Planning and Land Use Management (plum) Committee - Regular Meeting

Blumenfield, present. Hutt, here. Nazarian, absent. Lee. A presente. Ramen. Ausente. Tres miembros y un coro.

Presidente.

Thank you. And we're going to take public comment from the people who have signed up for three or more items on the agenda, and then we're going to talk about the items that we have signed up for agreement, and then anyone who is talking about those items for agreement. And then we're going to listen to the items, item by item, listen to presentations, take comments, and then vote. We're going to start with public comment in general after we've completed the agenda. ¿Puede leer las reglas para comentario público? Sí. Miembros del público que quieren dar comentario público de solamente un artículo tienen la oportunidad para hablar por un minuto. Solicitantes, aplican, apelantes y solicitantes tienen la habilidad de hablar cuando se les llame su nombre. Tienen un total de tres minutos para hablar. Un apelante puede tener solo un representante hablar de su parte o dividir los tres minutos entre su equipo y ellos mismos. Cualquier otra persona, incluyendo un abogado o un gerente o administrador del programa que quiere hablar de parte del apelante que no lo hace en ese tres minutos de periodo, pueden dar comentario público cuando sea que se abra el periodo de comunicación. public comment for this article. At this time, we hope that the applicants and appellants have their equipment ready to present at the appropriate time. Members of the public who want to talk about one point or more on the agenda must mention it and have the opportunity to speak for a total of two minutes. Before I give public comment on the Thank you very much. . . . . . Un impacto comunitario se ha presentado de parte del Consejo del Centro de Los Angeles apoyando el asunto. Para 14, para la ficha 26-0721, impacto comunitario se ha presentado de parte del Consejo Vecinal de Vénez en contra del asunto. Secretaría, Fiscalía Municipal nos puede dar... additional instructions for comment. When you talk about points in the article, you should talk about the article. We want to hear how many commenters it is possible. If you're not talking about the topic or we can't figure it out, you're going to have a brief administration from the attorney general or the president. If you don't return to the topic or if you deviate, you're going to give up the rest of your time and we're going to move on to the next commenter. We'll let you know when you're out of time. Muy bien. Entonces, antes de comenzar el comentario público, yo voy a recomendar que uno se continúe. Agosto 11 del 26, protesta. Yo veo que no hay protesta, entonces se va a continuar. Y voy a recomendar artículo 2 a 11 y 16 que pasen con acuerdo con las recomendaciones siguientes para dos que aprobamos el renombramiento para seis que aprobamos las recomendaciones del administrativo y para adoptar las mociones para nueve para diez adoptamos la moción con el cambio técnico siguiente secretaria o SLA si puede leer las enmiendas técnicas para el acta. The amendments for 10 are from District 14, and the first movable clause is changed to instruct the Planning Department to initiate a code amendment for the floor order. It has not been changed, and then amendments for the end of the third clause And to add at the end, this report must replace SB 79, informing the obligations and adopted instructions number 7 in the Plum report adopted by the council on June 3, 2025. And the last amendment is for the last movable clause. And if the amendment reads that the municipal council instructs the planning department to initiate and prepare an ordinance modifying the floor ordinance para añadir estacionamiento, cuando estacionamiento está detrás de un frente. Y, colegas, este perdón. En cuanto a recomendaciones de acuerdo unanime, es 2 a 11, pero no incluye 11, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 y 16. Colegas, ¿alguien quiere tomar uno de estos artículos de acuerdo? So now we're going to take a public comment. We're going to start with people who have registered for three or more articles, and we're going to finish with that. Mr. Herman, Spenler. If I may, for Article 16, the recommendation of the President is to approve the recommendation of the Legislative Analyst, sorry, of the Administrative Officer. Mr. Herman, you have two minutes. Donde en el maldito infierno? ¿Por qué nos requieren? ¿Los promotores de vivienda tienen que pagar para los pases de los inquilinos? Porque cada vez tenemos que pagar para los impuestos de la propiedad. Que se joda número cinco. Mira número siete. . . . . . . . . . . . ratones que dejo hay huizar y vamos con 12 Bob. En el distrito 3 Bob. ¿Qué tipo de maldita sitio de cuidado residencial es para las personas viejas? Estoy aquí apoyando al solicitante, apoyando al señor Kumar. Denle el maldito dinero del árbol de dinero de judíos y quiten a LeBron James para que tengamos vivienda que le importa a las personas Envejecidas. 43. Bob. Jódase. Y que se joda el árbol de dinero judío. Estoy terminado. Wow. Iluminador. Próximo. Entonces estos hijos se puten a número 7. Can you write it down, Bob? Lafayette Park Place and Wilshire Boulevard. Heather Hutt, she knows. If she makes a meeting, we have a damn building that has been burned by people without a home. So they can burn that place until it's back to normal. What is this? Pasos de tránsito para inquilinos. ¿Quién necesita pasos para tránsito para inquilinos? ¿Quién? Necesitan estacionamiento gratis para los inquilinos, Bob. ¿Cómo en mierda llega al trabajo, Bob? Un carro. ¿Cómo compra sus drogas? Un carro. ¿Cómo consigue sus prostitutas? Un carro. ¿Cómo el consejo municipal les dan sus pagos ilegales? Un carro. Necesitamos estacionamiento gratis. We need to put them in another place. O van a estar bajo de una carpa si es que no tienen vivienda. Trabajas todo la vida y Robin Hood no entiende porque es una pendeja. Trabaja toda la vida y luego se enferma. Y aquí es la Heather Hutt asquerosa que está hablando sobre su asqueroso puente al otro lado de su proyecto. ¿Y qué haces, Bob? . . . . . Now we're going to move forward with agreed articles, as I mentioned, 2 to 3 and 16. And they're all going to be unanimous agreements. And then eight separately, because we have a number of commentators, and I want them to be together. Someone here came in to talk about... Articulo dos, tres, cuatro, seis, siete, nueve, diez o dieciséis. Si usted está aquí para hablar por uno o más de esos artículos en la agenda, por favor vayan hacia el lado y van a tener un minuto o dos minutos, pero un minuto por artículo. Bienvenido. Buenas tardes. Buenas tardes. Miembros del Consejo. My name is Matthew Menchie. I'm with Inner City Law Center. We are a non-profit law firm. We are here to support No. 10, who appreciates all the work that has been done, the planning and the advice. Thank you very much for putting this on the agenda of an unanimous agreement. I think that will allow for more flexibility in the exchange and the floor arrangement. So thank you very much. And we appreciate all your support for this motion. Thank you. Thank you for coming. Thank you. Next commenter. Good afternoon. Scott Epstein with Abundant Housing LA. Talking about article number 10, I want to say that I appreciate the jury and the judge for because this continues on and for this committee to adopt the motion, this is something very big. It's something very important to allow this parking lot in particular to be based on density for these low-floor projects. It will be a tool that makes these projects possible. And I think it's an important moment for this council to say, We want to do these projects, we want to have a four-story scale for the neighborhoods that already exist, but we're not going to over-manage what's inside those buildings. We're going to be fair and we want to do a lot of Thank you. Good afternoon, members and staff. I'm Antonio with Strategic Actions for Just Economy. I'd like to thank Ms. Isabel Jurado for her