding, the deputy chiefs were included in the first 1.1% that we talked about. Therefore, that whole 1.1% will not be granted to the department. Okay, okay. I avoided that.

That's why the deputy chiefs or assistant chiefs are not included in the organizations that we announced. So you are right. Then we are doing 12,402 donations. 1,24,926 Lakhs. Yes, that's right. Let me check this. Give me a minute. Don't worry about that.

Yes, I have the reason for making the initial expense minimum.

I have loaded it now. I haven't updated it. You know, some employees have changed. From intermediate to advanced level, some have moved to recruit level. One person has left instead of another person. Umm. But my required salary is 1.46 instead of 1.56. That's what I think. According to the calculations you have calculated, these are my calculations. What do you have to do? So, your suggestion is to make it clear. These were the numbers you gave me. Can you tell me in short?

Yes, that is, it was 6592 on the recruit table. Oh, forgive me.

You don't have to go through the numbers again. What do you need to include in these numbers? What do you mean to include? Even now, the two-year plan and the next year's plan are two times bigger than that.

No, this is only for the one-year plan. One-year plan.

For this coming financial year. And then we can come back. But... Because the other part of the three-year plan is for public safety. The cost of living is not 2%. That is, no one gets that much. So if you try to make a three-year or two-year plan, you will not be able to get it to the actual level. Then everyone will think, how did it become 92% when it had to be 100%? Therefore, if you look at it, even in a multi-year plan, we think that we have reached 93-93.5% this year. In the month of April, let's count the annals again and if the annals are held in three years, let's keep a fixed balance. That is, next year it will be 97% or 98%. Then which is that balance, that is that balance. Now, I can understand that the economic growth of the income is making it more difficult. You will have to calculate the reason to be safe. You know, right? 4 to 6 percent. Life expense. Then if it is less, that is good. Otherwise... Yes, it is bad. But... Are you more prepared? Because we are rising from the first numbers.

That is, it was not our intention. We wanted to be consistent with the numbers given by the first consultant. If we go to a one-year karar, are you ready for a year with those companies that have increased by two percent? Yes, I don't think there is a big difference between the two percent I indicated and the way they indicated.

It's just that things are going on between the ranks. Therefore, I am sure that they will reach the next few numbers. Jonathan. Yes. But I need to check it quickly. Then? We are talking about the one-year agreement you have signed. Is there anything else we need to discuss regarding the loss? I don't think so. Can I ask you a question? I know that the council has given instructions for this, but we are still discussing whether or not to tell the council that there are small changes to be made in the context of the things we have seen. In terms of more funding, the reason is that everything is confirmed on September 1, isn't it? Before that, we have to implement the budget and other things. That is, now.

As you said, the council has not approved anything so far. So, in reality, you can go to the council and tell them, right? This is what the union is suggesting. Is this acceptable to you? They can say yes. Okay. That is, it is a possible thing. Yes, that is my question. Is there any way to make them understand how far we are? Yes, we are talking about the funding that the council had previously discussed as a pay plan. And we talked about the funding for those six documents in the workshop. So, if we act on the basis of that money, I think that the final plan will be available to the council as long as it is within the scope of funding. I think that's the main thing. And, instead of deciding on all the salaries, it allows us to make a fixed budget. As Jonathan pointed out, he is trying to do more for you than the Council initially proposed. So, I think we are trying our best to meet the requirements that we have been given. So, we don't have the courage to say to the council, hey, we have reached this far. We needed this much to get to a career. So, I think we are standing here. Okay, that's what I had to make clear because I thought we were getting closer to our goal. We are slowly moving forward. So... Yes, will you give us some time to think? I don't think it will take much time. We can stand here for a while.

Okay, after 5 hours 29 minutes, we can start the yoga again. Okay, I had to make a small change in the numbers. I was able to include it in some of the numbers you used. I had to cut about $500 from all the salaries. I cut them all. But that's about us. I don't think he's angry. Give me some time to think.

