City - Regular Meeting

under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [Music] Here um additions to the agenda 11 C, we're going to add the Mer land trust 10 C, I'm sorry, 10 C. Any other additions? So, it's actually the developers agreement. Yes. A motion to add or I'll make a motion to add the development um agreement for Mader's Trust. A second. Second. Any other discussion? Okay. All in favor indicate by saying I I. Any names? All right. Resolution 2025-22 acceptance of the June 25 2025 donations and they were Lions. Let's see. So the WMD Sapontiac was five dump dump truck loads over 50 yards of class 2 granite for the Eagle Park trail. Okay. The Rock Lions Lions leveled it off. Level off Herbert Construction. Dwayne Willenberg 10 machinery there, right? Yep. It was a nice warm bay for that, wasn't it? It was a nice warm bay. Yes. Uh Buds Bar for $50. There was an

anonymous donation of 500 and Rockville Lions of $1,000 to the fire department as well. So, I'm looking for a motion to accept those donations and a second. Also move. A second. I'll second it. Julie second. Any further discussion? All in favor indicate by saying I. I. Any nays? Hearing none, move on. Uh, approval of the June 2025 bills paid. Looking for approval. A motion to approve in a second. Make a motion to approve the bills as printed. A second. I'll second it. Jason, a second. A motion, a second. Any further discussion? I just have a question about one of the entries under fire protection check number 023639 for $28,19.50. It's legal fees. It's for the invest employee investigation. Why does it go against the fire department? That's where you have further questions back next week and we can discuss it. Okay. Okay. Any other questions? A motion a second. All in favor indicate by saying I. I. Any names? Hearing none, we'll move on.

I'd like to have the record show that I abstain from check number 23 620. Okay. Uh the consent agenda, that's the approval of Rockville City Council minutes, acknowledgement of building permits, the sheriff's report, month end reconciliation, and the resolution of the lawful gambling permit for the Grand Lake Association. Make a motion to approve. I'll second it. Julie is second. Uh motion second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, I'll indicate by saying I. I. I. Any nays? Motion passes. All right. Department reports. Uh, you're on for Cody. You're on for Justin. Good evening, Mayor and Council. First item is the uh Lake Road project. We wanted to provide a quick uh background and update on that project. Uh the Lake Road improvement project is a street resurfacing project on the west side of Pleasant Lake. Uh it includes uh some additional curb and gutter. Uh two infiltration basins and additional parking for the Lion's Park. Um in February of 2025, we uh brought to the council the option of applying for additional funding to help uh with the project. Um most of the storm sewer portion of the project. Uh we applied with the MTCA through their funding grants um and we did not get anything um on that and that was a um told to or provided to us uh last month and so we are now directing our attention to back back to the Sock River Wershed District um who we've been

previously uh in contact with for additional funds for the storm water uh portion of the project and that was in the amount of 55 5,000 is what we last discussed with them. So, we'll be working with them on getting uh the city of Rockville back on their agenda for the 2026 construction season. The MPCA just turned the grant application down because it didn't qualify or they I forget the numbers. They had a lot of applications and it was very competitive. Yep. Any other questions? Okay. Thanks, Cody. We move on to work station. Uh second item is the uh Grand Pleasant and Voit lift station project update. the contractor for that project uh has been working on the lift stations um over the past couple months and we're getting close to the end. Uh the contractor was looking at the manholes at the south side of the Pleasant Lift station a couple weeks ago and noticed that there's uh some severe uh degradation to the existing concrete structures um to the point where they were actually able to um push their fingers into it. They described it as putty. So those two lift stations in question that we've provided on the um figure here before the council meeting um had to be uh we had to come up with a resolution that uh would fix the problem. So in in contacting with the contractor what ideas what we could do for the repairs, we came up with three