motion. and to all of you as a municipal council so that they can analyze the incentives to develop 100% affordable housing and also include the other detailed amendments. Specifically, sorry if I didn't mention it, this is for number 10, for SB 79, for that ordinance. We welcome any development that allows for accessibility to transportation while residents have the ability Thank you. Thank you. Hola, me llamo Isabeliz y estoy con Strategic Actions for Just Economy. También quiero darle las gracias por adoptar la moción. Espero que esto sea un paso en la dirección correcta para planear equitably para vivienda y como una persona que vive en la sede 14, le vuelvo a dar las gracias. Próximo comentarista. Hola, voy a estar hablando sobre la moción 10. Y quiero nada más decir buenas tardes, miembros del consejo. Soy Luz Vela del Distrito 14. Quiero decir gracias a Jurado por haber presentado esta moción y también a Padilla por secundarlo y también por votar por él. Esto va a ayudar mucho con la asequibilidad que se necesita de manera desesperada en Los Ángeles. Y eso realmente va a ayudar a producir. vivienda asequible para las personas ahora y también para las generaciones futuras. Muchísimas gracias y espero que podemos hacer que esto suceda más rápido. Y de nuevo, muchísimas gracias. Gracias. Hello, I'm Virginia Nueva. I'm a resident in a street in Studio City for 15 years. And I'm here supporting Nazarian's motion for funds for emergency access studies before this street project continues. And it's committed today. And a project of this size will add more problems to the street. My problem is emergency access. Thank you. . . . This is Article 8. Thank you very much, members. I appreciate the opportunity to talk about Article 8. We have an excellent number of people who will comment. There are several different opportunities and difficulties that are mixed up here in the months that have elapsed. We have been working with our own department of Cuban firefighters in the two sites that are the subject of this motion. These two sites are very different, very different operations in different parts of the 15th. One is the ranch tanks, which is a liquid storage site that has been the subject of many motions over the past 20 years, at least. And the other is Jones Chemical, which is a manufacturing facility, and also a dry storage facility, and also a liquid storage facility, and transportation to and from neighborhoods. Each one creates significant risks of loss of life and property in terms of the proximity of these industrial uses in recreational housing sites. the incident of Garden Grove, . . . two properties. Right now we have the incident in Boyle Heights. Also, these are different manufacturers, industrial manufacturers, but they are all examples of risks. And I also want to say briefly, that hut is so familiar with Rancho because of the work that she has done in this life, in past professional lives. But Rancho was the warehouse of 25,000 25 million gallons of methane, which was approved for different uses in 1973. In 1973, we didn't have the same standards of SICWA or professionalism to protect our communities, we have improved in that sense, and it was not even approved for butane in 1973, a change of use during the 50 years that followed, and now we are facing that. I will also say how the CUP has analyzed how to protect oneself from 25 million gallons of butane. There is no standard that exists. to protect us from 25 million gallons of butane. They can speak for themselves, but there is no way that such an installation would be approved today or would last a decade before or a decade earlier than that. It's this one... Jones Chemical has a completely different property. It's in Harvard. It's also in residential properties. They manufacture and transport chemicals. and they're in a very fun place. So I think it's going to be very important that this material, when this motion passes, and I thank you in advance, when you return this analysis, you can tell us how this can reduce compliance with the Jones Chemical site, because with the various violations that other professionals are going to describe, what they are when the report returns, Yes, I'm going to give you a new permit to make this a security and low compliance, which is normal. I don't know how one does that when you're on top of a Superfund site. I don't know how one disturbs the terrain and how one could do it. So, I'm just going to thank you in advance for listening from our presenters. We have excellent people from of the Harbor Gateway Community, and the Delamo Action Committee, and also the San Pedro Community, and beyond. They're going to talk about these two properties, and I'm excited to hear the testimony, and also that this returns so that we can take the next steps to discontinue these uses. Thank you very much. We're going to take a public comment on Article 8. Anyone who's here to talk about Article 8, The reality is that this explosive center has worried me for years.

Public officials are aware of this dangerous problem and have basically ignored the possibility of a disaster until now, because these are not only the only neighboring communities, but the ports. The ports can be destroyed in a singular event on the site. But it's unthinkable that the state of California and Los Angeles haven't done anything to protect their citizens, their businesses and their gardens. Now is the time. Now is the time for important action, to do something about this bomb that will explode. Thank you for your time. Hi, I'm Noah Weiss. I'm grateful for the efforts of the Harman Kaskar council since the accident to do something. There are many reports, many follow-ups. But for the socialists within us, I'm going to ask that we are not socializing the risk of loss and privatizing it. the profits. I have never heard anything from my social colleagues about how we are going to protect the public interest. With respect to the fire department, Mr. Hamilton, there are 23 fines here on the site. The fire department is trying to build to move things forward as far as possible to have affirmative cancellation action following the report. Eso sería, estaría muy agradecido por eso, pero gracias, consejo, de nuevo, por la atención. Gracias, señor. Siguiente orador. Transcendent color homogenized. El incendio de pilas de litio y los incendios peligrosos son todos peligros en negligencia crónica I spoke with Mayor Abbas about the 25 million of gas in Bhutan and he was already worried. He ignored me from there. The security of the country, having the operators on site, a white of terrorism and the radio of the Good afternoon, I am Cynthia Babich. director of the Palomo Action Committee, an environmental justice organization. In 1994, focusing on threats of fires, and the Jones Chemical is a unit on the site, our work focuses on the amount of dangerous centers in our neighborhoods and how we can make our community a safer place for families. This trajectory led us on many paths, but all paths lead to land use planning and this causes healthier communities. Communities in the Jones Chemical are not healthy. It is a tool that measures companies or communities due to pollution, El Distrito 15 tiene rango de 99% de contaminación, carga de contaminación, y para centros de zonas tóxicas estamos a un evento catastrófico de un desastre tremendo y de una contaminación muy grave. Gracias. Siguiente comentarista. José Margaret Manning. Antes vivía... in the port of the port I am very familiar with the city the strip that was annulled in the city of Los Angeles to serve the port of San Pedro and I was very aware that there are many centers and there is local police and the mail And now I live in the West Carson area. But I'm still exposed to what's happening in Jones Chemical Inc. And also what's happening in Boyle Heights on the seventh day of the disaster there. I'm aware of that. that if we had seven minutes, we would be dead if there is a release of toxins. Good afternoon. Thank you for supporting this motion. I live in a house that is