Clark County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

today's meeting and will be brought back at a future meeting. There are two opportunities for public comment during this meeting and it's important to understand the difference. The first public comment period takes place at the beginning of the meeting. This public comment is only for items that are listed on today's agenda. Comments during this time must relate to a specific agenda item. If you wish to speak about a particular agenda item, you may comment at the beginning of the meeting, or you may wait to see if that item is discussed later and includes an opportunity for public comment when the item is being considered. Some routine items may be approved together as part of what is called the consent agenda. If you do not agree with a staff recommendation for one of these items, you must request that that item be removed before the Board takes action. If it is not removed, it may be approved early in the meeting as part of a single vote. Items that are not routine are considered one at a time and may include an opportunity for public comment before the board votes. When it's time to speak, please come forward. There are three microphones available, including a handheld microphone if you have documents you would like to show. If you wish to show a document, an overhead camera may be used at the direction of the board chair. Please do not display documents that contain personal or sensitive information. When speaking, please talk directly into the microphone, clearly and at a steady volume. This helps ensure your comments are heard and recorded as part of the public record. Speakers are required to state their name, spell their last name, and state their address. At the end of the meeting there is a second public comment period. This final public comment is for items not listed on the agenda. No action may be taken on those comments at that time. All public comments are limited to three minutes unless otherwise announced by the chair at the beginning of the meeting. During all public comment periods, board members may listen but are not allowed to respond. Thank you for being here and for taking the time to participate in your local government.

Good morning. Welcome back to the Clark County Commission meeting for July 8th. We will begin the first time set aside for public comment. Anyone wishing to speak on items on today's agenda, please come forward at this time. Seeing no one, I will close the first time set aside for public comment. Good morning, Ms. Sammerman.

Good morning. Second item on the agenda is the approval of the agenda after considering any additions or deletions of items. Staff has the following request. Hold to the August 5th, 2026 zoning meeting. Item number seven, VS 26-0289. Item eight, WS 26-0288. Item 25, VS 26-0293. Item 26, WS 26-0294. hold to the August 19th, 2026 zoning meeting, item 18, ET 26-400-046 for UC 230540, and item 20, UC 26-0302. The above public hearing items are gonna be opened as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the date is previously stated. With these deletions, which are item 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, and 26, the agenda stands ready for your approval.

With the agenda changes right into the record, thank you. There's a motion for approval. Good morning.

Good morning Jennifer Lazarevich 1980 festival Plaza Drive representing item number six We would ask that item number six be held until your September your second meeting in September, which is September 16 Commissioner Jones that works for you

Yes, in addition to that, I'd like to direct staff to accept a complete application for a rock-crushing operation in conjunction with grading of the hill to a developable site.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

Commissioner McCurdy, your motion can be reflected.

Can I just clarify? Excuse me, sorry. So as long as the applicant gets that in by our filing deadline, which I think is the end of next week, it can get scheduled for 9-16. Yes, we understand. Thank you.

And I amend my motion to include those changes.

There's a motion, please cast your vote. The motion passes.

The third item in the agenda is the approval of the minutes. The minutes of the June 3rd, 2026 zoning meeting are ready for approval.

I move approval of the meeting minutes.

There's a motion for approval, please cast your vote. The motion passes.

Next are the routine action items, which consist of items four through 17. These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item. If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for your approval.

I move approval of our routine action items. There's a motion for approval, yes.

Sorry, one more thing. Under item number four, Jennifer Lazovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, here today on behalf of the applicant, there is a condition that reads under Public Works compliance with previous conditions. And when you read those previous conditions, it talks about a detached sidewalk. but I believe the direction in Sloan is that there aren't going to be detached sidewalks, and so I just wanted to clarify that detached sidewalks aren't required there.

That is my understanding, too. So modify that condition.

Yes, sorry. I'll see what Public Works says.

Good. Antonio. We're doing attached sidewalks. I think the discussion in the past has been attached. Great. Thank you.

