Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

This is the planning commission.

Each agenda item is divided into two sessions. Public hearing and consultation. In the public hearing, an agenda item is called up. The applicant holds his presentation. Members of the Commission may ask questions and the public can direct their comments to the Commission. Only four people are allowed to speak for it and four people against it per day. Each speaker has five minutes, provided for by questions by the Commission. One minute before the deadline, a warning signal will appear that asks you to summarize your comments. After an interlocutor, the applicant receives two minutes for a rebuttal. If you want to speak, come to the podium, speak into the microphone and name your name and address for the protocol. Write your comments exclusively to the Commission and not to the applicant, the employees or the audience. After the hearing of an application, we go to the consultation on this application, where we discuss every point, if necessary, with contributions of the employees, but without contributions from the audience. The committee members then vote on every application and the results of the session can be asked today or, if not present, at the planning department. If questions arise during the consultation that were not addressed in the public hearing, we can allow additional comments after measurement to clarify them or arrange the return of the application for a future session. A member of the committee can independently exclude himself from the discussion and voting on a certain application. This does not mean that you are directly connected to the application or to the applicant, but depending on the circumstances, ethical rules can require exclusion. In this case, a representative at your position disagrees. The Planning Commission makes final decisions on subdivisions. Calls against these decisions go to the district court. The Planning Commission is a purely recommended board of directors when it comes to revising limited use permits and planned developments. The City Council will make the final decision about these applications and all applications against the decision of the City Council will go to the district court. I would like your attention at this time. Please switch your cell phones and other devices to silent, vibration or off. Please, uh, you know, members of the commission or employees, switch on your microphones while speaking. Who will go through the list of attendees? Myself, Jay Stubbs, Mr. Kirk Marte, Ms. Jennifer Denson, Mr. Harry Brilline, Mr. Larry Dorsey, Mr. Chad Anderson, Mr. Matt Anderson, Mr. Nick Ember, Mr. Josh Wood, Mr. Kenny Nichols, Mrs. Ellie Edwards. We have a quorum for today's agenda. I propose to accept the agenda. So be it. Two. Proposed as per order. All for it.

Let's see if the microphone is on now. Test.

Point 1 on the agenda. And once again as a reminder, we will hear every agenda item in its entirety and then go straight to the consultation. This is a change if you are here and have not been here for a long time. Number 1 is a submission of a request for zoning for 1451 Cedar Crescent Drive. Es handelt sich um eine Umzonung von einem Mehrfamilienwohngebiet R3 zu einem Mehrfamiliengebiet R3, um eine zuvorgenehmigte Bedingung aufzuheben, die die Anzahl der mobilen Wohneinheiten auf dem Gelände auf 113 Einheiten begrenzt. Herr Bird, Name und Adresse für das Protokoll.

Jerry Bird, Bird Surround, 2009, Halsmann Road, Mobile. Wie bereits erwähnt, begann dies mit dem Wunsch, to increase the number of units according to the location plan from 1970, which was 407 units. Since the last session, many additional information has been submitted by the owner to the portal. A few letters. One of them states a 20% reduction of the number to 357 in contrast to the 447. In the report of the staff, page 7, paragraph 3, it is mentioned that normal residential development covers 0 to 6 units per acre. Now, 6 units times our property size of 66 acres would allow 396 units and we don't get to that number. In addition, two sections further down in point 5 is the speech of a maximum permissible density of 25 mobile home units per acre, which corresponds to 1,150 units. I don't think you can put so many there. You all know the truth. But whatever it is, it's in the personnel report. The 8-foot-high observation deck, whose construction was demanded in 2022, was rebuilt afterwards. In fact, it has been standing there for a long time. A part had to be repaired, and that has now been done. In addition, the observation deck along the other side, not the south side, as the board of adjustment for the 6-foot deck was approved there, was repaired or is currently under construction. The owner expects about 90 days for completion. Part of the reason for this is that they have to remove the undergrowth before the construction of the fence to set up the posts and then build the fence. The west line, the entire north line in the zigzag is 5,040 feet long, which is a little bit below a mile. That's a whole lot of fence and the building just needs its time, but they're just about to build it. Mr. Ray, the owner, also suggests that he is Every six months, 25 mobile homes are staffed. Four, five, six. They bring it here, set it up, and find someone who buys the mobile home. They will own or finance it. They will rent the parking lot. The person, the resident, will be the owner of the mobile home and maintain it. Wir würden darum bitten, dass der Gesamtplan, der die 447 Sätze zeigt, die Form des Parks oder die Gestaltung des Parks, weil alle Versorgungsanschlüsse dort vorhanden sind, die Anzahl der Einheiten auf 357 zu begrenzen. That would simply offer flexibility, where these units are placed, instead of someone saying, oh, let's take these away here and those there. It could be that parents and a child would like to live next to each other and we might have painted the place and could not put it there. But these are the points that we would ask you to consider. Die Verwalterin, die zuständige Verwalterin hier in Mobile, ist heute auch hier und wird ein wenig über den Park sprechen und lassen Sie sie nach vorne kommen.

Danke, Herr Birt. Ein Hinweis bitte, gnädige Frau, nennen Sie Ihren Namen und Ihre Adresse deutlich für das Protokoll. So, das wäre geschafft.

My name is Christy Carranza. My address is 1451 Cedar Crescent Drive, property 380 in Mobile, Alabama, 6605.

I'm sorry, I'm ready. You're ready.

Go ahead.

I just want to make it clear, you know, I'm the real estate manager at Sea Pines Mobile Home. I've been living in Sea Pines since 2010. My children grew up there. My children were raised there. They went to school here in the district. I know that my boss said that we want to be able to get more units in the caravan park. You only know that so that we, because I know that many people had a little misunderstanding and thought it would be expanded. It will not be expanded. It's just about trying to get more units in the park. Mr. Chairman, please proceed.

So part of the overall conditions that will be met by 1979 was the fence and ensuring that all conditions were met. What is the status of the fence that should have been built in 1970 compared to today, 2026?

Im Moment arbeiten unsere Leute gerade am Zaun. Wir haben das gesamte Material erhalten. We took care of the west side. We had to interrupt briefly because we had a water pipe break. So we had to take care of it first. But we work on the fence and it is on the west side. We should be ready by mid-next week and then continue working at the entrance where the fence collapsed. We want to get everything back in order. I mean, you know, we also take care of our safety as well as that of the tenants who live there.