very close to Jones Chemical. I had the good fortune to speak with the vice president, Tim Gaffney, environmental issues of the port of the meeting in En la oficina del concejal McCusker me pude expresar mis miedos de un boteo de gas. Me dijo que una pérdida de gas y me dijo que esto va a bloquear el gas de cloro y lo van a redirigir al club de Boys and Girls y a la comunidad donde yo vivo. Thank you. Gracias por dejarnos hablar. Jones opera sin certificado de ocupancia. Vivo cerca del centro Jones Chemical. Estoy criando a mis nietos y estoy muy preocupada en el ambiente que los estoy criando. Water in Jones is a danger to our community, to our neighborhood. Chlorine gas is transported through the streets in trucks and to a building with dangerous chemicals. Tim Gaffney from Jones said that a tree would stop the gas, but there is no tree. Why is there no tree? Why are we not protected with vegetation and laws of such nature? Alrededor del centro. Yo puedo oír los trenes soplando, tocando las bocinas, porque no hay restricciones de cuánto viento se permite pasar para tapar el sonido. El siguiente comentarista. Hola, yo soy Donald Lecrae. Yo vivo ahí alrededor de JC Jones Chemical. and raise my family. And now I have grandchildren and I am very afraid to think that at any moment they may have an accident and I lose my whole family. So I think it is important that we do something to fix it. Because I lived for 40 years I'm here to support Team McCusker and the motion. We have to be protected. They are dealing with chlorine gas. Chlorine is a very dangerous chemical. That location. There was an inspection recently where there were 48 crashes and an IPA report in May 2024 that shows that the catastrophic launches, that means that the gases are going to be close to my house and my location and that can kill us. You can kill a community within minutes. Centers like those don't belong in our community. Next commentator. Good afternoon. I'm Rick Thomas. In the center near Jones. I wrote four articles about this danger in our community. I'm going to repeat. 48 victims. 48 breaks. If a restaurant had 48 breaks, they turn it off. If it had 48 parking breaks, it wouldn't have had its license. But this fire department identified 48 breaks, and their recommendation is to dismantle it and rebuild it again. So I took out all the pollutants from our neighborhood, the streets where I take my dogs out every day, poisoning the kids. contaminating the bus stop. That is his recommendation. That is not going to happen. We are going to do everything necessary from a legal point of view in terms of class action to judge anyone involved. This is a threat. You have to go. Thank you, next commentator. Good afternoon, council. Honorable President, I am Son Kearns, representative and coordinator for Lynette Paragon, federal representative for the communities of San Pedro, Harbor Gateway. I am here to speak supporting this important issue of the agenda presented by Councilor Tim McCusker, who seeks to talk about the significant concerns in two chemical centers, JCI Jones Chemical and Harbor Gateway, Hunter LPG San Pedro, Both of these centers are in breach of multiple state laws, but the sanctions were not significant. The repeat breakers at the federal level are subject to the risk management program of the Trump administration, which is trying to weaken. and we see this issue as an important motion to improve the security of our communities. Thank you and we encourage you to approve it. Any other commentators? Anyone for issue number 8? Well, there is no other speaker. The public comment is closed for this issue and all the issues of consensus. As I mentioned before, the recommendation was for the report to instruct the departments to move forward with this information. We are now moving on to the issues of consensus, to the list of consensus. Separamos el tema número cuatro. Si tiene preguntas. Está bien. Tiene otro tema. Una pregunta del tema número cinco, pero está bien. Si tiene el tema número cuatro y cinco, está bien. Conseja Lajat. Bueno, tenemos la votación para... 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 16 for consensus. Lumenfield, in favor. Hutt, in favor. Nazarian, in favor. Nazarian, in favor. Lee, yes. Roman, yes. Five in favor. The issues are approved. Well, now for issue number four. Who do you want to ask the question to? I don't know who, I have to direct myself, but I just wanted to ask if we are moving urgently to try to make changes to the rules for the council for a deadline after the building code requirements could be added and I wanted to understand how we can add this at this time if this deadline is in place. I'm willing to include it in the follow-up report. Maybe Planificación has a question for this. I think this issue is a security code issue. We are aware of the article and we can put it in the report. I think that his motion and that of the Councilor Nazarian, I wanted to add that as an additional recommendation, how we can do this in the context of a moratorium, or what I perceived as a moratorium on the changes in the construction code. Is the Councilor Nazarian willing to accept it? Yes, I'm fine with that too. I think it makes a lot of sense. I felt that it had something to do with the security problem. We take that out and we can add that issue to the follow-up report. Well, thank you very much. What remains for us today is the recommendation to approve. Number 4, to instruct the Department of Construction and Security. And ask for a report. including in that report how it is different and how it is allowed in the state law that prohibits changes to planning. Blumenfield, in favor. Hutt, in favor. Nazarian, in favor. Lee, in favor. Roman, this issue has been approved as it was modified. Well, issue number 11. You can read it for the act. Issue number 11. . . . . . conversation in the committee. Good afternoon, Councilors and members of the Plum Committee. I am Eric Brown, planner with the Planning Department of Mano 11. This is a modification plan to facilitate the construction of the Venice plant, a waste water plant for the Iperion treatment plant. to a public center and the classification of W2PF came, as highlighted in the planning letter of May 7, 2026 and a letter to the municipal council on April 10, 2026. The commission recommends that the planning committee, the council approve the amendment and change of zone and that the project be analyzed in the environmental report and additionally the CPC approved a review of a plan for the proposed project that is under a separate appeal that will be heard from the planning commission in August. The amendment of the general plan is being heard today because there are 70 days or 75 days to act Los peritos de la apelación no quedan del comité de plan hoy. Esto concluye mi presentación. Bueno, ahora los miembros del público, alguien aquí del público, quien quiera hablar para el tema número 11, si es que sí pueden pasar adelante. Good afternoon, advisers. I am Kenny Lee. I am right next to the Venice plant. The house of my family has direct property, just a direct border with this project, and my six-year-old daughter is there every day. The city recognized significant construction and the impacts of such. There are still no protections applicable, nor or written commitments, talking about what happens if construction activities make houses unsafe or unavailable. We simply ask that the project... We know that the project involves several years of heavy construction, including demolition, excavation, piledrivers and breaks. We are not asking for critical infrastructure to be built. We ask that the city protects residentes que tienen la preocupación más grande. Ninguna otra ubicación en Los Ángeles les piden que observen un proyecto de tal tamaño. No debe estar en una zona tan densamente poblada. Gracias. ¿Alguien más quien quiere hablar para comentario público? Bueno, eso cierra comentario público para este tema. Are there any comments? Or is there a member of the office of the Park Council? Very well.

