Planning Board - Regular Meeting

Hello. The meeting of the City Planning Committee on August 10, Monday, has begun. Please check your attendance. Anderson. Chae-ri. Park-heo. Ri-chi.

Newer.

Do you have any changes or deletions? No. Do you have any announcements or public statements? Yes. I talked to a few people on 1023 East 15th Street.

Mr. Chairman, I visited the site myself. Thank you.

It's in front of the July 20 meeting log. Do you have a confirmation case? Confirmation case. Request. Request. Please decide how to request. I will request. Please check your attendance.

Anderson. Terry. I did not attend. Parker. Yes. Rich. Yes. Newer. Yes.

Now, I will explain the legal and legal process. Step 1. Consultation. The employee introduces the application form. Step 2. The board of directors reveals the communication content with external parties. Step 3. Check the understanding officer who will attend the application human resources consultation. The understanding officer who is only trying to make a statement can speak during the public participation time. The understanding officer is an individual or a group that will be negatively influenced by the profits that the ULDC protects or promotes. This includes health and safety, police and fire services, service systems, development density or intensity, transportation facilities, medical facilities, equipment or services, and environmental or natural resources. The alleged negative benefits can be shared with other members of the local community, but the general benefits of the local community that everyone can share should not be provided. I will pass the microphone to the members for the testimony. All cases are over. Thank you. If you are here to speak about the case today, please come out in a group and raise your right hand. The evidence of the case is true and completely true, and I solemnly declare that it is not a lie. Good. Thank you. If you come out in a group, please tell us your name and address and declare that you have declared. If you didn't stand up and speak today, let me know when you change your mind. I'll let you know then. Thank you. Would you like me to take the door? Thank you. Request A. The end of the case number is 1253. Request is a request for explanation. The applicant requested a change of purpose from a commercial area to a medium-sized area. The owner is Curtis Adams, and the address is East 15th Street, 1023. Thank you. Do you have any questions for the committee or employees? I have a question.

I lived in the Bay County area for 40 years, but as far as I remember, this facility has always been here and seems to have been used as it is now. So I have a question. Why are you asking for a change from the existing use to a medium-sized business? And if you change to a medium-sized business, what kind of business are you trying to do that you are not currently doing?

Originally, it was a business registration application, but the area of use was wrongly designated, so it could not be approved. As you said, it was a building that was not suitable for use, and the ownership rights were changed. If the ownership rights of buildings that are not suitable for use are changed, the existing permit will be invalid.

Due to the change in ownership rights, this case is now listed.

Yes, I understand. When the previous owner owned it, the area of use was properly designated and the existing use was maintained during the period of use. Yes. As far as I know, it has always been used for commercial use, so it has always been unsuitable. However, due to the recent change in ownership, this request has been raised. I have a question. There is no need to change the name of the site.

The problem is that when reviewing the business registration application, the main role of our city planning and the person in charge of the 용도 지역 is to check whether the business and operation are in line with the 용도 지역. until the review process is completed. We are checking that part right away, and as new owners come in, we check all the information. So we look at the content and say, wait a minute, they must abide by the current rules. As Michael Orlando said earlier, this is the reason why the problem was raised. If you want to comply with the current regulations, you must be designated as a mid-industry, high-end area. So today's request was submitted to you. If you are designated as a mid-industry area, you can operate any industry you want. That's right. However, the mid-industry area only regulates specific facilities such as recycling facilities. That's right. If you are designated as a certain area, you can carry out all the projects that are allowed in that area. Also, what I would like to remind the committee is that the Chinese industrial area is the subject of the main development review, and the main development review must go through the committee's review. Also, environmental impact evaluation is necessary. 따라서 중공업 구역에 제한되는 모든 개발 사업은 위원회의 심사를 받아야 합니다. 승인되었습니다. 좋습니다. 질문 하나만 더 드리겠습니다. 네. 만약 거부되면 어떻게 되나요? 어떤 조치를 취할 수 있나요? 죄송합니다. 만약 부결되면 어떻게 되나요?

미시간 시에 항소하는 것 외에 다른 방법이 있을까요? 경공업 관련 규정을 따라야 합니다. 경공업 지역 지정이 유지될 것입니다. 따라서 현재 용도는? 그대로 유지됩니다. 만약 거부된다면 경공업 지역으로 남게 됩니다. 네. 그대로 유지됩니다. 따라서 기존 사업체는 더 이상 운영할 수 없게 됩니다. 현재 사업체는 문을 닫아야 합니다. 네. 담당 직원은 최소한 지역 지정 부분에 대해서는 승인할 수 없습니다.

해당 요청에 대해서는 승인할 수 없습니다. 네. Are there any applicants? Yes, then. Next question.

Do you have any other questions for the staff? Yes. Is there anyone to talk about this case? Who is it?

I'll tell you.

I'll give you a chance to talk to the applicant first. Please tell me, applicant. There are no applicants. All right. Is there anyone else you'd like to talk to? Then, is there anyone who's online? Is there anyone who's online on behalf of the applicant? I don't know. I'm sure they knew this was right. Yes, I'm reminding you once again. Do you remember there was a problem with the number of races last time? This person was supposed to attend. You have to connect to Zoom. No, no, no. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no In the last meeting, I told you that I will come back here again and act tomorrow. It is scheduled to be submitted to the City Council. Let me tell you again. There is a regulation that the applicant must act on the case unless he or she participates. I will be able to attend the next meeting. Um, can I ask one more question? Yes, it's okay. Let me ask you a simple question. Have the employees been in touch with the applicant for the past few days? Yes, can we postpone this case to the very end and discuss it again in case there is a subsequent application? Yes, I will. If you want to, you can move it to the back of the will. Tell me. Did you have any opinions? I'll ask you a question to make sure I understand. If this company wants to operate in the same way as it does now, there's no other way but to move to a medium-sized area, right? That's right. As far as we know, yes. As of now, this is our trap.

