Board of County Commissioners– Board of County Commission Meetings - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

The Nye County Board of Commissioners addressed several key issues, including the temporary reinstatement of a liquor license for Breakthrough Beverage, the approval of debt management and capital improvement plans for various towns and districts, and the continuation of public transportation services in Pahrump and Beatty. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to public comment, with residents expressing strong opinions on proposed changes to the county's land use and zoning ordinances, particularly concerning solar projects and data centers.

About this meeting

Government Body
Board of County Commissioners– Board of County Commission Meetings
Meeting Type
Board Of County Commissioners– Board Of County Commission Meetings
Location
Nye County, NV
Meeting Date
July 21, 2026

Transcript

1115 sections

5:17 – 5:58•Speaker 51

All right, Serena, how are we doing? Yeah, no, we're good. That's all right, you've got time. He went to breakfast. All right. Welcome, everybody. Sorry for the three-minute delay. Not really. We're going to stand with me, if you like, for Deacon Rick Minch of Our Lady of the Valley Catholic Church for our invocation.

6:04•Speaker 29

Deacon, D-E-A-C-O-N, Rick, R-I-C-K, Minch, M-I-N-C-H. Good morning, commissioners and staff. Thank you for having me.

6:12•Speaker 30

Let's bow our heads in prayer.

6:15 – 7:06•Speaker 29

Father in heaven, we thank you for this day. We give you thanks for the gift of 250 years of our nation, the United States of America. May we continue to be one nation under your care and wisdom. Assist with your spirit of counsel and fortitude, your servant President Trump. We pray for Governor Lombardo, our legislature, our county officials, especially those in our precious Nye County. May they be enabled by your powerful protection to discharge their duties with honesty and ability. We commend to your unbounded mercy we the people of our nation, state, county, and town of Pahrump. May we be blessed in knowledge, preserved in union, and granted the peace which the world cannot give. We ask this in all things in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

7:07 – 7:18•Speaker 51

Amen. Thank you, sir. Okay, we're going to call this joint meeting of the Nye County Board of Commissioners at all together. And Commissioner Jabbour, would you like to lead us, sir? Yes.

7:19 – 7:33•Speaker 42

Thank you, Chair. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

7:34 – 7:47•Speaker 51

Thank you, Commissioner. Thank you. Good morning, everybody. And manager, let's go to number three, please.

7:48•Speaker 50

Two, please. Item two, presentation of certificates and or plaques to seven employees honored for their years of service. Thank you for that.

7:59 – 8:34•Speaker 51

Oh, and we got... If I turn it on, you can hear me.

8:37 – 10:16•Speaker 42

Thank you. Thank you and welcome today. Appreciate everybody being here. So we have some plaques to recognize some people. 10 years, 10 years with the Nye County Sheriff's Office, Richard Schreier. Richard, are you here today? Sheriff, did you put him on special assignment? Okay. But thank you, Richard. Thank you. and 15 years with Nye County Sheriff's Office, Jose Parra. Is Jose here? He's on that special assignment with Richard. Oh my gosh, look at this. 20 years with the town of Pahrump, buildings and grounds, tough job. Carlos Campa, Carlos. See, he wanted you to think he was Carlos. Come on up, Carlos. Congratulations. Thank you very much. Show all your colleagues. 20 years, 25 years. No, we have a few more 20-year recipients.

10:16•Speaker 51

Can you believe this?

10:17•Speaker 42

Well, we all know this gentleman, 20 years with Nye County Sheriff's Office. I'm surprised he's not on special assignment. Gregory Curtin.

10:35•Speaker 51

Thank you so much.

10:55 – 11:26•Speaker 42

Get a good look at all these people here. You know, he's on the motorcycle, and if you're speeding, you know. Okay, so, wow, 20 years. I thought he was here longer. But 20 years with natural resources. John Klinke. John Klinke, are you here? You hiding in the audience here somewhere? So John, over the years, has helped us with our resources, with everything imaginable throughout the county.

11:26•Speaker 51

Especially water. Especially water. Go, John. Thank you, John.

11:30•Speaker 42

Okay, we have another 20 years. Amy Kruger. Amy, come on up. Nye County Sheriff's Office.

12:04•Speaker 42

I heard some whining in the background, but must have been her phone. Are you sure?

12:11•Speaker 54

I'm sure. That's all I have. No. What do you have? I have one more. What?

12:17•Speaker 42

I have one more.

12:18•Speaker 54

You messing with us?

12:19 – 12:33•Speaker 42

No. according to this 25-year recipient with Public Works, Joseph Maness. Joseph, are you here today? Joseph?

12:34•Speaker 54

I don't know what that is.

12:35•Speaker 42

We're going to give him a plaque. Joseph, yes, thank you. And thank you very much.

13:06•Speaker 51

Okay. All right. Thank you, Commissioner Jabbour. And thank all the recipients. All right, Manager, let's hit number three, please.

13:16 – 13:37•Speaker 50

Item three, general public comment, up to three-minute time limit per person. Public comment will be for all matters off the agenda. Public comment must be limited to matters that are within the jurisdiction and in control of the Board of County Commissioners. Action will not be taken on the matters considered during this period unless until specifically included on an agenda as an action item.

13:40 – 14:57•Speaker 17

Come on up. Anthony Greco, G-R-E-C-O. I hold in my hand a federal subpoena, which was just served to Brett and Brian, and the deliberations will start questioning a lot of people in the community that work here on August 7th. Okay, so this is not a joke, but I do want to say that I'm going to mention three people that have nothing to do with this case and that would be commissioner one, two and three. They will not be deliberated. Uh, they have nothing to do with the case. I want to stop the rumors right now because rumors hurt people and there shouldn't be rumors. You have to have facts when you're talking about important stuff. So there's about 10 people that are in the county that will be getting subpoenas for deliberation. And this case will go forward. The federal judge, the lawyers for the county said that they wanted the case dismissed. The federal judge says the case has too much merit and it will go forward.

14:59•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

15:03•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

15:09 – 17:47•Speaker 60

Good morning, everybody. This is Beth Borasevich, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. I'm calling about what almost the entire community that is on any kind of social media will call the yard, which is now supposed to be our splash pad. The splash pad that was constructed is nothing like the flyer that was sent around. It has three cinder block walls that are, they say two feet, but it looks more like three feet, that children could potentially slip, slide into, fall, or hit, and crack a head, crack a tooth, break a bone, get a heck of a scratch. anything could be happening in there on top of that they put a chain link sense with filtering in the link for what this is the most atrocious looking thing i've ever seen i would not allow my grandchild to go in there it's like they'll get in there and there could be somebody bullying the younger kids an 18 month old could be in there just you know toddling around a whammo hits the ground That place is unsafe. I have not seen a safety record. I've not seen a report of any kind of inspection. And I've already served you guys with a formal complaint that I hope that you take and you actually follow through with what should happen, which is an investigation. Let us know what's going on. And I would like you to stop the grand opening on Friday until we have the answers for safety for the children. That's all unsafe. i care about i want those walls taken down i want this thing to be built properly and the person i think there was somebody named honey as well as the buildings and ground departments buildings and grounds should not be involved in my opinion in building anything they're supposed to maintain stuff not build it where's the architectural plans engineering plans the water plans there's nothing You guys went and took $289,000 plus an additional amount of money for the walls and built something. And I don't think any of you commissioners have been out there and looked at it. I know John has, but the other commissioners. And you allowed this. I cannot believe it. I'm like, you guys have no taste first. Second of all, we need the safety information. Thank you.

17:48•Speaker 51

Thanks. Go ahead, Tanya. All right, we can't have clapping and stuff like that. We gotta keep it chill so we can get through everybody.

17:57 – 18:58•Speaker 77

Tina Dixon, representing the SASE trainer. In 2022, I applied for a grant through the commission and was awarded a grant and have spent the last two years trying to submit the proper documentation. And I'm doing it here because I haven't gotten any response back that anything that the last bid that I sent was received, so I wanted to deliver it, and if it needs to get put in the record or whatever, but I need to close this grant so I can move on. I've worked really hard with the teams that, and I guess I'll back up. What I got the grants for was to train service dogs for veterans in Nye County, which I have done, and I have submitted paperwork in various forms to close that grant. Um, and so that's what I'm doing today is submitting that paperwork. So I don't know who to give it to.

19:03•Speaker 77

I have copies for thanks.

19:06•Speaker 51

Sam. Anybody on the phone please?

19:09•Speaker 27

Yes. Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

19:15 – 22:20•Speaker 55

Hello chair. Good morning. Bruce Johnson, J-O-H-N-S-O-N. As we honor the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, I ask this Board to remember the foundation upon which every public office in Nevada rests. The Declaration begins with the laws of nature and of nature's God. It declares that all men are endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights and that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. nevada carried that same principle into its constitution in 1861 nevada adopted common law as its source of jurisprudence that was carried into our article 1 section 2 where it declares all political power is inherent in people government is instituted for the protection security and the benefits Maximum law, the main object of government is protection and preservation of personal rights, private property, public liberties, and upholding the law of God, American maximum. That means authority does not begin in Carson City or in Washington or in this room. It begins with the people. Our common law heritage teaches the same lesson. Nevada adopted common law. Bear with me one second here. Nevada adopted the common law upon entering the union, including the historical institution of the grand jury, a body designed to stand between the people and the abuses of public power. The United States Supreme Court has recently affirmed constitutional limits on modern surveillance through cases such as Katz, Jones, Carpenter, and Chatterjee, reminding us that advancing technology does not diminish protections guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment. And just this year, Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing in Trump vs. Slaughter, issued a reminder that reaches far beyond Washington. We have tolerated adventurous theories long enough. It is time to return all the way to the Constitution. That message is not only for federal agency, but it's for you guys as well. It is a principle for every level of government, every ordinance, budget, code, enforcement action, policy, and should be measured against the Constitution And the authority actually delegated to government. One of the oldest maxims of law teaches the welfare of the people is supreme law. And another reminds us where there is a right, there must be a remedy. Finally, scripture tells us in Micah 6, 8, he has you deal, man, what is good and what does the Lord require thee, but to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God. My hope is simple that Nye County will lead by returning in both word and and deed to the Constitution honoring the common law, respecting the rights. Thank you, sir. I appreciate that AI speech. Come on down, sir.

22:26•Speaker 47

Good morning.

22:27 – 24:41•Speaker 23

Joe Opatik, O-P-A-T-I-K. Bringing ingredients from Lakeview Golf Course. to provide a brief update of projects, fundraisers, community events held at Lakeview Golf Course during the past six months. In addition to our weekly golf leagues, our monthly tournaments, Lakeview has expanded the schedule of community programs and special events. We have Blood Drive on the 25th of this month from 8 a.m. till noon. This spring, we hosted another successful car show that brought residents and visitors together for increasing activity at the golf course and clubhouse. We've also supported several community fundraisers benefiting fraternal and religious organizations. These events have allowed Lakeview to serve not only the golf facility, but also a gathering place for the wider community. Our trivia nights continue every other Friday evenings and has become a popular and dependable clubhouse activity. This month, we're beginning an indoor battle golf tournament. Contestants can chip a lightweight golf ball into a 6x6 golf scoring mat. These points and awards are presented to the top participants. This provides a safe and entertaining activity for golfers and non-golfers. The monthly golf tournament will begin August 1st For our cornhole tournaments, they will continue in the fall as the weather temperatures become more comfortable. With continued warm weather, we are actively looking for additional indoor activities that will attract residents, increase clubhouse use, and provide affordable entertainment for the community. I want to thank also Arnold Knightley for posting to the town website on a weekly basis, and Janie Reeves for posting to the tourism site. With the continued warm weather, we'll keep, oh. Read that part already, sorry. Anyway, thank you for your continued support.

24:42•Speaker 51

Thank you, Joe, and I just want to say that that golf course is actually making money now. That's the plan.

24:49•Speaker 54

Because of you.

24:51•Speaker 51

Come on down, sir.

24:59 – 27:29•Speaker 46

Good morning, commissioners. So when we think about the concept of what a data center is and how it affects us, we have to weigh the pros and cons like we would with any other major life decision. We have to weigh what is claimed to be gained with what has the potential to be lost. If you played a sport, let's say football, and one of your offensive guards was injured, there would be no one to protect your quarterback. In this analogy, the guard is the guardrail against bringing a data center to Nye County. The quarterback is the citizens of our community. They're all the quarterback. Speaking of this analogy, there's been a lot of rhetoric regarding data centers. You have individuals that convey strong emotion for and against. On the floor, you hear key buzzwords designed to arouse rapid response like jobs and the economy and technology and state-of-the-art closed-loop systems. And that lends itself to speculation, not only about things like how many jobs and how does the technology add any value to PROM's residents, but also what about waste? And don't closed loop systems have the capability to leak? Let's avoid speculation and let's focus on what we know from previous data centers that have been built in our country. In Fayette County, Georgia, residents were promised modern infrastructure with minimal disruption. Instead, investigators found that a QTS data center had used more than 29 million gallons of water without proper billing because of utility oversight, resulting in a massive retroactive bill. In Cheyenne, Wyoming, a metadata center promised a closed-loop cooling system, yet during construction, wastewater from that cooling system entered the city's sewage system, causing bacterial contamination and disrupting treatment operations. Reclaimed water had already been distributed to parks, golf courses, and other public spaces before the problem was discovered. And even if the developers disclose peak water demand, source of water, wastewater, chemistry, discharge destination, how can we take anything they promised but with a grain of salt? What incentive, training, or ability do they have to protect the citizens of Nye County from illness? And can they reverse that if it occurs? Looking at two recent proposals, one from Mance, which claims to use less than 300 acre feet of water, which is 98 million gallons of water per year, and the other from Osprey, which, according to a VA presentation, would use 1,600 megawatts of peak electric load, increasing by 400 megawatts for each of the next four years. That's literally 1.6 gigawatts and exceeds the 1.21 gigawatts Doc Brown's DeLorean needed to power the flux capacitor to travel through time and back to the future. Water supply, the cost of electricity, and waste contamination does not only affect the people on this side of the room, it also affects your side as well. And I thank you for your time. Thank you.

27:29•Speaker 51

Thank you, sir. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

27:32•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

27:48•Speaker 51

Come on down and preempt, please. Sorry about that.

27:56 – 30:04•Speaker 13

Good morning. My name is Laura Stewart, S-T-E-W-A-R-T. And I'm here to talk a little bit about the data centers also. I have many relatives in North Dakota who own small farms who are being affected with this. And in Racine, Wisconsin, I think it's Racine, Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, they are actually filing a lawsuit against Microsoft and their $7.3 billion fair water at the data center in Mount Pleasant. And the world's most powerful data center is now at the center of the class action lawsuit filed by the nearby residents over alleged excessive noise, construction disruption, and extreme light pollution. The lawsuit filed in the District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on July 1st alleges that people living within a proximity of 1.5 miles of the facility have been subjected to continuous industrial noise from cooling systems, HVAC equipment, generators, and construction activity. The proposed class lawsuit would include more than 1,000 households in the Sturdivant and nearby Mount Pleasant. Plaintiffs also claim bright nighttime lighting has disrupted their quality of life. At least 48 lawsuits have been filed against the AI data centers. Microsoft has acknowledged that its high-speed cooling fans produced a humming sound that traveled further than expected. The company says it implemented mitigation measures and announced on June 18th that the measure had been resolved with additional sound reduction. However, residents argue that the disturbances continue and are seeking legal action. At least 48 lawsuits have been filed. Currently, at least 75 to 142 major AI and data centers are projected to have blocked or delayed counsel due to local disputes, community protests, and government moratoriums. Data centers reportedly caused $25 billion in environmental damages last year. It's like sexual predators. Mega corporations seek to prey on the most vulnerable cities.

30:07•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. We don't have anything on the agenda for a data center. Come on down, please.

30:15 – 33:13•Speaker 5

Good morning commissioners. My name is Heather Marquez. M. A. R. Q. U. E. Z. I am a mother of six and one of three administrators for parent mother's corner. 3 years ago, our group stood before this board petitioning for a splash pad for the children and families of. When we were later told that the community would need to raise half the cost for the proposed shade structure, we accepted that challenge and organized a bake sale completely funded and staffed by local mothers. And thanks to the overwhelming support from this community, we raised the required $5,000 in a single day. This is proof that our community welcomes this project. Today, as we approach the ribbon cutting and grand opening of this project, we're left asking, what happened? And more importantly, where did the money go? As there is no shade to be seen anywhere near the splash pad or the park. The plans presented to the public showed a welcoming community space where families could gather and children could play safely. The project that is scheduled for its ribbon cutting this Friday looks dramatically different from what the public was shown, and many families feel blindsided by those changes. Beyond the appearance, many parents have legitimate questions about safety. The splash pad appears to utilize a painted concrete surface. While there may be coatings designed to improve slip resistance, parents are concerned about the lack of impact absorbing surfacing in an area designed specifically for young children, as falls are inevitable in any play environment, especially one involving water. In a rural community served solely by a critical access hospital with no dedicated pediatric unit and no dedicated trauma unit, I believe those concerns deserve careful consideration and a clear explanation from the county. I'd also like to know whether this facility has been independently reviewed for full ADA compliance, including accessible play opportunities, routes, seating, shade, and other amenities that ensure every child has the opportunity to enjoy this space. But perhaps the greatest disappointment isn't the design itself. It's the lack of communication. If budget constraints, engineering requirements, or circumstances required major changes to the original plans, the families who helped make this project possible deserved to be informed and have the ability to offer feedback. This community has repeatedly shown that it's willing to volunteer, donate, and work alongside the county. We deserve transparency when the vision presented to the public changes so significantly. So today, I respectfully ask this board to place this project on a future agenda for a public review of the design changes, an explanation of how those decisions were made, and a discussion of improvements that can still be implemented. and to please consider postponing the ribbon-cutting and grand opening of the splash pad until its safety can be verified and its construction completed to the specifications shown in the original plans. This isn't about assigning blame. It's about rebuilding trust and ensuring that the children of Pahrump receive the community space they were promised. Thank you for your time.

33:13•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

33:16•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

33:20•Speaker 51

Yeah, I know. It's off.

33:31 – 36:12•Speaker 31

no come on down sir tim doyle t-i-m-d-o-y-l-e uh good morning chairman commissioners and members of the public my name is tim doyle thank you for allowing me to speak several months ago i became aware of what i understood to be a recreational lake spring mountain raceway as part of my research i submit a public record request seeking information about the lake i was surprised to discover that the county approved an rv site an rv park site plan which does not identify it as a recreational lake at all it identifies it as a drainage basin A drainage basin is generally an engineered area designed to collect, temporarily store, and safely convey stormwater runoff to help reduce flooding and to protect surrounding properties. What made this discovery even more surprising is that I also located a 2014 development agreement recorded in 2021 discussing the construction of a six-acre recreational lake for public recreation and drainage control. The original lake was later removed, and the replacement water feature now appears on the approved site plan only as a drainage basin. Unlike the original lake described in the development agreement, the replacement water feature appears to be a private amenity within the RV park inside the raceway rather than a public recreational lake. However, the feature remains continuously filled, includes recreational improvements, and has been publicly depicted with a person paddle boarding. Based on the information available to me, I have not identified drainage, entering, or leaving it. I submitted three public record requests seeking permits, engineering and drainage studies, construction plans, inspections, reviews, water use records, and documentation explaining the basin's approval and classification. I included photographs identifying the feature and its recreational use. I have not received any of those records. I then submitted a county complaint concerning the apparent absence of responsive records. After receiving no response, I contacted town manager Brett Wagoneer, I did not receive a response from the town manager. A water comparison is important. Using a published Southern Nevada evaporation estimate, a six acre open water surface can lose approximately 34,800 gallons daily, or 12 million gallons annually. By comparison, the proposed Blackjack data center has been estimated, assuming dry cooling, to consume 15,000 to 55,000 gallons daily, or roughly 5 to 20 million gallons annually.

36:13•Speaker 33

So they are equal in water usage, the data center and the lake.

36:18 – 36:43•Speaker 31

These are estimates, but they illustrate why consistent public discussion of water use is appropriate. I also researched Nevada contractor licensing. For those unfamiliar with these classifications, a drainage basin is commonly associated with excavation and grading work, which may fall under A7, excavation and grading license. However, if a project is constructed as a recreational lake that impounds or stores water, Nevada also has a specific E3 classification for dams and reservoirs. Thank you, sir.

36:43•Speaker 51

Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

36:45•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

36:48 – 39:44•Speaker 11

Good morning, commissioners. Gregory McMahon, MC, capital M-A-H-O-N. On June 5th, all of you, all five of you, voted for a moratorium on data centers. During this moratorium, you were going to come up with ordinances in the event that they would move forward, laws that would have to be in place. I'd like to know what you guys have come up with. What are you ready to present us? What I'm hoping is that we don't show up on August 4th and you have a bill to present that says, yeah, data centers can go forward if they do these rules. I'd like to have a two-way conversation or something, all of us would with you guys, to hear your thoughts and to be able to respond to your thoughts Some of the ordinance I think are important would be before changing any heavy industrial zoning or approving another data center, Nye County should formally adopt these following protections and then strengthen them. There should be no evaporative cooling. There should be 100% no chance of waste leaking. There should be full public disclosure of direct and power related water consumption. There should be mandatory water use efficiency reporting. independently verified every year. No potable water should be used. No infrastructure, power, or water costs should be shifted to existing residents. Authority for county utilities to deny service when supplies are inadequate should be in place. Full cumulative impact analysis across every proposed project should be in place. Meaningful separation from homes, schools, wells, and agricultural operations should be in place. What are the emissions restrictions? What are the noise restrictions? There should be no grandfathering of pending projects into weaker standards, and there should be no permit until the developer identifies the end user and proves the water power and public benefit. The burden of proof really needs to be with the developers, not with us property owners whose wells, rates, and homes and future are being placed at risk. I would also urge all five youth commissioners attend this next informal meeting on July 25th so that we can hear each of your thoughts on the ordinances and hear why you want to ban data centers or hear why you don't want to ban them and what the reasons are. Don't just bring it on us on August 4th. This is supposed to be full transparency. You're supposed to be representing us. So Let's be open about this. Let's talk about it. Thank you, Commissioners.

39:44 – 40:05•Speaker 51

Thank you, and I will remind everybody on this coming Saturday, 10 a.m., Commissioner Bain and Commissioner Jabbour have got a meeting to discuss this, 10 a.m. forum, 10 a.m. in this location, so you'll be able to talk about that however you like. Come on down, please.

40:08 – 41:22•Speaker 2

Hi, good morning, commissioners and public officials. My name is Katerina Sepulveda, K-A-T-A-R-I-N-A-S-E-P-U-L-V-E-D-A. I'm a member of Nevada Maternal Health Coalition, Prevent Child Abuse Nevada, and also a health care provider here in Pahrump. I'm a champion for maternal and child rights. I do see that the recent splash pad is a huge health to families and children. There are many problems with the splash pad. I am concerned that families may be injured and may cause some unnecessary hindrance to families through injuries. I do believe that we want to also have more information about the funding for the shade, I was able to participate in that fundraiser and we were able to raise $5,000 as a community because as moms and families of Pahrump, we believe in community. So I ask your help in this to reevaluate the splash pad and please reschedule the grand opening until safety measures are met and hopefully we can all enjoy a nice safe splash pad in the future, thank you.

41:23•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on down, ma'am.

41:31 – 42:59•Speaker 18

Good morning. My name is Carol Jones, C-A-R-O-L-J-O-N-E-S. I have been reading quite a bit online and on the internet about data centers the burning of medical waste and I believe the community is very concerned about the lack of information, the misinformation and the lack of communication from sources that be. I would believe it would serve the commissioners and the community very well if there could be some facts given. Hopefully that will happen on Saturday. Hopefully that will happen on the 4th. But I believe the community is extremely concerned and upset with the lack of communication. And I don't know the answer to this other than I believe, personally, it would serve our community very well if all the commissioners would put together some facts for the community's understanding. Thank you very much.

42:59•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

43:03•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

43:10 – 44:05•Speaker 63

Yeah, my name is Matt Sadler, S-A-D-L-E-R. Good morning, commissioners. Hopefully, this is going to be a nice, productive meeting. I just wanted to point out something to the commissioners and to the people in the gallery there. Make no mistake about it. The commissioners in different ways have over time mentioned that we need to hear more input. We didn't really know. There's not enough people in here to voice opposition to data centers and this and that. But make no mistake. They know exactly how we feel. You commissioners know exactly how we feel about a litany of these issues. And I won't get into specifics, but Just know that your legacy, and I know I'm beating a dead horse here talking about legacy, but seriously, I think the buck's got to stop here with you guys. You guys have to start making better decisions. Be more transparent with us. Don't play games. Don't act like you don't know the temperature of the room. You know darn well. Keep that in mind. Have a great meeting.

44:05•Speaker 51

Thanks. Come on down, Lorraine.

44:10 – 45:18•Speaker 26

Good morning, Lorraine, G-I-L-B-E-R-T. Today I am going to start with something my sweet grandma taught me. We must take care of our own home before we can help anyone else with their home. The town of Pahrump, and we are a town, a desert, D-E-S-E-R-T, desert, desert community. Unlike other areas, we don't have dams, rivers, streams to reinvent our water until each and every single person. owner owner in this town has infrastructure roads streets water sewer electric we cannot give away what you all don't own because you don't own it the people own it they are in essence your boss they are the ones that elected you that you are the voice for data centers not until each and every taxpayer has those same things that these people want. That's all I'm going to say.

45:19•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

45:23•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

45:29 – 47:11•Speaker 59

Jody Reddington, R-E-D-D-I-N-G-T-O-N. And I just wanted received my tax bill for the property that I own up in Calvada Meadows that is one of the utility challenged lots and listening to everyone who has spoken before me regarding the issues with these data centers and the potential for the impact it will have on our town yet having sustainable and responsible solutions for those of us that have land we can't use. This is a huge inequity and I am really hoping that there is more progress on the horizon for changing and updating the current zoning to allow all of us that are paying taxes on land we can't use for us to be able to be able to build and live on that land. before you start paving a way for these data centers. It's just mind-boggling to me the lack of logic going on here. So you've heard me speak before. I'm still standing my ground on responsible, sustainable solutions that are real and available today, and it just requires updating that zoning allowing us to live and contribute to the town before you start destroying it with allowing a data center in. That's all I have to say.

47:13•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on down, sir.

47:21 – 50:23•Speaker 47

I'm Joe Hughes, J-O-E-H-U-G-H-E-S. As you know, the existing water rights in Basin 162 exceed the recharge rate, more so probably with increasing drought. The only reason we've been doing OK so far is that not all the water rights have been used. Now there is a surge of new development demanding considerable water use, probably a lot more than they're stating, actually. But you're going to have thousands of new homes, solar field construction and operation, a spaceport, whatever that is, big secret apparently, it seems likely that the existing water rights will soon be fully utilized and our aquifer starting to deplete, which means that the water table will continuously drop. And it's not like there's a big lake beneath us. The aquifer is more like wet sand and gravel. There's only a little water per cubic foot. This means that to supply excess demand of a foot of water, the water table will have to drop by dozens of feet. So I believe that Trump is already facing a near future crisis of wells drying up. And it will happen very quickly and irreversibly. Then there's the plans for the data centers. In addition to all the other problems of data centers, and there's plenty, they are well known to be massive users of water, all of which is taken from the valuable aquifer and evaporated into the sky. Given that we are already facing a future water crisis, allowing data centers here is outrageous. The nearest other water source is Lake Mead. It's far away, and it's over the high Potosi Pass. And of course, Pahrump has no water rights there, so we'd have to buy the water from Arizona ranchers and farmers. Can we shut down the data centers when the crisis becomes more obvious? Probably not. Will Dana Centers pay for a pipeline after they have sucked the aquifer dry? Probably not. Pretend your well dries up. Either you drill deeper, that's going to cost a lot, and it might only last a few years because the water table is going to keep dropping. So what's the alternative? Well, bottled water at the store for drinking, cooking, and toothbrushing. No baths.

50:23•Speaker 51

Thank you, sir. Thank you. Okay. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

50:28•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

50:35 – 53:07•Speaker 20

Good morning, Chair and Commissioners. My name is Nathan Whitaker, W-H-I-T-T-A-C-R-E. I'm the CEO of Stabilis Technologies. And I'm here today talking about our $76 million broadband grant project. This is an opportunity to bring reliable high-speed fiber optic internet service to unserved or underserved residents and businesses throughout Nye County. And we're prepared to make this investment along with the state of Nevada and the federal government and to start construction soon. But we can't move forward without two critical pieces in place. First, we need a memorandum of understanding and a franchise agreement This has been in with the District Attorney's Office since May 22nd, and we do not have a date or time when this framework will be put in place. We can't, according to the Public Works Office, cannot start and receive permits or construction for the project without this MOU and franchise agreement. Second, we need a clear and timely permitting process through Public Works. This is a large, multi-phase construction project involving fiber placement, road crossings, restoration, inspections, and coordination with county staff. And we understand that the Public Works Department is extremely busy and must also protect county infrastructure and ensure that construction meets applicable standards. We are not asking the county to waive those requirements, but we are asking for a predictable process appropriate points of contact and the timely fashion in response to our permitting applications. We are ready to start construction on this project and all construction has to be completed by December 31st, 2026, or the money is revoked from the state and goes back to the federal government unspent. Again, this is a $76 million project investment in Nye County, and we are excited to be able to deploy this fiber optic infrastructure to bring high speed internet to residents that have not had this. And this is an investment from the state of Nevada into Nye County. We respectfully ask the commission and direct or to direct the county staff to accomplish these things. Get the MOU in place quickly and effectively. and then help expedite our permitting applications with Public Works. And if we do this, we can get this project done and completed to bring High Speed Internet to approximately 12,000 residents in Nye County by the end of the year. Thank you.

53:08•Speaker 51

Thank you, Nathan. Come on down, sir.

53:14 – 55:06•Speaker 3

Good morning. My name is Damien Coughlin, C-O-U-G-H-L-I-N. I'm here about the splash pad. My wife was a part of the group that raised the money. They were told to raise that money for the awning for the structure. before they would even consider starting it and they jumped on it right away. Uh, I agree that we need the safety information because that's not a splash pad. It literally, there's no pad there. So we have many splash pads in Vegas, so there's no excuse as to why it couldn't be done. It's our neighbor. We have the budgeting in Vegas. They could have sent that over, told us how to do it, how much it would cost, so that we would get the information right away. We would know, as a community, the community who wanted it, what it would cost, what it would take, and the time that it would take to do it. I agree with the design changes. I agree that it should stop the grand opening. And We're excited to live here. We moved here from Vegas. We love it here. The people here are awesome. The community is great. It's growing. My wife has found great friends, great families here. And the fact that everybody came together for the splash pad just shows how much this community wants to give to the children. And I believe it's great that we're all a part of it, that we're hearing about it today. Um, I look forward to seeing a great splash pad better than any other in Vegas. I think we can do that here. We can have something to brag about for the kids. And, uh, we felt so welcome and we're blessed to live here and I look forward to seeing great things in the future.

55:06•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you, sir. And welcome, Sam. Do we have anybody on the phone please?