While waiting for that, I have a question. I know that we have a certificate of Out-of-State Peace Officer Pay Certification in front of us. If all this is not completed today, what is the possible time limit for the city to move forward? Moreover,

I think that the decisions we make today will have to be rescheduled for some other purpose. The agenda needs to be announced three days before the event. So, we are looking forward to it. So, will it be next week's Thursday or Friday? Not at all.

Because if I announce it tomorrow, it won't be counted, right? It can be counted. Okay.

Yes, all the things can be rescheduled for next week's Thursday or Friday.

Okay. I don't know how all of you are doing. It's Friday and Saturday. I think it will be helpful if it's Friday. So let's use Friday to do our work. Stop. Stop. Stop.

It's a normal North Side character. No, it's the same.

Stop. Meshapuram. Oh, what a surprise.

What happened here? Oh, no. Not that. I was wrong. Q5. Not that. Q5. That. Do you all have a Friday morning break?

Do you have a Thursday?

Next week, yes. You don't have a problem, do you? Pardon me. Yes, yes, I think I don't have a problem on Thursday morning. Okay, we can plan for 9 o'clock on Thursday morning.

27th or 28th? 27th, okay. We are still in the math class. Give us a minute. Can we talk about fitness again while Kennedy does that? Of course. Okay. Kelsey and I also saw that she was very interested in the policy she proposed. I think it was prepared. I remember you helping her prepare the policy for the Kennedy Road Test. Then, if we are looking at a one-year contract, we will be in the middle of the first year of the fitness requirement, have you checked that?

Yes. The thing we discussed about redusting is that if we all agree, the redust can be moved from 3 months to 6 months. Okay. Then if we look at it for a year, we don't have to worry about 2-3 years.

Then, how will a report on cardiovascular heart diseases be? Since we are struggling with money issues, I am not sure if I can fund it. But before the next meeting, we will be able to make it final. But let me tell you right now, it is not that promising. So you are only funding it for the officers. They have to complete it here for five years.

One for us, one for me, one for Kelsey. So many people, especially senior officers, will get something suitable for this. That is, you are not talking about everyone.

Okay, that will help. Then do you need this only for officers? Five years of acquaintance. Five years of acquaintance. That is the reason. What does it say about this?

You do not intend to do it every year. That is, only once in five years of your career. That is the basis. The reason is that they may feel uncomfortable. Cardiovascular examination is a one-time thing for some people. We want every officer to have annual physical examination. It will be a very cost-free thing. When we say physical, we give blood examination to each officer every year. But blood work is one thing, but is it a proper test? Can they talk about these things to the doctor? That's the thing. Because if the state of the city needs physical health, we need health workers. Therefore, we have to show the same behavior. We can ensure that we have health workers. So I think our problem is what you expect from the test. You are doing this as a fire force. Therefore, there is a rule in the law about what a fire force should do. And the presumption you are talking about is that it requires physical examination. So, tell us what it is, we can do it, and we will find out how much the cost is for it. I think the cardiac stress test is important in this. It is necessary to maintain the conditions. If it is mandatory for the city to have a physical exam, I think most people see the doctor once a year. I think you are doing it as part of your health insurance plan. Because it comes under health insurance. That's why that part is covered.

Yes, in my experience, when I get the results of the city's oral test, I show it to my doctor and we talk about it. So it's part of my oral test. As far as I'm concerned, that's the thing. The most important thing is the stress test, heart test, or whatever we call it, it's done. But again, we need it after five years. Are you ready? After we give you the loss-relief money, that is, the loss of $500 from your request, and then if there is any other fund left, if it is in Jonathan's hands, can we use it as a cardiac screening for the employees? A heart test was done. Then, as Brandon said, what kind of cardiac screening should be done along with the blood test and consultation with the doctor? So, those things. Yes, I have not stopped you. Also, I assure you that we can make a plan for the employees. It is up to the employees whether it is ARC or not.

Yes, that is the reason why we do not intend to go into it. We can't say if anyone has done it this far. I don't want to do it again, because it will be a difficult 20 minutes for me. Yes, but we don't know if others have done it. That is, for those who have been doing it for 5 years or more, or for those in their 5th year, know that this is a success.