And to go back briefly again, even if we are now working on the fence, there has always been a fence around it since 1970, or what does that look like?

Yes, there is a fence. There is a slatted fence and a mesh wire fence, but I know that due to all the unrest and the many thorns on the urban side, many of the fallen needles, I mean, the thorn needles have pressed into our mesh wire fence. That's why we want to get rid of it all and are working

But to come back to it once again, as far as you know, I assume you are not the owner, but the administrator. As far as you know, there was a fence that surrounded the property.

And you have, according to your knowledge, since 1970, fulfilled all requirements regarding the surrounding and the conditions.

Thank you, Mr. Woods. Are there any further questions or comments from the commissioner to Ms. Carranza, who is the real estate administrator? I assume that Mr. Bird and Ms. Carranza can also speak for Mr. Ray. He's not here. Is that correct? Actually with the real estate? No, he's not here.

But you both are here? Yes. Chairman, I have a general question.

Are you serious?

Okay, let's start. Mr. Bird, you said that you would introduce 25 units over a certain period of time.

Sie sagten, Sie würden die 25 Einheiten pro Phase über einen gewissen Zeitraum einführen. Gibt es irgendein Dokument oder eine Einschränkung bezüglich dessen, was Sie dort unterbringen? Wenn ich Sie jetzt in zwei verschiedene Wohnwagensiedlungen in mobile mitnehmen könnte, einige sind älter und abgenutzter, andere sind brandneu. Entschuldigung.

Sie werden neue Einheiten hereinbringen, neue Wohnwagen kaufen, sie heranschaffen und aufstellen.

Alles, was also neu ankommt, wäre brandneu.

Die Einheiten, die kommen, werden neu sein. Bisher unbewohnt. And I said that you would bring them in. You suggest to bring about 25 every six months. That's what you see a market for. You step it up, maybe order four or five at first and set up. If you get these sold or two thirds of them are sold, you bring more and put them on.

But everything that is delivered will be brand new. Nothing. No used units will be delivered.

New units are coming.

Thank you.

Just one question. I will raise a lot of my comments for later, but You know, I asked Henry a question in the last session. He's obviously not here. So are you both authorized to make decisions in his name in this session or just answer questions? I'm sorry.

Let me put it this way. I have problems with my left ear.

The doctor will get it under control one day.

Could you repeat that a little louder, please? Jared asks a question. Are you both authorized to make decisions about the application in the name of Mr. Ray? I think so.

All right. Another question. Let's get started. And back to you.

Yes, please.

As far as you know.

Come on.

Was ist in Ihrer Zeit dort schon vor der maximalen Belegung, obwohl dieses Gelände durch die bedingte Nutzungsgenehmigung für eine große Anzahl an Bewohnern zugelassen war? Wie viele Wohnwagen oder Stellplätze sind inzwischen belegt?

Tatsächlich bin ich How should I say it? I've been in the park since I was 15 years old. I'm now 40, so I've been in and out of this park for a long time. There used to be a lot more units in the park. Now we've lost a lot of motorhomes. People sold them, moved away. You know, people buy them and pull them off the property. But we're now at 133.

And then I heard Mr. Börth talk about the step-by-step approach, about 25 every six months, more or less. I assume new construction sites, new mobile homes that come there. I suspect the intention behind this caravan park or mobile home park is to remain a mobile home park, not necessarily a mobile home park. That's probably what we're looking at.

That's what you told me, mobile homes. Okay, understood.

Thank you all.

Please ask further questions.

I have one, and it could be directed to the staff or Mr. Bird. The staff report mentions that this zoning is actually intended to raise the conditions for the quantity limitation. There is a hint here that the lifting of the conditions does not permit an increase in the number of mobile home apartments. What is your opinion on this? Excuse me, Kirk. Yes, if you look at the updated personnel report, the remaining comments in the fourth paragraph. I don't know if you have them in front of you or if the staff would like to give an input. 3 of 15, fourth paragraph from above.

I mean, that's what it's all about.

But it is intentional to go from R3 to R3 to remove these conditions. Right. And the personnel report states that the lifting of the conditions does not allow for an increase in the number of mobile home apartments. I understand that.

It must meet the current requirements. I suspect you are saying, Mr. Marte, that according to your understanding, the approval of this application, the limited use and the limitation under which you are currently operating, does not raise... I assume. Mr. Chairman, please proceed. Basically, you say that the lifting of these conditions only allows the property to work as it currently is. It has been decided since the last session and in these discussions with the Planning Commission and the Committee for Zone Separation that an increase in the number of units, since we are now under the UDC, would require a limited use permit. Basically, this takes the conditions from the zone planning district and enables the applicant to proceed with a limited use permit, if he wants to expand, and we can then determine the conditions for this.

As in the last session, we are now in a two-stage process for the property owner instead of a one-stage one. Do you understand that too, Mr. Bird? And that's that. Any further questions or comments from the commissioners? I would like to remind the commissioners that you have a series of written comments on this application. Ich frage zunächst das Publikum, wer möchte sich für oder gegen diesen Antrag äußern oder hat Fragen dazu. Bitte melden Sie sich per Handzeichen. Bitte melden Sie sich. Ich sehe eine 2. 3. Hello. My name is Kindy Katz. I live in the Pausen 400 Park Road. Excuse me, is that better? Better.