In general, our role is to check whether the limited operation method is in line with our land use policy, goals, and regional regulations when a new business is introduced.

Then the only problem is that if we change it, it will be a permanent change. The specific sub-districts that are not related to other high-industrial sites will be designated as high-industrial sites. If we maintain that industrial site, LII, and let them continue to operate, we will not change it permanently. But I don't know if that's going to be advantageous for us.

In my opinion, the other option is, so I'm saying it like I'm talking to myself right now, but the committee will eventually have to modify the Enun Yongdo area. 즉, 실제 문구를 수정해야 한다는 거죠. 물론 그것도 하나의 선택지가 될 수 있지만, 시간이 더 걸릴 겁니다. 그리고 그건 분명히 고려해 볼 만한 사항입니다. There is no other way that comes to mind right now. If you have any other ideas, please let us know.

There is also a way to change the use of the medium-sized business site to a more limited use according to the purpose of the specific person through the Development Cooperation.

Yes, there is one more question. You said that it was a change in ownership. How did the ownership question come about? About the use area before the sale. 알고 계신 게 있나요? 저는 잘 모르겠습니다. 그런 것 같지는 않아요. 하지만 말씀하신 것처럼 매입 시 실사 과정에서 일반적으로 요구되는 사항인데 그런 건 알지 못합니다.

혹시 용도 지역 확인 서류를 요청하는 경우가 있어서 저희 기록을 확인해 볼 수는 있겠지만 지금 당장은 매입 전에 용도 지역 확인 서류를 요청한 적이 있는지는 모르겠습니다. This is a question from the chairman.

Then I will give you an additional question. How long did the previous owner own the property? When the comprehensive plan was established and related regulations were laid out, it was designated as a construction site and construction site. Was the previous owner designated as an unlimited use? In other words, the current owner is Do you understand what I'm trying to say? Yes, we'll check it right now. All right.

The applicant did not attend and was inconvenienced by the number of relatives in the last month's meeting, so we propose to postpone this case to the last order. All right. If there is no online response from the applicant, we will postpone it to next month. There is a question for the applicant. Yes, I think it would be more appropriate for the applicant to ask a question directly. My question is that it would be better for the applicant to ask directly. All right. There is an agreement to postpone it to the last order. Yes, I agree. All right. I'll re-apply. There is an agreement to postpone in the last order of the committee. Please check your attendance. Director Anderson.

Yes.

Director Cherry. Yes.

Director Parker. Yes. Director Rich. Yes. Director Bauer. Yes.

We're postponing it to the last order of the committee today. Yes. All right. This is request B.

The end of the case number is 1618. It is a request for the easing of the construction regulations. The applicant is requesting the easing of the construction regulations of Panamá City's integrated land development regulation 104 to 26 according to section 26. Thank you. Do you have any questions for the person in charge? I also have a question.

There are questions for the owner, and there may be questions for the person in charge. First, do you know if the owner has selected a construction company for construction? It is known that there is a structure in the area. It would have been nice if the photo was included in the data. Then, it would have been possible to confirm that construction had already been attempted and that someone had stopped it. Um, there's something like a stick or a pillar. I don't know the exact term, but the vertical structure is going up. So I'm curious if the manufacturer did that structure, or the building owner did it, and why they're asking me to do this now. I think it's a question that the applicant should answer. I didn't know. Yes, I see. I have a question about this real estate. I think it would be better to ask the employees. I'll ask you. I was a little embarrassed when I was passing by in the car. There are two beautiful platanus trees in the front yard. I understand that there is a difficulty. But when I went to the yard, When I looked at the house from the front, the second structure on the right was right next to the fence. Wow, that's 7 feet. I don't think it's about 2.1 meters high. So I was going to check it myself. Let's do some math. If I can see it properly in our architectural drawings, you can see that the house, which is marked in red, is 13.9 feet 9 inches. And if you look at the second page with the MTS measurement and map, the length of the second structure beyond the house is 11 feet 7 inches. Therefore, if you add 13.9 feet and 11.7 feet, it is 2.2 feet. I want to make sure I'm looking at it properly. When you look at the house from the front, on the right side, Is there already a problem with the decommissioning of the construction line?

This is a sub-design with MTS measurement and map. This is their measurement data and the most accurate information. The other sub-design I showed you, so there was a similar question about the garage solution design. I think the measurement value of the drawing is not accurate, so I asked the applicant again. Please provide the measurement data. The measurement data does not have a 7-feet distance.

I can see one line, but it says 08. It seems to point to the fence. Yes.

I don't know where to point.

Then, is there a 7-feet distance between that line and the fence? It's called a wooden warehouse. It seems to point to the fence.

Yes, point 8 seems to indicate a fence invasion. I don't think it's in the same area.

There is no data showing the distance between the land border and the wooden warehouse. It doesn't look like 7 feet when you go there yourself.

Because the purpose of the measurement or the focus already knew the location of the structure, it seems to have indicated a certain distance.

Yes.

Yes, that's probably it. What I don't understand is that there seems to be a problem with the construction line after this area. It seems to be something that needs to be checked. If that's true, 시에서 좋습니다. 건축선 후퇴 문제가 생길 겁니다. 계획위원회로부터 건축선 전제허가를 받지 않은 상태에서 안마당의 건축선 후퇴를 0으로 하려고 하시는군요. 라고 말할 수 있을까요? 저는 이 신청자에 대한 우려가 큽니다. To be honest, I don't know if there is a problem with the construction of this area. The only way to know for sure is to check the measurement, but if

If the structure marked here is not attached to the house, you may only need a 3ft, about 90cm above backrest. Side view. If it is not attached, you only need a 3ft, about 90cm above backrest. So I don't know. Yes. It is unfortunate that concerns about the backrest ratio have not been raised or discussed. I understand that this is not the core of the request.