55:13•Speaker 27

Yes, sir. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

55:20 – 58:22•Speaker 66

Commissioners, my name is Matthew Winterhawk, W-I-N-T-E-R-H-A-W-K. I'm speaking general public comment today because this matter is not listed as an action item today. That is precisely what item three permits. I'm asking one commissioner to place an emergency data center moratorium, full forensic review of proposed blackjack development on the next available agenda. Nye County residents are not ignorant, and they're beginning to understand what is actually happening. These interests are not simply betting on artificial intelligence. They are monetizing the entire build-outs. A person does not have to own a data center to profit from its arrival. The surrounding opportunities include land, water rights sales, real estate options, excavation, grading, roads, draining, concrete, steel, electrical transmission, gas pipelines, substations, battery facilities, environmental permitting, stormwater pollution prevention plans, Field inspection, engineering, equipment procurement, utility expansion, legal work, lobbying, consulting, political contributions, and nonprofit donations used to manufacture community legitimacy. That's why construction overlap matters. That is why every financial relationship, contract, client, option, contribution, and beneficial interest connected to these projects must be disclosed before any approval moves forward. Hundreds of acres associated with failed residential development visions are now being positioned for conversion to light industrial use for massive data center projects. Yet the public still does not know the actual developer, operator, beneficial owners, power demand, water source, water right numbers, cooling system, generator fleet, construction phases, or complete supporting infrastructure. This is Basin 162, by the way. Residents already live with the pressure on their wells and water supply. They should not be forced to prove an undisclosed industrial demand is safe while the applicants withhold the information required to evaluate it properly. I am requesting that an agenda item directing Nye County to suspend every unfinished discretionary approval connected to this project and its supporting infrastructure, require any claim of vested rights to be proven by the applicant, a noticed public hearing, not decided privately by staff, order a parcel-by-parcel audit of every claimed water right, including priority date, beneficial use, point of diversion, place of use, and annual duty and utility commitment. Prohibit the segmentation, the land conversion, wells, roads, easements, substations, transmission batteries, solar generation, and development agreements must be reviewed as one integrated project, not separate. And conduct a forensic review of every vote, permit, waiver, extension, and staff approval that allowed data center development and its infrastructure to proceed under warehouse, industrial, solar, utility, or temporary use or conditional use permitting. Residents who are working, raising children, elderly, are unable to travel, or simply unaware of this meeting have not consented through their absence of being there. Them not being there is not consent. Let me just say it clear like that. Silence created by inadequate notice is also not public support. Place this on the next agenda. Preserve every record now. Nye County does not owe this project momentum. The developer and every person that's positioned to profit from it owes Nye County. Thank you.

58:22•Speaker 51

Thank you very much. Serena. Come on down, sir. Yeah.

58:30 – 1:01:36•Speaker 16

Thank you for allowing me to speak with you this morning. I'm Dr. Ray Kelly, R-A-E-K-E-L-L-Y. In addressing the issue of data centers in our valley, there are five areas of concern which you are already aware. Air pollution, light pollution, water depletion, noise pollution, and the drain on our power grid with increased costs. There are a number of governmental and private studies done that review issues in each of these areas of concern. Last week, I dropped off just three of those articles at the commission office here. I have them today if you'd like me to submit them for the record. From studies in the Library of Congress, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, the Lincoln Institute of National Land Policy, and many others, they document that these data centers put severe, quote-unquote, drain, on local and regional resources, such as air pollution. Fossil fuels consumption generates nitrogen oxide, methane volatile organic compounds, fine particulate matter, which will greatly increase the high levels of particulate matter that we already have in the valley. This leads to increased severity and increased incidence of asthma, heart conditions, and cancer risks, according to these studies. If they are not going to be using fossil fuels to generate electricity, then they're utilizing one or a combination of two of these following resources. A Valley Electric power grid and that increased power demands from Valley Electric will require them to purchase more power from other sources. and create infrastructure that will handle the extra load demands. These studies show that those increased costs are passed on to residential consumers. I don't have the time to go into the solar generating fields and their negative impact on the environment and their tremendous water consumption demands. I don't have time to go into the light pollution issues either. Water depletion. Our current aquifer is being depleted at approximately two feet per year. A typical small center of 100 megawatts consumes approximately 500,000 gallons of water a day. That's equivalent to approximately 300 households. A mid-sized center consumes about 5 million gallons a day, equivalent to the whole town of Pahrump. Our valley aquifer cannot tolerate this kind of demand. The noise pollution issue. There are a number of studies and video news reports that document the audible and subsonic pollution generated by these facilities. They produce loud hums, buzzing, and at times screeching piercing sounds, and a pressure pulsing that is transmitted through the air and in the ground that can be felt miles away. People describe it as feeling it deep in their bones. These subsonic pulses produce physical symptoms similar to Havana syndrome. These data centers pose significant health risks that cannot be ignored. These studies go on to say that they cause symptoms such as hearing loss, stress, insomnia. Thank you. Thank you. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

1:01:37•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

1:01:44 – 1:04:35•Speaker 69

I wanted to talk to us a little bit about the master plan. Interest 278.0284 gives us that any action the local government related to development, zoning, and subdivisions of land or capital improvements must conform to the master plan of the local government, period. in adopting any ordinance or regulation related to development zoning and subdivision land or capital improvements. The local government shall make a specific finding that the ordinance conforms to the master plan. Here's the point. The master plan is a very important tool. That plan does not include anything about data centers. It does surprisingly have content about solar, but it also enables the public and us to really discuss about what's going on with the development as a whole, the land use, transportation, and water conservation. The water conservation component did come up in the regional planning, and it does often. And one of the things that we know that the public should be allowed to speak, especially in general comment and also all the way through when they're permitted to. So making sure that we listen to the people is an important thing. Where we're at with the master plan ordinances, part of the big picture of getting the data centers right, A, if it's going to be there, which I'm not necessarily a proponent of, B, if it's not going to be there, that we have things that say, hey, here's why it's not, that it's all the way through, not just from a surface but also throughout the documentation in ordinances and master plans and the likes you know this is a big topic uh solar was a big big topic as well this is probably bigger right now uh but these are the kind of things that need attention throughout the organizations within that govern the components including water district and and things of that nature Uh, that's that's up to you people. It's up to us to say, hey, here's what our feelings are. Here's what we believe. But then it's also us up to us to listen to what. The facts are, we may have the facts we may have part of the facts. You know, there's an internal cooling system. And that is factual that's something we need to take into account. But if we refuse it, meaning having no data centers. that we have a fully informed and intelligent decision that we can make. Thank you.

1:04:36•Speaker 51

Thanks, Tim. Come on down, Ms. Deborah.

1:04:44 – 1:06:07•Speaker 25

Deborah Thomas, T-H-O-M-A-S. You know that, though. I want to remind each of the commissioners that they work for their constituents. That means you treat your constituents with respect and vote the way the majority of us tells you to vote you can also call us and share your ideas why you're not going to vote the way we want you to vote maybe we'd have it wrong it is very much the way an employee does things the way his very much the way an employee does things the way his or her boss tells them If you don't do that, you are not likely to get re-elected. Some of you are better employees than the others and I'm not going to name names. On each and every issue, you need to decide whether to vote the way you would like to vote or the way your boss tells you to vote. Just like Put stuff away. When you take it out to do something with it, you have to put it away just right. My dad taught me that. He was an electrical contractor. If you don't treat your constituents with the respect we deserve, we are not likely to elect you again at any time. Thank you.

1:06:08•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:06:11•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

1:06:19•Speaker 58

Good morning, honorable, my County Board of Commissioners. My name is Emma Valador, V-E-L-A-B-O-R. Can you hear me?

1:06:33 – 1:09:38•Speaker 58

I'm Julie Robbins, 2026, while imparting my knowledge to the Alamogosa Valley Town Board Town Hall audience. My First Amendment rights were violated along with several enterprises by our Alamogosa Town Chairman, Carolyn Allen, and member and clerk, Mike Cottingham. Commissioner DeBoer and Commissioner Koenig were present and witnessed it. Commissioner DeBoer, what was the disciplinary action protocol for such board behaviors? The moment Chairman Allen heard the title of the article, which is Department of Justice documents confirm Center for Biological Diversity received millions and taxpayer funds from ESA-related lawsuits. It was very obvious she did not approve of it. She interrupted me and had the deputy escort me away from the podium while I was speaking. Then Mike Cottingham, the clerk, the member, slammed his fist and rebuttaled what I had said. This is totally, totally inappropriate, uncalled for. Our town should not be associated with the Amargosa Conservancy, who claim to be completely against solar, but yet took a $120,000 donation from Gemini Solar Company. This is beyond hypocritical. They say they're totally against all of your solar, and therefore all these little animals and all these plants But yet, they're taking money from solar. The Amargosa Conservancy vice president is Patrick Donnelly, and is also the director of the Center for Biological Diversity. Again, the Department of Justice documents confirm Center for Biological Diversity received millions of dollars. How much? 2,286,000. $686.91. Most of it going to attorney fees. And all of that was our tax payer money. And they obviously got all of the land, all the BLM land that they were demanding to get because supposedly they were out to save some creature. And I believe in all life, okay? also i believe that our book has been severely compromised there are members on our board who have stated that our town board chairman thank you thank you for that thank you ma'am come on down ma'am please good morning my name is tamelyn taylor t-a-y-l-o-r and i've been a resident of peru for past 10 years or so

1:09:39 – 1:12:30•Speaker 12

And I work at Nye Communities Coalition. And I'm here today just to share a little bit about what I do there. And that's related to food security. As you well know, Nye County has one of the highest food insecurity rates in the state of Nevada. According to a study completed in 2024 by Feeding America, Nye County insecurity rates lie at 17.3%. Or this is also could be one in six residents have an uncertainty as to when their next meal will come. And unfortunately, children, it's even higher. One in five children live in food insecure homes. So to address some of these issues, Nye Communities Coalition has a monthly food security meeting. where we meet with area food pantry managers and other stakeholders. And in there, we brainstorm and strategize on how we can increase food access to many of our very vulnerable residents in the community. And I would also like to mention that we have some good news here. Over the past year, through donations and grant funds, Nye Communities Coalition has been able to donate or distribute 64,719 pounds of food in pantries in Nye, Esmeralda, and Lincoln counties. So we couldn't have done that without a lot of our wonderful partners. And one of the area I want to point out is that the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints They have done substantial food donations for this community. And then also there's a local farm, Green Life Produce, who donates produce on a weekly basis to the food pantry. So we're very grateful for them. I don't know if everybody knows that most of our food pantries here in Pahrump, there's nine of them, that the food pantry managers work for free. They're volunteers. And there's so many other residents, too, that help them out with this. But I'm really impressed about what they do here, their commitment and their dedication to the community. I wanted to point out that one way they go above and beyond is that several of these food pantries are also making home deliveries to folks that do not have transportation or any way to get to the food pantry. And everybody involved is doing it for free. getting money for gas or anything like that.

1:12:31•Speaker 51

Thank you for that update. I appreciate it and I'm sorry. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:12:37•Speaker 51

Come on down, Frank.

1:12:45 – 1:13:52•Speaker 8

Frank Caraboni, C-A-R-B-O-N-E. A little bit of a change here. I'm going to talk about Purple Heart Day. Usually, Colonel Waters comes up here and talks about Purple Heart Day. But he kind of told me it's time for me to start standing up here and talk about it. So Purple Heart Day, August 7th. Hope to see all you, not only you, the folks that are elected, but anybody in the town, anybody that's welcome or camera friendly. So if you want to come record and see what's going on, it's a great time to look at our citizens that actually have received the award of Purple Heart. And we also talk about some of the folks that are not around any longer to talk about Purple Hearts. We're also going to have two Purple Heart recipients actually as speakers. So I think you're going to get some good feedback from how they feel about how they got this award. So again, August 7th, 6 o'clock, Tacopa Cemetery. Hope to see you all there.

1:13:53•Speaker 51

Thank you, Frank. Come on down, Diane.

1:14:03 – 1:16:34•Speaker 38

Diane Southworth, S-O-U-T-H-W-O-R-T-H. I'll start out by saying I'm just as upset about the data centers as everybody else, and I don't want them, but that's not why I'm down here. I want to speak again about the Safety or Safe America Act that is trying to get through Congress and how it will affect this county. To start off with, that act is unconstitutional. Founders wanted states to handle the elections. They did not want a centralized federal government handling those things because they did not want it to be able to be disrupted very easily, and that's why they did that. Number two, as far as the county is concerned, was some of the regulations that they want to put in if someone makes a mistake and registers somebody who is not eligible to vote, They're saying they can give up to a 10-year sentence in jail for that. You know? And as far as that goes, there's so little fraud when it comes to non-citizens trying to vote. The Heritage Foundation did a report from 1999 to 2024 where they checked all the states, all the problems. You know how many they came up with? 77, all of whom were prosecuted. So that isn't an issue. It's one that they want to tell you is an issue, but it's not available. Two, I'm sick and tired of women having to give out more information to do things than men. And I think it's ridiculous. There's an easy solution. I got my Social Security card when I was 17. They've seen me through my marriages and divorces, et cetera. I don't want to spend $165 for a passport that I'll never use. And the Social Security Department has all that information. It could be easily verified. I have my birth certificate. I don't care. I'll sign it. I'll give them a copy of my birth certificate, my Social Security card, and my driver's license. But that's all. I'm sorry. My family's been here since the 1700s. I don't think I should have to prove anything else.

1:16:35•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:16:39•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

1:16:45 – 1:19:48•Speaker 56

Yes, Amy Nelson, N-E-L-S-O-N. I want to start off with the 250th anniversary of this country. You know, maybe it's time that the powers that be in Nye County create a time capsule and create it so it's open to 50 years so we know what's been going on and we can look back on all this progress. The other thing I want to talk about that a lot of people can't relate to are the frequencies that are generated from any data center. It doesn't matter what size it is. The power that it has going further is the difference. Well, you know, when you put a cat in your lap and it purrs, that makes you very relaxed. Some people might even fall asleep. And everybody agrees with that. Even children are soothed by the purring of a cat. That megahertz sound that they generate is between 25 and and 150 hertz, and that could also promote healing. The megahertz with a data center is below 20 hertz, and that's where you have distress. You have diseases, you have illnesses, that science as it is right now won't relate to those megahertz sounds to failing health to people that live within a 50-mile radius of even one of these substations for the power companies. Back in the 90s, you had a whole street of doctors move when they had a substation put in their backyards. Maybe you can remember all that. I don't know how old some of you are. The other thing is the splash pad. I went online because there were some details given on the cost. I went online and priced everything, and there is absolutely no way that this costs $300,000. That is completely ludicrous. Somebody should have had more oversight to what was going on with this and had a better plan of what they were going to produce. Side by side with a prison shower. It looks identical. It looks completely identical. I don't know about the safety. There's a lot of people that know more than me. And another thing, the power company came by or sent some people to upgrade my meter. And I'd heard for the last year people talking about a lot.

1:19:48•Speaker 51

Thanks, Amy. Come on down in front, please.

1:19:55 – 1:21:14•Speaker 36

Thank you. My name is Ann Underdahl, U-N-D-E-R-D-A-H-L, and I have no idea what a prison shower looks like. Me neither. But I am here with a public service announcement. The Nye County Democrats have arranged for a speed dating event happening on August 4th, 6 p.m. at the Senior Center. People in Pahrump, this is open to the public, will have a chance to come meet, chat, maybe fall in love with a candidate, maybe not. All of the candidates up for election for District 4 and District 5 commissioner will be there. Tables will rotate. You get a chance to sweet talk all of them. Tell them what you want, what you don't want, and they can't get away from you. But you'll be moving on, understanding what they're really for as opposed to what other people tell you they're saying. So it's open to the public. I would recommend if you live in District 4 or District 5, You come by, have a good time. We'll probably have cookies and coffee as well. That's the Senior Center here in Pahrump, six o'clock on August 4th. Thank you.

1:21:15•Speaker 51

Thank you, Ann. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please? No, Chair. Okay, come on down, Darrell.

1:21:25•Speaker 62

Darrell Lackey, L-A-C-K-E-Y.

1:21:27 – 1:24:29•Speaker 19

I was handed this visual aid. And it's so cool. I'm sure you'll be seeing it one way. But, you know, it's a polar bear in a snowstorm, I think, right? Or it's on. They see that I'm on now since I went vegan. I'm on. I'm on. I love it. You'll be seeing it a different way, I'm sure. But my friend was telling me about it because he reads the paper and he says, oh, you know, $700,000 for the well at the fairgrounds. I'm like, wow, is that going to have an elevator to the bottom? What's that going to have? A $700,000 well. What does that have that other wells don't have? It's got to have, oh, ouch. hands lots of hands in it i guess i don't know if it's going through the mormon church like you know in the old days with tim i don't know i don't know i i wish that people behind me would go ahead and dig in sometimes i say stuff and it gets other people riled too you know like about the uh about the about the gut uh you got a six-pack here you got parasites guess which one i got We were taught how to do everything wrong. And you follow the New World Order direction no matter what. People are almost on. People are waking up. People are waking up. And they see that you ain't loyal to them. You're not got a program to end homelessness and poverty for the whole country. And I want to start it here as an example in this place of badness or whatever you want to call it. Whatever you want to call it, it's just lies and corruption. I'm usually on. But here we are. And we're at the decision, at the point of bringing in these electronic centers. Y'all got 2.5 gigahertz routers in your houses. You know how dangerous 2.5 gigahertz is? And you leave them on all the time. You got 5G phones in your pockets. So do I. We're stuck to it. That's all they provide is danger and sickness. They don't want us getting our Social Security. You know, I shut off. They took $202.90 out for their serpent medication. The serpents, the AMA, the two serpents. I went down. No, they gave me that money back. I'm not having them take money out. I'm not going to ever use the hospitals and the medical system here. They have serpents that represent them. The serpents represent the ever-populating parasites that you have. from being on the wrong diet. Humans are herbivores. There's no such thing as omnivore. It's a word that was made up. And you are making decisions over other people's lives, and you're filled with parasites and parasite excrement. So how's that going to make you feel good?

1:24:29•Speaker 51

Thanks, Daryl. Thanks, Daryl. Always a pleasure and a joy. Sam, you got anybody for us? No, Chair. Come on up.

1:24:40•Speaker 78

How do you follow that?

1:24:43•Speaker 78

I'm sorry. He's giving me snot.

1:24:45•Speaker 51

We're not sure what he's on.

1:24:47 – 1:26:49•Speaker 78

OK. My name is Jean Alexander Booth. A-L-E-X-A-N-D-E-R hyphen B-O-O-T-H. Good morning. I had no intentions of speaking today, but I couldn't after that wonderful prayer we had this morning, the prayer that asked God to protect our precious Pahrump. I'm going to extend it to our precious Nye County as well. Data centers and medical waste is a threat to our precious town. Ash Meadow is at risk, our homes are at risk, the people are at risk. And I ask the commission to fight with the people of our precious town to ban data centers and to take whatever steps necessary to stop medical waste. As I stated before at the hearing, I'm a Marine Corps veteran. My MOS was power plants. I worked on fighter jets, engines, and I tested them in test cells. There was tons and tons of manuals on protocols on how to keep people safe, how to make these machines work, but every single one of them failed. And that was my job, was to help fix them. But I knew what to do when they did fail. I don't think the medic waste people have a clue what they're getting into. They've never built this thing before. They are not even building it. Somebody else is. And even the people who designed it said it is highly untested. Yet everything is put at risk. So I'm asking our commissioners to stand with the people of our precious town, our precious county, and fight with us to ban these threats and to protect us. If you don't, God help us.

1:26:52•Speaker 51

Thank you, Sam. Anybody on the phone, please?

1:26:56•Speaker 51

Come on down in the room, please.

1:27:03 – 1:28:35•Speaker 22

Peggy Miller, P-E-G-G-Y-M-I-L-L-E-R. I am a Knight County resident. I live in Crystal. They have already come out, your data centers. We've watched them dig a hole to see how much water Crystal has. There are rumors around Crystal that they want to buy the whole Bloomin' town and close us out. I've been there three years. We moved out of Las Vegas after 40 years. Couldn't stand the nonsense. Love the quiet. My dogs are happy. My family's happy. We look outside and see gorgeous sunsets. We don't need our water gone, and that's what they're gonna do. I've got all kinds of things. I was a librarian, so I did a whole lot of research on this stuff. In 2023, which is a long time ago, John Clank or Clanky did some NCWD meeting where they talked about water levels in Southern Nye County. And I looked at their website also and they haven't done any updates since that 2023, at least anything published. Maybe they're still looking at it. But according to them, water levels are falling. And every time, and I have another one that I have that talks about, let me get to it.

1:28:37•Speaker 32

Oh, it's on the bottom.

1:28:39 – 1:30:01•Speaker 22

This one is from 2015. It's Pahrump Valley Times. The author of it is Lillian Brown. And the heading says, Test Site Contamination creeping toward area drinking groundwater. Now it says in here that it isn't heading really all that much toward Pahrump, but it also says that if it continues to fall, it will. And that was 2015. So who knows if anybody's still keeping up with that. All I can say is please, please, please, please don't let these data centers go in here. We are the lowest rainfall in the United States. America has the lowest rainfall in the state of Nevada. We get less than, across the state, less than 10 inches a year. And that includes all of your rain that happens in the north and all of your snow and everything. So we don't need it. This is not a place to come in to get millions and millions and millions of gallons of water. This is not it.

1:30:02•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you. Perfect timing. Don't we only get like four inches? Come on up, Linda.

1:30:12•Speaker 71

Linda Clark, CLARK. First of all, I want to welcome everybody here.

1:30:18•Speaker 58

It's so wonderful to see all of you here. Please keep coming. It's so important.

1:30:25 – 1:30:50•Speaker 71

Second thing, I hear a lot of stuff here. It's hard to know what to believe anymore, but one thing I want to ask real quick, Clyde. If Bruce and Ian are going to get together to talk about all this stuff, why aren't the other three of you? Is it not interesting to you? Do we not matter? I don't understand. Yes, Debra, you too. We are going to be there. Okay. It's a forum.

1:30:51•Speaker 71

That's not what we heard. I don't know. Go ahead. I rattled the cage. Excuse me, Chair.

1:30:59•Speaker 42

Go ahead. Thank you.

1:31:01 – 1:31:47•Speaker 71

Okay. My question, after we went through all of that, is... We've been listening to this stuff for several years now, and you know that I've been coming with a lot of other wonderful people here, and we really do care. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that our boards care. We sat in a board last week for the RPC, and what a joke. We ended up walking out. It was disgusting. I don't know why the community is invited to come to these things when you guys don't even listen to us. Oh, yeah, you listen, but I think you have your earplugs in. So we get all this stuff back from you, but we don't get any positive answers that you even heard what we said.

1:31:48•Speaker 72

And I know there are a lot of people here that go to these meetings.

1:31:52 – 1:32:22•Speaker 71

And they come away looking at, why did we come? The other thing that's interesting is our complaint about that is you have all the important things at the end of the meeting. A lot of people want to talk, but they have to go home. And I've said this before. The mom with the child. Someone has to go pick someone from school. They can't stay till 5 or 6 or 7 o'clock at night, hoping that you guys are going to cover something that they wanted to hear at 10, because maybe it was on the agenda. But you kept postponing it.

1:32:22•Speaker 72

Isn't that what happened? Yeah.

1:32:24 – 1:32:52•Speaker 71

OK. Why does that happen? Why can't we listen to something that's put on the board, on the meeting, that we want to listen to? At the time, you say it's possibly going to be on there, and that I don't have to make other arrangements. and stay till 10 or 11 o'clock at night to listen to something that probably isn't going to pass and you don't listen to us anyway. So just a cute little thing to stir in your eardrums, take your earplugs out and listen to us, please.

1:32:54•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:32:59•Speaker 51

Come on up, Marianne.

1:33:03 – 1:36:07•Speaker 73

Marianne Hollis, H-O-L-L-I-S, the splash pad. I was at the groundbreaking, and the moms and their babes were standing in the blistering sun, and all the dignitaries were under a tent. And I thought, wow, I hope there'll be some sort of shade structure for the moms and their kids. So I ended up going under a tree because it was too much for me, and I was sort of talking out loud to myself, And I said, where's the shade? Where's the shade? And a gentleman who was standing next to me said, well, if they get hot, they can just go in the water and get cooled off. And I said to myself, thank God he's not in charge of this. Lo and behold, he is. And I said, what's going to keep the kids from, excited kids running around from running in the street and or a car coming down the street, maybe jumping the curb, losing their sight, line of sight, and jumping the curb and hitting a few kids? Well, we're going to put up ballards everywhere. I said, well, a kid will still run through a ballard. Well, then we'll put up a fence behind the ballards. I'm like, oh, my God. Ka-ching, ka-ching. What I see now is there are ballards, but they extend way further down, and there's no protective gate that I could see. The moms did raise $5,000, and repeatedly I asked Mr. Martinez... What's happening with that? And at a meeting that he had with myself and a few other citizens, he said, there's just not money to put in one that's worthwhile. Well, is nothing worthwhile? I don't know. And I said to myself, why would you wait to sink a shade structure when you've already poured the cement floor? And a mom who wants to bring their child to the bathroom, you have to come out, go all the way down, and then take a left, and then go into the bathroom. Your line of sight, should you have more than one child, is gone. There's no line of sight. And I do know what a prison shower looks like. And I think this is an insult to a prison shower, to tell you the truth. I asked for the scope of work that would be followed because the scope of work that was in the bid opportunity might have changed. And I was told it's the same scope of work. And it has not been.

1:36:07•Speaker 51

Thanks, Marianne. You're done. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

1:36:12•Speaker 51

Come on up, Dwight.

1:36:19 – 1:37:10•Speaker 49

Good morning, commissioners. Dwight Lilly, L-I-L-L-Y. Well, every now and then in your life, you see an item come up that unifies almost 100% of a population. You can have young, old, educated, uneducated, people on the left, people on the right, people that are rich, people that are poor. But every now and then, there's something that comes up that unifies. Well, we've had several of them. We've had meta waste. We've had 5,160 new homes in a water-starved area. Now we've got data centers. And we're going to have a meeting coming up to discuss data centers. How about a poll? Just raise your hands if you go against data center. Wow. There's your poll right there.

1:37:12•Speaker 42

There's your poll right there.

1:37:15 – 1:38:39•Speaker 49

I've never seen an issue come up in all the time I've come to meetings that has unified people. And Ian Bain is right about having an item to just say no. How would you like to buy a house in Mountain Falls or a new development, and as you come out the gate, And enter Highway 160. In front of you is this monstrous building. But that's not even a data center. That's the administration center of this massive data center in a town that prides itself with being the gateway to Death Valley and a rural Nevada town. I've been negative about this, you commissioners, because I thought, you know what? I figure it's probably going to be a three to two vote in favor of data centers here. But if I've ever seen a unifying situation that has brought all the people of PRUMP together, it's this one. So let's see how this goes. But if I was you, I would reach way down for my good angels when you think about this. That what is best for PRUMP? Is it best to change the entire nature of PRUMP over data centers, or is it best to try to get back to where we are, rural Nevada town? Thank you. Thanks. Come on down to PRUMP, please.

1:38:45 – 1:41:49•Speaker 39

Greg Dankowski, D-A-N-K-O-W-S-K-I. In 1984, I moved to Nye County at Mercury, Nevada. I established a P.O. box and a bank account in Mercury and moved into an old army barracks left over from the early days of the Camp Desert Rock. A year later in 1985, I moved to Pahrump and got another P.O. box because U.S. mail service did not exist to my location because I had no address, just a legal description. I lived in an old 12-foot travel trailer with no utilities until I could save enough money for utilities. As I lived my life in Pahrump, I began to notice that the quality of my life and others was diminishing. My first observation was that the government was becoming tyrannical, specifically the sheriff's judicial and planning departments. My second observation was that the BOCC was not listening to the people. My third observation was the roads were becoming worse. In many cases, the bar ditch is smoother than the asphalt. My fourth observation is that the mantra of Nye County is retaliation. And my last observation is that common sense is not common. I am disgusted that the civility and peace are equated with the toleration of evil. The toleration of evil does not define good. There are 40 churches here and not one leader comes forth and speaks up for morality. The only exception was when Victor from the Patch of Heavens spoke about his church, church's water being confiscated years ago. And specific to planning and code compliance, there needs to be cognitive testing by a neurologist and visual testing by an ophthalmologist before employment. We live in the most contaminated county in the U.S., maybe even the world. There have been 828 underground nuclear bombs detonated in Nye County. There have been 100 above-ground nuclear bombs detonated in Nye County. We have U.S. Ecology burying waste near Beatty. We have the Nevada Test Site burying waste in Area 5 in Nye County. And most of all, Here we have active infiltration basins draining treated non-potable water into our sole source aquifer, which by the way is illegal in our neighboring state to the east called Utah. Thank you Mormons, you got it right. Now the leadership of Nye County wants to bring more waste to Nye County. Haven't we done enough to contaminate Nye County? Nye County must be HQ for toxicity. Yes, we have mental midgets and misfits and morons that live here, but not everyone fits that definition. Some are listening, watching, and waking up. Here in the land of Lucifer, there is a revival going on.

1:41:51•Speaker 51

Lastly, development is not our friend. Thank you, sir. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:41:57•Speaker 51

Come on up. Annette. Annette.

1:42:05 – 1:45:07•Speaker 6

Annette Fuentes, F-U-E-N-T-E-S. I have some little pamphlets here that I put together for you guys on this subject. Commissioners, I would like to go on record and have this information entered in the minutes. I would like to bring to your attention a problem in Ash Meadows that will affect private inholders in surrounding small towns such as Amargosa and Crystal. Are you aware of two reservoirs in Ash Meadows being drained? Enclosed are the before and after pictures of Peterson Reservoir and Crystal. Those reservoirs have been there since before the refuge was established, and now Fish and Wildlife has drained them. Tell me what fire suppression are they going to use if this refuge catches on fire? I had a church camp in the refuge, and I have to supply fire suppression at my camp because I'm open to the public. One of the issues no one is addressing with these solar farms is fire issues. People are concentrating on water and noise. What about fires? This will bring fires, believe it or not. Amargosa has a small volunteer fire department who do their very absolute best with what they have to deal with fighting fires. But having these solar farms out here will bring a bigger risk to the fires. Do you all remember the Palisades fires in California? All the reservoirs were drained and there was nowhere to get water. I have enclosed a copy of an agreement about fire support provided by Ash Meadows between the Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife, and the town of Amargosa Valley, which was done in June of 1988. I have sent emails to Department of Interior, EPA, Department of Agriculture to have this matter investigated. Fish and wildlife are responsible for protecting Ash Meadows. I want to know how they intend on protecting the refuge and the stakeholders inside, which I am one of them. The reservoirs are drained. Where do they expect to get the water? What will happen to all the endangered plants and animals found nowhere else in the world? By the way, show me the person who walked the whole world and knows this. This is why I will never agree to handing over more of the public lands to Fish and Wildlife and BLM. They are not good stewards of our land. Ash Meadows is a disaster. No one is watching over Fish and Wildlife. They have destroyed established wetlands, illegally diverted water, and draining the reservoirs. BLM has sold off leased land. to solar and data. Unfortunately, the good people of Amargosa are believing that the National Conservation Area will save their water. I definitely understand their concerns, but they don't understand there's a bigger problem. All the water right holders, the big ones, have sold off or leased their water rights to solar and a private data center coming in. They have the legal right to do that, unfortunately, and we just like it or not.

1:45:08•Speaker 42

Thanks, Annette.

1:45:09•Speaker 51

Come on down in front, please. Right now. Oh, shit. Hold on.

1:45:15•Speaker 42

Excuse me, Chair. Yes, go ahead. And excuse me, folks. All the water talk, very important. I really have to take a comfort break.

1:45:25 – 1:45:38•Speaker 51

And this is why things drag on and take long because we spend two hours on both of them. Thank you. Which we want everybody to speak, but my God, it takes a long time. Comfort break, 10 minutes. Go ahead, Nancy, speak.