options. Uh the first option was to replace remove and replace both manholes with brand new structures. Um we got a quote for that. Uh and that is also provided in the packet. Um but that was listed as $148,000 and 17 $175. Sorry. And that is uh we reviewed it and that is uh way more than we were willing to even consider. So that was not uh not considered as part of our uh improvements. So the next option was the fiberglass inserts for the manholes. That is something very similar to what we're doing the lift three lift station locations where we put in a fiberglass um sheet circular sheet into the manhole and that would um act as the structural integrity of the structure. inside that um between the manhole and the fiberglass would be grouted. So it' be filled with a little bit of grout. Um so that is also in that same quote um for a price of $48,915. The third improvement option u is a what's called a monoiform. It's essentially a constructing a brand new 3-in thick concrete wall inside the existing structure. And then inside that is an HDPE line um to keep the concrete um from being exposed to the gas uh inside those manholes. That quote was received this afternoon. That uh was also in the packet at the next sheet, I believe, and it's listed as $48,25357.

We were expecting it to be a little higher. So, I think that's actually a good sign um and makes it a very valid option for uh council to consider. Um we have not reviewed it in detail because we just got the quote like I said a couple hours ago. So if council were to continue and approve that option, we would make it contingent or pending our final reviews of any submitts um any of the manufacturing project products. So um that would be our um recommendation if we were to proceed with that option. Uh question fixing this now doesn't affect the lake road project for next year. we don't have to tear back into this manhole after we fix it this year. Right. Correct. So, the manhole would just be replacing or removing and adjusting the casting on the Lake Road project. If we were to do that third option with that concrete um line manhole basically um their surface restoration, what they described it to me was it's a 6x6 square and it would be either backfilled with concrete or they could do an asphalt patch if they wanted to, but it would be a very minimal surface restoration involved if that was the option that we go with. So very minimal effect on the lake project. In your experience, what would be what would you recommend the best option? Excuse me. Yeah, we we like the that third option with the concrete um monoiform, but again, we asked that we probably should have it pending our further investigation into the actual um submitts that were asked for uh as part of that project. reason why we already

um received those uh documents for that fiberglass insert and we already have something very similar with the lift stations on the project. So that has already been reviewed uh internally. The second option or the third option, sorry, um has not been reviewed because we just got it a couple hours ago. So any other questions for So and then there's a second part to this. Uh the second part is the uh the two lift stations Grand and Pleasant uh lift stations during their rehab. they uh the contractor uh found that the two the pipe railings for both uh those two lift stations crumbled when they started removing it. Um that was proposed as part of the project to be removed so they could put the inserts the fiberglass inserts in and then replaced as is. Since they crumbled and fell apart while removing, they had to replace with brand new material. And that quote for the new material for both the Pleasant and the Grand lift stations are included in the packet I provided at the end. One is $7,82611 and the other one is $3,466.92. So in the memo that I provided that totals to $11,000 and 11 $11,000 $293 was it and three cents. Sorry. Three cents. Yeah. Yep. And that covers those two lift stations for the pipe railings. So in total, um, if council approves,

depends on the option, but we, uh, recommend that council approves and goes forward with the third manhole rehabilitation option, which is that concrete monoiform interior wall structure. um for the total price of $48,25357 in and then include the $11,000. So total would be $59,000 $59,546 and that would fall under the grants. Correct. Yep. So as I explained in the next uh page, that is still under that $1.201 $20 million grant amount. What are the wishes of the council? So, if you look at this third option, Yep. and it doesn't feel like it's something you guys want to move forward. We would bring it back to council at the August meeting. So, you got to wait until then to bring it back or can we go ahead? could make a one pen. We could do that if council desires to. That way they can keep moving forward and we don't have to wait another correct. And either way, uh, I talked to the contractor before I came here today and they're going to be moving out at the end of this week regardless of what council decides and have to come back to do either one. So there's no So it's not going to it's not going to affect this contract schedule. Correct. So, with these change orders, where do we sit with the Yep. So, on the second page of that memo, adding in the