However, considering the entire area and as a member of the board of directors, I think it is appropriate to check this part. I just checked it with my own eyes, and as I passed by, I looked at the vertical structures and saw how close this wooden warehouse was to the fence. I don't know how to deal with it or if we need additional discussion, but I'd like to know if the construction company was hired and what procedures were taken to get here. The construction has already been carried out, but why did I see this request now? As you can see from the name of the wooden warehouse, it seems to be an attached warehouse. It is a structure that will be used as a temporary building. We need a 3-feet, not a 7-feet. Um, do you have any other questions from the board of directors or employees? Can you tell us about this case? I'm sorry, but can I ask you in more detail about the fact that the 2-feet distance on the road border is 0?

How far should it be from the road border? According to the measurement results, the closest part to the road at home, that is, the distance to the land border, is said to be 24 feet 6 inches. Then how far should it be from the road?

Well, it's about 0.5 feet 6 inches.

Because, according to the layout of the pillar-shaped warehouse, 다 24피트이기 때문입니다. 네. 신청자분께서 이 안건에 대해 말씀하실 수 있을까요? 성함과 주소를 말씀해 주십시오.

제 이름은 미키 홀이고, 주소는 4019 발렌시아입니다. 질문에 답하자면, 제가 2013년에 이 집을 샀을 때 이미 그 구조물이 있었습니다. 네.

Okay. The hurricane blew up the front part, but there was a 30-feet RV warehouse. I returned it to the construction company and I stopped it. The front part I'm asking for help with is that warehouse. It's only 20 feet from the end of the garage. 20 feet. It's in my land, and there are two cars. But I can't put it in the garage. Because of the trees falling from the tree, you have to use washing detergent and wax twice a month to change it yourself. It's not automatically washed. Please allow me to manage my cars, and I'd really appreciate it if you could help me in this situation. The storage is designed with a low roof. It's not like a sloping roof, it's a flat ceiling that doesn't take up a lot of space. I didn't block any side or other parts, and I just made it so that I could protect the car. This is all I ask of you.

Not yet. Did you not make a contract and hire a tax company?

Contractor. No, my wife. I do it myself. I was the general manager of 30 commercial buildings in Atlanta. All right. I also built a basement tunnel. I've built all sorts of places from here to Montana. I think it's worth making a carpet. Of course. I'm just thinking about this. How did you get here? My wife told me, but why did you come to us after the construction started? My wife read an article in May that the governor of May would allow us to spend up to $7,000 on a deck-like structure. I thought I could save less than $700. I started the construction, and when I read it in detail, there was a lot of wind. So I stopped the construction. I even built a pillar, but I tried to build it without permission like the people in the neighborhood. To be honest, you know, everyone over there does that. After reading that, I stopped.

I went to get a building permit. That's when the money started to spill.

Design fee $ 3,000. The cost of enlistment in front of you is $ 500. 서류 작업에 더 많은 돈이 들었고, 마당에는 건축자재로 쓸 나무들이 쌓여 있어요. 그런데 제 차가 10만 달러 나대요. 저는 장애인 참전용사라서 차에 왁스 치를 일일이 할 수가 없어요. 도저히 못해요. 그리고 그 테너는 흰색 차에 쓰는 거예요. 사진도 있어요. 보여드릴 수 있어요. 건물 앞에 주차되어 있어요. 그냥 허락이나 도움을 구하는 거예요.

The length of the structure you are trying to build is 24 feet, but considering your cars, is it okay to have a shorter length? Do you know the length and size of your cars? Yes. Measure about 2 feet from the garage door. Let's go.

I'll cut off the bumper behind my car. I'll cut it off regardless of the size. I'll do whatever you want. Yes. My concern is that if the bumper is only 15 centimeters away from the road, it can interfere with traffic.

It's about 1.8 meters away from India, and it's about 6 meters from the end of the bumper to the road.

Yes, it's not all the way to the road.

There's no problem with the bumper, but I asked the same question. The car is not even 7.3 meters long, why do you have to cut it so long? My car is 5.5 meters. I have enough space.

If you say cut 30 centimeters, I will do it. To protect my cars and cut them out and manage them myself, I'll do anything. Then it's an additional question. Why can't you put the cars in the garage? It's not going in. It's not going in. In what way? It's long. It's long. I have two. One is a Toyota Tundra SR5, and the other is a Ram 1500 four-wheel drive, but neither of them goes in. One doesn't go in at all. I have the same problem.

My car is 2500, but it's too high. So I passed by your truck, and I thought it wouldn't go into the garage because it was too high or something. Yes, that's right. I knew your answer would be like that. I didn't plan too much to take your time.

This is to prevent the tree branch from falling and having to build it again. If you put an aluminum cover on the falling tree branch, you have to tear it off and build it again. This is a really exaggerated design. If you look closely, you'll know, but it makes it three times stronger than you need it. It's just a flat roof on top of two flat walls. Am I right? The main concern about the problem of trees falling on the vehicle is not because of the width of the vehicle, but because of the end of the road.

Teacher, those trees are covering my entire land. The height is 50 feet, but the teacher will not allow me to cut down a 50-feet tree, and I will not do that either.

I hope you do the same. I don't want to. But the trees are really big. When I planted the tree, I didn't know that there was such a component in the tree.

I didn't even imagine it would be a problem later. I haven't even recognized it, but now I know how big the problem is. Still, the street is really beautiful. My cars are beautiful in my eyes. I'll give you a question. Thank you. Is there anyone else who wants to talk about this problem? Please come out and tell us your name and address, and if you have a legend, please tell us. This is William Britton. My address is Florida, Panama City, Valencia Cote, 4002. I live nearby. This is the person who is across the street from Mickey's house. I think you should consider the law of the disabled in the United States. He is disabled. Now come out the door and go down the stairs. Thank you. Thank you. Do you have any other opinions?

Uh, I'm Belinda Taylor. I live in the next house, Balenciaga Court, 4027. Taylor, did you just sign? No, not yet. You promised to tell the truth, right?

Yes, that's right. Thank you. Um, I sent an e-mail with no reason for this question. I wanted to ask if you checked. Did you check? Yes, thank you. Is there anyone else?

