P&z Board - Regular Meeting

All right. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Hello, everyone. We are going to start the meeting at 6.35 p.m. Everyone, please gather in the meeting and stand up for the oath of the flag. Please swear on the flag of the United States of China. I'll start checking. Director Julia, please come in. Director De Asier, please come in. Director Cruz, please come in. And Director Senna is currently in attendance. I think Leon is impatient to come. Director Rodriguez may be coming. I'm checking the arrival schedule. 위장직을 발의하겠습니다. 저는 위장직에 출마하고 싶습니다. 저는 찬성합니다. 위장직을 발의하고 When Rodríguez comes, we will proceed with the selection of the vice-chairman. Director De Asier, yes. Director Cruz, yes. Director Julia, yes. Director Senna, yes. Good. The case has been passed. 다시 한 번 축하드립니다. 샛나 의장님, 감사합니다. 정말 고맙습니다. 이 자리는 언제든 바뀔 수 있습니다. 평생직이라고 생각하지 마세요. 때로는 자신도 모르는 사이에 바뀔 수도 있습니다. 아, 맞아요. 정말 그렇습니다. 정말 그렇습니다. 회의록 쓰인을 위한 동의를 제안합니다. 제가 제청하겠습니다. Let's agree to approve the meeting. Yes. I was on the phone with Vice Chairman Rodriguez. Director Sierra proposed to approve the meeting and Director Julia re-appointed it. Approving the meeting of the City Planning Committee on April 14, 2026. Director Cruz. Yes. Director Julia. Yes. Director de Asier. Yes. Director Senna. Yes. The case has been passed. First, I will give you a public comment. Hello, everyone. Welcome to the City Planning Committee's meeting. If you want to speak, please come out in a row and tell us your name and address. If you want to speak in person through online or Zoom, please click the response icon and raise your hand. If you participate in the call, please press the star sign, star sign, sign, and then press the number 9 to raise your hand. Then you can speak. Each speaker is given three minutes. Welcome to the city planning committee meeting again. Please tell us your name and address when you speak. Shall we proceed with the presentation of those who speak? Yes. Good. Those who want to speak about each case, please stand up. Please raise your right hand. Do you promise to only tell the truth? Only the truth will help you. Yes, thank you. Please sit down. Let's read the progress.

Yes, we will let you know that the following items in the board of directors have a legal nature. After the applicant and the staff have announced each item, there will be an opportunity to speak on each item. All testimony, including public testimony and evidence submission, must be carried out in writing or in the academy. In addition, all people who testify can receive the opposite newspaper. Even if you do not want the opposite newspaper or document, your testimony will be sufficiently respected. Ordinary citizens cannot directly testify against the witness, but you can request a member of the board or a witness to ask a question instead. The representative of the organization must submit a document that proves that he has the authority to speak on behalf of the organization. The person who submits a document to the board must submit at least 10 copies to the auditor. Please ask the auditor for detailed information on the legal procedures. Hello, good evening. I am Justin Teleria, the traffic officer in charge of urban planning and area setting. The name of the applicant for this case is Thomas Guillen and the ID number is BH2026-0372. The applicant is asking for an exception of 13-1508, allowing access to a 1,335-feet long entrance. The maximum entrance fee for 40% of the current village's front yard is 1,188.6ft x 6ft. The employee in charge advises to approve the proposal based on the following conditions. The planted plant should be actually the same as the limited plant, and the packaging around the tree in front of the site should be carefully removed and the soil should be restored.

이상입니다 네 위원회를 통과하고 위장을 통과했습니다 기존 진입로를 교체하는 것입니다 네 I'm going to replace it with asphalt and road blocks, but I don't know exactly. The applicant seems to be able to explain more details. But it was there since 2009. It was already installed. That's right. And we're suggesting the same area as the one you asked about the material. You might ask the person in charge about that, but it's exactly the same area. It's just re-installing. Yes, thank you. I think the way I saw it was 4.5 inches, about 11.4 centimeters apart. It looks like a partial concrete slab, but when considering the part in the city, does that space also include it? No. It must be very difficult to calculate, but it will probably be included. We are the entrance. the whole thing as a non-toxic structure. Even if there is a little toxicity due to packaging or interval, it's like a small blessing you get for free. However, generally, the 30, 60, and 40 standards are calculated and applied to the entire surface as Bluetooth. Please wait a moment. To be honest, I received an unannounced consent letter from all board members. And Mr. Nelson Rodriguez, the chairperson of the board of directors, is participating in Zoom. Alexis, can you hear me? Yes, I can. To be honest, I didn't receive an unannounced consent and didn't get any calls. Thank you for your time today. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, do you have anything to say?