change orders and what we're uh showing in today's memo here, we're at 1,133,941 71. Sorry, we're sitting we're sitting below the 1.201 201 million. Yep. The only thing that would be left on top of that is the construction engineering portion and that is still to be determined, but we're going to be pretty close to that 1.2 um number with that. So, what if we run into any more problems this? So, they're pulling out this week and that's all it's left is this change order amount after this week. So, and if we go with the third option, there may be there will be some deductions because two line items will not be um needed in the pay um structure of the contract. So, it'll save 23,000 I believe. So Cody, to back up this a little bit, if you recall when we rehabbed the pip mit lift station and then it was how long later we found those pipe issues and we had to go in there and fix all that stuff up in the street. What are things looking like outside these manholes? Looking like outside, you're saying? Yeah. Grand Lake and Pleasant Lake. Are we looking at similar corrosion issues outside the manholes here too or No, the manholes you're talking about. So, this is these two are south of the Pleasant Lake lift stations. We um did not look at the Well, the Grand lift station goes to the PIP lift station. Both of them do. Yep. The Grand Theo goes to this Pleasant, correct? Yep. So all these uh gravity manholes that are near the plaza are kind of like the main focus area where the gas is

going to before it goes to PIP lift station. And that's why we also looked into the ones to the north of this lift station. That was this morning. Uh and they the contractor said it's not as bad as the southside, these two manholes that we're talking about, but there's some signs that it's starting to degrade a little bit. So it might be worth considering in the future to get those line before it gets to a big reconstruction that we're talking about for these two in particular. Is there any chemicals we can be putting in the system to combat that? We talked with the contractor about that here recently and and their theory and we kind of had the same theory is with all the grinder pumps that are on the lakes on both sides, especially in this area that go to that lift station, everything comes pre- stirred. And because it's pre- stirred, the gas is already they're already working. Yes, absolutely. So instead of a gravity system that comes in and then goes into lift station and then starts stirring, it's already got the gas eating away at the system before it even gets there. The decomp decomposing's already happening. Correct. And it said it's it's one of the I don't want to say one of the worst, but it's it's it's really um degraded uh compared to what they normally see for something that's only this old. Spicer has the same problem. They got a similar system to what we have. So that's and they're doing things kind of what we're doing to combat that. But they were using some chemical too that they were dumping in lift stations to help the gasification. I can't remember what it was. That' have to be Yeah. In the lift station itself cuz otherwise upstream it's just people's grinder stations that are, right? Yeah. And I can't remember what it was. It was something. I thought Way Park was adding bugs or something to theirs. No, this this was

actual chemical and it wasn't it seems to me it was like a like a detergent like a I can't remember exactly what it was. I can find out. Yeah, we can look into it too. Yeah, cuz they were buying it in 55gallon drums and Oh, right. Yeah. And that's the goal of this project is to prevent any first her degradation in those lift stations because it's It'll approve the lifespan of the struct these structures. Well, I guess I'll make a motion that we go ahead with Cody's plan three here pending your review of the submitten product. And if it's if it if it doesn't suit what you want, we'll be back looking at this next month and go with a different total dollar amount again. 59 59,546. Correct. Yep. Okay. You have a motion to I'll second it. Third option for $59,546.60. Uh any further discussion? Motion. Second. All in favor indicate by saying I. I. I. Any naysay? No. Okay, Bobby 9B. Yeah. So, I know last month we touched a little bit on the ride and Julie mentioned maybe she has some numbers or anything. Yeah. Um I don't have official numbers. It's around 10,000 this year. Um could be a little bit more. Um so we'll have more of a number here in the next week or two. Um so just let you know that. Um, they have trading on the 14th up at the fire hall again. Um, so that's coming up on the 14th. They had their totals on the fish fry. I'm not going to