Here you go.

Mr. Michael Jones, Balenciaga Court 4022. You're on the right side of Mike's house, aren't you? Did you sign it? Yes, that's right. Do you promise to tell the truth? Yes, that's right. Thank you. I have no problem at all. My house is on the right side, too. We don't have any problems. However, as the construction of our neighborhood was in progress and more reports were added, the situation became a little more difficult. Before the news came out, he had a wider reach. Our neighbors didn't really want the news, but it wasn't something we could do. So he lost a lot of money. I understand his truck problem, but I want to try to make him a good neighbor and maintain a good relationship. I have no problem. Thank you. Would you like to speak to someone else? All right. I don't think so. Is there anything I can suggest? It's a confirmation case. I'll re-enroll. Can we have an additional discussion? Yes, I re-enrolled.

Um, I think there's a delay problem on the right. I think we need to solve this problem, too. You can re-enroll or raise another case. Um, this question. I'm curious about the board's opinion on how to deal with it. If I ask the employees, real estate-related changes. When the application is received, I'm curious about the existing changes to other parts of the property. I usually review it, but when I look closely, I'm a little worried.

When expanding a existing building, the way employees generally deal with it is not important what the structure is when expanding the main structure. If you do not comply with the current construction delay regulations, and if there is a problem due to the delay regulation violation, if the goal is to adjust the entire area to the current regulations, I am sorry that this part cannot be dealt with here, but it is allowed to delay the regulation violation in the development approval process. The employee does not have the right to change the retirement regulations. So, as you may remember, in the past, when a certain part of the person in charge, for example, visited to deal with requests such as front or back, it included a sentence that indicated whether the side or other parts should be modified together. We are trying to solve all the problems at once. Effort is the key. Now I know what you're worried about. I have the same concern. I'll ask Mike's legal team.

제가 변호사라서 잘 알지만 동의안을 제출해야 할까요?

아니면 신청자와 협의해서 이 문제를 다시 논의해야 할까요? 네, 이 문제 를 완전히 해결하기 위해 홀 씨가 추가 신청 수수료 등을 내지 않도록 하려면 이 안건을 보류하는 것이 좋을 것 같습니다.

Are you talking about the distance? I think you're talking about the place where the wooden warehouse is located in Siknyangdo. I'm not sure which way it is. Is it north? There is a slope written as 1.6 on the north wooden building. Yes, that's right. Where is the wooden building? Excuse me. Yes, it's 1.6 meters. If you come down a little toward the wooden building, that part looks the closest to the building. If you agree with me, it's the north. From the fence. If you ask the surveyor to measure the distance from that point to the land boundary, then you can decide whether to approve or disapprove of the problem. Then, not only the front withdrawal problem, but also the side withdrawal problem will be recorded. Therefore, we will modify this request and include the request for withdrawal. That's right. But we have to report this part again. A lot of people here will give their opinions, but some people may think that it's okay to retreat last year, but it's okay to retreat 4 feet, about 1.2 meters to the side. That's what I'm worried about. So I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything.

There is no such problem because it is expanding the scope of request. There are also control elements included. What I want to tell you is

And as you may have heard, the building was an existing structure. When he bought the house, he didn't change anything, and after Hurricane Michael, he repaired it like other people in Bay County. Yes, I know. But for him, this problem needs to be solved properly. When he tries to sell his real estate, it's never easy to catch the problem right away. Yes, it will be a problem. Yes, it's an important problem and needs to be solved. I think everyone agrees that there will be a simple solution. However, to make sure that it has been properly processed, it would be better to discuss both problems in the next meeting. Yes, ask the surveyor to measure the distance from that corner to there. Then the employees can send a notice to the residents around them. The cost is not the burden of the city, but the burden of the city. 그리고 9월 9일에 청문회를 열겠습니다. 9월 계획위원회 회의는 14일에 있습니다.

9월 14일은 그 달의 두 번째 월요일입니다. 저희가 하려는 바가 이해되시나요? 잠깐만요.

There is a question about the retreat distance of the wooden warehouse structure on the northern border. This issue has already been discussed. This issue is already discussed. In my opinion, I think the committee will approve the request. But in order to prevent future problems, The next meeting should be postponed. I will get the exact measurement value and report it to the neighbors. As you know, we can discuss other cases today, but if we deal with this case together, everything will go smoothly. Then you can proceed with all the procedures without any problems in the future. Therefore, it would be good to deal with all the cases at once. Please don't approve one by one today and deal with them all at once. Then do we have to wait another month? Yes, that's right.

Unfortunately, this problem has been going on since May.

The other option is, and in my opinion, what the board is trying to avoid is to approve the application you submitted today. Oh, but there is a construction law violation. You have to write the application again, pay $500 more, and come back. That's what I'm saying. What we're trying to do is, Mr. Hall, we want to solve your problem at once. It will take about 30 more days, but the staff will burden the advertising cost that needs to be announced to the neighbors. I have to let my neighbors know about the distance between the north and the south. Not only to the neighbors sitting here, but also to other neighbors. Uh, I have no choice but to do as you say.

No. Yes, there is no choice. I should have just done it like the people in the neighborhood. You've never met me, and I've never met you. Anyway, I'm sorry to say this, but my words. I paid $34,000 to install a shield. But no one is doing the test. I'm acting like I'm building a 10-feet building there. I finished the radiation construction, but I can't even get a test for covering the soil. But you're trying to waste my time and your time on the flat roof carpet that I had when I bought the land 13 years ago. It's not what I installed. It was when I bought the land 13 years ago. Thank you for your help. But why do you have to be responsible for what you already have?

You seem to be trying to expand the inappropriate structure. That's what we're trying to do. The structure already existed in an inappropriate state. Do you need his consent to approve this case? No, I don't need it. So there is consent to approve the case and request. That's right.

If you tell me what the problem is about the change today, I will solve it before there is a problem again. There is no need to continue the debate. If you tell me what I have to do, I will cut out the part that looks like a snake. Then everyone will be satisfied.