Hello, I'm Kinley Katz. I live on 1400 Park Road. I live right down the street from the Sea Pines Mobile Home Community and today I am the managing director of the non-profit organization The Peninsula of Mobile, here. We are a community organization that works for the coastal community of Mobile south of the East 10 between the Dock River and the Mobile Bay. I am here today to speak for both our organization and for the residents and community members who have been working for a responsible development on the peninsula for years. We respectfully ask the Planning Commission to reject this application for lifting the 133 unit limitation for the Sea Pines Mobile Home Park. Overall, our organization is not against growth. We are not against affordable living space. We are for a thought-through development. We are for thought-through housing construction, a construction with minor effects. And this is not a minor extension. As she mentioned, this is actually not an extension at all. It is an exaggeration of the current residents who live in this caravan park. Der Antragsteller fordert eine Genehmigung zur Erhöhung des Limits von 133 auf 134 Wohnwagen, wobei ich verstehe, dass Sie dies nun um 20 Prozent begrenzt haben. Aber dennoch, es ist mehr als eine Verdreifachung der derzeit zulässigen Größe. Ninjal. Abgesehen von der Überbelegung der derzeitigen Bewohner gehen die praktischen Auswirkungen dieser Erhöhung weit über das C-Pines-Grundstück hinaus. I'm sure you've seen the maps, but as a reminder, this property is located directly on the Mobile Bay. It is located directly behind BC Rain and it is located directly next to our new Brooklyn Airport in development. With an estimated increase in mobile parking spaces, potentially over 1,000 new residents will be accommodated on this very small property. Es stellt sich die Frage, ob die Straßen, die Entwässerung, die Rettungsdienste, die Evakuierungswege und die umliegenden Wohnviertel der Halbinsel dieses zusätzliche Maß an Bevölkerung und Verkehr angemessen aufnehmen können. This is already a geographically limited residential community directly on the Mobile Bay. We have already seen what damage a heavy whirlwind storm can cause in this residential car park. If you think back to Katrina in 2005, this community has completely devastated. The influx of more and more of these mobile homes will only further reduce the safety of the inhabitants. The inhabitants in this Park, excuse me, earn a safe and orderly maintained facility without their security, their supply facilities and their infrastructure being affected. The property is currently on the future area use plan of the city as a residential area with a low density. It is mainly made up of residential areas, single-family houses and maybe duplex houses, but it is not suitable to take up more than 400 mobile homes. The city also approved the peninsula overlay plan to control the development in this unique and environmentally sensitive part of Nobel. The intention is to promote responsible development and at the same time address exactly the problems we are talking about today. Rainwater, the effects of construction, environmental sensitivity and the long-term resistance of the peninsula. An increase in the number of apartments on this property is not in line with this construction plan. The city has determined the actual maximum of 133 units in 2020. That's not 20 years ago. I mean, put them together.

One more minute. Thank you, Miss Katz.

Now, to put it all together. This limitation was introduced only four years ago. Together with the regulations such as the fences and barriers around this park, which I can confirm not only through the report of the urban staff, but also through my own experience when moving around this property. Diese Zäune wurden nicht repariert. Sie wurden nicht angerührt. Sie wurden kaum beachtet. Wenn Sie vier Jahre Zeit hatten, um diese Auflagen zu erfüllen, verstehe ich nicht, warum Sie erst jetzt damit anfangen. Insgesamt hat die Peninsula of Mobile jahrelang mit der Stadt, den Bewohnern und unseren Partnern zusammengearbeitet, um unser Gebiet in eine andere Richtung zu lenken, um den Verfall zu bekämpfen, die Infrastruktur zu verbessern, unsere Umwelt wiederherzustellen und das Regenwassermanagement zu stärken. Wir setzen uns für eine verantwortungsvolle Landnutzungsplanung und Investitionen in die Zukunft unserer Halbinsel ein. Wir bitten Sie respektvoll.

Fahren Sie fort, Bensinger. Es klingt wie letzter Satz. Alles in Ordnung.

Thank you for your time and your thoughts. Thank you, Ms. Katz. Please give your name and address to the protocol, sir.

And we will be another person. Is that correct? Good day. My name is Brian Knight. I live on Park Road 4757 on the peninsula I request the Planning Committee to cancel the changes to the regulations for Siniskz-Odyssey 037 and 20. This is in favor of expanding the C-Pines motorhome park from 133 to 447 units. These are 314 new motorhome parking spaces. More than three times what the city has approved. There is a considerable increase in the intensity of use. With three to four people per house, that's around 1,000 additional inhabitants. With two cars per household, that's more than 600 additional vehicles that push into an existing residential area. This is the wrong place for such a density. The property is designed according to a land use plan for residential development with a low density and surrounded by residential houses. Es steht im Widerspruch zum Halbinsel-Overlay, dass die Stadt speziell zur Lenkung der Entwicklung auf einer sensiblen Küsten-Halbinsel eingeführt hat. Die Frage ist nicht, ob 447 Einheiten auf das Grundstück passen, sondern ob unsere Straßen, unsere Entwässerung, unsere Notdienste und unser begrenztes Evakuierungsnetz tausend weitere Menschen aufnehmen können. Wir sind eine von Wasser umgebende Gemeinde, die eine genaue Prüfung verdient. And think about how recently this limit was set. The council limited this property in 2022 to 130 units with corresponding floors. The personnel report states that the terrain is still not conformable, apart from the existing paving and planting. Now the applicant wants to completely cross the border. If the city is allowed more density before the existing floors are filled, they lose their significance. In 2022, the Commission rejected a new finished house settlement at Brill Road, which is less than two miles from the current location. These 314 units as an extension instead of a new park does not change anything about the effects on the municipality. Our community, Dolphin Island Parkway, has been fighting for an improvement of this area for years and we are finally making progress and I firmly believe that this means a step back. Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Neid.

Hallo, ich bin Bettatina Bailey. Ich wohne in der Bayfront Road, 3000 Seine 6 Bayfront Road. Mein Grundstück grenzt direkt an den Sea Pines Wohnwagenpark. Und wie ich in früheren Sitzungen bereits erwähnte, ist meine Familie dort seit den späten 40er, frühen 50er Jahren ansässig. Meine Großtante ist verstorben, aber glauben Sie es oder nicht, seit dieser Wohnwagenpark eröffnet wurde, hat sie sich, ich habe immer noch Notizen und alles, hat sie sich sozusagen für die Einhaltung der Bedingungen eingesetzt, wissen Sie, bei solchen Dingen im Zusammenhang mit dem Wohnwagenpark. Das ist also von Anfang an ein fortwährendes Problem. Herr Ray und ich haben uns am Nachmittag nach dem letzten Treffen getroffen. Er versicherte mir, dass er sich um den Zaun kümmern würde. Es ist wahrscheinlich ein Abschnitt von sechs bis neun Metern, der auf unser Grundstück gefallen war. Er versicherte mir, ich werde mich darum kümmern. Ich werde mich darum kümmern. Machen Sie sich keine Sorgen. Alles klar. Er hat es schließlich gemacht, aber es wurde durch Blech ersetzt. Nun ja, wie Dachmaterial. Dass er an das Holz, an den bestehenden Holzzaun genagelt hat. Es fehlen Lamellen im Verbliebenen. Holzzaun. Es sind also immer noch Löcher im ganzen Zaun. Und das betrifft nicht nur unser Grundstück. Es betrifft auch die Nachbarn. Es gibt Nachbarn, die ihren gesamten Zaun auf eigene Kosten ersetzt haben, weil sonst nichts passiert wäre. Es gibt Nachbarn, die hier und da Lamellen ersetzt haben, weil sonst nichts passiert wäre. Herr Ray hat mich mehrmals telefonisch kontaktiert. Ich habe die letzten zwei oder drei Male nicht auf ihn reagiert. Er geht davon aus, dass alles in bester Ordnung ist. But as I said, he replaced it with sheet metal and I don't have the feeling that this is a safe material. To be honest, I didn't think that mesh wire or roof material is acceptable for fence construction. And another thing that interested me and I asked someone from the planning commission or the zoning commission regarding construction permits. He has been replacing this fence for about four months now. I don't think so, I'm not sure, but I don't think that these repair permits have been approved. And from my understanding, this should actually have happened. Ein weiterer Sicherheitsaspekt. Erst letzte Nacht hat ein Nachbar sechs oder sieben Schüsse direkt hinter der Grundstücksgrenze im Wohnwagenpark gehört. Es geht also immer noch so weiter. Die dortigen Wohnwagen sind sehr baufällig. Die Mehrheit von ihnen ist sehr baufällig. Wenn wir die Anzahl und die Ästhetik could be minimized, that would be fine. But I am simply amazed at the state in which the whole thing has been left in the last 50 years, a good 50 years. Thank you.

