Board of Supervisors - Special Meeting
The Board of Supervisors discussed financial updates, the potential forensic audit, property transactions, and budget amendments during their meeting.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Board of Supervisors
- Meeting Type
- Board Of Supervisors
- Location
- Madison County, IA
- Meeting Date
- September 15, 2026
Transcript
269 sections
We can make the appeal.
We proceed with the examination of the order.
Any statements of conflict of interest?
Any support? I would ask you to send the part of your public documents.
I think it will take some time to be.
I support the proposal. So you're proposing to change the order of the day, to send the discussion on politics. Diana, you support the motion. I agree with all those who are in favor of approving the order of the day as modified, reiterating the discussion on the policy of public documents.
Voting yes.
All against. The motion is approved. So, Michelle, you have the first points.
And I don't really know how to print out the order of the day, so I don't go out of order. And proceed. The first point is the update of the contribution. Thank you. This is for the verbal. Just like yours, I sent it to you this morning. And this is just a review report.
Michelle Brand, reviewer of the content.
You can start talking a little too fast. I just wanted to let you know. that the balance is completed until December. From the last report of the treasurer there are five days left to end January and then I will start closing the month of January.
In addition, I want to put this in the list of things to create. To assure everyone, I will not do anything like that.
The budget amendment is also here. We must discuss it during the phase dedicated to the definition, in the date, through that resolution. The financial update for John Wayne Drive 101, 100 months, ARA 8, While we evaluate and talk about involving an architect who thought it was important to let everyone know that so far there are 50,000 dollars in that project. 17,000 dollars. They belonged to fiscal year 26. This included re-inspection, re-inspection of the amianto, the bonification of the mufa and then the re-inspection. These are the ones I access.
Does it also include the roof?
No, so that will be in Milan Fiscale 27 on your sheets. So, again, that's the part 1008 and it's 23,000. I understand that we have not received offers for the public building in the last few days, so I just wanted to make sure. We are at 50,000 dollars at the moment. This must be dealt with with a balance amendment. But he said we could subtract 17. You managed to see the number at the bottom there? What was left for the bonifica of the UFA was 16,088 dollars. We spent 17,170 for an excess of 1,082.28. The positive news and the negative one is that this comes from the total balance of the fund for buildings and land and we have not exceeded it. We wouldn't be the same if I had spent money that was not substantial. So this was what I wanted to update you about. Sales of the conservation building. It's coming and I put it in my report. So we discovered that the
Can I stop? Excuse me for interrupting. So you have a progressive total and then the import. So the progressive total is the expected cost. The import is how much you actually pay.
We spent that amount of money. In the sense that the invoices are not all arrived, but we signed some contracts. The contractors, the contracts have been signed. The work is in the completion phase. Anything else? The legal description is not enough to transfer the title, so it is my responsibility to note it. We must obtain a planimetric relief.
Could you call Steve Pearson?
We have already spoken to everyone. This is something that Sharon and I, yes, we have to do. I contacted Chad Daniels. I have more familiarity with him. He has not yet given me a price. He suggested involving Mike Hackett, who is a geometer, but that would be a conflict of interest.
So we need a terrain map because the legal description is insufficient.
And this must happen before selling the building. So we have to take care of it as soon as possible. Because we also have a loan, bridge and lease for the conservation building for an import of, I did two calculations this morning, about 222 to 800. In which interest is 4.100 from October. On the 25th and the 26th. I looked quickly this morning. In October when it expires.
So, when will we have that 8? Or still?
Well, let's hope as soon as possible. So, when will he call me back? There is a limit of expenses for which I have to, if it is a couple of thousand dollars, I proceed. Or, well, it's not on budget. You should talk to him, because he mentioned who you should have paid. You could ask him about the income. The conservation should come out of the sale of the buildings. And I mean, I'm not worried about the budget, but at the same time, I want to respect Steve. But we can't sell without this.
So think that that cost should come out of their budget, but... John, do you have other thoughts?
