County Council - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Porter County Council addressed extensive storm recovery efforts following a derecho, detailing debris cleanup, FEMA reimbursement, and new drop-off sites. The Council also voted to establish a Municipal Unified Strategic Taskforce (MUST) committee and appointed a representative to discuss future local income tax distribution and rates.

About this meeting

Government Body
County Council
Meeting Type
County Council
Location
Porter County, IN
Meeting Date
August 25, 2026

Transcript

752 sections

0:00Speaker 15

Good evening. Before we start, I'd like to say something in regards to the

0:24Speaker 10

storms that we've had.

0:26Speaker 19

Do I do a roll call first?

0:27Speaker 10

Oh, that'd probably be a good idea. Mr. Bozak, I don't know what I would do without you. Roll call, please.

0:33 – 0:44Speaker 15

Andy Bozak. Present. Michelle Harris. Here. Brett Stone. Here. Andy Vazquez. Here. Rick Nerg. Here. Greg Simp. Present. Jeremy Rivas. Here. Devin Presley.

0:44 – 5:51Speaker 10

Now that we know we're all here, in regards to this storm that recently hit us, basically a series of storm, if you will, For those of you who do not know, it's called a derecho, and it's hurricane force winds that hit us. And this derecho happened to be about 125 miles long, in some places more severe than others. Unfortunately for Porter County and the northern end, they got beat up pretty good. So we need to get something done for all our citizens here. And Redstone, myself, Ed Morales, Mike Jabo, and Carrie from the The recycling department met, and we wanted to try to figure out what to do with all the debris. So after that meeting, we got together, we got a process going, and we'd like to read the following. And it says, before anything else, we want to acknowledge the hardship that so many of our residents and businesses have endured since the retro that struck Porter County on August 11th. The storm affected communities across the entire county, but its impact was most severe in the northern half with damage increasing as you travel toward Lake Michigan. We know these past days have been challenging and we deeply appreciate your patience as we work through the recovery process. Immediately after the storm, our first priority was clearing roads so emergency services, utility crews, and the public could be moved safely. This required rapid action and resulted in a large amount of storm debris, trees, limbs, and other vegetation being pushed to the roadside. In many locations, fallen power lines were entangled with trees and our crews could not proceed until NHTSCO confirmed those areas were safe to enter. We thank the residents for understanding these necessary delays. The state of Indiana and the federal government now recognize the state as a disaster area. We hope that this declaration will open the door to additional resources and funding to help offset the significant cost of recovery. To protect our eligibility for federal reimbursement, Porter County must follow all required state and federal procedures. This includes careful documentation, proper contractor selection, and strict oversight of debris collection and disposal. We are now fully in the cleanup stage, and there's still much work ahead. Total cleanup will take weeks and in some several certain cases months. Due to the severity and widespread nature of this storm, our compost sites throughout Porter County are nearing capacity and cannot accept additional storm debris at this moment. To relieve this pressure, the county will be announcing additional drop off sites within the next one to two days where residents can bring storm related vegetation. Because of the sheer quantity of debris along our county roads, we will be requesting proposals from qualified contractors to assist with collection and disposal. This will supplement the efforts of our county workforce and accelerate the cleanup process. Rest assured, Porter County is taking every necessary step to clear debris from our roadways and to keep our recycling centers available for storm-related materials as capacity allows. We also want to make residents aware that many contractors are currently offering electrical roof beams and structural repair services. We urge everyone to remember that contractors must be registered, bonded, and insured in Porter County. Our offices are expediting all registration and permits requests to help us forward with repairs as quickly as possible. For those dealing with damaged aerial electrical services, please note that the county must inspect the work of your licensed contractor before NIPSCO can reestablish electrical service. This inspection requirement is in place for your safety and to ensure compliance with state electrical standards. As recovery continues, the county will keep residents and businesses informed of revisions, updates, and new information as it develops. We are committed to transparency and timely communication throughout this process. In closing, we again express our sincere appreciation for the public's understanding and patience as we navigate these extraordinary circumstances. Porter County is committed to restoring normalcy as quickly and safely as possible, and we will continue to stand with our residents every step of the way. Now, Hopefully we'll have more information on our website, county website, also the EMA, emergency management, good resource to go there. If you have friends and neighbors who are affected by this, please have them do so. And thank you for your time.

5:51 – 6:05Speaker 19

President Vasquez, I had a question. I've been getting a lot of questions from community members asking, so we are going to pick up their logs, their tree debris on the side of the road. If they bring it to the road, eventually the county will get it picked up.

6:05Speaker 10

Mr. Stone, if you'd be so kind.

6:07 – 7:22Speaker 17

So we had a conversation with Mike Bocari and some other people on the phone. I think the first thing we wanted to do was make sure that our compost sites are open. And I think they're at capacity right now. And I asked Carrie, what What's it going to take to reopen them dollar-wise? And it was somewhere in the vicinity of three-quarters of a million dollars to have somebody come out, haul it away, get the compost so people can keep bringing the debris. So there's going to be some. some requests coming up that are going to be some big requests, but we have to fund them because we want to make sure and keep those composts clear so everybody can keep bringing them. My question is, that's phase one. What is your question exactly? The two-pronged approach is, Mike Jables putting together probably within 15 to 30 days, a scope of work, lower than that, but less time. Okay. A scope of work, cleaning the debris for the county. So if you can get it off to the side of the road, 15 feet, we are going to take it and pick it up. That's what we're going to do.

7:22Speaker 19

Thank you. I had a few questions.

7:24Speaker 10

Do you have another, sir? Oh, I thought you had, okay.

7:28 – 7:41Speaker 19

Oh, no, a few different people have asked. There's actually a petition going around Grand Woods. There's a guy walking around, present something to the commissioners right now. They're gathering signatures to get it picked up. Now I can tell them, hey, it's already happening. It's already a little time.

7:41 – 7:54Speaker 10

Right, there's a process, and that's just unfortunate, but that's how it is, and we're moving as quickly as we can and getting the things that we can do to make the roads safe for all our crews, our citizens, and everything down the road.

7:54Speaker 17

You recognize Mike really quickly.

7:57Speaker 10

Mike Jabo, if you would come up, please, to add to this.

8:02 – 8:17Speaker 17

Have you gone to sleep? No, I'll tell you what. Thank you, Mike. This guy's a godsend. He's putting in a lot of time. He's the one looking for the scope of work and organizing. Right. I suggest maybe we put in for a recliner so he can sleep at his desk.

8:17Speaker 12

I already do that.

8:18Speaker 10

Yes, I know. That's why I said the recliner.

8:20 – 9:48Speaker 12

Go ahead, sir. Today, we had a meeting with a consultant who It's a three-pronged approach to this. You get the contractor to pick the stuff. We have to track it to get the FEMA money when it's available. If it's available, you've got to track your debris from cradle to grave. In other words, GPS and all that stuff is going to be used as part of this. The other part of the stool to this is in addition to the contractor, the person that helps with that, is the person who helps us make our applications to FEMA. We want a very high success rate so we can get 75 cents on the dollar for every dollar invested. The commissioner, I, Lance, Carrie, highway superintendent, assistant superintendent, had a phone call with a consultant who does that latter part. They guide us. They're the ones that make the submittals, make sure the I's are dotted, T's are crossed. Their cost, if we get FEMA money, is reimbursable 100%. And so we're hoping by this Friday or as late as next Monday, we will engage this consultant through the commissioners. And then we'll start the process. We found out that probably the stuff carries already a man, even though it hasn't been cradled to grave exactly. We could also get reimbursed for that. So I tell you all that, but don't take it to the bank because we've got to wait and see until Washington signs off and gives us that phase. We've got emergency, but we don't have to clean up money yet.

9:49Speaker 10

Excuse me, sir.

9:50Speaker 12

I thought when we had our discussion at that meeting, it was 75%, up to 75%. Yes. Except for the consultant, they'll pay 100%.

9:58Speaker 10

I'm willing to take 100%.

10:00 – 10:24Speaker 12

Thank you. So our aim is, and the commissioners will come up with a statement encouraging the residents to bring their stuff to the road. And if it's within 10 feet of the edge of the pavement, we can pick it up and we believe we'd get reimbursed for it. So that will keep it from going streaming through the compost site, which means you've got to handle it two times. We handle it one time and dispose of it.

10:26Speaker 12

Thank you. So that's the strategy we're looking for right now. So more will come in the next probably five, seven days. We'll definitely enter into contract with a consultant before.

10:36Speaker 19

Can you put something out to the population that we're working on?

10:39Speaker 12

Yeah, the commissioners will have to make a statement to that effect in a public meeting. So yes, we'll be prepared for that.

10:44Speaker 10

So one of the things I should do as well as EMA and our county website, look at the commissioners in particular for information. Okay.

10:52 – 11:21Speaker 12

And today, two of our, well, one person from the assistance highway superintendent and Chelsea Gordon, our stormwater manager, went up in a helicopter. And we did a survey of North Porter County. It's far worse than we thought that we can see from the roadway. Probably what we see in the roadway, you can maybe multiply that two, three, four times. So we do have a better handle on the awesome destruction that we're going to face that's not on the roadway.

11:21Speaker 19

You guys went in a helicopter?

11:22Speaker 12

Yeah. The sheriff's drone.

11:25Speaker 19

Yeah, drones everywhere.

11:26 – 11:42Speaker 12

Drones are useful, but the helicopter, we were able to do it an hour, hour and a half in days. But Lake Lance arranged for the Lake County Sheriff to bring the helicopter over to Porter County. Our staff went up so we could assess the team. There's a lot of places we can't get to.

11:44 – 12:03Speaker 12

So we are making the action quietly behind the scenes. The commissioner should be coming out with some major announcements. They did today as the start of it. And over the course of the next few days, they'll be making more. And we appreciate all your participation because we've got to go into this thinking we'll never get rehearsed. We just have to do it.

12:04Speaker 19

Well, thank you for handling some of the emails that we're getting. We didn't know where to go to for NIPSCO or Comcast Verizon. So thank you for jumping in and helping us.

12:11Speaker 12

Appreciate it. Any other questions?

12:14Speaker 10

And thank you for answering Mr. Kaminsky and his particular concern with Comcast.

12:19 – 12:31Speaker 12

I don't know if he's solved yet or not, but we're working on it. But he knows we're working on it and we're very aware of his concerns. Very good. Thank you. Our pleasure. And if anybody's got any questions, feel free to give a call or an email.

12:31 – 13:53Speaker 17

Thank you, sir. Mr. President. Sir. Kind of goes in the line of what we're talking about. We get reimbursed 75%. It's still gonna be a big number for us. What I'm concerned about, is you have Portage, Chesterton, some of the towns. And I've brought this up before, and I think it could be a good idea. I've talked to Scott McClure. I just want everybody to ponder this. I think if there's a good use for being able to borrow that money to municipalities from our foundation fund, over three years payback, Scott would tighten it up. Because what I'm concerned about is they're gonna be signing big contracts for removal. And I think they're gonna get stuck with the cashflow problem. You know, if you're signing a contract for two or $3 million, I don't think too many contractors are going to wait six months to a year to get paid over a certain amount of time. Just throwing that thought out there that it could be a viable source to help some towns that I think are going to have some cash flow problems because I think it's going to be a pretty big number. So that's it. Thank you.

13:55 – 14:38Speaker 10

And I agree wholeheartedly. Let's face it, we just haven't got the money. We're going to have to get it from somewhere. And if ever there was an appropriate place to pull it in time, I think this is it. However, we should also think about down the road as we go. I don't believe this will be the first situation that we're going to see this. In case, personal opinion, correct me if I'm wrong, later on at the end of this meeting, I think this is something we're going to see more of. And we've seen it happen more and more, tornadoes in our area, more and more wind damage. That's something to think about, but that's for another day. Moving right along, minutes, approval of the minutes, regular council meeting, February 24th. So moved.

14:39Speaker 6

Second. Second.

14:40 – 15:19Speaker 10

I got a motion second. All in favor? Aye. I say an aye. Aye. Motion carries. Animal Shelter. She was at present for the budget meeting, I believe. Yes. And felt that the council got everything that needed to know was coming down. So she asked if she could be taken off. But she also talked to the commissioners who more or less fill up with that. Okay. Porter County comp time report. You're missing the comp time report? Yeah.

15:21Speaker 19

Sheriff, are you guys getting a copy of this report now? The comp time report for all your officers? I thought we were sharing this with department heads over there.

