Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

I have just a family. It's like a It's my business card, but it gets by people. So, are you okay? We are. Perfect. The water. All right. I'll call this meeting to order for Wednesday, January 28th, 2026. Our 7 p.m. planning commission meeting. Um, did I say 2026? February 28th. February 28th. Yeah. I mean, it will be in a couple days, which is fine. Sure. If it matters. I don't Does it matter, Lisa? Probably not. We'll call that a scrier's error.

Who's in charge of this? All right. So, thank you for keeping me on the rails. Sorry. Um, roll call. It's great to have everybody here. Yeah. Um, have we released Mr. Moss yet? Yes. Okay. So, yeah, we've got a full full attendance. Um, and we'd like to welcome our newest member, Michael Adamson.

So, um, we'll give you some time to introduce yourself in just a second, but I'm going to start with, um, a quick thought. So, there's a proverb. It's attributed to be Chinese by some, but I don't I don't know if this is true or not, but it's it's kind of a curse, and it's um along the lines of, "May you live in interesting times." If you've never heard that before, it's sort of a um you know, it it just implies that interesting times are usually chaotic, tumultuous, uh stressful, etc., etc. And I would say that we're living in interesting times.

So, um I just wanted to give a thought about that. it. Yeah, I I would have preferred to not live in interesting times really, but um we're here and I would say that one of the benefits of living in interesting times is that we have an opportunity to keep our ears to the ground and look for uh being a means of change and for me that just means trying to be a steady presence. Sometimes that's all I feel like I can do. So that's my thought and I'll share a legislative prayer and then we'll do a pledge of allegiance. Our father in heaven, we're grateful to come together as thy children and to uh exercise our duties and obligations here as planning commissioners. We ask for thy guidance as we make these decisions today. We appreciate thy blessings in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right. I will confess I was super super concerned when I drove into the parking lot. No, I know exactly. and so relieved that the items on today's agenda are not nearly as controversial as the parking lot would have originally Yeah.

made it appear. But before we jump into the controversial text amendments, uh Mr. Michael Adamson, if you'll please introduce yourself.

Yeah. Yeah. So, um Michael Adamson uh had had some previous opportunities to interact with uh Mike and and Sydney. Uh I am a traffic engineer and planner by trade. Uh am a consultant. Uh a lot of my work actually deals with interacting with cities and assisting them in planning out their roadway networks, active transportation networks, transit planning, the whole sort. And so was very interested after my interactions with with city staff in the opportunity to potentially uh be a part of the planning commission and uh serve in this capacity to weigh in on you know the future of of Centerville and try and help guide uh how we invest in our infrastructure, how we invest in our plans towards the future. I believe Mike, did you have something else?

You said exactly what I was going to actually say. So I I will add that we're very excited to have him obviously with his background. I think that's great to have that planning commission um resource and I think it'll be a huge benefit as we do discuss things relative to transportation and general planning um elements. So we're excited to have them join us. Cool. Thank you very much. Thank you. Um let's go ahead and move on to the business items. We'll start with um well we did number one. Number two, the public hearing on the zoning code text amendments for Shorelands Commerce. Um, who would like to lead us out with a description? Miss Dwise, go ahead.

Okay. So, um, obviously you guys know that my staff reports I like to kind of give a just a brief explanation of this. Um, this one is a little bit more tricky just because there are some additional layers. So, I'm going to go into a little bit more detail than I typically do, um, but not too much because I trust that you guys read the, um, staff report. So, on January 26, 2026, Tom Allred applied for the zoning text amendment to add vehicular rental or sales new limited to the Shorelines Commerce Park and remove vehicular and equipment rental sales from the Shorelines Commerce Park. The removal is staff's recommendation post um definition review. As stated in the report, definition updates will need to occur in the future. The addition that Tom is presenting is due to a conditional use permit for Salodto, which he is the partial owner of. This condition states, which I think that this is pretty important, it specifically states, which you guys have reviewed um and actually passed, no mechanical repair shall occur on the property until such time that a zoning text amendment to the Shorelines Commerce Park zone is applied for by the applicant or other property interests and therefore potentially approved by the city to include mechanical repairs within the shoreline. 's zoning designation. So by allowing for the use of vehicular rental or sale new limited to be a conditional or permitted use in the Shorelines Commerce Park. This zoning text amendment would satisfy this