Mr. Sun, did you turn on the microphone? Yes, thank you. Hello.

Thank you for giving me a chance to listen to my request. Please tell me your name and address. Yes, my name is Thomas Yang. The address is Palerque Place, 15101. To answer the question, yes, I will use the existing entry rule as it is. will not increase or decrease the size. And I'm going to use concrete for decoration with lines. Um, so the size will be exactly the same. And to tell you about the ratio of 40 to 60, my house is a fan-shaped fan, so it would be a little more difficult to secure a 25-bit, about 7.6m fan if it is a normal fan. 하지만 사진을 보시면 잔디밭이 많이 남아있잖아요. 배수 문제는 없을 거예요. 전체 면적의 60% 이상을 차지하는 건 아니고요. 배수와 잔디 등을 위해 40% 이상이 남아있어요. It's a little over 25 feet, but it's not covering the entire front yard with concrete. I hope not. Yes. No, that's not good. We're not a big business like a car store. Do you have any questions for the applicants? I'll ask you. So, as you said, you're going to put concrete in that space, right? It's in the process of changing into a new look. That's right. Yes, yes. All right. Now it's all regular asphalt packaging. It's old asphalt. Yes, asphalt. It's gray and looks ugly. When will the neighbors change the entrance? He asked. No, that's right. It's improving. I'm improving. Yes, and the area remains the same. That's exactly right. Yes, I don't want to widen it any more. Actually, there's no need to widen it any more. As you know, it's much easier to remove the existing packaging. All you have to do is make a hole. It's not selling any more. The area is maintained as it is. That's all my questions. Do you have any other questions? I would like to propose a proposal to approve the project as recommended by the employee. I agree. Is there anything more to discuss? No. Yes. This is a proposal to approve 5A. Disseer Disseer Disseer And to tell you about the record, I'm sorry I'm late. As you know, I had a big accident on Sunday when I was working at an airline. So I was out of my mind with the cancellation of the flight. But the boss told me to go to work today. Thank you so much. And thank you for recommending it. All right. Let's move on to the next one. Hello, members of the committee. This is Justin Telleria, City Planning and Transportation Committee. The names of the applicants are S. Tabon and Alicia Famis. The address is Lake Champlain Terrace 636-6361. The applicant has two exceptions. The first is an exception to 13-426. It is allowed to expand the swimming pool size of 20x25 feet to 8 feet 3 inches beyond the measuring line. The second exception is that the swimming pool size of 20x25 feet is as close to 8x3 inches as the measuring line. Therefore, there are two exceptions. Both are related to the swimming pool, but two exceptions are required according to two different regulations. The person in charge advises to approve the attached drawing. That's all. May I ask a question to the chairman? Yes. The wall at the bottom is stretched to the lake like a sea wall. Yes. Is that wall approved? Or has it already been approved? I do not know.

You can't find permission-related materials. You may have to get permission on behalf of the swimming pool. However, because the height is only 70 inches, no exceptions are needed. There are many cases where the height is a total of 18 inches. Therefore, no exceptions are needed. I know that you advertised that there are exceptions. I think I did a little bit. Yes, I didn't know how high it was or what structure it was. 7 feet, about 2.1 meters, no, 1 feet, about 30 centimeters, it doesn't work either. The wall height is only a few inches, a few centimeters, but it's okay. I don't think I need to remove it. should be reviewed by the construction department. That's what I'm curious about. Yes, I see. Thank you.

Yes, do you have any other questions for the employee? Yes, there is one more question. One of the discussions was that it was impossible to install the structure beyond the transit line, but it seems that the T-key 오두막 is in line with the current construction law. So you don't need to remove it.

