About this meeting
- Government Body
- Planning Commission
- Meeting Type
- Planning Commission
- Location
- Perris, CA
- Meeting Date
- August 20, 2025
Transcript
1514 sections (from 1,789 segments)
Okay. You ready?
Yes. Okay.
Good. Air conditioning's on, so I'm ready. 604.
We didn't check to see if they're connected
to the other one.
I got one here. I don't know which Yeah. Okay. That's okay. So that must be that must be the metal, I guess. No.
This one's.
I got this one here. I don't know if that's
I think this one's controlling too much.
Okay. Okay. Okay. Everybody's here, so we're gonna start. We're all ready?
We are all ready.
Good evening. I think you can hear me right? Welcome to the City of Paris Planning Commission meeting 08/20/2025. Aren't you glad it's cool in here? With the hands for the heat? Everybody wants the heat turned on? Come on. You know? Okay. You could be outside guys. Okay. At this time, we thank you for coming this evening and we're gonna get right to it because we've got a few I quite a few items here. But, we're gonna start with our roll call and we're starting at 06:05PM.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Here.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Here.
Commissioner Lopez?
Here.
Vice chair Shively?
Here.
Chair Hammond?
Here.
Thank you.
Thank you and we're gonna have our pledge of allegiance by commissioner Jimenez.
Please stand.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of Thank you very much. We're at item four, which is presentation. I don't believe there's any presentation. So, we move on to item five, consent calendar. Approval of planning commission minutes for 08/06/2025 meeting. Are there any corrections, additions, deletions?
I didn't see any. Okay.
We open it up to public comment. I know we have to do it. Public comment on the consent calendar item a. Is there any public comment? Seeing no public comment, we close the public comment portion and call for a motion.
I'll make a motion.
It's commissioner Minas.
I'll second it.
I'll second it by commissioner Lopez.
Commissioner Jimenez? Yes. Commissioner Minas?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez?
Yes.
Vice chair Shively?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes.
With the vote of five to zero, this motion is approved. Thank you.
Thank you very much. With that, we move on to the public hearings item 6A. And I believe staff has a request, but I don't know if you want me to do that now or once I read it. Just go ahead and read it first. Okay. Item six a, general plan amendment 23 dash zero five two four seven, zone change 23 dash zero five two four five, Plan development overlay zone 23 dash 05246. Tentative track map twenty three dash zero five two four four. TTM three eight seven seven five. And development plan review twenty three dash zero zero zero one nine. This is continued from the 05/07/2025, Planning Commission meeting.
A proposal considered the following elements to facilitate the construction of a 141 town home style condominiums and amenities on 11.6 acres located south on the Wavell Road and East of Wilson Avenue. Number one, the general plan amendment and zone change to change the land use designation of 11.6 acres from r 6,000 single family residential to m f r 14, multiple family residential. Number two, plan development overlay to allow flexibility from the m f r 14 development standards. Number three is tentative track map to consolidate 57 parcels into one condominium lot and two lettered lots totaling 11.6 acres. And development plan review for review of the site plan and building elevations.
Applicant, d r Horton, contract planners, Nathan Perez, requested action, adopt resolution number 25Dash07 recommending that the city council adopt mitigated negative declaration number 2403 and a mitigation monitoring reporting program and approved general plan amendment 23 dash zero five two four seven, zone change 23 dash zero five two four five, Plan development overlay zone 23 dash zero five two four six. Tentative track map 23 dash zero five two four four. TTM eight three seven five. Development plan review twenty three dash zero zero zero one nine to facilitate the construction of a 141 townhome style condominiums and amenities on 11.6 acres based on the findings contained in the resolution and subject condition of approval and as always, in the ex parte communication, ad hoc committee meetings, or site visit.
I did have ad hoc meeting this last go around.
I also sat on an ad hoc meeting.
I have none.
Definitely site visit more than once. Thank you. With that, Mr. Perez.
Okay. Thank you Chairman Hammond for that introduction and members of the Planning Commission. The first item we have before you is the Acacia Point project and the applicant Mr. Ryan Woosley from D. R.
Horton. As you may remember, the project came before you on May 7. The Planning Commission voted to continue the project to off calendar because of the following concerns: one, lack of accent materials and architectural details to differentiate Italianate from Spanish style architecture two, the absence of a clubhouse in the site plan three, insufficient on-site parking four, need for additional communication with adjacent property owners to the south and also to the east. Five, absence of three d renderings illustrating the main entrance and also three d renderings from street views from Nuevo Road and Wilson Avenue. And then lastly, confirmation that the applicant is providing 24 foot wide emergency vehicle access through drive aisles.
During the meeting, was four Paris residents that spoke in opposition, and their concerns were related to traffic, on street parking, dust, the height of the stockpile, and backyard privacy. So in response to the feedback of the Planning Commission, ad hoc and local residents, the applicant revised the plans and addressed their comments as follows. The applicant added architectural details such as wrought iron shelves, decorative tiles, stone veneer, and I'll explain a little bit more in the elevations. They modified a site plan to replace some pickleball courts with additional parking, and they added parking in different locations. They relocated and expanded the dog park.
Also, they expanded the pool building to include a new meeting room. They provided three d renderings of the main entrance. And during that time, they conducted a community meeting which they provided details on the dust mitigation and also their commitment to remove the stockpile by 09/03/2023. They also incorporated tree plantings along the southerly and easterly properties to maintain backyard privacy, and also disclosed to us that Nuevo Road was going to include a class two bike lane with no parking. So now going back into the project, currently the project is located at the Southeast corner of Nuevo Road and Wilson Avenue, currently vacant.
To the north, there's existing apartments and also a small little shopping center. To the Southeast West is single family residential. Here's a site photo, south view across Nuevo Road. And here's a site photo east view across Wilson Avenue. So currently, the general plan designation is currently R 6,000.
The applicant is requesting a general plan amendment to rezone to MFR 14 to allow higher density on the underlining zoning or general plan designation. And this is the way it's going to look. Also as included as part of the project, the applicant is proposing a zone change to rezone from R6,000, which is single family, to MFR14 planned development overlay to allow the flexibility and to facilitate this development. And this is the before and after. The site plan, this is what the applicant's proposing.
They kept the 141 unit townhome style condominiums consisting of 34 detached buildings. The units range from three to four bedrooms ranging from 1,600 square feet to a little bit under 1,700. Some of the amenities which are centralized include a pool building and they actually increased the size of the pool building to include a seven thirty five square foot meeting room. And I'll explain that in the next slide. There's also two points of access along Wilson Avenue.
The main point of access is located where the yellow arrows are, and the secondary access, which will only be used for emergency vehicles, is located or depicted in the red arrows to the south. Here are some of the amenities, which include tot lots, picnic areas, covered picnic areas. Also, as mentioned earlier, there's going to be a clubhouse. So they actually increased the size of the main building to include a seven thirty five square foot clubhouse that's going to be attached by a breezeway. And this is pretty much the elevations of that pool building.
And one of the details that the ad hoc requested was to have tile along the archway. City staff has reviewed the project and it complies with the MFR 14 and PDO standards and parking standards. And here's the rendering that Commissioner Jimenez requested. I know she's very appreciative of this. It pretty much depicts the main entrance and how it's going to look.
So this is kind of like a three d rendering along Wilson Avenue. Here are the building elevations. This is the typical Spanish. The applicant added more shutters, wrought iron pot shelves, decorative tiles, and different color on the wainscope at the bottom of the of the building. This is the typical Italian eight, which they added more shutters, stone veneer at the base of the garage entrances.
Here's the conceptual landscaping plan. It's going to have a couple of what we see in California. You know, for example, they have a couple of shade trees, coastal live oak, blue Afghan pine, and magnolia. Also, they're going to have Tuscan blue rosemary, for example, and bottle brush as some of the shrubs that they're going to be including as part of this development. There's no palm trees.
So I know that Commissioner Hammond is not looking for any palm trees. So community outreach. The applicant conducted community outreach on July 23 at the Paris Union Student Union room. Out of three seventy eight mail notices, eight individuals attended who are probably here tonight. The applicant kind of showed or presented their revised project and also provided details on the dust mitigation that they're going to have.
They have water trucks out there and currently they're moving the dirt farther away from the residences. Also the developer kind of disclosed their commitment to complete the stockpile removal by 09/03/2025. So environmental determination as part of the sequel process, there was an ISMND that was circulated and we received three comment letters. California Department of Transportation and Riverside County Flood Control comments were informational in nature, and Eastern Municipal Water District commented that the project proponent needs to consult with their development services department prior to preparing a design conditions report. Based on these comments, all potential significant impacts have been reduced to less than significant with the implementation of the mitigation measures.
Therefore, of the comments raised additional environmental concerns that have not already been addressed in the ISMND. So staff's recommendation is that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council to adopt Resolution 2,507, adopting mitigated negative declaration 2,403 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approve General Plan Amendment 20 three-five 247, Zone Change twenty three-five thousand two hundred forty five, Planned Development Overlay twenty three-five thousand two hundred forty six, Tentative Parcel Map thirty eight thousand seven hundred seventy five, Development Plan Review twenty three-nineteen to facilitate the proposed Acacia Point project based on the findings herein and subject to the conditions of approval. This concludes my presentation. I'm here to answer any questions that the commission might have.
Thank you, sir. At this time does the applicant have a presentation? I'm pretty sure they do. And just as always, state your full name and spell your last name for us.
Absolutely. Mister chairman and members of Planning Commission, my name is Daniel Boyd, vice president. I have entitlements for D. R. Horton.
It's a pleasure again to be before you with our revised proposal. Before we begin, I'd like to take a moment to express my appreciation to staff, this commission, and the members of the community that have devoted a substantial amount of time working through their concerns and comments. And we're very pleased to have done that additional outreach, and I think that was a very bright idea of this commission, and we applaud you for that. Before we begin, I have reviewed the conditions approval, the adopting resolutions associated with our application, and we are very pleased to accept the same as presented to you before your staff report. You know, we had a number of suggestions and recommendations from this commission, and staff outlined a little bit about them.
And I'd like to take a moment or two to expand a little more detail. On July 23, we basically reached out to to the community. And as you just heard, we had some attendance, and we were very pleased with the comments of the community. We we mainly mainly talked about a few things, and we dove into some detail, namely parking, landscaping, privacy concerns, and the status of the stockpile. The famous stockpile.
It is going away. The removal of stockpile will be completed no later than September 3, And that's two weeks from today's meeting. We're employing the daily use of water trucks. We have a full time monitor. We have on-site project signage. And yet, while I'd like to tell you this evening, we're a 100% dust free, we are not a 100% dust free. And so when the winds come up, we add more water. But I'll just be very frank with you. It's a twenty four seven operation. Unfortunately, our guys don't work in the evening.
But we do appreciate the concerns and comments from the community, namely from a couple of residences. But I can assure you, our commitment is solid. We'll have that stockpile done in two weeks. We have had a couple of discussions with a couple of our homeowners that have expressed their concerns related from rodent control to dirty swimming pools to other things. And so we've reached out to these two, and I'm pleased to report we've reached resolution with one of them, and we're working hard on resolution with the other.
And I believe she's here in the audience, and she can further expand on her concerns. But we're trying, and we're trying to reach out, and we're doing our very best. We do field phone calls every day. We just received one yesterday about dust control. But that's what we encourage. We encourage people to pick up the phone and let us know. So my office staff here, our management team can communicate to our field team, and so we can jump on those kinds of issues. I wanted to first begin by being very mindful that this project's stood dormant since 02/2004. It never really moved anywhere. And during that time frame, all the way to this date, the site was not maintained.
The property owner allowed it to go fallow. And as a result, we had a lot of trash buildup, and frankly speaking, lot of concerns and complaints from the community. So what we are doing with your support, we'd like to move the project forward, get it built, and have another community in the great city of Paris. That said, we are very particular about our changes. And I think basically what I'd like to do is first name we discuss the pad elevations between our project and the adjacent residences.
We prepare some detailed information, and if you are curious, we can provide that to you. But I can say that after all the concerns were raised when we after our community meeting, we realized that most of the pad differences are within tents. One does go as far as a foot, but by and large, we're fairly consistent. We also were able to show a section of what's between us and what's going to be between them. And that was very helpful for the residences so their anxiety levels were calm, so they could see the landscaping.
One of the items we committed to, to ensure privacy, was strategic planting of trees. So that we're just not out there throwing trees every 20 feet on center. And so we've opened up our arms to the residences so when we get to that point, we can be smart about our plan. The major modifications, which you've heard somewhat, is the biggie, the clubhouse. And we did some adjustments to the site plan to create the room for that that clubhouse.
The clubhouse is going to contain a kitchenette, an additional bathroom to what's already been provided in the pool house, and a meeting room. And from your comments and suggestions, that grew to about 900 plus or minus feet. But when you combine that with the pool room and the covered breezeway, we're offering a clubhouse in totality of just about 1,800 square feet. That also allowed us to readjust some of the open space. And I believe it was, one of our commissioners that suggested that we have I'm looking right at you.
We had, obviously a comment is, why can't we provide something that is as really open so that people that come to the clubhouse can have parties, have birthdays, and those kinds of things. Simple, but needed, and we provided it. And so we're excited about that. The next item, of course, is that we had a lot of architectural enhancements to the project. And your staff basically enumerated those between the two styles.
And of course, we brought that back to the ad hoc committee to make sure that we were on the right track. And I believe from that standpoint that we are. We've had additional changes to the plan, namely the swimming pool. One of the comments was, I believe, was a chair that commented on the see, I write these things down. So the pool itself has been substantially enlarged. We've gone up to about little over 900 square feet, almost a 50% increase. So we put a lot of emphasis, as we should, on that clubhouse facility, including the pools. We did a number of other things. I mean, obviously exciting for the dogs. We eliminated one of the dog parks, which wasn't very large.
But through the site plan modification, we were able to actually increase a new dog park up to 3,500 square feet, up from about 400 square feet. And we're putting in the associated amenities that you typically would see, the fountains for the dogs and all the waste and so on and so forth. And that is a gated feature. So we made those changes. We we think at this point, while we we we hope that, we we're going in the right direction this evening, we also did another major renovation, and that we included much larger turf areas for open space recreation.
And from that standpoint, as you heard, we did make architectural modifications to our elevations. I don't need to repeat those, but I think after the ad hoc committee meeting, I'm hoping that the committee agreed that at that point, we're on the right track. Parking. Parking is a big deal. Well, through the site plan modifications, as your staff reports indicated, we're able to increase the parking by a surplus of 20 spaces.
We have a total, though, of 62 guest spaces, and they're split between street and guest parking. And so basically, that's an addition, of course, to the residences' two car garages. And I may add, it did come up. I just want to remind the commission that our governing documents in the association will control the parking in those garages. There will be monthly inspections as problems persist.
Doesn't mean that someone can't store a box here or there, and of course, are trash cans. The primary use for that is parking. We've also, as part of our required street improvements, we basically on Nuevo excuse me, Wilson no, excuse me. That's right. Nuevo, we're going to be striping, no parking. And on Nuevo, we're going to basically be making street improvements to there as well. There is no question. We listen to the community. There are concerns about parking. But I think overall, not only do we comply with the city's ordinance, but we passed it.
And we're doing our very best to make sure that this project on a long term basis doesn't create a problem. And so from that standpoint, I would conclude that we have our staff here, our design staff, if there's any questions. Mr. Chair, I do respectfully request that the public hearing be reopened in the event there are questions that the applicant can answer, either from yourselves or from the community. That concludes my presentation. And of course, I'm ready to be peppered with questions. But I hope you all, with your smiles, agree that D. R. Horton takes this very seriously. And we have a number of projects in the city, and we've been a good neighbor in the city.
We've had previous experiences. This is one of them. And we're very happy to come back and, I think, present a better refined project for your consideration. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Stay close. At this time, do we have any questions for the applicant, for the city? I mean, questions for the city and the applicant. Feel free to go. Thank you, sir.
Thank you so much for the presentation. I had a question in regards to the the vinyl fence that's gonna be on the south and east side of the property. Is that gonna replace the current fences that the neighbors have?
No. Actually, it's a great question. I appreciate you bringing that to our attention. We met with the homeowners. The existing fences of the homeowners can stay if they so desire. Our new fencing will be abutted up to their fence. If a homeowner wants a new fence, we'll put it in for them at no charge. We have to have coordination, we have to have permission and those kinds of things. But we shared the fact that the existing fences from the homeowners with all their stuff in the backyard stays in play. Unless they would like a new fence.
Now that gets a little complicated because you have one here that says yes, and four down here that say no. So there's a little bit of staggering. So what we would want to do is work closely with staff and make a determination of how that's going to look. But we gave that choice to the homeowner.
Okay. Perfect. And so where the where the vinyl fence is, there's not gonna be much traffic, much pedestrian traffic. Right? There's a there's a large buffer?
Yeah. There's a buffer. Okay. And and and again, another great question. If you look at the cross section, you'll see there's a V TIG that comes down. We have an upslope. We have landscaping. And then ultimately, we have the homeowner improvements on the other side. So there's a substantial distance between those two structures.
Okay. Perfect. I I I was just asking because I was a little concerned about the integrity of the material. But since there's not gonna be a lot of pedestrians in that area, it shouldn't be much of an issue. But thank you for that.
You're welcome.
And I want a clarification on the the bike path on Nuevo. Is that gonna be included on Wilson as well?
Is that
No. So is so Wilson
Don't think so.
So Wilson will allow parking, street parking. Yeah?
Yeah.
Okay. On on Webull, can we also include signage that says no parking anytime?
That's already in there.
Okay. Perfect. Thank you so much. Okay. No further questions. Thank you.
All yours.
Just to clarify, no pickleball courts?
Correct. Gee. We you're gonna miss that.
I'll come up with the reasoning here in a minute. You don't have it in front of you, but page 3.6, there's some locations on the elevations that specify occurs at enhanced deck conditions only. What are those enhanced conditions?
I'm gonna have there he is. The best person for that would be our architect.
Yeah. Just state your full name for us and
Good evening. Yeah. Good evening. My name is Dan Duke, and I work with WHA. We are the architects on
this project.
Spell your last name for us.
D u g a n.
Yeah. Okay.
The enhancements on 3.6 are the additional items we added that go along Wilson Avenue that are faced from the public street.
Okay.
So all the buildings that are going down Wilson Avenue will have these additional pop outs on the side with the roof and the and the detailing in the middle of that.
Okay. I appreciate that. Currently, that's all I have for this
moment. Currently.
Currently.
So just to clarify, there is only there's one dog park in this. Correct? Only one
one large dog park.
And it is large. Right? I was just looking at the the Cornhole Courts and I'm envisioning like a small one for the because it's at the other end
of the
community. And I don't know how popular Cornhole is. But I mean, but that's why I'm I'm working on it. But I don't know quite sure what my question is yet.
Well, I do know kids love it and it's also quiet.
That's yeah. Fair. Teens do love it. And then we did just have the one three d rendering. Right? The one of the entrance?
I'm sorry?
Sorry. There was only one three d rendering? Yes.
That's correct.
The one of the entrance? Okay.
That's correct.
Those are my I don't really have too many questions right now.
Okay. Thank you.
I'll let it
move on.
I think the only thing that wasn't answered from our questions to ad hoc was you also are a fellow tiny dog owner. We had asked because a lot of the dog parks are for bigger dogs. So things are at a bigger level, like the drinking fountains and things like that. So that's the only thing I didn't see out of all the requests was any modifications within the dog park for for tiny dogs?
Well, to be frank with you, I don't know if we actually considered the small dogs versus big dogs. It's it's such a large area that it wouldn't be very difficult at all to have some chain leak separation so smaller dogs can play on their own. Dog, for example, likes to play with big dogs. And so it's kind of a mix up. But it's a large area, and it doesn't necessarily mean that what we see today, the homeowner association may want to make modifications to that.
Right. No. I was thinking more along the lines, like, of the toys because, you know, my tiny dog thinks he's big, and he thinks he can jump through the big hoops, and he thinks he can bridge the big water fountain and climb on stuff that he can't. So it was more along the lines of just thinking about the the closer to the ground doggies.
Understood.
Yeah. That was the only thing I think that we brought up at Ad Hoc that I didn't see mention of.
Well, I think again, and and feel free to comment that it's a large area, one. And number two, it's gonna be completely secured and gated from the association standpoint. If it turns out that homeowners feel, as you do, that there needs to be some separation, I don't think that's a
No. Not worried about separation. I'm worried about adaptation so that baby doggies can have access to stuff. Not so much about the separation, just things that they can have access to as well and opportunities for them to interact with.
I actually am worried about the separation. As a like you said, a small dog owner and they're reactive, the size could be one mile. If there's a dog that they're trying to get at or, you know, angry with for some reason, they're going to get there. So, I think some sort of separation. I know most dog parks that I go to do have a separate area for the small dogs, you know, just separated by a I think that would definitely be preferable and helpful for
Well, I'm I'm happy to accept the condition. If you'd like that modification, we can commit to that. Or we can work with staff. Whatever's easy.
Thank you.
I don't see
a problem.
Okay. Thank you.
Oh, okay. I I won't drag it on too long. Yeah. Thank you for coming back with the I think one of my the only thing I was looking at was it says pool building and actually we should differentiate that being a clubhouse. So in here it says pool building, but actually we're talking about a clubhouse.
We're actually talking two things. We're talking about a clubhouse Mhmm. And we're talking about the previous pool building. Mhmm. And inside that pool building, we've got, oh, well, showers outside of that pool building and the bathrooms inside.
Yeah.
So what we did is we took a kind of a comprehensive review of the design combining both of them. They're technically separate, but they're combined with an overhead covered breezeway. So it's one large facility, if you will.
Okay. Well, on the plans, it says clubhouse, then it says pool, and then you have the way they make the changes. So I'm looking at what we have here, where it says clubhouse is separate. So is that the case, the clubhouse is a separate building?
That is correct.
Okay. The
clubhouse is a separate building.
That's why wanted to end. It wasn't here as a clubhouse, it says pool building.
Right.
So we need to make that distinction for us, the average person, not you guys, so that they know the clubhouse is not a pool building in and of Right. Okay. And the reason my daughter's in a townhouse and technically what she's in San Diego is not a townhouse, but I won't get legal on them. But the clubhouse has a kitchen in it. And that's one of the things that's missing in this thing is a kitchen in the clubhouse. And also storage area was not specified. Storage area would be tables, chairs, which she has in hers. Right. And this is anecdotal, but it's also current. They love that. I mean, nobody in that was seeing that that entire building if you didn't have that clubhouse. Nobody.
Right.
But they have chairs, so we rented the tables. I was just there. You rent the chairs, you put them back yourself. And you have a kitchen. If you don't wanna be outside in the winter, you cook stuff inside. That's missing in that. So that may be something that I'm looking at as a possibility inside the clubhouse.
Well, actually, we've already accommodated for that.
Okay. But I didn't see it on here.
Well, we'll have to look at the floor pan. Yeah.
Yeah. Okay.
We are including a kitchenette
in
Okay. In in the clubhouse.
Yeah. I didn't see it on there. That's the only it just has a building that says storage Okay. And w c, whatever that is. But
We should be provide you with a floor plan, but we are providing those amenities.
Yeah. So that would be one it's not, you know, it's just one of those things, obviously, HOA would control all that we expect. But the idea that clubhouse should have that in there
Yes.
Because it
has And it does.
Very important. And you can have all kind of meetings. You could have smaller ones. Could do the HOA. We'd have meetings, things of that nature.
The majority of the square footage is predominantly a large meeting room.
Yeah. That's the whole point.
And that's the whole point.
Yeah. And correct.
But we do have a countertop kitchenette. We've got another bathroom. It's a unisex bathroom. Mhmm. And so I think we have all the kinds of bells and whistles that you're sharing with I we just need to have a floor plan that shows that. But we can work with staff to make sure that is
included. So that that was the only thing that that thank you for putting it in there, but I just didn't see that. It ticks off because my daughter happens to be in one, so I'm saying, San Diego's little different than you guys. Okay? But, that's the sale thing there because we had something that was perfect. Put tables out, take tables up.
You got it. Done deal.
Okay. A hundred hundred people, not a problem. You put the tables up Yeah. You pick up the trash.
That's right.
That's what we do. So otherwise, they charge you double. Yeah. Right. So, yeah. So that was my only thing. Also, lastly, lighting. The entrance, we don't have a nighttime rendering of the lighting, but when you come in the entrance, is there gonna be up lighting there, inside of the bollards, or the lighting bars where you walk, because we're talking about walking condominiums are totally different apartments.
Right.
Because where she's at, it's so clean you can eat off the ground. Yep. But, the idea of walking at night and having those lights is a big difference.
Right.
You know, and you don't want all you're on a main street, you're not like when she's off in some place. Main street, so you want that lighting so that they can walk to the dog park at night. Sure. You can walk over to the what do you call it? It's not pickleball, but it's Cornhole. Cornholes. Yeah. See how old I am, too. But, either way that is walkable and you have a walking trail in there, but that was my Lighting is should be throughout this whole thing. Mhmm.
And, obviously, security. It's a big deal over in this area. But if you're gonna go in and you wanna walk at night and people wanna walk their dogs, you know, and for those of you dog lovers up here, walk your dogs over to that park which is way over that side, you wanna have lighting so it at least feels safe. So it's a safety this is a public safety commission. Right. So that's my thing. So make sure we have adequate I think lighting is mentioned here, but I don't know what detail. Level of detail. But the idea, like you see here, lighting when you come in, you shouldn't have lighting there.
Right.
Enough lighting where it's obvious what you're going into. This is a condominium townhome. Right. And so that that would be my only thing to make sure that that's mentioned in there. If it's not in detail, we're gonna have more detail about that. Lastly, I'm really being short tonight. The basins that are there, we don't want weeds just all over there. They should be maintained, they should have some semblance. I've seen some great basins that look so fabulous planting, since we don't have planters here. You know, landscape planters. Something in that basin which I know that I'm pretty sure the homeowners are gonna association will be doing. But then we because it's softened away, well it's gonna be noticeable, you know. And so water goes in there. It's never gonna be, you know, ten hundred year floods. But the idea though, it just doesn't look like a bunch of weeds, you know.
So, that should be maintained and we wanna make sure they're engineered, that that is something that's maintained and that's part of those HOA requirement that at least be some maintenance, particularly one in Nuevo because that's the one that's the most visible. And, we're gonna have that we don't have an RRTA bus stop there, do we? Because that wasn't one of the requirements. They didn't I'm sure they saw that they didn't even ask for one, did they?
Yeah. No. Not not at that location. Yeah.
Yeah. I don't even know if there's one farther down near Paris High School. No. I don't even know if there's one there. By By Paris High High School. It would make sense. Yeah. Okay. Okay. Okay. Pretty much the other one's for staff. Think the wording for the one year maintenance that I always talk about, the one year maintenance that refers to public works number five. I don't remember seeing that in here, but the idea of the wording for graffiti and that will replace by the same color, not just painting something. But the idea of one year maintenance, I know they have to do certain things, there should be one year maintenance. The same language should be in this and all the other ones.
One year maintenance because we're pushing, we really push landscaping here and maintenance and we just you know, it has to be done by HOA. We just wanna make sure it's in writing to understand that this is something that should be maintained in perpetuity. Right. Really. So that's that's pretty easy. I'm letting you off easy today.
You got me last time.
Yeah. So I think that was it for me with that wording and I think there's not in there. Number 45, I think it's number 45 or 46. But, we should relate to public works number 5. And I think that's pretty much are the are the picnic we know we have a picnic area shading. But all the seating and all the other things, do they have shade? I know we had a umbrella shade, but that's over all benches and all.
Well, there's shading structures at certain locations. I can't tell you every single location.
But Yeah. Yeah. If there's a shade structure, we're in Paris. This is Like today. Yeah. So you you a shade structure might mean, you know. Yeah. At least to be beneficial. Some people want if you wanna sit in the sun, go sit on the grass, that's fine. But if you're gonna sit there on a bench and be a 100 degrees, you might want some shade. Okay. In in this city.
Yeah. You look if you look at your amenity illustrations Yeah. You'll see
The types.
That you've got some shade structures included.
Okay. Yeah. Okay. I think that's it for me, believe it or not. Now, you guys have any other questions?
Yeah. I have another one.
Mhmm. Was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on the visitor parking spaces. So I saw here that you guys have 62 spaces. How much did that increase from the last proposal, the last meeting? And is this including potential parking on Wilson or strictly just on-site parking? On-site. Okay.
