Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Good evening. Welcome to the Planning Commission meeting for May. We're going to go ahead and get started with the Pledge of Allegiance Commissioner Snyder. If you could lead us in that, I'd appreciate it. You.

Ready again. Pledge allegiance to the flag

of The United States Of America and to the Republic for which it stands,

Thank you. Commissioner Clerk, could call roll this evening for us?

Chair Story? Here. Vice Chair Gutierrez? Commissioner Esbander?

Present.

Commissioner Corral? Here. Commissioner Schneider Commissioner Thompson and Commissioner Avalos Villalobos. Chair, you have a quorum.

Very good, thank you. Moving on to the oral communication from the audience on items that are not on the agenda. So if there's anybody that has filled out a slip and has given it to our clerk to speak on an item that is not part of the three items that we have on the agenda, If we had anybody requested to speak for that?

No, sir.

Okay, very good. Alright, moving on with that. So no speakers for that. So we'll move on to the minutes. We have the minutes from the April 15 Planning Commission meeting. When the time comes, I'll entertain a motion and a second to approve them. Motion. Okay, the motion by Commissioner Thompson. Second. Second by Commissioner Estebaner. Any comments or questions or additions or corrections? If not, all those signify by saying aye. Approve. Aye. Opposed?

Hearing none, motions approved for that. We're moving on now to our public hearing portion. So once again, if you want to speak with this one, you could follow one of the forms that are in the lobby and then give them to the clerk, we'd appreciate and stuff. But right now, we'll move on to the first public hearing item, which is Tandem Track Map twenty twenty four-two or Tandem Track Map 20737 and Precise Plan Design twenty million two hundred forty thousand and twenty four. Okay. I'll have a presentation by Daniel. Go ahead, Daniel.

Alright. Thank you, Chair. Good evening.

Sorry,

Commissioners. So tonight, as the chair mentioned, we have the master case 2024Dash0028. The applicant is here requesting the Planning Commission review and consider. Tonight's proposal is it includes a tentative track map of subdivision. Today, the site where it's located consists of four existing parcels just over 35 acres. As many of you may know, this is

a phase two for a development that's ongoing. This portion will complete

to the east along Linden. The site is located within the Renaissance specific plan and has some various residential zoning there. Today, it's actually vacant. There may be a little bit of staging starting to get set up for the next phase, some construction stuff. But other than an access road out to Linden for the existing phase one, the site is vacant with the natural grasses and what have you.

So this next slide just kind of shows you what the project proposal, how it would be laid out. It will be a private residential neighborhood gated and it will be maintained by an HOA. This phase will include two ninety two of the detached single family units. It will also include the major amenity, the recreational. Then we'll get a little bit more detail into that later, but the proposed density with these units over this acreage comes out to about 10.31 in that range.

So this is just a picture of what the map will look like afterwards. It does have 12 of these lots that will be formed for the development of the units themselves and then there will be eight other common lots for the use of private roads, those amenities that we mentioned. Storm water and landscape. So this slide just kind of again shows you the layouts but with the access. So there is in the southwest corner an existing driveway out to Linden but this community will also have a exit only out to Linden as well.

Fire department will require that. And then it will also connect to phase one through two of these private streets. This next slide kind of just highlights some of the amenities. This is the major amenity for the development there as a whole and includes the swimming pool, recreation building, all the shade parks, dog park, even some courts for pickleball and basketball. As far as the product, if you had a chance to drive out there and look at phase one, it will be very similar, but they are meeting the code requirements and proposing the amount of floor plans and variations that are needed, architectural designs and what have you.

So three plan types in what is called the Liberty grouping. This slide just kind of tells you what those square footage ranges are. Another group is the six pack, that's what it's called, but it also has a variety of three plans, that range of square footage, and then the types as well offered there for Santa Barbara Adaptive Farmhouse and the Prairie as well. Bungalows. This has the Spanish Colonial American Farmhouse Santa Barbara, three floor plans as well, and then the ranges for those as far as square footage.

So overall, the proposals parking does have seven forty spaces. That is what is proposed which exceeds what is required. As you see in the table below, five eighty four of those spaces are within the garages and then the other 156 will be located throughout the development for guests and what have you. So there was a new traffic study with all the other studies that were prepared for this project specifically and they were you know, compared to the consistent with the EIR that was prepared in 2016. And the results found that the project here will actually generate less than what was originally anticipated.

