About this meeting
- Government Body
- Planning Commission
- Meeting Type
- Planning Commission
- Location
- Norfolk, NE
- Meeting Date
- February 3, 2026
Transcript
86 sections (from 306 segments)
What we do Uh, good morning. I will call the February 3rd, 2026 Norfolk Planning Commission meeting to order. inform the public of the [clears throat] open meetings act posted in northwest cornerwest on repeat. Excellent. And I'll ask for roll.
Wait here. Sock here. Simonson here. Hky here. Ha here. Kubby. Griffith here. Kee here. Ronfelt here. All right. It ask for approval of the full agenda. Move to approve. Second. Please vote.
All commission members present voting in the affirmative. Motion carries. Consideration of the approval of the minutes of January 21st, 2026 planning commission meeting. to approve. Second. Please vote. All commission members present voting in the affirmative. Motion carries.
All right. The next uh is consideration to have city staff prepare conditional use permit for discussion and action at the regular scheduled planning commission meeting for automobile sales on property addressed as 600 West Omaha Avenue. This item was postponed at the January 6th, 2026 planning commission meeting. Good morning. If you would sign in for us.
A little explanation. What I put up here was what Steve Ramos put together for potential parking spots. You guys had kind of asked about that because parking was a a big concern and pulling out onto Omaha and that sort of, you know, came about last meeting. Um, so he put this together to kind of show general parking spots and that if some are parked in the front to leave that that pathway open so that you wouldn't be backing out into Omaha that you could do hopefully most of your maneuvering on the lot. Did you want to let them know kind of how you wanted to rearrange it? Because we were talking about having some of the parking for the the dealer in the front building, the the east west building. And now we did find out from the state that the 10 parking spaces according to them have to be contiguous, meaning there needs to be one place for 10 parking spots. Half can't be inside, half can't be outside for that required 10. So what we're going to do is we're going to move right now. We're going to move to the building. We're going to use this place because in the back in the back the building in the back we have space for 12 cars even if we if we don't going to have 12 car but I mean it's a space for them. So, you're going to keep the cars
that are for sale in the white building and then you're going to move your shop to the east west tin building. Yes, sir.
And I'm assuming you got okay from the landlord um to park vehicles in that back lot then? Yes, sir. Yeah. He's right there. Okay.
Gotcha. Okay. So then it's there's no cars for sale on the front. I would love to have use one of or two of the parking lot that we guys let [clears throat] we are allowed to park in there like this place the people from Omaha Avenue can see but yeah I mean and we called the stay and they said it doesn't matter if you have five inside the building and two or three on front outside the building we only need like a one place for pay in case you have more than 10. So they need to have 10.
Yes.
The state requires a minimum of 10 parking spaces in one contiguous area. We called the state yesterday morning when he was in my office to ask if if you have the 10 parking spaces, can you also have some in other areas? And they did say yes as long as there was one place for the minimum 10 required. [clears throat] Any other questions? Yes. I would just like to hear from the property manager. I guess if you would be willing to come up and speak and we just have you sign in.
Okay. And your name, sir? Bob Rayside Jr. Um, Mr. Rayside, as far as the parking spots in the back, what are all of those four?
Those are there's a couple apartments up on the far right building. There's two apartments up there. Um, so it's parking spots for them. And then there are two buildings in the bottom or two businesses in the bottom. One is Olsson's Pest Connection and the other is ASC. Um, so they've got some employee parking in the back. They only need about six to eight spots in the back. So they need six legally they they need how many spots for that building. Do you know? I think he was figuring two per apartment and then two per business. I think when you and the guy came over.
Yeah. When we came we cuz the business is by square footage. You figured it was about 1,000 square ft for, you know, combined total for businesses. It's one for 200. So you need five for the businesses, four for the apartments. So you need nine, which is essentially that northern back line there would all be theirs. And then how many parking stalls are needed for the the the car dealership business?
Essentially, they needed 16 total. So 10 for the display, five for the mechanic, and then one extra for like uh a customer for the uh the dealership. So that's how we came up with 16 last time. And how many inside do they have or is there space for? There's You said there's space for 12 inside in the back building. In the front building it's more than seven.
So in the back part there's room for 12. The front there's room for extra. That business only has two people. There's a mechanic and him. So there's actually only two of them there. So, in the the new proposed display area, the white roofed building, is there any other entrance door other than the overhead doors into that building? There's an entrance from the front through that metal east west building, but on the outside, um, no, just through you can get into that metal building through the side, through the alley, or there's a overhead door in the front that's always open. So that would be the two entrances.