Yeah. There's 62 spaces. 60 yeah. 62 spaces of guest parking, and that's broken down between the street, the private streets, and the designated guest parking along the amenities. And so there's 62 in total. When the site plan modifications were completed, as staff has reported, there's 20 additional surplus spaces as part of that. So it's dispersed throughout the project. And staff should have the ability to tell you where they exactly are, but I can. They're basically split between the streets and the guest parking areas.
Got you. But how much did it increase from the last time you presented to us?
That I don't have an answer for, but hang on one second. Two.
Two spaces? Two. Okay.
Yeah.
Alright. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Yeah. One thing and it's lastly I'll say that one thing about is difference between like where she lives townhome, you don't really have unlike apartments where they're all on the street. So different what kind of meetings and townhome. So you know, I can walk driving here, there's space and there's another space, six spaces, another two. It all works out in condominiums and townhomes. Apartments are dope different ballgame. The apartment across the street over there, they're all on the street. The apartments, they're all on the street. The condominiums different. And townhomes are totally different.
So, 62 is a lot of spaces for that. And, it's just the difference between apartments and condominiums is a is a Grand Canyon, you know. And, Wilson, you can park on Wilson, probably shouldn't have to. Unless you have a party and you Nuevo is out of the question. That that's this Yeah. Yeah. But anyway, that was it. And, if there's nothing else? Okay. Okay. Thank you very much.
Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it.
At this time, we'll open it up for public comment on this agenda item. And anyone having a public comment is welcome to come to the podium and address the commission for three minutes. I don't know if we have any blue sheets. I don't think we do. Okay. So if anyone would like to comment on this item, you're welcome to come at this time. Just state your full name and spell your last name for us. We don't need your address. We don't need that address.
I'm Tamina Martinez and I live, I believe it's behind
Okay.
Where all the high dirt is at. Okay. Now, I have one question. I'm not too good about distance. I wanted to know how far are they gonna be from my home where where their buildings are gonna be at.
Because I wanna make sure there's not gonna be an alley back there where now we're gonna have people, you know, going into that alley which, you know, we could might not have our privacy. So that's one of my main concerns. So if if they're gonna be fenced all around, we wanna make sure, like I just said, on the distance, we'll make sure there's not gonna be an alley where I live at. And, I also would like to know how far is how long is this going to take for them to finish building their condominiums because we do have a concern about the noise and the dirt that's been going into our home. And, also, what is it that we have to do if we do decide we would like a new fence put in our home?
Those are my questions.
Okay. Thank you. Hopefully, you got them down while we try to get we won't up here, but we'll let the staff and or developer ask. Any anyone else? Okay. Before we get to an answer on those. Mhmm. Thank you, sir. If you just state your full name and spell your last name for us.
Alfredo Adriano, a d r I a n o. Yeah. He's met a lot of my concerns. The dust, again, I called their office yesterday, and they had six feet above their machinery of dirt still floating around. They took care of it. I I don't you know, I'm not I am complaining, but actually, how are you gonna know if somebody don't complain? And also, that's a wind tunnel between their buildings. I live where she lives next door to her. It's a wind tunnel. And I raised this concern before, the type of trees.
And they said that they would probably talk to you guys because you guys have a format of whatever trees are supposed to be there. And I would ask that there be no pine trees because of the high oil in pine trees and that, you know, maybe they'd be some kind of, a myrtle tree or something if they want beautiful stuff. You know what I'm saying? Because that's a wind tunnel. Every day around this time, there's no wind out there right now, but it it's horrible.
I mean, canopies just go flying everywhere, umbrellas everywhere, and I don't think anyone's really raised that concern for that area. And that's my own concern is for fire. If one tree goes and the old tree goes and our our lots go in the back, so that was a a concern of mine. Again, he's they've met other things of my concern up to this point, but one thing was raised up about lighting. I I just didn't even think about it.
What kind of lighting are they gonna have on the back of those buildings facing us? Are we gonna be blinded in the evening time because the lights are on all night long? I don't you know, are they gonna have scallop lighting where the light comes down, which would be great? You know what I'm saying? Are they gonna have stuff so it it doesn't affect us when you go outside and we're you know what I'm saying? It's it's horrible when a neighbor puts up a light, and it's right in your eyes. It's right in your bedroom's eyes. You know? So those are the two major things I had. Yeah.
Can't think of anything else. I appreciate your time, and appreciate the condo. I do appreciate the condos there, but I don't know what else to say. But I think that covered it. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Thank you very much. Anyone else? Okay. Uh-oh. Sorry, I didn't see you. State your full name and spell your last name
for me.
Luis Gomez, g m o e z. I was concerned earlier. He has spoken about the the problems about the pools. Well, I haven't got an agreement with them at all. My pool's still getting dirty every day, and I'm spending beyond money on cleaning it and stuff like that. That dirt is still as high as it it's been. They they lowering in it, but all they're doing is just moving it. They're not taking out. They're just moving it around. That's all they're doing.
But the pile is still way up there. My my fence is six foot, and it's way higher than that still. It hasn't went down for nothing. So that's my that's my concern that we haven't got an agreement on none of that with them. And we spoke when we had the meeting with them at Paris High. And they just said, well, we're gonna take the dirt down, but it's still high as it is the beginning. And my other concern is, like, what he said about the light. I have a pool. I have a big yard. And if I'm gonna be out there wanting to relax in the dark, I'm not gonna be able to with those lights if they're gonna be having those type of lights.
And then another concern that I'm seeing is that they're saying they're gonna put trees to block our privacy. Are they gonna put it in front
of the windows of the properties?
As what I understood last time, they said they're gonna put it on the sides. So the windows are gonna be able to whoever rents or buys or whatever are gonna be able to look into my property. That's my concern also there.
Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Anyone else before we go to the developer? I mean the applicants, sorry. Oh, at this time, we will allow the applicant to respond as we always try to do.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. To the first point regarding the potential for alleys, no. There's no potential for that. There'll be no alleys in those areas at all. Number two, lighting. Lighting will be subjected to the approval of a lighting plan. And when we look at the lighting plan, staff will make sure that these kinds of concerns that we're hearing are absolutely avoided. We don't want spotlights going into our neighbor's yards, of course. And to your point, mister chair, yes, there'll be ballers.
There'll be directional lighting. There'll be ample lighting within the in the so so we can promote safety. As far as the and the gentleman spoke to the trees, that comment did come up. His concern is flammability of potential trees. So I think staff can pretty much make sure that that we're not gonna get a tree specimen that's going to have a potential to have a flammable concern.
With regards to the pool, that was a lady that we're trying to work with. We don't have an agreement yet. She proposed an offer. We proposed a counteroffer, and we're still working on some resolution. But frankly speaking, the stockpile is being monitored fairly closely by your staff, including photo documentation almost daily. And if you look at it, I mean, you could say, why is this not gone in two days? Well, it takes time because we are simply not pushing dirt from one into the next. We're bringing it into the ground so that the dirt goes away. But we're fully committed to the September 2 date. So that we don't see a problem with that.
And we're in close communication with Nathan almost every other day. And we exchange photos every other day. So it is high on our priority list. But it will be gone. And once it's gone and subject to the approval of this commission and city council, of course, we'll be moving forward. To the last question was the duration of construction. Well, frankly speaking, grading is always a big thing, right? So when we get the grading plans approved and we finish the grading, the land development, which is your water, your sewer, your utilities, all those fun things that you need, takes about four months to get situated. That's after plan approval. And so we need to get the plans approved.
So say four to five months, maybe a little longer, but not much more for actual development. But mind you, as we proceed with development, we're building things too. We're building perimeter walls. We're building sidewalks. We're installing landscaping. We're getting we're putting in the streets. So each day, these issues that we hear will be going away. But from start to finish, from when we actually see a model sale or models opening, it could be several months. But frankly speaking, we're shooting for right around that one twelve month time frame. So hopefully in the next ten to twelve months, you'll see models up and running and then we move forward from there.
Okay. Hopefully, they addressed all of them because I didn't write all the questions down. But hopefully, unless they have I missed something. Okay. Okay. And I think
Quick question for you, sir. There is signage around the perimeter of the property for dust control? Sure.
There is a on-site sign, yes, posted with a phone number, contact information, and that's how we get generate phone calls.
AQMD, Air Quality Management District, Riverside?
Yes. Yeah.
Okay. Thank you. You're welcome.
Do you have the knowledge or would you be able to speak to the the concern about the landscaping, as it aligns with the windows of the property and provides privacy?
Right. Well, first of all, we'll have a landscape plan that will be reviewed and approved by staff. And one of the commitments we've made to the community, particularly along that area, is that strategically we'd like to pit trees where it benefits both properties. We're just not going to arbitrarily go out there and start planting trees. So the idea is that we want to use the trees as part of our natural screen.
And so what will happen I think is we'll be presenting a landscape plan. We'll sit down with Nathan and staff and work through it. And then at that point we'll make some decisions as to what we think. But at that point too, I mean, we're open arms with the community. We don't have any problems working bringing the community involved to make sure that what we're doing is beneficial for both.
But we have to remember, the city sets the standard, they set the specie types, and they have certain specifications that we have to comply with. But I don't think this is going to be a huge issue for us. And I think that basically with the tree planting, we can basically avoid some major issues. And frankly speaking, from a line of sight perspective, when you look at our second story, our line of sight really comes down to the existing fence line. So it's not like we're on top of their backyard, right, peering down on the Jacuzzi.
You have to remember, they've got a setback between their existing wall plus or minus 15 to 20, maybe in some instances more than that, right? We too have a setback with everything in the middle, the landscape trees. So you have an enormous setback from building face to building face. And so it's not like you've got buildings five feet of separation. That's not the case here.
Okay. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Would you clarify what that space is from your where your your gate fence will be to the closest building?
Sure. Absolutely. We have a diagram.
I see it. It's on it's on our plans, but, you know Yeah. It's a little bit too small.
Go ahead. You wanna speak to it? Sure. Okay.
This is our
oh, I gotta sneak in. Ryan Woosley, w o o s l e y, d r Horton. So along the East P L, we have a separation from the fence line p l to our structure of 26.9 feet. We're assuming ten, fifteen foot minimum rear yard setback on their side. So that's around 37 feet, 38 feet distance on the east. And on the south is 30 feet between our best guess on their setbacks. We don't have everyone's exact setback.
Would it help if we show the site plan?
We're not showing the presentation on our end. We're looking at the agenda item. Thank you. Thank you. Yes. This is helpful. And, can I ask staff a question? Typically, if this was not townhomes, what would be the setback if this was, our 6,000?
So typically, you know, a conventional subdivision would be like 20 feet. And then, you know, if somebody wants to build a patio, they could go up to 50%. So technically, they could go up to 10 feet
from So this is more than if they were building single family homes that were still R 6,000?
Yes, because they have a buffer.
They have the buffer? Okay. So a single family home could have that patio, and it could be at 10 feet, technically.
Yeah. That's correct.
And they said south was 30 feet. Is Was I correct in my notes? Mhmm. Okay. Thank you. Okay.
Okay. It's not zero outline, don't worry. Yeah. If he knows. You very much and we close the public comment portion unless there's anyone else. And, we move to discussion of the planning commission. Wake up Isaac. I
just want to start off by thanking the applicant. Thank you for your willingness to to listen to the residents and to us, the commission, and ad hoc. You made a lot of changes to the project. We do appreciate I love the inclusion of the the clubhouse. I thought that was amazing, and I love the elevations for the for the pool house as well. It looks really nice. I was a little bit concerned about the parking, but I do note I do recognize that you have two parkings for every unit. Hopefully, So, that's sufficient with the extra point five spaces for for visitors, and that doesn't include the Wilson parking the outside parking. So I I hope that's not an issue moving forward, but the elevations are beautiful. It's 36% landscaping.
So I think when it's all said and done, I think it's gonna be a very beautiful community, and I'm looking forward to seeing this built out.
I also wanted to say thank you for being so flexible. Thank you for being so receptive to our million comments and concerns. I really appreciate you bringing back the project and making so many changes. It it really means a lot. I'm always excited to have more high density housing, so I'm really excited for this. Again, with that adding that conditional approval that we have a separated smaller area for the for the small reactive dogs like mine. I really enjoy this project and I think it's a really good one. Thank you.
Thank you. Yeah, small dogs. I
also want to thank the applicant for being so flexible, open to having the ad hoc, and really taking into account everything that was said by the community. The Planning Commission in our statements and questions the last time, I do want to echo safety for the little ones. And by that, I like the tot lot. We need a little tot lot for the doggy area. Also, I think one thing that wasn't mentioned and was not highlighted was the monument sign.
And that was something that I had brought up during ad hoc. And I wanted to commend it because it's beautiful. I felt like it was missing something. And I was the one that requested the one three d rendition of that because I really felt like it was missing a catch, something to catch your eye to know where to go in and really accentuate what was inside. One of my concerns too during ad hoc and during this meeting was the proximity to the neighbors and their houses, because I also really appreciate my privacy.
And that's the reason I asked for the normal typical distance or setback for a single family home. And because this is further out, that does give me a lot of peace of mind. I agree with the alleys because teenagers like to fly not just teenagers, people in general. We like to find little quiet areas. The good thing about this one when you look at the layout is on the south where the residents existing residents are.
Thank you. There is a little walkway, and the way the houses are positioned, they actually have windows. So, like, you know, you have your window open there because there's no neighbors in the back. So I feel like that would be an added safety reason, where it's not the garage, it's not hidden. It's something that any of those people living on that south border can look outside and see what's happening in that walkway between them and the residents in the back.
I like the extension of the clubhouse, the additional parking. I know it was something that I was asking for. I especially appreciate that in our plans, we had a very detailed parking analysis with how many parkings, but there was also a trash day pickup and where they would be because what usually happens is it's parking one day, and then one day out of the week, it's a trash collection, so nobody can park there. But there's no overlap. Those will remain as parking spots, and you're not losing those spaces for trash day, which was extremely important so that you're not scrambling for parking one day a week.
And I want to appreciate the community for coming out and voicing your opinions the last time, this time, and continually reaching out to the applicants and making sure that we do what we say we're going to do and continue to call. They've been very, very professional, very responsive. So community keep reaching out. This is they want to work with the community. They want to make the community better. So please, let's continue having those conversations.
I wanna thank the applicant for for the presentations and the time that they they spent on this project as well as listening to, planning commission and the community is what their the needs are and what their desires are. I think by doing that and, spending the additional time for in the from the last meeting till now made a slightly better project. So I appreciate that on your end. I think people, your residents will be appreciative, and the neighborhood community will be appreciative of that. I do like of course, I do like the architecture a little bit better now.
It'll explain the the color schemes a little bit better. So everything in in from that point forward, it was an improvement. So, the clubhouse is a great addition, which is much desired. Thanks to, commissioner Hammond for his input on that. But, so I'm very well supportive of this project.
But also moving forward, there's a couple there's one thing that I would like to remove from the items, and that's just the pickleball courts as stated in there, which they're not providing any. So I don't want any miscommunications in the in the future that pickleball courts in there. So the document can gone be gone through and move pickleball courts from the entire documents everywhere.
Thank you, mister architect. It's nice to you too today. Yeah. I just I'm not gonna prolong this. I'm absolutely ecstatic about the idea of this project. We need a lot more. In fact, I'm kind of not really nice to the city by not having more, but you're need multi family because every other city around here is doing it, including Irvine. Mhmm. Can you believe Irvine with apartments? Yeah. They said, you can't sit fiddlehead. Now they can't get enough of them. We're way behind. But we need quality. And one of the things we demand is quality, landscaping, we're gonna constantly Everybody comes before us, you better have landscaping ready.
So one of the great things about this is the ad hoc committee. So they will kind of filter things and so when they get to us, they already know us, we know them, we know each other. So if they're asking questions, we don't have to ask a lot of them. That's what makes this go faster than that six hours. Because you have a headhark. I appreciate everything to the design. The lighting is a concern. Security is already a concern, but I think that's good. That'll be done. The dirt's gonna be moved guys because it's construction, you're gonna have dirt.
It's not gonna look like that. Okay? And I think one of the things is the need for multi family housing being pushed by the state of California is absolutely necessary. You're gonna see this and they're gonna push it down. So we might as well do it right, do it nice, and do it in such a manner that gonna be quality because you're gonna get a lot more multi family housing in areas that you would say that we have to do it. Okay? So, one of the things I like about this is in condominiums we had one that's on Barrett or in that area where you live. That was the only one and I went to I'm probably the only one here that went on a tour there. And, you know, how we did, we got in there, but that was it, you know, for a long time. I mean, maybe fifteen years since you do that, but now this is a start on a major roadway on a major street.
So I appreciate it. I think the only distinction I'm making when we get this to the amendments is make sure that we say the word clubhouse as separate from pool and pool building because it's not the same. You wanna sell it, you wanna sell a clubhouse. Because anybody can use a clubhouse, you know, but the clubhouse is key. Any kitchenette in the clubhouse and a storage area for tables and chairs, mandatory if you wanna make money there. So, if you're charge HOA fees, they're gonna want a clubhouse. And, I just know because my daughter's the one. And they want it. These are 30 year olds. They're not even going in there unless they have it. They say, we're not going in there unless you have clubhouse. I'm 60. They're 30. They're the ones buying. So guess what?
You're gonna put a clubhouse. So, I'm not gonna charge what they charge, they're ridiculous. I'm not tell you what they charge it. But the idea is it's something that it could be beneficial. So, appreciate it. I'm not worried about the parking because there's more than enough spaces with more than adequate, especially when you talk townhome condominium. Park apartments, a little different discussion. But, I don't know, and I hope I'm wrong, I hope I'm right. You're not gonna have that overflow on Wilson. I just don't think it unless there's a special event, really special event, and probably should go to the Emporium or Saint Laurent Paris High or something. But, yeah, don't think that's an issue, the parking. So, thank you. Thank you for for all the concerns. Thank you for all the design. And, once again, hopefully we can get this up if we do approve it fast.
Know, it's ten years from now waiting for an apartment. But at least I think we hopefully answered all the questions and I appreciate it. And good luck. Okay. Will there be anything else? Okay. Alright. We exhausted that one. At this time, we're looking at a general plan amendment 23 dash zero. I have to do this for legal reasons guys, not because I wanna read.
Okay? General plan amendment 23 dash zero five two four seven. Zone change 23Dash05245. Plan development overlay zone 23 dash zero five two four six. Tentative trap map, 23 dash zero five two four four.
And development plan review, 23 dash zero zero zero one nine. Proposal considers the following entitlements to facilitate the construction at 01/1941 townhome style condominiums and amenities are 11.6 acres located South Of Nueva Road and East Of Wilson Avenue. The general plan amendment and zone change to change the land use from one eleven point six acres from r 6,000 single family residential to m f R 14 multi family residential. Last, development overlay to allow flexibility in the m f r 14 development standards, tentative track map to consolidate 57 parcels into one condominium lot and two lettered lots, twenty eleven point six acres, and development plan review for review of the site plan and building elevations. And, where requested action is obviously adopt I did it to myself.
That's what I get. Okay. Hold on. Oh, she actually has it here. Give me a second.
See what happens when you have technology. Adopt resolution 25Dash07 recommending that the city council adopt mitigating negative declaration number twenty four zero three and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve general plan amendment 23 dash zero five two four seven. Zone change 23 dash zero five two four five. Plan development overlay zone 23 dash zero five two 46. Tentative track map 23 Dash zero five two four four, development plan review 23 Dash 00019 to facilitate the construction of 141 town homestyle condominiums and amenities 11.68 acres based on the findings contained in resolutions, subject condition of approval, and we do have some amendments.
A correction to add the public works number five concerning one year maintenance, and I believe it's number 35. Make sure there's no references to pickleball in the court. The other stuff like home, the dog park, that's maybe an HOA thing, but that's an HOA consideration.
Graffiti painting and panels?
Yeah. It's in there. Yeah. Yeah. Fortunately, the graffiti part is.
And, I think the storage well, that's again administrative. That's one of those to make sure that the clubhouse has the kitchenette and has a storage area. It would be four tables and chairs. And, I think there might be a restroom in there. But, that was not on the plan, so the plans match what's in here. Was there anything else? Think working
with staff for the type of trees placement along the borders, but that would also be
Yeah. To exclude pine trees because we live in Windtella where I'm at, so I know the Windtella. Yeah. Not African sumac. Thank you. But, yeah, I think that was it. So, we have that? Okay.
Mister Chair, did you get the condition of approval for separation of the dog park?
Yeah. I wasn't sure if we wanted to make that a condition or is that something as a condition? Yes. Because I don't know if that was in there at all, was
it?
It it wasn't the separation. Right? It was more amenities for large and small dogs.
Well, separation she made.
I said that, but then Commissioner Menace preferred a section where it could be separated for the
smaller dogs. Yes. Thank you for the clarification.
The dog lover is up here. Okay. And that would be a COA. I don't think that's in there now, but that would be a COA. Number of I don't even know what number. I'm not looking at it, so whatever the last number. Okay. Okay?
That could be added as a planning commission planning division condition of approval number
40Something? I don't
know. E
45.
45. Okay.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
Okay. Thank you. And at this time, if we have no other things, we would have a motion to approve or draft approve.
I'll make a motion.
It's a motion to approve from commissioner Isaac Lopez.
I'll second.
And seconded by commissioner Jimenez.
Commissioner Jimenez? Yes. Commissioner Manes?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez?
Yes.
Vice Chair Shively?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes.
With a vote of five to zero, this motion is approved.
Thank you very much. Get started. Turn it on unless you need to take a quick break. You okay? Okay.
Item six b, tentative parcel map 25 Dash 00007, TPM 38528, and development plan reviews twenty two zero zero zero two two, twenty three zero zero zero nine, and twenty three zero zero zero one zero, continued from the 08/06/2025 meeting. Proposals are considered the following entitlements for the development of Nantes Street trailer storage and maintenance yard on three separate sites totaling 9.72 acres located along Nantes Street between Nevada And Webster Avenues within the general industrial zone of the Paris Valley Commerce Center specific plan. Number one, tentative parcel mapped to consolidate eight parcels into one parcel for Site 1, totaling 5.61 acres. And development plan reviews for the site plan and building elevations of Sites 1 And 2, each proposed to be developed with an 11,700 square foot mechanical service and maintenance building with outdoor trailer storage with Site 3, which is supposed to be developed as a trailer storage facility. Applicant, Lake Creek Industrial, And Matthew Evans is the contract planner who should be up here.
Requested action, adopt resolution number 25Dash15. Adopting mitigating negative declaration number 2405, and the mitigation monitoring reporting program. And improving tentative parcel map 25Dash00007, and development plan reviews 22Dash0002223Dash0009, and 23Dash00010. To facilitate the Nantes Street trailer storage and maintenance charge on 9.72 acres based on the findings, continue resolution, and subject conditions of approval. And even before I get to the staff is what they're going to say, I think the idea is that do we have any ex parte communication, side visits, or ad hoc committee meeting?
I went to ad hoc for this one.
Okay.
I had an ad hoc and I drive there frequently, but I actually did a site visit and sat in that area for a bit.
Okay.
Nothing? None for me.
Okay. Yes, I was in that area. Also, on a note, we have a, well, memorandum from commission well, planner Matthew Evans to the chair and members of the planning commission. Item six b, comment letter pertaining to I don't wanna read all the TPMs on this one. From Curt Hines, base civil engineer on behalf of March Air Reserve Base.
Mister Hines is requesting that this item be continued next planning commission meeting for the following reasons. One, project is adjacent to the clear zone and located in accidental potential zone one, a p Z 1, and MARB Airfield. Two, there is no development allowed within CZ and limited development permissible in a p Z 1. Additional time is necessary review the Department of Air Force and federal guidance to support compatible development of land as defined within the Paris Valley Commerce Center specific plan. And three, manpower deficiencies and sudden unexpected loss of planning staff are placing additional requirements on March Air Force Base, BCE for internal DAF priorities and external community relation actions dated 08/20/2025.
And the actual memorandum of is also attached from the Department of Air Force, Air Force Reserve Command, 08/20/2025 for the record. Okay? And then we'll ask Citi how they want to proceed with this.
Thank you, mister chairman. We do have a presentation. However, the applicant would like to address the commission at this time.
Good
evening, chair, members of the commission, and staff. My name is Christine Saunders representing Lake Creek Industrial. And we would agree to the request for the continuance out of respect to our neighbors and to make sure that they have the time that they need to review the project. We've provided the plans to them after the last planning commission and have been working with them since then to facilitate that review. It just hasn't been completed at this point. We also have planned the project specifically for that proximity to March Air Reserve Base, and we feel confident with our determination and with staff's determination that it's consistent. And I hope that that will be the conclusion when we come back to Planning Commission.
Okay. I'm not sure everyone understands, I don't know if you do, mister Brown, about the March Air Force C zone, B zone, CLEAR zone. Maybe a staff person can maybe go through a brief explanation of whether this is and that way one way or another voting is just explanation of clear zone versus the runway zone. I think I do because I did type up a whole entire thing about it, but maybe not all of us do.
So just to make it quick and easy, the clear zone is a zone where there is no structures are allowed. And the proposed project does not propose any structure within the clear zone. It's adjacent to the clear zone. So that's the quick and dirty explanation Thank of a clear
you. Very good. We use you all the time, Patrick. Okay. So it is your and of course we're still going to do public comment. So, as a developer, you're willing to do a guess it would dates would not be a date certain. So, we just have to have off calendar?
A date certain Right. Be requesting
So, the next planning commission meeting would be on September 17. September 3 meeting will be canceled.
Oh, okay. September 17. Okay. Okay. That is a request. But, anyway, we still wanna have is there any public comment on this item at this? Seeing none, no public comment on this item. So it comes back to the commission for a we have a date certain, 09/17/2025 in the council chambers here since I'm
And just for clarification, being that we're continuing this item to a date specific meeting, we're not going to send notices to as as required by law.
Yeah. Okay.
And to clarify, it would be at the regular meeting time.
Yeah. Okay. It says it it has been agreed to by the developer and it's been requested and we do have the I'm I'm pretty sure you have a copy of this, Sylvia, of course. Okay. So, everyone has a copy of it and the requested letter, the backup letter, everything. So, we just need to take a vote and get a motion to move this to calendar date 09/17/2025 as a continuation.
I'll make a motion to continue this item to some September 17.
I'll second that.
K. Move by oh, you got it. Okay. Commissioner Lopez, seconded by commissioner Jimenez. Okay.
She knows her voices now. She doesn't even have to look back. She knows all her voices.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Yes.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez? Yes. Vice Chair Shively?
Yes.
Chair Hammond? Yes. With a vote of five to zero, this motion is approved. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you very much. Last chance, anyone wanna take a five, ten minute or we're good?
We're good?
Okay. We're good. We move on to item six c. Specific plan amendment twenty two dash zero five three eight zero, tentative parcel map 22Dash05379, TPM three eight seven three o. Conditional use permit 25Dash00004, Development plan reviews, 22Dash00037 and 22Dash00038.
And variance twenty five dash zero zero zero zero one, continued off calendar from 09/10/2024 city council meeting. Proposal to consider the following entitlements to facilitate a mixed use project on 16.91 acres located on the south side of Ramona Expressway, Green Paris Boulevard, Redlands Avenue in the commercial zone of the PVCCSP. Number one, specific plan amendment to rezone 7.13 acres of a larger 16.91 acre site from commercial zone to multifamily residential, modify the development standards table to increase the building height from 30 feet to 50 feet, and the land use table to allow self storage facilities, the commercial zone with a conditional use permit. Two, tentative parcel map to subdivide two parcels into five parcels totaling 16.91 acres. Three, conditional use permit to allow one to allow 181,000 square foot self storage facility on 5.4 acres.
Development plan review number four, for the review of the site plan and building elevations for two freestanding sit down restaurants totaling 9,000 square feet, a four story 107 room hotel on 4.31 acres, and a 204 unit multifamily residential development on 7.13 acres. And, number five, variance to allow reduced side yard setback for the self storage facility. Marwan Alabasi and the contact planner is Nathan Perez again. Okay? Requested action.
Didn't get enough the first time. Adopt resolution 25 dash 19 recommending that the city council certify the final environmental impact report. Identifying alternative four as the project as the project adopted mitigation and monitoring program statement of overriding considerations related to air quality, cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and noise, and findings effect. An approved specific plan amendment twenty two dash zero five three eight zero, city of departmental map twenty two zero five three seven nine, conditional use permit twenty five dash zero zero zero zero four, development plan reviews twenty two zero zero zero three seven, and twenty two zero zero zero three eight and variance twenty five zero zero zero zero one to facilitate the construction. Multi family resident development, a self storage facility, a hotel, and two sit down restaurants on 16.9 acres based on the findings contained herein and subject conditions of approval.