Thank you. There's a motion for approval of the routine action items. Please cast your vote. The motion passes.

Next is item 19, UC26-0247, holdover use permit for outdoor storage and display, waivers of development standards for the following. one, eliminate and reduce buffering and screening, two, reduce security fence height, and three, reduce access gate setback. Design review for a proposed tow yard and outdoor storage on 1.01 acres in IL, industrial light zone, generally located north of Sahara Avenue and west of Palm Street within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning. Good morning, gentlemen. Rand Tadmore, 1917 Sondrio, as owner and representative of Metro Towing.

Welcome. Do you have a presentation today?

No, I've been working very close with Commissioner Serbrum. He wanted a couple things added to the approval, some landscaping, which we are in the process of doing. And in regards to the paved driveway going in, work will begin tomorrow and will be done by this Monday. And I'm working very close with Commissioner Serbrum to his approval.

Okay, then if that completes your presentation, I'll open the public hearing. This is a public hearing on item 19. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Good morning.

Good morning, commissioners.

Hi, my name is Al Rojas. I'm very active in Sunrise Manor. I'm not very familiar with this project, but I authorize it. We want to see investments in our community, and for the owner, my name is Al Rojas. If you ever meet me, we're part of Neighborhood Watch, and we would love you guys to make more money and make our community safer, and we want to thank you for investing in our community. Thank you.

Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak? Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing on item 19, Commissioner Sagerblum.

If Al approves it, I guess we're done. But I do have a couple of questions. Would you come on up? So we want to agree with the waiver as far as the fence and the height. We don't need to redo that. But we are going to put trees along the Palm Street. Is that correct?

Could you use that handheld microphone? We can't hear you without it.

Okay. The commissioner requested us to go 18 feet from the gate going inside. We have chosen to go 25 feet because wasn't sure if the 18 feet starts from the curb or from the gate. So we're going to go 25 foot to make sure everything is covered.

Let's just stop right there. So Antonio, is that?

But we're going to go from the end of the curb 25 feet to make sure that it meets the requirements of the commissioner. And as far as the plan. I'm sorry.

Just hold for a second. Let me just see if Antonio, can you see it?

Thank you, Commissioner. Are we talking about the driveway width or the gate setback?

I thought it was the setback. But whatever you want, we need to make sure that that public works is fine with the driveway.

So the driveway width is okay. They'll have to accommodate ADA. I think it's the setback that we're talking about.

Right, and the minimum setback is 18 feet.

Okay, so we can put that in the decision?

Right, so does he want to withdraw that and just meet code, or you want to just have a condition of minimum 18 foot setback for the gate?

No, we'll take whatever he's given us, but make sure that we're ADA compliant. So I guess they put the sidewalk behind the driveway?

Yes, sir.

Okay. All right. And then with respect to the trees.

So what we're looking at right here, this is Palm Street. So from the gate or the light bulb, which is 15 feet. So we will start right after not to abstract the visibility. We will go every 10 feet. and plant an acceptable tree with Mrs. Haglund. I have the complete list from the water department. We are bringing brand new water from about almost 200 feet away with a brand new time clock and make sure that the trees will live and the area will look good and be cleaned up.

All right, so with that, I would, is that okay with you guys?

I just want to clarify on the trees, so you're fine with having the palm trees like he mentioned?

Not palm, they would be trees that are approved by the Water Authority.

Okay, right, so we have a, there's a regional plant list that he'd have to choose from, and we can work with him on that, but no palm trees, right?

No, but no palm trees. All right, with that, I would move for approval.

There is a motion for approval. Please cast your vote. That motion passes. Thank you.

Next are items 21 and 22, which are companion, can be heard together. Item 21 is VS26-0287, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Decatur Boulevard and Cameron Street and Dewey Drive and Hacienda Avenue within Paradise. Item 22, WS26-0286, waivers of development standards for the following. One, increase retaining wall height. to increase maximum parking and three modified driveway geometrics, design review for a warehouse on 11.84 acres and an IL industrial light zone generally located north of Diablo Drive alignment and east of Decatur Boulevard within Paradise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr. Chair, Commissioner. Stephanie Gronauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive. Here on behalf of the applicant, this property is located on the east side of Decatur Boulevard, just north of the Diablo alignment. It's approximately 12 acres, and it's entirely planned and zoned for industrial.