15:31Speaker 6

Do you have any extra comments?

15:38Speaker 19

No, my question is, do we share this with department heads? We don't know.

15:44Speaker 15

Ryan, do you guys know? We'll make sure we distribute that.

15:47Speaker 19

Okay. Just so you guys can see it because some of your officers have gone up, some of them have gone down. Get it? I just want to make sure you saw it.

15:59Speaker 19

I looked over at the other day. I didn't see any massive ones. I think ours are still coming down, which is good. We're almost out of comp time for our department.

16:18 – 17:04Speaker 10

I'll give you about a minute or so to take a look at this. I saw it the other day and went through it. And if you take a notice, we have two sheets, one for June 23rd to July 27th, and July 27th to 8-19. Yeah. It would be good to also reflect and see who went up for the last time, what type of danger was, if any.

17:33Speaker 10

Any members have any questions on the Comp Report? Hearing none, first reading, please.

17:43 – 18:50Speaker 15

Hereby notice is given for County that the following adjustments to the 2020 that are placed before you create a separation. The general fund salary is 71,000. You have an eight time salaries reduction of 18,000 over time, 18,000 uses and subscriptions of 125. Hourly, $5,000. $15,000. Power, $15,000. Building liability, $5,000. Travel, $5,000. Balance and coding, $55,000. Office supplies, $1,000. Other supplies, $2,000. Data processing equipment, $50,000. Insurance, restore, fund, buildings and structures, $129,000. Data Project and Equipment, $1,229,421.10. Sales Disclosure Fund, Contractual Services, $36,500. QO, the Bridge Fund, $2.4 million. Share of Donation Fund, Drug Task Force, Other Supplies, $12,000. Veterans Donation Fund, Other Services and Charges, $100. Thank you.

19:17 – 19:34Speaker 10

First up for the evening, SUNEF, assessor's office. We have additional 36508 to 39500 contracts for appropriation you can pay for annual support and maintenance for CAM8, computer assisted mass appraisal system and licenses. Good evening.

19:35Speaker 19

I'll make a motion to approve. Second.

19:37Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none. Roll call. Rickner.

19:44Speaker 15

Yes. Simms. Yes. Rivas. Yes. Bozak. Aye. Harris. Yes. Don. Yes. Vasquez.

19:50Speaker 10

Yes. Zero. Thank you.

19:52Speaker 19

Ms. Neff, I had a question. On your email, it says there was a transfer to transfer for $1,000 to boards. Is that something we needed to do or tackle?

20:00Speaker 5

No. Yeah, that was no longer necessary.

20:03Speaker 19

I just want to make sure we didn't forget it.

20:06Speaker 2

Have a good day.

20:09Speaker 10

Veterans Director Christian Molchan, an additional $100 to 22,500 are the supplies appropriation needed to purchase gift cards for veterans.

20:17Speaker 19

Make a motion to approve.

20:18Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?

20:22Speaker 19

Was this the gentleman that just got a home imported? Correct. Awesome. Thank you.

20:26Speaker 10

Any other questions or discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please.

20:30Speaker 15

Harris. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Rivas. Yes. Simms. Yes. Rick Nero. Yes. Vasquez. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

20:38Speaker 10

Thank you, sir.

20:42Speaker 10

Superior Court 1, Judge Fitch. Additional 125 to 39, 300 dues and subscriptions approach needed to dues increase and end dues.

20:54Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call.

21:01Speaker 15

Yes. Samuels. Yes. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Harris. Yes. Stone. Yes. 7-0.

21:06Speaker 10

An additional $15,000 to $3,100 legal appropriation for anticipation of the pauper appeals transcript. If I'm not mistaken, you only have about $3,300 in that fund, sir.

21:17 – 21:42Speaker 8

Yeah, it doesn't have very much money. We had seven trials so far this year. Two of those were murder trials. One of those transcripts was like $8,000. The other one was like $6,000. We have about, I don't know, seven more trials possible for the year with indigent attorneys. So... This would cover the need for now, but we may have to come back at the end of the year, depending on how things go. Second.

21:42Speaker 10

Motion to second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please. Simmons.

21:46Speaker 15

Yes. Biss. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Harris. Yes. Stone. Vasquez. Yes. Yes. 7-0.

21:53Speaker 10

Additional $10,000 to the 11-200 hourly part-time help needed in Superior Court.

21:58Speaker 10

I have a motion to second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please.

22:04Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

22:11Speaker 10

I have a form 144 up to $25 for our part-time assistant.

22:15Speaker 15

Form 144 requests for hourly part-time assistant. Motion to approve.

22:20Speaker 10

Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please. Vazquez. Yes. Harris. Yes. Sampson.

22:26Speaker 15

Yes. Rivas. Yes. Bozak.

22:27Speaker 8

Yes. Harris.

22:28Speaker 8

Stone. Yes. 7-0.

22:30Speaker 10

Thank you, Your Honor.

22:30Speaker 8

You have a good night. That's the same money for the 10 grand, right? Yeah. Okay. Thank you all very much. Have a great evening. Thank you. Yep.

22:37Speaker 10

Have a good night. Parks and Recreation. Jake, anybody from Parks and Recreation? Anyone?

22:48Speaker 19

Okay. I'll make a motion for the first additional for the appropriation due to insurance rates and utility rates, additional of 5,000 and 18,000 to power. I'll second that.

22:59Speaker 10

We have a first and a second. Any discussion?

23:02Speaker 19

Do you guys know, is it just increased costs that caused this? And have they rebudgeted for next year and adjusted? I was making sure. Yeah. I want to make sure we don't do it again.

23:12Speaker 10

Yeah. Pretty much. I talked to them and that's basically the case. Okay. Roll call, please. Yes.

23:21Speaker 15

Harris. Yes. Bozek. Yes. Rivas. Yes. Yes. Brickner. Yes. 7-0.

23:27Speaker 10

Additional $25,000 to $1,100, $200 hourly appropriation needed to cover seasonal staffing costs for the remainder of the year.

23:36Speaker 6

I think this goes into their busy time.

23:41Speaker 19

They should have been here to tell us what it was for.

23:45Speaker 19

I'll make a motion to table that.

23:47Speaker 10

I have a motion to table. Roll call, please.

23:56 – 24:07Speaker 15

Dumb. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. No. Yes. Harris. Yes. 6-1. Soil and water conservation.

24:12 – 24:27Speaker 10

An additional $10,163.60 for 1,100 salaries, $777.52 to $1,200 FICA, $1,138.33 to $1,200 PERF appropriates needed to cover the cost of additional salaries for two employees. And this is just transferring the funds?

24:28Speaker 24

Correct. Transferring funds from our account into the local fund at the county.

24:32Speaker 10

From Peter to Paul.

24:33Speaker 19

Motion to approve.

24:35Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Roll call, please.

24:40 – 24:53Speaker 19

Is your motion for all three of them together? Mine was all three together. Do you want them separate? Well, I'll read for all. How about if I just read for all three together and then we'll vote for all three for the sake of brevity. Sorry. Thank you.

24:53Speaker 10

Form 144.0 to 6,296. Hold on. Hold on. We got a vote on that one first. Oh, okay. So on the very first one.

25:01Speaker 6

$10,163. Then $777.52. $1,138.30.

25:11Speaker 10

Okay. That's the motion.

25:14Speaker 19

I withdraw my motion. I second hers.

25:17Speaker 10

Okay. Roll call, please.

25:20Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Okay. Form 144-062-6980. District Administrator.

25:32Speaker 10

0 to 33. 9880 district conservation project manager appropriation needed to cover the cost of additional salaries for two employees.

25:42Speaker 19

What is this one?

25:44Speaker 24

It's all related. It's all the same thing. It's just the division of that 10. So it comes out of our account.

25:53Speaker 20

Line items? Oh, correct.

25:58Speaker 24

Motion to approve.

26:00Speaker 24

No county fund.

26:01Speaker 10

Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call.

26:06Speaker 15

Sims. Yes. Rivas. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Harris.

26:10Speaker 15

Stone. Yes. Vasquez. Yes. Harris. Yes. 7-0.

26:14Speaker 10

Development and stormwater management. Thank you. Mike Jabil. You look familiar.

26:20Speaker 19

Have a good night.

26:23 – 26:34Speaker 10

Additional 2,400 to 3,500 contractual services appropriation needed to cover continuing bridge projects and replacement of bridge 132 in County Road. 2.4 million.

26:34Speaker 19

Not 2,400. 2.4 million.

26:39Speaker 10

Hang on, Bruce. $2.4 million. I sit corrected.

26:45Speaker 10

If you can do it for $2,400, we'll do it right now.

26:47Speaker 12

No, we can't.

26:48Speaker 10

Okay, $2,439,000.

26:49Speaker 12

How much is in that fund?

26:50Speaker 19

I'm just curious.

26:51 – 27:27Speaker 12

I think we've got $1,113,000. And just an explanation, the reason it's so big is because bridge projects, especially when we get funding from the feds or the state, we don't dictate the schedule they do. So sometimes we've got to It goes up and down, and the reason this is much bigger, we had a bridge we didn't expect to fail. That's that one on South Babcock Road between 600 and 700. That bridge is somewhere between $1.5 and $2 million. We let that contract, so that's why we were before you. We always budget skinny, and then we pull the money out as we need it during the year.

27:29Speaker 19

Motion to approve. Do we have that already? Got a motion. I'm sorry. Seconded? Motion and second.

27:35Speaker 10

Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please.

27:38Speaker 15

Rebus. Yeah, what was that? Yes. Yes. Yes.

27:46Speaker 12

Thank you, council members. Have a good evening.

27:48 – 28:02Speaker 10

You too, sir. Thank you. Coroner's office, Cindy Dykes. Additional 5,000 to 3,200 travel appropriation needed for mandatory certification training, investigation hours exceeding past the 12-hour shift, and trainee scene calls.

28:06Speaker 4

Can we just, can we do the transfer first? Because that's for sure. Or no?

28:14Speaker 10

Why don't we just go ahead and order real quick? It doesn't matter, I don't think.

28:19Speaker 19

Okay. So, yeah, what are you doing here? I'm sorry.

28:22Speaker 10

We're keeping with the order here.

28:24Speaker 19

Don't you have money in training already?

28:27 – 29:11Speaker 4

We do, but we're, okay, we had the budget workshop. We're not quite sure where to put this money right now. When somebody is training and they go on a scene call, I pay them so many hours out of hourly. If they have to go down to Indianapolis for their CE flowers to maintain their certification, I pay that out of hourly. So when Ryan and I first sat down and talked about this, we weren't quite sure where to put it. So I'm not sure if, right?

29:11Speaker 19

Is it training?

29:12 – 29:23Speaker 4

I don't see. It's training, but I don't know how to pay it out of training. Well, either way, it's certification and training.

29:23 – 29:36Speaker 19

But we already have a line item for training. Can we pull her budget up, please? Right? Don't you have a line item for training already, Cindy? Can't we just pay it from there? Is there money in there?

29:36Speaker 4

Right. I can, but right now I've been paying it out of hours. It's training.

29:43Speaker 19

That's what the training budget's for, I thought. I'm just asking. I'm not micromanaging. I don't know. That's what I would assume.

29:50Speaker 4

That's what I've been paying it out of. I don't know. Out of right stuff. Oh, so you only have $2,000.

29:58Speaker 6

Unless the auditor's office has a reason. Is that not right? We haven't quite figured it out. Well, it's not travel.

30:17Speaker 19

But it's not travel, right?

30:18Speaker 4

No, it's not travel. We were just trying to figure.

30:22Speaker 19

So you have $2,000 in training right now, right? $655 left? Yeah, $344 left.

30:31Speaker 18

Oh, it's at the bottom. I'm sorry.

30:32 – 30:44Speaker 19

Okay. That was my question. You don't have it in training anyway to pay it out of there, so we'd have to move it somewhere. Why don't we just put it in training? Jeremy, what are your thoughts? You've been here forever. Where do you put it at?

30:44Speaker 20

We couldn't do it.

30:47Speaker 19

Do you want it in travel then?

30:49 – 31:02Speaker 20

No, I mean, if you want to do it tonight, it would have to go into travel. If you want to table it and do the next meeting into a different one, either hourly or training and education, we could do that as well.

31:02Speaker 6

Well, it seems like it should be in training and education. Second would be hourly, but it's certainly not travel.