Because it's a structure that fits the location and size.

Do you have any other questions for the employee? I'll give you one more simple question. Aluminum.

Is the terrace already installed and was it approved at the time? Yes, I see.

How do you pronounce this iron structure? Yes, do you have anything more to say? First of all, good evening.

Thank you for your time. My name is Esteon Bar-Mez, and as I said, I live in Lake Champlain Terrace 6361. I've been living here since 1998, and it's a beautiful neighborhood. We want to participate in this project, too. I've wanted to have a small swimming pool for a long time, but I've postponed it due to the slope and various regulations. But these days, My wife is suffering from congenital cancer. I'm suffering from nerve disease, so I keep asking my wife to exercise in the swimming pool. So we want to have a small swimming pool. Everyone around us has a swimming pool, but it's a shame that we don't have one. And because of the beautiful trees around my house and the location of the house, I know that there is not much choice other than making a swimming pool in this unique shape. To secure some space to stretch your legs. The pool is not very big, but I grew up in a 28X20 size pool in Miami Springs, so it feels small to me. But again, we know that there are rules and regulations, and we sincerely hope that we can proceed with this project.

Please keep working hard. Oh, and...

The wall you mentioned was there from the beginning. The owners who bought this house were built in the 70s. So I think our neighborhood was there before it became a city. And the wall is quite short. As a doctor, to tell you my personal story, I am a cancer survivor.

For 18 years. For 18 years. For 18 years. So I had to keep fighting. I had to fight. I had to fight. I'm a liver cancer patient. It's a really hard fight. How much?

You know it's a hard fight.

We all know that anticancer treatment is a double-edged sword. It destroys cancer cells and destroys other organs in our bodies.

I go to the hospital every 28th. There are days when I'm in good condition and there are times when I'm having a hard time, and what doctors usually recommend is water sports. So I think you can do that.

We didn't want to bother you.

So we all wrote a statement that required a signature. How many minutes do you have? You have to give it to the lawyer and you have to give it to the secretary, too.

I didn't know this was the first time I'd been through this. You have to give everyone a copy. Yes. Do you have any other questions for the sale family at the board meeting? We will submit a consent form to approve the case according to the employee recommendation. I agree. Thank you. Yes, do you have any additional discussion? Yes, we will check attendance for the 5B item. Director Senna's consent Director D.C.E's consent Director Cruz, yes Director D.C.E, yes Director Julia, yes Director Rodriguez, yes Director Senna, yes Admission consent Have a good time. Next, the applicant. Are you ready? Yes, time flies. Hello. No, hello. I'm sorry. I'm Justin Teleria, the traffic officer. The next applicant is George Gio, LOC, and the address is 8500 North West 100 60 3rd Terrace. The applicant is asking for an exception to the construction law 13-1500, and is asking for permission to maintain a 240-square-feet building with a capacity of at least 6 feet from the existing building to be maintained at a 0-feet interval from the original building. According to the exception criteria, the employee is recommended to reject the proposed proposal.

For your information, this case was announced from a slightly different point of view. At that time, we did not ask for any exceptions. Since it is an existing building, the actual structure has not been changed. However, between the time of application and the time of application, you will remember that you have approved other exceptions to the existing building a few months ago. At that time, the employee in charge decided that it was more appropriate to request an exception for the distance from the main building rather than the crossroads on the side. So we reorganized their request for an exception, and now they are requesting an exception for the entrance of the sub-structure, not the terrace attached to the main body. Did you understand? It's the same structure. It's exactly the same thing. It's just that we're just changing the way we look at it and the way we discuss it. May I tell you?

The point is whether it's attached to the existing structure or whether it's six feet away from the existing structure. That's right.

At the time of their first application, there was a violation of the relevant section, and it was before we passed the latest canopy and department structure request. And of course, it was too deep for the structure attached, and it wasn't separated. It's not separated. It's attached to the body. Therefore, the distance is 0. By passing a new regulation, we reduced the distance from the house and allowed a deeper canopy if it was attached. So the new 2-feet distance has become 5 feet. Now 5 feet is okay. So the standard of 7.5 feet was not right. That's right. However, as you know, the distance from the house is still attached to the structure, so the 2-feet distance is 0. Therefore, an exception is still required. Do you understand? So exception.