And so as a result, all the intersections that they looked at will operate at satisfactory levels according to the general plans requirements. So there are no impacts as a result of this project. And so just to kind of summarize, there was an addendum, as I mentioned, to the Renaissance specific plan amendment in 2016. This project will not prepare or have any new impacts. Oops, that went too far.

But it does satisfy all the requirements per sequel guidelines and no further environmental is required. This last slide just kind of has staff's recommendation. The Planning Commission adopt the resolutions J through L as stated here in this slide. That's all I have for you tonight. I mean, you guys have questions, but the team for the development is here in case you have any questions. We can bring them up at that time.

Thank you, Daniel. If the applicant or their representative could come up and be prepared to ask questions or give a brief presentation or address the commission, we'd appreciate it and stuff. The applicant in the audience? Of course he has.

Good afternoon or evening chair and members of the commission. I'm Glenn Crosby with the Lewis Companies here representing Lewis Hill and Rialto Company. So, very, very happy with the staff report that was prepared by staff, very thorough as always. And, we're also very pleased to bring the second phase of Renaissance before the city tonight. We've actually started our final engineering on this project as well concurrently and Lennar, the builder in phase one is actually making very good progress up there.

So, we're excited to see that. I know we put up a lot of work and I know Mr. Story on the front end many, many years ago and Daniel, you know, residential seems so out of reach back then economically and it's just, it's really exciting to see all this coming out of the ground. So I'm available to answer any questions and again thank you for your time this evening.

Thank you, Glenn. Any questions for the applicant? The representative? Terry.

I

Yeah. I I can answer that for you, commissioner. So there was a traffic study that was prepared as as mentioned in the presentation. The traffic study identified or determined that the traffic that would be generated by this project, the addition of that traffic to the existing intersections to the roadway segments will not exceed any of the thresholds that are established by the city's general plan as far as level of service. Now, far as long term, this project will pay development impact fees for traffic. And really at that point, it's the city's responsibility to monitor traffic situations and then utilize those fees as necessary.

Applicant?

Go ahead, Question, go ahead.

Do you guys have an idea of what phase one trenching, how far out that might look?

What you guys have? Well, our goal would be to go to the builder market here pretty soon, probably by early mid summer. And assuming we can get plans approved, civil engineering plans by towards the end of the year, I mean, could in theory hit the ground running with development early next year. So that would put, you know, the start of models probably somewhere around the middle next year ish if everything goes pretty smoothly. So

I don't know if it's. Thanks, Len. I don't know if it's Daniel or Daniel or someone from Kimley Horn. And I appreciate Terry's question on the intersections, but what my question comes up is, you know, since I drive that I don't know how many times a day is that those intersections as much as what the impact is as those homes get closer to Linden. When chaos happens at Amazon shift, because when those people leave work or come to work, it's.

Yeah, it's rough, and so I know you know there's minimum impacts or something from the residents there and stuff like that. But what's the? There a potential impact with during those? Those are the peak things and stuff like that. I mean, there's certain time with their shifts and things, but it is when you guys have been out there and stuff. It's it's it's nasty. They don't know how many you know accidents I've been out there and seen or driven through to be able to do it because they tend to not. Either obey the speed or the left turn, the right turn, the median or whatever it might be, but. Has that been looked at and is there any impact that may happen from those with the residents, the new residents there and stuff? I don't know, go ahead.

Yeah, I think you're more specifically referring to the entry off of Linden and there's no signal traffic signal there. And so you've got traffic going north and south and you've got folks who are going to be trying to exit the neighborhood. Correct. The traffic study that was prepared did do a traffic signal warrant analysis.

Okay.

I would ask if the applicant's engineer is available if they could elaborate a little more on the traffic signal warrant analysis.

I know historically, you know, we've gone through that and you know, with phase one and phase two and it did not. Did not trigger the warrant in the city's position historically has been. If it's not warranted, then it's not going in. There will be one more. As you know, we have have phase three and one of the conditions from the original 2016 EIR is that the reason we're doing these addendum is to come back and look at traffic each time with each of these phases. There will be another bite at the apple to look at that. But yeah, this point, you know, it was not triggered by the warrant, but it's certainly something we can keep.

And I'm fine with that. I clearly understand that. But I think you're right. When we get to phase three and then we have the more impact with the houses, eventually it will trigger. It won't be now with phase two and stuff, but just to make us aware and stuff that you know as it gets closer to the likelihood there's going be. There's got to be one somewhere mid block there between Renaissance and Miro because it's a it can be rather speedy and stuffer, but great. Thank you. Any other questions for staff or for the applicant? Okay, good. Thanks, Glenn. We're all good. Alright, at this time, I'm going to go ahead and open the public hearing. It's the time and the place for that. Has anyone filled out and requested to speak at the public hearing?