request. Uh, this amendment to the Shorelines Commerce Park zone would be aligned with the current and proposed general plan as stated in the staff report um, on pages 2 through six. I I also just wanted to make sure that if when we did take out the part of the um vehicular and equipment rental sales, I just wanted to make sure that no businesses in the Shorelines Commerce Park were affected by this decision and there is no businesses in the Shorelines Commerce Park operating underneath vehicle equipment rental sales. So that was double checked. Um, in conclusion, the city staff is supportive of the proposed amendment to the Centerville zoning code as provided by the applicant. I will say the only edit is that the applicant proposed it to be permitted. Staff use it that it should be a conditional use permit. We recommend that the that it be a conditional use permit rather than outright um permitted is due to this type of use being a conditional use permit and every single other zone within the city that it is permitted slashconditionally use permitted. Um, this will also allow for the planning commission to review this area, the Shorelines Commerce Park. Um, and really just have more eyes on an area that's like a specialty zone. So, instead of me just doing a review when a new business comes in, it would be able to be brought to the planning and just having more um more backgrounds and more

eyes on it would be helpful. Um, and that is my my analysis. Excellent. Thank you, Mr. Whis. Um, I'll come back to the planning commission. What questions do you have for staff? Go for it.

Well, you know, so full disclosure. So, I called Sydney earlier because I read through it three different times. I was honestly still a little bit confused. I don't have legal background. I remember this sticking out of my mind before because we were concerned about some things. Um and so she explained a lot of things to me. I I don't need to reexlain. What? You have a look. No, no, no. Keep on going.

Okay. So, um the one a few of the things that I that she explained to me was that um there will still not be any external work outside. no writing, no showing outside um in the entire zone uh the shorelines area that would not be permitted. And it like she just said, and I'm saying this out loud, reiterating it because I had the question. I didn't know if anybody else had the question, conditional use permits. This is what they're saying about that. to have continued conditional use permits so that we're always reviewing what's happening out there and having a little bit more oversight in our open field area, the west side.

Correct. Yes. Specifically for the uses called out in the Shorelines Commerce Park Zone. So, it's not like a conditional use for every single use in the Shorelines Commerce Zone. It's just for the ones that are specifically called out now including or proposed to include this. Okay. I think it's a good idea considering that it provides a little bit more oversight for the city as to what is happening out there or what can happen. So you answered all my questions. So chairman Chair.

Yeah. I just had a question on I saw the list of conditional uses or uses and conditional uses. Do those specifically apply to the shoreland uh com shoreland subdivision commerce park or do they apply to other subdivisions or areas within the city? It depends which table of use you were looking at. Um let's let me see if you want to look at the screen. Um, possibly. Was it this page right here? That's the one that I saw. Yes. So, this one is specifically for the Shorelines Commerce Park.

And I I guess when they put that together in the first place that they had originally uh go down a little bit further on that, you know, for some reason we were they had vehicle and equipment rental and sales. I guess when they did the last master plan or subdivision or master area. Yeah, master area plan that they that was a consideration. I think that after after staff has looked over the definitions, the definitions really need some work and

based on our interpretation of it. Now, we we all three of us staff up here agree that that needs to be taken out of that just due to the invasiveness of that use um definition. And when we look at what we want the Shorelines Commerce Park to be, the ability to sell vehicle rental sales new um is much more desirable than vehicle and equipment rental sales less so much less invasive. Um it also when you talk about what type of use is involved with vehicle and equipment rental sales, there's going to be a lot of outdoor storage. There's going to need to be a lot of buffering. There's going to need to be fences and walls. And the Shorelines Commerce Park design standards specifically call out that we don't want fences. We we want certain types of buffering to occur, which would be difficult to meet the invasiveness of that use. So, it it really the Shorelines Commerce Park, just full disclosure, has an identity crisis at the moment. And and we're really trying to fix it while also helping out a local business in the area. what it comes down to. I was just going to add to it if I could be an addendum to what she said is that area has a lot of waring features even in application that it's not only clearly confusing for staff at times and what it's trying to achieve and trying to be but it can only be more confusing we think for applicants in the future. So, I guess what you're hearing me say is this the first probably of a much larger or maybe multiple steps of review of this area, especially where it's our future economic um development opportunity as a city where it's it's 150 180 acres of real estate. It really

needs to be looked at more clearly to identify what it's trying to be because it can't be both things. It can't be it can't be like this open scenic area but then also want industrialized uses that are being identified here. Well, it specifically is what you see when you're coming from the north. This is what you see in what you think of Centerville.

