Cable Advisory Committee - public_hearing
The Pittsburgh City Council's Cable Advisory Committee held a public hearing to discuss Bill 0544, which proposes a new tax and licensing system for mechanical amusement devices. The bill aims to create a new revenue source for the city, potentially generating $2-3 million, especially if the state does not act on regulating skill games.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Cable Advisory Committee
- Meeting Type
- Cable Advisory Committee
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Meeting Date
- June 23, 2026
Transcript
6 sections
Good afternoon, and welcome to Pittsburgh City Council's cablecast public hearing for Tuesday, June 23, 2026, relative to Bill 0544. I'm Councilman Anthony Coghill, sponsor of the bill, and if I will turn it over to our clerk, please read the title of the bills.
Bill 544, Ordinance Amending and Supplementing the Pittsburgh Code of Ordinances, Title VII, Business Licensing, Article IX, Amusement Businesses with a New Chapter, Chapter 774, Mechanical Amusement Devices Tax and Licenses.
Thank you, Madam Clerk. Our first order of business will be a brief introduction of the legislation.
I guess that's what you just gave, correct?
Yeah, well, I'll comment on it briefly. So, you know, we set out pursuing this tax for additional revenue dating back probably over a year ago when council was debating whether to, you know, increase our property taxes. So this was really an alternative for me to begin with, and I really didn't support the property tax. And this was just another way of kind of thinking outside the box to create another revenue source for the city of Pittsburgh. As we all know now that the state Supreme Court deemed that the skills games are gambling devices and not knowing, and they gave the state legislature up to four months to really come up with a regulation or a tax or whatever they or plan to pursue. It's no secret. We feel that the we anticipated that the state would be taking this up, maybe not so so quickly, but the state that they would be taking this up. But there's no sure answer as to what they might do. Well, you know, we hear back and forth with state legislatures, one flat fee. Others want to tax at 52%. Others want to tax at a lower rate at 35%. So not knowing of course what the state was going to do we decided to continue down the path that we've started on over a year ago because we had a lot of work and research involved in it and if in the case that the state doesn't act on it we will be situated to start collecting this tax and hopefully budgeting for our next years to come at a surplus of we hope two to three million dollars A lot of those questions are unanswered right now because we don't have a short count as to how many devices there are. We are talking through, we're meeting on a weekly basis with the administration and the necessary department heads, PLI, finance, as to, you know, the people that will need in order to collect this tax. So we're hard at work at that. We're going to continue to pursue it until told otherwise. Obviously, if the state supersedes our legislation, then it may all be for naught. But at this point, we're deep enough into it that we're going to continue to pursue it. And, again, not knowing whether the state's going to – how they're going to act on it. we thought it prudent to continue to pursue. So with that, that's a brief synopsis of where we're at in the whole situation. And that will be that. And any comments from our guests? So our next order of business will be testimony from our registered speakers. Please give your name and neighborhood a public record. Each registered speaker will have three minutes to address counsel. I do not see any registered speakers, and nobody has signed up, and nobody is online. Is that right, Madam Clerk? Okay. So there are no registered speakers for the record. And having exhausted that and not having that, we will... Seeing no further speakers, we'll move on to comments from members of council, which there are only one member, and that's me. And you just heard my comments. So having exhausted the business of this public hearing, this meeting is adjourned.
Thank you.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.