31:12 – 31:25Speaker 20

But the reason I think we did it is because she's Does she have the money in hourly to pay this out of hourly?

31:26 – 31:42Speaker 19

Is that the real issue? If she's been historically paying it from hourly, why are we trying to change it now? Is it because that fund's running out and she wants to move it? Okay.

31:42 – 32:00Speaker 20

Again, just thinking it would be best if everything was technically all put in its correct places. Travel should be in travel, training and training, hourly and hourly. The fact that it's commingled now by opening up travel, you're allowed to go forward, make it clean.

32:02Speaker 10

So basically it's housekeeping. Yeah.

32:06Speaker 6

So you're moving this for housekeeping, not because it's actually needed. It's more just like so that going forward, when you do have these expenses, it's coming out correctly.

32:20Speaker 6

So the move is not needed.

32:22Speaker 19

But we're also building our budget because it's an additional $5,000. You're not taking $5,000 out of hourly and putting it there. So for next year, our budget will now be $5,000 big.

32:30Speaker 4

Well, yeah. I'm putting it in my budget, the $5,000. We just have to figure out where it needs to be.

32:39Speaker 19

You're taking it from the general fund. So that's the way it's worded, correct?

32:43Speaker 4

Because every, well. Let's take it from hourly.

32:45 – 32:56Speaker 19

If you're already been paying it from hourly, let's take $5,000 on hourly and put it in travel and then you've got your $5,000. And we didn't increase your budget and that's in the right fund now.

32:56Speaker 4

But I can't do that.

32:59Speaker 4

Why take it from hourly because I'm going to do extra.

33:02Speaker 19

$5,000 more an hourly. Why aren't you asking for that? Because that's what it sounds like you're asking for.

33:09 – 33:23Speaker 4

It's because we don't know where to put it right. But what I'm going to do every year. Take it out hourly and put it in travel. Every year I'm going to come back up and I'm going to ask for extra money because I don't know.

33:23 – 33:44Speaker 19

No, we're going to get this budget right. If you know that you're going to spend $5,000, you're going to budget for $5,000 travel, not come for additionals. That's wrong. You need to budget correctly to handle this. And what you're telling me now is that you want $5,000 extra dollars and you're not asking for it in the right way, in my opinion. I would take it out hourly, move it over there and let her have her travel money.

33:44Speaker 10

Can we do that?

33:45 – 34:04Speaker 4

It can't be taken out of hourly. Because then I won't have enough money to pay my deputy. You're paying it out of hourly now. I'm going to be coming up. Right now, we need an extra at least $3,500 to make it through the year. In hourly? Yes.

34:04Speaker 16

It's about four months left. There's a budget.

34:10Speaker 4

That's what we are trying to figure out.

34:13Speaker 19

And then when you ask us for more money, then come back to assignment. That's what I would do. And fix the budget for next year so it's right, so it's more accurate.

34:20Speaker 4

That's what we're trying to do. That's why I went to the budget workshop.

34:25Speaker 19

Yeah, that's great. That's what you should do. That's awesome.

34:27Speaker 4

I did. I went to that. Good.

34:31Speaker 19

No one's cracking down on you. I'm not mad at you. You just got to do it the right way, and it can't feel slimy. It feels slimy to me.

34:39Speaker 10

So do I have a motion?

34:45Speaker 19

I would let her keep paying it out of hourly. If she needs more money, come back to us. And if you want to fix it next year, let's fix the budget.

34:52 – 35:26Speaker 4

That's where I've been paying it out of. When we have a trainee, I pay her or him out of hourly. deputies have to go and get their hours to stay certified to be a deputy coroner i pay out of hourly okay so i don't know where this money i think it should go into hourly but i'm not sure yet we have to work this out how come when they were going down for the training how come that didn't come out of training

35:28Speaker 6

Like you said, when you send your deputy down for the mandatory season.

35:31Speaker 4

I have to pay them hourly to go to training for their hours that they have to go. So where does that, does it come out of training or does it come out of.

35:42Speaker 6

Are you paying them to be trained for their continuing ed?

35:46Speaker 4

Yeah, they have to be.

35:47Speaker 6

Then that's training.

35:51Speaker 19

I would agree with that. Yeah, I would agree with that. That gives us an accurate picture of what she's paying out. Right. What's being trained.

35:57Speaker 6

Right, because there's a difference between being on the scene and hourly being at training. Like, then you know how much you're spending on training.

36:04Speaker 16

They're still paid hourly. I mean, they're going down whenever, during the week, knocking down, they're being paid. You're not just paying them.

36:11Speaker 26

But they're being paid because they're being trained.

36:16Speaker 4

It's mandatory training. Right, right.

36:19Speaker 26

But I mean, if it wasn't for training, they wouldn't be paid. Mr. Bell.

36:24 – 36:43Speaker 15

It might be as well for the auditor's office to reach out to the State Board of Accounts for further clarification. If that helps you guys at all, that makes you guys feel better. If you did decide to table it, I think that would be a good idea. Just to make sure our bases are covered.

36:45Speaker 19

I'd make a motion to table. I'll second it.

36:46Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second to table. Any further questions? Roll call, please. Yes.

36:56Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes.

37:00Speaker 10

Yes. Yes. We'll get this straightened out for you. How's that?

37:07Speaker 4

We'll figure out where it's going to be paid for.

37:11Speaker 19

We'll get it taken care of.

37:12Speaker 4

Right. That's all I need to know.

37:16Speaker 19

No, we're good. I'll make a motion on the 150 equipment to other vehicles. Second.

37:21Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying aye.

37:28 – 37:48Speaker 10

Opposed, same sign. Motion carries. Thank you. Thank you. We'll see you next month. Health Department Administrator Matthew Paul. Chemist Grant Fund, 4,022,500 other supplies, appropriation needs to purchase autism elopement kits,

37:50Speaker 19

Motion, it's a grant. Second. Motion and a second. Just real quick, what's an elopement kit?

37:55Speaker 8

It's to help make sure that a child doesn't get lost. Door locks, window alarms, that sort of thing. Cool, thank you.

38:03Speaker 11

And that's provided to the families. Okay.

38:06Speaker 10

Can I get a motion, please?

38:07Speaker 14

We already did. And a second. And a second. I'll get here eventually.

38:12Speaker 10

Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please. Bless you.

38:15Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

38:20Speaker 15

Harris. Yes. Yes.

38:23Speaker 15

You're welcome.

38:28Speaker 10

Porter County Recycling and Waste Reduction. Carrie, if you're here. Oh, I thought you'd be out in a loader. Last time I talked to you, you were at a loader taking tree debris out of the way.

38:37Speaker 25

That's been my life. Usually in steel-toed boots, it feels different to be in real clothes today.

38:43Speaker 10

Form 144, part-time up to $33.54 change.

38:46Speaker 6

Motion to approve.

38:47Speaker 10

We have a motion and a second, please. Second. And we have a motion and a second. Any discussion?

38:52Speaker 19

I'm just curious. So we're having trouble finding employees out there.

38:57 – 39:08Speaker 25

No, not at all. We had an employee go on leave, and this is an employee who went on leave, and this is taking a part-time employee to cover that full-time employee's position.

39:08Speaker 19

And then it'll switch back next year?

39:09 – 39:20Speaker 25

It'll switch back as soon as the leave is over. I guess I needed to know, do I have to come back? His pay rate will come back, but I presume on the 144, it just remains the same?

39:20Speaker 19

Do we need to change our motion and just make it for how long the person's off, or does it matter? Or is that a question for our attorney?

39:29Speaker 20

It's just establishing the number. It's part-time up to 33.

39:34Speaker 10

Okay. Will she need to come back next month and then revert it or?

39:37 – 39:58Speaker 19

Okay. But at some point, let me ask this this way. If she, that person quits, they get a whole new person in there and she wanted to pay him 33, 20, 54. She could because of the way it's set up. So we probably do need to put a limit on that. No, but if you left in your replacement, you know, so I would maybe adjust the motion. Or not, Adam?

39:58Speaker 9

Well, it's up to, so.

40:00Speaker 19

Right, but I want this to go back to what it was when this person's back to work. I want it to go back to the 1825, not 3350. Yeah, they will.

40:10Speaker 16

That's up to her. I mean, it's part of it. I mean, because she could expend it. She's going to do it. Right? Yeah. All right.

40:17Speaker 15

We've got a budget to maintain as well.

40:19Speaker 16

That's true. And overspend in the hourly, right?

40:23Speaker 10

So we had a motion.

40:24Speaker 16

You already had it. You're good.

40:25Speaker 10

Okay. Yeah. Roll call.

40:29Speaker 15

Harris. Stone. Yes. Vazquez. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank you.

40:37 – 41:05Speaker 10

Thank you. Good luck. Jessica Bailey, Board of Elections and Registration General Fund Grant. Let's see. Not a grant. General Fund. Additional $10,000 to $21,100 off supplies. 2,000, all three at the same time. 2,000, 22,500 are the supplies and 5,000 to 22,520 ballots encoded. What did I say?

41:08Speaker 16

Approve 10,000, 2,000. I need new classes or something. Second.

41:12Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Karen, go ahead.

41:19Speaker 17

What's going on? Did we go over from this last election as far as monies?

41:26Speaker 25

No, we didn't go over from the last election. We're still recouping from the flood. We had a whole lot of ballot stock, and we lost.

41:34 – 41:45Speaker 17

Okay, so I know this is pretty much all. I knew the next three were all that, but this is also ballot stock and different things? Yes. All right.

41:48Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call. This is an all three ayes, folks.

41:57Speaker 10

Yes. Simms? Yes.

42:01Speaker 14

Vasquez? Yes. Stone? Yes. Harris? Yes. Bozic?

42:06 – 42:20Speaker 10

Additional 50,000. Yeah, I got the other zero. 50,000 to 45,100. Data approved. Data processing, election equipment replacement, and water damage. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call.

42:23Speaker 14

Brickman. Yes. Vazquez. Yes. Stone. Yes. Harris. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Rivas. Yes. 7-0.

42:31 – 42:47Speaker 10

An additional $129,662.62 to building and structures appropriation to repair 157 Franklin's for water damage. Second. A motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please.

42:48Speaker 14

Brickner. Yes. Vazquez. Yes. Stone. Yes. Harris. Yes. Bozak. Rivas. Yes. Sims. Yes. 6-0.

43:02 – 43:23Speaker 10

We have 1,229. 1 million. $229,421.10 to 45,100. I just want to not pay out that much. That's all it is. Data processing equipment appropriation for new election equipment. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call, please.

43:24Speaker 14

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank you. Thank you.

43:38 – 44:11Speaker 10

Juvenile Detention Center. Allison. Did you switch jobs there, Jessica? Just out of curiosity. Additional $71,899 to $1,100 salaries. Additional appropriation needed for a full-time nurse to the JDC. We're going to do both at the same time. Form 144-0 to 71089, registered nurse. Form 144, requested additional full-time registered nurse. Would you like to, you already expounded on this, I believe, last time you were here.

44:11Speaker 7

A little bit.

44:13Speaker 10

Would you like to do a little more?

44:14Speaker 7

A little bit of some stats, if you'd like to see it.

44:17Speaker 10

I knew you had something, then you worked on it, so that's why I'm asking. You can do the work, might as well see it.

44:25Speaker 5

Might as well see it.

44:34Speaker 6

I love the staple list. Staple. I do. I do too.

44:40Speaker 10

Wow, that's kind of cool.

44:42Speaker 6

Staple's jammed. Copiers. We're in a copier.