I'm sorry to interrupt you. We're not seeing anything on the projector.

Oh, sorry.

There it is. Thank you.

Thank you. Okay, so as I mentioned, this is just on the east side of Decatur here. It's about 12 acres on the north side of the Diablo Drive. The property is completely planned and zoned for industrial. As you can see, it's completely surrounded by industrial as well. This property has been operating as an outdoor storage yard for many years. In fact, there's been some code enforcement issues and complaints on the property. So the proposal for a new warehouse building on this property will significantly improve the area and be compatible and harmonious with everything in the surrounding area. The proposals for a 257,000 square foot warehouse building, as you can see, there's potential offices located on the corners of the building, so it'll be built and potentially split up depending on who the tenants are that come into this property. We have four access points, two on Decatur, two on Cameron Street to the east to help with the flow on the site and make it a better situation. The waiver requests for the throat depth waivers we've worked closely with Public Works on. In this northwest corner, we added a right turn lane after working with Public Works on that, so that'll help the queuing along Decatur for this northern drive aisle. On the southern drive aisle, we've agreed to have this access in only, and we can certainly provide signage to that extent, so this would be access only, no exit on Decatur. We've also worked with them on this southeast corner. As of last night, we had a proposal to slightly revise and lose a little bit of square feet in this southeastern corner. Got an exhibit that I've shared with Antonio, but basically this would straighten out this drive aisle so that a full turning opportunity can be had on Cameron. This is important for the operation of the site just because since it will be limited access on Decatur, the overall usage of this site is important to have northbound access and southbound access on Cameron Street. So you can see we'll lose some of this building here, about 2,000 square feet, and provide for a straighter opportunity here with the truck access into the property. So I'll submit this exhibit to the record, but I think we've addressed the concerns there, and I'm unaware of any concerns with the driveway on the north side of Cameron. We also have a waiver for retaining. We are a little bit higher than the industrial site to the north, so we've got about five feet of retaining we're requesting along this north property line. Also, we're over-parked, which now requires a waiver to have additional parking. So we have 210 parking spaces where 131 are required. We did have a parking study produced. And so my understanding is it's no longer a waiver. It's now a design review because of that study. But the idea is just to make sure that there's plenty of parking, especially for customers if they come and this is broken up into different end users. We do have a lot of trees. We exceed the trees on the property. So from a heat island effect, we should be. um contributing or trying to mitigate that heat island effect by providing all of the trees but with that said we'd ask for your approval we think this is obviously a great improvement to the area opposed to the outdoor storage that was happening on this property and we'd ask for your approval thank you this is a public hearing on items 21 and 22 anyone wishing to speak please come forward

Seeing no one, I will close the public hearing. Mr. Papazian, you were kind enough to work late into the night last night on this. Is everything that was read into the record meet your understanding?

It does. Thank you, Commissioner. And if I could just write that condition for that southerly driveway on Decatur to ensure that it's only one way in to include the signage and striping. So we'll say the driveway shall operate as one way access and shall be clearly marked with one way signage and paving striping to indicated the permitted direction of travel.

That works for the applicant?

Yes, that's great.

Very good. I will move for approval of items 21 and 22 with the additional conditions written to the record by Public Works and the applicant. Please cast your votes. The motion passes. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Next are items 23 and 24, which our companion can be heard together. Item 23 is VS26-0292, vacate and abandon a portion of right of way being Glen Avenue located between Dalhart Avenue and McLaren Avenue. A portion of right of way being McLaren Avenue located between Glen Avenue and Park Street. And a portion of right of way being Dalhart Avenue located between Glen Avenue and Park Street within Sunrise Manor. Item 24, UC26-0291, amended use permit for assisted living facility. waivers of development standards for the following, one, increase wall height, which is no longer needed, two, allow decorative fence and walls, which are no longer needed, and three, alternative driveway geometrics. Design review for proposed assisted living facility on 1.49 acres in an IP industrial park zone generally located south of Glen Avenue and west of McLaren Avenue within Sunrise Manor. Good morning.

