Commissioners Court - Regular Meeting
The Kendall County Commissioners Court held a special called meeting to discuss the County Clerk's records archive funding and the FY2027 budget. Key discussions included the County Clerk's request for an additional employee, facility maintenance issues, and capital improvement plans for various departments.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Commissioners Court
- Meeting Type
- Commissioners Court
- Location
- Kendall County, TX
- Meeting Date
- June 25, 2026
Transcript
998 sections
Good morning, everyone. Today is Thursday, the 25th day of June 2026. And it is 906am. And we're here for several, several matters. First, we're here to do a public hearing And then we're also here for our second day of budget workshops. So because this is actually a public hearing, I'm going to call roll. Commissioner McCall? Present. Commissioner Weijian? Present. Commissioner Chapman? Here. And Commissioner Carpenter? Here. We have all members of court here, so we have a quorum. Next up, we have public comments. We have one. one member of our esteemed public here would you like to say anything before we start. Anyone online like to make any public comments. It is officially 9.07 AM on this Thursday June 25th 2026 and we're commencing a public hearing. This public hearing is to conduct a hearing regarding the county clerk's plan for funding the preservation and restoration of the county clerk's records archive. Good morning, Denise. How are you?
Good morning.
Can you just give a quick summary of why we do this for the public and just to remind the court members what this is?
Okay. We do this every year just to make sure and also to inform the court of what I'm doing, the records archives. And we charge $10 on every instrument except for your birth or death certificates. But all the other instruments get the $10 archive. And with that, With no cost to the county, the records are preserved, and we use that money to do that. And like this year, we're working on the criminal, and I'm going to do 1951 to 1992 and preserve that for next year's budget. And right now they're working on from 1865 to 1950, which absolutely those have to be put in books, but I haven't gotten that far yet. I'm just trying to get all of our records. put reserved and then I'm going to have them all be put online. So that way we will have from the beginning of time up to present day. So that is my plan. I'm working on it. So by hopefully after next year, I'll have one more year and I'll have everything online. As we finished our probate, we've got our commissioner's court. And so that's the money that we use to do all that, to keep all of our records online and preserved.
Okay.
Yeah.
And if I can just judge and commissioners this in the in our county budget, this is fund 26. And so this money is is part of these requirements. This money is controlled by joint control commissioners court and the county clerk. And so it is required to be budgeted. There's currently 654,000 of fund balance in this account. And this money can only be used by the county clerk for preservation and archiving of the records within her office. And so it's called a special fund or a dedicated fund. And so there's money budgeted in the current fiscal year with the plan that she came for next year or last year with for the current year we're in. And then now she's doing her plan, and there's money budgeted in the FY27 budget for that purpose. So all the money that she brings in in that $10 fee goes into Fund 26 revenue, and all the expenditures for this specific archiving plan comes out of Fund 26. So nothing is crossed in the general fund.
Right. This year, this year it's going to be 107,000 because I'm not doing the whole thing because they take all my records and I'm not going to do that. Cause if we need something, we have to call them. And so it's better to do, I'm doing whatever 41 years.
So if I were to make a motion, do I need to include the figure of one Oh seven or you just need to just, this is just approving the plan. Okay. Only. All right. Uh, does anyone have any questions before I make a motion? So I do, uh,
I know this has been going on for years. Yes, sir. Roughly, how much do we have left over there in the historic courthouse to bring up?
Well, I get this year's done, and then next year I'm going to go from 92 to 2009. Because 2010, I started with Tyler. So that's all done. Okay. I get to stop at 2009. And then after that, you go back and you have to put them in like 1865 to 1950. Those have to go in those books. If you see those in my office in the back, those years have to be in books. So then I'm going to go back and ask for that to have them put in books because then they go in sleeves and all that. So trying to preserve it one and not to do it all at one time because they can't complete everything. So it'll be about probably four more years. Hopefully I'll have it. That's my plan.
Four more years to probably, yeah, to do everything that we really need to do.
And I might can get it done before then, but don't know.
Would you mind recognizing the ladies that are helping? Are they not saving us a lot of money by helping over there? Oh, the ladies?
Oh, you know, I haven't seen them. What's that? They are not on this part. They're not on this part? No, they're not on this part. No, this is just strictly criminal. And that's all the files that I have at the sheriff's office where we keep our files. And they don't see any of that. That other part, they have already done that. We did that years ago, the older part. We still have some, I think, that we needed to work on. So, no, they're not on this part.
What I'm referring to, there's three ladies that come over and they unfold the tri-folded or whatever, four-folded documents and put them, straighten them out, kind of take a plastic press and open them up so that they can be sent off and then duplicated and put online. And it... I mean, those three ladies do it for no charge. Oh, they're volunteers?
Yes. Well, usually on Thursdays.
And they've been doing it for years.
I guess, and they've taken a break for a while, so I have not seen them for a while.
But they do a lot of work for the county in archiving these records and getting them preserved and getting them, help getting them online. We definitely need to recognize them.
And they may be in Susan's office. That may be why I'm not seeing them. And I don't know who is there now. I haven't seen him.
I do know some of the stuff they've done was criminal because they are going through a lot of this stuff. They stop and they find a particular document that was interesting such as uh uh the new the old jail where it used to be it was only moved into a very short period of time and they had the first jail break and so anyway and of course they they pull that stuff out they read it and they uh make notes of it it's Going through these records all the way back to the 1860s, they have found a lot.
I know Kay Pugh, the former district clerk, has been helping. And I don't know, there was another two ladies. Catherine.
I haven't seen Catherine.
And then Mrs. Vogt. Yeah. I have not seen her in a while. But every once in a while, Kay will come in. But I do believe they were working on some of Susan's stuff. That's probably why I don't see them. But they do a wonderful job, the ladies do.
So I wonder if when you go through the jail tour, you can see some of those logs from way back. I bet that's where they got those pictures. I'm sure.
Oh, yeah. I'm sure there's a lot of history.
It's interesting to see what people were arrested for way back.
It is. We still have those books, too.
Yeah.
So is there anything else you'd like to add? Because I will make a motion for you. Okay.
Before you make a motion, Denise and I had a lengthy conversation with Jen Osteen prior to actually posting this to make sure we were doing the process correctly. We've learned some new stuff, and Denise, can that correct me if I'm wrong? There's no action item for this, so it's just a public hearing. So when y'all accept the budget, if y'all accept it or not accept it, That also assists her being in there. Why?
Because I have an order here. Do you want to sign it, or I didn't know? That's what they did last year, so I don't know if they can sign it today, or do we need to wait until it's approved? A Jen question.
Wait.
I would wait. Okay.
Let's get all of our signatures on it. We won't date it, and that way you don't have to collect anything. Okay. That will be fine. Okay. So if there's no further discussion, it's 9.15 a.m. on this Thursday. Actually, excuse me, 916 a.m. this Thursday, June 25th. And that concludes the public hearing regarding the county clerk's plan for funding the preservation and restoration of the county clerk's records archive. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thanks for all you do. Thank you.
We'll now move into our consideration and possible action regarding our session two of the FY2027 budget hearing workshops.
Judge, I know you told me that the first person I was supposed to come is IT and that possibly they would need to come later today or at a future meeting. So if it's okay with the court, I would suggest go ahead and maybe, um, if somebody could reach out to Jason Parker and ask him to come early. And in the interim, I can start with our 315 item, which are these departments that either have no changes or Rick said they did not need to meet with the court unless the court had specific questions. So I was just going to present those budgets. If that's okay, we can get that going.
But also call Brian with EMS and let them know we're basically moving everything up.
So we're going to start, if you look at your 315 item, we're going to start with county clerk, which she wasn't going to be here this afternoon. It's department 13, or maybe not available.
And that's department county clerk.
And actually her budget was reduced. Are you not going to have imaging?
Yes.
But not in the general fund?
No, nothing in the general fund.
So that's why her budget was reduced. And so this was one of the reasons she wasn't going to need to come because there was no, I just thought since she was here, she could sit here in case y'all had any questions.
We know you run a well-oiled machine over there, so there's no issues there. The main reason you're here is, can you talk about the employee request that you're asking for? I think that's the one.
The main concern for the court is employee requests. I am asking for an additional position for the county clerk to be added to the office. It's due to the increase of the workload since we have the two courts. You know, when the sheriff's office arrests somebody, you know, that creates more work. For us, for the DA, and then that trickles down to Susan and I. So we're just busy with the two courts, and then we have commissioner's court going on sometimes. Same time we have court, and that makes it very hard to cover everything. Probate court. And the probate court has really grown, especially our guardianships. We have a lot of guardianships.
And they're not simple. They're complicated.
No, they're very complicated, and it takes a lot to have to. to work through all of it. So it would be helpful. And, you know, and then in public we have, we're just busy. Our birth certificates, people know they can come and get them and having to go in San Antonio, you know, I mean, word gets around. Yeah. We average a bunch, an average about a hundred a month now.
Then do you have space for this person?
Yes, I do. They're going to build that out hopefully tomorrow. And we will have it. It will be for the handicap. We're going to build it on the end so we'll have room for somebody. Is that the place where I sit in front of Maria? It's going to go out to the side. It's going to go out to the front of the foyer. So they're going to take that one half out, and then they're going to just move it, and we're going to have two spaces. But we'll put the other computer there for the time being for birth certificates. Okay.
And you have plenty of work for this new person?
We will have plenty of work because I'm going to need people to be able to do a commissioner's court. You know, I need three. You need three because anything could happen. And Teresa's doing a great job and Paula is as well. They're both doing a great job. But it's, you know, they go on vacation and then something happens and then y'all are going to get me. So, yeah, there's just a lot of, it's just very busy.
It's, yeah. I'll open it up. I guess we'll start with you this time, Ted. Any questions for Denise?
It's not a no. It's a maybe. I want to get through the entire list of everyone that's been requested.
I understand that. I'm a yes.
How many employees do you have currently? Eight. Eight. Are you full? Every position's filled? Yes. Okay. Yes.
And then would this mainly be attributed to the new district court and the workload there?
That is correct.
Yes. It takes three of us because we have a lot of workload and I am the third person, but I really need somebody else to help the ladies, you know, get the cases filed and go into court. And so I can stay down and do some of the stuff I need to do, which, you know, that's why I come in early and Get it done.
So is your staff working any overtime now because of that?
We do on court week, yes. We have to because we work through the lunch hour and then we have to get caught up because we have to be ready in three weeks for court next, you know, for the next turnaround.
Are we paying overtime or are they taking comp time? Comp time. They're taking comp time. So then certain days are not there.
So, I mean, yeah, it's busy during court week, especially when you all have commissioner's court and, you know, and I've got... One up here and then, you know, the next day we have probate and we have two. I really need three because when we fill probate court, I need to have two ladies working, you know, here to get him ready to go. So and then I have one sitting up there.
Yeah, because the way probate court works is you have a clerk here. assisting me and they have one or two over there assisting clients because we try to get we created a efficient way of doing court instead of letting people walk away and send it send in documents with signatures we get everyone to sign it all documents in front of us and that way we can open and close the case right then yes and we are efficient doing it that way but they need letters we have that prepared but
And everybody kind of comes in because we stack them from 10 to 11, then 1 to 2.
But we often have to work through lunch because these things take longer, so they're giving up their lunch time to do this, but they'll get comp time. But the attorneys appreciate the system we've got going.
Yes, we get a lot of compliments. A lot of compliments that we're better than the Bexar County and the surrounding counties. Like I say, I like to be organized. When somebody walks out, I want to know that they have their paperwork and they don't have to come back.
that's a testament to your office and your lady.
So I just, they do a great job.
Thank you for that. And so it's probate also increasing as our population increased.
Like I was just saying with guardians, guardianships is what's exploding, really exploding. Yes. They're just bringing them to Kendall County because it's easier than going to bear. You don't want to be in bear.
And they take time because you got to have a court reporter here and then you got to question witnesses and go through, uh, It's an in-depth analysis of their assets.
It's a day for our guardianships when we have that. We put them all in one day because we have to have that. So it just takes time to process each one of those individuals.
So this is a need, not a want.
Yes.
And what is the result or what is the consequence if this position is not funded?
We'll just have to do what we can do. We'll just have to have a few more court days and try to, whenever the judge is available, to get these things done.
Corinna, do we have a tally of how many hours the employees are taking comp time or payout time? She said everything is comp, so it's not a dollar amount, but it does translate into a dollar amount.
Juanita should be able to run that report, and if not, Clint and I should be able to run that report, I believe. There's a report that can be run that shows
paid out for comp time taken that that that is what you would be looking at because I think that would be helpful because I'm inclined to want to do this I would like to know how many hours because then you know that really offsets the salary paying you know x and dollars of comp time why keep you know, putting all that pressure on existing employees. Right. And then fund the new position, and we're not really spending maybe but half of it. Right. Just want a comparison. So thank you, and let's look at this in round two when we get those numbers. So I'm not a no. I'm still looking into it. Okay. Thank you.
So I have another question. How many days a week are you working on the – I'm sorry, how many probate – How many times a month are you doing probate and guardianships and things like that? Twice. Twice a month that you have the three employees up here. Right now we just have two.
Okay. Unless I'm not in court, then I come up.
Okay. All right. And I think this information will be helpful that we get that we'll be able to kind of make a more informed decision around two. All right.
So you're now wait and see? I think so.
Yeah.
You can comment, sir.
One of the things that I've watched for years is the average age of the people in Kendall County. It affects our tax rate, how many taxes get frozen. We're now at 22% over 65 in Kendall County. And growing, yes. Which is one of the factors attributing to...
Right. And you do not know if you're going to have 10 probates filed or 20 a month. You just don't know when they decide to file them because they have up to four years to file a probate. Now, guardianships are different. We have to act on those as the judge will. When a new one's filed, it's got to be heard pretty quick. So we have emergency ones that happen, so We never know on a daily basis. Whatever comes in, we have to take care of it.
Okay.
Okay, it looks like this will be addressed in round two. Thank you.
Thank you, Madam Clerk.
Okay, if we could go ahead and go to page 15, which is Veterans Services. She made no changes. I will say there is $1,000 that has been historically budgeted in office supplies. In office supplies, and typically what Mr. Cortez buys is just the ink for his cartridges. He did tell me that he probably is going to need a new printer. His printer's on the fritz, so I don't know if he'll buy it this fiscal year. I know he's only spent $80. Maybe he will purchase it next year, but that In normal years, I would not think that he would need $1,000 in office supplies because he only spends...
He hardly asks for anything, so just keep it and let him get his printer. And Jason's here, by the way.
Okay, so if y'all want to go ahead and go to Jason, we can come back to that MyList later.
So we get any questions on veteran service?
Just one thing, we are going to have to deal with their space at some point.
Correct, but we have a...
couple potential options if we buy that building or once election moves out we have space of who's moving out of elections could that could be a home for them as well so just a reminder that that old house is what it is where offices indigent services and veterans services needs to be torn down exactly we haven't the county's never put any money into that so that's that's something in the future a demo and maybe we'll do something else with that space we own the land
Correct.
Parking.
Yeah, ideally that could be, that also could be where how we expand this court is that way. We were always talking about a parking garage, but we could, top two floors could be office spaces. That's another, could be a dual way to get a benefit to the community.
So that everything is right here with this courthouse, Justice Center, and not have to build over
Correct. And we could put two new courtrooms over there if we needed to. And so I think that's something we need to explore as well as utilizing the current footprint we have.
Good thinking.
Thank you. Good morning, Dana. How y'all doing?
So we're going to go to page 45, judge and commissioners, which is the facility maintenance budget.
This is Department 510 facilities. Okay. Jason, I don't know if you did. What was the leak that Melissa and I found above?
Still working on it. What was it? Coming out of the holding cells on the second floor. Oh, really? Okay. We think it could be leaking in the wall from the toilet. It's fresh water, I mean, because it's under the tile now. We found it under the floor tile. So they got prisoners up there right now.
So I don't know. But you're on top of it. And then what about the missing piece from that flood last week? Everything's fixed on that.
Okay.
What kind of pipe is that? You said it's fresh water pipe.
It's probably water going to the, we think it's going to the toilet. That's what's in that area.
Is it PEX or copper?
Copper. And when this place was built, they were still using copper pipes.
So do you think we'll encounter more of that and then eventually have to move to PEX, which I think is kind of the industry right now?
We just had a leak on the first floor men's restroom on a two inch line, inch and a half line, whatever it was. It's all copper. But there's some places we can make it PEX if we've got the option, you know, adapted from copper to PEX. But in some places we don't have that.
Have you accounted for the possibility of having to redo this entire courthouse and the cost? No. No. that might be something you want to look at.
That's my answer for a lot of things as a bulldozer.
Well, I think we have to plan for it.
So no, I mean, yeah, to repipe this building, that's, that's going to be an, you're pretty much about to shut the whole building down. We're going to have to rip open walls and ceilings. I mean, it's a, it's, It's all in the floor, you know, drop ceilings and the walls.
Yeah, we're going to have to set up temporary work locations because there's no way to make that work.
And there's no way to really do it, and you would have to do it from the get-go to the finish. Because if you try to turn the water off to do the first floor, then you're not really helping anything because nobody could be on the second or the third anyway because the water would have to be off to the entire building.
So it's just patching as we go then?
Well, right now, what happened in the bottom was not a pipe. It was actually a pump that just blew apart. It wasn't a pipe itself. It was a circulating pump that was circulating hot water to the restrooms right there by the Sallyport and up to the second floor. So it wasn't really the pipes. It was a circulating pump.
Okay. Well, I would ask that you be thinking about it and thinking about the plan and And coming back at some point, it doesn't sound like, you know, we need to think about this in the next budget year, do we? No. Okay. But let's like look long term. No problem. And then the other concern that Judge Cahoon had was something about the aesthetics of the bathroom and the grout. Can we get a little, you know, grout patching up there and make it look cleaner? Yeah.
The two bathrooms you and I talked about between our office.
And the jury rooms.
And the jury rooms. And I kind of let everyone know that we have a plan for it. It's just you were trying to tackle the more higher priority issues and that the cosmetic things were going to be addressed. We have a steam cleaner. We can steam clean it if that's what you're asking.
We have a steam cleaner that we have. that I can try to steam clean the grout before I... Because the next only other thing to do is to chip it all out or grind it out and then re-grout.
Re-grout it. Could you look into doing that, Judge Cahoon? I think she said Judge McDaniel goes and cleans the tile because she can't stand it.
We put new floor in her bathroom. She still has tile on the wall. I think. The floor, we put that vinyl like what's in the hallways.
Yeah, so that's not a problem. I think it must be the tile on the wall.
You put it on the floor in the jury rooms as well? Okay, I think it's talking the jury rooms.
Oh, the tile on the floor in the jury room. That was the bathroom.
The bathrooms that are in the... I saw it yesterday.
Every bathroom in this building needs to be gutted and remodeled. Every bathroom. You've seen the wallpaper in the bathrooms. It's all peeling. The grout The tile's all nasty in all the bathrooms, the countertops. But they're all functional. They're all functional, but they're just ugly.
And we did move into this building November 1st of 1998. That was kind of when departments started moving into the building from across the street in the historical courthouse and the various little buildings that were kind of around the county. So some things are
So we're coming up on 30 years.