44:46 – 47:37Speaker 7

What I have in front of you is some statistics in regards to the changes in regards to medical care for juveniles at the juvenile detention center between 2024 and 2025. What is not reflected on this is on call for our nurse. So this is primarily services that were done with our juveniles within the juvenile detention center on site. If you see in regards to medical care between 2024 and 2025, there was actually an increase of about 255 contacts with kids over just that year. So I just thought that this would be a good thing for you guys to see about some of the things that we do for our kids in the juvenile detention center. There's various things like our initial intake, our assessments, our rechecks, consulting with the doctor and things like that. It also, I have in here in regards to medication administration, which I know we've talked about in the past. Medication administration for our kids in the detention center is crucial. Having a nurse available to provide that service optimally, 24-7 facility, and we have juveniles that have to take medications early morning, midday, and in the evening. We have helped train staff that can do that, however, be more optimal in regards to nursing staff doing that. I have Jessica here because she can speak a little bit more to what that means for a nurse and the liability guarding that. We have In 2024, we gave a total doses of medication for kids 4,630 times. It did reduce last year to 3,300. But that just fluctuates. But I think that overall what we are requesting is an additional full-time nurse because the juvenile detention center is so different. Like for additional outpatient clinic, a nursing care, because we are seven days a week and we are 24-7. A lot of the kids that present to the detention center are very high needs, medical high needs. Many of them do not have primary care physicians. Many of them are behind immunizations. Many of them have significant mental health needs with the psychotropic medications. We are having to do medication administration, pregnancy testing, emergency medical response, hospital follow-up, provider coordination, finding providers for these youth, looking at insurances and making sure that we have them connected to providers that actually can provide these services to these youth as well. So in addition to those responsibilities, our full-time nurse is also on call 24-7. We have one nurse.

47:38Speaker 19

Is that registered nurse AR? It says AR, registered nurse.

47:43Speaker 7

A registered nurse. It's like a registered nurse, an RN. Okay.

47:47Speaker 19

No, but it says AR next to it.

47:48Speaker 7

Oh, it does?

47:49Speaker 19

Yeah, it says registered nurse is the new one. And then above it, it says registered nurse AR. Is that your current nurse?

47:54Speaker 7

Oh, Alex. Yes, AR. Yeah, that's Alex.

47:58Speaker 19

Just curious, why are you hiring a new nurse more than that person would be making? Exactly. That's already with us.

48:04Speaker 7

Because Alex actually comes out of two funds.

48:07Speaker 19

Oh, he makes more.

48:07Speaker 17

Yeah. So what I wanted to say- Didn't we talk about this at length last budget, right? That we were going to need a nurse? We did. Or was it the health?

48:16Speaker 7

We talked about an LPN.

48:18 – 50:08Speaker 7

Yeah, we talked about an LPN. But because of some of the significant medical issues that we've encountered in regards to the youth, an LPN is not going to cut it. What I wanted to talk a little bit before, and I'll have Jessica talk specifically about how to deal with this. We have our on-call nurse 24-7. give an example we have two full-time therapists they share rotation of on-call for emergencies i have three supervisors that rotate on call for the center as well as myself and the assistant director so we can rotate all that alex has no one he has absolutely no one when he takes a vacation Thank God we have a fantastic relationship with the health department and Jessica and that whole team. Because guess who comes over and does that work for us and helps? She does. And it's only because of that relationship that we've built together and cooperation. It's been helpful, but it's not sustainable. And frankly, this model is not sustainable for long-term retention for our nurses as well. Giving you an example in regards to one of the youth that we had recently, we had a critical type 1 diabetic who was non-cooperative, taking off his monitor, needed 24-7 care. Alex got, I'm not joking, in a 24-hour period he got 40 phone calls because our staff was so worried about what to do and wanted to make sure that this kid was safe. So again, how many kids do you guys average at a time? We can have up to 24. On average, we have about 14.

50:09 – 50:24Speaker 6

So the goal of having the second nurse, which apparently we talked about last year as an LPN, but because of the medication and because of the severity of the issues going on with the kids, we feel that an RN is going to be a better fit. Correct?

50:24 – 50:57Speaker 17

Yes. Okay. And I 100% agree with... this I just I'm just trying to recollect weren't we trying to do something with the health department to get them to use a nurse or something or trying we were we were trying to work on it was the grant that went away yeah for the LPN we were gonna fund it but we don't have that money anymore and we were it was gonna be a part-time okay because that's where I kept thinking yeah and we were gonna supplement that but we already settled yeah

50:57Speaker 13

Well, nobody would come for a part-time LPN for that.

51:03 – 51:18Speaker 13

Yeah. So I think a full-time would be better because that would offer more medical care at the facility from morning until at least 9 o'clock at night. And then not one person on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

51:19Speaker 6

I have a little question and maybe this is something that's, forgive me if this has already been discussed. You're fine. Are you guys able to bill insurance for any of these things, for these? You cannot? No.

51:32Speaker 27

That would be nice though.

51:32Speaker 13

That would be great.

51:34Speaker 27

Are you an LPN or RN? Me? Yeah.

51:39Speaker 27

Okay. A regular.

51:42Speaker 13

Just a regular.

51:43Speaker 7

Just a regular.

51:47 – 52:05Speaker 27

Allison, I'm going to ask, I don't know the answer to this question. We cannot, if somebody comes into the center that requires medical attention above and beyond what we currently can provide, we cannot say we cannot accommodate or they have to go somewhere else?

52:05Speaker 7

At that time, we would have to get them medically cleared at the hospital. And at that time, the hospital would tell us next steps and then they would come back to the center.

52:14Speaker 7

And that time our nurse would be telling us what the care plan would be at that time.

52:18 – 52:30Speaker 27

So you do have a protocol in place. Yes. So if we don't have the personnel to accommodate a medical condition, we cannot say they got to go somewhere else, this individual.

52:30Speaker 7

You've committed a crime. Right.

52:32Speaker 27

I mean, but.

52:33Speaker 7

So we can't have the second.

52:34Speaker 27

Because we're not a medical facility.

52:36 – 52:55Speaker 7

You know, for example, we have a kid that might have had an OWI and he was in a car accident. Okay. So obviously that's a pretty significant charge. So they would go to the hospital, get medically cleared. If they stay there because the hospital says so, that will happen and then that child will be brought to us after their.

52:55Speaker 27

I guess I'm looking at somebody that has a chronic condition that requires an RN. Yes. And we don't have an RN.

53:02Speaker 7

We do have an RN.

53:03Speaker 7

Full-time RN Monday through Friday.

53:05Speaker 27

But we don't have enough RN.

53:07Speaker 7

No, we do not.

53:07 – 53:19Speaker 19

Okay. Is there anything we can do to work with the health department, take part of this out of their budget, and they can help us out with some of that? Oh, Andy, that's what. I know that was the original.

53:19Speaker 7

That's what they said. We had the money.

53:22Speaker 19

That's what the original. But I thought the original plan was to work with the health department. It wasn't until they had the rug pulled out. Yes. Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you lost your grant.

53:31Speaker 7

No, the health department lost theirs.

53:33 – 53:48Speaker 19

The health department lost big money. Yeah, the big, right. This is just, I mean, it's a big year for us. We've got a lot of big ass. We've got major things going on in the community. We've got our IT. We've got our roads. I'm not against it, but it's a big ass right now.

53:48Speaker 6

I know it is.

53:50Speaker 19

Would you be able to make a part-time work if the money was right? And would it help?

53:55 – 54:14Speaker 7

The problem with the hourly, because we looked into that as well. So you're looking at if somebody would do 28 hours a week at $50 an hour, it would actually cost more in hourly. Okay. And that's not even counting the on-call time. Okay. The kicker is with the full-time is obviously the benefit package. But it actually would cost more in the hourly. Okay.

54:18Speaker 19

Can you look at any grants to help this out? I know you guys are always looking at grants.

54:24Speaker 7

I'm coming in front of you next month with two grants.

54:26Speaker 19

I'm going to make a motion to approve this, see if we can get a second. I'll wait for it.

54:33Speaker 17

Any further?

54:33Speaker 6

I'll second.

54:34Speaker 17

Discussion. Discussion. Be 7180 United. We have to prograde it for the rest of this year and then approve 7180 United for next year.

54:43Speaker 19

Well, this is just the form. What's it called? 144.

54:48Speaker 7

And the additional.

54:49Speaker 17

Yeah, the additional would be $71,000. That would be if we would hire somebody right now for a full year.

54:53Speaker 7

Now in January. Right. If it's not prorated, that's fine. But then for when I come in front of you for next year.

55:00Speaker 17

Next year, it would be $71,000. Right.

55:03Speaker 7

Absolutely. If that would be helpful.

55:05Speaker 17

That would be helpful.

55:08Speaker 19

I will retract my motion.

55:11Speaker 10

Would you like to make an emotion, Mr. Stone?

55:16Speaker 17

Seeing that it's August, I just don't know what to do. Can someone do the math for me? No, because we're only repaying September.

55:24Speaker 7

Well, September. And that's if you hire us. If I hire right.

55:29Speaker 19

Is this a pretty easy position to fill or hard?

55:34Speaker 13

I mean, I think we lucked out with Alex, but then, I mean, okay. I have a question and I feel like I should know this.

55:42 – 56:26Speaker 6

So no, it's all good. Do the homeschools of any of these kids, do they provide anything for medical? I mean, I don't know. We have three nurses. I'm just asking, like, do they provide? No. so you're not getting greeners or no like we have staffing for psychologists social workers and all the things we i mean we have our therapists our nerves yeah so our schools are not coming in and no no no that was the only other thing i was thinking is if there would be 23 000. thank you i mean to me this this is a tough one because i can see the need it's just hard

56:27 – 56:38Speaker 27

Hiring a full-time person, and here we are, beginning of September, halfway through the year. I mean, that kind of set a precedent here, but we haven't been doing that.

56:39Speaker 6

Well, it sounds like this was a unique circumstance.

56:42 – 56:54Speaker 13

Well, that's where... Well, also, with just him, I mean, he's going to rack up that comp time, and I know you guys are looking at that, because there's no other way around it. There is no other.

56:55Speaker 10

So the extra amount you're looking for, like Joy did the math, would be $23,963.67. For the rest of the year. For the rest of the year.

57:08 – 57:30Speaker 17

You know, I'll make that motion to approve 23,963, and then we can look at this at budget time, and then Andy and whoever else, if there's any others that can come up with, because I think it is important, and we did talk about this two years ago, the importance of having a nurse instead of, I would say, maybe not fully qualified people handing out medication. So I think that was a priority to make sure to get that done.

57:30 – 58:00Speaker 7

I do want to point out, though, it's... you know obviously i will be bringing the annual budget here um but for me to be able to hire somebody between now and then if i can't guarantee next year no once we pass they're gonna i hire someone for i can't do that and then say by the way no i think red was just saying oh figure out where we're taking we're gonna figure yeah exactly yeah i really the exact amount for the remainder of the year so that's that's all good we're not second

58:01 – 58:14Speaker 16

I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Yeah, I just got one question. I know the discussion's happened before, and it really doesn't matter with the care, I guess, but you said you have about an average of 14 children in there.

58:14Speaker 7

It could go up, it could go down, it just depends.

58:18Speaker 16

How many are they Porter County residents?

58:25Speaker 6

Is there a reimbursement? They're not Porter County residents. Oh, residents. Oh, okay. Makes sense.

58:34Speaker 10

We can't transfer them back, huh?

58:35Speaker 7

And then also, Jeremy, just so you know, we do contract with some counties to hold their kids, but we charge them.

58:43Speaker 7

And so we get money. It goes into the general question.

58:49Speaker 18

You mentioned something about cop time, but I don't see you on our cop time reports. Does Alex not have cop time?

58:54Speaker 7

Is he not on our reports? We're not in the right stuff for the courts.

59:03Speaker 20

They're not what? They're not in the right system. Oh, so we don't even see his cop time. We don't have the ability to pull that.

59:10 – 59:25Speaker 7

I'd be more happy to share that with you. It's a number we need to know. It's not. We've been working really hard in regards to having him take some time off. Jessica helped him be able to take a couple weeks off, which actually burned the majority of that time.

59:26Speaker 7

So, yes, we're very cognizant of counseling.

59:31Speaker 10

We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Moving right along here. Hearing none, roll call.

59:39Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

59:48Speaker 7

Thank you. Thank you for the brainstorming session. Thank you.

59:51 – 1:00:02Speaker 16

Allison, set the amount. You bill, like, for county or something. Is that what? Are you adjusting that ever? I can't. I think you need to adjust that up.

1:00:03Speaker 3

Yeah, it needs to be 110.

1:00:05Speaker 6

And then we raised it about two years ago to 140. If it's a federal kid, it actually goes up to, I think, 220.

1:00:14Speaker 16

Oh, it needs to be 220. Maybe it's something to consider. Yeah.

1:00:22Speaker 17

Thank you, Alex. I appreciate it. Or 267.

1:00:31 – 1:00:48Speaker 10

Way to go, Bojack. Okay. West Porter Township Fire Protection District, Daniel Dalton, additional $40,000 to $44,300 of their mobile equipment appropriation to pay off remaining balance on engine loan. Are they here?