In the interest of time, we will continue with recommendations to adopt a resolution for the amendment of the General Plan Thank you very much. Acto Administrativo en cuanto al adendo que se evaluó el plan este de impacto en medio ambiental de Vénez verificado en el 2027 y el adendo de la fecha 29, octubre 29 a junio 24. No hay ninguna evaluación y revisiones que se requiere para aprobar el proyecto. Si puede llamar la lista. Blumenfield, Joe Hutt, Joe Nazarian, Joe Lee, Joe Raman, si. Cinco, este, a favor y se aprueba este artículo. Entonces, si lo puede leer para el acta. Dos, consiste de una apelación de parte de Mary Ann King para la determinación de la Comisión de Planificación en aprobar una determinación de parte del director en conjunto con la construcción de un Can you hear me? Thank you very much. Can you lower the microphone a little bit? Esto es una operación de CPC-2234-3381DB. in 734 North Byrd Avenue, North Byrd, which was approved by the commission on April 8, 26, for a three-story unit, for a shared apartment, which operates as a site for care for people of advanced age, for people of advanced age with low incomes. At the market level, an appeal for all determination was published. But the decision of the Commission regarding the density bonus cannot be appealed. What can be appealed is the determination of the Director for Unit 43, RCFE, located in the design overlay of the Reseda Community and the categorical exemption. For the plaintiff to be noticed, he did not mention matters relating to the determination of the doctor, but he did mention matters relating to the categorical exemption of the class of 32. The plaintiff presented a report on each point of the appeal that was presented to the Board of Directors and is available for evaluation under the density of the state and the code 6141. The Commission had limited authority to deny the price of density, including incentives out of place. Thank you. We're going to hear from the applicant, the representative of the applicant, if you're here. If you go ahead, we have the applicant to continue. We're going to start with the applicant. Welcome. Soy el representante. Para usted es el representante. Entonces tiene tres minutos. Es el representante del solicitante. El solicitante o el apelante. Solicitante. Primero vamos a escuchar del apelante. Así es que como lo hacemos y luego el solicitante. Entonces permanezca cerca. Hay un representante para el apelante. La persona apelando. Mr. President, if I may, is there no representative for the plaintiff? I can't hear you. No hay representante para el apelante, Mary Ann King. Ella no pudo venir a la reunión. Sin embargo, ha presentado sus comentarios por escrito, los cuales están anexo a la ficha 26-0680. Muy bien, gracias. Y ahora vamos a escuchar de parte del solicitante. Usted, señor, tiene tres minutos. Muy bien, muchísimas gracias. Ustedes, como bien saben, I'm going to say it anyway. My name is Akile Shahar, and I am the representative of the applicant. This facility is for the care of people of advanced age, of third age. And as you know, the population of the third age right now is the highest number of people who are staying on the streets in the state in the last 10 years. Las personas sobre la edad de 65 caen sin tener vivienda. Eso ha llegado a ser más de 150%. Entonces, esta instalación es muy necesitada en esta comunidad. And you know that, and you know it very well. We pay more or less $40,000 per person to take care of a person without a home. Of course, it's not an installation for a person without a home in itself, but it's all related to the system. So every month... that our project is delayed, we lose $200,000, while the quality of life is also low for the lives of the people who are living on the streets. And that's the point that I'm trying to make, that the reason why this installation is important to create for the city. The second point that I want to make is that it has already been evaluated more than 50 times, and I haven't even gone to the building Now. Here is the important thing. This installation is three floors. And I proposed eight in the city. This is not. It's three floors. The houses are two. So we have a decision to make. If I give you all the installations you want, it's going to be a much higher building. um um Si ese es el caso, por favor, adelante. El comentario público se cierra. This in my district frustrates me because we have all these state laws that limit our ability to do a lot in terms of making changes. This project is asking for eight permits, and although I agree with the applicant that these are extremely necessary, and the majority of us have to do it by right, They still present us with advice and we don't have to vote yes or no. We can create conditions, we can do things, but we shouldn't even come to this organization. I feel that they are asking for eight permits, which is more than our code allows. As far as this administrative process is concerned, if it were six, we wouldn't even have a decision to make. That's why it came to the CBC initially. um Patio enfrente, que se permite entonces el solicitante por lo menos proveer árboles. Esos árboles no van a impactar los planes del proyecto y es algo que creo que en ese entonces voy a pedir que añadimos eso como la condición que deben de sembrar árboles en la vía pública, que como dice el código, para forestería urbana, porque son requeridos. Y con eso, voy a hacer la recomendación que negamos la apelación he fichado por Marion King. Lo cual que creo, en cuanto a las leyes tenemos, no es que todas las cosas que ya pidió son sin mérito, pero bajo los requisitos que tenemos, tenemos que realmente negar la apelación y entonces sostener la que aprobó para la construcción de este edificio de tres pisos. para el sitio de cuidado residencial para las personas de tercera edad en el 73 North Baird sujeto a condiciones para aprobarse y sujeto a hallazgos y determinada por la acta administrativa que se tenga exenciones de CICUA 332 y no hay ninguna prueba sustancial que una exención Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Five, yes. And this application is denied. Now let's move on to 13. This has to do with the public transport site. and partner group in cuanto la commission de junta de seguridad en cuanto C.1, en cuanto operaciones de transporte. Esto tiene que ver con la demolición de dos estructuras y la construcción de un edificio de apartamento de seis pisos de 160 pisos. Verónica López, Oficina de Comisionados. This article is the appeal for a transport route and it is limited to C1, which has to do with transport hours. I will respond regarding the concerns regarding the actions on restricted hours. They said they did not apply consistently around the city and We are here to answer any questions. for the Act on Housing Responsibility and the Exception of Community Projects. This transport route was approved on June 2nd by the Commissioners for Building and Safety, and the personnel's recommendations were adopted for an export of 43,000 um um and will increase the impact hours for the community and allow 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. when the school is in session and between 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. when the school is not in session. The board restricted the hours of transportation between 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. on Wednesdays and 9 p.m. . . . . . de ecología global la cual está a dos cuadras norte del noroeste del proyecto. La carta de apelación también mencionó que estas horas no se aplicaron de manera consistente alrededor de la ciudad y también mencionaron que hubo un desarrollo en la esquina de la calle Tercera y Fairfax ante la Comisión de Seguridad y Edificación, cualquier actividad de exportación, importación y de tierra como designado de parte de la Junta de Ingenieros de la Mapa de Grid número 813. Fairfax is not on this site. And so it did not require that they approve the route. So the letter also mentions that a warning about the hours of restriction was not presented. As the personnel mentioned, it is available to all parties interested on Thursday before the hearing. The applicant asked for it on June 1. Thank you for your time and attention. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. TENOR BLACKMAN. Thank you for your evaluation and a process that took almost five years to have its permissions. And then another 18 for the permits. But we have returned to amend a condition from the Commission for approval for our transport route, condition C1 in terms of operating hours. Environmental analysis evaluated all impacts and has mitigation measures to reduce any impact to a less significant level. This is going to be seven days of work, and this transport is only going to be 1.8% increase in travel during high-traffic hours. This is a negligent impact. There are no schools around the site, and the route does not pass any school transport site. This is inconsistent with the determination letter, and in Evaluación medioambiental que se aprobó en el 22 de parte del Consejo en Pleno. Esta condición también no es consistente con una recomendación de LDOT y obras públicas para la ruta. in addition to limited areas, are inconsistent with the conditions imposed on other sites. This already has security operations, including a fixed route that only works on the site, space for trucks, dust control and inspection, arrival restrictions, and also more And also, a limitation would be that this would be increased to six more weeks than the proposed, and three to four million more in project costs. For these reasons, we ask that PLOMA approve the partial appeal so that it can read as described. Gracias por su atención en este hecho. Si están disponibles para cualquier pregunta o comentario que usted tenga. ¿Algún miembro del público ha llegado para hablar sobre este artículo? Si es que ese es el caso, por favor, adelante. Bienvenido. Abandoned Housing LA, gracias. the original plan was not going to hurt any of the students. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.