I only know that date. That's the day I started with the county. So I know the date. And so, you know, some things do need to be repaired. But while he's in there, there's other issues. And I know I think I've said this before, but, you know, in the county auditor's office, my specific part of my office, you know, there's cracks around the windows and the walls and stuff. And I think that's probably settling issues. And so at some point, that's something that the court's going to have to think about overall. I think we've done a lot for the outside. I think the inside, I mean, it's being maintained, but there's just a building that's almost 30 years old.
Yeah, because I talked to Sharon, and she's trying to get a quote because a mason needs to come, and you're aware of it. There's cracks. The rock is separating from the building, and water can get in behind it. And so there's some TLC that needs to be done to solidify the envelope of this building in addition. But, again, Basin's aware of all this. The foundation could have settled causing these cracks. Yeah, and our office has some cracks. But everything that we're talking about is on your radar. It's just a matter of what priorities that you're having to address on a day-to-day basis. Is that a fair assessment?
So I would just like to explore this. I'd like a facilities report. kind of asset inventory or analysis so that we have a big picture of what we have and what would be major projects that we would have to plan in the next two to three years and then day to day. And you're doing a great job, and I get a lot of good feedback from you, you know, from your work, and all your employees are just super nice. And I love Alex over at the Blanco building. He's just so helpful, and he dusts like I've never seen anybody dust. He moves all my stuff and dusts. But it looks like you're day-to-day trying to take care of everything, and you have to do that. But let's look long-term and see what our plan is so that we can budget you some money, and we'll take your lead on what you think is more critical that we need to do now, what could be in the next two years, and then the next five years.
Does that also include that family building across the street? What is it, genealogy? That building, that's almost as bad a shape as the Veterans Building.
That needs to be on the list. We really need to have a total inventory of what all we've got and where we are with it. And I think Commissioner and I were going to work on the capital improvement plan, which would address some of this.
I think part of this, Commissioner, could be handled with our needs assessment, definitely, because I think that would be the opportune time to include that into the needs assessment plan. That would be... definitely something that I think would be a part of that plan because they've got to assess these buildings. And so right there is your, you'll get a detailed report.
That may be too. And, but I think that's something that you would want to be involved in as well. I mean, it's kind of your baby.
If you would like to call Jason back for round two, just for more discussion of this, I can run a report. A detailed report that shows all buildings in the county because we have those. Not only do we insure them, so I have them that way, but I also have them in the financial system because we capitalize this because they're perfect. Thank you. So we can bring that back to round two, along with the comp time report, you know, just either the first or second day of the, you know, of the. as we get to other's projects, but we can bring him back for y'all to have that document. And he can... He's like, oh, goody. And I can give him that list.
Yeah, if you can print him whatever you have, so basically we all can work off the same thing.
It starts the talking point if you are going to work on whether you wait on the space needs or you do a capital improvement plan. It gives you kind of an idea, a snapshot of the buildings that the county owns.
Do you want to just let everybody know what the capital improvement plan is now that we have a GIS person and you and I can get back on that?
Well, the capital improvement plan will go through and it's going to be a in my opinion, kind of a different branch of the needs assessment. You go through and you think the needs assessment will greatly enhance the capital improvement plan because it's going to give us goals that we have to look at. Are we going to need a bigger jail? Are we going to need a this justice center? Are we going to need an annex for just the administration side of the county? All of these things will go into a capital improvement plan. Then at some point in time, I think there is a way that through the legislature, existing laws that we can go, okay, Mr. Developer, you're coming in here and you're going to, we need to ask you to help with X, Y, or Z because your development is going to be a part of what is causing us to have to enlarge these other parts. So impact. Avoid using that word.
Generally impact.
For a reason. Don't say that. Yeah. Impact is not. We cannot charge impact fees.
I didn't say fee. I just said impact.
But we can work with developers on areas that they will affect the growth in the county.
And that's only fair.
Yes, I agree.
So in Jason's budget. There is one $600,000 expenditure that is on their capital list. That is the Tupperwine storage building project. And I just want to discuss that to find out if you're keeping it in or not keeping it in.
I'm just trying to put that in because at Tupperwine, we have a space in between the sheriff's office and where EMS or emergency management operates. There's a building there, but it's not in good shape. And so the thought is we can tear it down, build a nice metal building two stories and use it for storage because there's a lot of departments that need climate controlled storage for all their storage files uh and whatever else we we could turn in a couple offices over there for people now you just want to go well because we didn't i didn't put any plumbing
Yeah, you're on a septic system over there that I don't know what shape that septic system's in. I didn't put in enough electricity. I put in just enough electricity for some air conditioning and some lighting.
Do you need toilet and plumbing there?
Well, I was just saying that it could be expanded if we want it, but the main reason was storage because we got people storing places in the old jail. We're running a space here. This way, every department or office could be given... their own locker, and it just makes sense to utilize that space.
Do we have to put an elevator in it since it's two-story?
It's not going to be an elevator. It's going to be more of just a lift.
Like the dumbwaiter that we're putting in the Burdick Center?
Okay. And so we thought $600,000 was a reasonable way to do it. But if we take this out of the budget, that's $600,000, but it's just something that It seems to be a reoccurring need for folks, and so I figured let's... We don't have any secure storage right now.
So the building that we're using for storage is not secure. What all is in there? I mean, and a pet peeve of mine is keeping stuff that we don't need to either throw away or throw away.
Well, the tax office has stuff, county clerk, district clerk, treasurer. Everybody's got auditors. Everybody's got something in that old...
These are records then.
Yeah, these are records.
And they have to be climate-controlled.
And right now those records are really not, what I would say, properly secured in that you have a jail key that fits basically every door. What Jason is proposing in this building would be similar to what we used to have in the old maintenance office behind the courthouse. It was a huge area and they had the wire cages. And then each individual office only had the key or access to however it would be, whether it be electronic or a key or whatever combination. You have the access to that only. Everybody that had storage in there would have access to the building, but then you only have access to that space.
Good plan. One thing, and this kind of just popped into my mind, we need to plan for additional electricity usage and a bigger bill. If we're going to air condition a two-story building, hopefully it will be insulated well. But with any new purchase, like, Brenna, have we talked about or thought about the Burdick Center when that comes online? That's 10,000 square feet of air-conditioned space. If we buy more property, that's more air conditioning, maintenance, repair, replacement. Those are all factors from adding new property.
That's a good point. I actually reduced based on usage last year. If you look at utilities, which is the 10, 5, 10, 5, 4, 400, you know, in FY25, we had 190,000. We used 162. There's 190,000 budgeted right now. And in eight months, we've used 94. So I reduced it based on trend to 175,000. But I think I better increase that back up to 190 for right now. So that would be, I'm going to be adding 15,000 back just to cover that. Because I didn't know when that was coming. I didn't know when that was going to be finished. The verdict.
No, we're paying for electricity now. I imagine you've got it set at a higher.
Pretty much off.
Pretty much off. Okay. Okay.
I had the heat on during the winter just for freezing purposes, but it was way low into the 50s. We haven't had anybody in there in a while. Even when somebody was going in there, I had the stats way up into the 80s just to maintain a semblance of.
Is that freezer off, that walk-in freezer?
No, because they had food in it. I don't know what we're doing over there. Some people were using it, so I never turned it off. There's food in there.
Yeah, I wouldn't turn it off because leave it running. You got your deer hanging in there?
Maybe. Is that freezer going to be disposed of under the new construction plan? Yes.
Well, I guess because we're having a hole in the wall, they're going to have to fix the wall.
It's part of boating storage, isn't it? Boating machine storage. What are we doing with that? Are we going to auction that off?
As soon as I'm given the okay, I'm going to, I wanted to auction everything off the cooking equipment because that way the Right now, I pulled the stove out because the vent hood needed to be inspected, and I didn't see any sense in wasting money. I yanked the gas off so the fire marshal would leave us alone about the cooking because it was hooked up. It's pulled out in the middle of the floor, and he's never come back. But anyway, you give me the permission. I'll start inventorying all those freezers and refrigerators. We took the ice machine out of there, and I moved it over to Bernie EMS because they needed an ice machine over there. Because theirs was no good.
Is that on a list somewhere that we had this asset and we moved it so we keep up with where stuff goes?
Well, we didn't have any assets. So the nothing's over there is considered on our list because it's never been. But you understand, she didn't have it on a list.
Doesn't Clint go around and take pictures of everything?
Yes, but the building as a whole. It's the building that we insure. So for something to be considered an asset, the tangible item has to be $5,000 or more. So, like, because that's what we depreciate anything over $5,000. So, stuff that's less than $5,000, we don't have an asset list of. But, like, this equipment right now, this refrigerator, freezer, whatever, we would still bring it to commissioner's court because I would consider it individually probably an asset. And to dispose of stuff, local government code says only the commissioner's court can declare something surplus or salvage. And so that is when we would auction off. So right now it's not individually on a list because we didn't buy them separately. We bought the building as a whole. So it's part of the contents of the building.
Let's get together after this and we'll talk about.
But we would have to go take individual pictures for the auction site. But before that, we would have to bring the list to Commissioner's Court. Y'all would have to approve to dispose of such through an auction. And then we take all the pictures. We get it online. we take care of the entire auction in our office. That's something that we do.
Commissioner Chapman, you and I probably need to go over there because there's some nice tables, some stainless.
I'm not, I wasn't going to really get, well, some of those tables have sinks built into them and they're really, there's some good tables over there. We need to make sure what we keep.
See what we want to keep. And, and I don't know any other County department like the ice machine, anybody else can use them.
Right. Yeah. So should we check with all of the EMS buildings and, um, comfort fire, anybody that could use any of those.
I went to the jail and talked to Green about using the stove over there because it's a good big gas stove. But he said he didn't need it.
This is a gas stove with the whole Ansel system and everything. We don't need that for sure.
And the thing is that money does come back into the general fund because you purchased the property with general fund money. So all the money goes back into the general fund of things that you sell.
Okay. Well, we approved the space needs plan, and so I don't know when we're going to start demoing, but that's on the horizon.
I would probably suggest that you and I go over and look at it sooner than later so that we can get these items removed from there because once we approve the basic plan, ARCHITECT now is moving forward towards a final design. So we probably ought to try to get that out of there sooner than later.
Yeah, because there's a lot of stuff I'm going to have to store then. All those tables and there's desks and stuff in there that we're wanting. So yeah, before they start doing what we're doing.
A good idea would be of any of these that actually that's at, oh, sorry, if any potential employees I think before we sell the desk, we certainly need to offer them because I know the desk that the purchasing agent has in her office specifically, her staff member, they purchase the desk for. But her desk that she uses, all that furniture, she got from the Burdick Center because over a year ago when she moved, so the county did not have to buy furniture. We basically already bought it when we bought the building. So there may be others. The JP2s. laid claim to the rest of this and that's great that's great that means we don't have to buy it's not part of soft cost of once some once they're in there if if we can use it i just don't want to sell it if there's desk and things i mean i i would i would look at one i my desk is 28 years old and i've had money in my budget but i've been told for a few years i might be moving so i haven't bought a desk that might not fit in another office but i would i'm You know, I wouldn't mind using a used desk if it would fit in my office, but I just don't want us to sell them if somebody can use them. So that would certainly be something I'd want.
Okay. So, Jason, you maybe get with Commissioner and I will go over and kind of make a list and put out a little memo. If you need something, speak up.
Can I go back to the topper wine for a minute? You're talking about building a metal building that you would then climatize. Can we, if just thinking, we have a storage building there, could we, if all the furniture and all those things have been there, all the chairs, all of that, it was out of there, could we climatize that building?
Which building? That's a separate building. That's the emergency management building, and we are climatizing half of it.
No, the storage building that's at Topperwine. The one at Topperwine that is existing, that has all the used... My building? Mm-hmm.
There's not even electricity there. We were talking about putting electricity, but that building's not even going to have electricity. It's like a barn.
It's a barn.
Right, but if you're building... But do what with it after we air-conditioned it?
If... Can we climatize it to do what you're talking about building this building to do?
Then I don't have any place to put any of my stuff.
So if we're taking stuff out of the jail, I'm just thinking we have that.
No, the stuff I have stored in there won't fit into the jail. I've got trailers in there. I've got all the extra carpet, tile, all the building materials stored.
And I'm talking about the building that has the chairs, all the papers.
That's where everybody dumps their junk on me, which I have to then deal with. But there's really nothing in there that I could store in the old jail. I don't have anything in there I could store in the old jail.
Well, I was just thinking of using an existing building we have, instead of building another, to acclimatize it.
Like remodel, refurbish, add on, make it what you want. Use the shell. Because you've got, right.
But then I just go back to what I have in there now. I have no place to put that, what I'm storing there now, if I use it for document storage. And you'd have to redo that old building. It's got big overhead doors. You'd have to pretty much reskin the whole building because it's got big overhead doors that wouldn't, and one walk-through door. But like I said, if we did that, then I don't have any place to put what I have in there now.
So you're saying you're going to keep the barn type building for your outdoor trailers and whatnot, and then we'll have a new building that's climatized for records. So two buildings. Okay.
Would you like to keep the 600,000 in there currently? And I suggest you go back at the end of this. when you're done, to review this entire list to make sure it's stuff you still want to do. I'm just curious as of right now, do you want to keep it in?
Start with Commissioner Weeson this time. Yay or nay?
On the $600,000, let's leave it and see if we can stretch and make it work. Are you asking for any new employees?
Not at this point, no. I'm waiting. The more we're adding square footage, the more I'm getting pretty much stretched pretty thin with the six guys I got.
Can you make it another year?
Yeah, I'll put it in there for next year. I haven't put it in there for this year. He projected, so I did project. No, I'm good. That's all I have for you. Commissioner McCall, yay or nay?
I think it sounds like we're going to revisit it, so I say we see again what we have at the end of budget.
I'm a yay. I'm going to revisit because I want to know what our space needs are. I still hear there's people moving around, and we haven't even talked about who's going where, even in this courthouse, and I'd like to I'd like to have that conversation as well so we know what's even happening in this building that we're in right now.
Can you tell me the number of your employees again?
I've got seven custodians and six technicians.
Just one comment you made that everybody dumps or drunk on you. See, that's what I was getting at. Is this stuff that... I mean, how do we dispose of stuff? It's not...
But it's broken. We've now... I've gone... to Sharon and talk to her and we were getting, I mean, they were, before I started here, they were saving everything broken or not. And when I got here, that building, you couldn't even walk in and it took probably six full roll off dumpsters for me to empty that building. And the stuff is broken. Cause I'll get a call from somebody that, Hey, I got a new office chair. Come get this broken one. Well, the guys were just so used to taking everything out there because that's what, and I'm like, no, if it's broken, We're throwing it at this point, taking it to solid waste if that's where it needs to go or wherever it needs to go. At this point, if it's a broken desk, if it's a broken chair, if it's broken, we are now disposing of it immediately.
Okay, good. And that's okay for them to do that? Yes, because it's not really an asset.
Okay. But it sounds like we may need to spend a few hundred dollars to get, I mean, I know we did those roll-offs for a while when y'all were cleaning it out about a year or so ago, or about a year ago, but do we need to get another one out there?
Oh, yeah, because the roll-off I have now that's over by that old rent house, it's full again because we had to clean out that rent house. So I'm fixing to get it, and I'm going to have another one put down there to get rid of the broken stuff that we now have accumulated.
What are we doing with that rent house?
We are... It's in, I had hoped to auction it off, but it's been in the legal hands for a couple months.
So it's like pier and beam and someone can move it?
It's partial pier. It's got a concrete front porch.
Right. How much would we actually get for that? Because somebody's going to spend a lot of money to move it. And is it worth the cost of the county?
Two to $500, maybe. $500? Yes. Or that, but.
You know, it costs the county to do an auction.
I don't know.
I mean, it would, I'm guessing. A hundred dollars.
I'm guessing though. Okay. So it cost us a hundred. Let's say we get a hundred dollars for it and it cost us a hundred for the auction. We get zero. It gets moved off of county property at no cost to the county. That's what I'm shooting for. Because if the county has to go in there and tear it down, I'm just guessing between the, even if we do it, between the dumpsters and the equipment and the manpower, we're looking at, In excess of $5,000. Oh, I'm talking, I think you're pushing $50,000. So, okay, I'm being generous, but still.
I was just curious.
My intent was not to make money. My intent was to get rid of it and not cost the county anything.
Yeah, I've had mobile homes torn down, and it's like $3,000 to $5,000.
And in reality, auctions probably cost the county in time because it's manpower. A big auction with a lot of stuff can cost us about $300, which is why I try not to auction off one thing or two things because we have to take the same number of pictures. You have to put it on the website. He has to go out there. Somebody is going to pick it up. We have to go out there. We have to receipt the money or not receipt it. We get it. We make sure they've paid and all this. Cheryl receipts the money. I mean, so.
And I actually had some local people that were interested in bidding on it if it comes up for auction. So, uh, again, I was just hoping we'd get a hundred dollars for it and, uh, get moved off county property.
So are you handling that? Yes. Okay. Thank you. How much land do we have over there?
Where that building is? That whole lot? Quarter to half an acre, maybe?
It's bigger than that. Uh, I think it's, uh, probably close to an acre. Uh, A lot of big trees and everything, so it's not all usable. When you take the whole, it's kind of a little shaped property.
Not enough land that builds a new judicial system over there next to the sheriff's office.
I thought you were going to say a ballpark. A ballpark.
The soccer in front? Yes. And that's where I'm going is, you know, if... So, yeah, definitely we can do that. If we're looking at all these buildings we're buying individually and influencing office space, you could literally build over there, sell Blanco, move everyone back to the courthouse, all the commissioners and everyone that does day-to-day. That's where the space needs comes in, just before we spend more money on another building for storage.
Yeah. Well, like I said, the only reason I put this building out there is because we don't have any secure storage. If I go in there and check the key out, I can open up any storage, any room I want, and I can go through the auditor's stuff or I can go through the district clerk's stuff. I can do anything I want. One key opens up every door. And I don't even know how good those air conditioners haven't been changed out in, I don't know, 20 years. They're old air conditioners.
Humidity and all that, if it's even damaging the...
And this was just a way to get people to have their secure storage with metal cages. That way you would, you know, if you needed one, you'd have a cage that only you had access to. So on that assessment, you want me to take her list and just tell you how the building shape is, what you're asking for?
Yeah, in your opinion, I think that'd be great. And I mean, as Commissioner Chapman said, when we do the RFQ or RFP to do the space needs, we can pursue that as well. But you know more than anybody here about all the
Are you asking to grade the building and give, like, what's wrong with it?
Kind of an assessment, as detailed as you can be. Like I said, you know more than anyone about all the facilities. I always say, if you get hit by a bus, we've got to have a piece of paper.
All right. Anything else for Jason? All right. Thank you, sir. Next up, department number 540. That would be EMS.
Good morning.
Morning, Shelley. Welcome back, Brian.
Good morning. Welcome back, Brian. Good to see you.
Good to be back.
So if I could just quickly give you some highlights of the budget and then y'all can ask your questions. We increased We're on page 49. It's Department 10-540. We decreased operating or the EMS decreased operating increased uniforms just based on cost. alone. And, um, but then medical supplies we did increase and that's based on trend. I anticipate even possibly having to do another budget adjustment this year. We've already done one and moved it up to 175. Um, so they are asking, um, for 265,000 in that line. That's the first big, big item.