But it's not enough just to get rid of that part. The problem is now. It's not the front part of why you're here. It's a different problem now. Before I bought the house, no one thought it was a problem.

Yes, that's true. Someone violated the regulations.

The same goes for the price. Anyway, our committee is doing our best not to pay additional costs. SEVENTEEN 3T seems to be an additional part of the house. Yes.

So, the main structure in the area is 7 feet from the land border. The structure in the area is 7 feet from the land border. Other options are to be reserved until next month, and the exception will be approved as requested.

Yes, I am also trying to find the best way for you.

Is it okay to maintain the distance? Or not? Related How is the regulation?

She is coming back. How far is it allowed? First of all, you have to vote. There is a case in a while. You can't remove the case. You have to vote first. You have to vote for or against the suspended case. Yes, then I will proceed. The suspended case is to approve the exception as stated in the will.

Mr. Anderson, please tell me. Mr. Cherry. No. Mr. Parker. Yes. Mr. Rich. Yes. Mr. Bauer. Yes. The case has been passed. Thank you.

You did well.

Thank you. Then you mean I have nothing to do until the next meeting?

No. You just got an answer that you can't.

Now there is a problem with the inappropriate use of the North side, so you have to solve it. How can I park my car in the meantime? It has been approved.

It has been approved. Thank you. All right. This is a request letter. Request letter. The end number of the case is 1618. This is a request to ease the construction regulations. The applicant is asking for a resolution of the local area general cross-strait regulations stipulated according to ULDC 104-36.2.8. The applicant wants to build a commercial building with a minimum front cross-strait of 25 feet and a size of 5,000 square feet. The owner is Jason Oaks, the applicant is Brad Harris, and the address is 26 and 551. Thank you. Do you have any questions for the staff?

There is a question. It is known that there is a right to use the dot paper, but it seems that the right to use the paper suggests the necessity of this measure. Did the officials check the right to use the dot paper and verify the fact?

There is a right to use the dot paper in the front. Yes. Do you have any other questions? The applicant has come to speak about this case. If you tell me your name and address, the members will receive a letter. Yes, I am Brad Harris and the address is Baldwin 903. Please make sure that what you are about to say is all true. Thank you. Do you have any questions? Hello. You mean to say that you have to make it go back at least 25 feet, about 7.6 meters from the road, right? Exactly. It's not a set minimum distance, we've already decided. 2. In other areas of the area, it is not exactly the same use as this area, but it is usually 15 feet, about 4.6 meters, or 25 feet, about 7.6 meters. Anyway, the reason why it is necessary is because of the right to use the dot paper. There is an existing sewer in the north of the city, about 8 feet deep. Therefore, if you need to repair the sewer, if there is a problem with the nearby building, the foundation of the building can be damaged. If you need to repair a 25-feet distance, it is to secure enough filling space from the sewer. Now the rest of the work is to preserve rainwater and asphalt packaging. In short, to explain in more detail, the sub-district I am talking about is the sub-district of Hanwha-su in the city. According to the applicant, there is also a transportation, boat, and sub-district.

Have you ever seen any evidence of it? I do not have a related record, but it will be easy to find.

You can ask the applicant to submit a copy of the sub-district. It is a sub-district marked on the measurement drawing. It is estimated that the transportation department will be on Highway 98. It is also possible that the city's public facilities are using the area. I think it's about 10 feet. There's no measurement drawing in front of me right now. According to what our surveyor has confirmed, the utility line, that is, the sewer, is only on the north side of the land. Yes, it's on the north side of the land. Oh, I see. You may have to write a new land border, but that can all be processed during the process. However, the one closest to the limited building is the sewer. Yes, I understand. Do you have any other questions? Thank you. Yes, go ahead. I'll just give you one question. For what purpose will this building be used? I got a lot of emails about why expansion construction is needed. I heard it's an expansion construction, but I think there's a concern about mainstream sales. Why are you expanding? Are you trying to make the mainstream stores bigger? This branch is different from the branch of mainstream stores. It is currently only in construction. 주류 판매를 목적으로 하는 것은 아닙니다. 기존 주류 판매점 확장에 대해서 말씀하시는 거죠? 네. 창고 같은 곳일 거예요. 박스 트럭으로 싣고 내리는 곳이요. 술집은 아니고요. 네. 주류는 판매하지 않을 겁니다. 네. Do you have any other questions? Thank you. I'll tell you about this case. Do you have any more questions? Is there a case? Yes, I think it's still under review. What are you talking about? 검토 중입니다. 제가 보기 N문제는 하수관 용지 문제인 것 같은데 그 용지가 부지 앞쪽을 가로지르고 있어서 문제가 되는 것 같습니다. 네, 음, 예전에. 6번가였던 곳에 대한 내용이 잘못된 것 같습니다. It may not be visible because it's too small. Yes, was it a transportation area? Or was it a road? I think it was either a transportation road or a 6th street. It was part of the urban area, but it's abandoned now. I think that's the problem. Anyway, I agree with their opinion. This sewerage area is still causing problems with the construction line withdrawal regulations. The point you just mentioned is... Even if the building is placed over there to solve the problem at the back, the problem of the lower water level and sub-basin remains. All other rear and side sub-basins are following the regulations.

Yes, that's right. Therefore, Because of the city's impoverishment, we have to move the building back.

Because the sewer is passing right in front of the building.

And the building owner promised that this has nothing to do with the main sale. Main sale There is no sale and there is no expansion of the main distribution network.

Thank you. Did you answer the question?

Yes, yes, good. And for the record,

You have the opinion of the letter we received, right? Yes, good. Would you like to agree? I will hand it over to the chairman. I will submit a consent form to the vice-chairman. I agree. Yes. I agree to the consent form to approve this case. Use the conference room.

Mr. Anderson. Yes. Mr. Cherry. Yes. Mr. Barker. Yes.

Mr. Rich.