No sir.

Okay, very good.

Move to close the public hearing.

Motion by Commissioner Estavander, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to close the public hearing. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, the public hearing is closed. Any discussion commission or what is your desire and your pleasure regarding this project?

Move to adopt or attach resolution exhibits J through L thereby approving the addendum to the RSPA two zero one six FEIR EAR 2025Dash0001, tentative track map number 2024Dash0002, and precise plan and design number 2024Dash0024 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions therein.

Okay. Is there a second? Second. Motion by Commissioner Estefaner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson. Any comments or questions? If not, if the clerk could do a roll call vote for us, please.

Commissioner Schneider. Aye. Chair story I Commissioner S Vander Commissioner Thompson. I Commissioner Corral.

Good. Motion's Alright. Approved unanimously. Congratulations. We're looking forward to it. Thank you for what you've done and stuff. So, thank you. Moving on to the next one. Next public hearing for conditional development permit number 20 and precise plan design number 20. Daniel, you want to

go ahead? Thank you very much Chair and Commissioners. I'll be making this presentation on the second item. This application that was filed by McDonald's USA LLC. On this first slide here just gonna go over the location of the project site.

The project site's shown there on the map within the red boundary. It's approximately 1.94 acres in size. It's one parcel of land located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Acacia Avenue. This site is within the Foothill Central specific plan. Within that, it has a land use designation of Foothill Mixed Use Zone, which accommodates a variety of both residential and commercial uses.

As you can see in the aerial here the site is already developed previously with two commercial buildings. The larger building is currently occupied by a company called Black Friday Deals as a discount retailer. And then the smaller building on the right side is Chuck's Liquor. And then as you can see on the surrounding area here to the north of the project site across Vigil Boulevard you have various commercial developments. Then to the east across Acacia Avenue is the Acacia Plaza that's anchored by Stater Brothers.

And then it also has other tenants such as Pep Boys and then there's the Burger King there at the corner. Then to the south, immediately to the south there's a public alley but then across from that on the other side of public alley there's some single family residences. And then to the west of the project site are again just some various commercial developments that include a medical office and a Bank of America. So what the applicant proposes to do is to first demolish the smaller of the commercial buildings that's occupied by Chuck's Liquor, so would be demolished. And then in its place they will construct a new 4,210 square foot restaurant building with drive through service.

This will be a McDonald's restaurant. Additionally, the applicant will install associated paving, landscaping, lighting, and drainage improvements on-site. So this next slide just showing you the site plan and the layout of the site. This is an enlarged view of the property just kind of highlighting the lease area where the McDonald's will go on-site. So kind of at the bottom left of the site plan you can see the where it says existing building to remain.

That's the Black Friday deals. And then McDonald's would locate the building closer to the northeast corner of the site, closer to the intersection of Foothill and Acacia. They'll have a drive through that'll enter on the south side of the building then wrap around the east and north side. This drive through will provide queuing for 11 cars from its entrance to the first pickup window. The applicant will also install a 15 foot landscape setback along Foothill Boulevard.

Currently there's no landscaping in that area, it's just pavement. And then they will also install a landscape setback along Acacia Avenue that will vary in width from a lowest point of nine feet in width up to 22 feet in width. Those landscape setbacks exceed the minimum five foot requirement. The overall landscape coverage for the entire site will be slightly over 10% which exceeds the minimum required amount. The landscape coverage though for the lease area in particular will be at 20.7%.

That landscape will come from the landscape setbacks and planters throughout the site and the parking area. There will also be an asphalt driveway and parking spaces that will be installed on the west side of the building and the south side of the building. Access to the site will be provided by two existing driveways. I've shown them their locations here with the red arrows on the site plan. The top arrow is an existing 35 foot wide driveway that's connected to Foothill Boulevard.

And then the arrow there at the bottom right is the existing public alley driveway. So cars will be able to come in through that public alley and then turn right onto the drive aisle that's on-site in order to get to the parking areas or the drive thru lane. Then additionally the applicant will install a pedestrian pathways site lighting and a trash enclosure. Next slide this is showing you the floor plan of the building. The building has an articulated footprint meaning it's not just a box but there are projections on all four sides of the building.