And also just to FYI, we discussed, uh, A request to change the truck 2472 truck to a 4896. And tentatively, the opinion of the court is that it's a go. Again, this would take effect October 1st. So we got to wait through the rest of the budget. There may be changes, but that is the tentative opinion of the court. So I know that was one of your big concerns. Just want to throw that out front so we can focus on this. And we also put in the budget. which so far it's another tentative approval, is an ambulance for 369175, a new bus, and then also ambulance equipment for 177540. Those are currently in the budget.
Okay. Judge, are those listed on our capital?
Yep.
Yeah, okay.
Which my understanding, but I don't have that information, is that a portion of that should be covered by a grant, but I will bring all grant stuff and any grant matches or any grant income to in round two.
And I need to clarify that because tentatively we had put out a grant request for the SB, is it 3000 or three? The EMS equivalent.
That was the last legislature.
We did not. when the list came out, we weren't on the initial approval list. However, when I went to my judge school, they basically said reapply because basically you're eventually going to get it. And so that's why we're putting it in there because if we don't have it in there,
I didn't know we didn't get that. That was like a year ago. I didn't know we didn't get it either.
I've just been... I didn't know that they said no. I just was waiting.
They didn't say no. We just weren't on the list.
Did we not file paperwork in time?
We did. Everything was good. It was just smaller counties.
I think smaller counties...
But that was the whole purpose of the grant.
Rural counties. But we're... We're kind of in the middle. We're not like so small. We're one of the midsize. So I think it's, they're prioritizing a different order, but that's just speculation.
So that was, we came out of the last legislature and it was a big deal. Texas association of counties did several articles and everybody, we learned it at all the conferences.
So in the future, when that happens, maybe let us know.
So we can call one of our legislators, Senator Campbell or track Claire. I mean, that's unacceptable for us to miss something on the first round when it was specifically for rural counties.
They gave it to like 50 counties. So far. Yeah. And I don't think we're out of it. I think we will get it based on the tone of, you know, the instructors that everyone's going to get it.
It's just when we've been keeping up with Christina on it and she's been touching base with them and then touches base with us.
So isn't there like a year lead time?
get these trucks and get them outfitted it takes longer than that so uh the current deal is 14 to 18 months depending on what their backup is once we place the order so how does that lead time fit in with it's as long as we order it we're qualified so no matter when it comes in the grant will cover it but we we needed two new buses anyways so regardless whether we got these this was This is to upgrade our fleet. So we have a current fleet, have another one. And so even if the grant doesn't come through again this year, my proposal, the recommendation to this court when I'm not here is go for one more bus because that way they will have a backup bus. That's in every station.
That's the important thing is we have one station. It only has one unit in there. And if you're having a shift change and that unit is out, then you're pulling a unit out of another district to cover that call. It's best to have two units.
So just long-term emergency planning, I think that is. So, Corinne, if you want to note that to just bring up next year, one more bus is probably a good idea.
Where do we stand with an order?
As far as?
To order the vehicle.
So we do a bid, but until we have an approval from the court and we turn that in, we don't get in a queue, so to speak, for them to start building it. Now, on the last couple months, what we have done is saved a couple of dollars is when we go in for that bid, if Razor has bought chassis already, we may be able to buy a chassis that's brand new that may be last year's model and save $15,000 on the purchase. That's what we did the last year? Yes.
That's a good idea.
The county had the money purchase the chassis and then the box was budgeted, you know, in the next fiscal year. This one that's just in service and comfort, 280.
So my question is then, when are we going to order the bus and are we actually going to spend the money in FY27 for this vehicle and its outfitting?
If the court approves the budget, then what I do is Before October 1, we usually try to place the order with the court's approval. That way we try to avoid any price increases before October 1, and then we're in the queue to start building that truck.
Do we have to put down a deposit or pay for the entire thing?
No, we just need a commitment.
Can we commit so he can order now? Technically, there is no budget for FY27. So no one can commit to a purchase, and FY27 to the commissioner's court gives the And that authority comes with an adopted budget.
And we can't do a budget transfer and put that in a line item?
So you can't put current year budget in next year. Now, he could purchase the chassis right now. And essentially what you're doing, you're saying, hey, I'm going to buy a box next year. But if there was no adopted budget, the county's still on the hook for that box. But Sharon, there's – like, I can't give Sharon permission to – issue a purchase order because I have to strictly enforce the budget and there's no budget until you guys set the budget.
And then you run the risk of, I don't know, with the SB grant, buying it this year is before we've applied. That may not qualify us. I think you got to apply, get it in the queue and then buy it. So there's some logistical issues that I hesitate on. I know you're trying to save money. It's a good idea, but I think we just got to do this next one.
And we will follow up to find out when we have to reapply, try to get that.
Do you think realistically we're going to spend that money in this next budget year?
So my understanding is that last year we bought a chassis. You're waiting for the box, and that's going to happen this fiscal year for one that you have on order. No, we already did. We spent the $200. We don't have anything on order right now. What's on the schedule is the court's public hearing, I believe, is the first commissioner's court in September to adopt the budget, which means that you could not get a purchase order until after that. So that would be September. So if you got a PO from Sharon and ordered that that first or second week of September, are you going to have an ambulance By September 30th, 12 months later, no.
Just depending on where you're at in the queue. So if we take a chassis, if they have to have a chassis on the lot, and we get in a queue ahead of time, we may be able to have it done in 12 months. They did open up a new facility for building. So the time has been reduced some, but I'm not sure exactly when the delivery time would be. I won't know that. I can find that out, but I don't know what it is right now.
Isn't this the same process we've been following every year is we just buy the chassis the first year, next year we budget the box? Yes.
Well, that means you don't need all of this in the budget. That was where I was going with that question.
But you may need to for the grant.
That's right.
So I don't know until you know more about the grant. You may need to have everything in there.
So that they see that we committed to it.
Correct.
Does that make sense? Is it a reimbursement grant?
I don't know.
Yes. Really, most of your grants, the county has to foot the bill, and then you get the money.
That's all. I'm just trying to make sure we, without talking to Christina, we don't ruin our ability to get the money.
I don't know anything about it.
Because that would save, I mean, I see what you're saying, it would pull out another $180,000 from the budget if we're only going to budget for the chassis.
How much is the grant generally?
The grant, I believe, was $350,000. Correct. That's the set amount for an ambulance. That's the only thing that I know about that grant.
What if we just kept the grant application going all the time? You only get one.
One per. You only get one per county. So once we get it, we're done. Or how often?
Well, period. Until the legislature revotes on it to approve it again.
Yeah, I asked that question, can we keep applying? And they said, no, each county is entitled to one under this grant program unless they change the terms.
But part of the grant requirements is that the county has to, you have to have the expense budgeted. Mm-hmm.
So leave it in there and we'll just see whether or not it gets spent.
So do you want to budget the revenue? Because I wouldn't really budget the $350,000 revenue if we haven't even applied. I don't know when that application is.
Can we talk to Christina on that? Because I don't know the details. I really just know that. I know we've got to reapply and get the money budgeted. Sorry, I don't have time.
No, that's okay. I was trying to think about the offset. Once we find out on the application status, you can budget the revenue maybe. Yeah. Because that just reduces the fund balance you need to spend. Now, if you don't get the grant – whether your fund balance is budgeted or not, you have to, you know, you still come up with the money.
Is it safer to do the 350 budgeted, like we're going to get it, just that way you close all loops?
It's not safer. If you have it budgeted, then when money comes in, it's receded into that specific line item, and you're not using fund balance money. up front to purchase it if you if but if you don't have it budgeted and you get it it's called um just it's like a new revenue source it's a budget adjustment where i'm increasing revenue so i would decrease the amount of fund balance you had budgeted because you wouldn't need that fund balance okay so it's really either way if but if it's i'd i'll look at the grant requirements and see when that that goes through and then kind of make that decision but um
I think that was all the questions I had. Did we miss anything that you wanted to talk about?
There is one thing. This is in general.
Which page and which line item, please?
It is... She had initially 55400, but it really needs to be 55410 radio equipment. So she added a radio in for that new truck, but what she didn't realize is we have four mobile radios currently in the ambulances that are end-of-life that we need to replace. So the money that she budgeted for radio really needs to go to replace those radios and those trucks. But do we need to upgrade this in general now? What do you say? So the dollar amount is going to be real close because we just replaced, put a new radio and the new ambulance. So I did get a new quote as of yesterday.
And I had it in the wrong line item. I had it on small operating equipment.
It needs to go down to radio and radar equipment. But you budgeted, you asked for $30,000 for two dual head radios. I put that in radio and radar, not in small operating. Okay, good. Thank you. But you had $30,000. So what do you need?
Four radios at $6743 apiece.
Because we have to upgrade the equipment in the current trucks. That didn't get a new radio. 280 has a brand new radio in it.
So how much again?
It's $6,743 with installation because they're going to have to replace the antennas and stuff. And the thing that I wanted to also mention to the court is we're not the only department that has this issue. There's other units that has mobile radios that are end of life. LCR has sent that information out. So it may be something that the county needs to look at as a whole. You have one, and I think you know where I want to go, too.
So one thing, if you want to, there's funds available for them to purchase in the FY26. So that would take out $30,000 here, and we would spend $26,972 currently. The other thing is all four constables put in their budget for future use because they said the radio is the end of life. And, Sheriff, maybe you can speak to this, was – was really like a year to two years out. But what's happening is they're no longer making parts for these radios. So if they go out, the county would be on the hook. So the four constables are fine with waiting a year for those radios, but just know that they would need those radios next year. But those radios are like $11,000 worth they're needing. So these are less So whether you wanted to purchase the constable ones early, they're not in the budget, took them out based on conversation with them, or with a couple of them, and based on their notes. But there are funds available currently, at least for EMS, to go ahead and get theirs in FY26. Is it in the same line item? No, there's some funds there, but they have some money that I could adjust so that they could get it. So that would be taking in 1054- 55410, that would be removing that $30,000 next year and making it zero.
Okay.
And then the total outlay would be... That line item would be zero for radio.
The total outlay that we'd be using from existing budget for...
Two radios would be... For these, it would be 26,972 current year. But you coordinated with Sharon? Harder, yeah. I need to do a budget.
I'm just saying they need to coordinate with Sharon to make sure you follow all... I know it's not related to your department anyways. I know with a lot of the radios that we have with... some of our VFDs and everything. I think we need to talk about just giving those radios to those departments for long-term for the county. I think it's, you know what I'm saying, or where I'm going with this, Corinna?
I'm sorry, I didn't know you were speaking to me. I was...
Sorry.
No, that's okay. Okay, yes.
We had that conversation about giving the radios for a lot of the VFDs, giving them their radios. So it's their asset and not the county's moving forward? Can you make a note of that?
Yes, I think that that can be a discussion that y'all have whenever you have the fire departments here in July.
If you just want to make a reminder on that because...
I have had a discussion with one person from Bernie about that. And I would suggest... I would suggest that because years ago we took all of the equipment that the county bought off our books and gave it to them, except the radios that we purchased later on. And that was just how emergency management.
Yeah, I think so. Just let's make note of that. Anything else, y'all? Ladies, anything from you for EMS?
Shelly, when you were talking about other departments using radios, I don't know if I followed you on that. The price, I guess, or what were you saying, what other departments could use?
Well, anybody that's using the VHS system or the 800 system may have radios that are coming obsolete. Oh, okay. So ours is not the only department. Anybody that's in emergency services and maybe include fire departments that may have those issues. Okay. So in the past, the county has looked at it as a whole and tried to purchase to get a bulk rate to reduce the cost overall versus each department buying something and then the price being higher. Like out of the same company? Same company, yes.
Okay, and that's why we were talking to JPs.
With the mobile, handheld radios.
With the handheld radios.
If I might just interject here. So what Brian is saying is that... LCRA put out a letter.
Sheriff, could you come to the speaker or a speaker? Yeah, we could meet.
There's one right there.
Not speaker, microphone.
Are we on? Hello? Is the red light on?
No, it is now. Okay. So what Brian is referring to is the LCR issues a letter on the radios that we have, and what they're telling us is that our radios are coming to what they call end of life. When did you receive your letter?
Probably in April.
Yeah, so earlier this year. So what that means is that they're not going to tell you that At this date and time, these radios are no longer available or whatever. What they're telling you is that get ready because these radios are becoming obsolete. We're not going to do parts for them. They're going to be inserviceable. And so they're getting them out of their inventory. And so I think I brought this to the court's attention before. So we have started that process in trying to eliminate a bulk purchase. You're talking just my office would be probably close to $700,000. And so if you, like Brian said, historically the courts have kind of looked at this holistically and in bulk to include everybody throughout the county that uses the services. Of course, EMS services. dispatches for everybody. And so the problem is it's not knowing exactly. So three years is a good probably estimate of how much longer these radios are going to be. They may last longer than that as long as you have any problems with them. They're still going to work on the system. But if one goes down, you're not going to be able to get it fixed. And so that's the challenge here. So they kind of give you a notice that letting you know that you better start thinking about you need to replace these radios. Three years is probably a very good estimate, maybe four. It's probably going to be no less than three. It could be maybe even five, but the time is coming, so you need to start thinking about it. So that's one of the grants that we've had. We've reapplied now twice to start the process through ACOG. We got one grant approved. I think we purchased six, if I'm not mistaken. I believe it was six radios that we've already got installed, and we're reapplying because you can't. They have a limit on what you can spend. So I think it was like $75,000, $80,000. So we've reapplied for that to get some more radio. So we're trying to work on piecemealing this thing in. But at some point, the court's going to have to address this with the fire departments and EMS and law enforcement.
So just know that it's coming.
We're doing our part to try to get as many radios as we can. I think on our new trucks, we're purchasing new radios for them as well. So to try to eliminate, you know, the high volume of purchase at one time.
That's why the constables did say that it's like a future. It's going to be in the next, you know, like two years, probably that they would be needing those.
Let's address that. Already had those radios that cost for the radios included.
Oh, for the new vehicles?
Okay.
Yes. Okay. Anything from you, gentlemen, for EMS?
Okay. Thank you. Just one more question. Do we have contingency? I mean, like you said, the radios could work two to three years, but if one breaks, we're not going to get it fixed, and we'd have to then buy one.
So we always do budget some money in contingencies miscellaneous. So if that were to happen, then we would move money over to the appropriate department that may need that replacement radio. Yes, ma'am.
Thank you.
Did you remove that one we had requested for another vehicle? Yes. Okay, good. Thank you.
That's not included. Okay. Oh, wait. No, it is included. It is included.
You can scratch that.
Okay. Well, that makes me happy.
What we did is before the escape, we were lucky enough that Road Bridge was able to get a new scanner that was able to actually access the
module on that truck and we were able to get it programmed and we'll put it back in service so perfect so you don't need the new vehicle we don't need to replace okay so that knocks off 43 45 45 so that so line item 10 540 55130 i'm sorry 55200 okay um
needs to be $324,175. So we're taking out $45,000. I'm sorry, which page and which number? So it's page 50, and it's the line item titled Vehicle Purchase. Oh, I see.
Okay. So that just needs to be $324,175.
Yeah, before they said with the old stuff that it couldn't be fixed, and with the new module, they were actually able to go in and fix it. Good. Yeah.
So good reduction. Yeah, the car only has 63,000 miles on it, so it still has life in it. All the lights were on on the dash, and it wasn't safe to drive until we got it fixed. All right. Thank you all.
Thank you, guys. Thank you. Good to see you both again.
Do you want to jump ahead to some of yours? So sure. Since it's only 1030, knock them out.
Yes, and I don't know if you want to see if anybody from this afternoon wants to, because my part's not going to take very long.
Melissa, do you want to call the JPs?
Probably cannot. That's too hard.
Engineer and parks and see who can get over here.
So if we could go down to page 19, which is non-departmental. And so the very first line item that you'll see says employees. This is not a line item that actually gets budgeted. This is my placeholder line item during the budget process. So right now you'll see $1.5 million, and that is what the judge spoke about yesterday that has the 4% increase to the scales. It has moving the TCDRS up to a match of 200%. So that's where all that is encompassed. So that actually will go away It will be zero at one point when you decide what you're going to do to the scales. And when you decide and any money that's actually increasing salaries would not be more than that.
It goes to where it belongs.
Yes. So but right now, that's just that placeholder of that one point five million dollars that encompasses what the judge has has requested in the budget. of the 4% to the scales and stuff. Because we don't calculate all that out until you'll decide what you're going to do because it's every single line item in the budget. So we wait to hear what you actually want to put in there and then we make that zero and we distribute that out to those.
And that's if everything were budgeted or everything recommended by the compensation committee were budgeted?
So nothing that came to the compensation committee is budgeted. The only thing that is budgeted is what the judge recommended to the scales, which is a 4% increase to the scale, all three scales, taking TCDRS from 195% to 200%.
9% carryover of insurance.
The 9% carryover and the natural progression of the scale. So that includes if you did nothing, there's still a natural progression of people moving on the scale, as well as the 4%.
But not new hires?
No new hires.
Okay, that was my question.
Because we wait until the court decides what they're going to do there. So no promotions, no new hires or anything in there. That still has to be encompassed in the budget.
This is all salaries?
This is and the benefits associated with that increase.
Okay.
So that would be if the scales moved up to 4% and the progression of those employees that are currently staffed, then... That's what you would, it's not even quite 1.5. It's like 1,400,000 something. I rounded right up to 1.5 for an easy number. But that includes the benefits associated with the increases to the scale on current budgeted staff. Even if they're empty, even if the position is not vacant, we include those because that's the total. Because they're trying to fill them. Correct, yes. Okay.
That's a very important number. I have to get my head around that. All right.
That's just the placeholder. So it's in one lump sum. So it's actually in the budget. And then the rest of this, the unemployment insurance, that is a line item that Juanita does use whenever the county does have to pay unemployment claims. Office supply county stock. Why did that go down? Just because of trend. I don't think we need to keep budgeting $10,000. I mean, like I budgeted $65,000 the year before, $10,000 last year. Just based on some things, I thought maybe we would have more claims. We didn't. And this is a department that I would get the purchase orders for mostly and then sign off on because this is no one's department. It's non-departmental because it's kind of countywide. Your office supplies postage, that takes care of what we use like for the mailroom. Okay. fuel you'll see that there's that there's activity current and fuel i just want to tell you when we purchase the bulk fuel for the topper wine station we purchase it there but then we credit it back so it's always zero because it goes out to the departments that are using that fuel so it's just a line item for accounting purposes or we don't need to have money budgeted because it's budgeted in all the departments
But you reflect the activity.
You would see the activity, but now once we pay it back for that quarter, it would be net zero again. Last year, the reason it didn't is just how it fit when we bought some more fuel.
What's our total cost for fuel?
I don't know offhand. You can tell me later. Okay, I can look that up. Okay. Now, operating would be something if it's really the generic, it's the miscellaneous line item in every single department that has an operating, it's a miscellaneous line. It did increase. Now, because that is last year, the court budgeted some funds to do some of the Christmas decorations for the courthouse to be part of the like the Dickens on Maine and all that to have the budgeted funds. So I think this is and I think there's still some expenditures coming out for this fiscal year. So that twelve hundred will in that thirteen hundred will increase. But this was Cheryl Cheryl. was taking care of that. And so that is just like additional lights and things that are needed that would be like a one-time expense. But last year we bought the lights through the company, but every year it does cost for them to install them and stuff. So that's what that is. The pauper burial is pauper burial.