And after this meeting, they're actually meeting the fire marshal down at the site because it it sounds like they may need more human doors for the fire marshall because there's just one people door right now. So, I'm just trying to get this right in my brain, too. Um, so the state requires 10 spots for a car dealership, but those can be inside or outside.
The 10 have to be inside or outside. They have to be contiguous. Okay? But [clears throat] as long as you have 10, say, outside, you can have a few inside. Or if you have all 10 inside, you can have a few outside. As long as you have those 10 contiguous spaces. Okay. Cuz yeah, I'm just with everybody parking. I mean, needing them for the business, needing them for tenants, needing them for the customers, needing them for the vehicles that are being sold. They just want to make sure there's enough spots. So, it just seems like a lot going on.
So, the top one of the top apartments is owned by the building owner and he's here two days a year. So,
and so the main way to get a vehicle into the white roof building is through the silver roof building. Um, no. So to get a vehicle in, there's actually an overhead door right about where that cursor is. Yep. Okay. Okay. Then you can also pull in through the front and there's an opening so you can come in from the street and go in. Gotcha. It's actually got two. Yep. Gotcha. That that overhead door from the parking lot must have been put in recently. I didn't see it on Google Maps at all. Um No, there was swing doors in it before and they were just changed to an overhead door. Yes. But a vehicle can fit through there. Yep. Vehicle can fit through.
Okay. [snorts] Any other questions?
Thank you, gentlemen. Any discussion? If I were to have a business like this and car dealership, it just this location doesn't make sense to me. And I would try to find alternate locations um just because of visibility. And I mean I want people to be able to see my vehicles from a the street of Omaha Avenue that's as busy as it is. But I mean, I guess if it legally checks all the boxes and he wants to do it, so be it. [clears throat] I think I struggle with the same thing. It's it's that front just I can't get over the front piece of that. Does it make more sense to have everything, you know, to fit them all in the back? I mean, I think yes. Specifically with that the 10 10 contiguous cars. I I think about our last meeting too when we had this on here and just the people traveling through the alley. Um there's a galllet said that alley is pretty widely used and so want to make sure it's safe as well because that's not a lot of area going from the alley to the big street and then uh if you're going to have two parking spots there or cars there not a lot of room either and it you know it it is a cup you know us as a planning commission you guys as planning commission
commissioners have a say in what goes in it um from a standpoint of if you don't think deem something appropriate, then we've got to make sure that that's that's in there. You know, whether it be safety wise, whether it be this, whether it be that. It's just one of those things where um you know if you want this to move forward, state your opinion in that matter as far as what your concerns are and how do we you know voice those concerns through the the conditional use permit. I would just add that if that's what you choose to do. I have concerns that the only access to the display area is either through the service area or through an overhead door. We have safety issues there of patrons or potential patrons walking in an overhead door where vehicles are backing out or moving around. Um, I guess we could put it in the cup that it'll meet all city, state, and federal requirements. That way, if the fire marshall um deems there being an additional person door, people door in it, it's covered. Yeah. I mean, to that point, I appreciate that, Derek. to what we can put in there if it were approved. I don't I wouldn't want to see customer parking right in the front there. It's fine if you want to display a couple of vehicles, but
safety I just that would be my addage. Yeah, because listen, I'm no race car driver, but I'm just thinking to myself with kids in the car, whatever, backing out on Omaha Avenue with semis barreling 45, you know, sometimes miles an hour. That's pretty blind there. I don't want any sort of traffic accident there. Mhm. So if it if it were that would be my opinion is to zero customer parking in the front. Yep. Because that is what my mind goes straight to is someone backs right out and then a semi just takes them out. Clobers.
That's my that was my fear from the beginning. So, I think if that's something um that you know I would get the problem is is there's there's not a lot of space there. You'd be in a sevenpoint turn trying to get turn around especially if that garage door is closed to the service center. You know, you're going to be in a sevenpoint turnaround and that you know especially if there's cars up front. It's just not ideal. I want the very basic driver to be able to get in and get out just for, you know, consistency
just how that photo looks. I mean, they don't have to park like this. They can just go and do like this and go through the the aisle and take the Omaha Avenue. That's easy to say, but this photo is very deceiving because I'm looking at street view right now. There's four vehicles there and it is packed up there. I mean, it is there's two pickups that would have to back out. I don't know how they're going to get those. I mean, they're hanging over the sidewalk as it is. So, I I do think the limiting customer parking up front is probably our best route there.