It's more or less the same line of thought that you...
So we have an offer or a potential offer.
We can't sell it without this.
That's why I don't want to send it back thinking, oh, you know... I just wanted to update you a little on the situation. Is there anything else you can add?
No, that's what I was going to say.
The relief is really fundamental to determine if it is above or below the three acres and this could certainly influence the value of the property.
The useless value. Yes, the property. I ask you to be there for a long time before we set the limit of the three acres. Yes, it happened a long, long time ago.
And the legal description refers to highway 163. So there is another level of uncertainty about how it is currently described. And you really need to make a superimposition for... I just have to fix the house a bit.
I don't imagine that once it's done, it can be sold in 70 years.
Yes, because we will have a legal description, for sure.
Do we have to have a clear review? Or will we end up with a disaster?
I imagine we have received the instructions.
Honestly, guys, this... And then I also did the evaluation. Sorry. We're on six and a half.
Okay. So, are there any other questions for me, people behind? I think we still have some. There's something there.
No, I still don't understand why the demolition was not done before the building was put on sale, but we are here and it must be done.
So yes. We will go on as quickly as possible.
Well, let's hope to do it quickly. Who will contact the people to authorize it? It will be you.
And I've already done it, I mean, I've already made the phone calls.
So I'm just waiting for the price.
If you could keep the advice updated on this.
And also their advice.
And keep Stevenson informed too.
They know the conference. So now we are at the time of the public comment. Please note that the public comment is limited only to public comments. So if you want to make a public comment, come to the podium, write your name, where you come from, and you have three minutes. Good morning.
Vicky Bronner, Wintersat...
Thank you for updating the review on what we have written. We still have to spend for the transfer of public health and business in the real estate of the... 50,000 dollars. And that is only the tip of the iceberg. And you have not even scraped the surface of what will be needed to be able to transfer the business of the veterans in that building.
Not to mention that we just found out that the public health building has not received any offer.
You find yourself with a perfectly usable building.
Think about how we could use that building, whatever you like. I'm here only as a citizen. I don't know how you can sit down with a tough face and tell the public that you are responsibly protecting the interests of the community. I would like to take a break and prepare a cost-benefit analysis. I know that Supervisor Sansom is not yet in this Council after January 1st.
but be sure that all of us will take care of the two supervisors responsible for the financial disaster that you have caused us. Well, if you are on the phone and would like to comment, press asterisk 6 to activate the audio, say your name and where you come from and you will have three minutes available.
Very well, since we are not requested, we ask for a few interventions.
Now let's move on to the resolutions to be taken into consideration as regards the approval of the application for the forensic audit. Last week we received three offers for the forensic audit and, as usual, the Council decided to take a week to examine them all before making a decision. So we have the three offers. I assume that the Council has examined them all. I think it is clear that UAH is the most competitive offer. I have some clarifications that I would like to insert in the contract text. They are the... The contracts. That's my opinion.
I'm sorry if I interrupted you.
I'm counting on you, just because I advise you to know that the contracts will be issued by the legal office if you decide.
So... So take note of it.
There are some things about the terminology that I think we must clarify and define with certainty.
You said . So you said . You meant . Yes, sorry. I agree.
Ok, I'm not in favor of any of them.
I don't want to proceed, because if we hire these people, it's really, really expensive.
They say that they will probably live in the port until the end of the year. It's the private sector against the government. The public will probably still ask the state to do it, because they are angry. So, no. I won't do it, I'll vote against everything here. I don't know if I've been doing it. This is an audit for air. It means, yes, I do it. An in-depth analysis. I called ten salespeople. They don't even know what it means. It's an even deeper analysis. It's a lot of money and we don't even know if we have it. We're not on the same page.
We have to save ourselves. We made a mistake. Enough. Stop spending others' money.
Well, I agree. It's unvaluable. It wasn't something. Then don't do it.
We can't allow ourselves.