And then... And that one I could see increasing in the coming years because we've been getting a lot of pauper burials, but... To date, it's been relatively low, but they're expensive.
And didn't the funeral home go up on that?
Yeah, it's like 1,600, average about 1,500 a pop. But I can see that as we grow becoming a bigger number. But for next year's purposes, I think 10 is fine.
So then the other are just are like the postage lease and countywide stuff that we have to pay. Property and liability insurance, that number will fluctuate. Clint and I are trying to determine the best way to charge property and liability insurance right now. We have it spread across the departments, which makes us do a lot of journal entries. And so if I increase that line, it's because I'm going to suck it out of everybody's department, put it in one. So it's one bill. It's just easier. Contract services. That $10,000 is where we pay for the shredding service that the county has. And the $200,000 miscellaneous, that's the miscellaneous money that I would use if needed for year-end budget cleanup. So sometimes we don't have money left in commissioner's contingencies because we've needed it throughout the years, but I need it because there was an employee that left and a new hire came and they had insurance issues. And the employee that left didn't have insurance. So I just used that if needed to do budget adjustments later. So I reduced it. I think it was like $250,000 and I've already used $28,000. But I think based on how people turn their budgets in this year, it seems to be a little bit better budgeting.
So I don't think I would need as much. So is there a line called contingencies and then a line called contingencies? contingencies miscellaneous or that's the same thing?
So in the 401 budget, you'll have several contingencies. One of them is miscellaneous. The miscellaneous that I have here is what I would use. It's just miscellaneous. It means if we don't need it to do budget adjustment, it sits there. It never gets spent. But in order for the court to do budget adjustments, that's not considered an emergency declaration. You have to have money within the budget to cover those expenses. And it can be pretty much anything? And it can be anything. So this in the 409, I use it, like I said, mostly at the end of the year when I'm cleaning up retirement or Social Security or all of a sudden we have something on a share vehicle or something. an emergency type vehicle and there's no money left in their budget. There's just no money, but we can't leave that particular vehicle without tires or something. I use that money like August, September to finish out the fiscal year.
So Joe from Parks is on his way. Give him about 15 minutes. And then engineering, Mary Ellen said that she can do all of her categories, engineering, brush site, solid waste, but Donnell's portion would need to stay for this afternoon. Okay. So would you like the Mary Ellen? Yes.
Yes, please. Thank you. Okay. Page 29. Department 438. Pre-trial services.
I don't believe Erica made any changes to her budget. She went down, so I don't know if The only big expense in that is that we rent that building out on Johns road. So, but that's when y'all talk about space at some point, I think we need to have a really in-depth conversation about space and this courthouse people moving and everybody. I don't know if that's this, this probably not enough time this round, but certainly in July, I know we're talking about space needs, but there's also departments here that may be moving or may not be moving. So I think, at least that first quarter in July, we can talk about that.
Did you get an exact figure of what we're paying in rent yearly for that? Because in my head, I have $47,000, $48,000. This is not it.
$49,094.
Where is it?
Rent, buildings, office space.
Oh, $49,000. It's real close.
So when is that contract, and that's annual contract? I believe so.
So if we got her moved out, that's $50,000.
Has... This rent increased?
Yes, it did. It did. And I think it might increase again. And we can look at the rentals that we have right now when we talk about the spaces.
How many employees are in there?
She has, I think, there's three. Erica, I believe, just has two assistants. They have unique space needs.
That's their challenge. They need a secure bathroom. So that second building at the one we're looking at could be. could work on the new location. So we can talk offline about that.
So yeah, that's it on that. I don't know if you want to go to district clerk page 31. So I do have some good news on Susan Jackson's Her total needed for this, her records archived. So she has spent her, she spent the, you know, today we talked about archiving the county clerk because the state allows the court to set that $10 fee. They don't allow that in the district clerk's office for that. But those records also have to be archived. So it's on the county to foot that bill. And she's been kind of doing what she can with the special funds and she's been paying her tax. or imaging out of the special fund the entire time Susan was here, but now it's time for the general fund to start picking up some of this. However, she got two new quotes. She was going to try to be here. We talked yesterday because she got, she went back to them and said, I need you to do some more work on these quotes. And she knocked off over a hundred thousand dollars of this. And so she has a new quote, but since we're doing it early, I don't know that exact figure, but instead of 405, it was like 290-something thousand. What line, Karuna? So it would be the two line items at the bottom where it says software 120,000 and other capital outlay 185,000. It's probably closer to 80. So it is, and I don't know if we want to call her to get those two figures, but it was instead of 405,000 needed this fiscal year, it was two... Like 275 or 297?
No, you don't need to call her. Just get the accurate figures and put it in because that's something that needs to be done.
But when she told me this stuff, I was like, oh, that's great news to bring to the court. I think you should come. That's good. And tell them. So I can get those figures for you, but I did want to share that.
Yeah, there's no reason for her to come back. So HR... Juanita, you have anything you want to comment or you want her to handle it?
There's this page 41. The thing that you're going to see that was increased is the medical other, and that is for the new hire. It costs a little more money, $200 and something a piece now for the pre-employment physicals. So you're going to see line item. We're on page 41. You're going to see about halfway down the page under other services and charges, that very first line that says medical other, you're going to see that we increased based on the cost of the pre-employment physicals. And then she is asking for $13,000 for some software, which is on your capital expenditure list. And that software is application tracking software. Oh, look who's here. We did. We were just getting ahead.
No, no, no, no.
I was trying
She was giving you credit for reducing the price, and we were just putting it in, so you're good.
We had somebody that had to cancel, so I'm just doing all those.
So we didn't mean to stress you. Well, I'm sorry. I apologize.
No, no. Oh, it's less than I said.
It's $247,000. That's the figure now. So over a three-year period, $120,000 for the PLEO, which is the software to run over the documents, $127,446.85 over the next three years for the imaging.
And I just have that total, and I'm going to write it down. I'll adjust the budget. Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
came up here like a whirlwind. You're not late. This was us.
You're really early.
I said you were going to come because it's really good news, but then we were early, so I was trying to fumble through it, but thank you, because I said it was 274, but it's 247.
Do you all have any questions regarding it at all? I'm happy to answer them if you do.
No, thank you for getting this follow-up quote.
That's cheaper. If you've heard, we're told some We're a very good client. Oh, good. Let me just say that. We're a very good client. They are taking care of us.
Susan, we are talking about space needs, too. So just so you know, because I was in your office the other day. You could barely get by. I couldn't get by, and you had a folding table there. And you're tiny. Fancy.
Yes, yes. Thank you.
All right, appreciate that. All right, thank you. You're welcome. Sorry for causing you to.
No, I didn't.
All right.
We're going to just, everyone, let's take a break from 1042 to 1047, the restroom break, and that way we're good to go. So we'll just pause for a second. All right, so we're back in session. It's 1049 a.m. on this Thursday, June 25th, and we're here with our Department 660 parks. So I don't think, if I recall, there was no major request from you this year. But long term, you talked about potentially once we get all the property properties acquired, some planning, strategic planning. done for those, and then probably an increase in your employees. Is that a fair summary of what we kind of talked about?
Correct.
But for this year, everything's still manageable, but probably next year is when you're going to need to start having a little assistance. Corinna, is there anything I'm missing from our
That is everything you talked about. The only large item is the contract services item, if y'all would look at that. It is line item 10660-54861, and it shows the $289,000, and that is for... The concept development plan, maybe for Guadalupe River Ranch, $150,000. And then floodplain study parking lot design for Guadalupe River Ranch, $130,000.
So we did put a little money in for some strategic planning. You know, I don't know if we're going to do it park by park or should we do it county wide. I don't know what the best approach is, but we at least put some money in to start something next year. But Joe, do you want to talk about this?
This question, is it on this capital expenditure?
No, I actually built it into the budget.
It's not capital. It's not. Well, these items are in the budget, but this is not a capital expenditure because it's a contract. Right.
It's built within his department is all I'm trying to.
But it's a one time.
Well, these two were Guadalupe River Ranch specific reason being because the grant, as you know, we submitted our waiver of retroactivity to use the purchase price of the ranch to be our match. So they would match us up to the 11 point, whatever million it was. They would actually reimburse us for the planning process. They won't reimburse any development. So anything shoveled to dirt, they will not reimburse, but they will reimburse retroactivity. If we get rewarded the fund, of course, they would reimburse these plans.
And how much are you figuring in? Sorry, you said the numbers really fast.
I didn't say any numbers yet.
280. Yeah, it's 280. 280. And what do we get for that?
That would be for the concept development plan and a floodplain study and parking lot design. Okay. And that would be for on the bottom terrace. You don't need the floodplain study for up top. So that's the reason.
That main area where you and I went, where it's kind of parked like already by the water, focusing on that area. Yeah. Okay.
Because you won't need, according to Mary Ellen, you won't need that study up at the top because it's not.
Right. Do you have anything to add on that? Is that what you were thinking about long term?
I was really leaving it to Joe's discretion, so I'll follow your lead.
I'd like to go ahead and go out for an RFP sometime later this summer for the concept development plan. We could probably just lump those into one RFP.
Do we have anything for the park and comfort so that we could maybe get the same firm to do everything together? Commissioner, were you looking at something else?
They would have to be separate, though, because they won't reimburse anything for the gill track.
Yeah, see the grant. We did this differently because it's the grant. And since Christina and them were all working on Guadalupe River, we figured focus on that first and then shift to the other ones because that one's the big, there's a lot at stake for that one. Commissioner McCall, you have anything to add? Opposition?
No. I just have a couple questions. The building maintenance went down 20,000. I was just wondering...
That was because we added an extra $20,000 last year to get the whole comfort park painted. That was kind of a one-off project. And so now it's just back down to what it normally is. Okay. Any big building maintenance type stuff we call Jason, that line item is more just for little stuff that we fix.
Some years it increases, some years it decreases depending on the needs at the park.
And that may be similar to the capital outlay on the page 73 went from $28,000 to what was that?
That just depends on if somebody requested capital outlay items. So this year he's purchased... Zero-turn lawnmower and trailer.
I already got the two mowers and the trailer. I just got the trailer yesterday, actually. So those three things were already bought. I had those three things requested in this budget, but there was money left over. So we went ahead and bought them now.
So that's why there's nothing budgeted in Capital Alley.
Okay, thanks. And you're operating one up from $65,000 to $80,000. Why is that?
It's just everything's more expensive. Fuel parts. Everything, yeah. Equipment. And I would say this every year. My goal is never to go down to zero if I don't have to. I know that's a philosophy of some people's. If you don't spend it, you lose it. But it's just one of those things where everything's.
And one thing we should point out, Joe's department not only covers parks, but you cover the weeding and mowing, landscaping of all the county buildings, the sheriff's office, this building, genealogy.
I think it's at 26 now.
Wow. And you're doing that with your current staff.
Correct.
Well, thank you.
You know, I don't know if this was ever communicated with you, but I was talking to Will about doing some zero scaping around this building, especially on the larger grass areas. Is that still on your radar?
That's kind of one of the things I talked about. We can maintain status quo as is, but with the now almost... Almost 800 acres of parkland and 26 facilities were pretty much maxed out. Those special projects like that are what really, really sets us back. So that's why I held off on asking for the employees because we're pursuing this grant and we wouldn't receive funds until about the 2028. And so we won't really need any employees out there for now. That's why I pushed this off.
Do you think that that special project is something that could be worked in to kind of, again, I'm trying to just get this building where it's lower maintenance, water efficient, and... Yeah, I mean, we can talk about it.
We don't use any water here, though, really. But it's your mowing the grass, and it's kind of... How much turf grass do we have here?
Is it that much?
It's not very much. We don't have an irrigation system or anything, so we're not using... We water the shrubs every once in a while.
Is there lawn in the front?
Yeah, it's all in the front. Will and I were talking about that possibly being a way to cut down on, and it kind of would be uniform between this and across the street eventually. But again, it's all going towards that water conservation was the theory. But we can talk about it later. Gentlemen, anything for Parks? All right.
Do you have enough lawnmowers?
We just upgraded.
I had someone that sent me a message saying, you need to buy Joe a new lawnmower.
He just got two. He just got two, so we should be good.
Well, with all the rain, you guys have been a little busier this year.
We're struggling right now.
Would you like to give us a report on the Longhorns so that the entire court knows and I can tee us up?
Well, there's only one left, so...
The longhorns, we had an issue because they didn't have a great fence. And we moved them into the one patch that had fencing, not just a hot wire. So they didn't run through it and then run amok. And then during the eclipse, Joe wanted to use that patch for parking for the eclipse. So we needed a temporary home for the longhorns. And so Matt Carriker at Guadalupe River Ranch said he would take him and house him as long as we needed. And so... In the meantime, one who wasn't long for the earth anyway, she was pretty long in the tooth, probably about 26 years old, she died. There were two. And then I never knew we were going to buy the Guadalupe River Ranch. I just think it's very ironic. We ended up buying that ranch, and the Longhorns are at home in the county again. But since then, we've lost the other one. So the Longhorns have always been taken care of, which is what I think this court did several years ago.
Were you on the court, Commissioner?
When the Longhorns came to the county?
No, it was not when they came.
So someone wanted a home for the Longhorns, and they were at Joshua, and they were quite unique and a novelty, and people enjoyed petting them and feeding them and hopefully not getting hooked by their horns.
Well, they weren't petting them, that's for sure.
You've got to know how to pet them. But the last one's okay, right? She's got hay and... She was a nice one. Yeah.
Oh, so you got the friendliest one left? That's good. All right. Well, thank you for getting over here and for everything you've been doing. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Joe. Mary Ellen, you around?
Yes. Brian can come at 1.30. Is that okay? Sure. Okay.
Because the JP shouldn't take long.
No. Hopefully we get done early. I need to be able to leave.
I'd like to get done early, too.
Hi, Mary Ellen. We are going to go to page 11, County Engineer, Department 402. Page 11. Sorry.
Mary Ellen, do you want to start with your promotion request. We had several, you had several requests and we, as a group, wanted to talk about these at a later time. Can you talk about?
I am, I've talked with a couple of members of court. I'm working on some proposed reorganization in the department and I would ask if we could please postpone discussion of employees until the July court, if possible.
Are we needing to put that on executive session?
I've submitted an agenda, yes.
To general counsel? Okay. So that's duties and responsibilities of county engineer? Yes.
Okay.
And that'll address all your employee requests or your raises or promotions?
What are you focusing on there? Yes. Not the reclassification of the compliance inspectors from 8 and 10 to 10 and 12.
Those were approved.
Okay.
So I'm talking about the clay one. That's executive session? Yes. And then can you talk about at least your additional staff requests today? Because that seems more time intensive, and that's one that we've got to kind of make some decisions on.
Okay. Yeah. So we, I had submitted for three employees. One is an administrative position or the front window. I presented a copy of this log to the compensation entities with number of calls that Kim had tracked in her three months with us.
And just to clarify, Kim, was it a temporary help from another department?
I have everything, yes. It's all the same stuff?
Yes, yes. Can you guys share? Thank you for coming early. Yes, I know I have it with me. Oh, okay. Okay.
It was a great help that we had Kim in our office, um, answering the phone, um, transferring calls, um, you know, greeting the public when they walk in, number of visitors, uh, making sure, you know, cause they're sending people to it or sending people over to the fire marshal's office or finding someone in our office, if it was related to engineering, um, Health Department is reflected in this as well, and I know that's moved out, but that wasn't a big increase in call volume load. Essentially, right now, JA and Joy are taking care of all permit processing, data entry, plat submittal, all the intake process, and every time the phone rings, they're in the middle of trying to enter in somebody's name, address, what is the name of their permit, how many lots are they asking for, what's the type of project, what fees do they need, what's their credit card number, and set that aside, answer the phone, answer the front desk, and with about 40 calls, anywhere from 30, 40 calls a day to their line interrupts them that many times in trying to get things uploaded and entered, which delays how quickly they get processed. And leads to more mistakes because when you get interrupted, you have to figure out where you left off. And we've seen an increase of mistakes since Kim left and before she was brought on. The number of calls to the front office is solely their two phones and mine. Everybody else answers their own phone. Everybody else schedules their own appointments, goes up to the doors. When they know that there's a meeting getting ready to schedule, they're up there to say, you know, getting ready to greet people and bring them in. So these numbers are reflective of three phone lines. And I think that person could help serve the other department. I know Brady had a request earlier. for someone as well, and if that person is in his department and answering the phone, that would be fine by me, but it would take a tremendous workload and increase efficiency by having somebody answer that phone for all of the departments in the building. When we were in the courthouse, those two positions, we had those same two positions and permits and plat intake, and we're only answering calls for our department, and so then it's now increased to other departments and other walk-ins. So it's an added workload to their efforts in addition to just the increase in permits and platting. So that was one of the people that I requested. And like I said, I know Brady had a similar request. And to me, it doesn't matter to me which department. If the court were to approve somebody, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if that was mostly a dedicated Brady person if his need is greater. Any questions on that position?
Just a comment. I like that idea of taking that admin specialist. One is a two and one is a three, and the salaries are a little bit different, so we would have to figure that out. But I know when Kim was there, it really helped JA and Joy concentrate on their work and not have to get up and run to the window or deal with that. Kim did a lot of things. She did actual engineering work for you when you were going. It was maybe the Waring lawsuit or something. She had to go back to 1863 or something and go through all those records. She kind of did some stuff for the health department. I asked her to do very little, just, you know, occasionally. And Commissioner Carpenter maybe asked her to do some things. I think Brady could use some help and leverage his time rather than put another full-time person on inspecting, just get that assistance. So I like the idea of splitting those two.
Mm-hmm.
But just to be clear, she's more than answering the phone.
Yes. Yes. Kim's, I mean, and Kim's role, this was driven by those numbers and the added workload to the two front office individuals. But that's correct. I mean, she was doing research for us in pulling records of discovery in our lawsuit. She was doing redactions in PIR requests of information that couldn't be released and You know, she was putting together reports for us. I mean, she was not just answering phones. If you want, you know, if it's an admin one, it's going to be more towards answering the phone greeting, making copies. If it's an admin two, maybe there's some more things we can pull somebody in to do. And so it's just a question of what that position is. If it's somebody geared more towards Brady, then maybe, you know, maybe it's not called an admin two. Maybe it's whatever his needs were. Um, but, uh, if it stays with under the engineering office, I would probably put it as an administrative assistant too, and then load them up with all of the things that we can, you know, dealing with public information requests, um, doing the scheduling of 400 Blanco as a conference room for the entire building. working on like I said the septic reports and trying to get those available to the website or through next request as public information that's just readily available for anybody to access you know I think there's a number of things that we can keep that person occupied and busy that would help bring things forward they could be in charge of the website making updates and posting these to the website and hopefully that would take off from everybody else who is learning the website and then has left and has to, you know, each new person that's come in, I'm trying to get them up to speed on the website. And IT has been great helping us with edits to our website when we haven't had a trained person in. But I would probably put that up with the admin person as well. I haven't, I could bring back a more specific list of duties that I would propose if that person was in the department, but I didn't want to put too much work into that if that was something that was really going to be in Brady's department.
Well, would that work okay to have 20 hours in one department and 20 in another? How do you do that accounting-wise?
It could as far as how you pay them. I think the problem would come in as who's actually the boss, right?