Okay, this may be the first place for those who come first. This is the waste left by the city for this. Isn't it? I know that the fire department and the fire department are doing this every three years. I think that the recent law that says that they are not required for agricultural research after five years of agricultural research.

So, like the fire department did in the beginning, we can use this tool in the seniority level. It was first given to the best employees in the department. So, we can move forward like that. Your employees are the same. Justice is boring. Yes, I think that would be the best way. Okay, yes. Looking at it, your specialty.

Yes, by avoiding that $500. Can we do that? Because according to our calculations, if we give 93% of it, the total expense will be the same. Okay, I don't have the percentage in my hand. So, yours will be a little different. Can you give me those coins, or can you bring my laptop with you?

Hold on. I need to find the right spreadsheet again. I think this is it. Okay, you read it for me.

If you are interested, I have emailed it to you. If you need it, I can read it. No, it's okay. I can open it here. Okay, while I'm doing that, Jonathan, I'll give you my laptop.

Can you type this? I'll check fitness.

I had a question about fitness. Yes. This is an essential job.

Okay, can you show it on your screen?

Otherwise, this will become an essential job. When you are out of work, when you do fitness, test and exercise, how do you handle work-hairs and compensation? Excuse me, can you repeat your question? I know that when fitness is mandatory and people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet are forced to do so, I know that people who are on a diet What I asked was, I know that the fire department is doing this. They allow time to exercise when they are on duty. But according to us, the other people took away that knowledge. Yes. In the same year when the city wanted to inspect physical activity, the police took the opportunity to exercise in Medavi's duty. So, can you tell me how this is fair? Yes, I didn't know about it. So, I can't talk about it.

I think that the officers want to improve their health, work more efficiently, and exercise. That is our goal, and also to improve their physical health. This improves your mental health. So, from the point of view of the city, our goal is to improve the overall health of the officers and their ability to work. This is beneficial for the city, and that is why we are fighting for it. A healthy officer will only have low health insurance claims. They will only have low mental health issues. They will only have low work case compensation fees. In addition, their work can be done more efficiently.

I fully agree that we need physically disabled officers. There is no doubt about that. If there is a problem, we are required to hand over documents to a city that is not included in civil service when something is required. So we are imposing some kind of obligation on the officers. Therefore, we would like there to be a security system that allows them to exercise during duty. Cheap allowed it. We had it. We didn't know about that rule until you told us about it. So, we will have to go back and discuss it. But if this is an important matter, you are agreeing to it in this karar. So, you agree to it by yourself through the karar. In return, we are giving you compensation. You always say that you are giving everything away. But what do we get as a part of this? Otherwise, you are making us in such a bad situation and we are very behind. Okay, we are here to talk about the salary because the city funds have been misused for a long time. Both sides need to be left behind. We are working for that. I think we have reached our goal. I agree. As Brandon said, the part of becoming a police officer is to be a physically active officer.

So, we need you to be physically active officers. You need the salary according to that. So, two groups are helping here. We are requesting for the implementation of the Charasiri. In this regard, we need Charasiri. We are not asking for more than that. We need 30% Charasiri. Charasiri. Charisiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri.

Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri.

Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri.

Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Charasiri. Char If this becomes less appropriate for the working class, we will pass it. If the new laws don't improve the system, the working class should not improve it either. I fully agree that the new laws make it possible. I am happy that you agreed to it. Another thing, I saw in the policy. When Assistant Chief Thomas wrote the policy, I talked to him when he sent it to me. And I sent the changes back. It says that this is the only step to make a decision. And under this, don't just walk around the streets of Vileiruthal Palangal with a person who is a true survivor. Don't give up suspension or fitness exams. You have to remove the word, solely. Even one part of it. It shouldn't be like that. I have no objection to that. We can remove it. I thought this came from the subcommittee. There may have been a lot of discussions about Cheap Thomas, but I think this is what the subcommittee has made. I believe that the language we got from Abhiyan Kararal was that. I think it is acceptable for me to say that the results in Vileyaruthal are acceptable. In Abilene Carrar, they were giving money to all stress tests and mental health tests. So there are differences. We cannot choose only the language we like. We have already noticed this. We are eager to find out more about this. We can reveal it in the next episode. So they should be punished.