1:45:39 – 1:46:10•Speaker 37

My name is Nancy Yanda, Y-A-N-D-A. And I'm just saying... We don't want this here. And whoever lives in that area, if Deborah Strickland lives near the data center and that comes in, is she planning on up and getting paid enough money from those lawyers for her to just high hell out of here? She don't want to live in this town anymore because it'll become a ghost town if those data centers get in here.

1:46:12 – 1:46:28•Speaker 51

Brian, do we have to sit here and listen to being accused of committing crimes? Brian? Come on down. No, I'm going to drag this on as long as I want. Go, Bruce. Please go.

1:46:28 – 1:46:40•Speaker 42

No, no. I listen to everybody that comes in, and I write notes. So go ahead. My clothing attire may change color. Don't try to make it quick. Don't try to make it quick.

1:46:42•Speaker 15

Good morning, Knight County!

1:46:44•Speaker 51

Oh, my God. Another yeller.

1:46:48•Speaker 15

So I bet you wish you were still in Africa, huh?

1:46:52 – 1:49:24•Speaker 15

Anyway. I went to a very interesting meeting on Saturday. Facts, getting more facts. I've been studying the data centers for months now. There was a gentleman there, he was a Navy man, was in the Navy for 30 years, and he worked in a nuclear program, 30 years. He's worked with the closed-loop systems, and he says, don't fall for it. He says, this closed-loop system, it's a lie. He says, the only thing that the closed-loop treats is the GPU and CPUs only. And these facilities, this hyperscale data center they want to put, the Mance hyperscale, the humidity has to be maintained at 30% for static electricity not to occur. And if it does, kaboom. Also, the temperature inside these places need to be 67, 68 degrees max. And it needs constant clean water. These closed-loop systems, the water has to be drained, has to be new water put in, and the water that they drain out of there will have forever chemicals. Once it goes into our water supply, we're dead. We're done. Can't get it out. And he says the fact that anybody wanted to put a data center in the desert is retarded. So... I just want to make that point. The other thing is I stood here back in May and brought up the topic of data center. And at that time, I don't know if anybody ever had. And I did make a point that a lot of municipalities were – officials were assigning NDAs to not speak about this subject to – the citizens, and I asked if any of you had been approached. And it would be nice if you all could go on record if you were approached by Ativan or Green League or any of these people, corporations, not to say anything to the public. That would be nice. I think to put rumors to rest, we would all like to hear that. And let me see. Oh, yeah, and at that time, I think Commissioner Strickland said she hadn't even heard anything about a data center at that point yet. So help me out here. I'm having a hard time. How did we get from not knowing about data centers to two months later when we got plans for possibly two of them? When it's your time to speak, you can respond to that. It's just, you know, I'm confused. So anyway, other than that, welcome back from Africa. I hope you had a good time. So have a good meeting, everybody.

1:49:25•Speaker 51

Thanks. No, her time is running. She's got props.

1:49:53•Speaker 51

No, you're up.

1:49:54•Speaker 54

You're on time right now.

1:49:55•Speaker 51

You're using up your time. Can you spell your last name for us or write it down somewhere?

1:50:05•Speaker 34

I'm going to make it really easy for you guys.

1:50:09•Speaker 28

Tony, T-O-N-I-H-O-V-E-R-M-A-N. Come on, people.

1:50:17 – 1:52:41•Speaker 34

Come on, show them. Stand up for Pahrump. I don't want my town ruined. I don't care about any of your personal... things that you have going on, your own personal agendas. I don't want, I don't want it in my town. I moved here six years ago for a better life. I got out of that cesspool called California and I moved here. I moved here, I bought a piece of land, bought a trailer, had a well drilled, huh Deborah? And I don't want my town ruined. You guys will be gone. All of you will be gone. And I'll be here. A lot of us will be here. And we're going to reap the consequences of your decisions. And it's not fair to us. You guys will all be gone. You will have moved on. There's over 500 properties in this town right now that are for sale. Jeez, someone here knows something. I don't want this in my town. These people don't want this in our town. And I don't think my fate and my future and my health should be in the hands of the five of you. And there's a commissioner that did show up at the rally on Saturday, and I thank him. There are some people in this town that are in government that are for the fight for no data centers. There are some people on this panel right now that don't give a damn, that won't be around much longer, that have their own agendas of the legacy they're going to leave on us poor people out here. They really don't give a damn about us. I just want to say that I'm going to use the last breath of air I have in my body to fight this. Because this is not what I signed up for six years ago. This is not what I agreed to buy into. And this is not the cancer I'm going to end up with later down the road because you guys all have it on your own agendas. To get whatever you're going to get from these... companies that are going to back and finance these shell companies and these investors that want to put this data center out here. This is your land.

1:52:41•Speaker 51

This is my land. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

1:52:46•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

1:52:52•Speaker 62

Michael David Garcia, GARCIA. Can you hear me? My volume okay?

1:52:58•Speaker 51

Perfectly good, sir.

1:53:01 – 1:53:32•Speaker 62

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I just wanted to, you know, thank everybody in the audience that showed up today. Your voice matters. I want to thank everybody that spoke. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful. And thank you for everybody for holding up those signs. Everything came across loud and clear. Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A, for the record. And once again, Chair, I'd like to address some of your etiquette issues when it comes to serving the people.

1:53:32•Speaker 51

If you don't like it, file a complaint. Move on with your time, please.

1:53:37•Speaker 62

I'm sorry. Are you engaging me? Is that an open meeting violation? Whatever you like, sir. Just keep going.

1:53:42•Speaker 51

You're wasting your time.

1:53:45 – 1:54:50•Speaker 62

I did not yield my time. Are you addressing a challenge, or are you just communicating with me unconstitutionally? Are you interrupting my time? Once again, I come to you for natural rights. To all the speakers that had their First Amendment rights violated, you see how the sheriff stood up? You see how the DA stood up for you? You see how these commissioners want to ask questions about protecting God's trust? God's trust. I remind you about Luke. 17-2, better a millstone when it comes to our children. Every county, every state, they are participating in fraud, extortion, and official oppression. They will all pay the price. Executive Order 13818 in 2017 said it clearly by Trump. This is treasonous wagers. It qualifies as a state award when you put your rules, policies, and discretionary opinions above an inalienable right. Article 1, Section 1 of Nevada Constitution.

1:54:50 – 1:55:52•Speaker 61

Have you all read the contract? Do you really think you can supersede that? In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, amen. Okay? Let's bring the spiritual torch up. Who's holding the light? Why don't you start, Chair, with Ezekiel 37, 38. You might be able to find your research when it comes to laying down the sins of the flesh. Don't you dare preach to me. Who's the servant? Who's the master? I represent the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords. What are you standing for? I stand for the children. Let me ask you something, DA and Sheriff. If Captain Berkowitz was on the Brady list and also was unbonded, How does his arrest of me in the violation of my First and Fourteenth Amendment at the school board is lawful? Y'all conspired. Subsection 241 and 242. May y'all... Go ahead, sir.

1:55:52•Speaker 51

We're extending your time because I interrupted you.

1:55:56 – 1:56:10•Speaker 61

Oh, thank you. Thank you. Appreciate the courtesy reach around. Mr. Jabbour, BOTC 7.52, written after Chevron, the administrative rule of law that hijacked common law. Now you're done.

1:56:10•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone? Actually, let's do Tonopah. That'll be fun. Go ahead, Tonopah.

1:56:19•Speaker 51

Thank you. Go ahead. Sorry.

1:56:23 – 1:59:32•Speaker 14

No, it's okay. Good morning. I'm Misha Allen, A-L-L-E-N. I'm with UNR Extension. I'm the extension educator up here in northern Nye County. And my job is to develop educational programs based off of the needs of our Nye County communities and what they identify. And so my work is very much community driven. And our Nye County public has been very clear in their opposition to large scale land use projects like solar and data centers. And I've learned to categorize their opposition in two ways. One, which is due to a lack of land stewardship, and I include natural resources and environmental issues in that. And then two, also due to lack of community host or host community benefits. And so in response, I developed two educational programs to specifically address these. So I provide education on one, alternatives to conventional solar, and these are things like agrovoltaics, which is farming and ranching under solar, and ecovoltaics, which is conservation, and ecosystem benefits under solar. And both of which, by the way, they're ideally sited in semi-arid and arid regions like ours because of their water savings characteristics. And then two community benefit agreements, which are incredibly important, I think, to counties like ours, where 97% of our county is public lands that are not captured within the traditional tax generating mechanisms mechanisms that are necessary to fund local government operations and services. And without these revenue sources, industry development can unintentionally become a burden rather than a benefit to host communities. And so my current work includes supporting Nye County Solar Consortium, in partnership with the nine county natural resources director, Megan Labadee, where we have an interdisciplinary group of local community leaders and NGOs working to identify a pathway for industry development that aligns with our community values and needs. And they're really clear in wanting industry to develop community benefit agreements with host communities prior to county permitting. And since I'm funded by a mixture of county, state, and federal funding, you might be hearing about some of my statewide work, particularly with the Nevada Association of Counties, where energy, data centers, and community benefit agreements are issues that they're working on. And I've provided education and technical assistance to NACO and multiple counties on how to address data center impacts on natural resources, water, energy, emergency management, and jurisdictional capacity. And I'm really proud to have cultivated a network of in-state and out-of-state experts that have offered to support and inform our work here in Knight County. So we actually have people willing to rally around us and to help, which I hope as county commissioners and administrators is really great news. Because it means that we're not alone in this. You're not alone in this. And that you're welcome to leverage me and my network. Thank you, Misha. Good work, Misha. Thank you.

1:59:34•Speaker 51

Come on down, Susie. Actually, Bruce.

1:59:39•Speaker 54

We're going to die here. This is two hours in.

1:59:42•Speaker 51

Yep, break time. Sorry. Bruce is going to pee himself.

1:59:48 – 2:06:11•Speaker 51

Ten minutes. All right, Serena, we ready up north?

2:06:14•Speaker 54

Thank you for that.

2:06:22•Speaker 51

I thought it would end.

2:06:50 – 2:07:43•Speaker 51

Um... Okay, thank you for your patience, Susie. Everybody was about to have a problem.

2:07:44•Speaker 54

It'll be way easier to pay attention now. Go right ahead. Thank you, Susie.

2:08:00 – 2:11:06•Speaker 32

Once again, good morning, commissioners. Susie Hertz, HERTZ. I attended the most recent RPC meeting last week, I guess it was, and I just wanted to report to you what I observed and what I experienced. I understand some other people have made comments already, but I wasn't here. The then chairperson of RPC, the RPC mistakenly, seriously mistakenly, cut off the public from their comments. Cut a speaker off mid, within their three minutes, and then proceeded to, just short of shouting at the rest of the audience and any other public speakers, that the the board was not going to hear any more of those such comments. And it was a blatant attack against speaking rights of the attendees, the public, and I think that you need to know that. I think that the behavior of the board was really inappropriate, very unprofessional, And across the board, many of the people who sit and are now seated recently on that board are not appropriate for what they're doing. For the brevity and the depth and the gravity of what is being discussed in the RPC, those people should be educated and informed. And many of them are not. And I am bringing this to you because you appoint them. And I would really request that you look and observe and evaluate who's been recently appointed to those boards because they're just not the right people. And our town is at stake. They're making bad decisions on what the zonings, the ordinances are and how to apply those to people who apply for the ability to do business or have homes or whatever, and they're totally inappropriate. They took an enormous amount of time with one particular applicant, and they could not give that person a succinct answer to how to fix the problem so that that person and that business could go forward. And it was shameful. And it was very solvable, but the people who were there were incompetent to deal with it.

2:11:06•Speaker 51

Thanks, Susie. But do you mind me asking what item caused the big...

2:11:12 – 2:11:39•Speaker 32

It was a gentleman who had a tow truck business right in the center of town, and they just could not deal with what he was doing... to make his application work, and there was a minor component missing, and nobody would answer him as to how to fix it. And it was a shambles, and shame on them.

2:11:39•Speaker 51

Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Come on up, please.

2:11:46 – 2:14:47•Speaker 1

Hello. My name is Mary Rose Parkman. Last name is spelled P-A-R-K-M-A-N, and I'm here as a resident. I'm asking you, when it comes to data centers, are you asking yourselves at what cost? With the Mance Data Center facility, the developers are planning 15 to 16 data center blocks. Each of those are requiring 100 megawatts. That actually, again, you should ask yourself at what cost, because the electricity demand and the grid reliability will be greatly impacted, the amount of energy that this facility is proposing to use is enough to power over 80,000 homes, nearly four times the homes that we have here in Pahrump. Water usage and aquifer sustainability. I'm glad you had your break to bring up more water. But again, ask yourself, at what cost is this data center The fact that the plans are advancing before the release of a crucial Basin 162 groundwater study that highlights the lack of precaution that is being taken in this approval process. That report will not be available until 2027, is what I've been told. Yet this data center will be voted on August 4th. Again, a very big concern. The number three, air quality and noise pollution. They claim that this facility will be 1,000 plus feet away from any homes. That's less than three football fields. But the noise pollution that has been reported from other data centers has been staggering. And this distance is not going to cover up the decibels that are likely to be created by a facility of this size. I can go on. There's heat, efficiency, environmental burden. My biggest concern is risks of public cost and insufficient oversight. I think it's perhaps the most concerning prospect that the environmental and infrastructural costs of the Mance Data Center could be passed on to the public. Local tax rate payers will be facing facing increasing utility costs, diminished water security, degraded air quality, and all of this is without adequate transparency or individual feasibility studies. No amount of progress or tax dollars, which by the way will not be realized until up to five years after this is built, none of that is worth the literal lives of the people that live here. And lastly, I'd like to make sure that.

2:14:47•Speaker 51

Thank you very much for that. Thank you. I'm sorry to cut you. Come on in, Mr. Fender.

2:14:57 – 2:18:03•Speaker 41

Hi there. Mike Fender, F-E-N-D-E-R. I sat here till the end and you wanted to extend this because I wanted to hear what everybody had to say. And I agree with a good portion of it. And I think you all understand why I'm saying that because you actually believe a lot of things that I do. and report back to you because I do a lot of research. Bottom line is we're at a point, a juncture, where the county is going to have to set up a restriction and then literally set aside an area for this type of project, not necessarily here in the valley either. We are now going to have more land available up by Tonopah because the I'm going to use this as a suggestion because that solar farm up there just went belly up. It's now owned by the Sons of Liberty. They're located out of Texas, and they spent $7 million on it. So are they going to tear it down? What are they going to do? So now we've got an area up there they could actually put, since it's already been irradiated, so to speak, you could put a data center there. Another reason is there's also a new substation going in outside of Tonopah, and these data centers need substations. How many are they going to have around here? Probably four. Four transformers came in. So you don't need to have this data center at the entrance to our town, which somebody stated recently, this is the entrance to Death Valley. You just don't need that. You're putting a junkyard, so to speak, now at the entrance gateway right into our town. It just doesn't make any sense. Now, the water issue is another thing. I mean, nobody knows how much water we have. Now, I listened to Mr. Meads recently, and he's got a good hold on what the water issue here is in this valley. He's lived here a long time. I have also been reading there was a report put out by a group of individuals and corporations this past February, they had a giant meeting on these data issues. Now, a report was put out, and I forwarded to Dan Weeks here about four months ago. But anyway, you may have heard about it. You might not have, but I'm pretty sure you could have. Bottom line is these data centers do not belong here. More people now are pissed off about this than solar farms. And solar farms are another big issue we're going to be dealing with. I don't even want to go there right now. You understand what I'm getting at. But I would recommend that the county look at the idea of literally setting aside an area, not close by residents, not in a large area or a semi-area, outside town where you can actually build things if you have to. I'm not saying you have to. It's just like approving solar farms. Thank you, Mike. Okay, thanks.

2:18:03•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

2:18:08•Speaker 51

Come on down, Patricia. Patricia?

2:18:18 – 2:21:11•Speaker 28

Good afternoon. Patricia Robb, R-O-B-B. You know why I'm here. And everyone did a good job behind me talking about the data center, so I will move on with the mission I'm on. And that is the utility challenged lots. I know that the planning department is working on an overlay ordinance, which is good. I'm looking forward to that actually being ready soon. because these owners have not been able to use their land for almost five decades. They pay taxes on it. The tax bills just went out. And of course, they're paying just for a piece of paper right now. They're not paying to use their land. so i just kind of want to reiterate some of the benefits although i've mentioned these before i want to go a little bit more further into some details besides them being able to actually use their land that they pay taxes on they're also going to be less likely to walk away from paying those taxes land values will rise once they can start using them. It does stop squatters from using those lots, as well as complaints against code violations out there. There's no infrastructure needed. These owners are taking everything on themselves. This is just a reminder of everything. It encourages conservation-minded living. So I like what Misha in Tonopah had to say about UNR's extension. We need education on alternative utilities, not just solar. People are not familiar with how alternative utilities work. But when it's going to be your responsibility, you're going to learn how to do it. But everybody should know that. And as far as permitting tiny homes, container homes, it does give people the opportunity to enter into the market and actually enjoy their land. sustainable housing creates pride of ownership it also creates real neighborhoods instead of rows of unused tax draining parcels it reduces the homelessness risk we all know that sewer water and power will never be extended to most of these VR zoned lots so alternative utilities are a realistic solution. This does avoid potential lawsuits also over regulatory takings and property rights violations once the ordinance is accepted. It also aligns with state and national trends such as SB 150. Now, legal dwellings with permitted off-grid setups can be registered, mapped, and planned for emergency response as well. So I know you've heard all this before. I know you've got a lot on your plate you're dealing with, but this is probably one of the easiest fixes of all. So I thank you for your time.

2:21:12•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody else on the phone, please?

2:21:16•Speaker 51

Closing public comment. Manager number four, please.

2:21:22 – 2:21:40•Speaker 50

Item four, commissioner manager comments. This item is limited to announcements, brief discussions of public comments, correction of factual inaccuracies, direction to staff, or topics proposed for future board meetings. Lengthy deliberation of topics not on the agenda is prohibited by the Nevada open meeting law.

2:21:41•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Commissioner Bain.

2:21:43 – 2:25:05•Speaker 45

Thank you. I'll be very brief. I just wanted to touch on, sort of frame the debate that's going to happen here with the obvious, both up here and both in the community. And, you know, an interesting thing that you watch to explain how Donald Trump won this election, it's because of a disagreement and a protest over things that government has purported to be facts. We've accumulated all these facts and this information. This is safe, this isn't safe. This is right, this isn't right. You're wrong, they're right. And over years and years, it kind of came to this big rejection that happened, I believe, in 2024 and probably in 2016. I think it happened in 1972 with McGovern with some socialist ideas that are now embraced pretty openly. I think it happened in 1980 with the election of Ronald Reagan. probably happened in history that I didn't trace or watch. But the reality is that in the future, in the very near future, there's going to be accumulation of what the administration is going to call facts. And these facts are going to be contrary to what a lot of people believe. This is not a debate over facts. Data centers are not a debate over facts. There are debate over whether or not people believe what they're being told. And that's something that I think that Hillary Clinton didn't understand when she was running against Donald Trump. And not to frame it any other way, but just that this is what's going to happen. And I've quoted, I don't know if I've done it up here, but there's a commissioner that was with the Obama administration in Cook County in Chicago, in Forest Claypool. He used to say, when you're explaining, you're losing. And it's because when people don't believe and there's no trust in what they're being told, it doesn't matter what you say. And I've said it up here before. You had a doctor with 50 and I'm 52 years old and we had a doctor with 52 years experience Fauci and he had a specific set belief on what was dangerous and how to take care of that danger and that harm. And within one year that changed. Now was he a bad doctor for 52 years? and the government was right? Or was the government wrong and that's why he changed his position so that he could accommodate the government? So the debate is not gonna be over how many facts that are in air quotes or information that is designed to get you to believe something that's been going on since the beginning of time. probably beginning of, definitely beginning of this country. I was born into Dan Rostenkowski's district in Chicago, and I was raised in Tip O'Neill's, so I know a little bit about manipulation of what you'd call facts, which is why I'm a Republican growing up in Democrat places. So I'll leave with that, but I just want to remind the public that you're going to be inundated, or if you want, indoctrinated with what I would call Information that's designed to get you to believe something that goes contrary to what you believe in your heart and thank God for this system of government Where we we don't need to engage it in debate if we don't believe in something we just vote no Thank You mr. Chairman Thank You chair good afternoon everybody

2:25:09 – 2:28:17•Speaker 42

So I just wanna touch base on a couple of things. Data center is at the top of our minds, our brains, our tongues, and yes, Commissioner Bain and I and county manager helped schedule to facilitate a forum, not a meeting, it's not a dialogue. It will be a monologue this Saturday at 10 o'clock here in Chambers. Okay, and we will do and have the format much like we did with the wild horse and burrow Issue at the time where we had where we had all sides All sides to come and speak and have have some time to educate All of us all of us. We're all in on this and so again I this Saturday the 25th, 10 o'clock here in Chambers, please, because a lot of you came forward today, many of you came forward and had some pertinent information, whether pro or con, you had pertinent information regarding these data centers, right? They're not all the same. Yes, I was at a meeting in Amargosa. I was asked and summoned to come down on the liaison for the Amargosa town board and I want you to know that Carolyn Allen who was mentioned earlier. She's the chair of the Amargosa town board. She works very very hard very hard day well day and night sometimes she Sends me messages at 3 o'clock in the morning and I'm like, oh her alarm clock must be broken. I She works very hard for the people of Amargosa and the community. And that includes Crystal. Crystal doesn't have an advisory board or a town board. So it does encompass Crystal because of the Basin 230. That flows into Basin 162, by the way. And so... I would like to speak on splash pads because I was here when when the original Proposal came before us and I know that it's going to be addressed during manager comments And I'd like to jump back in at that time Because I don't want to misspeak, but I do want to hear I do want to hear the information from the director as to why and certain things have happened and why certain things have not happened and then i'd like to uh... jump back in chair for you know what so thank you know yield at this time thank you commissioner clinton thank you for your comments commissioner jabor i have nothing to add thank you commissioner koenig i don't want to prolong this anymore we have to so i have nothing i have a couple comments so

2:28:18 – 2:29:41•Speaker 51

There's a bunch of people here that are holding up their on signs and are very upset and angry about data centers that we have not approved, that we have not approved, that we know none of the facts on yet, that we know none of the information on. But it's like an angry mob carrying their pitchforks, and I just don't understand how you can scream and demand that we be respectful to you when you can be asses to us? Hell no. That's not how that works. Secondly, here's a perfect example. There was a screenshot on the data center forum where somebody responds and says, aptly named Karen, I don't want to know about them. I don't want to learn anything about them. I just don't want them. What the hell is that? If there was a shoe store that wanted to come here, I would need to know the positives and the negatives of that shoe store before I voted for it. That is what we're supposed to do here. So I apologize to the normal people in this audience and on the phone listening to have to watch that BS and listen to that garbage from the angry mob. And if that mob thinks they're gonna change my mind in one way or another, Good luck on that one. Any managers, please?

2:29:43•Speaker 54

Thank you, Chair. Thank you very much.

2:29:47 – 2:31:26•Speaker 33

If I could, sir? Go ahead. Just quickly. I wanted to comment first about the public comment that was made regarding the laying of the fiber. Oh, yeah. Okay. He's completely misinformed, lying, shall I say? No. He actually met with my office yesterday. Yes. So we had a meeting with him, and this is much more complicated because they want to put this fiber into our right of way. And then we have issues of making sure that there's not any risks to anything else. And obviously some issues to work out with regards to that. So this is not just as easy and simple as he wants it to be. And understand that we're not... We're not getting anything out of his grant. This is his grant that he received. And so we just have to be careful with that. But again, we did meet yesterday in my office. I did want to comment also on the question that came up with regards to what was happening in Amargosa. I just want the board to understand that I'm actually in the process of completing in response to an open meeting law complaint that was filed by this individual. My investigation is pretty clear that what happened was they were given a certain amount of time, and I don't remember exactly, I think it was like six minutes, that they were allowed to talk during this open forum. She refused to give up the mic, kept being belligerent and angry, and ultimately had to be escorted out of there. So, again, that's a matter that I am dealing with, and we'll have a response back to the Attorney General's office on that open meeting law complaint.

2:31:28 – 2:31:40•Speaker 54

Chair, may I add one thing to DA? On August 6th at 6 p.m., that fiber internet groundbreaking will be at the Rood Center if you want to learn more about that, too. Thank you, Chair.

2:31:40 – 2:32:15•Speaker 51

Thank you. I also want to add one quick thing. The 30 people or 20 people or 10 people who show up to these things or go all over Nextdoor and the social media apps and things like that, griping and complaining about everything under the sun, they don't represent the 50,000 people here. Most of us are normal thinking forward folks who have spent three decades here, raised a kid here, centered through college here, Those of you who show up from California 10 minutes ago and tell us what we're doing wrong, screw that. Come on up.

2:32:26 – 2:35:18•Speaker 35

Christy Sigmund, S-I-E-G-M-U-N-D, Manager Animal Services. I just want to start by actually saying thank you, a public thank you to two groups of people. First, our volunteers at the shelter. Their work does not go unnoticed. It changes the lives of these animals in the shelter every single day. They help make these dogs socialized, adoptable. It really, really matters and makes a difference. So I just want to thank them publicly. I also want to thank the community publicly. Our return to owner rate in this first 21 days of this month has increased almost 20%. So thank you guys so much for coming to the shelter, picking up your dogs when they get out. It makes a huge difference to our space in the shelter as well as to the life of that animal. We're also seeing an increase of donations. Those donations, words can't even quite describe the impact that those donations of food, litter, beds, blankets, sheets, towels, it really truly changes the lives of those animals in the shelter. So I wanted to start by saying thank you to those people. This month, We are still in the Bissell Empty the Shelter event. We have seen 35 adoptions, which is wonderful so far in the first 21 days. We still have over 80% of our shelter is available for adoption. Kittens, cats, adults, seniors, you name it. We even have a rooster and a pig. and a bunny. And fun fact, so the rooster and the pig came in together, and so they are very appropriately named Heihei and Pua from Moana, because they are together. We like to have fun. But they are available for adoption, so someone who says, oh, we only have the same kinds of animals in the shelter, I say come and see our shelter, because we have all different kinds, breeds, sizes, ages, you name it. $20 adoption fee for the whole rest of the month And then on this Saturday, the 25th, I believe, of July, we are having our Adopt and Shop event, which we have every single year, but this one is special. This is our Christmas in July, where fees will be waived for the entire day. So if that $20 still poses a financial strain on you, come down this Saturday. Fees will be waived. We literally have over 100 animals in that shelter available for adoption. So come and check them out. And then we are gonna roll into August and continue the fun because we have been accepted and will be participating in the NBC Clear the Shelter event all through the month of August. So you will continue to see those $20 adoption fees all the way through September 1st. So pretty exciting stuff. Come and see us.

2:35:20•Speaker 54

Koenig, you guys want to say anything about the donkeys and the case on the donkeys?

2:35:27•Speaker 43

Yes, I can... do a quick little thing on the donkeys.

2:35:32•Speaker 54

We had donkeys, didn't we?

2:35:33•Speaker 43

We had donkeys, a couple hundred donkeys.

2:35:35•Speaker 54

A couple hundred donkeys.

2:35:38•Speaker 35

160. Seems to be an echo in here.

2:35:42 – 2:36:43•Speaker 43

160. 160, okay. And they were farmed out to various people who took them, and we had to pay the fee, and it came to $140,000, something like that. $132,548. Close enough. Ask me how I know that exactly. Court was finally the other day, and I had to testify briefly because I kept telling them all I did was go up there to look at 160 donkeys, see what they looked like. They didn't believe me, but that was all right. And then their lawyer asked me while you were there, did the donkeys look healthy? And I told them that I am not a veterinarian. So anyways, we won. They owe us 130 some odd thousand dollars in change. So it was a good thing that happened. And the donkeys that have been farmed out, I guess the people that have them can keep them if they want. And if the ones that they don't keep will be up for adoption.

2:36:43 – 2:37:08•Speaker 35

Yes. So most of the fosters are keeping the animals that they have. We will have some that will be available for adoption. This win was a huge win, not only for the animal or for the county, but for the animals as well. They have changed so dramatically and drastically in the last year that they've been with these fosters. So I am very, very happy with the outcome.

2:37:09•Speaker 43

Those hundred and some odd donkeys were on, what, one acre of land?

2:37:14•Speaker 54

They're a hoarder.

2:37:15•Speaker 43

It's kind of squishy, let's put it that way. They weren't happy.

2:37:20•Speaker 54

Thank you for the fosters.

2:37:22 – 2:37:42•Speaker 33

Could I add to that, too? Thank you. We are initiating collection actions because we actually got a judgment against her for that amount. So we are initiating collection actions to collect that amount so that we can reimburse ourselves for the costs that went. And so, again, we're moving forward now with the next stage of making sure that we get everything collected.

2:37:43•Speaker 43

Yeah, because all that money came out of the shelter's budget, so she essentially has no budget left. We'll fix it.

2:37:53•Speaker 50

And to your senior deputy, Brad Richardson, well done.

2:38:01•Speaker 51

Good job, Brad. Thank you, Christy. All right, Jimmy. Are you ready?

2:38:14•Speaker 42

Jimmy. Yes. You're on.

2:38:17 – 2:41:29•Speaker 79

Thank you. Jimmy Martinez, M-A-R-T-N-E-Z, tried to address as much as I can with the splash pad. It's not as beautiful as Las Vegas, of course, but we don't have their money. So we try to make as best as we can with the money that we have. It is secure. It is safe. We blocked it off so we don't have kids running all over the place. We did look into Las Vegas. Las Vegas has issues with kids running around all over, and I've seen parents chase their kids. So to help this out, So they're not running, we close it off, and also a second benefit of having what we have as a brick structure is to prevent our investment. Of course, when during construction we had a dust storm and we had to go clean everything, the dust out of the lines and out of everything, if that would have happened and we didn't have that brick structure as of now, we would have been spending a large amount of money to replace all this stuff. Once we started, everybody didn't want the splash pad because it was fresh water. We went to reclaim water like everybody wanted. That is a big cost because we're recirculating the water, chem leaky treating it, everything like that. So that is lot, pumps, power, all that stuff that needs to be done. It is slip resistant. It's not paint. Well, I mean, it is paint, but it has slip resistant texture on there. So if you go on there, it is slip resistant. It is ADA compliant at all level. It only drains to the drains. And there is a ramp where people with wheelchair access can walk, come up from the street to the curb and walk on, or sorry, roll on if they need to. There is benches. Yes, there is no shade as of right now. It is on order. I just got told a few minutes ago the PO is in my emails and I'll be moving forward with the company. The town is installing them to save costs because we only have $5,000 for the shade and it's more money than $5,000. The rest of the money is coming out of my budget as in parks departments to cover the difference to get shade. So that is coming in. Buildings and Grounds is installing it. It's all engineered. We will put that through permitting and everything. For the splash pad, the company does it all day long. They come out, they just did one in Northern Nevada before they did ours. It came out great. I think this came out great. Yeah, it's not as beautiful, like I said, as Las Vegas, but it's our first one. We know we need a lot more money for the next one. What else do I got here? It's not just one feature. There's multiple features. They're just in the ground. You only see one. It's not a prison shower. Actually, ours is nicer than a prison shower. I don't know if you've been to prison, unless you're with Martha Stewart. I mean, come on. We are, we do everything we can with the money we have. Reason why it takes so long is because we got to do a lot of bidding process. Once we go through the bidding process, it tricks prevailing wage. So that's where a lot of our money comes from. Prevailing wage to provide a service that get a contractor to come out here and do the work.