I think it needs to be under Mary Ellen because all her employees are there. She's the bulk of that department. And that when you look at the phone calls and everything, everything's about engineering. So it makes sense that she's in charge of this admin staff and baby Brady and it benefit from the presence.
Okay. I think that's the cleanest in our discussions in the compensation committee. Um, we discussed this with both Mary Ellen and, and Brady. Um, And it made sense to the committee, which is why we recommended it, you know, under here, that it would be in the engineer's office. One, because if the court approves it, it would be under the engineer's office. And the reason, the driving reason is the location. That person sits in the engineer's office. And so it would make sense that whoever that supervisor is, that's that supervisor's physical space. but that person could do other duties, meaning, you know, uh, administrative duties for the entire office. There's just not a spot for like a PBX operator or a greeter in that building, the way the building was designed. And that's really probably what's needed when it's a multi, um, multi-use building, when there's more than one department in there, like we have here, we have somebody that sits in the circle as well as somebody that answers the telephone. Um, So the committee, that was the committee's more driving force. Like when Mary Ellen brought that, we're like, okay, well, the bulk of the calls are that, which means the bulk of the work is probably there. And in speaking with Brady, it was more of like, well, when I'm not in the office, we need somebody that can collect money and that can do this. And so I think there's a way if the court chooses to move forward with this position, that between the two department heads, they could work that part out.
Okay. Well, that makes sense to me. And I hesitate to Say because we need a new building, we bought a new building, we need a new PBX operator because that's just overhead that we do not need. So I really see the person as admin, and she also answers the phone. I mean, it's primarily the people coming in are primarily engineering.
I would say at least 60%.
I mean, it depends on the day, obviously, but yes. So I'd like to see somebody hired who's really good at being doing, could do a lot of things, even if that means an admin three. And I don't know what that looks like and what the job description looks like, but it would be under you and to help with all those things. And then I'd like to hear from Brady on what his needs are exactly. Maybe it's 30 hours for you and 10 for him. I don't know.
Brady and I have talked about it, but not in specific how we break it out because, you know, how do you plan it out completely when we don't know where the person would be or what the court's thoughts are on a position? I think he and I could sit down and put together a better plan given direction in this session for July on what that looks like. But he and I have talked about regardless of where that person ends up, our intention was to collaborate for that person to help benefit both departments. And if it was somebody that was really geared towards what he needed to do, they could at least answer phones and greet people on our end. But, you know, we didn't get down into do you need somebody 30 hours a week or do you need somebody 20 hours a week? So we could work on that and bring a plan back to court in July.
Okay. And then I think this has to play in with what your plan is that we have to talk about in executive because it concerns other employees. So I'm positive toward it. We just have to work out the details.
Okay.
Okay.
No, I think I'll wait for Brady. I was just going to explain what Brady was wanting.
I just don't think it's conducive to de-splitting, but you'll learn more. So is the consensus that this is a tentative yes for Corinna to start putting this in at this point?
For me, it is.
I'm a yes.
Chapman? Yes. Commissioner Carpenter? Leaning that way, I just want to know, like you said, 60% of the calls are engineering, where are the other 40%?
It's either IT, fire marshal, commissioner, and then in this list we had the HR, but that was a very few number. I think your 60s weighed low.
The IT's got to be in-house or accounting, right? Because you're going to have people from the outside.
No, no. It's internal people coming in to get their badges or whatever, but since it's the secure door, they have to They still have to help.
It's about 85% are engineering. We just looked at the numbers. It's very few for other departments. So tentatively put that in because there's majority.
I agree, but I wanted to ask one question. So you have the station already set up with a computer and can they buzz from that area or they have to physically get up and go open the door for the people? There is a buzz. There is a buzz? Yeah. Okay.
But one of the things that I've asked from our offices. We don't want people just wandering through the engineering 400 Blanco building unescorted because there's plans, there's checks, there's, you know, and so, you know, you can buzz them in, but you're going to stand up and greet them and then walk them down to your office or fire marshal or IT. Okay.
Okay.
Okay. You want to go through your other re-employee requests, please?
Yes. So we, I had submitted a request for permit coordinator. What I envision this individual being is somebody who is a lower level technical person that is between the front office intake and processing and the project manager level. So they could take some of the development permits off of Wesley and push him to be able to do some more of the higher level challenging or advanced technical work. And then, and help, you know, they could review, like I said, development permits. And I'm sorry, I got two copies of a draft job description. You guys want to share?
Carolyn, we have down that you requested two of those positions. Yes. Correct? Okay. Yes.
Make sure.
And Compensation Committee said no. Didn't recommend either one? Okay.
And I think I've probably told all of you at this point that we are basically at capacity of meeting the statutory deadlines for things, PLAT being the largest thing that has a statutory deadline. We are meeting statutory deadlines. But I would say barely. We're at the far end of our statutory deadlines, whereas previously we were a little more towards the middle on most of our projects of the 30-day shot clock. We have in the past been doing courtesy technical reviews. So if somebody was missing a couple of documents that didn't really impact the design, they're missing a signature page, they don't have their tax certificates, things like that, we would go ahead and give them courtesy comments, even though we weren't in the shot clock. and their application was incomplete so that they could keep moving forward. In order to continue that, we need assistance in the office. But if this isn't the year for, I know there's a lot of requests, if this isn't the year for a permit coordinator, I understand that. But level of service and turnaround time will decrease. We just simply don't have the manpower to keep up with the number of permits. and meet our statutory deadlines. So, it means things like development permits, instead of getting done in two weeks, maybe three weeks. If we get a complaint that somebody says, hey, I saw, you know, somebody is pouring a slab over here, and I don't know that they have a permit, okay, we'll check on it, but it's probably not going to be next week. Because at the end of the day, we can't miss our statutory deadlines, because if we miss those, plots are automatically approved. So, the reason I'm asking for it is, to maintain the level of service, but that's a decision for you guys to make if level of service can decrease in order to facilitate individuals in other departments.
I guess we'll start with Commissioner Chapman, you this time.
Without knowing what you want to do with your department, I'd kind of like to wait and And hear that discussion before saying yay or nay. Okay.
Same. I agree. That makes sense.
We can have it holistically. Okay. Corinna, would you move that?
I do have one question, too. Just talking about the administrative assistant, when we come back again and talk about it, can you kind of add in how that helps your workflow throughout the whole department and the timeline for permitting and things like that. And then also the prospective compliance help. I don't know if that plays into your department and how much that would change the workflow too.
Let me make a note here and then I'll make a comment to that. When submitting for a budget, I did submit for a code compliance individual, but as I worked through that process and had this permit coordinator and finding out that the health inspector had that code compliance certification to assist if we needed it, I advised the committee that I wouldn't ask for, I was withdrawing a request for a code compliance person. One of the job duties of the permit coordinator would be assisting with the notice violations and the documentation and the letters. And if we couldn't get the letters to be successful, that individual could then coordinate with the health department to try and find a resolution for compliance. And let's give that a test run. Obviously, we'd need to have some sort of policy and thing in place. But Instead of jumping straight into, hey, we need somebody to do this, if we have somebody that has a certification, let's give that a test run and let's see if that's sufficient. Because it may be that we clean some of these out and there's just one or two occasionally that need his assistance and we can handle the rest. Or maybe he, you know, let's see how that works out. And so I advise the compensation committee that I didn't want to request that individual this year. Mr. Chapman?
So I want to back up and say, As far as your request, I am for the receptionist position. It's the other one that I'd like to hold off on. Yeah, that's what it's just a permit. Yeah. Or what are these called?
Just my permit coordinator on second round.
And then. And maybe we could not call it receptionist because I don't think we have the luxury of having a receptionist.
There will be a lot of duties.
Like a beefed up admin person. Whatever the proper job description would be, I am for that.
But it would be administrative specialist two or three depending on the work.
Right. I would like to get with Brady after he meets with you guys and find out what we think can overlap to create the position, because depending on what goes into what he needs, that may make it a two, it may make it a three.
And then also, would it affect the temporary person that you have? I mean, would the job duties encompass any of what the temporary person is?
No. The temporary employee has solely been scanning documents. And Kim tried to help a little bit with that, but it was very hard because She needed to be in the front. Yeah, she needed to be in the front, so she would go to the back to scan things and then miss call. But we, just to give everybody an update, we got all of our old plat files have been scanned in and the cabinets have been cleared out. I think EMS has inherited two of them this week or last week. So we have space. So from any other new employee standpoint, I think we have space to put people besides the front. And I do have some furniture or inexpensive solutions to create workspace out of that area that the scanning was taking place.
Okay, great. Oh, there was one more thing. Oh, my permit. Just where are we with that? Yes. And tell us what that is.
So my permit is our software solution. I know yesterday when the health department was speaking, you guys talked about some sort of software, and I don't want to be in the middle of their business, but my permit can also help health department if that's conducive to their workflow, which would allow for one-stop permitting, but I don't know if it works well enough for what they need to do. But it is our permitting software tracking. Any permit that's applied for, an individual has their permit and all of their documents in that system. And we are working to make that open to the public so you don't have to email in your permits. You don't have to come drop off hard copies with the exception of some things for plats that you just can't get around, like the mylars. But it is... taken us a long time because of our workload. We basically are building from scratch the step-by-step process that has to occur that we've been doing on a day-to-day basis manually. But we have to build that workflow into MyPermit. And basically when we start working on it and we start making progress and the ball comes back in our court from the company MyPermit, they make some changes and say, all right, we need you to verify this or look at this or change it. And we haven't had a chance to get back to it. I mean, it's something that Clay and I are working on together to get the workflow set up and trying to get it up to speed. But every time we start to sit down to work on it, three plats come in and we're on a shot clock or something else has come up. So it's something that we need to make a priority. It's just been a challenge with the workload.
We have to figure out how to make a priority because in the end, it's going to save you time.
It will, yes.
And maybe with the plan that we're going to discuss in a couple weeks... We can figure out who would have a little bit more time to work on that.
Okay.
Has anyone made Stephen aware of this MyPermit program to see if he needs to explore it to see what option works better for him? I don't know, just to keep him in the loop.
We can try and set up a meeting with Mary Ellen and Stephen to come back around. to visit this code compliance issue that the court was requesting more information on. So at that time, we can talk about that. But I'm assuming that on my permit, you can go online, you can actually submit your application, you can even pay for it. But until somebody physically on your end goes in there and checks a box, It's not issued, correct?
Correct, right. It is automating the process. So it would allow you to sit at home and say, I need to apply for a driveway permit. And you could create your account. You would say, I need to apply for a driveway permit. You would enter your property information. You'd have to upload a couple of documents. But then once submitted, the front office would have to release the fee to you to pay. So you wouldn't just pay for it right there. So in case you didn't actually need a driveway permit, you haven't paid, then we would have to refund. So we would then release the fee to you to be paid. You would pay it and then it would be in our system. And then what we're working on is the automated process where I complete my task and I've checked it off and now it goes to you. Because right now we're building that and assigning those steps individually. as we go through the process. And so this would say, all right, it's your turn. Okay, you know, if we had the fire marshal's office on it, hey, fire, you need review of this platform, you know, the water storage tank. And so it would basically assign those pieces. And then it can also issue approval letters when we say, okay, we're ready to issue this permit. We can click the button and it'll spit out the permit so we're not printing it out at either signing it or adding an electronic signature. It just generates the permit when we say this is ready to be generated. So we still have full control over the timing and the review, but it's all automated in each step.
They're called process automation.
All right. If there's no more questions about engineering, can you address solid waste recycling and brush site? So we want to get done by noon so we can break for lunch.
Did you want to go over any of the other budget requests? Does anyone have personnel?
What were your big jumps and asks? We increased operating and then contract services is $250,000. It looks like it's currently $165,000, but there was some funds needed. So I did a budget adjustment and we removed part of that original $250,000. And so those are services that Mary Ellen uses outside engineering services for special projects and some grant, um, things. So I would suggest both of those would need to stay the same that they are. Yeah. Operating was a big jump.
Um, this fiscal year or this time last year, I reduced the operating, I'm sorry, the office supplies, um, from, I'm sorry, did you say operating? It's operating. You said operating. I'm sorry. Um, the jump in operating and this, this is up to you guys. Um, There are two tanks at the Parks Department that, not at Parks, I'm sorry, Joshua Springs Park, the one at YAC and then one at the pavilion. They need to be relined. We had a quote for tanks at Roden Bridge, and that's included in their budget as well, to reline the water storage tanks. It's about 9,000 per tank. I think it will end up being a little less at Parks because the Roden Bridge tanks are a little bit larger. But I figured that was good from a budgetary standpoint to say, you know, not having somebody come out and give us a specific quote for each and every different tank. This was at least a... What kind of tanks? The water storage tanks for the system.
From the well? Yes.
Okay. They're just starting to seep and leak and they just need to be relined.
Part of the county's public water system. Oh, well, you're going to have to do that.
So that's the jump. It may come in cheaper. But like I said, I used the quote from the road and bridge tanks, which are a little bit bigger. as the holding place to make sure there was enough in there. Because by the time we get around to doing this, you know, things cost more anyway. But that's the jump. Otherwise, if it wasn't for those two tanks operating, it would have stayed the same.
And contract services was your other big jump.
Yes. And it stayed the same. I've just already used some of the money. I had to move some of the money elsewhere in the department for budget adjustment.
So some of that for outside engineering, contract services? Yes. As for outside engineering, we've used it for grant application with the CDBG-MIT. If we need survey work, we take it out of there. I will say the review services, the outside engineering is largely review services. And although it doesn't get reimbursed to this line, most of that from plotting or commercial development does get reimbursed to the county. But it's just going into general fund is an ease we collect.
Your associated fees are in which lines? So that's all in revenue. So revenue has like a development fees line, a septic fees line. Do we know what that total is, if you added that up?
Because you're one of the departments where you are offset by fees.
Right, not completely.
I mean, there are things that, you know, so development permits, we have $170,000 anticipated These revenues are always going to be what you anticipate to bring in. Septic permits, 95,000. Subdivision permits, 70,000. Driveway access permits, 60,000. What page is that on? 60? It's on page three. It's just part of revenue, the revenue projections.
And what does that add up to? 170, 95, 70, and 60. 395,000.
And it has been a number of years since we've looked at our fee schedule. We've been looking at our fee schedule for possible revisions and clarifications. There's some things in the way that sometimes property develops, even as a commercial development that doesn't quite get captured because of the way the fee schedule is captured. So we're still paying for permits, but some of the outside review isn't getting reimbursed the way it's set up right now. I would like to bring back the fee schedule to you guys that we can either put in place for October 1st or January 1st. I just didn't quite, that's not quite ready yet, but I could bring that back in July if you'd like to look at that as part of the budget process and what impact that may have for revenue.
I think that'd be a good idea. I think Commissioner Carpenter probably really wants to look at that because I know you probably get more comments about the fee schedule. I mean, I've got two big developers and they're both lookout group for george's ranch and esperanza cordiera there's never been a complaint about fees but i'll bring that back and then we can have feedback and discussion on it and make revisions and then bring it for adoption at some point so if we could go to page 64 which is county solid waste um
The operating budget of this overall budget was reduced. So no real changes in the operating other than some reductions. The other capital outlay grants, that $140,000, that is offset by the revenue that would be coming in, and that is the grant that they went out for in this this year, but it is not to be funded until FY27. And that was the pre-crusher grant that the County was awarded for FY27.
Yes. And on the, that's good. From a ranking when the, um, grants were, uh, scored by ACOG, um, we were, we ranked well and they, um, agreed that this would be a grant that the County would be awarded. The next step is that it goes to TCEQ and TCEQ makes sure that, um, It meets all their criteria. And I haven't seen TCEQ turn one down yet, but we have not seen an award letter yet from TCEQ. I did check with ACOG, Regional Solid Waste Group, and it's just still in their report. This happened a couple of years ago that TCEQ was slow in getting the grant. What was the amount? I want to say it was 60 or 65, but there was an opportunity for a little bit more, but we won't know that until we see the award.
Operating went down. We have an associated revenue fee. Sorry. I think it maybe would be helpful sometime toward the end of the budget after we talk about all the expenditures, what that is offset by for revenue from our fees.
We will go through the revenue. The entire general revenue one.
And their fee schedule is also one I could bring back. I've talked with them about some of the bulkier items like mattresses were one of the cheapest places to bring your mattress. And so we get a lot of people from other communities and Bexar County because it's just so much cheaper to bring it here. We do need to be careful because as you raise fees for solid waste, you're more likely to get more illegal dumping, which we shockingly have very little of here, which is great. But I think there is room to maybe increase it a little bit, particularly for the big bulky items, but we just don't want to go too far. So I could bring that back for you guys to evaluate as well.
When's the last time we increased those fees?
It's been a really long time.
It's been a long time.
It's been a really long time.
That would be a good idea. Can we ask seven years, probably? Don't we ask for residency? At the brush site, we do. But not at Solid Waste. Not at Solid Waste. That's a good idea.
But if people show... A long time ago.
If people... We can. We just still have to worry about illegal dumping. So if somebody comes all the way here, finds out the policy change, they may dump it in our county, even though...
That's a risk.
Or you can charge a little bit more. That's an idea. A premium for them coming over here.
Yeah, and it can still be cheaper than Bexar County, but it could be a little bit more. So if a mattress is $15, then it's $20 or $25, whatever. Some number if you show up and you aren't a resident.
We're here to serve our residents.
Right.
Bexar County needs to stay in Bexar County. Can we Talk just for a second about the website and the hours. I tend to get a lot of calls about, I don't understand why they can't post their hours, and I went all the way out there. Which department are you talking about? Solid waste. Solid waste, okay. Aren't we on that? I'm sorry. We are, but I didn't know you were just.
Solid waste. I believe the hours are posted on the gate there. Are they kept up to date? They are, but the problem is if solid waste gets fooled,
They close the site. That's the problem. And people get really, really mad about that.
But if they're full, they're like, and the pre-crusher will help with this. So the compactors having been repaired or replaced now means we haven't had one down from time to time. So our capacity is higher because we don't just have a whole compactor down not doing anything. The pre-crusher should help because now instead of three mattresses filling an overtop bin, we can get a lot more in there with use of the pre-crusher. We can add another bin. We've talked about in the past, road and bridge, expanding the space. We'd have to move the fence out and extend the pavement and add another bin. We can look at doing that. I can talk with James about how many times he's closed since we've had the new compactors in. Because for a while, when the compactors were down all the time, back and forth, we had a lot of repair issues. When the new ones were installed, we had some electrical issues. There was the wrong motor. It was a little bit of a headache getting brand new compactors up and running. And so there were a lot of closures happening. um during that time frame which was probably several months that um so if it's quieted down now we may be okay if you're talking about ones that were maybe six months ago or more yeah um but if you're still hearing them then maybe we need to add capacity but historically what they've happened is they just get could you put that on the website that just note if we are full we will close yeah i can do some so some sort of directive there and you look at capacity with donnell if if it's just a matter of adding another dumpster it can't hurt to
Right?
What's a cubic yards on those containers?
We have a contract right now. I think. And so that would be something that, like Kendall County. So, yeah, I mean, I think you could. I think we could. But you went out for, you know, solicitation at one point for the number of things. But like she said, once that grant for the pre-crusher comes through, that should help a lot with that, at least at the solid waste location.