And as always, I think I said, ex parte communication, ad hoc committee meeting, and or site visits.
I'm curious. Ahead. Go ahead.
I had driven by the site and had ad hoc meeting with them.
I drive by the site each day.
I had ad hoc for this project.
I also served on ad hoc, and I drive by there every single day, multiple times a day.
Yeah, I've extensively been by this project site and sat on Dawson Street. Didn't get a ticket either, that's what sparked it. But extensively, so I very much know this site. After thirty five years, I should know this site. Okay. Okay. There you go, mister Perez. Alright.
Thank you, chairman Hammond, for that introduction again. The third item we have before you is the retreat at Lake Parish project, and the applicant is mister Marwan Alabasi. Some background information about this project, if it looks familiar, is. On 09/10/2024, the city council voted to continue the project off calendar. And the reason why is because they wanted to ask the applicant to explore an alternative concept without a warehouse building, and instead of having a warehouse building to have a residential development.
The applicant has updated the draft environmental impact report to include alternative four with this site design layout. Well, not this one, but the next one. Project modifications. On 04/10/2025, staff facility facilitated an ad hoc meeting, which the ad hoc expressed the need for the following, and I'll read it from the slide, provide ADA compliant secured trash enclosures, provide a conceptual landscape plan that includes half diamonds throughout the parking lots, to provide a wall and fence plan four, to provide additional landscaping along Dawes Street frontage five, revise building elevations, colors and designs to be consistent with the apartment three d rendering And six, to provide a path of travel from the multifamily residential development to the proposed shopping center. The applicant has revised the project plans to address the Ad Hocs Committee's recommendations.
Now some of the modifications, as mentioned earlier, the applicant is no longer proposing a warehouse, but they're proposing towards the rear near Daw Street, a multifamily residential development of two zero four units, also as shown in the yellow area. Also as part of the modification to the site plan, they're proposing a self storage consisting of 181,000 square feet, which is shown in the red rectangles. So the project site, if nobody knows where it's at, it's between well, it's along Ramona Expressway between Ramona, Daw Street, between Paris Boulevard and Reliance Avenue. The site is currently vacant. To the north is vacant also.
To the south is an industrial building, which is Whirlpool. East is Camper Resorts of America, and to the west is Park Place mobile home community. This is some site photos early in the morning of the site looking south. And here's a site photo across from Daw Street looking north. Now the project site is currently zoned commercial.
However, the applicant proposes to rezone 7.13 acres from multi family to commercial to multi family residential to facilitate the apartment community. Here's their overall site plan, which consists of three components. The commercial component is on the right hand side along Ramona Expressway. They're still proposing two sit down restaurants and a four story hotel which will have 107 rooms. To the south, which is on the left hand side, is the self storage facility, which consists of six buildings totaling 179,000 square feet and a 2,000 square foot caretaker's residence.
Multifamily residential development also consists of two four story buildings totaling two zero four units. And I'll get into details in the next couple of slides. Here's the site plan commercial. It essentially, as mentioned earlier, has two sit down restaurants. Building 1 is 4,000 square feet.
Building 2 is 5,000 square feet, which are depicted in the blue area. There's a four story hotel, which is shown in the orange area, which has 170 rooms and also a pool as a facility for people who stay there. There's two thirty nine parking stalls and four RV stalls, and there's two points of access, one along Ramona Expressway, which is a right in and right out only. And they will also have access to the properties to the south, which would be the multifamily residential. Here are the commercial renderings.
I know Commissioner Jimenez loves these, which depict, you know, the way the restaurants are going to look. And also the main entrance off of Ramona Expressway, as you can see there. And there's no palm trees. I mean, I know it's depicted down there. It shows down there.
So here's the building elevation for Restaurant Number 1. And if you notice, it has an outdoor eating area. And Restaurant Building Number 2, and they both have different styles of architecture. Here's the building for the hotel elevations. If you notice, it has a four story building with a main entrance towards the north portion of the building.
So city staff has reviewed the commercial component, and it complies with the commercial development standards and also parking. Now, the second component is a self storage which replace, you know, a portion of the warehouse site consisting of 179,000 square foot self storage facility consisting of six buildings a caretakers facility, as mentioned earlier, which is shown in the yellow actually the orange box 19 spaces and 43 recreational vehicle spaces. There's also a 14 foot high decorative screen wall along Dawes Avenue, which is on the left portion of the slide, which will conceal, you know, any type of RV vehicle that's going to be stored at that location. Two points of access are proposed, one off of Dawes Street, and there's one towards the front, which has control access that they have to go through the caretaker's facility. Here are the building elevations for the self storage.
And city staff has also reviewed this and it complies with the commercial standards and also parking development standards. The specific plan also is going to allow self storage through a conditional use permit. So that's one of the specific plan amendments that's proposed tonight. Here's the site plan from a multi family development. To the north is on the right hand side of the slide.
It has one point of access, which you basically have to go through the commercial shopping center off of Ramona Expressway. And then the second, which is the main entrance for the residents, is off of Daw Street. If you notice there, there's two zero four units, one hundred and sixteen one bedroom units and eighty eight two bedroom units distributed through two buildings that are four stories high. There's three ninety six parking spaces, two zero four covered spaces, especially when it gets hot out here, you need to park it underneath a carport. And some of the amenities that were provided is a pool and spa, poolside restrooms, community room, fitness gym, outdoor lounge areas, and barbecue stations.
The majority of the amenities are centrally located between both buildings to allow, you know, easy access for all residents. And here are the building elevations on the multifamily residential. As mentioned earlier, it's four stories. And here's the typical carport elevation. And here are the renderings again.
If you notice, there's different views here. One is off of Daw Street towards the rear entrance. And then if you notice, you kind of have kind of like a perspective of what type of amenities the apartment community will have on the bottom right hand corner. City staff has also reviewed the project and it complies with the multifamily residential development standards and parking standards. So environmental determination and environmental impact report was prepared for alternative four, which included a second notice of availability for a forty five day review comment period, and there was only one letter received from Riverside County Flood Control, which was informational.
The EIR concludes that all impacts that have been reduced to less than significant or have been reduced to below the significance level with the implementation of mitigation measures, except for impacts related to air quality, cumulative GHG emissions noise, which have been identified as significant and unavoidable. Therefore, an adoption of statement of overriding considerations for air quality GHG noise would be required in order to approve the project, which the council will have to approve it. Staff recommends that the planning commission recommend to the council adopt resolution twenty five one nine certifying final environmental impact report identifying alternative four and approve the specific plan amendment, tentative parcel map, conditional use permit and development plan reviews and variants to facilitate the proposed mixed use projects based on the findings herein and subject to the conditions of approval. This concludes my presentation. I'm here to answer any questions.
Thank you, sir. Once again, thank you. Okay. Obviously, we are if our applicant has the oh, go ahead.
Mister chair, if I can just clarify, the statement of overriding consideration is only for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Right. Not for noise. No. Okay. Thank you.
Oh, it's not for noise. Okay. So we can take that out. Anything noise would yeah. Okay.
And as we know you are, but do the routine. You state your full name, spell your last name for
Good evening, commissioner, chairman, staff. My name is Marwan Alabasi. I'm the applicant. And, special thanks to Nathan, of course, Patricia and, Brad and all staff that worked in this. And thanks to the commissioners to have us in front of them for the second time. And to the members of the ad hoc that joined us a few months ago. You may recall, like Nathan said, this came in front of planning commission last year. And we got the votes to move to council. We did move even a few hours at Planning Commission, a few hours at council. We saw some concerns from the community and from council about the project that we had.
So we went back to the drawing board and we went to a different alternative. And we took into consideration the many speakers that spoke at Planning Commission and Council. And we decided to go in the direction that people were asking. They wanted some residential. And we all live in this county and the state and we know the shortage in housing. So we figured apartment was the way to go. And again, thanks to my team here, by the way, my wife Liz, my son Ramzi, Corinne, and our architect Greg and Ryan, our environmental consultant for any questions. So we went to the drawing board and we saw the everybody kind of liked the front, which is the hotel and the restaurant. So we kept them. We just kind of flip flopped them, moved the hotel to the east.
And we decided to go with the recommendation of doing the residential and the storage. We did some studies and we saw there is a need for both, especially in that area. We made changes after the ad hoc. We made changes after talking to the community and planning commission and council. And we think we have a project now that we'd like to think that could move forward and hopefully get it built. It's a large project. We're a small developer. It's probably over $100,000,000 project. So we're phasing it in phases, the economy and the housing and the interest rate. But we definitely intend to build all of it. Unlike the warehouse, it's not contingent upon what goes first. So we'd like to see all of it build and it will all get built. This is my presentation. If anybody have any question, I'll be here to answer.
Thank you. Thank you very much, sir. Again, any questions for staff and or the applicant at this time? I know you do, so don't hesitate.
Thank you for the presentation. My question is in regards to the hotel. Commissioner Jimenez brought up a really good point with the last hotel that we had in regards to the pool and the privacy with the screening. So what what type of screening are you guys providing around the pool area for the hotel?
I think we even addressed that last time with the commissioner Herman commissioner Herman as we had enough we added more landscape in the back. And now we moved it to where the storage is there, and we're actually utilizing the wall of the storage units itself. And we have an eight foot wall, so there's absolute full privacy from the storage area. And we have the hotel itself screening it. We have a lot of landscape like commissioner Jimenez requested at that time. And we added plenty of landscape around it.
But is it gonna be a wrought iron or a block block wall?
The block wall will be between the storage and the hotel.
Mhmm.
The pool itself, there'll be some wrought iron around
the With with landscaping around?
Correct.
Is it gonna be like bushes, like hedges?
Or Correct.
Okay. And then for the RV parking, I see there's RV parking at the hotel. Is there going to be any regulations in long term parking for the RV?
This is only for residents. The hotel, as we you may have the AVID, which is for kind of overnight stay, and we have the extended stay portion. Extended stay, most people stay three, four, five days if they come in for an event. We don't it's only for the residents, for the hotel residents. For the hotel.
So the managers will be in charge of the parking lot? Absolutely. Okay.
It will be signed, That overnight parking only for residents, there'll be stickers signed. I'm sure you've been to hotels where they give
you Yeah.
Course. Stickers. So it'll be we have RV parking at the storage. If somebody wants a long term, that's where they park.
Perfect. And in regards to the apartments, there's not gonna be any garage parking. Right? Everything is just carports and and outdoor parking?
That's correct.
Okay. Perfect. Thank you so much.
I was looking at your plant palette here, and I really like it. However, I do have one minor nitpick that I wanted to know if you'd be interested in changing. Plant number 33, and it's a milkweed. It's a desert milkweed. I know it's, like I said, it's a nitpick.
We actually have the migration of monarch butterflies goes directly over Paris and actually goes near the area of Lake Paris. I was wondering if you would be able to change that desert milkweed to either a California milkweed or a narrowleaf. I know it's very minor nitpick, but that first one that was it's actually harmful to the monarchs and I was just, you know, it's a small change. I was wondering if you'd be able to do that.
I would say absolutely because I don't know what you're talking about.
Yeah. I figured.
Well, I'll say yes.
But it's it's a small change, but it's big for the little guys and I don't know.
Just I will I will accommodate Yeah. Was that was it.
Yeah. Thank you.
You're talking Greek to me, we'll do it.
Sorry.
We we are here to accommodate. It took us a year from the last time we went to council because we really wanted to come with a with a product and the amenities. I know Nathan read some of it. We wanted to make this, especially the apartments, make it affordable yet a bit luxurious. I mean, at the pools, look at the kids pool, look at the spa, gym, conference area. So we wanted to make it affordable, not necessarily affordable housing label because we were asked not to do that. But it will be not for lower income, but it will be affordable.
That was the extent of my questions right now. Thank you.
Mr. Olivasci, you have five phases in your current plan. Do you have an estimated timeline on total completion of all five phases?
We intend to do all the off-site work, all the underground in the first phase. We will we're looking at probably two to three years for all five phases. Like I said, it's over $100,000,000 project. It's a good sized project.
So in one portion of the storage facility where you're storing the RVs, the portion that is not bordering the RV resort, you're showing a a bourbon wall. But the portion that's on the east side that is bordering the RV RV Park doesn't have a burned walls. It's gonna be a 14 foot high wall on both sides?
It's either the unit itself or wall. The entire parameter is gonna be either the building walls or a parameter wall.
And then single story elevations for the single story unit on the West side is do you know what the height is that? Is that going to be 14 feet?
I will defer to Greg, our architect. Probably 14 feet is the safe assumption.
Yes. Think it says 14. East and West, right? Yeah. Hello.
I'm Greg Simonoff, S I M O N O F F. And that is a single story building. Will have clear height of about 10 feet inside. And we would assume that that building would not be any higher than around 14 feet.
Alright. I'll pass the torch to for others to question, and I'll come back.
Good afternoon. Evening? Evening. Quick question. Did we lose any square footage on the restaurants when we did the modifications?
Absolutely none.
Did we lose any on the hotel?
Nope. We just flip flopped them for privacy because we figured the hotel had better privacy about the storage.
Okay. My next question was do you have a color or palette sample of the colors because I don't think they're coming through very clearly?
Yes, we do. And you know
how I am about colors.
We changed colors. We had it gray and a lot of requests came in to go change. So we've changed the colors. I hope you will be satisfied with the change.
Yeah. You know it's gray. Alright. I wanted to look at the colors because I think with the apartment, sometimes they look a little bit drab if they're that color where they're just too tan, too too brown. They can look a little bit drab, especially when it's four stories and there's just so much. So I just want to look at the colors for a moment. I'll give somebody else a chance to ask.
Take your time.
I wanted to direct my question to engineering. Is there going to be any restrictions that's going to restrict people from parking on Dawes Street? No. So there's no parking? Wait. Currently, there's no parking? Okay. But Oh, and it says? Okay. Alright. No worries. Thank you so much.
Yeah. I missed the ticket. Was sitting there. I got a ticket. That's why I know.
You still you see that? Go ahead. Go ahead because I got a lot.
It'll be quick.
Yeah. I have another question. Do we have a potential tenant for the self storage facility?
Are the tenant. We're going to build it ourselves.
Okay. And then should it be transferred over to a new tenant or anything in the future? Is there anything guess this is more so for staff. Any way that we can ensure that the color scheme of that self storage remains as is presented rather than just because it's so close by to to homes. Think this is a real I I like this color scheme and and I would like it to stay that way even if ownership changes.
The change of color would have to go through an administrative development plan review process reviewed by staff. It wouldn't come back to you. Okay. But, it's noted as part of the minutes and the record that this is the preferred color scheme for the self storage.
Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Or you want me to go before you
Go ahead.
Okay. Because I might be long.
That's okay.
Okay. I'm gonna talk enough to where they're gonna think or whatever they're gonna think. A few points, some may be for staff and some may be for you, but mostly probably some staff stuff. We need to make a correction because the plans have to match. So we're saying a 30 foot driveway, which is actually 42 feet, and we want to reflect 42 feet, which I'm completely saying that is a width why they didn't have to be able to have it? Because you only want interest on Ramona. So it's we're talking 42 pieces so that they match the plans. So in engineering, it says 42. The plan say four thirty, it's 42. And so it's gonna match whatever the engineering says. So that's what
That's a long story. But yes, I agree. We definitely will do it.
They put it in there so it's no
Yeah. Brad is aware of that. Think we talked about it. Oh, yeah.
Yeah. He's smiling. That's why. Also, I'm picking on engineering today. On Dawes Street, it says southbound traffic. I think we mean east and west. So I think the engineering, it talks about when they do egress or that it goes south and it's not really south, it's east west direction. So when you come out of that driveway, it would be on Dawes. It would not be North South. It would be East West. Right?
Mhmm. Sorry. Is that is that condition five Yeah. Second bullet?
Yeah.
Yeah. So if you're going out of there, it's gonna be southbound.
We're Coming on Dawes, you're gonna go
Coming out coming out of the site, you're going southbound. Coming out
of site, you're going out
of the you're putting a stop sign for that southbound movement out of the site.
Oh, of the site. Okay. I wanna be very clear about that. Can I say, wait a minute? Am I directions that bad?
I know. It's just out of the site putting a stop sign. That's all.
Okay. Okay. So, $1,000. Okay. Okay. The other thing, obviously on Ramona, you were suggesting a deceleration lane, which you're gonna be from the end of their property, not Farmer Boy's, but the end of their property all the way to Redlands. Is that what's proposed?
Right. So in front of their property, it's conditioned to be 61 feet from the median southerly edge
Mhmm.
And they're proposing to go above and beyond and go east of their property Mhmm. To accommodate a right turn pocket into the neighboring property Yes. Exactly.
Okay. Okay. So we don't make that turn have to be a real
Right. Yeah.
That would that would be a nightmare turn.
It'd Keep everyone who's turning right off the main line.
Okay. Okay. A few more and I'm talking so that I can kinda clear the way for you guys. Also to how do I do this one? We're talking about, going back to what he was talking about, a 14 foot wall on the east side and a 14 foot wall on the west side to the portion where particularly south of that community or clubhouse of Camp Resort, I'm calling it a clubhouse, I'm probably not. But, Camp Resort, so that would be 14 feet. That would that would be screening the any of those RV parking which is part of the storage, I'm assuming.
Correct.
Yeah. So that would block that there. So if it's 14 big difference between eight and fourteen. Right? So if it's 14 feet and then right now there is just no really no fence on the southeast corner. It's it's it's just not there. You know, I see the they're they're just parked in angles there, you can just walk right across. And I said that the last time. So that would make a big big difference, you know, and especially safety and security for those people parking that would be parking there and storing those there. That would be important.
I've I've got a few issues so be be patient. I talked to building the building and safety person and this is more of a something that I do on particularly on COAs and particularly engineering as a reference to elevator codes and you have elevators proposed on both buildings. And so some reference as a condition for engineering, I would imagine, to say that would be title 22 and I won't title 24 part two, I won't get into all that CBC. I don't wanna make it a assumption, but something that would be absolutely mandatory. At least make that such because you have ADA requirements and safety requirements, is what they are mostly about.
And that is a concern, accessible. Those kind of things are necessary. And if you're building elevators, particularly when you have public, having done ADA elevators, they're not nice people. Let's just be let's just put it that way. But the idea is that it's not only safe security, but it's a necessity that we at least make a reference to make sure that they are you know, the spacing there, the handlebars are there. You have the disabled. If a person is is blind, they have the the finger sits. All that has to be there. And so regardless, whether the first Floor or second, you if you put that elevator that has, you know, those one of those requirements. So it's really a ADA and a safety issue.
And if something goes wrong, want that certification in the elevator. So a reference to which is not even in here at all. I'm not assuming anything because I was a city employee, so I don't assume anything. I know better. Thirty five years as a city employee, I know you have footstep in writing. So it's best even if it's not it, I tend to do it because I did it because I wrote contracts for city of LA. So I know. You know, 116 pay contracts and one of those things is minor things would get you in trouble. So that's what I'm requesting and it's just really a statement. So if we're gonna put them in to make sure that they adhere to the title 24 and I'll leave it to you guys administratively.
Not gonna say specifics, but administratively to discuss and that would be something that the building inspector would do, that would be something they would do, but just we met to make sure that there's an understanding that it needs to be up to code.
If I may actually, it's regulated by the state.
know. So it it will be inspected. I've had them in my buildings in the past. Right. Yearly inspection certified. So, yes, I'm definitely ADA
Right.
Compliance.
Right. So I just wanna make sure that that's not that anyone doing, but I wanna make sure that the city understands that that's my request, that there at least be some reference to that.
Patricia, can we just have make sure there's note in there for the California elevator code in there?
Yes. And I was I was looking for the building and safety conditions that we can can add it in there because that would be the appropriate location for
that
condition. Yes, it's within your purview to add in for clarity.
Believe me, I'm going easy on you today. That was a major one. Think Yeah. I think that covers pretty much. In the in parking summaries, this is for future notes, we talk about the number of parking spaces, we talk about that, but we don't say the number of ADA parking spaces.
So if you have x number number 292, how much of those were ADA? I'm not gonna worry about EV, but ADA parking spaces as numbered on the chart. It might be mentioned on there, but I mean on the chart, we always put the chart and we don't say, we just say total parking spaces. It would be nice to do for here and future reference to say, of this total, we have a total of 10. We total eight. And, it depends on square footage, it depends on all that other stuff, but you gotta have them because this is federal. And so, least the number in the chart, and I think it may be more staff report, but I didn't see ADA on there. I saw the number of spaces.
Mhmm. Yeah. I I I understand your your concern. ADA parking spaces are regulated by the California And Building in an attempt for us not to make any errors in our calculations or in our staff report, We refer to the we defer that calculation to the building official when the plan check when the plans go through plan check review.
Yeah, and I would look at say based upon the square footage net, what is the requirement? Now, whether or that is something we would have to do, that would be beneficial. But, the requirement for the number of spaces, you have to have a certain amount of ADA parking spaces, period. So you gotta have them. And so, this is what's required whether that's actually something we put in, you know, that's the building inspector. But I would like to at least have what is required for the total number of spaces as a percentage. In everything. Don't care if it's LA, Downey, all of them have it.
Right. We don't. All the jurisdictions are covered by the California building code. Yeah. Maybe the architect can provide us a percentage of what would be required, but what I'm trying to explain is that as part of the planning process, it would be difficult for us to provide a percentage of ADA parking spaces because that's outside of our purview. That's within the purview of the building official.
Then we can make, we should make reference to the fact that this is something that would be, even if it's an asterisk based upon this the California code, this would be a requirement spaces. If we're saying 292 spaces, it would be determined by
It's a percentage of the required spaces.
Exactly. Exactly.
There there is a chart that goes with it that lists the number of spaces Yeah. And what's provided. We do show the accessible parking on our plan.
Oh, yeah. On the plans. Yeah. So it would just match what would be on their chart.
And to apply to
Yeah. To Yeah. So I'm just saying it would it would match what they would have on the chart. So if they have on the you have number spaces on your plan, would just match their estimated.
Yeah. And and we do have a condition of approval number 33. It's ADA compliance that reads, the project shall conform to all disabled access requirements in accordance with the state of California title 24 and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act ADA. So, are covering that respect but it's outside our purview and that's why we don't include it in our calculations for parking.
Okay. Well, yeah, I agree. I'm just saying if you're showing it on the plans as a certain number then they probably should just this is estimated that they're going to have nine spaces. They estimated they have six. So, I'm just saying I'm matching the plan. The chart is not part of the COA, so that's probably just Yep. It's not easy. Easy.
The money well taken, we'll do a better job next time to ensure that the project plans include a table that shows the number of Right. 88 parking spaces
Mhmm.
And EV charging spaces.
That's all. Yeah. Thank you, Patricia. Everybody got me time to get questions in? Go for it. I got a
few. I clarify something?
Mhmm.
The wall in the east side, it was brought to my attention by mistake. It shows eight foot wall. It'll be 14 foot wall.
That's what I thought.
Yeah. Yeah. Just want to clarify it. Thank you.
So that goes back to what you were talking about.
I apologize if we called it eight in the plans, it's a 14 foot because we need it for safety anyways, for security.
Mr. Chair, so if at the end we can make a condition of approval requiring the 14 foot high wall if that's the desire of Yeah. The Planning
And I think the condition would that would be modified would be 44 B.
Right.
Double I. So we could take out east from that and then add maybe four and add along the east a 14 foot high wall.
Okay. And eight foot on the west?
On the east side.
Yeah. But eight foot on the west?
No. We'll leave the the the west as eight foot high spoof stucco. Right.
But
to the to the east, a 14 foot high wall.
Okay. Okay. And that goes around that that clubhouse for the camp and resort?
The entire stretch from the hotel to
DOS. Okay. Okay. And a
little zigzag around the clubhouse. Yes.
It's also 14 feet on the south wall except for it's a berm. Correct. Eight foot high on the exterior side of the property. Mister Alabasi, the for each phase, when you install or when you do the parking, will you be providing or just prepping for electric vehicles?
For each phase, we'll be think the code still does not require the electric vehicle. So we'll be proposing it for future when it becomes mandated.
Perfect. Okay.
There's a well, I'm being a nitpicky today. On the rendering one of the renderings, and there's no page, but these are the apartments. And it shows the picture of the apartments, and I don't know if you have a picture of that. And I'm not sure this was right, but where it says the parking there, they're showing on the plan, it's talking about carports adjacent to and you see that, go back to the previous picture of the apartments. See, the carports are supposed to be next to the apartments, right, Based on the plans. And then the ports on the other side are open. So on the plans, the carport is adjacent to all the residential.
That was changed, I believe. Initially we had it. And I think that we did not there was a request from the city, correct? To move it. Maybe Nathan could address it.
Yeah, the whole reason why we moved the carports is to meet the setback requirements. So we couldn't have a structure up to the setback.
No, but I'm saying the picture on the plans is carports right adjacent to residential. On that picture, it shows it up against the wall. So which is it?
You're right. It just looks prettier that way. But it it should be against the building.
You're correct.
I think the rendering was done. And we had several conversation with staff, and it was recommended because of setback issues.
Mhmm.
We we agreed to move it by the building.
Okay.
But we apologize. It doesn't
I'm just nitpicky tonight. Yeah. I had coffee. What can I say? I'm awake. Okay. That's it for me. Go ahead, Guy, for now.
I do wanna jump on that. Do we have any other renderings of the hotel or is this, like, the only couple of ones that we have? I'm sorry, not hotel, the apartments. Yeah, I want to see the apartments. Were those the only ones? There was no additional details of where like entries, exits are?
We can get you some stuff to look at. I mean, yeah, I'm sorry. Yeah, we actually, to be honest with you, we've modeled the whole site. I mean, I could, you know, at some point, if you'd like, we could walk you through the model and you can see every aspect of it. But we had to select certain images to kind of show the nature of the apartments, and we selected those to put into the presentation.
Right, but I feel like the storage and the hotel are so detailed, and this one was just like two slides, three slides, not a lot of detail over. The entrance point is for the residents, how mobility is around inside. Like, there's not a lot for the hotel.
For the hotel?
I'm sorry, for the apartments.
The apartments.
Yeah, like, it's not clear where entrances are. Like, the Okay, north and here. South has
can, if you go to the plan, yeah, the well, yeah. No, go back to, yeah. No, go to the rendering. It's fine. Go to the rendering and then we can point to it.
Because there's actually a, you know, as you enter off of Ramona, there's a guest parking area there. And there is a, and that is a fenced area around there. And the fence goes back to where the entry lobby information area would be for the apartments. So that area and that zone, that information zone, that sort of public area, is a public area and is accessible. And then the rest of the apartment complex is secured.
Right, but entrance into the actual apartment complex. If I was a resident, I wouldn't like, there's no designated places.
There are two lobbies, one for each side, where you can enter into the lobby and then into the corridor, which takes you to either the elevator, the vertical transportation, or to your units.
You're talking for the entire community or for the building itself?
No, just for the buildings themselves.
No,
see them, but I don't have an elevation of them. That is what it's going to look like. Nathan, were was the apartments brought to Ad Hoc, and were these the only elevations?
Previously, they actually added more elevations and more three d renderings. But, you know, this is basically what was given to us. So I don't recall how many elevations they provided, but
We didn't have the three d.
Yeah. We didn't have three d. But they did have the two d elevations of the building themselves.
More of them or was it just these?
It was just those. Yeah.
And this was brought to our ad hoc?
Yes. That's correct.
Attorney, can I ask my fellow commissioners if they had any feedback during ad hoc regarding the elevations or any concerns?
Sure, go ahead.
Okay. Was this at all talked about in the last ad hoc about the elevations, color scheme, the architecture, aesthetics of
it? I do remember Shively did bring up the architecture of the apartments.
I believe we had a discussion on some of the color schemes on it. I don't have don't have the ad hoc drawings with me, but there probably been some changes to the elevation. I don't recall what it is.
Yes. It was briefly mentioned.
If I could add, the color was changed. We had a grayish color. And there was they requested the change to go to the tan yellow brown color. And at ad hoc, they requested three d rendering, and we did provide them. Those are in the carports. And And the carport we did provide them.
Okay. Good. I think one potential request from mine, think you already know what I'm gonna do with that one. It's about a certain tree in African sumac. Get rid of it. What? African sumac. That's one tree listed on this thing, and we don't have a
I made a commitment to whatever plants you wanna change. I'm Yeah. We already agreed with
African sumac is I I have it in front of my house, and it's a disaster.