Yeah. And that's that's part of it. We want to change the nature of that even. Right. And when you look at vehicle and equipment rental or sell, that's like your big Mac trucks, your your huge bulldozers, your giant trailers. That's what it's saying it wants. And I don't know that that's what we want in that area or in the city of that area. So that's that's why this challenge even from staff to talk about this came into play when the applicant brought this forward. Yeah. They they raised a good question. Yeah. To make us think about it because I mean our our thoughts are is I mean when we're making this change, we're making the change not specifically for Mr. Allen and Mr. Cook is we're making this change because we think it's the best thing for that zone.

Correct. And then the question becomes how do how do you implement if this is a good use for that zone is it a a conditional use or is it a mandated use that can be applied? Yeah, that's a question that needs to be asked. Yeah, great points, great questions. Um, I know that in the staff report you talked about how we shouldn't hold the application up because I mean the intent behind that original cup was to get them up and running and we didn't really anticipate this hurdle.

Um, playing devil's advocate, why not wait and get those definitions uh corrected because they are they're in need.

They they are in need. And what we why we are asking for the applicant to kind of follow through with this is that we know that as staff we don't want to we don't want to do a quick fix instantly. We don't we don't want to just rush it and then a year from now have to come in and make those edits again. Um we're going to be doing a review of different municipalities. We're going to be doing a review of the American Planning Association definitions and making sure that they really do align with um what the definition should be. It it is going to be a larger hall and if we're looking at like a three to four month

review of this. Yeah. And I wouldn't want that. Yeah. I wouldn't want that.

Yeah. There's to go with this and and Lisa and I and Sydney all had the very conversation you're asking about. We did and we talked about that. Do we fix the definitions of what vehicle rental and sales categories are and try to better align them and clear them up so they're not as all blended like they are? They kind of blended to each other. But if we do that, then we hold the applicant up. So the decision was the applicant made the application. We don't want to be creating any due process slow time I guess or or delay. So let's get it. But we do know there's a bigger discussion for creating better definition as well as better again SEP diagnosis. And so there's two things going on that this is is bringing to the table as we talk about it which which helps us to better see where some of the gaps and challenges are that we need to improve as staff.

Right. And I do think um that this actual amendment is beneficial for the city because we're taking out a more intensive use and replacing it with new new sales of motorcycles, automobiles, and light trucks. So, I think it's a good catch that, you know, this actually is is beneficial for the city and something that staff is in favor of, but you know, with staff time and priority, you know, it will take a few months to to fix these definitions, but this actually fixes a problem with our ordinances right now that we would recommend. And we've been dealing with these definitions for, you know, 10 years. So, right, it'll be on the list of things to do.

But I I the this is where I was headed. I was playing the devil's advocate so I could then play the other side. Um to tee that up. Uh I want to ask you what are the unintended consequences here and in the interim due to this change are there any applicants that could come in and slide in under the gate before we close it so to speak. Um the the reason I ask it because Commissioner Mendenhal said it very succinctly. We're not making a decision on whether or not this applicant can engage in the conduct that they want to and that we've talked about previously in their other applications. We're making a decision about whether or not this zone is appropriately uh reszoned

for this. So, do you guys from your perspective do you see a a problem potentially hypothetically? I think there's more of a problem to wait. Yeah, I do. So what we're doing right now is stop gapping this intensive use that we don't want there once we read the definition and we just said let's streamline this to make sure someone doesn't get in with that

and then we'll go back and fix these other definitions. But I think it will be I mean I I do think that the definitions are mutually exclusive. You you have to read them. They're complicated but they talk about you know new car sales. They talk about equipment use. They talk about repair and limited. But I think that we can simplify them. But also what is a vehicle? Because some of them include boats and trailers some and trailers and you know are we really talking vehicles or so anyway once we looked at it it would be a complicated fix that will take a few months. So I think yeah this is beneficial. this is stop gapping right now

and and I think for that area it is it is an economic development opportunity that's huge and so we want to make sure we have the right potential uses that bring in the most value for the real estate that they would be taking up and this use is way more valuable than I think a vehicle and equipment rental just because the intensity and the look and the feel and how it damages the future aesthetic would not be worth it. So I'm I'm in the same boat. I feel like the urgency is there to remove that from a conditional use and put this one in its place. Got it. Right. Thank you. Just wanted to develop that conversation in the record. No, it's a good discussion. Appreciate it. More questions. I have one for Mike. Sorry, did you have a question? You can go.