Thank you, Ms. Bailey. I had three and this is our third. We now come to the opportunity for the applicant, Mr. Börth, if you come forward and want to take the floor. I would like to point out to those present, and especially to the commissars, that the owner and the applicant, together today, not present, have reduced the original number of 447 by 20% to now 357. I just wanted to briefly name and correct this number. A rough calculation of potentially 25 units every six months would be a success. Decision on or off August 2031 means. A bird. Now, to come back to that again.

If we were to suggest a division in R1 one-family houses, we could have six properties per acre, so up to 396 units. Of course we don't do that. We are in the area of the mobile homes and we only ask to use the plan that was approved in 1970 for the already existing roads. All supply lines of underground electricity, water and wastewater are available for the 447 units and the restrictions on Was his offer in this regard? That would take him until the year 2031. And he will not even reach this number, if the buyers go out to him. Of course he tries to offer affordable living space. That is certainly better than building an apartment project. I think of living on the second or third floor next to a loud neighbor. At least you have some garden space and distance between the residential units. But I hope you agree. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Mr. Börth. We now close the public hearing part of this agenda and move on to the consultation. I would like to remind the commissioners once again that in addition to the three today's speakers and the applicant, they also have comments on their iPads. Questions or comments from the commissioner?

Mr. Chairman, I have some comments. I took the liberty of researching myself a little bit, because this is a feedback from both sides. Google Earth lies according to the best knowledge and knowledge does not. And if I look back on the years 2002 and 2003, I have it here on my cell phone. I would even show it on the screen if I could.

It looks as if there were, I don't know, let's say 300, 200 caravans on this property.

And as the young lady mentioned, you can go back to 2005 see that the number of houses, according to Katrina, has been significantly reduced. So, you know, for my part, it tells me that despite the decision of the city council of 2022, there is a precedent for this number of houses. I think my biggest problem is that Mr. Ray has had this presence since 2015. He has been an owner for 11 years. And if you read the reports of the employees and hear from these neighbors about problems, It seems as if Mr. Ray had only recently decided to give the client the attention that he had long deserved. I would like to point out that some of the information that he provided, and I guess that Ms. Carranza came here as an administrator and talked about the things that were done, in the end they are only the real estate. Administrator, you are responsible for the owner, right? And take a look at a part of this information that Mr. Ray provided. It looks like, yes, this fence, it looks like metal. And also note that he is making an account here for some safety cards. The order was given on August 11, 2026. That was nine days ago. So it seems as if he is now realizing that he has to do something. He suddenly becomes active. And personally, the question arises for me. If this commission does something and the presence suddenly conforms to this short period of time, what happens next? And that's why I'm personally ready, based on a precedent case here, to consider increasing the number of units. I'm willing to agree to what Mr. Wray demands. Personally, I'm not. I have a question for the staff. In the staff report, it is noted that ... every expansion of the construction, which exceeds 50%, would lead to the presence of fully adapted to the UDC requirements. I think the question for me and the other commissars is ... we can demand that the presence of less than 40% be brought to a conformal state. I don't think that's a question that the staff can answer, because the regulation regarding this number is very clear. It could be that we can refer to the council. But the conditions that were associated with this special foundation of 2022 and the limited number were actually, as we have found out, voluntary conditions. The non-conformist?

The 50% increase or decrease would require that the terrain is brought into complete harmony, based on the historical number of units, as they have existed for at least two years. If 66 units are added or proposed, then the 50% ratio will take effect. However, based on the research that we have conducted, our discussions with the legal department, the fact that the location was never fully adapted to the conditions of 1970, the special regulations that allowed the use, and was adapted in 2022, means that due to the long duration of operation, it can now be regarded as not conform to the rules. They are technically available without any additional permits. They are all expired. As I said, no adjustment to the regulations was made. A single caravan on the property would require from our point of view that it meets the current regulations according to UDC, the Unified Construction Plan. This would mean that the applicant or owner has to go through the procedure for a limited use permit. In this stage, conditions can be determined such as the number of units, the retention of buffer zones, tree planting, landscape design, etc. I hope this answers your question. But in the end, this application does not allow you to amend the conditions without the procedure for a conditional permission to use. This essentially justifies the fact that the location is hopefully in line with the relevant guidelines and that it can be taken into account for the compliance with the current regulations, which are followed by the procedure for limited use permit. I understand that.

Thank you. Do all members of the Commission understand that? Yes. A question to the staff.

We obviously have some pictures of fence work that have been carried out.

Do we correspond based on the pictures in the UDC in relation to the materials used? Was a fence permit granted? I mean, what exactly do we see there?

We do not know a fence permit, not even for a short check. According to UDC, fence materials are only specifically regulated when a buffer is required. in the form of a wall or a wooden fence, but it also means or another visibly dense material. At this point, there is no specific material, as long as it is visibly dense. And in this case it is visibly dense, but as I said, without permission, you do not violate our regulation so much, but against the regulation that requires permission for construction.