I agree with you.
We'll But change we didn't have a tree. We have all the bushes, we just didn't have a tree. So, you know, I wasn't picking on it. But that's the only thing the only thing in there that and it's not because it's a bad tree, it's just too much maintenance. And so it's a maintenance issue. So if that's okay with
Absolutely.
Yeah. Other than that, I'm pretty much I think I think they've asked it unless you've got something in. Mhmm. Okay.
Nathan, was there any feedback given on the hotel elevations from staff and the colors and and or anything else? Were there discussions around not the hotel, I'm so sorry, the apartments. No.
It was just, you know, to change the colors. Originally, it was kinda like a gray color.
Mhmm.
And, you know, I guess, I think it was either I forgot which commissioner, but they requested that the colors be changed. And council also wanted to change the color well, not the council. Basically, to change it more to a tan color and also provide three d renderings based on these elevations.
And this was the lab that was provided. And I don't know. I guess I'm having I don't have a problem with the tan colors. There's no accent. There's no pop up. There's nothing. It honestly reminds me of Colombia. You've been like, this is what you see when you live in the apartments there, but
it looks very drab, very dry. There's no character to it. We're happy to work with Mr. Alabasi on providing an accent color that complements the rest of the building the rest
of So, the color even that top left elevation, there's beige three quarters of the way up, and the top one is gray. Like, there's no consistency. There's no pop accent colors, no personality. Mhmm. I'm really struggling with the apartment portion of this. Like, really struggling.
Got it.
Yeah. I think the the front elevations, the two d elevations, didn't don't give any justice to the colors. These three d renderings do help a little bit, but I we can definitely use introduce another color element to make it pop a little bit.
We don't have a problem. I'm lucky I didn't choose the colors. It'll be it'll be really bad.
No. Because you picked the gray ones, and I would have been perfect with that. But whatever. I didn't show up to that ad hoc. That's my fault. Next time I'm gonna go.
We change it. I won't tell you how many people said get rid of the gray, but I'm I'm open. It really doesn't bother me. I like both of them. But I I like this one. I could see the accent. We'll definitely add some accent to it.
Accent. It needs something there.
Our architect is here. I hope he is I need to address that.
It needs something. It needs personality needs.
We can work with staff and revise the elevation. We're happy to work with staff and to get you some updated elevations and to work through this as we go forward. And make sure you're happy with the elevation. We want you to be happy.
So we're clear that this was the color that's presented. And so we're talking about asking.
Accent colors.
Yes, yes, go They're open to
working with applicants. I understand. Oh, and I forgot to ask. For the restaurants, we didn't lose any square footage. No. Do you still have the same interest in the restaurants? Or what were you planning? Do you have?
The same interests have not changed. Okay. It just depends on when we get this thing approved so we could nail them down. Same interest, nothing has changed. The same with the hotel.
Okay. So the interest is still there. I did have a question just on the traffic flow and that's for engineering. I'm sure we did a study. Do we have because that corner in the back where like there's a fence coming out of the storage facility, there's a fence coming out of the apartment complex, and then we have the traffic from on-site. It do we think that would be an issue? I'm thinking more of the RVs.
Sorry. Is this for the self storage or the
For well, there's
a place where all three kind of, like, merge
Oh, in the middle on-site.
Mean This one you see where, like, you're exiting, and then there's exiting from the apartment complex, and you're moving on to the hotel and the commercial So
everything has been designed per code for, you know, fire and safety.
Okay.
And to help out, there are gated access points there. So it's not a constant free flow there. So I wouldn't see any issue with it, personally.
The traffic to the storage is very minimal. We did a study. It's like 20 trips per day for the whole facility. And the entrance you see by the caretaker, this is more for the people who sign in up. When they do sign up and they want to come in, they come in off DOS. That's the entrance. They have a number to punch in. We don't want people going through the hotel parking lot and the restaurants. It'll be from DOS.
Okay, good. Then I did there was one more question I was thinking about. Oh, I remember last time we had talked about because one of the concerns with the community is people exiting the campers location and making a left. I think there was going to be a center divider that went all the way through so that they couldn't make that left.
I'll let Brad address it because we beat it to death. So
the applicant, once again, is going above and beyond to put that median in to restrict let turns at that point. And with or without that project, I think I said this last year, we would be putting that in as a Yes. City project for safety reasons.
Yes.
But they're going above and beyond to do it as part of their project.
Okay. And is there any chance to I I feel like the previous renderings had more a more boom in your face pretty entrance way.
You like the warehouse? You want us to go back to warehouse?
No. The entrance from Ramona, not the warehouse. I wanted something that I feel like the entrance for the previous one was a little bit more
I thought everybody loved the hotel and the restaurants. Mean, they're really
We do. But the entrance into it, the monument signs, I think, is what
It didn't change. It did not change at all.
They didn't change? I feel like I think with the switch layout, maybe it looks a little bit different because the hotel's further back.
And we added more landscape. Think maybe that's
where you see the building.
But we're willing to remove some landscape, add more landscape. I mean, we're open to that. No.
I'm thinking working maybe with staff for a monument sign that really like represents what's here because this is new for this area and it's
It's gonna be the nicest looking building in the room.
Right. Wanna make sure the monument sign matches what's inside. So working with staff for
Absolutely.
That
uplifted monument sign? We have an entrance, the lighting, fireworks.
There you go.
Okay. Water. Water
water feature in the sign.
Oh, don't go there. I don't wanna deal with the water. We did that at my shopping center, the one in Ravonna Expressway. Five years later, I got rid of the water problem.
Question for attorney. With the request for change of color for the apartment, can it be reviewed in the future through an ad hoc meeting with the two of us kind of reviewing and approving it along with staff?
You mean, like, after planning commission recommendation or after you say in the future, but what
do you
mean by In the future. Whenever he makes his changes of color elevation changes and stuff like that.
So rather than just working with planning staff, it would be to work with the ad hoc committee and planning staff as a commission approval?
Yeah. Yeah. That that would be okay. I don't mind doing it, but I hope it doesn't delay things. I mean, would do it through construction documents if you want. We'll send it out. Yeah. And whatever change is needed, we'll be happy I to just don't want to add more time, please.
No, I need know, this is your phase three, so we have some time.
The phasing is not necessarily in the same order because, like I said, this could change the numbering.
Yeah.
But, I appreciate the opportunity to take a look, and I think it would satisfy Commissioner Jimenez as well.
Absolutely.
So, to clarify, you mean based on the decision tonight, we would still be able, like, not continue, but potentially if it moves forward, still okay.
More of an administrative.
More of an administrative. We just wanna be a part of the conversation. Yes. Okay. Thank you.
Yeah, okay. So that's for the color and elevations or just color? Color elevations, that's a quick okay, yeah. I'm out of that one. Okay. I think what she's also may be referring to, and this would be the last of it so we can move on, the entrance way is not just so much the signs, but you know paving stone and something like that. Because on the picture, obviously it's not gonna look like that's the diagram. We don't want white concrete.
Go to my shopping centers, you'll see how we do. Oh yeah. So
that's another administrative thing. But I mean other than just plant who wants concrete? You know, cobblestone, are you amenable to that kind of thing? And We will
do a
decorative Okay. Okay. Stone and concrete, yes.
Okay. So that would have to be a consideration. I'm down unless you guys have more. Okay. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Okay. We open it up for public comment. I don't know if we had any blue slips, miss Sylvia. We do. Okay.
Do we have how about how many do we have? About 10?
We do have one. And we have three.
Three? Yes. Okay.
I have Erin Grieco.
Evening, commission. My name is Aaron Griego, g r I e g o. I am here with the on behalf of the Ironworkers Local four thirty three to express our support for the project and ask for your support with a yes vote for today. Building building a project such as this creates jobs that builds stronger and better community from day one. The developers have committed to local hire.
This will put hundreds of men and women just like me to work earning fair wages and safeguarding our children and families' futures. A yes vote today shows us and all of Paris that you care about positive development and stronger future for everyone. For all your support, I vote yes, please. Thank you for for your time. You. Sir.
Bob Ramos.
Good evening, commissioners. My name is Robert Ramos, and I'm the I'm with the Ironworkers Local four sixteen business agent representing over 2,200 members, many of them which reside here in the IE. Projects like this, you know, are wall thought out by the developer, and we're here asking for your yes vote tonight. It will provide, you know, it will provide a local hire aspect. What that means also, the community gets to work where they live, which is going to stimulate the economic growth and also have the the families reunite.
Right? In my thirty two year career, I I spent most of my time in LA. Yeah. Right? As the years got gone on, that one hour drive turned into two hours, three hours. Right? Holiday weekends, forget about it. Might as well just stay over there. Right? So we're asking for your yes vote tonight. Like I said, this is a well thought out plan in development, and it will put many of our skilled and trained labor to work. Thank you. Thank you, sir.
Zach Stratters.
Alright. Good evening. Zach Stroster with Care California. Always a pleasure to be here before you. Just real quick. So Care is in support of the project. A couple reasons specifically. One, as per the usual, with this particular developer, but especially tonight in this project, they did a great job reaching out to the community. They made sure that the community's concerns were heard, that those concerns were met, and they developed the project around whatever the needs and the concerns of the community were. Also wanna just, talk about the the breadth and the scope of the benefit to the community because it's not just an industrial warehouse.
Right? Care is always grateful when a when a developer does a really good job of making sure that an industrial offering meets the needs, but this is more than that. Right? This has this is full bodied, if you will. There's residential. There's hotel. You know? Then there's storage. So there's a lot that they put into this. We're eager to see the build out, and then we also always talk about infrastructure. Not just the community generally on a a surface level with regards to jobs, but what does this look like for the future development around it? You know, so they're taking this parcel, they're doing a great job making sure that it meets those needs. So, Carod's overwhelmingly in support, and we ask that you do the same. Thanks, and God bless you.
Thank you, sir, very much. And we had blue sheeps about anyone else, because we don't have to have a blue sheep. Okay. Speak now, forever hold your peace. Okay. No one else? Okay. Thank you very much. We closed the public comment portion. I don't know if the developer would have any response to that. Have any response? Does the applicant have any response to that? I don't think so. Okay. We close the public comment portion and move to real discussion from our commissioners. We're gonna start with Isaac no matter what. I
just wanna express my gratitude to the applicant. Thank you for really listening to us, listening to the planning commission, the city council. I know it was we're very hesitant to approve the the industrial project that you originally proposed to us. We have we do have a lot of industrial, but we don't have a lot of apartments and a lot of we we could always use more residential. And especially on Ramona Expressway, I feel like the residential is really gonna help out that commercial aspect of it. More people living there. There's gonna be more people going out to the restaurants and the area and the the the the commercial buildings in that area. So thank you so much for that. I'm super excited for the the restaurants that are gonna come to sit down restaurants. Everybody knows that Paris does need more of those.
The hotel is perfectly placed right next to Lake Paris, which is super popular in Southern California. So, just very grateful for you to, paying attention to those details. The the apartments that you proposed, I like the design of them because, I like the the central amenities that you that you included because it kinda gives a sense of community. All the apartments, all the buildings are gonna be together in that one center. So it kinda gives, like, almost like a college campus vibe with with everybody centered around the buildings. So thank you for really paying attention to us, and I'm looking forward to seeing this project built out.
I too wanted to thank you for your time. I wanted to thank you for, again, responding to the community. I know the community came out and gave you a lot of feedback and you responded to that feedback in an amazing way. And it's really, really admirable and I just wanted to thank you for prioritizing Paris residents and for really understanding that this location is, I mean, a gateway to the lake, to such a popular destination. It's what Paris needs. It's where Paris needs it. It's a really exciting project. I really love the plant palette. I I don't know. I just really love it and I just wanted to give it a shout out.
I think you did a really wonderful job with selecting the landscaping and the plants that you'll be putting there. Again, especially considering how close we are to the lake and retaining that air of, you know. Again, thank you for this. I really enjoy this project and I'm very excited for it. It's it is what we need, and I'm so thankful for you prioritizing us and showing us that we can have really nice things without, you know, sacrificing. So thank you.
I also want to thank the applicant for their flexibility. I know I said in that very first ad hoc, and we talked about our concerns with the industrial there. And we kept bringing it up, And you were like, no, it'll work. It's a good space for it. Like, there isn't a lot of this. Brought it forward. We were hesitant to move it forward. But I think in that process, you really heard what everybody had to say. And you were like, let me take a step back. Because yeah, it would work.
Yeah, it would probably be a good fit for it. But really taking a step back and listening to the community, to Planning Commission Council community, everybody about the need for high density housing. And I really like that there's a storage facility right next door because when you live in an apartment, if you haven't lived in an apartment, you have absolutely no storage for anything. So having a storage facility right next door, you can store your seasonal stuff in there. You can swap out your Halloween stuff, Christmas stuff without having to drive.
You could just walk over. So I really appreciate the flexibility. I appreciate the landscaping palette. And normally, I would be very hesitant about even considering moving something forward and working with the applicant after the fact. But we've worked with this family for a really long time. We know what they do. We know that they always come through. They do what they say they're going to do. So in this situation, I don't have hesitancy in putting faith in the developer, working with the staff, because I've seen that there is, I guess, conviction to your word. So I think it's something that is really needed in the city.
I'm really hoping that having those apartments will bring in some more commercial, because the first thing we hear is how many houses per blah, blah, blah are households and rooftops and this and that. So that'll bring rooftops to that area. So I'm hoping with the hotel and rooftops and that's a lot because that's four stories, two buildings I'm hoping that also will be a catalyst for a grocery store, banks, other things that are needed on Ramona Expressway. And thank you for thinking about the safety of the residents and the traffic flow and this and that. So all the little details that are thought about when considering something for the city is very appreciated.
I would like to thank the applicant very much for his thoughts and considerations for this project in the city of Paris. You've done several projects in the city of Paris, but nothing of this scale, which is very appreciative. And appreciate that you took the time and consideration to listen to everybody that had their concerns and for you to take a step back, spend some additional time on it, and come back with a much more feasible project, not for the city of Paris, but for yourself as well. One of the items that you are probably venturing in is storage. You know, Americans are one of the they save everything, where Europeans don't save as much.
So storage is a big business, across The US. So, I think it'll be very lucrative for you to have this on this location. So it's welcoming. And then, of course, as Commissioner Jimenez said, the department's there. So I think it all kind of flows together with the hotel and the restaurants as well.
Hopefully, they're, you know, which as you said before, they're nicer restaurants, sit down restaurants, higher end restaurants, something that city of Paris is desiring. And I'm much looking forward to because not to be able to, you know, don't wanna bring a client to Taco Bell. You know, I I enjoy my times, but it's hard to, you know, have that experience and and have a nice discussion in a a nice setting. So I appreciate the the restaurants and, know, as this whole project ties together, that, you know, you're committing a lot of your time and resources to the city of Paris for this project. And I look forward to be successful as possible.
Yes. And I won't prolong it. I agree with him. And I would just say that and I've known you a long time. Probably longer than anybody here, so. We've seen each other, we're getting gray, I've lost my hair, so I'm a little different. But you know, I'm still here. One thing I do know for sure is that this is the perfect location. Obviously, remote expressway was for some reason over the thirty five years I've been here is neglected and you're gonna get a lot of traffic. Because I live in Paris, I know it's gonna be a lot of traffic.
The perfect complement, I hadn't thought about it too, the storage there and you have apartments. It's a perfect combination because obviously, you know, you go in an apartment and you have nowhere place to put this stuff, you have storage units that you can use. So that's a perfect complement. What I like to and I've been asking for even once I started on this commission was hotel in that area. I cannot believe no one has put a hotel. That's unconscionable that no one's been able to do that. I don't care about housing a hotel in Lake Perris. The two go together. So you're right down the street, maybe that'll bring on a grocery store for thirty three years one of these days. But obviously, think also too, one of the reason I pushed the width of that sidewalk or the width of that opening is across the street.
Whatever development there, you can have a walkway also that is, you know, well lit and you can go back and forth one thing over there, whatever they propose, back and forth. So now you've got that connection between the two, not just the lake. So you design the hotel, you design RV parking because people go to the lake and they want to park there and stay. And so you have that design. So you thought of everything on this one. A lot different than the last meeting. Right? So I appreciate it too. I'll let them deal fight over the colors, you know. I'm not a colored person. It's gray green. Know it's not green. But but I'll let them deal with that. And I appreciate the quality and the commitment that you have as many don't. But I appreciate when you say you're gonna do something, you're gonna do it.
So I know that for several years. And I can really know that I just wish it'd be sooner, two years, but we gotta be patient because it takes a lot. But yeah. And there's not gonna be a lot of traffic on Dolls Street, you don't have to worry about Dolls. Okay? But by having the acceleration lanes it's gonna open up. You can't do it if you don't because people drive 70 miles an hour and come on, remote expressway, nobody's driving the speed limit. You know better than that, you don't either. So there's no such thing as speed limit on remote express. But that makes a big difference and one of the things we push and we ask a lot of questions and it's not because we're trying to be beat up, it's because we really like the project.
If we did, we wouldn't ask any questions. Now get that for future reference. So we're very picky, I'm very picky, the director knows I'm very picky, I'm a pest sometimes, but it's to do what's right. We want the quality and it's important to go to community because they gotta live with it. So we're the we're the spokespersons. There's nobody else, but we're the final spokesperson and we send it up. So I appreciate it and that's it. We've gone through all this and you'll be sitting with ad hoc, but basically it's pretty much laid out. So thank you very much, thank you for the family there. I'm surprised I didn't hear from them.
But I thank you for it and appreciate the project and I have no problems with it. If the only thing I'm asking is asking Sumak tree, you really got it made. Because that's the only thing I really was questioning. That's it. Now you really got off easy if that's all of that questioning, and that's nothing. Okay? So anyway, thank you very much. And if there's nothing else further to add, let me go through this routine. Just bear with me. I'll be quick.
But I'm just doing this for the record. If you so make me read it a third time. Okay. Pacific plan amendment 25 dash 05380, tentative parcel map 22Dash05379, and a conditional use permit 25000004. Development plan review 22Dash0003722 dash 00038 and variance twenty five zero zero zero zero one.
It was moved from continued off calendar from 09/10/2024 based on the city council meeting. So the proposal to consider the following entitlements of the city mixed use project of on 16.91 acres located in the South Side of Mote Expressway between Perez Boulevard, Redland Avenue in the commercial zone of the PVCCSP. As follows. Specific plan amendment to rezone 7.13 acres of a larger 16.91 acre site from commercial zone to multi family residential, modify the development standards to table to increase the building height from 30 feet to 50 feet, and the land use table to allow self storage facilities in the commercial zone with a conditioned use permit. That's why you have conditioned use permit.
Tenant of parcel map to subdivide two parcels into five parcels, totaling 16.91 acres. Condition use permit to allow 181,000 square foot self storage facility on 5.4 acres. Development plan review for the review of the site plan and building elevations for two freestanding sit down restaurants, totaling 9,000 square feet. A four story 107 room hotel on 4.31 acres, and a 204 unit multifamily residential development on 7.13 acres, and a variance to allow a reduced side yard setback for the self storage facility as indicated in plans. And requested is that we adopt resolution twenty five nineteen that the city council certify the final environmental impact report, and then find alternative four as a project, adopt the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, statement of overriding considerations related to air quality, cumulative greenhouse gas emissions, and I think our director said not noise, right?
Not noise. And findings of fact, And approved specific plan amendment 22 dash zero five three eight zero. Tendant tract parcel map, twenty two zero five three seven nine. Conditions used permit, 25Dash00004. DPR, 2200037, 20 200038, and variance twenty five dash zero zero zero zero one.
The facility construction of a multifamily resident development self storage facility, a hotel, two sit down restaurants on 16.91 acres based on the findings contained herein and subject condition of approval. And, we do have some additions, and I don't know if I got them all, but one was on the plant, and that might be administrative, go from milkweed to California California milkweed?
Narrow leaf? We could do narrow to a narrow leaf milkweed maybe?
Narrow leaf. I'll take your word for it. I have no idea. Yeah. No on-site living in these trailers or RV trailers as stated and maybe a sign posted of the corporate there's no on-site living on the property. Right? Okay.
With
the exclusion of the office building.
Oh, yeah. Well, the office. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Think so. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. You threw me off there. Oh, to add the wording concerning elevators and that I'll leave that to staff administration on that one. The colors, I think that would be discussed. I think it was 14 b point double I or something. But the idea is that would be worked with the ad hoc committee and the staff upon approve based on approval. If that's okay with our city attorney.
It would be to work with or to so I think more clarification is needed as to the details of that, but it's the idea is that, you know, work with staff to make adjustments to the the colors and elevations for the apartment buildings. To this I would say to the satisfaction of the planning manager in consultation with the ad hoc committee, and specifically, that would be commissioners Jimenez and Shively, as I understand it.
And I think too, the carports need a facelift.
Including the carports.
Including the carports.
As to colors and elevations?
Yes.
Or okay. Okay.
So we would add a condition of approval to to that effect.
So just to clarify where the applicant is not required to change the elevations, but to work with staff and the ad hoc committee on the color scheme, specifically more of an accent color that will enhance the color scheme of the of the building for not only the apartment complex, but also the the cardboard.
Color scheme is main main is
So to add an accent color and improve contrast or something along? Because it's good if you can articulate some direction.
Yeah. Right. Yes.
So, is that correct?
Ex and points. Yeah. Correct some ex and points and yes.
Okay. Okay. And, also, I think as a CEO of engineering, to match the plans of 40 foot to 40 foot foot 42 foot driveway aisle versus the plans that say 30 feet, we have to make sure it's 30 feet that match what's in the engineering.
So the engineering condition reads 42 feet. Right. So it's just more plan check with the applicant at that point.
Yeah. And there's a major difference between the two. Okay. I think that's all I have. Unless you had something else, I think that was it.
Okay. If I can add, Mr. Chair, there was also a request work with staff on the enhancing the main entrance and also complimentary monument signs at the entry. And then, yes, and then to modify condition number 44, b two, two little i's to remove east and to add a new condition there for the east side to include a 14 foot high solid wall. Yeah. Let's see what else do I have.
Is that smooth
Yes.
So the west side would continue to be eight foot high, smooth stucco wall, and the east side would be 14. 14 foot high smooth stucco wall. Right.
Mhmm. Also replace the African sumac tree with an alternate tree material.
Yeah.
palm trees. Trees. Let's see what else. African sumacs first. That's that's number one. Yeah. Okay.
I believe that's all I have.
Yeah. That's a lot. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. I don't I don't remember anything else but anyway. Okay. With that we request I think that was it. Right?
Okay. Okay. It's 20 thing. Okay. Thank you, man. Do we have a motion to adopt this action?
I make a motion.
Vice chair Shabley has moved to adopt this resolution. Need a second?
I'll second.
And seconded by Commissioner Menez.
Commissioner Manes?
Yes.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez?
Yes.
Vice Chair Shively?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes. That was an easy one.
With a vote of five to zero, this motion is approved.
Thank you very much. Okay. Okay. Quick break? Okay.
We're gonna take a quick break and get to item d, which would be the drive thru coffee. Okay, we're reconvening at 09:03 p. M. City Of Paris I'm sorry. Planning Commission meeting.
Item six d. Thank you for your patience. Conditional use permit 24Dash05152. A proposal to construct a 1,741 square foot that's the previous one. Yeah.
Square foot drive through coffee shop, Better Buzz, on 0.63 acres of a larger 1.21 acre parcel. That's what I get for drinking soda. Located on the South Side of Old Nuevo Road between Raising Cane's and In N Out Burger in the commercial community zone. Applicant, Gary Edwards, permits placed. The planner, Rafael Garcia, requested action, adopt resolution number 25Dash20, finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to section one five three three two infill development projects and approving conditional use permit 24Dash05152 to facilitate construction of a 1,741 square foot drive thru restaurant on a 1.21 site, based on the findings contained in the resolution and subject to the conditions of approval.
We did get two memorandums. Item 6d, just for the record, I believe it is for the record, comment letter pertaining to cap two report Dash05152. And attached for our consideration, I won't go through the whole reading of that letter, but in essence, it was a letter of response to this particular item. And it's it's for the record and talked about in some summation improvements to the remaining undeveloped portion of the property, which is one of the considerations. So I'll let the staff or whoever decided they wanna discuss that part, And that was that letter.
So I want to just add that. Also, six d, update the conditions of approval pertaining to Cup 24 Dash 0524 Dash 05152. Updating the driveway as part of the Driveway 3 along the east and requiring operation management plan to manage on-site traffic. And I won't go through all that. The one of the changes was number 44.
Operation management plan. Business operators shall have in place an on-site operations management plan during peak hours to manage on-site traffic and queuing. And this is an attached letter, 07/30/2025, updated 08/20/2025. I'm just not going through the three pages of trying to read it, but just putting it on the record. And if staff wishes to discuss that or anyone, you're more than welcome. K? At this time, was there any ex parte communication, ad hoc committee meetings, or site visits?
Been by the site a couple times. I have none.
I am by the site very often. Too often, I think. I
also frequent near the site.
Yeah. And I don't live too far up to the site, so I'm pretty adequate. I actually drove over there and got the real scope of what's over there. So I do know this site very well. And there you are, sir.
Good evening, honorable members of the Planning Commission. As you indicated, the item before you tonight is a request for a condition to use permit for a coffee shop. The project site is located on the South Side Of Old Neville Road between the In N Out fast food restaurant as well as the Raising Cane's. The surrounding land uses include the In N Out to the West, the Raising Cane's to the East, and Arco gas station across the street to the North, and undeveloped property directly to the South. As a reminder, the project site is approximately 1.21 acres in area, but the applicant that's before you tonight is only proposing to develop the northern half approximately of the project site.
So the yellow demarcation that you see, approximately the southern half of that lot will continue to remain undeveloped as part of their proposal. Just a quick reminder, the general plan land use designation and zoning for the property is community commercial. The zone does allow for drive through restaurants with approval of a conditional use permit and that's the reason we're here before you tonight. As you indicated, some of you visited the site. The this is a the picture that you see here is a view looking south towards the site from Old Louisville Road, and that's a view looking south across the street towards the project site, which is currently undeveloped.
As you all know, the In N Out is directly to the west in between this project site and the 215. And on the other side, you have Raising Cane's, which has recently been approved and is fully operational on the East side. Another view that this is sort of in front of Raising Cane's off of Old Louisville Road looking southwest of the project site. As I indicated, the applicant is only proposing to develop the approximately northern half of the subject property. They are proposing a seventeen forty one square foot commercial building that will function as a commercial drive thru restaurant.
They are proposing a coffee shop. A wide variety of improvements are proposed as part of this, including landscaping, parking, as well as other improvements. The interior of the building will include a four ninety one square foot serving and seating area, along with an outdoor seating area that is shown in red as part of this diagram. The Better Buzz building is shown in red along the as part of the site plan. And the parking lots the parking lot along with the parking stalls, as you can see, are shaded in blue.
They are also proposing dual drive thru lanes along the east. Those dual drive thru lanes are going to converge into one lane and wrap around the building along the north and the west side of the buildings. The drive thru lanes, as proposed, will be able to include up to 16 parking spaces overall in queuing. They will also include two menu boards as well as an order box so that people can order while they're going through the drive thru. With regards to parking, there will be a total of 24 parking spaces as part of the project.
Now with regards to the development standards, the project meets and exceeds virtually all of the development standards that are required by chapter nineteen thirty eight, including lot coverage, FAR, building height, setbacks, landscape coverage, and parking. The project is required to provide a total of 20 parking spaces, and they are providing 24, which is they will be providing an overall surplus of four parking spaces that's above and beyond what's required by the zoning ordinance. They're also providing a wide variety of landscaping throughout the site. As you can see, this is a conceptual landscape with a wide variety of trees and shrubs to enhance the overall appearance of the site along with the building. Now some of the renderings, this is a south facing elevation, so this would be front elevation sort of facing the parking lot.
It will include a wide variety of treatments and improvements, including metal canopies, stucco siding, brick veneer along the base of the building, as well as other improvements. The building overall will boast a modern contemporary architecture design with a flat roof. The flat roof will have also a parapet that will extend beyond the roofline in an attempt to screen all of the mechanical equipment that will be roof mounted as part of the building. And it will also include a modern color scheme to help improve the overall aesthetic appeal of the building. The building will be approximately 21.5 feet tall at its peak, And it will include all of the improvements as noted previously.
