County Council - public_hearing
The County Council discussed various departmental budgets, focusing on the Health Department's staffing and funding, the Coroner's vehicle and equipment needs, and the Commissioners' budget, including IT services, maintenance, and capital improvement projects. A key point of discussion was the need to address discrepancies in budget reporting and to ensure proper funding and management of county resources.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- County Council
- Meeting Type
- County Council
- Location
- Brown County, IN
- Meeting Date
- July 30, 2026
Transcript
1800 sections
Thank you.
You know, I thought about what you said about how much time...
All right, the commissioners have been delayed, so we're going to go ahead and start with the health department.
Good morning. Morning. I just want to say, Judy, you're the good penny that keeps coming back.
This is my second time back. Dr. Conway our health officer had wanted to be here but because the meeting got changed he's not available and Tomi had wanted to be here but I couldn't get hold of Tomi so she may show up at 10.
So because we bumped you early we're missing our health officer and our board member? Yes.
Let me go through what they've got and if they've got questions when they get here.
And I wanted to take a minute and introduce Tiffany Petit, she's been with us about a year and a half, she's an environmentalist. So she came to give me some back up.
Environmentalist on the help us.
She's an environmental health specialist so she does We are now having to inspect pools and spas this year for the first time. So you can imagine all the pools and spas, especially spas at the tourist homes and stuff. So that's primarily her job. She's learning septic from Ernie and also food from Jen. Did I explain that right?
Try it back to her. That's a lot.
And I did a bed bug inspection earlier this week.
So cool. I really don't want to know where that's at. So when did your septic training start?
You know, I think the first day I was at the health department in December of 24, I went out with Ernie.
How many times have you been out?
A lot.
Okay, because I've had a contractor reach out to me who's concerned that if something, you know, happens to the retirees or whatever, that we're going to be down to no one to accept existence. It is important, and that was part of bringing on the feeder position was to train and cross train, and it's in their job descriptions already, that food people also do septic, that Ernie knows how to do food, those types of things, that these people be cross trained. And I'm just going to say this, and it's going to sound harsh, we give it, we take it. And we expect you to fulfill your obligations. So you can relay that back to Dr. Conway and the board. Make sure that if something happens, these contractors aren't waiting because they have reached out to me because I still see them and they know I'm on council, that they're worried.
I assure you that is happening across training.
I do have all my certifications. I just don't have the hands-on training.
Okay, well, we need that hands-on training because that's important. Okay, thank you.
Duly noted. So I guess the only thing, and I've talked to Judy Swift about this a little bit, trying to get my head wrapped around some of the, like in the employee number 12006 in the 1159 budget. 1-2-0-0-6. The 1159 budget. Is there a title to the position again?
Assistant Sanitarian, $17,191.
Can I step in here and ask a question?
Absolutely.
Throw this out and tell me if this is correct.
Okay.
We have an environmental health specialist that is retiring.
I've not gotten anything in writing about that at all, so I can't. Rumor mill. Right, and we don't go by the rumor mill. Okay.
This is.
All right, I'll work on choosing my words wisely. We have an employee that is leaving tentatively at the end of the year. And this line item that you're speaking to is not the same individual that it almost appears as if we have an employee who has been a good employee that wants to retire but at the same time he also wants his cake and eat it too so hey I'm going to retire but let me come back when the weather clears up next summer and give myself something to do and I'll go out here and you know I don't look at it as this employee wants to get his cake and eat it too I think he's
offering to come back and help if we need him.
Yeah, well, my issue is, you know, how many environmental health specialists do we need to have full time in order to be able to stay on top of the workload?
Right. I think, and we've been interviewing for environmental health. We've been interviewing for Cory's position too. So there's a lot of interviews going on. We've got a couple of the environmentalists that, in their counties, they've racked up comp hours and they offered to come in and use their comp time maybe one day, two days a week and learn Brown County. So but I guess my issue is that I know he's part-time in this in the 1159 budget for $17,000 and then in the 1160 budget the HFI He's also been allocated $17,000. So that's $34,000 a year. But it's not, I'm not looking at this as a part-time. He's a full-time employee. And his position will be filled coming January as a full-time EHS. So that only totals $34,000. So where is the extra $10,000?
Well, there's usually $10,000, $94,000, $7,000, $10,000-something in what used to be the tobacco money, but it's in the HFI money. Because that position always got paid out of two portions. It got paid out of health, The majority. Right. And then it got paid out of what used to be the tobacco money, but also HFI. And the two combined made the full.
Right. The tobacco dollars in previous years had always been $10,971.
And I think it was the same from what I remember seeing in the HFI.
It's 17, it's the exact same amount.
Exactly 17.
Mm-hmm, 191.
And you're at a loss because you're not the one who did it. Right.
So I just want to, I guess my concern is I want to make sure this stays a full-time position and if there's 10,000 out there in the legacy tobacco dollars, I'm not seeing it anywhere.
So I know that you've always had a full-time environmental health vet doing primarily septic and a full-time food serviceman primarily food service. I think you definitely need to have those positions and I think you're probably going to have to come back and we're going to have to look at the salary. This is what we paid the environmental health specialist and put those together. Again, because you're a loss and because you're not able to prepare the budget. I understand that.
So who prepared the budget?
Melissa.
Oh, okay.
So we have the three environmentalists, and they're all getting cross-trained, have been cross-trained. We've got one that specializes in food. We have one that specializes in septics. And now we have one that specializes in pools. And Tiffany can tell you, and the fees on that, do you know about how much money we've put?
Okay, and I do know that I do, I'm sorry to interrupt you. That's okay. So I know that the plan was, and this can be done apparently, I mean, I haven't checked on it, but... that because the pool fees have brought in over 66 000 dollars that's they want to not charge the county health fund that money they want to take it from the pool fees we actually talked about this a meeting or so doesn't this is going to be coming up um so we need to look at her salary coming out of those pool fees, and they have to do a line item, a payroll item, properly through the State Board of Accounts to have those fees paying for her salary so it's not coming out of the county taxpayer, which I think is an awesome thing. So that frees up money. for the county taxpayer as well. So that's my understanding.
So a quick clarifying question. So the 66... That's their fees they brought in.
Just from pools and spas.
Is that for the 12 month period? Yes. Does that cover full salary and benefits for the person responsible for it?
Actually, I'm showing Ernie to get $45, $80, $30, $45. I'm sorry, what was that?
$40.
You're talking about pools and spa, Julie? $45, $80, $30, $45.
No, she's talking about Ernie.
Okay, so for pools and spas, does the $60, instead of all that comes from the pools, spa...
Yes, everything.
Licensed home, hotel, inspection.
Yes.
Yes, on their collection form, they separate, they have to separate that.
Okay, so that specifically, that kind of tourism's fee structure, is it fully supporting the position? Yes. So they're paying for the full, that's good, okay.
Right, and it's even doing the payroll. including equipment and supplies that are needed, training, membership fees, mailing, educational materials. So yeah, it covers much more than just the salary. And that's something that's going to have to get worked out with you guys as the line items, right, that we need to create for this position.
It is. And she will still be cross-trained and septic. She will still have the same pay grade, that whole thing, because those pay grades are all set by those, I mean other people have done, in the past we've done pools and those kinds of things, it just wasn't done for a while and now it's being done again. So we need to do that, that's for sure, is to get those moved over, however perfectly that's done. I don't know.
That's just showing that there's $34,000 out of one fund and then $10,000 out of another. For Ernie, right. Yeah, there's $10,000. I don't know where the $10,000 is. I don't see it here.
Right. And you're showing the $34,000 coming out of the $1,159 and the $1,160. It doesn't show it on this. Okay, okay.
But if she has $17,000 and $17,000 in there, obviously you take the $10,000 out, you got the $34,000. Yeah. And the rest of it is.
So are we assuming missing and the budgets $10,000? Exactly.
But if she's got 17 and one, because it's always been 10,074. If there's already 17 in there, you're not missing the 10. It's just over.
But we're not seeing we're not sending two 17s together. His salary is 45,000.
Yeah, but isn't there money already in health for that?
No. The health fund is showing, the 1159 is only showing 17,000. Then in 1160, it's showing 17,000.
Okay, so who's 41,850 on here?
That is a, it says it's an environmental specialist.
I think it's the assistant.
That, okay.
That would be 41,853. But then on 12, 12103, we have 46,531.
That's the only documents I ever see or work off of.
1-2-1-0-3.
Well, I'm on a different. What's the line number? 11-6-15. I know.
We're talking. It's environmental health.
11-15. 11-6-15 is part-time.
I know, but he's not part-time. He is full-time current.
I don't know where these numbers came from.
Okay, look at this book.
It's towards the back. When you say towards the back, do you have a page number? Well, there's one, two, and three, sorry. If you look at the very top of the page, it says 1169.
Right, I see that. Page 2 on 1159.
So that would be Ernie at $46,531. Which one to show Ernie?
The top one.
Top one. 12-1-0-3.
Ernie is the 12-0-6 it says here.
He's 1-2-0-6.
And then 1-2-0-6, where does that?
I don't even see that on there.
On the form 1, he's 1-2-0-0-6.
Okay, she's got...
See 12103, excuse me, 12103, which is at the very top of page 2, that's the food inspector. So we're looking for 12006.
So if you go... We're not talking bad things or good things. Scott. We can do food and septic. That's why I'm giving you numbers.
Scott, if you go to page one at the very bottom... Judy, can I get you to slip over here real quick? What?
The way I see this, I'm going to jump in and say what I've got to say. Your total budget between the two funds, $763,590. At the core, I'm showing you guys you've got 10 employees. Is that what you need to fully staff that department for you guys to be able to do what you've got to do? Yes. So of the $763,590 budget, 61% is labor costs. Okay? This is top-down approach. Big picture. Alright? We can play in the weeds all day and we're blue in the face. $763,590 is all in it.
Are you talking about both budgets?
That's both formulas. Okay. So everything. Sure. You testified, I just asked, you need 10 people to fully staff the health department in order for you to stay on top of the workflow.
Right.
Correct?
Mm-hmm.
Okay. So 61% of that budget is $468,618.52. Right. Okay. 25% of your budget, which I appreciate y'all doing, is you've got $103,000 in there for group health. Right. And you have Social Security, FICA tax, Medicare, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Right.
That's 25% of the budget. So 86%. We've done a good job, and if we can keep it there, that's great. We've got to work on labor costs.
And what you have to figure, too, in after labor costs is what's left over. Which isn't much. A big chunk is $43,000 in attorney fees and $7,000 in malpractice insurance. So what does that leave us with?
Nothing. Let's just do the math. Let me do it. I'll do it. Yeah, so what you're looking at is other services and charges, which is $47,300. That's another big chunk, right? So if I take 47,300, divide that by the 763,590, that's another 6%, all right? So if you add those up, that's $61,000 plus $25,000 plus $6,000. That's 92% of your budget, just those three separate categories, which does not leave you much left over. It's only 8% to cover the copy of your paper.
Okay. So I guess bottom line, what is your point in presenting that?
You guys have done a good job. I like the budget. It's fine. You know, the main issue is you have to have, and I don't want to 12 month cycle, you have to have 10 people, right? Exactly. Because to me, when I think of the health department, I think of the health department every time I go eat food in Brown County, okay? That's my value the most about the health department, right? I want to make sure I'm not eating, you know, I want to make sure my food is good. Bad lettuce. Thank you, yeah. Right. So then you get the pools, then we get the subdues. Exactly. And then you get all the other stuff.
And the pools is something brand new, that's all.
Well, that sounds like the pool thing is cash flow in itself. Exactly. It's a money maker. Yeah, that's great. That's a good thing. Yeah, so that's not even factoring this, that's, because the revenue that the pool thing generates, is that money getting deposited back into the 1159? Yes. does it julie it will what when the miscellaneous revenue comes in from the health department does all miscellaneous revenue coming from the the health department goes back into their funds in 1159 yeah okay yeah yeah so yeah so you guys so actually you know your numbers are actually better because you guys are generating cement a lot of fees yeah that's right so when that goes back into their fund does that have to be reappropriated or does it go
She's going to have to find out how to do that properly through the state accounts to move it from the health fund collection area into a payroll area. Used to, you couldn't even do that, but I've been since then told that you can legally do that now.
Yeah, the only thing that the health department is going to have to be, the only thing on the health department you guys are going to have to keep a close eye on this is based off of you know you've got it on 1159 um it's showing a projected revenue of 600k for 2027 right and so it looks like your projected cash balance could end up somewhere in 185 so obviously we want to protect those cash reserve balances you know in a perfect world you'd be able to watch that grow a little bit every year right so to me based on your budget your cash flow and you know there's And what I don't know on the revenue, Julie, is whether or not, you know, Reedy is including this, you know, what their forecast is on miscellaneous revenues. Because if they get the forecast wrong on how much actual miscellaneous revenues are coming in from the health department,
They should be aware of the pool thing because it's not just here.
They have to do what their projected revenues are from January 1 to June and then June fall. Absolutely, the fall is going to be a little more Usually a little less because when most of their fees come in in January and February, those kinds of things.
But what I don't know is on the revenue coming in from the pool inspection thing, has that, how long has that revenue been flowing in?
About a year, a year and a half. Since January. Since January. It's annual.
We don't have a long historical track record yet on that until we kind of get it. And then the only other thing, my only question would be is, you know, What's the probability the Indiana Department of Health is going to continue that? Because they came out about two or three years ago.
Right. We've been assured that to expect the same amount we received this year for 2027. And, you know, it's every year. It's just wait to see.
Where you guys can get in trouble is if Indiana comes back and says, oh, no, 1160 is gone. You're not going to get any more money. This is right.
OK. So it's my understanding that after the first of the year, whether it's true or not, someone was going to go part time. So I'm going to assume here, and I don't like to assume, that's where that $17,000 came in. OK. All I'm going to say about that is you have to work out that internally, obviously, if somebody is going to be part time or not part time.
with that said we have to be captain okay so if you look at page one at the very top there's your seventeen thousand dollars right you're on the 1159 no i'm on this white booklet here well which fund are you on the 1159 fund He's at the very bottom. Here he is. Okay, he's at the very bottom of page one at 17,000. So let's just say that the 1159 budget and that 17,000 is a part-time EHS.
Okay.
But in the overall 1159 budget, then we've lost a full-time EHS.
Well, these were feeder positions, all right? I mean, I can go and pull them in if I need to. These were feeder positions. When people left, these people were trained to take those positions. We were not here, and it was very well stated, we were not here to grow government. They were here being trained to take over those positions as people aged out, retired, quit, whatever. We are not going to be growing government.
Right, I understand that.
Okay, so technically, we're not losing people. We always had environmental health specialist we had two septic ones and one food service okay so we've had two feeders and we had two others we had four so I don't think county's looking at growing four okay so if that's the case which I appreciate then that seventeen thousand dollars is not correct and I'm not getting any assurance from anybody on at county council that this is still a full-time position let me pause for a second
Because we added a pool person.
Is that separate or no?
No. That's a new responsibility. No. I'm just asking the question. The food person used to do pools and food. Okay. Okay.
Before the new responsibility.
We've always had three.
No, we had food and pool forever. And then there was a time when they just, for whatever reason, decided they weren't going to do pool. Now pause.
Isn't there a new chunk of time for pool and spa inspections that was not there previously? No, they always did pool. Well, no, they did it.
But not to the extent of what it's now.
Isn't the new workload, I mean, how much workload is it? So that's what I'm trying to get at. But not like this. How many do you have? I think 160, 170. All right, we just have about 110, 120.
So we're going to increase it about 30 to 50. They didn't inspect all of those, did they? No.
Well, they had to have, if there was a problem, they did. But they had the pool, water was brought in and tested. And if there was an issue, retesting was done. And if we had to go out, we went out. Now I realize you can go out once a year. Is that correct? You don't go out and check every pool every month. No. You're doing it once a year. So let's just be clear. Once a year, they're not doing it.
But that's on a rotator basis. You don't do 160 pools. at one time a year. You've got those on a rotating basis. Right. Break it down to 10%, you'll be 16 at one time, 16 on a rotating basis.
And they don't always pass. Right.
So then there's retesting and remediation and all that stuff.
I guess I'm just trying to get a new workload, right? And I don't know how more inspections more testing tests are being brought in but you're also having to do on-site inspections that you weren't before so trying to get at your point which is okay we've always had three now there's this much more workload for pool inspection I don't know how much that is and okay three people are doing that work is that I mean is that is that part of this rub that we're
Well, it's just that it was presented to us that these were the fever positions and to take over the possible people we were going to lose through attrition.
Okay, let's take a step back real quick. What changed in the pool inspection? State code. Yeah, the state code. What did they change? They do hot tubs, right?
Right, in tourist homes, yeah.
But they've always had a portion of that. But they didn't do it seriously. Hold on.
Before the law changed, what were you expecting?
To my knowledge, when I got here, they weren't inspecting anything, but I don't know that they ever inspected or mandated that the hot tubs had their water tested, which that is actually a lot more work than I realize, like monitoring those tests as they come in and then providing guidance when they fail.
It was always there. But it was only addressed if there was a problem.
It was mandated, but they weren't. I don't think they were doing it. I don't have any records of any.
There should be records there because they used to have to.
So you're saying it wasn't proactive, it was just that you discovered a problem. Right. And now it's proactive. You've got to go do it.
Now the state mandates that you do every one. One time a year. One time a year. So that's where the bump in the load has taken place. And that's 160 new inspections on site. 160 inspections every year that have to happen proactively every year.
How many site visits, doing the quick math, you're 106. So it's just every other day you're doing one inspection.
We're trying to figure that out. We promise people we wouldn't disturb their guests. So, you know, some days there might be a lot of inspections and some days not.
And that's paying for a full-time position. The fee, the new fees, based on the new law and 160 new inspections are paying for a full-time position that was previously not being paid for.
Yeah, we tried to make the program self-sustaining. So we allotted a part of that money to go to the legal fees.
And I'm not against that position. It is paying for itself. It's just that my discussion here also is that I'm just reminding you of how it was presented to us. And we need to look at, you all need to look at, if somebody, we lose them through attrition, you bring them in part-time are they going to be temporary are they going to be under that 29-hour threshold so that they're not getting benefits those types of things we want to know those things need to be brought to us because it costs us money and that that's not a position that is being paid for by your pool or whatever but yet we do want these septics inspected and that kind of thing so With that said.
Okay. So I've still not got a clear answer on whether the $17,000 out of the $1,159, the $17,000 out of the $1,160, I need assurances from you that this is a full-time position. And where's the $10,000 coming from?
Well, I think Julie has some paperwork now that the actual amount is not correct. It does need to be fixed.
So when you say it's not, what's not correct? Just curious.
Well, if you're adding the $17,000, you're only getting $34,000 or something. I think there's $10,000.
I've got it right here. Okay.
And there's longevity.
So let's look at that eight, all right? And whatever that that eight number, you know, let's set that at 2,080 and add the longevity back here.
44,930.45 is what the actual base pay should be.
But that doesn't include longevity, right? No. Okay, so how many years have we got longevity there?
Ten.
Ten, so another thousand bucks. So what was that number again? Okay, so 45 grand, 46,000 is what we need in those two line items. So take 46,000, that would be $23,000 each line item, and go ahead and change those two line items to 23 grand, a lot of being.
Okay, now, which two line items are those? It's the same line item. Before we go to, I want to know which line item it is so I can make a note of it. Okay, hold on. 12006, and that is, what's the title?
I'm going to give you the answer because I have the information in front of me It's twelve thousand and six.
All right was currently a is 17191 and that's out of fund 1159. So line 12006 which is currently 17191 20 out of the 1159 needs to be increased to 23k. That's for fund 1159.
I'm on that page and I'm making that note. I need to know what is the title of that job position.
environmental specialist environmental specialist thank you okay here's the problem with that okay let's just finish this conversation and what does that position do we got another they do septics I'm sorry he's asking you questions they do septics pools and food but primarily septic okay thank you all right in fund 1160 right environmental health specialist 615. That number is $17,191.20. That number needs to be increased to $23,000.
Okay.
That would give you enough to be able to make sure that that individual, that position, can be compensated based off their current job classification.
There's issues. Yes. Okay.
Because in the 1160, they show it under the 11615 number and it shouldn't actually remain in the same number.
So I've got 12,006 for this position.
On the 1160 budget, it's different.
1159, I'm sure. Yeah, it is.
That's what the problem is. What do you mean? In 1159, it's under 1206, and in 1160, it's under 11615.
Yeah. So both those line items, one of the line items needs to change.
Yeah.
So you need to change, you're the auditor, do we change, just keep it at 12006 and make it 12006 and 1160? Yes. Okay. Everybody, Judy, you clear on that?
Yeah. Maybe I missed this, but 11910, it says Assistant Environmental Health Specialist 39805. In this book.
Yeah, I didn't even see the 1-1-1. Page 2.
I'm looking at the actual form once. Where are you again? Assistant, environmental. Assistant environmental specialist. On the front row, there is no. Page 2.
Looks like they switched the position because actually Ernie should have been 11-6-12.
Yeah, it's nothing in this year, but in the past it's been. Yes. Yes, okay.
Okay, 11-6-12 then is who?
Without a name, job position. Actually, 11-6-12 would be the assistant environment, a sanitarian.
Okay, 11-6-12 is the assistant environmental specialist?
You chose environmental health specialist.
And 1160, Judy, is that not your HFI? Right. So you'll have to go in and get some permissions, right?
Right. So, Jim, as far as you saying, okay, let's take up the money out of the 1160 fund, it's not that simple. I mean, we have to get permission from the state to do that. They could come back and say no.
I know. I was just trying for the council position to address the issue, solve the problem, and then that you guys got to do what you got to do.
And if they come back and say no,
Wait a minute. Hang on a minute. Let's just think this through. And you're talking about the Indiana Department of Health. Right. I didn't think the Indiana Department of Health established compensation for county employees. I thought that was the council's fiscal responsibility. They don't. Then how could they come back and tell the Brown County Health Department that you can't pay this person this? Because that's, in essence, what you're saying. Let's think it through and make sure it's fact-based.
It is fact-based.
She just got through testifying that the Indiana Department of Health cannot establish compensation for, does the Indiana Department of Health, go look at statutes, go pick up the phone and call them, can they override the county council, because from a statutory standpoint, the county council has the exclusive discretionary authority on all compensation in for county, for Bryan County, Indiana. And the compensation for this county has been established by an ordinance by the factory evaluation system and based off job classifications. So we just did the job classification. We based it off the 26, you know, the 26 salary ordinance. You need 46 grand. And what you're saying now is that we can, we made an agreement, I'm assuming we made an agreement that we're going to bump those two line items and those two different funds up to 23 get to the 46 case, you've got enough money to cover this employee, who's going to be full-time, and now what I hear from you is you're telling me that you've got to get approval from the Indiana Department of Health. And the only thing I'm questioning is Indiana Department of Health doesn't have the statutory authority to be able to override the county council on compensation for employees. Because if that was true, then MDOT would be doing it and everybody else would be doing it. Now, if they want to pay for it, fine. You guys pay for it, but the Indiana Department of Health can do this all the money, and we can take it off our budget.
I had a comment or a suggestion. I think we're just trying to find a way to easily fund the position And a full-time whatever it is. And so we need 10k added to your budget and perhaps you know if Last thing we want to do is require some kind of state application request for change all this stuff. It's not it's just a burden on Everybody? That's my question. Instead of doing the five out of there, could we just do the full ten over here and then shift five into that for an already authorized expense?
Scott, where are you getting the five from?
The HFI. Well, he's doing five in each fund to make ten.
Oh, okay.
Five was out of the HFI fund. You're saying that triggers a state application. Let's try to avoid that is what I'm hearing. It may or may not be approved. Probably will. They're not setting our salary, but they have to approve the expense on that fund. That's how it works. And so to avoid triggering a state application, a whole deal for everybody, could we just do 10 out of the other fund?
Oh, the 1159 fund?
Yeah, but shift five out of that, reduce five out of that, and put it into the HFI fund, add it to the HFI for an already approved expense? Or do you have, would that trigger, you can't fit it into an existing approved category? Judy, are you following me here?
I'm just going to state this. they have to sign contracts as we did not we but the county did and if they do not follow they we're right they don't set our our salaries right but we have to ask permission they have to ask permission does this fit in with your rules and regulations can we do this etc they're probably going to say yes we do not want to risk them losing this money and it all coming back to us, Jim, because we're asking them to do something that they should do and ask. It's part of the whole – HFI money, it's federal and state money and there are rules and regulations. If they need to ask, let them ask. They're probably going to say yes. But let's follow the rules and not risk them losing all their money because they're not doing the proper procedure. Period. My recommendation...
I don't have a problem with the health department being in compliance with the Indiana Department of Health, okay? What we had discussed, and Scott has got five grand, it's $5,809 per fund. That's the increase. So whether you all want to take $5,809 out of $1,160 5809 out of the 1159 fund. You tell me what you want to do.
I would suggest that we leave the 1160 fund alone.
Perfect.
17,000 whatever.
We need to increase the 1159 fund by $11,618.
And that's how it should have been submitted to you in the first place.
Perfect. So does that solve the problem?
Yes.
Perfect. Does that work? what we're agreeing to is to in order to make sure that this position this full-time position is the compensation is consistent with the 2026 salary ordinance factory evaluation system including longevity we need to increase that line item which is You will increase that line item twelve zero zero six in the eleven fifty nine fund by eleven thousand six hundred and eighteen dollars Jim that is a really good idea Keeps it clean and simple
But you will get back to us on this part-time thing, let us know before you hire or whatever happens. Oh, absolutely. And keep us in, because again, we need to know what you guys are doing. Absolutely. Before you hire somebody and put them in there and say you're getting benefits or you're not getting benefits, because those kinds of things are eating us up. Oh, sure. Okay, thank you.
Okay, so what we're doing on line 12006 and 1159, where it currently sits at 17191, we are adding 11618 for a total of 28809? Yes. And we are leaving 1160, line 12006, which... And it stays at... It currently has nothing.
Well, add it, 17191, and then take it off the 1160. It shouldn't be at the 11.6.
That was my next question. There's a line. 11.615. Yeah, take that off there.
That is zeroed. And that's out of the 11.60. That's the 11.60. What's going to be taken out of this?
Yeah, let's make sure we get this. 11-615 and 11-60.
Basically, it sounds like 17 change went from the 11-60 to the 11-59. Is that what? Yeah. In our budget.
The first page of 11-60. Okay. Two-thirds of the way down, there's line 11-615. Right. That has 17-191.
In the 27 request column, the 17,000, see that? For environmental specialists.
Right, and that will stay the same. That's not changing.
Well, that one, I think Julie's suggesting we shift that full amount over to the 1151.
This is the number, because it's her number. It's the other number.
So that's where a lot of the confusion is coming from.
Yes, he's at two, is this 1160? Yes. Alright. This is where he's at.
Somebody messed up the thing so he's here so the 11th is 17 191 needs to be here and
I see what you're saying, okay. Now is that a recent...
I'm going to need to remove it from this one because that's not... That's not that recent.
Yeah, okay. That makes sense, yeah. Thank you.
Okay, is that... And the other one will, on the 59, the 2-0, or the 12-0-6.
Right. It'll be the 28.
Okay, Julie, is that a recent change because if we look at the 24 and 25 adopted...
I have no idea who did that. Honestly, I didn't change it. If you go back here, that was $4,000.
I'm aware. I know, but I'm saying, is this, how did we now get, was this a past?
That's a question you would have to ask Melissa.
Okay. So HFI.
So this is 12, 2006. It's going to be early. Yes. Okay. Hold on. Is the assistant. Assistant? Where are you going, Jeb?
What? Sit back. Go ahead.
Yeah, I've noticed.
Well, the issue here is because it was $37,000 in the last one, so they hadn't 10 to this one, so that would be a missile pay.
This is 1160, right? Yeah, so they would use the 10 and go back to the other $159, and if you had
See, they have, yeah, and 30, so if you added these things,
But this is now being zeroed out. Are they going to try to keep that in 1160?
No, it's not being zeroed out.
I don't know. That's what I said. This one is being zeroed out.
You're taking it down to take it across.
It's been 10,000 for the past three years.
It's only been 10,000 because she screwed up the number.
I don't remember the years.
This is where it's coming in. It's going in. So it needed to be adjusted or... Switched around.
I know what I'm saying.