2:41:30•Speaker 51

So you didn't steal the money, you didn't do any of the stuff that these, some of these people. Oh, I didn't know I spent money.

2:41:38•Speaker 79

I mean, they can see my wallet.

2:41:39•Speaker 51

You spent what you were supposed to spend, and you did what you were supposed to spend.

2:41:42•Speaker 79

Every penny went into that splash pad, if not more.

2:41:44•Speaker 51

Exactly my point.

2:41:48 – 2:44:44•Speaker 42

Thank you. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Jimmy, for coming and giving us some clarification and explanation. As I mentioned, I was seated commissioner when this first was proposed and most recently I've been to the Simpkins Park to review and monitor and one of the commenters mentioned that Commissioner Koenig has been there and I'm not sure how they know if we're there or not there. They asked us to take cameras down and we did. There's no camera over there. None. No. So I have some concerns. And I understand that there is budget issues, and you had to make some modifications due to the water issue, the reclamation and the pump. That's not inexpensive. I get it. But I just want to bring a few things to your attention to see if we can find some money because it has to be done right before we even move on to think of another splash pad. Let me talk about the benches for a moment. There's two benches that can fit probably four people comfortably. There were a couple of families here earlier today that said, I'm a mother of six. My mother had five. and taking us to the beach, the ocean, to the pool, to the lake, et cetera, with the big beach bag, okay, that's not even adequate for one family, the bench. You have two benches, okay, so we're only going to welcome and accommodate two families in reality, or they have to bring their own beach chairs and umbrellas, et cetera. And then if they bring their own umbrellas because there's no shade, which is very important, right? Yeah. The answer is not go into the water and get cooled off. There's no refuge from the sun when you're in the water. It makes it worse and it's magnified to get a sunburn. And these are children that we're talking about, right? And so... Umbrellas, personal umbrellas are not safe. We're talking about safety. We're always talking about safety because the wind will pick up and take the umbrella and maybe impale somebody or poke somebody in the eye, what have you. Worst case scenario, right? And so my main issue that I'm going to address are the ballards.

2:44:46•Speaker 33

Commissioner, I'm sorry. This is getting into lengthy discussion. Yes, yes it is. I think we need to put this on an agenda item. I don't think it's appropriate to do this during.

2:44:55•Speaker 42

We can put it on an agenda, but if you don't mind, Mr. DA, let me finish with this as my last. I'm advising you not to.

2:45:05•Speaker 33

This is getting off of what is appropriate for manager's comments. This should be put on an agenda item publicly.

2:45:13 – 2:45:41•Speaker 42

Okay, manager, if we could put this on the next agenda item, okay? And Mr. DA, one of the issues that was mentioned was to postpone the ribbon cutting, which really is going to be humorous if we allow that to go on. Would you mind me addressing that, to postpone that, be able to postpone that before the agenda?

2:45:42 – 2:46:11•Speaker 33

All I can do is give you advice. I've given you my advice. Again, this is getting into lengthy discussions of an item that's not on the agenda for the public to understand this is going to be discussed. Again, there's nothing that says that you can't discuss things with the county manager outside the meeting. And if you have concerns, my suggestion is that you deal with him outside the meeting.

2:46:13 – 2:46:26•Speaker 42

I understand. Manager, if we can get this on the next agenda, please. Splashpad and Jimmy, I hope you'll be available for that too, and I'll resume at that time. Okay. Thank you, sir.

2:46:26•Speaker 79

Do you think I know your answer to what you're talking about?

2:46:29•Speaker 42

No, we have to stop it.

2:46:31•Speaker 42

We have to stop it.

2:46:42•Speaker 42

Okay, thank you, Mr. DA. Thank you, Chair. And thank you, folks. We'll get this on the next agenda. Thank you, Jimmy. Thank you, Jimmy.

2:46:51•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have any managers or directors on the phone, please?

2:46:55•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

2:47:02 – 2:48:39•Speaker 75

Good afternoon, Commissioners. Braylon Powers, POW ERS, the President for Nye County. I just wanted to share... that the real property tax bills have been mailed. My department processed these in-house. This is our third year now. The last batch was taken to the post office yesterday. I would be amiss if I did not give a shout out to our IT department and to our assessors. We had mechanical failure with our Xerox. Our IT department came to our rescue and orchestrated the same day fix. and our assessors provided a temporary printing solution for our tax bills, as well allowed us to utilize their mail folding inserting machine here in Pahrump. I also want to give a huge shout out to the deputies in my department. This is a huge project for us and they knocked it out of the ballpark once again. And to the deputies up north, thank you so much for taking care of our daily operations while we administered mailing 60,000 tax bills. So thank you everybody for a great job. And definitely thank you IT and assessors. The first due date is August 17th. It does fall on the third Monday in August every year. That is by NRS standards. The NRS also allows for an automatic 10-day grace period, pushing that official due date out to August 27th. And that is all I wanted to share on that note, commissioners.

2:48:40•Speaker 51

Thank you. Ray Lynn, Sam, anybody, uh, come on up chief.

2:48:49 – 2:49:31•Speaker 7

Good afternoon. Commissioner Scott Lewis, director of emergency management. On a Friday evening, not too long ago, there was a serious fire that occurred in Beatty that ultimately took down three structures. Our volunteers did an outstanding job protecting the nearby exposures and worked tirelessly throughout the evening and overnight hours. Unfortunately, a person lost their life in that fire. The fire is under investigation by the Deputy State Fire Marshal. And emergency management responded to support the command staff that had been established. And one firefighter was transported to our local hospital for evaluation over at night. Sad news, but I thought you should know.

2:49:31•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you for that. That was a bad one. Sam, do we have any other managers?

2:49:37•Speaker 27

There's a hand raised, but I'm not sure.

2:49:38•Speaker 51

Let's check it out. We're adventurous today.

2:49:41•Speaker 27

Caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

2:49:48•Speaker 51

I apologize. We're on item eight? No, no. No, that would be lovely if we were. That'd be after lunch.

2:49:57•Speaker 54

Count on after lunch.

2:50:03•Speaker 51

All right, so that's it then, right? That's it. Okay, closing that out. Number whatever the next one is.

2:50:09 – 2:50:21•Speaker 50

Item five, approval of the agenda for January 21st, 2026. There are no changes that I've been made aware of. No, you do have an emergency item.

2:50:21•Speaker 51

Okay, so six then, please.

2:50:26 – 2:50:53•Speaker 50

Item six for possible action, emergency items. I just wanted to bring back to you guys last meeting. On the 7th, we had a bunch of the liquor licensing that was on the agenda. Okay. There were a couple of licenses that didn't get renewed. One of them, particularly, was Breakthrough Beverage. Since then, we have kind of learned...

2:50:54•Speaker 42

Excuse me, Chair.

2:50:56 – 2:51:10•Speaker 42

Excuse me, Manager. Mr. DA, this is in regards to an emergency item, and we're going to be discussing liquor licensing. I think it would be appropriate that we call the Sheriff the Chair of the Liquor Licensing Board at this time.

2:51:10•Speaker 51

Thank you. Absolutely. Handing it to you, Joe.

2:51:31 – 2:52:47•Speaker 50

So to continue, we learned some information that kind of gave some explanation as to why We had not received the renewal fees and stuff from the applicant that we just learned here recently, so I had asked the DA about doing this emergency item to, if nothing else, temporarily reinstate the license until we can conduct the show cause, which is how the code actually requires a full-on reinstatement, just because I have heard from several of the businesses in town that this is hurting their business because they have not been able to get restocked. Breakthrough Beverages, if not the only distributor that is being used in town, they are definitely the main distributor being used in town. And there is a representative in the audience if you guys have any questions. But our intentions are to bring back an item on August 4th to the Liquor and Licensing Board for a show cause, and they can provide a more detailed explanation. Breakthrough beverage.

2:52:53•Speaker 51

So how would chair handle this item specifically?

2:52:58 – 2:53:10•Speaker 50

Like any other, I mean, I believe you could have discussion on it. You can do public comment on it. Are we looking for a motion? Well, I think you'd have to do public comment.

2:53:10•Speaker 43

Well, I know that, but ultimately you're looking for a motion.

2:53:13•Speaker 50

Yeah, looking for a motion to temporarily reinstate the show cause on August 4th. August 4th? Yes.

2:53:22 – 2:53:41•Speaker 52

So do we need to formally open the meeting of the licensing and liquor board? OK, so done. OK, so is there any comments from the board before we go to public comment? I have none, Chair.

2:53:44•Speaker 42

Do we want to hear from the applicant?

2:53:47 – 2:54:13•Speaker 52

Oh, yes. Yeah, you said somebody was here? OK, yes. So that you're aware, we can't take any testimony as far as reasoning behind the non-payment, if I'm not mistaken, would be the right way to go with it. Yeah, that would be for the Shrokotsky. Yeah, this would just be a general statement.

2:54:13•Speaker 51

If any of us had questions for him.

2:54:16•Speaker 51

That's fine. I don't. Oh.

2:54:23 – 2:54:44•Speaker 30

Good afternoon, commissioners and city management. My name is Kevin Wilkerson. I am an employee of Breakthrough Beverage Nevada, VP of Trade Development. And I wanted to come down and apologize for what you're referring to. There was some administrative errors that happened. There was three sets of checks sent out. We certainly were not trying. Sorry.

2:54:45•Speaker 50

I'll save that for the show.

2:54:46 – 2:55:05•Speaker 30

Yeah, so anyways, we wanted to come down in person, state our apology. Payment has been made, and now we're just trying to find a resolution so we don't have to wait until August 4th. It's impacting our customers. It's impacting our citizens. So we're looking for a resolution. Ask any questions you would like.

2:55:06•Speaker 54

Chair, I'd like to request that you spell your name for the record.

2:55:10•Speaker 30

Kevin Wilkerson, W-I-L-K-E-R-S-O-N.

2:55:17•Speaker 30

Want to do public?

2:55:19•Speaker 52

Yeah, public comment. Thank you. Any public comment? Don't see anybody. Nobody in Tonopah. Do we have anybody on the phone?

2:55:29•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

2:55:36 – 2:56:15•Speaker 62

Hello, commissioners. Hello, Sheriff Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A. I didn't hear anybody define that this qualifies for an emergency item. You're basically bypassing original process, due process and protocol, you know, unless you're willing to admit on the record that you did in fact cause these folks harm and loss. An emergency item. Sheriff, what's it called when you borrow without a state of emergency? Thank you. Let's stick to the constitutionality of this. Come on now. Thank you all.

2:56:18•Speaker 52

Thank you. Anybody else?

2:56:23•Speaker 52

With that, we'll close public comment.

2:56:25•Speaker 43

I'd like to make a motion.

2:56:27•Speaker 43

Motion is to issue a temporary license until August 4th for breakthrough beverages.

2:56:34•Speaker 50

Second. I ask for one correction, a reinstatement, a temporary reinstatement.

2:56:40•Speaker 43

Temporary reinstatement of their license, good until August 4th. So amended, second.

2:56:47•Speaker 52

Okay, we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? If not, take a vote.

2:56:50•Speaker 42

Or a show cause.

2:56:51•Speaker 52

Or a show cause.

2:56:52•Speaker 42

Or a show cause, thank you.

2:56:53•Speaker 52

Yeah, so we need to get that on the agenda for a show cause for August 4th. Aye. Aye. Aye.

2:56:57•Speaker 42

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye.

2:56:59•Speaker 42

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye.

2:57:01•Speaker 52

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye.

2:57:09•Speaker 1

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye.

2:57:10 – 2:57:30•Speaker 50

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye 10 a.m. timed item for possible action, discussion and deliberation regarding the monthly statement of county treasurer pursuant to NRS 354.280, including receipts, balances and funds, money on deposit, outstanding checks and cash on hand.

2:57:34•Speaker 51

Thanks for that. Hey, do we have Ray Lynn on the phone, please, Sam? Yes, sir. Hello.

2:57:40 – 2:58:12•Speaker 75

Good afternoon again, commissioners. Hello. Raelynn Powers, POWERS, Treasurer for Nye County. Today's presentation is our bank reconciliation and treasurer's report for the month of May. Everything looks to be in order and moving along just fine with our bank reconciliation and treasurer's report. We are gearing up for the close of fiscal year 26. We are working hand in hand with our finance department. Nothing really.

2:58:13 – 2:58:54•Speaker 56

outstanding to report this month commissioners do we have any questions thank you any questions for ray lynn before i open public comment yes sir nada okay sam let's open public comment please thank you chair the caller is unmuted please speak and spell your name for the record amy nelson n-e-l-s-o-n i'd like to ask the treasurer if this reconciliation includes the late fees or fines from the businesses in District 1 that didn't pay their taxes on time. Has that all been reconciled? Around $89,000. Thank you.

2:59:01 – 2:59:12•Speaker 51

Thank you, Sam. Do we have anybody else? Let's do public, Raelynn, please. Sam, do we have anybody else?

2:59:14•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

2:59:19 – 3:00:17•Speaker 60

Seth Borisovich, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. I was wondering why we took $920,000 out of an interest-bearing account in Wells Fargo and where did that money go and would it have been better just to leave it back in that account to get some interest? And then I have like three or four other questions. I don't know if you want me to just read them or not, but why was the Flint scholarship account reduced to zero? Is it because we went and gave all of the scholarship money out? What caused the 1.13 million increase in deposits in transit in May? Are there any outstanding vendor checks older than 180 days? Which capital project funds are significantly behind schedule? And how much of the general fund balance is unrestricted versus legally committed? And those are my questions.

3:00:18•Speaker 51

Thanks, Beth. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

3:00:21•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:00:27 – 3:00:40•Speaker 62

Hello, Commissioners. Michael Daly at GARCIA. And once again, I thank you all to consider preserving these records for state and federal violations. Thank you all.

3:00:41•Speaker 51

How about now, Sam?

3:00:44•Speaker 51

We're going to close public comment. And Raelynn, if anybody has questions for you, they can email you. You don't have to go through it here. Thank you, though. If there's nothing else, we're going to close that item.

3:00:54•Speaker 54

CHRISTIE WOODARD- Thank you.

3:00:55 – 3:01:10•Speaker 51

TODD BANDUCCI- Eight, please. CHRISTIE WOODARD- Uh-uh. TODD BANDUCCI- Nope. CHRISTIE WOODARD- Nope. TODD BANDUCCI- Sorry. Hold, please. OK, we're taking lunch. CHRISTIE WOODARD- Easy one? TODD BANDUCCI- Yeah, let's do some easy ones. Which one would those be, Bruce?

3:01:11•Speaker 43

CHRISTIE WOODARD- Please tell me an easy one. TODD BANDUCCI- Let's do 15.

3:01:18•Speaker 51

Let's do consent.

3:01:24 – 3:01:46•Speaker 50

Item 15, consent agenda items. These are items that staff recommends for approval. The board reserves the right to move any consent agenda item to the regular segment of the agenda should issues arise that need to be addressed. Discussion of any item from the consent agenda items that needs review before a decision is made. This is item 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.6,

3:01:57•Speaker 51

Thank you on that. Uh, let's open public comment on any of these items, please.

3:02:13•Speaker 51

Go ahead, please.

3:02:14 – 3:04:38•Speaker 73

Thank you. Marianne Hollis, H O L L I S. You caught me off guard. You didn't get me, give me enough time to pull all my backup comments. However, Let me talk about 15.2 and 15.4. Should I do one at, obviously one at a time? Okay, 15.2. I'm looking at the number of cannabis licenses, 22. The last time that I knew that there was a number to be acceptable was 14. And then someone came forward, I think it was Green Life Productions that wanted up to four of them. So I thought, what else do we have 22 of here in this town? Gas stations, fast food, whatever. And then I thought, I looked at some of the license types and its medical production, and I thought, what do we have for medical here besides this? Barely anything. 22 licenses, we have 24 beds in our hospital. That's all I'm comparing that on. So I don't know what the actual number is allowed now. Is it up to 22? And as far as the 15.4, I'm not gonna have enough time. The Lombardo's office go-ed set aside $75,000. to assist with an update to the environmental review for the Pahrump Fairgrounds, which will include tying in the two wells. Now, the last time that I was able to track down an environmental study was 2012, so I And that came in at a lot of money, like $700,000 in 2012. So I don't know the extent of this study. Is it just in that area? Or is it from where that first study ended and it will continue all the way over? And I just think that $75,000, of course, is needed, but we'll soon be hearing about the additional costs for this, I'm sure. Thank you.

3:04:38•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

3:04:42•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:04:49 – 3:07:32•Speaker 60

F4 Savage, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. This is regarding 15.4. First of all, I would like Nye County to ensure that any kind of documentation or anything that's written up about the fairgrounds indicates Pahrump Fairgrounds because this land does not belong to Nye County. It belongs to the town of Pahrump. And I just want to make sure that it's perfectly clear because there's documentation saying that Nye County is requesting funds for the fairgrounds. I wouldn't know why Nye County would do that. It would be Pahrump. Why are the Nye County staff authorized to expense project-related wages to Pahrump Fairgrounds room tax? What explicit project-related wages go to 25414? How much will be billed and where does these billings show up on the town of Pahrump's financial statement? Nye County was issued $75,000 for the purpose of procuring engineering services to connect the two wells at the Pahrump Fairgrounds. I just heard something weird is that there was going to be one well at one end and one well at the other. include a long-ass pipe out there to connect the two of them. And I just don't understand that. And hire environmental consultants to update the existing environmental assessment to be used for all future projects at the fairgrounds. Is $75,000 going to be enough for that? Those environmental studies are really expensive. engineers, you know. I worked with a bunch of engineers and they say that their stuff don't stink and that's why they charge so much. But anyway. Has there been a hearing from the town for Nye County to provide funds at the fairground? Is it even authorized in any of the documentation? The town of Pahrump should be requesting funds for its own project at the fairground belonging to the town and not the county. So it's just kind of weird that, you know, some of the money from Nye County is flowing over to the fairgrounds, and it doesn't make sense why that's happening. I mean, all the funds should be requested from the town of Pahrump. All core spending should go back to the town of Pahrump. And then I'd like to know who's handling that other than your commissioners. I mean, is there some manager that we don't know about that's in the background that's handling that? Is Brett doing that? That could be because he's our town manager. So anyway, those are just some of my questions, and hopefully I can get an answer somehow.

3:07:37•Speaker 51

Thank you, Beth. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

3:07:40•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:07:47 – 3:08:06•Speaker 70

Hi, my name is Ron Richardson, R-I-C-H-A-R-D-S-O-N. I don't have an agenda, so I don't know the agenda item, but I'm calling in with respect to... ETSU-26-1. It's an appeal to I'm sorry, sir.

3:08:06 – 3:08:17•Speaker 51

It's not this one. I'm trying to figure out which one it is for you. Is it 8? It's the next item, sir. Anybody else, Sam?

3:08:19•Speaker 27

No, Chair. But we did get a request from the treasurer to hear her item while we have her before people start calling in about their tax bills.

3:08:27•Speaker 51

OK. I thought we just did that.

3:08:30•Speaker 27

CHRISTIE WOODARD- Item 20.

3:08:32•Speaker 51

TODD BANDUCCI- OK. Well, first of all, closing public comment.

3:08:35 – 3:09:19•Speaker 54

CHRISTIE WOODARD- May I comment to something? TODD BANDUCCI- Yes. CHRISTIE WOODARD- So as far as 15.2 and your concerns, there are nine businesses with several licenses. So that may help this question of why we have so many licenses. they are doing business with nine businesses and maybe they have cultivation and they have production. So just to clarify that, as far as the CBDG and the question from Beth, Nye County's been putting in for CBDG this whole entire time. GoEd is always given the money directly from the governor to Nye County through our different townships. So I don't understand that question from Beth either. So thank you very much, Chair.

3:09:19•Speaker 51

Thank you. I'm ready for a motion.

3:09:21•Speaker 54

Motion to approve.

3:09:23•Speaker 51

Second. Motion and a second. All those in favor?

3:09:27•Speaker 51

Aye. Aye. Oscoch, aye. That carries 5-0. Thank you. 20, please. And then we're doing 8.

3:09:37•Speaker 50

Item 20, and we're going to lunch. Sure we are. I had to make the solar item? Yeah, that's what I wanted to say.

3:09:45 – 3:10:03•Speaker 50

Perfect. Item 20 for possible action, discussion and deliberation to adopt, amend, and adopt or reject my county resolution number 2027-16, a resolution directing the levy of the tax rate required for fiscal year 2026 and 2027. Thank you for that.

3:10:08 – 3:10:27•Speaker 27

Chair, I do need to state on the record and request the commission if they make a motion to adopt this. The resolution number is actually 2026-12. Oh, 12. On the next page.

3:10:27•Speaker 54

Yeah, just the agenda item. No big deal.

3:10:30•Speaker 27

Yeah, so the backup is correct. It's just an administrative error. It's 2026-12. and we do have the treasurer on the line.

3:10:40•Speaker 51

Thank you, Sam. Go ahead, Raelynn.

3:10:45 – 3:11:59•Speaker 75

Raelynn Powers, POWERS Treasurer for Nye County. Thank you, commissioners, for squeezing me in. The item before you today is the current tax rates for all of the districts throughout Nye County. The overall tax rate has not changed. We're at the direction of our comptroller and the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. We have removed the prompt museum tax rate of 0.0039, and that has been moved into the Nye County General Fund, which is our taxing entity as COGEN. There is a tax rate comparison report included in the backup that provides a very clear and concise identification with the current rate is, what the year before us was at, and where that rate has been moved from. This is also based off of our budget, the approval of Department of Detaxation, as well as the red book that Detax publishes. There's no questions. We simply ask that the Board of County Commissioners approve and certify these tax rates, and we're good to go.

3:12:00•Speaker 51

Thank you, Ray Lynn. Let's see if we have any public comment. Let's open up public.

3:12:07•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:12:10 – 3:12:29•Speaker 60

Of course, it had to be me, Beth Borasevich, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. I just want clear and concise language. There is no tax hike, right? That's all I want to know, if I'm right or wrong. That's all I want. Thanks.

3:12:30•Speaker 51

Thanks, Beth. Sam, do you have anybody else for us?

3:12:31•Speaker 43

There's a comparison between last year and this year, and they're both exactly the same if you look at the backup.

3:12:39•Speaker 54

There's no further comment on the phone.

3:12:40•Speaker 51

Closing public comment. Commissioners.

3:12:42•Speaker 54

Thank you for that comment, Koenig. I'd like to make a motion to adopt Nye County Resolution 2027-12. No. 2026-12. 2026-12. Second.

3:12:55•Speaker 51

Motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye.

3:12:57 – 3:13:43•Speaker 51

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. I didn't stutter. Ready? 23, please. Thank you, sir.

3:13:49•Speaker 51

Me too. I'm ready to get the heck out of here.

3:13:53 – 3:14:24•Speaker 50

For possible action, presented by Mike Jackson with Southern Nevada Transit Coalition regarding public transportation updates and discussion and deliberation to approve to fund an estimated $140,000 for fiscal year 2027 for a local match required needed to contribute public... continue public transportation services in public under the Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 Rural Public Transportation Program.

3:14:25•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Good afternoon, sir. They promised me you only needed three minutes.

3:14:29 – 3:16:17•Speaker 48

Yeah, well, I'll cut to the chase. I love that. That's for sure. My name is Michael Jackson, and I know how to moonwalk. I'm the Executive Director of Southern Nevada Transit Coalition. Brand name, Silver Rider. We operate all the rural transit in Southern Nevada. We've been running service in Laughlin, Mesquite, Boulder City since 2002. We've won the Rural Transit of the Year for the nation in 2013. So we do what we do, and we do it well. We were asked by NDOT to come to Pahrump to help with the situation to continue transit operating, in which we did. NDOT was good enough to work it out with FTA to fund it 100% while we tried to work through this transition. 100% funding is running out. We need match. And to understand a little bit how it works, if you're not familiar with public transit, is the federal funds require a match. At our other sites, Laughlin, Mesquite, and Boulder City, we operate off of separate grants, and we get a commitment from the RTC of Southern Nevada for the matching funds for those federal funds. So I'm here today to ask for Nye County to support this in matching federal funds to continue to operate public transit in Pahrump. Without that, we will have to shut transit down July 31st. So I need action now. I need a commitment. Otherwise, we will either have to pause public transit or close it down completely.

3:16:18•Speaker 51

What were the other jurisdictions you do this?

3:16:22•Speaker 48

Where we operate? Yeah. Laughlin, Boulder City, and Mesquite, and basically all the areas in between.

3:16:28•Speaker 51

Gotcha. How do their meetings go compared to these?

3:16:32•Speaker 48

Mesquite's pretty lively.

3:16:34•Speaker 54

Nice. Do they give you a match?

3:16:38•Speaker 48

The City of Mesquite does not, the RTC does. The RTC is the MPO of that area, and all of our match is provided by the RTC of Southern Nevada.

3:16:49•Speaker 43

How did this work here before?

3:16:52 – 3:17:05•Speaker 48

How did it work here before? I believe that the transit person before received different funds from different areas, but I'm not exactly sure. I was not privy to the financials of the president.

3:17:05 – 3:17:48•Speaker 43

I am the president and chairman of the board of Front Valley Public Transportation. It still is a company that we don't operate because NDOT shut us down because we didn't have enough money in the bank. We didn't have money in the bank because NDOT didn't pay us. So a lot of this is a bunch of lies and things. But wait, wait. They funded us 100%. So I don't know why they can't fund you 100% when they called you to go take over from what we were doing. And now we don't have it. And you don't do veterans, which we were doing, which takes veterans anywhere they want to go for free. So we're going to start that up again in September. It'd be up to the board on this, and we don't have that kind of money.

3:17:48 – 3:18:11•Speaker 48

Well, when it comes to Pahrump Valley, I don't know their circumstances. I wasn't privy to that, and that wasn't my business. But I do know from the beginning of Pahrump Valley Transit and their formation, I assisted them in every way I could. I donated vehicles to them. I provided all of my programs, procedures, and policies to help them be compliant. So I was a good neighbor.

3:18:11•Speaker 43

I'm not picking on you. I'm just telling you what NDOT did, because what they say happened didn't happen. All right.

3:18:20•Speaker 48

Any other questions?

3:18:22•Speaker 42

Yes. Go ahead, sir. Thank you, Mike Jackson, for... Michael. Michael? Whoo!

3:18:30•Speaker 48

Yeah. One glove.

3:18:33 – 3:19:04•Speaker 42

Thank you for stepping up. at the sensitive time that NDOT asked you to. And so I'm not speaking for Commissioner Koenig when he says that this is all lies. You stepped up, your organization stepped up, and have been facilitating the transportation for all of the folks in Pahrump for whatever appointments that they need, but only in Pahrump. Is that right?

3:19:04 – 3:20:02•Speaker 48

You know, quite honestly, when I agreed to come out and help, my thought pattern at that time was to come help, get the transition taken care of, and then hand it off to find somebody else to take it over. Once we came out here and seen what great employees there was there and truly the need of public transit in the Pahrump area, it made us want to stay. And so we're in it to stay. We're in it to continue. We've been at our other sites for many years, 23 years. We're here to stay. And it's funny, Pahrump was part of our mission statement when SNTC was formed. We actually had a board member, Pablo, that was out of Pahrump. The lawyer Pablo, he was our board member. So we're kind of going back to where we had originally started, and Pahrump was part of our vision. So we're here.

3:20:03 – 3:20:14•Speaker 42

Okay, so... So you're saying that any funding that was left over, because you've taken over all of the assets here in Pahrump.

3:20:15•Speaker 42

Most of the building, the vehicles.

3:20:18•Speaker 48

Anything that had FTA interest in it.

3:20:22 – 3:20:55•Speaker 42

Yes. So you answered one of the questions, is you're only good until July 31st. And then what happens you shut the operation down if we're not because if you've done research on Knight County, we're in a deficit We're trying to get out of the deficit trying to figure things out So what are our options? To continue to have you and your operation to continue to provide transportation For whether it's the seniors whether it's good getting Medicine, whatever the case may be what we're looking at is

3:20:57 – 3:21:24•Speaker 48

for our next budget, which starts in October. FTA, I believe, will release more funding to put us through until we start into the next grant, which we need to apply for and we need to have a commitment for that grant that starts in October. Without any knowledge or any commitment, FTA will not release any more funding.

3:21:25 – 3:21:54•Speaker 42

So with this request, the estimated to me is up to $140,000, up to. And so would that carry, I don't know where we're going to find that money. We need time to find that money. I can ask the question, I'll ask the question. Do we have $140,000 comptroller for this great entity that's doing a great thing, service for our folks here in Pahrump?

3:21:55 – 3:22:32•Speaker 72

So on the county side, no. We are still in a budget situation that we're trying to work our way out of. But we do not have a budget for transportation, but we do have a fund balance that we can draw upon and do a budget augment in the town of Pahrump if it's just to get us through. this short time period to give us time to figure out what we can do on, is it just the town is the question, or is it going to be county-wide?

3:22:33 – 3:22:53•Speaker 48

Well, currently the demand response is within Pahrump, and we do a service to . There is also the service that was canceled before we had taken over that goes to Vegas that does need to come back because there's medical services that the residents of Pahrump need there too.

3:22:53•Speaker 42

How many times a week are you going to Beatty?

3:22:56•Speaker 48

It needs to be evaluated.

3:22:58•Speaker 42

How many times a week are you going to Beatty? Because you said you have a service for Beatty.

3:23:04•Speaker 48

Oh, Beatty is just once.

3:23:05•Speaker 42

One day a week? Yes. Okay. And four days, five days a week for Pahrump?

3:23:11•Speaker 42

Six days a week for Perum? You're not on record, ma'am. Sorry. Thank you. I can hear you, but you're not on record.

3:23:20 – 3:23:32•Speaker 48

Six in Perum, one for Beatty. Okay. And Vegas needs to be evaluated. Okay. We basically came in with no changes other than we stopped the two-week in advance reservations and changed it to 24.

3:23:32 – 3:24:01•Speaker 42

Okay. So let me ask you a question, sir. We obviously don't have the money now. If the operation shuts down on July 31st and then we are somehow able to find funding for this, funding source for this transportation for the people of Pahrump and once a week to Beatty, would you be able to resume immediately? Yes.

3:24:05•Speaker 48

The longer it goes, the longer it may be for us to lose the great employees that we have here. That is a big concern.

3:24:13•Speaker 42

Comptroller wants to jump in through the chair.

3:24:17•Speaker 72

I have a question for you. You said that it expires at the end of July. The end of July? Is that correct?

3:24:25•Speaker 48

July 31st, we're out of money.

3:24:27 – 3:24:38•Speaker 72

Okay. So the federal funding that you're talking about, is this the – can you give us a little more information about the federal funding?

3:24:38 – 3:25:15•Speaker 48

The federal funding that we're operating off of right now, I believe, is still left over COVID money, which was 100%. I'm not exactly sure. That's not my deal. When we were asked to take over and stated that they had – 100% funding to carry us through. When we first started rolling into it and coming up with an agreement, the agreement was about $250,000, and not all the money got approved, and it ended up being only $106,000, because the $250,000 wouldn't last until November. And that's why this urgency has come up. It was only $106,000 that FTA approved.

3:25:18•Speaker 72

So we don't, do we know that the FTA would definitely approve it come October?

3:25:22•Speaker 48

I have emails that say.

3:25:25•Speaker 72

And what kind of funding from the FTA is this?

3:25:29 – 3:25:49•Speaker 48

Just over 100% funding. Does that make sense? From now until, basically what I've been told is the FTA does not want to release any more 100% funding unless there is a commitment. And it's not a commitment for now, it's a commitment for 2027.

3:25:51•Speaker 72

A commitment from the transportation company or backing from?