That's basically all of the development aspects of the project. With regards to the environmental determination, the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the CEQA section 15,332. It is considered a Class 32 infill exemption. As part of this, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt resolution number 2,520, finding that the project is categorically exempt from the sequel guidelines pursuant to section 15,332 and approve conditional use permit twenty four-fifteen thousand one hundred fifty two to facilitate the construction of a seventeen forty one square foot drive thru restaurant and coffee shop based on the findings contained as part of the resolution subject to the conditions of approval. Now, as noted, we did receive two comment letters.
I want to quickly touch on that so that the Planning Commission as well as the members of the audience are aware of some of the commentary that we received. The first comment letter was received from Mr. Alan Robertson, and he had some concerns regarding the project. Specifically, they had concerns regarding the East Driveway. So if I can direct your attention to the site plan.
The site plan has two main entries into the parking lot area, the west driveway and the east driveway. The applicant would like to the person who has concerns would like to limit the traffic movement along the east side of the parking lot so that it's a left out only, and that they believe that if there's queuing along the restaurant, that that queuing may back up and may have obstructions along that eastern driveway. So in an attempt to avoid any obstructions, he had a comment that the movements along that eastern driveway should be limited. Staff took that comment into consideration, and staff still feels comfortable with the design that's proposed, and we are recommending full access along that eastern driveway. On top of that, they also had concerns regarding the southern half of the site, which will continue to remain unimproved.
The applicant can elaborate, but it is staff's understanding that they have a lease agreement to improve only the northern half of the project site. The southern half of the project site is still owned and by In N Out, and so there's no agreement to make any improvements on that southern end. So that's for the Planning Commission's consideration. The second memorandum that was provided to you as part of this item was pertaining to updates to the conditions of approval. And for your consideration, we have updated the conditions of approval for the planning department as well as the engineering division related to providing full access movement as part of Driveway Number 3 along the east side so that Driveway Number 3 will allow for full access.
On top of that, we are also going to be requiring an operations management plan. Better Bus has indicated that they are very familiar, obviously, with the market demand and what they anticipate. And if there's ever any type of queuing issues, they have a strategy in place to address a lot of those issues that could materialize, especially as the site is developed. And I know that sometimes there's a lot of excitement, and there can be some queuing issues. So, an attempt to resolve that, they do have a strategy in the works to address some of those issues.
So, those are the two conditions of approval that have been modified to address this item. And that basically concludes the presentation that staff has. We'll be happy to respond to any questions that members of the Planning Commission or members of the audience may have pertaining to this item. And as a reminder, I'd like to just inform you that there is a member on behalf of Better Bus here, and they'll be happy to respond to any questions, although they may they don't have a formal presentation before you tonight. Thank you for your time, and I'll be happy to take any questions.
Thank you, MPL. And as always, if the applicant would like to maybe that presentation would like to add anything to say, now's the time to come forward. Nothing? Okay. Okay. At this time, are there any questions for the applicant and or city staff?
Thank you for the presentation. My question is gonna be directed to engineering. In regards to that comment letter that we received, did you see an issue with with the the East Side access point?
So to answer, no. With their traffic study, part of the traffic study, they analyzed drive through queue. They analyzed a few locations throughout Southern California, and the maximum queue that was analyzed at those locations was 11 vehicles. Okay. They're providing 16 vehicles in their drive thru queue. Not necessarily, you know, first day would be different from normal operations, so that's why planning added that peak hour operations queue or peak hour operations condition.
Oh, they have they're gonna have someone
out there.
You know, put up cones if need be. Right. Something around those remember reading and hours doing that.
But from a day to day standpoint, the full access is actually beneficial for the shopping center as a whole because think about it. If someone comes in from that first access point and they don't have a ingress into the location, they'd have to make
a u -turn about There's gonna be a huge traffic jam Right.
In that parking lot. Right.
So from a overall operation standpoint, full access is preferred.
Okay. Perfect. Okay. No further questions.
Quick question. Am I understanding correctly, that southern portion, it's not owned? Is that not owned by the developer?
Yeah. The parcel is approximately 1.2 acres. They're only proposing to develop the northern half, which is where they have the lease. And it's staff's understanding that it is owned by In N Out.
Okay. Thank you. That's nothing more for right now.
So currently, you have a FAR of point or or 6% for the entire acreage. Do you or in and out have any idea what is planned for that unimproved area?
There are no plans as of right now.
Or it could remain vacant for a while or be a parking lot based off of what potential could be built on the other portion of the lots or the southern site. Is it possible to get what the FAR is based off of what is being currently developed?
The FAR based on what's current developed, as far as I can recall, it's 6%, so it's very low. They are allowed to
That's what's currently built, but that that doesn't seem appropriate for their whole full acreage of the whole lot. What is the what is the far for the developed portion of the entire lot?
For the developed portion of the light. So the site is approximately 20 I believe it's I have to double check, but basically it's 0.63 acres, their portion of the site. So they're allowed to have a FAR of up to 0.75 and they're only developing approximately seventeen forty one square feet of actual area.
Okay.
Of actual building area.
Okay. Yeah, if they're allowed 75%, they can go up to
Yeah, roughly if you wanted to kind of you would kind of double that to be like 0.12 because it's the project site is they're only developing half of the site. So it'd be a 0.12, about 12% if you only account for the leasable area.
Thank you.
Rafael, was ad hoc recommended or mentioned at all for this as far as the traffic end?
With regards to the traffic, that was something that recently was developed. It was something that was brought to our attention as far as concerns from the public. And that came up this week, so it wasn't something that we necessarily had time to look into since it was the comment was brought to our attention on Monday, I believe.
And was there any ad hoc mentioned about having the drive through around the front of the building facing the street?
I can't recall if we had an ad hoc for this specific item. I don't think we did.
It wasn't right. I know there wasn't one, but it was one recommended to the developer because No. We don't usually have the drive throughs through the front of the building. In N Out has it around the far left. Raising Cane's has it around the back. And this one has it through the front.
Correct. I mean, based on kind of the site considerations, they're playing with a very limited kind of area. And so, they were trying to maximize the utility of the area, and this was kind of the best design that they could come up with based on, you know, the parameters that they're dealing with.
Okay. Can we go back to the site plan, please?
Sure.
Did we consider flipping the whole thing over? Because I drive a big truck. If I'm coming in on that one by raising canes, it's a tight u-turn to try to get into the drive through. Mhmm. So if we flip it over, it would be a better radius. Did we consider that flipping it over? It feels like the front of the store is in the back.
Staff didn't, but maybe the applicant can provide a response to that as they were the ones who presented the design of the project before you tonight. Okay.
Yes. Hello. Just state your full name and spell your last name for us.
Good evening, mister chair. Good evening, commissioners. My name is Conrado. My name is Conrado Gallardo, g a l l a r d o. I'm the architect of record for this project.
In in designing early on in in designing this lot, this has basically become the optimal position. I think I think if we flipped plan vertically, we would have the same issues. We'd also have issues of the exit and entrance being too close to the main street, that we have issues in that sense as well. Also, east entrance, during peak hours, would be regulated. The entrance traffic would be directed towards the other side. So that way, we don't have this condition where you have to make this tight u-turn into that space.
I've been there during peak hours. I know exactly what Raising Kings is like. That's why I'm asking.
Right.
Because if you flipped it around with the building to the bottom right, that would give you access around the back to have the drive through exit straight onto Neville Road.
Right. So
the drive through would channel around the back. You could still have that same stacking parking up front, the front of the store towards the front. I it just does not feel like an ideal I I am very familiar with there. I get my nails done across the street, go to that Starbucks, shop at that Stater Brothers. My daughters are always at In N Out and Raising Canes. So I am like, I know this area like the back of my hand.
Right.
And this is not ideal.
Right. We also have the issue that we we are pretty far along in the process here. This is gonna be considerate a considerable change to the project if we make that type of adjustment. We are pretty much through the building department, planning department, or not planning department, but maybe really a lot of our reviews are really conditioned on the approval of the CUP. We've done the process and we've coordinated and worked with all the planners in the city. We feel like we've gone above and beyond, and we think that this is the best solution for this site. One item just to kinda help ease with the u-turn with the big truck. You know, I I drive a
truck too, and one thing, it's they're they're showing 13 feet distance between that first drive through aisle and the main where the Raising Canes is. A lot of the times, you see, like, two feet, five feet. 13 feet is a little bit more of a buffer. I don't know if you'd still be able to make that first lane without, you know, doing a three point turn, but you would definitely be able to make it into that Far West Drive
going against traffic if somebody's trying to come this way. I'm thinking about safety and Right. Really easy traffic flow in that area.
And at that point, if it overflows, that's what the condition comes in where they need to do their on-site management to keep the traffic flow within their contained site.
Yeah. In and out that they were gonna do that too, and I haven't seen it. I guess, how hard would it be to do some kind of amendment or change like that at this point in the process? That's why I was asking if there was an ad hoc. This is something that could have been preemptively looked at ahead of time. Is it, like, really difficult?
To revise the whole site plan?
Mhmm.
As the applicant mentioned, yeah, it would take some time. And there may be some other issues that we can't think of at this point that arise from the, you know, revised site plan. Like, Dathkem was mentioning, the egress may be too close to Old Nuevo Road.
But the egress could have still been south and crossing crossing going around the back. If the building was in the bottom right, you could have made still that ingress, egress kind of like where it's at or even lower, wrapped around the back of the building, stacked there, and then exited towards the top. Would have been I'm just looking it after the fact. I'm seeing things that could have been easily solved. Yeah. I guess that's it for me. Thank you.
What is the width of that? And I guess as engineer, what is the width of that eastern reciprocal driveway where we see proposed? That's a big deal. Width of that between Raising Canes and that because you also have access to Raising Canes.
Right. It's currently 30 feet wide.
Okay. Okay. From a legal standpoint, would the reciprocal agreement has it has to be signed by an agreement with Raising Canes. If they objected, will we have a problem?
Yeah. If it's a reciprocal access agreement, you would need both parties to agree.
So that that's conditional on this. They'd have to, you know, not saying they would, I'm just saying they would have to agree to that. But, you know, it's also a benefit for them as well because you're driving to theirs, you're driving there.
So I'm being told that I'm being told that we do have the reciprocal access agreement.
Okay. I'm over there because I live over there, so I'm probably over there more than anybody with Stater Brothers. But I think In N Out has a double, but they do have people standing out there. So you'd have the In N Out effect, I'm assuming, because you go at nighttime, even now, it's gonna be double stacked. But they have a person or two out there taking orders, so that's what I mean by operation management. So, you know, they're gonna be more they would be more popular because of those two. So you you know, whatever the normal crowd would be, it might be a little bit. And, you're operating from 04:30 in the morning, that's the proposal. Yeah. 04:30 in the morning, which is people going to work like I used to.
So, little different, know, orientation. But, I think the width of that driveway, reciprocal ashtray driveway, would make a big difference. This is 30 feet, not with the 26 feet we always hear fighter for. But, 30 feet could make a difference, if not even more. But, I think the idea that I don't want you to talk about the trucks, but 13 foot wide aisle is a little different than kind of some of them. Because, the old like like Jack in the Box on Fourth Street, you can't get a truck in that one. Not that I go to Jack in Box, but you go to Fourth Street, there is no way because it's nineteen eighties and seventies built, not gonna get one in there. You're just gonna go park in the lot and get out of your car. But, this is a coffee shop like the Starbucks mentality. Starbucks down where you live down there.
They start with the cars lined up, but then, you know, they kinda move, but it's just gonna have that coffee effect with Starbucks. The one on Ramona Expressway, don't think it's even but it's around the back. So, it's it's it seems like so much space, so that's large space that's on the southern portion, you know, it's it's surprising move it farther back, that might have made a difference. But, know, if In owns that, they control that part of the property. Are you leasing this space in
the front? Yes. That is being leased.
Oh, you're leasing that space from In Out?
Yes.
Okay. Okay. I didn't know they own that much. Wow.
I'd like to add also as well that the the peak hours for Better Buzz is from six in the morning to about 10:00.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah. So, you know, both Raising Canes or In N Out is No. There any won't overlap of
any traffic. Yeah. You'd be surprised how many people at 04:30. Trust me. I was on the roadway at 04:30. You would be really surprised in Paris. Yeah. Just ask Starbucks. Oh, gosh. Okay. The unimproved area and there's not much you could do because you don't control that. I think the the idea is what they were saying in this letter is that the idea there's just be weeds and things like that. That's an in and out decision. There's a lot they could do with that. Community garden, who could?
But or parking stripe, that's yeah. But we have no you have no control over that. Any questions there? Because I have a few more things. Go ahead. Go ahead.
Mister chair, if I can offer a suggestion, and I don't we haven't had this discussion with the applicant. But if if maybe there is if we can explore moving the drive through lanes closer to the building in the same configuration as it's shown right now, but just closer to the building like where the trash enclosure is shown. That way you have a little bit more room as you come out of the drive aisle to get into the drive through lanes. And it creates a little bit more area for stacking. I don't know if you're going to lose not radius, but the number of vehicles that you can stack.
But at least you'll have more area at the bottom on that drive through lane that goes east and west. You're coming down from the drive aisle that's shared with Raising Cane's, it's not a sharp turn like you were mentioning. You have a little bit more room to be able to turn into the drive thru lane.
I don't know, would that be something?
I think part of my issue is just having cars on the street, the drive thru on the street side. I think that is part of my cause that's not something you typically see.
Mhmm.
And that's not it's it's like looking at big rigs. As you drive by Mhmm. You're looking at stacked cars. Not a beautiful building with cars parked and landscaping. I think that is my main issue. Okay.
And
And maybe maybe have some some provide some clarification. I believe there is a three foot high decorative wall along the drive through lane with landscaping to minimize the views of the of vehicles. That's typical to provide with businesses with drive through lanes.
Yes, we are providing some of the landscaping that is outside of our lease line and in the public library.
If there were I'm just piggybacking what you're saying. If you're looking at the you have 13 feet before you get to the drive aisle because you're kind of closed with that trash enclosure. You can't really not much space to move it. So would you reduce the 13 foot space there for landscaping or whatever that I'm not sure what that item is there. If we reduce that, would that be the only compromise? Let's say instead of 13 feet, it would be 10 feet. So that would be for a larger vehicle. So you see what I'm saying? Where it says 13 feet? Before you get to that 16 well, and reducing from 13 to 10, because you can't do the trash enclosure because you gotta you can't move that anywhere. Right?
You could move the trash enclosure because they have excess parking, so that could be relocated somewhere else. Don't know, maybe the applicant can provide a little bit more clarification on that.
Because I'm looking at the menu board and that's kind of standard unless you move that or you move that 13 feet to 10 feet and you gain additional three feet to the the east side. I that's just a suggestion. Go ahead.
We didn't look at that. My name is Don Armstrong, a r m s t r o n g. I work for Better Buzz. I mean, we've gone through several renditions of what the best layout to give us the optimum stacking ability for it. But to move it over, you would have to move the trash enclosure to another location, and that would require the employees to walk across a traffic area
to get to
another area. So we would prefer not to lose parking, even though we have a surplus that is used. We don't want to get rid of the parking the trash enclosure from its current location. So the only way to do that would be to shorten that up. Having a 13 foot wide aisle does make it easier for vehicles, and it's appreciated by most people who own a bigger or larger vehicle. I I don't have a large vehicle, so I've never had that
that issue going in there.
But having a large truck and seeing them going in,
you know,
I can understand that. But flipping the building and and moving that around to have the building on the bottom right side as our Colorado already made comment of having those entrances would be on the north side would be too close. On the east side where our ingress, egress is at, it's lower than what the ingress is for Raising Canes. Theirs is further north, so they're not directly across from each other. So when you make that turn, left turn off of Old Nuevo Road, you would go right into you can either go into Raising Canes or come down and make a right into the Better Buzz location. Those things were looked at. By moving that up, you would have the both cars coming in at the same locations.
Yeah. I guess guess what and that that was kind of piggybacking on that wasn't mine, but where you see the if you look at the arrows on the southeast portion, there's 13 feet there. Right? You see 13 well, car 16 is. Mhmm. It's 13 feet. That would be the only place that you could reduce that size.
Right.
That's what I'm talking about. That's the least of the things that we have to do. The trash enclosure I was like, it's almost not possible. Right. But, if there was any gonna be movement, that would be the place thirteen ten. That would to me would be the only solution. Do you need 13 feet there? And what is that I don't know what that square thing is there. I don't know if that's
receptive median between the two drive aisles.
Yeah.
Well, not between. To the right of that drive aisle. So you see our car 16?
That's just a landscape area.
Yeah. Then there's a landscape area. If that area moved 10 feet, then you would gain your feet. That's the only place I see on here where there would possibly be a movement.
Correct.
Yeah. You can't move the trash enclosures, can't move the building. Right. But if that were possible, I'm just saying that maybe, and I'm looking at our engineer, is that a possibility?
So I think that would actually make it worse with the u-turn movement for the trucks because that 13 feet gives a little more Mhmm. Space to Yeah. Give that turn. So the way it is right now, again, most you'll you'll look at a lot of places like Starbucks or other locations. They'll have a five foot median stretch. This is showing 13 feet. It gives you a little bit more of a room. I'm not saying you'll make be able to make that far right lane, but you would you should be able to make that left lane.
Yeah. I don't have a truck, so I can tell
And to clarify, when I meant flip the building, I didn't mean keep the parking and move it to the top left where it would be. It would be maintaining the same that Southwest one, and that would be like you're stacking around the building. Do you know what I mean? It would be the Southwest. That would be the stacking all the way across because if you flipped everything over and the building ended up further on the right, that whole bottom section could be your stacking. And you could have double stacking.
And then the way I'm interpreting that would be the parking stalls would be at
the north
at the north end.
Okay.
That's what I meant. Not that parking gets moved and it's completely flipped and now it's on the Northwest corner. It would still remain in the Southwest corner, and the whole stacking would be that bottom section, and you could have two long lanes there.
Yeah. I mean But that requires the
ingress, egress to be relocated. I can't flip the building and keep the queuing and put the parking on the
north in the bottom. That's, I think, what I'm trying to explain.
But if you leave the ingress, egress there, your queuing is gonna go past the drive entrances. On
the East.
On either side. The driveways at that point would be a little too close to Old Nuevo Road. So the buffer
No. I'm saying they stay in the Southwest. I think that's what I'm I don't think I'm making clear. They stay in the Southwest. The stacking would be around along the south part of the building.
But we won't get 16 cars stacking if we did that plan. If you It's longer that way than
it is the other way, but
As they go past the drive entrances, though.
Mhmm.
So they would be if the queuing went past the drive entrance, it would block traffic coming in. If I understand
Yeah. No. I I don't think I think I would have to draw it out because it gives you more room because you could double stack all along the south side, and as it turns around, like, it would give you a wider range.
Right. But when it comes across the bottom where the blue is now
Mhmm.
And it wraps up on that on that southwest corner, it comes around to the building for the drive through. It's on the opposite side of the car. The car would have to be on the right hand side, so we'd come in through the in and outside, queue it up, and come around this the southeast corner in order to hit the driver's side window. But the location of where that would be would block that drive entrance. I'd have to move the drive entrance out of the way.
You would have to flip the building completely still to make it match.
I'd to move the drive entrances up so that the queuing wouldn't be in front of that exit.
I think that flip too, it would eliminate that eastern driveway.
Mhmm.
And from an overall site circulation, let's say there's a utility cut that has to happen at that driveway, that main entrance, you would not have that second reciprocal access anymore. So the site that's shown in front of here may work better as a whole for this whole site just because you have that straight through axis on the west and the east. Mhmm.
The Southwest Driveway lines up with the Kane's Driveway.
The Southwest is on the in and outside.
Yeah. I mean, the South the eastern portion, I've got it upside.
It doesn't align
with I the
don't know
if we have a
do you have an overall set, Ben?
I think No. No. No. It doesn't.
No. Yeah. You can kinda see it on that one.
Yeah. Different. It's different. Okay. Okay. Okay. Any other questions?
Have one more. The landscaping doesn't match what's around there. Did we give feedback on that? Because we like to have cohesive landscaping. I don't know if that was
That that's our intent.
Okay. And that is similar to
what's off-site there? As well. So we have a sidewalk that we're adding, and then the landscaping between the sidewalk and the city curb
Okay.
We'll be putting in. So those will all be part of the set of plans that get reviewed and
Okay. Just wanna make sure because the images didn't have this kind of landscaping it just had.
Yeah. Yeah.
We The three d renderings do not reflect Yeah. What Yeah. Those the landscape planners.
Those are more just portraying the the look of the building.
Okay.
Yeah. That would I was just gonna state that too. It's commissioner Jimenez's thoughts is that and I agree exactly that in as planning commissioners and as an architect, I would want to see exactly within the rendering is what your plant palette is. So this is very misleading to us, what you wanted your presentation to us. So I would hope that any future presentation would be a plant palette in the elevation of what is in your plant palette on your landscape plan.
Duly noted.
My go ahead. I don't even know if these fellow commissioners would are going there, but I'm gonna throw something out there. I like the seating area that's adjacent. The only thing with me, and that's just my personal thing, is to be enclosed even if it's what they call pony walls, the cheap ones, and some kind of mesh because if you're gonna be open open early morning, there is a particular element that might walk up there. I'm being very delicate.
Okay? So, that's the only concern of mine because the open thing is this is Nuevo Road, this is not down where Chipotle is by Walmart where nobody walks. They walk over here. So, my concern is it's open, you're asking for trouble. Some kind of enclosure there to me because I live there might be an issue with the not having it enclosed to some degree.
But, that's the only question I would have because the patio is wonderful, the idea is there, but I'm just wondering because and I don't even know if they know what I'm talking about, pony walls, but the but the concept is just that it would be something that would be enclosed. Not physically with heart, but, you know, where you just walk out as a mesh and you can go in there and six in the morning, seven and not have to be concerned about that. That's my only thing that I would consider because it's not part of this. And, just food for thought if you'd like to at least consider that and look at that as an idea because that's, know, it's on a major street, a major thoroughfare, none of the other ones are open at this time. You'd be the only one open at that time in the morning and then winter it gets dark.
And, people in this city leave. I usually work at 04:30 in the morning. You know, I'd be it's 04:30 in morning, might be sitting out there. 06:00 in the morning dark. So it's You have lights on the patio. Yeah. Yeah. Closed, it would be a safety it's more of a safety issue. And that's a consideration. But that's only my my other one. Do you guys have any other issues, I think? You do? Okay.
You know I always do. On the elevations, the one that is the north facing elevation, can we go to that, please? That's That's south. South facing. One more. The one okay. So I don't know if you got a full north side because the north side is where that pop out is, right?
On the back?
No, back. Back. Let me see this one. Okay, on this one, so just to clarify, that pop out section that we see on the left side of the screen, that's what's actually facing the street. Right?
Yes.
So on ours, it's just a brown wall with better buzz on top. That's what's would it be possible to possibly extend, like, the beehive schematic on there or even moving the Enjoy Your Bus Paris to that side, making that because that's what we're going to see. We're going to see cars and a brown wall going through the drive through from the street. So maybe enhancing that a little bit more so that it takes attention away from the cars. That little veranda that you have, like the little canopy on the south side, you said there was some kind of gating or landscaping covering the cars, right, on that north side against the street?
Covering the cars?
Yeah. Along the sidewalk? Yeah.
Oh, yeah. We have landscaping along that north side.
Would it be possible to add some of those elements to, like, create more of a shield too? We just don't want to see the cars when we're
I mean, don't think that there's going to be an opportunity to put that type of cover that's over the
Not the cover. Just like a little trellis halfway, like some kind of barrier, like a decorative piece and monument sign even, because I know Raising Cane's havoc. I'm trying to just make sure we don't see the cars on.
Like an eyebrow? Some kind
of eyebrow something to take attention away from just seeing a stack of cars as you're driving by.
We can do something to enhance that appendage that's on that north side.
Yes.
And we already have a three foot wall that goes around with landscaping on the outside of that that goes around the drive through.
It's how tall?
Three foot. I mean, it's not gonna screen a vehicle in its entirety, but it's gonna help screen it.
So, Commissioner, just for clarification, you're looking to enhance not the bottom part of the elevation, but the part
The part where it's just
a brown wall. Yes. So the higher the the the top part of the wall? Right.
Yeah. We can I mean, assuming that it's all within code and everything and we're allowed to do it, we could add those hexagons or another sign or something like that?
Not not at the very top of the of the part that's protruding out, but on the elevation, on the on the facade, on the front side of of the of the projection. Mhmm. Something to enhance is some architectural feature to enhance it so it doesn't look so plain. Yes.
On the north side?
Yes.
I I can bring that up to our management team to see what their thoughts are on that. Like, it's not something I can commit to tonight.
K. And adding some a higher some kind of fencing or something to block the cars.
Perhaps
even extend put some vegetation or higher vegetation in front of the land the the cars to kinda block it a little bit. I know it hides the building a little bit, but it yeah. Commissioner Jimenez's issue is commissioner Jimenez's issue is seeing the cars in front of the building instead of seeing the building. And I I understand why the building's up front. It's because you want that front curb appeal.
So I understand that portion, but her concern is seeing the cars. And I think a different landscape palette with higher vegetation, higher brush might be able to conceal some of it and still be able to see because the wainscot on the bottom is three feet, three and a half feet perhaps, and maybe, you know, something like that will conceal the car.
If there is a lot of cars, maybe the
Is that your concern?
Yes. And that is just a plain brown wall that's facing the north side. You want curb appeal, but there's no appeal.
Commissioner Jimenez?
Disagree. I think there is curb appeal there on the building. It's not just
On outside?
If I'm trying to
On on all sides of the building. It's not Commissioner,
chair Hammond, think we need to keep it to question and answer at this point. We haven't gotten a public comment yet.
You were kind of on the fence on those. Any other questions for them? No. Or okay. Yeah. We were kind of crossing in, but we were kind of okay. Okay. Well, thank you very much. Then miss, you had something? Okay. Or for staff, either way. Okay. With that, we move to public comment on this side of agenda item only. And anyone wishing to address the public on this agenda item, come to the podium, state your full name and spell your last name for us, and we'd appreciate it.
Alan Robertson, r o b e r t s o n. So I'm the owner of the properties around this site. We developed the Raising Canes. Now we have a proposal to the south to to build out that new shopping center. Also, we did sell the Raising Canes, but through the CC and Rs, we do still control that drive aisle. So everything there is gonna be under our control, and we were hoping that we would have a little bit of help here to deal with some of the potential traffic concerns. I mean, honestly, you guys know Paris better than anybody. Paris is gonna be excited about this coffee shop. I've been to Better Buzz's. They are crowded.
They always are all the way through the day. Part of our shopping center, it's gonna have a 40,000 square foot health club. That's a lot of traffic going in and out about the same time peak hours as this Better Buzz. We wanna see this Better Buzz here. I I really like their use, but we have to do something with that eastern driveway to make sure that it works and it jives with the rest of the center.
Because if we have traffic backing up into that area, it's gonna completely detonate our whole shopping center behind. And there's nothing we're gonna lose tenants. We're not even gonna get this thing off the ground. So I'm not asking to kill this project. I'm just asking that the applicant work with us and do something that works better than what they have. So appreciate your time and listening to our concerns and hope we can do something there. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, sir. Appreciate it. Anyone else on this particular agenda item? Okay. And at this time, as always, we go to the applicant. If the applicant would like to respond, we always give the applicant a kind to respond to that. As always, we do this.
Again, I want to, you know, reiterate that we understand the traffic issue in this project, you know. We understand how critical it is. That's why we did an extensive traffic study. We studied and surveyed our you know, a few of our other more busy stores, and we made sure that we are above and beyond anything any of our previous stores have done. You know, again, we're stacking 16 cars here.
I believe Paris zoning allows requires eight. So we're providing twice as much stacking here. And again, we have a traffic management plan in place for our peak hours and our busy hours. And I think we've addressed the issue with traffic. I think the concerns will be I think we've addressed those concerns as well. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, sir. Anyone else? Okay. We close the public comment portion and bring it to the Planning Commission for actual discussion. My phone.
I understand the concerns that commissioner Jimenez has, especially with the north elevation of the building. I think it does need some type of enhancement, maybe like lettering or something just to give it a little more pop. And, hopefully, the the landscaping that's being provided does give the screening for the vehicles. I hope that the 16 stacking vehicle stacking is gonna be sufficient enough. And I know In N Out does do a really good job managing the traffic when it does get busy. So if you guys could keep that same standard that In N Out does, and I I'm I'm pretty sure we shouldn't have an issue with this. Better Buzz is super popular. A lot of my friends like it, and I'm sure a lot of the residents are gonna be super excited to have this. So I'm excited to have this to the city.