Right. But what I'm saying is... I know what you're saying. I don't want to zero something in 1160 if we still need it. You don't have it. No. But it's not there. Okay. Okay. Okay. So it has to... Thank you.
We're just shifting it from tobacco to Agent 5. Essentially. Yeah. That's fair enough. Yeah. Makes sense. Right.
Okay, but the twelve twelve oh six at twenty eight We're still getting We're still getting out of the If we can get this resolved I don't want to step this is the step to resolve Add it to the 28,809. We end up with 46,000. That's it? That's it.
Okay.
There's a suggestion to send it back to you and have you resubmit it. I don't want to do that. I want to resolve it now so 1159 your
So 1159 fund in the budget book.
They need to be sure you're getting this right because you're not going to have a position if we don't.
And we can make you copies, though, if you need to take it back. This?
Yes. That's what I'm going out of right now.
We'll take the pages out and make copies and put it back in there.
So 1159 fund. Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, go ahead. It's your it's your yeah, it's your department. It's coming here.
Get it right Double-check our work here. Okay, so are we talking?
Okay, we're in 1159 page page 1 page 1 Okay, we are at 2006 Which is in there as assistant sanitarium? the bottom line
Okay, 1-2-0-0-6, okay, that's 17,000.
Okay.
It is not 17,000 anymore. We added the 11-6-18 to it for a total of 28,809. Right, yeah, that's environmental specialist. That's what I was trying to clarify earlier.
Tell me those names have been weird for years.
Well, I'm trying to clear them up so they're not weird. And up above on line 1612, that says sanitarian environmental specialist. Sure. That is the Assistant Environmental Specialist. Is that correct?
Okay.
So those are the two changes I have on that page. What was the change there? Just the title?
The title.
Just the title.
It's not Sanitary and Environmental. It's Assistant Environmental Specialist to line 12006, which is the Environmental Specialist. Yeah. Yeah.
Covering septics, pools, and septics and pools primarily. Now, I go to page two. Up at the top, line 2103, Environmental Health Specialist. Is that a correct title?
Okay. Line 220... okay line 12 103 all the way up at the top which does not have the header on it that's environmental health specialist correct correct title yes okay and which what what subcategory is that which are they food that is primarily food food okay thank you now line 2108 also environmental health specialist
That's food, pools, septic, bed bug, yeah.
That's your new number. Septic. Okay. Vector, yeah. Vector. Vector, yeah. I knew there was a cleaner word for that. Um, 2201 emergency preparedness, is that correct? Okay. Page 3. I don't think there was any questions on that.
I do have a question on emergency preparedness.
Okay.
So, it's, I showed that there's Okay. Is there a reason why that's so low?
Well, because that position will get anywhere between $20,000 and $25,000 from the state grant. Okay.
Thank you. I knew there was some . Okay.
And while we're on that, I was going to wait until we get to 1160. That has That has paid a couple thousand dollars out of that previously, and that has been zeroed out. Is that because that fund is no longer paying that? Where are you? On 11-6, sorry.
Well, some of that, pardon me. I'll give you the breakfast, sorry. Some of that went with Cory, right, because it was, yes, thank you. I don't know what the term is. Some of it had to go.
Is that right? Right. fund, we get reimbursed from the state. We have to send it an invoice for that $20,000, $25,000 payroll. They reimburse us, and then that money, it depends on how things are done in a particular year, but sometimes that money gets deposited into the 1159 fund to offset that salary. Sometimes it's put in its own fund, and at the end of the year, it's all moved over into the 1159 fund. But that's where it should all end up, is the 1159 fund. Okay. Okay. Thank you.
Page three, there were no... Anybody have any questions about anything on page three while we're on it?
I don't.
I don't see anything out of...
Page four of the 1159 Health Fund. I don't see anything out of line there. Everything stayed the same. Page 5 of the 1159 fund, I don't see any changes. Nothing is out of line there. Page 6 also reads. Okay, now to the 1160 fund.
Right.
Page 1 of the 1160 fund. We come down to... 11... 16th line, 1612. That is still the assistant environmental specialist, the same as it was in the 1959 fund? 1612?
Yes, that is, that was Tiffany's position, only it was Aaron's. So that would be assistant.
Assistant environmental specialist, okay.
I do have a question. We blew through some. Are we going to hire the vacant ?
We'll come back to that after we get all this. Now, the 11615 environmental specialist, I had noted here that that was assisted. Was that incorrect?
That should be changed to 12006. Is that right? Yes. That was the note I meant to add to the line up above.
So that is zeroed out and does not exist anymore, correct? Correct. 11615 is not applicable.
It goes to 12006. In the 1159 fund? Yes. Okay, and then you go to page 2 of the 1160 Fund.
Going back to that, what's the title of that one?
That's... 11615 is a line that's going to disappear, correct?
Oh, it disappears. Right, right, right. Okay, gotcha. It's not applicable.
Gotcha. It is a non-existent line. Okay, so then we go to page 2 of the 1160 Fund. 12006. That is the Environmental Specialist.
Right.
pools and spas primarily? No, septic primarily. Primarily septics or pools, spas and septics?
Primarily septic, but yeah.
And that's got zero requested.
Right, we have added 17191.
Added 17191. And that is this line disappeared and moved to code 006. To 1160, okay.
No, next page. No, yeah, sorry. Yeah, that's. That went away because that's. 1160. No, 1160. because that was put in the wrong line of action. So that's where that becomes cut.
Okay.
Does that take care of all the confusion for everybody?
Well, if you guys want to add those up and make sure we got it right.
I've been kind of adding and we've got it, you've got it.
Yeah, I've seen everything change in my head, which is, nobody wants to see that. Okay, now Judy, to your question about adding.
Well, I'm not adding, I'm just asking.
No, what, you're asking about adding.
Are you going to fill that vacant public health nurse position? Public health nurse?
A nurse, yes. Which line item is that?
We're just kind of going at one at a time.
That is funded out of the 1160 fund.
100%. Page 1 on 1160.
Right, is that right? Is she in the 1159 fund?
There was a line in 1159 for public health nurse.
Well, they have public health nurses in there, but this is a vacant position. That's when I...
On page 1 of the 1159, there's a public health nurse.
Right.
That is not the position you're talking about?
No, I'm talking 1160.
OK. And that is the 1811.
And they're going to fill that.
Wait, which one was it?
Right here, on page one. No, the sign number. Part-time at 35,000.
10, 520. But it's only half of the salary.
It had changed to part-time, yeah.
Changed it to part-time. So 100% of her salary comes out of the 1160 fund.
Yeah, it's not in the 1159 budget at all and a hundred percent of that salary is 35,000 part-time and it's part-time and you said it's a school liaison for nursing they bridge that Gap between the health department and the school, right?
Instead of having a full-time nurse
Oh, so they're half-time at the school, half-time at the county?
No, they're just half-time. They're part-time at the school, strictly at the school? Employee, but they go to the school and do vape education, hand-washing education.
They're doing health department things. Yeah, they don't need to be there eight hours a day.
Okay.
And so the cut to halftime, what are they not doing that they were doing? Well, it was budgeted last year for $69,000.
I think at one point, and I wasn't here, there was discussion full-time, but then it
With HFI cuts it went down to part-time.
I know it used to get a lot and then it got cut.
Well since 24 it was $66,000, $25,000, $70,000. But HFI got money cut.
It got cut from, that represents full-time. It got cut down to half-time or part-time.
Yeah, it used to get a lot of money and then now they don't.
So it wasn't our decision, it was mainly a demonstration.
It was an HFI position, like mandated by HFI I'm pretty sure, right? Yeah.
And they used to get X amount of dollars and then the state came in and said, no, not just our department. Everybody got cut, so then they had to cut. But I was just going to say, we are going to try to fill it. You said yes, you're just taking it one at a time. Okay.
In 1160, on page 4, the vaccine refrigeration fee has gone up to $6,000.
In 25, it was $15,000. 26, it was $4,100. This year, it's $6,000. What's the fluctuation?
I think from 25, didn't you change? the refrigerator? Didn't something change?
Well, I just want to bring this up. I still get notices from Helmer, because I think you probably still have the Helmer, right? So the warranty is out, and I meant to forward that to you. I mean, I've told them I don't work there anymore, but I still get it. So I don't I don't know if they got a new refrigerator. I don't know anything about that. But I'm just letting you know.
I think that's what that was.
I'm just letting you know that the Helmer warranty is out.
Okay. I'll talk to Celia. I'm pretty sure that she's been in contact with Helmer.
I'm sure she probably has. I'm sure she is.
I know it's sometimes really hard to change those emails. Go to a different person. Yeah.
Heard an advertising went up from 1,200 to 3,500. Is that just an increase?
Are you looking at the 1,159 budget?
1,160.
Okay, and what was the question? I'm sorry.
On page four.
Printing and advertising? Yeah. Increase?
Or are we looking at this one?
Does that include maybe the increased cost of postage when we send out mail in?
That's what I think. I thought there was another postage.
What's the category, I'm sorry?
Printing and advertising. We're also
paying a part-time person to be more out there on social media, like Jen will do a live feed on how to wash your hands. Contractual, right? It's a contractual feature. And that's part of that, coming out of the HFI. Okay.
That's all the questions I have.
Did we pass, Jim? I was done a long time ago.
You're ready to let us go.
We have to argue through it. I apologize for the arguing.
We can stay above the line.
I felt that discussion.
We don't want to feel the discussion. We want to have the discussion.
We don't enjoy the discussion.
Then we have it. And if you have questions, just come back to us.
So just to kind of give you a heads up, we're still interviewing for the school nurse liaison, for Corrie's old position, for environmentalist if we get that person to retire. And so my position, this position has been replaced. She starts Monday. And then Addie, who was the front person, is coming back. She was on maternity leave and she starts Monday. Yes, Jim?
Who replaced? Position because you are standing in for Melissa right and then this position on Monday begins with Taylor Alton She's coming back My understanding is that we have the board and towards you and your board members. The board is responsible for hiring the doctor.
From a statutory standpoint, the doctor is the manager over the entire health department. Yes. Okay. To me, and what's this position that you're in right now, what's the title of that position you're in?
Office administrator slash manager. Okay, so the administrator.
to change the, in other words, give the administrator exclusive irrevocable authority over the health department. So to where the doctor, because here's the thing, my understanding, again, I don't know what I don't know. My understanding is that I'm assuming that it's pretty difficult today in today's world to find a physician Number two, I think the current person in that position, the doctor, serves on two counties, is what I've been told. So that, and I'm assuming the individual's got private practice or has a full-time employer. So that means that individual has three different areas of responsibility, which would limit their amount of time that they're going to be able to a day, week to week, month to month operations of the health department, which places the administrative person kind of in a conundrum. And I guess what I'm solving for is that administrative person needs to have the full power and authority so that the remaining employees can't go around and try to circumvent their authority, if you will. I understand what you're saying. Yeah, I don't know if that can be resolved, but I think that's an issue that probably should be looked at. We probably should try to resolve that if we could.
Would that be changing code, though, if we did that?
There's so much, Jim, involved in code that it would have to be looked at very thoroughly.
We've got a lot of worms to pick up off the ground from that.
So, yeah, I just, you know, that's a concern, area of concern. Obviously, as a council member, I have nothing to do with it. Okay, so that's my only... Sure. Duly noted.
Thank you. Thank you, guys. Thank you so much.
Well, you're welcome.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Yes, thank you.
And good job. Good job.
Yeah, you did a great job to pick up the pieces.
I just wanted to make sure that one area was clarified. And you did a great job.
Well, we needed it clarified. And I'm sorry we had to cut to discuss it the way we did.
I think I was afraid of you.
I don't think Judy's ever been afraid.
Maybe a little nervous. I remember when we met at the Music Center during COVID, you guys were sitting up on the stage and we were like, now look at that.
That was structured that way. We're going to raise this pedestal here a few feet too.
Thank you. Thank you.
Y'all come back now, you hear? Not me.
You never got a jury. I can't. I'm on county council.
So what changed with the commissioner's schedule? When are they going to try to come in? At 1. At 1?
Okay.
Sorry. Yeah, so we can bring a recorder up.
I mean, this should only be like a minute.
Yeah. Twelve minutes.
Twelve minutes? And you didn't bring my package up?
Well, I thought about it, but...
You're going to pay everything out of your perpetuation fund.
Yeah, I turned in the exact same thing, except for salaries. Well, AJ and myself. But yeah, Amy comes out of salary, or out of perpetuation, and I left everything the same as last year.
And you're still signing your document that says you, I think you have to, that says you have enough money in there to fulfill the obligations of the office. The sworn statement.
The sworn statement, yes.
Probably every year.
Do you know how many transactions you guys go through on the average of a day or a week?
can print that out and tell them.
Overall, for the year, we do probably less than 5,000. Because one day we could have five, and then one day we could have 20 to 30. So it just kind of depends. We're doing a lot of our documents are now electronic. which has been really nice.
So people can do remotely rather than going to the office. Yes.
Yeah, they have to do it through a title company.
Because you can go towards the computers you got for the people.
Yeah, we still have a few searchers that come in, but the searching in person is way less than I'm sure it was.
So the company is getting literate, computer literate out there and doing it that way.
Well, through the years, the office has had everything digitized and brought up over a period of time through them entering documents, companies coming in and doing it and that kind of thing.
So it's just evolved. We're still doing back indexing. I think when Judy was recorder you guys got to the 50 year mark for back indexing which was a huge milestone because most of the searches that happen through title companies they do a 50 year search for home sale transactions. But yeah we're still We're still back indexing.
Yeah, out of the old book.
It's just very, you know, you want to go to sleep.
So does that change the demands for the structure of employees, since you don't have to have face-to-face time or anything like that? No, uh-uh. Wow, how come?
It just doesn't. Yeah, I mean, because there still has to be an employee to do the electronic work, and it splits it up enough to where each of us have... You're pretty much at the minimum right now, so you can't go below that. Yeah, I have my first deputy, and then Amy.
And if they go on vacation, or they have to go to... conferences, which they're required to do. They have so many things they have to do. Somebody has to be in that office. So you've got to have that half time or three quarter time, whatever it is, to fill in when they're doing their mandatory stuff.
Yeah, Amy's there Monday through Thursday. I mean, there are counties that have two employees and it's awful for them. I mean, even just since I've been recorder for six years, some of the recorder's offices that even though they were paying their other person out of their perpetuation, the council or they would you know whoever they said you don't get this position anymore and they take it away and it's it's awful for them because then they have to they like some of the offices will actually close if they you know if there's no one there yeah if the if the recorder is at a training and if the other person is sick or had something you know happen they just shut the office down because there is no
And then that shuts not only your office, it shuts down the transfer, it shuts down the transfers in the other office.
Can we use a floater? No. I am very anti-floater. I'm sorry. I am because I'm anti-floater. It's too much responsibility for one person to have in every single office.
It's a living curve. It's not a matter of just entering information into...
It's not.
It's digesting and figuring out all kinds of things.
I mean, the treasurer module, the assessors, the auditor's office. One person, I mean, if I was going to be a floater and I had to learn all of that stuff, oh, you'd be paying me a lot to do that because it's not worth it.
Yeah, I was a pro floater when I first came on council. I was like, well, there's somebody who can just go around and do the clerical work. And then you realize what happened. Yeah. in the office. Yeah, it's not just clerical work. Yeah, that floater is going to have to be probably a $75,000 position because they have to know everything about the recorder's office.
On top of being bonded. You know, yeah. Because, I mean, like as treasurer, the thought of, okay, yes, if somebody had to come in while we were at a conference or something to just do the basic I don't want that responsibility. Yeah, I don't want that responsibility on myself of someone coming in there that doesn't necessarily know everything they should know and If something gets messed up if money goes missing if money gets put in the wrong place somehow, you know There's just too many liabilities. Yeah, exactly. That would be all I would want a floater to do.
important office to Jim's point about property rights.
And I know we're the office that you think, oh, they don't do anything. It's not true. We are a very important office for all of the transactions that go on in each of the, you know, we all work together.
You hold the proof of our property.
Yes. And by the way, you can sign up To be alerted if your property is like being, what is that called?
Oh, yeah. Through DocsPop, you can do a property alert that if there is a change to your property deed, it alerts you. It'll also alert you if neighboring properties are changed also because we see a lot of that where someone will call in and say, hey, I got this alert. But that means it's working because the technology isn't as fine tuned to go right down to every single parcel. But it does work because when people's neighbors change something, then we have phone calls or someone comes in and says, hey, I got this alert that something changed with my property, and usually it's just the neighbors.
Because there are people out there stealing people's property. Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah. I mean, we've had people in southern Brown County, they have property and they don't live here, and their neighbor just happened to call them and say, hey, I didn't know you were selling your property. Well, we're not. And so somebody, yeah, that somebody had contacted a realtor, pretended to be these people and said, we want to sell our property. And it was all, it was all fraudulent because they all did it over the phone, over the internet. And yeah, they had to, they pulled it off. They could have, yeah. They could have had the neighbor not called. Yeah, because it does happen. We haven't had it happen here where everything has gone through officially, but it does happen in other counties. But for those people listening, you should give us the alerts on your... Yeah, docspop.com.
Can you do that in the office?
Not through our office. You have to do it through your own computer, phone, however, because you have to sign up through email. Docs pop, D-O-X-P-O-P. And it'll say property alert. I think, or Property Fraud Alert. I'm not sure which, but definitely. It's a free service. Yeah, it's free. And you have to sign up through email.
The irony is you have to give them your information, which is stored on another database somewhere that somebody else got access to.
That company has been around for a long time, and they're a locally Indiana company.
Yeah, DocsPop is a great company that lots of counties work with.
Do Funkhouse still own it? Who? Nick Funkhouse? No? I'm not sure.
We work with a girl named Julie, so I'm not sure.
It's like the story of, let's say, the credit alert company that got hacked for millions. They're there to protect your credit record when they get hacked.
But we got hacked.
Anybody else have any questions?
I know there was discussion about the end of this year, Andy going to the auditor's office and potential for, well, someone's going to have to fill in. Are there rumors for us? Rumors, yeah, there's rumors. No, well, it's more than rumors. You know, someone has to go finish Andy's term in the treasurer's office. And I mean, yes, in reality, I'm probably the most qualified candidate to do that. I don't get to choose that. That's the party has to choose who they want to fill that and, you know, the rest of her term. But you're interested? I'm interested. Yeah, I mean, it's going to be strange to... I'm interested as long as the party can see that AJ, my chief deputy, is the best person to finish my term as recorder. Because I don't want to leave my term in my office as recorder currently to someone who has zero experience. It would be ridiculous to put anyone else in the recorder's office than age I mean AJ should be recorder AJ is brilliant. He knows that office inside and out It was the best thing Judy ever did when she hired AJ as her chief deputy.
So as a precinct committee What I just heard you say is that on scale from 0 to 10 how interested are you in being caucused in January for the
I'm interested. Yeah, 10. I mean, yeah, I'm a 10.
You're a 10, but you're conditional.
I'm conditional.
Yes. Being caucused in to take over the recorder's office. And how many years have you been with the Brown County government?
I started here in, I think, 2002. Oh, wow. Yeah. Stephanie Yeager was treasurer at the time.
So you've been here 24 years. You're a senior member. I'm a senior member. Thank you for your service.
Yeah, with that, I don't want to tour that conversation anymore.
Yeah, no, yeah, no. Yeah, this is my only grown-up job I've ever had. All right. Thank you very much, John.
Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. Emergency management. Come on down.
How are you guys?
Good, how are you? Awesome.
We're calmer now.
Calmer? Yeah, we're awake and calm. I like calm, usually I deescalate. Great. So I'm new to this, but he's got me along here. We'll be just fine.
So you're now the director. And Julie, you've looked at his salary and the longevity and all those things are built into that. OK. We're seeing $37,277 in EMA administrator. Is that an ask?
Yeah, I think it was in last budget.
It was an ask last time.
Yeah, so it's the same ask for sure.
That's full-time?
It would be full-time. I'm not sure that I would be able to find anybody for $37,000, but at least I could get somebody helping with the paperwork.
Has it been ran through the WIT system?
I have no idea this is.
I have no idea.
Probably not.
Probably not.
So it would have to go through that whole thing with the job description etc.
I don't see any benefits included in our budget request. And there are some of those that are picked up in the commissioners budget. And I believe EMA is one of those. Because the commissioners, the commissioners budget picks up PERF and all the FICA stuff for a couple different departments.
Has it been added to the commissioners budget? It's been, they need to be added, it's there, it's been there for... I mean the new position benefits?
If we decide that, but they gotta go through that whole process before, and have to go through the FES and that whole thing, I mean, the commissioners are still looking at who really has the authority over the job description for that. Um, we're over the salary anyway.
Make a note of that question and ask the commissioners when they get up here. What's your question? If that new position, um, if the Employee benefits are covered or accounted for.
And has it been through the- Just so that you all know, because I have it here printed out, when it comes to health insurance, HSA, FICA, PERV, Sheriff's Department, pension, wellness, unemployment, and AUL life, there are only four departments in approximately Yeah, there's a million nine that comes out For health insurance just to go through the expenses again, you got a million nine seventeen for health insurance of which 1.625 is coming out of four funds out of the commissioners budget HSA is all coming out of the general fund is that they've got calculated 526 to 9940 not sure how they arrived at that number, but those monies The bulk of it is coming out of the general fund for you know out of the commissioners budget The pension which is your your Perth bulk of that 454 is coming out of the general fund out of the commissioners budget coming out of the general fund out of the commissioners budget unemployment is coming out of that and then obviously the AULI so the big contributing members with regards to health insurance really is the health department highway department so they're helping out with some of that most of it is funded out by the commissioners and the general fund
So you have equipment repair maintenance. It went from $6,000 to $9,500. Can you give an explanation for that?
It went from $6,000 to $9,500.
What did I say?
You said $6,000. Just clarify for the recording. It went from $6,000 to $9,500.
One of them is the Corddry Sweetwater tornado siren that we have to do a little deep dive in, see why it's sticking. I don't know what the cost is going to be for that. A couple also are the two generators over there at the EMS base that need new carburetors, batteries, coils on them. Other radio equipment costs that are going up is due to the fire tower in the park project Well, they're taking the fire tower down and refurbishing it but they're taking all our communication assets off of it and they're not allowed to go back on it so we're currently building a tower in the state park at the service center. We have a 40 foot container in place right now. We're building it out to house all this radio equipment, but there's some radio equipment that's going to be purchased to go back there.
Updated. We're going to take the fire tower out, take everything off of it, put it back up there to not be used for what it is intended for.
Right, so it's historical and just going to go back renovated as it used to be.
So the historical configuration will not allow that?
Correct.
And so you have generator and equipment, 1,000? Is that just, that doesn't include the carburetors and those kind of things? No, that's something completely different. Just for what, general maintenance?
That would be to purchase two inverters so they could be used for stuff like, you know how we had the power go out for the election?
Uh-huh.
Stuff like that it could be used. Okay, so purchase like inverters.
And continuing education went from 1,000 to 3,500.
Yep, and that's to continue the professional development series through emergency management and then also to get my instructor for what's known as incident command 300 and 400 levels so I can teach that.
When you say level 300 and 400, is that NIMS?
And you'll teach that? Mm-hmm. So you can teach that to... county employees, anybody that would need it?
And who would need those?
Fire chiefs, fire departments, anybody that's going to be in the command in the Emergency Operations Center coordinating an emergency response really should have.
I think I've had the three, four of them myself.
I'm pretty sure you do.
Yeah, yeah. Okay. I'm just...
I'm just... Plan director. I was plan director in the 2008 flood and floodplain administrator. I didn't have that NIMS training. and I really wish I had at that point. So people like when you're dealing with the flood, the flood plan administrator, the building commissioner, they would be good to have that as well. They would be.
Absolutely.
Yeah. I think even if it's allowable to reach out to those people that would have to deal with those kinds of things, I think it would be important so that they know the command structure. I agree.
Yeah. Completely agree.
Can I step in here and I can pass the quick question? Sure you can. Just curious. When I'm laying in bed, and the storm's going over while I'm watching YouTube, and my phone goes pa-circo, is that just the, like, this guy down here? I'm just curious, I don't know. A-R-C-G-I-S? Is that the system that tells me that I gotta get out of bed otherwise I'm gonna get sucked out of my house by the morning help?
It's the one that delivers information, yes.
There's been times that I'm like, nah, I ain't getting out of bed, I'm just gonna stay here and wait. It can't get you out of bed for you, but it can tell you you should So that's what we're paying for that that's it, okay, and then I'm just I don't know what I know So we got that to me when I think of emergency services 137 grand Absolutely.
As far as our hazard vulnerability oh So wildfires a big one down here We also have flooding we have quite Quite a bit of flooding so there's your top three right there severe storms. Yeah severe storms Winter weather now and sub-zero temperatures true, you know flooding Other things that are kind of under the radar, you know is cyber, you know attacks. That's That can have an impact. That's really high up there. I couldn't even imagine how much Evan or Eric is dealing with all the time Yeah, so as far as natural disasters, yeah Right
I do have a question. This was way before your time, way, way, way, way before your time. There was discussion made about, as people came into Brown County, and that there was a system available, and again, this was way before your time, that would be able to notify people, even though they're not on Everbridge or whatever it is that we use, but they're traveling into Brown County and we've got a tornado coming, it would capture those incoming phones and be able to alert them? I don't think that ever happened. Was that just kind of a pie in the sky kind of thing? I know there are some of those things that you can't answer, but is there such a thing out there that does that?
Yeah, so it's called IPAWS or Integrated Public Alert and Warning System. Yeah, as long as you have a carrier, it's a general message that you push up to the state watch desk and they push it out and it can have your geofence around a certain area. When we had to evacuate those 30 homes in January from the pipeline rupture down here, we used IPAWS to hit that population there. Because not everybody's on Everbridge, right? So this is going to anybody that has a carrier. So yeah, it works. It's very effective. And it's integrated with Everbridge too, so you're going to get both. So we can get Mr. Kemp out of bed.
Okay, alright, okay, thank you, you answered my question.
And those are more than just county specific. It actually breaks down to north and regional areas of the county, doesn't it? It sure does, yeah. The tornado that went through, you know, Horseman's Camp, it's, I think, I think in the north side I might... I might have got the alert for that, but that's kind of, it targets the, it kind of looks for the region of the county that's being, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, they call it geofencing, and you can just like, hey, this is the, here's the GPS coordinates. Anybody in that area, hit their phone.
I can tell you, we were sitting in rafters in that thing when, I mean, everybody in there was like, it was kind of frightening.
Yeah, well, just this, uh, June 17th, we had five tornado warnings in that one night.
I was in the path of two of those.
That's when we identified that there might be a little bit of a struggle there with it. I don't know if it was the amount of times that it was going off or it was getting weaker, but it tested fine last Friday.
I was in the path of two of those up north that stopped before they got to my house.
Yeah, we got incredibly lucky.
We did. Which goes to my next question that I've asked for a couple years now. Grants for Weather sirens, tornado sirens. Helmsburg, the residents of Helmsburg and everybody in the Helmsburg Valley are very interested in a weather alert siren. We've got the one up on the overlook. Depending on atmospheric conditions and terrain, not everybody can hear that. Some people can hear it, some people can't. So there's been discussion for a couple years now of getting a tornado siren down in that area. Southern part of the county. There are, I had talked to I can't remember where I started talking, but asking about grants available for that. And the first answer I got was we don't have enough tornadic activity to qualify for grants. Well, since that time, we've had five tornadoes go through various portions of the county. Are we now eligible for possible grants for expanded tornado signs?
I haven't seen any grants come available for it, but we can definitely make the argument for sure when they do pop out.
That's one thing I would definitely like to keep an eye out for and make that kind of a priority for, because I know there's, I've been questioned by several people, we can't hear the tornado sirens.
Right.
I mean, even with the alerts on the phone, but if somebody's outside, they left their phone in the house and, you know, they're not going to hear it. So, you know, the sirens are very, very important for a lot of people.
Yeah, it's top of the list. When we see that funding come out, if and when, we'll be jumping on it.
Okay.
Yeah, I have my thought one. What's the viability of the sirens, or very little, I guess, maybe, sirens versus the phone thing that people have? I mean, I didn't know which was more effective in getting more people, because again, obviously, I can't— I don't always take my phone outside.
If I'm playing in the dirt, I don't want my phone drying in the mud, so I'm just leaving it in the house.
Yeah, we don't, and we can't hear the siren when we're at, but I'm not sure I would even hear it night in the house anyway.