There is a representative of the Council of Soto-Martinez team. Welcome. Good afternoon, honorable members. I am Ted Walker for District 13. The Council of Soto-Martinez, the application of the applicant for the development a mixed-use building located at 1911 in Boulevard Saint-Saëns in Echo Park. We have a very narrow case that focuses on the hours that a developer or promoter can do a demolition activity and that is waiting for approval to start. The office is here to recommend applicant support so that the operations are allowed as recommended by the DOT. La oficina de servicio de calle y la hora aprobada, como diseñado por los comisarios de seguridad, requiere mucha reducción de esas horas. Pero ahora un análisis de la decisión. La concentración primaria, revisar este caso similar a las condiciones de seguridad con las escuelas al lado que pueden ser impactados. Viene la ruta aprobada. La academia de Narvarao es la escuela más impactada en el grupo, pero esto... But if we analyze this in the appellation group, we believe that it would be less impactful for fewer days in total for applicants, days requested for additional weeks, because there are fewer hours every day. It does not mean that there is less land to move. And I want to go back to how we got to the routes. These are approved for hillsides. If this project was in another commercial corridor, like several other places, they will be allowed from 7 to 4 in the afternoon. Proposito de la apelación de ruta para asegurar la seguridad en zonas de construcción para proyectos que van a exportar más de 1,000 yardas cúbicas de terreno. Las calles siendo usadas para arrastrar no son las calles angostas This is a project with 166 units and 24 reserved for low-income homes, allowing a commercial corridor in Echo Park. It is not the type of project that we should be delaying, except that there are security concerns made in the report of the Security Commissioner's Board. This not only dictates the route that the trucks take in hours of operation, but it includes other measures to ensure Thank you very much. Thank you very much. If I have a question, the presence of a school near the route. This is a policy that is always considered by the board or by the department, which is historically constant with previous decisions. Yes, there is a reason why The presence of a school is sufficient to limit the hours, the requirements, the consideration of the entrance and exit, the process of schools on the route. But not always. no siempre lo causa, que en algunos casos sí. Si la escuela está en la ruta, las horas se restringen. Siempre, siempre. No son discrecionarias, no. I have seen that there are many cases where it happens but it does not happen. But we can grant the appeal and it would not have affected it. It does not have to affect it. There is no law that says that it is correct. There is nothing that says that it cannot happen. Another conversation. I am confused because I want to understand the rules and regulations of this. There is a rule that says that if there is a school, it always limits It is the opinion of the board that it should be restricted as an added measure to limit the collection times and when students are walking to school. This is a pattern of practice of the current board. There is no rule or regulation of such an effect. The previous boards have not done this. The previous unions have done this, but not as consistently as this one. So it is a practical pattern, but it is not something that has always been done. I imagine that I have seen cases where it has not been done, but to ensure that we break that practice in terms of being consistent, I will recommend that we authorize the appeal then I will recommend La Junta de Apelación, hecho por Holden, y para los comisarios, la aprobación, las operaciones, por la demolición de dos estructuras y la construcción de una unidad, de unidades, estacionamiento en dos niveles, las propiedades ubicadas en 1911, Boulevard West Sunset, y 1910, 2008, 2010, 2018, on the streets of Reservoir, subject to the conditions of approval and the adoption of the determinations of the project, that we modify the conditions, allowing this from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday to Friday, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m. when there is no school, no work can happen, and the vehicles must arrive before the designated time at the beginning Any additional comments to call the list for that recommendation? Blumenfield, in favor. Hart, yes. Nazarian, in favor. Lee, in favor. Raman, yes. Five in favor, and the appeal is approved. Very good. Now the issue number 14 for the act. 14 is an appeal made by Richard Garvey. the city planning commission in the termination to approve a permit for coastal development, the fulfillment of the project, and a review in conjunction with the demolition of two houses, the construction of a mixed-use building that consists of 20 units in District 11. Good afternoon, councillors. I am Sian Akou. Departamento de Planificación, proyecto aprobado de la comisión del proyecto, ubicado en 1410, 1422 South Main Street, la demolición de dos viviendas, la construcción de un edificio de 656 pies cuadrados, donde cuatro unidades se van a dejar al lado para gente con ingresos bajos, Utilizando zonas de 467 pies de zona de servicio, 656 de uso de oficina, garage de un nivel y techo de treli solar y acceso al techo, 28 espacios de estacionamiento. El reviso del proyecto, el apelante argumenta que hace falta estacionamiento y tiene restricciones en el vecindario. to cumulative impact in breaking the Coastal Act with the visual impacts and character of the community in breaking the Mellow Act. They presented a letter on June 17 to the archive that will talk about each point of appeal. The CPC made the required requests that coincide with the Coastal Act and the Mellow Act. and only the applicant does not provide enough evidence to support his claim that the project is not eligible for categorical exemption. The employees recommend that the Planning Committee recommend the denial of the application and approve the approval made by the Planning Committee on March 12, 2026. This includes the presentation of the employees and we are ready for any question. Thank you. Let's hear from the applicant who is here or the representative. El solicitante próximo para hacer la fila. Buenos días, yo soy Rick Garvey, soy el apelante. Respetuosamente animo que el comité otorgue la apelación y que reverse la aprobación. Viví directamente detrás de la propiedad por más de 30 años. that I present today is not opposition to the neighborhood. Instead, it is a legal act that proves that the approval cannot be separated. There are three independent judges and they demand it together. First, the SICWA analysis is incomplete. The city concluded that no transit study was required because the project generates 86 daily vehicle trips. That number is wrong because the city excluded the 37,700 square feet of the restaurant. If it was correct, it would have exceeded the threshold for the transit study. Under the arguments there, I do not need any expert study. The Supreme Court in California, Posen v. Laco, says it cannot fragment a project to avoid that review, but it is what the city did. This project also almost duplicates . . . . . La ley costal requiere compatibilidad visual y mirando a edificios al lado no son pruebas suficientes. La ley 305250 requiere estacionamiento adecuado, una presunción de que los residentes van a abandonar