Planning Board - Regular Meeting

For the option. We send it back.

Good evening.

Good evening.

Any comments? There is an order for a public hearing today.

Any comments? Anyone from the public wants to intervene on this request? Mr. President, since there are no comments from the public, I propose to close the public hearing. Second. All in favor?

Only as a note, Pat made a comment in the resolution during the last meeting not to organize, for example, barbecues, I mean bigelon. Yes, it was discussed and for us there is no problem. Motion to adopt the plan of action.

Mr. President, I propose to adopt the resolution of the urban commission of the city of Carmel, number 2623, 10 September 2026. The number of the disaster map is 15.69. Putnam County Housing Corp. 1117, Seminary Hill Road, approval of the definitive urban plan and the special permit. I support. All in favor?

Thank you, Joe. Thank you very much.

Someone who has just entered represents 64 Stewart Road.

You can come in front of you.

No, I'm not here. No, that's Bon's.

Next in line is Bonzero restaurant, 11 Clark Place. In line. Other comments?

No comment.

Felicio? Sorry for the resolution. No additional comment. EPAT has prepared a resolution. It has been distributed to all. A motion to be accepted. Mr. President, I propose to adopt the resolution of the urban commission of the city of Carmel, number 2622, 10 September 26.

The number of the cadastral map is 75449.

Bonusa restaurant, 18 Clark Place, approval of the final urban planning. I support.

All in favor?

Good luck with your project. When will you start? Uh, right away. Well, good luck. Thank you, sir.

Oh, I have to withdraw the drawing I presented to Rose. Excuse me, I'll talk to my ... Oh, I have to withdraw the drawing I presented to Rose in the urban planning commission here.

Oh, here, okay.

Thank you, sir.

Good evening.

Next to the order of the day.

Subdivision in two lots for partners 14 entrance way. I hope you have some comments.

Good evening.

Good evening. This is a subdivision in two lots on Entrance Way. The applicant has obtained an interpretation from the ZBA according to which the five lots can be divided into two separate lots. However, they must return to the planning committee to complete the activity. It is necessary to provide a scale of the drawing in the block of the title, provide the file map number on the map, Add lot number one and lot number two on the map. Once these points are resolved, I have no objections to the approval of the sketching plan. Thank you, Enric.

Thank you, President.

The proposal provides for the subdivision of a 11,300-foot section consisting of five separate lots. As Ed mentioned, they support an existing family residence, so much so that the subdivision would be two lots of 9,971 feet and 6,339 square feet. The applicant has noted the needs for The Autostradale Department, Fire Officers and the Department of Sanitation of the County have applied for the water pollution prevention plan, which is in the process of revision. There is information that indicates that there are no proposed areas to be reserved for open space. The applicant will have to develop a metric compute for the good execution of the sewage. This would really only concern the drainage of the Piovane waters and the landscape. Nothing important, because it is a subdivision for two cases. Sewage for the Piovane waters, etc. The applicant will have to provide, as part of the preliminary approval of the plan, the report on the use of water and reflux water, which is in the review phase. They have provided that and any other information required by the senses of the chapter of section 131 of the municipal code.

Pat did not have any comments about it. Give us again a brief overview of the project.

Well, this is why it fell apart.

We were all

Yes, it is a very common situation in that area. Originally we were returning to the borders of the original lots. We have carried out many projects with two lots created for a house, considering that there are available foams and water. The original subdivision planning established it and we are following the original guidelines.

We tried to respond to all the comments.

of the last meetings and I think we did quite well. If there could be little things left behind. As Ricci said, the report on water has been presented. In this phase, I think we are ready to move on with you. So I ask you this for the next meeting. If possible, we could plan a public hearing and perhaps the final approval at the same time, since the project is minor and there are no road constructions or other developments of the property.

There are a couple of points requested by Ebb that must be completed.

Minor questions, but they must be completed.

The council is waiting, but for me it is good to proceed with the public hearing, because personally I want to hear the response of the community. But we won't go further if you don't ask the few questions he asked you.

What he just said will probably take us 20 minutes to fix the details.

We can definitely do it.

We have a motion to schedule a public meeting.

President, I make a motion to schedule a public meeting.