You can also see the interior layout of the building. The seating area dining area will be on the north side particularly the northwest corner fronting Foothill Boulevard and then the kitchen work area will be on the east side of the building. The main entrance will be on the west side of the building facing the parking areas and there'll be two drive through windows, the primary one and then an additional through window on the east side of the building. And then you can also see here on the floor plan there'll be a trellis cover on the east side of the building, the right side of the image that'll go over the entire width of the drive through lane. Next slide showing you the exterior elevations.

You can see all four sides of the building here. As I mentioned, this will be an articulated building. That articulation will come in the form of projected masses that have depths of up to 18 inches and also offset wall planes up to five feet in-depth. This is just to help provide some relief along the building. There will also be vertical articulation in the form of height variations.

The heights will vary from a minimum of 21 feet up to 24 feet at the highest point of the parapet. The exterior finish of the building will be comprised of stucco finish painted in earth tone colors. The trellis canopy that I mentioned earlier will have decorative columns. They'll also install metal brow accents on the north and west sides of the building. Aluminum batten accents on all four sides of the building reveals wall signage as well as glass windows.

Next slide, this is showing you the conceptual landscape plan. Get a better idea of how much planting they're proposing to install. The orientation is 90 degrees here so north is on the right side. I wanted to be able to enlarge this so you guys can see it clearly. As I mentioned right now this is all asphalt so there's really no planting out there.

So the applicants proposing to install quite a significant amount of planting in the form of trees, shrubs and ground cover throughout their lease area. There was a traffic and we'll move on to some of the analyses that were prepared for this project. There was a traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates. There were existing trips from the Chuck's Liquor that was there. So the traffic study analyzed what the net difference would be from Chuck's Liquor adding the McDonald's.

The McDonald's would generate 800 is projected to generate up to eight ninety six new daily vehicle trips. That's in addition to what was already generated. That would be with 70 net new AM peak hour trips and 60 net new PM peak hour trips. The traffic study analyzed a few intersections in the area. The addition of that traffic would not lessen the levels of service of any of those intersections to below acceptable.

All intersections would remain at an acceptable level of service and so there are no additional off-site traffic intersection improvements required. In terms of California Environmental Quality Act, this project does qualify for a categorical exemption specifically section fifteen three zero three, new construction or conversion of small structures. A notice of exemption form has been prepared as attached to your gender report. The project before you tonight is consistent with the Foothill mixed use zone, the Foothill Central specific plan, the city's guidelines, and the existing commercial uses to the northeast and west of the site. This project will serve to improve an existing commercial site with the highest and best use.

Public hearing notices were mailed all property owners within six sixty feet of the project site and the notice was published in the San Bernardino Sun newspaper. And with that staff recommends that the commission adopt the attached to the report before you tonight that's exhibit I and J thereby approving the conditional development permit and the precise plan of design. That concludes my presentation I know the applicant they're they're here with their team and they'd like to say a few words to the commission.

Very good thank you Daniel. The applicant the representatives could come forward love to hear from you thank you.

Hey, good afternoon commissioners. Appreciate your time here. First, I'd like to thank Christine and both Daniels here for their effort here and the work on this project. I represent McDonald's and I was a project lead for another that opened last year just down the street here on Foothill Boulevard. I would say because of that experience, work with the city and city staff, and I I developed throughout Southern Southern California, I would say the City of Rialto is top notch in terms of the staff and how they evaluate and present projects.

Great, could you repeat that to make sure they all hear that thing? So that gets on the record because the council and those elected officials aren't here tonight. They need to hear this and stuff, but go ahead.

With that said, since then I've been through my personal network promoting the city to bring in more investment here and that's why I bring up to you tonight McDonald's. So I'm here to answer any questions, so appreciate it. Thank you.

Well, you. Thank you for proposing this is the Commissioners have any questions for the applicant.

Jerry, I had one that I brought up with staff today and if we could, that's that driveway that's exiting onto Foothill Blvd. Given its proximity to the intersection there in the left turn pocket. Could we entertain or at least consider putting a right turn only sign? There were people that are exiting out that driveway, but turned eastbound on Foothill instead of trying to make a left turn across several lanes. And the impeding traffic that's westbound Foothill.

Daniel, what is it? What did the traffic study indicate in determined about whether for off-site or on-site movements and stuff? What what did it? What did address there?

Yeah, the the traffic study did analyze the driveway intersections. It was not a recommendation in the traffic study. That said, I think it's a common sense ask. If the Commission would like, it's at your discretion, you could add a condition of approval during your motion tonight that would require the installation of that that sign that you mentioned.

Fully prepared to agree with the boat with the project. I just had that one issue with the pulling across the left turner pocket there.