But if it was six months or more ago that you were having complaints, that was when they were down all the time. Like every other day, there was something. Now that you say that, yeah, that could be. Okay. That could be. One other thing, a number of years ago, there was apparently an unofficial solid waste Facebook page that was shut down when we found out about it because it was an unofficial site. Um, but that was used apparently to help notify people like, Hey, solid waste is going to be closed today. We're full. Um, I, I don't know if the County wants to put together a Facebook page for solid waste to be able to make those announcements. Should it happen? Or if there's some other way to, to get the word out other than just showing up and seeing the sign.
We'll have to talk to Jen Jen and then there'd have to be somebody in charge of it. And it would be only for that purpose.
Well, if it's, if it's on our website, the administrative specialists could, put some kind of banner across that it's closed and the date. Right. We can look at that.
You want to touch on recycling and brush?
Page 65 is the county brush site. There are no changes. Everything stayed the same. And on page 66, which is recycling, there are no changes. Actually, I decreased telephone $70 because you're not needed. And operating, it was decreased by $80 to a flat $2,300 based on trend.
Is the rental, sorry, on the, looking at the wrong one, on the brush site, that's in there, correct? And that went up last year and that should hold for a while. Should hold.
Yeah, the $4,800, we pay $2,000 a month right now. Okay. I mean, we pay $4,000 a month right now. We were paying $2,000.
Are we doing our food drive again? I ask because I know that sounds like out of the blue, but we're using the fairgrounds, and I think that was kind of a perk for paying them more rent. They said we could use the fairgrounds for the food drive.
No, it wasn't the... My recollection was that they were going to give us access to that area between that road and where the brush site office is now, which we really don't need.
We haven't talked to the food bank yet this year. Our last discussion, I think, as a committee was we were going to give them one more shot because we haven't really been happy with the product that we were being handed. So I think that if we did it again, this is going to kind of be our test year if they were going to continue that up.
Maybe can you just make a note? We'll get our committee together here and make a determination. Thank you. All right. So, Mary Ellen, that covers everything for you. Are you going to come back for road and bridge?
Okay. So, you're scheduled for 2 o'clock with that. IT is going to be at 1.30. GPs are at 1. So, Corinna, while we have another little bit of time here, you want to knock out a few more little.
Yes, please. If we could go to. Thank you. If we could go to. Thank you, Mary Ellen. I'm sorry. 43. We'll go to purchasing. That budget overall did decrease. Office supplies went down. Operating went down. I don't know if there's any discussion, but that one decreased. And if there's no discussion, we can go to Department 499 is on page 44. which is the tax office, and Mr. Hudson made no changes. However, the county appraisal district line item, that is a line item that when we get the appraisal district's budget and what they charge the taxing entities, that's when we'll know. But for budgetary purpose, I went ahead and increased that line 5%, so we would have something in there because their budget typically does increase, and we have to pay our portion. But I will adjust that figure, which is line item 10-499-54061. That will be the exact figure that they charge us. We should have that early August, I would think we'll have that. And so before you have a proposed budget, that line item will be corrected.
Have you seen any downside on our sales tax revenue? How much have you seen or have you...
So sales tax... Yes, this fiscal year, the sales tax, to me, it looks like it has gone down. Now, next year, I do have an increase in it because I think there'll be an uptick some. And so we are going to budget $7 million or we have proposed $7 million in sales tax. It will be interesting to see when Cheryl does the next report what that looks like. But the money that we collect that Kendall County receives in June is is sales tax that we all paid in the stores in April. You pay it in April, those companies have to send it to the state in May, then the state distributes it in June. So you're always two months behind from the date that the sales tax was actually collected by the vendors. That's when the consumers are buying stuff. Um, so there was a couple of months that it looked to me like it was, it was slightly down and I'm not sure really what that was because our, our sales tax really didn't even decrease during COVID. I mean, I mean, they, it just, it just didn't. We were, we were one of the very fortunate counties, but, um, I feel like it might be back up on the rise. So we'll, we'll see what that looks like. Um, but Mr. Hudson made no changes as far as his budget goes. Um, And then when we look at revenue later, that's something that I kind of I do a little stab at revenue. And then I actually keep projecting revenue till the end because I can only go off trend. And what I never want to do is is say, oh, we're going to collect all this and you only need a million in fund balance. And then come back and say, I undershot revenue by a million. You really have to have two million because then that's a harder decision for the court to make.
Department 551 is on page 54. That's Constable.
Are they coming in? They were not. They said they did not need to come in, but if there were any questions that you had had, they'd be glad to come in round two.
The one thing, they had a firearm upgrade request. They took care of that this budget year.
So I will say they don't think that they are going to get those this fiscal year. So if... case, then I would bring that to you and we would know that total because I don't think they can get them in.
What did they want exactly, Judge? They're being consistent with the sheriff's office. The sheriff's office historically carried SIGs, but there is a switch to the Glock. I think it's because of safety issue with the, like that Glock or that SIG has been notorious for guns just randomly going off. So as a department, they switched. And they just want to be consistent across the board with what the sheriff's office is doing. And so that's it. They were just purchasing replacement firearms. Because historically, they had been required to buy their own firearms. And so that should be a county purchase.
And all four constables actually had a decrease to their operating budget.
Is there any liability in the constable buying his own firearm versus the county's? Buying it and supplying it?
Throughout the state, there are many sheriff's offices and constables that purchase their own equipment.
That do that? Okay.
But we're Kendall County. We're not going to make them do that. I like that. Can you follow up just to see? Because I'd like to get it now if we can, but I know it's shipping issues.
They did not think. The last I got from Constable Serene, I believe, that they were not going to be able to. get them in this fiscal year. So I would have to know the exact amount. I would bring that back.
And did you use GT distributors?
We did. I don't know who they're using.
That's who I think they were going to try to use as well. So all right. So it's probably the issue.
So any questions on those? They all had a decrease. And then juvenile probation. So Jasmine was not going to be able to come in. She can't answer any questions if If you have, she actually left her county portion the same. This could be different. Her juvenile board will be presented her state budget probably in August when she receives it and they set, the juvenile board does set that salary based on the state. This is just the county's portion. Um, and so if she somehow the state decides to give juvenile probations more money than the county's portion could be lessened a little bit. Um, but somehow I, I doubt that. So she kept all of hers the same except for office supplies. She did decrease because, um, with Joanne leaving after 38 years, there was a Extra office supplies she needed, which you can see it was only $450. She reduced it to $200 based on what she thinks she'll need for the year. I increased their auditing line item by $1,000 because the state was so overwhelmed that I felt like she would have had an independent audit of her state funds. and that the county is required to pay for that. They gave them a waiver because they did not have the manpower to audit their juvenile probation department. So next year she will have one, so that's why that's in there. That's the only increase in there, and that was driven by what I believe that she will need.
We're okay with detention as far as I know that one year we cut her back on detention, and then we ended up having to find some money.
You did.
We built it in as a larger. After our talks, we did.
You did. So there's $150,000 that's in residential and then $100,000 in detention. And that's based on higher trends. Yeah, there's more than enough there.
The only thing, and I don't know if we have time to do this and maybe we put her in a meeting, I would just like to hear about the trends of her department because I know that Judge Naber talks about truancy.
increase and i'm just wondering if that's reflected over in juvenile it i can tell you we have a juvenile board meeting every single month with the county judge the two district judges myself because i'm their financial officer and then um the the juvenile chief and it is interesting to hear there but but if but if you want y'all have we have a juvenile board meeting in july and so after that i can if you want me to update but the trend is it's trending higher because
It's just the nature of the beast with the kids, but it's the value, how much it costs to find a home for them or a placement. That's the issue because there's only so many places in the state that does it, and the rates are outrageous. And so that's why it's gone up. Yes, we've had a few more kids involved, but it's just how much you pay for those placements is just, it's going to continue to rise.
I can ask her to come give a, that would be good. Y'all don't.
publish a report or anything each year? No.
Okay.
So 579's department, 579's adult probation on 62.
Adult probation, counties are only required to provide your, what we call adult probation. They are a CSCD, community supervision and corrections department. They are a state department, a state agency. Counties are required to provide your local CSCDA building and the associated cost of that. So we pay the utilities, the phone bill, and the contract services is the pest control. That's the only thing that we provide, and that's because it's our Kendall County building. But everything else is paid by the state. their salaries, their benefits, their office supplies. Counties are only required to house that state agency in our county. So that's what that charge is for.
Why did the property and liability insurance line go to zero?
Well, because that was for our building there, but I have now pushed that total over to the 409 budget.
Like what you just said about fuel, too. Okay. And then the pest control was cut in half? Wow, that's good.
We went out for a bid. That's awesome. So that is that one. And then so 580...
That's our 911 board.
I left that the same right now. Is that the one you were thinking might be 10%?
I would move that up to 900,000. We haven't had a meeting yet, but would you be able to call Steve, Chief Perez, and see if he can get us the numbers on that ASAP of what the proposal is? Because we haven't had a meeting in a while.
Can I mark that for round two?
Yes. Sheriff, do you know anything on
They usually contact me. I will send them a text right now. They have been considering going with the 40-40-20 cut as opposed to doing the business that we've been doing all these years, which I think would be beneficial for everybody.
Just let them know we're in budget. We're just trying to allocate.
I'll just bring that back to round two.
I'm thinking $900 at least.
Okay. Then if we could go to page 68, indigent health care. So there's a reduction here, and you'll see it's in conference and training. She hasn't spent any of the last two years. And that is because now the only conference and training that the two women that work in the indigent health care department, indigent health department, go to is the software training, and the company provides it for free. So they no longer have to pay. So there is a reduction. in in their budget and barbara does not anticipate that that increasing in any time so is that the other person you said to there's someone at the sheriff's office right now she works with who does she know bernadette works for barbara chrisman okay yeah so um and they actually work part-time for kendall county part-time for bernie housing but they are housed in our the house over there okay with with ron cortez and so then um fix a page oh you have to go all the way to page 154 for historical commission and and really we don't do anything with that that is not our money we are a fiduciary for historical commission it's their money and so i just budget their fund balance for them to spend if they need it that's where they buy signs and stuff so page 74 is your extension service and um Are they coming? They are not. They said they did not need to come unless you had specific questions.
They went up $600 is all they did.
No, actually they reduced the increase is actually just in longevity. So they reduced their fuel just a little bit and everything else they kept the same. But if you have questions, Stephen said they'd be glad to come.
Can you talk about 670? So 670 is my...
Page 75, conservation. So conservation is where we pay the trappers, and it's the allocation that the county has to the Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District. So those have historically remained the same, $76,800 and the $2,300. But I have not received anything from either organization to see if there would be an increase. So that's why those are the same.
They stay the same. Work out a schedule now.
So if anything were to change, then obviously I would bring that. So really quick, since we have five minutes, can I just go over what we will be talking about in round two?
Yes, please.
So in round two, the departments that we did not see are going to be elections. We're going to see emergency management departments. which means fire marshal, as well as some outside entities, which would be the fire departments and any of the allocations that y'all would like to do. And probably not the first day, because the first day I anticipate we will be talking with Jason again about the buildings that we discussed today. We will be talking about the cop time report. that we discussed, as well as bringing back anyone that you have seen today or yesterday, which would be the position for the law library from the district clerks and that allocation, the employees that you wanted to come back to round two, which may not even be the first day. Y'all may need more information before you are ready to make those decisions. But there are several things that we would need.
And so we have three days, July 13th, 15th, and 16th. Two of them are full days. One's a half day. So during those, the goal is to make some serious decisions on to these matters because at the end of the month, we have a couple three-hour blocks set aside for fine-tuning. So the next round is where we're going to make the big decisions.
You'll finish going through the budgets that we haven't gone through as well as bringing back the round two.
And so with that, it is 1156. We'll pick this back up at 1 a.m. after a lunch break. 1 p.m. What did I say? 1 a.m. I'm looking forward to it.
Yeah, 1 p.m.
Oh, I thought 39.
105 p.m. on this Thursday, June 25th, and we're resuming our budget workshops with our GPs. So I'm going to turn it over to Corinna because I know that we all met and she kind of knows what you're doing. what your budgets look like.
So the first thing on the compensation committee document that Juanita passed out to the commissioner's board, there is an additional one JP clerk. And adding one JP clerk, and the committee did meet with all four of the JPs at the same time, and adding one JP, one additional staff member, that gives each JP two full-time clerks. Because right now we have two people who are going from roving clerk. Is that what they're called? Roving clerk. And one of them is divided by three JPs right now. Okay. And adding one new personnel, then all four of your JP offices have two full-time clerks.
We tried to give them, supplement them with some part-time funds to have part-timers help. It just doesn't achieve the purpose. So the recommendation of the committee was to fill out their staffs with two people each. And so that's the big ask from the JPs. Their budgets have stayed flat. Judge Hudson needs a few new chairs, which A little extra for her drew and mismatched falling apart. So four different kinds of chairs. Yeah. So other than that, everything is States consistent for their offices. So if you have any questions for why this, they need the sports staff, uh, They're here to answer any questions, but I support it. The committee supported it. I guess we'll start with you.
I wholeheartedly support it. What did you say? Wholeheartedly support it.
Mr. Regent? I'm good. Mr. Chapman? Good. Mr. Carpenter? All right, add it. Okay, let me mark that. Does anyone have any questions for them so we can let them get back to work?
Their budgets start on page 32, and they are consecutive, JP1, 2, 3, 4. Anybody has any questions? I did reduce Judge Pressler. She and I spoke about it. We had done a pretty large increase last year, unfortunately, in the autopsy line just because that was needed. Part of that due to just incidents last year. And so we did reduce that by 15,000. And so you would see that decrease. in there. Other than that, the only real increase we had was a little bit of training in one, and then the courtroom chairs added to operating for Judge Hudson's office.
Oh, and there was one other potential change is Judge Hunter wants to give up his car allowance and get one of the enemy down vehicles because of How many miles he's been putting on his own personal vehicle. And so as long as we have a fleet or a vehicle, kind of like what Judge Van Stavern did, as long as we can find one that is usable, I have no problem with it. But again, that's, I'll open that up for discussion. Yes, flying to Van.
What vehicle did we talk about yesterday? Health Department's little vehicle?
Yeah, that was a cool vehicle for everybody. But I think he's looking for more of one of the Tahos because of where he could be going. Asking for four wheels is probably too much. I don't think we have that many at four wheels. It was the only four wheel in one instance after the flood that could get into the field. I guess it's pretty clear. Yeah.
Judge, the only thing that we would do is one of the things that the compensation committee talked to the JPs about is that if the court granted the position, then the temporary money would come out because the court allocated temporary funds in each of them. because of when their one singular clerk is going on vacation or sick and they don't have the roving clerk. So there would be $3,600 removed from Department 455, $3,000 removed from Department 456, and $3,000 removed from 457. Department 457. There was none in JP4, Department 458, because she did already have two full-time clerks. So was that added up to those three amounts? $10,200. So that kind of offsets the salary then? So it's a little bit, because that would be coming out of the budget. We left it in, because I wasn't going to mess with anything in salaries until I knew what you wanted to do, but those three would come out.
Could you come to the mic, please? Just because we have some people on Zoom.
On that temporary fund, I feel like we should leave it in there because we have a clerk presently who's going to be on maternity leave that me and Judge Hudson share. So me and Judge Hudson will still need to have that available for somebody to come in and fill in August and September before our new budget starts. And I've already pretty much used all of my $3,600. I don't know. I can't speak for Judge Hudson, but I feel like she's going to.
But that's in this budget year. That's what I was going to say. The $3,600 I'm talking about removing is in the budget for next year, October. Okay. So right now you have used $1,944 as of when I printed this. Okay. I don't even know what today is. Tuesday. You've spent $1,944 of the $36,000. So you still do have money currently in this year. But if you needed it for this year, we would do a budget adjustment to the current year for anything that happens in August and September.
Okay. I think we'll still need some of that in October. I mean, I don't know how long somebody's out for maternity leave because I hadn't done that.
She's talking three months. She's talking one month in the next fiscal year. So I don't need it. I mean... We're in my office.
How do you want to handle it?
Well, it's really y'all's call if you want me to budget enough to cover like a month for that. Okay.
But we're already going to be into I don't know when she do, but we're already going to be partially at least into this year, still this year's budget, and next year's budget, we're budgeting for an extra person. So I don't see doing both.
So typically, if somebody has staff that's out, there's not temporary money to cover the shortage. You make up what Judge... Ben Staborn is asking is to not have some funds to have someone come in.
Available if needed. So that way it's not a deficit or we're looking somewhere else for it.
We don't do that in any of the departments.
No, you don't budget ahead. You do not budget normally for that. It's absorbed. In order to hire a temporary, somebody would have to come to the commissioner's court and ask for money for temporary ahead of time if there was going to be a prolonged absence because we typically don't have temporary. They had temporary in the current year because they were sharing clerks. They were sharing clerks.
We had temporary because we were catching up on... These years prior to me taking over, we're just cleaning up a bunch of stuff. And that's what I'm currently using our temporary person for. She's not answering the phone, sir. Doing anything with customer service. She's there to scan in files and review files so we can get the ones ready for destruction. piled over there so we know where we're going with those. That's the only, I think, bad or special thing about my court compared to their courts because they've had pretty consistent employees in their departments for the past 20, 30 years. So those were... They were handling their destruction files and scanning as they go, and it wasn't like just sitting there waiting. So that's what my temporary clerk is doing now. So I was just asking, in the event we just have our one clerk for a month or so, I would like to have that still available so that person could help with that. Answering a phone or answering a question when people come in to make payments.
You know how much work you have left to do to get all that scanning done?
We have three more boxes in the civil pile and about 20 more boxes in the vice versa. Three more boxes in the criminal and about 20 more boxes with civil.
And about how many boxes do they do? per week or per month? Have you projected how long it'll take you?
Not really, because we just have somebody comes in once a week. So, you know, like eight hours a week. So we haven't used our whole $3,600, and I wouldn't expect that we would need another $3,600 come October. But I would like to keep something in there, like even if it's $1,600, just in case. Because that girl's become pretty familiar with the way our office works, and she is able to tell people. You know, I came in from the jail today and there was like four or five people stacked up to make payments.
But even when you have your two full-time clerks, then you're not going to be able to handle it?
No, I think we'll be able to handle it, but I won't have two full-time clerks. When is she due back, though? Well, she's expected to be gone August, September, October.
So just give one month.
How about that?
What's one month? Is that $3,600 divided by 12?
I mean, if you're going off that, that's $300. And if it's one time a week for eight hours, is that what you're doing, a temporary person?
Did you put $500 there? $500 there then.
So during that absence, you guys will continue to just share the rover until October when someone else?
Yeah, but she is our rover, so we won't have anybody. I mean, we'll have Brandy. We'll still have Brandy like once a month.
We'll be working with only one rover once per month for the months of August and September.
It'll be Brandy.
Okay.
where are we at according to what you think or is it the consensus to put 500 in there or to i'm good with that i'm good anyone object okay okay i want to talk about space needs but you go ahead no i'm just making sure judge hudson you were you were no we're fine without it okay we can do okay for a month thank you okay i'm good judge thank you and i guess uh
Mr. McEwigen has one last question before we release.
Judge Hudson, would you come up? I guess you had heard that we're moving elections. Oh, just to the microphone. Sorry. Okay. We're moving elections sometime next year to the Burdick Center, and then that's going to free up space in your building. I know everybody's going to be eyeballing that space, wanting to expand, but we still do need a place for indigent health, And veteran services, because the building that they're in is going to have to come down.