1:00:52Speaker 19

They don't want our money. They're just moving their money.

1:00:54Speaker 10

Yeah, they're moving their money. It's not ours.

1:01:00Speaker 19

I'll make a motion to approve. Second.

1:01:05Speaker 10

We have a motion and a second. Any discussion whatsoever?

1:01:11Speaker 16

I don't know. Parks operating fund was kind of parks money. We tabled that.

1:01:16Speaker 19

I'd like an explanation. And if you look at the next thing, additional equipment expenses for the next year. I don't have an explanation for that either. So I would table the next one personally.

1:01:28Speaker 6

I mean, I think if we're going to table it, I mean, I don't know. Table it all? Table both, yeah.

1:01:32Speaker 16

We should table everything. They're not here, they're not here. I'll withdraw.

1:01:36Speaker 19

We've gotten away from it.

1:01:37Speaker 10

I have a motion.

1:01:39Speaker 19

Withdraw my motion. Let's go in order.

1:01:40 – 1:01:55Speaker 10

Okay. I have a withdrawal of motion and a motion to table West Porter. Motion to table. We have a motion and a second. To table both. To table the motion. And any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call.

1:01:56Speaker 15

Revis. Yeah. Yes.

1:02:10Speaker 10

Porter County Sheriff Jeff Bellen and crew.

1:02:13Speaker 6

Table. Table. Immediate.

1:02:19 – 1:02:31Speaker 10

Any further discussion? No. Jail general fund, $18,000 to $11,300 overtime reduction in federal prisoner fund to cover cost of overtime for the remainder of the year.

1:02:32Speaker 19

What is reduction? You're just not getting as many federal prisoners right now?

1:02:36Speaker 1

No, we actually did a reduction of $18,000 in a different fund. It's further down on the list. We're taking it out of the Fed money and putting it into the general fund.

1:02:45Speaker 10

I'll make a motion to approve.

1:02:47Speaker 10

Motion and a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call. Rickner.

1:02:53Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Harris. Yes. Stone. Yes. Vazquez.

1:02:57Speaker 10

Yes. Zero. 59,000 from 11,100 salaries to 11,300 over time. Motion to approve the transfer.

1:03:05 – 1:03:21Speaker 10

Motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, same sign. Motion carries. Transfer $4,600.

1:03:21Speaker 6

Motion to approve. Second.

1:03:23 – 1:03:45Speaker 10

I have a motion and second for the furniture and fixtures over $100. Do we have any discussion? Hearing none. All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, same sign. Motion carries. Sheriff General Fund. Transfer $4,800 from $1,200 hourly to overtime. $9,400 from $1,400 mayor paid to $1,300 overtime.

1:03:46Speaker 19

Motion to approve. Second.

1:03:48 – 1:04:14Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, same sign. Hearing none, motion carries. I need, let's see, transfer 17,212.56 from 36100 maintenance agreement 39500, contractual services. Transfer needed to cover the increase of medical onsite services.

1:04:14Speaker 19

$15,000 more? Goodness. Motion to approve. Second.

1:04:19Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?

1:04:23Speaker 19

Next year, too? Higher?

1:04:24Speaker 10

Yep. I just have a curiosity.

1:04:28Speaker 6

Talk about it. It's like medical supplies.

1:04:32Speaker 10

That's what's primarily going up, medical supplies itself.

1:04:35Speaker 6

For the service. This one is all service. And aren't you guys looking into another? You're getting it.

1:04:41Speaker 18

Yeah, we're doing cost comparisons right now.

1:04:45Speaker 10

Okay. Any further discussion?

1:04:48 – 1:05:12Speaker 18

What's that? You can borrow our JDC on. Well, so ironically, that is a conversation we just had with one of the providers about she's not here to stop giving. Well, that's a conversation, right? So right now, that's a completely different conversation. building division, but that has been talked about. And we've mentioned to this group that you guys may want to get a cost on that.

1:05:12Speaker 6

Merged or to get sort of the same service at both.

1:05:15 – 1:05:38Speaker 18

Hmm. If you're out bidding, could you just ask what that cost would be? They would have to talk to JDC specifically, but we did with the one provider we just talked to, not who we currently have, but who we just talked to, we did bring up JDC in that conversation saying the county may want to have a... Can you talk to Ms. Cox if that conversation goes in?

1:05:39Speaker 19

Yeah, that'd be great. Yeah, if it benefits, if it saves, right, and you get, I'm not going to rush, but you know, there's some continuity.

1:05:47 – 1:06:16Speaker 10

Yeah, we still enter department cooperation last year. Be great to see it again this year. Yeah. Thank you. We had a motion in a second. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, same sign. Motion carries. Drug Task Force Fund additional $12,000 to other supplies. Appropriation needed to purchase safety shields. We're talking about plastic? Yep. Okay.

1:06:16Speaker 19

I'll take a motion to approve.

1:06:18Speaker 10

A motion and a second. Any further discussion? These are seizure funds?

1:06:23Speaker 19

Yep. I like the way you guys transferred and moved stuff around. No additionals right here. Thank you.

1:06:29Speaker 10

Yes, we thank you too. Thank you.

1:06:33Speaker 10

Roll call. Right there.

1:06:35Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

1:07:01Speaker 19

Sheriff Ballantyne, thank you. A motion to approve the reduction of 18,000. Oh, we got the federal. We still got to get our money.

1:07:08 – 1:07:28Speaker 10

Okay, let's get our money. I'll keep that. Okay. We have a federal prisoner DOC. Second. Reduction of 18,000 so Bozak can get his new toys. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Hearing none, roll call. That's good. Yes.

1:07:29Speaker 15

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

1:07:33 – 1:07:50Speaker 10

Federal Prisoner DOC General Fund, $20,000 from $1,100 salaries to $2,202 for uniforms and clothing, $10,000 from $1,100 salaries to $4,500 for equipment. Transfer needed to cover the cost of uniforms and new radios for jail staff.

1:07:50Speaker 19

I had a real quick question. We've done a couple transfers from salaries. Is salaries good for the end of the year? You're not going to need more? Motion to approve.

1:07:57Speaker 10

We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none. All in favor, signify by saying aye.

1:08:06Speaker 10

Opposed, same sign. Motion carries.

1:08:09 – 1:08:58Speaker 18

If I may, I would like to address the comp time report. Yes, sir. All right. Thank you for providing that. We see that. When you go to the jail and jail crew, on that. Our jail officers bank 60 hours, and this is based on a 60-hour bank, not a 40. And when you look through that list, we only have two jail officers that are over in that comp time in a total of eight hours. So I'm just wanting to point that out, that out of 65 employees, there's only two that are over, and the total is eight hours, just so you know. And then moving on to the merit side, Their bank is based at an 84-hour bank. What does that mean? Where you can have that many hours saved in the comp time, right?

1:08:58Speaker 19

Oh, you guys are allowed to save comp time hours up to 84?

1:09:01 – 1:09:24Speaker 18

Yes, yes. And so with the merit side... There's 73 employees on the merit side. It looks like there's only seven merit officers that are over, and the total is 33 in comp time. So I just want to point that out because it kind of looks different and higher than based on the rest of the county employees, but that's because of a higher bank.

1:09:24Speaker 19

What happens when they hit 84? Do you make them take it? Yep. Speaking of the comp time report, who else, what other departments are missing off it? I mean, just finding out tonight. Are there other?

1:09:35Speaker 15

It's courts. Courts don't use the right stuff as well. So, I mean.

1:09:39Speaker 19

It's not stuff we have to monitor. They don't have big issues. Or it is something we should be looking at.

1:09:44Speaker 15

we would have to kind of work through how to get that. Yeah. Okay. You have to work through that, but we'll make sure that we get that clarification out there.

1:09:51Speaker 19

I just don't want someone with $300 leaving and then we owe this money. Right. That's a big hit.

1:09:56 – 1:10:16Speaker 18

Well, yeah, and then we have to wait to hire them and hire the replacement and things like that. Okay. But I just wanted you to know that and have it clarified. It doesn't seem astronomical, but our people, our supervisors definitely do a good job at monitoring where they fit and to keep those below the standards. And we'll get you this report. Okay. I appreciate it. All right. Thanks, everybody.

1:10:16Speaker 19

Thank you. Did they catch a guy yet? Roseanne set up the cops left.

1:10:27 – 1:11:37Speaker 15

Second reading, please. The following adjustments to the 2026 budget have now been presented for you for your consideration. Under the general fund salary, $71,889. Salary reduction of $18,000. Retirement, an increase of $18,000. News and subscriptions, $25,000. Outlay, $35,000. Legal, $15,000. Power, $15,000. Building liability, $5,000. Now it's $25,000. Office supplies, $10,000. Other supplies, $2,000. Data processing equipment, $50,000. Insurance restoration fund, buildings and structures, $110,662.62. Data processing equipment, $1,229,421.10. Sales disclosure fund, contractual services, $36,508. CC, or communal bridge fund, contractual services, $2.4 million. Careful. First man's 100 dollars drug task force under supplies 12,000 veterans donation fund. Other charges $100. Soil and water conservation fund salaries $10,163.60. Fight 772 $77.52. Per 1138 dollars. Since Jim's brand other supplies 1000. 2nd breed. Motion to approve.

1:11:47Speaker 10

I have a motion and a second. Roll call, please. Andy Voska. Yes.

1:11:54Speaker 15

Michelle Harris. Yes. Andy Bozak. Yes. Jeremy Grievous. Yes. Greg Simp. Yes. Rick Nerla. Yes. Mike.

1:12:08Speaker 10

Motion carries. Thank you. Attorney's report.

1:12:13Speaker 9

Nothing to report. Happy to take questions. Happy to take questions.

1:12:17Speaker 10

What is the meaning of life? Okay.

1:12:21Speaker 9

I don't have the answer to that. Okay. Well, then.

1:12:25Speaker 10

We're going to see now. We have nothing there. Okay. Any other matters that may come to the properly to before the council?

1:12:36Speaker 19

Anyone? Well, we got the levy limits tax cap thing. You want to tackle that? We can bring up.

1:12:43Speaker 6

Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't see Ms. Natterway up.

1:12:46 – 1:13:52Speaker 5

Hi, Suna, Porter County Assessor. I just want to remind the public, everyone, from these storms we've had, there's a form available. It's called a Petition for Reassessment. It's a 137R. that any homeowner and property owner that experienced some damage, any damage that would reduce what they could typically sell their property for, they can apply or petition to the county assessor for a reassessment of their property. This is for some major structural damage. If you have some fascia that might be missing or that kind of thing, that wouldn't be something that would really reduce the value of your home. But if you have structural damage, fill out this form 137R It's available on our website. It's on the front page of our website, so it's super accessible. And you have one year from the date of the damage to apply for that. I know right now people aren't really thinking about next year's taxes, but it is something that's available to them.

1:13:52Speaker 6

Can you give an example, just so we all know, like what would be something that would be like a reasonable reason to apply?

1:13:59 – 1:14:22Speaker 5

Well, if a tree fell on your home, if you had major flooding in your basement and you had to tear out all your carpet and probably some of your drywall, that kind of thing, those are things that would definitely fit into our... Or if you had a pool and a... If a tree fell on the pool that... Or a deck or... Or your deck...

1:14:23Speaker 19

Do all these forms go to you or to like portage people? Do they do it through their portage assessors that all go through the county? It all goes through the county. Thank you.

1:14:32Speaker 6

Also on your social media page, like we can share it.

1:14:37 – 1:14:58Speaker 5

I could make that available to you. It's really on the front of our Porter County Assessor website. We added a banner, so it's right there and super accessible. There's also some at the front counter here, anyone who wanted to stop in to grab one. And, of course, we have them in our office. We can send them to you if you want to call and ask for it.

1:14:59Speaker 6

Yeah, maybe that information would be great as a post. then people can share it. I don't know if we can do that.

1:15:08 – 1:15:34Speaker 5

We did a PSA to the local radio stations, and I heard them a few times, which was wonderful because that gets the word out for people who are listening locally. But just share. Just share with your neighbors who you know might have damage to their homes. So that this opportunity doesn't slip away because it can reduce their assessment, which would reduce their property tax liability for next year.

1:15:36Speaker 19

Thank you. Thank you. Good. Good info.

1:15:40Speaker 10

Okay. We have any other?