We will end up cutting the services. You will not come to steal. We can't allow ourselves to continue like this.
Let it be the State.
They have already started investigating. Let them finish.
The state has put 18-24 meters to respond to us, or 23-24 meters.
They will be the solution. You don't know how much it will take. They could put more. They can say 10 months. It doesn't mean that ... They can say, oh, we found this, that and the other. Look, we still have to dig deeper into the citizens who pretend to know what's going on. Are they worried about any lawsuits? But my concern is that many of the conclusions that emerged in our fiscal audit of 2024 concern things that we have been doing for years.
Two or three treasurers and reviewers have done it.
So why hasn't the State told us about these problems? All these discoveries should have been able to face them. The State hasn't told us until this year. So my concern is that I don't think they have the staff to do it.
Because if they had it, they would have had 26 marks.
They would have given it to us. 26 marks means that if they find something, they open the door and find something else. Then they look for something else.
Before, they probably didn't find anything and no cause. Until something happened. Did they really cause something that mattered to the public? The accounts returned.
However, it worked. But when they found something, an IOU, this, has leaked any type of case. These worrying questions, we do them from others. So, this is a worrying thing. Ok, so you should have participated in the race. I don't know if you should have considered two or three. Spend this money from others. So, don't do it. We don't have them. I think that here we have solved the options, because we have had a difficult movement from the state auditorium due to the bank reconciliations. We have not yet paid the taxes. Our taxes are coming back.
There is something wrong, and we have had problems with the bank reconciliations since the fiscal year 2000.
There is something wrong if our treasurers, reviewers, whoever they are, have problems. And I want to make sure that it is not a matter of malversation. They have problems because we have read the wrong people. Oh, Diana, come on!
We had the same results in the fiscal year. All right, let's move on. Let's vote.
There is no point in arguing because you have already made your decision.
So the point, the point is, however, You can see that at the moment we have only, we have not settled the entire import for the UBIT Forense. Do you have the balance for the UBIT Forense?
I think we have already settled, if I remember correctly, 60,000.
I do not remember what number. Obviously it is not enough, so we will have to make a balance change to do it.
I don't want to spend this money.
Of course, I don't want to spend this money.
Do you want to announce how much the figures for the Forensic Registration were?
So, the least expensive is 2. 240,000.
The highest is 30 dollars. And the second was 288.
900 and the other that we will not take. The fourth is 25,000 dollars.
So I made a few calls. They told me that for a forensic review it's a normal number. I know that in January last year, when the cashier was arrested, we thought we should have done a forensic review. And they said that at least it would have been 100,000 and this was last year. And then we thought about the fact that we are still behind with the 25.
And so we don't have anyone to make an offer for this. And they probably won't make offers for the forensic review. Based on the fact that people with whom I speak say that it makes no sense to do a tax review for the 25 if the accounting books are too expensive. I want to be sure because the car is in front of me. And from what I understand, the companies that do the Forensic Division usually don't do...
So for this reason we didn't do it, I didn't realize that when we have our... Those who have an offer for the Forensic Division will probably not make an offer for the Tax Division on the 25th, because they want to maintain their independence on the 25th and they want to maintain their independence according to the standards.
So... If we don't do the review, we will have unhappy people.
If we do the review, we will spend at least 200,000-241,000 dollars. This is the second year in which we don't do it, we are not paying taxes on time.
Let's do the square. I'm also worried that something is happening that we are not aware of.
And we need you to wait for us.
You made me feel uncomfortable that you think there is abuse. Are you the one who says I'm accusing you? No, I didn't accuse you of abuse.
I didn't say there was an abuse.
This is my concern.
That there is something.
What is the abuse?
We had the same problem here, saying the same thing and I'm worried.
It seems that you are saying that they are behaving badly.
It is a terrible statement.
It is a terrible statement.
We had members of the public come here to accuse us, to accuse others of abuse. Previous reviewers, previous treasurers. So the point is that I want to make sure that nothing is missing. And this is not a comment on people, Diana. It is a comment on the fact that it is the second year that we are not able to take into account.