Yes, I believe Commissioner Chapman had mentioned it once before that that building is in poor condition and it would cost far too much money to try to fix it up. And what did I think about having Barb Chrisman and Ron Cortez in our building? And I work really well with them. And in fact, with Ron, I've been working with him when we have veterans who pass away. We work very closely together on that. So, no, it would be great. We'd welcome them. Thank you.
Okay. That's it. Thank you.
Appreciate you all coming in. That's all we got. What are we going to do? Can we do road and bridge or IT?
IT. And then road and bridge is coming in at 2 o'clock, their normal time.
Melissa, can you call Bob Lippo? Because he was going to represent Nicole's office for any IT questions.
We are going to be going to page 24. Hi, Brian. Hello. Department IT, which is 10.415 in our budget. Okay. This budget, there is an increase of $352,743. And the bulk of that is going to be in the other capital outlay line.
Oh, Nicole's here.
I don't know if you want to talk about the budget part first or the employees first.
Let's talk the budget part first and then go to employees.
So there's two increases. One is in software maintenance from $59,000 to $167,000. And the second is other capital outlay from $0 to $317,865. And so Brian can explain what those two items are. Everything else is stayed the same.
So does everybody have a copy of this?
No, you would have to get, I don't even know what that is.
This is my five-year capital infrastructure plan. So, so we can kind of move away from this and get down to the nitty gritty on these numbers.
They do not have a copy of either one. Do we need to make copies?
Can you sit here with me and share mine? Sure.
Yeah, we can share and make a copy. We'll share.
Actually, if I can just have a copy when you're done, Brian, that's all I would need. Thank you.
Okay, thank you.
So this was we went back over our inventory for the large infrastructure items that we need to hit in the next five years. So this you pretty much scratch this capital outlay sheet and then go with this. And so we're looking at kind of the switch infrastructure on H2. Look at the second page. It's the top. It's the first year, FY27. Those are the end-of-life switches that we need to get this next year. And the $170,000, and I don't know if you had a copy of one of our... No? Okay. We're not going with this vendor for that amount because I was able to... Cut that less than half.
On which item?
So we have it all in one as $317,865 because it goes into one line item. So does that line item actually just need to be $244,000? Yes. Okay. $244,000. Which item? Which line? So 10-415-55900, other capital outlay. Closer to the bottom of the front page. There should be $244,000. $244,000.
Instead of $317,000?
Which is a decrease of $73,865. Because you got a better price?
Yes. Yes, we got better pricing and a better way to build this out. I could come during a closed session and kind of show you all the plan. That way we're secure. But this sheet is going to be kind of going forward. So you'll always see five years ahead. So next year, we'll add on the next year on there because these numbers are going to change. But the switch pricing is going to be different. But you'll see infrastructure-wise what we have to change out. especially at the sheriff's office to maintain our CJIS compliance, the infrastructure level. So we are running lean and mean and trying to run leaner and meaner on our end. Okay.
Thank you, Brian, for that.
You're welcome. Any questions?
I think the other thing or the employee request.
I do have one question. Go ahead. Did you put anything in for the Blanco building to get that conference room up to Zoom?
We are waiting for the TIPS contract number so we can actually do it now on this budget. We have, okay. Yes. So that's just a wait. That's weeks away, I think so.
You want to tell the court what that is?
So it'll have to. So you're just a AV upgrade to the conference room to enable teams and zoom for meetings right now. It's kind of haphazard. He set up a computer and then we all try to get around it. I think Commissioner Chapman and Commissioner region and myself, we all experienced the the mayhem in the trying to have a conference call in that little bitty conference room. So I think the quote is right at or under $3,500 to upgrade that room in $400.
Probably the biggest user is engineering. Commissioner Chapman and I have used it several times for the architect for Burdick Center. I sit on development calls with engineering, so I'm not sure who else. Fire Marshal doesn't use it that much.
You'd have to ask Brady, but I think they've used it several times. They've used it more than we have.
And is it safe to say we could, as the calendar allows, have other departments book it if they needed to do a big conference call?
Yeah, so that conference room has its own calendar, and so you would just call whoever at the engineer's office and they could book that conference room for you.
Because you can get about eight people in the room and then you can, it's got the big monitor and then if you get the proper mic and camera, everybody can see.
So we're adding the wide angle lens so you can actually get me into the picture. Okay.
No offense.
That was the main thing.
As long as we keep that door closed, we get the whole room.
Yeah.
So on the – is that all the questions you had? So on IT, I know you and I have talked before in the past, and we were trying to develop a path as so as not to invest so much in cloud storage. Where are we with that in this?
So we'll – We are that's part of that is the backup for that so we are I Got to choose my words carefully so we're not in the security zone, but Kindle the Kindle County cloud is alive and kicking so So what we have is County important County data in the county cloud which is on-premises and And then SaaS, software as a service that everybody else uses their apps or tech share, that kind of thing. RMS CAD is fixing to go from on-prem at one spot into the cloud in an upgrade. I almost gave myself away there.
Without getting into anything that we're doing, can you explain the reasons why that this the amount that the cloud is costing and going up every year, not only the cloud storage, but then we have access to the cloud that we have to pay for.
Is that correct? Right. So as their price, the cost of those data centers are going up, the cost of the software is going up with it as well. And so you can, relieve some of that tension is what we're doing is a hybrid model where we house our own data and the cost of ownership is way cheaper than having to put that piece up in the cloud where you're basically renting the server. And with, and with the CJ side, you have to make sure that there are, following all of the CEGIS rules, if they're not, the responsibility still falls on the county. So you could actually be penalized if you're not making sure that your vendor is CEGIS compliant. And I'm talking about the law enforcement side of the house.
But we are still moving in that direction. Yes.
I would say we're... 80% in-house, 20% everything else SaaS. So the next phase is to shore up the backups for that.
Did you say you were going to have something in executive coming up to explain some of the security part of this a little in depth?
I have a presentation. You can go over that and answer more questions.
Bottom line, though, these are needs, not wants when it comes to the equipment. These are needs. If that's the question, then it needs to go into the budget.
I've changed that $317,000 down to $244,000 based on his information that he just passed out, Judge.
That can be a luxury at a time to update the court just on what's going on. You don't have to worry about your... budgetary numbers. The main concern for the rest of your time here is your employee and promotion requests.
There are three requests, and I can just read them. One is to add, it's going to be twofold. One specifically for IT was to add a PC technician. One was to add a cybersecurity analyst position. And one is to promote the current systems administrator to an IT infrastructure administrator from a grade 15 to a grade 19. So that is what's listed on your document from the compensation committee. And then there is another position that we need to speak about that the compensation committee did meet about, and that is funding. when you were talking to the sheriff yesterday, the IT specialist too, and that's the, that's a discussion for the, an IT specialist for the sheriff's office specifically. So I think that discussion was going to happen during this as well, since they would both be in here.
Okay. Let's start with the promotion.
So, so when we had that, conversation committee, salary committee meeting. I was kind of overwhelmed with, I thought you guys had all of my documentation. So when we had that meeting, we found out that you didn't. So we had to print that out. So this is a long, I don't know if you have this copy now. Okay.
So we can't pass out anything to them. that you gave to the Compensation Committee at the time, because we have two members of Commissioner's Court in that meeting, so.
Okay, well, I think on this part, in the great words of Kenny Rogers, know when to hold them, know when to fold them, and I want to rescind this and then concentrate on the IT specialist position for the Sheriff's Office.
So you're withdrawing the request then?
For the promotion? Is that what you're...
I didn't think I... I thought you said I couldn't do that. It had to be a reclassification of the position.
No, no.
You can ask the court for... You can ask whatever you want, but we told you what, based on our policies, procedures, what the likely result would be, but you're welcome to ask You can have us, you can ask whatever you want.
So I guess, can I ask if what is the salary committee's on this? It was a no.
Soft no? No. The request was to move James up from a 15 to a 19 and give him a new title. And the salary committee said no.
And why did you want to do that?
So the That position, systems admin, is pretty basic in its title and in its position. And so when I'm trying to reclassify it, infrastructure administrator, it covers that whole gamut. He's kind of a hybrid of systems and network. And so I also wanted to give him a little bit of seniority, a path forward, a path upward. So that's it. That's not that was my main one.
That was his that was his explanation, but then when we dug further. The salary committee felt like this was for the person and not the position and we would that's always our philosophy is it's more about it's going to be his positions got to justify and so that's why we were against that. Would you like to talk about your the other positions that you'd like to create.
I felt like having a cybersecurity analyst would, that would also be a hybrid. I'm just kind of going by what, when I was doing my research and I felt like the city of Bernie is a really good footprint for kind of mirroring their IT. And so I, So they've, they've added a security analyst and actually they hired from within and then replaced that person. I think with a, uh, specialist to move the specialist to, to cybersecurity analysts and they're developing it from there. Uh, what I wanted was someone that could also blend in and the network and the system side, but also we needed somebody to pivot as soon as there was a sign of trouble. So, example, this morning that was me. I saw an alert and I'm hunting down a person to get an answer. So it would help us to have that kind of person ready to go. Helping James and Taylor and Justin in that realm. So they've got to have that skill level, which is rare for the cybersecurity analyst position in itself. And that's why I was looking for a
Hybrid some of that has that all of those skills ready to go And is this the one you were describing as the unicorn position that it's going to be hard to fill and so it's a rarity And so the salary committee felt that that was not the best use of a position To find such a highly specialized position that we may not even fill And which your final request and that what was just we have a
Specialist one position. It's just not active. It's on the chart.
There's not a position. There's just a job title on the chart. There's not an open position. You're requesting to add a position, add another person, a PC tech.
And that one, that came from... Conversing with the sheriff and and he had requested to have someone on site and I said I couldn't really Do that, but we could have more of a presence if we had more people They are high priority Law enforcement EMS all over, you know, first responders are our highest priority nights and weekends as well So
How are you tracking when it comes to call volume tickets? How are you tracking it? Because we're focusing on Sheriff's Office right now. How many tickets do you get or calls do you get from the Sheriff's Office as opposed to the rest of the county?
So we have a ticketing system, and we could probably pull up a pie chart and show it to you guys, but I think 20% or more of our calls are for the Sheriff's Office. 20%? About 20%. And then how quickly are those resolved? Pretty quickly. Within a few hours, I think. I don't know if Sheriff's got any complaints. I haven't heard of any complaints. I'm always asking so I can try to gauge our response time. And that's kind of, oh, I've developed support in this. In the IT world, it's not just by workload, but response time. Because response, a late response with somebody with a computer down, that's costing somebody. Somebody sitting there waiting for a computer or waiting for the Internet or the infrastructure is down or whatever.
And does that person have to physically go? Are there times they have to go to the sheriff's office to alleviate the?
A lot of times it could be fixed remotely. I could think of at least a day or two this past week that Taylor and one of the maintenance guys were there for a day, a day and a half with Sergeant Baker moving access points around. So there's mixed.
I've had Taylor call me coming back from the sheriff's office. So I was just wondering if that's a pretty common.
And then I just had some notes from our conversation that really these are more wants than needs because it said when you were asked why you need these positions, it's not that we're overwhelmed. You've gotten no complaints received from your clients. It's more of just a concern. So you're just trying to get ahead of it. And so I just had some notes that Ideally, you're able to maintain everything you're doing at a good pace right now. You're just thinking long-term. So it sounds like these are positions that could wait another year technically based on the conversation, the number of call volumes, and the quick response times that you're currently doing, correct?
Yeah, and you and I have talked, and I told you straight out that if you just told me, hey, Brian, can you run even leaner and meaner, you know, yeah, I can hold out for a year. Yeah. I'll open it up. Commissioner Lesion.
I like the fact that you've done the five-year plan on the capital outlay. I think that's really good, so I commend you on that. And to me, they sound more like wants than needs. And maybe you could do kind of a, I don't know, maybe a two- or three-year plan on your personnel. And I'd like to better understand what each of your employees does, how many people they support, what kind of cross-training and skills they have, and can they do several things. Given that, do you really need a specialist, and at what point? And then if you could hold out for another year and then concentrate on getting something kind of set up. I feel like it's piecemeal and not just an overall plan. Like I said, you've done a good job on the capital part, but if we could look at it in terms of employees. And we've got so many other requests for employees that I'd prefer to not fund this this year. Before I turn to you, sir, Kerna?
So I just want to make sure we go back to the position, the IT Specialist 2 position that we talked to the sheriff about as well, because that was not the PC tech. That was not the... the infrastructure administrator position, and that was not the cybersecurity analyst. The IT specialist too was a result of the, the video cameras and the other things that are under the control of the sheriff. That was, that was like, he didn't necessarily recommend it. The sheriff didn't necessarily recommend it. It was like a discussion point that we had based on, um, the commissioner's court authorizing only the sheriff's office to have access to that. So in the committee meetings, we felt like with that, there needed to be an IT specialist and it came up as an IT specialist too in some of our discussions. So it's not one that they, either one specifically requested, but we felt like as a result of the actions, you know, of that rule that now there really did need to be somebody at the sheriff's office that was an it specialist too and the committee in talking to both of them recommended i'm going to tell you i recommended two people in the committee i just i just did because of of the phones and the laptops and the radios and the cameras i was like i don't know how one person can do it but ultimately the committee the majority said let's recommend one And so that position deals with the law enforcement and I think the CDA and all this. So I don't know if y'all still want to speak about that, but that's another position.
Well, I was taking that into consideration. So my decision still stands. I'd like to see no other people added to IT.
Mr. Cabin? I agree with Commissioner Weijan. Thank you.
Mr. Carpenter? It's not a hard no.
There's three, majority, no additional.
But did we talk about the fact that that's under the sheriff's office yet?
No, it was not a request of IT and IT. It was for the sheriff's office.
They're just going to have to work out a system to make this work. Yes, sir. Oh, yes. Yes, would you share a guess? the whole CJIS thing. And it's going to be, I think we're going to have to find a way to work with the current staff to grant limited access to do this. Just because there's, after looking at this, there's been so many employer requests that.
Okay.
I just want to make sure we leave that part out. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. First of all, let me just say that Brian takes care of us. And when we he prioritizes our services. And so we have no complaints or issues with what he does for our office. I'm going to apologize to you because I'm going to fix in the muddy the waters for you. So the court has made a decision in an order. Under the recommended recommendation of Bob Ogle.
You had a lawyer.
Am I going back in time? You are. Wow. Where'd that come from? So Mr. Lippo has advised the court to separate our security surveillance system outside of anybody else other than law enforcement. And that's where this is kind of starting from. So that being said, this is new to me. When I heard that, I said, okay, we have control of it anyway. But I guess he quoted some statutes and some Homeland Security requirements that mandates that only law enforcement have access to security surveillance camera system. So this brought up the conversation of having an IT person. I think Brian will let you know that I've been asking for this for several years. We have an office specifically designed. The building was built to have an IT person there at the Sheraton. Going back to the tickets, I'm going to tell you that those calls are very inaccurate. They're accurate in the ones that are documented by the ones that are called in to the IT department. But I can tell you there are many, many hours spent by my staff dealing with IT issues that we don't bother IT with, that we don't feel should be our responsibility. I could have Roger Baker here to tell you a typical day of the things that he does. when it comes to softwares, hardware, in this technical world that we live in today. We spend, he spends, along with others that he recruits, but he spends countless hours working on issues in the office. What I don't think that the court realizes is that the amount of technology that we use in my office. I don't have all the numbers, the complete numbers. Every car has got a computer in it. Every car has a camera system in it. That's a very complex system in itself that routinely Roger Baker is dealing with issues. to try to fix. That's not his job. It's not in his job description to be an IT person. Body cameras, cell phones that are now ticket writers, the ticket printers, the iPads, the desktops that we have in our office. It is a very long list of technology that we use in my office. And I haven't even gone to the jail yet. I haven't even touched base with the jail. So what's the answer? Based on Mr. Lippo's recommendation, he suggests, or I guess it's been suggested, whether he suggested or not, that I have segregated IT person that works directly under the sheriff for the sheriff to take care of all these issues when it comes to the security side of things. It's not only just the cameras, the surveillance cameras, it's the body cameras. It's the video cameras in the car. It's all the access that they have to reports in the office. Everything that we have access to, they have access to. Emails. Everything that we do that we have to comply with under the restrictions of CJIS, they now have to comply with as well and have to be certified as such. I'm not an IT person. I know nothing about this world. I don't even know what a switch is. I know they're expensive. But I can tell you that what he does for my office based on documented calls is nothing compared to what we do every day at my office. Now, I'm not saying that he can't take care of all that. All I'm saying is I don't know what the legal or best practices whatever the mandate should be in keeping what we have in our office secured by all measures to make sure nobody else has access to it except the sheriff's office. So in our conversation with the salary committee, it was recommended that I have a IT person that works for me in my office, stationed at my office, having access to them every day to ourselves. I don't know if that's a good idea or a bad idea. But I can tell you having one person specifically for me, under me, only for me, is a bad idea.
Can I say something? Sure. I feel like we need to have an executive session discussion where we can talk about the overall security again. I don't know. I think we shot from the hip. A few weeks ago, we made a quick decision on taking cameras down all over and not having any surveillance. But I think you might be right. But I think we might need to have. And I think our compensation committee is overstepping. Y'all are having conversations about decision making. about positions and creating positions and splitting positions that we haven't even had a conversation about. And I don't think that's right. That's borderline gossip about employees with other employees that aren't elected to make those decisions. But I think we should have another executive session item where we can talk. But I think it's a very highly sensitive topic.
I don't think there's anything that's going to be discussed that is sensitive. It's just the fact that what we deal with every day is sensitive.
But we're taking all of our cameras throughout the entire county and placing them under your department. And I think you might be right. You might need someone specific. Then we've got to have lots of trust in that person.
If I may.
I think the reason for that security is Nicole, could you come up?
There's two levels, Nicole. The courthouse cameras are controlled now by outside of our IT department, which brings up his concern that he doesn't have someone specifically that's...
I think the camera thing came up because security is the responsibility of the sheriff, right? I think for purposes of an IT person, and I think what they're talking about is somebody who liaisons with IT. So they work with IT. They work as an IT person with IT, but they're the only one that has direct access to the criminal justice stuff. We have to be able to know when somebody accesses our information, how they've accessed it. There's got to be a log. So if somebody's remoted in to one of the computers that we have, because my My understanding is IT can just do that whenever they want. If I'm correct or not, they'll have that capability. So they don't have to get our permission to access the computer, which I completely understand when they're trying to update stuff. But we need to know when that's occurred, what time that's occurred, that kind of thing, because we have to be responsible for especially the CJIS data. If somebody can access our computers and get into our stuff, we have to have a log to be able to go back and look at it to keep it secure. Um, we have these CJIS audits, um, that they help us with. Um, I think, um, there is a lot of it stuff that the sheriff's office has as well as mine. And when I, he talked about this, he just kind of brought it up and I was like, can I piggyback on that with you? Um, Because there is so many things that we do IT things for. That being said, the big thing is just to make sure it's all secure and that certain things only law enforcement or people under law enforcement have access to. And not that we have this issue with Brian. The issue is if something were to happen and we do not supervise the person taking care of our IT stuff, later on that could create a problem. So this would be something that's a fix for the future where we have an IT person that liaisons with our IT department and pretty much does that job that they're doing. It's just they kind of have a funnel for the access to the information. Does that make sense? Am I saying the right thing, Sheriff? Am I explaining it right? Yeah.