But it depends on atmospheric conditions too because there's sometimes I've been standing on my back porch in Fruitdale you know don't hear the siren at all and then there's sometimes it's just the atmosphere is just perfect and I can hear the siren going off on the overlook. Sure. That sounds like it's next door.
Well back to budgets.
Yeah.
He will need to have a job description created. There isn't one.
You mean for his assistant?
Oh okay. Not for him. He's got one. But for the assistant that he's requesting, he will have to have that all done, go through all of it.
Yeah, if we decide that's what we're going to do. I checked with the commissioner's office and they had not had one. Yeah, because we froze it. Yes, you froze it.
Okay. One question. Have you found any use for drones in the last two years?
Yes. Just used one from Fruitdale Fire on... Search and Rescue? Well, no, just identifying the path, doing the damage assessment for National Weather Service. I want to say that was June 18th, so it was the next day. We had that tornado that actually went through Hilltop Christian Camp.
So they used it just to map it?
Yeah, we did it to kind of get an overview of the damage so we can actually see if it was an EF-0 or an EF-1 and kind of go from there. But we can certainly use it for search and rescue too. We're actually developing some pretty cool platforms for that as well. I couldn't answer whether or not they have a pilot over there. They do have a drone, yeah, and we have plenty of pilots around. I mean, you're a pilot too yourself, right? Yeah. Yeah, so I mean.
Yeah, I'm just curious, and Tom is too. He's got infrared, which you can use for it. Absolutely. But you pretty much have to have the canopy going.
Right. I remember doing those sorts of things six or seven years ago when we had that individual loss down on Valley. Right.
Yeah, we did a test on that. Unless the guy's got a bright green shirt on, he's laying flat and you aren't going to see much.
That's right.
When he's moving around, even with the canopy off.
I have a question for the council. In Cory's budget,
You have this EMA administrator in your budget, and we have not approved this salary ordinance yet. Last year, there was a position in another department's budget that they didn't have the position in there on their Form 1, and what ended up doing is we stuck that position in on the salary ordinance without bringing anybody's names up. Now is the council going to approve in the emergency management the full-time administrator position for Corey?
Well we have to decide that and there isn't a job description as she said already so we can't really approve something.
So are we going to take that out of Corey's budget? Because we don't need to let Corey walk out of here with the unknown and we're going to make a decision.
Well then I think we need to take it out until we Obviously, we're not going to assign a $37,277 salary to it without going through the SES system, evaluation process, all that. So that might be a come back and ask kind of situation. So yes, good question. We probably need to remove it at this point until all the ducks are aligned.
And furthermore, I don't want it snuck in on the salary ordinance.
and also if it's a part-time we want you coming before us because again we're not wanting to add people to benefits and all those things we're wanting to know what's going to happen before we hire people we want things to be straightforward yeah because let me just remind everyone as far as i'm concerned what we're you know the whole purpose of this is that his budget your budget comes out of the general fund
And this is without the Lint supplemental. We're $574,326 in red ink based off the 2027 projected revenues. And that does not include any sort of increase with us making changes to the factor evaluation system. So that's where we are right now.
Well, and then I suggest that we take it out, and then you'll have to revisit it and...
Consensus with everybody?
I'd lean that way. Take it out? Yeah, take it out.
Zero it out for now? Yeah. Gary? Yeah.
Okay.
Thank you, Corey. No problem. Appreciate you guys. Thank you. A busy start to the year.
Yeah, well, we need some rain now. Yeah.
That's why we've come over the house a couple days ago. We're glad to see it.
Yeah, we didn't get much at the house, but we're constantly hauling water over to the garden every evening now.
That's OK, but I don't have to mow as much. That's the bright side. There's the bright side. That's the bright side. Thank you, everybody. Thank you.
should be showing up shortly.
Is he on his way? We want to take a break?
Yeah. Let's take a break.
myself as far as for Parks and Rec Board, just the interim. That's kind of why I just stopped in real quick for you guys.
Brandon Harris, he's been actively involved in the REC in the past and would like to be appointed to the Parks and Rec.
Brandon Harris, nice to meet everybody. I know most of you. So, yeah, I kind of haven't been on a board for, what, six years or so. But I've been busy with coaching, raising my kids, that sort of thing. The end of the – yeah, yeah. You know, not as important as – Anyway.
Raising kids is the most important.
Raising kids is the most important, that's absolutely right. And you know, I think why I have a desire to do the Parks and Rec is, you know, it's something that I don't think everybody in the county realizes that it is a potential viable income source for us. You know, the lights, if we could get the lights so many more games could be played, right? So if you just think from a local tourism standpoint, how many parents bring their kids here to play, but our parks aren't set up to play late games. So we miss a lot of tourism potential just in that alone, because if we shut these games down early, they're going back home to eat, right? What do we do when we travel to games? At the end of the game, we stay in that town and eat. Everybody does. The kids are hungry. So that was one quick point I just wanted to make that when I was watching yesterday, CBB was saying, well, how could we justify our costs for tourism for this? I absolutely think that tourism from that if you look at that as a local level would be a easy cheap option to keep a lot i'm talking thousands of people in our town for just a few more hours you think every single day right so anyway just something to kind of justify that sort of thing well that's why when we met with
some of the folks the other day on the CDC, they talked about being able to capture to be on registrations, the QR codes, all those things where people have to fill out stuff where they're actually coming from so that there is proof that it is terrorism and what those numbers are. In justifying that for tourism dollars, that's what we have to have is proof. And so I know that you're getting those things and have some of those things in place already. So that's really good.
Yeah, and I think that's just an easy one. You don't know how many people are necessarily coming from Columbus, but when you know every time we're playing these towns all the time in rotation, right? If we have a nice park, right, somewhere for these people to park their cars at, places to stay, you know, Our park is behind on what it needs to provide, not just for our local kids, but just in general for the county. Number two, what I found out in the first meeting, I don't think many of us would guess this, do you guys know that our pavilions are booked out almost a year ahead of time?
That's awesome.
Well, they're inexpensive. They're zero. We do not charge for pavilions. We do not have any sort of a... reservation system other than they have to call into parks and rec and god bless her she has to try and pencil and pin it in there for for this right now and then we also have the new pavilion uh that we just built right so we now have two two pavilions right that are getting ready to come into this fall That again, potential viable income source. You go to any other park, you're renting these things out, yeah, maybe low end 20 bucks, but some of these are $100 a pop. If you're gonna be there for say half a day or a full day, you're gonna have 10 people or you're gonna have 40 people, right? So anyway, another just immediate thing that I saw right off the bat was like, that is a great problem to have for us. So another thing is, Those pavilions could be upgraded really cheap. The floors are all busted up, right? Some really simple things. Low end, you know, that would, again, increase tourism, guaranteed.
I've already heard that the Overlook pavilions have 10 requests for weddings.
already yes yeah the current issue that we kind of brought that up in the board is how do we reserve that and how do we come up with rules for that the issue is is it yeah we would there's just there's just a little bit of black tape through there that we could could do but so far we're telling them yeah I mean if you can get there first come first serve but if we did have a actual reservation system then Again, it could justify sending an employee out there to clean one up every now and then or something, you know what I mean? So yeah, that was another quick thing that I saw pretty quickly. So yeah, Parks and Rec, I think that's something I can jump into and help. I don't want to do all the serious stuff you guys are up here doing anymore.
So we have a regular meeting coming up in August 56th.
Okay, yeah, yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking because 17 Scott
with our regular meeting in August.
Are we advertising for that position currently?
Yeah, it was in the paper this week. So we've asked for all the applicants to submit a letter yet.
Uh, no, but I can.
I mean, I can officially fill one out for you guys, sure. As soon as possible. Yeah, I'll do that.
Because I need to go to Julia, would be the best place. I think that's probably where you go to.
Yeah, because when I was coach, so I was, Mark and I, I've coached his son for years and years, and kind of at the end of the season when the past board member passed away he was kind of in my ear saying you know hey Brennan you know it'd be a good good idea for you so yeah he asked and I was thinking about it and I was like why not you know I can I can definitely step in and help here oh yeah yeah are we on the record
Yeah, no definitely from the local standpoint you see you see the from it from a parent standpoint, right and
You see the little park area that we built is booming, right? It's booming. Where do we park at? How do they get there, right? You know, there's nowhere for them to get to, and here we are talking about another big expansion. We just had, I guess, the engineers come in, and they're not... I don't think they're taking into consideration that if they make that bigger and do that, where are the people going to go, right? So to me, it's like we're going to improve something here, but we've got three other things over here that I think should really be done. Because right now what's happening with that is successful, right? But we're going to expand it, and from what I've heard is for a local entrepreneur to use it for training and that sort of thing. I don't think government should make a deal with someone local to build an infrastructure for their business and then if that business goes away for whatever reason, then we now have this huge complex. They're wanting to build a training facility for mountain bikes is the next project. A whole new separate area that is going to be infringing on where the garden area is so yeah so that's the current thing that I think is is trying to get pushed through on that standpoint but yeah for me you know you you look at the the pickleball thing if we don't have lights the pickleball things at Nolan void we're not going to be able to put the pickleball courts next to each other we've already realized that unless we change the kind of the dynamics of the park the pickleball courts are going to be in two separate areas So then you're going to have to have a different set of parking and that sort of thing. I don't think we're thinking about baseball tournaments. We've had two baseball diamonds now for the last couple of years, guys, that we can't even play on because the soil is horrible. I mean, you can't put the kids out there and play. So you can't really host tournaments and that sort of thing. But we could all the way up to you know adult baseball right we could have tournaments like that So you know are we going to fully utilize the park you know what I mean? It's like got a lot of space there, but I don't think we're fully fully utilizing it so you say soil From what I heard, it was before my time. They went and put new soil down. They put the wrong soil down. They didn't put baseball dirt down. And so it's just clay and dirt, mud. And so you really can't take care of it, even if you drag it.
I'm sorry, can I interrupt for just one second? Would somebody would like to buy you all pizza for lunch? Are you all up for that?
Somebody? Somebody?
Yeah.
Well, if they wanted you to know, they'd tell you.
Well, we can't accept gifts from anonymous people. Why? Anonymous is good. We can't pay them back. Are they the next budget request person?
I'm just saying, somebody wants to buy lunch.
That's a nice offer. I don't think we should do that. Why? Anonymous failed to know why you do that.
I mean, it could be me.
Thank you. It could be you. That would be very nice of you, but we don't know that it is you.
I've done it before.
Yeah, I know you have. How about you buy it? No. You're welcome.
Yeah, we have to be careful with stuff like this.
Yeah, we don't know who it is, especially. But yeah, I think we should probably not do anonymous. That's a nice offer, though, for whoever it is. Yeah. Yeah.
We want to take a vote on it? Yeah, let's take a vote on it. It would be pretty cheap.
I'll make a motion to take a vote on it.
OK. What are we voting on? Pizza. Yeah, I'm out. We can't take a vote.
We're not in a meeting.
I guess not.
Even if we didn't know who it was, he'd need it anyway, probably.
So anyway, Gary, I think a really simple extra one is if we built, say, two more pavilions, they'd be booked out in a heartbeat. Two more pavilions? At the park, yeah. I mean, I would have never guessed. I've lived here for a long time. Would you have guessed that they're booked out a year?
I think they'd do a little bit. Brown County State Park, but I didn't think about that.
And you think how much money they're making, and we're missing money right here. I mean, and she was saying that, you know, people, they have their family reunions there. As soon as they're done, they book again, you know? So it's like, wow, that's, you know, that's a good, viable income source, you know?
The coroner is here for his time. Thank you, Brandon.
August 17th, I'll be here.
Yep, 530.
Alright guys, enjoy the rest of your week. Thank you.
here. I'm always open.
He's your last one before lunch.
I know. So everybody left.
Hey, everybody didn't leave.
I didn't.
Hey, Mike. What do you and the other guy, Dave, what do you guys want for a vehicle? Whatever's good enough. You want a Suburban? You want a Caravan? You want a Durango? What do you want?
An all-wheel drive. You want all-wheel drive? Or four-wheel drive. Four-wheel drive. With decent ground clearance or acceptable ground clearance. Got it. We don't want a Porsche. it just needs to be they tried that once before a few years back and there was an outcry I don't know by how many people but that wound up going to the Sheriff's Department well but what's the difference between a pickup with a camper shell and a cargo van I'm just that's my opinion so a pickup single cab pickup or an extended cab pickup with an eight-foot bed and a Cap on it would be usable But will people in the community feel slighted I know that's you know a Suburban fits all the bills, but it's also expensive. All right So and I understand, I also understand that it's going to be setting a lot of the time. And it would probably be a vehicle that would be in service for 20 years because of the cost and the low mileage put on it.
Is it true that you have the room that we have a suburban keep it inside? Yes. So this vehicle could be inside. That's a big deal.
people think about the coroner coming out and picking up a body like it's a funeral home going to a funeral. That's not the case. We're removing a body from a location it can't be to a location it can be for temporary, you know, and then the body, whenever the investigation is done, whether there's an autopsy or not, it's released to a funeral home, they come and pick it up and they take it away. Thank you.
And the vehicle primarily would be at the coroner's office most of the time. We're not driving it to get groceries. We're not driving it home.
It's not a personal vehicle. It's a department vehicle for picking up and transporting bodies and the equipment that the coroner's office would need to have on a scene. Because there's been times that we've had a deceased person that is no more than bones and we've had to set up an awning or something over it to protect it while the collection of the bones is going on in a forensic manner. So I mean there's equipment that is hauled in it and stored in it that we would need at the scene and also the transport.
We've done, Kevin Patrick and Dwayne Parsons and I have done some little research and probably needs to do a little more but Dwayne said he went up to Johnson County and they use pickups, which is surprising because they've got greenwood.
They're going to get a pickup. They don't have one now. They're operating, they don't haul their own bikes. No, they use service. They use a service and the reason why they're going to get a pickup is so that they can haul their equipment normally to scenes And in the event that it's going to be an extended time lapse before the body's picked up, they could transport a body, but they won't be normally transporting a body. It's just, that's the way they're going to operate their system.
As far as a new vehicle, if you wanted, did get a pickup, but you priced it out too at Skillman, you'd get one for $41,000, four-wheel drive, a little shot, eight-foot bed, get a nice cab on it, could look nice. The benefit of pick up in that respect is you've got a very good barrier between the cab and the subject and you can clean it out very easily.
A pick up, you don't have to have the tray because the bed is the tray. And then there's no retrofitting with a tray or having something that did that had a situation where there was carpet like say in a Suburban where there's carpet that needs to be protected so that if there was a leak it wouldn't be into the carpet or whatever or into any of the crevices.
Having been involved in dead bodies a lot in my life, 39 years worth, I think you need a proper vehicle. What do you actually think is a proper vehicle? Because we have people making decisions here that have no idea. It's like Jim's always saying, if you don't know what you don't know, you don't know that you don't know. And I know you're not going to try and soak the county. What would you actually want? What do you feel is needed?
A pickup would check off a lot of boxes. A four-wheel drive pickup would check off a lot of boxes. The only other thing is if you get a really tall pickup we would need to find out whether the cot normally would be able to raise to the level to get into the back of the pickup because like the health department's diesel pickup that's really tall and I don't think that would even be An option because it's too tall for the cot to get to where it needs to But they do have in ambulances the auto lift system, which It it slides out picks up but then you're talking a whole nother big cost There have been times that I was the only one there and Which, you know, but then there's a lot of times that law enforcement or fire department or EMS will stand by until, to help.
I mean, literally, we're talking dead weight. And I'm familiar with body bags and how they slush around and all those wonderful things. And also, as far as I know, that would never be used for personal use because no one would want their groceries
After a period of time and even with the van that we're using now I try and keep it where it doesn't I mean I keep it sure other than some like like the tires on the cottage, I get a little bit of dirt or mud on them. Sometimes that's in the back, you know, where you take them in and out, but I try and keep it clean.
And then I also try and disinfect, especially if there is a particularly bad if you look into the cost, what it would cost us to get what you need versus I mean, there's going to be a decision made by all of us, obviously.
so have you researched this yourself so that will give us a better understanding what you need and what cost might be incurred to get the job done at the best price well and of course vehicles fluctuate in price and if you can get it on the state bid normally that's between five to seven thousand dollars under a normal person's price but I'm not sure what's available 100% on state bid what the state has said we will buy this at this cost and they always allow other governmental agencies to go in on the state bid prices so that would be a little bit more to research to see what we can actually do that within a reasonable amount of time because we've been kicking this around a lot a lot and we need to make a
So that's what it's got to fit into. If you wanted a new vehicle, you could probably opt to a new pickup truck for that and be in spec. And you've got good dividing between the driver and the occupant. It's up to you, though, whatever you think works better.
Like I said, a pickup would check off a lot of boxes. It's just what the community is willing to accept. But if you have a loved one that's deceased at your home and you're wanting them removed, I'm not sure what's the difference between a nice four-wheel drive pickup with a cap on it and a cargo van, in my opinion. I'm not sure.
Well, and to that point, not every, as we have discussed numerous times, not Every person that dies is a coroner's case.
Right.
So, I mean, many times we know that physician's going to sign off and they're not going to call you necessarily. You know, Jamie's going to come and pick it up in the nice vehicle.
Right.
If I fall over dead out in a state park, hiking or whatever, we know that that four-wheel drive's not going to get there. Somebody's going to come out with an ATV where they're going to be carried out on stretchers or whatever. It's not always pretty where these things happen. And it's not always, I mean, to me, I personally, that's just me, I don't care if I'm carried out on a truck as long as my remains are treated with dignity. With respect. Dignity at the scene, the people around me are, whether it's Sheriff's Department, EMS or whatever, are making sure that that's, you know, done well and that kind of thing. That's all that matters to me. I can't speak, obviously, for the public, but I would hope that most people can feel that.
Well, and I think a lot of times people think about, well, not a lot of time. I think what the issue was in the past, when the coroner's office had the pickup, and there was an outcry, and I'm not sure how big an outcry it was. But there was, you know, you can have one person that yells loudly. And a lot of people that are silent, you know, and don't have a problem with something, but you hear the one person that yells loudly.
So I you know, the one outcry that that if we're talking about the same pickup truck, that it was being used for personal use. That was the outcry that I knew about.
Well, and there was also some people that were complaining, I don't want my loved one pick up in a pickup. And I'm not sure if that was one person, five people, you know, or just a rumor that started. I don't know.
And what is the standard statewide? What is the standard that most, especially in rural counties, what is the standard most used? What's reasonable and prudent in most counties?
A lot of times it's a cargo van. I know Bartholomew County, Which is semi rule for the most part They use a high-top cargo van that's outfitted for and it's I Can't remember if it's a front-wheel driver or rear wheel drive, but most of their roads are paved They don't have the hills that we have But they do have some places that are kind of like in Brown County in parts of Bartholomew County. A lot of places use like Pacificas or smaller vans, but a lot of them use cargo vans. So Marion County uses cargo vans. So it's, you know, it's just all over the place on what different.
So how many bodies on average are you picking up a year? an average is a guess.
I would say 40 to 50 and some of those are courtesy pickups where I'm not actually it's not actually a court a coroner's case yes and I understand how that works yeah so some of them once I once I move the body it changes to where a doctor's willing to sign I mean, you know, it's just all over the place.
But where you actually have to go out there. All of the variances I'm not concerned about. I'm concerned about what you have to do. So how many times are you stuck getting a body because that versus whatever is reasonable and prudent and meets the community standard would be considered acceptable to the people in the county. That's what's reasonable. And for me, I'm not suggesting a $100,000 van and if they can find something adequate, it's adequate. I guess my offense is this. When we have different areas that we have, we spend $50,000 for lights, for holiday lights or more to fit our need that's an offense to me that because it should be treated with what's reasonable and prudent even if you go to court that's what's going to be based on what's reasonable prudent and what is past practice and that's all we're asking so we're just looking for the best possible price and maybe Gary can find it or whoever can find that but that that is the need and the fact that we people aren't involved in this don't know the difficulties in all of this and nor would they want to because i've had to do all the dead body stuff and go in the houses so i understand what what you're up against so with that i guess i'm done with my story yeah i want to jump in here um is the the number one kevin because his commissioner is about to buy this vehicle so if you all can buy a four-wheel drive pickup truck to where you can get the cart in it and if we can do it tastefully
where the cap is painted the same color as the truck.
We have nice graphics on it, so it appears as a nice presentation, number one.
And it's dedicated to the coroner, not... It's the coroner's vehicle.
Okay, so number two, I want you all to make sure that you have, that this vehicle is equipped with everything you need. storage all the stuff that you need to make sure that this vehicle has that all right and lastly because you just testified that the vehicle stays inside which is a big deal so now you know we can conceptually difference maintain properly you know we wouldn't be able to have to buy another one for 15 years let's say right so you average that cost out over a 15 year period lastly would be can we get this done before the end of the year of 2026 and get this resolved because then we can allocate the money back into your budget so the commissioners can you guys can get this vehicle bond get it done get it behind us that way that we can take this money you've got pegged for 27 out of the budget because there won't be any need for it because we can resolve
I believe that it's a doable deal because I know that we've had a constituent that's been helping us and giving us information and researchers they've actually been visiting foreigners offices and I just want to make a clarity statement with what was said with regards earlier on as to what where Johnson County is moving themselves to Johnson County was again had their own service that had body pickup for all of their corner activities and in the conversation with that that happened is their their recommendation and their approach given where they were at they were actually moving towards this the proposed solution is being the reasonable solution because again it other than the question of respect and the attribute of it. Again, and I know this is a very uncomfortable conversation with everyone, because this man right here has to look at it as, this is my responsibility. I have to be respectful. But there's still things that have to be done. And then you have the family engaged with that as it's a loved one, and it's not simply just something that has to be done. So that is a very, very difficult balance between the activities. Given the environment and geography of this county it is my opinion that proceeding with a pickup being either an extended cab or a single cab properly equipped from purchase new now the comment that was made from the Johnson County corner discussion was that it was roughly anywhere from a new pickup by forty to fifty thousand dollars depending upon the that aspect of it and then obviously you have the equipping fee which there's some max aspects of it as light bars and those things that we do do this for the sheriff's cars and
With the exception of... And as far as light bars and things like that, we don't need a light bar or anything. However, the Sheriff's Department might have some used lights that they've removed from... You know, because that's cost-saving right there. If the county already owns some lights, and it's not like we're going to run lights to a scene. It's just like if we're sitting alongside the highway for a serious accident... the vehicle is seen so that nobody runs into it.
Emergency flashing lights.
I just researched some of the dedicated needs. These are mortuary cotter stretcher, body pouch storage, cot locking system, PPE, I don't know what that is, and biohazard supplies. evidence collection kits, scene lighting, which is what you're possibly talking about. If you're out of the country and you need to light up something, you get them in there. Camera and documentation equipment, those are the options they talk about.
And a lot of the equipment, like I said, we've already got like in the van that we're using now we use some tote tubs that we keep the equipment in that we carry now we don't carry everything because we don't have everything but at the same time like if we need to set up an awning to protect a body the Sheriff's Department does have some of that stuff with their evidence equipment and if it's like a found body and they might bring their awning so we wouldn't have to have an on it. So I mean, it's just things like that, that we would that we work together, you know, we're so that the county is not duplicating equipment, and just having extra equipment just, you know, that nobody's using. So
It's my recommendation that we proceed forward with procuring a new pickup truck equipped and Which then we have the question about what the equipping costs need, right?
Let's do it, right? Let's do it, right? These look professional. Let's make sure the coroner's office is set and everything's in place and it's impossible We can get this done before we have five months left
Again, if it's going through the buying program, I don't know the inventory. Per what I understand, it is available. So that would be the only contingency. Could it be done by the end of the year? I believe we could make that happen.
John Jones, I had a conversation because Brad's buying all the police cars and everything. Right. and they may be a little bit higher in price for something, right? But on the flip side, they are also equipped to be able to do everything that you guys need to make sure this thing is fully equipped and we're done with it and we don't have to talk about it for a long time. do it right the first time. And so, to me, it's the two of you need to be making the decision, plus the new guy, Dave Fensmeister, I think that's how it's pronounced. Frenzmeier. Frenzmeier, yeah. So it's the three of you. Ultimately, Kevin, it's your decision. that you guys need to make and i'd like to see us get it done because if we get it done by the end of the year then we can just go ahead and take this hundred grand out of the budget for 27 because then you all need to come back here and say hey we need 75k to get it all done and we can be done with it behind us we checked out the pickup you could get new for 41 000 basically
Correct. But that's not equipped. That's not equipped.
So let me just make a comment from like an extremity standpoint. If I'm not mistaken, it's anywhere right at $12,000 or more to equip a patrol car, $12,000 to $15,000. I don't foresee that being the need here, unless we feel like there's a need in order to put a loop system in.
We don't need, like a lot of the stuff is a console, we don't need a console. Correct. We don't need, we usually operate off of walkies anyway, so we don't need an in-car radio. We don't need a computer stand. I mean, there's lots of things that a police car has that we don't need. And if you're taking out the cost of a tray to put into an SUV and the divider to divide the driver's compartment area from the passenger's area, Those are costs that are going to be, you know, neutral. Neutral and zeroed out.
Do you have to have a repeater in your vehicle?
No. No.
So just in general, you could go 45k, another 20k, 65 grand, get it all done, turnkey, rock and roll.
I believe that would be an extreme max.
I would rather it be higher. I'd rather have it not need it than need it.
Yeah, because there's no...
So who's going to flesh this out?
My comment is I think that the work has been done with Dwayne Parsons doing the research and the conversations that have happened. It's just a matter of he's been waiting for us to go through and say give me a number and I will go through and we'll get it equipped professionally, done to the point so that we can get it and happen.
We need to put that on the agenda for next week.
What we need to do right now is I want to take 100 grand out of the budget for 2027 I would like to see the council, you know, agree 65K, that's the top number, right? It should hopefully give you more than enough cash to really get this thing resolved. And I want you guys to get, because Kevin, I'm assuming if we, you know, we would have to act fairly fast unless we go ahead and advertise it Do an additional appropriation for the coroner's budget. Stick the money in the budget for 2026. So that way you've got the money to go get the work done. And we can get this behind us. We've been jacking around with it way too long.
Completely agree. OK. So I would say that if we can.
Let's take 100 grand. Take that 100 grand out of the 2027 budget of the coroner's budget. And then let's be prepared to allocate up to $65,000 for this four-wheel drive, whatever it is you guys decide you want.
A couple of things that I would like to see that I think would solve some of the stigma problems of a few people with a pickup truck is we can get a, like has been discussed, get a good professional-looking cap on it
metal and you know not just you know we already have basically it we already we've identified and from the research that's been done as to what that needs to be look like and they've been recommendations I would like to see a metal cap something let me finish this
Remove the tailgate. There's a back enclosure where you can remove the tailgate, replace that with two doors where it's more like an SUV, more like a van.
And that is what Johnson County is looking at trying to do with their configuration.
And it's dedicated strictly to the coroner's office. It's not going to be used ever for the highway department, so this is a dedicated... A dedicated vehicle for proper treatment of the deceased. I'm reiterating some of Jim's points and saying that's some important stuff.
Just blacked out windows or curtains or something.
No windows. And right now what we're using has windows in it.
The only thing you might do is do some NASCAR graphics on the front of it.
Well and and and the thing is even if we would have have to have one with Windows you can put graphics over the windows that completely I do have a question for Michael because the things in the conversations that we did have Are you?
Are you secured with regards to your cooler space in the coroner's office?
Right now I'm not having any problems with the three person cooler. The only thing that I do need to look at at some point is that one person trying to move a body from the top or the bottom shelf of the cooler because it's up, middle, bottom is relatively unacceptable I can use the middle shelf without any problem. With your cot? With the cot. The problem is if I have to go down or up, I don't have any way of doing that unless I can get help to help me move it, and then it's all manhandled. And I put in for a lift for, in my budget the last couple of years, and that was cut out. And I'm not saying we have to have it, it's just Sounds like you need it. At some point, it needs to be.
And I think too, explaining that in that way makes us understand that maybe some way we missed that part of it. Yeah, I think so.
How much, what was that amount? I can't remember off the top of my head now.
If you all determined you need a lift, shouldn't the lift be incorporated in the cost of this vehicle? We're talking about an actual lift on site in the coroner's office.
Well, when you do come back, you're already doing additional appropriation. That sounds like a need, not a want.
So is that under machinery and equipment?