I wanted to thank you for your time. I know it's been a really long night, and we're not even near the end. I do agree. I'm not the biggest fan of the the cars queuing along Old Nuevo, but I do understand the limitations and why that is what it is. It's just not an optimal, you know, stretch of area.
I think if we can get, you know, some some upgrade to the facade to something to screen it, I do think that would be very, very helpful. I think it would have been helpful as well to to see the landscaping a little bit better, get a better visual how it's going to mesh with what's existing there already. I do agree. I do I am excited. I want a better buzz in Paris.
I think we're due for something that's more than the normal coffee typical coffee shop we have around here. I just really would like to see better screening or just yeah. The car is queuing so visibly is a point of frustration. Thank you.
Yeah. For me, that's a big one. And then it's a north facing facade. The other ones, it's a beautiful building on all other sides. It's just unfortunate that the side you see from the street is very plain.
And I've been to other better buses, and I don't think I've ever seen one that has the drive through on the street side. I think usually that would be I I'm used to seeing the the south side be the side that faces the street. I would have liked to see landscaping that matches what it's gonna be. Lighting. I think having, like, a view from the street with cars stacked and what it would look like would have been helpful. I understand the limitations. I understand wanting to be closer to the curb. You don't want to be hidden in the back from two big neighbors. I understand that part. I just wish we could have done something more.
That's why I asked about if we have had an ad hoc, because we usually kind of talk things through and look at options at that point with multiple brains in the room. So I'm very conflicted because it's needed. Beautiful building on the three other sides. We just like if we can enhance that. I know Raising Canes has like a little monuments or something just to really show on the North Side what better Buzz is about, because I don't think we see that.
And I'm kind of concerned because we can't get an answer now. Usually we say, yeah, we'll work with the development team and look at something in our options and screening the cars. More mitigation for what our concerns are, that's where I'm feeling very conflicted, where I don't feel like we've reached any kind of discussion even. It's just this is what it is and that's it. And I'm feeling very, very conflicted about that.
I understand traffic, I understand all that. I know the area, but it's just I feel like it's missing. I'm open to opening it up back up to to
I just wanna make sure you were through.
I I guess that that's it. I know people are super excited about this. I was super excited, but then when I saw the layout and all, I was just not not in love with it. So, I'm okay opening it up if Mhmm. The applicant wants to Yeah. Add something else.
I just wanna make sure you got your point through. Yeah. We have no problem, then we can reopen the public comment portion. And, if you would like to come up here, we can reopen the public comment portion. We're all in agreement.
And, the applicant will have a comment. Just state your full name and spell your last name for us.
My name is Kevin MacDonald, m a c d o n a l d. One of the things and and we're listening out here to you, and and we don't want you to think that we're not listening. We're pretty far into the into the process at this point. We're over a year, you know, and a lot of money spent in trying to do this with designers and developers and giving us the best queuing and whatnot. I think one of the things we have no problem trying to enhance, you know, understand your concern, Ms.
Yimenez, understand that we can put that we can put, you know, different signs on the front to make that look a little better. That's also a separate permit. The signs have to we can agree to that, and I think that's certainly a great idea. And we obviously want to have our signage there. We just have to, you know, tweak the signage.
That's not a problem, but again, a separate permit. What I was thinking, too, when you were sitting there, if you're I know you're really familiar with the site, there's a huge transformer right there where it's going to be. So that alone, you know, maybe we can do something where we pretty that up and then put something on the other side, and it's a pretty high set, you know, like it's huge, And that's part of one why, you know, of the maybe that's queued around that way because you can't really get in there. So if we can maybe get some, you know, permissions from the city and say, hey, you can paint that up and do whatever you want to really beautify that, to make it look good, and then, you know, something that involves the city or something like that. You know, we had to do that in Laguna Beach.
We had to have, you know, some specific things. We do have in Laguna Hills, we do have that, you know, front drive through that goes around the front, which is sort of unfortunate, but sometimes we're only given a certain lot and how you can get in there. So I think if you guys are open to it, we're open to moving those signs around the best way we can and have an open dialogue about it. We want to have our signs out on the front. That only makes sense to us.
But I think if we use a transformer and you guys work with us a little bit, that'll hide, you know, a big part of it. And then we also yeah, I think that'll hide a big part of it and, you know, come up with some plants that, you know, make you happy along the way and make sure the butterflies are good. You know, we're listening. But I think those are minor things for us at this point. If we're just down to, some signage and maybe beautifying the transformer, I think that's a win win for everybody.
Did you have any I'm just waiting. Did you have any other comments? Okay.
Some just some suggestions were some suggest suggestions were brought to our attention by missus Patricia. She was we're throwing some ideas out there. And considering the main sort of the main volume that's in question, definitely, can add some hexagons and some signage in that and choose. We were also thinking maybe adding like an awning on that elevation. As you can see, if you could flip to some of the other elevations, we have an awning over some of the windows.
And so we would have another architectural element on that side of the wall. That's something we'd be open to. Typically, we put our awnings over our windows. Unfortunately, in that area, we have equipment back there, so we can't put a window, but we could maybe articulate something there, maybe in the stucco or maybe even a false window there. So we can make that volume look more front of house than back of house. So that's something that we would be open to doing as well.
Okay. Thank you very much. Anyone else? Okay. We close the public comment again, and we come back to the commission for discussion. Back to you.
Back to me. I think, yes. When you said awning, I'm thinking museums. Because I love bees and I love the honeycomb figures having some kind of lighting down so it's like an accent piece, some kind of artistic elevation. And Patricia, when you were taking care of some stuff, we were talking about there's a transformer up front.
I don't know what the legalities are with the city of Paris about enhancing it. I know we had that art walk, I guess, where we decorated and wrapped some things in the city. I don't know if that's something that also we can kind of build in and enhance with the development to take attention. I'm all about deflecting. Like, if you can enhance certain parts, it takes attention away from some things. So I feel like with some kind of art piece, lighting, if we were able to like do something with that transformer.
We can certainly work with the applicant if he's open to fund the wrapping for the transformer. That would be something that we can do as a condition of approval. Maybe if we can ask the applicant if he would be open to work with staff on the funding of the wrapping for the transformer, we can add it as a conditional approval.
And I believe that would be something they'd have to coordinate with SCE.
Oh, okay. So the California
Edison So it might be a little difficult.
Right. I mean, there would just be some coordination aspects that would need to go down just because it's their facility.
Yeah. SCE doesn't enumerate, like, anything around their transformers with at least three feet, but depending on the size of it, maybe more.
So I would be okay without that and just having that maybe awning, lighting towards
Right.
Some kind of accent.
And that transformer is within the parkway. So you got the sidewalk parkway. It's within the parkway, so there'll be landscape around it. Around
it. Mhmm. Mean, it could be Could be hidden still. Up.
Right.
Yeah. And we can certainly work with the applicant on a landscape palette to follow the same theme as what's already out there. And and he already expressed that he would be willing to to work with us on that.
Yeah. I think that's what's on the landscape plan, but it wasn't reflective on the Yes. Three d renderings. Yes. That's why I was pointing it out. That was question time. Yeah. I think I would be okay. Like, if there was an awning with some kind of accent artwork there with lighting to deflect from the cars going by, it would be a better Mhmm. Setting. And and when there's no cars, it would still have a beautiful art piece there for attention. Mhmm. Okay.
So I I think the applicant may know or not know that so out of all these renderings that we got, there is not one frontal of that north side of the building. Everything is all the other sides and then angle of that side. So what we get in color rendering is not what we were gonna see on that north side. I'm kinda curious if they understood or knew that when they submitted these or not. So but, again, all the other sides are shown.
The my issue, again, is the the color palette or the landscape palette is what is on the elevations. There are some plants that are here and some plants that are not on here. Don't see any trees on on the renderings, but you have them on your plant palette. And a lot of these plant landscaping are not matching what's what's being utilized between Raising Cane's and In N Out. So I would definitely like to see the plant palette revised in the removal of the oleander, which is, of course, is a poisonous plant.
Remove that definitely from the the landscape plan. But I think, in general, the building looks good, and I like the color palette. It definitely goes with the your overall concept of the the of name. So that's appreciative. And and it just I don't think I'm getting the full feel of what your presentation is.
I think I'm missing some information. And as as you know, if you submit construction documents the same time as you submit planning documents, you're at risk of having to make some changes or major changes. So but I I think there's some changes that need to be done here to satisfy commissioner Jimenez's his her concerns. And then but, again, because I see version two delta two's on here that doesn't meet the rendering. So what the and you have some time to update your renderings to match what the plans are so we get a full understanding of what the building's gonna look like.
So we're not getting the full impression or the true impression of what what your building looks like. So I think I think I would need I'm kind of thinking I'd like to see see another recent middle almost, for it to be able to get the full impact, the full effect, and the coordination between all three areas at the same time.
Yeah. I am it's the building in and of itself, and the plan is is fine. I just think there's some missing pieces here. Not only that, I would love to see an enclosure in the outdoor seating area. That's a big thing for me.
What she's talking about, from you can't have high trees in the front obviously, but it could be very enhanced and thick landscaping there in the front. So you want that view of the building, but you're trying to do protect the cars so it's like a compromise, but thick landscaping. Other areas, know Riverside's good at that, Temecula's really good at that. But, when you have enhanced landscaping in the front, so you have the landscaping, the cars are there, there's a certain height, and landscaping's gonna be three to four feet. But, that kind of gives a little buffer.
You know, you can't do anything with that transformer, but that would be the thickest landscaping. And, you know, we're seeing a rendition, but we're seeing plants that I'm not sure that that's what ultimately we look at because this is the back, right? Yeah. So, the front, what that would look like and renderings with that, what the trees would look like, is really just more detail. This is our architecture person here, so obviously I think at best it's not I think we it's badly something that we would want.
It's badly something we need. Just just the enhancements are just kind of missing, we're not really sure. Also trying to work out with the well, that could always be an administrative thing, but work out with the adjoining property to make sure that that is covered in terms of the reciprocal agreement there and reciprocal access. There's some understanding, but I'm not sure that that's been clearly laid out. Because obviously, we expect this this would be, if we did approve it, would be something that would be stacked. That area is very popular. I'm by the In N Out more than anybody because I'm all kinds of night. In fact, I'm gonna drive by there tonight when I go home. But, those cars are stacked, but they are managed. They are seriously managed.
So sometimes, you know, you don't have to call a CHB like you do in some other cities. You have to call the police out. There are two people standing out there, they're moving along. And, Chick fil A's not quite that bad, but definitely In N Out has a stacking. So, that kind of management is the thing that's a concern. But, now they're right next to this, I don't think Raising Kings is quite there. But, because they have sit down, a lot of sit down, but a lot of cars go there. And, my concern also is that empty space in between, there's not much you can do with. But, know, Internet needs to make a decision about that just can't just be weeds and everything else there. I don't understand that one, but that's beyond us.
But anyway, that's my my main concerns that I think I don't know. I just think I really, you know, some of the issues we talked about are not you know, devastating issues, it's just some enhancements that could be done, whether that's through ad hoc and a quick meeting. We're not talking about six months. But, I mean, that could be met, ironed out with staff, that's my proposal. It's something if this is the direction of the commission. And if you don't feel comfortable, don't, you know, but we could really need the landscaping palette, which we have not really seen. I think that's fine for trees. I saw it on trees here, but that's I think that's here. And we're seeing a rendering that's not gonna look like this. So and what it would look like enclosed.
Those are some very minor stuff and and add additions to the building. You look at Raising Canes, it says, one love. I mean, it's right on the outside of the building. It's plastered there. You know it's Raising Cane's. That's their theme. Better Buzz, if you're gonna just have this is the back of the building where the front of the building is your main thing, your main feature in between and you're talking about some enhancements. So you see where I'm going. There's some just some things that could be added, some things that could be possibly done. I don't know how much more, but I think it looks pretty good.
But, know, we that's something that we work with, but that's not a major thing in the building. I just I think some of the landscaping which is a big thing with this commission as you probably know by now, landscaping is one constantly for the last umpteen years we're always pushing landscaping and architectural enhancements because that's the main that's our purview, you know. And, I think that's it for me, because I'm not gonna prolong this agony much longer. But, unless you guys have other I'm sure you're gonna have something else to add to it.
I I currently don't have anything to add to yours, Commissioner Hammond. Well, my question is to Ben and Patricia if if we can potentially not vote yes or no on this, but maybe do ask for a continuation to September 17.
Yeah. You could do a motion to continue to either to a date certain or to off calendar and to work with staff on those issues. Okay.
And I would like to know if the applicant is willing to do that or if they want us to vote on it.
Or you could reopen the public hearing for that.
Wanting to comment?
The app the applicant indicated that they would appreciate a vote tonight.
do wanna add based off of yours. Like, the conditions for approval recall for the trellis that we usually have for our city, in the trash enclosure. The enclosure does not reflect that. I'm also a little bit concerned about the sitting area being so close to the trash enclosure, like it's adjacent to it and just the smell.
We would need to add some of the things that we talked about then. They wanted to deny them with these conditions of approval. So some of those things would be some of those things would be part of the condition of approval.
Just a point of clarification. With regards to the seating area, I think you, plan commission indicated that they would appreciate it if it enclosed. That also means covered. Covered and okay. Just double checking making sure.
Not concrete, which is somewhat
But that's like a patio cover, is that what you're referring to? Patio cover with because they do have a barrier there on the sides. Yeah. But more than that. Yeah. Something to enhance the sides and to also provide
Screen screened in or something. So it's just walk off the street and you know, and it's more of a safety issue, not just aesthetic, you know. Just for clarification purposes. Thank you. Okay, here's then here's what oh, I'm sorry. Did we close the public hearing, Brian? I think I did. Okay.
To be sure, you should reclose.
Yeah. I'm gonna say it again. We closed the public hearing part.
So is this still within our purview to continue this item? You
can make whatever motion you want. You can, you know, you can move to continue or you can make a different motion.
So currently, if we proceed to vote a yes or no vote, my vote is no. Just because I don't I can't really put my name on something that I don't completely understand what's the information that's in front of me. And there's too many missing pieces here for me to consciously say yes. Even if we do a long laundry list of Conditions. Conditions.
And keep in mind, please, commissioner Shively and the commission, all of you, that the the resolution that's been prepared by staff was a resolution to approve. That's what the staff's because that's what the staff's recommendation was. So if there's going to be a motion to deny, I would recommend, since this is not a recommendation to the city council, this is a a final this is an action appealable to the city council, but it's an actual primary action that you would, you know, articulate findings for denial and direct staff in our office to prepare a resolution for denial to bring it back for a final vote at the next hearing. So it would be kind of a preliminary vote with direction to prepare a resolution to deny, if that's the way you wanna go with your motion.
But can we also make a motion to continue and request an ad hoc?
Absolutely.
Before the September 17 or whenever our next one might be. So
Of course.
We can I guess our our options are approved as is with conditions, deny with recommendations, or continue request an ad hoc?
The denial would be provide direction to staff to prepare a resolution based on what you've articulated tonight, the concerns you've articulated, because we'd be preparing a resolution with findings to deny. So I would recommend that as opposed to a final denial action tonight. I would recommend, you know, directing staff to prepare a resolution for denial to bring back at the next meeting for final action with no further public hearing. It would be a non public hearing item. Or, of course, you can move to continue and that could be to a date certain or to off calendar. Or you can move to approve as is or approve with further conditions.
Okay. Yeah. Could I offer another option? To approve with conditions and one of them would be to go to ad hoc for feedback. You don't think that would be
Just to provide feedback, applicant has indicated they would be amicable to that. So approval with conditions to satisfaction of the ad hoc. Is that something that would be doable for the Planning Commission?
You'd have to have an ad hoc.
So at what level do we
Here, it's not going to city council, so it would be kind of like the full commission punting to an ad hoc on And since it's key issues, I wouldn't really recommend that approach.
And ad ad ad hoc is myself and commissioner Ramirez.
So if it was a more narrow issue such as, you know, a very specific item, you know and, again, like we said with the the prior one of the prior hearings tonight is, you know, if it's, for example, you know, make adjustments to the, you know, the the pop out on one side of the building to enhance, you know, provide an architectural feature or enhance the colors. That could be, you know, the condition you can include a condition that, you know, you know, modify to the satisfaction of the planning manager with with, you know, in consultation with the ad hoc. But I wouldn't expand it too much beyond that when it comes to kind of deferring a decision to a future ad hoc ad hoc meeting. Yeah.
Yeah. I I would love a better buzz in City Of Paris. I think the best thing to do is to extend it or or continue it, tells if the applicant is okay with September 17, which is our next ad hoc meeting.
Well, next Commission meeting.
Next meeting. Sorry.
Yeah.
Yeah. It's whenever you guys want it. Yeah.
I I'm and then yeah. I think there's too many issues to just say to push it off on that. And, now I understand it might we're only talking we can't do it because Labor Day week. That's the reason why we can't do the next meeting. Otherwise, we could be that. But, I know it may a burden, but it's not that much of a burden. So, I'm more in favor of that because I don't want to vote no, don't want to vote yes because we vote no, it's gonna be no. But, see, we're the last ones because it's CUP, so we want to make sure.
I truly feel that, you know, not just myself and Jimenez have the biggest issues with this, but I think it's only I think all the commissioners are like understanding of what's really presented before us.
Okay. So, in that way then you have ad hoc committee meetings, you go through it, you get the renderings, which we tell all of them do they don't. But specific renderings, specific pictures, front, that should be done all the time guys, in planners, all the time, every single aspect. It just makes it more difficult because then we will have questioning things. That's what I mean for everyone even watching developers, get detail so they don't have to sit here and go, okay, let's have palettes, all that stuff should be there, so all we have to do is say, make a little change.
But, we don't have that and it's not just this one, but it's been previous. So, I think that may be the compromise and it's a matter of weeks and not months And that's just my my opinion. Yeah. Because you're not getting consensus. And I think ad hoc is very detailed. Ad hoc is gonna do it, you know, we everybody wants to see the restaurant. It's just a matter of timing. It's not a question of no yes, but it's really the what we need to see and feel comfortable with. Right? Okay. That's just my opinion. Okay. If you if we can reopen the public comment if you want, he wants to say something. We can reopen the public comment if you like.
Appreciate you opening that up. Again, Kevin McDonald, I think you've already got that part. I was just talking with Don and ourselves. I don't think we have any we understand where you guys are missing a few things that but I to me, they seem minor. It's a problem. They're not they're big things to you guys, but for us, I don't think the landscaping you know, we're not gonna wanna put anything that's not matching what's, you know, in and out and with canes. We're not gonna we're not proposing any of that kind of stuff. We're not gonna put any African sumacs. I can tell you that. I sure. I'm just trying to
make that But currently, your landscaping plan is that way. And that's we're approving the landscaping plan as you're presenting it to us.
Okay. And we apologize about that. Normally, what happens with our designers is they just put in some things for the pretty pictures and and whatnot. To be honest with you, we didn't know that we had to put a full presentation in today. We sort of scrambled to get that in today to have, you know, everything on there.
So, you know, our bad on that part. But we can certainly I think some of the issues that are holding us up are very small. We want to try and work on getting the better facade and the better look for that, and we can get you those pictures and whatnot. I think there's a way to go with the landscape in the front and or working with a transformer. What I sort of need to say, though, is that we have investors that, you know, invest in us and having a certain store count, etcetera, And sort of time is of the essence for us.
And if we don't get a certain amount of stores in fiscal twenty twenty five, then it's a really big deal for us. I'll be honest. This is a stretch for us money wise. It's an expensive spot. And one of the things that is probably going to be a deal breaker for us, and I'm just being open book, is having a covered patio is going to be $70,000 $80,000 construction wise.
Adding that into our budget is that's probably going to be a deal breaker for us. However, what we've done in the past, and we're open to working with you, we have umbrellas that are the B signs that are our logo. We have the ability to maybe put, you know, the shades in or something like that. You know, there's other things that we can come up with, maybe some fans, you know, for misters and stuff like that to maybe, you know, cut some of the costs there. But we're also a business, so we have to try and do the best we can.
We really want to be working with you guys. We would love to be here in Paris, but there's also some big financial things that we have to deal with. So understand your position. We're just asking you guys to put put your foot in our shoes sometimes, too. These are these are big things. You know, as far as, you know, the landscaping, you know, we don't have a problem doing what everybody else is doing and and making it look pretty because we want it to look good. You know, we want a good image out there. Our owner is fanatic about, you know, having that image a certain way. So, you know, I mean, if you guys can work with us on that. But what also concerns us is time.
You know, you push it out another month, then there's no chance of us getting into, you know, 2025. Is there a way? I don't know the legal parts of it. I'm just a laborer and stuff like that. But is there a way to, you know, push this down the road and have a vote on it another week once we get you get you that plan that you need to do?
You know, for landscaping, we get you that plan. We get you you know, we talk to SDG and E. We get the permissions for them to, you know, paint up the transformers. We we get back to you within a week and then give you some time to to vote on it at another time or give us a, you know, approved with conditions or or whatever if that's the case. You know, we wanna make we wanna put you in a spot where you can say yes. So I
I think the, comments that we currently are looking at, won't hold your your plan check up. I think that can continue on. And if we need to add something to it, it's just a revision to it or maybe even it's approved and then come back with the revision after we get the approval. So you can get a permit on it and then whatever changes that need to be added can be an addendum or ASI or something like that that that doesn't prevent you from starting construction perhaps.
Is there there's no way to pull a permit without approval. Is there
Correct. No no permit without the planning approval.
So I'm I'm sort of confused at that.
In essence, I'm gonna make this this is one of those mediating things. We would have to and I'm I'm not as hard fast on a just some barrier. I don't care about a 10 over that. So some barrier. That's an easy cheap one. Okay? Don't don't tell me that. So to put a barrier, not just open walk in. But that's not a big deal for me, the deal The idea is that this is an architect, so you're gonna get more technical than I reject. The idea is that if we the only thing we could do in the compromise, you have to have ad hoc and you'd have to have staff after the fact.
So in other words, we'd have to see like we do administratively, you know, you'd have to see the color palette. You'd have to see these things and then can we do that legally? We say we'd these are conditions but then they have to look at it afterwards and agree upon that but it's the process is still going on. That's the compromise. So the idea is that we're looking at, okay, you need not just if we just had it, we wouldn't even be having this discussion, we didn't have it.
So the idea is that if we had enhancement, we'd have to put in there enhancements on the building, boom. They'd have to see it whoever's in there. Enhancements on the outdoor seating area, they'd have to see that. That's an administrative thing. Then we'd have to say the plant palette, which we really just have trees we don't have until this picture, I don't even know what it is, that's something they'd have to see. We'd have to see a planter thing that would be approved by or looked at by the ad hoc and staff. You see where I'm going? So, it would be after the fact step and I'm not sure that's one of those things is almost like we did the previous one, you'd have to trust in the fact that we have ad hoc and administrative to look over a pallet to do those kind of things. That's the only way this gets through if we decided to approve it. Do you see where I'm going with that?
So, we're looking at we'd have to put conditions, like he said, we'd have to say conditions of approval to enhance the landscaping which we don't, you know, these pictures don't tell you, but then landscape the landscaping to match the other stuff. It could be Texas privy, it could be whatever you have here or whatever. But that's ad hoc and administrative. Okay. And then you talk about the outdoor, you know, I'm not hard and fast, you know, but the idea is that's just a side note. The idea of the building and that kind of stuff is a natural thing we always ask. Okay? Just enhancements, that's no big deal. You know, maybe sign some squares. Okay?
So those are things unless there's other things. I think those are things would have to be added as conditions of approval. And then based on ad hoc and staff, that would be something to go be finalized. But we would have to look at it now and say, okay, based on that we push it on. As opposed to moving it to 17.
I guess we're at your mercy on that. I don't know what's best. I'm trying to tell you where we are. You're telling me where you're at. I think for no problem moving some hexagons around, that's zero. We can get that to you tomorrow. We can get you a more comprehensive landscape plan tomorrow. That's not a big thing. Again, my apologies for not having that there. We should have had that.
That's our mistake. Is that a hawk? Is that what you guys are telling me is sort of like an after hours inspection where we would have to pay, you know, to have the staff here? Or I'm just asking what
don't know if the ad hoc people discussed because I'm not on that.
Ad hoc doesn't ad hoc doesn't cost anything for us, for me and her. It's it's it's our donation of time for you guys to understand what two people of the the Planning Commission would like to see and Sure. Understanding what all five of us value. It gives the opportunity to see that before you come in front of the Planning Commission. So, if you ever get a chance for an ad hoc, absolutely take it. Because we definitely could have bypassed a lot of
So, you're saying, let's take the ad hoc and go from there. Is that fair?
Because what I see here, honestly, is a building that's good. I don't I don't have issues with the building. I don't really say that we need a cover above the patio. I think what's your intention of the umbrellas, in my opinion, I don't know if Commissioner Hammond is the same way, is perfectly fine with your umbrellas. Right? So, that for me is not a deal breaker.
Thank
you. The building, I think, is is good shape, good color. It just it's the missing pieces for me that I didn't see, that I expect to see. The landscaping that's on the plans versus what's in the rendering
Okay.
Is my point of view.
100%.
We normally and we're I would say, honestly, we are one of the toughest kind of commissions to get stuff through. But we're I I definitely believe we're fair and honest and upright uproar with everybody.
Okay. And we appreciate it. Thank you very much. Sort of first time through for me. So when you say you wanna continue or or do the ad hoc, whatever, we're we're in. We'll do what we have to. If you just if we leave today and you tell us exactly what you need, we'll get it to you within two days.
Yeah. And we could have Patricia set up an ad hoc for us.
So we can close the public hearing again and go back to deliberations. Mhmm.
Yeah. Thanks, John. Okay. Thank you. So we will close the public hearing. I can't imagine anyone else unless someone else out there. Okay. We close the public hearing and come back to the planning commission. We still have discussion because not everyone is there. Yeah. Public comment. Thank you. Public comment is closed. That's what happens with That's okay. It's pretty early. So any you were talking. I didn't wanna cut you off.
Your flashlight's on. Alright. You, me. To clarify, know you advised against necessarily voting for approval based on the condition that, you know, there's an ad hoc after the fact. Could you clarify? Could you just repeat? It's very late. Why are you advised against that?
Yeah. I I would recommend having the ad hoc before the final Planning Commission decision. Unless the the issues are very limited as far as what you're deferring to ad hoc. Because this is a this is a decision of the Planning Commission, not a recommendation. And depending on what issues we're talking about, you don't wanna defer the whole decision, the substance of the Planning Commission's decision, and just defer major pieces to a subsequent ad hoc.
It doesn't really make sense. The ad hoc is intended to be before the Planning Commission's decision. So the idea here would be, I I would recommend a motion to continue the item to the seventeenth and have an ad hoc meeting prior to that with the applicant. Because right now, the issues seem like you don't have enough information to make a a final decision on this substance of yes or no on the project. And you you can't really punt that to a subsequent ad hoc make a decision and put a condition that's punting that. Punting to to an ad hoc on a specific condition would be on a narrow issue.
Okay.
It's not customary to to have an ad hoc committee of the of the commission after the commission's decision has been rendered. Normally, that it's only administrative things that staff handles. That's why I was recommending that any type of condition like that still be, you know, if it's, for example, on, you know, add additional design or additional architecture feature to the one pop out on the north side of the building, I would still recommend to the satisfaction of the planning manager, but you could add in consultation with the ad hoc. But if it's if if it's a larger issue that's really about the you know, that really goes more to the substance of whether the conditional use permit should be approved or denied
Mhmm.
It's not something you wanna defer that to a subsequent ad hoc via a condition of approval.
Understood. The conditional use permit for this is primarily for the drive thru element. Correct? So if we were to I guess we couldn't split it up. Okay. That's it for me for right now.
Okay. Was everybody discussed? Because we I talked a lot, okay? Okay. Okay.
So do we think we can give clear enough direction and make it a condition
Mhmm.
That we could approve this with conditions, with the notion that with planning managers review and ad hoc review. That's a question to us.
And you're saying
to do so, you would be requesting a continuance Or you're saying No. Just adding conditions of approval and voting for okay.
Adding adding these conditions and then vote, yes or no.
I don't I mean, I don't have an issue with the outdoor that I see some barrier there that's it's not a deal breaker issue.
I do.