Yeah, do the applicant. You don't have any opposition to putting up a. Sign to be able to do that, and it's a sign to be able to do that. I mean, it's it's you know you're on the honor system when you put those up also in thanks to the but- anything that can help

yeah- I understand your concerns again I've I've- done projects on this yeah busy corridor- for McDonald's. Up. Like I said that the study evaluate this we looked at this right you know what would try to say- even before playing this and what did the- this traffic say to kind of determine that it still worked- in terms of safety- in addition you know there's other- tenants within this property- that we have to- you know- work with as well on this one so we can't disagree to this but I understand your concerns but- by reviewing the whole team with the landlord and other businesses reviewing the traffic study, it wasn't warranted. And so with that said, you know it was something that you know. Yeah, it wasn't working.

Any other questions for the applicant.

I only say this because I've built several McDonald's restaurants and I built one on Firestone and Downey that had the same type of intersection. And it eventually they did to my understanding, put a left turn or no return sign up there and it'll and it got rid of the problem with the traffic trying to cross.

And that's great point. I think as you know, you know McDonald's is one America's great companies here and so. Business, you know our business and customers is number one right in the city and so as things as the project is built and open and businesses are coming in. If we see an issue there, absolutely we'll work with the landlord of the city to address those issues.

Any other questions for the applicant? Anybody else? Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thank you. I know. Yeah, it would. Yeah, but we'll get to that. We get to our comments and stuff. Okay, this is the time and the place to open the public hearing, so the public hearings open at this time. If anyone would like to speak and hopefully filled out a paper to speak with this. Has anyone filled out paper to speak? No Sir. Okay, very good.

Is there motion

by Commissioner Estavander is there a second to close the public hearing? Anybody Okay, Commissioner Corral very good. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Hearing none. Public hearing is closed. Okay, what's your pleasure?

Move to adopt attached resolution exhibit I and J thereby approving the conditional development permit number 25Dash0008 and precise plan to design number 25Dash0015 based upon the findings subject to conditions therein.

Motion by commissioner Estavander. Is there a second or go ahead. A second by commissioner Thompson. Any comments or questions? If not, we could have a roll call.

Commissioner Schneider. Aye. Chair Story. Aye. Commissioner Espender. Aye. Commissioner Thompson.

Aye.

And Commissioner Quoran.

Aye.

Items approved. Thank you so much. Congratulations. Moving on to the final public hearing for this evening stuff, we have conditional development permit number 20204 and precise plan of design number 20202. Daniel, you want give the presentation on that one?

I sure can. Thank you, Chair and Planning Commissioners. So, this next item before you, master case 23Dash0047 as a proposal. This site is located, it's in the IP zone of the Gateway specific plan. It's on the Southwest Corner, Valley Boulevard and Lilac.

So the proposal is to develop a 21,112 square foot industrial building. This property is 1.4 acres in size. It's one parcel today. It is vacant as you can see with no street improvements on either Valley or Lilac. This next slide goes over the site design.

So the applicant or developer has proposed to put the building in the Northeast Corner so that they can locate the truck court in the Far Southwest. So we have some parking over along the West. More specifically, there's 23 of those vehicle parking spaces. And you'll see a difference in the driveways. The arrows are not shown here for access, but the driveway that's located off of Valley will be limited to vehicular traffic only for pedestrian, you know, non truck.

Truck will be required or limited access through lilac. That's for ingress and egress. That would be in compliance with the city's municipal code for indoor storage facilities when it comes to routing, truck routing away from sensitive receptors. It is also consistent with the studies that were prepared for this or the analysis that was done for this which included a health risk assessment. So this project does not, it's well below any of the thresholds for AQMD and part of or what was included in that health risk assessment kind of indicates that the trucks will need to access off of Lilac and then head east on Valley away from the sensitive receptors.

So that being that's why you see there's a 34 foot wide drive aisle there on Lilac and the one on Valley is the twenty sixth standard for the vehicle. So this is just a look at the floor plan. It'll kind of show you that the office location is in the Northwest Corner. It's about 2,250 square feet of the building, which will allow the remainder 20,862 for storage purposes. It does include the two dock doors over again, as mentioned in the southwest portion of the building, and it does have one grade level dock door near there as well.

So when it comes to the architectural design, this does meet the city's design guidelines when it comes to horizontal and vertical articulation. So you'll have the roof height variations, the three foot depth, and the wall plane breaks. And the construction is the concrete tilt up walls that have the pink colors. There's three pink colors. There's glazing at the corners of the building, including reveals metal eyebrows for accents.