I would agree with that. And I also agree with Martin on the people doors and making sure that we have something in there because I that's a huge safety issue I think too. And you you had mentioned the fire marshal.
Yes, they're meeting him after this meeting this morning to discuss this because when Jean was in my office, we talked to Shawn and because of the the change of the buildings and bringing the public essentially into C vehicles, that changes the requirements. So, they're going to be talking about that this morning. So I can put something in there about shall follow all fire marshal regulations just so that [clears throat] we know what it is and afterwards I can certainly get specifics from the fire marshal as to what those requirements are if you want.
I think that would be good. I'm guessing they're going to probably want a people door man door in the front and the back of that. Mhm. But would that be doable in store? I mean, you either do or you don't. Uh that's going to affect, you know, the the ability for you to do this. If you're not willing to put in the doors, then it's just kind of kaput anyways. It's, you know, it's not possible. I understand. So,
okay. I I just I would like to meet with them today and see what are the option and like talk with the L with the owner and see how much it's going to cost and see if we can do or not. I mean, I don't have an answer now yet. I would like to say yes, but I don't know. I don't know how 100%. Because if that's the only one like like I'm just saying if this were to be approved you would have to do Yeah. Exactly. I understand. It's not it's not an option. I guess I know I know in that case if we are not able to do that I guess we won't open the business right there.
And I guess just for clarification you rent both of those places right? Both of those buildings. I rent one of them and the other one is from my is my partner and he rents it and he rent it. Okay. Is all of this okay with the property manager slashowner? Uh yeah. Now there again the door. It's going to depend what where he says the door's got going to depend on what he gives us for requirements for the door. But I mean I would think it would be possible but it's going to depend where he wants to where we have to put it. So, but as far as the owner goes, it's all above board
because I would be pretty upset if I didn't want this here and we approved this and he's like, "What the heck? What is going Why is there a a used cars, you know, operation being operated?" Owner's aware of what's going in there. He's opened a door. It's just going to depend if they want a door where it's at. Um, okay, fair enough. I just wanted to, I guess, put that on the record. So, I would think if if there's going to be a door required, it would be from the public area of the building. Yeah. On the north side,
I'm I'm assuming we're going to have several things from the fire department that we're are going to need done. So, I think putting that in the the cup is just our moving forward point from now. We do that and see where we go from there. Val, is there any if this were to approve, if the cup were to be approved with what we've decided on as far as conditions of the of the permit, if we if that were to be approved today, city staff prepares it, the meeting is held with the fire marshal, fire department, what you know, all of those. Is that going to is that preventative? like he can he just take the cup and run?
No. This if they start, you know, exing things and nixing things and whatever. Um today if you vote to move this back to staff, it's just to write the the cup with the conditions. So there's still that next two week buffer as far as amendments and things if we needed to do something, right? So this wouldn't come back for an actual vote on the written cup until the 18th. Okay.
And at that point too, we can if things come about from the fire marshall or if what the fire marshall says you need to do to make this happen and you go, "No, that's too expensive." Or the the land owner says, "I don't want that done to my building." Then you can just kind of let us know and then we can just scrap it. Right. Okay. I think we're trying to just look out for the public and give you every opportunity to do it. I just I don't want to scrap it before it's too late, I guess, I think is part of it. But I understand.
Um, there any other concerns, questions for the applicant? So thank you sir. Thank you. Thank you.
Any other thoughts, comments? Like Val said, this we're only approving for staff to put together the cup today. we'll get a second chance at this and u I guess that's all I have to say. Seeing that I take a motion. Do we want to Yeah. Any other conditions include you know so we have time frame how long do you want to give it to them? Five. Okay. And then
just based on the size of everything, I think 10 may be a little long and personal privilege like usual, right? To the the applicant. Yeah. To the applicant. And then the other conditions I have um just being specific, 10 contiguous display parking stalls in the northern concrete block building. Uh no customer parking in front along Omaha Avenue, display parking only. And then shall follow fire marshall regulations. and then I'll put the specifics in there that is needed after they meet today. Anything else is I don't know if you want
this was just a thought I guess as far as do we want to do you guys want to limit that on the south side of the building where those two spots are. Do we want to limit how many display cars can be there? Oh, that's good. But but I also if there's no customer parking, is it that big of an issue? So I just would raise that comment. I I would like to see designated customer parking in that back lot, not just if there's one open, a customer can park there.