I couldn't approve without permission.

The rear two-way street is okay. 6ft, 5ft, and 5ft. It's 5ft in all directions. I think the rear two-way street is okay. Wait a minute. I don't remember well.

Basically, the structure is attached to the pillar at the corner. So, yes, that's what I was curious about the attachment part. You have to get permission for this part. That's right. Yes, already. That's right. Yes. So, it's 5T on the back and 637 on the side.

And Mr. Chairman, the village side is suggesting that we throw the opposite vote on this case.

That's right. The village side is against it.

To put it bluntly, this case does not meet the 7 conditions of the construction regulations. I will explain the conditions again to revive everyone's memory. First of all, I did not receive a written support letter. Usually, it is not a condition that can be received in advance when requesting to submit it at the hearing. So most of them say, don't approve this case. But is this case A. Did you receive a written support letter from your neighbors? B. Does it match the development pattern of the village? Of course not. Because other canopies and structures must meet the requirements. Therefore, it does not match the development pattern. Also, the unique characteristics of the surrounding area must be preserved. If the construction regulations are followed, the unique characteristics of the surrounding area are preserved. Therefore, this case is not approved. Well, this change can be approved without actual damage. In this case, it is a problem because the structure of the type is almost the same as what it can have in general. Therefore, this case follows the regulations. However, it is questionable whether this building is actually suitable for the site. This area is a general area of ​​general size, and it is a place where structures that meet the architectural regulations can be built. Therefore, this case does not comply with the regulations and the difficulty of the applicant is because of a special situation. However, if this case is not a special situation, a special condition occurred as a result of an action that the applicant could not control. In other words, the applicant's actions led to this situation. Therefore, in this case, the standard cannot be met once again. Therefore, the person in charge cannot give a positive opinion in this case. It's because we can't meet these conditions. But at the same time, the building is an existing structure, so the applicant has no choice but to request it. Now I will explain why the applicant came here himself.

Please tell me your name and address. My address is 8500 North West 163 Terrace. First of all, thank you to Miami Lakes Elementary School and Middle School. This is the first house I bought. As you know, sometimes I should have done it, but I could have done it. Sometimes I think. I heard the person who sold the house. They didn't work properly. In the end, I hired a legal agent to work properly. But thank you for being able to stand in front of you like this. Thank you for your consideration. And if I were to ask you if it would help, This is a question related to the former Marine Corps. You know what I mean? Now, I'll ask you a question through a seat. When I bought a house, Did you have a swimming pool? I was allowed to swim and take a bath, but it was only easy to take a bath because of the construction delay regulations. I think that part is the problem. When I bought the house, was there no swimming pool? That's what you built, right? No, you did it. Yes, there was a swimming pool before, and I was allowed to get a new construction. But I heard someone say, I didn't know what to do because I bought a house for the first time. 그래서 허가를 안 받았던 것 같아요. 허가를 받았나요? 음, 잘 몰라서 허가를 안 받았던 거죠. 허가를 받았을 거예요. 네, 지금 허가를 받는 절차를 진행 중입니다. 감사합니다. 다른 질문 있으신가요? 못 들으신 것 같은데요? Do you have any other questions for the applicants? No, I don't have any. Thank you. Thank you. Yes, we will discuss it at the board meeting from now on. I will present the approval document. I'll just discuss it. I agree. Yes, please. If you're okay, I'll tell you first. I'm worried about the attachment part of the structure. If the structure is modified and separated, it is a matter of whether it can be used in the construction department.

It is possible to separate, but I do not know the specific procedure or the requirements requested by the construction department. However, between the structure and the house, 6 feet, about 1.8 meters above the gap seems to be able to abide by the construction law. Yes, it is correct to use a separate structure while maintaining the existing distance and size. So you're saying you have to separate and reduce 6 feet? Yes, I understand.

Have you discussed this issue with the applicant? Have you discussed this issue with the applicant? Have you discussed this issue with the applicant? Have you discussed this issue with the applicant?