Good morning, Chairman, Commissioners. Dave Turner, 333 North Rancho Drive, Suite 900, representing the owner-applicant of this item. First item is we're asking for a vacation of the right-of-way for detached sidewalks along McLaren, Glenn, and Dalhart. The use permit is for assisted living senior care housing facility. There'll be three separate new buildings on the site. They're each 6,244 square feet, and they'll each have 16 beds. We understand that this may not fit in this area exactly, but we think it's gonna enhance that area and can only help develop the growth of that area. I mean, it's a pretty industrial area, we know that. We're putting in the detached sidewalks, the landscaping, and we think these facilities are needed in this area. There's not very many in this general area, so we ask for your approval of this item.

Thank you. This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak on this item, please come forward. Welcome back.

Hello, my name is Al Rojas. I'm very active. It's Sunrise Manor area. We have a neighborhood watch program attacking the homelessness. I totally support this project. I think it's very strategically located to have some kind of something to address the homeless issue that we're projected to have a big problem here, but we are definitely getting on top of it. There are other issues going on. Now, I drove there. I saw a lot of trucks over there or something, um let's not forget that in this general area is where we closed that um the wash over off of sahara and boulder which is definitely piling up and we definitely got to go get some service down there but there's not many residents area in there it's a high industrial area it's a perfect place to address the homeless issue maybe have some homeless uh DIVERSION PROGRAMS OR SOMETHING OR WHERE YOU CAN CONTRACT THIS SENIOR LIVING. I THINK IT'S A VERY, VERY WELL-PLACED PROJECT, AND I TOTALLY SUPPORT IT, AND I DO BELIEVE THAT WE DO NEED TO PUT A LITTLE BIT MORE ATTENTION IN GETTING THOSE RVs. THERE'S RVs, THERE'S ENCAMPMENTS. WHEN WE CLOSE THAT WALKWAY ON ARROYO, THERE'S A LOT OF HOMELESS STUFF, AND WE'LL BE ADDRESSING THAT. I'LL BE WORKING WITH THE COMMISSIONER ON THAT, BUT I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU.

Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak? Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Commissioner Segerblum, you're two for two.

All right. Well, I think that was a kiss of death, Al. But even despite your approval, I'm going to go ahead and approve it, too. So it is a new form of business in that area, which has been highly industrial. But we have the KB homes to the south. We have apartments to the north, and I think that eventually this is going to transition into a residential commercial area, and this is the first start. So I met with your clients and they seem legitimate, so I would go ahead and approve it.

There's a motion for approval on items 23 and 24. Please cast your vote. The motion passes, thank you.

Thank you, and thank you for meeting with us, Commissioner.

Next are items 27 through 30, which are related and can be heard together. Item 27 is PA 26-700-018, plan amendment to re-designate the existing land use category from neighborhood commercial to business employment on 1.24 acres, generally located north of Quail Avenue and east of Santa Margarita Street within Spring Valley. Item 28 is EC 26-0214, Zone change to reclassify 1.24 acres from an RS-20, residential single family 20 zone, to an IP, industrial park zone, generally located north of Coel Avenue and east of Santa Margarita Street alignment within Spring Valley. Item 29, VS26-0216, Vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Russell Road and Quail Avenue and Rainbow Boulevard and Torrey Pines Drive. And a portion of right-of-way being Quail Avenue located between Rainbow Boulevard and Torrey Pines Drive within Spring Valley. And item 30, WS26-0215, waivers to development standards for the following. One, reduce buffering. And two, increase parking. Design review for a proposed office warehouse on 1.24 acres, an industrial park zone, within the airport environment's AE60 overlay. Generally located north of Quail Avenue and east of Santa Margarita Street within Spring Valley.

