Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

That's what you said. That's okay. The August 11th, 2025 meeting of the city of Canon Falls Planning Commission will come to order. Roll call. Johnson here. No. Uh Fox here. Nova here. Douglas here. Nats here. Okay. The agenda is before us. Additions to the agenda for a motion to approve. Motion to approve from Chris. Is there a second? Second. Isaac. All in favor? I I named I'm trying to do this in order tonight. So,

you're doing great. Approval of minutes from the July 21st meeting. Motion to approve. Chris moves. Second. Second. Brian seconds. All in favor? I I so moved. Is there any public input? Okay. No public input, public hearings, uh preliminary platform awarded addition. And he said you were going to take that.

Yep. Yep. So, so um Mr. Gorman has applied for uh a preliminary plat to plat lots in what are currently the uh Terraot St. Clair terraout edition and um which is actually not far from here right across the street or right across the railroad tracks. Um this was a part of a a plan and a an application very similar to this back in 2018. Um at that time the presentation and application was made to uh plot out those lots and um with certain conditions of a a couple conditional use permits and a variance allowing them to have variance for the block length. um have conditional use that the lots could come off of uh not have to be adjacent to a city street because they would be served by a private road and uh Mr. Gman would put in the utilities that would uh then become part of the city's infrastructure for utilities and those would be the the mains that would serve uh the properties at that time. So the preliminary plat was approved and granted all the those conditions and variants are granted. In addition, there was a um a vacation uh request for the alleyways uh adjacent to those to those lots so that uh they could uh develop them with the proper setbacks and with those private roads and those were all approved. Uh since that time uh the preliminary plat that

was approved did not uh get um applied for a final plat. So a final plat was not approved by our code. Uh if you do not complete the from the preliminary plat to the final platin in a year's time then that preliminary plat goes away. Um additionally the the variances and cups for or the variance in the CPS uh I would say are called into question whether or not they still apply to the land but that's not necessarily for our determination tonight. Um the vacation of the alleyways um however was that was implemented and actually recorded. So as far as the county recorders office and and our legal descriptions are stand there are no public alleyways in that area. So that brings us to where we kind of are with the application today that um Mr. Gorman would like to put the alleyways back in the current standards for our alleyways. Uh this is one of the older plots in town. So the current standards for the alleys are 16 ft of paved surface with 16 additional feet of rightway. So 8 ft on either side. So a 32 ft rightway with 16 ft of pavement. Um so that then you know create some different uh unique circumstances regarding uh this project and where the the plan will play. So try to kind of explain how this would would work with the some of the maps that that you have. So, I apologize for all of the the stuff that's in there. So, I wanted to kind of include some of the information from the past decision, but I did try to draft some maps like these to show um why the requests um that would follow the preliminary plat if approved uh would need to be completed before the final plat. So, um as originally uh when we originally met and Mr. Norman and I have met a number of times around this

project. You know, the the thought with the alleys being, you know, we were under the impression that alleys being 16 ft would allow for for the most part the the two kind of main areas for development um to meet all of the the setbacks within the um RB district where these lots are located uh for the potential building of two twin homes. However, then when we were revising things and actually applying and looking at the at the code with the additional 8 ft on either side of the paved alley, um which would be beneficial because that would help to u maintain the rightway access for the utilities that have been installed in the area. Um that that would create a a a need for a variance um for this. So, so essentially the the core of tonight's decision is really to have the you know the public hearing and the the decision or evaluation of the the plat with the acknowledgement that there's a a list of conditions that you would likely approve as recommendations if this project were then to move to a final final plat situation where you know the lots could be developed and then actually homes be built on that site. So that would include, you know, the the variances for not just the the setback for one of the or two of the parcels um to be closer in front um so that they could meet the the setbacks, but the lot depth cuz the lot depth of an RV is 142 ft. So with those changes, um the lot depth minimum is not met on either of the two main parcels that that we're that we're looking at. So, um, so as you as you see and it was reviewed