And then what about display cars in the front? I'm okay with the display cars in front. Do we want to limit how many spots can be considered? I think, but what happens when they have to move those? And that's going to potentially be the same scenario as it could be with a customer. At least that's where my mind went. Hopefully, they're a little bit better at maneuvering than Well, yeah, my 68-year-old mother or whomever, you know, like that's just I understand that.
My thoughts. Personally, I think I'd rather have it full of display cars up there because those are going to move less and you're going to keep customers from parking up there if the spots are already taken. So, I don't think we limit that up there. Okay. It looks like there's about room for I'd say four display cars uh to still keep a pathway to their overhead door open with a driveway. There's a sidewalk you got to be careful of, too. is three or four. Three or four will be pushing.
Any other specific conditions for Val? I see. Yeah. Kind of three. Yeah. Probably three on east side of the door and then three on the west side of the door.
We
[cough and clears throat]
Val, any other uh So, we have the the no customer parking in the front on that south side. Yep. Um, designated parking in the back, right? Designated customer parking. Okay. Yep. Um, thank you. All 10 in that north building. Yep. The fire marshall in the fire marshall. Any state, federal applicable codes?
Yep. Five-year time frame. Personal privilege applicant. And how many? because I thought limit the display to so many vehicles along Omaha Avenue and maintain a pathway on private property for vehicle maneuvers so that you're not in and out of Omaha Avenue. That way you keep your pathway open and then of no blocking the sidewalk. I mean, is that that might be in the state or, you know, local municipal code, but I think it needs to be flatout stated is no blocking of the
no overhang of any vehicles across the sidewalk. So, I mean, I know there's not a, you know, you know, ton of traffic on that sidewalk, but it's just it's also winter time, so there's not a lot of traffic out and about anyways, but So, how many vehicles did you want to limit the front to? Three, four? What did you guys decide to keep the the pathway open? I would say no more than four. Okay. From that picture, he looked like he had space for three on the east side of the door.
And I'd say there's at least space for three on the west side. I can't confidently call a number and say well if you go by Steve's I mean here are the two parallel parking so from the white line up that needs to be maintained as a pathway. to to maneuver on site. Um because the white line is the back of the sidewalk cuz they're going to have to get cars out of that building that they're working on.
Mhm. Also,
okay. So, where are those cars going to go? Like if you're trading out, you have, you know, one coming out, leaving the customer to pick it up and one going in presumably in that back lot.
So, I think we I think we have to limit it to three now. I I didn't think about the overhead door being right there in the middle. you're they're going to need room to go in and out with other cars there. And if they're the ones backing out on to Omaha Avenue, this this conversation's been for nothing. I think you got to limit it to three. That's kind of what I was thinking in the beginning. No. Any other specific conditions that you guys think need to be addressed?
Would we want to suggest signage be that is not a customer? Would that be could that be included in that
no customer parking? So, designated customer parking in the rear parking lot and um signage along Omaha of no customer parking or something like that. Okay. Any other conditions? I take a motion. I would move for consideration to have city staff prepare conditional use permit for discussion and action at the next regular scheduled planning commission meeting for an automobile sales on property addressed as 600 West Omaha Avenue.
Second, please vote. Voting in the affirmative. Keech, Hubky, Sock, Griffith, Hoffert, Simson. Voting in opposition, Ronfeld, and Wait. Motion carries. Thank you. At this time, I'd uh open up the public hearing at the request of Terresa Ramirez and Janet Oberhouser to consider a zone change from OD office District to R3 Multiple Family Residential District on property generally located southwest of the intersection of South 16th Street and Park Avenue.
Good morning. Morning. [clears throat] Good morning. Uh, my name is Ignasu Machuka. with IMP construction and um IMP construction and a group want to partner up in this lot. Um it's been vacant for ever. Uh we would like to do uh some town homes in the property. The lot south of it is already R3 and um is that [clears throat] owned by the school val [clears throat]
approximately how many town homes are you thinking? Uh we're getting it surveyed, but uh probably about 10 of them.