Good morning, Jennifer Lazovich. Welcome back. Nice, thank you. 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here this morning on behalf of the applicant. The site is located on this map in green. It sits just east of Rainbow and north of the alignment of Quail Avenue. Immediately to the north of us is a two-story office building. Kitty Corner in this area is a commercial project consisting of inline retail and then a gas station. As you move to the south, this whole area, this is developed as a substation but has the ability to move through this entire piece. Just south of that is a multi-level mini warehouse building. To the south of that is an approved church and immediately to the east of the site is an approved and operating community residence. We are asking for a plan amendment to go from neighborhood commercial to business employment as well as for the corresponding zone change to IP. The proposed plan is for an office warehouse is for an office warehouse. We would have access coming in off of Santa Margarita right here. The building sits over to the east side. This is the area where that substation expansion could occur, and over to the north is where that two-story office building would be. this gives you an idea of what the building elevation would look like the roll-up doors that are at grade have glass in them as well as the front door that kind of gives you a bird's eye view of what it would look like this is somewhat of the alignment of where santa margarita is we do have a waiver for an offset of that early on we met with public works to lay out the site and although we have a waiver for that they felt that the Placing the building on the east side would be better than placing the building on the west side and having more of a waiver for an offset. We do have some additional landscaping buffer requests, but at the Planning Commission we did withdraw The waiver for the width of landscaping on the east side again the use to the east of us is an operating community residence But we will comply with the landscaping required on the east side your Staff report for your waiver reflects that change And that change was that we withdrew the waiver for the landscaping on the east side It also in when we did that meant that we are now providing 39 parking spaces instead At our neighborhood meeting, we had one couple who lives in the area attend. They expressed no opposition to this plan. When we went to the town board, they did approve the plan amendment. For various reasons, they denied the other applications, but they did approve the plan amendment. And then the planning commission also recommended approval of the applications that are before you today. So with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions.

Very good, thank you. This is a public hearing on items 27 through 30. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. And with the waiver withdrawn related to landscaping, I'll move for approval of items 27, 28, 29, and 30. Please cast your vote. The motion passes, thank you.

Thank you. Next is item 31, WS26-0263, Waiver Development Standards for Alternative Driveway Geometrics, Design Review for Proposed Vehicle Maintenance or Repair Facility and Proposed Retail Suites in Conjunction with an Existing Shopping Center on a 0.85 acre portion of a 6.24 acre site in a CG commercial zone within the airport environs at East 60 Overway, generally located west of Valley View Boulevard and south of Blue Diamond Road within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, board and staff. My name is Victor Knight, architect 9582 Iris Flat Court, representing the applicant for this project, located on Valley View and Blue Diamond Corner. We're the Breakmasters project going in right here, part of an existing, larger commercial development. We are in agreement with all staff recommendations and are here to answer any questions.

Very good. If that completes your presentation, I'll open the public comment period on item 31. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Move approval of agenda item 31.

Thank you. There's a motion for approval of item 31. Please cast your vote. The motion passes. You.

Next is item 32, WS26-0283. waivers to development standards for the following, one, eliminate buffer wall, two, allow attached sidewalks, and three, allow modified driveway geometrics, design review for the expansion of a school K through 12 on 8.23 acres and a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Sahara Avenue and east of Bruce Street within Winchester.

Good morning.