by our engineers, uh, you know, when going over this and and kind of having some things that were already approved, already done, some things that were not done, um, but were approved. uh we do feel that it would um be recommended to at least approve to the preliminary plat so long as those you know we did did address the conditions that would would need to be to be made. Um and I'll kind of touch on some of those. So so number one we the for the engineers circumstances they just want to make sure that anything that MIDOT would have would be acknowledged. So in my meeting with Mr. Garmin, he has applied for the the permit the proper permits for Lake Mandot uh for I think there was a culvert that was moved for uh storm water drainage. So, but I don't at this at the time of the application and drafting this. We didn't have any answers or feedback. So, we just want to make sure if there's feedback or there's some things that Mindot wants to have done because it does is adjacent to the uh within the rightway that they that those be incorporated. Um so that and then everything is met to the standards and that we do um ultimately get um the documents that are required for the plat uh to to the final forms. So you know the certificate of survey we do have one on record that you know is from um the 2018 time frame. We do have a grading and drainage erosion control plan which was from the previous one. out, you know, but we would want to make sure that that's updated if there's any uh changes or things necessary for that. Um, and then the utility plan, just making sure that we do have one, we do have where actually some of the asbuilts are or where the asbuilts are, um, with notes on that that's incorporated, but just making sure that those things as they get to the final plat stage are updated. So, you know, it's not it's typically required to have them uh

incorporated, but in terms of wanting to make sure, hey, can the is it is the is this project even going to get past this stage? That was one one of the reasons we had the the work session conversation about it. Um, you know, the investments in in those costs, we wanted to make sure it could be done. And even um if this were to go to a final plat, you know, could be somebody else that could ultimately develop it. um as well. So, you know, those lots are, you know, noted that, hey, this is how they can be buildable. You can build on them, but these are the contingencies and things that they have to to fall through that might be, you know, make them more viable for for a person to to develop. So, just um you know, a couple of the other things are are relatively small or the the name for the roadways. Um, just acknowledging that when we had hardwood estates, there was uh a little bit of complication with some of the naming conventions and roadways that would, you know, need to be acknowledged because they're not necessarily fronting off of Fifth Street or fronting off of even Sixth Street, which, you know, is is marked on a map as the al part of the alley, but it's technically not where the Sixth Street is. Sixth Street is actually farther west. So just figuring that out at the end um would I think be uh necessary and then the the variances that were were described so that they um acknowledging that while they don't meet the the code um the the spirit of uh needing housing and having something built here and having it primarily uh meeting a lot of lot of the other circumstances um other than those distances um would be you achievable. So that's

all I have for my presentation piece. Is there take any questions or if not um you want to open the the hearing first take the public comments because I do know we have individuals that will speak to the public hearing. Um I will open the public hearing for the preliminary pledge for the aortment edition at 642. Would anyone like to speak to this? Yep. your neighbor.

I live on the south end of this and um actually this is kind of a circle in 2018 when this was all coming forward. Um that started our city council journey. My husband and I started attending meetings and of course no one listened to us. So um at the time it got all approved anyway. Um, and let me pause. Can you give your name and address for the record? Yes, I should know that. Becky Youngark, 810 Fifth Street North.

And so here we are again. We were concerned about crowding in 2018 and we're concerned about that again. And so I don't know if any of you have seen that area, but the thought of five families moving into three buildings there. And I am on the park board. Where's the green space going to be? where is there going to be any yard left because it is tight there and it is not a city um standard lot. It's been the variance was approved in 2018. So um they're beautiful lots but to put five families into that area I think is too small and um I think it would be a disservice to the families that were live there including us. So, thank you very much.

Great. Are there others who would like to comment

on the preliminary plan? I can't see behind the poll too well. Any anyone else hearing? None. Then I will close the public hearing at 6:44. Now we move to item seven discussion. Item eight, preliminary platform requirement additions members of the commission. Do we have a time frame as to I guess 2018 or 2017 it didn't get finished. Took a year nothing happened. So what is the time frame for getting things started on this one? getting it completed. Uh what are the chances that it won't be completed or even started again after a year? Do we have any guarantees on that?

Can I piggy back on that? So if if if approved, does it does this last for a year as well? Did I miss that or misunderstand that? Uh no, that's correct. The preliminary plat would need to be taken to the final plat stage. Um that definitely wasn't there weren't any other requests for that for an extension that time longer. Okay. If I may, Miss Johnson, I have a couple questions. No answers. Um you were talking about two units, two lots. Are you talking about the one twin mom lot? Okay. Yeah. Okay. Cuz the other one does conform. Okay. Y I I thought that

No, there's Yeah, there's only one that needs the front setback variants. Um just to be clear, uh if I if I misspoke. So the the one on the south end was the one that needed the front setback variance. The one on the the to the north does not need any setback variances. It only needs the lock depth variance. Right. And and it wouldn't except for that 8 ft of right away. It was it was right on the edge. It would have it would have complied. Yep. It would have meant all the complying, but we when we reassessed and and agreed that the 8ft additional rightway for the alley needed to be there, then that pushes that.