give you the exact dollar amount because I don't remember, but I know it was 17 something that they made off the fish fry this last March. So, that was a great thing. So, um, if you have not heard the volunteering for the firefest, they aren't going to be doing it because they have canceled firefest. So Mhm. So that um they won't be volunteering and helping with that to raise money for the fire department also. So but there wasn't a whole lot. They ran through the meeting pretty fast. Yeah, it didn't take long. That's for sure. Okay. Thanks, Julie. All right. Um Bobby, you want to take up the statement or you want me to read it? The one you emailed me today, right? Okay. So, this is a statement from the council and I'm not going to speak beyond the statement at this point um because of confidentiality. Uh the council has received and reviewed the findings from the recent HR investigation preliminary allegations were considered at a special counsel meeting on June 25th. The council acknowledges that there are deeprooted issues within the fire Rockville Fire Department. To support meaningful progress, a facilitator from the Minnesota League of Cities will be brought in to assist with facilitating a discussion to address the issues as well as implementing training sessions for the fire department, city staff, and at least two council members. We recognize that the missteps have occurred on all sides. Now is the time to focus on rebuilding trust. Though we cannot rewrite the past, we can reshape a better future. Together, let's move

forward with unity, respect, and shared purpose. And we have to make a motion on that as well. to accept the statement. To accept the statement or I will make a motion to accept the statement. I will second that motion. Okay. A motion a second. All in favor indicate by saying I I I I. Any nays? I hear I from you. I I I am going to say nay. Okay. And the reason I'm going to say nay is I think the council can do better. I think uh within lie of what our meeting consult was on the 25th. I think by not taking some kind of formal action leaves a pause in what um staff needs to move forward with in the future. If if somebody does a similar situation, how can they rectify that? If we're not going to stand up to what our policy is, it it's meaningless. And I don't want to get into what the policy is because that infringes on right on the on the privacy part of things, but it's just I think as a council we can do better. Don't disagree. That's why we move forward with positive positivity as well. Correct. I I'm I'm not arguing that part. I think that that's good. But I I think maybe we should be looking at some some kind of disciplinary. I would

like to see the the HR committee look at this thing wholeheartedly so they can see all of the stuff that was in any of the files that we haven't seen and let them sit down, make a recommendation back to the council and then go from there. That's what I would like to see done. Any wishes of the council to do that? I don't disagree with Brian. I think it needs to be looked into further. I thought that's where we were all on the same page and that's why we're moving forward the way we are moving forward. So yes, I don't believe this ends here. It needs to um continue to be rectified so we don't get to this point. But I want to make it very clear that it was there are multiple people here at fault and that needs to be addressed altogether. So, I would agree with Brian that it needs to be looked into further, but that does not change my stance on accepting the statement. Yeah, I would echo both Ashley and Brian. Again you know I think I think looking into it um holistically now with this new situation being added might be in the best interest of the of the HR committee. But that doesn't necessarily stop approving this action because I do believe that this is the right move um for us to take as a council on the on the packet that was presented in front of us by the uh by the attorney. I agree that I feel this is by the attorney. She recommended this and I think this is the right way to go and I don't disagree with you know sitting down and going through everything one more time as a as either lays on or as a HR committee. Any other comments?

Okay, that the statement passes as is and we'll work on the rest of it. So, can I make a motion that we take this issue and it it can pass, it can dial a second, it could do whatever, but that we send this back to HR for further investigation if if they feel when they look at all the stuff that we have not been able to see that if they feel that there's some kind of disciplinary stuff that needs to move forward that we take that recommendation from them and and do a accordingly. That's what my motion is. So, we have a motion. We already have a motion on the table that's consecutive to accept the statement. So, I need to know that was voted on. Well, but someone said name, so I have to do a roll call. Okay. Okay. So, BH name. Okay. Uh MH uh I Yes. Okay. A M. Yes. JM Yes. JH. Yes. Okay. Thank you. So that passes on a a four to one. Okay. Brian, you made what's your motion? That would be my motion that I just stated that we take these allegations are there, send them back to the HR so that they can look at everything that's been not privy to the whole council and let them re-evaluate this and then come back if there should be any disciplinary stuff moving forward because it's going to set a precedence and how the city moves forward with this type of situation. because right now we're not we're not acknowledging the policy.