I think so. So it's in your 27. I mean, we could front load that to the same additional appropriation this year. I mean, otherwise, Mike, you say it's not acceptable. I assume that means there's a dignity issue there in some way. So let's front load that this year, maybe take it out of your 27 budget like the truck, front load it into an additional appropriation with that same announcement, same advertisement, same meeting, and do it. Just get that done.
And you think that you can get that lift for that amount of money?
That's what I had back when I first asked for it. I don't know whether they went up.
Can you research?
I will do that, yes.
Okay, while we're all here, I'm going to go through all these lines because that was the intent of these hearings. On the sheet, you have 27 budget requests, $26,000 for the elected official. I don't know where we got $23,072 on. up on the screen. Are we going with the $26,000?
We have to make sure that it's appropriate with the SES. Right.
But as a line holder right now, are we going with $26,000?
Well, what did he make last year? We had $26,000 in the 26th budget.
Okay, so we want to leave it at that.
Where did we get $26,000 on the adopted budget? In 2016.
You want to leave it according to the salary ordinance or change it to the 26th?
We need to change it to the salary ordinance.
Yeah, we've got to stay true to the FDS system.
Okay, 23072. Okay, next line. Chief deputy, we had, there's 12,000 on 26, 13,000 budget requests for 27. What do we have in the salary ordinance?
Are we waiting on somebody? Mm-hmm. Yeah. Julie. Julie. Julie. I'm sorry. We're going to .
Oh, I think we're looking at the salary ordinance for the chief deck owner.
OK. OK. Mike had 2,900 in longevity. That's why it was more money.
Oh, OK. So we'll just leave it at 23072. Now the chief deputy, what did we have in the salary ordinance for chief deputies?
Chief deputy, we have 12. We had 12 and it's up to 15 now. Yeah. And again, this is all going to go through the FES system.
Right. The 27 request was 13, so we're going to leave it at 12 until we get the FES.
Mm-hmm.
Okay. Deputy coroner. We had, according to the 26th budget, was $2,000.
Chief deputy is $12,000. The deputy corner is $2,500.
In the salary ordinance? OK. Postage, $50,000. Does that stand the same?
I don't know exactly what Dave's thought is. It would either be me or it would be Tim True.
500 is the same as 26. Evidence collection supplies... 350, is that good for that? Evidence collection supplies?
Hold on, just let me... That's your current ask. I'm trying to scroll in, it's... And it's collection 350 yes, okay?
Blood draw equipment of 250 is it yes? batteries 300 I Think all of all of those are exactly the same as last year's right yeah Yeah, I just make it sure as you because then we're actually doing the data entry and
Just carry those over. Yeah.
It's worth $1,200 for body bags. Is that still good, that cover yet? Travel expenses of $250. Auto insurance of $650. Depending on the vehicle.
Yeah, that's probably going to go up, maybe. Probably. $650,000 a year. Depends on how many miles. Depends on miles, though, but replacing that vehicle.
You want to leave it at $650,000 and adjust it as we need it?
Kevin, I mean, you're the insurance guy, actually, on this. What do you think? $650,000 for a brand new truck? $50,000 truck?
Maybe I don't I don't think that's gonna be Reductions and everything that we've done.
Yeah, I don't think it'll kill us Auto maintenance of 750.
I don't even know that we need that. We got a new truck. It's got everything's oil changes
Brakes. Fire rotations.
750? You want to keep it at that? Yeah.
And if they don't use it, it's going to go back anyway.
Again, you've got to be careful with that because the services that are going to be happening here are not going to be services because of use. It's going to be services because of non-use. Yeah. Right? So they're not going to be as frequent. So therefore, I mean, it's highly likely this vehicle will only ever go through a one-year service.
Right. Maybe two oil changes, maybe, in a year. Pretty minimal.
And the other thing that you've got to think about that is if for some reason a rock hits the windshield, you've got to replace the windshield. I mean, it's not something that you can plan for.
But you can have a contingency. Right.
Or you're on the scene and you wind up poking a hole in a tire and having to have new tires.
I just learned that the auto insurance is coming out of the commissioner's budget.
That was one of my questions. So we even need to put it in.
It should actually come off of his budget. So that's a 650 savings because that comes off of us?
Yeah, that was one of my questions. So it can come out of his budget. Okay, so we can zero that.
Thank you.
That is 8.
Can we save that for the... Oh, that's where you're at. Well, I want to get through all the data first. 500 for fuel, is that enough?
It's not very much.
Big truck, what's that going to get, 20 miles a gallon?
But if I think 40 runs would be a lot heavier than a regular truck.
You're about to to the gas all the county vehicles.
So it basically the commissioners do pay it out of their budget. Yeah Well they all have their own Or do you want to keep for tracking we want to keep it in in here I know that we have in our budget 230 to over $230,000 for gasoline And as little as there
run, I mean, it's not going to be...
But if he has his own code through the highway department, it's easier to track that way on how much he's actually spending.
Right. Do we want to keep it that way? You would keep your code regardless if it's in your budget or not. Let me...
I don't know how it's set up for tracking it in... I know that we have $237,000 or $200,000, again, over that. My comment would be is... You're going to end up using the highway facilities just like anyone else, so there would be a code in that. Zero.
And whether or not he has the fuel line, he still has his own code for tracking. Correct.
Reese is signaling me at zero, and it is zero. It goes to us. Fuel? Fuel can come out of that.
Okay. That's what I was thinking, too. Yeah.
Okay. Autopsy fees...
In 26 for 26,000 400 and on the autopsy fees I Haven't been told that there's going to be any increase currently each autopsy cost 2,200 but with everything else I am I'm not going to be surprised if it does go up.
Is that IU or Columbus Regional?
It's Sergio Forensic Services out of Fishers. They're a traveling pathology. Bartholomew County, Johnson County, Morgan County, there's they're basically central Indiana any place that doesn't have their own pathology department like Monroe County does their own you know over there but everybody else uses them yeah not not every case requires well and not every case does but If I don't have a good reason why somebody's deceased, I have to do one. I have budgeted for, I think, 11, 12 autopsies a year, but I have had to come back and have had to ask for more money.
Depends on the year, depends on what happened.
At $2,000 apiece, $26,000, we'll get you 13 of them.
Is that a good number to hold? That's a good placeholder and then basically the way I understand the statute is It's not if the council will approve a request, it is they will approve a request because they have to be done if they have to be done.
Kind of like a murder trial has to be done.
So the thing about that is if you need more autopsy money because we exceed, then you need to come back to us.
Right, and that's what I've had to do in the past before.
Hazardous waste of 500, does that cover everything? It should. Okay. Body transport 500. What is body transport? How is that different than gas and vehicle?
That is... Maybe to Bloomington?
Is that you having to take them to the autopsy?
Yeah, because there has been times that we've had to transport bodies for autopsies. And, you know, because...
It's them coming and picking it up and getting it?
Yeah. Or you pay others to do it, maybe it sounds like even...
So you keep it in there just in case?
Right.
Special Forensic Services? 500 good on that? That's the ask. It's been consistent.
Because When I do a toxicology, if I'm looking for certain drugs, the state will pay for it. If I'm looking for something else, I have to pay for it. So if I'm looking for carbon monoxide, I have to pay for it.
If you have to call on an anthropologist, who pays for that and that happens?
The University of Indianapolis has a... That's who we use. them out of the University of Indianapolis. They say it is free, but it's not. If they come out to do something It's free, but you're expected to pay if they have to stay overnight. You got to pay for the room and board If they are there during the day and come back the next day you got to pay There's just you'll get a bill from them or incidentals But the service is free. It's the incidentals that you know I alarm system for 50 is that for it has not went up since it was installed so it's a hundred and some 105 every quarter advertising
No, public service. Education and training, 600 cover all that? Or are we going to have some more expense with a new coroner coming in?
You know, I mention this every year. It prides me that the local counties, not just us, that our local counties have to pay for education and training to the coroner when they get, and I'm probably off maybe by a quarter or 50 cents, every death certificate of a person that dies where you ask for one, or 10, multiple times a year, 10 years from now, whatever, goes to the state coroner's center, their fund for state training, and yet we still have to pay training at the local level. It just fries me.
The way it works is your initial death investigator training is paid for by the state.
And that's good.
Yes, because that would be pretty expensive. As a matter of fact, they're instituting a program that if a coroner goes through, that if a deputy or whatever goes through the training and then they don't fulfill their obligation to be, they're looking at Making making it where the person signs a contract that they're going to pay back And part of that is like say if you can't the If you're a certified death investigator, you have to have so much in-service training, and that, if you can't go to the training that is provided for free, you're still expected to get that training, and that's the reason it's in there. Yeah, I'm not questioning that. In case we have to send somebody.
Yeah, I know you have to have your training, but they take in a lot of money. A lot of money. So, to me, they should be providing all kinds of training for you.
Well, and that's part of how they pay for the coroner's initial trainings and, you know, the certifications and stuff is out of that money.
I know. But, you know, it's a lot of money. For 92 or 93 or 95, you know, coroners that are out there.
Is 600 enough to cover any coroner? Believe so, okay Repair equipment is stays the same 300 is that still good? What was the question I'm sorry repair equipment 300 that's what it was last year
No, because the cooler wound up being $2,500 I believe altogether.
We made it. So I mean, that was a one time repair, though. Yeah. We did an additional preparation for that.
Yeah. But I mean, 300 just for like incidental daily repair stuff, it probably would be okay.
I don't think it but if there's an additional preparation probably be better that way we can kind of track it.
Yeah.
Okay. Using subscriptions 250? Nope. 450.
that cover everything hold on just saying I have to keep jumping back and forth yes okay because the coroner's association fees it's deputies are $75 a year and the coroner is $150 a year so if you have 150 that's 3 So yeah That that should cover unless that goes up at some point.
So Okay And now Julie question for you. If you look up at the spreadsheet, I'm missing some lines from the book You want me to add those now are you gonna take care of those I'm not gonna take care of them once we're done
Okay, but we'll go through Furnitures and fixtures we have 2200 request for this year Yes I still need a conference not a conference table but a table where I can meet with people and they can sign documents and some chairs for that and I mean I'm still just I have a couple of in tables that I purchased out of my pocket and some hand-me-down Chairs that you know, you know and a hand-me-down desk is all I have in my office.
Okay Vehicle purchase a purchase of a hundred thousand we are striking No, we're gonna eliminate it from 27 And we'll do an additional appropriation for 26 when they find something. Good and done. OK. Machinery and equipment of 10,500.
Striking into the new appropriation.
Is that the lift you were talking about?
Yeah, that's part of the lift. And that was asking for a second or new three-person cooler. But what we can do is get rid of the seven. The only problem is I don't know whether the body lift has gone up.
Yeah, you're going to check into that.
But we're going to do an additional appropriation on that for this year instead of 27. Right. So is there anything you need in that line for 27? Or is an additional appropriation for this year going to take care of it all?
You want $1,000 in there for unknowns equipment-wise? It probably wouldn't hurt. or more, I mean, tell us.
Yeah, what do you see, do you see it needed for next year or do you want to wait and, do you think we can just strike it out and do an additional appropriation as needed?
I don't think we can do an additional appropriation, I mean, if you, because it just kind of whacks things out.
Give them a reasonable, what's a reasonable budget for like any equipment needs you may have for the year, even unanticipated, you may have something break that you need.
That's what's covered under repairs.
Don't spend it unless you need it.
This would be purchase of additional equipment. Well, that's under repairs. This is purchase of new stuff.
If you can't fix it, that's what you can use it for. $1,500.
Yeah, $1,500, $2,000.
A placeholder of $1,500 would... You can always come back. Transfer between lines.
And buildings, we have $1,050. That's recurring though, correct?
I don't want to put recurring stuff in the QM cap. We don't have to. You can also put the repair equipment in the CCD and the furniture and fixtures in the CCD.
That would be OK with it. Because QM-CAP, by the name, is Cumulative Capital Expenditures. So recurring expenses, in my opinion, doesn't belong there. But new purchases of equipment and stuff, sure. You want to discuss that when commissioners come up, or do you want to take care of it now?
CC Furniture and fixtures Furniture and fixtures.
I assume Theresa made a recommendation. Yep, and her recommendation was So I'm gonna go with it.
Okay, so we're going to you want to do that with the buildings also the 10 The 1050 for buildings. What was that for?
It says window coverings for the ponds
Okay, and again obviously the structures are so we're taking care of anything and all that repair roofs didn't you know doorways seals that kind of stuff So is it is it are you talking about internal structure that you need to change on that micro? To eventually
whether it's this year or under Dave, there needs to be an epoxy of the office space and the autopsy room minimum. It would be nice if the whole building could be epoxied.
You're talking about the floor?
Yeah.
So if that's the kind of activity, I would say that that's something that would need to roll underneath the commissioner's activity because that's, again, a large – I consider that a big part of the structure part.
And the reason being is the concrete was sealed – But it looks horrible.
Yeah, it's sealed, but it's still not.
Yeah, and there was some blood in the autopsy room that got on the floor, and it stained the floor.
Okay.
So, I mean, it actually needs an epoxy covering over the entire floor of the whole building.
That's a 20,000, 30,000 number more like than a...
So you want to zero that out here and then take it into the commissioner's office? Okay.
Yep. I don't know, yeah, $1,000 is a little light on that.
Yeah.
I just got an estimate for just polishing it, 1,000 square feet, and it was almost $12,000. Sure.
Get out the rags and the minwags.
And that's not county money. That was a different one.
Okay, there was something else that was going to move. Furniture. Furniture. And again with that kind of thing, Mike, that's something that we can probably fit in next year easily.
Okay.
And was there something doing anything would you say?
Okay Okay, so the only
So furnitures and fixtures, we don't need to add that line back on here. Buildings, we don't need to add that line back on here. Vehicle purchase, we don't need to add that line back on here. So the only line that's missing from what's on the screen is machinery and equipment for $1,500. Do you want to move that to...
I would rather have that kind of fall under him because that's job specific.
Because then you're tracking what's actually... Yeah, right. Okay.
My understanding is you took the fuel output another commissioners budgets already there I'm as far as the building improvements and those kinds of things. I agree. We can work that through
And then obviously the alarm aspect of it is something that can pull up, but it doesn't sound like you want to put it under a cued cap. You want to keep it in a reoccurring spin under just normal building activities. Yeah.
Okay. All right. Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Well, that's done. That's time. Code 2. Code 2.
What was lunch?
Code one. Code one.
All right, we're back on. Get this show on the road. All right, we have commissioners, and we're going to start with the Kuhn Cap Development Fund.
We appreciate you guys coming for us. So I just want to just take a couple minutes, okay? So our goal is, again, a great deal of work went into what's being presented here today. And, again, we believe that we'll demonstrate what we've taken and made a huge stride. areas where we've been successful, and likely there's areas where we haven't been successful. But the goal is to sit this and say, here's the way we look at this, here's what we think is going to work best for us. I'm open to anyone here saying, well, maybe this is something that I have a question about, or something that, well, maybe if you look at it this way. That is the point. this i mean we just had several engagements right now you know we've taken on some additional thoughts theresa almost smacked me in the head when i walked into the commissioner's office and said oh you're taking on the building over at the coroner's office so this i'm like that's our responsibility right we don't want we want to have those things land where they're supposed to land yeah so i don't i take regular beatings so um just
Yes, of course. Well, I think we did a demonstration on the savings because I've heard some grumblings about that. So we wanted to show you where we know we've saved. We've added some things back at this point, so these numbers, they're going to all change. The most impressive part of KimCab at this time is our IT department. So I would like to turn it over to Eric first to start at the beginning because he has... I'll let you have that star in your hat. You did a lot of work, Eric.
Hello. Hi. Hi. I know you guys know who I am, but for the TV viewing public, my name's Eric Evans. This Monday, I celebrated my first year anniversary of being your IT director here at Brown County.
Yay, thank you.
Thank you very much for what you've done. Seems like it's been longer than that.
in front of you guys, but this is my 12th overall time defending a budget in front of a county council such as yourself. So I'm not going to say I'm old hat at it, but I've been around the block a couple times with it. I wanted to just take a couple minutes to give kind of a state of the union of the IT department, since some of the other department heads have been doing that. You know, they brought me on as someone who That's the advantage that I bring to the table here. And I'm not saying that to be self-aggrandizing. I'm not saying that necessarily to air my bona fides. But one of the things that's relevant about that is in my time at Monroe County, where I was the chief technology officer, about on year change that's similar to a change that I see us going through here in Brown County. And basically they decided that the current financial management package that they were using was no longer working and so they decided to switch over to allow financial management which is the same financial management package we use here in Brown County. So I have been through the process of switching a fairly large county over to Wow. Why does that make me valuable here? It's because, you know, Julie obviously was instrumental in the procurement of that software and getting it configured so they could do the basic stuff that they needed to do. But as I listen to the email threads and the conversations between the council and the commissioners, it's clear that despite the arguments that you guys have amongst the two boards, you guys are laser focused at creating the controls that are going to be institutionalized here for a good long time. Once those controls are created, once the workflow is working, there's going to be a long time before that changes. And I just kind of wanted to talk a little bit about what that process looked like at a different county. Because I wasn't here when we first did the switch over to Laos. In Monroe County, what they did, they spent several months really examining how their charter accounts were set up, which departments had access to which funds, which accounts, which locations. These were all things that were built out by the Laos company. Julie and her staff, like I said, have populated the basic stuff, but as we move forward and look at the other functionality that we're paying for and not using yet, you know, it really is my strong recommendation that we start looking at fleshing out some of the other functionality of the program. Again, at Monroe County, it was a month-long process where the commissioners met with all the different department heads. They met with a representative from WOW. We went through. And then I, as the IT director, went through and set all the permissions. It's not that we don't want department heads seeing all of the funds and all the accounts. It's just very overwhelming to see all those. One of the problems that we have there that we are absolutely already having here is buy-in. When we get to the next phase of our life with this software system, for it to be more useful than it currently is, we have to get buy-in from the departments and from the elected officials. And we do not have that now. I am getting pushback when I've gone around to different departments. I've started showing them how to use the software, how to run easy reports. And we are currently very siloed. Our departments are set up like little kingdoms. And in order for them to buy into this, we have to sell it to them. And I think what that looks like is having a meeting or a couple of meetings, like a department head meeting, where And I'm sure they laid eyes on this when we were shopping around for it the first time. But several years have gone by. And every department has their own accounting method. A couple of the departments, I've shown them how to use Wow. And they're enthusiastic about it. It's user friendly. It does the job they want it to do. A couple of departments are like, we're not going to use that. Which is probably, on some level, their prerogative. But, you know, one of the functions that we can look at doing down the road that became absolutely vital during COVID at Monroe County was the ability for the department heads to do the basic data entry for their claims. Okay, and what that process looked like was, you know, you'd have someone working in the department who was not the department head who would do the initial data entry for the claims. It would then be reviewed by the department head for mistakes. and then sent to whoever in the auditor's office, in this case Doug, who processes the claims. At that point, all that person really has to do is process it into writing a check and all that stuff. All of the data entry for stuff that could get mixed up is being done in the departmental level by the person who's procuring the services, procuring the goods, knows what it's going to be used for, knows what line it should be paid for, all that stuff gets situated and goes through several levels of eyes on it to make sure it's correct. We got that implemented right as COVID hit and it was life changing for the citizens of Monroe County because we were able to continue to process claims where we couldn't have done that if we were relying on a paper system. We're several steps away from being able to do that here at Brown County, because again, we've got to get buy-in from the departments and the elected officials. And who knows? That may not even happen. But I would be remiss, as your IT director, to not strongly urge us to move in that direction. Again, I want to be careful with you. Julie has done a fine job. This is not meant to be an indictment of the auditor's office in any way. It's just look into the future. And I think, you know, we need to look at having a meeting or a series of meetings between Julie, whoever the incoming auditor is. I think Ed Ogia would be absolutely instrumental in helping out with this process. He loves getting into the weeds of the numbers. And, you know, he's a kooky little dude, but he's got wisdom. He really does. He dishes out the wisdom. And, you know, he knows what he's doing. So that is one of the two recommendations that I'm going to make here today, is that we strongly consider how we're going to work with Lyle moving forward. And I'd really like to get the electeds and the department heads involved in seeing what our lives could be like if we all were using this elective. The second thing I would like to talk about is the health department. you know, we went over their budget today. One thing that you need to understand about the health department is that at some point prior to my being here, and as I understand it, maybe even prior to Laura, my predecessor, there was a schism that happened with the health department where they decided they wanted to contract out their own IT services. And because they are governed by the health board, you know, they have the legal authority to do that. I think we would function a lot better by bringing them under our umbrella. We're already providing certain services for them, and we've been in talks. When Melissa was there, we were in talks to take over from their IT vendor. I've met with their IT vendor a couple times. He's ready to pass it off to us. I've talked to the doctor via email. He seems to be enthusiastic about that. Now what does that look like? I think that there's probably some stuff. They do some IT purchasing on their own through funds and whatnot. We may be able to get better pricing because we have a slightly larger scale because we're buying for all the other departments. We should take a look at that. They have some serious infrastructure work within the office that has got to be done. And because this is going out over a public feed, that's all I'm going to say about that. But there is some serious infrastructure work in the office that has got to be done sooner rather than later. So I'm really hoping that we can get things kind of on an even keel with the health department so we can get in and take a look at some of those things. So all that being said, I'm going to proceed on to my elements from uh the commissioner's budget i'm going to tell you guys the same thing i've told every council i've i've presented before you know i've done everything i can in my due diligence to bring some of these numbers down to cut where we can cut even though you know my budget is pretty it's pretty modest we were able to find cuts and i'm going to detail some of them here I want to establish with you guys, and this is echoing something that the Federal Service officer said, there are going to be times when I may come before you guys needing some money. And most of the time in that situation there's going to be an emergency element to it. And it's imperative in my mind that you guys understand that if that happens, that I have gone through every aspect of the deal to bring it in as low as possible. As an example, you have the project in the sheriff's department where I had had direct previous experience with vendors providing the surveillance camera gear for their interview rooms and the breathalyzer room. And I was like, hey, if I take over that project, I know how to deal with these sales guys because I just did it. I saved us over $15,000 on that deal. I'm not trying to sing my own praises, but the point I'm trying to make is I'm very aggressive about that. And if given the chance, as time goes by, I think I'm going to be able to do more of that type of thing. So having said that, Looking at my items in the commissioner budget, the first item, and I know we're basically talking about COONCAC, but the first thing I wanted to highlight is actually in our general fund under the telephone services, which is general fund, so of course 1,000, then 3,100, 0068 is our location for this. This is our telephone services, all our phones that sit on the desks in the department, our voice over IP phones. We contract with this company to do that work. I'm presenting that at a $15,000 reduction. We were able to audit and I credit Bill Moyer for being responsible for that. He audited our phone. We met with the company that provided it, and we were out of contract with them, and I said, hey, if we sign a three-year contract, what kind of deal will you give us? And we were able to get that down to a, you know, basically I think like around $1,300 a month less than what we're currently paying. You know, in the grand scheme of things, all the figures you guys have been dealing with over these past three days, $15,000 isn't a huge amount, but it's also not nothing.
Was that on IT firewall and security?
No, this is on telephone systems and service.
By the way Eric you had another gentleman sitting beside you today.
We didn't know who that was. So that is Steve Mascari. He's the contractor that I brought on to help out a little bit. You know Bill has Is Semi not here because of paternity leave? And because we're a two-man shop? Gotcha.
Yeah, that's key. Thank you.
Steve and I go way back. Some 25 years ago, I gave him his first IT job. Yeah, good. That's a key...
Did you hear what he just said about the savings he had on that?
Moving on, now we are in Comcap. We were able to make a reduction in our IT services obligation. There's a number of services that we're able to do internally now. And there was a little bit of headroom on that that I thought was unnecessary. So instead of asking for 16,739, I'm asking for 5,375. Which is at $11,000 and change.
Page 2 of Q&C.
Yeah, account line 31001.
Yeah, so that's IT services obligation.
Okay, so it's how much now? I'm sorry, it took me a while to get there. $5,375. So that is it, okay.
Yeah, that's what's in there.
Okay, thank you.
Most of the other lines are flat. There's an increase in the IT virtual solutions. That's something that I'm going to try to work on a different way to go as we move along on that.
That's the one where they significantly raised the price. That's the one we had to cover for this year too.
Yeah, the company that we contracted with was acquired by Broadcom. Broadcom took a very aggressive approach with the entire And now they're getting a huge amount of blowback and are actually turning around and starting to lower their prices with certain clients. So we may be able to stay with them. If we move to a different vendor, we're going to have to move our entire server virtual infrastructure, which will be a pretty major undertaking. We'll have some labor involved in that.
Which they know is why they can raise the price.
There is a certain amount of attrition, and they just kind of went a little hog wild on it. And, you know, it caused what happens in the market. Other competitors popped up to try to snatch up their clients, and they didn't like that. So there is definitely some signs that they're easing up on their kind of draconian approach that they had there for a while, real crazy stuff. That's the long and short of it. Most of the other lines are flat. There's a small increase for copy release and maintenance on that one. We did take that out to bid and went to two other vendors to look at trying to, we have a number of copiers that are at end of life so we have to lease new copiers. We took that out to bid with three different vendors including the one we currently use and the pricing with our existing vendor originally was not great but the other two vendors were like, the one vendor said we can't service all of these existing copiers that you have so you're going to have to also contract out with this other company to get those serviced. So that eliminated them from consideration. The other vendor which is an offshoot of the vendor that we use for our voice over IP service that I talked about previously. They've been trying to capture our copier business for a while. And they have pretty good pricing, but the deal that they pitched to us would have involved us replacing a significant portion of our fleet over the course of two days. I have been through a scenario where you have multiple departments getting new copiers on the same day, and it is not worth any amount of money saved. People get upset, they get mad at me, they'll get mad at you, it's a bad situation. So we went back to Gordon Flash, our existing vendor, and said, we need you to lower that price down so we can stay with you, and they did, they did come down. I also credit Bill Moyer for that one as well.
So I think the other thing, too, that Eric has stepped up from us and that is the challenge of exactly what he's describing there. Just because something has been there doesn't mean that that is going to stay. He did exactly the same negotiation with the website software that we use. And again, got us into a contract that at the end of that contract, we will only be paying what we were paying now. So the first two years of that coming to us had a discount. So we're already operating about savings in two years, along with only not even seeing a price increase at that third year. So I commend him on the activity and the work that he's been doing with that. Because I've thrown questions at him, and he's walked away and come back and give us answers. And every time he's walked away and come back and give us answers, they've been well within my expectations for that.
I want to just say that I appreciate the work you've done. And a person that always needed change within a department. But sometimes you've got to change with the times. I mean, things become more efficient. We may not like it, you know. And I look for us to have changes coming down the road. And I think that probably as we... and that kind of thing, and we get different eyes on things, fresh eyes always help, I think that will kind of move along, because some of us old people, and I'm one of those old people, it's harder for us as we age to learn as quickly, not that we can't, as quickly, so I think some of the attrition and fresh eyes will hopefully help move us into the directions that we need to go. That is my hope. And we need to just be conscious as department heads and elected officials to try to help one another to be the best that we can be and try to take on these new changes.
Yeah, I agree with Judy. Eric, you've just, you're just kind of, I love the way you approach things. You're, you know, you're managing change very well and just your subtle suggestions and even just the way you're approaching your presentation today is very, very, you know... well done and and you know we've had conversations about reports specifically for the council that you've been very helpful in as well we've got five maybe six reports that I think we should be seeing on a monthly basis and Eric's got that in the works for us and even has a way to kind of overcome one of the other gaps which is our boards and commissions that may want to see these reports just having those automatically generated for us in a way that uses automation and AI and you've been very helpful at identifying those solutions and I know you're working to implement those automated solutions to start spitting out reports to our emails before meetings just automatically and so just appreciate your willingness to help and work on things that Are very helpful to us.
Thank you Agree So I think what we first Since we're not that deep into it parks and recs is here. Can we allow them to go ahead first and then come back? Yes, I give my presentation.
Okay, I I got in nine o'clock 30 hours
no sleep this should be fun yeah to update you on kind of where we were we talked to the CBC board and there Michelle may have updated you're maybe not had time yet but we're gonna reconvene with them at our council meeting on the 17th Monday evening 530 after they have a chance to talk with you about how your kind of estimates they just want to better understand that and they are looking at the capital expenses as well as the operating expenses being included in their innkeeper's tax portion to offload off that budget. It does appear they're leaning towards the capital expenses as an easier way for them to be helpful in that budget and so they're going to want to meet with you and talk through some of those things.