I didn't even see you. Mine's super fast. Sorry. I need to look this way before I open my mouth. You said you referred to SCP. Shorelands Commerce Park. Oh, SCP. SCP. SCP. Okay. I was thinking, oh, is that an abbreviation for something should know? Sorry, I shouldn't I shouldn't do that. Okay. All right. Just wanted to clarify that. Sorry. It's okay. Um I mean obviously from what I've read like these repairs have to be an accessory use, right? Like it cannot be the primary. So is there anything for him and future people to to know okay like I have to stop right here. I can't do any more than this. Is there anything that guides them in that way? I don't know. Do you want

I think it's just a code interpretation. So again, as we've been discussing, we can't write everything into our code, but right now it says that the main use obviously is is the sale of vehicles, right? Motorcycles, automobiles, and light trucks and incidental service and and maintenance. So they have to fit in with that code interpretation. And so yes, if they go too far, then they will be putting their CUP at risk. and this applicant in particular, we had that conversation with them and it is it feels it is incidental maintenance. It's it's typical oil changes

and those sorts of things. But I guess to your comment, you know, the zoning administrator makes an interpretation and obviously the city attorney can then make an an interpretation and and see if you know

Yeah. And the other thing I want to note as well is when we're looking at definitions and whether to enforce, we look at the other definitions and say, "Okay, is this really are they selling vehicles or are they now a vehicle repair?" And so we have a definition of vehicle repair limited and vehicle repair general and and those definitions obviously limited is enclosed building and but not body paint shops and other things but like changing brakes and doing things like that. So if the repair gets you know more than incidental to selling the motorcycles then they've moved into this definition and also would be in violation. So again, as I say, mutually exclusive definitions, meaning this is different than the other definition. They work better when they when they don't overlap. So we say we know what this is and we know what this is.

So I I'm a dumb person. Um, so I I have this business and I'm doing repairs and for me as a business owner, it would be really nice to be like, okay, 49% of my sales has to be or 51% of my sales has to be like or profits I should say has to be sales of the thing. There's nothing like that that's just like this is the exact thing so that I can look at it and go okay as a dumb person cities don't regulate that that through my experience that granular. I I understand what you're saying. Yeah. Yeah. But cities don't get to that level, at least that I've worked in. I've never seen that level of intensity. Okay. Yeah.

And when we're interpreting code, if we don't have a definition or a term that's defined, then we just look to the dictionary definition. And so we the key term here would be incidental, which is something minor, secondary, or subordinate to the main activity. I I

what I'm saying is yeah, at some point we will have to make that determination. If you know it's you can see things outside, there's more deliveries, they're not making any sales, it's it's a different business, then you know they likely have to either start selling more motorcycles or move to a different location. And and I was going to add to that with with it being a business and and having certain expectations of definition, you know, if complaints started coming in or information started coming in, I would probably right start investigating and finding out how they're operating and determine what's really going on at that point.

Okay. Additional questions for staff. The one one that I wanted to ask is does this change in any way necessitate a change in their cup? No, we've talked about that too. I I mean I don't I think we're of the opinion based on how the the cup was approved and a term of it that ironically this was a term and it it basically evidences that if there's a code amendment that is made then that code amendment were it to be approved by the council then applies to this cup. There is a term actually in the cup submissions that says that, right? So they would not have to come back and and request a new conditional use permit.

They may not. And and if we can do that at staff level, but it also depends what the city council the city council makes the ultimate determination. And but if they go with staff's recommendation in where we are now, we think that that cup could be converted, but it will need to be converted to a different use because they're not actually the vehicle equipment use. So we want to slot them into this use which would allow them to do the the service and maintenance the directed use which is the one that was back in January of 2025. Yeah. But we do appreciate this correction. I think it will be better for the city as well. Very good. Yeah.

Um I'm going to ask the applicant now to come to the podium and state your name. And why is the podium backward? Just good question. No, I want you to face out. Sorry. I'm used to it. Sorry. Go ahead. Tom already. What else? Um, just so you've heard the the the conversation. I wanted to know if you had anything to add. Any questions you'd like to pose?