Have you discussed this issue with the applicant? Have you discussed this issue with the applicant? Have you discussed this issue with the applicant?

Nelson, in my opinion, I think the structure is stronger. I totally agree, but that's a little vague. One more thing I want to say is that the actual part is very small.

About 60cm. Actually, it's a bit hard to say that it's off, but the part that's attached to the house is only about 90cm. I don't think it's even 90cm. It's probably about one pillar. So the part that's attached to it is very subtle, right? Yes. Because it's mostly sticking out to the side yard. I see.

The reason I say it's stronger is because it's attached to the higher part. So, The resistance to the wind is getting better. It's not that there's no resistance to the wind at all, but it's getting stronger. Is it possible to attach it like that? No, it's already attached. It's attached. Yes. It'll get weaker if you separate it. Yes. So what I'm considering is how to attach it. That's right. Yes. As a construction worker and from my experience, I think the attachment method is safer. Is that method okay? No.

No, the current regulations are divided into two. One is a regulation for structures already attached to the house. According to this regulation, in some cases, 12.5 feet and 5 feet in all land boundaries are applied. That's right. If the yard is 17 feet, 12.5 feet will be given, and if the yard is a little larger than 17 feet, 12.5 feet will be given. At least 5 feet of 2-foot distance is required on all land borders. At least 2 feet distance. In other words, if the yard is larger than 17 feet, the 2-foot distance is 6 feet, 7 feet, or 8 feet. This is the order we passed. And it is only allowed to build in a range that does not exceed 20% or 350 square feet or about 32.7 square meters in the back yard area. Yes, remember this part a few months ago. We have also revised the regulations on the structure of the building. If you don't want to exceed 20% of the back yard area, you need to be 6 feet or 1.8 meters away. Likewise, you need to be 5 feet or 1.5 meters away from the ground border and 6 feet away from the main body. All ground borders, especially the structure 5 feet away from the back yard border and the structure 6 feet away from the main body, must be determined to determine the minimum standard. And deeper than 12.5 feet, about 3.7 meters. For example, if the yard is wide enough, it may be about 4.6 meters away, but it must be away from the body. Therefore, to distinguish these two, a certain standard, that is, a distance, must be set. So, to separate it, do we have to remove the entire structure? Or is there another way? Well, in my opinion...

I think it depends on the person who wrote the design drawing. That's right.

You'll have to re-write the design drawing. You'll have to go through the sharing process.

That's what I wanted to say. Let me go back and tell you. One of the biggest problems here is that we don't know how the structures are connected. So we don't know if we're following the area restrictions or the architecture law. It's something you have to judge in the building department. That's right. There are many ways. If it was approved and implemented, it would have been possible to create a 4-feet exit with a 6-feet gap between the pillar and the existing house. That's right. If we calculated the area and the weight of the roof properly. So there's a way. But we can't help it right now. Because the situation is like this right now. And this is the problem with what we call legalization. In fact, this is not a legalization, but a new one that has not been approved. So we have to deal with it as if it's new. That's what I think. I've been through this process in various local governments, but everyone is trying to see it that way these days. It's a building built without permission, so I don't want to admit that it's legalized anymore. So I'm going to move it to a new building.

The construction department will request engineering documents and calculations to ensure that the structure can withstand the appropriate wind and fixed conditions. And to be honest, I'm not representing the construction department, but the engineer in charge.

I have to plan how to judge whether the architect has the basics first, how big it is, whether to take an X-ray, whether to cut the concrete, etc. The structure engineer or architect must write a report that identifies all the structures based on the results. That's right. That's the only way to approve the case in the building department. You can approve it here, but if you approve it there, the situation will be completely different. That's 100% right. So you have to keep that in mind.

That's right.

All right. Now, our committee doesn't say it's not easy. We will try to find out what measures can be taken to comply with the regulations in cooperation with the applicant.

Would you please come out in front of the microphone for the speech? I agree to start the hearing again. I agree to start the hearing again. I agree. Hello. Yes, yes.

I have a ticket from the construction department. I'm sorry. You have to vote. Yes. Tell me. Hello.

Yes, I have prepared the documents of the engineer from the construction department. If you want, I can show you the data on my laptop. I'm telling you in terms of checking if all the work is done properly. Have you already approved the plan in the construction department?