Is it only necessary to remove the word, Kennedy, you, only? Yes, that is... Certainly, we can.

Forgive me.

Certainly.

We can do that.

Walk slowly. The intention is not to use it in any way for duty fitness.

I don't think it has ever been like that.

Yes, we are proud of it right from the start. I ask you. And there is another thing that I would like to include in this. I don't know if this was mentioned in the previous meeting. Physical fitness should be completed, which means that the distance chosen by the employee should be completely ruined. They should have decided this before the assessment started. Once they are done rowing, then what? I understand that thought.

Likewise, I understand that the job that cannot be done, or that cannot be done without their permission, or the job that is not suitable for the profession, is a fact even if we want to believe it or not. We don't need an employee who suddenly enters the light duty.

I think they can write some regulations about rowing if they want. I have seen people doing many things to avoid things. That's right.

They are trying to make laws.

If you are on light duty, you need a doctor's appointment. So, there are a lot of exceptions. So, how do you make this happen? Is it the division commander who does it or how do you do it?

The procedures related to that.

This was left to the committee, because it seems that only two people who received the certificate to conduct this test using the concept tour over are in the department. I think that if you are a captain or a commanding officer, you should not be a certified instructor. They agreed that all assessments will be done during duty. They will implement it. Jonathan has entered the numbers you gave. We are satisfied with that. Did we miss out on anything from physical fitness?

No. Were you waiting for anything else regarding physical fitness? I am sorry. Yes.

Okay. Yes. I think we are coming together in the first part. We are moving forward with the newest numbers you sent us in the first year. A fund of 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. If you are interested in changing this to a minimum of 500 metres, I don't mind. Or if anyone wants to try it, please add a part about it. It will be a clear test. I don't think we need to write about the actual test in this. I am looking forward to it.

I expect that the person who runs this test will not be allowed to continue. Then... Um... Yes... There is one more thing about the documents. I was going to send her to the department of documents. We have already sent an officer to the department of documents. So I don't want to create any problems. Okay. Yes, I think I sent her to the department of documents after we talked.

So this is the same language. I just said that I had a miscommunication. I don't know if you told me about the change in the readership from 3 months to 6 months. To tell you the truth, I would like to see them for three months if we don't make them do it. And I don't expect your physical fitness to improve in three months, but I expect it to improve. That is, there is time to exercise at least once every three months during the time of duty. I think there will be a problem in that. Because you will have divisions and division commanders. They can't bring them back in three months. Then some will be like the people in my sea. I can bring them next week if I want. I do not object to the fact that officers are allowed to work once in six months or once in three months. In other words, I don't think it's their duty to take care of their part. I don't think it will be a problem if I talk to Kraig and Aadav. I'm going to change them no matter who your commanders are. I'm sorry. We are also trying to ensure that the officers are responsible for their arrival and departure, and that they get time to work once every three months. So, along with that, we will be part of this process of gatekeeping and stakeholding in this meeting. Will you be able to bring a law that allows you to work out during your duty time? I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them.

I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them. I have no objection to you talking about that with them.

I

We have the right to allow the Municipal Assembly to work out during duty time. The Municipal Assembly is ready for it is another matter. But you have the right to it. I don't think we can complete it today. I understand. We can bring this to the next year's meeting, right?

Because we are now holding a meeting for a year. We can hold another meeting to end this meeting, right?

There will be. But I don't think it will happen within a week before the end of tax and budget issues.

Still, I am fully committed. If the next year is the first thing to be included in the agenda, we can start working. I will now start talking to the chiefs to find a way to do so. We can expect that they will get more facilities even when they get new employees and stay in the state.