I just want to make sure that I understand that correctly. So our decision today does not consist of a random number of units for an increase to act or to determine. It's just yes or no. Can the applicant return to a later date for a limited use permit, where we can then act or determine an increased number of units? Correct. That's correct. Thank you.

Mr. Vorsitzender, please start.

I'm honest with you.

From my position, from my position, I have my difficulties with it.

Wir halten die Vorgaben nicht vollständig ein und ich verlasse mich wieder auf die Punkte des Personals. Und jetzt bitten wir um einen zusätzlichen Schritt oder darum, zurückzukommen und Dinge zu ändern, damit wir in Zukunft vielleicht etwas tun können. Ich meine, wir halten uns nicht an das, was dieses Gremium und der Rat so vorgenehmigt haben. Daher fällt es mir schwer, mit irgendetwas anderem vorzufahren. Ich meine, basierend auf den Empfehlungen des Personals und unserem Personalbericht und allem sind wir hier nicht regelkonform. Wir bitten jetzt einfach um ein bisschen mehr Zucker, schätze ich. Und aktuell erfüllen wir die Vorgaben nicht vollständig. Based on what the staff in the report says, there is no service fence. The fence does not fulfill the answer.

To get to the point of another commission member. I mean, every time a problem arises, we run away. We get a camera. I mean, we have the conditions that we voluntarily agreed to not meet.

We didn't even do what we were supposed to do. That's why I have my difficulties with it. I vote here with no or for a rejection or I reject this as long as we have not met the conditions.

I find it difficult when we had met the conditions, the voluntary conditions under which we were all standing, and we had come back and said, we need a supplement, we want to go a little further or bring in more people here. And I just have problems with it when we have not met the conditions and have not adhered to the buffer zones or the like.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Please proceed. I would like to make a request. Before you have a question about the personnel, if this

If we reject this application today, there is a minimum waiting time before the applicant can re-enter the topic, since it is planned here as a relocation, which would take much longer than a subdivision, right?

Usually the deadline for a relocation is one year from the date of the decision of the City Council. Das wurde bei den vorherigen Bedingungen nicht ausdrücklich festgelegt. Ich müsste den Rat fragen, ob das zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt noch möglich ist. Ich würde dem Antragsteller lediglich raten, dass für jeden zukünftigen Antrag vor der Einreichung einer Verkehrsauswirkungsstudie vorliegen muss, The report of the traffic department in the employee report states that such a thing is necessary and I do not believe that they can make a decision about a relocation or an exception, which almost triples that. The number that you have thrown into the room today, or offered, 357, is almost three times the current value. And we are talking about a residential area here, while we are talking about apartment complexes in Dolphin Street. and at the airport boulevard demand traffic impact studies. We definitely need one of these types of construction before you make any decision.

To get to the point, I briefly overlapped that and we are talking about potentially 450 to 500 additional cars that drive into and out of the complex every day. This is not an overwhelming number, but it is quite significant for a residential road. As you may have seen, Mr. Chairman, if that was all from Mr. Nichols, I would like to request the rejection of the relocation application, as it does not agree with the comprehensive plan and due to the inconsistency, as this could negatively affect the surrounding infrastructure. Managing capacity in the infrastructure in relation to the transport revenue to and from the location, Uh, no obvious change of the conditions that would make a change necessary or desirable, as well as a lack of recognizable benefit for the welfare of the community.

Second.

We have an orderly and supported application for rejection of the request. All for it? No. Then I vote against it. The rejection application has been accepted. We now move on and this is the end of this agenda item. We now come to number 2. These are all new agenda items. Number 2 on the agenda. 4035 Dolphin Island Parkway. Subdivision of a property with 3.71 acres. Should we approve a permit, it will be specifically based on the renunciation of section 63. There are 8 conditions. Ist der Antragsteller anwesend? Der Antragsteller ist anwesend und winkt. Sind Sie mit den acht Bedingungen einverstanden? Der Antragsteller nickt mit dem Kopf. Ich frage nun, ob noch jemand im Publikum ist, der zu diesem Tagesordnungspunkt für 4035 Dorf in allen Parkway sprechen, dagegen sprechen oder Fragen dazu hat. Da dies nicht der Fall ist, frage ich, ob es Fragen oder Kommentare der Ausschussmitglieder an den Antragsteller gibt. Wir schließen nun die öffentliche Anhörung und gehen zur Beratung über Punkt 2 über. Bitte um einen Antrag.

Antrag auf Zustimmung zu den Empfehlungen des Personen. 2. Verzicht auf Abschnitt 6c3. 2.

Ordnungsgemäß beantragt, unterstützen wir einen Verzicht auf Abschnitt 6c3 bezüglich der Grundstückstiefe. Alle dafür? Gibt es Gegenstimmen? Der Antrag auf Unterteilung wird angenommen. 3. Unterteilungsantrag 6.17 Vanderbilt Drive. Unterteilung eines Grundstücks mit 23 Acres. Possible renouncement of section 604 to allow a property not to be limited to a public road. There are seven conditions. Is the applicant present? The same application. A hand sign. Do you agree with these seven conditions? Is it? Anyone in the audience who speaks against this point at Wanderby Drive, speaks against it or has questions about it? If no one takes the word, we close the public hearing. We go to the consultation over. I request an application.

Approval of approval according to recommendation of personnel with renouncement on section 64 of the subdivision regulations.

Approval of approval according to regulations. All for it? Is there opposition? The application for subdivision is accepted. Number 4 subdivision application for 40801 Holtzmill Road, subdivision of a property with 3.3 Stein Acres. There are 9 conditions, no specific exceptions. Is the applicant present? The question is whether the applicant is present. I don't see anyone. The applicant is not present for the application for 4001 Holzmeer Road. I ask the staff whether they are aware of any problems or whether they would agree to the new conditions introduced.

The applicant has not had any contact with us since the application was submitted, but we have also not received any public comments on the application.

This seems to be a mixed distribution with some seemingly routine conditions. Is there anyone here who has questions about this submission application for HALS Mill Road 4801 or has questions about it? Okay, since this is not the case, we will close the public hearing and open the consultation. Questions or comments from the committee? Or a request?

Request for consent to the recommendations of the staff.

Second. Approved and supported. All in favor? Yes. Opposition? The application for subdivision is accepted. 5. Subdivision application for 1401 and 1403 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue. Subdivision of a property to 0.08 acres. 7 listed conditions. Potential exceptions of section 6C2. A1 for non-standard property size and 6C2B4 for property width. Is the applicant present? Yes, sir.