And then is there all the infrastructure already in there? Sewer. We would get it in. We already uh talked to the city where the water sewer is. Uh we've talked to the power company where the power would come. Okay. And then you'd be responsible. They they're just as far as the street goes, uh, it'll be a private road going in. Okay. So, it be maintained by the property by the homeowner. Okay. But every there's enough room in there for emergency personnel. Yes, we did talk to Sean, fire marshall. Uh, we would have to do like a circle drive so they can go in and out at the end of the
driveway. Okay. Uh, as far as those trees go, that's all is that all an easement right there on the east side. That's actually public right of way. Okay. So, there's they're not going to be able to touch that or anything. Start knocking down trees. Correct. Yeah. I could see the neighbors being somewhat frustrated with that, I guess, if that was the case. But, nice privacy fence. Yeah. It is public rightway. So I mean if ever we needed a street to go in there then obviously they would be gone because that public rightway is the only access to this piece of property right now.
Ah so if anybody ever wants to buy and develop that then we'll have to get them there.
Fair enough. [clears throat] Any other questions for Mr. Machuka?
Thank you. Yep. This is a public hearing. Is there any one that would like to speak for or against this matter? Good morning. Good morning. [clears throat]
My name is Sandra Duncan. I am the power of attorney for my mother that lives at um 1501 Park Avenue. Um she has dementia. So um that's why I'm here. She doesn't quite understand what's going on. um as um I guess potential homeowner when she's gone um because it will be uh transfer on death to my brother and I when she passes away. Um the the valuation of property um could go down because of the town houses. We're also looking at traffic um with the school. Right now the when the people come to pick up their kids, they all park on both sides of Park Avenue. Um sometimes as you know as as far down as the 1505. Is that your address, Mike?
1507.
1507. um which is on the other side of the trees um when they're coming to pick up kids. Um my husband and I actually live on 16th Street uh closer to Northfor Avenue and um morning school traffic can be quite um interesting. Um sometimes around noon when the kindergarteners are coming and going and then of course in the afternoon um when kids um I do see you know uh town homes having children and it being easy for them to walk to school because um Mike's wife and I used to both walk to school uh because the property that they have was their parents' property also. Um, so it, you know, it just seems like putting, you know, 10 more units in there. Um, could be a lot of congestion as well as the size and the their parking. Um, it doesn't seem like it'd be quite enough space for parking lots and homes. Um, I know that, you know, the land has been there since I was a baby. [laughter] Uh, in the alalfa field there, that's pretty much what used to be there. Um, I don't know how that would work with the because is it the school that owns the south piece of property? That Yeah, that big square there.
The school. Yeah. Um, I don't know if there's plans in the future for what the school wants to put in, you know, a bigger gymnasium, um, you know, more classrooms, things like that would then really, you know, congest things. um a [clears throat] couple of houses up 16th Street. There were a couple old houses and there's two small um Well, see, they're not even on that map. Those two empty lots, uh the the second one and the third one north from Yes, those two. They put in two nice um buildings. Did you guys build those two? No. No. Okay.
So, just single family homes, you know, something like that I think would be a a better fit for the neighborhood is um to keep those as the single family homes. But then it's, you know, goes back to the access, the street access. Um, I'm not sure what the city rules are when they put in streets. I do remember as a child my when they paved Park Avenue that a lot of the residents had to pay for it and then they and they put in the bridge that's that you can't see anymore. There was an old wood bridge there. So, I don't, you know, Mike is the only one I know that has property that would have to and it wouldn't be fair to him to pay for a street, you know, to go in there. Um,
for for clarification, this would fall on the developer. Yes. The street would be done by Yeah. He said it would be a private entrance. Yes. So, but if it were to be single family homes, you know, depending on how many you could fit in the L, then would it be go back to that right of passage and take the trees out and put a street there?
Yes. If they all ch turned into single family detached, then we would have to put the street in because you with what they're planning, we don't need to touch the rideway because it's essentially going to be a driveway into their parking. But if you put single family houses along there, then you would actually have to put the street in because you couldn't cross other people's property. Yes. Yeah. Yes. And a sidewalk. Mhm. There's not a sidewalk there right now on that side. And you'd be surprised how many kids run down the middle of the street because there's no sidewalk. Well, there is one on the north side. A building permit that would trigger the sidewalk, right?
Yeah. Yeah. Right. Know that I understand, too. Um, so I know the daycare just recently added uh extra gravel. I don't can't really tell on the old map, but for parking for their employees. [cough] So, [clears throat] they did add that.
Any other comments? [snorts] Thank you. Do I put my mother's address on here or my own address? Yours. Okay. Aggy, can I get some clarification? Are these going to be for sale owner occupied units or rentals?