Not really. We had a good meeting and you covered stuff pretty thoroughly. We're forthright our intentions intentionally, but if we're out, we appreciate you considering everything, looking over it, being thorough on it. Um, yeah, there is we do have dealer required maintenance. I mean, it's just normal stuff. If there's any repairs, I we're supposed to have a mechanic able to fix anything, do anything. So, there is but everything's internalized. discussions, right?

Some repairs, but minor stuff. We don't want Okay. Only doing repairs on the stuff you sell or if somebody's like, "Not that it matters. I'm just

probably I mean, unless there's a restriction, we would probably wouldn't say no to the business. I mean, it's Yeah, they're so similar, but we're Yeah, we don't we haven't got quite that far yet. We don't want to really repair stuff. We want time. It's just I can see it going that direction though. And that's a good point. Somebody asked, I'm not sure we do it unless there's restriction. I mean, is there anything that you guys know if we define certain brands or certain types of vehicles? We be so again we're not we're not that granular like I said earlier

just so I would I would and obviously we're not we can't tell you right how things will be interpreted but at least from my perspective as long as it's minor and incidental and you can characterize it that way right yeah that would make sense yeah so um very good any other uh questions for the applicant Right. Thank you so much, sir. Yeah.

All right. Uh because this is a uh um Oh, well, any further questions for staff before I go to the the public hearing portion of our program. I'm going to open this up for public uh the public hearing. Um this is where we receive any comments. I assume none were received digitally, electronically. And everybody count seven seconds in your head. This is a test to see whether or not you you you can gauge seven seconds in your head. I have no idea if I I hit it or not. There's actually um DR officers are trained to as one of their tests to have somebody estimate a number of period of time for seconds which can be used to determine whether or not somebody is intoxicated or high uh because it accelerates your internal clock.

That's complete like aside. Anyways, 7 seconds is over. I'm going to close the public hearing. Um, any further questions or should I bring it back for motion and debate? Motion and debate. Yeah, motion. All right. Okay. So, um, who would like to lead out with their comments? Go ahead. I hereby make a motion. All right. We're moving. Are we okay or no? Please do.

Okay. Here I make a motion to recommend city council approval of zoning code text amendments presentable zoning code 12.47.090 090 regarding SCP zone permitted and conditional uses for the addition of the new conditional use category vehicle rental or cell new limited to centerville zoning code 12.47.090B and removing the vehicle and equipment rental or cell use category from Centerville zoning code 12.47.090B 090B based on the following reasons for action finding one through three and then planning commission may include any additional findings that are deemed applicable.

Yeah, I don't think we have any. Okay. So, all right. I have a motion. Can I have a question on Yes, Commissioner. So, we this would in that the new definition would be included as a permitted use and not as a conditional use. Oh, it's it's conditional use. Well, I there's there's a couple there's about three of them here and I'm trying to see which one we're who going after. It's the statement that says for the addition of the new conditional use category would make it a conditional use. Okay, I found it. No, it's a it's a great point and I had the same question in my mind and I'm like scanning which one are we reading? That's what it says. Yeah, that that statement.

Um to to that point, uh looking at the uh what Sydney had shared earlier for the the exact edits in the section itself, I was noticing that it was written within the permitted uses section, but it will be under the conditional use based on the way we're planning to correct with that motion. Correct. The red line was submitted by the applicant. Okay. Yep. So, two clarifications, but that doesn't sound like we need to make any modifications to the motion. No. So, I have a motion on the table. Second, baby. I've got a second. I'll second it. Let's move. I have an enthusiastic second. Uh, any conversation on the motion? All right, Mr. Mendenhal or Commissioner, I'll start on your end.

I I I I I All right, that's unanimous. So, that is being forwarded with a positive recommendation to the city uh council. That's what, two weeks or next week? Um well what we are looking at is that most likely it is going to need to be postponed because the second one is the second city council meeting is going to be cancelled for budgeting. Wamp wamp and we have a full agenda on the current ones. Yeah. So most likely the I think it's April 11th. April 7th 7. April 7th. So we got we got some time but thankfully the applicants have been gez Louise

really really uh flexible with us. So, we really appreciate it from staff perspective. Well, we got we're getting there. Getting there. Well, best of luck. Thank you for all the the help that you're providing to the city. Thank you. Okay, moving forward to the community development director's report. Um, the only thing I want to note is we have uh a new water efficient landscaping standards ordinance that Lisa has graciously worked on. Uh, it's been completely overhauled. Um, it's it's written very legally soundlike. I reviewed it today. See