What date was that 13th yeah, well Michelle's got it in Yeah, CBC's got separate meeting 17th is the council council evening 530.
Yeah But yeah, so maybe for today's purposes Just just the operational the top half of your budget the capitals Unless counts us questions. Maybe a little less important.
So we did see your spreadsheet where you estimated kind of how much each slot was tourism. I don't think we need to go back into that unless you want to. Or, Darren, do you think it would be helpful for the public to hear it?
If you have any additional explanation of that or how we arrived at that that you want to share, or if not, we can wait until we expand on it in the other meetings.
I'm sorry, on the percentage breakdowns of each? Yeah. I mean, most of which we just looked at and kind of tried to weigh what we could see as tourism related. Salaries, again, that was one of the things that we kind of just considered what portion of our job we could kind of estimate on being tourism related versus just dealing with events, sports programming. With the capital, most of the capital improvement projects though, looking at those, for instance, the Salt Creek Trail, some of the repairs that need to be done with the trail itself. One could argue so many different ways on the Salt Creek Trail for instance on what percentage of use that gets from visitors versus residents so but we kind of estimated 75% of the trail upkeep or the repairs that needed to be done could come out of tourism or at least be associated with tourism related expenditures.
Is that in the form one? Yeah, I got that, but I was just looking at the
Yeah, yeah, so that's the total was that does that all fall under Salt Creek Trail maintenance I am well, so I apologize.
I was actually looking at Salt Creek Trail maintenance But there is under capital outlays Salt Creek Trail repairs Which is what we'd actually looked at potentially even being a hundred percent
$14,000 and some change. That's again on the capital.
25% for All of us With our seasonal like our just our mowing maintenance position We've kind of gone back and forth about you know, what percentage that could really be associated with tourism right now we just put it down as a hundred percent and again it's subjective to whomever's really evaluating that so.
We talked to them about how to capture that and we did the other day. We re-arranged all that and I'm sure we'll go Of course, we talked about the salaries, all that's going to go for the FES. We're going to work on that at the end of the day today.
Essentially, if I may, our budget is the same except for the capital from this year.
You know one of the things I've noticed visibly numerous times just having a lot of involvement on the property with sports and stuff, is just what I perceive as a really large increase in use. Large increase in use over, and I'd say ten years, maybe even five years, just maybe even five, kind of, you know, Keith Baker kind of kicked it off with the disc golf project. How old is that project?
I want to say it is, I think it just turned 10.
Yeah, so 10 years. Over that period of time when Keith kind of really started to drive that and then the mowing crews came in and the trails. Then it there has been in my mind visually over that ten years just a really large increase so my point is You know I see that but somebody like Patrick who doesn't have kid in sports or may not know where deer run is or whatever May not see that and and so I think what would be interesting is they have you know traffic counters and people counters on trails and stuff. I think to start quantifying really what I consider a big success on Deer Run is we've got to somehow start to capture use and that takes equipment and maybe hopefully just a little bit of your time if we can automate that stuff but I mean, it's crystal clear. I think anybody who's been there, the parking is all the way up the road, the use like back to school bash the events that you had the chamber fest event there. I mean, it's just night and day compared to 10 years ago, and the care of the property. I mean, it's just super obvious.
It's not just the event. I mean, I go there for the local kids sports, baseball, it is crowded. If you don't get there early parking, you're walking. And every field is full. I just think it's fabulous. It has grown. I mean, it's just blossomed from its inception, which it should. It should blossom. And it's just really grown, and I appreciate it.
Somehow your budget has kind of stayed the same. I don't know how you do that. Magic. Magic. Oh, yeah. Yeah. But it is, you know, every hundred visitors is like another case of toilet paper and a thousand gallons of water. more trash to pick up and the grass kind of stays the same it's more use on the facility like the wear and tear but somehow you've maintained I look far back in your budget but I mean rarely do you ask for I mean we gave you a new mower a couple years ago but I just appreciate your You know, and you've always, I mean, we're really just being honest about your budget. You kind of, from the council, prior councils at least, you've been, you know, fighting for your life every time you come in front of us. It seems for years. Because if you should be threatened, it could go away.
I remember those days. I remember some of those days, too.
I was reminding that, well, we are a luxury and not a necessity.
But if you ask those parents in those programs Whether you're a luxury or a necessity and you ask the kids in those programs. I think you get maybe a different perspective Yeah Well done. I think it's hard for me to say that. Well, thank you. But, you know, good job.
Thank you. Well, does anybody else have any other questions for now until... Are you guys looking to approve this budget as it stands without the CVC's contribution of the $155,000 grant?
No, I thought we put that on.
So yeah, I would end those meetings with the CBC. I would just, you know, are you going to go to their CBC meeting? Is that how that'll work? Okay, so that'll be public. Mark doesn't know yet, but I was going to tell him after this, so that was what we were doing.
Surprise!
If you do have other meetings, Judy and I and maybe other council members would probably like to sit in and make sure we're following the conversation as well.
Do you want us back here on the 17th as well with the CBC? Yes. Okay. Yeah, that was the only thing I wasn't clear on, so.
It would be better to get everybody involved at the table.
Do you know what time that, 5.30 on the 17th? Okay, you've got the list. Thank you.
Since this is requiring a whole lot of people coming together, I'm going to try to get this early on the agenda and taken care of. I don't know how much time we're going to need.
I think I will
And before we get too far into anything, I've got one follow-up question for you.
Wallet and keys are over there. Wallet and keys. You're a little jet-lagged, I think.
I wouldn't have gotten this very far. Wallet and keys.
Oh, boy. I'm driving a slide. I think Kevin's honest. Right?
on the allow that we could use for the Form 1s? Form 1s, or is it driven simply off of the Excel spreadsheet that we would create and put it in allow?
So I downloaded into Budgets on allow.
functionality to streamline the Form 1 process?
The short answer is yes. There is a module where you can get the budget stuff ready. We would need to do some planning early in the year to make sure that we're ready to use that. After that, we were able to get it pretty streamlined, which allowed the budget hearings to be a little more smooth, although this has been pretty decent. We have not run behind schedule as much as I thought we were going to here. But yeah, to answer your question, I think we should definitely take a look at that. We may not be able to get it pulled off for next summer, but certainly the summer after that.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
Yeah, they could do that. Something that flows smoothly with everybody, something that everybody would be comfortable with. Is that part of the package that we're not utilizing that's available to us, or would that be an extra thing?
Are we done with him?
Did you have anything else to add? No, I'm finished. Okay. Thank you very much.
Okay, so salary save, you guys are working on all that, so that's not an issue. Are you, what documents are you looking at so that we're all looking at the same? I got the form one I submitted.
We don't see that right here. Okay.
Then you got Julie's and then Reedy's?
I got the form one. I'm going to be looking primarily at Julie's budget.
There's a discrepancy on the Form 1. Julie and I found it. Did you correct it in your book, the $3,000 to $5,000 on that maintenance? Here's my question. We have a maintenance stipend and you guys are doing away with stipends. So on my Form 1, it was $5,000. It was only $3,000. And Didn't know how Do I need to take it out of here the first line yeah the very first line do I need to take it out because You're adding it to the salary So Teresa one thing you may do yes talking funds like if you're I'm an 1138 you count lines I
And actually not even numbers, like the name of the phone.
It's QCAP.
QCAP. QCAP. Because that's how we are going to be searching and trying to follow you. Okay. Let me ask a question.
We've got three sources. We've got the Form 1. We've got the Commissioner. We've got the Form 1. We've got our book. We've got Reedy. Is there discrepancies between that that we know of? There are a couple between our book and Brady's. Are we going to rectify those in the future? Do we know why they're there?
That's why I wanted to start with Comcap, because there's a lot of discrepancies, and I don't know what I don't know.
Okay, so we're talking maintenance factors.
Right, it's account line 10490.
To get to your point, I've been concentrating on Julie's book. And then I'm going to take that and compare it to what it took to read his book afterwards. Because Reed is playing off of Julie's book, supposedly. There's two different spreadsheets, and one spreadsheet she did for herself, and then the other spreadsheet was in Reed's format that she sent to them. And then there were some calculations, additional calculations.
I also sent them to Form 1's.
But us sending the spreadsheet kept them from having to go through the Form 1s and manually key in everything. So are the Form 1s already available?
No, they are not reflective of the Form 1s.
We found several discrepancies.
Okay, so back to my question then.
Yes, ma'am.
Maintenance stipend. Explain that, please.
That is back in the day when Rick Fox used to manage the maintenance department.
Okay.
There was a stipend given to him for that management when he went away. you divided that stipend between the two maintenance employees and that's my question so we're doing away with stipends is that going back into my oh oh six eight or do you want me to keep it here and transfer it January one to that pay line I don't know
Well, their pay will be under the new FBS. I think she's asking what to do with that $3,000 right now.
Yeah, because you don't have it. This is the only place I know where it is. If you put it someplace else in my budget.
I'm talking about $10,490. Yes, sir. And the five grand? It's $3,000. It's $3,000 for this year. Okay, because of the Form 1. I'm going by Form 1. Exactly. I just said that... I'm assuming that Form 1 should take precedence over everything else.
I agree with you.
I just said there was a discrepancy, Julie, and I found... And so the council's already passed the ordinance that terminated stipends void of being statutorily required. Right. We've got that. So all you're talking about doing is just deleting that line item, correct?
And where is that money coming from? Because we're not supposed to be lowering salaries.
Exactly. And that was going to be my point. Their salary is not going to be lowered. This stipend will be incorporated in what they have. If they're above the line and we move up and it doesn't catch up to them, they're not... their salary will not reflect a raise because they're above the line of what we're doing.
Okay, so I'm removing it then. Okay.
And on your form one you had $5,000 but there's $3,000.
It was only supposed to be $3,000, yes.
Okay, so this book is correct. But we're zeroing that out.
And then Julie, you have some place where that's going to come from? Or are we going to try to take that back out of Q and It'd be best just to find someplace else to take that from.
Since it's such a small dollar amount, it feels like it could just be, when you do your WIS saying, it could, yes.
Instead of pulling an extra $3,000 from anyone and having to track it.
Right.
Yeah. So Todd's would be $4,600 with the base pay, his longevity, and the $1,500 stipend. Are those the two stipends? salaries that we had a discrepancy on? Yes. Correct. Okay. So that's where that came from was probably this $2,000 did not get put into.
Okay. Is it okay if I engage in this conversation? Yeah. If you choose to take that approach and without knowing what looking at it from a payroll perspective I'm assuming what you're doing is their hourly rate will actually exceed whatever the hourly rate is that the council determines that those 19 job classifications are to be for 2027 and so I'm assuming that what happens is System with Kim their hourly rate will not it will be higher than what those job classifications are for everyone else Yes Say their classifications will be higher or their entire FES system the way I understand it unless there's something I'm missing there are old 35 pay grade system versus the FES system because there's a distinction between those two approaches is that rather than employee being at a pay grade 9 comes before the council and says I need to be a pay grade 14 prior to the FES the whole approach was extremely subjective very biased all right because then adding grades based off absolutely no objective rational thought all subjective very superficial then we would turn right around and hand out stipends above and beyond that and to me that issue is you know that is the primary reason why the four of us drove to Muncie back in 2024 if y'all whoever's present remembers that trip I agree I agree with you totally you remember the trip to Muncie yeah okay So my concern for this system is the system has to maintain its integrity.
Correct.
It has to maintain its integrity. And my concern for this, right here, it's just simply voicing my concern, but at some point when we all sit down and have to talk about these 19 classifications and what we're going to do with regards to 2027, which I've already given you my proposals, and how to approach it. But then we've got to deal with the special occupations as well, right? That system, you know, if you come in and you're a co-mod A or an exec A or LAT A, B, C, whatever, whatever your job classification is, we've got 15 employees within this county that maintain that classification. They should all be paid the same amount hourly rate period I mean period right and if they're concerned about their income then perhaps they'll have to look to try to find a job in a different department and a higher classification so it so I'm just I'm raising the red flag with this these two individuals I appreciate what you're all saying is that you don't want you know 2025 you what you're trying to prevent.
Which is what's happened to them this year.
I understand that they're the only two.
The only thing I'm voicing is that what I don't want us to do circle back and really to try to drill down to understand how this is going to work going forward for 28, 29, 30, etc.
If they're above what they should be getting paid based on their pay grade, they're going to stay there. We're not going to drop them down. They're going to stay there without a raise until everybody else in that position catches up.
So that would be, what's the saying? What is it? High tide, what's all about? Is that the main concept?
And their boat was at the high tide. Right. So they're going to stay there until the rest of the time. Yes. All right.
So we're going to have to remember that for 28, 29, 30.
Yeah, it's in there because we're going to be all right in parallel.
So not to add it. Yeah, not to add any usual complexity to what's already a situation that's trying to resolve itself. But the commissioners are sitting there talking about the maintenance activity. So as you know, we have taken on our owner's technical rep and the commissioners have funded out of our own our own funds now the bond to go after capital improvements preventative maintenance activities and all those kinds of things we there we feel there's a shortfall in managing that okay and the proposal or what we're looking at is reorganizing it so that we have a working manager that would be able to deal with preventative maintenance, tracking what their asset improvements are, what the costs are associated with that, in addition to dedicating a maintenance person to the specific area. Because once the prosecutor's office is built, That complex, because it is a complex, it's EMT, it's the coroner, it's the law enforcement center, and then it will be the prosecutor's office. That complex in and of itself would keep a maintenance person busy with any spare time that would be necessary to address the other facilities like the health department, parks and recreation. Highways.
The historical process have the different elected officials within different buildings where they submit a PO to the commissioner's office, request order, and then it, you know, I'm going to think of it kind of like a PO or repair order.
A ticket. A ticket. We have a ticket system now.
So if I was a circuit court judge and I've got a window that won't shut. Yes.
to the commissioners no it doesn't go through us right now it goes through it it goes to IT or maintenance so you go into the tech drive any department head any person here can click on it and say I have a maintenance request we have the option to tell them what the request is how an urgent it is right positions is what we have.
And these two positions are self-managing, correct? So they basically have complete autonomy.
There's been more oversight.
Well, I understand that, but historically now. Historically, right. And so we have these two individuals that historically have behaved in a culture where they had complete autonomy. And the only thing that really any accountability would be if the circuit court judge says, you haven't been in there to fix my window, and I still can't get my window shut. It's raining in, right? That's been the only thing. And so what you're kind of proposing is, because I agree with you completely, but with that, what you're thinking is, is you take one of those people put them in the complex, we'll call it the complex, that whole area over there, and then would they report to the sheriff? Is that the supervisor that would be over that person?
So my ideal situation is yes, we've had conversations with the sheriff about that saying yes, I'd like to have him being responsible for that. The problem that I have with that is He's going to dedicate himself to make sure that the law enforcement center is going to be the one that receives the attention when we have three other buildings that are going to be there, plus a maintenance shed. So my proposal in trying to reorganize this and circle this around is, to actually have a working managing maintenance person that is familiar with what we require for preventative maintenance, what we require for capital asset management improvements, and then that person would manage the activities related to whatever the maintenance is.
To create a new title, this would be a buildings facilities manager.
Yes, that's a good statement.
That's what this person would be. That would be their role and responsibility. Because how many different parcels, how many different buildings?
So there's four, 10, 11?
There's 11.
So you actually know. That's interesting.
And I don't include the tower.
Yeah, the tower.
The radio tower. No, no, no. I'm talking about buildings. That's physical. That's 11 buildings.
We actually have people that are working out. So we have 11 facilities plus grounds maintenance. And so, for example, when I pulled in this morning, this week, in the front of the building, this building's gonna need some PLC.
You don't like all those holes from the bees?
Yeah, and if you look at it, that's three people. Well, no.
Here's the reason why now would be a great time to start looking at this, to change it, is because one of those individuals is retiring. Okay. So at this point, this is a great time to restructure that whole, like you said, you're building prosecutor.
Buildings and facilities manager.
And the only reason that I'm saying that we need to take that into consideration is because Commissioners are part-time and you get three of them. Sometimes you get two of them get one of them right and we get down this path of again if it had not been for dan carter this is the this is the plug and the decision and congratulations on the commissioner's office and the council working through that together and saying we need to have some technical that was gary gary we need to give gary a trophy so so once Again, and again, I'm going to get that right. So we, with the council's help, actually were able to offset some of our costs because, again, remember, we came and moved things that were at the law enforcement center over into the bond because we were going to run short Paul and Cass. We are not coming to you and asking for any appropriations because, based on what we have done, we should be within what we have agreed. Appropriated under the other funds to take care of all of the other buildings that we have with replacing the roof on the VSO Replacing the siding on the on the on the cap office over there Going through and actually dealing with the courthouse as far as the drainage issue and continuing to address that because we've got problems Do not please what I get ready to say what I'm about to say you do not feel you need to feel like you need a good job on the defensive
Okay. Speak nicely now. I know. I need to go take a politically correct course. As you all know, I'm not very politically correct. As a matter of fact, I don't have a PC bone in my body. Use discretion then. Go ahead, Joe. All right. Last year, last year, okay, in the form one out of the general fund, the commissioners administrative assistance assistant was not in the form one we snuck that in on the the salary ordinance okay i'm not trying to point fingers or assign blame but now here i said and i guess i'm a little and don't quite you know the current commissioner's office And so I'm here and I'm asking myself the question of why do we have to have two commissioner's office assistants in the office? Because now I'm sitting here thinking, well, wait a minute, if you need another manager type person, so this building's facilitator manager, we're adding more labor costs in that commissioner's office. And also keep in mind, just from a councilman's perspective, because I've got my blinders on, the forecast for 27 is, and this is based off of the 2026 salary ordinance, we've got a $574,000 deficit just in the general fund alone for 2027. projected budget based off the revenues. Now the only thing in the revenue number that's not included is going to be the lit supplemental. Now if this lit supplemental comes in for $500,000, then we could be about a push. But as it stands right now, if we don't receive the lit supplemental based off REDI and we're paying them a lot of money, okay, they're showing $574,000 is our disbursements will exceed our revenues. So for every dollar that we continue to add, and Morgan, and you all know that our labor cost is the big expense, and then second to that, our employee benefits. So I'm sitting here and I'm agreeing with you, I understand your approach to have a person, a building's facility manager, two people in an area that they manage, and then hopefully the commissioner's office holds that building facilitator's manager responsible for taking care and making sure the maintenance and upkeep of these buildings
About three let me I'm not three we're talking about two people in maintenance a manager and an employee So help educate me if I mean if I if I've got it if I get a commode that
placed, or squeaky door hinge, or HVAC system. I'm assuming due to the complexity of the HVAC systems, we outsource that maintenance, I'm assuming, right?
So facilities is the one that deals with all of that. Those two maintenance men are the one that deal with that.
So they'll actually make the phone call and call the HVAC people and have them come in? Yes.
And they'll actually, so the thing that's been challenging for them is the commissioner's office has been putting them through the task like Eric has been put through the task of saying, I'm not dealing with one quote, I want three. I want to go and get the exercise of saying, when can it be delivered? So we have even, we've adopted more stringent activities in our behavior than statutorily required by the state.
Our spend is way down because of that.
That activity there. So to answer your question, So with regards to the second position in the commissioner's office, I just jotted down a few things as I tracked that. So claims, again, I don't even want to, again, I relish the day that we can.
Can we just stay in Comcap and not jump back to general right now, please? Comcap is very confusing.
So, yeah.
And that's a general fund number of good points, but... Yeah, but we're not talking about money per se.
We're talking about the maintenance.
So the question you had is are we adding another person to maintenance?
The proposal would say I would like to have a manager position and one maintenance.
Okay, but now that manager position, I'm going to assume that that manager position is going to step and be reclassified, that job description maybe because we have that employees been here over 30 years so they have quite a bit of longevity that's already in our budget so we could do that I'm right now based on what you've shared with me I mean that makes perfect sense one other option I think you should in the interest of like three bids and kind of looking at all your options
On the public safety complex position or challenge, right, you're managing or maintaining some pretty complex systems and automated doors and cameras and kind of high security type of specialty type of situations in those four buildings. And so I'm wondering if, well, one, if you would want to look at like a maintenance person that would clearly contract out a boatload of that work, that cost, and look at also the cost of, and I've seen this around like a,
a company that contracts for the maintenance of similar types of complex facilities they also form out some but they've got some more specialized staff they can bring in so we do do that in the form of fashion so for example the generators we have seven generators that we now have we contract contract that through and bid out and that is now managed by hepa par evapar which we just went through and it went up this year by 901 dollars because we added the seventh generator right So those kinds of activities, exactly, safety systems for example, Corson, Corson is under contract with us or under routine with us to come out and do the safety inspection systems with regards to fire extinguishers and all those things. As far as the complexity of the intelligence and the security of the buildings, that falls on our IT directors shoulders. So that stuff is happening along.
And back a gazillion years ago when that one individual did start, there is a special training that that maintenance person has to take on a federal level to be the maintenance person for the jail. So the individual who is retiring is the only one that has taken that training and it was quite a few years ago. So that is going to be an incurred cost coming up and it is an expensive training. How much is it?
Do you remember what he said? I don't remember. even on the same site, while doing multiple complex things. And so it'd be interesting to look at some of these maintenance companies are built to oversee some of those maybe duplicative contracts could they incorporate maybe a, maybe they have a generator person, maybe they have an automated person. I mean, Eric's not gonna be like doing some of that work, right? He's contracting out too, but you may find some efficiencies there. And here's the other thing. When you're dealing with the jail and the prosecutor's office, the coroner's office, EMS, those are emergency state service buildings, right? It's a critical priority in certain cases where a safety issue may emerge. And if you have one maintenance person that has a, vacation or has a sickness or we miss lose them for they move on there's a risk there in that facility especially and when you couple that with the complex issues i think you may want to look at just glance it get a bit hey what would you charge us to oversee that operation Contract and maybe do more of it in-house at a lower rate than a contract you may find savings there And you get redundancy in your maintenance staff if one guy gets sick They got 40 deep right and so you kind of build in some security right for the sheriff be kind of a comforting thing to have one person who could do any other right is when that one person gets sick and You know, it's like, oh boy, here we go. Like, everything else gets shoved off. The other guy may not be trained on those systems.
Isn't that what you just said you're doing?
In essence, that is. Because, again, we don't, again, there are things that the maintenance people are not doing. The maintenance people are not doing landscaping. They do not touch grass. The only grass that they touch are weeds at the tower when we go and ask them to weed it.
Well, they're probably not HVAC certified.
Actually, we do have.
They're plumbing, they're electric. We are very fortunate with the two maintenance men we have.
They're crass, but again, they're crass people. They're the guys that are hands-on guys that are there fixing the problems. Our maintenance people went out here and actually removed these units when we were going and dealing with the waterways issue. They went through the exercise of actually revamping and redoing the plumbing and reinstalling and rebuilding the pressure regulating system. They've actually gone through and actually did construction work when we changed the IT department and all those things. So they are a broad skills individual, and some of them where Chris has HVAC experience, the other picks up.
So what do we need? What do you need? We need to move on. We can sit here and try to micromanage you guys all day long, right? But that's not my job, and you're the commissioners and not me, so good luck, good job.
So you want the one person...
So anyway, in the middle of a subject here, we don't need to... What you're proposing is simply we have an individual that's going to retire, we're going to bring in another individual, That individual will have a different job description from the individual that retired, which may create a change in pay grade classification. That's all you're asking for. Yes, sir. Do you hope to have this done by the end of the year?
Our person is leaving in August.
Okay, so that would be yes.
Is that the supervisory person that's leaving?
They're self-supervising right now.
And I just want to make a point to this again. So what you're proposing with making one of them a supervisor is one of the job descriptions that you want to change to?
Correct. And you guys are going to have, I'm assuming, Wagner and Seeley write up the job description?
We will do that. because it's a complete change of the program right we will be with you and all the whole way and I don't know but I'm assuming you guys would do the draft and then what we may expect in 2026 is that we may have to come in and do an additional preparation
for the remaining line item number for 2026, and then adjust 2027's line item as well. Yes, sir. That's pretty easy peasy, so can we now move forward to the next adjournment? Yes.
Okay, I didn't change.
Thank you.
I didn't. Okay, so that's the salary portion. The next line item is group health insurance. I did not change the number from 20,000. I kept it the same.
You're a team cap.
Yes, sir. I don't want to jump on that yet. Can we wait?
I have a big presentation.
I know you're biting at the bit, but can we? No, no, no, I'm all right.
But this is not a you issue. This is a council issue. But anyway, all right.
Start to think because we're by the benefit. So let's all play nice. Okay, so if I really hate that you don't have this, but if you look at the form ones, I did the different departments because last year in the budget, Really let us all it was a learning experience to let us all know that there was a lot of things that we weren't Utilizing Kim cap for that we could So you guys added a lot of things in there last year and I kept them the same so I talked to all the departments Eric did his so I have the departments itemized here now when Julie that in I
Because it will not go into Gateway that way.
Yeah, so Julie had to take all of those numbers, combine them to MMM into Gateway.
Yeah, you're good with that.
You're good with that. What she put into Gateway is not... That's going to go into the 0000?
Yeah, excuse me? That's going to go into the 0000? Yes, it had to go into 0000 so that it would go in through Gateway.
Is there a fix to that?
I still have the same amount, the same number, same cost in there. because I added the cost together. So they still have the same number, the same cost.
No, I mean, is there a phase two?
When Reedy did it in Gateway, they did each individual line item repeatedly. That's how I was able to figure it out last year because of the dollar amounts.
I think the way that I'd have to be done is going in and correcting it actually by hand in Gateway.
For me, Kevin, and Teresa, it's real simple. Assuming that Reedy's numbers are accurate?
They're not, Jim.
Well, let's just walk through it then.
Because there's a lot missing. I don't understand what they did.
That's what she's doing. She's walking us through it.
May I finish my thought, please? Okay. You have a total budget in the Reedy number 590. 590, 646.
I have $645,000.
And that says $650,000. Or no, that's $27,000. Yeah, $645,000 for $27,000. I've shown $590,000. That's what I was trying to reconcile.
There's a whole, this whole section right here.
Hang on a minute. Let's just try to keep this big picture. What I'm looking at, as far as my responsibility and due diligence individually, is I'm looking at the projected revenues and I'm looking at the total for that fund, right? And all I'm gonna look at is based off this number, they show us $144,000 in surplus revenue, right? So we're spending less than we're bringing in, so our disbursements don't exceed our revenues. And then I look that we've got a million dollars, should be, for a forecasted 12-31-2027 cash reserve balance. But what I hear you saying is you're saying that the Reedy's budget number is wrong. Because they've got $590,000. And now if we go back and look at yours total.
Do you need an extra one, Scott? I don't have an extra one.
This is showing $645,000. I don't have that either. You don't have that page? Okay, so we're at $1138,000. Yeah, $1138,000.
So we've got $645,000, $195,000.
And Reedy has got Yeah, Rudy's off by $54,549.
I got $45,840 is what I got that they're off.
Jim, where do you see the $645? On the Form 1.
On the Form 1. I have the actual Form 1. And then if you look at Julie's book, it says $623. That's what I've got.
$623 total for my chem cap?
Yeah.
Right. Yeah, because the challenge with this whole process is, number one, just the sheer volume of numbers, number one, and you make one That's what I'm saying because there's three pieces here and there this is definitely different. Are you using something other than what Julie or Reedy did?
I'm using my Form 1.
Take out the stipends.
This is just a board showing, because we said we shaved a million dollars off our complete budget. This is just a year. This is everything that you have allocated, appropriated, additional and or appropriation and budget through the years for these different funds. So I was just doing a take out the stipends.
here well furniture and fixtures to me are not a have to pay that's not my what I seen is a lot of these Jim if you look at your Reedy budget book on page 32 there's a well if we have to add it back in that's we need to add it back in that's what my question is well but hang on a minute i see it even if even let's say reedy is wrong because it doesn't really matter okay you're off 45 50 grand you're still running a hundred thousand dollar surplus yes at the end of 2027 yes so we can go in and try to fix the math after the meeting with reading you guys can it's all right So that when we go to pass, because Julie, you have to advertise the budget, I think, on August 17th or something like that, do you not? So you've got to advertise it. And of course, obviously, everybody knows we've got to pass the budget in October, the third Monday of the month in October. But I think that let's not lose sight of the fact that we're still surplus, projected to have a million dollars in reserves at the end of 2027. So CubeCap developments, got money in it.