1:15:42 – 1:19:29Speaker 27

Yeah, just one. Could I, I don't know if this would be an appropriate time to just say a couple things before we get into the next part of the agenda. But just for the record, I just wanted to give a shout out. of job well done to so many county workers, public safety, city and town workers, and their public safety, their street departments, city and town leadership, county leadership. I think that, you know, you read some, I mean, this was a heavy hit, the storm, countywide. Sometimes it's easy to criticize and be negative, unfortunately. But I think some people don't realize just how much work is going on behind the scenes with not just our county employees, but also city and town employees. And there are so many pieces working when something like this happens. And I guess I would just, and it's not just me, but talking to several other council members and just other people out there, just how grateful they were for the response that we had, I think as a county, I think it really, you know, for our sheriff's department, highway department facilities, our EMA, you know, had a chance to talk to Lance Bella and everything that was going on and, and, uh, You know, the collaboration, the communication that goes on, again, some people just don't realize. I know there's a lot of frustration with some individuals with loss of power and damage. But, you know, I guess it's an opportunity. I've had the opportunity to be you know, one of the foot soldiers during a significant incident and also on the administrative side. And I think for something that doesn't happen often, I think that we did very well as a county. And I just wanted to put that out there that I think there was a lot more positive good work that was done than maybe areas that we can improve on. And there's always room for improvement. And I think we'll have an opportunity to review that at some time. But anyway, I just wanted to put it out there for the record Again, you know, sometimes it's easy to sit back, no risk in complaining and being negative. But the individuals who are out there doing the work, I think that they did an outstanding job. And again, not just unincorporated Port County workers, but, you know, cities and towns, Valville, Portage, Chesterton, you know, the Pognon Dunes, Beverly Shores, I mean, all across the board. And even with limited resources, they did the best they could And kind of going back to the beginning of our meeting, I think Councilman Stone, but whatever we can do as a county when it comes time financially to assist, I think that we really take the opportunity to look hard at somehow being able to do that, to assist these other municipalities. And anyway, job well done. And thank you. Hopefully we don't have to deal with anything like this anytime soon, but I feel that we are as prepared as any county in the state.

1:19:29 – 1:19:51Speaker 17

It was actually nice for me. just neighbors helping neighbors, right? I mean, you get out there and within three hours, you have people with chainsaws clearing somebody's driveway because they have a bent back or something. So that's what it's all about. And that's why Porter County is a great county to live in, so.

1:19:52 – 1:20:17Speaker 27

Well, one of the pillars of quality of life pillars, I mean, you talk about public safety, parks, roads, Faith based community strengths of quality of life are one of those pillars of volunteerism. I think that really came to the forefront, really showed the people that came out and volunteered again as a credit to the quality of life and the culture that we have in Porter County.

1:20:20Speaker 6

Steve, you did an excellent job. I know, but you did, I mean. Fantastic job.

1:20:30 – 1:21:02Speaker 10

As I mentioned before, Carrie was, she called me that she was concerned about some funding, but it was, I said, I'll look into it. It's not my area, but I looked into it and gave her an answer. And the whole time, each time I talked to her, when she called me and I called her back, you could hear the roar of the payload that she was operating. And how many hours were just out of curiosity were you on that thing? Just so you know, we're not paying you for two jobs. I just wanted to make that clear. As an operator.

1:21:04Speaker 25

The team effort brings me to tears.

1:21:11Speaker 10

At the meeting, I could see the smile on your face knowing that things were getting done. Thank you, Carrie.

1:21:16Speaker 17

Did you say your budget for the shot?

1:21:18 – 1:21:46Speaker 25

The shot after the second storm. The growth has been ground twice, so we've exceeded our ranking budget, but We're making room. I'm telling you, this has been a huge effort. The Valparaiso team, the county highway. I have a joke. I think every elected official has heard this. I might have a wake-up call from the assistant director of the highway department every storm warning. Hey, where am I going? And that's at 5.30 a.m. when the county comes into sight.

1:21:47 – 1:22:03Speaker 10

You mentioned Boone Grove, and that brings to me something that South County, that some of the areas are still cleaning up, if I'm not mistaken. Yeah. Dave, out your way. There's some people cleaning up, correct, with wood debris, and that's going to be picked up as well, is it not?

1:22:04Speaker 25

I cannot confirm that because of the highway, but we are working on a plan. We are working on a plan.

1:22:11Speaker 10

Okay. Polar already took off? Okay.

1:22:14Speaker 17

Always. I was told .

1:22:17Speaker 10

Mr. Jabel, could you add anything to that? Thank you, sir.

1:22:22Speaker 25

Thank you. No pressure, Jabel.

1:22:24 – 1:23:13Speaker 10

Yeah. Thank you. Moving right along. We have another matter that must come before us is the must system, the municipal unified strategic task force. I don't know how many of you got your, well, you've got your orange folder there. A lot of the materials, some of you have been in meetings already with people, have a little bit under better understanding of this. And by what I understand this, and correct me if I'm wrong, that we have to have someone who's speaking for us. In other words, that individual does not have the final say so, but they will go according to what this council so decides to do. So, um, and your voice, and that's primarily what you're doing there. The other thing is, we must vote on to be into this must system.

1:23:13Speaker 19

We have to create it. Correct.

1:23:14Speaker 10

We have to create it. That is correct.

1:23:16Speaker 19

To create it and then appoint an important individual is correct.

1:23:20 – 1:23:52Speaker 10

And 1 of the things that we had talked about with some of the other municipalities is I had had discussions. I know Michelle has had to. And possibly read that we, um. One of the questions is bringing in Baker Tilly for additional help in regards to this for the financial costs and so on. And my question to Steve Quinn actually was, can we pair this out in regards to the counties not bearing the full brunt of the cost of this? And I believe your answer was something we could look into. Is that not correct, sir? So, yeah, everything would help.

1:23:52Speaker 19

And I know who is Steve? I see who he is, but I don't know where he's from. Okay, thank you. Steve, would you raise your hand? There you go.

1:24:01 – 1:24:20Speaker 10

They kept talking about you. Steve Poulos, to be exact. And so, you know, one of the things that I would like to suggest that right after this meeting that we come together, and get a date going right at the back. Right. And then let's just go ahead and get something done.

1:24:21Speaker 19

Okay, so. I have a question about the must committee.

1:24:24Speaker 19

So this committee can raise a tax, but it's non-binding from what I'm being told?

1:24:30Speaker 10

It must be unanimous.

1:24:31Speaker 19

This is a question for you.

1:24:33 – 1:25:13Speaker 9

Yep. So first step, first thing is if the council has to decide, A, do we want to form the must committee? They don't have to. It's not compulsory. It's permissive. To answer your question, every single county in the state has the opportunity by this new legislation codified at 6-3.6-3-13 to form this committee. So what happens is, and it must be formed on or before October 1 of this year, and the report from what we find, the committee, needs to be submitted in advance of December 1 to DLTF. So it's tight timelines.

1:25:14 – 1:25:50Speaker 9

So what happens is every single county has the opportunity to create one. If they create one and they come up with a plan in terms of lit as far as maximum rate and the distribution plan, that plan has to be unanimous amongst all the municipalities within the county. That gets sent to DLGF. Every single county sends it to DLGF. DLGF takes that, gives that to the Indiana Legislative Council. And then they take that into consideration for future legislation. It's a suggestion.

1:25:50Speaker 6

So who are considered the municipalities in Porter County?

1:25:55Speaker 6

Who? Valparaiso is. Who are the other municipalities?

1:25:59Speaker 9

Okay. Valparaiso. Someone help me here.

1:26:06Speaker 19

Yeah. So like Burns Harbor says the small wouldn't be on this board.

1:26:12 – 1:26:24Speaker 10

Hebron, okay. You guys don't need 20, 30 cents as they will be, but they are being put on there for practicality purposes, if I'm not mistaken. Okay, thank you.

1:26:24Speaker 6

Yeah, that's what I had been told. So it's like Portage, Valparaiso, Hebron.

1:26:31Speaker 6

No. What? Chesterton and Porter.

1:26:34Speaker 10

Yeah, Chesterton. Okay. And Porter's got the 3,700? Porter?

1:26:38Speaker 17

Porter? And affordable towns would have to take part in this, correct?

1:26:42 – 1:27:05Speaker 9

Yes, they all have to take part. And in order to submit a plan to DLGF, there has to be unanimous agreement amongst all of those entities in terms of what the max rate is going to be and what the distribution is going to be. If not, then it doesn't get sent and not considered. Even if it gets sent and considered, it is not a binding thing. It's just something that they consider for future legislation in 2017.

1:27:06Speaker 10

If I'm not mistaken, this is voted on yearly?

1:27:10 – 1:27:29Speaker 9

Negative. Negative. It's just, it closes December 1st because they're going to take it into consideration for future legislation, essentially going into fact into 29. So they'll take it up in the 27 session, the legislative council, and then they'll decide are we going to make this.

1:27:29Speaker 19

So we're just making suggestions.

1:27:33Speaker 6

Of what we would like to see happen in our county.

1:27:35 – 1:27:49Speaker 9

It would seem strange to me, I guess I would say, that if those suggestions weren't heard. They created the statute for a reason. I can't say that's absolutely what's going to happen.

1:27:50Speaker 19

So if this must group decides to raise lit, the state would raise lit based on their approval or it would come back to us as a council to do it?

1:28:00 – 1:28:20Speaker 9

It would be, they would say, okay, your max, in the scenario where you've submitted your report and we agree, like, hey, this is going to be a max rate in our distribution agreement amongst the entities, the state would say, okay, do that. So it's like spot legislation. So it could be by? It could be. Okay. But...

1:28:21 – 1:28:40Speaker 6

I think that the overall goal of the Musk Committee is when we are taking the different entities who will have the opportunity to raise their own, is that we are taking into consideration Our taxpayers and everybody isn't just raising independently. We're working as a team for the betterment of the community.

1:28:41Speaker 19

So about getting taxed twice while some of that lives in the county is just getting a lot.

1:28:45 – 1:29:00Speaker 16

It's necessarily we're not making we're just recommending one person from this is going to join with others and send a recommendation down. But it's just going down. Right. Who knows what state legislators do?

1:29:00Speaker 19

But, like, the small towns that are really getting affected don't even get a voice on this.

1:29:05Speaker 10

Neither do townships, for that matter, that don't have a township.

1:29:11Speaker 9

Or fire protection territory.

1:29:13Speaker 19

Schools, yeah.

1:29:16 – 1:29:51Speaker 19

Not really. Sounds like the old system worked. Yeah, it sure does. Now, if we create this must board and say red is our representative, whoever it is. You guys initially said that he would have to vote. We instructed him to. So we would then have to take a vote. When Red went, just using you as an example again, you go to this meeting, you find out they want to raise taxes. This group wants to raise it by 0.10. Then you'd come to us. We'd vote. And then you'd go back and give our voice. Is that how you operate it? Right.

1:29:51Speaker 9

Not entirely clear to me that that is the case.

1:29:54Speaker 19

Right. The person that we appoint to that board can make a decision. That's what I think. Without our approval. That's what I think. That's okay.

1:30:02Speaker 6

I don't. Okay.

1:30:02Speaker 19

No, I get it. Most people are going to ask, but.

1:30:07Speaker 10

So that individual cannot make on their own. No, he could. He could. So.

1:30:13Speaker 6

Come on up. Do you have a question or are you going to say something?

1:30:22Speaker 19

But you got to identify yourself again for the recording.

1:30:27Speaker 10

And we have someone to join you. I take it.

1:30:33 – 1:31:55Speaker 2

So Steve Pulo, City Administrator for the City of Valparaiso. I don't want to just simplify this, but to me, I try to look at it simply for everyone. I think the decision eventually needs to be made. Do we want a countywide tax or do we want individual municipalities to do what they want to do? I think that makes things very problematic. If we can come together and come up with a proposal that's comprehensive, that's for the benefit not only for the municipalities, but also makes the county and the municipalities whole based on local income tax. In my mind, that's the goal. As far as what happens after December 1st, I mean, they must change their minds at times because, frankly, it's for budget purposes. It needs to be established in 29 and then happen in 2030 because they just moved it a year if I'm correct. We hosted a meeting on July 23rd with all the clerk treasurers in the county. And there is a, from my understanding, there is a. a positive participation as far as everyone wants to see this happen and by engaging baker tilly they can create the model not only for the county but also for the individual municipalities and then from there you can make a determination of what those percentages need to be bless you

1:31:59Speaker 19

That makes sense. So do we need them? What do we need? Well, just for clarification. Hold on. We got a person that wants to speak too.