I went to town. Okay. So, I forwarded the um comments on to the water district. We'll hear back hopefully hear back from John Perry maybe tomorrow, the next day. See if everything's sound there. But, uh we'll schedule it for a public hearing if you're okay with that on Friday. Yeah. Um and then it'll come before the body at our next meeting two weeks from today. That'd be great to get it in place for this coming year when all the water restrictions go into effect after it's a high high priority for banger snow year we've had. high priority by some of the council members as well and there are want to take advantage of the opportunity while we're going to the spring. So, okay, good.

So, we tried to address all the issues that the planning commission brought up in their thorough review of it and a little bit of the addressing the non-conforming, you know, when you have to comply with this. And then the other thing I would note is the datus detached ADUs that the legislature likely is going to approve that. Um, so we'll probably be bringing forward some kind of code with with ideas or terms of restriction. I don't know. We'll have to talk internally what we want that to look like. But I think that that that is right now being looked at to go effective. I think it's May or June 1

is what's being looked at. And 10,000 square feet or larger would qualify for dad use by state code if that. Can we make a rule that if it's ConX container, it's got to be double stacked. Sorry. Yeah. And with that, uh, but you know, kind of to the comment, uh, garages, detached garages and other structures can be modified into daddies by this code as well. Some of the terms of Wow. Well, we knew it was coming. We knew it was coming. Super fun. When they when they pass the ADU preeemption, the biggest question that's coming now is, can you have an ADU and a DATU? And the league leadership said, I don't know. We'll have to look into that and get back with you. So, don't give people

And by fun, you mean interesting times? Yes. Interesting times. I think they'll pass it. It'll be interesting if you can get internal ADU three homes on the lot or not. We don't know how that You think that will be the limit? Like, do you think that'll be the limit? So, there's a lady back east that has 13 Yeah. tiny homes and she's like she's in compliance. She's she's like making $13,000 a month. She got like one every There definitely is a push and pull. There was a variation of it that didn't have the 10,000 square foot in it, but that was the expectation from the league when this was discussed out of session. And now the um sponsor has conceded and put with the first substitute put back in the 10,000 foot. I mean 10,000 that's kind of that's substantial

of a home or the lot has to be 10,000 ft or larger to be able to do. It's not that big. So okay. Oh, I Oh. What's 10,000 ft an eighth? About a quarter acre. Oh, it's a quarter. Yeah, it's not very much. I was That's why I was like 10,000. That's huge. Fascinating. Well, keep your ears to the ground. There were a record number of bills this year. Yeah. So, um it's overwhelming and exhausting to try to track everything. Yeah, I think we saw like 990 was the number or something today. 25. Thank you for that update. That's going to be fun. Um, let's look at the minutes from now the 28 is correct. Yes,

the broken clock is correct twice a day. Um, the minutes from January 28th. Does anybody have any corrections, additions? Um, and I correct me if I'm wrong here. I was reading through them and you have HB248 is something that you brought up for us to like read last time. I looked that up. I think it might be HB48. Am I wrong in that or does that even matter? Oh, you're talking to me. I'm sorry. It's okay. What were you saying again? So, you had told us to uh like there were like it says in here toward on page three at the very top uh impact land use including potential amendments to HB248 of 2025.

Oh, 48. Yeah, that's 48. I think it's HB 48. Am I wrong? And does that even matter? Yeah, on the WOOI maps. Oh. Is that something that I even need to correct it to 48? Let's do that because 248 is veteran protections from last year. Yeah, it's 48 then. Nice catch, dude. That I wanted to do told me to and I couldn't figure it out. Don't stop. We do have an ordinance coming forward on that, but we're not bringing it forward to the planning commission because we're just going to adopt it as part of our construction codes. Nice. Okay. Um any other corrections? Seeing none, um all those in favor of the minutes as amended say I.

I. I. Any opposed? Seeing none, that's unanimous. Um I am open to a motion to adjurnn. I will make a motion to adjurnn. I'll second that motion. Motion in a second. All those in favor say I. I. You're out. All right. Record. Nice work, guys. Last time it was 7:36. Thank you, everybody. Thank you, sir.