Okay, I have a motion. Does everybody want to second that motion? So, I'm not sure what I'd be. So, the motion is to reopen this particular investigation or just look at the individual files as a whole and see if this has merit. Look at the allegations that have been presented to the council and look at their personnel files to see how things are. We didn't get to see all that stuff. And when you when you make a decision on a disciplinary issue, when when you don't get to see all the information, how do you make a just decision on that? Because everything that gets put into a personnel file is pertinent to that person and their actions. And if you don't get to look at all that, how can you make a justifiable decision on not disciplining that person? Oh, or persons. Well, first, excuse me, but first, I mean, we all sat here and you know, the attorney said, this is what her recommendation is. And that's what I thought that special meeting was about is to we all read through everything. If you didn't read it, that's I'm sorry. That's kind of your fault. If you didn't read If you didn't read every last piece of it, you know, I spent two days looking at that stuff to make sure I understood what's going on and took notes. So, and she recommendation was to go this angle with no discipline at this time. That isn't what she stated at the beginning. She she stated at the beginning she changed her mind as she was listening to us ask questions and them all speaking.

She stated at the beginning what her recommendations were and the council didn't say anything, didn't whatever. And as the meeting went on and the council was swaying to this meeting and doing this what you guys just voted on. Um, and I asked her to please state. I asked her three times to restate what she started to say at the beginning and she said she wasn't going to do that because that isn't what the council's plan was. No, she said she wasn't going to state that because that was not her recommendation after she knew more of the story. And you were on board that night and now that we're in front of the public, now you're not on board. So that concerns me because we all we all did agree to be a unified front on this to show unity how to move forward because there is so much conflict and we know that there's deep issues and that they need to be brought to light and I think that still needs to happen but that is not part of this. No, I I guess I disagree and that's that's my opinion and you guys have your opinion. I think Brian the other part of the statement is that there's been a lack of I think the breakdown is there's been a lack of communication on all sides whether it's fire department, city staff, council in in the past. What we're trying to do is move forward and be transparent requiring the training of city staff and council along with the fire fire department. Right? At the end of the day, the fire department, we need the fire department together as one group. Those guys do a lot of work every day willingly. I would like to move forward so we can

get we can get with the training and not get further behind. And I I would agree with that. I I And and I and I can I can wrap my head around that and I can support that. But what if down the road, six months, a year, the training's long gone, and this stuff comes to light again, and then what do you do? We didn't do nothing this time. What's going to provoke you to do something happens again? I think the rules and the definitions and the direction will be clearer in the future. I think that is where we failed as a city prior and that's what needs to be put in place and that's part of bringing the training in and making sure that these situations are handled correctly from the very beginning and they don't escalate to where this has gotten us today. I hear that statement. Yeah. My envision would be we as a council would be a little better trained as well to handle a situation as it comes up instead of letting it fester to this point. Anything else? So, do we have a second for Brian's motion? Okay. Motion dies for 11 second. Okay. Roads, trails, and utilities. Brian, would you be okay reporting on what happened to that meeting? Yeah, so on June 24th, the Artub met here at city hall. There was a few things that were on the agenda. Um, one of the things that was discussing is our driveway ordinance and

the issue of approaches and driveways being put in without um coming to the city and getting a uh approval or a permit. and the committee felt that we should send out a letter stating that we've noticed that there's been a violation and please come down to city hall and get things up to the standard that they need to be. After several discussions, some of it was why do we need to do it? And when we discussed some of the reasons for having this so that they're installed correctly, it made sense to these members and they all felt it was probably a good idea to make sure that we follow forward with it and it was on a 50 vote. Um the other was the um there was a lot of discussion um the parking lot at Lions Park. Um, and I'm assuming this is with the Lake Road project. Yep. Um, to add additional parking um, with using class 2 granite. Is that correct? Currently, it's proposed as just a asphalt parking. You're right. And then we discussed changing it to a granite aggregate surface. Yep. And then Brian, just to kind of backtrack on that just a little bit, some of the reason that was discussed is because with the grading, right now a lot of people park along the park in the grass and stuff, but once the storm water improvements go in, that's going to alter. So, we're looking at trying to provide some more actual parking spaces down the park. And it would be it would be closer to where if the pickle ball court actually or if anything gets developed on that end of the correct so that there's parking spots there parking down. Yes.