My question to you all is because I listened to the budgets and I know that I heard some of the items that you had put in Comcap last year are back in their budgets and when I talked to them I kept them so there was a little confusion for me did have you guys highlighted anything that's gonna have to go back
In your talks with everybody here's here's what I would like to solve for in this meeting with the commissioners office today my primary priority Because we as a county do not have any documented policy on how we're going to fund The biggest risk that we as a county are exposed to which is our self-insured health insurance, okay And the challenge that we've got is that we've got, you know, based off of Rady's numbers, our disbursements shall exceed our revenues for 2027 in the general fund, and it will drop our cash reserve balance. Assuming we don't get the lit supplemental income. If we get that in, okay, maybe it kind of saves us a little bit. We could be a break even, hear me out. So what I would like to walk out of here today with is that we've got, you know, you and I have had these conversations over the last three years, you got the shell game. Okay.
There is no shell game. I know, I don't like the shell game. That is gone.
I despise the shell game. It's gone. But, but, you know, are we, would it be in the county's best interest to take some of that, the premium that has to go to the, to fund the 4700 account, pull that out of the general fund to bring that down. We have a good plan.
Flip this board around.
I have a plan too.
I'm actually very pleased with where we are and all of our hard work. I don't have any.
I don't think we need to spend much more time burning through every line item on Team Cap. Okay.
You asked if we moved anything. He was in here and we talked about the corner stuff.
Yeah, we've had that conversation already. Okay. So we know that that's coming and again, like I told you, I just want you to slam it on the back. I did not. I know. I was just saying. Theory.
Okay, so you don't want to go through. So basically I kept the courthouse who's department six Jules sir oh I had a discrepancy last year income cap GIS was not in my form one and it's a $32,000 bill every year it is a licensing fee for our GIS so that is actually something that we're going to come back to you this year and say We didn't fund it, but we need to pay for it, because we've already got the bill.
Does the commissioner's office, do you guys leverage GRS?
Now I do.
Do we leverage it? Yeah, generally. We've leveraged it more now than we have. So if you go and look at some of the things you've done, so, for example, when we were coming back in here and talking about, you know, LMI is trying to get a graphical representation of understanding the census tracts and those kinds of things. He's been helping us with looking at what are considered private versus local versus public roads. I know that right now there's conversations between biolytics being used along with GIS being used to talk about our small structures, which are not the bridges. So there's things going on in that nature that are going to happen.
List in 26 some kind of kind of a proactive conversation in the future To look at you know GIS Take a hard look at GIS Planning and zoning testified yesterday. I think it was that they they actually depend on it Yes, I personally use it all the time because I love this system.
We do too.
I like it. It's great. I don't but I do but I don't know that perhaps leverage that technology so let me share with you I just I want us to because you know as well as I do that position okay that job description you know in another county those are highly sought-after yes skill sets correct and so I it would be it would be look at that technology, look at who's leveraging it, and making sure we don't
Let me go and share a couple of things with you. So the web version or the interface that you have with regards to GIS on the web version is not inclusive of a lot of things that do happen in the background. So now there are actually zoning information in the actual user-based installed on our desktop there are also layers there that identify the bridges and their locations there are also locations in there put in with regards to railroad crossings and all those things so Tom has been doing those things and working as we have been coming forth. One of the things that we were talking about doing with regards to GIS and trying to interface it with was actually go and try and put the snow plowing information as it is, as it related since where we would actually track this road's been plowed, this is when it plowed, who's it signed to, when it was plowed. So those are the things that we're trying to consider so we can look at one, giving real time updates on those kinds of activities. Has it happened yet? No, but it's something that we're wanting to do and work on.
I actually value that system very much. We use it all the time. I think it's a great system, and I think that prior it's been utilized not to its capacity for sure. Well, I think the thing is that... It's being utilized more. I mean, back in the day it was only used for a few things, and now it's utilized for a lot more, and I think that's important.
Yeah, because to summarize for me, Eric, you testified on this, And now we're on the Lao GIS. There's conversations going on about compensation and payroll and tracking comp over time, that stuff, right?
We're going to talk about that too.
So it might just, as a council member, I love technology because I couldn't be in business if it wasn't for all the cloud-based applications that I've got. But the challenge with those cloud-based applications is it takes some serious skill set necessary. And the issue is, are we leveraging the technology to where we can squeeze every value out of that technology? Well, to do that means we've got to have staff that have the time and energy to internalize their systems, where they know how to bend them, twist them, make it do whatever they want to do. That takes time and that takes some skillset necessary to make sure we have the staffing in place to leverage those technologies so we can really get the real value out of them. My concern is to go ahead and spend $80,000 a year on to license the technology, but then we don't have the skillsets nor the staffing to be able to really take advantage of that technology and leverage it for everything.
We are classic at doing that, and that needs to stop, so I agree.
That's a concern. It's a real flag for me. I agree, Jim. How do you want to move through the rest of what you got?
Well, you tell me what funds you want to do next, I guess.
Are we done with Kim Capp? I think we are. Okay, let's go on to the next one. Pick one.
Okay. Do you want to do the general fund?
Sure.
Okay, let's do the general fund.
Let us all catch up here. I thought you already did that.
Telephone, Rx, stipend, Hs, yeah. You gotta go back like eight pages, yeah.
General, there you go, right there.
All right, I think.
General here. Page 13 and 14 are reading.
13 and 14, thank you.
It says commissioner. Is this general? It says commissioner. I think it's general. I think it is.
Julie, where's it at in this big book? Did it go and order a department? Yeah, you are here.
It's like eight pages before Team Cap. You've got to go back. You're on the left. Oh, yeah, very well.
These are done for pay.
So, there you are.
There you go.
one source of data. That would be nice.
And I know we talked about salaries when we cleaned that center this morning. That clerical support floater is really not a clerical
Thank you. She's clerical.
No, she's not.
Stop saying that. Well, I don't know. It's not. Well, you know.
So let me give you an example of the task that she has on her plate. okay so obviously she's she's the one handling all the constituent engagement that's coming through the door okay she's looking at with Stacy panel which is your clerical support so she's doing all of that she's in the process of becoming a notary since we only have one or two notaries in this freaking building because that's part of it we've gone through the exercise of we've gone through the exercise of she is handling and she has offloaded all claims to her
And they're on time, and they're beautiful, and they're trackable, and there is no delay getting down.
That is correct.
We had a 31-day window. We've shaved it down to 25.
So all the claims from the departments come into this individual?
No. For Commissioner's Office alone. Okay. For the Commissioner's Office alone.
Not all of them, no.
Not all departments. Kevin spends his time before every commissioner meeting looking at all the claims. So the other part of that that she's been challenged with is we do not have, as far as the commissioner's office, a contract tracking activity. Basically going in so that we get ahead of our contracts, not having someone like the ambulance service come in and drop me a contract before the week of expiration. So she's now pulling through, pulling all those commissioner contracts together, putting them in a tablized form, and we're going to basically make that a monthly or a quarterly activity to review and say, what contracts do we have expiring? When were they last negotiated? What was the fees and all those things? That's taking place. That's real important. That is correct.
Well, not only that.
Talk about that. So the next thing about that is, which Eric's alluded to, we are not using all the capabilities allowed. One of the things that she's been tasked with is going through and when we as commissioners have our meetings and approve any contracts or any work that may be anywhere from a week to three months out, We have no way of capturing that against our running balances in loud today. So she is going to is working on a spend what we have authorized and spend so we can see. Yes, this $85,000 in this fund. Here's what we have is our balance. Here's what the commissioners have approved so that we can sit there and say, oh, we are not going to be able to keep our target or we are not going to be able to operate within that. Appropriation or working with Teresa from the budget perspective to say do we have leeway and flexibility in other? Series is to transfer these ones before we have to come to you.
Okay In essence yes because we don't have
any mechanism in allow to do that right now i think you could stop now so i'm done are you sure yeah all right okay it keeps coming up i didn't know it just feels like a dead horse i didn't know and the only reason the reason i was challenged is to let you know i'm challenging it because it's been previous historical crazy well i'm not going to say that because i'm working on the npc okay I'm good.
Let me do two more things. We say that there is no floater activity. Yes, there has been floater activity. She has been a floater for the auditor's office. She has been a floater for the VSO office. She has been a floater for the highway department. She has been a floater for the health department. Now, does she know every job in that? No, that's impossible. That's just impossible. heard that and the last thing with that is she is the one is responsible for our asset tracking list she is keeping every asset with the exception of buildings and property under the guise of here's when it was sold here's what she was That has not been in place for years. And it's working because...
So does she have an ankle chain and like a 300 pound block tied to her leg?
Yeah, we're trying to keep her very, very busy.
If you're talking about getting rid of her, yeah. I just want to say thank you for updating us and the public because there's this view. I know. And if we don't know, we don't know. Right. So... We appreciate it.
Well, and I think the sheriff's office, Brian being the chief and, you know, the changing of vehicles because we're rotating things more now, they have come to her and asked for information and cars and vehicles and we got the title, we got everything.
Three months ago it was walking through this building trying to find the titles of vehicles that we could not find the titles to.
We removed over 100 vehicles off of our insurance.
We could use a quarter of our time as Darren's assistant.
Okay. All right. So let's go.
Jim's okay. Anybody else got any more questions on that?
No, no, thank you.
All right. Thank you.
Okay. So salaries, not messing with them. That's all your guys' purview. Maintenance call-out pay, we did keep it at $2,000. That is very generous. They very rarely hit that item. So I did not change that. Social Security, in going through the funds, the Commissioner's Office takes care of all the Social Security and Medicare for the county. There are still quite a few errors in payroll I've seen. Not anything to do with that payroll person, it's just the mapping. Things have changed.
there's enough money in there it's a good looking at this when I look at this I'm just sharing with you okay 526 299 40 is the total dollar amount for FICA now just true so you're not gonna have this this is a custom report that I created for myself oh okay because what I wanted to know Is that what are the line items? How many departments did we pull money out exclusively for FICA tax? So the total was $526,299.40, right? And then we got Sheriff's Department, Highway Department, Health, and Commissioner's Office. So all I look at is go, okay, $526,299, I can take that number and divide it by 7.65. right, to give me a benchmark with the total labor cost, because that number we all know.
It's a fixed number, right.
Right, it's a fixed number, but you can't calculate that unless you know the total. labor costs on an annualized basis all in, right? So it's somewhat of a guesstimate.
So the only way that that would affect us this year is if you guys went into your whatever program and you did the all in. That would affect this budget, but otherwise, no.
Yeah, because to me, when I look at the general fund, there's really, as you flip through this one-on-one, You know, you got $203,000 for, you know, professional legal, attorney, retainer, professional services, HR services.
Okay, that's got to change because I heard Julie say in the meeting that she's not taking ARA in her budget and we have to take it in ours, I'm assuming.
So you guys are still using ARA?
We currently are using ARA for the OOR grant for the county.
What are they under on here, or are they not?
Well, they're not there. That's what I'm saying. I just heard Julie say that. How much is that contract, $10,000? $10,000.
Actually, I think they should get up to $13,000.
Holy smokes.
Okay, I don't have that in my numbers, so that would go under professional services, which is $35,000. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
So you're going to take $35,000, $10,000. No, $13,000. $13,000. I need to add $13,000. $13,000. And that's for ARPA? Is that what they're called? 80.
80. Or OKRA.
No, no. ARRA. ARRA. Yeah, thank you. Yeah. All right. I think I can draw that. All right. So that moves into 215. So, you know, as a person The other stuff, communication, transportation, 917. I'm assuming those are all mandatory. We've got to pay.
Give me line items, Jim.
Yeah, where are we, Jim?
I want to go line by line so that we're not making mistakes. Well, I'm not making mistakes.
I've got the actual 401 here.
We're all capable of making mistakes.
So it's all pretty easy right here. All right, well, you guys are waiting on the button. We're just trying to follow where everybody is here.
Okay, I'll go down the line. Okay, so we just left Social Security, Medicare. That number is good. We decided that PERF is also a fixed number. It's a calculation that can be done on your income, so that's a fixed number. Again, will change if you guys do something different with your whatever WIS has. I did not increase or change the group health insurance. I left it at 1.1, and when we get to that subject, you'll understand all that. HSA the 120 that is also this year rolled into our health fund number So that's new It's yeah, we'll get there yeah, that's separate $10,000 for our unemployment is It's worked every year. Again, that's going to be a fixed number. If you change anything with income, we'll have to look at it. Employee wellness incentive events, this buys water. It does not do anything except buy water. So we are spending $30,000 a year on Culligan.
I haven't griped about this in the past.
It's shocking. Where is the water? Everywhere. Every building we have water purifiers everywhere.
You either have a standing alone dispensing system where you go in that room right there and you have a stand alone dispensing system that processes it from a connection from the water supply and in addition you have one on the sink and then you also have two of those on the fountains downstairs. Is it soft water?
In essence, yes.
Well, it's Phil Culligan, Som, Soft, and others. What are we missing?
It seems like nobody trusts the town water. So that every building that's a huge expense, it is something that we are going to call Culligan out and because every department has created their own contract and their own agreement. So
That's where you guys look at those contracts.
Thank you. And it's out of control.
So what? So $30,000 for water? Yes.
I'd say, look at those contracts. Drink tap water. Get it for them. Yes, sir. Sorry, folks. Just curious.
You guys probably don't know this. What the heck do we in this county government, because county government with 11 buildings, I'm assuming is buying all their water. off of Nashville. That's correct.
That's correct.
So how much on an add-on?
So in essence, basically what you're doing is an add-on service is either being softened water or softened and filtered.
Yeah, but what are we just spending on water just to buy the water from Nashville here? That's a dumb question. Well, that's the one thing with the sewer bill. The sewer bill is a big concern.
For the jail, it can be as much as $6,000.
I would prefer that
Just do some investigation on this.
Hold us accountable and ask us about it.
Yeah.
Why don't we just... Because it is... Well, we're in contract, so we can't just... We may not... I don't know what everybody's done.
Look and see what the contracts are doing, and as they end, I suggest we get rid of it. We do not redo it.
And I've dealt with Culligan before on matters like this, and I have got them to group my plants together, so... I think that this is fixable. I was just shocked when I went in to do the budget numbers and realized that every single invoice that's hitting that account line is water.
Why is it called employee wellness incentive?
Sir, I do not know why it flipped or what.
Well, the actual title is employee. It's under the line.
I can tell you why.
Scott.
They were wanting us all to drink more water.
It's water purification. That's what we're paying for. Right? Yeah. Well, let's call it what it is.
That's fine. We can tell Doug to change it. Water purification.
Can you bring that back to us? Yes, sir. We will. With the contracts. Absolutely. And that is one of the things that he's going to help us with.
Let's keep going. That's why I wanted to go line by line.
Are you going to be able to get to us at our work session next week?
No. Absolutely not.
This is a last quarter of the year information.
We are aware of it. We are aware it's a problem and it looks ridiculous and we are trying to investigate and see. AUL life insurance, those numbers have not changed. We still pay $940 per employee with the $20,000 life insurance policy. If you flip the page, the callout stipend, we already covered that, the $2,000. Postage. That has to do with the maintenance.
Separate from the other one though, right?
What is this?
The maintenance call-out.
Is that part of the report? Have we rolled that into their salary? That's the call-out stipend. Call-out pay? No. That's $25 if they get called out. 10 o'clock at night, water?
Water's from a leak or they have an issue with regards to an alarm going off or they have an issue with a door closure issue. They have a generator that's not coming on. or they're out there shoveling and putting down salt. Anything that happens when it's dark.
Okay. Postage 200, hopefully that can go away one day, but it's necessary now. Gas, oil, and lube, the 237, that's working? We switched that around. We don't have a full year of revenue back to give you those numbers yet, but I am getting reimbursed now from all the different areas. All the departments that have it. Yeah, I'm getting reimbursed.
So we are not shorting that fund anymore.
We're actually capturing the reimbursements for the gasoline that the commissioners were paying for. Yes.
Well, and the question is, we're capturing reimbursements, which is key, but have we built that into our budget estimates? Yes. No.
I don't have that number yet to build that in.
You still have a year to go. Because I'm seeing only $35,000 here to date spent in that line through March 31st. So that's like way under. It is very way under, yes. Do we still need $237,000?
Again, I don't have the numbers to be able to say.
So this is not an accurate number?
It's a questionable number. It's a comfortable number.
When can you get a...
I think that will be in the middle of next year. We should be able to say, hey, this needs to come down.
Can we go back to, well, gosh, the other variable here is gas prices. It's like totally close to, yeah, 230, it just seems.
We don't have all the data to give you a good plan to fix that number yet.
All I can see is historical. In 25, we spent 202.
Yes, but you've got to remember that.
We asked for more money. Yeah.
And in addition to that, when we were being reimbursed, it was going to the highway department. Yeah.
Yeah. So we got additional reimbursements. Gas prices are going up. There's a lot going on there. I guess we can leave it. I mean, let's just, if it's out of line, though, let us know. Let you know.
Can we talk about Culligan? But $237,000 for gas for all county vehicles is not a very high number. We paid $3,300 total last year.
Well, that's county vehicles. We pay all of the vehicles. The only thing I don't like now is that it just goes into the general fund so that you guys can't see a
That's that recovery of that money. So I'm not really sure how with the auditor we can work that out, but we can't see it unless we go dig for it because it goes in under miscellaneous revenue. I don't like that. I would rather it be, you know, a captured fuel money so that I can tell you your fuel money is this that we got back. So it's a project.
Okay, we'll leave it.
For your partner person.
Okay, office supplies, sir, yes?
I got to throw this out there just in the calculation. If I take $237,000, follow along Kevin, 237 grand, I divide that by $3.50 a gallon, that's 67,714 gallons, right? So if I take that 67,714 gallons times average fuel economy at 20 miles a gallon. the benefit of the doubt, right? That's a big thing. That means we're driving 1,354,285 miles a year. No. That's what it comes up to be.
Because you've got to take into consideration that there are patrol cars that sit idle.
Mm-hmm.
Okay, well, tell them to get that.
Dr. Chernoff goes in. Yeah, see how that goes.
I just want to say this. This has been a pet peeve of mine for the last several years, all right, is that we're buying all our fuel from Pomerang. I was out of Cortland, Indiana. Okay, so we're buying diesel and gas.
Actually, we moved to Keystone. Keystone. We are now buying fuel from Keystone. Oh, I'm sorry.
I don't even know who that is.
We used to buy it from Premier Ag.
Is that some company that owned by the mafia? No. Keystone? Pipeline? I would just, you guys don't have time to do that, but I can really capitalize that on anyone. I would really love to see how many cars, Just automobiles, trucks, and passenger cars. Well, I've never seen it. I'd like to see it. See Stacy before you leave today. And then I'd like to know, do we have an inspection service where we inspect those cars?
That one is a little laxing in that because each one of them parks.
You know, maintenance records and all that kind of stuff.
That's something that Sandra's got on her plate, and she has approached Brad because they're talking about possibly doing more of the sheriff's maintenance over in the garage.
This would be a good thing, yeah.
Very good thing. And so Sandra has that on her project list.
I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Okay. The next line is $3,000 for office supplies. I didn't change that. We don't really go through that. You know, I bought my first office supply this year.
I didn't really hit it last year.
We were getting hit with a bank fee, and the clerk and the auditor's office finally got that handled and taken care of with the bank, so that's no longer an issue on our budget.
I'm not really sure what that cleaning service is out for Is it okay so it must just be a mistake litigation So I Know this is a touchy subject
And it's not just one in the particular individual on the council or anywhere else. So I went back and actually pulled together some information with regards to legal fees that have been spent that have been classified under either legal services or litigation. So in 2025, there was $51,463.60 spent in 2025 for legal fees. That went to $37,151 to employee matters. Brown County Music Center contract, $10,276. Cybersecurity, $2,153.50. Zoning, $1,353.10. Indian Hill, $530. So of that, which we are experiencing, because again, we're taking a different tact here. We have been, from a personnel standpoint, trying to use independent individuals either conduct investigations when we have employee challenges and things that nature or even when we've gone through the exercise of being challenged through various state or federal agencies with you're not compliant here you're not compliant here because there have been anonymous reports that have been coming through to our organization so 80 so if I look at that number of Basically, 80, not quite 80%, 75% of that involves around employee matters because we've been addressing, responding to IDEM with regards to the fuel system and not being compliant with that, which has been there for years.
Which we discovered we didn't have the tanks on our insurance and now the tanks are covered under our insurance.
We've been dealing with IOSHA. with complaints of safety violations and things of that nature. I looked at every one of these as an opportunity for this county to improve itself because every time we have had to go and react that way, we have instituted and put either training or additional planning or gone through and made corrections and all of that because it has been lax years Okay, so it is costing us and that's where it's costing us in litigation And that's why we basically took a very conservative approach with $40,000 under professional legal Account line 30102 The attorney, does anybody have any questions on that matter? The music center was basically the review that was being done on the contracts and basically becoming familiar with what is and isn't viable under that contract. So I know this is all a soft spot and a hard spot, but again, if I look at it from an elected official perspective, that is a commissioner coming in and commissioners coming in to say, help me understand what this is, how it's structured, and is there an opportunity to change. I don't know that, and it's $10,200. Okay. This year, There's only been $1,000 spent on that. In 2026, we spent $50,710 to date on nothing but employee matters. That means engaging to understand statutory and regulatory obligations under the commissioner's authority against other various agencies, whether that be the Department of Health or those kinds of things, where our authority lies with regards to or responsibility relies with regards to contracts and all of that stuff. So I think you're very aware that we're trying to go through and work through these things, but unfortunately it's an expense that's increasing because we're taking a very different tact.
So you're getting your house in order.
Well, whenever you have a book that you haven't really pushed, and now you're pushing that book, people are going to push back, and that's the result of that. We're not planning on that being the norm.
Correct. And we're not trying to take the approach of it not being a nonconformist in that. We want to learn these things. I had absolutely no understanding from the perspective of what the relationship is between the commissioner's office and the health department. Now that we have a better footing in understanding that, and again, we had to engage a different legal service for that because our existing legal services come through and said, ah, that's a conflict of interest for us because they were both representing the health department and the commissioner's office. so and as a matter of fact and going out and actually going to look at the fees and services and what's available we're now actually looking at what water retainer is of actually questioning the relationship that we have a bunch of number and that is why we don't have a
county attorney. Because we can't have a county attorney because of conflict of interest.
You mean a local county attorney? Yeah.
We don't have a single county attorney because, like in the health department, commissioner...
would have had to hire two separate attorneys anyway here's the challenge that i have with that and again and again other other counties have county attorneys so why why are we unique here's the reality in that case they would have to go out i understand that but apply the 80 20 rule right eighty percent of that county attorney can do the majority of those functions and where they identify as being necessary either by code or responsibility that's different right here's the take that i tack the tactic that i take on the answer to that question is this county has no idea and that's why she's heading up a project with regards to our ordinances what our statutory ordinances are in place with regards to being obsolete or relevant or current And we have no idea how that measures against the state codes that also govern those activities. So that's why we're going through and putting money towards $6,000 to $10,000 and wanting to end that project to get that adopted so that we can get that in place, so that we can get the house in order, so that we can actually put structure in place that should have been there for years.
And that's not something new. That's something we actually had done 10 years ago. Correct, in 2014. And it hasn't happened since.
And it has not been touched since.
And on that regard, we had a conversation yesterday with Ted about county attorneys enforcing ordinances and those kinds of things. We encouraged that conversation and maybe that's something that could be looked at because some of these ordinances, whether they're animal control or planning and zoning or whatever it is to me, These things need to be enforced. They're not being enforced because it doesn't fall under the purview of the county prosecutor because they're not criminal or whatever. Criminal. They're actually civil activists. Exactly. But we need to look at those because those things, if they're ordinances, they're enforceable. We need to make sure we're doing it.
And sometimes we've been finding out through the start of this project is we create ordinances, but we don't complete them. So we start them and then we say you're going to be fined for this, but we don't set up a fine schedule or any of that.
You don't get the fine system through the court's office or whoever does all of that.
So this company that we're proposing, it'll be an online-based system where anybody can go in and look up traffic lights and every ordinance in the county regarding traffic lights will come up to the most current. if there is anything um you know july 1st is always the big law change um they will work with our us and our attorneys to change codes change codes get us up to date tell us what's not not relevant and the whole thing so modification it's going to be a huge foundational and that contract is again there is a maintenance clause and that was it's anywhere from 600 to a thousand dollars a year for them to go through and say this is what the state has done in the statutory director
statutory change, look at our ordinances, are we non-compliant, or make you actually a recommendation to say you may want to go through and actually implement an ordinance in this area.
Well, it's also embedding the ordinances that we passed that year into our set of codes.
Yes, sir.
That's a key piece. Huge. So we can see the most updated. It's all incorporated and codified. So we better keep moving, I think.
Okay. Can we get rid of outdated ordinances?
So let me explain the behavior that has happened with that. The behavior that has happened with that is when Barnes and Thornburg goes through the exercise of writing that ordinance, they simply put a line in there that says, if any preceding ordinances that they are hereby terminated or whatever their formal language on that, and this herefore replaces it. That's where the codification will weave that in.
We're more than halfway already in their database because Glenda Stogsville did it. So they are going to take that information because they were the company, and then they'll just merge all of that together and do our complete. And Town of Nashville has used it for 30 years, so you're probably familiar with this, Scott. Okay. Attorney retainer, because we did have an increase of $1,000. That's correct. So that's $4,800. That's just divided by 12. insurance liability I have you might notice that I went down a hundred thousand dollars and that is due to our taking unnecessary cars off the policy the blanket bond has worked out wonderfully for us this year saved us a lot of cash and the more to come on that we've gotten a lot of credits back from them because of the mistakes that we found in our our things So I dropped that down to $500,000 for this year. So that's a guess.
Word of advice?
It's the numbers.
Word of advice? Sir? You should have made it 501, 619, and 31 cents. Well, that's why it's a guess because it's like 500 million.
That's not a real price, right? It's an estimate?
Well, you have to remember that our insurance goes
six months this year six months next year so I can't tell you what that is so yeah it's a guess okay so again going down the axis sharing where the work has been come from that the work that has come from that is Bob Grady knows Brown County's Commissioner's Office really well now. And he knows Teresa really well now. And he is actually stepping into the fray and actually looking at ways to help us reduce our general property and liability insurance. As far as coverage and things of that nature.
I'm always about to look for it if we can. Not always, but many times it serves us better.
All I know is you guys are making me tired, and I'm getting a headache. Keep moving.
So you've got travel expenses. Travel, I kept at $1,000.
And that's for mileage to conferences, road, school, whatever. Yes, ma'am.
Kevin, Teresa, is there a reason why you guys don't want more training from AIC, or conferences, or Association of Indiana County Commissioners? or well just if that's the only training 34 or that's just travel yeah that's just my travel my training these things you're dealing with these things you're dealing with kevin almost every other county is dealing with too so it's just a good resource and so i think you find it pretty helpful to have a peer kind of we always go to amc I do, I go to ICC.
ICC, that's, oh good, you are going there.
Yeah, we did cut that out.
Good, okay, good. Yeah, no, no.
Good, good. Okay.
We are maintaining our memberships to AIC. Yeah. I'll give you the information. Okay, good.
Sometimes they do have some good stuff. Not always, but sometimes they have to.
I will have to defer in saying yes or no to that because I don't have the time to sit down and read through their emails or attend their conferences because we've been dealing with...
Okay. Okay. $48,000 for telephone system, which Eric already went over with you.
He said $15,000.
$13,000. The animal shelter contract is... That's no more because we did away with the tax last year.
Oh, that's just the tax-related fees.
Uh-huh. Yeah. Internet 35, Eric already went over that with you. Okay. I hate Pitney Bowes, so, yep, $2,200 for milling machine. Okay. Public legal notices, you gave me $8,000 last year, and here's the thing. We are getting so many hits off of Indeed and the different resources we're using to search for jobs. I mean, we got Eric off of Indeed.
I think we have to continue that. We do.
And it costs money. I am very conservative with my time. I do go over with the department heads on what they need, how long they need it in, what needs to be published to try to. But I'm already spent. I've only got $1,300 left in there for this year. So I have spent that money and
I'm just going to reiterate that I think it's very, very important that we keep that in there and that we also encourage, if not mandate, that's up to you guys and your policy, that they have to also advertise outside the county. It's important. You don't know what you're going to get.