Good morning, Liz Olson, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, here on behalf of the applicant, Matter Academy. We've been before you several times for this school. This is another location that they are looking at. As you know, they're a highly rated Title I charter school here in town. They've been here since 2014 and looking to expand on this site. So as you can see here, we are located on the corner of Sahara and Bruce. About four years ago, the front portion of the property was approved for a charter school and has been operating since. Matter is looking to come in and expand from a K-5 to a K-12. Matter only has one high school currently operating in Las Vegas and they have more than 500 children on the wait list for that high school. So this will really provide an opportunity for those children to be able to stay with Matter throughout their entire education. Our request today is that expansion on the bottom portion of the site. So the northern portion of the site here is that existing building which will continue to operate this year, 26 to 27. This is what we're calling phase one. Phase two would be this building here. We're looking to construct and start school in two years from now, so 2028. And then the final phase would be these two remaining buildings, which would be then another two years down the road. So slowly growing, but eventually getting K through 12 on this property. The access is off of Karen here to the south. Our car loop goes all the way around the property. It can hold 120 cars for pickup and drop off. And our access point over here is going to be used for staff access. Our buildings, we have particularly made them stepped back. So this is the east side of our property here. And you can see where we have a condo development on our east side, we've stepped this back to mitigate any impacts on those neighbors there. And we're also set back 86 feet from the property line. So trying to mitigate any impact to them as much as possible. We have a couple waivers. First and foremost, I'd like to withdraw waiver number two for our attached sidewalks. We will be providing those detached sidewalks. Our second request is for a buffer wall along the eastern property line. It requires, as you know, the eight foot block wall between the residential and our use. We have met with the HOA of that condo, and they would rather see a screen fence with basically what's there now. So they do not have a really tall wall. We sit significantly higher than them, so if we put that eight foot tall wall there, it would block quite a bit of their light coming in. So in working with the commissioner and planning staff, I'd like to request this additional condition for support. The letter of support from the HOA for the residential property to the east indicating a screen fence is acceptable shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit. If the letter is not provided, a wall shall be constructed per Title 30. So that will provide an opportunity for us to get that approval letter from the HOA as we've been discussing with them. Our last waiver is for our reduced throat depths and existing departure distance and Public Works was comfortable with those based on our circulation and the existing location for this driveway as it's pushed back as far as it can go from the intersection. As we know, schools are always concerned with traffic, so in working with Commissioner Sagerbloom, we'd also like to present this condition, which will allow us to come back and show that the traffic is suitable for this site. A one-year review as a public hearing to review traffic prior to the release of building permits for phase two. So this year they will operate here as what's currently approved, but we will have to come back before Phase 2 opens in two years. So with that, I appreciate the time and happy to answer any questions.

Thank you. This is a public hearing on Item 32. If you're wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Commissioner Sagerblum.

Thank you. Antonio, are there any issues on Sahara as far as? Stoplights or light or crosswalk.

Thank you, Commissioner. There's not at this time. The previous school worked with us on the driveways and the throat depth. So at the time, with what's presented in front of us today, the throat depth and everything that the prior school constructed is adequate. But I just want to put on the record that any future phases, the throat depth may be inadequate and probably need to look at that. We need to just ensure that the throat depth in the future works safely and sufficiently.

and the requirement that they come back with another public hearing through that process before they start construction, that would satisfy your requirement there?

Yes, sir, and if I may add, because they are withdrawing waiver number two, which was the attached sidewalk and constructing detached sidewalk, they will have to file a vacation with our office.

all right uh with that i would move for approval i'm sorry um i'd just like to clarify on the fence um do we want to say a chain link or non-decorative fence is permitted with screen with mesh and i'm not sure how tall it is is it six foot the the nicest one you we can we can require Well, we do, the CODA requires a decorative fence, which is wrought iron, but if we want to have what's existing there, that would be a non-decorative fence with mesh screening.

What is, what are the, what does the HOA prefer?

So the HOA is looking to have that non-decorative with the mesh to still have privacy, but also allow some light in.

The HOA wants a chain link fence?

Correct. They've asked us to keep what is there for consistency.

Yes. And I've asked for a letter which I haven't gotten yet, so that would be one of the requirements. But if that's what they want, then they provide that.

Will it be six feet tall, Liz? Yes, please. And then just wanna clarify, they're gonna have a maximum of 600 students in the K through five this phase?

Correct. Right, okay.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. There's a motion for approval of item 32 with the additional conditions. Please cast your vote. The motion passes. Thank you.