It seems to me it's the the landscaping we shouldn't be arguing about. That should be automatic from you guys. Landscaping and some enhancements to the building. We're not asking you to move the building. We're not asking you to move that, which would be a whole different ballgame. So, to me, those are the two primary issues unless you got some other issues. It's landscaping that's still could be looked at, but we usually do that. Because, like we say, change the colors of a building, we'll say, let the ad hoc deal with the colors of the building like we did on a previous project. So, is it brown, is it gray, but it comes down to enhancements in the building in terms of more squares and archit and landscaping. Right? So those seem to be the two major issues, and those could be conditions.
And also, the trash enclosure is extremely close to the dining area, so potentially moving it up or a little bit away from the dining area. Because if you look at the plans, it's like literally there's like a little walkway and a little bit of landscaping in between, and I'm just worried about the smell for the patrons. But there's room within that long aisle to kind of move it up, push it forward.
It's an administrative thing moving.
Yeah. Those yeah. They like pushing it forward. That leaves some buffer in between.
Those seem to be the three issues, so we've narrowed it down.
Yeah, I do feel comfortable.
Yeah, we can Location of the drive thru is no longer Yeah. An Okay.
The trash enclosure was
It is, but I feel comfortable with, like, the measures that they're open, the applicant is open to taking to kinda mitigate and deflect from that.
Yeah. Working with the mister Johnson, I think that's his name, that's beyond our purview. That's what the reciprocal that's beyond our purview. You know, you need to work with them. That's theirs. That's not our consideration with In N Out, and I won't even talk about that empty space. That's not our purview tonight. So I think I've we can pretty much narrow it down to those three things. And k. You don't have to come up here. You can just go, oh, okay. Yeah. I bet so. So if we're good with that one, now it's a matter of wording. But the only other thing oh, I'm sorry. Oh.
Oh. Yeah.
You okay? The only other thing is I think there was the wording of the public works thing, I think also a number 41 about the one year maintenance for landscaping. And that's I think it's number 41 To include the same thing, the reference to public works as standard city staff for public works for one year landscaping maintenance because since we're talking a lot of land landscaping, it's definitely one of major things.
We will remember
Yeah. I know.
For all the ones coming forward to find a commission.
I'm the pest. I admit to being a pest. It's my middle name pest. Okay. Okay. Now let me try. We're gonna we're gonna wrap this up. This is a condition used permit 21Dash thank you for your patience, 24Dash051502. And mainly because we're the last stop, so we gotta be a little bit more than normal. Can go to discussion. Go
for it. Yep. Go ahead.
I guess, you know, I didn't realize we're closing our discussion. I I didn't
You just step jump in.
Yeah. Get to hear from commissioner Scheibling. Vice chair Scheibling.
So I understand their position. I I being the architect, that I understand that there's quotas that every restaurant or every everything has to open up. And I've done several of those buildings. I've done all the Denny's, the KFC's, the whole gamut. I've done them all.
So I understand that. But I would you know, just seeing this, what was presented here wasn't what I was approving. And I don't I don't feel comfortable with that approval. If now that we can put the right conditions in the that we need and then have staff work with them and then plan a commission or or ad hoc kinda oversee and and feel good about it. And I think we have we have the confidence in the rest of commission Mhmm.
To oversee that.
So you were okay with voting in?
I'm okay with voting. At this time, I changed my feelings on it.
Mhmm.
Yeah. I'm sorry. You feeling the same?
Well, I mean, initially, was because I just felt like the applicant wasn't willing to meet us anywhere or make any kind of modifications. Even though they were minor, initially, I felt like it was a pretty stagnant, like, this is what we have. This is what you get. No movement. I have felt a shift along the way and an openness to work with us.
So I'm open to having good faith that the second part of what I've seen from the applicants is what's real and not the initial, no. We're really not gonna do anything.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, my thought is too that whether we they can still continue with their building department plans regardless because what we intended to do here has nothing really to do with those plans. Right. So and if we had modifications, they weren't gonna be so severe that it's gonna jeopardize what they currently have.
And if it was something minor as putting a canopy above the the patio, whatever, they could just put in their cover sheet, you know, canopy to be to be deferred, and they can continue to get it approved. Yeah. So there's avenues that would satisfy that in the drawings, you know, if that was so jeopardizing it. So so I that's you know, I I understand that I get frustrated with the same process because I deal with it just like you guys do. So I understand it.
And I'm I feel that we can confidently go forward with what our recommendations are
for this project. Yeah. I'm comfortable with with that. And I think I know it's against the norm, but the idea is that doing the amendments to that gives me the comfort because I already trust the ad hoc. So they can not make decisions but they can oversee it with staff. I have no problem with that. I would recommend that in any city, you know. And I don't care what city. I've been in five different cities guys. The idea is that I have no problem with that. Not to take the decisions, but we make decision to add on to it, then they just help sit with you and oversee it. That should not be an issue. So, we say you should have some enhancements, oh, okay, okay, we're done. Oh, you mean you mean to add a little color here? We're done here.
So, we're trying not to hold it up at the same time, but we still want some oversight because we just we don't trust staff, we do. But we these these guys are something that represent us. They know us. They know our feeling. So I think that would be a compromise. But we still have the amendments. And there's only four of them, I think. Well
what we need to do now is articulate the proposed conditions of approval that would be And then there could be a motion Yes. To approve with those. And
I'm gonna try but you I'm gonna need help. Okay. So if there's no more discussion. Okay. So we close that portion and we come to discussion now. I'm gonna go
Buys an opportunity for discussion once a motion's on the floor.
Oh yeah. Yeah. Let me read this. Well, I don't know if I need to read it again but I'm This is what's proposed. Okay.
A conditional use permit. Proposed to construct a one thousand seven and forty one square foot drive thru Alcoffer shop, better buzzes, on point 63 acres of a larger 1.21 acre parcel located on the South Side Of Old And Waybill Road between Raising Cane's and In N Out Burger in the commercial community zone. Requested action, obviously adopt resolution 25 20 by the project category exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act if you pursuant to section one five three three two, infill development. In approving conditions, use permit 2405152 facilitate the construction of a 1,741 square foot drive thru restaurant on a 1.21 acre site. Based on the findings, continue resolution, and subject conditions of approval.
And we have a few. What I missed to make the correction for the item 41, a COA, to include language concerning one year maintenance plans and that's kind of a standard. So that's that's a no brainer. The other one, forget about the enclosed stuff. Okay.
Enhancement of landscaping at the front northern end of the property to reflect the palettes that are acceptable to the city and to be reviewed by ad hoc and staff at future date. And, I think landscaping is the main thing. I don't know about the covering. I don't know if they the patio Enclosing is another thing that's a discussion at the front of the building with the cars. Right?
That was gonna be a canopy potentially.
But, you're telling me okay. Okay.
Enclosure. You wanted enhancing the
Oh, I'm gonna have to be yeah. It's fine.
And then maybe just finding a way to relocate
The or trash. Thank you. The trash enclosure. The trash enclosure. So they have to to smell it, let's put it that way. So three those those basic things. Do I catch it?
And that that would be to the satisfaction of the planning manager with a consult in consultation with the admin Yes. For all of Except for the first the the one year maintenance one.
And if we can just add the conditions of approval that were distributed at the very beginning of the presentation, the revisions to planning conditions and engineering conditions as per Oh, yes. Thank you.
Yes. There was a lot of them. That's why I didn't read it. And
for the enclosed patio condition, it's not to fully enclose or cover the patio, but it's just to have umbrellas or other shading.
Which they have in the picture. And there's a barrier there. There's a line barrier. I don't know if that's electric fence. Just kidding. Just kidding. Don't get that idea. Okay. Wait a minute. Just joking. Just joking. Electric fence. Okay.
And and then for for the the enhanced landscaping on the northern end Mhmm. To provide a little more clarification on that, is that to screen the sufficient to screen the
cars in the Yes. Drive through
That's that's helpful.
I'm not gonna designate height. I mean, what screens? You mentioned this lab, and there's all kind of stuff you mentioned. I don't know. I'm no botanist, so I don't Anyway, those areas, hopefully, got those.
Our planning energy has a lot of power, doesn't she?
Yeah. And
did you include added architectural feature or design on the northern end where
Yeah.
Okay. You got that.
Yeah. Mhmm. Mhmm. Are we good? Okay. Yeah. That's a big difference. Okay. Alright. Sylvia, good luck with that one. Okay. I need to read oh, no battery. Oh my gosh. Okay. We have a most oh, yeah. Oh, okay. We're almost done. Okay. Thank you. You. Thank you. She's how computer literate I am. Right? Okay. Do we have a motion for to to adapt this when with the amendments? So a motion to approve this particular project.
I'll make a motion.
Commissioner Lopez has moved to and commissioner Menez is second.
Commissioner Jimenez? Yes. Commissioner Menez?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez?
Yes.
Vice Chair Shively?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes.
With the vote for five to zero, this motion is approved.
Yeah. We gave you a break tonight.
Okay?
Thank you very much for your patience, everyone for your patience.
We usually give breaks.
No. We don't usually. No. Yeah. Yeah. Good luck with it too. Mhmm. Okay. We're on item e, which is the fun one. Right? We're gonna make this quick city. Okay. Zoning code. Okay. Quick, quick. Okay. I'll just read it. So, when you by the time you Yeah. Okay. Okay.
I'll read it slowly. How about that? Item six e, zoning code text amendment 25 Dash zero zero zero zero four, a proposal to amend chapter 19.44 of title 19 of the Paris municipal code to eliminate the option permitting warehouses and distribution centers in the business park zone with a conditional use permit. The applicant is the city of always going down automatically. City of Paris, we're done.
That's an o. Get out of here. Requested action to adopt resolution 25 dash 14 recommending that the city council determine the project is exempt from California quality guidelines under section one five zero six one b three common sense exemption and approved zoning code tax amendment twenty five zero zero zero zero four to amend chapter 19.44 industrial zones to eliminate the option permitting warehouses and distribution centers in the business park zone. And, that's the key based on the findings herein. Obviously, I'm not gonna talk about any ex parte. This is the city of Graves, so we don't have to worry about that. Once again, mister Garcia.
Good evening once again. As you indicated, the zoning code tax amendment is number 25 dash zero zero zero four. Proposal to amend the zoning code. This item was originally scheduled before the Planning Commission on July 16. It was continued to tonight in order to provide additional time to address certain procedural matters.
On 05/27/2025, this item did go before city council for consideration, and they directed staff to initiate the zoning code amendment in order to eliminate the option to allow warehouses and distribution centers in the business park zone with a conditional use permit. So, the zoning code currently allows an option where if you secure approval with a condition of a conditional use permit, you are allowed to have industrial warehouse facilities and distribution centers. This change to remove that allotment would be consistent with the Paris Valley Center specific plan. So that's the goal of this item that's before you tonight. Currently, warehouse and distribution uses are permitted in the BP zone with a conditional use permit.
So, that's the item that we would be amending. The only real item before you tonight is one amendment to the land use table, section nineteen forty four zero twenty which would which would prohibit warehouses and distribution centers within the BP instead of allowing them through a conditional use permit. This would also add a provision as part of Chapter nineteen forty four clarifying that any legally established warehouses or distribution centers that are already constructed, currently operational, or approved but not yet built with a valid conditional use permit issued prior to the adoption of this amendment may continue to operate in the BP zone as permitted, provided that the CUP remains valid and it doesn't expire. This item has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA section 15,060 one(three). Since there's no it's just a policy change to the zoning ordinance, there is no project or development that's proposed before you as part of this item.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution 2,514 determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Guidelines pursuant to section fifteen oh six one b three and approve zoning code tax amendment 25 dash zero zero zero zero four to amend chapter nineteen forty four to eliminate the option to allow industrial warehouses and distribution centers in the business park zone with a conditional use permit based on the findings contained as part of the approval. That concludes the presentation. Staff is available to answer any questions that the members of the commission may have pertaining to this zoning code tax amendment. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. So, any clarification or questions or
Can you go back two slides? Right there. Thank you.
Oh. Yeah. I'm kinda
like I have a quick question. So if we decide to eliminate industrial from BP, does it still have to get approved through city council?
This there would be no option to do it. So right now, we speak, conditional use permit would be required if they wanted to do industrial in the PB zone, and that would come before the Planning Commission. And assuming that it has no other discretionary entitlement like a zone change or general plan amendment, the Planning Commission would be the final decision maker. So, this specific action would not go to the City Council. The Planning Commission would be the final decision maker.
So this amendment will this is it's gonna be final tonight?
Correct. So what this would do is is basically you would remove that requirement. Instead of allowing them with a CUP, now you're saying they're not allowed period.
Okay. Gotcha.
So they're not allowed period under that designation, but they can apply for a zone change?
They could potentially. So if they were, let's say they were zone BP and they wanted to rezone to LI or GI industrial, they potentially could apply for that rezone and that action would would bump it up to city council review. So, the the the entitlement would still come before the planning commission. You would review it and you would issue a formal recommendation to the city council.
So, if they're requesting a rezone, it would still come to us first?
Yes. Because because it needs a development application. So, typically, it would need a develop DPR. So, development plan review. So, that development plan review and the and the rezone would come before you for consideration and for a formal recommendation that would at that point move forward to the city council.
So, how is that different from what happens now?
Because right now, if somebody had a BP zoned land and they wanted to do industrial
Female They could do it through a CUP.
They could do it through a CUP, and you would be the final decision maker. Now, you're saying that's not even allowed, so they would not be able to submit an application because you can no longer secure a CUP for that specific use. It would just be prohibited, so not allowed.
Okay. But if it was a CUP and it came to us and we said no, we were the final?
Yes. Currently, yes. You were the final decision maker.
But they could still appeal and go to city council.
They could. Correct.
So, it's still like the same process but this is prohibiting from using CUPs.
Yeah. I'll I'll try to explain it. Right now, if somebody wants to do an industrial warehouse in the BP zone, they need a conditional use permit. Right. And that's reviewed by the Planning Commission.
Allowance is being removed. So, now, industrial is just prohibited in the BP. So, there would be no way to secure any type of approval for industrial in the BP zone unless they were to do like a rezone or something like that.
Okay.
And commissioner Jimenez, to add to that, there's more discretion in the on the part of the city when it comes to approving a zone change. The city under no circumstances obligated to approve a zone change Versus under a conditional use permit, the discretion is a little more limited. It has to do with whether the required findings for a conditional use permit are met. So not only does it change the approval authority from planning commission to city council, it increases the city's discretion because there would be no obligation to ever approve a zone change.
Okay.
There's more discretion over a zone change application than over a conditional use permit application.
Okay. So our hands are a little bit more tight if if a developer wanted to bring in a CUP, they had more leniency, I guess.
You have
more power to say, since the use is prohibited with the with this change, you would have more power over ensuring that no such use could go in because you would never be obligated to approve a zone change. Theoretically, the discretion over a conditional use permit is a little more limited because it has to do with if the required findings are met, it it should be approved.
Understand. Okay. Okay. So if somebody comes with a CUP, our hands might be a little bit more tight if it meets certain requirements.
Yeah. If you were to approve this tonight, they wouldn't be allowed with a CUP. Okay. Would never they will never be able to apply with us with a CUP.
They would have to apply with a zone change Correct. And then we have more discretion over how to move
It's a legislative act of the city council, and there's no circumstances under which it would be required. They would be required to approve a zone change.
Okay. Thank you.
And if I can just add, this will make it consistent with the Paris Valley Commerce Center specific plan, which doesn't allow warehouses in the BP zone.
So currently, they would already need a specific plan amendment, which is also a discretionary council approval. So it's already essentially this is more a matter of making the city's regulations consistent. The zoning code consistent with the specific plan, which already prohibits so they would already need a discretionary specific plan amendment, would require council approval. So it's essentially the same. It's already prohibited because of the specific plan. So this is now just bringing the zoning code in line with the specific plan.
Do we know how much BP land we still have within the city that has not been rezoned or conditionally approved under CUPs?
There was a total of four sites, and two of them had been recently approved with projects with a CUP. And so, there's only a what I recall, two undeveloped sites. Okay. They're unlikely to move forward with any type of development because they're currently I think one of them was part of a potential future basin and the other one was owned by the county. So it's unlikely but this was a direction that was provided by the city council.
Okay. So it's not to limit or or make sure we maintain things. It's just really to align our
Except for the fact that the zoning code they're the zoning code applies to the BP zone as opposed to the specific plan areas.
Okay.
So they apply to they can apply to different areas.
Okay.
So the the zoning code can apply in areas where that are not within the specific plan, and that's where it wouldn't to that extent, it wouldn't be a matter of just bringing them bringing the zoning code into conforming with the specific plan. It would actually be in making the zoning code more restrictive and prohibiting.
Okay. And commercial is not included in this because commercial, they would already require a zone change. They could not apply for a warehouse in a commercial zone with just a CUP?
It's yeah. Right. The warehouse the use of a warehouse is already prohibited in the zone. So now similar to that, it would now be prohibited in Okay. The BP zone
Thank you. Oh, one more. So does this mean if currently there is a warehouse in BP area that was under a CUP, does that CUP carry from owner to owner? Or if they go out of business and it closes down, is it automatic has that CUP attached to the land? Or is it with the developer?
Yeah, the CUP runs with the land. Oh, right. And right here, if you can see on the slide, there's some provisions that if there's any development that has been already approved with the CUP, those uses are considered permitted uses unless they let the CUP expire. But once something is billed. Once something is billed.
It has a CUP forever.
Right. It runs with the land unless
the
use cease to exist, I believe, for one year. Then at that point, the the CUP is considered void.
So once it's built for the life of that use, it essentially remains in effect.
Okay. And then And
when that use ends
For a year, then it goes Yeah. Back to needing a Yeah. I mean, we would probably approve if the building's already there, but at least there's a potential where we can get some of that business park land back to Business Park because you can take a warehouse and build business offices. Okay.
Okay.
Got my second one.
Isaac? Yeah. No, I think it's pretty much like that. I think, yeah, read through it. It's it's very well done, very well put together.
The idea that it's not retroactive to some point because it's a futuristic thing because obviously we're not getting to AB 98 yet. But, the idea is that this is something that was done a long time ago, probably a while back and I don't think it was really thought through the idea of business, park, light, industrial all in the same thing which is and then councilor Rav of course brought it up and shithead. And, it was just long overdue, but, you know, we've got projects that, you know now, the only thing last question is the only thing. If a CUE CUP is terminated it can be terminated, I think according to this, that changes the ballgame, doesn't it? Because if you don't meet crime with the CUP, it's done.
So, it's not something that's in, you know, perpetuity. No, no. It could be terminated. Just like liquor stores in the CUP, if you start having all these complaints, it's gone.
It can be revoked.
Yeah. So, it can be revoked. We need to make sure that we understand that it can be revoked if for some reason they don't meet the criteria. You could destroy it, but I mean, it can be, it's not something that's automatic. But, if it comes to us, we do the CUPs, you know. But, the idea of an industrial and then that altogether, I think that was the initial idea. So, was put together well, I think I don't have any and laid out. And, in red we talked about all the good neighbor Well, so I'll leave that alone. Anyway, I'm done. It was very good.
Unless you guys have any other questions, we will open it Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. I was If you had any other questions, we're letting them off easy this time. Okay. With that, well, with that we open it up to public comment. And anyone wishing to address the just state your full name and spell your last name for us, sir.
Good evening. It's late. I'll be very brief. My name is Bill Blankenship, b l a n k e n s h I p, representing the Commercial Industrial Association. I believe I just heard that there are no projects pending that would be impacted by this action tonight. Is that what I heard correctly?
Okay. Yes.
I hear there's two that potentially could be, but there's not projects proposed on those sites. Is that correct?
Two projects were recently approved. I want to say months ago were approved Right. With the CUP, but we don't have any pending projects.
Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you for the clarification.
Oh, thank you. Okay. Any other public comment on this item? Okay. We close the public comment portion. And unless you had any discussion? Okay. I can't imagine. You're just getting tired. Right? Okay. So there's no discussion. I think it's pretty much self explanatory. Appreciate the work done by staff on this one putting it together. Alfredo, especially, good good job. Yeah. And, okay. Just a second. Rafael, I'm sorry. It's getting late guys.
I mean Alfredo. I have to be it has to be late. Mean, yeah. You know it's getting late when I don't even know who's here. I don't even know my name. Don't even know what his name. Yeah. Who am I? Yeah. I don't even know my name, so we don't even talk about him. No, what is my name? Jeez. Okay. Zoning code amendment text amendment. We have we do have a sense of humor, guys. Zoning code text amendment 25 dash zero zero zero zero five, proposal to amend chapters 19.08, and 19.44 of the Paris municipal code as well as the Paris good neighbor guidelines related to warehouse logistics. That's the wrong one?
That's the wrong one.
I thought we were finished.
Okay. We need to vote on this item.
Okay. You see how it's eleven something? I don't even care anymore. She said, jeez, you know. Okay. Thank you. Oh my gosh. I need I need coffee or something. Adopt resolution twenty five fourteen. Alright.
Recommended that city council has determined the project exempt from California Quality Act guidelines under section one five zero six one b three common sense exemption and approve zoning code text amendment twenty five zero zero zero zero four to amend chapter 19.44 to eliminate the option permitting warehouses, that's what it is, and distribution centers in the business park zone based on the findings contained therein. We didn't have any amendments, we didn't have any changes. So, all the sense and purposes, we could take a motion to approve that resolution.
A motion or second, Lopez. First, first, no second.
You thought it was me, you see?
Commissioner Jimenez? Yes. Commissioner Minas? Yes. Commissioner Lopez? Yes. Vice Chair Sharfrey?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes. Uh-oh, you almost forgot my name. See, it's not just me. See?
With the go over to five to zero, this motion is approved.
Thank you. Yeah. See, we're all losing it. Okay. We're moving on to item f, zoning code text amendment.
That's what we're getting right. 25Dash00005A proposal to amend chapters nineteen point zero eight and nineteen point forty four of the Paris municipal code, as well as the Paris good neighbor guidelines related to warehouse, logistics, development standards for consistency with a b 98, our favorite one, a b 98. Plus additional guidelines to further improve development standards within proximity to sensitive receptors. Requested action, and obviously, it's the city of Paris. Adopt resolution 25 dash 21 recommending that the city council determine projects exempt from CEQA guidelines pursuant to one five zero six one three common sense exemption, and approve zoning code text amendment 25 dash zero zero zero zero five to amend chapters nineteen point zero eight and nineteen point four four of the Paris municipal code, admitting the industrial development standards for consistency with a b 98, and improve development standards and in proximity to sensitive receptors based on the findings contained herein, and adopt resolution twenty five twenty two recommending the city council determine the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act between fifteen zero six zero c three and fifteen zero six one b three.
As the amendment will maintain consistency with state law and will not result in an impact to the environment and adopt the amendment of the good neighbor guidelines for consistency with resolution 25 dash 21. Rated redevelopment standards for warehouse logistics development based on the findings contained in red. Once again, here you are.
Thank you. As you indicated, the item before you tonight is, another zoning code tax amendment. And just to provide a little bit of background, back in April, 08/2025, city council directed staff to update the industrial development standards consistent with the framework that the City of Riverside had at the time. So the City of Riverside is undergoing a similar process, and as part of that process, they had some agenda items that had been scheduled. The Planning Commission observed some of those requirements that they were anticipating in adopting, and they directed staff in adopting some type of similar framework in an attempt to be to have a more robust framework when it comes to industrial development warehouses, and also to adopt something that would be, at the very least, consistent with AB 98, but they also indicated a desire to have something that would be greater than the legislation provided by the state.
Staff at this point has prepared a draft ordinance and resolution with standards to address the following items. We'll be going over each one of these areas in detail, but item number one would be in relation to the maximum structure size of an industrial warehouse, and that would be based on the proximity of the warehouse to a sensitive receptor. Number two would be the maximum structure height, and that would also be based on its proximity to sensitive receptor, the setback requirements for the structures on the site. And again, that would be based on proximity to a sensitive receptor, the distance of the bay doors, and that would be that distance requirement would be based on, again, its proximity to any residences or other sensitive receptors, The height associated with a boundary wall, specifically for industrial warehouses. The stacking associated with the truck traffic along the main driveway, and that would be based on the number of dock doors associated with a warehouse.
Landscape buffer, and that would be the linear dimension associated with the landscape buffer, as well as the tree box size, and those requirements would be based on the proximity to a sensitive receptor. And number eight, the housing replacement requirement. Currently, there is a requirement as part of AB 98 where you're required to replace any residential units that are removed as part of an industrial project. And number nine was to simply update the definition of a sensitive receptor in order to be consistent with state legislation. This is also going to include an update to the Good Neighbor Guidelines that would be consistent with the policy framework that we're going to present here tonight.
So item number one had to do with the maximum structure size associated with an industrial development project. Currently, the City of Paris does not have something that is specifically analogous to this. So something to keep in mind is that the city of Paris does not limit structure size based on its proximity to a sensitive receptor. We just have a 50% lot coverage requirement. And so that's applied to all industrial projects.
However, the City of Riverside developed a slightly different methodology that limits the square footage, the maximum square footage of an industrial warehouse based on its proximity to a sensitive receptor. So the closer that you are to a sensitive receptor, the more restrictive the standard. So as you can see, the City of Riverside is providing a 10,000 square foot limit if you are within 200 feet of a sensitive receptor 100,000 square foot limit if you are between two zero one and eight hundred feet of a sensitive receptor 400,000 square foot limit for a warehouse if you're between 801 to 1,500 square feet from a sensitive receptor. And if you're over if you're over 1,500 square feet, then at that point, we would default to the 50% lot coverage since our standard would be more restrictive than the City Of Riverside. So the highlighted cells that you see there are the are what staff is recommending.
And then the last column, all the way on your right hand side, you see the overall policy recommendation. And so we're that's what we're proposing as part of item number one. With regards to item number two, the city does not have a height limit that is based on sensitive receptors. It just has a standard height limit of 50 feet for all industrial warehouses. The city of Riverside limits the height of a warehouse based on its proximity.
If you're within 200 feet of a sensitive receptor, the high limit would be limited to 35 feet. If you're beyond 200 feet, they increase the height to 45 feet, and that's what's being recommended. With regards to setbacks, they vary. For the most part, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend a lot of the setbacks that are associated with that we currently have in our zoning ordinance. So for the typical setback along a front yard for a warehouse would be 35 feet.
There is not a setback requirement for if a side the side yard is not adjoining a nonresidential or a nonsensitive receptor. If you are adjoining a sensitive receptor, the setback would increase to 60 fee. The street side yard would be the same as the front yard setback requirement of 35 feet. There would be no minimum rear yard setback if it is not adjacent to a residence or another sensitive receptor. And if it is adjacent to a sensitive receptor, the rearguard would increase to 60 feet.
So, that's what's being recommended overall based on a review of the city of Paris, city of Riverside, the Good Neighbor guidelines, and AB-ninety eight. Go ahead.
This is a question.
Yes. I wasn't sure if I could jump in.
Yes, go ahead.
Because it's a present day. Can we go back to Slide number one, please?
Yes.
Would it be possible to say whichever? Because I know we're doing like within 200 feet of a sensitive receptor, we're going with 10,000 square feet. Can we say 10,000 square feet or 50% coverage, whichever is less? Because it might be 10,000 feet, might be more than the 50%.
Right. So, yeah, the Planning Commission has the flexibility to propose whatever you want. I think what we can do is we can go over these and come back item by item and yeah, we can definitely develop a framework that's slightly different than what's being proposed. And we can take that into consideration and take it to as the City we move it forward. But yes, we can say or 50% whichever is lower.
Whichever is lower.
Yeah, can that's actually we can include a footnote here. So, on this presentation, in order to make it as simple as possible, we didn't include a lot of the footnotes. But my requirement would or one of my suggestions would be to potentially add a footnote that says, or 50% whichever is lowest. And we can include that in each one of the cell box. So, that's actually very good comment. We can definitely do that.
Okay. Thank
you. But, we can discuss it further.
At the end. Okay. I was making notes, I was like, I don't
know if I can
Yeah, but there's a lot of information here. So, if you have questions, feel free to stop me. That way I can provide some additional context.
Okay.
And then, we can come to a consensus at the end of the presentation once we wrap up all the items.
Female Okay.
Male So, regards to the setbacks, you know, obviously the far right column is what we're recommending, and we're recommending sort of a mixture between city of Paris and city of Riverside. For the most part, the setbacks that are provided by the city of Paris tend to be the more restrictor setbacks, with the exception of if you're on a side or a rear yard and adjoining a sensitive receptor. So, they're adopting a they were at that when we reviewed them back in, I believe it was June, they had a more restrictive policy if you were adjacent to a sensitive receptor. With regards to number four is the distance that's required by the bay doors. The city of Paris and the city of Riverside, I don't think has a standard pertaining to that specific requirement.
The Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines actually does. They require a minimum distance of 300 feet in order to reduce a lot of the impacts associated with having bay doors or dock doors directly adjacent to residents. AB 98 tends to be more restrictive, so they require 300 feet for industrial, a 300 foot distance requirement. However, that distance increases to 500 feet if it involves a rezone. So that's something that's required by the state, by the new state law. Can we
be stricter than what AB 98 recommends? Yes.
So part of the direction that we received from City Council is to potentially explore options that are more restrictive than
More restrictive, because I'm thinking 500 would be
just What we attempted to do as part of our methodology, and thank you for stopping me, that way I can clarify is we attempted to see these different sources and what type of standards were out there.
I like that.
And then, what we did is based on what we saw, we attempted to kind of go That's with the more restrictor
what I'm noticing the pattern, but
Yes. So, that's kind of that was kind of the level of analysis or the method. Okay. But any one of these standards can be changed. So now that you know that information
Female To be more restrictive. We can't be less, but we can be more.
You can be more, right? So we would have to, at the very least, be consistent with AB 98. But what you can do is, you think about it, if you want to go with something stricter, we can definitely entertain that. So, item number five was the stacking along a truck entry gate. So, these the requirements varied.
City of Paris and the City Of Riverside zoning codes don't have a requirement. AB 98 does have a requirement that they provide 50 feet from property line with an increase of up to 70 feet for every 20 bays beyond 50. Currently, the Paris Good Neighborhood guidelines has a more restrictive standard of 150 feet with an additional 75 feet of queuing required for every 20 dock doors beyond 40 up to 300. We are recommending the 150 with the clarification that multiple lanes should be permitted. That's a common design that we have nowadays, and it tends to work pretty well. So, that's what's being recommended.
And what happens if it's beyond 300?
If it's beyond 300, there would be no additional stacking requirement that would be required. So, the notion is that once you get to over 300, whatever queuing depth or stacking depth
Should be
should enough. Be enough to accommodate, correct. Item number six is the wall hide requirements along the perimeter of an industrial site. So this is just your perimeter screening wall requirement. The City Of Paris requirement within the zoning code is 12 feet. Riverside has a requirement of 10. The Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines requires 14. And AB 98 references 10. So we are recommending 14 feet, which will be consistent with the Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines. Landscape buffer and tree size requirement based on proximity to a sensitive receptor.
Let me quickly explain what that means. AB-ninety eight specifically, as well as the Good Neighbor Guidelines, has a requirement that you are adjacent to a sensitive receptor, you have to have a landscape buffer that has to meet a certain linear dimension. And within that area, there are certain sort of increased landscape requirements that are typically required in an attempt to mitigate any potential impacts associated with an industrial use. So, as part of that, they typically what we saw in most of the regulations, they require larger tree size. So, typically, tree size, they come in box sizes, and they're 24, 36, 48.
They can be much larger as well. And so, what we attempted to do is figure out what type of buffers are out there and what type of tree sizes are being required within the buffer area and beyond the buffer area. So, the one thing that we noticed is that AB 98 requires a 50 foot requirement. That's if it's within 900 feet of a sensitive receptor. That 50 foot requirement increases to 100 feet if a rezone is involved.
So, the only differentiation is, is there a rezone or is there not a rezone? What AB90 does not address necessarily is what's required if it's not if it's beyond 900 feet. So, that's probably one of the directions that we would be seeking from the Planning Commission is, what if the industrial use is more than 900 feet away from a residence? What should we keep it at 50 or should it go lower, greater, should there be one? That's one of the, I think, policy recommendations that we would be looking from the Planning Commission. We are recommending 50 feet. Good. You can
clarify, is that 900 feet from the property line to property line or from building to building?
Typically, it would be it would not be from building to building. It would be from property line to property line. Would That be kind of the most conservative estimate from my recollection. But that's something that can also be clearly defined by the Planning Commission. If you would like to adopt a certain methodology that is maybe more restrictive, that's something that's at your discretion.
On the same on the slide, you got 50 feet. A 100 feet of rezone is required, but on the recommended documentation here, it says 30 feet.
That is correct. And that was a typo. So, would like to clarify that. That was done in an attempt to include the existing buffer requirement within the Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines. The Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines requires 30 feet, even if it's not regardless of whether it's within 900 feet or beyond 900 feet.
AB 98 really only requires that if it's within 900 feet. So this requirement would only be triggered if you're relatively close to a sensitive receptor. If not, we could always go with that 30 foot requirement. So that is a good catch, and I'd like to clarify that that item on the staff report was a typo, but on the condensed table, I believe it did show the correct dimension. Thank you for bringing that up.
Is the reason why there's a difference between if a rezone is required, it's because if you bought your house that you already knew that the adjacent land was zoned industrial or should have done your homework?
I think I think that when you look at AB 98, the purpose of the legislation is to account for impacts that industrial uses have on residential. That's really where a lot of the impact is. And a lot of the times when it involves a rezone, it means that you're rezoning land that was not really intended for industrial, and there may be sensitive receptors.
Okay.
So, every time that a rezone would be involved, you'd be required to meet sort of a higher burden, a more restrictive standard. That's what AB 98 requires, and that's what we're recommending. But if it's beyond 900 feet, I think one of the items that we would be looking from you is, Commissioner Shively indicated, is do you want to keep it at 50? You can reduce it to 30, consistent with the Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines, but it's one of the items that neither our code or the Good Neighbor Guidelines or AB 98 necessarily clarifies. Professors, yeah.
Right. So, it's something for your consideration. The other requirement is tree size if within a landscape buffer. So, typically, most of the requirements range between 24 inches box all the way up to 48 inches, depending on which source you were looking at. So as an example, our city code requires that 30% of the trees be a minimum of a 36 inches box.
The Paris Good Neighbor Guidelines requires thirty six and forty eight inches box. My recollection on that is that they think it requires a fiftyfifty split. So, at least 50% of the trees if it's industrial, 50% of the trees have to be 3650% of the trees have to be 48 inches box. And that ultimately, we're recommending the 36 as well as the 48 inches box requirement for that. Tree size for any tree that's proposed beyond the landscape buffer, we're recommending 36 inches, which is consistent with what we saw in from other places.
Number eight, the housing replacement requirement. So, currently there is state law that requires that any housing unit that's demolished or removed has to be replaced, whether it's industrial or non industrial. So, that's one thing to keep in mind. AB 98 increases that requirement. What AB 98 says is that if you have an industrial development project and that leads to the removal of residential units, you have to replace those units at a ratio of two:one.
So, for every one unit that you remove, you would have to replace them with two units. That's what we're recommending as part of this one. So this is something where obviously there's a the state has declared a housing crisis throughout the state, and they're attempting to maintain the housing stock. There's already state law that requires that the units be replaced, but this increases our requirement. Number nine is just updating the definition of a sensitive receptor.
There's not too much to this one. Basically, it defines a sensitive receptor to include residences, residential zones, schools, day care facilities, publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas primarily used by children, nursing homes, long term care facilities, hospices, convalescent homes, or similar live in housing and hospitals as defined by Health and Safety Code section twelve thousand eight and seven hundred. And that is a definition that's consistent with Assembly Bill 98. Overall, the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA section fifteen oh six zero C three and fifteen oh six one B three. We are recommending that the Planning Commission provide direction on this item and recommend that the city council adopt resolutions number twenty five twenty one and twenty five twenty two finding that the project is exempt from the sequel guidelines pursuant to section fifteen oh six zero c three and fifteen oh six one b three.
Keep in mind that resolution twenty five twenty one is the resolution in relation to the zoning code tax amendment, and resolution twenty five twenty two is a resolution in relation to the amendments to the good neighbor guidelines in order to synchronize both documents. And also approve the zoning code text amendment number 25 dash five based on the findings contained as part of the resolutions. That concludes the presentation. I think we can go item by item if
I just have one more quick question.
Go ahead.
Can we go back to the one that describes sensitive receptors? That one. I think something that is missing from sensitive receptors, I work in education, so we see a lot of walks of life. I didn't see, like, group homes or things like a recovery facility for
Would that maybe be for No, long term care
recovery is very different from long term facilities. Long term care means like you have physical therapy, things like that. Like I'm thinking like a rehab group homes. So when juveniles are are released back, they live in group homes. So I don't know if that falls into any of those.
I believe I believe from the state requirement and let city attorney correct me on this, but a lot of those users are considered residential in nature. So I think they would be included, but Included? We'll we'll be happy to defer that to our legal counsel. And
what about like communal places of worship, like churches and stuff?
Yeah. So what this definition is proposing is to go with the definition in government code section six five zero nine eight e Okay. But to add to it residential zones as opposed to just residences. Because the definition in government code section six five zero nine eight e says residences but not residential zones. So, like, for example, undeveloped areas in residential zones would be captured by this definition but not the government code. And I'm checking the government code section right now to see about the other question.
Maybe we can come back to that one while
he's researching. Researches that.
Yeah. Absolutely. So we can definitely amend it as long as it it typically, we wanna make sure that whenever we're amending something like this, because it's coming from a bill, that we're not doing anything that wouldn't be kosher as far as the law.
We can have a stricter definition. We just can't have a less strict definition where a b 98 applies.
You're talking about potentially churches or like when we approved down on Betty Road where it was temporary. Like, go from Kaiser and then send in there for a previous but isn't would that be
I have the definition here if you'd like. So under government code section six five zero nine eight e, it says sensitive receptor means one or more of the following. Number one, a residence, including but not limited to, a private home, apartment, condominium unit, group home, dormitory unit, or retirement home. Okay. Number two, a school. Number three, a day care facility, including but not limited to in home day care. Number four, publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas. Number five, nursing homes, long term care facilities, hospices, convalescent facilities, or similar live in housing. And six is hospitals. That's it.
Would just be adding that extra because group home was not identified here, but it is part of the code description under number one.
Group home is already in there, so that's why it's what this what you're seeing on the screen is
Summary?
The the underlined portion is what the city currently has in its good neighbor guidelines for a sensitive receptor, which doesn't quite align with the a b 98 definition, because a b nine 98 didn't exist when the good neighbor guidelines were adopted. Mhmm. So we're bringing them in line by saying, we're gonna go with the a b 98 definition, but we're gonna add residential zones, not just residences.
Okay. And,
yeah, since it's already covered group home is already covered by Yes. The government code section, you don't need to call it out here.
Okay. Yeah.
Thank you.
Can we include churches and
places of worship? Churches are referenced, I believe, in there.
He didn't it wasn't included in the government code.
Okay. I don't see churches being referenced, or I'll check for places of worship. No. It's not referenced. So, yeah, that would be something you would need to add. And I don't see why you couldn't.
I do have a qualifying question on that just because I have seen churches that lease out a small business park or they can lease areas, some venues in non typical not where you would expect a a place of worship. Would that be detrimental to this, I guess?
I think I think you're right. A place of worship could be anywhere, and it may not involve a sensitive population as far as health wise. I think this definition is getting at places where you have children, but people who have, you know, who are in poor health, and so they're sensitive populations in the sense of
I see what you're saying. But like if it's a church, like, bigger church that has, like, a a school attached to it, it would be protected under this because there's children there.
Right. If there's a school in with the church, then it's that's covered.
Yeah. Okay. Include
places of places of worship or no? Okay.
To clarify schools, our schools actually, elementary school, high schools, or college?
And charter schools because there's a mover. Charter schools are taking over old, shopping
School, it says, a school including but not limited to a preschool, pre kindergarten, or school maintaining kindergarten or any grades one to 12 inclusive. So it doesn't include a college.
So it does protect
College Charter schools.
No tech schools. Yeah. It would protect charter schools.
But it wouldn't do any tech schools or colleges? Mm-mm.
Nothing Only if they're k through 12.
Anything that's,
yeah, beyond twelfth grade would not be covered.
Well, what if we include above or any type of schooling?
As we say schools, they're not saying public, it's to be private, public. But I think the idea
is Yeah. That would be the
think we should include all levels of education.
Community college,
has a lot of area around it.
I figured college students are so loud anyway, they wouldn't make it even no.
That's is officially passed.
Well, that would that would be an addition. Would not be some coverage here, but that would be something city of Paris would add. Right? If he's talking about college and so we would have
That would be a local more restrictive. Mhmm.
You Mhmm. Like restrictions.
think unless you had some other change. I think the changes I
think I do. Could we go back to number four, please?
Number four.
So, I was following pretty closely when ABN 98 was going through the channels. I think I know that the prevailing recommendation at that time from a lot of the I think like the American Lung Association, I know WRCOG recommended buffers for sensitive receptors to be at least like 300 meters, which is about a thousand feet. I don't know. That's like the that's what the original guidance was. I would be interested in in getting somewhere near that to try and meet that standard to offer the most protection for residents. I don't know if you guys were open to a conversation about that.
What if we do 500 feet for industrial and then 800 feet for rezone? Just to up it a little bit.
We could and when we're thinking distance from sensitive receptor I think identifying if it's I'm just thinking if you have a huge lot and it's going from lot line, you can have an ADU pretty close to the lot line and that would be closer to the bay doors. You know what I mean? Like if you have an ADU right against your back and if we say from we're not describing what the sensitive receptor place to measure is. Can we specify from
So you're saying to specify further lot line to
Not from lot line but from Oh from Whichever is again whichever which one is So like if it's more to be from the lot line that's what we want if it's more to be from the door.
In any situation, would it wouldn't it be the most conservative option to go from the lot line? Mhmm.
That is a very so that is a very conservative way. But this truck loading bay is is I think it's a minimum distance from the truck loading bay to the property Yeah.
Oh, it is to
the property?
Or to the sensitive septic to property line.
Right. It's from the nearest truck loading bay to the sensitive receptor.
The building how do we measure?
The the sensitive receptor, since we're saying it could be a residential zone, it could be the line of the zone.
Okay. So
Or it could be if it's a school, it could be the property line
of the school.
Okay. So it could be the backyard lot line is the closest sensitive receptor, not you're not the sensitive receptor only when you're inside the house. It's your whole property.
Right. Or it could it could skip a property and be the next property over. So it so it could be still 300 feet or 500 feet, but skip a small strip mall or something like that and then be a resident behind that.
Okay. So it would still be, though, within the 500 or whatever feet. Okay.
Yeah. I I think it's 300 feet. And because I'm so technical, would say that minimum 300 feet because if you have industrial development, in some cases, it might not be reasonable to be could there be more than that because otherwise you're just not gonna have it. So, you have it would depend. So, in cases you want to set a minimum, you set a minimum 500, the minimum would be 500.
It could be maximum 50. But, in some cases, we had a few cases where it just was not possible to have very but we said 300, but if you can't do 300, you got a problem if it's a sensitive receptor. So, it's gonna be the minimum has to be there, a 500 or a minimum 400 or a minimum 300, then we need to discuss if if should there be a minimum. But, at least, we want to be in line with a b 98, you know. So I'm looking at, you know, if we're saying 300 feet for industrial to a sensitive receptor, we're not now, again, if you had ADUs in the backyard, we're not talking about the building. Right? We're just talking about the property line.
I also have an issue with this because it's to the closest Bay Drum. We have seen a few where they have the parking, but it right against the sensitive receptor or that nearest. So it kind of closes because I think the goal of having them is to keep them as far away from the sensitive receptor as possible, but there's still their parking is closer. So I I think we have to find a way to ward it so it's more strict, there's no parking against
those receptors.
There's there's another portion of of in here that's that's probably a little bit more restrictive than the truck loading bay. So the other portion of this, say, from basically industrial poppy line
to buffer. Yeah. The the buffer line.
Instead of receptor
Yeah.
Which could be more restrictive than actually the truck loading. Yeah.
Because they need that buffer.
Yeah. The buffer we sent out to
Yeah. We need to increase it somewhere to where there is a larger distance between.
I would just remind the commission that we saw a public comment. I think they're waiting. So So
so Before we get this done. To have public comment first and then maybe
I think before you
get into deciding too much, you should hear the public comment and then you can get into deciding.
Okay. Perfect.
Right now,
if you have more questions for staff, now would be the time Okay. On the staff report.
Thank You got cut of the fact that it's the city of Paris. That's why I kinda ignored
it.
So my question to staff is what happens if a b 98 is not approved by the or the assembly or signed by
It's already been adopted into state law, but it takes effect on 01/01/2020 these the the statewide development standards on warehouses take effect 01/01/2026. But the bill has already been passed since already it's already law. But the law said, commencing 01/01/2026, here are the statewide development standards.
Signed by the governor and everything.
Yeah. Everything. And and this was I think it was passed in 2024 and took effect 01/01/2025, but it says commencing 01/01/2026, here are the new development standards.
That's why we wanna get in line with we wanna be in line with AB90. Okay. Yeah. Let's open it up to public comment. Any member of the public would like to comment on this item and this item only, and I appreciate your patience.
Just state your full name and have somebody. Oh, have the blue gate. Oh, okay. Okay. Very good.
Hi, everybody. Good morning. Was gonna be evening, but now we're almost at midnight. Yeah. Yeah. My name is Evan McCray. Last name, m c c r a y. Obviously, you guys can tell I'm here. Usually, I'm here to support things. Tonight, I do not support what you guys are looking at right now.
I I'm here despite the fact that I gotta be up in a few hours. You mentioned you're up at 04:30 sometimes back when you used to work. Well, I'm still working. And, yeah, all the guys behind me are
still working
too, so it's been a really long night. And I wanted to get here and talk to you guys because it's about something that's important to us, not just me, but everybody else here. And I really hope it doesn't fall on deaf ears because you guys are almost making decisions. And then, oh, yeah, we still got public comment. So I hope you guys do kinda
Just late.
Oh, I understand. I remember your comment from the last one. So you know, we're opposed to changing the zone code, obviously. The change in language closes the door on economic opportunities for many working families in this community, not just mine, but everybody else. I ask that you take into account the negative economic impacts this will have.
You guys make it pretty stringent for anybody to come in here and develop a coffee shop, much less anything else. With this, you guys are just gonna continue to drive them away. And it's I don't know what you guys' plan is for the future, but with nobody coming around to invest,
how are
you guys gonna build the roads, infrastructure, everything else? You guys are gonna have to wait. Everything's gonna get deteriorated. And then they're gonna go, well, that's what we wanted, but we really would like some infrastructure. Oh, I wish we had some people to invest in where we're gonna be. Well, what could they invest in? Where can they go? Oh, they could build a coffee shop after two years going back and forth about the color of the coffee shop. Overall, yeah, I I would say I'm pretty frustrated. I think everybody else here is too.
I wish you guys would take into account the fact that a b 98, yes, it is law, but it is also being currently amended. So you guys should wait till the amending comes through to really make a decision. This feels rushed to me. It was brought up at the last council meeting, and now you guys are here. You guys should really take your time to think about it, really weigh the options here. Understand you guys wanna be like Riverside. They got the most stringent, you know, stuff in all the region. But just think about it. There's a difference in size. There's a difference everywhere.
So with that, I do just wanna ask you guys, please reject this proposal. Like I said, it's rushed. AB 98 is not a sure thing. It is law, but it's being amended. The economic opportunities will crush this community, and please just don't make it harder for us to provide for our own families. Thanks.
Thank you very much, sir. Anyone else? Are we k. Well, you got this.
Evening. It's, Bill Blankenship again. Last name, b l a n k e n s h I p, here representing the Logistics Association NAOP, Inland Empire Chapter. There's a lot to talk about, and I'd like to echo something that was just said by the last speaker. This is rushed.
It was the last council meeting that last council meeting, one of the council members said, let's bring this forward. Let's not wait for Riverside. Riverside has spent three years deliberating on their good neighbor policy or new language to an existing policy that was adopted in 02/2020. They have also a very restrictive good neighbor policy in place today, much like yours, and you saw comparisons to your current policy, Riverside's current policy, and what Riverside is proposing. For three years, what they're proposing is out there, and it doesn't have the support to move forward.
It was debated again last night and pushed further down the road to wait and see what happens with AB 98. That was also talked about tonight. A b 98. I've met with both of the authors of a b 98 and the coauthors of the two bills that are there currently in process, and they've received over 200 suggested amendments. There's been about 15 amendments that have been applied to both bills that are pending, and both bills are sitting in their appropriate appropriations committees waiting for movement.
A b 98 excuse me. A b 98 was literally cooked up in three days at the legislative limit when the governor signed it, and both authors said it needs to be fixed. So even when they adopted, even when the governor signed it, they knew they were putting forward something that was flawed and very difficult to enforce. The league of cities, counties, business, wide range of folks are are trying to work to fix AB 98. So adopting standards for a b 98 probably doesn't make sense yet.
Now if the legislature doesn't do anything, governor doesn't sign anything, then it does make perfect sense because that will be the law. And that's what every city should do is they should recognize the current law and how that affects their existing good neighbor policies. There's a lot that was discussed tonight about sensitive receptors. Churches, many churches are buried in industrial complexes. That's not an appropriate use for a a good neighbor to as part of a sensory receptor.
There's a wide range of other things that are sensitive receptors and should be honored. You know, there's a lot to talk about. The industry has not been at the table. We just heard about this. We didn't see anything until it was publicly noticed Friday evening. So we're just reading what you folks are seeing tonight, and the industry really needs to be at that table. There needs to be a thoughtful process. As I mentioned, the city of
of Anyone else? We close the public comment portion and come back to the commission. Unless, well, unless the city had Well, can't say the city has rebuttal. I don't know. We could say the city could come back. I don't think he wants to. Okay. So, we come to the commission for any discussion on this item.
I do wanna thank the speakers. I mean, you're obviously very passionate about it. You've been here. It's just about midnight, so thank you. I do take what you said into consideration, and I think we'll use your feedback moving forward in our discussions.
But I did I just wanted to extend a thank you for your time. It is five minutes to midnight, and I don't I definitely recognize your tenacity tonight. Agreed. Did there there's more discussion? I
do also wanna thank the speakers our our speaker tonight. You guys stayed super late, and and there was one part that I completely agree with, but completely disagree with. We were hard on the coffee, but it went through. So we understand we have those limitations. We are strict, not because we want to be, but because, like you all, we live in the community and also coffee houses. Everybody else can also we encourage developers to use unions. It's not just industrial. We're hoping that it really spreads so everybody uses them. But I do have a question for our staff. It is a minute till midnight.
I feel like this is like a really robust piece. And we would need more discussion time. I think this is something that deserves a lengthier amount of time for us to sit up here and discuss and get a little bit more guidance before I think we are able to to make a decision. So I don't know if it's possible to move this to the first item at our next meeting. That way, that also gives us more time to dive deep, ask more questions.
I think city too took notes on on what our speaker said and maybe gathering a little bit more information. That way, we we make more awake, more well informed decisions. I don't know how my fellow commissioners feel.
I agree. I think more time to just look at each item individually so that we could I think if all of us take the time and just have our own suggestions and we come back to the next meeting and start dishing them out and just discuss them. I think it's it'll be a better idea for us.
Yeah. I agree. Well rested. Well more well thought out. And then we can reach out to our neighbors and those who will be most greatly affected by it as well. I think that would be the most fair option.
Would the commission like to continue it to a date certain, as it's September 17, for the benefit of people who are in attendance today?
Would it be possible to request that it be put on the first item? I mean, these people use I'm assuming we're pretty far away because there isn't a lot of things going on here, so I'm assuming they have to get extra early to get to work. Is it possible to request that we do move it to September 17 and have it
be the first item? Absolutely. Yes.
Go ahead. You had something.
AB 98 is something we have to adopt and get a resolution to, regardless of whether it's approved now or gonna be amended. It's just how are they gonna amend it. And us taking the position of the more stringent item between Riverside and and Paris is the plan without even understanding what
Yeah.
The amendments are gonna be. So I'm I'm okay with postponing it or moving forward with it now.
Yeah. Not gonna prolong it. Know these guys are late. I am this is the direction of the city council. You must understand that bottom line. And never forget that because as a city employee, when you get directed to do it, you pay attention. Period. Okay? So, I'm the only one here who's been a city employee. I understand what happens when you do that.
But, we wanna make sure that we make the decisions that are I'm not sitting here at 12:00, sitting here making decisions. AB 98 is the law, it's the law. You will comply with the law whether we like it in the city, whether we like it sitting out there, you will do it. And they do change, make changes, you will understand that we will do it. Now, whatever they do in Sacramento and I get all these texts from Cal Matters and League of California, I get constant bombardment with that stuff.
You know, and I have to stop it sometimes. But I know where they're on on that but it's still a b 98 has been signed. Now if they make amendments that's another thing. From our standpoint, it's a lot to comprehend in a short period of time. And, if we're not under some deadline that we have to do it by a certain date, it would make certain sense to do move it on to another date. That's not a problem for me. Just understand that, you know, we have to balance that with what their demands are at that at another We serve at the behest of the city council guys. So we have to understand that balance too. If they want a certain thing done, you have to make some decisions about that. On the other hand, you want to make the right decisions and we wanna make them thought.
So I'm not gonna prolong it and say that I would not be against it. I'm looking at staff and I see Patricia's ready to go to sleep. But in all that, we didn't, you know, this is an important issue and it's a really important issue. So, if it's not at all possible, if it's not if the consensus, we can move it. So, I'm assuming September's I keep saying seventeenth. It is the seventeenth, right? That's the third yeah. Because Labor Day we would do it earlier. But, that gives more than enough time, maybe even explanation for AB 98 in more detail, understanding that some of the things maybe Riverside, I don't think it's going to finish theirs by then. Yeah, too big.
They have 400 what, 400,000 people, we have 80,000. So you know, let's be considerate too. Okay? We don't stop development here, we have a lot of development coming guys. So we are probably we're we're the most stringent and most difficult commission because we are demanding of doing things the right way. So if we seem that way, we're not gonna stop. You know, we demand high level architecture, we demand high level buildings, so we're not gonna apologize for that. So all I'm saying is September 17 is as agreement that we're gonna have to make motion to move it to a calendar date specific of the September 17. Yeah. We can't really well, we're just continuing. Okay.
And the motion should specify the time and place.
Yeah. Well, it better be here. Yeah. You're
right. But regular meeting place and time
6PM in the City Council chambers on the September 17. If there's no objection, we can move move to do that. If there's no objections. Okay. Okay. So, we just need a motion.
I'll move.
Okay. Moved by commissioner Jimenez.
I'll second.
And, seconded by commissioner Jimenez. Jimenez?
Just to be clear, this is to continue the public hearing. Correct?
Yeah.
Correct. With keeping it open and continuing it.
Okay. Yes. Mhmm.
Mhmm. Commissioner Jimenez? Yes. Commissioner Jimenez?
Yes.
Commissioner Lopez? Yes. Vice Chair Charlie?
Yes.
Chair Hammond?
Yes. Mhmm.
With a motion of five to zero to continue this item for 09/17/2025 at the City Council chambers, this motion is approved.
Details? Skipping the next meeting, obviously, we'll not be meeting September 3 because it's Labor Day. Is it that Monday or what? I guess it's that Monday. Right? Okay. Yeah. So, Day week, so obviously we would not be meeting that week. And, I don't have any other than, you know, the summer is here. It's gonna be a 107 tomorrow. So, you know, be cognizant of that. Yeah. I'm getting to her. Yeah. That's next. So with that, I don't have any announcements and I'll leave it to our director.
I will be brief. We have, for the September September 17 meeting, we have the two items that were continued today, the Nantes Street maintenance and storage yards and the zoning code amendment amendment to the good neighbor guidelines for compliance with AB 98. We also have a rezoning in the Green Valley specific plan area. We have commercial development over on Ramon Expressway between I-two 15 and Webster. We have a CUP to upgrade alcohol sales at the seven Eleven gas station on Paris Boulevard.
And we have an amendment to the specific plan for consistency with AB 98. And those are all the items I have. I also would like to remind the commission that there is an APA inland empire section workshop for planning commissioners on September 4. And everyone is registered? Oh, absolutely. Excellent. And that's all I have to report. Thank you.
Thank you very much and thank you Sylvia for your hard work. And even Brad's awake, believe it or not, yeah. But thank you guys and with that, thank you to our city attorney for your input as always. Some of us we were really tough, know, but but anyway, with that we say thank you. We adjourn. I don't think we you could just pick a name. We don't have to worry about that. So But anyway, thank you and thank you for the audience for and our IT people who stayed awake. And with that, good night.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.