Now, to try to answer your question, Brian, so um I've certainly thought about putting a twin home in there, but it's awfully expensive and things aren't selling. And the the bottom line is I'm going to plat it, period. Okay, that's my plan. So, it would be platted. It would be completed well within the year and it may sit there. I'm not guaranteeing you that I'm going to build anything. I'm only doing it so that my children won't have to do it cuz I may not live long enough. I don't know. Okay.

So, it's just one step at a time. You may shoot it down and it may just sit there. I don't know. Can I add? Yes. And maybe this is a question. If this is platted with all these variances, does that continue then with the land or will that expire the year variances? No. The So the variances if you go to the final platin are approved then the variances stay with the property. Okay. Yes. When it's when you go to the final plat. Yes.

Yeah. only when it goes to the for sure when it goes to the final fund. So my question is back in the and these variances are different slightly from you know or or the conditional use and the variances are different than what was approved back in 2018. So that's why I'm I'm not saying like I don't want to I don't want to ask the questions or even apply the 2018 decisions and what was approved at that point because they're not really relevant to the plan that we have today

because we're going back to public rightway cuz that was that was part we were moving to private streets. So that was one change to the to the allowed rule which you know incorporated the two I believe that was the two conditional uses. So, one private street, so they they would not be fronting off of a public street. So, that was one conditional use. The other was to even allow for a private street period. And then the because then they wouldn't have the proper block length, which was the variance piece, which I guess I haven't looked into, but it wasn't necessarily worried. I wasn't worried about the length of the block so much or where this is about. So, but at the time, you know, the infrastructure was put in. So, like that's that's an investment that's already been made that makes these lots more buildable if they can then meet or get approvals for this in terms of its land use. So, you know, kind of we're talking about tracked in the data center. We're talking about the land use approvals. We're talking about the development agreement that encompasses the infrastructure. Some of those things are coincide. So in this instance, there's infrastructure in in the ground. It's, you know, those things would be ready to be made connections. The alleys would have to be re repaved, you know, and added, but that's, you know, that is in terms of infrastructure cost like the lots are are fairly ready to be developed. So just just cure a couple couple things I guess I have. What's the access off street then? Is there no access or is that just

No, there's there is and that was actually what he had I referenced in the in the mind piece was he moved the culvert so then that would align where the alleys would be replatted to go. Okay.

I might interrupt you Chris for just a minute because I don't want to forget this midbot thing. Um, I applied back in early May, something like that, the midnot, and got no response, if you can believe that. And then when I have a friend that works for the design department in Mindot, and I called him up. So, he gave me a name and a number, and I called this guy, and I got a quick response and he said, "I'll get on it." And there was a couple transmissions back and forth and I would get a permit in about a week. That was at the end of end of May. I still don't have it. Well, I moved to Culver. Okay. And and I mean it's it's moved. It moved like 25 ft north and they're I just drove by there. Then they've got it dug out and they're going to pave an entrance to it. So, and I tried repeatedly to get a hold of this guy. I get no response. No email response. But I have an email thread. my wife does because I don't do that kind of stuff. And I

So, is it going to be a shared entrance to the young horse's residence then? Is that how that's going to work? Yes, there's an easement. My I built that house for my son. My son and I built that house. And there is a 20ft easement to go to Young Marks off that entrance. It also wraps around and comes in behind Dakota Street. So, there's two entrances and exits. And then, do I understand this correctly, there's going to be some sort of HOA agreement where that private alley is taken care of?

No, it's not a private alley. So, that was the past. That was part of the past. So, I want to be clear on that. Like, you know, there's things of the past ones that are not applying to where we are today. And and in 2018, I had a person that was interested in purchasing the whole thing. And this was part of the deal. And I put the infrastructure in and I've got it to five lots and that fizzled. So here I said and the alley meets our

the alley would meets the yeah it would need to it would be part of the contingent that meets the design requirements but the way it's platted it could it could meet that. So our public works don't have any issue following that or taking care of that or they have for years and years. No. Okay. in another just detail. So if if this makes it to the final plat and is approved, uh if somebody comes in and decides not to build twin house but just wants to build the regular house, does it have to be replatted then or? No, they would just have to meet the setbacks as they as they apply or well this even the front that front setback variance that would that would be regardless of whatever home would be put there that it would need to need to be in place to make the make it buildable. I mean you would otherwise you would have a very narrow house. Yeah, I guess these are construct there that I guess that that number would be relative to the design of the the twin homes that you shared with me because that's what you know I think is built on here. So that

you you lost me.