Yes. Mr. Ba. Yes. I'll tell you again. I've never seen this before, but I understand. Here's the request. The case number for the basic case ends with 1500. It's a request to change the purpose. The applicant requested to change to a general area of Glyn from the local area of Glyn. The owner is Valentinos LLC and the applicant is USA Building Restoration LLC. The site is located in East Peoples Court 2913. Employees are advised to use it. Thank you. Do you have any questions for the director or employees? No. Did the applicant come to speak about the case? Yes, there is. I think you've logged in online.

Hello, I'm Andres Kelsen. I haven't made a statement yet. All right. Is it true that what you're going to testify is the truth, and you're going to speak the truth and make a harsh statement that there is no lie? Yes, that's right. Yes, thank you. On behalf of the applicants, I'll answer the question. Do you have any questions for the applicant? If I understand correctly, There's already a building in the north and you just need to change it for the south.

I think there's a multi-generation house on the 5th floor.

네, 북쪽 부지는 이미 개발이 완료되었습니다. 512번지 바로 뒤쪽에 작은 구역이 있는데, 그곳과 합치려고 계획 중입니다. 각 부지 소유주분들과 이미 협의를 마쳤고, 모두 동의했습니다. 문제는 이전에는 두 부지의 용도가 같았는데, Now they have been changed for different purposes. It's hard to put the two parts together again. Do you have any questions? Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to talk about this case? I don't think so. Would you like to talk to someone else? Do you agree? I agree. Request. Agree. Request. Please check your attendance. Director Anderson. Yes. Director Cherry.

Yes. Director Parkin. Yes. Director Rich.

Yes. Director Yu. Yes.

I agree. 59 votes.

It was passed with the opposite 0 votes.

Thank you. I will move on to request A.

Are you a applicant? Yes. Good. Do you have any other questions? This is what we discussed earlier. Do you have anything to ask the staff? Yes. All right. Can the applicant hear you? Yes. We're here, too. All right. I'll ask the applicant a question. Yes. Then I think it'll be more comfortable. Please come out as a reflection. For the record, please tell us your name and address, and tell us if you've made a statement. If you haven't made a statement, he'll take care of it. I didn't make a statement. Daniel Lesson. The address is 23 Pueyr Loop, Fairhope, Alabama Square. What you're about to say is the truth, and I'll tell you all the truth and make sure there's no lie. Yes, thank you. Thank you. Do you have any other questions for the applicant? Oh, he wasn't here when everything happened. The question was whether it was recorded. So we need to check all the questions again. I'm almost done with the questions I missed. Would you like me to repeat the report again? Would it be helpful? Would you like me to read the report again? Yes, I think so. Mr. Orlando, let's hear it again. Yes, I see. The case number is Indian 1253. We are requesting a change of purpose from the commercial area to the mid-industry area. The owner is Curtis Adams, an applicant for SA Recycling LLC 2, and the address is East 15 and 1023. There is a question for the applicant. Please tell me. Is the sale completed? Is the sale completed? Yes, that's right. Yes, there is another question. Did you check the problem before the sale? Did you know that you need to change the purpose? I didn't know. We couldn't figure it out. I found out when I was about to issue a business registration certificate in the city. Yes, yes. Do you have any other questions? What are you planning to use this cloth for?

As I've done so far, I'm going to use it for high-tech recycling.

That's our business, and we're going to keep doing that. We don't have any plans to introduce additional processes. We're not going to change anything and we're going to do the same as we do now. Thank you. This area is on the opposite side of the bicycle shop. And It's right on the opposite side of the residential block. It's a diagonal road. Yes, I got it. This is where the courier station and recycling center are located. I'll call it Kettle Corner. Yes. If I saw it right, the address you mentioned is across the road and right on the other side of the residential complex. Yes, it's on the other side of the diagonal. 네, 직원분께 질문 하나 해도 될까요? 네. 혹시 부지가 주택단지 로 이전될 경우 Is there a way to put a limit on how to use it for other purposes other than current purposes? If the purpose is changed, you will have to go through the review process. It's a question about what will happen. Is that right? It's already a problem for us. Yes. One of the things that Hayley pointed out is that if any development activities are carried out, for example, Even a small development such as a four-story building should be referred to as major development and approved by the board of directors. Therefore, any changes must be reported to the board of directors. Yes. My biggest concern is that after 15 years, they will sell the business and change the content of the business. Unlike the present, if it changes to a form that has a harmful effect on the local community, we cannot interfere. Yes, thank you. As of now, only major development projects must receive the approval of the board of directors. This is the only standard we can refer to.

Yes, so major development projects must automatically receive approval from the board of directors. Therefore, even if they want to change their business model in a few years, they are If you want to change the use of the business, you have to report it to the Commission.

Whatever development activities you do, you have to get approval from the Commission. Therefore, even if it's an expanded cycle business, it's the same. That's right. Yes, but that's possible. Yes. Do you have any other questions? Is there anyone else? Thank you. Is there anyone who wants to talk about this case? Yes. Hello. Can you hear me? Yes. There's one person who wants to talk first, so I'll tell you for a moment. I was going to tell you about the topic we're discussing right now. Yes, go ahead. I'll start with the applicant. Yes, go ahead. I'm sorry. Yes, we don't intend to change or expand the purpose. I'd like to tell you that again. The appropriate purpose is that it has been maintained for a year, so we knew that the existing purpose was recognized. Panama City knows that it has different regulations from other cities where we have run the business. The only thing we want to change about the purpose is to do what you want in the city. For example, there are improvements or investments. We plan to invest in the installation of a footbridge and a fence. However, we want to reuse it as a good investor in the local community and reuse it in an environmentally friendly way so that it will not be thrown away on the street. We're not trying to build a new building, and if it's not requested by the city, we're not going to change anything. Of course, you would want us to do that. We have no intention of selling the business. We will continue to work hard to become a good tenant here, and we will never change the purpose. I really wanted to tell you this. Thank you. Ma'am, could you tell me your name and address? My name is Richardson.