And we were not able to put the sentence
Do you see the relationship, though?
But again, introduce yourself and do the job.
I mean, if you are given a disastrous accounting, it's not your fault. We have to understand what happens to the accountants who cause this problem. It worries me that we didn't take these funds. I don't want to, right?
I want to say, Jessica, you see, we did not take it for this. It is not about 20,000 extra dollars, you know, for public health, which is our obligation to cover. It is not an obligation, I find myself talking again.
We resolve to the public the guarantee that there is nothing that does not go in our books.
Well, there is something that does not go in our books until it comes back. However, this will not square our accounts. Their arrival will concern the 23rd, the 24th and the 25th. But that doesn't mean doing the job. You understand, right?
The reviewer said that our books were such a disaster that they had to give up. I listen to you. I don't believe, I don't believe, I don't believe.
Guys, they will rebuild and try to understand if there is something wrong.
They won't rebuild it. Well, that was one of the requirements, they had to rebuild it.
And I understood. I'm worried that not having spoken for this, we don't know to what extent they are our sales. And for me it's not that you don't want to send back the problem. Well, I understand that the solutions are, you know, I received your brief report. And I understand that the solutions do not want to insert it. What makes it in the system, what makes sense, why? What makes sense, why?
The change in the system. That's why, but we can still make the change.
We can't just insert it in the system until we're even. The fiscal year 26 is not closed.
This is a different question. This is something that we, as Contea, have to decide whether we want it or not.
This is what you're talking about. I don't want to say, I think we're between us. But this will require a change of balance. If we approve it, it will require a change of balance.
We have members of the... I'm worried about...
I am also worried about how to pay it and how we will finance all this.
However, I have not heard any valid option here. We do not have a estimated timing on when this will be resolved, on when the balance will be made.
We have nothing at all.
So I imagine it to be open if there is another option here, but I have not heard it yet.
Two different things though, Jessica, if you don't mind me clarifying. The draw is the Friends of God. The fact that the Friends of God arrives will not lead us to the draw. I just want to be very clear. Well, I just want to make sure that it is so.
One of the things they do. I understand, but not being in a draw and not knowing to what extent we are one helps us with this better.
Taking the decision on when and how to spend the money. Exactly. I understand that too.
Why don't we call someone else to help us equalize? That wouldn't be my competence.
Do you suggest we have to call someone else?
I think so. It depends entirely on the auditor. So...
I don't know how to respond to the citizens who have been here for over a year, angry and still worried about our accounts.
Some of the people present in this room pointed it out.
You have to be worried about our accounts. But we are worried about your conversation. Excuse me.
I don't. And here are the places. I don't need help. You should address the people among the public.
I don't need help to square the costs. Thank you. Just let me do my job. Non sto, non sto dicendo nulla di tutto ciò. Lo so, ma io sto ascoltando di sopra e sto cercando di fare il mio lavoro e non ci riesco. Non ci riesco. Devi andarsene se continuo a interrompere.
Ok, allora, quella era Kylie. Quella era Kylie.
Quindi... Va bene... We have had citizens who have repeatedly come to say that they are worried about our accounts. We have had citizens who have come to ask for a divorce because they are worried about our accounts. There is no trust in our accounts at the moment.
I remember this fact.
There was a citizen who came here and... Ok, but it's different from... Sure, but someone... Ok, please, I've had several people...
Okay, individual citizens, maybe they are concerned about you personally. Are they concerned about me? So you have had people in this room who have expressed concern for our people. Well, I'm sure. Probably because your treasury is finished. This is worrisome. It's one more reason to want to see the president. But he won't do it. Let's move on. Excuse me, why do you suppose this?
You're right. We can't let the same thing happen to us.
You don't understand? Come on, we can go back.
You should have let the state end, but you made it a political issue. You made it a political issue. Yes, you did. The state said they couldn't end it.