Or did you have to get this document first to get permission? Why not? The document is already there. Then,

What is the only way for them to proceed as they want? Is it to remove the existing building and submit a plan to the construction department? Then you will have to get a removal permit first. You need a permit to remove it. That's what we're talking about. So the existing

There is a way not to remove the building and not to connect it to the existing building. Ask the engineer to design a few pillars 6 feet from the existing building, about 1.8 meters away, and make an awning. The awning has nothing to do with the distance after the construction line, and is allowed up to 4 feet, about 1.2 meters. So the gap between the house and the roof is 2 feet. How many feet is it now? We need 3 feet between the roof and the roof. Yes, 3 feet. About 3 feet. It's a loss.

So you can make it explode about 3 feet. Then how far is it from the distance you're asking for? The person... The suggestion is that you can pour two base.

There's one right now. If you remove the base and pour two new bases, it will fall 6 feet from the existing structure. This is all because of the new layout. Before, it was only 1.5 inches apart by applying the appropriate 2-way distance, but now it's attached to the house.

So everything changed.

It's because it's attached to the house. That's the problem. That's what I was talking about earlier. So I was trying to find a way to separate. The problem in the village is separation. The biggest problem is that the building is attached. You can't do that. So I put the second foundation and built a new pillar. If you separate at home, the rest will be fine. But the problem is... is attached to the building. And I will clearly explain why we re-organized the application letter in this way. If the building is considered to be attached to the structure, the maximum depth is 12.5 feet, but it is currently 20 feet. That's right.

Then, not only the side cross-section, but also the depth is limited to up to 12.5 feet. Do you understand what I'm saying? That's why I decided to do this. It looks easier to do this, but I think we have to give up a lot of money. Right? Yes, she's going to lose a lot of the structure.

That's what I was trying to say. Yes, yes, that's better. All right. You know what to do. What do I have to do? As of now, we are opposed to the proposed method. So, can the project be listed? Can we postpone the listing so that we don't have to pay the fee again? Can we submit and approve the consent to separate the structure from the house and drop more than 6 feet of the foundation structure and approve it? If we approve it that way, we have to approve the permit from the construction department. 그러면 다시 오지 않아도 되잖아요. 네, 제가 맞나요? 네, 맞습니다. 변경하실 수 있습니다. 한 가지 여쭤보겠습니다. 그 알루미늄 구조물의 지붕선이 집 지붕선과 같은 높이인가요?

아니요. 네. 네. 어, 동의할 수 있을까요? 아니면...

so that it is not structurally attached to the house, but can it be allowed to allow more than 3ft of the tent to escape? Yes, in my opinion, what they are trying to do is to make the roof and the roof completely connected. However, I don't think there will be a big difference if the tent coming down from the top of the 3ft exit is added. They're only two feet from the house. That's why they don't actually get that much. I agree with your consent to proceed in that direction. I'll modify my consent. I'll modify your consent. All right. By modifying the consent form, they will install a base six feet from the pillar edge of the existing house and approve the implementation of two new bases. In this way, you will comply with the architecture law. Once again, I emphasize that I am looking for a solution that you don't have to demolish the building. This problem costs a lot of money, and I've seen this before. So the best way is not to demolish the entire building as I and D.C.R. suggested. If the building is considered a sub-construction, you will have to demolish about 8 feet to the back. 하지만 이 경우에는 전체적으로 손실되는 부분이 거의 없습니다. 네. 알겠습니다. 감사합니다. 안건과 제청이 있습니다. 제청하실 분 있습니까? 네. 제가 제청하겠습니다.

찬성하시는 분 계신가요? 아니요. DC어 이사님을 통해 안건 전문이 기록되어 있는 것 같습니다.

모두 찬성하시면, I'll leave it in the record. Yes. Next. The presentation is by James Ziegler. Hello. Um, the next applicant is asking for an exception to the 13-1500 structure, which allows the 5-feet height fence to be extended from an area where the fence cannot be installed in the water to a 5-feet height fence beyond the standard line of measurement to 15-feet. The person in charge is recommending that the proposal be approved as indicated in the included drawing. There is a part that passes through the chair. There is a fence there right now. It's not the location of the applicant's suggestion, but it's right next to the standard line.