My address is Bay Avenue, Panama City, Florida, 700th Street. What I'm curious about is... Did you file a lawsuit? I'm sorry. No, I didn't. What did you say?

Did you file a lawsuit?

No, I haven't done it yet. All right. Please raise your hand. Would you like to rest? Would you like to do it with your right hand? The testimony you are making is the truth. Do you swear that there is no lie after telling the truth? Yes. Thank you.

My concern is what impact it will have on the land next to the old iron processing plant in the 15th house if the use is changed to a medium-sized business. We have a land right next to it, and I want to know what impact it will have on our land.

Currently, there are no changes to the existing use. Since the ownership has been changed, it is just a procedure to comply with the relevant regulations. If the property is expanded, it will have to be reported to the parliament again, and the landlord will be notified again.

Yes. Another question is whether this address is currently empty or if there is a high-rise processing plant.

Yes, it is currently operated by a high-tech processing plant.

Yes, and they seem to have improved their appearance by working on it. But I'm still worried. What I was worried about was what kind of problems we would face if we bought this real estate or took any action on our property, and what kind of impact it would have on us.

Yes, I expressed the same concern at the board meeting. Right now, Lawson is not planning to expand on the owner's side. If the owner expands the use of the property, it will be reported to the board again. It will be reported to us. That's right. Yes, I understand. Thank you.

All right. I'll ask one more question. I have something to ask you before you go.

Yes, please tell me. In my opinion, the property that is affected by this change seems to be only a part of the Gocheol processing plant, right? Other real estate is not affected. So other real estate is not affected by this change. What I'm telling you is that there is a use change. Therefore, if it is not a real estate owned by the owner, the same use area or development plan is applied. You understood well. Thank you. Thank you for pointing out that point.

이 중공업 용도 변경은 해당 부지에만 적용되는 건가요? 주변 부지 전체를 포함하는 건가요? 그런데 왜 저희는 이런 통지서를 받게 된 거죠? 말씀해 주세요. 저희는 주변 부지 소유주들에게 통지해야 할 의무가 있습니다.

Yes, that's what I'm telling you.

Oh, I see. Then it has nothing to do with us. We are not involved in the problem. Of course, it does not directly affect our branch, but there is a right to know that this case is being reviewed. Then why is our branch changed to a commercial and commercial business instead of a residential business like before? Why has it changed? If it doesn't affect our land, why is the use changed? Are you saying that the use of our land has changed? Yes. Yes. That's a long time ago. It was originally for residential use. It was changed to commercial and commercial use. Yes, that's right. What I want to know is this part.

그건 별개의 문제예요.

제 생각엔 서쪽 지역에 대한 동네 개발 계획 말씀이신 것 같은데 저희도 몇 년 전에 시에서 그런 계획을 세웠어요. 아, 무슨 말씀인지 잘 이해가 안 되네요. 파나마시는 동네 개발 계획 수립 과정을 거쳤습니다. St. Andrews, Millville, and Glenwood were affected by the whole city as a whole process. These areas were classified as historical areas in the city. So, over the years, we have gone through a large-scale meeting of residents. A vision plan was established through the meeting, several meetings, and workshops, and it is a book. And based on that plan, three areas were created. You can see it on the map. Location area, general area, and urban area. There was a large-scale use change, but I remember it was January 2025. Yes. The use area designation has already been completed, but the actual map has been applied to all notes in 2025. Therefore, what you are saying seems to mean such a change and transition. What we are discussing today is about specific areas outside the boundary line of the region where large-scale regional changes have been made. Therefore, the specific note is very different, but let me tell you again, KIA is located within 300 feet, so you will have been notified, and you may have seen the contents in the guide letter. If KIA is a real estate owner, KIA's real estate is within 300 feet from the target real estate according to the regional order, you must be notified of the reason for the use of the region change. That's why it's a precious notice. But... Today's meeting will discuss the area and nearby area planning process, and the two different reasons for the large-scale regional change that occurred at the end. If you have any questions, concerns, or opinions related to this, please let me know anytime. Today's meeting is about the request of Long Island, L.A. and Hawaii. As you said, there was a change in the surrounding area. Yes. That's right. This change has already happened a few years ago. Yes. It has been carried out over the years. I remember that the area was set in 2019. And the actual map has been adopted, but the exact date is not sure if it is 2021. Anyway, everything happened within the last 5 years. If you have any other questions, please ask me anytime. I am Janice Swan. I haven't officially announced my employment yet, but I'm just telling the truth.

Thank you. I want to make sure I understand you. She also told me the address of KIA for the record.

It's 918 East 17th Street. Thank you. There are three houses in the suburb. So what you're talking about is them.

In order to maintain the current business, you have to load heavy luggage. As the ownership of the business was transferred, there was a problem when registering as a business owner. In order to maintain the same use as the current business, there is no choice but to register for industrial use. There is no intention of expanding this time, but if I expand the business use later or add a building to the relevant area, I have to return to the borderline. Then there will be a problem again.

That's right. The road has already been damaged because of the truck. The truck is heavy and flies a lot of stones. My mother is also very uncomfortable. When it rains, the road is flooded, so you have to wear boots when you come out. It's because there's sand piled up. The road changed like a sinkhole, and all the large trucks passed by and were damaged. It's just a mess. But if they don't do it like they do now and take other measures, they have to return it to its original state. We've been living in this small town for more than 40 years. I can't stand it anymore. My mother retired, but she doesn't plan to buy or move a new house. This is where we lived. As I said, we own the entire small block. The house we've owned has been cleaned up. So,

If they try to change it, they have to return it to its original state. Yes, I understand. Thank you.

Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to talk about this issue?

I don't have one yet.

What I'm saying right now is the truth, and you've seen me swear that there's no lie. Yes, thank you. Could you tell me your name and address? My name is Angela Whitley, and my address is Mercedes-Benz Avignon 1625.