Okay. So I I just we're not approving we're not we're not asking for approval tonight for a seven to make this front setback 17T. We're just saying that contingent upon it, it needs to be at least 17 feet in a future final flat approval. And that was based on what we the design of, you know, that twin home design that you showed the the the plans building plans that you showed for for that because that was like 50 is that 53 52 ft deep. So yeah, so with where that would start to where it would finish, then it could fit within a 17 ft set back in the front and a 20ft set back in the back. Trying to preserve the back lot as much as possible because that's what's budding young. So if somebody came in and these are preliminary platted and they said, I don't want to do twin homes, I'm going to do regular homes. they would they could maybe amend the setback number if their home design was skinnier or near narrower front to back. Um they could you'd be change, you know, going from I think we're at max of 52 ft from the front to the back of the constructed house to you know if you go all the way to the 25 then you're down to 44T. So it's possible.

Can I can I interrupt? Can I get a copy of that when we're done? Yeah, I love that. I love that color you got. Yeah. No,

but and and so that you understand I do meet the setback requirements to Young Marks and I've told them that if I'm going to do this and I get along great with the Young Marks. Um I told them if I do if I am going to do that that I'm going to get a permit to put a fence up in the back because there was this massive uh line bush. So, they were hidden back there and I and I told them that I'm going to come in and put some of this out. And they agreed that it needs to be thinned out, but I told them I'll put up a fence and it'll be right on the property line. And then they're they don't have to be that close. But I do meet the set back there. I meet the set back on the side. I would have met the set back up front till John stole 8 ft from me.

Other by 6 in. Yeah. Other questions? We're not We're not dealing with fence right now. Okay. Other questions or comments? Thank you. Thank you. Um I just want to know I I just want to make sure I understand. We're going to um what you want to do or what this wants to do is is shift shift the road the alleyway. Um

replplatting the alleyway. Repl it it's gone. Um and um I am based on what I see on here uh and I don't know the layout exactly other than there's a bank there from the young youngs property. You know they have their driveway and what it looks like now is that um that would have to shift over a bit. Correct. No,

I I do believe their existing driveway fits within that 20 foot uh drive roadway easement access that and that is in existence and that's the looks like unless it's over that that can be the map. So the aerials aren't perfect. Uh I can I've I've had examples of this where I turn 23 aerials on 24 aerials and everything moves. Yeah, true. West a little bit. So, so we can't we can't totally we can't you can't base the aerials as

okay as where they ultimately will be. That's that's going to be on the survey. And um just for my information um because this is going to be this this uh roadway in here is going to be an alleyway. Does that um does that have to be paved? Yes. Yes. Right now the city code has as has alleyways or paved. Okay. That is the design statement. And it's not 100 ft. So yeah. And they're not two acres in in size. So it's not going to meet the exemption.

But they're these are public alleys anyways and not where's the cost of that as a developer. Okay. Other questions, concerns, thoughts? I'm just going to ask Mr. Corman. So, you get the preliminary plan done. It's just what that's what you want. That's your whole thing is just to get it going. And whatever happens after it's approved, if it goes to final or whatever it might be, you don't really care if someone else bought the property from you or it's going to go to your kids or whoever it's going to go to. You're just going to prepare this to be able to be developed. That's your main emphasis.

That is correct. I do have a blueprint to put up one twin home which would be next to Young Marks first and I do have a friend of my sons that wants to build on it. Okay. But Okay. So when you say it's close to Young Mark that mean lot too block. There we go. There we go. Lot one. There we go. I have a I have a plan. If it was all approved, I could pull the trigger and build it tomorrow. Well, after it's approved, right? And the final plat's approved. Correct. Yeah. Yes. I could probably do it before the final plat is approved. My guess. No. Can't. Okay.

Okay. No, you would. Yeah. you need you need the final plaid approval and the variances to meet our zoning permits. Okay?