sus automóviles y el código del gobierno que ha explicito El sitio de densidad no excede la ley costal y usó elegibilidad como un... Y no puede apoyar esto. El récord está incompleto y la determinación incluye que no ha estado vacante desde 2018, pero los fotógrafos de dronos comprueban que está utilizado activamente para un... . . . The highway is 1.5 miles away. Well, any map shows it to be at 2.4. They are not typographic errors. They reveal an act that was not reviewed very well and determinations that cannot be trusted. Thank you. Well, thank you, President, Honorable Member of the Committee, Nick Letters. Representante para el proyecto en 1422 Calle Primaria. Esto es un proyecto de densidad con 20 unidades, incluyendo cuatro reservas para casas de ingresos bajos en el espacio de zona costal de Venice. Este proceso nos llevó cinco años para llegar a este punto y por suerte tenemos la aprobación de la Comisión de Planificación de la Ciudad. El director de planificación revisió la apelación y recomendó denegación de la apelación y nos juntamos a eso. Una porción grande ataca la altura y masa del proyecto. La comité de plan no tiene jurisdicción para revisitarlo. La altura y tamaño de piso se fijaron bajo la ley y son finales bajo la aprobación hoy. El permiso costal, el cumplimiento con el mello bajo, In each one of them, the project meets the standards. I also want to highlight that the applicant and the owner of the property are voluntarily offering to repavement the alley on Horizonte Avenue for the CIEBO with the B.O.B. permit and 21 days of public notification for all the neighbors next door and that offer is in the act. solicitante no solamente está cumpliendo con los estándares ahí, está arreglando la ley. Pero lo que queda ante el comité es un desacuerdo de póliza para vecinos quienes prefieren que ningún proyecto se construya para nada. Eso es entendible, pero no es una base legal para... no permit la aprobación unánime y pedimos que el comité denigue la apelación y que permite que 20 casas, incluyendo cuatro casas de inglesos bajos, se puedan llevar a cabo. Bueno, próximos miembros del público. ¿Hay alguien en público? I'm Steve Locke. I've been living in Venice for 46 years. And I'm here to support the appellation. The giant project is 15 feet from my studio door. And basically, it took me out of business permanently. My studio is in the intersection of Toledo Court Street. They're going to do construction and traffic. 24-7, the intersection is full of vehicles, trucks, new tenants and people who go to restaurants and existing residents and tourists. It seems not to have the feeling for the tenants now that they exist to block this area with all the traffic. It is not conscious and it is in bad spirit not to mention a loss of electricity. No deben aprobar este proyecto. Lo tienen que venir a ver. Es demasiado grande para esta zona. Gracias. Buenas tardes. Yo soy Liz Redman. Yo soy miembro del Consejo Vecinal de Venice, pero no estoy aquí con el Consejo de Venice. Estas son mis opiniones. Mientras apoyo crear vivienda y promotores No creo que esto se dirije a los asuntos de compatibilidad de los vecindarios y nada personal hay, pero como la comité de plan tiene muy poca experiencia con projects of density in the coastal zone, and perhaps they do not understand how different it is from all the other areas of density projects in which the appeals are heard. I encourage them. The unanimous opposition of the neighboring council of Venice and the land use committee, who denied it in particular, and who trust. I urge you to support this appeal. Thank you. Next commentator. Good afternoon, new councilors. I am Kenia Lee, a member of the Council of the Municipal Council of Venice. I am speaking, supporting the statement of the community, recommending support for the appeal and denunciation of the project on 1410 to 1422 Main Street, al sur, este proyecto no se puede tratar como todos los otros proyectos de densidad que están fuera de la zona costal. Los proyectos costales en las zonas tienen que cumplir con la ley costal y los MELOAC. El sector especial de la ley de densidad requiere que la densidad y las previsiones no the coastal resources protections as well as they are required in the coastal law. This part of the density law is only required in the coastal area and it has to ensure the compliance with it. And also the law of the state of Melo was adopted to protect existing housing in the coastal area, but here Thank you. Is there anyone else here to speak on this issue? Representante de la oficina de la concejal Ajad. No. Bueno, muy bien. Comentario público se cierra para este tema. Vamos ahora a la conversación de la comité. Colegas, ¿hay algún comentario o conversación para este tema? Viendo que no hay ninguno. I'm going to ask the planning department to respond to the things they heard. In particular, there are comments from Siqua and the automobile trips, not including the restaurant. If you can respond to one of the points made by the commentators. Well, Air Brown. Planning of the city. Planning department related to El análisis que hicimos para VMT, excluimos restaurantes de escala baja cuando hacemos el análisis VMT por las guías de la DOT. Y los restaurantes de escala corta son locales y no resultan en viajes regionales y los excluimos. Y los restaurantes son relativamente pequeños y generalmente son If the applicant prepared a visual study of the neighborhood, the study did identify There are many structures that are as large as four levels in the center. And what the applicant identified is that in that block generally there is a structure of two levels, but in the general center there are up to four levels of structures. It was enough for the employees to determine that the project has the character of the neighborhood. And another thing that emerged from the community was the use in 2021. And if the Mellow law is going to be implemented, if the uses are determined by security certificates, if there are non-compliant trailers that the plant identified and that they should not have use permits, Well, colleagues, any other questions or comments? Well, I'm going to recommend denying the appeal and upholding the approval of a permit and fulfillment of project and three for the review of the construction of a five-level building that consists of two residential units in the property of 1410 to 1422. And B, determination. In the entire administrative act, the project is exempted from SICWA by sectors 15303 and 15332. There is no exemption from the category, according to the SICWA guide, and there is no unusual circumstance. The list, please. Blumenfield, please. Hutt, please. Nazarian, please. Lee, please. Roman, yes. Five, please. And the appeal is denied. Well, now I think it's the last issue. Issue number 15. The appeal for an EDU. You can read it. 15 is an appeal made by Slefkin McClure, Dennis McClure, and Patrick Kane Dossett for the termination of the approval of a specific plan exemption and coastal development permit. And three, a review of the plan along with the construction of four levels with an ADU joint. This project is located in District 11 of the Council. Planification. We are going to start with this. I am Helen Rafferty with the planning department. The issue number 15 is the operation of the area west of Los Angeles with the approval of the exemption of the plan and permission of coastal development and review of the plan. the exemption is equal for a project located in the 37 Montreal Street to the east and