And then when it comes to the landscaping, there is a significant setback to comply with indoor storage facilities, the one to one. So the building being at 34 feet in height, it does have the setback there. Is 23% is what is being proposed in the landscape coverage, which exceeds the minimum. And there will be landscape planters throughout the parking area on-site as well. So this project, there was a scoping agreement that was prepared by LSA.

It shows that there were 65 new trips, 26 of those will be from trucks and the other 39 would be passenger. These numbers, they were deemed to show that there's no significant impacts for the nearby intersections. And so this project is categorically exempt pursuant to section 15,332, which is the infill development. When it comes to the public hearing notices that was published in the paper, mailed out to all of the property owners within the thousand foot radius and the site was posted as well. So the project is consistent with the IP zone, the industrial park zone of the Gateway Specific Plan, as well as the indoor storage facility section of the Rialto Municipal Code, the design guidelines.

And we'll bring this vacant piece of land developed with the highest and best use for that zone. Therefore it's the staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions J and K to approve the CDP and PPD as stated herein. That's all I have for you tonight, but the applicant has their team here as well if you have any questions. Thank

you, Daniel. If the applicant or the representative could come forward, so if we have any questions for you, I'd appreciate it.

Good evening. Good evening. Thank you Chair, Commissioners. My name is Somi Mukherjee. I'm with Magellan Valley Partners, the applicant, and I'm here to answer any questions you may have.

Any questions from staff, I mean or from Commission? Terry, what you got? Okay. With the traffic and I know there's a scoping agreement and everything with that, so maybe just because I remember bunch of stuff and things, but across the streets the days in right? That's the motel. Does this that truck driveway align with anything over there? Is it do they offset? Is it? Is there a conflict? I don't know. Daniel may know or Daniel may know or somebody. So is that going to create a issue at all there? Plus remember that the. The truck parking for the all the the days in is all down is the backside of lilac there and stuff. So there's more.

I mean there's not trucks from this, but there's trucks coming out of that days in more frequently and things that do that. Don't know if that'll create issue there. I'm sure you guys looked at it and the scoping agreement talked about that, but what does that? What does

that look like so? Yeah, the staff did conduct a review of the layout, the traffic study that was part of the traffic scope agreement that was prepared for this project. We If were able to go to some of the slides, the driveway that's proposed to be connected to Lilac Avenue is fairly aligned. May not be dead center, but it is very quite close to aligned with the existing driveway at the days in to avoid traffic.

Okay, great. Okay, very good. Any other questions or anything for for the applicant or for staff? If not, thank you so much. Thank you. I'm gonna go ahead. It's time to place to open the public hearing so we could open the public hearing. Is there anyone that has requested to speak this evening on this item?

No Sir.

Okay, very good. So is there a motion? Motion by Commissioner Estavander. Is there a second? Second seconded by Commissioner Corral to close the public hearing. All those in favor signify by saying I. Opposed. Hearing none, the public hearings closed. It's your pleasure Commission. You're fine.

Exhibit J and K to approve CDP twenty twenty three dash 24 and PPD twenty twenty three dash 32 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions therein.

Is there a second?

Second

Okay motion by Commissioner Esteban or seconded by Commissioner Thompson. Can we have a roll call please?

Commissioner Schneider I chair story I Commissioner Esfander

I

Commissioner Thompson

I

and Commissioner Cora.

Motion carries unanimously. Thank you so much. Congratulations looking forward to it. Thank you. Alright, moving on the action items. We don't have anything there. We any community development director comments. Oh, we'll let that guy do it. So let's just let her stay out in the audience and stuff. That's cool.

I'll just give one quick The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting would occur on May 20. However, that meeting will be canceled. The staff will be going to the ICSC Conference International Shopping Center Convention in Las Vegas on May. So the next meeting that we will have will actually be the first one in June, which will be June 3.

That'll be

our next planning session. Awesome

June 3.

Next meeting

is June 3.

Yes, great.

That's the only

update that's what I want. Just what I want to do on my birthday, so it's that's fine. So it's that's Okay. I mean on my birthday so. Oh sure. Okay, yeah, there you go. So any comments from the Commissioners anything?

Hate to see Chuck Liker go.

Yeah, that's got that's got some incredible history. I'll tell you about it later and stuff, but but if not, do we have a motion and a second to adjourn?

So moved.

Motion by Commissioner Estavander. Second by anybody? Chris Growl. All those in favor signify by saying aye.

Aye.

Opposed? Hearing none. Meetings adjourned. Thank you.