Z. Hudson, Roe Engineering and Surveying, 3002 Laughlin Drive, Laughlin Drive. We would also like to submit the requirements for the 30 feet to the middle line of the existing roadway. Since you are familiar with this property in the northeast part, there is an existing building. The MLK Avenue was recently re-asphalted. There are new cobblestones and sidewalks there. The property border runs behind the sidewalk. From the sidewalk to the building, it is about three tenths of a foot, even if it is not much, as we currently display 28.9 feet. At one end and 29.2 feet on the other to the existing middle line, if we go back 30 feet, the front of the building, which is an older building, would actually be on the public road. We would also like to apply an exception, together with section 6.2 and 6.2b, excuse me, for the non-conforming property size. These are two existing foundations according to limits and dimensions. One is only 21.5 feet wide and the other 27 feet wide. So that's all we can work with on the size of the foundations.

Thank you, sir. We will get the opinion of the employees on this specific request regarding the 30 feet from the middle.

Planning and zone allocation would prefer that the building is not on the public road and that it is a negligible amount. Would we agree with that? However, we would refer to the technical department for confirmation. Yes.

The technical department is fully and completely... Are there any questions or comments from the commissars? Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak for or against this application in Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue or has questions about it? Since this is not the case, we will close the public hearing and go to consultation. Please, your application.

Application for approval according to the recommendations of the employees under renunciation on section 62.1 and 62.2. If we do not comply with the proposed condition number 1 for the dedication of the public road, we also require a renunciation of section 6 of section 9 of the subdivisions.

As ordered, the application has been changed and supported. All for it. Any objections? The application for parceling under the so-called exceptions has been adopted. 6. Particulation application 501.5 Dine-Willis Road, 529.5 135 Middle Road, CB Work or C-Works Business Particulation. A property 896 Acres. 9 introduced conditions. No potential exceptions. The applicant is present. The applicant is present, winks and shows consent with a thumbs up. In accordance with the newly mentioned conditions, is there anyone in the audience who is against this application that Willis and Middle Road are speaking against or would like to ask questions about it? Since this is not the case, we will close the public hearing and move on to consultation. Are there any questions or comments from the client or should an application be made?

The application is approved. The recommendation is comprehensive.

Orderly supported. All in favor? Is there an objection? The application for parceling number 7 is accepted. Parceling 601 Charleston Street. Application Charleston Street. And 354 South Warren Street. The Simone Mixon parceling. Two basements, 42 acres. Potential exceptions 62 B2. The NFE. And 66. Newly introduced conditions. Is the applicant present? Applicant present. Hand sign. Are you in agreement with these conditions? A nod as approval. I ask if there is anyone else in the audience who would like to say anything about this application to Charleston and South Warren Street. Since this is not the case, we close the public hearing and open the consultation.

Please about my application. I apply for approval under the preceding recommendations under summary of section 6.

section 6.922 e and section 6.6. Is there an opposition? The application for parceling is accepted. Article 8, parceling application 5054 US Highway 90 West Dread Subdivision, two land plots, 2.02 acres, no potential exceptions, nine conditions, nine conditions. Is the applicant present? The applicant is present. Mr. Bird is waving his hand. Are you in agreement with these conditions? Are you in agreement with these conditions? Is anyone in the audience for this application on Highway 90, specifically 5455, present? Since this is not the case, we conclude the public hearing. Opening of consultation. Please support my application.

The application to support the recommendations of the staff.

Orderly applied and supported. All for it. Is there opposition? The application for parceling is accepted. Number 9 in our notes. The application for parceling in the 2051 Waterview Lane is a withdrawal application of the applicant. Ich bestätige es mit dem Personal. Das ist korrekt. Daumen hoch und eine verbale Korrektur. Ist jemand im Publikum für diesen Antrag anwesend? Er wurde zurückgezogen. Nummer 10. Parzellierungsantrag in der 53 Formen Road und 6 7 8 4 6 7 8 Dickens Ferry Road. Zwei Grundstücke, 5,4 in acres. Die Planungskommission hat eine Vertagung vorgeschlagen, um den Antragsteller aufzufordern, die Anträge auf wesentliche Änderungen für die Planungsgenehmigung und den PUD einzureichen. Der Antragsteller anwesend. Sind Sie damit einverstanden? Der Antragsteller stimmt einer Vertagung zu. Wäre das die nächste Sitzung, die im September stattfindet?

So the next session would be on September 17th, as long as the applicant can submit the documents by August 31st. We could reasonably put it on the agenda.

Mr. Börth, you have time until August 31st. Yes. To submit it. A nod as confirmation. Number 10 was proposed for publication. I now ask whether anyone in the audience would like to comment on this application regarding Dickens Ferry and Forman Road. Since this is not the case, we conclude the public hearing. Oh yes, sir. We haven't seen each other. Are you two? Thumbs up. So, no comments on this application. I think we just received a confirmation from the back row. We conclude the public hearing. I file the application for dismissal. Err... Accordingly, all for it. Der Erschließungsantrag wird bis September vertagt, mit einer Einreichungsfrist für die Unterlagen zum 31. August. Nummer 11. Erschließungsantrag für 1311, 1316 Chamberlain Avenue und 13 Old Sher Road. Aufgeführte Bedingungen. Möglicher Verzicht auf 6B9. Herr Bird.

Jerry Bird, Bird Sermon, 2009, Halsmill Road. I agree with everything, except with point 2 of the regulations, which provides sufficient guidance for a 50-foot-wide road along which Chamberlain is in charge. Understood. Chamberlain is narrow. As always. I assume that all houses on the north and south side of the street were built in a distance of 11 to 13 feet to the road limit line. If we were to dedicate that, it would be 11 feet. That would be right in front of your front door. The Chamberlain Avenue is only 650 feet long. The street is paved with cobblestones. E-ways are available. All supply lines are available. Basically, Chamberlain is only about shifting the property limit between property A and B. B gets about 15 feet from the owner of property A, and that is the purpose. We therefore request that Chamberlain is not expanded.

Thank you, Mr. Bird. All other conditions are in order. A question to the staff regarding their specific application for the plan to be revised for Chamberlain Avenue.

Chamberlain Avenue is an expanded road and the planning team is not informed about plans for capital improvement for expansion.

Now, 6B9 is already one of the points of retreat. So that would be done anyway, right?

If the Planning Commission releases section 6b9? Yes.