Um then the other was got brought up with future projects. Um the salt shed was discussed um paving Rous Lake um 4,400 ft of Rous Lake and that kind of what would it cost? And is there a benefit to it? You go from a gravel road now to paving it. You're going to if we've been doing like we've been doing it would be an assessment to the property owners. We got two property owners on 4,400 ft. How are we going to assess that when both of them are not going to want it? One's a farmer and the other one's the granite company. It's not a benefit to them. So, um then the other thing was uh they felt that maybe we could spend up to $10,000 to see the feasibility if we could pave um Agot Beach Mitchell Road or Mitchell Lane, I guess. So, I don't know if you guys want to proceed with that. Well, some of the backstory on that is there's a lot apparently there's a subset of people that would like to see AGOT and Mitchell get paid. Some do, some don't. Yeah. Yep. Some do, some don't. Um, and so kind of the thought process was if council would allow some money to be spent to see what it would actually cost to do it, um, then at least we would have some facts to lay before the people that are interested in it to say here's realistically here's what it would cost to do that and it might help give people the information they need that are interested what it would cost the city to actually. So, it's up to the council if you want to move forward with authorizing Bolt Mink to spend up to that kind of money to see if it's feasible or what it would cost. Was there a dollar amount attached to

what the invest in investigating cost or whatever would be just up to $10,000 to do a investigating? And that's just to get a budget number, rough budget number. Yeah. That's no plans, no specs, no very preliminary estimate and layout. Yep. So again, if council can either make a decision on it tonight or if you get brought back to the next council meeting if you'd like some time to think about it before Yeah, you can decision. You don't nothing has to be decided tonight. Does anybody w wish to make a motion on that? Also, I'll put it on the workshop agenda for next month and we'll just have a kind of a continued discussion about it. At that point, you guys can decide whether or not you want to add to the agenda and make a motion or Yeah, perfect. Sounds good. Okay. And then there was just some other discussions. Oh, this you might want to know. So, there's been discussions about over in Eagle Park to connect Eagle Park with the county park so people don't have to walk on County Road 139. Um, the art tub felt it was a good plan, see if we can go ahead see what kind of cost it may be, if we can get most of it or all of it donated. And I've been kind of spearheading that. So, if you guys are okay with continuing that, that's what we'll do. Okay. going just like in the ditch area putting like a sidewalk going down to the reser. It would be a sidewalk. It' be a trail like currently in Eagle Park. Okay. That would go in Eagle Park along the county road. And then we'd have to get a culvert and get it. So that's a landing up at 139 cuz the county park comes out onto 139 at that intersection of Sock River Road. So it just be a crosswalk to get across there. And somebody could walk from park to park without being on the road other than crossing. Okay. Okay.

So that it. Yeah. And that was it. Thank you, Bobby. Public works. Yeah. So we had it on there because we thought maybe we were going to have something to bring forward, but there's nothing to bring forward. So we'll stick right on. Okay. Uh 10A, the I94 coalition letter. That was Yeah. So, this so I just received this uh draft letter from Jody Tyws County. Um she is just collecting some letters of support from different city councils and wants to know if you guys are interested in sending in one from Rockville. What are the wishes of the council? You want 94 to be three lanes? doesn't directly affect us, but it affects us for our people that live here that commute. So, um it's probably not a bad idea to support it. It's just a signature letter that we support. Yes. We're not cost it's not costing us anything. No. No. So, we need a motion to accept that to sign that letter or not? I would make a motion to sign the letter for the I94 coalition. Okay. A motion. I'm looking for a second. I'll second it for more discussion. Okay, let's have some more discussion. So, Cody, this would be more of a question toward you. I know you're not with Mindot, but by showing support with this project down the road as things develop more along our border up against 94, does that help us or hurt us as far as noise barriers to getting them to contribute to that because that stuff gets expensive? It does. And I can see that happening along Brentwood edition, right? Yep.