They could have, if they had.
They could have. No, I think they could have.
They said that this is why we had a lawsuit yesterday, they couldn't do it. They didn't do it. We have to let it be. Let's go on. Let's make a motion. So, at the moment we don't have it in the budget. We should make a balance sheet to be able to do it.
I'm not at ease, I mean, we can make a balance sheet, but we always have to pay the funds so that we don't close the fiscal year.
I don't know what's in it. Now. Obviously. I couldn't hear what the cashier was saying when I spoke. She, she, she was saying that she doesn't need any help.
I'm working in Paris because Diana suggested it. Absolutely. It wasn't in our daily routine. But it's a completely different thing. From having an OV in Florence to understand if our books are correct.
Because we had problems with the bank reconciliations, so the auditors had to pay. Every single year it was a crisis.
And I don't understand why.
So Kylie sent a message and expressed that there was some progress on her part.
I think what I would like to clarify is what are the assurances that the situation is under control.
And we have, there are weather forecasts or ideas.
And for me it's okay to give it a little more time.
But this is something that has to be done. Yes, and the question, there are two separate questions. You have to live in balance to be able to close fiscal year 26. We have to close the fiscal year 26 that we can deal with.
Once the fiscal year 26 is closed, we can start to register all the expenses of the fiscal year 27.
And then we will have an idea of what our balance is.
Then the concern is also that due to the delay in taxes we will also have delayed entries. So, you know, I think we have to get an external entity to do it. as a state auditor, it has not been able to do in recent years. We can always contact these entities to see if they rely on the conclusion of the audit forensic within the end of the year. The reason we wanted this is that we wanted the new council to have accounting books in order within the beginning of the year. We can try again.
What is happening at the moment?
With the balance, the taxes, all that stuff.
We didn't have to pay.
I'm fine, really, the advice is fine.
I can contact each of these referents and see if the price would change, if we had the time, because I really don't want the new advice to be taken care of. If possible, I would like
You don't need to let these people do their job. Stop delaying so many extraordinary meetings and let them work and see where we are. We are spending 241,000 dollars. This is not a comment on their work. We just need to confirm that our directors are ... I think they will do a good job. We've had problems every single year.
Well, let's fix things with different people. And we have?
241 thousand dollars, you have 6 dollars for the diesel and you will spend money. Are you spending money? You spent 50 thousand dollars on the building that should be demolished.
It's crazy.
All right, I'll see what I can do. Let's close the court's offices. Maybe you should. Maybe you should. Maybe you should do it. You can talk to Ted Davis. Talk to Ted Davis. You are the ones who created this disaster. We have to second his preferences. He doesn't want to move. You should have left him alone. Maybe he will move. I don't want to keep a 7,200 square meter building here. We could sell it. No, we could put something else in it.
What?
Let's ask Maturin to come. Let's ask other entities to come. To be the owners. I think they would say yes, so...
Please stop interrupting.
This is according to the definition.
She's still interrupting. I'll ask her to leave.
I'll do it. I'll ask her to leave. Okay, let's proceed with this. So, Jess, what do you think?
We should contact...
Contact...
I think it's appropriate to understand how the situation would be if we replaced the expenses.
The company... Can we put this point in the order of the next Tuesday? We can have an update from the treasurer at that point and see what deadlines we are planning to understand what kind of progress, what results have been reached from here to then.
For me it's fine.
To postpone the veterans' business in the court until everything is resolved for me is fine. I really have to do something.
So, we have a lot of choices here.
So, regardless of what is happening now, we could be forced to sell the building, we could be forced to externalize, we could be forced to do a lot of things that we don't want to do.
And the last thing I want is that this problem is always there. We have books with terms, with orders, and we make a judgment with them. We send them the problem, letting them handle it.
And as for the rent of that building, I didn't know that the government of the county of Maicon was dealing with real estate management.
We are dealing with real estate management.