So, we would not be able to approve the zoning side of that of that building permit, which the county makes us do our part first on the zoning piece before they approve the the So, yeah, you might meet all the building permit stuff, clean sale, they can they can hammer that out really fast. However, we have to have the authoriz the zoning authorizations and that's why we're going through this process. So, first it's preliminary plat then it would be the final plat and you would need the conditions of that to be met to meet the final plat so that it could then get the approval to build that property. Okay.

So, it ain't happening tonight. We're just recommending we're making a recommendation one way. There's no nothing's happening tonight. That it's as the process goes. The plary PL process starts with the public hearing. The recommendation from the planning commission. Then that recommendation if they voted up or down, it still then goes to the council as their recommendation. So it will be going to the next council meeting on a resolution. No, it the the That's there would be the 19th. Yeah. 19. And then so it goes to the council as still a preliminary plan.

And if it's approved by the council with conditions, then we we wait for those conditions to be met. Yes. And presented in a final plan. Would that also need a public hearing or uh not no final plats don't necessarily need the public hearing, but the variance is what? Yes. It's an overall suitably cooler on our

Yeah. So, yes, procedurally too, there's a lot more more steps than tonight. You're you saying yes tonight doesn't necessarily mean it's going to happen. You saying no tonight doesn't necessarily mean it's not going to happen. You are recommendating re a board to make a recommendation to the to the council page has what you're supposed to say. I guess I tried to script it.

I the one where it has the all the nine I mean unless you want to further discuss or be ready to move on.

I I guess I just want to I I guess I I'm okay with this. I I don't have a huge problem. I I think it's a good thing you can get more houses in there. I get it doesn't leave the front set back, but yeah, I I'm I'm okay with this just like I was with Dollar General. There are a ton of variances there. This is only has the one there for the setback. It's it just makes sense to me if you get more houses here and you know it's it's an odd lot odd piece of property as it is and that's what variances are for. And I I think if if your twin home design was 8 ft shorter and you met the setback I I have a feeling the Young Marks would feel the same way if you get what I'm saying. There'd still be a house there even though it's 8 ft shorter. Um, and I, you know, yeah, it's it's unfortunate, but

I'm going to I'm going to I I want to just interject like go for it.

When So, I I appreciate Mr. Gorman on this process because he's really he's he's done a lot of diligence to meet with me to talk about the project. We've gone over a lot of different things in advance of even the application being, you know, formally submitted. It wasn't the the 8 foot right away piece um has been a change in our design standards. So when we when you originally brought this forward every we're looking at everything is oh yeah 16 ft for an alley. That's what they all are everywhere you look all around. 16 foot alleys are are all over the place. It was after that. So that that piece is kind of a a late I guess awareness on on our part. So I I I do want to own part of it. Isn't his design could have been different if it was if that was all part of the original kind of thought process and plan. He could have had a design that was 8 ft short. So I don't I don't want to make it seem like he's trying to force something in here, but based on what we what we discussed, you know, we wanted to get the make sure we're meeting the timeline for the public hearing getting set and having something to discuss. So just needing to acknowledge that hey there may be an additional variance that somebody could come in with a design plan and that that front set pack variance may not be needed but as it stands with the information we had we wanted to acknowledge it incorporate it not feel like we're presenting something that isn't

would be would be worse I guess. Yeah. No, I I guess at the end of the day, it there's more houses, probably more affordable houses there, twin homes. It's It makes sense to me. And yeah, that's

I guess I would have to agree with you. It's like I've driven around that property, looked at it, and if we're trying to make things more aesthetically pleasing for people to come into Canon Falls, look at it. I think where it is now to me when I drive by it looks dumpy. You know, at least if we put houses in there or something like that, I think it'll make it look a little bit more attractive, which is good for people, especially coming in from that direction to say, "Oh, yeah, look at that. They're doing something positive." So, yeah, I I think it's a positive for this for the city compared to what's there now. I know it's outside of what we're approving tonight, but I think it'd go a long way if you built that fence when everything's done. But

we get a permit for that, too. And and first of all, I would like to just say thank you to John and Dave for uh the incredible amount of work and effort that's gone into trying to figure this all out, including all the old documents, what's still applied, what didn't, and your willingness to work together bring this to us. Uh if we're ready, the what we would need is a motion to recommend approval recommend to the city council approval of preliminary plan so long as the following nine conditions are met in the application for final flat within a period of one year to date resolution. Would someone like to make that motion?