All right. All in favor?

Thank you very much.

See you at the Trumpet this week. Good evening. Also.

150 for retirement.

The next point of the day is Goldsmith, Gaylord, 1923 Colton Road.

Good evening.

Ed, you didn't comment on this, did you?

No, no comment from me.

Rich, you didn't have any. The applicant has simply taken note of all the comments I have collected. The only thing is that there is an agreement in the implementation phase and the existing or proposed pacts or the restrictions on the act applicable to the site should be examined by the planning council.

So I imagine that the point of the matter is that the owner has built a lake for the carpe coi on the property of the neighbor

However, in reality, the genesis of this problem derives from the original lottage plan of 1967, as I have provided in our documents. The northern border of the property of my client, the one on the left, extends by 154 feet, and that of the adjacent owner, the property of Geylog, by 150 feet in the opposite direction, overlapping according to the original lottage in our documents there is an enlargement of those two lots that show the overlap that is the genesis of the problem for years they considered a certain border between them as an informal border the lake was positioned there with the conviction that it was on the side of the border that both used at that moment and what we are trying to do in front of the council now is to formalize and legitimize that agreement that they have reached for a long time and that they have signed So it's not that he acted improperly, or, you know, contrary to the interests of that border owner. The Golden were working on that informal agreement they had with which they both tried to correct that overlap and recognize a border, and it is the one you have in front of you today.

I think we are all in favor of terminating informal agreements, handwritten agreements, and similarly in favor of formal borders.

The reformers. There is a written agreement. So they acted on this basis for many years.

So, the next step here, I think, would be a public hearing. Let's make a motion. Mr. President, I propose a motion for a public hearing. I make the motion.

All in favor? In favor.

I can ask, I can only ask a question.

Wait a second. Hello. I can only ask. We are planning a public hearing, so anyone who wants to listen to the question can present themselves in a future date. Okay. I just wanted to wait. Come back. We have a question from our legal advisor, so he might want to stay to listen. I just have a quick question. The other owner of the property is a demandant or has given consent to the request? Well, it is based on the agreement they have reached, so my client had to carry out this request for both. So my question is, do we have the advice? Do you have something written that shows the consent of the other owner? In addition to the agreement that I have deposited with my documents. So a written agreement has been deposited. Second question. There is a contentious dispute between the two parties. There has been someone in the past. So the only contentious was about the back of the property.

With other parties not involved.

Different parties.

Perfect. But nothing of what happens with respect to this question will in any way affect the conclusions of that contentious. For nothing. Separate parts of the property, parts in different causes that do not involve this side at all. And the public audience will emerge. Excuse me. The public audience will make all the comments that the other neighbors could have emerge. Thank you. Probably two weeks.

My genitals.

Only take note of the public audience.

The next point of the day is the final raffling of Yankee Land Development Bay Hill Road and extension of Owen Rye.

Do you want to skip the 7-8 points in the order of the day? There is no one. Let's move on to 9, Western Bluff Subdivision.

Good evening. Good evening.

Do you have any comments about it, please?

No comment about it.

No objection to the approval of the final loting plan. We can give an agreement of permits and you are still working to obtain the cash, right? It was that.

And then, you know, with the extensions of six months we will be able to start.

What are your plans for these seeds?

Before the six-month delay, my plan is to start work there. It is expected this fall. If I understood correctly, we have to wait until the end of September to start cutting trees.

Excuse me, did you say Goofy?

I think so. Goofy or Pipistrella. Something like that. They were disturbed.

And are you practically ready to go?

I'm practically ready to go. I have my engineer on board. So yes, I will deposit a cash and I hope to enter at the end of the month.

I will pay the taxes, I will bring there some car.

Motion. For an extension of six months. For a short drive.

I make a motion to extend of six months.

All in favor?

Good night everyone.

ROSE has distributed the newspapers of July 9th, July 22nd and August 13th.

Violetti, everyone. I made some minor comments on all three. I propose to approve the newspapers subordinately to those minor changes.

All in favor? We have a motion to update the meeting.

I make a motion to update the meeting of September 10th at 7 p.m. All in favor?

Good night everyone.

Good night.