I fully understand the position of the city council that a healthy first responder should be in the department. With their nature of work, fire forces have time to work out during duty. Because they don't have to stand in patrolling all the time. Otherwise, they won't wait for the fire to happen anywhere. But we, as law-abiding children, don't have that permission. We can't work out in two groups or anything else at once. Therefore, it is good to know that we are supporting you physically. When the Fire Force gets time to work out during duty, we understand that you do not have that consent. Therefore, we support you in that regard, because we are aware that a city that is physically strong is needed. Okay, let's come to an agreement that both of us can agree on. So, I think you'll be ready to talk about one thing. I know that we can't make such arrangements this year. But there will be a big change in the CET Hall's proposal to give a cheap mark. Yes, I talk to them regularly.

So, I'm happy to start that discussion. Are there any other changes in the fitness arrangement? If you and I agree that this is a department policy or command directive, I fully support it. Reason If we get the opportunity to complete it within three months, we can do it. As a supervisor, I think it will help us to implement it. But I think this discussion needs to take place. Let me repeat your question. I think the rest is correct. Okay, then I will tell you the important things that are next to me. According to the statistics sent by Kennedy in the most recent meeting, we have a one-year schedule. We are forgetting six issues. Every three months, we conduct a one-year fitness program. In addition, we provide more funds for heart tests. This starts with the most experienced officers. Therefore, this will be a heart test that is not mandatory but only available to those in need. This is an optional matter.

They don't have to, but we will definitely encourage them, because that is how you will get benefits. Yes, we will tell our people, if you don't do this, you will not get benefits. Some people can start their own health insurance research, then we can remove them from the list. But when we move forward, when five years are completed, they will realize that this is a part of it. You should complete this to be safe. The fire department is always doing this to be safe. Okay, so we will investigate it.

I will try to get the necessary facilities for this heart examination with the help of a health insurance consultant. Are they using Oum Shanan or any other fire department? One thing we can do about this is that I know that some doctors in Shanan have a connection with us. I don't know if any of them have a heart attack. We can see if we can do this if we talk to them less. It is a matter of talking to the chief or AC Thomas or the AC Squad. Okay, we can do it. I have some connections in Shanan. I know that they are helping a lot with this first responder group. So we can work together. There are equal needs for the fire department. So we are joining them and doing it. Whatever it is.

There are some changes in the article 6 in our status card related to promotion. The reason is that we now have a lot of young sergeants and officers. Then, in the next six or eight months, the Lieutenant will be waiting for the test. And about that, when we think about how serious the test will be, older sergeants will not be interested in it. They say they don't want it in this stage of my career. So, we suggest that the number of years of service in the Surgeon's Office should be reduced to three years. This will still be avoided. More than half of the Surgeons. From the test written.

Yes. When it was decided, our intention was to appoint someone under 10 years of service as a Lieutenant. If you look at it practically, one year in the academy, then PDO, PTO, time limit. Then the service of six years until the exam is written. So it really takes seven years. Even if you write the exam within three years and get the status, it will take about ten to eleven years to complete the service. And only two years. Yes, it is less in most places.

Abilene is 2 years old. Their minimum test sergeant is 5. Therefore, Article 6, Section 4 requires 3 years of minimum advanced certification to become a lieutenant.

Yes, yes. When we were talking about that, I was a bit selfish. I wasn't a lieutenant in the case of the Allies.

Now I can say that a person who was a sergeant for three years can become a good lieutenant. Yes. After this, I don't think there will be a lieutenant test. In a short time, four years or more, yes, or until an assistant chief asks for a lieutenant. Because the rest of us have only two years of service. I can't wait for 20 years. I don't see any problems in that.

I would like to discuss this with the chief. So if you bring this to the next meeting, I think it will be a very quick discussion. Next week, Thursday morning or in the afternoon? In the morning. Okay. We have to change the place from here. I think this room will have been booked earlier. That's why we are having a meeting in the council chamber. But I'll let you know the details. Okay, no problem. Okay, does anyone want to cancel the yoga session? At 9 in the morning. 9 in the morning. Okay, 21st. I will cancel it. 9 in the morning.

One person has canceled it. I will cancel it. Me and everyone who agrees, agree.

Yoga will be cancelled after 6 in the morning for 7 minutes.