the area to make a unit of 2,452 square feet of four levels with an additional unit of 742 feet, patio, ceilings and a roof, stairs and a corridor. The project includes 383 cubic yards of cut-off and a total of 335 cubic yards. The plaintiff argues that the specific exemption to allow an increase in height, indicating that the shift is based on design choice, arguing that this is imposed automatically and that the specific exemption makes it not coincide with the specific coastal plan and that it is not compatible with the neighborhood. The plaintiff argues that the categorical exemption is not applied by unusual circumstances. The unusual circumstances mentioned are the location of the project and two, the 383 cubic feet, three, the proposed structure of four levels and four, the proximity of the existing houses on each side. The applicant argues that the construction of the proposed project impacts the stability of the site and affects La integridad estructural de las casas. La apelante reclama que el proyecto va a tener un impacto adverso económico al valor de las propiedades al lado. Y presentaron una carta con el 17, 16 de junio, que habla de cada punto de la apelación. Y como destacado en la carta de planificación, hicieron las determinaciones para las acciones solicitadas y para determinar que el proyecto coincide con los requerimientos de la ley costal Mellow. in plan especifico costal. Adicionalmente, el apelante no aprobó pruebas suficientes para apoyar su reclamo de que el proyecto no cumple con una excepción categorial. Recomienda que el comité de plan recomienda la denegación de la apelación y que sostenga la decisión del IPC que determinó que el proyecto queda excepto a CEQA y que no hay pruebas sustanciales demostrando que una excepción categorial se aplica y apruebe la excepción del plan especifico y permiso For the project, this concludes the presentation. We are willing to answer any questions. Well, next we are going to ask if there is an applicant or representative here. Good afternoon, Councilor Blumenfield and all other members of the committee. o el Consejo en realidad. Voy a hablar de cuatro problemas que se apoyan en el Plan Específico. El Consejo Clase III, Selección Categorial, y la protección, la casa asalada, el impacto económico para las propiedades en el vecindario Antes de conversar esto, igual tengo que aclarar una cosa. Estaba mirando en el sector de comentarios públicos en la página del consejo y vi que el solicitante dijo que hizo una oferta a los vecinos para mirar a los planes arquitectuales para este proyecto y contrataron a un arquitecto para mirarlos para ver si hay otras maneras de hacerlo y esa conversación Nunca sucedió. Ni yo, mi esposo y mi otro copilante. Nunca, nunca tuvieron esta conversación con el solicitante. Entonces, quiero aclararlo para que se vaya. Ahora para los cuatro asuntos que yo mencioné. El plan específico de Coastal Bluff, como saben, existe para proteger la propiedad de Coastal Bluff. Y tenemos un una comunidad muy única. El proyecto ante ustedes hoy ni siquiera es uno originalmente presentado por el solicitante. En 2022 buscó la aprobación para tres, una residencia de tres niveles y de hecho, aunque era mucho más pequeño, él fue al Consejo Vecinal de Westchester y fue denegado. No voy a dar detalles de por qué, pero básicamente era que no estaba en cumplimiento con el plan específico de Coastal Bluff. Volvió hace dos años después, y quizá lo empezó dos años antes de eso, con el plan nuevo de cuatro edificios crecientes y con un ADU. Y yo reconozco que la propiedad, yo dije que mi esposa y yo vivimos al lado del proyecto en calle Montreal, It is a very unique property and it has a very deep and very inclined hill. And one of my neighbors this year is an engineer who is going to talk about what he sees in this. But I recognize the legitimate concerns. However, my concern is that if the applicant's decision to pursue a four-level residence No me da más de un minuto. Eso eran tres minutos. Eso eran tres minutos. El apelante le dan tres minutos en total. Los pueden repartir. Ustedes son uno solamente. Me dijeron que tenía cinco minutos de Ruben del departamento de planificación. Estuvimos dando tres minutos a todos. Usted es un apelante separado. Básicamente le tenemos que dar tiempo igual a todos. Le vamos a dar un minuto adicional. Y al solicitante le vamos a dar también cuatro minutos adicionales. Well, the municipal code provides a specific plan and says that it should not be a self-imposed position for special privilege. And with respect to SICWA, I am going to talk about other things that are why SICWA should not have a categorical exemption. The protection of a house next door. We live, I am not discussing with any technical report, I am discussing with our properties. Están siendo evaluadas para ver cuánto nos va a afectar de deslice lateral, vibración, la instalación, filamentos, caisson, todo esto. Y hay arena costal, pozos que son inestables. Ahí vamos a hablar también. an economic impact as well. The last thing, also the approval, the exemption. Well, thank you. Thank you. Next, we will hear from the applicant, because we gave him a minute. Go ahead, you now have four minutes as well. The applicant, you can give him If there are more than one, the applicant's side will have four minutes to divide it however they want. Thank you, Your Honor. Rosa Gregg Shoup represented the applicant for this project. To get to this point has been a very long four-year adventure. The project was finally approved by Westchester Playa del Rey, the Plum Committee, and the neighborhood council. The office supports the elements and the guarantees and planning recommended approval of the entire package including the two exemptions of the plan and the commission area of the east of Los Angeles and for an extensive conversation of deliberation in the commission and the employees approved El equipo de desarrollo apoya la respuesta y los argumentos y quiero mencionar que un argumento justo solo pertenece a si el consejo va a estar aprobando una declaración limitada si vamos a necesitar un IR. El equipo de desarrollo responded to the letter on June 17, supporting the positions of the employees. The problem with this, the project when the primary problems arise, the public law, that a police lost sight of the public and based on the letter and testimony, the neighbors Tourists enjoyed a place that cannot be taken out because of its height. These are the arguments of the plaintiffs. The guarantor for a state in 240 Montreal said that the state has a private view and privilege of such that will be impacted by the project. Having a house of a level and being in Montreal that they will not be able to see the areas the wetlands de su casa, aunque es una casa de tres niveles. Desafortunadamente para ellos, la ciudad de Los Angeles no tiene un sector codificado del código municipal que les otorgan el derecho a cualquier vista protegida. La ley costal protege vistas públicas y de puntos de interés. and does not recognize public views only because there is a vacant space, which means that it should remain that way. And personally, living next to an empty space that allowed me to look through my windows, I would like to have that view and continue to have that view. That is basically the most important thing about this argument. Well, thank you. Now we take comments from the members of the public. If there is anyone in the public who wants to speak on this issue, you can come forward. We give you a minute each.