You know, if we agree to it. Theoretically.

Are there any questions or comments for Mr. Bird? Or is there a need for clarification from the commissioner? Well, since this is not the case, I only ask if there is anyone else in the audience who would like to speak for or against this subdivision application at Chamberlain Avenue and Old Shell Road, or has any questions about it? Since this is not the case, I conclude with the public hearing. We go to the consultation and take a motion against it.

The recommendation of the staff to approve and section 6b9 of the division provisions to be issued. Orderly applied for support.

All for it. Is there an opposition? The application for the division has been accepted. Number 12 is an application for a roadway renunciation for 5000. Treutnitz 01 Moffett Road, Canopy, Partners LLC requests the renunciation of the construction of a roadway along Moffett Road. Indications for the commissioner in this application or in your agenda until the applicant is present. Please come forward, sir, and present your case for the roadway renunciation.

Bruce Smith, CMG Engineer, is 457 St. Michael Street, represents Canopy Partners, the owner of the property. We are applying for a walking path for the walking path along the Moffett Service Road north of the property. There is a large 72-inch oak in the northwest corner that we would have to walk around and that would affect the planned building that we want to build there. But the main reason is that there is a case of probably about 15% on the Moffett Road to the Service Road. It is a really steep slope. It is outside the right of the road. There is really no way to mitigate this to create a safe entrance where pedestrians could cross this driveway. That is really the main reason. I would like to answer all the questions you may have.

Danke, Herr Smith. Fragen oder Kommentare der Kommissare an den Antragsteller? In Ordnung, da keine vorliegen. Frage ich, ob jemand... Danke, Herr Smith. Die Frage, ob es jemand im Publikum gibt, der für oder gegen diesen DEWIG-Verzichtsantrag sprechen möchte oder Fragen dazu hat. Da dies nicht der Fall ist, schließen wir die öffentliche Anhörung und eröffnen die Beratung. Gibt es eine Diskussion oder einen Antrag?

Ich stelle den Antrag auf Genehmigung. Wir stellen den Antrag auf Genehmigung.

Jemand soll das notieren.

Wir brauchen einen zweiten Antrag für das Protokoll.

Haben wir eine zweite Person? Unterstützt ihr den Antrag? Einer pro Jahr.

Ordnungsgemäß beantragt und unterstützt zur Genehmigung. Alle dafür? Gibt es Gegenstimmen? Der Antrag auf Verzicht auf den Gehweg ist angenommen. Do you have an explanation for this? Don't go too far, Kirk, because I think we have an amendment. Address point 13, the amendment for 801 South University Boulevard, University Professional Park, Cummings Architecture Group as representative. It is about the essential change of a already approved PUD, which allows the common use of parking spaces between several building sites to allow the construction of an 11.1 or another 10 square foot building and 10 additional parking spaces. I was told that this applicant wants to postpone the topic to the next session. Is that confirmed? Please give me your name and address for the product. Ben Cummings, I am the architect for the applicant 1 Houston Street. Yes, we would like to ask for a postponement. I understand that we have to submit new drawings for the session on September 17th until August 31st. Is that right? Is that correct? I don't know if I can keep that. So what would be the next?

The next session will be on October 15th. We will then bind you to the deadline of September 15th, I think.

I will try to keep the appointment on September 17th, but if not, it will be the following session. Is that okay?

We have to decide on an appointment, because the application can only be approved once.

We are aiming for the October session. Danke, Mr. Cumming. Gibt es Fragen von den Kommissionsmitgliedern an den Antragsteller bezüglich der Änderung? In Ordnung. Vielen Dank, mein Herr. Gar keine vorliegen? Entschuldigen Sie. Dies wurde zur Vertagung bis zur Oktober-Sitzung empfohlen, aber ich frage, ob jemand im Publikum Fragen dazu hat, dagegen ist oder etwas zu diesem Antrag beitragen möchte. Since this is not the case at the moment, we will close the public hearing. I will postpone the meeting to the October session with a term of admission until September 15th. According to the ordinance, all in favor? The application for the meeting for this process has been accepted. Well, welcome back, Mr. Marte. Commission member with a prison statement. Number 14. This is an amendment for 1891 and 1901 Harold Street. Instead of mobile, essential changes to a already approved PUD that allows several buildings on several buildings with common access between the locations to remove two buildings from a already approved PUD. For the members of the Commission, there are potentially eight determinations and potentially 15 conditions for approval.

Jackson Bergler here from Rowan Engineering on behalf of the applicant. I am here to answer all your questions on this development, but it is only about making the PUD changes, i.e. removing only the plots 2 and 3 from the PUD overlay. Clearly expressed.

Are there any questions or comments from the committee members? Well, since there is none, I thank you, sir. I now ask whether anyone in the audience has any questions about this application.

What is parcel 3?

Is that just a coincidence? Are you sure it was with us? Parcel 3 is just a strange looking ... Parcel 3 was designed in this configuration to avoid a residential building buffer under the previous zone allocation regulation.

We have questions for this application. If you please make room for our audience. Please name your name and your address for the protocol. My name is James Johnson. I live on Prairie Avenue 36, which is right next to it.

I am a 21-year veteran of the Air Force and just moved back here.

This is my mother's house. We received the letter by mail and this is my first time dealing with something like this. The only question I have is whether this is the whole purpose.

Because I have to go back and explain this to my 82-year-old mother. Right.

I just want to know if the only purpose is to remove these two parcels. This was developed as 123.

Now just remove these two parts.

Because that's a field. I used to ride a bike there as a child. There is only an open meadow with many snakes back there.

So that was my only question. I just wanted to know if that was the only reason for it. Thank you.

I appreciate your time. Thank you, Mr. Johnson. Thank you for your service and good luck with your mother. Mother. Anyone else? We close the public hearing, open the consultation and accept an application.

And there are eight claims. I apply for the approval according to the recommendations of the personnel with the claims.

Orderly applied and supported with the claims A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H. All for it. Is there an opposition? The amendment has been adopted. At point 15 we have an arrest. Mr. Kenny Nichols, we still have a decision. This is a double application for a subdivision and a relocation in the Dockwood Drive 255, 259 and 259. Subdivision of a property of 2.82 acres and relocation of a single-family house GBA 1 into a buffer commercial area B1. According to my notes, this was proposed or applied for return. I would only have to know if this is confirmed, and if so, what framework conditions would apply for this return.