I'm sorry to have so many questions, but I have a list of questions. Yes, I understand. I heard that as the site is re-registered as a medium-sized business area, regulations on existing buildings are required. Then do I have to install a landfilling? If so, is it for rainwater leakage? And I'm curious about the traffic problem. Are there more large trucks? The 17th and Mercedes-Benz Avenue crossroads are already lacking in large truck traffic. In addition, there are homes where children run around in that area, and there are a lot of drivers. I wonder what kind of new business will be established as it changes to a medium-sized business area. So I'll let you tell the applicants again. What the applicants have said so far is that there is no change in what is happening in the current area. This is basically a process of checking because a new business has registered as a business owner. I think the rainwater management staff will be able to answer that question. I'm curious if there are any changes in the rainwater management requirements or crossroads as it changes from Long Island to Highland.

I'm sorry, but a few days ago, a fire broke out and damaged a nearby commercial building. I wonder how much the fire can spread to the local housing market. My family has lived there for more than 40 years. As you know. If the real estate changes its use, it will be a problem for the upper stage. That's right. We are at the stage of judging whether the current use is allowed. What you said is very appropriate, but it is generally discussed and considered in the development review stage. Yes, you may have heard about the main development elements I mentioned earlier. In Hawaii, any development request, i.e. according to the request of our district area, if a applicant requests expansion or change in the Chinese industrial area, they must re-apply to the committee. Therefore, it will be reviewed at the stage of listening to the same information as rainwater management, transportation, and overall development relief issues. Generally, people who apply for a use change focus on getting a development permit. In fact, it often takes years to develop a property. Therefore, at this stage, it is up to the time to request such information. Because the applicant does not know specifically what plans they have. You may have to attend another meeting and fight. But if that happens, you will get attention from the committee. So I understand that you may be frustrated, but to be honest, that's what development is all about. Because no one knows when to enter or how the business model will change. In that case, you will have to go and adjust. To answer the question again in detail, such problems are It is reviewed and reviewed in detail at the development review stage. Yes, in the construction industry area, you have to do an appropriate analysis, and you have to explain how to do it if there is additional development in the committee. And if you want to remain in the construction industry area, you can operate as before, but if you don't, you have to follow the relevant regulations. The only way we can see is that we discussed this part for a while, but it's not certain, we're just writing it down as it comes to mind. The use designated as a current state-owned business area is that the land is renovated. So the actual text will be modified. But this is the point about text modification. Use change or land use change is generally limited to a specific area. If you modify the text, it will be applied to all use areas. It applies to all areas in the area. So a lot of review is needed for text modification. The reason why we see people hesitating is because of this. It's not limited to a specific area anymore, it's a problem that applies to all fields within the city border. Yes.

To explain her question in more detail, you're saying that data analysis is not automatically carried out without any special measures, right? That's right. It doesn't happen automatically.

It is because the specific content of the main development of the project is stated. However, if there is an expansion or modification of the major development of LI, we need to review the technical review committee. The technical review committee consists of employees. All the employees sitting here are members of the committee. That's a city engineer, a city public facility engineer. In addition to this institution, it is a separate expert group that implements the city project and the law. 하지만 산업, 상업, 산업개발명령서 형태로 기술검토위원회의 쓰인을 받아야 합니다. 네. 하의로 이전할 때 지역사회에 유리하게 적용될 수 있는 성능기준이나 더 높은 기준이 있나요? 적합성 분석 같은 것이요. 네. 몇 가지 있는데 지금 당장은? There is no list, but there are some things to consider in the main development process. I want to make sure I understand correctly. Yes.

So, as you may remember, there is a list of things that should be solved in the main development.

This is called an influence assessment. Oh, yes. Influence assessment. I'm sorry. So, We need to complete the influence assessment of HIGH. Yes, HIGH is a strict use area. However, because it is such a strict use area, we need to consider various additional things to be developed at HIGH. My focus is that such things are not required at LI. If the purpose of the community changes, then... All considerations must be applied, but it is not the case now.

Therefore, there is an opportunity to analyze more thoroughly through LI. Yes, that's right. Thank you. Is there anyone who wants to talk about this case? No. Would the applicant like to ask a question or comment? Yes. Would you like to agree? Agree. Request. Request. Please confirm your attendance. Congressman Anderson.

Yes.

Congressman Cherry. Yes. Congressman Barker. Yes. Congressman Rich. Yes. Congressman Du Bao. Yes.

The consent has passed as 5 to 0. Thank you. Hello. This is a non-procedure.

There will be a presentation by the Stirling-Anderson Committee. Yes, Mr. Chairman. Yes, the tension is crossing. At the end of this meeting, I have to resign from the board of directors. Unfortunately, There was an unexpected proposal from Washington, D.C. As you know, I'm currently in the Florida Air Force Defense Force, and I couldn't refuse this proposal because it included a promotion. I thought I'd be working here, but I didn't. But the good news is that Florida housing rights or Bay County, Panama City housing rights will not be given up. I'm going to keep the house. My wife and I are planning to move to Washington, D.C. for a while, but the deadline hasn't been set, but I think it'll be at least a year. I'll be back after that. I will watch the meetings on TV and YouTube. I have already contacted the street committee. Thank you for giving the opportunity to the committee, the committee, and the mayor. It was a much shorter term than I thought. And of course, I would like to thank the board, staff, microphone, resources, and viewers. All of you were great, and you kept telling me the news, and I tried my best to catch up with you. To be honest, I tried to follow you, but I couldn't. But that doesn't mean I'm hiring like this. If you come to Washington D.C. in the next two years, please contact me anytime. Thank you for giving me the opportunity. I'll send you a letter. Mike, is that what I have to do? Mike Burke. You can send it to the Director of Development Services. Yes, I got it. I checked. I'll send you a letter this afternoon. Thank you for giving me the opportunity. Thank you so much for your time. I'll wait for the online comments. Yes, thank you. Please understand that you were busy going to Washington. Now it's time for the hearing. Is there anyone to speak? No one is here.