We have already done it in the past. We are out of it. I don't like it, but selling a great property doesn't make much sense. We did it. The course of the business. The interior. The communities. And we sold them. That's what I just said, Ed. We are out of the real estate management sector. I just said it. So I don't understand why we can't sell.
Anyway, this is another conversation for another day.
So, regarding the Forensic Account Review, I can contact each of them to see if they would change if we extended the timing. It should be that we paid the price. But I'm worried that if we don't do it...
And if we had more clarity on the timing necessary to obtain the votes and to deal with these other things, it would be another story, but I have not heard it yet.
Yes, it would be fantastic. I would agree to explore what would happen if I sent it back. What would be the financial impact?
So, what I can do is contact each of these suppliers to see if, by extending the timing for the Prince George project, the price changes. I would like to present a motion
because it means first the motion to send.
I will present a motion to send so that the supervisor can contact these three companies that have responded to understand how it would happen if the timing changed. One second. I support the motion. Is there any discussion? All those in favour of sending the motion to contact the suppliers to see if the prices change.
Passing the timetable, I vote yes.
Sure.
Have you voted yes?
Well, so we have the motion of Mrs. Oddity to send and contact the suppliers to see if the price changes, if the price changes, if we modify the timetable.
Well, the next point at the order of the day is the amendment to the budget for public health. and they have to make an amendment to the budget to be able to do it. So both on the front of the entrances and on the front of them.
Correct. I have a spreadsheet on my computer.
The money from the subsidy will come back to us.
We will be able to go forward on the side of the expenses.
So they presented a budget, they approved it, and it will be one billion. Because it's too late to publish it on this week's paper.
So maybe from the 28th to the 5th of October. Only one week. I have the calendar open. And he meant to talk about my calculation sheet. Or not? I just want to put it on the verbal, not on the money, because we are setting the budget for ten months instead of nine. I want to put the last one.
Again, I... Well, in the past the only thing this council could do was to control only the totals.
They proposed their own budgets. And I... I understand that... I haven't approved it enough for... That is your main point on which you are concerned. My main point is that instead of preventing an increase in expenses of 105,000 to 166,000 it is enough only 9,200 to 152,000 92,000 to 206,000 to 75,000 and I'm just curious because, I repeat, I haven't seen it up to, I think, 19.30 last night. So I put it together and I thought that since you were nominated in that council you couldn't. I'm just a reference. That's it. Referent but you are also the person who.
So what we can do to get back to the point I think we can solve. I think it's better for the contest, let's do this. What we should do, perhaps, to take the beans with a fava, is to move part of those funds to the supplementary fund, to compensate for the minor medical benefits that, as you said, have not been pre-ventilated on the license. And this is taken from their budget, it is in the supplementary rather than in the general.
It must be. That is our decision.
It is up to them to decide. I understand, but I am saying to move part of the extra 10 months on that fund. So instead of putting it in the general, let's put it in the supplementary, so we fully finance the
I'm saying that they are financing too much. So you're telling me that I think we're talking about opposite things right now.
No, maybe we're just overlapping. So, they have provided $10,200 for medical expenses. And you're saying... They should have been closer to the $40,000.
We do what we do with the employees. So, going back to your point, Vico, why don't we move part of that extra money of the 10 months in that container?
so they can fully finance their medical expenses.
So you don't want to ask them again why 10 months instead of 9? I'm sure they had their reasons, but...
In the end, whatever the advice tells me to write, I will write it. Which at the moment gives us a 30,000 dollar gap instead of 20.
I repeat, I want to put it verbatim that I think these figures are wrong if this is the intention. And you can only tell me what you think of this.
What do you think of using your nine-month recommendation and then increasing only what is expected for health insurance? I think it would be an advantageous situation for everyone.
And again, I don't think you're exaggerating, the council will have to vote at this very moment. I mean, we really have to set a date.
But in the worst case, even if we approve 10 months and they don't spend it, we save it at the general fund.