1:32:08 – 1:33:31Speaker 3

I'm the Town Council President of the Township of Burns Harbor and the Ex Officio Clerk-Treasurer. I'm here representing my community. My understanding of the impact of SEA-1 is that LIT, the local income tax collected by the city, is scheduled to end on December 31st, 2028. The purpose is to offset tax caps and reductions placed on local property taxes by giving counties and municipalities alternative ways to fund operations. We received $250,000 that is support to our operations. We count on this revenue supplement for the operating budgets of our police, fire, street, building, and park departments. I am concerned about our ability to maintain our operations if we no longer receive this. My understanding is when the state no longer collects it and disperses LIT, we are reliant on the county council to enact a LIT tax for towns under 3,500. So I'm here tonight asking you to... select someone to be your must representative and work with everyone to determine what this tax will be that is enacted. It is not a new tax. The lit tax that the state collects will be stopped and then we can pick it up as a county. Otherwise, we will lose 250,000 and Porter County itself received 41 million last year. So without it, we all stand by this.

1:33:32 – 1:34:08Speaker 2

Thank you. And if I may, as the model is built, the importance of having everybody on board is critical because if you have one or two communities not participate, then that adjusts the model as far as the percentages are concerned. So engaging Baker Tilly to facilitate this for us countywide, in my mind, makes sense because they understand the rules, they understand the regulations, they can facilitate the meetings, provide the advertisements, and then you know, build the model for everyone for the conversation to happen.

1:34:09 – 1:34:29Speaker 19

But we could create the must and then in another year, like if we decided to do this must group and then we just did a countywide tax instead of individual municipalities doing their own. So it's spread across more people. But at that point, Valpo in the next year or two could enact their own, correct? Or is this must going to be the rule for how we're going to do it?

1:34:30Speaker 9

Yeah. So it's assuming that creates that spot legislation, that would be the one.

1:34:36Speaker 19

Yes. Okay. Yes. I just don't want to CSB double tag, just cause a problem in a couple.

1:34:41Speaker 9

So it's, it's, yeah. Okay. So there'll be a statutory formula if you don't.

1:34:47Speaker 2

And, and in essence, the model's important to look at. Does it make it everyone a whole in the County? And what is the net impact on the taxpayers?

1:34:58 – 1:35:11Speaker 10

And just to be totally clear, one person from this council, once they are appointed, regardless of meeting with us or not, if they say, let's do X, Y, Z amount, that's gospel?

1:35:11Speaker 19

Well, could we make our appointment with the motion that they'd have to come back and get our... So...

1:35:18 – 1:35:58Speaker 17

just our figurehead you have to appoint a representative vote i mean okay you can't make that representative vote the way the group wants i don't think so okay so what exactly and i understand collaboration between the cities and the towns and the council to maybe ultimately have one for say and then you know we distribute to the towns and cities but what was the talk of you know in 2028 they drop off we can actually lower our lit rate for people to take the leaf and then the towns and cities would be able to vote on nerves their own correct

1:36:00Speaker 2

Well, if you don't do a countywide tax, then, yes, the county would do their own and then the municipalities.

1:36:07Speaker 17

Yeah, on their own to raise up to like 1.5 or something like that.

1:36:11 – 1:36:28Speaker 2

Yeah, there's ratios and maximum thresholds of what everyone can do. But, you know, in my opinion, no. The danger with that is how does that affect the taxpayer? And are we doing double taxation potentially if we don't look at the model correctly?

1:36:28Speaker 6

Say that again? Yes, we are. Yeah. Yeah.

1:36:30Speaker 16

Are they going to make 90?

1:36:34Speaker 19

Yeah, but we're also, you got to look at it this way. We're distributing taxes from down south to pay for stuff up north. I mean, they could say it the other way too. I would agree with your statement, but.

1:36:44Speaker 16

I mean, is the state going to look at 92 different models?

1:36:49 – 1:37:17Speaker 2

Well, I don't want to speak for the DLGF, but I think they want to see within the state how many deliveries they're going to get by December 1st of what counties are working with their local municipalities. And if the stack is thin, who knows what may happen. But if the stack is thicker, maybe we'll see some progress. So after December 1st, I mean, I can't tell you what may happen.

1:37:23Speaker 27

Do we need a motion to move forward with this? I think this is the, this is a, we definitely need them.

1:37:29 – 1:37:44Speaker 10

Can I get a motion to convene for the must system? I make a motion. I have a motion. Second. And a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, I need a roll call, please.

1:37:44 – 1:37:55Speaker 15

Andy Bozak. Yes. Jeremy, do this now. Greg Sims. Yes. Mike Rickner. Yes. Andy Vasquez. Yes. Redstone. Yes. Michelle Harris. Yes.

1:37:58Speaker 10

Now we've got to figure out a representative. Yes. I want Jeremy to be that one.

1:38:03Speaker 19

That's the guy I want. The tough part is, you know,

1:38:13 – 1:38:33Speaker 17

know just getting the one person i i don't like that i don't like that part of of you know we're all up here are we not allowed to attend the meetings so so yeah so it's subject to it's a public meeting yes so i don't think so if we had if we had all seven council members there that's not illegal

1:38:34Speaker 10

That's a public meeting. Okay. Everyone should go. Yes. But once again, the concern is that that one individual holds on. Yeah, but this is.

1:38:43Speaker 27

You never can tell. Hey, look, I don't know if I say that you sit up here and we can't change that.

1:38:50 – 1:39:06Speaker 27

This is what these are the cards that the state has given us. It doesn't make, we can go say we don't like it all day long. We need to participate and it's by state statute and this person is our representative. I don't know how much more we need to talk about it.

1:39:06 – 1:39:17Speaker 9

Agreed. The statute is clear that it is one representative from the county council and each city and town fiscal officer in the committee to negotiate and establish the support for the list and distribution.

1:39:19Speaker 27

We can sit up here all day long and say what we don't or don't like, but let's move forward on it.

1:39:28Speaker 10

So can I entertain a motion for picking a member? We have nominations.

1:39:33Speaker 27

Michelle, you want to do it? I nominate Michelle Harris. I nominate Jeremy Rivas.

1:39:39 – 1:39:51Speaker 19

You're nominating somebody who didn't even vote for it. That's why I voted for it. That's why I nominated him. They're conservatively thinking. I mean, this group is able to raise taxes. We need to be conservative. I nominate Michelle Harris.

1:39:52Speaker 10

I have a motion to nominate Michelle Harris.

1:39:55Speaker 27

Do I get a second?

1:39:57 – 1:40:20Speaker 10

Okay, I also have a motion to nominate Jeremy Rivas. Do I get a second? Second. Okay. So I believe we take a vote, do we not? Yeah. Okay. This is by roll call. Is there any other nominations? Hearing none, nominations are closed.

1:40:21Speaker 11

You will do a roll call by voting by mentioning the name of the individual.

1:40:26 – 1:40:38Speaker 10

who you want to support, throw your support behind to be the voice of the county council. Roll call, please.

1:40:40Speaker 19

Jeremy Rivas. Michelle Harris.

1:40:42Speaker 6

Michelle Harris.

1:40:45Speaker 15

Michelle. Andy Bosman.

1:40:57Speaker 15

Mike Brickner. Harris. Greg Simms.

1:41:03Speaker 15

Jeremy Rivas. I'll abstain.

1:41:09Speaker 19

Jeremy's been on this council for a long time, understands the budget. I think he'd be very helpful on that.

1:41:13Speaker 6

My only concern is he's not here next year.

1:41:16Speaker 19

It doesn't matter. He's not going to leave it. Don't make a good decision if you're not going to be here next year. He's not going to be here. He's got the most experience.

1:41:21Speaker 6

I'm not saying that, but I'm saying that. That's exactly what you're saying.

1:41:24Speaker 19

He's got the most experience. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. Followed by me.

1:41:29Speaker 17

I'm stunned to be asked what's going on.

1:41:32 – 1:41:46Speaker 6

Hold on a second. I have a question. Adam, if this committee, let's say everything gets approved with the DJLF and this committee has to meet on future occasions, do we just nominate someone new? to be the representative then?

1:41:47Speaker 9

Well, but the report has to be submitted prior to 12-1.

1:41:52Speaker 6

But let's say there's not going to be any work after December 1st whatsoever.

1:41:57Speaker 9

That's a wrap because then it goes to legislative council. It's a wrap.

1:42:03Speaker 6

I feel like that's just never how it works.

1:42:06 – 1:42:20Speaker 9

And they could change it. But yes, to answer your question, in that event, you would have to have an active county council member if they changed the statute and said, we're going to roll the must out for longer to do X, Y, or Z.

1:42:20Speaker 19

Now that we've created the must, who's in charge of the must, the executive, to set the agenda, to set the meeting, to contact the cities and towns? How does that work?

1:42:29Speaker 10

Well, we still need a representative. That's all there is to it.

1:42:31Speaker 19

We already have a 3-3 tie. Oh, it was 3-3. Oh.

1:42:36Speaker 10

With an abstain.

1:42:37Speaker 19

Revis, nice move. But, okay, so... Revis, do you want it?

1:42:43Speaker 17

Hey, this is a joke, man. Come on. This is something serious. Cities and towns, we need to get...

1:42:49Speaker 19

I didn't realize he abstained.

1:42:50 – 1:43:06Speaker 17

This is something that we need to get figured out as a community. And listen, I support Jeremy's non, the way he, you know, is very conservative. I'm a very conservative person as well. Okay. But he's not going to be here next year. We have to nominate somebody, in my opinion, that's going to be here, have a vested interest.

1:43:07 – 1:43:37Speaker 26

And he's a member of this community. It's a vested interest. And he's also the most veteran person on this council. He's got more experience than almost all of us put together. So what better person, he's seen a whole bunch of things ups and downs from this county. So I think, and he's been a member of this community and he knows all these other people. When you're sitting down with a group of other people, why not have somebody there that understands who they are, has communicated with them, and is a likable person?

1:43:37 – 1:44:07Speaker 27

Well, with all due respect, to Jeremy, there's not any attack on Jeremy at all. But, you know, this is a representation of our council. And, you know, Jeremy, I respect his vote. I don't even know if he wants to be there. Doesn't he want to? participate in the program to begin with because of the vote, I would assume. And again, no disrespect. That's his personal choice. But I don't understand how we can. Anyway.

1:44:07Speaker 10

Let me interrupt. Auditor's office. Auditor's office. May I ask you a question? Our attorney. Am I allowed to change my vote? Am I allowed to change my vote?

1:44:17Speaker 17

Let's re-vote. Let's re-vote. I'll throw my hat in the ring if that's more palatable or whatever.

1:44:23Speaker 19

Let's remake the motion for Michelle and re-vote.

1:44:26Speaker 10

Okay, we have a motion for Michelle.

1:44:29Speaker 9

No, can't do that? We want to reopen nominations here because technically when there was a tie then the motion failed.

1:44:35Speaker 10

Okay, so can I get a nomination for speaker for the system?

1:44:41Speaker 17

I make a nomination for Michelle Harris.

1:44:43Speaker 10

I have a motion for Michelle. Do I have a second?

1:44:45Speaker 9

Well, we want to see if there's any other nominations.

1:44:47Speaker 10

Any other nominations?

1:44:53Speaker 15

Any other nominations? Jeremy Rivas.

1:44:55Speaker 10

Jeremy Rivas. Can I get a second?

1:45:03Speaker 10

No seconds. Lack of a second. It fails. Michelle? Michelle?

1:45:07Speaker 19

Do we have a second for Michelle? Yes.

1:45:10Speaker 10

Yes. So we have a motion for Michelle, first and second. Roll call, please.

1:45:18Speaker 19

Andy Vasquez. Yes. Michelle or Jeremy?

1:45:23Speaker 19

She's the only one that got the second. Redstone. Yes, Michelle.

1:45:28Speaker 15

Michelle Barris.

1:45:31Speaker 15

Andy Bozak. Yes. Bozak. Yes. Jeremy. No. Greg Simms. No. Mike Brickner. Harris.

1:45:43Speaker 17

President, somebody out in the audience that didn't get a chance to speak.

1:45:46Speaker 19

Well, that will.