I'm just finishing this thing for my mom. Would the private drive be on the east of the property? It'll be Yes, correct.
Uh, this is still a public hearing. Was there any other questions, comments?
Hello. Uh Mike Tolken. I live at 1507 West Park. So I'm right across the tree line from them. Uh one of the bigger concerns is just the space over there. If you look over on 15th and park, there's a triplex right there on the south side of the road. And anything, you know, you put a driveway down that side. There's not going to be really a lot of space for anything over there. Like Sandy said, the added traffic with the school there, the daycare next door is probably the bigger concerns. Um, we'd like to see something in there, but like I say, we want it to be taken care of and, you know, stuff like that. But don't really have a whole lot else other than, you know, just the space of the area and what they're looking at. you know, 10 dup or 10 town houses in there. It'd be awful tight for everybody for parking and stuff like that.
Is there parking now allowed on both sides of park there or either side of park? Um, yeah, it's open parking on both sides. There will be parking spots designated to each unit. Mhm. A minimum of two. Yeah. on their property. on their property. Yeah. Yeah. That that property I'm at, my father-in-law bought that in 59 and then my wife inherited it and we moved in there. So, we've been there. Family's been there a long time. But you don't own the lot to the south of your house.
No, that's actually a a doctor owns that and it's in trust right now. We've looked into it before. Uh Dr. Desai. I don't remember Dr. Desai. I believe it's in trust right now since he's passed away. So, it's been kind of sitting empty. We've been mowing about half of it just to because they kind of quit taking care of it. The back half is just weeds three foot tall. And you can see a little trail through like a little drive back there that we've been mowing the north of that keeping it up just because we don't want weeds right up to the back of our property. Thank you. Yep.
Iggy, would these units have garages or driveway parking or what's that? They'll have driveways and garage and garage. Yeah.
There'll be two to three bedrooms. As for the public hearing, anyone else like to speak? [clears throat] seeing none, I'll close the public hearing and open for discussion. I think uh good morning. My name is Paul Duncan. I used to help mow and take care of the property.
Would you would you just come up here and speak and sign in? Good morning. My name is Paul Duncan. I used to take care of the property by mowing, picking up trash, tree limbs, things of that nature on that L-shaped piece of property. Um, I'm cur east and west. 16th Street shows it's running north and south into the trees. Where will this driveway, private drive access to this to Mrs. Romero's property? Does anybody have any idea or proposition of where that street might be?
So, it'll be right on uh Park Street. It'll be right by It'll be lined up with the tree line. Oh, on the on the on the west side of those tree lines. Yes, on the property line or in the property. Oh, in the property. Oh, I see. Okay, that answers my question. Thank you very much. Thank you. Appreciate it.
Any discussion? Um I think in regards to school traffic, we're never going to avoid that. It's horrible. No matter if it's Bair Monasury, North Fork High, or Northeast Community College, it's it's horrible everywhere. Um, but I think we also have to remember that this is just for a zoning change. We're not talking about building plans or anything like that right now. Val, will you pull up the zoning map again? We're supposed to see if it fits. And to me, it looks like it fits better than what's there currently.
I agree with that. It's funny to see that agriculture right there. Yeah. Um well that space has not been used for really ever. I mean so is is the where the cursor is now is that the spot I can't quite read it as office district. Yeah. And the A is that school, the parking lot? Yeah, the A is just a random piece of A that the school owns. Okay.
Yeah. It shouldn't be egg in the center of town, but the schools, they don't have to change zoning. They can be anywhere. So, it just kind of is what it is. Yeah. It's always been an alalfa field, so that's egg. Yeah. So, that's that's not the field right now. There's there's a big parking lot in that area, right? Oh, is that Okay. Uhhuh. That other one is easier to see.
What is the stand for those? That's a conditional use permit. I don't know what they got as a conditional use permit for that, but And that's where those [snorts] the triplex is.
Mhm. There's no other discussion. I take a motion. [snorts] Make a motion to consider recommendation of a zoning change from office district OD to R3, multiple family residential district on property generally located southwest of the intersection of South 16th Street and Park Avenue.
Second motion and a second. Please vote. All commission members present voting in the affirmative. Motion carries. this time. Any other open topics or concerns? Seeing none, I'd take a motion to adjurnn. So move.
I will Perfect. Okay. All right. Good to know. Go Sharpie today. I know. I came illprepared. Just don't let it happen again.
Cross your fingers. I don't have school.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.