3:25:56•Speaker 44

From Knight County for matching funds.

3:25:59 – 3:26:11•Speaker 48

Just like when we apply for a grant on our other sites, our grant includes a letter of commitment from the RTC for that grant to get approved. Does that make sense?

3:26:11 – 3:26:22•Speaker 42

Mr. Jackson, excuse me, Comptroller, Chair. Could you tell me approximately how much your monthly operating costs are?

3:26:23 – 3:27:04•Speaker 48

It is costing anywhere, because we had a three-week payroll, so that was three payroll a month, but it's ranging between 40 and 60,000 a month. That's no expansion, running what they had. No Vegas, no nothing. I see such potential here too, such potential. And one of the things important to know, because I know the way things may have gone in the past, we don't ask for that 140,000 a check at the beginning. We draw off that every month. We get reimbursed for our expenses.

3:27:04•Speaker 42

Approximately, it's like four months of operating costs, approximately. Yeah.

3:27:12 – 3:27:40•Speaker 48

so every month we bill endot and then we bill knight county for the match chair or the cost of that yeah uh mr jackson you mentioned laughlin and mesquite you said mesquite doesn't have to come up with any money the city of mesquite doesn't because it's in clark county and rtc is responsible for the how much money does laughlin come up with laughlin None of the other, RTC is our match provider for all three sites.

3:27:41•Speaker 54

What's the third site?

3:27:43•Speaker 48

Boulder City and Laughlin.

3:27:45•Speaker 54

Didn't get that.

3:27:46•Speaker 48

And they're all in Clark County. Clark. Therefore, RTC of Southern Nevada is responsible.

3:27:50•Speaker 54

And we don't have such a thing with our RTC here for Nye County, Commissioner, sitting on that board? No. Thank you, Chair.

3:27:58•Speaker 48

That's something that you guys do need to think about with the next census when Pahrump goes over 50,000 in MPO.

3:28:08•Speaker 54

We're already there. Think about what?

3:28:12•Speaker 48

You'll become an MPO.

3:28:13•Speaker 54

What's an MPO? Long discussion?

3:28:17•Speaker 48

Long discussion.

3:28:17•Speaker 54

What does it stand for?

3:28:19•Speaker 48

Metropolitan Planning Organization. receive federal funds.

3:28:23•Speaker 54

I'd like to see the RTC have an item in regards to that so you guys can inform us.

3:28:27•Speaker 48

Yeah, you need to dig into that.

3:28:32•Speaker 54

Chair? Thank you, sir. Chair of our, excuse me. Mr. DeBoer is the chair of RTC.

3:28:36•Speaker 42

This is the first I've heard of the MPO. Thank you, sir.

3:28:40•Speaker 48

I'll designate the area with a UZA, and then you have to form an MPO, and then you're able to receive federal funds.

3:28:50•Speaker 54

Now we're talking.

3:28:52•Speaker 48

straight to you.

3:28:53•Speaker 42

But that's not until the next census, which is another four or five years from now.

3:28:59•Speaker 48

It'll be here before you know it.

3:29:01•Speaker 42

Well, we're trying to figure out this solution for transportation for our people in Pahrump right now.

3:29:10•Speaker 48

So I need action. I need to know something quickly. Otherwise, 31st, it won't happen.

3:29:20 – 3:30:29•Speaker 42

Yep. Basically, right, basically. So sir, I've said this before and I'm not speaking for the rest of the board. Because I believe in this, I know what you're doing, I know what you've done, I know what you're going to do, and it is for the people and the transportation, but I can't give you what we don't have. And according to the comptroller right now, we don't have it. We'll look for it. And if it's in time, the 31st is next week. But the good thing is is that if we're able to find it, a funding source, we'll be able to resume. And then the risk, yes, and apologies in advance for your staff that... that need to survive, they need that paycheck. Again, we can't give you what we don't have, and I'm not speaking for the rest of the board, just for myself at this time. Thank you, sir. Thank you.

3:30:30•Speaker 51

Let's open public comment. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

3:30:35•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:30:41 – 3:30:53•Speaker 70

Hello, my name is Ron Richardson, R-O-N-R-I-T-H-A-R-D-S-O-N. I was speaking in respect to, I guess, it's agenda item number eight, ETSU 26 . CHRIS RODGERS.

3:30:54 – 3:31:11•Speaker 51

Well, sir, we're on 23 right now. Can you guys keep it down, please? Or we can take another break and stay here all night. Jesus. Anybody else, Sam?

3:31:12•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:31:15 – 3:32:00•Speaker 69

Hi. This is Tim Bohannon, B-O-H-A-N-N-O-N. Part of transportation in this kind of setting is important for those who need to be able to get medical care. So from a public safety standpoint, That is a factor that has to be considered. Now let's get down to the real fun. From a finance standpoint, we're in tough water. But if I heard correctly, that there may be some room in the current budget to be able to do something short term, get us through the immediate concern, reevaluate,

3:32:01•Speaker 70

and then go forward from there.

3:32:04 – 3:32:43•Speaker 69

The other aspect during the MPO, I'm not sure how quickly that MPO would be able to turn around and be able to do something from a federal funding. I'm sure it takes time. And that will have to be evaluated. And the timeframe from 7-31 to whatever that date is, would have to be calculated at the background. I don't think it's part of today's docket. So in the interest of public safety, think about it. In the interest of finance, you got to do what you can do.

3:32:45•Speaker 51

Thanks, Tim. Sam, anybody else, please?

3:32:49•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:32:56 – 3:33:16•Speaker 69

Commissioners Herman Lewis, L-E-W-I-S, excellent decision. You can't spend what you don't have. While the gentleman seems very nice, he's very short on specifics. I'd recommend that he present paperwork on the other matching grants so you have stuff that you can look at that's in writing. Excellent job. Denied. CHRIS RODGERS.

3:33:19•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Come on up, Susie.

3:33:24 – 3:33:55•Speaker 32

Susie Hertz, HERTZ. I'm not sure about this money that's in the town of Pahrump, but if I heard correctly, we're talking about from August 1st to October. August, September? Two months, maybe three. That's not a long time for a temporary use of town funds for town transportation. Just a thought. Thank you.

3:33:56•Speaker 32

Come on up, sir.

3:34:02 – 3:34:50•Speaker 17

Anthony Greco, GRECO. It's a real good idea to have public transportation here, but for a short-term thing, it's not any good. You get people used to using something, and then the rug gets pulled out from under them. You've got to make sure that there's enough money for a few years where this could do something for us. know anything to make the town better is good but when you start something you can't finish is good and just please please be careful with our money 50 years in business I heard the checks in the mail for a very long time thank you Sam yes sure the caller is unmuted please speak and spell your name for the record Amy Nelson if I'm not mistaken

3:34:51 – 3:35:32•Speaker 56

I might be confused, but don't we have that trans transportation that works out of the senior center that's available to everybody? If you call them up and make a reservation, they can take you just about anywhere and they charge gas money just about 20 bucks to go to Vegas one way. So I'm not quite sure. where this company comes in, but if we don't have the money, we don't have the money. We can't afford to help them and not help what we have. Thank you.

3:35:32•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam? Oh, come on up, Linda.

3:35:41 – 3:36:17•Speaker 71

Sorry. Linda Clark, CLARK. Seems like since I've been here, we've had money for transportation for our seniors and our people that need it. Why all of a sudden don't we? Did we cut it out of our original budget? Or did somebody else spend it for something else? Which is more likely what happened. I find it very interesting that you guys always have the money for what you want. But where is the money for what we need and we want? Thank you.

3:36:18•Speaker 51

Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

3:36:20•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:36:27 – 3:36:39•Speaker 55

Yeah, hello, Commissioners. Bruce Johnson, JIP, HNSON. I'm trying to wrap my head around this $40,000 to $60,000 a month. Can anybody help me out there? Thank you.

3:36:42•Speaker 51

How about now, Sam? Got anybody?

3:36:43•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:36:47 – 3:39:00•Speaker 60

S-4 Savage, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. I want to let you know that I have been using this service to get around town since I don't have a vehicle prepared or yet. The people are extremely, extremely nice, and they care for all of the people that they pick up. We have sometimes five, six people, and they know their stories, unless it's somebody new, and then they get to know you. And it's an excellent service, and I do not want to see it go away. I had previously spoken with somebody in government there, and they had mentioned that we probably have the money in the CDBG grant, some of that money that we've been taking and throwing at these RVs. Maybe we can take that money and provide rides for the people that need to get around town. You do have to call in advance. They tell you two days, and then you have to pay $4 each way. I tried to find out what the $4 was since they were already funded, and nobody says anything except that they have to pay it back to the federal government, which is a little strange, and I'd like to know what that is. But this is a very good program. It's something that has helped me. And that's not why I say it's a great program. It's a great program because one of the ladies took somebody shopping and they stopped the bus and he helped him put his groceries in, got him home. He had his little cart and helped him get his groceries in because he didn't have a car. And that is a benefit to this town. and everybody that uses this service says how great it is. So I would like to see us continue. I would like to know if there's any money in the CDBG grant or any other grant that's just floating around out there to fund these guys with our matching fee of $140,000, I think it is. So that's what I gotta say, and I sure hope the commissioners

3:39:02 – 3:39:39•Speaker 8

actually sit there and talk about the cdbg do we have the money xena let him know and so i got to say thanks thank you i'm going to remind everybody we have a hundred plus donkeys again come on up frank frank carboni c-a-r-b-o-n-e i guess the question i have is from what i understand from the conversation 140 000 is not for just that short period of time i believe that's one year's worth of funding So just want to make sure that's clear. And if anybody wants to get up and clarify my statement, I just want to make sure.

3:39:41•Speaker 51

Thanks, Frank. Sir, do you want to clarify on that or no?

3:39:44•Speaker 54

Like you said, it was a match.

3:39:48•Speaker 51

Just for the public.

3:39:51•Speaker 48

140 is for a year's time. Our share of a year. You said it's drawn upon throughout that year. Thank you, sir.

3:39:59•Speaker 51

All right, Sam, we got anybody else, please?

3:40:01•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:40:07 – 3:40:35•Speaker 62

Hello, commissioners. Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A. Can you all hear me? Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate the enthusiasm. But once again, I go back to the right to practice and the right to travel. And this is another example of y'all's failures. And I hope you don't take it personal. Your silence is really beyond any argument. Thank you.

3:40:37•Speaker 51

Okay. Sam, do you have anybody else, please?

3:40:40•Speaker 51

Come on up. Tony. Couldn't remember.

3:40:47 – 3:42:38•Speaker 34

Tony Hoverman, H-O-V-E-R-M-A-N. So we don't have the money to help out the citizens in this town. A lot of us pay property taxes, and I'm glad I don't rely on this transportation you guys say you don't have money for. Well, since you don't have money for this agency that's been helping us out, Why don't we take all of your official cars that Pahrump and Knight County is providing to you when you need to go and conduct official business? And we can hire some drivers and they can drive your company vehicles. And these poor people that need help with the groceries, they can still get the groceries and be taken to doctor's appointments and dentist appointments and whatever appointments They need. I mean, you guys all have really nice personal vehicles. I know Deborah does. She's got a beautiful Jeep. She displays outside so everybody can see it. Why don't we just take some of the city and county cars and take these poor people to the grocery store and the dentist's office and the doctor's office? We already have the vehicles. You guys would have to maybe use your own to conduct business, but there's a whole yard out there full of vehicles that are behind a chain-link fence out there in the yard. So there is a way around this. It might be a little bit of a convenience to all of you, but I don't think this should be taken away from the people, people that pay taxes and people who vote you people up here. Thank you.

3:42:39•Speaker 51

Thank you. Yeah, we could raise your taxes, but they don't work. Mm-hmm. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

3:42:48•Speaker 51

We're going to close public comment.

3:42:50 – 3:43:10•Speaker 54

One second here. I just can't let that go. Let me just state that there's a brand new county Jeep. I have a brand new county Jeep, by the way. I don't even have a county vehicle. Don't use a county vehicle. And by the way, they just stated they have all the vehicles they need. They have the building that they need. It has nothing to do with vehicles. It has cost of operations. Thank you, Chair.

3:43:10•Speaker 51

But I just want to make sure we don't forget psychiatrist appointments. Right. Because there's all kinds of different appointments.

3:43:17 – 3:43:48•Speaker 43

I have a comment. I have a comment. Wait a minute. It's my turn. You're right. Mrs. Clark had a question. The previous transportation service that we had here was not paid for by the county. It was paid for by NDOT. who cut us off, that's why we went away and now NDOT is paying them and now NDOT appears to be trying to slip out from them and they want the money from us. So we didn't have the money before and we don't have the money now.

3:43:50•Speaker 54

Can we consider commissioners LATCF? Can we consider LATCF comptroller?

3:44:00 – 3:44:11•Speaker 72

Yes, you can. And I want to remind the commissioners that the service is for the town of Pahrumpit residents and Beatty.

3:44:13 – 3:44:28•Speaker 42

And Amargosa was part of the original. That's right. And I don't think they had that much activity, but Beatty certainly could go to two days a week if there's a demand for it. Beatty was easy.

3:44:30•Speaker 43

And they loved it. But Amargosa is just... Wasn't ready for it. Well, you can't go house to house in Amargosa. That's true.

3:44:37•Speaker 54

It's a long way.

3:44:41•Speaker 54

I know the comptroller's kind of driving us towards the town of Perumbo.

3:44:44•Speaker 43

How much is it? What do we have left in LATCF?

3:44:48•Speaker 54

Well, we don't know because we're negotiating. Available.

3:44:50•Speaker 43

Available. Not left. Available. Available.

3:44:53 – 3:45:09•Speaker 72

I have to check on that. I would suggest LATCF for Beatty and Amargosa and do a budget augment for the town of Pahrump and have the town of Pahrump pay out of their general fund.

3:45:09•Speaker 43

I still move what she just said. It's not separate money, it's 140 for all. So, no matter how you break it up.

3:45:17•Speaker 54

If you can break it up.

3:45:18•Speaker 42

Yeah, here's the risk.

3:45:20 – 3:46:13•Speaker 42

Mike Jackson mentioned that October, what I heard was a little bit of reluctance, sir. It's not guaranteed. And so if we're to find this money through latch funding, we would be able to at least carry for six months. A year. Well, there's no match if he doesn't receive the funding. Right, so that brings us back to the six months risk. But with a letter from Mike Jackson's organization, letter of intent, and a letter of intent from us to them, that would certainly help secure your funding. Did you close public? I believe you did, Chair.

3:46:19•Speaker 72

So the balance available in LATCF, $1.172 million.

3:46:28•Speaker 54

Before we get done with negotiations for... We're still negotiating buyouts. Buyouts. And we don't... We're done?

3:46:37•Speaker 50

Those are done at this point.

3:46:39•Speaker 54

Okay, good. So it sounds like that's our solution. I'm making a motion to fund this out of LATC.

3:46:46•Speaker 51

I'll second. Four seconds. Motion and a second. All those in favor?

3:46:50•Speaker 51

Aye. Boscovich, aye. I don't know if Bain did. Aye. 5-0. Thank you on that. 19, please.

3:46:59•Speaker 42

Thank you again, folks.

3:47:05 – 3:47:46•Speaker 50

Item 19, for possible action, discussion and deliberation to A, determine Nye County Sheriff's Office K9 Charlie, a patrol and narcotics detection dog, is no longer required for public use. B, surplus K9 Charlie due to medical issues. C, determine it is in the best interest of Nye County to transfer ownership and medical responsibility of K9 Charlie to Deputy Richard Brumker pursuant to NRS 332.185, and D, delegate one-time authority to Sheriff Joe McGill to execute the agreement between the Nye County Sheriff's Office and Deputy Richard Brumker for the transfer of ownership of K9 Charlie.

3:47:47•Speaker 51

Thank you for that.

3:47:47•Speaker 50

Sheriff, do you have anything?

3:47:49•Speaker 51

What was the dog's name again? Charlie. Briefly before I open comments.

3:47:57 – 3:48:29•Speaker 52

I'll be quick. So Charlie's getting old, aren't we all? And he's having some poor health. He's got some joint issues. It's time for him to retire. He has served this county proudly for the last, I believe, seven years. And so he has been living with Deputy Rumker since he came to our department. So obviously Deputy Rumpker would like to keep him and cuddle him and treat him like a dog instead of treating him like an employee. So that's our hope. Cool.

3:48:30•Speaker 51

All right, let's open public real quick. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

3:48:35•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:48:42 – 3:49:26•Speaker 56

Yes, Amy Nelson, N-E-L-S-O-N. My nephew was a canine handler here in Rump and A good friend of mine also was a canine handler in Pahrump, and they get very attached to one another. And so I think the only person that should have this great animal, this great hero, is the deputy. I don't want to mispronounce his name. Let me look at the item again. Sorry. Deputy Richard Rumpker. So I'm in favor of the deputy having this animal as his own.

3:49:28•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

3:49:32•Speaker 51

All right, we're closing that out. Commissioners, let's do it.

3:49:35•Speaker 54

Motion to approve all A, B, C, D as written.

3:49:39•Speaker 51

Mr. Board, seconds. Motion, two seconds. All those in favor? Aye. Boscovich, aye. That carries 5-0. Thank you. Nine, please.

3:49:53 – 3:50:44•Speaker 50

Item 9, 10 AM timed item for possible action, public hearing, discussion and deliberation on AP-26-7, an appeal of the Pahrump Regional Planning Commission's decision to deny ETSU-26-1, a 12 month extension of time for ZCMP-25-1, a conforming zone change to change 3.77 acres from village residential VR-10 to neighborhood commercial To allow for a new public storage facility to be built at 4061 East Dandelion Street, assessor's parcel number 027-651-15, MM Holdings, LLC, Constantine, whatever that is, and Valentin Zafirov, property owners, Top Rank Builders, Inc., agent applicant.

3:50:45 – 3:50:56•Speaker 54

I'm going to need to recuse myself, as I am a public storage facility owner. I did the same thing on June 17, 2025, when it was item number seven. Thank you. I will leave the room.

3:50:58•Speaker 51

I don't even think you have to unless you want to.

3:51:00 – 3:51:26•Speaker 45

Okay. No, I meant leave the room. May I address very quickly? I just have a procedure question. So it's to affirm the decision, so if nobody votes, if nobody votes and everyone walks out like she did, what exactly happens here? I guess I'm just confused. Shouldn't it be the other way around to overturn the decision? I'm just confused why we'd write it that way. Is it typical? Does anybody know? Did anybody write this?

3:51:27•Speaker 82

I believe Ms. Sandoval's coming down to address.

3:51:29•Speaker 45

Okay, thank you, I'm sorry.

3:51:35•Speaker 53

Celeste Sandoval, S-A-N-D-O-V-A-L, Assistant Planning Director. So our recommendation is to affirm the denial of the RPC's decision.

3:51:44 – 3:51:59•Speaker 45

So it's denied, and so if we do nothing, then what happens? Like let's say we don't vote, what happens? This passes? I'm just confused with the wording. It just is odd. I'm not trying to start something. I just don't understand. It's just odd to me.

3:52:00 – 3:52:11•Speaker 33

No, the way the code is set up is that the Planning Commission decision can be appealed. If this board does not overturn the appeal, then the decision of the Planning Commission would stand.

3:52:13 – 3:52:24•Speaker 45

So it's not to, oh, you're recommending to affirm the decision, not to, okay, so the motion will be whatever the motion is. You understand what I'm saying? It's weird for an appellate board to be doing it that way. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate it.

3:52:29•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Go ahead.

3:52:33 – 3:53:45•Speaker 82

Thank you, Chair. The Primp Regional Planning Commission at its June 10th, 2026 meeting heard an application for an extension of time, ETSU 26-1, requesting additional time to satisfy the conditions of approval associated with ZCMP 25-1. The original zone change was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on June 17th of 2025. subject to conditions including the requirement that the applicant submit and receive approval of a category one site development plan within 12 months of approval by June 17th of 2026. The applicant requested an extension due to unforeseen circumstances affecting the original project timeline, including changes in property ownership, changes to the design team, and needed additional time to complete the review and approval process. The Prump Regional Planning Commission, after considering all testimony facts and evidence submitted pertaining to this matter, voted 4 to 1 to deny the application. The applicant has appealed the decision to this board. We recommend to affirm the decision of the RPC and deny AP 26-1. In your backup, you'll also see the draft minutes to that meeting as well.

3:53:46•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Let's open public comment and see where we are on that. Sam, do you have anybody on the phone for us, please?

3:53:55•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:54:01 – 3:54:53•Speaker 60

F. Borisovich, B-O-R-Y-S-E-W-I-C-H. I spoke about this a while ago. If you have an agreement with an individual, then they sell it. their property and then they sell the designer of the property and everything else, how can you say, oh, okay, let's use the old information because we have new people. You can't do that in my opinion. I suggest you guys reaffirm RPC's decision to deny this. These people are coming out of the blue. And they may have a whole different idea of what's going to go in there or what's going to be built. So they need to start over from the very beginning, in my opinion. Thank you.

3:54:54•Speaker 51

Thank you, Beth. Come on down up front, please. Oh, you'll be fine. Trust me.

3:55:05 – 3:56:04•Speaker 68

My name is Carmen, C-A-R-M-E-N-N-A-S-S-I-F-F. This is the third time I'm coming in front of you guys. This is right next to my property, about 50 yards. And what Beth had to say is the thing that concerns me. They're going to get this. They've never... disclosed what they want to store there. I see them getting this. And then what if they want to put metal waste there? What if they want to store the trucks for the metal waste on that property? It's four acres. They can do it. This is like things are being done on this property. I had a petition. with over 40, 50 homeowners who are against this, as it's up against their property. So I was so excited last month when you guys denied it for their extension. I'd like to see the denial again. Let them reapply and tell us what they're actually going to put in there. To me, waiting a year is they're waiting to see if Mediways is getting, possibly, or data center. They could slam in there. So please, uphold the planning department.

3:56:04•Speaker 51

Thank you very much. Sam, do you have anybody on the phone, please?

3:56:08•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:56:16 – 3:57:13•Speaker 70

Ron Richardson, R-O-N-R-I-C-H-A-R-D-S-O-N. My property is right to the back of this one. I was against this zoning change in the first place, and I'm in support of denying an extension. The current property owner, I guess it's changed hands since then, is not maintaining the property already without doing any development on it. Some vehicle drove through his perimeter wall at the intersection of Malibu and Dandelion. It's been a hole in the wall and an eyesore for over a year. Inside the property, it's covered in tumbleweeds creating a fire hazard. The way they're dealing with the current property does not give me much confidence if they're going to do any better with whatever it is they plan to do. So I would like to see that... the board uphold the denial request, or uphold the denial that's an issue for an extension.

3:57:14•Speaker 51

Thank you, sir. Come on up, Susie.

3:57:19 – 3:58:13•Speaker 32

Susie Hertz, HERTZ. I was at the RPC meeting where this took place. So as witness to that, the reason behind it and the reason behind any of us who were at that meeting were exactly what Beth said, which is why would you give a permit to somebody you don't know who hasn't submitted any plan, who's just bought the property, you have no idea what is to come. So those people needed to apply again as a new owner with their plans of what they expect to do with their property in a proper way, and they shouldn't be floating on the prior owners. So that is my opinion, and it was the opinion of the RPC as well. Just wanted you to know. Thank you. Please don't turn over the denial. Thank you.

3:58:14•Speaker 51

Thank you, Susie. Sam, do you have anybody else for us, please?

3:58:16•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:58:22 – 3:58:45•Speaker 66

Matthew Winterhawk, for the record, I'd just like to echo every person that just came up there and said they do not want that facility. Listen to the Nevadans who are going to do it directly with the consequences. It's pretty simple. You are there to execute on behalf of them. Do exactly as they say. They're the ones right next to the property. Deny it. Make them go through the hoops. Protect your people. Thank you.

3:58:47•Speaker 51

Sam, do you have anybody else for us, please?

3:58:50•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:58:53 – 3:59:06•Speaker 69

Sam Bohan, B-O-H-A-N-N-O-N. Yeah, in June, that was a very easy call. And I ask that you uphold the decision that we made in June. Thank you.

3:59:10•Speaker 51

Thanks, Tim. Sam, anybody else for us?

3:59:13•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:59:19 – 3:59:39•Speaker 56

Amy Nelson, NEL, SON. I was at this meeting and they didn't come with enough information. They were very vague and that's why I was denied. So I would hope that you support the Planning Commission and deny this. Thank you.

3:59:40•Speaker 51

Thank you, Sam. Anybody else?

3:59:42•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

3:59:48 – 4:00:15•Speaker 63

Yeah, my name is Matt Sadler, S-A-D-L-E-R. Yeah, I think the temperature in the room is pretty obvious. I think you should reaffirm the RPC's decision on this. This is kind of in my district, some of my neighbors, some people I know personally who do not want this. And just like most zoning changes on balance, I'm inclined to deny. This is a no-brainer. So please go ahead and reaffirm that decision. I'm sure you will. Thank you very much.

4:00:18•Speaker 51

Anybody else, Sam?

4:00:19•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:00:25 – 4:00:37•Speaker 55

Yes, Bruce Johnson, J-O-H-N-S-O-N. And under the circumstances of the way things are structured in this particular situation, I'm going to urge you to deny it. Thank you.

4:00:38•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody else, please?

4:00:41•Speaker 51

Closing public comment. Bruce, it's your board. Thank you. Thank you, Chair.

4:00:45 – 4:01:17•Speaker 42

Ms. Sandoval, please. It's my understanding, I've heard, I've heard, but it's my understanding that the applicant was not present at the RPC meeting. That is correct. Is that correct? Okay. So my next question is, and thank you for reaffirming that. My next question is, if this is denied, will this be a reflection on the applicant for them to start over, start the process over?

4:01:19 – 4:01:51•Speaker 42

Excuse me. Excuse me. Please, I'm having dialogue with the assistant planning director to get factual information on this situation before a motion is made and then the vote is taken. I have to go through the process. So please, I understand it's a different owner. Of course it's a different owner. So, Ms. Sandoval, please.

4:01:52•Speaker 53

So, if you do affirm our decision, they do have the option under code to appeal your decision to the courts?

4:02:00 – 4:02:32•Speaker 42

Yes, that's on this... They can reapply or... That's under this process. If we deny and reaffirm the Planning Commission's decision to deny... then they have the right to appeal through the Fifth Judicial Court. I understand that. But if they choose as the new owner to start all over again, go through the process from day one as the new owner, new applicant, will this reflect on that application?

4:02:35 – 4:02:53•Speaker 53

As far as reflect as... Will it be a negative on them? No, no. And we want to clarify, too, that one of the owners is the original owner. He now has two additional owners on the property. But this will not reflect negative at all.

4:02:53•Speaker 42

Okay. Thank you very much, Ms. Sato. Thank you, Chair.

4:02:56•Speaker 50

Thank you. Just one more clarification. There would be no waiting period?

4:03:01•Speaker 50

Technically, they could go home today, reapply?

4:03:06•Speaker 43

Okay. Mr. Chair. Commissioner Koenig. I'd like to make a motion to affirm the RPC's denial.

4:03:13•Speaker 42

Jabbour seconds.

4:03:14 – 4:03:33•Speaker 51

We have a motion on the floor and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Or is I? Moskovich, aye. That carries 4-0. Oh, I'm sorry. Four with one absent or recused. Abstention. That's it. Eleven, please.

4:03:38 – 4:03:53•Speaker 50

Item 11, for possible action, discussion, and deliberation regarding a debt management policy statement and capital improvement plan for the town of Beatty for fiscal year 2026-2027 pursuant to NRS 350.013. Thank you for that. Who's speaking on this? Hello, Zena.

4:04:02 – 4:04:18•Speaker 72

Good afternoon, Commissioners. So the town of Beatty has no debt and they have no capital for the next five years. We are required per NRS to file this information with D-tax.

4:04:19•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Let's open public comment. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone for 11, please?

4:04:27•Speaker 51

Let's close public comment. Commissioners?

4:04:39•Speaker 42

I want to hear you.

4:04:40 – 4:04:53•Speaker 43

I want to hear you support Beatty. I'd like to make thank you make a motion to approve The town of Beatty's fiscal policy statement a capital improvement plan for fiscal year 2026 2027

4:04:55•Speaker 42

and congratulate them on not having any debt. Two more seconds, thank you. Yes, I wish I was in this.

4:05:01•Speaker 51

We have a motion and a second. All those in favor?

4:05:03•Speaker 51

Where's I? Muscovich, aye. That's 5-0. Thank you. 10, please.

4:05:10 – 4:05:26•Speaker 50

Item 10, for possible action, discussion and deliberation regarding the debt management policy statement and capital improvement plan for the town of Pahrump for fiscal year 2026 and 2027. pursuant to NRS 350.013. Thank you for that.

4:05:37 – 4:05:53•Speaker 57

Hello, commissioners. Jennifer Fanning, F-A-N-N-I-N-G. Today we just have the debt management policy statement and the capital improvement plan. You guys have already seen and approved our capital improvement plan. Nothing has changed. And the town of Pahrump has no debt. You go.

4:05:53•Speaker 51

Love that for us. Let's open public comment. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

4:06:01•Speaker 51

Come on up, Marianne.

4:06:03•Speaker 54

Did you just whistle?

4:06:12•Speaker 54

I'm sorry, I laughed. I was like, what are you doing? You can't whistle at her. I think that was his phone. You've really gone off the rails today, I've got to tell you. Yes. You're off the rails. Yes.

4:06:21•Speaker 73

You made him blush.

4:06:26•Speaker 73

You threw me. Is there any chance that you can combine 10 and 21? No.

4:06:33•Speaker 51

DA, can we do that?

4:06:52 – 4:07:05•Speaker 51

I'm waiting for the I'm waiting for the oh Yeah Well We'll just keep them separate Make it easy. All right, Marianne. Go ahead. Sorry.

4:07:06 – 4:09:05•Speaker 73

Okay The reason that I had stopped for a second was because I wanted to confirm that I heard that Pahrump has no debt But we have bond debt Well, that's debt Correct 24 million? And I want to, what? I'm having a hard time staying in control here. I want to recognize the comptroller for including that bond information that I had asked about a couple of meetings back. And clearly says here, total general obligation debt. $23 million. So that's a debt in my book. I don't know, debt-free? But at any rate, I looked at this capital improvement plan probably closer than ever before after watching the budget hearings this year, and the format's very easy to follow. I appreciated that, although I did need a magnifying glass by the time I hit the last column. But I counted up... 36 new capital improvement projects, 10 existing, 11 that are out of cycle, and one newly created room tax line. I don't know if that's historical in the number. I know the comptroller's new, so that might be something she needs to look at and report on later, and I'd appreciate that. But 36 new lines, you know, and only a third plus one-third are existing. It's ambitious when we're starting off the fiscal year having to pay back a loan to meet the budget requirement.

4:09:06 – 4:09:24•Speaker 54

Chair, I'm sorry. We don't have item number 21 open, and you're speaking to that. See, that's why I'm so sorry. I was trying to. It was a good idea. We are trying to figure it out. It's so close. That's why we're not following you. All right, I'll stick to number 10. So we're talking to Ms. Fanning. She's in charge of the town of Prom. They don't have any debt.

4:09:24•Speaker 51

And nobody wants us done quicker than I do.

4:09:26•Speaker 54

And that's why the $23 million. Okay.

4:09:29 – 4:10:09•Speaker 73

And I'll go back to number 10. The this. Okay. And where am I? On the last page, almost the last capital improvement project is about the fairgrounds. And one of the lines here, the last one says, portable restrooms delivered. Are those the ones that we purchased previously? Or are those more portable restrooms for $144,000 and $58,000 cost to install them? Is that new?