So move second. I'll second it. I have a second. Further discussion. All in favor? I I So moved. Thank you. Thank you. Leave all the village. Good. Thank you. We are down to discussion item B. Approve sunrise court repeating wall. And if you go way way back in your pack, you can find that. Sydney, you're going to speak first.

All right. So, this item is for the approval of a building permit and excavation permit at 211 Sunrise Court. So, that is the manufactured home um in the southern portion of town. Um, so I had an applicant come in, uh, he wants to put up a 4ft retaining wall, which is where the building permit comes in. So if you're at that 4T limit, you have to do a building permit for a retaining wall. He's also doing a lot of excavation um, in order to put this in. So that's where the excavation permit comes in. Um, unfortunately his site is within the Bluff Olay Protection District that the city has. Um so per that city code we need approval by planning commission um before we can approve the permits um and send the building permit off to good county um for its final building approval. Um so for the process we did bring in the city engineer um so that we could do some erosion control measures with the applicant. Um so with his construction it's required that he has to seed or saw within seven days after his um construction is complete and then if any slopes are greater than 4 to one um he does have to do um the erosion blanket instead of just sogging due to the um slope of that bluff. It is right behind this property so that's where this issue comes into play. Um, so that was brought up with Sydney, city engineer. It already went through zoning approval through me. Um, so the purpose of this memo is to get planning commission approval so that we can keep this approval process going. Um, and then the applicant can get going with this construction.

So is is there anything there now? Is there like is it just is there an old retaining wall or is there wood? There's no retaining wall right now. He has a shed that's back there. Um but the retaining wall is past the shed where that um loft and the steepness comes in. So he's trying to hold back erosion that comes onto his property with that retaining. Okay. So this is actually addressing a current problem. Correct. Yes. Other questions, comments?

Is there where he's putting the retaining wall? Is there a neighbor beside him or above him or however that that must be above? Is that the case or Yeah, so there's I believe up on the top of the block there is neighbors and then just beside him within the porch, he has neighbors on right and left of him. Okay. Are they having the same problem? I guess I haven't spoken with them. Especially the ones above if they're having trouble. That's right. Well, the retaining wall stop be okay. Other questions, comments.

Just just I don't know. I mean, as long as the city engineer puts some conditions on it, I trust his judgment. I'm happy with it. It makes sense to me. We could we could talk for a long time or we could just move to approve the uh excavation and building that.

Let's make the motion to approve. Brian moves to approve the building and or excavation and building permit. Yes. Is there a second? Second. Second. Item seconds. Further discussion. All in favor. I say move. Uh, next planning commission meeting is September 8th, council August 19th. If there is no further business or anything

provide one update about our upcoming uh September. Uh so our project with tracked um is near is getting moving along. Uh we do have a a tenative agreement in place with the township related to the annexation of the property. So that will be going in a resolution to the city council on the 19th. So um as part of that uh we had a very long meeting with track last week. Um as the data center uh code amendment um has progressed. they understand the terms of that and are prepared to amend their initial application back in in Maine to accommodate that process as well as um things that they've their modifications from their original original piece. some more I'd say concessionary um asks from preliminary what we so they have a deadline with us to get that information to us so that we can have everything prepared and get to the uh planning commission. I do believe prior to that planning commission we will likely again have another uh work session joint work session with the council just to make sure everybody's on the same same page as these process go through. Uh and then Izzy I think has an application today that came in. So how I just want to make sure uh you're aware I would very very much need attend attendance that night because there are five public hearings individual public hearings that would be needed for the tracked application and then there'll be additional public hearing for the applicant that came today. So, it's it's going to be a busy one. It's

going to be on the 8th. On the 8th, you want to have a work session for our meeting, the work session before the meeting. It'll be a shorter work session than our previous ones, but just to make sure that the council has their attention to it as well. 6:30. We'll see as things come together. Wait for it. possible to send the planning commission members that timeline? Yes. Yep. Yep. Yes. It's too long to print, but

No, it Yeah, it's a it's a I can I can try to format it so it fits on a 8 and 1 half by 11 11. But yeah, I'll I'll speed on what's expected. So if you just share the email address and anything further for us anybody else have anything they would like to share and a motion to adjourn you already. Move to move. Second

second. All in favor? I I post name.