1:45:48 – 1:45:59Speaker 19

Hold on. I still have my next question, though. What do we do once now? Who's in charge? Is Michelle the executor of this? She's got to schedule a meeting, get people together. What's the next step, Steve? Okay.

1:46:00 – 1:46:35Speaker 2

yeah so so if if the council as as a convener now if you choose to engage baker tilly they can provide the scope of services to arrange for all those meetings and all the advertisement and the requirements and to provide that final report. I think the discussion that you and I had, Mr. Vazquez, is how to equitably share those costs with all the municipalities in the county. And I think that is what we need to determine as part of that first meeting that we have with our treasurers and Baker Tilly and your representative.

1:46:35Speaker 10

I think one of the things that we had talked about was by percentage of population, which would only seem to be quite actually fair and equitable for everybody concerned.

1:46:45 – 1:47:01Speaker 2

And then the question is, at that meeting, do you want one contract that's managed by the county and the municipalities reimburse the county, or do you want 10 to 12 separate contracts? I think for simplicity purposes, you make one contract, but that's yet to be determined.

1:47:08Speaker 10

Any other discussion?

1:47:13Speaker 19

No, just keep, please keep us in the loop on when those are.

1:47:15Speaker 6

You guys can all come.

1:47:16Speaker 19

No, that's what I want to know, when they are.

1:47:18Speaker 19

I asked when the meeting was.

1:47:19Speaker 6

It's going to be, you're the first person calling. I'm by picking you up. Okay.

1:47:28Speaker 17

Mr. Cotton. Mr. Cotton did want to say something previous before, so I just wanted to make sure that.

1:47:34Speaker 10

Hey, would you come up, sir? Your name, sir.

1:47:43 – 1:48:26Speaker 11

Yeah, my name is Robert Cotton, city councilor for Brazil. And I just had a, I have the impression that you guys don't believe that you can consult with the representative, whoever you choose to represent. There's nothing that would preempt the must representative from consulting with this body, even as you go sequentially into subsequent meetings and or special meetings, if in fact you would like to do that. We have a budget committee. And I'm certain that there will be discussion as that is ongoing. But I wanted to make certain because the emphasis seemed to be that this is responsibility given to one person without consultation of the body.

1:48:27 – 1:48:50Speaker 9

am i am i mistaken or yeah no i i think the question was could that one person could could this council say we will authorize this person to vote in this way in this way only but that you cannot it was more of a question of yeah what if the person didn't like our patient went the other way we all know we can talk outside i think yeah definitely thank you mr cotton there's a

1:49:04 – 1:49:29Speaker 11

Communication is key, and Porter County wants to light the way or shine bright in the context of this entire new experience. So the leadership from the county, our largest and most prominent body, I would expect nothing less but then to find ways to congeal around making us represent as I think we are. So thank you very much.

1:49:30Speaker 10

Thank you, sir, for your comment. Any further discussion?

1:49:39Speaker 19

Can you come talk in the mic?

1:49:42Speaker 10

Are you representing a community like the leader or can you hold a still public discussion?

1:49:49Speaker 23

I'm representing the city of Portage and the clerk treasurer.

1:49:53 – 1:51:17Speaker 23

Okay. I would like any clerk treasurer in this room, would you guys please stand up please? Okay, we came here because we were informed about the meeting and we just wanted to make sure that someone was going to be a representative from the county council. I totally appreciate it and I'm looking forward to meeting with Michelle and her giving you guys the feedback. It's not going to be a secretive meeting like Steve said. We've met before already. It's going to be open to the public so anybody can attend. something that the legislators are going to look at. It's not anything etched in stone. They're going to make the final decisions on what's going to happen. And if the county can come together with the municipality in that county, it's going to look a lot better. And that's what we're looking at because there are going to be municipalities that can basically go bankrupt if we don't stay within the county jurisdiction as far as the county passing of county-wide lit. And that's what we're looking at as far as the city of Portage is. I think Balboa's looking at it. Steve, correct me if I'm wrong, that's the whole intent of having this must-meet and getting our input from Porter County to the legislators. Thank you.

1:51:18Speaker 10

Thank you. Anyone else? Any other trustee? Any further discussion on this?

1:51:26Speaker 16

No, let's just make sense of the problem created by this. Yeah, we all agree.

1:51:30Speaker 10

100%. I think there's no disagreement, I think, by anybody up here.

1:51:34Speaker 6

100%. I also think this council worked really hard last year to make sure that taxes... Yeah.

1:51:43Speaker 10

Extremely hard.

1:51:45Speaker 17

Yes, we did. Yeah.

1:51:48Speaker 10

Any further discussion?

1:51:51Speaker 17

Yeah, and to that, I'll go ahead and I'll say...

1:51:54Speaker 10

Okay. There is no further discussion. Meeting is public.

1:52:03Speaker 11

I'm going public, but we have to go into recess for public. Anything from?

1:52:06 – 1:52:28Speaker 10

No. Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. We will stand in recess for public discussion. Anyone have any comment for public discussion, please come forward. Second call. Anyone for public discussion?

1:52:28Speaker 19

They're coming up.

1:52:30Speaker 10

Okay. I'll wait right here for you. You're very much welcome. Please state your name.

1:52:38Speaker 19

Normally we've got a mic over there too, but it's missing today.

1:52:43 – 1:55:48Speaker 21

My name is Jolie Storbeck and I live here in Valparaiso. I am here as a founding and co-chair of the National Organization for Women's Disability Accessibility Caucus. as a person with a disability and a paid staff member for Everybody Counts, which is the independent living center that serves both Lake and Porter counties. And I am here to talk about the recent death, July 4th. I have my little notes here. The recent death over the Fourth of July weekend of Mr. Gene Rush, who was in custody at Porter County Jail. And I'm calling on the council to conduct a thorough impartial investigation into Mr. Rush's death and the treatment of all people with disabilities held in the Porter County Jail. driving while suspended should not carry a death sentence and every single person who who every single person whether they have a chronic health condition a cognitive or intellectual disability a sensory disability or mobility disability deserves to be treated with basic human dignity A panel including medical professionals, disability rights advocates, and civil rights attorneys can and should investigate the protocols in place to implement policies for ensuring the safety and dignity of people with disabilities in accordance with Section 504, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Policies, and I'm sure they exist, but policies that sit in manuals on a shelf that staff are not trained to implement properly are less than worthless. Mr. Rush should be alive today, but he is not. The Council can and should take immediate action to ensure that no one else ever dies in our jail or on our streets because they have disabilities or medical conditions. No one should be treated as less than or dismissed in any way when they complain about a medical condition. Every deputy and civilian staff member should have the tools to treat everyone with the dignity they deserve, be they deaf or hearing impaired, autistic, nonverbal, or have a tracheostomy. Education and training programs are available, many at no cost, by agencies like Everybody Counts that I work for. the state and federally funded independent living center for our area. I implore you to take advantage of the resources that are available and do everything in your power as our county council to prevent another tragedy. Thank you.

1:55:57Speaker 10

And state your name, please.

1:55:58Speaker 22

Thank you. I don't think this is on.

1:56:01Speaker 19

You got to talk loud. Okay.

1:56:04Speaker 22

Usually people tell me to talk loud.

1:56:07Speaker 10

Okay. State your name, please.

1:56:08 – 1:58:54Speaker 22

Sure. My name is Teresa Torres. I'm the director of Everybody Counts. That's a state and federally funded disability rights center that serves Lake and Porter County since 1986. I'm here for two reasons. First, I would like you to know that our agency is receiving, taking referrals of individuals with disabilities and or senior citizens who have been unable to access physically sites for distribution of goods, foods, or services. Our agency is providing deliveries to those individuals. So please contact us and let other local referral, let local providers of those services know to contact us either at 219-769-5055 or info at everybodycomes.org. Those referrals, we're open for those immediately. In addition, I'd like to share that I too am horrified and outraged about the recent violation of a man's civil and human rights, which led to his unnecessary death in the Porter County Jail. The Americans with Disabilities Act is federal law which mandates the provision of reasonable accommodations. In this case, that law was disregarded, common decency was ignored, and medical needs were ignored. As a result, a man died. I urge you, as Porter County Council, to take steps to ensure that this kind of travesty never occurs again on your watch. As an independent investigation must be conducted, accountability must be taken, all relevant staff must begin, must receive full training to be sure that they understand the need to and how to treat people with disabilities, with all kinds of disabilities, with disability and respect. If they can't recognize what common decency demands, at least they need to know what the law requires. Our agency has provided ADA disability awareness and sensitivity training through the Lake County Sheriff's Department in the past at no cost. And we are available as you move forward to write this form to also be of assistance. Thank you.

1:58:56Speaker 10

You're welcome. Any further comments?

1:59:03Speaker 19

Are you guys also presenting to the commissioners? Because they're the ones that actually oversee that. We're the financial arm of the government, too.

1:59:09Speaker 22

Absolutely. Sure.

1:59:10Speaker 19

Okay. I just wanted to make sure you guys make them aware as well.

1:59:13Speaker 22

Certainly. Thank you. Just because we just moved into beyond working with people that we serve directly, we're just moving in to make you.

1:59:23Speaker 19

additional training. That's great. Yeah, talk to them, please, too. Thank you very much.

1:59:33Speaker 10

Yeah, Mr. Cotton, please.

1:59:35 – 2:00:43Speaker 11

And, you know, I generally will call and speak to you guys individually. I haven't been able to get a call back from some of you guys. I spoke to Andy here more recently and saw Mike in the store. I probably could have asked this question to you then, but I did just dawned on me tonight. that someone had asked me with respect to our cooperative disposition towards ICE detainees, that there is perhaps a cost associated with people who are released from some type of civil offense and then detained in lieu of a collection by the ICE agents. I'm not certain to what extent Numbers of people have been caught up into that. But there is an expense that we as taxpayers assume. with the additional time that we might house folks in lieu of a pickup for mice. Isn't that federal money that we get paid for? I'm not certain. I'm trying to figure it out.

2:00:44Speaker 19

I don't know for sure either, but I think we get money for that. I'll have to make a share.

2:00:48 – 2:01:15Speaker 11

I'm trying to figure out and quantify what expense that is to the taxpayers, particularly with respect to health issues that was mentioned sometimes if a person is there may be additional expenses. But it's certainly something that very, you know, pecuniary or financially sharp guys would want to know. And I would hope that that would be something that could be made available to me. Thank you. Have a good night. Thank you.

2:01:17Speaker 10

Anyone else? Going once. Anyone else? Second call? Public comment?

2:01:28Speaker 19

Why do you wait the second call?

2:01:32Speaker 10

Please state your name.

2:01:34Speaker 5

I just want a better understanding. John Miller, Valparaiso. I just want a better understanding. Is there going to be an MOU for the test?

2:01:42Speaker 7

Because, I mean, if the county raises a lit, and the cities can raise the lit, is there going to be an MOU?

2:01:52 – 2:02:08Speaker 19

Well, that was one of the questions I had asked, that they can't do that once we come to this agreement is the hope, correct? that once we come to an agreement in this must committee, And it gets approved and gets pushed back down to us. The cities and towns aren't going to be able to raise it without, I assume, getting back together.

2:02:10 – 2:02:22Speaker 9

They can't raise their own. It would be set at the rate that it's set at and distributed pursuant to that agreement. So it's the rate plus the distribution. You wouldn't be able to double dip if that answers your question.

2:02:23Speaker 19

That's what I wanted to make sure, too. It's important that if the new mayor gets in, he's like, let's just raise it.

2:02:28Speaker 7

Okay, thank you.

2:02:38 – 2:02:56Speaker 10

Anyone else? First call. Anyone else? Public speaking? Second call. Anyone else? Third and final call. Public comment? Public comment is closed.

2:02:57Speaker 19

Motion to adjourn.

2:02:58Speaker 10

We have a motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor, say aye. Aye. The ayes have it. Thank you.

2:03:13Speaker 19

Joy, I noticed.

2:03:15Speaker 22

Can we do it next month or no?

2:03:27Speaker 23

Yeah, it wouldn't even go into fact until 29. I guess we're all going to jail.

2:03:49 – 2:04:17Speaker 9

So just remember that the must is it's just every single county in the state can send in, hey, we have this recommendation for our county. And then the legislative council does whatever they do with that. They either adopt it, amend it, or throw it in the garbage. Then it would just revert to a statutory rate that already exists. All right? You're welcome.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.