4:10:10•Speaker 51

You can go a little longer. I interrupted you.

4:10:16•Speaker 51

We have no rules today.

4:10:19 – 4:10:47•Speaker 73

I'm sorry, rules for us, not for you. That's how the rules are going today. All right, then. I don't want to get into 21, but those are the things I noticed. And unless there's... an orchard of money trees being planted someplace in Pahrump, this is ambitious in capital improvement projects. That's all I want to say.

4:10:47•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

4:10:51•Speaker 43

The trees are in a splash pad. No, Chair.

4:10:53•Speaker 51

We're going to close public comment. Commissioners?

4:10:57•Speaker 54

Chair, I guess we're going to approve this. Yeah.

4:11:01•Speaker 51

Let's see. Hi, Jennifer.

4:11:03•Speaker 51

Ms. Fanning. Do you want to say something else?

4:11:05 – 4:11:39•Speaker 57

Just to answer Mrs. Hollis' questions, there was a lot. So last year was my first year with the budget. I didn't know to put things in for out of cycle. I was advised to put those items in there for this year. It's a place saver, just in case. So that's why there is a lot of new on there. Speaking with Jimmy, obviously he's not here right now, but he did say that a lot of these projects, some of them are ongoing, but as far as the larger expenditures, this is probably going to be the last year for it. They're going to kind of try to tighten things up, let the funds build a little bit before we continue on with more.

4:11:40•Speaker 51

Okay, thank you.

4:11:42•Speaker 54

Chair, I'd like to make a motion to approve the town-approved debt management policy statement and capital improvement plan. Second.

4:11:48•Speaker 51

Second. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor?

4:11:52•Speaker 51

Aye. Aye. That carries 5-0. Thank you. 12, please.

4:11:57 – 4:12:10•Speaker 27

Item 12, for possible action, discussion, and deliberation regarding the debt management policy statement and capital improvement plan for the town of Gaps for fiscal year 2026 through 2027, pursuant to NRS 350.013. Brett, you sound different. Oh, sorry.

4:12:16•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. All right. Who's? Go ahead.

4:12:19 – 4:12:40•Speaker 72

Thank you, Commissioner. This is Zena Teich. So we have debt. We have revenue bonds for the town of Gabs that is going to be paid off by fiscal year 29. And we do have capital expenditures, ongoing capital expenditures for fiscal, this coming fiscal year for $36,000. Okay. Okay.

4:12:44•Speaker 51

LET'S SEE IF WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE.

4:12:50•Speaker 27

THERE'S NO COMMENT ON THE PHONE.

4:12:52•Speaker 51

CLOSING PUBLIC COMMENT. COMMISSIONERS, MAYBE JABOUR.

4:12:55•Speaker 42

CHAIR, MOTION TO APPROVE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENT. SECOND.

4:13:02•Speaker 51

MOTION, SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?

4:13:05•Speaker 51

MOSKOVICH, AYE. THANK YOU. 13, PLEASE.

4:13:08 – 4:13:20•Speaker 27

Item 13, for possible action, discussion and deliberation regarding the debt management policy statement in capital improvement plan for the town of Manhattan for fiscal year 2026 through 2027 pursuant to NRS 350.013. Thank you for that. Hello, Zena.

4:13:25 – 4:14:01•Speaker 72

Hello. So again, this is a requirement. The town of Manhattan does have revenue bonds that are going to need to be paid off all the way through fiscal year 53. The capital schedule is also attached and I have a correction to make on The D-Tax form, it's the D-Tax form, page 3 of 7. We are providing the five-year capital plan, which is the question for, the answer should be yes.

4:14:04•Speaker 51

Got it. Okay. Let's see if we have any public comment on this item, please, Sam.

4:14:10•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:14:17 – 4:14:40•Speaker 42

my comment was for the previous and for gab never mind okay Sam do we have anybody else please no chair closed thank you chair motion to approve second management policies as amended as amended page four of seven thank you second amended as stated

4:14:40•Speaker 51

AMENDED MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?

4:14:44•Speaker 51

THAT CARRIES 5-0. THANK YOU. 14, PLEASE, SAM.

4:14:49 – 4:15:00•Speaker 27

ITEM 14, FOR POSSIBLE ACTION, DISCUSSION, AND DELIBERATION REGARDING THE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE PARAMPAL DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 THROUGH 2027 PURSUANT TO NRS 350.013. THANK YOU FOR THAT.

4:15:07 – 4:15:20•Speaker 57

Hello again, commissioners. Hello. Jennifer Fanning, town finance manager. Again, it's the same CIP that you guys already have approved for the swimming pool. Debt management policy and the town pool has no debt.

4:15:21•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Let's open public comment. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

4:15:25•Speaker 27

Yes, chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:15:32•Speaker 65

Matthew Winterhawk, for the record, I'd just like to say that I would be happy when someone calls in and would like to speak on behalf of something and give a comment and or guidance that lives in that direct area.

4:15:42•Speaker 66

But, you know, that's all. Thank you.

4:15:43•Speaker 27

I don't know what that means. I don't know what that means.

4:15:47•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

4:15:51•Speaker 51

Okay, we're going to close public comment and commissioners.

4:15:57•Speaker 54

Motion to approve is written.

4:15:59•Speaker 42

Board seconds. Motion second. All those in favor?

4:16:01•Speaker 51

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. That carries 5-0. Thank you. Let's stick with Zena. 21, please.

4:16:10 – 4:16:22•Speaker 27

Item 21, for possible action, discussion, and deliberation regarding the debt management policy statement and capital improvement plan for Nye County for fiscal year 2026 through 2027, pursuant to NRS 350.013. Thank you for that. Hello again, Zena.

4:16:27•Speaker 72

So I'd like to ask if we can do number 22 first because it has to do with changing some of the capital and that would affect the report.

4:16:38•Speaker 54

Would you like to have both of them at the same time?

4:16:40•Speaker 72

Can we do both of them at the same time? Sure.

4:16:42•Speaker 51

Can we open 22 as well please, Sam?

4:16:46 – 4:17:11•Speaker 27

Or Brett, whoever. Item 22, for possible action, presentation, discussion, and deliberation to review and approve or amend and approve the nine county fiscal year 2026 through 2027 capital outlay budget amounts for nine county capital projects 100401, special capital projects 10402, and local assistance and tribal consistency fund 10340.

4:17:14•Speaker 51

Thank you for that, hello.

4:17:16•Speaker 72

Okay, so the first thing I'll talk about is the debt. We have a revenue bond for the jail, which is the current balance is $14,700,000.

4:17:25•Speaker 54

Can you put us on the same page as you, please?

4:17:29 – 4:17:48•Speaker 72

I have my notes, I'm sorry. Sorry. It's page one of the debt policy. It is the third page. Third peep.

4:17:50•Speaker 54

Excuse me, Chair, which 21 or 22?

4:17:53•Speaker 72

Oh, I'm sorry, 21.

4:18:00 – 4:18:22•Speaker 72

OK. So we have the revenue bond for the jail, $14,760,000. Then we have general obligation. $2,127,000 for the animal shelter. And then we have regular debt for Siemens Energy Project for $6,212,000. The Siemens Project are the solar panels for the Justice Court.

4:18:35•Speaker 54

And a lot of other stuff.

4:18:37•Speaker 54

Like new air conditioners. Yes. There's a lot, a lot of stuff we've done throughout the county. Thank you, Chair.

4:18:42•Speaker 51

Thank you. All right, let's go ahead and open public comment.

4:18:47 – 4:19:26•Speaker 72

Should I talk about the capital, the changes that I'd like to ask the board to consider? So when we approved the capital back in May, It was before we had done a loan from the capital fund of $4 million. With the loan, now that we have the loan, we don't have enough money for all of the capital projects. It would create a hardship on the fund. So we need to reevaluate some of the projects that were approved in May.

4:19:27 – 4:19:43•Speaker 54

May we instead, Chair, if I might, talk to the comptroller, we will never get all of these projects done. So in, I mean, not even close. So can we just approve it as written, knowing perfectly well that we will not spend this money by the end of the year?

4:19:44•Speaker 72

So the real issue are the items for fiscal 27.

4:19:48•Speaker 54

27, thank you, Chair. Pardon me. Thank you.

4:19:54 – 4:20:48•Speaker 72

So now I'd like to go to item 22, the backup, page one of two and page two of two. and then we're gonna show on the screen the item. So back in May, these are the items that were presented, and the items that we have highlighted in gray are the items that we're giving a recommendation to fund through another fund instead of capital. So the first item that's grayed in is the 2026 Chevy Silverado work truck, for the planning. Instead of having it coming out of capital, we're suggesting to be funded on 10254, 50%, and 50% for 25268.

4:20:48•Speaker 54

Can you express what those funds are? What are those? You've got to memorize.

4:20:58 – 4:21:13•Speaker 72

Building permits and Pahrump permits. The 25268 is Pahrump building, Pahrump business permits. And the 10254 is building permits.

4:21:14•Speaker 43

That makes sense. That makes sense. So we're putting Pahrump permits in a county fund?

4:21:20 – 4:21:34•Speaker 72

It is a county, yes. So buildings, the planning department A good portion of the planning department, their salaries are charged to the town of Pahrump buildings.

4:21:36•Speaker 43

Explain it that way, it makes sense.

4:21:39•Speaker 51

I said it's hot. It's hot. Ask, all you got to do is ask Cory.

4:21:51 – 4:24:27•Speaker 72

Okay, so the next item are the three motorcycles for Nye County Sheriff Office. We're suggesting to put them to PSST. The same goes for the key box system, PSST, four drones, stationary LPRs, the ring rescue, and the vehicles we're suggesting to Not funded this year because they already have a purchase order in the system or a requisition for about 400 and something thousand dollars for vehicles. So we're suggesting to take 500,000 and put it towards 10405, which is extraordinary maintenance for our buildings. And then from fund, originally we had approved in fund 10402, the Pahrump Justice Building soft water system. We're suggesting to put to 10402. Was that, it was one? Next item is 150,000 for the Justice Building Emergency Generator. We're suggesting to put it towards the 10402. And then on page two of two. The district court rolling folding shelves, putting that towards the district court improvement fund, 10247. The purchase of a vehicle for HHS, put that to fund 10283, indigent medical, or indigent, I'm sorry. Juvenile probation has a truck and a roll forward from the prior year that we did not bring forward in the May capital. So we're asking for approval for that. And the truck we're asking to put towards juvenile probation as opposed to the 10401. And those are the changes.

4:24:30•Speaker 33

Okay. Chair, I have an issue, though. Yes, sir. We can't do PSST funds without amending the PSST plan.

4:24:37•Speaker 37

Oh, crap. Which you could do.

4:24:41 – 4:24:56•Speaker 33

Well, but I also have some concerns about whether or not there's been a check on whether it's supplanting funds or things of that nature. We really have to look at that. So what would you recommend? How would we? I think we're going to have to bring that element of it back.

4:24:58•Speaker 72

So not do some of the sheriff's stuff and then reevaluate.

4:25:04•Speaker 33

Anything involving PSST funds needs to be looked at because we're going to have to amend the plan for that.

4:25:11•Speaker 51

So that would be part of somebody's motion, correct?

4:25:15•Speaker 43

We've been through this before, recently.

4:25:22 – 4:25:33•Speaker 51

Okay, let's do public comment and see if we have anybody on the phone, please, Sam. That's going to have to be part of the motion.

4:25:33•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:25:39 – 4:28:16•Speaker 66

Chair and Commissioners, Matthew Winterhawk for the record. I want to make sure the public receives actual financial facts contained in today's packet, not an election season headline. You know, there's been discussion going on that, you know, earlier Pahrump and then now possibly Nye County more broadly is debt-free, but obviously Agenda 21 item says On page three, county's own debt management policy says that as of June 30th, 2026, the county carries a general obligation bond debt in the amount of $23,099,000. The packet also identifies an approximately $14.76 million remaining on jailed bond, $2.127 million on the animal shelter, and $6.212 million on the Siemens Energy. That is not zero debt. And also for the statement on Agenda 22, the financial picture is even more important because the staff report states that after capital requests were approved, finance brought forward a resolution to borrow $4 million from the capital fund for up to a year in order to maintain sufficient cash flow to even make their payroll or accounts payable payments. So on that same agenda, the public may hear language about being debt-free, but the county is now acknowledging more than $23 million in outstanding debt and a temporary need to borrow $4 million from capital funds to support basic operating cash flow. Those facts cannot be hidden or buried beneath political wording. And if someone intends to claim that it is town of prompt itself is no separately issued bonded debt, well, then say, you know, here we go. The town of prompt may. have no separately listed outstanding bond instruments, but that is not the same as saying that the residents live under a debt-free county government. Pahrump is an unincorporated town and its residents are in Nye County, taxpayers. They receive county services and remain affected by county debt, county liabilities, county capital decisions, and county cash flow problems. So a zero debt service property tax rate also does not mean zero debt. The packet explains that county is paying debt through other available funds and transferring rather than levying a separate debt service tax rate. So I'm therefore asking the board to answer clearly, is the proposed zero debt statement limited to only prorump and the bonded debt? Or will the county publicly acknowledge its own 23 million outstanding debt? What are the exact terms, approval date, repayment source, and current balance on the $4 million capital fund loan? And why does money intended for capital projects need to maintain payroll and accounts payable cash flow? The public deserves a full, explained, not a campaign slogan, Nye County's own records do not support your headline of debt-free. The documents, outstanding debt, continuing debt, service payments, and serious enough cash flow concern the finance proposed borrowing $4 million to cover payroll bills. That's extremely alarming. Thank you.

4:28:16•Speaker 43

The debts that he mentioned are the same ones you mentioned. He read the same page that you read, except he didn't hear you, I guess.

4:28:25•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

4:28:27•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:28:33 – 4:29:00•Speaker 69

Hi, Tim Bohannon, BOHA NNIN. Yeah, I'm actually a fan of taking part of this back and making sure the PSOC is adequately worked on and bring that portion back. If it needs to be done, it needs to be done. But we're barring Peter and paying Paul. So let's make sure that we can get it right. Thank you.

4:29:01•Speaker 51

Thanks, Tim. Come on up, Marianne.

4:29:05 – 4:29:19•Speaker 73

Marianne Hollis, H-O-L-L-I-S. Mr. Bohannon made a good point just there. I have a question. Who sets the debt limit that we can incur?

4:29:21•Speaker 72

That's an NRS requirement.

4:29:23•Speaker 54

We probably shouldn't be answering those questions, Chair.

4:29:26•Speaker 51

Yeah, sorry. Got to wait.

4:29:27 – 4:29:49•Speaker 73

Okay. I'd like to know who sets the debt limit, what is the amount, and what is our debt capacity now at? Because the number that I had, if you add in the 23099, it meets the debt limit. Maybe my math is off. Maybe I'm not calling things the proper word, but I'd like that explained. Thank you.

4:29:50•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody else for us, please?

4:29:52•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:29:58 – 4:30:23•Speaker 56

Yes, Amy Nelson, N-E-L-S-O-N. We are at our debt limit, as far as I know. And the only thing that I would like to see really looked into and changed is the kennels. They need to have epoxy coating, and they need a heater for the wintertime. That's how I feel about it. Thank you.

4:30:24•Speaker 51

Thank you, and I agree with her. Go ahead, Linda.

4:30:29 – 4:31:01•Speaker 71

Linda Clark, CLERK. It's a long day, long week. Okay. I would like to really have a guarantee that you guys aren't going to put your hands in the pot and mess this all up. The second thing I want to say is a suggestion. We need to hire... Beth Dutton. Bring her in here and let her get things straightened out. Do you know who Beth Dutton is, Rob? Oh, okay.

4:31:01•Speaker 51

Yep, I can't answer you. I'm sorry.

4:31:04•Speaker 71

Yellowstone, and now she's on.

4:31:06•Speaker 51

Who has time for TV? Go ahead.

4:31:09•Speaker 71

I know she's not from here, but you know what? She's got a good mind, and she would have never let you guys get into this mess. Thank you.

4:31:20•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam?

4:31:23•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:31:29•Speaker 62

Hello, Commissioners. Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A. Can you hear me? Is my frequency and channel okay?

4:31:43 – 4:33:09•Speaker 62

Oh, thank you, thank you. I appreciate that. Well, the good thing about TV is at least you'll see better actors. but anyhow, um, once again, I, I remember when I was, uh, my first amendment was spelled for specifically, uh, outlining UFC 15, that's United States code 15. And, uh, y'all have still failed to, uh, correct the record. Y'all officially logged it as UFC more conspiracy stuff. I know it, but anyhow, United States code 15. And, uh, Once again, this is a perfect opportunity to show that qualified immunity and fraud should never dwell in the same place. And I hope our state and federal partners are paying attention because if people don't trust them, y'all shouldn't trust them. The spreadsheet, they can't hold the water. Thank y'all. Oh, and thank you, Matthew Winterhoff. And right on point every time. And I can't imagine a commissioner not wanting to hear what you have to say. And Bruce Jabbour, again, great, great, great, great, great talk about the constitutionality of things. A right to practice and a right to travel. Foundational law, 1867 Nevada. Wake up, people. This administrative rule of law is dead without God's trust. Look above you. The sign's black. Why don't you try shining it? Bring the spirit. Thank you.

4:33:12•Speaker 51

Sam, come on down, Tony.

4:33:18 – 4:34:25•Speaker 34

Tony Hoverman, H-O-V-E-R-M-A-N. I just want to know when this lady was reading, this really nice lady named Zena was reading off stuff, and she said, water softening system. Who's entitled... in this town to have a water softening system at the cost of my property taxes. I don't have a water softening system at my house. I don't know if it's the court system that was supposed to get one or the jail system, but a water softening system? I have nitrates in my well water. A water softening system? My property taxes are paying for that now, too. That's outrageous. I don't know who thinks they're entitled to have a water softening system in this town. I really would like to know the answer to that question.

4:34:29•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do you have anybody on the phone, please?

4:34:32•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:34:40 – 4:35:45•Speaker 55

Hello, Chairman and Commissioners. Bruce Johnson, GLHNS. Speaking on items 21 and 22, because of the concern of financial stewardship of Nye County, the Declaration of Independence reminds us that governments derive their just powers from the government. And that Constitution carries that principle . . . . . should therefore be measured not only by its cost, but by its long-term benefit and its impact on generations. One of the oldest maxims of law teaches the welfare of the people is the supreme law.

4:35:46•Speaker 70

That principle calls for careful stewardship, transparent decision-making, and management of public resources.

4:35:55 – 4:36:59•Speaker 55

I encourage the board to continue asking difficult questions before assuming new obligations. Is this project necessary? Is it financially sustainable? Have long-term operating and maintenance costs been fully considered? And has the public been given meaningful opportunity to understand and comment before commitments are made? Stewardship is not measured by how much government built. It is measured by how faithfully government protects both public treasury and the rights of the people who provide it. I'll close with Luke 1610. He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much. Faithfulness in small financial decisions builds confidence in larger ones. I encourage this board to continue governing with transparency, restraint, fidelity to the Constitution, remembering always that all political power is inherent in the people, including all the people sitting in them chairs out in front of you. And every dollar entrusted to government should be managed for their protection, security, and benefit. Thank you.

4:37:00•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do you have a water softening system? Just kidding. Is anybody on the phone?

4:37:07 – 4:37:21•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record. The end of the call. No, I don't.

4:37:21•Speaker 51

Done. Closed. Commissioners? I don't know what you want to do. But there has to be amendment.

4:37:31 – 4:38:08•Speaker 54

Well, we can approve it less the PSST. Excluding. Excluding. So I would like to make a motion to approve. The debt management policy statement capital improvement plan for Nye County fiscal year 2026-2027, which is item 21. And item number 22, I would like to amend and further hear more on the Nye County fiscal year 2026-2027 as stated, less the PSST to be heard at a different time. You've got something. Second. Second.

4:38:09•Speaker 45

May I ask a question prior to vote?

4:38:11•Speaker 54

We have a staff that... Great.

4:38:16•Speaker 45

When it's excluded, it just is not addressed. Is that correct? So there's nothing that's being done with the PSST stuff in there? Not at all. So it's just staying where it was this morning?

4:38:26 – 4:39:03•Speaker 45

So sometimes when I talk, I'm not necessarily asking questions. It's because the legislative record is important. So in the event that someone does something that is contrary to what is intended, which you can imagine happens around here every once in a while, they'll go back to the legislative record, which is the reason for the record. So I'm just kind of restating here that all of the things that are marked PSST and or sheriff, and correct me if I'm wrong, they will remain in the same situation as they were 24 hours ago, even after this motion is carried and voted in the affirmative. Is that correct? Somebody please. Thank you very much.

4:39:06•Speaker 51

Thank you. Did you make a motion?

4:39:07•Speaker 1

I did. I got a second.

4:39:09•Speaker 51

Oh, motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye.

4:39:12•Speaker 51

Boscovich, aye. That carries 5-0. Thank you. 16, please.

4:39:20 – 4:39:46•Speaker 27

Item 16, for possible action, discussion, and deliberation to A, approve, amend, and approve or reject an interlocal contract between Nye County and the Nevada Secretary of State in the amount of $25,000 to provide no-ink services for voter registration, database, elections management system, and associated equipment, B, fund from 10101 General, and C, execute the agreement.

4:39:47•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Hello, Cory.

4:39:50 – 4:40:31•Speaker 21

Hello, Commissioner. How are you? Yeah. I'm just here if you have any questions. This is the same exact contract that we had signed by Bruce a while ago, we were not charged because the state did not do their part of it. It was supposed to be $49,000, 49 and change. This is mandated that we go to the top down. We weren't charged, but then Clark County came in, which then brought our charge, our portion of the whole thing to 25,000 instead of 49,000 a year. So I'm just asking that we get this contract. I did want to let you know, the DA did get back to me and he has no problems with it either. So if you have any questions.

4:40:31•Speaker 42

Well, he's sitting right next to you. If he had an issue, he would have told you.

4:40:35•Speaker 21

Well, maybe. I don't know.

4:40:38•Speaker 51

Depends on his mood. All right. Let's see if we have any public comment on this item. Sam, please.

4:40:47•Speaker 51

Closing it up.

4:40:48•Speaker 54

Chair, I'd like to make a motion to approve to fund from 10101 and execute the agreement.

4:40:53•Speaker 51

Four seconds. Motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye.

4:40:59 – 4:41:58•Speaker 51

Thank you very much. Aye. That carries 5-0. 18, please. Oh, sorry. Comfort break. 10 minutes. 437. You're going to throw something. I say do two every week. I was born ready. All right, where are we at? 18 it is. Man has spoken.

4:42:01•Speaker 42

And be careful because we're about to be recorded by the recorder.

4:42:09 – 4:42:27•Speaker 50

Item 18 for possible action, presentation of projected expenditures of money in the Recorder's Technology Fund to be used in the 2026-2027 fiscal year. I think we should continue this. And the quicker you are, the more I'll like you. 18.

4:42:28 – 4:43:06•Speaker 24

My name is Dawn Sligar, S-L-I-G-A-R. I'm Chief Deputy Recorder. I'm here on behalf of Deborah Beatty, the Nye County Recorder. We are required by NRS 247.306 to report annually how we are utilizing our technology fund. And so the two items that we need to report on is revenue and expenditures. We have an approximate revenue of $115,000 based on prior years. And our expenditures for this year is approximately $150,000. We plan on using it for restoration projects, office equipment, and other things to be determined. That's my complete report.

4:43:06 – 4:43:20•Speaker 51

That is super fast. I love that. Side question for Sam. When these are just presentations, why do they say for possible action?

4:43:21•Speaker 27

I think it's just habit to add it to every item, but you don't need to take action on this.

4:43:26•Speaker 54

Thank you for your report. Thank you.

4:43:28•Speaker 42

Thank you very much. Thank you, John. I'm glad we were able to push you forward quickly today.

4:43:36•Speaker 54

We got you right up there, didn't we? Yep.

4:43:43•Speaker 51

I'm going to wait for Brian because I want to be sure before we move on.

4:43:48•Speaker 54

Brian. Brian, do we need to do? No motion, no discussion.

4:43:56•Speaker 51

No, no, but they say for possible action. Do I have to do public comment or no?

4:44:02•Speaker 54

18. 18. We didn't do action. We just did a report.

4:44:08 – 4:44:19•Speaker 51

It is on the agenda, so. I'm going to open public comment, just to be careful. But from now on, if there are presentations, feel free to call them presentation only. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

4:44:19•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record. Mm-hmm.

4:44:26 – 4:45:00•Speaker 66

Matthew Winterhawk for the record. And honestly, it wouldn't be if it didn't say technology fund that I would have something to say, but it's kind of a hurdle for citizens to be able to get documentation quickly without having an online website. So I would love that the direction inside that office just, you know, as a citizen outside, that it becomes digitized and we can get to these records without having to go through a bunch of requests and payments and lost paperwork and and then the request not being approved and getting lost in translation. It'd be a lot better if we could get to the actual paperwork, so thank you.

4:45:00•Speaker 51

Hey, Winterhawk, for the record, W-I-N-T-E-R-H-A-W-K.

4:45:06•Speaker 54

Thank you so much for spelling for him.

4:45:11•Speaker 51

What now? Sam, do we have anybody, please?

4:45:13 – 4:45:33•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record. I'll move to the next one. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:45:37 – 4:46:00•Speaker 65

Oh, hello. This is Paul Lemus, L-E-M-U-S. Usually when it's an agenda item like that for other boards that I happen to sit on, you don't necessarily have to approve, but you can accept the report. And that's usually what they mean when it has an approval on there is just to either accept or deny that report that the recorder's office had made there. That was just a suggestion to throw in, but thank you.

4:46:00•Speaker 51

CHRIS JERRAM, Yes, Chair.

4:46:06•Speaker 27

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:46:10 – 4:46:26•Speaker 62

MICHAEL DAVIS- Hello, commissioners. Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A is my volume. CHRIS JERRAM, Yes. I just wanted to point out the obvious. It's kind of hard to have a quickie when we have to wait for Brian to watch it. Thank you.

4:46:27•Speaker 51

Anybody else? Sam, do you have anyone else, please? No, Chair. Closing?

4:46:35•Speaker 51

That's it. All right, we're done with that. 17, please.

4:46:41 – 4:47:00•Speaker 50

Well, how do I follow that one? All right, 17 for possible action. Discussion and deliberation regarding the quarterly report from the public administrator on deceased person cases that are open, closed, pending, NCPA creditor claims, non-cases, or cases that have been turned over to family.

4:47:01•Speaker 51

Thank you for that. Do we have Ginger or anybody on the phone? Or do we need anybody? Or what do you guys want to do?

4:47:06•Speaker 27

We have Ginger on the phone.

4:47:07•Speaker 51

OK. Hello, Ginger, and welcome.

4:47:10•Speaker 76

Ginger Simpson. You enjoying the heat?

4:47:15•Speaker 51

I'm loving it.

4:47:19•Speaker 76

Does anybody have any questions?

4:47:21•Speaker 51

SIMPSON for the record. You guys got anything for Ginger?

4:47:26 – 4:47:52•Speaker 54

I just noticed that Bill Stremel is on this list as deceased. He's been, yeah, he's been very active in our community. How do I know him? And you know he's come and spoke to us many, many times. He's emailed me, you, all of us, and I just happened to flip over to that. And so my condolences to all the families that have lost loved ones and what they are faced with to try to get through the system. Thank you, Chair.

4:47:52 – 4:48:23•Speaker 51

Thank you. Commissioner Jabbour, you got anything? That sucks. Yeah, commissioners, anybody got anything for Ginger? No? Okay, let's, if you'll do, if you'll stand by, Ginger, we're gonna see if we have any public comment, please.

4:48:24•Speaker 51

Sam, do we got anybody on the phone, please?

4:48:27•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

4:48:34 – 4:49:29•Speaker 69

Hi, Tim Bohannon, DOHA. And definite condolences for those families impacted on the list, Chair. I did have a couple of general questions for deliberation discussion, what I would be curious of, knowing where there's a situation where there's cold cases, What's the action on cold cases? Does it sit there? the way, what happens, you know, that's something of concern or interest. And then no case or turnedovers seem very simple. You know, it's over the family, they have it. But whenever it's cold, you know, it almost sounds like NCIS or one of the drama shows, if you will. What happens with that? And where can I find that information? Thank you.

4:49:29•Speaker 51

Thank you, Tim. You can email ginger and I'm sure she would be happy to help you out. Come on up.

4:49:34 – 4:49:59•Speaker 76

Um, Susie, I can't answer that question very quickly. Um, typically we don't going into specifics on a case. A lot of those that are, you'll notice there's one from 2013 that is because nothing had been done by his administrator until she passed away in 2025 and I inherited the case from her. through her not doing anything for 13 years.

4:50:00•Speaker 51

Ah, gotcha. Cool, thank you for that explanation. Susie.

4:50:06 – 4:50:44•Speaker 32

Susie Hertz, H-E-R-T-Z. Just a comment, it would be nice for a courtesy for those in the audience who don't have backup to maybe get, when this report is happening right now, some general information, some general data, numbers, of people, whatever it is that's relevant, that's talking about open cases, troubled cases, et cetera, just saying it would be nice to say, at least get a number count on what's been handled during this period of time. Otherwise, everybody's sitting in the audience saying, what are you talking about?

4:50:44•Speaker 51

OK. Thank you. Thank you. I didn't realize that. Sam, anybody else, please?

4:50:52•Speaker 51

All right, we're closing public comment. Thank you, Ginger. If commissioners have nothing, do we have to vote on this? No. Okay, thank you very much, Ginger.

4:51:00 – 4:51:12•Speaker 50

Just real quick on that backup question. There is binders over here that have all the backup for every item on the agenda that are free for anybody to browse through.

4:51:12•Speaker 51

So is the backup not online?

4:51:15•Speaker 50

It's also online, but I'm saying if they're here in the audience.

4:51:18•Speaker 51

Oh, I got you.

4:51:20•Speaker 50

Gotcha. They can't take it home, but they can go over there and look at it.

4:51:24•Speaker 54

I think Miss Susie is asking us to have a report that says how many cases got closed, what's still open, and I don't know about that.

4:51:32 – 4:51:43•Speaker 51

All right. Thank you on that. Let's move on to number eight, please. Then you know what happens after that, right? Moment, and we're out.

4:51:44 – 4:54:04•Speaker 50

Item eight, 10 AM timed item for possible action, public hearing, discussion, and deliberation. regarding a request to amend and adopt or reject Nye County Bill number 2026-01, a bill proposing to amend Nye County Code Title 17, Title Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning, Chapter 17.10, Title Special Use Permits, Section 17.10.010, Title Definitions by adding the definition of approved assignee, Commence or commencement, permit holder in person, section 17-10-050, titled requirement to obtain special use permit by providing for an extension of time and for obtaining a written letter from a town board, deleting section 17-10-080, titled designation of use in districts in the Pahrump Regional Planning District, Section 171090, titled Approval Process by Amending the Process for an Application for a Special Use Permit and Waiver Applications. Section 1710100, titled Preliminary Development Plan approval by removing the requirement for the applicant's signature, adding entering into a development agreement, and amending the documents needed to submit for a preliminary development plan approval and final development plan approval. Section 17.10.120, federal building permits and commencement of construction by requiring applicant to attend a pre-development meeting. Section 17.10.140, titled Development Standards by Requiring Applicant Conduct an Audible A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level Test in Section 1710.150, titled Setbacks and Height Restrictions by Removing Height Restrictions of SECS to Solar Panel and Allowed Variances and Amending the Allowed Waivers for Setback and distance restrictions and providing for the severability, constitutionality and effective date thereof and other matters properly relating thereto. Thank you for that. Hello, Celeste.