Good afternoon, Melissa Headley from Goodwin Mills and Kurt, representative of the applicant. We are applying for a return so that we can revise our traffic study. We have submitted our already carried out traffic study after the preliminary discussion. It was signalled that this would probably be acceptable, but after the review, a revision was required. Therefore, we apply for the return to the October session. However, I would like to make sure and clarify when this revised study should be submitted. We have a time window in which permissible traffic calculations can be carried out. It has to be more than two weeks after the beginning of school, which also includes the USA. The school started this week. Then we have the Labor Day weekend, which we also cannot count. So there is only about one week left in which we will carry out all the calculations, transfer the data into the model and be able to edit the traffic report. I have the feeling that September 15th...

In fact, September 14th is the deadline for the session. On October 15th. The next session is on November 19th with a deadline in October.

19.

So we don't have any flaws. This was the only point where we really had to work. I therefore wonder if there is room for improvement in the enrollment period for the revised study.

Mr. Chairman, please proceed. Unlike the previous case, in which the submission was required until September 14, you do not make any changes to your layout or the proposal in general. So we don't have to send any new notifications, as we do in the previous case. In this particular case, we can ask that you submit the documents with us until October 1.

Okay, I think we can do that. I just sent a short email to our traffic engineer.

Thank you, Ms. Headley.

I now ask if there is anyone in the audience who is for or against this double application regarding the division and zoning on the Dockwood Drive or would like to ask questions about it. The recommendation has been expressed, the matter is adjourned. Since no word has been provided, we proceed from the public hearing to consultation. I propose that the decision be made to postpone the meeting on 15 October. The original deadline for enrollment is due on 14 September. The deadline for the traffic study remains October 1st.

Orderly submitted application.

Who is in favor? The application for postponement has been accepted. We can welcome Mr. Nickels back to us. Number 16 is also a double application for the relocation of a large... ...beach. Lots of numbers. I'm going to scroll down the street names here. Moot Avenue, Griffith Circle West, Griffith Lane North, Griffith Circle East, Halls Mill Road and McRae. This is a relocation application, just so that it is given as a protocol. about the transition from R1 and R3 to the multi-family residential area R3, as well as the approval of a conditional use for the expansion of the caravan settlement in R3-3. There are potentially many conditions here. However, according to my notes from the staff, an appointment has been called. I would like to confirm, is the applicant present and do you agree with that? Please come forward, give your name and address for the protocol and we can discuss the timetable.

So, my name is Owen Gates. That's a new address. Private Drive, Spanish Quarter. I work for Caliber Management. We are the company that manages all real estate that is in the possession of Connecticut Capital. We have our seat in Daphne. I've been here for almost seven years. We are specialized in prefabricated housing and mobile housing and mainly in the area of Mobile Baldwin County. We also have real estate in the south of Mississippi and in Georgia, but we are particularly looking forward to this. It has been around for decades. This is Griffith Mobile Home Park. We have it now, I think, for one and a half or at most two years. And we have already, you know, made a lot of improvements to the park, cleaned up a lot and operated a lot of tree care. And we really want to re-evaluate this place and make it a modern, affordable living facility for the community. We have, you know, all the different plots that we have taken over with the acquisition. You know, part of it is that we will summarize it into a single large plot. And the plot on which the park is currently located has a shared zoning. So one part is designated as R1, one part already as R3. So I think we have good arguments for the fact that the property already consists of an R3 zoning. We are only trying to bring the entire property under a zoning and basically under a regulation.

Thank you, Mr. Gaetz. However, an application has been submitted. Is that confirmed?

Yes, that is confirmed and we would like to file it in October.

We will select the meeting date on October 15th with an approval period until September 14th. A question to the staff, what exactly is needed from the applicant?

Until September 14th, the division of the property must be submitted, which is stated in the documents. And I think in the conversation with the applicant it was considered necessary to add another floor. Is that correct? We will put that back first.

Nevertheless, the property division must be announced in accordance with the law.

The 14th of September would be the deadline for the submission of the desired revisions as well as the division application.

Do you agree with that? Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak against or to this application? The Griffith Wohnwagenpark. Since no one is reporting, we will close the public hearing and we will conclude the hearing on October 15th with the deadline of September 14th. All in favor? All in favor? The hearing is adjourned. I believe in efficiency. Doppelantrag auf Teilung und Änderung in 3001 Airport Boulevard Meer EF Center for Advocacy Careers, Bel Air Mall, Teilung. Die Teilung umfasst zwei Grundstücke auf 40,49 Acres und eine größere Änderung. Zuvor genehmigtes PUD, das mehrere Gebäude auf einem Baugrundstück mit gemeinsamer Zufahrt und Parkplätzen erlaubt, um Grundstücksgrenzen in Abstimmung mit einer zugehörigen Teilung zu ändern. Acht potenzielle Tatsachenfeststellungen und elf aufgeführte Bedingungen. Jawohl.

Z-Cuts from Roe Engineering and Serving, Die Tausend Schrei, Lied an Drei.

Wir stimmen den Bedingungen zu.

Ich wollte Abschnitt 6 D3 ansprechen, der sich auf das ungewöhnlich geformte Grundstück bezieht. Wenn Sie damit vertraut sind, dies ist die Bell Air Mall. Es ist offensichtlich ein seltsam geformtes Grundstück, aber das haben wir nicht zu verantworten. Daher bitten wir um einen Verzicht für das ungewöhnlich geformte Grundstück.

It's in our notes. Are there any comments from the employees on this application? Are there any comments from the client for the applicant? All right, since there are none, does anyone else want to speak to the audience for, against or to this application? This is a double division and change at Airport Boulevard 3201. Since there are none, we will close the public hearing and move on to the consultation. We will divide them up. First the division. Possible release of 6C3. Please for a request.

Request for approval of the recommendations of the personnel with the release of section 6C3.

In accordance with the request and support. All for it? Is there an opposition? The request for division has been accepted. Change of the request. 8 facts and 11 conditions.

Application for approval according to recommendation of the personnel with the circumstances A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H. Second.

Approval according to order and supported with the circumstances A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H. All in favor?

Yes.

Are there any opposed? The amendment application has also been adopted. Damit ist unsere Tagesordnung für den 20. August abgeschlossen. Unser nächster Sitzungstermin ist der 17. September mit einer Einreichungsfrist zum 17. August, die bereits abgelaufen ist. Schönes Wochenende!