The paper is crazy expensive, but they did drop their price a little bit.
Oh, paper is awful.
Paper is awful. Well, I called them the other day, and they did come down a little bit. But it's still very costly.
There's social media. There's Indie. There's LinkedIn. There's all those things. We just don't know what kind of people you're going to get.
Well, and I think the other thing that we, I know you said through the presentation, so for example, I believe it was Paycom. Paycom actually does do... They do. It's part of their whole process. They do. So that's an opportunity where we may not, we may be able to shift that or do something a little bit different. Right.
Right now it's working because they're calling me telling me, Teresa, shut it off. I did and Judy Hess did that to me and the Purdue Extension lady did that so they're getting they're getting applications okay burial and veterans markers those two numbers we did a lot of research on this we got the IC code they came to us and asked us to increase this through our research and the commissioners discussions That stays the same. You talked quite a bit about that yesterday.
I think the communication should have been is Brown County is right in the middle. We're not the bottom. We're not the top.
Professional services, we just added that to 80 because of ARA. So I just made that change in my book. What's that for? ARA. ARA is in there. Christy's in there, Dan's in there.
In what?
Professional services.
So the majority of Christy falls under professional HR services. And some under the professional services.
I put the HR manual under the professional services because it's going to be $10,000.
But again, the majority of that, I would say the large percentage of that is Dan Cartwright.
Okay. Professional services, Christie. Oh, wait a minute. Sorry, wrong book, wrong thing. Okay, mental health. When I called the state on mental health for our center stone bill They told me to always they can't charge us more than 5% of the prior year So I took last year's balance to add 5% and that's a direct number for Center stone for next year Correct dues and subscriptions 500 Commissioner meetings Scott, that's where our AIC and all that comes out of, the $5,000.
So that's conferences and travel.
Yes, sir.
No, that's just conferences, right? Travel is your mileage, right?
Correct.
It's registration. Yes.
For personnel services, $20,000, that's the HR services. Section detention, that is Mallory's line. she had come to the commissioners hoping to be able to decrease because they agreed to let her do ankle monitors for the juveniles and they have had a plethora of juveniles this summer so she said that that number is going to be hit so she asked us to keep it the same cell phones that's Eric he already that and that's it
They're all hanging out at Eagle Park. They're doing something.
Don't know. They're being bad.
But the sad thing about it is when we, the savings that we captured in being able to do the angle detention at home was completely wiped out by a whole new series of increase of juvenile detentions that were required for a more aggressive and
We did away with Thrive Alliance and ARC because we asked them to come in and have meetings with us to explain what their spend was. And we discovered that none of the monies that we were paying them stayed in our county.
Sorry.
Thrive Alliance is basically a senior organization that goes and looks and plays the, let's call them a broker for services through the federal government through various programs like Medicare, Medicaid, so that they can do housing or any kinds of things for those Seniors that are financially troubled or in that way when we had the conversation with them They basically said they were doing seven-year wait There was a three-year wait for any Brown County citizen to get any of our cash.
And it's been that way for years.
So that's one. ARC is the Association of Retarded Citizens
So that money, none of that, we were giving them a monthly check, and it goes right down to the state of Indiana. It does nothing here for anybody in the county.
It basically went to a national organization. I think I did see Thrive serving food now at the Episcopal Church in Meanblossom. They do some of that, but they don't have a lot of actual direct support. And they basically, when we had the conversation with the director from Lums, basically said, they're doing $700,000 in Bryan County as it relates to that kind of elder care where we can get fees. And again, our contribution was not contributing to any of that.
Many, many, many, many, many, many years ago, it was different. It was. But through the years, they filtered out what they were providing.
They just got really big.
And was Spot on there as well? No, that's another one.
That's not in this one, it's in another one.
Oh, it is in this one? Sorry, it's in 11.12.
Yeah, it's in 11.12.
So we're going to 11.12 now, economic development? That'd be good on the budget book if you'd flip the page.
Okay.
Can we hold on for just a minute?
Do we need to take a break or anything? Yeah. Are we good? I need a break. You can go on without me. I'll do that. You want a cigarette? You know, may I ask a question?
Oh, I found the math error between QDCAP and reading.
Yeah, that 45,000.
Look up on the screen.
Oh, Eric, I clicked Darren's name up there accidentally when you were out. Well, I mean, I think that's on his computer.
No, that TV was about to power off. There you go. You got it. Oh, I see what you're saying.
Oh, it's a TV. Right here, these lines?
Yes. See the ones I've got right here?
They have numbers in our book that did not get put on the spreadsheet for here to the tune of $27,000-some. That's the difference between the Reedy book and our book.
I added it up as $45,000-something.
Yeah, but you came up with $46,000.
No, $645,000. Yeah.
You found the difference to get you to your book, but you didn't find the rest of it. Right, I did not find the difference between that and this, but I found the difference between this and this. And it's those highlighted cells up there that did not get filled out on the spreadsheet. So that's what it is.
computer, but it's still in the books. There's like 20 grand missing out of the . . .
QCAP?
Is it QCAP?
2752, that was missing. Yeah, and that's what, so we just had a question about why there was a difference between what Rudy had and what we had. And it was because those blank ones up there that did not get filled out on the spreadsheet that got sent, yeah. Yeah, there's 1,000, 2,000, 2,000, 25, 50, 4,000.
Yeah, those are all the other apartments.
4,000, 13,000, and 4,000.
So that's where the difference came in.
You ain't even started the hard stuff.
Yay! Did anything, what we just went through, did we change anything? We didn't make any changes?
Yes. Under professional services, you need to tack on $13,000 because we're picking up the ARA obligation. And then I think we need to go back under We talked about the corners building and having the floor building and things of that nature. That's what?
That's in his budget so we'll do that. We gotta add that to this.
We gotta add it to King Capsule. Where was the professional services you had?
Um, Darren, it is account line 35000. Under 1000.
Okay, you have $67,000.
Right, and we're adding ARA, so it'd be $80,000.
That line up there on the screen is $80,000. Yes. And there was one other thing that we... Maintenance?
economic development fund number 1112 economic development let me get there looks good I'm gonna I'm I'd like to skip the first item and just go down to the other items because I don't want to get hung up on that first one okay so account line cleaning service 90,000 is what we have budgeted questions if you if you ask the employees they're gonna say no We are actually having a meeting with them because we need to, we don't know if the problem is because we're not providing them with the proper cleaning tools. So it's a work in progress. We're trying to figure that out. Okay, the vaccine, the $500, that is for the health department. So if any of our employees go over when they onboard and say they want their Hep B, Hep A, whatever, we have to pay for that. So that's a reimbursement to the health department. public safety and yeah that is EMA that is the training that he goes through for EMA any questions for if I keep going because he had quite a bit of training in his as well yes yes he did The animal shelter contract for 55. We invited them over.
It's not the training he takes. It's the training he provides. Provides, right?
Yes, ma'am. Well, both. Because he has to go.
He's got money in there for the training that he has to take. That's in his budget. This is separate.
This is the training program that he facilitates with regards to the EMT.
For the whole state, yes. Yes, yes, yes.
Okay. I'm just clarifying. Yes, yes.
okay we came up we had animal shelter come over and go over their budget with us and they they have a I love the Humane Society okay so they have an unrealistic expectation of County funds right now and I can see where it you can see their plan and their achievements We gave them an extra $5,000 this year to offset some of the money from the animal tax. Once they showed us their programs, it was legitimate. We felt that it was a legitimate ask.
Well, because Animal Central takes in a percentage of animals that they have.
Right. And they want to increase the amount by 50% every year.
so it's just it's not realistic for us right now yeah so we had the conversation with the Humane Society they're basically saying they're running behind and they would like to see the county provide an increase of 50% over the next five years
That's a good wish, but it was based on percentage of animals they take into animal control initially.
And again, that's a conversation. So there were two conversations that were had with the Humane Society.
Just to clarify, an increase of 50% combined over the next five years? Only of the animal services contract.
50% each year.
50% each year.
That would be $17,000 a year. That, in essence, basically their target is looking at getting $150,000.
Okay, I want to set up a GoFundMe page. I don't know if it's softer than anything else out there.
Appreciate that, but it won't work. But you've made them whole from last year and added 5K.
So, in essence, yes. And the whole from last year was with regards to, like she said, the animal tax, as far as the dog tax.
And I appreciate what they do. I really do. I do too.
And we haven't increased them for years. It was legitimate. So I think Pat, you went there with us too, didn't you? Yeah. Yeah.
And Joel as well.
And they came out again this year and just reiterated that same thing.
So that is the actual funds where we're actually receiving services rendered. Mm-hmm. from the Humane Society. And so we did actually do change the tactic. So we did authorize a prepayment, a lump sum this year and one payment for them. But months going forward, we rewrote the contract where we will be receiving monthly invoices. And should we decide to terminate that contract, services rendered will be prorated as to what was provided. Because there was no stipulation of that in the existing contract under animal services.
Yeah, I would like to see, at some point, them do a presentation of how many animals they've housed for the county for this kind of money. Absolutely. The animals that they've housed for animal bites and various things. I think it would be awesome. They used to, many, many years ago, they would give those. And they did provide a similar thing for us.
They're investing not for profit. So Scott Rudd, how many animals have we got coming over the border that'd be tourists? So could we use TVC?
We asked that question. So we asked that question.
So animal tourism, I don't know. the point being is that there is some questions as far as in the numbers themselves um because when we went through this whole discussion on that we were looking at you know theresa did some leg work some preliminary leg work to look and compare ourselves to surrounding counties morgan county johnson county bartholomew county and we took some very basic calculations and if we look at the number of animals that are going through their facilities from just dogs perspective we're not talking cats
dogs we were going paying or contributing as much as four dollars more per animal than any other count in any of the other counties well we were at five morgan county was highest at two bartholomew county wasn't even a dollar morgan county wasn't even a dollar so that's that's cost per citizen average
That's cost per citizen. So obviously it goes down because they have larger populations.
So our citizens are bearing a much higher cost per pet because of the population size.
And I think we talked about that when you guys were at the meeting with us.
I go back a long way and was involved with the Humane Society back in the 78. I was the manager at the old one back on Ferry River Hill and I was their manager at the shelter in 1887 before I came to work for the county and they have improved so much on the number of animals that are being spayed and neutered over those many, many years ago. I do appreciate what they do and how they provide. So I think it is great. It is a good benefit.
And I don't know if you've been out there, but the facility is beautiful. Oh, it's awesome.
It's a wonderful facility. you know, along with their volunteers, have done just an absolute job.
Didn't Evan Worley commit a million bucks?
I don't know how much.
I don't know what it is, but we know that there was significant amount.
So I give them kudos for what they do. I do too.
I do too.
And I'm not having animals drop, you know, I mean, back in the day we all had animals drop constantly. And not that that still doesn't happen, but it does happen less.
okay moving on the fair board we came out and we did an audit of their fund usage that we were giving them because when the this group of commissioners came in they were still locked in at that 35,000 a year and then they knocked it down to five And then now this year we had them come in and say, you know, cause we heard them actually $5,000.
Okay.
So that's going to be, you'll have to, I mean, that'd be up to you guys when that's all done. But anyway, if any of you want to see this, this is the list of all the projects that they have going on in 26, their projects for 27. And they showed us all their history of what they have done with the county cash. All the way back to 2016. And it is impressive. Very impressive. So, however they get funded, they need funded.
In the reviewing of that, when we had that conversation, the $35,000, which the commitment that was made at that point in time was, they were the ones going to be responsible for improving the fairgrounds. So the project list that they put together since 2016 shows that it has been going into the improvement of the fairgrounds.
Okay. Okay, next page, utilities, $300,000. I'm sure everyone's aware that utilities have went up. So I did the math with the increased cost, what our spend is, $300,000 was fine to stay, so I did not change that number.
So is that water, sewer, electric?
Julia, it's gas, electric, gas and electric, right? Yeah, I don't know.
Gas, electric, and water.
Water? Yeah. Okay. Yeah.
I don't know if... Trash service is the only one that's questionable.
That's professional services? Highway uses, road improvements. I only have $50,000 on my form.
No, that was the dump truck.
Okay, sorry. $100,000, that didn't change?
And let me just give you an example of what that was used for in this year. $49,000 of that was used as an emergency repair in the Orchard Road bridge. Remember the conversation? We said it was a two-ton weight limit, single lane. So that's where the highway department dips into that. And we actually do having them manage it. We're not doing a lot of oversight on that. They're actually doing it themselves.
Any questions? Okay. Next item is the motor grader.
Motor grader, that's the new purchase, the road grader. That was a replacement for one that is going to basically cost us $49,000 to be repaired, and it wasn't even worth 67.
This says five-year purchase, so do we have to make it- It is a five-year lease with an option to buy out at $1.
Okay.
All right. Next one, I put 50,000 in for dump trucks. She came back and wanted 100. And the reason is because this is going to be one of those lines, Julie, that we want to encumber money every year. So the plan is to take $50,000 every year. and let that build so that she can buy.
So in essence there's basically three dump trucks right now at the highway department. Those three dump trucks and again it's actually interesting for me from a trucking standpoint. You have two different qualifications and training that you can go through in a CDL driver's license. More than 80% of the people that are getting their CDLs today are being qualified under automatic trucks. Not very many people these days are actually being qualified under manual.
That's terrible.
So what's happening is you have the industry shifting to where there are not going to be anyone. The issue that we're having in with three dump trucks is we have three manuals and it's getting tougher and tougher for us to find CDL drivers that are willing or capable of driving a manual truck.
I would like the manual to stop it better. What was the question, Scott?
Again, so let me just share...
That trend and the reason it is going that way, if you've ever driven a manual semi, it's 18 gears that you typically have to go through. You've got clutch. It is a physically demanding exercise.
Okay, next. Again, we did the audit with them, the spay and neuter. It It's a functioning, working program that we didn't want to take away from the Humane Society out of the budget.
So that's 20 in addition to the 50? Yes, sir.
So you've upgraded it.
All of the years paid out is $50,000 for animal services, $5,000 coming from the dog tax, $20,000 for spay and neuter. It's been that way for years. We did have a conversation with them this year. We are going to look at opportunities to try and offset the spay and neuter or go through a different kind of thing.
We've asked them to find different funding.
that program so that it wouldn't have to hit our budget so that's they said they would work on that project Mike and again we will work through that yes sir but we went but they were receiving $5,000 from that fund so since we eliminated it that's why we increased the animal control services by 5,000 so the answer to the question with regard to the spay and neuter the question that I asked is is this being means tested and their response was no we're just kind of making sure that they're a resident of the county so I don't mind facilitating and you know what there's a burden on someone that has a pet and they can't do those kinds of things but they just make it available to him or walks through the door okay maintenance 85,000 we we function very healthily within that so I didn't change that
Redevelopment Commission you've group yearly given them $10,000 correct Julie is that who you you did you use that fund to pay for the work on rebelled the tip response That's where that money probably should come from Yeah, we're looking at Redevelopment Commission administration fees is that where you could use Okay, Brown County Transit match 30,000 that's the same that's the YMCA access That is it Oh besides the health insurance
Shall we jump? Are we ready?
We might as well roll through lit.
You want to roll through lit? Okay. All right. So we need to come back to this one then?
Yeah, we'll come back to that one after we get lit.
Okay.
All right. Public safety.
Okay. Again, let's skip that first
account line and move on to this next okay we got lots of info and backups okay we we're kind of in a weird spot with all right the nine one the nine one one lease that is it is what it is I don't know if you can explain it in better words.
Basically, that is the equipment rental for anything the dispatchers use in the system. So the rental has gone up, so the equipment cost on that lease has gone up.
Where are you? I see you. On page two. Oh, page two?
No, page four.
Well, she's on 911 lease on page two.
I skipped the health insurance.
Yes, sir, you're right Scott we're right Yes, okay like he said the IU health contract and
Okay, let me back up a second. Bear with me. Okay, flip back to page one. Okay. The 911 contract. So I've been working with Andrea Markham on this to understand it so that we can explain it to you where we're at and why we took that out of there. So in 26, we had the end of that contract where we have to pay that $500,000. So that contract ends. But the contract doesn't end until?
2027 May.
May of 2027. So we're in a gray area. So it ends in May. They won't even tell her numbers. They won't even give her any guesstimates or anything. So this is gonna be on your opinion on what you wanna do. We zeroed it out because It's not going to hit any type of budget for the county until 28.
So... You said May? May of 27. So... We've paid the final payment. Hang on a minute. I'm going to try to process this. I don't mean to take everybody's time here, but... So May 2028. 2027. Next year. Well, next year.
May of 27, it ends.
That's 10 months. We are off again.
So 10 months from now, what happens?
It ends.
It ends. What ends? Well, the new one begins.
The new $500,000 contract or whatever cost starts. So we need to. So next May, we're going to have to pony up how much? They're not telling us.
And they did it. The last time the contract was in place, and this is unbelievable because we didn't believe it and we asked for proof. When they started that contract and got in bed with that, they didn't have to put any money down until the following year. So we don't know what they're going to do.
Right. And keep in mind, I'm polling from a conversation from Sutherland. back in early 23.
You can't remember that far.
So Andrea Markham who is the director who has taken control of this she said I am waiting to hear back from Craig Bennett with AT&T about our contract and when we will start contract negotiations for 2027. In November of 25 I emailed him to find out when our contract was up. He advised me it was May 1st of 2027. As soon as I hear back from them, I will try to get some dates so that we can see what kind of figures we are looking at for the next contract. So keep in mind that this contract is going to be a 10-year contract, most likely, again. It's definitely most likely going to be increased from what it was. Right. So.
It was $500,000 over 10 years, $50,000 a year, and that is the payment for the software utilization and the lines.
Then you've got the separate fee for the 911.
The lease.
You've got two.
You've got the equipment lease and the software. And the equipment lease is the 718. That's correct. That's just an ongoing annual cost. Yes. But then on top of that, you've got this 10-year contract.
And that 10-year contract was written in such a way that it was payment due at the end of the 10 years. Yes. At the end of the 10 years.
That's why we thought...
Yes, at least. In 10 years.
In 10 years.
10 years if we if you assume that they will negotiate and start from that point I know but again that's where we're at because we're not getting any information back from them willingly at this point right so we're driving blind mm-hmm but that that the 10-year contract is 2027 It's already paid. It's already paid. It's in 2026.
The final bill comes this year.
We're paying the final bill this year.
We covered that last year.
It's in 2026.
This is to our concern that it is 10 years from now.
That's an assumption.
Right. But Jim, I'm telling you, when you read this contract, you'll be like, there is no way that a company would let you have their services for 10 years and pay for it in the 10th year. Well, the 9th year. You have to pay for it in the 9th year.
I don't trust that industry at all. So what's the 71800 for? That's the equipment. That's the equipment. Well...
So at the end, if you go and look at the overall cost for 911, you take into account the lease that we had been paying along with the usage fees or the $500,000 for the software and the lines. And again, that contract is written in such a way that there is a clause in there that says X number of lines can be used. There are additional fees that are being above and beyond that, and they have not given us that information either.
So we may even owe more than $500,000. There's all sorts of gatekeepers in that contract.
OK, we'll do a little of what comes out. No. Pause. Hang on a minute. What are you going to do?
You can't do anything.
Yeah, I got this. Go ahead, Sam. Let's just forget this meeting, and you guys do whatever you want.
Hey, Tim, that's not the way to do it.
Kevin, I would be in favor of what we do is figure out how we need to escrow this cost and escrow it on an annual basis. make it a permanent part of your budget, buy an item every year. It goes into a non-reverting fund. You can't touch it for anything else. It is specifically for this concept. We had that conversation this morning. I would support that all day long. We're in the same camp. Be very proactive about it. So whoever is sitting in these chairs 10 years from now is not blindsided and right.
Like we were with having to come up with $500,000.
Right, because what Sutherland told me, he got frustrated, is that 10 years ago when that thing renewed, then the county didn't have the money. And the settlement told me, and I don't know if any of this is accurate, but we didn't have the cash at the time to pay that.
Yes, yes, I think so my comment avoid that my comment to you would be is the conversation that we had this morning is to me at a minimum we escrow at $50,000 Appropriation every year because at this point in time it's likely to be the worst case scenario because we are going to negotiate it Yes, there was excess monies because they had to carry the burden for the 10-year period So that's why I met and if we have to do an ordinance get it recorded and
put the language in there, lock the thing down, that way the money's on it. It feels like it would be better to keep it in the pond. I agree.
Let's stick it in there. The process, I think, we normally would follow. Because we don't have any choice. A cumulative capital fund is meant for that type of long-term cumulative capital savings. We would create a line in the fund for the 9-1-1 contract and every year allocate $50,000 into the 9-1-1 contract cumulative capital fund.
You don't want it in economic development?
You could probably do it in economic development. Is that a cumulative? You could do it there too. Either one, but creating a line item and if we have to do an ordinance to create the line item. This is long term capital asset management.
And again, I don't normally admit defeat on many things when it comes to these kinds of things. Because of my experience but in my conversation with Eric because Eric has experience with this There are basically only two other vendors out there that provide these services and of the three AT&T is the quality provider and We're kind of trapped at this point.
I think they'll be a major truck going through Brown County. Yes fiber truck, right and you're gonna we're gonna find that out of the economic development
I'm going to be very careful with this because I have a mindset of, and I have a private sector mindset, as long as you are providing me quality services for a reasonable rate. But when you become the gorilla in the room, then that wants me as a nature in my mindset of the provider standpoint is, like we had with the VMware and the virtual software that we had. Unfortunately, in this particular entity, in this environment, it's likely that there won't ever be another step in the launch campaign. So I concede.
I just gave him the 9-1-1 contract, so if anybody wants to see it, Jen's got it.
Okay, so $50,000 is added, Darren. All right.
Okay. I don't have that. 3705. Wait a minute.
Well, and it's not technically, well, it's appropriation to a new fund.
It's not new. It was in there.
We just didn't put numbers in it. Well, but is that a savings fund or an expenditure?
It's public safety.
Which one was that added to?
Lit Public Safety, $30,705. $30,705, we're adding how much? $50,000.
So it's $55,000. $50,000. $50,000. We're going to do an escrow, or in essence, basically what we're going to do is accumulate $50,000 every year so that fund accumulates $500,000 in debt.
Right, we need to be done reverting funds, but we're gonna pull It's public safety. It's 9-1-1. It was in lit. It's currently in 11-12.
Wait a minute, am I confused? I'm confused here. 11-7.
11-7. 11-7. All right, guys. I need to slow down here. I'm getting tired. All right. 11-7, based off of Reedy's, based off the 2026 salary ordinance, okay, at the end of 27, there's only going to be $256,068 that he deserves.
That's an incorrect number. That's an incorrect number.
Well, it's a snapshot. Who knows what it's going to be. It's 70... But hang on a minute. Hang on a minute.
Hang on a minute.
Okay. Okay. 11-12 economic development, which we could pay it out of that. We don't have to pull it out of public safety. All right? But the economic development... So your recommendation is a transfer from economic development to LIT?
I mean the only question is can we create an accumulative fund in LIT? Non-reverting. Non-reverting line item.
We have a non-reverting line item, non-reverting line item, and the 1130... Yeah, 1170, so you create a non-reverting line item specifically for this 18G contract, right? And then we go in and journal money out of that economic development fund. Dump it in. Dump it into that line item. If we can do that. If we can do that.
Or, Jim, if we can just leave it in economic development, 9-1-1 contract, that's where it's coming from.
I kind of like that better, Jim. It's less hands tasting.
So we just stick it down in the green line item in the economic development and then for the AT&T contract.
And I'd say to give ourselves flexibility, just make it not non-reverting, but we can if we have to. We have a few things that we want that way.
If it's non-reverting though...
it doesn't go back into the number it stays that way what it is is every year never ends and then we have a balance in there can we it is not economic development I'm very loosely saying it can be used a little bit like a general fund but if I have this if we have this though inning dedicated not reverting fund is that going to prevent us from being a All right, so I'm keeping the 9-1-1 lease there for 71 8 Ambulance contract so this is the ambulance contract This was very painful meaning to sit through I
the commissioners made the decision that they did not want to decrease the service service level so you have you have basic life support or you have advanced life support currently we have two ambulances that provide advance it's called ALS we wanted to keep those in the county and there wasn't any time to do anything.
So, let me kick you off. Yeah. So Corey Frost has this and that. He's basically had other conversations. He's discussed other options, but it's going to take us a year probably to be able to take into consideration those other options. I get that. I get that. yes and again and then if we go through that again so let me my very practical approach to this is great I you love you thanks for the service wonderful I'd like to do that give me some more information we are going to look at basically amending the contract to be very specific about the data that we want them to provide us because at this point in time it's kind of well whatever we give you So we are going to ask for specific data as far as I'm interested in runs, time to service, areas of that. Nothing that's going to violate any of the HIPAA laws that's relevant to the service that they're providing. So that's an aspect of the approach there. And then Corey is going to go and have another option and have other conversations from other counties that are a similar size to us that have introduced services, you made the conversation, if you know someone that potentially could, that should be part of the discussion.
You're right, it's a 24 month conversation. It's going to take a while to really work through, number one. And then number two, and I'm going to throw this out, if you have a customer and you don't really want the customer, the best way to get rid of the customer We've heard all kinds of suggestions some crazy suggestions and it's like
you're dealing with people's lives and you don't want to this isn't an area to skimp my approach does you have to have yes sir my approach doing business as a county government so my commitment continues to be is that i believe we need to find a committee and then in encompassing the individuals that have relevant knowledge in this correct along with the financial and the Operating or execution aspects of this so that committee could be then go through this conversation I would I would I haven't talked board members about this, but maybe have Corey be that person because again He's already spending time on trying to figure this out and he's with them in the same building, too But I have the contract I have the old agreement.
I have all that data if anybody wants to see that I Okay, so right now we're at 830. That's a huge hit on this.
Remember, that's a 6% increase in service fees
Yeah, it goes up to $879 in 28 and $932 in 29. So you're looking at a million dollars.
No, they ought to be ashamed of themselves. The corporation, the size they are. They kept on data. They should be ashamed of themselves.
They can do what they want.
They're a huge corporation and they're a monopoly and that's how I feel about it.
sheriff's equipment the 60,000 is the next item and that is it's part of the outfit and it's not the outfit you know the extra package Brad has to have to outfit the vehicles that that's 51,000 is what I asked for there this goes along with it this is some of the computer don't speak his language correct so Brad verified that number 60,000 the 55,000 on the next page vehicle lease this is the last payment this year so that line will go away because this is the last lease that we have current 51,000 is the fit so that's the pieces and parts he has to have for the vehicles once he purchases them and the what is this contract that is 55 this is another Brad item it is public safety contract CAD system this is basically all of their all of their tracking software in case files so on so forth my understanding CAD yes sir
voice this concern because we have 17 sheriff deputies we've got an astronomical turnover ratio going on for the last few years we put the cameras for their chest right but we do not have dash cams correct we will get it we'll get an insurance discount if we do well here and patrick i'm going to make this statement you were law enforcement forever in marion county and here's the basis we're a cop and I'm 25 years old and I'm working third shift and all of a sudden I get a call and I got a drunk heading south on 135 now all of a sudden it's 3 a.m. and I get to turn on my lights and I need to turn on my siren and this guy's chasing me the adrenaline's rushing I'm having fun okay because I'm an adrenaline junkie and I'm an A-type personality all right that individual wrecks his car, hits a tree, and dies. And the next thing we know is the county's being sued, and they're suing the sheriff's department, okay, because the sheriff deputy shouldn't have been chasing him on 135 South. If we don't have a dash cam to be able to protect the county from a liability standpoint, from a young, aggressive, inexperienced sheriff deputy that could expose us to a tremendous amount of liability. And so to have the dash cam in the car, right? We've got some money in there in the general obligation bond that you guys are not going to use because you did a good job on the prosecuting attorney's office, right? We've got to wait for the bid. We're getting close. So if we've got a couple hundred grand left over in there, 222, 225, somewhere in that neighborhood, we can get those dash cams in those police cars that will last us, right, that we can upload, then I would highly recommend and support and encourage that we go ahead and get that done.
so just going on the record not not opposed to that not either i think it's a great investment on that one uh we have had those discussions we have a quote for that uh we could proceed on that pretty quickly i don't think the cost is as much as you're thinking it is so you know i throw that out there that the same vendor that we just did the deal with for the interview room cameras Has all our evidence being stored in the cloud is hot to try to sell us that same product And again, it's a discount on insurance So that's almost a no-brainer And there was another family killed it wasn't even in fact
So I again I say that with confidence because I already knew the man was having the conversations Okay, and then the last item the the $200,000 for the share of vehicles That Brad seems to be very happy with that it seems to be working and So, four cars. When we did the math on what he was spending per lease as opposed to purchasing these, I don't even know how did we ever get into a lease. $165,000 compared to $55,000.