Next are items 33 through 37, which are companion and can be heard together. Item 33, ZC26-0295, zone change to reclassify 15.05 acres from an RS-20 residential single family 20 zone. and an H2 general highway frontage zone to an RM18, residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located east of Interstate 15 and north and south of Jonathan Drive within Enterprise. Item 34, VS26-0298, vacant and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County located between I-15 and Las Vegas Boulevard South and Neal Avenue alignment and Brunner Avenue. Portions of right-of-way being Parvin Street located between the Neal Avenue alignment and Brunner Avenue. Portion of right-of-way being Rivero Street located between Neal Avenue alignment and Brunner Avenue. And portions of right-of-way being Jonathan Drive located between I-15 and Las Vegas Boulevard South within Enterprise. Item 35, WS26-0297, waivers to development standards for the following, one, alternative driveway geometrics, and two, reduced street intersection offset in conjunction with the proposed single family attached residential development on 15.05 acres in an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone Generally located east of I-15 and north and south sides of Jonathan Drive within Enterprise. Item 36, PUD 26-0296, planned unit development for a 216 lot single family attached residential subdivision with modified development standards on 15.05 acres and an RM-18 residential multifamily zone. Generally located east of I-15 and on the north and south sides of Jonathan Drive within Enterprise. And item 37, TM 26-500-079, 10 to map consisting of 216 single family residential and common lots on 15.05 acres and RM 18 residential multifamily 18 zone. Generally located east of I-15 and north and south sides of Jonathan Drive within Enterprise.

Thank you, good morning.

Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Stephanie Gronauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, here on behalf of the applicant, Lenar Homes. This property is located on the west side of Las Vegas Boulevard between the I-15 and Las Vegas Boulevard. It's north of Bruner Avenue. We're here with a zone change that conforms to the master plan to an RM-18. for a townhome development on the property. You can see it's an odd assemblage of property, but we are coming in with all one project for townhomes in this area, for sale townhomes. We are proposing 216 homes with access off of Jonathan, located here to this portion to the north. and then access off of Parvin for the other two portions of the community. We did work with Public Works before submitting this application to discuss vacating Jonathan from Parvin West because it does just dead end at the I-15. So we appreciate them supporting that application And that is part of the application there because it really didn't go anywhere with the I-15 located right there. We've worked with them on the waivers. Specifically on lot 117 was the concern we have a reduction of The 12 foot distance requirement to seven feet and in working with Antonio we've offered to taper this driveway, because this particular townhome has an extra long driveway it's about 30 feet in width all of these have to have two car. garages and 20 foot driveways these have even longer driveways so lot 117 that driveway would be tapered down. to ensure that that safety concern is addressed. So we would offer a condition to taper the driveway on lot 117. Also, we'll have full offsites on all of these three parcels. We would like to remove the condition that requires us to overpave from Jonathan South to Bruner. That's on the PUD and the tentative map application. This is the product type. So you can see it's a really nice looking three-story townhome. All of them will have front yard courtyards that are anywhere from six feet and larger. So they'll have private space in front of their units. The garages are accessed in the rear. They'll also have balconies on the second level. So a really great for sale attached product that certainly will be harmonious and compatible with this area. This area is planned for much densities like this and higher, and so we're excited to offer a brand new for sale townhome product in the area. So with that said, we'd ask for your approval with that added condition that we taper lot 117's driveway to meet that distance and safety concern, and then that we would remove the condition for the over paving down to Bruner. I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thank you. A couple things. These are all full driveways?

Yes, all 20-foot driveways.

Okay.

Or longer. Some of them are longer.

Even longer than 20-foot?

They are. Some of them are 30.

Are there any waivers for open space that you're not meeting in code?

No, I'm glad you brought that up. We exceed the open space and we'll have programmable open space within the green area. We also exceed the parking significantly, almost twice as much parking for guests as well on this property. So lots of opportunities with the PUD to exceed what the code would otherwise require with both open space and with parking.

You're basically surrounded by BLM land? Yes, we are. and you are off of Las Vegas Boulevard?