Yes. There is an existing fence right next to the standard line.

Yes, it was at the time. So that fence will be removed as part of the plan. Yes. That's right. There was a part that passed the chair and I asked the planner. Did I understand correctly? It's 6 inches. Could you tell me again? How far was it? Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence.

Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. Yes, the existing fence is 15 feet away from the existing fence. When the swimming pool fence is installed on the baseline, it is actually separated because of the bay window with both yards exposed, so you can't walk from one yard to another yard. In addition, there is a big tree right next to it. I don't know if it's a mango tree or an avocado tree. So, if you install a fence at a distance of less than 15 feet or 4.5 meters, the tree will go out of the fence. So the number 15 feet came out. There's a lot of space from the baseline to the water level, so there's a lot of room left even if you install a fence. And the fence. It's got to be low enough to keep an eye on it.

Do you have any questions for the staff? Are you going to use the same material as the fence? What did you say? Aluminum?

Aluminum? Yes, sir. Yes, aluminum.

Would you like to come in? Would you like to come in?

Yes, we're going to move the fence right now. Please tell me your name. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. My name is James Ziegler.

I live in Cypress Court 13920 and I'm the owner of this real estate. Well, I'm a little tired. He asked me to give up my vacation and drove for 13 hours to get here. I'm so tired. Yes, we're going to move the fence right over there. If you allow, we will move it about 15 feet. I talked to the neighbors and received three signatures to approve the work. If you need. There is evidence to prove that the new fence does not invade other areas and does not cover the view of the lake. We never want that. I don't want to harm my neighbors, I want to abide by the architectural regulations. When installing the existing fence, it had to be installed right above the boundary line, so it was only a space of about 1.8cm and 6 inches, so I couldn't walk around. I plan to keep the gate as it is so that I can go outside when I need to. But I want to be able to walk around the back of the house, that is, I want to be able to use some of our land through the fence. I have a question for the applicant.

Is there a fence in the next house? No, there isn't. There is no fence anywhere else. No, actually, we...

When installing and designing the fence, I discussed it with the neighbors. They were also the chairman of the Forestry and Management Committee, and when installing the fence, they said it would be okay if you could make it look like a wide fence. So we are all How long did it take you to get here today?

It took 13 hours. I left at 12 o'clock in the evening. Do you have any questions for the applicants? I'll ask you a question through the chairman. I don't know. There's a Ziggler who's participating in Zoom. Do you want to speak or not? I don't know if it's related to the chairman. Maybe my wife is watching. Yes. Is your wife's name Rani Ta? The first letter starts with Z. Oh, I'm sorry. Yes. Cassidy. Cassidy or Chelsea. You're at home, right? Yes. Yes. Is there anyone who wants to make a public statement? I asked for a confirmation. Do you have any questions for the applicants? You drove for 13 hours, and I think you deserve to be approved. Thank you, sir. I propose to approve the installation of the fence. I agree. Thank you. Yes, if you don't have a vacation. Thank you very much. Thank you. Yes. If there is no further discussion, we will proceed with the 5D item, the approval of the changes in the architecture regulations. With the approval of Rodríguez, the vice-chairman, and the approval of Director Julia, Director Cruz, Director Dieci, Director Julia, Rodríguez and Senna agreed. The case has been approved. Good. At this point, is there anything else you would like to ask the village? No. Congratulations to the new vice-chairman and the vice-chairman.

I don't want to be re-elected anymore.

Isn't it cool?

Yes. And I think there will be a meeting, but it's no longer possible because it's excluded from the case. So the October meeting may not be held in the end. Well, then I think I'll see you next year in November. Wow. If I can do it, next year. To be honest, you did a great job this year. We are trying to reduce the number of times you come by processing as many applications as possible at once. We are trying to reduce the cost and reduce the burden on you. Yes. Thank you to all the employees. Do you have anything else to say at the board meeting?

Then we will end the meeting at this point. I have nothing more to say. Ouch! Dad, this seat doesn't include everything. Thank you.