Hello, I'm Justin. I'm the owner of 227 Montreal. I bought it for 800,000, almost five years ago. I have followed and worked with the planning of Los Angeles and the district of Westchester. I have always had a plan for the housing Acaban de admitir que quitaron mi cartel. Tengo un código de QR porque soy un promotor profesional y hago bienes raíces. Mi contratista ha trabajado ahí. He remodelado viviendas históricas. Básicamente, los vecinos sienten que tienen el derecho para un... Next commenter. Buenas tardes. Me llamo Brooke Bryant. Hago bienes raíces con estate properties. Mi cliente es Patrick Kane Dawson, un apelante. También es el herrero del fideicomiso de su hermana, quien también es mi cliente. Thank you. And I have documented a lot of feedback during this process based on my first-hand experience promoting this site. Many people have mentioned the concern about the approved project of 237 Montreal, the size and the site of the construction and the uncertainty in terms of certain construction and the impact on Thank you. Next commenter. Yes, my name is Martin Morris, and I am the owner of the property in Dos Terrenos, east of the proposed site. I fully agree with what Elise LaPelante said. Yo creo que es muy peligroso construir una casa en esta colina. Es vacante por buena razón por 80 años. Yo mismo he tenido la experiencia, lo que pasa cuando perturban la colina, cuando la ciudad retuvo su derecho para poner un drenaje de tormenta al oeste, inmediatamente al oeste de mi propiedad. Thank you. Next commenter. Buenas tardes, me llamo Valerie Barlick y vivo tres propiedades al este de este proyecto. Estoy aquí para mencionar mi opinión en cuanto a esta propiedad. No tengo un problema con que Justin tenga una propiedad, una casa aquí, pero debe adherir a todas las regulaciones costales y de la ciudad. La Comisión de Acosta Bluffs se formaron por una buena razón. Todos estamos aquí mencionando el problema en cuanto a esta situación muy crítica. Es la responsabilidad de este comité asegurar que todas las ordenanzas y las reglas están en cumplimiento. Thank you. Next commenter. Harvey Beilick. I oppose this property that is being built in the way that it is planned to be built. I oppose the fact that this gentleman does not want to do anything, but that this is a property to rent with his credit card. If they investigate, I am against many of these things. I do not oppose that he has a property there. me encantaría tener una propiedad ahí en ese sitio pero nada de este tamaño no queda conforme con nuestro vecindario y con lo que ha mencionado la comisión costal gracias por su tiempo gracias próximo comentarista Hello, my name is Priscilla Slaney. I live on 229 Montreal Street, two doors to the west. This project, I think, I agree with the neighborhood. We want to have a house there. Originally, it was going to be three floors. And then there were aspects that do not fall under fulfillment. There are many remodeling around the street. And each of these So there shouldn't be any extraordinary exception for someone who says that they only want four feet when everyone else does. And they follow the rules until then. The terrain itself, the terrain in which we all live, is a hill. So any extra weight of three or four feet is a hill. que da estrés en ese sitio. De nuevo, yo quiero que se construya una vivienda con tal de que cumpla, pero en contra de que algo que esté fuera de cumplimiento. Y tampoco prueba de esto la Comisión Costal. Alguien más está aquí para hablar sobre este punto en la agenda. Veo que nadie más se ha parado o se cierra comentario público. Hay una representante de la oficina de Park para que hablan sobre este asunto. I will continue with the discussion of the committee. If you can respond with certain things that you mentioned and certain members of the public have mentioned, whether in compliance with the Coastal Act and the various issues that were mentioned, the HealthSide Bluff Si es que tomar en consideración esto, Kaelin Rafferty, asistente con planificación. Entonces, el primer punto del que quiero hablar es la cantidad de pisos en la propiedad. I heard several commentators and the plaintiff mentioned that originally it was three floors and that it increased to four. The size of the plans has not changed. What has changed is the fact that in this specific plan of Coastal Bluff, there were limits in terms of the front part and that it is different in terms of the second part. Entonces, el aplicante volvió a diseñar su proyecto para rebajar la parte posterior, para rebajarlo para que cumpla con la intención de los requisitos del plan para haciéndolo al rebajarlo, creo entonces de cuatro pisos, pero el tamaño realmente es Lo mismo que era originalmente. El siguiente punto del que quiero hablar. Voy a hablar sobre el permiso de desarrollo costal. Perdón. We would like to speak with the letter that was presented for this board meeting. Many of the points that were presented today were part of the initial appeal, so they are in the letter. As mentioned, the project is subject to the permit process and will then be evaluated by the departments to ensure that comply with the regulations of the code and also the geotechnical reports on the value of building and security and all the findings necessary for this permit have been made or have been adopted by the Planning Commission of the area. Y la determinación incluye estudios de compatibilidad que asegura que encaje con el medio ambiente del vecindario. Colegas, ¿algún otro comentario o discusión? De mi derecha a mi izquierda. I see that this is not the case. I will recommend then that we deny the appeal by Lisa Lufkin and McClure, Dennis McClure and Patrick Kinnan-Dossett. And to be sure with this approval of an exemption from the specific plan of the Coastal Bluffs to a development permit. And three, they are with an evaluation of compliance with the Menlo Act to Este edificio de vivienda de cuatro pisos en 237 y 239, este de calle Montreal. in order to adapt to the findings and determine whether the administrative act has an exception of CEQA 503, classification 3, and there is no substantial evidence to show that it is an exception of the categorical exception. As for the guidelines and guidelines 1 through 0.2, apply. Secretary, can you read the list of votes? Blumenfeld, yes. Hud, yes. Nazarian, yes. Lee, yes. Rahman, yes. Raman? Sí. Cinco a favor y la apelación se niega. Gracias. Y confirmamos que eso es todo. Sí, señor. Excepto vamos a seguir entonces con comentario público general para artículos que están ante, no directamente enfrente de nosotros, pero bajo la jurisdicción de este comité. Si hay alguien aquí que quiere hablar del comentario público general, por favor, adelante. Bienvenida. Buenas tardes, miembros, miembros de la familia, Lina Mara hablando como individuo. Estoy aquí para mencionar mi preocupación sobre el incendio en Boyle Heights. Muchos residentes, incluyendo yo, hemos sido expuestos al humo tóxico como resultado del incendio en Boyle Heights. Este humo ha llegado al este de San Fernando y ha creado más contaminación, aire que ya está contaminando y creando condiciones que aún son peores y más peligrosos, aún más que durante el calor climático. This has affected working class homes and reflects another example of the environmental injustice that our communities are facing. I urge you to conduct an independent investigation of the cause of the fire and to take full action to protect and support the residents who have been exposed to toxic smoke. Our communities deserve Thank you very much.