I don't think it would hurt if that's what you're trying to get at as far as Well, yeah. I definitely don't want to start pushing something that may hurt us in the future because that's I don't know if you know that's the wrong signal to say. It's not going to be like you're going to get additional like funding opportunities for something like that or they'll consider the city of Rockville more than another city or another, you know, St. cloud side for example. Um, but I don't I don't think it would, you know, be a detriment to the city in that aspect going forward. Okay. Would it hurt to ask Senator Hall what his two cents would be on it? Senator How, would you like to talk about that? Because I just don't want to shoot ourselves in the foot down the road because I will you see along any of the interstates, they're building these all over the place and it's it's coming. I don't see that it would affect your your it's going to be issue anyway, right? I mean, it's going to be if you want to have a noise barrier, you're going to have to help paid to put that noise barrier in. Of course, it's not going to it's uh but it isn't going to it's I think that's a separate issue whether we take that to three lanes and whether you put up a noise barrier to in fact it might help you. So okay be my opinion. Okay. Thanks. Thank you. That was all I had. Okay. Any f any other discussion? Uh all in favor indicate by saying I. I. Any nays? Hearing none. We'll move on to the bike guides lease agreement. So, uh, Tom Styles reached out about using the old public works building for the rehab on the bikes that they donate to the to the trails system. And I'm not even sure how many bikes do they donate

a year. It's quite a bit. Oh gosh. Just to Rockville alone, I think last year was 25. Yeah. Just for our Christmas. And he's done it a couple years. So, it's been a been a big hit. And it's just a group of retired guys from the area that need they lost their space and they're looking for a new space. So the lease agreement is for them to allow to use that building from September to the end of the year and maybe move past that. So I'm looking for a motion to approve it or deny it. I would make a motion to approve the bike guys lease agreement. I'll second that. Motion to second. any further discussion? The only question I And this isn't a very long-term lease, so it really doesn't matter, but is there any like out in here, like if we decide to do something out else with the building as far as to, you know, it's no longer down or something? Well, yeah. I mean, if something would happen where we wouldn't where where we, you know, we would either want it back for some reason or or we wouldn't, you know, think it is a break. I guess it's a breakable on our end if if we if we would down the road need it. It's only through for something else. Well, that's just it. Right now it's only through December, so it doesn't matter. It would just be more if we'd extend it. This is some liability. Yeah, right. Yes, exactly. So that's it for the lease involved. So we can break that anytime we have to and there there are we charging for this. So So that shouldn't affect us as far as having to turn it into collecting property taxes. No, no, I did reach out to So I think I think we're safe. Yeah. And that was all good too with the insurance rate that it's just I think we can just sit down and have a conversation. I think they're very flexible. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So motion second. Any further discussion? Um all in favor indicate by saying I I any nazs? Hearing none. We'll move on to the Modi land trust development.

Yeah. So I did just get this agreement. It has gone through both Justin and Joseph, the city attorney. Um, this is still 100% in draft form. It has not even gone to the Maui family yet. So, what I'm looking for council tonight is if you decide to approve it in draft form, then that would allow me to send it out to the monitor so they can review it. I'm sure there'll be some back and forth with that family. But this is definitely nowhere near final. It's just would like to get it in the Mi's hand so they can start working it. Okay. All right, I'd make a motion to approve. Okay, I'll second that. A motion to second. Any discussion? Hearing none. All All in favor indicate by saying I. I. Any nays? Move on. Any other discussions? Motion to adjurnn. Second. So quiet question. Somebody want to second. Oh, I'll just second jing. Second. All in favor signific. I sorry. Thank you. Thank you. We really suck at this. Yeah. I thought you said you suck at I thought we did that. Yeah, I did. I did. I do.