4:54:04 – 4:54:45•Speaker 53

Hello, Celeste Sandoval, S-A-N-D-O-V-A-L, Assistant Director of Planning. before we get into the meat and bones in the backup there is some comments from the baity town advisory board that i'd like to go over with you all since they weren't incorporated because we'd already received da sign off um under seven section 171070 the town has asked to add that all secs1 projects enter into a binding town developer community agreement prior to the county adopting a development agreement If amenable, the verbiage for the first sentence under 1710.070 would read. Stand by.

4:54:45•Speaker 54

Can you please direct us to what page number you're on so that we can read along?

4:55:14 – 4:55:26•Speaker 43

Just a comment, but normally, I don't know who did this, but normally it's read like it says it's going to be, and it's not read this time. It's really hard to find, make sure we got all the changes.

4:55:28•Speaker 53

The copy that was uploaded, because everything we sent over was...

4:55:33•Speaker 43

No red there, no red here.

4:55:36•Speaker 50

There's a clean version, John, and a marked up version.

4:55:40•Speaker 54

Yeah, we know, but we didn't receive any colored anything, and I wasn't going to bring it up with staff later.

4:55:45•Speaker 43

Oh, oh, oh. The ones that got distributed don't have it. So page 8 of 25.

4:56:04•Speaker 50

On the bottom of the page?

4:56:08 – 4:56:22•Speaker 54

17.10.070, correct? Yes. Please take us to where within that? It's right here, 8 of 25. 17.10.

4:56:24•Speaker 43

I got 8 of 21.

4:56:25•Speaker 54

Well, I'm in the marked up for it.

4:56:30•Speaker 43

The marked up one.

4:56:32•Speaker 54

It should still be page 8, I hope. No, they don't. They take more pages when you mark them up.

4:56:40•Speaker 42

Give us a moment.

4:56:47•Speaker 54

Yeah, it's still eight. Nope. Nope. Sorry.

4:56:52•Speaker 42

Energy conversion.

4:56:55•Speaker 54

Energy conversion systems.

4:56:58•Speaker 53

Yes, and it's almost kind of like they, in their backup, they have the wrong section.

4:57:06•Speaker 54

Yes, I'm not reading what you had.

4:57:08 – 4:57:20•Speaker 53

Yeah. So if you go to, it would be page 14 of 25. So it would be 1710-100. 15 of 25. It's probably the best place to start there.

4:57:20•Speaker 54

Now that's on the unmarked version then. Is that what you're saying?

4:57:26 – 4:58:29•Speaker 53

was the number again please ten one hundred seventeen ten one hundreds thank you i'll just find that seventeen ten one hundreds quite large what letter it's in the chart actually got it and it's down to where it says um nevada division of water resources and nye county water district governing board Yes. Okay, so they would like there to actually include... Insert? Yes, the baby water and sanitation district. Okay. And we're fine with that if... They want to be added to that because anyway, they have to be presented to the town boards anyway, so adding in at the same time the town board and the Beatty Sanitation District is fine with us. They can do them both at the same time.

4:58:29•Speaker 51

Is that something that would have to be in the motion?

4:58:34•Speaker 54

It would be added to our motion. It would be amendment.

4:58:40•Speaker 53

And they do have the wrong section noted for the binding agreement.

4:58:48 – 4:59:06•Speaker 54

Do we have a section on that we've discovered yet? Is it development standards?

4:59:07•Speaker 53

It actually could go under the 17-10-100 for the preliminary development plan approval under E.

4:59:16•Speaker 54

And under E, there's a very small, it says development agreement application shall file, applicant shall file an application is all it says.

4:59:24•Speaker 53

Yes, and we can add in there, if you guys are amenable.

4:59:28•Speaker 54

Page 10 of 21.

4:59:30•Speaker 53

Yes, a binding community agreement between the applicant, developer, and all applicable towns outside the PRPD.

4:59:41•Speaker 54

You can give that to us in writing so we can make a motion.

4:59:46 – 5:00:03•Speaker 53

They also are requesting to be included in our pre-development meetings. However, pre-development meetings are for when the project has already obtained all county and town approvals, their special use permit, final plan, like it's ready to go. At that point, any concerns would have already been addressed.

5:00:04•Speaker 54

Agreed. I don't think that needs to be part of it.

5:00:08•Speaker 53

Under 1710.150, setbacks and height restrictions.

5:00:18•Speaker 54

I have page 20 of 25. Indeed, yes.

5:00:22 – 5:00:36•Speaker 53

Sorry, I should have had the clean copy for you. That's all right. It is number C. Sorry, letter C.

5:00:41•Speaker 54

the PRPD statement? What do you want it?

5:00:43 – 5:00:56•Speaker 53

Yes, they would like it to state no solar panel shall be located less than one mile from a private property line in Nye County without the written consent of the private property owner.

5:00:56•Speaker 54

Oh, we can't go there.

5:00:59•Speaker 53

Hmm. Right now it's strictly related to the PRPD and they would like some.

5:01:07 – 5:01:19•Speaker 54

They would like some leverage for there. For outside. But right now we have one mile. Yeah, because they don't really have zoning. They don't really have zoning. So did they, so again, state what it was they wanted?

5:01:19 – 5:01:31•Speaker 53

They would like it to state no solar panel shall be located less than one mile from a private property line in Nye County without the written consent of the private property owner.

5:01:31•Speaker 54

So in fact, this statement that's here says if an applicant blah, blah, blah, that should say just PRPD and Beatty.

5:01:40•Speaker 53

Well, you could have them anywhere outside of Beatty as well.

5:01:46•Speaker 50

I would not recommend that because I know that's not the opinion of every other town in that county.

5:01:52•Speaker 54

Right. So it's only Beatty that's bringing this.

5:01:56•Speaker 43

So. Does it want to say in the town of Beatty? It can't stand the way it is because it says PRPD here and that's not Beatty or Amargosa.

5:02:05 – 5:02:19•Speaker 50

Yeah, I think adding the word Beatty is. POB? Yeah. town limits are town boundary of Beatty. Just because it's close to Beatty doesn't mean it's.

5:02:19•Speaker 54

We're not doing written, we're not going there with written residential.

5:02:23•Speaker 50

Because they've had comments on, for instance, the one that was out at Sacrabattis Flats and it's not in our town limits.

5:02:31•Speaker 54

It's not. It's not close to the residence.

5:02:34•Speaker 43

The point is, the way it's written right now has to stay also.

5:02:41•Speaker 50

True, that's a adding or the town of Beatty.

5:02:45•Speaker 43

As long as we understand the boundary. This has got to stay because that gives me the mile here that we want. I'm not going to lose that.

5:02:55•Speaker 54

So it can be stated within the town of Beatty boundary. Thank you.

5:03:03 – 5:03:17•Speaker 53

They are also suggesting the same for 1710-150. that they, no solar panel shall be located less than 1 1⁄2 mile from any federal or state highway located in Nye County.

5:03:17•Speaker 54

Federal or state? What's that supposed to mean? They're all state highways.

5:03:26•Speaker 33

No, 95 is a U.S. highway.

5:03:30•Speaker 50

Yeah. That's going to be I-11 someday.

5:03:35•Speaker 54

So are we saying that we didn't?

5:03:36•Speaker 42

It would be Beatty's jurisdiction.

5:03:38 – 5:03:50•Speaker 50

But again, it should be specific to the town boundaries of Beatty because there's a lot of Nye County that isn't in a town boundary. So right now, sorry. Why would we care?

5:03:51•Speaker 53

Currently, it's letter D. Yes, it is. And it strictly just states State Highway 160. And the PRPD.

5:03:59 – 5:04:18•Speaker 54

Correct. Half mile of... So how would we restate that to make it work? Within a TOB boundary highway. Would that even work? RTC people?

5:04:18•Speaker 50

Just a state highway within the town boundary of Beatty.

5:04:24•Speaker 54

So really, we could drop the 160 from state highway. Not really.

5:04:34•Speaker 50

It's the only, well, I mean, you got 372, but.

5:04:40 – 5:05:38•Speaker 54

Now we got Federal Highway. They're asking a lot. Trying to figure out how to do it. Okay, so on item D, it could be and. Within the town of Beatty, on federal highways. Adjacent to federal highways? They're killing me here. Federal highways. Okay, shall I read this again? If an applicant proposes a project, a PRPD, blah, blah, blah, from state highway 160 and within the town of Beatty boundaries adjacent to federal highways.

5:05:41•Speaker 50

Or state highways.

5:05:42 – 5:06:00•Speaker 54

Or just leave the state. Okay, so we could drop that. Then one half mile from a state highway and within town of Beatty boundaries adjacent to federal highways?

5:06:04•Speaker 54

If any, I know.

5:06:07•Speaker 43

Is it too convoluted? We'll just say any road.

5:06:10 – 5:06:21•Speaker 54

Is that too convoluted? Are you able to pull this together? Are you feeling confident with that? Yes. That it comes directly from the board? Yes. You could get that stated? Yes. That's all that matters.

5:06:22 – 5:07:04•Speaker 53

Thank you, Chair. Their last request, actually it's maybe a comment, under 1710-160A for a decommissioning security. So that is the next page. Letter A. So they're suggesting switching over to the solid waste management CPI and not the consumer price index. They're stating using the wrong CPI would expose the county to unanticipated expenses should accessing the decommissioning security be necessary.

5:07:05•Speaker 50

We are not allowing any of this into a landfill in Knight County. So I don't think that's appropriate.

5:07:12•Speaker 54

It's not relevant. And I'm beginning to wonder.

5:07:14•Speaker 50

We're not accepting it anywhere.

5:07:16 – 5:07:28•Speaker 54

I'm beginning to wonder if we're not getting very convoluted with these additional amendments that could come forward. should we have interest in Beatty come forward.

5:07:30 – 5:07:47•Speaker 54

What are you thinking, Commissioner? Same. So right now, I would like to say that I cannot entertain their changes, and I would prefer that they come to us with amendments when we actually hear a project that's in Beatty. Thank you. Thank you, Chair.

5:07:52•Speaker 51

Okay, let's, thank you for that, Celeste. Let's open.

5:07:56•Speaker 54

Can you keep those notes for our future for Beatty? Absolutely. Thank you.

5:08:03•Speaker 51

Let's open public comment.

5:08:06 – 5:09:46•Speaker 10

Come on up, ma'am. Stacey Edwards, EDW ARDS. I have no issue with routine housekeeping amendments. It's to be expected. However, I'm concerned with the bundling of major policy changes with minor technical administrative updates into a single package. I know every one of you worked hard on the original bill and accepted it unanimously. So I won't bore you with everything, but for the record, This proposal changes the approval process for special use permits and waiver applications. It requires development agreements as part of the approval process. It changes setback waivers and height restrictions. And most concerning, it deletes the entire zoning section, which definitively and without question governs where large-scale solar may and may not be located in Pahrump. Those are not minor edits. Each one has real impact on our community and deserves its own public discussion to answer questions like, why? What problems are these changes solving and how does it benefit us? When the zoning section is deleted with nothing replacing it, When the zoning section is deleted with nothing replacing it, who then decides where the large-scale solar can and cannot be in Pahrump, and who benefits from it?

5:09:49•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please? Oh, never mind.

5:09:53 – 5:10:59•Speaker 10

There's about three or four people in here that would benefit from it, and I think it's safe to say none of them live here. I'd like to remind everyone that transparency isn't just about giving notice. If these proposals are truly in the public's best interest, why not present each one separately? Why make the public sweat through 40 plus pages of unrelated policy changes to understand what's really being proposed? I mean, you guys were all confused up here with what she was proposing. She also added there was something that she mentioned that's not written in this this item so with that if you're not already planning on rejecting this I respectfully asked it to be tabled and each substantive policy change be presented to the public separately so that people have a real chance to understand what this is about because if people did understand all the data sent to people they'd still be here thank you very much Sam do we have anybody on the phone please

5:11:00•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:11:05 – 5:13:52•Speaker 66

Matthew Winterhawk for the record. I'm going to request that Item 8 should not be adopted today. Chair Boscovich, you know, he asked earlier, he said, hey, are data centers on the agenda? The words data center might not be on there, but the infrastructure absolutely is. Chapter governs commercial power generation, battery storage, substations, transmission lines, and Gentile connections. The infrastructure capable of powering enormous industrial campuses like the one now being proposed in Brum, like Mance, technology campus. Residents have learned not to wait for the final project name. We are following the land, the infrastructure, the permits and money before you tell us it's too late. Your own bill recognizes that these projects can damage roads, bridges, drainage, threaten neighboring property, create environmental and public safety risk and leave Nye County exposed when projects fail and or are abandoned. Yet this bill defines commencement so weakly that a developer may preserve a permit by merely obtaining a building permit, grading the land, beginning demolition and or placing some construction materials. That is not substantial construction. That is a sand and or paper trigger capable of turning a permit, a bulldozer, or one scraped acre into an argument for vested rights. The permit may then remain alive for five years with annual renewals handled administratively until that minimal definition of commencement is satisfied. The bill also creates an approved assignee category covering affiliates, lenders, secured parties, foreclosure purchasers, and collateral assignees. It says transfers may not be unreasonably withheld with excluding approved assignees from what counts as a transfer. Nye County could approve one applicant while financing ownership or control later moves through entities or the public never evaluated. We just had a name change for Mance that came through as Ativan and something else. So that's in reference to that. While notice remains only 300 feet right now, Town Board presentation requirements specifically also excludes Pahrump. The section governing use designations within Pahrump Regional Planning District is being deleted. Height, setback, and waiver provisions are being changed. This is not a minor cleanup. You are defining how easily a developer can establish momentum, how long entitlement can survive, and how quietly control can change hands. I am requesting that the motion continue. Itemate with written direction, honestly. Commencement requires substantial, lawful construction, even discretionary approval, not paperwork, demolition, or grading. Every extension assignment, affiliate transfer or change or control require beneficial ownership, disclosure, updated studies, public notice with a public hearing. Perumpt receive the same town board review required elsewhere. Notice reach affected communities, domestic well owners, not stop at 300 feet and no energy project be segmented from the data center or industrial customer that it is principally designed to serve. Publish a clean red line and a plain English impact statement. Return through planning, the water district, emergency management, fire officials and public review. Nye County must not manufacture vested rights faster than residents can discover what exactly is being built. Continue item 8. Do not approve it. Close the loopholes before you create the next one that is not going to be able to stop the next project.

5:13:52•Speaker 51

Please. Thank you. CHRIS JERRAMSEN. Thank you. Come on down and prompt, please. FAITH BOSKETT.

5:14:03 – 5:15:48•Speaker 81

Hello. My name is Faith Boskett, F-A-I-T-H. B-O-S-K-E-T, good evening commissioners and Prump Valley family. Let everyone understand data centers are not the big danger on the agenda today. Large solar is. There are several major policy changes regarding solar that completely reshape the land use in Prump. Deleting the solar siting rules entirely, it's easier for staff, but devastating for residents. Rewriting the approval process for special use permits and waivers equals fewer steps, less transparency, fewer chances for the public to notice what's happening. Things streamlined in a detrimental way. Removal of height limits for large-scale solar. Taller, more visible industrial solar structures. This will be more than just an unpleasant eyesore. Loosening setbacks and distance waivers will allow solar to be built closer to homes, wells, roads. This benefits the developer, but residents lose tremendously. This 47-page item has extra major changes. These changes need to be clearly understood and clearly discussed so that people can fully understand the dangers. If the county wants to make major policy changes, they should present each change separately, simply worded so to be understood. I request that this be tabled and then changes can be presented separately in separate meetings for discussion or completely rejected today. Thank you, Commissioners, in advance for upholding the protections, and thank you, Prime Valley family, for being diligent to protect your town.

5:15:51•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

5:15:54•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:16:05•Speaker 51

Come on up in Pahrump. I almost whined.

5:16:13 – 5:17:17•Speaker 80

Good evening, Commissioner Sharon. Last name is Cruz, C-R-U-I-S-E. Unfortunately, I did not have my time to do the due diligence, as a lot of the people in the audience did. So there were only two items that I saw that I wanted to touch base on. And the first one was under Section 17-10-100. And it says that you want to remove the requirement of the applicant's signature. And I found that extremely disturbing, because usually when a person signs their name to an application, they are stating that the information is true. And then the second item was under 17-10-150 that talked about removing the height restrictions as well as setbacks and distance restrictions. And that seemed extremely concerning to me as mentioned in the young lady before me of what could happen. And those are my comments and I hope you take them seriously and just hold off on this. Thank you very much.

5:17:18•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone please?

5:17:20•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:17:26 – 5:18:27•Speaker 56

Yes, Amy Nelson, N-E-L-S-O-N. Pardon me. I was at the planning and zoning meeting last Wednesday, and the room was packed. Every single person in that room was against changing the master plan and adopting the things you're looking at today. absolutely against it it hasn't been that long since this has been put in as part of the master plan so the people in those areas know what they're buying into it's not a good thing right now the public is against any of this especially something that will pave the way and open the doors for any data centers or any solar projects I, for one, am absolutely against this. I hope you deny this a complete item. Thank you.

5:18:28•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on up, sir.

5:18:33 – 5:19:34•Speaker 40

Thank you. Bob Adams, ADAMS, and here is the Secretary of Public Land Advisory Committee, commonly known as BLACK. The text of the original legislation was run-through plaque by then Planning Director Wagner. And something that was a big deal was the zoning. And I noticed that the table, the zoning table in 17.10.080 has been deleted. Please do not delete that item. Put it back in. And so the same thing on the height restrictions. On 17.10.150, keep those height restrictions in place. No variances on them. In other words, it's something that would have to be justified, but not just arbitrarily removed. Thank you. Thank you.

5:19:35•Speaker 51

Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

5:19:37•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:19:44 – 5:20:36•Speaker 67

Paul Greenewald, P-A-U-L-G-R-E-E-N-A-W-A-L-T. I just wanted to express a concern that I see here, section 17.10.140 that talks about requiring an applicant to conduct an audible A weighted sound pressure level test. I can't tell from this what all this might apply to, but I think that one of the things that's come up with the data center is that it's become clear that A weighted testing may not account for all of the possible noise impacts or physiological effects. So I personally am not an expert in this. I would hope that WSCC would consult with somebody who is an expert in the topic, and before this is passed, figure out whether or not they need to look at a much broader range of testing. Thanks.

5:20:37•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on up, Susie.

5:20:43 – 5:23:47•Speaker 32

Hi, Susie Hertz, H-E-R-T-Z. I'm not an expert in zoning and ordinances, but I can read and I have an education and I can understand things and I read through all of the backup and all of the changes that are proposed here and I agree with the people who have preceded me wholeheartedly. This is a major overhaul And it is abundantly clear to me that this is a favoring of large-scale solar. And large-scale solar is the power to drive data centers. We have been against large-scale solar in this town since it began to be an issue a few years ago. I don't think that has changed in any way, shape, or form. If anything, now that it's a marker for potential data centers, it's even a hotter negative issue. I think that the changes that were made, the setback forgiveness, the noise level increases that are not a problem through this new ordinance material, these are all issues that are harmful to this community and are topics that the people here don't agree with and I don't agree with. And I feel that it's really important for you to revisit this with a much broader public forum review so that the people in this community can see what you intend to do. I mean, at the very minimum, that somebody's allowed to make an application and doesn't have to sign for it. It's the most basic of things. I mean the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence was done by signatures and now we're just going to throw them away and allow people to electronically or politically or whatever way they want to move forward with these projects and the people in this town and this county have no control over them if this new ordinance and this new proposal goes through. It is not a good fit for us. And it is not something that preserves this community and this county. And you have only to look at some of the other communities around this state already who have fallen into these kinds of loopholes and had problems. Boulder City is a shining example And people have finally stood up, paid attention, and started to be a little bit more straightforward about our needs. Thank you.

5:23:57 – 5:25:28•Speaker 71

Linda Clark, CLARK. Well, we're exactly where I thought we would be today. We are being told again that this is what we need. And guess what? You held it to the last item again. So the people that were here earlier can't make comments on it. Go figure. What's that up to? It's not fair to this community. I don't know what you think we are. Yeah, I think you are. You think we're just a bunch of dumbasses. But we're not. We live here. We pay our rent. We pay our property taxes. We try to come and listen to you people. It's worthless. We don't get anywhere. You don't care. You show that you don't care. And it's beyond belief that this is happening in a modern-day community. And I don't know where we go from here. I know where I would want to go. I would vote all of you out and start fresh. But we can't do that based on the laws. So you take your chances, and we'll get to you eventually, like I said on my T-shirt. We're not done yet. So think about it, and you still need to explain to me why you have to wait to the last minute of the day to bring this up when you know people aren't here to talk about it. Yeah, smile. It's pretty sneaky, isn't it? Thank you.

5:25:30•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

5:25:32 – 5:25:44•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record. This is the same caller every time.

5:25:44•Speaker 51

OK. Come on up, Mr. Fender.

5:25:52 – 5:28:58•Speaker 41

Hi there. Mike Fender, F-E-N-D-E-R. And I did find a few things here within this, within Title 17, and I've read it over a few times, and there's a few errors that I could see, but I'm not an engineer. But here's, pass this on. This is some of the items that I thought were important enough in the deal with spacing and deal with miles, and it's very quite simple, and I don't want to get into detail right now. You can read it. It took this two and a half years to get to this, and I know it's protection for the town and probably for the county as well. There are some agencies out there that will override our county, period. First of all, we do not have... any congressional people in this state that want to back us up. We don't have any senators that want to back us up. They stand there and they laugh and they think this is all right. They don't seem to realize what we have here. It's a rural community that's faced with not necessarily a water crisis, but we don't have the ability to main certain solar projects of any great magnitude in this valley. The valley is only 35 miles long. 16 to 8 month 16 to 8 miles wide so if we're gonna get anywhere in this town We cannot turn over any of our land for data centers solar farms, etc. Because this is a community now. This is not by any means an industrial park for some some of these outfits out there. Now, I'm not saying it's all wrong. I do know we have another 17 solar farms that want to be built out here in the Amargosa Valley area. Is it possible those are gonna happen? You're damn right it's possible. There's some big bucks out there, and I don't think they're gonna throw away $82 million on one lease, and another company's gonna throw away another $22 million. So at some point, we have to have protection for us, and this is what this is for. And I can see why we need this. Did I read the first draft? Yes. Did I read the second draft? Yes. Did I add some stuff to it? Yes. I was privy to some of this information, so I know what's needed to go and save this part of southern Nevada and part of this county. The county's 11 million acres. The only part of this county that we own is about 3,500 acres. The rest of it is government-owned. So we have to protect what little we have here. Not much more than that, but that's about it. When they established these programs in 2007 to 2012, they weren't thinking about people, what the population was going to be here, because there wasn't many people here. Now there is. There's 50,000, not 10,000, not 7,000 when they first did the first PEIS in 2007. So we have to be careful just by doing This is a safeguard for our community, and people got to understand that. That's why I'm here arguing for it.

5:28:58•Speaker 51

Thank you, Mr. Fender. Thank you.

5:29:01•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on down, Deborah.

5:29:11•Speaker 25

Based on the discussion, oh, yes.

5:29:16 – 5:30:18•Speaker 25

Deborah Thomas, T-H-O-M-A-S. Based on the discussion that I've been listening to, looking at the backup, it appeared to me that it was baity. But the people that are coming up here and talking are talking as though it is in Pahrump as well. If it is truly in baity, why don't you guys meet with the residents of Beatty, your constituents, and find out what they want to have happen in their community. If it's here, we've been having quite a few town halls, so I think that it would be a good idea for you guys to attend those town halls. We'd welcome you. Thank you.

5:30:19•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, anybody on the phone, please?

5:30:21•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:30:28 – 5:31:41•Speaker 65

Paul Lemus, L-E-M-U-S. I was just calling in because we've been following this and some discussion came up in regards to Amargosa and the solar development, which we are aware of. And we've had several different parties, including attorneys and other conservationists, looking at possible ways to avoid the national conservancy portion of this. Now there may be a way that with this national conservancy, we can work with them together in the community and there may be a way that they can help to protect us. But unfortunately at this point, some of us kind of feel that Mr. Jabbour out of our area should have done a little more due diligence prior to uh, approving what you guys had previously approved, which I believe now has been temporarily held or put on hold. And I just like to say that when the first Ash Meadows agreement was written, there was an agreement. The most important thing in that agreement to us community members was the fire suppression. Those, that Peterson Reservoir was a fire-retardant reservoir where they could take...

5:31:41 – 5:31:55•Speaker 54

Chair, I'm sorry, Mr. Lemus, we'll stop your time, if I may, Mr. Chair. Mr. Lemus, we are talking about the Nye County Ordinance in regards to solar, and I think you're talking about the Amagosa item.

5:31:55 – 5:33:35•Speaker 65

No, no. okay well i'm sorry i may rebut that okay thank you sir no but that's why that's the reason and the purpose that they put in the application was to avoid the tonopah uh uh the tide water excuse me solar project that's what started the whole thing that's why they were supposedly submitting so therefore it's directly affecting us because when they did that they encompassed several properties including the fuentes family who's had their water stolen from them When they encompass that area, I don't think family residents like that who have already had their water stolen and they have never honored that agreement and returned their water. They've never tried to do anything to say, let's make it better. Let's compromise. My whole point is the Ash Meadows agreement was very important. It included Nye County. It included the fire department. It included the original conservancy. This conservancy is not following that agreement. They refuse to follow it and say that they don't want to follow it. So now us as a community, we are being forced into, well, now let's bring this application. Let's encompass our properties, which you know, Ms. Strickland, that that would cloud every title within that area, especially deals that are already in escrow, which we have several of them now. How are we going to do that to a community? In other words, we can't just say solar is the big bad wolf. Let's hand over a 10 times expansion to this other company who's already not good stewards of the land and not considering the other community members involved. And let's hand them over an expansion. Thank you, Paul.

5:33:36•Speaker 51

Thank you, buddy. Your time ran out, though. Come on down in front, please.

5:33:44 – 5:36:39•Speaker 9

Good afternoon. My name is Alison Farr, P-H-A-R-R. I am with Solar United Neighbors. I'm a community organizer, and that is also called Sun Nevada. We are a nonprofit. We provide unbiased education regarding solar energy. We're developer neutral, project neutral, nonpartisan, committed to helping Nevadan communities develop thoughtful solar policies that balance economic opportunity and local priorities. i live in las vegas i'm regularly here in parent meeting with people locally and i have enormous respect for the people and the land of knight county as you consider these updates to the solar ordinance i'd like to encourage you to include a process that incentivizes developers of solar farms to negotiate community benefit agreements or a similar legal mechanism with the town closest to that project something similar to what misha allen said earlier today You likely are aware that beginning this next year, Nye County will be receiving a new source of annual revenue from solar projects located on BLM land through the new federal solar revenue sharing program. That is a significant benefit for the county. I also ask you to think about the towns that host these projects. They experience the greatest day-to-day impacts during construction, and they're the best position to identify investments that would leave a lasting, positive legacy. Community benefit agreements give these communities a seat at the table. Rather than prescribing a one-size-fits-all solution, they allow developers and local leaders to work together on investments that reflect local priorities, whether that's infrastructure and services improvements, workforce training, or annual community funding. These agreements also are good for business. Projects that are good neighbors build trust, face less local opposition, and are more likely to succeed over the long term. My request today is simple. As you revisit this ordinance, please consider creating a pathway that encourages meaningful agreements between the developers and the communities that host these projects. Sun Nevada is happy to serve as a resource to provide unbiased research, sharing examples from other jurisdictions, and helping identify best practices and resources for negotiating and enforcing CBAs. I emailed more details about both CBAs and the federal solo revenue sharing. I also have a hard copy here with me today, if you'd like that. And I want to thank you for listening and for your service to Knight County.

5:36:40•Speaker 51

Thank you very much. If you want, you can leave it with Steena. She'll get it to us. Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

5:36:49•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:36:56 – 5:38:41•Speaker 64

Yeah, this is Mark Dalton, M-A-R-K-D-A-L-T-O-N. I just want to thank you for taking my call, and I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today, Commissioners. I hope that you're listening to everybody that's come out and raised their concerns about this, that your item 10 on this. or excuse me, item eight on this agenda. I think that you've listened to everyone's major concerns about this in the negative, that this is the proverbial camel's nose under the tent. This is how it starts. And I think this is where we are now. And I think this is what this community is fearing is where this will lead if we start making these changes to our laws and these county bills and these just without making changes making them known and we've had enough public comment on these things i think that you've heard plenty from everybody we can tell by everybody sitting here on the on the board that you guys are pretty tired of hearing about this and i hope that you will listen to the public comment that has come your way and do the will of the people thank you for you for your time thank you sir come on down please

5:38:47 – 5:42:07•Speaker 74

Carolyn Allen, C-A-R-O-L-Y-N-A-L-L-E-N. I'm the town board chair for Tamargos Valley. Thank you, commissioners, for hearing everybody out. First of all, as far as the amendments go, I think it would be extremely dangerous to not, if we table it, it would work out better because for the PRPD, It's a dangerous thing. But speaking for District 1 and Amargosa Valley, I support the recommendation, the recommended changes to the ordinance that provide clarity to questions that have come up through negotiations and working with these projects. About three and a half years ago, Commissioner Jabbour and Carbone drafted legislation that passed requiring any projects in towns affected to come before the town boards and discuss and deliberate the projects before going to the county. We engaged with these developers, BLM, local citizens, and often speaking one-on-one with neighbors impacted even before the county had been seen. This was also during the moratorium. Amargosa recognized with 15 solar project at that time, now 17. on BLM land, I want to make sure we learned what exactly was coming at us as we sat at the table, because if you know you're on the menu, you're definitely dinner, so you want to be sitting at the table. It has worked out for us keeping open communications and open between the parties, the county, all of us, and sometimes the towns know before the county does. And so the negotiations have been good, um, engaged, for example, the silver star project. Which is a good pilot program for this, what we were talking about. It started out at 6,300 acres. This was before the auction. This was before anybody was interested in it. And we said, this isn't going to work. We negotiated it down to 3000 acres. I met with all the people that would be impacted directly. and they signed off on it, and then we moved forward. And it was so much, it was with the BLM. With the renegotiation, they had to re-advertise the auction. And so we made progress. And so we've got a lot of relationships with these people, and it's open, and we call them out when we see the need. But I think for the PRPD, these are very dangerous changes. It is the camel... snows under the tent, and with the rest of District 1, we're almost all BLM land. And with the administration making the changes that they did, when they stopped everything, they came after our private property. And now all of our agricultural land is going to be ate up with solar. So we're ground zero. There's not a lot we can do, but you can make some changes to this ordinance for the rest of the county. Thank you.

5:42:09•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody on the phone, please?

5:42:12•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:42:17•Speaker 8

Hello, Commissioners.

5:42:21 – 5:42:36•Speaker 55

Bruce Schatz. Thank you for taking my call. You guys dropped three times. I don't know why. to get that figured out, so. Hello?

5:42:36•Speaker 51

We're having a real hard time hearing you, Bruce.

5:42:40•Speaker 55

Hello, can you hear me?

5:42:43•Speaker 51

We can't hear you, barely. Come on down, Tony. We'll come back to Bruce.

5:42:52 – 5:43:13•Speaker 34

Tony Hoverman, H-O-V-E-R-M-A-N. So that young lady that was just up here, Allison? Do you want a solar field in your backyard? How would you like to have an extremely hot heat source in your backyard? How would you like...

5:43:14•Speaker 50

Chair, why are we letting a commenter attack an audience?