Correct. So I'm just thinking about the precision at this moment. It's all I do. This seems to me... And this, I mean, my concern is what we're doing in September. Yes, 10 months were reasonable. Now we have to move it to October.
I don't want extra months. Let's do it for nine months, then we'll fix it. Anyway, let's see.
I don't know if I can see if I can contact the president of the council.
And if they say, no, Michelle, let's stay on ten months, as I said, I'm just... Well, you know, they have their reasons, I don't like them...
I saw my follow-up this morning from Greta.
Did you confirm what they decided at the meeting? And I don't even want to oppose your advice.
No, I mean, that's why I'm a poet.
So you're saying that we should postpone 9 months starting from October, actually from the 1st of October. So if we had to postpone the correct amount for the health situation, what would it be? We can add money there. It would be 14 that hour in another email that I sent them. I hope it's 14,000.
Okay. And then basically 9 months. And the total is 9 months. Well, 15, wait a moment.
Let me get there. So my email for them was... So the annual was 18,300. 10 months were 15,305. And I do a quick calculation here. And this is because it is based on an average between employee and spouse with high francs. And so this is the formula I used. And so if I take 18.711, I get 12. I can add it. The point is that if we make a mistake, we can always change the balance next time. So what are we going to change the balance? This is a balance change, the number one. We will only deal with the change in public health.
And we know the final figure. Excuse me, what? What are we going to request?
I want to know everything. You see it, you see it there.
So instead of 9,080 it would be 14,000.
So we will change the balance for an increase of 14,000.
So take 9,980 minus 1,14.
I said 14. So for me, yes. It is a minimal difference, unless someone has no problem using 10 dollars. Here it is.
And they could have done it for you.
If you want to do it, you could simply say to let me know when you decide. Because I don't have to make this thing work. On the website of the direction. Until Friday, I would prefer Friday. Because I'm going out of town. So let's leave it like that.
So why not, why not, why don't we do it like this? Because we don't approve. Nine months less than... the President of the Council explains why we need 10 months. Or we can subordinate 10 months to the President of the Council.
I think we want to know why they make 10 months.
So why don't we approve 9 months less than the President of the Council?
And they approve, so 9 months, I'm sorry. 9 months. And then with the increase in insurance?
With the increase in insurance, less than the President of the Council. And it won't matter because we can fix it, but we have to set the date.
What they do.
We just have to set the date. This is just a discussion.
We can fix those few numbers. I'll start preparing the modification today.
On the, on the donation.
You know, I think what we have to do is the health council. This is what they have approved. So I think what we have to do is insert on the donation what they have approved. And then our council could decide later to reduce their costs.
Only when will the amendment arrive, correct?
What do you say to contact them after talking to Brett? You could do it.
I just don't want to.
The council unanimously voted on this. I'm a little hesitant.
And how are things going, Michelle? She simply moved in a week. They didn't do that. So today we're receiving it on the 21st. We originally had it on the 28th, so I thought that we would move it in a week.
So we receive the document on the 22nd.
So the tenth day would be. So on October 5 there is a lot of flesh and fire. It's the public audience. Do you want to do it maybe to have more... Well, that was my suggestion last time, but I don't know how well it works.
For those of us who don't do... For those of us who don't do the 5 o'clock machine. Just like we did.
Let's move it from 28 to 5. You can insert everything.
So I accept a motion to approve the approval of the date of the event on the 27th of November, October 5th at 9.30.
One second.
Any discussion? All in favor vote yes. Yes. All against? It is a vote in favor with.
He said yes. Yes.
Yes. Well, then with the unanimous approval of that date, I will contact Greta and Michelle.
Let me know as soon as you can, if you can. It could be that you simply did not follow the example.
It's a bit what I hoped. So I will also talk to her to correct the situation. There could also be a reason behind this.
If you just let me know as soon as you can.
I will let you know. Other? Otherwise I accept a motion to update. Thank you Jess.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.