We are, yes.

Okay. All right, so if there's nothing further, I'll move for approval of item, I better open the public hearing first. This is a public hearing on items 33 through 37. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Oh, good. I need that ink bottle.

I don't live in the area, but I have a lot of knowledge in townhomes, My only concern, I mean, I'm neutral on this, but I would personally have liked to have seen more places where the kids could stay in the area. You know, these kids, a lot of kids are gonna be out there on the street and maybe where people could walk and maybe more greenery for the community, but I mean, I'm neutral on it. I mean, those are just my concerns if this was in my community. That's all I just wanted to say. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Just for the record, there's a green belt that goes right through the center of this neighborhood, and every single lot in this neighborhood has a courtyard. If there's nothing further, I'll move for approval of items 33 through 37. Please cast your vote.

Could we remove the condition and add the condition?

With the removal of the condition for full paving on Parvin to Mr. Papazian.

Bruner we're gonna remove a condition and I think we're gonna add a condition if that's okay the removal of the condition is for the additional pavement for how I understand it and then to ensure that lot 117 meets that driveway to BCR 12-foot standard they're gonna taper that driveway yes all right we traded one condition for the other you're still paving obviously all of your property

Correct. We have full off-sites for everything that's adjacent to the property. It's just the overpaving south to Bruner that would be removed.

Very good. Thank you. All of that's reflected in my motion. My motion passes. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Next are ordinances for introduction, which are items 38 through 40. 38 is ORD 26-900159, introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a development agreement with Toll South LV LLC for single family residential subdivision on 0.89 acres. Item 39 is ORD 26-900280, introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a development agreement with BDA South LLC for vehicle wash on 1.08 acres. And item 40, ORD 26-900472, introduce an ordinance to amend the official zoning map reclassifying certain properties as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on May 6th, 2026 and May 20th, 2026. And staff request you set the public hearing for July 22nd.

We'll set the public hearing for July 22nd.

And next is the second time for a public comment.

Yes, it is. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

My name is Al Rojas. I live in Sunrise Manor, 2095 Homestake Mine Court. I just want to say that we're making really great progress with the homeless issues in our community in Sunrise Manor. And I really want to thank the commissioners for their cooperation with our community. I also want to thank our Metro. You know, I lived in Orange County. I don't know if you knew what happened down in Newport. Fourth of July was a disaster. They had a TikTok invasion of teenagers. And we definitely want to work with Metro and our commissioners to monitor TikTok so we don't have that. And our... Law enforcement did a fantastic job. We did a great job. We ran a really safe Fourth of July. And I think Clark County and all of our leadership should be commended for that. The other thing that I wanted to say was I wasn't here yesterday. I saw a couple of the items during public comment where the commissioners will be appointing vacant judges. And I totally support that. I wish I could have brought my diagram where it shows the triangle where the county, where elected officials at the state level, at the local level are supporting law enforcement and the public is. And we were having a lot of problems with the judges that are not implementing diversion programs for these homeless people, which we know that just prosecuting them and punishing homeless people, criminalizing homelessness is not the answer. We're channeling it, channeling homelessness to services that will get them off the street One of the organizations that I'm working with, what they do is they detox first, get them off of drugs, and then we get them into paperwork, some other IDs. Can I interrupt you?

Could you just let go of that microphone? We have a lot of problems with these microphones. Oh, I'm so sorry about that. I apologize.

And so I think that was a really strong move. Some of my friends and colleagues, they testified against that. I think it's a really smart move. It's going to create a much better unified county when we have our judges working with us to address this homeless problem, which I really think we're going to solve. I think we're going to be the forefront in the country. That's a major statement, but I really do believe that We are going to show people how to get this under control, and I know it can be managed. So thank you guys very much. Thank you for all your cooperation, and thank you guys for all the first. We had a great first Tuesday, all the county commissioners that went out there with Metro. Thank you. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak? Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing and adjourn today's meeting. Have a great day.