5:43:20 – 5:45:49•Speaker 34

No, I just asked her if she'd like it in her backyard. I don't want it in my backyard. I don't want the water being used to keep the solar panels clean. I don't want the solar panels that need to be replaced after a while. Where are they going to end up? In our landfill? We don't have the water. So I just wanted to ask her if she'd like, if this was going in her backyard, how she would like it. Why don't I have the water? The water, the basin is not filling up because we haven't had the rain. And everybody seems to be forgetting that because if everybody recognized that, we wouldn't be talking about many waste, we wouldn't be talking about solar farms, and we wouldn't be talking about a data center. I moved out here because I liked it out here. It was nice. There were spaces. There was land. The sky was blue. And where I came from, the sky was rarely ever blue. And we had water. So now if these three things come into this town, Pahrump is going to turn into a ghost town and just a big valley dump. And I don't think that's fair to the people that live here. I don't think that's fair to the people that retired here. I don't think that's fair to the people that can't just settle in and get up and leave. And these guys back here, They've been watching with smirks on their faces because I've been watching the looks that these gentlemen in the back have been making. I just don't think it's fair. We don't have the water. It hasn't rained that much the last three years. But everybody in this room seems to be forgetting that. And this, this number eight, why don't you just open up the door to the hen house and let the... Let the wolves in. Because once it's gone, no amount of money can put Humpty Dumpty back together again. It's real simple. You pass this, the whole town's gone. And I don't want my town to be gone. I don't want my part of Peremp ruined. And so there's nothing that Ms. Allison can say or anybody can say that, oh, it's going to be good for us, da-da-da-da-da. Because I'm betting a million bucks she wouldn't want this in her backyard. Thank you.

5:45:50•Speaker 51

Thank you. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

5:45:54•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:46:01•Speaker 55

Oh, I'm not sure if you can hear me okay.

5:46:04•Speaker 51

Barely again, Bruce. We can't. Something's wrong.

5:46:08•Speaker 54

Something's wrong with your phone.

5:46:12•Speaker 51

All right. Sam, do we have anybody else, please?

5:46:15•Speaker 27

Yes, Chair. The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:46:22•Speaker 58

Good afternoon, Commissioners. This is Emma Bellador. I spoke with you earlier.

5:46:27•Speaker 51

Can you spell your last name, please?

5:46:30•Speaker 58

Oh, I'm sorry.

5:46:32•Speaker 58

Yes, sir. V-E-L-A-D-O-R. I'm available.

5:46:36 – 5:47:12•Speaker 58

So I called and spoke with you. Thank you, sir. I called and I spoke with you earlier in regards to the Amargosa Conservancy, but unfortunately I wasn't able to provide any documents over, you know, my computer here. But I went ahead and I texted them to you as proof that the Amargosa Conservancy did accept a $120,000 donation from a solar company. The solar company documents I texted you. Ms. Strickland, thank you so very much for responding to my text and thank you. I appreciate it.

5:47:14 – 5:48:13•Speaker 58

I'm sorry, can you hear me? Yes, ma'am. Okay, and I just wanted to clarify that because apparently someone there in the panel, some official said something about there not being such a donation. Ms. Annette Fuentes was right there. She was able to hear it. And she told the individual. I think it was Mr. Coonsey who said it wasn't true. And then she said, yes, it is. $120,000 was accepted by the Amargosa Conservancy by a solar project. And it just concerns me that I was rebuttaled like that. which is very similar to how I was rebuttal at the, um, the Amargosa town hall, uh, where they didn't want to hear what I have to say. Thank you. Thank you so very much. Have a beautiful afternoon.

5:48:15•Speaker 51

Thank you. The afternoon is gone. Sam, do we have anything else or anyone else?

5:48:22•Speaker 27

Yes. Chair, the caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:48:27 – 5:50:01•Speaker 55

Okay. Commissioners, can you hear me okay now? Much better. Very good. Awesome. All right. I stand in opposition item eight. The people in my county have spoken. They're not asking for fewer protections over their land and their water or their communities. They're asking for more transparency, more accountability, more cost of government. These mammoths do not exist in a vacuum. They come as this county faces growing for utility-scale solar, transmission corridors, and data center infrastructure. Projects that will affect our water, our property, our rural character, and the future of our children that our children will inherit. Before changing development standards, ask a simple question. Who benefits? Is it the families who live here or the corporations that seek to build here? Government was instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, not to remove safeguards or protect the people from government or from powerful private interests. Speaking of private interests, I want all of you to ask all these people, all these developers with these data centers and everything, do they have anything to do with collecting information on the people? And I expect that to be a question that gets asked on every single one. The Declaration of Independence reminds us that government derives their just powers from the consent of the governed, and we do not consent to surveilled technologies.

5:50:01•Speaker 51

What does that have to do with that? This is solar, sir, solar.

5:50:04 – 5:51:07•Speaker 55

Political powers inherit the people. If people are telling you these changes move too fast, reduce accountability, or make it easier to approve projects that permanently alter our county, then your duty is to listen. Authority precedes action. Show the constitutional statutory authority for every reduction in public protection. Explain why applicant safeguards are being removed. Explain why high restrictions, setback standards, and approval procedures should change when the public is asking for greater, not lesser, oversight. Do not trade the future of Nye County for administrative convenience. Do not make it easier for massive energy or data projects to move forward unless people clearly understand the consequences that have given informed consent. The land, the water, and the liberties of the people are not commodities. They are public trust. I urge you to reject these amendments and return with proposals that place the rights and welfare of the people first for the will of the people and the whole of the good. Thank you.

5:51:07•Speaker 51

CHRIS JERRAM, JR.: J-O-H-N-S-O-N. Sam, anybody else, please? CHRIS JERRAM, JR.: Serena, anything for us? Feel free to say no.

5:51:19•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

5:51:25•Speaker 62

Hello, commissioners. Michael David Garcia, GA, RCIA.

5:51:31 – 5:53:05•Speaker 62

Am I free to speak? Oh, thank you. Thank you. I appreciate that quickie. But once again, I want to reflect on your constitutional oath, and I don't understand why it's so hard. to go over subject matter jurisdiction that can never be waived. You know, it's all badlands when you're rezoning with undelegated authority. I don't know if y'all have ever been in Vegas and hit that free wood in a blind shot back when the Badlands Golf Course was going on, but that was a pretty penny when you rezone it like that. And I just don't understand. You know, you ignore the people. You've been ignoring me for the last six years. when it comes to due process, all of this has been happening in secret. Most of our problems is one or two commissioners getting together with the county manager and the DA, and they do this without anybody. They don't do it in the public. You know, this is just the tip of the iceberg. We're seeing the shavings. You know, we're looking for accountability and responsibility. How hard is it? You got paid to do a job. That's to protect. protect the defense. No, it's not about decorating an uncontested draw. It's about restraining it. Restrain it. Did any of y'all restrain Captain Berkowitz, the DA, the judges, the LA, the ALJs, Number one catalog, these children. Y'all are weak.

5:53:06•Speaker 33

This is not germane to the item.

5:53:08•Speaker 61

This is not germane to the item. Germane, germane, germane. You are not. Please cut him off. Make your point of order through the chair.

5:53:18•Speaker 51

Thank you. Is there anyone else?

5:53:24•Speaker 51

Closing that out.

5:53:29 – 5:55:16•Speaker 50

Commissioners, where the hell are we? Can I address a couple of things real quick? So a lot of the comments I heard, this is acting like we don't already have an ordinance and a permit process that you could go through right now. We've had a couple applicants come through starting that process, which did identify some challenges in the draft that was submitted. Adopted the ordinance that was adopted. So that is what a lot of this does the zoning categories were kind of Irrelevant because it requires an SUP. That's your approval process. That's your dictation Having zoning categories within the ordinance kind of gives a little bit of a by right approval to it even though it still requires the SUP. The SUP is what approves its location. The SUP is where you put the safeguards that have to do with its geographical location. There's different circumstances throughout the whole entire county which some of the stuff that was within this ordinance created a challenge for. Everything that, what works here in Pahrump doesn't work everywhere else. What works out in the middle of BFE won't work in Brum. I mean, that's what a lot of this is trying to address. But again, it's not that you're now approving solar to go in here. That's already happened. But there's an approval process. There's safeguards. That's what this ordinance does. And I just wanted to remind everybody of that.

5:55:16 – 5:55:39•Speaker 43

And I thank you for that. However, I love that word because it changes the whole world. But I would like to see this thing with the changes that Celeste had to make, with the proper red in here, so I'm sure that I've caught all the changes because I don't know if I have or not. And I don't know if I agree with them until I see them all.

5:55:41•Speaker 50

That's where I'm confused because I'm looking at a copy right now that's got blue and red all over the place in it. It's further down in the backup.

5:55:52•Speaker 43

I don't know. It was just the copy.

5:55:55•Speaker 50

The paper copies didn't get copied with the color? Is that what you're saying?

5:56:00 – 5:56:24•Speaker 43

I don't look at the screen because I can't write on the screen. I write on this and make my notes here so I can bring them here. You know that. We don't have it. Debra doesn't have it. I don't have it. And the ones that's less brought in here, I got lost in the discussion, sorry. But you can't bring stuff like that to the meeting and expect me, especially, to like it. Done with my rant.

5:56:25•Speaker 51

Thanks, John. Go ahead, Commissioner.

5:56:30 – 5:57:13•Speaker 54

Well, I had a problem with some of the Beatty stuff, and I turned to the commissioner from that district and said, well, what do you think? And he was in agreeance that the insert, I think, that would work is the Beatty water and sanitation insert for 1710 and 100. That's definitely. All the other safeguards are already in place. They have to go in front of the boards. There is, a letter has to be provided. So they were basically reiterating what's already in the body of this document, Commissioner Koenig. That's the one thing that I heard. I don't know what the rest of you heard, but that's where I was at with the Beatty inserts.

5:57:13•Speaker 42

Especially within everybody's boundaries of their jurisdiction.

5:57:25•Speaker 43

I personally would rather see it come back with all the changes instead of having to vote no.

5:57:30•Speaker 42

Is that your motion, Commissioner?

5:57:33 – 5:57:52•Speaker 43

I can make it to a motion, yes. Make a motion that we bring this back at the next meeting with all of the changes highlighted in red and the changes that have been specified for Towner Beatty and any others that were brought up today incorporated in the one I will see.

5:57:54 – 5:58:05•Speaker 50

So would you rather just continue the item then? Yeah. Is that what you're saying? And get the proper printed backup in your binder?

5:58:10•Speaker 42

So are you OK with a second on the motion, manager? Rather than the continuation?

5:58:16 – 5:58:27•Speaker 50

Yeah, I misunderstood. I didn't realize, I didn't understand why we kept saying the changes weren't identified, but I didn't realize it's on the paper copies. So I apologize for that.

5:58:28•Speaker 43

They are identified here, but it's underlined and it's just a few words. I mean, you can't find them.

5:58:35•Speaker 67

It's very difficult.

5:58:38•Speaker 43

Maybe I'm just too old.

5:58:40•Speaker 50

The motion would just be to continue the item to whenever, pick a date.

5:58:48 – 5:59:00•Speaker 50

With the added Beatty recommendations in the text and then put into the draft and re-present.

5:59:03•Speaker 51

Four seconds. Motion, second. All those in favor? Aye. Did we say a date?

5:59:11•Speaker 54

Can we have a date? Continuous dates.

5:59:15•Speaker 50

We can just continue at the next meeting.

5:59:18•Speaker 42

The next Pahrump meeting.

5:59:19•Speaker 50

The next Pahrump meeting.

5:59:20•Speaker 54

Are you sure? Because the effective date was supposed to be August 10th, so that would change that to what?

5:59:31 – 5:59:44•Speaker 50

It's 21 days out from that, I think. but we'll have to just recommend a new effective date when it comes back.

5:59:49 – 6:00:14•Speaker 51

Okay. Still amended. Did you call for the vote? I don't know. Vote. Let's call for the vote. Aye. Aye. Aye. Resign. 5-0. I don't know why we went through all of that if we were just going to. Now we're going to go through it again. That's right. With a clean version. Okay.

6:00:14•Speaker 50

We'll just take a three-hour break next time.

6:00:17•Speaker 51

24, please. What? Oh, we're not done?

6:00:29 – 6:00:51•Speaker 50

Item 24, general public comment up to three minute time limit per person. Public comment will be for all matters off the agenda. Public comment must be limited to matters that are within the jurisdiction and control of the Board of County Commissioners. Action will not be taken on the matters considered during this period until specifically included on an agenda as an action item.

6:00:55•Speaker 51

Thank you. Go ahead, Linda.

6:00:59 – 6:01:24•Speaker 71

I have a suggestion. Why don't we just save a lot of time and each of you voice your opinion on what you want and we'll go from there. You're wasting so much time. Yeah, you agree, right? Yeah, so what's your opinion? What's your opinion? What's your opinion? What's your opinion? What's your opinion? What we do with it, I don't know, but at least we know. Thank you.

6:01:25•Speaker 51

Thanks. Serena, anybody on the phone, please?

6:01:28•Speaker 4

Caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:01:34 – 6:03:59•Speaker 56

Yes, Amy Nelson, N-E-L-S-O-N. When I had my first comments, I was going to talk about the increase in the power bill. The Valley Electric sent some people out here. They wanted to upgrade my meter. And I hadn't been here for a year. And somebody said, well, you'll get fined. If you don't let them. So I said, well, yeah, you can do that. How long is it going to take? I'm on oxygen. I can't have it off too long. And they said about five minutes. So they changed it up. And lo and behold, a month went by and my power bill went up exactly $100. Nothing changed. Not from last year to this year. Not one thing changed. And my power bill went up. $100 in one month. Now I was reading about how expensive it's going to be for data centers and that it might increase our power usage and that would have to be paid for, you know, the power that they use would have to be paid for somehow. So my guess is this has a lot to do with all the infrastructure that's going forward to allow data centers in Pahrump. And I think it's really something to point out. So a year from now, I may not be here, but other people might say, oh, I heard that a year ago. And is it finally coming true? There's a lot of things in all of these items that we don't know anything about. There's a lot of things that are being discussed that we don't know anything about. but i'm sure that uh there's a dollar sign in front of it since the county and the town needs so much money but it's not a fix we can let us you know decrease government that will do a lot to save money but uh hopefully the next meeting goes a little bit easier for you ron i'm sorry that you had such a hard time um but we'll we're hanging in there with you And so we'll see you at the next meeting. Thank you.

6:04:00•Speaker 51

What did I do? I'm sorry, sir. Come on down.

6:04:11 – 6:04:28•Speaker 44

I'm Roger Wilson. I want to talk about something that hasn't been mentioned today, data centers. No. W-I-L-S-O-N. I'll make this brief.

6:04:28•Speaker 42

Let me finish laughing for a moment.

6:04:34 – 6:04:55•Speaker 44

I would just like to recommend regarding data centers that we extend the current moratorium for one year. What I'm hearing, I think that we need to grow more in our knowledge in this ever-changing industry. that will have a major permanent impact on our town. Thank you. Thank you.

6:04:55•Speaker 54

Mr. Wilson, we'll see you on Saturday here at 10 a.m. Thank you.

6:05:03•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:05:08•Speaker 62

Hello, Commissioner. Michael David Garcia, G-A-R-C-I-A. Yes. Is my volume okay for y'all? My tone's okay?

6:05:16•Speaker 43

It's marvelous. It's marvelous.

6:05:20 – 6:05:37•Speaker 62

Oh, thank you, thank you. I appreciate that. Always nice to have a few cheerleaders in the house. But anyhow, the great thing about defense, folks, when it comes to your constitutional oath, we got a chance to run it back. Y'all are obviously weak when it comes to fraud, extortion, and official oppression.

6:05:37 – 6:08:08•Speaker 61

So, Mr. DA, let's run it back. I will run it back and run it back and run it back. Address, redress. And next, we get to get the remonstrance. Okay? First, he didn't make a point of order. I was never ruled out of order, okay? Jermaine, let's talk about Jermaine. You ever wonder why the DA has never been prosecuted for processing fraud with Captain Berkowitz? What about the judges? What about the children? What about the trafficking of children? Y'all ain't got no levels. Y'all can't stand up. You are so weak with your spiritual altar, you can't even recognize. What about Matthew 19, 26? It may seem impossible for me to go against all y'all, but with God, nothing is impossible. I stand before you. Show me. Show me you can stand up for the First Amendment. Show me you know how many unconstitutional county rules, ordinances, and state statutes supersede in an alien vote declaration in Nevada Constitution Article 1, Section 1. Show me you got it. None of y'all have it. Y'all are weak. Weak, weak, and you sold out your neighbors. Justice for all. What about that pledge? Where are you at, Mr. DA? You're well aware that Kurt Bitto had 52 ex parte with Chief Justice Herndon. Where are you at? I can't hear you. Come on, Sheriff. Come on, Sheriff. You sponsored some of these unconstitutional ordinances. What about practicing from the bench? Why can't we bring a camera into a public courtroom in our own cases? You got judges hanging notes on the door. They're practicing. They're not legislators. They're practicing from the bench. What's wrong with y'all? You talk about animals. What about the children? Listen, we all have a cross to bear. Where's your cross? It obviously ain't in God's trust. Your oath to office is dead. She ever approved it. It's called... It's called legal realism. Your whole career, Mr. DA, has been an illusion with Chevron. Take that to the bank. You're nothing but a fraud. And I know it. I can stand up to you. Bring that sheriff, that policy man. A policy is not law. An ordinance is not law. A rule is not law. A statute is not law. Where is your constitutional oath you got paid for? Show me.

6:08:09•Speaker 61

Oh, thank you so much. Jesus.

6:08:15•Speaker 42

I don't know. It's freedom of speech.

6:08:19•Speaker 51

Speaking of psychiatrists, go ahead, Susie. Not that you need a psychiatrist.

6:08:25 – 6:11:33•Speaker 32

Susie Hertz, H-E-R-T-Z. I just wanted to mention and say that I appreciate all of the effort that goes on in the planning department and in the staff's levels of responsibilities. I can't imagine how difficult it is to have to try and rewrite these ordinances and laws to make them helpful and protective. So I respect that and I thank you for your efforts. As a citizen, I think that we're looking at a situation in our lives right now that has become monstrous. And that is what has happened with the growth of solar and data centers. And it's quickly growing out of control. I don't think that we as a small town, or any small town for that matter, has the expertise and the capacity to try and protect itself and its citizens from this massive big business push. And I also recognize from my own research that a lot of this stuff has been going on for years at the state and federal levels before we ever hear of it. So sometimes you guys don't hear about it either until the very tail end of things. But it takes a group of us, it takes us as a community to recognize that and to take responsibility for it and become educated. We need to know more. The town hall is an example of what will help do that. But we need more of that. People don't understand how the laws work and how the rules work here. in this small town or in our state. And I think maybe we need to do a little bit more work on that because you're here to protect us and serve us. And if the public doesn't know what's coming down the pike, that's the means by which they get so irate and so upset. and so enraged, and we can avoid that if we worked more constructively and aggressively at being educated and sharing that education. On a personal, just a today note, it occurred to me that maybe, and I've talked about us not reordering the agenda as happens every day, every time we have a meeting. And what happens quite often is that the very hot topics get left to the end of the day. And it makes people feel as if they're being kind of pushed out the door. And that's not right. And on top of it, I think if those issues that are hot were dealt with in their position, you would be less burned out by the time they come up.

6:11:33•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you. Serena, anybody on the phone, please?

6:11:37•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:11:42 – 6:14:29•Speaker 65

Yes, Paul Lemus again, L-E-M-U-S. I wanted to take my three minutes real quick and remind everybody of a Time Magazine article. I know it's a little off base, but in our situation in the Amargosa Valley area, this is some stuff that we've been kind of dealing with. So October 23rd, 1995, I was jumping on a bus and headed to the military to join the United States Navy and fight for my country. And I wanted to go there and be part of the war that was going on, which is kind of back in that area now. And some of the younger generations, like my kids that are in J.R.O.T.C. right now are being kind of abreast and brought up to this situation that we're now dealing with across seas. But back in Nye County in the same month, sitting on a bale of barley destined for his cattle, Dick Carver gets just a little misty eye as he recalls the moment that propelled him in the leadership of a rebellion. Now sweeping the West, usually mild-mannered and affable, The Nevada rancher and Nye County Commissioner reached a point last year when he had enough. To him, federal intrusion into the daily life of his county had simply grown too far. Great so, on July 4th, 1994, Independence Day, he took the law into his own hands. His weapon of choice, a rusting yellow D7 Caterpillar Bulldozer. I just ask that you guys take a moment to read this article. It goes back to a time when things like what we're dealing with now were going on. And we just want to say that with District 1 Commissioner Mr. Jabbar and things that are going on, it's a big area out there. We appreciate the stuff that you did and the motions you made with the International Property Maintenance Code. Thank you for that personally. We really thank you. Um, but we need to take a book, a page from the book of Dick Carver. And that magazine was entitled, don't tread on me. And I think it's important that you guys look it up and just read that article because this is what could happen where there's, you know, 250 armed residents ready to protect their land. And this is what we're dealing with in our rural area right now. So I just want to say, you know, in no way am I going against the government. I love my country. I fought for my country, and I will continue doing that. But it's a really good article, and I think if everybody goes back to that time and just does a quick review of it, it'll remind you of a time like what we're dealing with now again. Thank you.

6:14:31•Speaker 51

Thank you. Come on down, Mike.

6:14:37 – 6:15:24•Speaker 41

Mike Fender FEN DER earlier this morning. Somebody made a comment about the Emergosa Conservancy collecting $120,000 Well, I kind of disagreed with that kind of an idea and it wasn't blow the hole. I got a text From Kevin Emmerich. He's with basin and range watch his wife. It's Susan Sorrell's are really good friends. I And I know Susan. She knows me. I know Kevin, and I know his wife. He was adamant, stating that they did not get the $120,000 like somebody went and said they did. So I told Kevin that I'm going to get up here and let you guys know that's what he told me, and I'm passing it on, and I believe him. I really do.

6:15:25•Speaker 51

Thank you. Thank you. Serena?

6:15:31•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:15:33 – 6:17:44•Speaker 64

Hi, this is Mark Dalton, M-A-R-K-A-D-A-L-T-O-N. Sorry, I know that everybody's tired and just wants to go, but I just felt that I just needed to get this out. This is for Commissioners Koenig, Bain, Jabbour, and Strickland. This morning, I was a little taken aback at some of Chairman Boscovich's comments. I know nobody likes to talk about the data centers and everything, but his comments really struck a really hard chord with me. And so I'm going to ask that, I'm going to request that each one of you I'm going to ask you a question and see if one of you is willing to place an item agenda item on the next available agenda to review the chairman's conduct during this meeting today on July 21st to preserve the records and just review it. and consider, you know, his conduct and maybe censure or even possibly even up to and including maybe replacing him as the chairman because there's, I believe that we should be fair and impartial in our conducts and in our manners. But he's obviously made up his mind on how he's going to deal with data centers. And so I'd like to ask you each one of you.

6:17:44•Speaker 51

Where did I say that? That's not true.

6:17:46•Speaker 50

That is absolutely untrue, sir.

6:17:48 – 6:17:59•Speaker 51

You need to look back and watch the comments that I made. I said everybody needs to get the facts, but I'm sorry for interrupting.

6:17:59•Speaker 64

The comments today were that you weren't going, that no one was going to change your mind.

6:18:08•Speaker 51

No, sir. Sorry.

6:18:12 – 6:18:26•Speaker 64

Okay. Well, please review it and I'll be happy to come to the next meeting and apologize to you in person if you find that I am mistaken.

6:18:27 – 6:18:38•Speaker 51

You are mistaken. Okay, you got anything else? Mr. Dalton? Okay, Mary Ann, go ahead.

6:18:39 – 6:19:48•Speaker 73

Mary Ann Hollis, H-O-L-L-I-S. Out of sympathy for you guys and you guys and myself, I'm gonna try to get this under a minute. Last year, Ron, you said a couple of times you're not going to recognize Pahrump in five years. Remember saying that? I'm not recognizing it in one year since the time you said that. There's a Zen proverb that says, let go or be dragged. And my daughter gave me that on a shirt and said, when are you... you know, sort of going to give up on all this. You're like exhausting yourself. And I said to her, because I feel that if I let go, I've let down many of the people for whom I speak. And I don't want to do that. And now with all these hot topics coming at us from all angles, there's just no excuse to not keep on fighting anymore. and not let go. Thank you.

6:19:49•Speaker 51

Thank you. Serena, anybody else, please?

6:19:51•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:19:54 – 6:23:05•Speaker 55

Hello, commissioners. Can you hear me OK? Yep. OK, good. Bruce Johnson, JOHN. That's the way. I just want to quote Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch on his concurrent opinion. Trump with the slaughter. We have tolerated adventurous theories long enough. It is time to return all the way to the Constitution. And I'd appreciate it if you'd mute your mic, because that is very annoying. So as we conclude today's meeting, I ask you to remember that every vote cast today will one day become part of Knight County's system. And it might even come back to haunt some of you. The Declaration of Independence tells us that governments derive their just powers from the extent of the governed. The Nevada Constitution declares that all political powers inherit the people, and that government exists for their protection, security, and benefit in the whole. Those are not aspirations. They are limits on government. The Supreme Court has repeatedly reminded us of those limits. In the United States v. Lopez, the court returned to the first principles, reminding us that the federal government is one of enumerated powers and that constitutional boundaries exist to preserve liberty. Those same principles should guide every level of government, including county government. Today, we also revisit an important rule of jurisprudence. Quote cases for what they actually hold, whether discussing Lopez, Cheek, Doe, Garner, or Hassett, the lesson is the same. Law is built on the actual holding of the case, not on slogans or secondhand interpretations, and truth requires accuracy. That same commitment should guide this board. Before changing any development standards, before approving debt, before expanding surveillance, Before facilitating projects involving solar fields, transmission corridors, or data centers, ask the first question, where is the authority? Authority precedes action. If authority is delegated, identify it. If rights are affected, protect them. If the public raises concern, answer them openly. Constitutional government is not measured by how quickly it can act. It's meant by whether it acts according to the authority entrusted to it. Now, I would like to remind... Mr. Chair, Miguel, a year ago, August 11th, during the last Purple Heart Valor, I approached you and Brett Wagner out in the street and asked you what it would take to have a roundtable constitutional discussion. And you told me that you were not interested in doing so. Now, since that, you've been into the body politic, meaning the Nevada Republican Party, Nye County Republican Party's office, looking for votes from people and everything. So I really, I would actually hope you reconsider and this .

6:23:05•Speaker 51

Thanks. What's annoying is the AI speeches constantly. But that's just my opinion. Serena, we got anybody else?

6:23:12•Speaker 4

The caller is unmuted. Please speak and spell your name for the record.

6:23:19 – 6:25:49•Speaker 66

Matthew Winterhawk for the record. Addressing this board as a body regarding the conduct of its presiding officer during today's public comment periods. I heard Chair Boscovich repeatedly respond to residents who were opposing data center development with condescension, specifically stated early on, did we have data centers on this today? During the comment period, he has expressed tons of dissatisfaction. Let's just say that, and a plethora throughout this entire day. I heard him then state also, if any of you think that you are going to change my mind, well, then good luck. And I do have that recording. So it's literally on record. It's recorded. I have it screen recorded right now. Commissioners are permitted to have opinions. They are not permitted to treat the public participation as theater while communicating that residents' evidence, experiences, and concerns are incapable of affecting the decision-making process. The purpose of public comment is not to give officials three minutes to tolerate the public, Mr. Boscovich. It is to allow the public or people whose authority you exercise to inform, question, and petition the government. chair is not the board the chair has one vote the gavel does not transform one commissioner's personal position into county policy and it does not authorize the presiding officer to belittle residents for using the very process that this county tells them is available for them to use their voice today's content created the appearance and the opposition to these products will be dismissed before the evidence was ever even heard that is your lackadaisical attitude towards the constituents in which you are chosen to represent the damages public confidence in every decision of this board makes concerning data centers water land use, and supporting infrastructure, a very big concern for anybody moving forward with you as a chair. I'm therefore requesting that the commissioner direct. We have one, two, three, four other chairs right there. I'm asking that Jabbour, Strickland, Koenig, and Urbane consider a formal censure and removal and replacement of Chair Boscovich and appointment of a neutral presiding officer over all pending data center and related infrastructure matters. The chairmanship is authority delegated by this board. It can't be withdrawn by this board. When the chair uses that authority to discourage the public rather than protect its right to participate, the remaining commissioners have a duty to act on behalf of the public. So I'm asking the commissioners, once again, Koenig, Bain, Jabbour, and Strickland, will you sponsor and vote for an agenda item reviewing centering and replacing Chair Boscovich after his treatment of Nye County residents today, yes or no? And also remember, silence is also an answer, and Nye County is watching you.

6:25:52•Speaker 51

Are you finished, sir?

6:25:55 – 6:26:21•Speaker 66

Well, I'd also like to request that the record preserve at 1.20 this afternoon when Chair Boscovich announced a recess until 3 p.m., members of the public audibly expressed, 3 o'clock? And the chair responded, yeah, I didn't stutter. Or words to that precise effect, but, you know, I'd have to look at my recording. The recording will establish the exact language and resist obviously procedurally permissible, but speaking to participants and residents as though their surprise deserves ridicule is not the temperament Nye County should accept. Thank you.

6:26:22•Speaker 51

Anybody else, Serena?

6:26:26•Speaker 51

CLOSING PUBLIC COMMENT. COMMISSIONER BAIN, ANYTHING? NO. CHABOUR. COMMISSIONER CHABOUR.

6:26:31 – 6:27:14•Speaker 42

YES, THANK YOU, CHAIR. I'M DISAPPOINTED THAT, NO, I KNOW THEY HAVE OTHER THINGS TO DO. AND RIGHTFULLY SO. WELL, YEAH, WE HAVE TO FINISH THIS. SO I'M DISAPPOINTED THAT OUR FRIEND MARIANNE LEFT, BECAUSE I LOVE HER QUOTE, LET GO OR DRAG. But I don't smoke. So when I see Mary Ann, I will let her know. Anyway, thank you, everybody, for today, for your patience with me and each other. And thank you for all of your input, those of you that are still here. And I hope you have a great rest of your evening.

6:27:18•Speaker 51

Thank you, sir. Commissioner Strickland. Thank you, Jeff.

6:27:21•Speaker 54

I just want to know if Mr. Winterhawk is an actual member of this community.

6:27:26•Speaker 33

No, he is not.

6:27:27•Speaker 54

I just don't understand.

6:27:29•Speaker 33

I saw his financial declaration. He has declared he's been the last 10 years living in Clark County.

6:27:34 – 6:27:48•Speaker 54

So why does he want to call in and berate us and judge us on our little small town? Go mess with Las Vegas. My comment is keep your Clark County issues in Clark County. Go do Clark County. That's where you live. Thank you, DA.

6:27:48•Speaker 51

Thank you. Commissioner Koenig.

6:27:51•Speaker 43

I have nothing, thank you.

6:27:52 – 6:28:42•Speaker 51

Thank you. Mine will be really quick. I will not sit here or anywhere else and be kicked in the head over and over and over and people expect me not to fight back. That's not happening. I won't do it. And my comments stand. I stand by them from this morning. I used an analogy of if a shoe store is coming here, I want to know the positives and the negatives before I make a decision. Boom. And then I read a text that I was screenshotted showing somebody that said, I don't want any facts. I don't want to know anything about a data center. I don't want it. So that to me is ignorance. And the people that want to fight all the time are just ignorant. There's 30 people that have a problem and want to bitch and complain about everything. The other 50,000 here are normal, and I stand by that too. We're out.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.