Did we say also that that person had to be CJIS compliant?
Anybody who has any access to our computers, everyone at IT has to be CJIS compliant. Okay. Everyone has to. So when you say our computers, you're talking about DA's office and the sheriff's office? Correct, because we all have CJIS data on them. The way we do tech share, all of that has to be CJIS compliant. We do certain things with criminal histories have to be secured before they are sent even on a CJIS compliant platform like we have in tech share. That's on a cloud that's CJIS compliant, all of that. has to be specifically done for that. And Brian's been wonderful about making sure and helping us when we had that audit from DPS. But yes, I think this was something thinking about in the future as we're growing, we really have to have somebody that's under the law enforcement umbrella that law enforcement supervises dealing with criminal records because they are highly confidential.
How does that person interface with IT then, just the regular IT department?
I would think they would interface quite a bit. I think they would work with IT, but they would be the only one that had direct access to our stuff. So if anybody from IT needed to get into it, it would have to go through that person, and they would know what they're accessing and how they're accessing it.
Can we not have somebody in existing IT be assigned to that so that that person could also cover IT stuff? Brian, did you have something to say? That's us.
We are the gatekeepers. We have the logs. We are the keeper of the logs.
You come up because we've got people on Zoom that can't hear.
That's why in the state of Texas, all your county IT is CEGIS certified. Now we have to certify every year.
Each one of your employees?
Yes. We don't have access to the actual information. We try to refrain from that, especially digital evidence. We don't want to be anywhere near that. Here's digital evidence. It's zipped up. We can't see it. We just put it from here to there and we're done. You can't crack that open unless you have certain level of access, their logins, we don't have a login for to access that we can only move it from here to here. That's kind of the basic of it. But we are the see just gatekeepers of all the data, the logs. Now we have recon as our backup. And there, there are 24 seven overwatch on those logs, and they keep those logs for a year. And that's what CEGIS is looking for. The CEGIS auditors from DPS, they're looking for that, those kind of things. The audit, the technical audit that we just went through is like nothing I've ever seen in supporting law enforcement for 15 years. And I think Nicole's next, and then adult probation, they're next too. But it's the same logs for us. We're the gatekeepers. So I get... I get where he's coming from, where they're coming from, but there's not really a siloed IT department in any of the Texas counties. The closest one is Harris County that has a dedicated IT group to the sheriff's office, but they still answer to the IT CTO.
I think there's an answer, but it's going to take another body. much as you don't like that, my opinion. It's going to take another body. I need relief in my office because we have just naturally progressed by adding all the things that we've added over the years and taking care of our own business that we don't need to be taken care of. We're spending time on electronics and phones and ticket riders and camera systems and whatever else. That's not what we're supposed to be doing. And I think you can keep somebody dedicated at my office and keep them pretty busy almost every day. And if it's, you know, I mean, if it's under Brian, I don't have a problem with the way things have been going. I did call Mike over at the director over at Bernie and said, hey, what do y'all do over there? And I told him, I said, this is what they're thinking over here is what I was told. And he said, that's the way you need to go. Now maybe that's the first step is get somebody over there and then maybe two, three, four years down the road there's dedicated guys and that's all they do is stay over there all day. One person dedicated to my office under me is not a good idea. I'm telling you that. That person goes on vacation. That person gets sick. They leave. Whatever. Then I'm dead. I have to have others that are CJIS compliant to be able to go over there and have access to those records and be able to work on those machines.
Well, and I think from a security perspective, and I didn't have the opportunity to talk to Brian before this, and I'm sorry about that because I kind of found out about it yesterday. I think it's kind of the issue with, you know, our emails are also very sensitive, right? And I 100% trust Brian. I'm not saying anything, but again, we have to look on down the road because if somebody's under the court and not under law enforcement and somebody from the court directs, again, I'm not saying anybody here would do this, but in the future, if something were to happen and somebody directs IT, they're in a pretty bad place if they're asking, look at these emails or pull these emails or let me see this. And I have known on occasion that through the years that that has happened once or twice, that cannot happen. You're saying somebody from the court has asked IT to pull emails? Well, not from the court directly, but ancillary. That's what I'm trying to say.
Doesn't that have to go through an open records request?
Or a court order from a judge. It should. And that's where the executive section discussion probably should go. Correct. We have to make sure that, you know, they have bosses and if they're directed to do something, we still have to have that criminal justice information protected. So somebody cannot access that without us knowing. And Brian would never do that. He would tell us before that would happen.
You can't trust the person. You have to trust the system.
Well, and that's, again, if we're not supervising the IT person, right, if they're not directly reporting to us. We may not know about it. And that's where the pitch could come later. I'm not saying that's an issue now. It was just something that came up when we were talking about security. Because, of course, yeah.
Are there certain areas of our security systems throughout that only certain people in your office, Brian, are able to get into? Or is there a way of having... I don't really care to go in anyone's office. I like this to work for that door and to get into my office. I really don't want anyone else's. I don't need to be in your office or anyone else's, but is there a way to keep your people other than someone that we might bring on from being able to see data and like, how do we, and I guess that's- I think that's a private conversation behind closed doors and procedures.
We would have to talk to Brian about, right? Because neither one of us have the knowledge to really understand that, but I don't see it as somebody who's encapsulated outside of IT. I think they would be working with IT. It's just maybe a direct report to the sheriff.
I asked for a special session on the Wednesday, the 8th for some other issues. Maybe we can-
What's the date?
The 8th, that morning.
8th, okay.
Is there something you can send us? Law, best practices, what other counties are doing that we could look at? Because this is a bigger discussion than just you need another employee.
Yeah, and I think others have done MOUs with IT with law enforcement to make sure that there are standard guidelines about how to access the stuff and that kind of thing. And I can look at that, too. But I feel very unprepared for this right now because I haven't looked into it at all.
This just kind of came up in the last couple of weeks. I think you need someone. I really do. I think you need to have that. But I'm going to tell you that the man does a great job for us. But what you see on paper documented is nothing that's reflective of what really happens in my office.
And to your point about creating the tickets, because I see you in the hall, Brian, I need, but you'd like a ticket so that documents where everybody's time is going. And so perhaps you should have done more of that because we have no idea how many hours. And I take your word for it that it's a lot.
Yeah, there's nobody to blame. As things progress, we go from putting a cartridge into a video camera that everybody can manually do at any time to now automatically. Now it's digital. And we get these cameras. Now they're downloaded through whatever. I don't even know the Wi-Fi. And goes into either a mainframe device. or goes off into the cloud, but we have access to it. And when one of those cameras is not working, it's like we need it working right now. And then Roger gets on it. It's just a natural progression that he has educated himself to do the things that he doesn't need to be doing. And, you know, he's got cars to take care of him and many other things that need to be addressed. And so you're right. It should have been done. But now we've got ticket riders. We went from the manual tickets to ticket riders, and we just do it. It's broke. We get on the phone. How do we fix this thing? What do we got to do? I mean, it's just a natural thing. It wasn't like, call IT, you know, because it's new to us as well. It's just an evolution of how things have played out over the years.
And we're really talking about two different issues here. We're talking about access to records and footage and that kind of thing, and we're talking about IT help directly for your hardware.
All that hardware is connected to all the things that are evidentiary.
Right. And I think that, you know, when he's asking for another person, I think that that's kind of along those lines because we take up how much of your time? A lot of his time. I mean, I certainly understand that. And again, I would really like to have a chance to meet with him about this and talk.
I'm glad you agree because it's all. premature to decide. I would agree. And what that person looks like and what level on the pay scale, how much the person would make.
And it's not fair to you to try to make a decision right now when you hear this for the very first time. You can't make a good educated decision either.
I get it. But I think he's right when he's asking for more personnel and how much they do and how much they provide. And I understand that, especially with The next two audits he's going to be going through with DPS because those are not fun at all. They take a lot of time. Extremely time consuming. Extremely time consuming.
Can you all be ready on the 8th with something?
I mean, I think we can certainly work it out and we can, I mean, this may be something for next year, right? Because we were just approaching it and looking at it. I think that that's kind of, again, I liked, I personally, but this is the sheriff's request, like to be more prudent and kind of really see exactly what we need and talk to the expert about how that would look. Because I certainly think that element of this would be a direct report to Brian as well, you know, to work with in tandem, I think.
And we may even want to fund it mid-year or something, because it looks like it might take several months to get, and we have to have policy and procedure in place driven by law. Correct. That's the framework for which the person works under, and that's going to take some time.
Okay. So not a hard no. It depends.
All right. I'm going to say yes, but I just need to figure out logistics and stuff.
Round two for that to revisit this topic. Thank you. Thanks.
Okay.
Is that it for me? Yes. Thank you.
Thank you, Brian.
Thanks, Brian. Okay, so now we are going to Road and Bridge, which is Fund 11 or page 119. Hey, you.
Thank you. Oh, you have a handout for us.
I got cookies.
We put a lot of effort into your little spreadsheet here, Donnell. You just want to go over this quick since you just handed it to us?
So that's the equipment we're asking for for 27 and stuff. So if you start at the top, It's broke down by unit, and the cost to replace all of that would be $1,100,000. Well, it's what it is. It's in all the other backup that's with it, too, that it hasn't broke down.
And the rest of that is just his future plans, just identifying things for the court to understand what he may need in the future for FY28, 29, 30, and 31. I'm Justin. Huh? Justin.
So, like, we have a tractor that cuts brush, but it really makes a mess. People don't like it, right? Looks like a tornado went through there. So we've been looking at a couple different options. They make a mowing tractor, but if you look a little deeper, they make a piece of equipment that has cutter blades on there, so it leaves a fine cut. Me and Justin went to go look at the mowing tractor, and a couple guys went to look at the one at JCB in San Antonio that has the cutters, and it does a really nice job. I think it would be more productive. You get more brush cut, not have to have so much manpower struggling to pull that stuff and just cut it, pick it up and be done with it going down the road. Productivity can go a little faster. Give a bit more ground. And then we have a loader that has some issues. Eventually it's got 6,500 hours on there. I like to replace it because it's getting hours and it's hard to find parts for it too. And then you have a water tanker trailer. That would help a lot since we have to go all the way to Bernie to get water or comfort, especially when you're working so far out in the country. That would be nice to help out there. A haul truck and haul trailer combination because we're at this point where almost 500 pounds being overweight, be able to haul some of the equipment. Since this new grinder and excavator, we're at the breaking point. And then we have another trailer, 18-footer, we'd like to go ahead and replace. I did miss one thing last year's budget, and I'd like to bring it up this year, is another backhoe. I didn't throw it in here. I have a quote for it also, too. It's $153,250. Since we now have four main crews, I only have three backhoes because I gave up one for the excavator. It's a very valuable tool out there in the field. There's a cleaning ditches and loading brush, too. So I didn't get that one added on there. I'm sorry.
Are we able to squeeze that in?
Donnell, are you purchasing, in your current year's budget, you have $647,784 in your vehicle purchase. We have spent $361,000, so it leaves a balance of $286,000. Are you purchasing all of that this year? Yes.
The only thing that's missing is that two dump trucks have been turned in, and that's why it's showing it's a high amount left on there.
I think there's like 272 or something. So you're going to spend no way we can buy it.
Yeah, once it's paid in the next court, it'll be zero balance.
Okay. Yes. Okay, so there are no funds available. Well, actually, are you going to spend all $2.5 million in seal coat work? Because to date you've spent $43,000. No. There you go.
Okay.
And in this fund, this is a standalone fund. This money comes from the 5% sales tax collected on vehicles sold in Kendall County and the $10 add-on fee that's collected in James Hudson's office. So for registration. So I know somebody recently said it's money from the state. They told me it's money from the state. I said, no, it's money collected in Kendall County. It all goes to the state. The state gives it back to us because that's just how these funds work. But this is a standalone fund. So whether you spend it this year or next year, I'll fund $11,000.
That would round out your cruise. Yeah, that would be four backhoes total instead of just three.
If you want it to come this year, it would just be a budget adjustment to move money from the seal coat work line and move down to the vehicle purchase line, and he could go ahead and purchase it now.
Any opposition? I think that's a good idea. We might have a savings because of inflation. Yeah, so let's go ahead and pull that trigger. Okay.
Let's get with Sharon quick. Okay, because I did talk to some of the vendors, and things are going to change next year with emissions. It's going to kill everything. Diesel is going to be so much. Jessica can help a little bit on this. The DPF filters and all that, they're doubling down on it, so it's going to be an expensive cost.
Are there any other, let me ask you this, knowing that, Are there any diesel equipment from 2028, 2029 that's better to buy now, push off some of your non-diesel stuff? See what I'm saying? Let's try to get under the rule change.
I would say we could probably wait because the next one is another loader and another water truck farther down the list on 2028 and a dump truck.
You have a loader on you?
Yeah.
In 28.
Let's just keep it simple. Okay. I want to be simple. I don't want to ask more than is needed. All right.
I have a question. Are any of the things you're replacing, you said a trailer and some other things, are any of those going to be sold or auctioned that you're replacing?
The tractor will probably be, and the loader will be traded in, and the tanker we'll get rid of. We'll keep the lower half that's there right now itself, too. So there'll be a few items that'll go away.
When we sell items that were purchased with Fund 11, or the Road and Bridge Fund, then the revenue from those items go back into that fund. Okay.
We've been trading them in, too, so it knocks it off the cost. It helps a little bit. Okay. Trading costs. You're going to get more trading-wise, I think, we've seen, and it just gets it off the top. So instead of paying $85,000, you're going to end up paying $80,000. So it just makes it look easier. Okay.
That takes care of your equipment sheet.
And when they traded in, you still are able to track that and show that the asset, where it went? Yes, it's all tracked in the fixed asset system.
Do you want to go to your not promotions? New hire request? New hire request. Yes.
We were asking for two mechanics, a mechanic one and a mechanic two.
in a road worker three position the road worker three position would round it out because right now there's only four but i have a fifth crew and it would fill in the blank there i think we approved that and that's not another position that's that's doing away with the road too we already took care of it okay making that a road three yes not an it's not adding an additional personnel it's just taking A road two position and making that a road three position.
So should we tell him what we already approved? Yeah.
You weren't here yesterday. Yes, I was. Okay. But I thought we were talking about the addition. We're asking for one mechanic. Yeah. Let's talk about the mechanic.
You're asking for two mechanics.
Well, it's two, but I understand it's hard times. We're willing to do what we've got to do, but we do need at least one.
Explain the difference between mechanic one and mechanic level two.
Justin, you can help out a little bit here. He runs the shop back there, so he's going to have the detail about it.
Would you mind, like, you just sit at the seat for a minute so the mic can hear him?
Mechanic 1 traditionally takes care of, well, right now our Mechanic 1 is our, takes care of our sheriff's office vehicles. in standard oil changes, brake jobs, stuff like that. Our Mechanic 2E is required, Mechanic 2 and up is required to have a HAZMAT license to run the fuel truck if needed, deliver fuel, assist with fires, things like that.
What about year's experience? Is there a difference in year's experience from a 1 to a 2?
I believe there is a difference in the job description, yes. I believe there's a couple years difference in job experience. You're looking for a more seasoned person is what your need is?
I think it's two years. Two and a half, I think.
give or take I think just in the field of mechanics in general but that being said we don't take the mechanic one position lightly because obviously it's sheriff's office vehicle our tech one is very experienced in that because it's a lot of liability so that's where this gets kind of tricky as far as calling it one two and three because we're not selling him short Understood.
And so the recommendation of the committee was to hire a mechanic too.
So I don't know, does anyone? How many ones and how many twos do you have now?
Other than myself, I have three other people in the shop. I have a one, two, and a three.
One, two, and a three. And two can perform the duties under one? Yes, ma'am.
Everyone, I cover every position under me and likewise to the rest. So if you're a three, you cover your job and two and one.
I would say a two. I'm in for one employee at the mechanic two level.
I'm in favor. And then would you be promoting within and then hiring a one or another one? Or, I mean, I guess you have to have different experience. And the hazmat. But are you able to right now? Is there someone that you would promote and then hire at one or are we hiring at two?
I believe we talked about whether that would be the interview process. What experience came in as far as interview, but that's always different. The preferred method is to move up in-house, but I'd like to keep the experience in the one position, but I don't want to sell my mechanic one short on a promotion either because he's very good at his job. So that's where the one, two, three step gets difficult, which is something we've talked about before.
I would suggest advertising a position at a two, like a one or two, and the internal person can interview. They can have outside candidates, but the funds are there to hire a two and hopefully get the qualified candidate or the person is qualified to promote by the interview committee. But if not, then you can still hire a one if there's not a qualified two available.
Any opposition on a two at this end? Or do you have questions? Good. Do you have a comment or?
Okay.
Number two.
I'd like to say something about Justin. He works hard at what he does. He does give dedication to the county. He's a special employee that we have, and I'm very proud of him for what he does. And I speak of him highly to anybody that I can. Surrounding counties, I tell him he's the best that I have. So I want to let you all know that I'm proud of him.
Don't tell surrounding counties that.
He must be proud he's bringing you in here to do his dirty work.
I appreciate that.
Justin, during the flood, we had an 18-wheeler trailer that was full of ice that I started panicking because it kept shutting off the cooler. And I kept restarting it, restarting it. We kept fueling it for weeks. And you came out there in the heat of the day and got that thing running. And we appreciate it. That provided ice for the entire community for a long time. Yes, sir.
Happy to do it. Not only that, I think you were on one of the cutouts of the bodies. Yes, sir. So you were jack of all trades. Yes, sir. Thank you for stepping up.
He's a comfort boy. He was in high school with nieces and nephews in band. He was a young teenager then.
Donnell, does that cover everything? Yeah. Okay.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You're all you do for the county.
Thank you, Justin.
So congratulations, Court. You have gotten through the first two days of budget. Do we get out early?
Yeah, we do.
That makes me very happy.
Okay. Donnell. Yes, sir. Where's the Snickers?
I'm sorry. I fell down this year. I apologize.
Next year. He did that to send a message to you. All right.
I wanted to just ask one thing because we're going, we're finishing kind of round one today, right? I just wanted to ask that what we decide in each of these workshops can't be changed unless budget, any changes are brought back to the full court prior to the budget being approved. So we go through round one, we have this every year. And so I just want to make sure.
Yes. Yeah. So, so no one person can change. No one person on the commissioner's court can change the budget. The judge has a statutory duty of preparing a budget. That's a statutory duty that he is required to do, and so that is what's presented right now. And then you have these budget meetings to then put together a proposed budget, and then that is what you end up having. The commissioner's court as a whole has a statutory duty to have a public hearing on that proposed budget.
But anything we've talked about and decided, I just want to make sure we don't have any changes.
No, nobody can dictate to me to change. Okay. Now, with that being said, I do update stuff all the time when I'm looking at utilities and all of that. But what you were saying yes and no to, I don't go back and look at. I look at stuff all the time, like the utilities. And if there's a new contract that comes, I need to make sure we budget for that. That's something that's ongoing. But as far as what yard apartments you're looking at, the only thing you'll revisit would be those that were coming back. And if y'all change, you've already said you were going to do.
Okay, I just want to make sure.
Before we officially, it is 2.24 p.m. on this Tuesday, June 25th, 2026, and this special called session of Kendall County Commissioner's Court is now.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.