Huge. Julie, are you changing that in the line or do you have to create another line?
No, you can change the title of the line.
Okay, so sheriff car purchased, removed 2021?
Okay. And it's staying, you said it's staying at $200,000, right?
Yes, sir.
And is that purchase, any unused? Any unused funds in there, are they just going to revert back or are you going to use them for other equipment stuff?
So some years he's going to need more cars than others just because of things happening. So we want to put the money, any leftover in that line, we want to put back in that line every year so that he can build that line. Well, we haven't quite figured out the system to make that happen yet But we have quite a few line items when I do that with so where the Constantly builds in that line where the money goes back there Yeah
I should be able to. I forgot a note here to call Dave Ward and ask.
Okay. And that last statement, son, was said by Lieutenant Chico.
And then if we can't, can we move on lit money?
Get him to stop wrecking cars.
Totaling cars.
I don't know about that.
I know.
Take something out of QPAP.
probably do something like that but again this it's public safety it fits here very well oh I think I don't think that's an issue and then here's the proof of the last payment for the lease that we did okay are we ready to jump into the nasty Do you want to speak first or would you like us to speak first Eric can you put up our slides?
Do the Yeah, we're putting those slides up yeah Let's put the which one you think we should and just so you know then they said that they would be more than willing to
To come to a council meeting. In a council session and go through the details of this.
Just as a disclosure, I spent two hours in my office one-on-one with an expert. Okay.
Okay.
We'll compare expert notes. All right. So just to try and help set... that there has been work that's been done here, and it's not simply just the commissioner's office, okay? Because a lot of this work started well before we took over in 2025. So there's work that was done in the... I mean, you had these scary times here where we're talking about... Now, we're just talking about insurance funds. We're not talking about claims and things of that nature. We're just talking about the very broad picture here. So that's where we're at starting at little to no in the tens of dollars to now moving into the tens of thousands of dollars as far as cash balances. Right. So going from there. So right now when we started 2026 the cash balance that Teresa went through and checked was $969,000. Okay.
cash balance end of the year or anticipated?
Going into 2026, we started with $969,000 at the beginning of the year. And the budget that was put together for that was basically $1.3, almost $1.4 million. It was coming from the contributions from the various departments The money that was contributed from the commissioner's funds, the money that was contributed from the various departments like the health department, the highway department, and all those others. So that basically gave you this $1.4 million here.
It was supposed to be $1.8 million, but... We haven't transferred $405,000. Right.
We still have not transferred $405,000 out of the economic development fund that the commissioner set aside in the budget.
And that's not touching the $700,000 that you...
I funded it last year at $2.7 million.
We haven't touched that $700,000. They've left it in there. It's an economic development.
I understand that.
I'm all acutely aware of that. Let's just do that. So we still actually show the council actually from... from a reserve, setting aside a reserve of $700,000, also out of economic development. In that, looking at these numbers, we're moving, this time here was like the dark ages. We're walking out of it and we finally put processes, responsibility in place, working through Apex and all those things. With the work that you've done, Jim, looking at this, calm down, give me time, breathe, just calm down. So in the last two years there hasn't been any need for additional appropriations, right? Because it's been covered, it's been properly funded, it's had money set aside.
so and again so we've also come to a realization in our conversations that we may need to actually go and do something with these funds here okay so so Kevin is pause right there just for a second if you add up the amount that the council had reserved and budgeted for commissioners the total is I think what Jim is actually saying is right if you add that up 1.3 plus 700 plus
It was actually 3.2, the total, all in, everybody. The $700,000, all the other funds, it was 3.2.
Please tell the funds the money from the other departments if they can get it.
For whatever reason, and Jim, I don't know, maybe you can answer this, when I was doing this research all these past years, I noticed that a lot of the departments lowered the amount that we were grabbing from them. And I'm not really sure why that happened.
Okay, can I have the floor here for a minute?
Mm-hmm.
When I got on the council In January 2023 Dave Redding was sitting right here Ready looks at me. He goes captain potential liability that we as a county have. And I agree with that statement.
I do too.
Because it only takes one or two or three people to have something crazy go that we could get hit with an enormous amount of out-of-pocket health care costs. So I went as Pat ever better probably total of 20 hours and had a number of interviews with, I mean I even interviewed a consultant who came to my office from Bloomington that has forgotten more than i'll ever know about group medical and we went through the reinsurance contract with a fine-toothed coat what i after i did that deep dive 23 what i discovered is that we have been running negative carryover balances in the 4700 fund of 606 294 in 2021 2022 586 252 this was then in 2023 we ended that year up 11,858. But may I remind you the only reason, and Julie? Yes, sir. The only reason we were able to save ourselves is somehow you and Jackie Clemons discovered 2.5 million in revenue that we did not even know we had. And all of a sudden, poof, this money falls from the sky. We were able to use that money to go in and shore up that $4,700 account to get it in the black by 2023. Is Theresa there too? Remember you guys there? Theresa, you were there. Remember that?
Yeah, I remember that. Penny's from heaven.
Penny's from heaven.
You took off all the accounts quickly.
I did. I found lots of cash.
Now, 2024, I'm not quite sure, but we turned right around a year later, ended up in a negative 510. okay on the ending cash balance in the 4700 round 2024. now that's the past yes sir that's the past and council commissioners auditor everybody on youtube land apex i like apex i think they do us a good job i'm glad you do because they do a good job you know they're good okay and and you know and they are our group medical advisory firm and listen to their advice and do what they tell us to do. So last year on the budget, because I've got a copy of it right here, the 2026 midpoint expected was $2,690,000. Now that number includes the clinic cost of $145,000 And it also includes the HSA cost of $113,000.
It also included a $50,000 laser.
Well, anyway, it's $2.7 million.
Yes, sir.
So I took that number, and I said, OK, we're going to fund the 2.7. That's that 2026 expected. It's like an 80% probability that's really where we should probably hit. And then what we had to do is we had to go in, and you guys have been putting 404, 405 into the economic development fund. So Jerry Hickman and I, we had to go in and pull that out of the general fund. We couldn't put it, because we didn't have any money. We were in red ink on the general fund. So we shifted that burden over the economic development fund and pumped the economic development fund to a million one so that we'd have enough money in there to cover that 2.7 million. Now, we all know what occurred, okay? And last, fourth quarter of last year was, is what it is, and I don't want to talk about the past.
I don't either.
Okay. So now going forward, going forward, 2026, or excuse me, 2025, we got really lucky. And it looks like 2026 hopefully could be a pretty decent year What we really are probably take a hard look at is just Kim ought to be able to crank this out without any problem is You know look at those employees that are currently enrolled in the group medical and I'd like to look at their ages Because if what we've got is a lot younger employee base then that would go a little ways to explain why we've had some reduced claims. I can tell you some of that. Hold that thought, because I'm just going to walk through this. So this year, and the budget, because I've gone through all the Form 1s and pulled all the data out and put a little Excel spreadsheet together, we've got $1,000,917,000 allocated for the 4,700 account, and that was line item 12,600, I think. And that $1.9 million bulk of it is coming out of the commissioner's budget, which is the $1.1 million is the general fund, $4.05 is the $11.12, $11.38, $20 grand, $11.70, $100 grand. Health Department's paying us $100 grand.
Which they used to pay us $178. I know. I'm just saying.
I know. And actually, to be honest with you, when you look, month number you know if you look at that number you know it's an administrative nightmare for the auditor's office if you were to take it this way but actually if you're going to be fair and I don't know that really matters because there's 26 form ones just out of the general fund by itself so the bulk of this comes out of the general fund except what? Health Department so they're kicking in 100 grand Highway Department's kicking in $192,000.
They used to do $160,000.
They're up to $192,000 this year. So that makes up that $1,917,000. But if I look at, if I then look at the 2027, 2027 expected number, which you guys had a meeting here a week or so ago.
Yeah, were you talking about Apex on the screen, 2027?
Yeah, it's that, yeah. Now they're expected they've dropped it from the 2.7 last year to the 2.2 Which we don't want to get comfortable with that because it was an unusually good year Council is that we've got a million nine and We're a little underfunded by $300,000, not a lot, okay? So we could just leave the funding for 2027 at the $1.9 million, but if we're going to do that, we need to push this money out of the Economic Development Fund, shove the rest of that money out of that fund into that $4,700 account so that we know we're overfunded. We should be completely overfunded for 2026, so that cash reserve balance at the end of this year would be nice if it was $1 million, $1 million, $1 million too. Because keep in mind the other part of it is, is the reality, you know, that $4,700 account, we probably ought to have $3 million in a reserve balance that rolls from one year to the next just to with something catastrophic.
So let us share with you our conversation with Apex.
Well, yes, that and we would like to... And our review with Apex.
Real quick, just to recap what Jim's saying so we all understand. You're suggesting we leave it at the $1.9 million but shift what amount? $700,000. Take that $700,000 out of that economic development fund. And shift it into the $40,000.
Right, because if you take the $1.9 million, add the $1.7 million, you're basically funding a $2.6 million. Do you see what I'm saying? Because what we're solving for, what we've got to solve for, we have to keep, it is absolutely paramount, not only with the 4700 fund, but actually with all the funds, and paying attention to those cash reserve balances.
Operating reserves.
Oh yeah, those operating reserves. To avoid 22-23 scenarios. Because the reality is that when we hit those, you know, we got run negative cash reserve balances, State Board of Accounts comes in, notes it because the auditor submits the AFR, Then the next step is the standard of poor is they come in, see that, and that's what leads to the reduction in credit ratings.
We're on the right path.
We are on the right path, but to expand on his statement here is that when we went back for these appropriations here every year when we have these bad years, this was all you were funding.
Yeah, I know.
So what we're wanting to do this year is, if you look at this chart here, in 27... We want to go to the max. 2.5.
We want to fund the maximum inclusive of HSA and the clinic costs. Fine, let's do it.
Let's do it. Let's just do it.
This is what we're saying is... Keep in mind, we're going to have to pull, hang on a minute, to do that, because I'm right here with you. 2.5. 2.5, but hang on a minute. Do you guys have this pitch? make sure it says based on 2026 salary ordinance plus longevity increase because that's a current compensation to each because keep in mind guys what we've got the council is yet to do if we can get this group medical is that okay so I'm excited because actually you did Now you're going the other way, so that's good. With a condition.
We would like to tell you where we're at with that end and how we want to get to the 2.5.
Yeah, because if you look at that paper I just gave you that you're looking at, take that general, look at the general fund, Kevin, right? Look at the purple column. Yep. See the negative 574, 326? Yep. Okay. I think we've added more money in the line items today for the general fund, have we not? Increased some of it, not a lot, but we would need some increases. So if we had, we don't have, let's just stay big picture, okay? We don't need to get in the weeds. So let's just say we're 570, because all that's saying right there is that our disbursements exceed our receipts by 574,000 with the exception, keep in mind, It's the lit supplemental. So if the state gives us, here's an extra 500 grand. And this year we got 450. Right. We could squeak it out. I don't like squeaking it out.
I don't either, but I don't think we're going to have to.
Well, I know. So where I'm at then, when I go down to the 11th, excuse me, when you drop the line below economic development, right? Surplus. yeah there's two million a million nine million 981 in revenue coming in you guys have kept your budget at a million 265 good number right so we we are uh you know 792 000 uh surplus which is great okay and then that puts us up to 2.3 million cash reserve balance at the end of 2020. well i think it could even
Because their prediction is to this year, right now, if we keep going the way we're going, their prediction is that we'll have 362,000 left over at the end of the year.
I know. I know.
It's not enough, but it helps. Give us a moment. All right. So what we're saying is that, first of all, Julie's office, please move the 405. into the health fund. This makes this now the number it should be.
So in essence right now the cash balance setting in that fund is $1,455,000. All right. We're getting ready to add.
So here the $700,000 from that you put in the budget this year that's set in an economic development, which you've married it with the 405 for your number. We're saying it could probably stay in economic development this year because it's there, it's sitting there. If Sky Falls cash is there, but next year add it with this money. Because you're right here, this million dollars, everything that you're doing here, you haven't even touched this. This was your carryover.
This is great. It's highly unlikely that we're going to have $800,000 worth of... Let me ask you this, okay?
Because after today's meeting, you know, my trust level It was down here and then now it's moved up. It's like a scale back here. It's like a scale. A movable scale. Because what you have done today is you've demonstrated that you have put an enormous amount of time and energy into the research. You're paying attention to detail.
I want to just give some kudos to the commissioner's office and the PAC for working on the policy and doing some tightening up on some things and are still looking at tightening up some things that I think hopefully will help benefits all together. Do you agree with that statement? Absolutely.
So if you could promise that the money that we're going to leave in the economic development fund it's going to roll back up into the you all don't have an ulterior motive You're looking to spend that money on, you want to buy everybody in the county a widget.
So here's an alternative.
If all you're doing is going to escrow the money in there and leave it there and let it sit in the economic development fund, fine.
Actually, I would like to do one better than that. Because our conversation was, why don't we basically take this $700,000 and put it in the rainy day fund?
Because, now Jim, before you blow your gasket, if you put it in the Rainy Day Fund, you can, you guys have a goal. You're, right? You're, what, 2.5 million you want in Rainy Day?
Let me go back. This is a disclosure. I've told this to council. I've been very forthright with this. I'm going to continue to be forthright. As a county councilman, as a resident of Brown County who pays my fair share of taxes as this county, I have a ratio, 90-50 rule. 90 is I would love to see us, maybe it's wishful thinking, but our disbursements, if we could ever get our disbursements to never exceed 90% of our receipts, number one.
I think we're well on the way to that.
Number two, if we could hit that target, and then we could, and I'm not talking about all funds, I'm talking about there's about a half. The big ones. The big ones, right. If we can get those cash reserves to 50% of the revenue, right? Absolutely. So basically six months, right? But we can't hit that 50% target until we can hit that 90% target, right? If we can do that, the idea is we've got to build the rainy day fund because in January 1 of 2031, there's no debt in this county. And I would love for us to be able to pay cash for cars, for capital improvements, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Because what I don't want to see have happen is I don't want to, I strongly object, when I found out, when Greg Garitas came in here, the 24-25 budget, And throughout, they term levy stabilization. And when I found out what they meant by levy stabilization, my blood pressure went up and I wanted to just scream and yell. Because for those out there in YouTube land that are watching this video, basically levy stabilization, all that means is hey, my pickup truck's getting almost paid off. I don't have any warranty on it, so I'll go ahead and buy me another pickup truck and try to keep my payments the same. Government does the same thing because they don't want the taxpayers' taxes to go down because if their tax levies go down and they don't have to pay back a million dollars a year like we're paying right now for that $4 million four-year general bond, right, because if that bond gets paid off, the way advisors love to come in and prey on the municipalities because that's big fee money. Barnes and Thornburg and financial advisors, I mean, they're making big money for doing, you know, simple bond issues that, you know, a $6 million bond issue, I mean, it's like, who cares, right? Well, they're doing a subpoenaed tax form every year that we paid $3,000 for last year. So, to me, is if we can put our heads together, shore up the cash reserves, get some money in the rainy day without depleting our, we gotta be careful on the general, we can get by the general fund this year, because we got a little over four million dollars in there, but we gotta look at that general fund cash reserve balance at the end of this year, right? And hopefully it stays around that four million dollar number. That's where my focus is, and that's where I see my role and responsibility as a county councilman is kind of big picture. I need to be thinking about 2030, 2031, 2032. The downside of you guys being in the commissioner's office is you guys are very reactive because you don't have any choice. They're trying to be extremely proactive to look at how do we manage this thing.
That's why we need that other person.
That's right.
I want you to circle where you want us to combine and go. But what we've not seen is the asset management plan. So there's kind of this big kind of expense that we are not seeing in any of these budgets. And that's a big number, I'm anticipating. So we've got to kind of brace for that too, right? There's kind of another challenge that we're not
you know, and I'm gonna look at you and I'm gonna look at you because my assumption is one one of 27, you know, hopefully you'll find yourself in a new position in the county. But I'm gonna tell you this right now, whether I make it through November or I don't, uh, I'm gonna jump up and yell and scream bloody murder. if anyone rolls into this county and gets elected and comes out and says, by God, we need to go out and spend $15 million and build us a new, I don't know, fill in the blank. Because, well, what scares me is when that bond with the law enforcement centers paid off, right? We've had conversations in the past about wanting to build brand new what was it called, wasn't a courthouse, it was gonna be a brand new government administrative center. No, it wasn't a justice center, it was to replace the courthouse, we wouldn't take the courthouse. into a strip mall and have shops in there. And we were gonna build a new government, a big. New justice. Yeah, that's in the past. Yeah, courthouse, blah, blah, blah. Yeah, they were talking what, $10,000,000?
and it's a there's a lot going on there it's not just the long bail route okay we have that let's get into that so right now that's where we want to go we want 2.5 million we may need to adjust that by 200,000 is where my prediction is yeah where are we gonna pull the other 600 grand out of well you gotta remember you're functioning right now just off of your department monies yes you haven't touched this right cash i've got 800 000 when julie moves this up here i'm going to have 800 000 just to get to the end of the year that's great and they're projecting that we have a surplus of 386 000 by the end of this year so it's not but but it's moving down
Well, the surplus plus the... But again, that rolls over into your... Again, if that is hit, that rolls over into your cash balance.
So you get $300,000 in January.
So here I have $1,000,000 and then here I have this. This is what we're gathering for $27,000.
Let's get back to cash balance January 1. It's 9 plus the surplus.
Assume that we're not going to touch any dollars that was the cash balance carried forward for 2026. Again, that's what we're saying. Move this here, that gives us $840,000 to operate between now and the end of December. They're forecasting for us a $386,000 surplus. So if you simply take this number plus that $386,000 Our cash balance in 2027 in the health fund should be around almost 1.4 million. Not 300, it's 1.3.
And we budgeted 1.9.
And we budgeted 1.9.
So we'll have it. Do you see it? And you're going to have even more. You'll have more than 2.5.
And what we are saying, and so again, I, again, and that is still, again, this number here includes the $405,000 from Lit. It includes the $1.1 million. Actually, this is economic development. This is economic development. I'll get to 1.9 right here. I know where that's coming from. Gotcha. So, our comment would be, and that's why the proposal would be is, again, and I'm not an expert on 4700 fund, but if I take and dump this in to here, into this fund, can I get it back?
No. Okay, wait a minute. I'm getting lost on your math. So what you're forecasting at the end of this year, based on our history of claims and everything this year, that we're gonna be at? 1.4. Three point, I heard you say 386,000 on 12.1. Plus the 960,000. Hang on a minute, hang on a minute. Eric, can you put the other slide up there? I'm gonna think out loud. Okay. Tell me if I'm wrong, so I make sure I get it. 380 grand. Cash reserve balance, 382. There's your 382 cash reserve balance, right?
That's our surplus.
Okay, that's your surplus at the end of this year. Yep, based on the budget. Then we got $1.9 million that we're going to pump in.
And you have $1 million you didn't touch.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Okay, wait a minute. Just let me walk through this. I'm excited. I'm glad.
I'm not very smart.
If I take 382 and 197, that's $2.4 million. Correct. Okay. So I have $2.4 million at the beginning of 2027. Now I have to pay for the claims for all of 2027. Yeah. And we don't know what those claims are going to be.
Okay, but you're forgetting the point that when we go in at $2.5 million.
That's all in.
That's all in. There is no coming back to the county saying, hey, somebody had a catastrophic accident and you have to give us more money. Is that right? Yes, absolutely. We have five spill states in place.
It's between the stop loss that we have in place, the agreement that they have in place that they cannot come back and increase our rates above us.
For a bad year?
For five years.
we just enrolled in we just enrolled in two free programs that that offset the the the risk associated with people would be laser targets okay let's just keep it big picture top down million nine plus the 382 is the 2.4 if our expenses could be 2.4 million in 2027 but what you're saying is Anything above and beyond that, we're not going to have any liability for. However, what that would indicate, though, is at the end of 2027, our cash reserve balance would be zero, is what that would mean. The only thing that would save us is that if we hang on to the 600 grand or whatever it is in the economic development fund, the 700 grand, if we park that 700 grand and you guys were not going to touch that money and that 700,000 in the economic development fund, and we're gonna leave that loan just in case if we end up 12 places. Just in case, just in case, just in case we hit zero cash reserve balance at the end of 27, we can always default back and pull in the economic development funding and push that back over to 47 under the short bank account.
Let me just say something else, shut up.
We have, ever since I've been here, we've had a scarcity mentality. Minus 600,000, minus 580, boom, boom, boom. We planned this year with scarcity mentality. We did. Boom, we got 969,000 there. We don't know what to do with it. We don't even know how to think about it, and they're trying to tell us, hey guys, let's move over here.
Well, Steve, my confusion lies is that we heard that you guys created an ordinance to have a million dollar kush in that pump.
We passed a resolution.
Okay, I can't find it, so if we could get a copy of that, that would be great.
Well, she couldn't find it because it's a resolution, not an ordinance.
So it doesn't get recorded?
No, it would, but she was searching on ordinances.
So yeah, that was our goal.
We set that goal to council. Right, OK.
So keeping this here and working with all these other numbers puts you at your resolution.
Jim, was it $1 million or $2 million? A million. It was only a million. It was a million? OK. Yeah, because remember, at the same time we did it, I think we did a million. $3 million for our rainy day fund. We did $1.5 million also for rainy day. $1.5 million for rainy day? No, $1.5 million. He was $3 million for the rainy day. No, it wasn't $3. No, we didn't do $3. Was it $2 or $1.5? $1.5 or $2. It was $1.5 million for the rainy day and $1 million for the $47 million account.
So going back to our conversation saying keeping in an economic development, here's the reason.
As long as we don't touch it. Don't you guys come in here and go, hey, where's the money?
We want you to move it to rainy day. I can't move it.
We moved it to rainy day. You can get it out.
You can still use it.
You can still use a rainy day. That's where we got the money. It's usually part of the long-term savings, though.
We're at the cusp of you guys being able to get to the goals that you have set for council. It was 2019.
We told everybody it was a rainy day.
That was pre-me, yes, that was a year before I came. That was 2019, everything came out. How much did we pull out?
So Mike, I don't have a problem sticking $700,000 in the rainy day. That put us almost a million in the rainy day.
I feel really good about that. And, Jim, here's the other thing. In 2019, the way that we're putting this was covered by rain. I'm excited. So we're taking $700,000 and putting it back in rainy day.
That's okay with me. But you're saying that what you're saying, you guys are looking at it. Where is all of this coming from?
Would you stop?
Well, again, the needle in the eye is going to be the asset management cost.
Let's finish this conversation and we'll talk about that.
I'm going to punch you after three days.
So what I'm saying and the reason that when we had this conversation is it makes more sense to put it in rainy day because one, it builds the rainy day funds. Two, there are minimal transactions from that. If you try and go down the path of keeping track of what the hell's going on in the economic development, you might as well sit your hair up.
Mr. Commissioners, that rainy day, by the end of 2030, fund that rainy day so that when that general obligation bond is paid back and we're done with that, I do not want to borrow any more short-term capital. We ought to have enough money in that rainy day. It's embarrassing. We ought to have enough in there in cash to cover our capital
Yeah, we've got 40% operating So if you had a million in the rainy day, we're like, you know, right but I keep in mind Scott Let's let's be real.
We're looking for million County, you know, if you look at vermelian county They said over there on the west side of the state. I mean, they're north of Terre Haute a little bit They don't have squat. Well, okay, but you go look at their AFR on the gateway that little county. They're doing a good job So we ought to have we ought to have five million in the rainy day fund. We ought to be at 50% cash reserve. If we had $5 million in the rainy day fund, had another say $10,000, $5,000, $2 million sitting in the $4,700 account, and all the primary funds were sitting in 50% cash reserve balances, then we'd be cush. We'd be sitting good. We would.
So let's go 10 in the rainy day and say there's one option.
There's one option. So the other is to... Yeah, just let this play out. We're not going to know until the last quarter of the year.
Let's pay attention to it.
We have to. We have to. And keeping in mind that you have not touched any of your other cash funds. You have Riverboat. That's very healthy. You haven't touched it. You have opioid restricted and unrestricted monies that we haven't touched. We have things.
I don't want to save our money.
We are saving. That's what I'm saying. We're saving.
The next challenge here, everyone, everyone in the room and the YouTube lab, is we've got to, and I'm assuming, Darren, we have a special session meeting next Thursday at 9 a.m. Yep. And I'm assuming that we're going to spend that time talking about the factor evaluation compensation schedule.
I thought we were going to do that this evening.
I don't have the energy to do that. What? There's no way.
Come on.
It's not even dark out yet. Let's get back to the game. Can I have the fans for a second?
No, you've talked too much. Yes, please. Take over. When I first got this position, these two groups were so adversarial. I couldn't. We couldn't even talk to Jim. And Jim and I at one point said, we ought to find a way to get our groups
Well, and we would like to keep at the end of the year We would like to come back to you and have anything over 50% That's left in our funds to talk to you about putting that in rainy day possibly I mean if your focus is on rainy day and building that fund our office can definitely Our goal is to fill that like we've said and the health fund but the asset management is a big question and bridges
So the last item and again to quell concerns with regards to capital asset planning. So Dan Cartwright, I asked him to go through and we didn't put numbers to this, but the numbers, the information he's given me, I believe we can achieve these changes in combination with bond activity and our buildings and our maintenance activities that we've asked money for and funded to. Okay. So the following items we look at as commissioners in 2027, as far as activities that take place, replace the windows in the south and west exit doors of the courthouse. Repair or replace the sidewalk and steps across 130 State Road 135 at the courthouse. We own that, folks. Sorry.
We own it, and it is an NDOT nightmare.
Yes, sir. Which one is that? And it looks like crap. It's dangerous.
No, when you're driving right in front of Hard Truth there, those weird steps. In front of the courthouse. It's the parade area. Yeah, okay.
It looks a little like a piano. No, it's the horses, wouldn't it? So the annex building in and of itself, ADA compliance has not been on our top of the list. Dan's been saying you guys need to become compliant with ADA. So ADA operators on north and south doors of the annex building. We're looking at basically what it's going to take to remove the temporary and portable storage buildings here in the north parking lot. Are going to look at and he's working on now and it depends on what we can fit it in this year or not a generator For this freaking building. Yes Out there with that building is that The other thing that we have is since we have so much forespace and we have a lack of meeting space in this building and no availability to have sit down and have conversations with vendors or other parties or we will look to go and approach and renovate the second floor in this building in and of itself. So we can reset the office space, potentially look at moving IT out of that area, give some conference room space down on the first floor, build conference room space and availability for the council as far as office space for working in this building. Law enforcement center. Law enforcement center is ADA compliance with regards to the operation of the entry door to the jail. Clean up the basement storage. So we are looking at, and I don't know where you are on this, but I do not. I don't care how cheap it is to build a freaking basement space. I do not want to spend money building basement space to keep records and storage. So I am going to adamantly, adamantly, request that you really consider helping the other elected officials when they come to you and talk about digitization. And it's on that man's plate right there as well.
That's why I said change is hard, but we have to suck it up. We're paper crazy.
Keep going. I build a new post frame storage at the maintenance garage. Now, that is being considered for the potential storage of the clerk's election equipment because it needs a secure environment. It now sits in the jail. It needs to be moved. It has already been put at risk twice.
What are we talking about?
So there is a maintenance building that stands to the west side of the law enforcement center.
Number three, right here.
Oh, we don't have that.
You don't have that. Oh. So LEC, that maintenance building.
Yeah, we don't have that. You want to do what with it? Potentially building a, basically a maintenance, adding onto the maintenance garage area. Adding space to that facility. Yeah. Okay. One of the key things that's been coming up with Dan continually looking at this evaluation is replacing the water valves behind the cell pods in the jail. Repairing the parking lot on the north and west side of the jail so drainage will be adequate. Right now we have anywhere from three to four inches of standing water in front of the EMS building because we did not do a good job.
That needs to be fixed.
We're replacing the fire suppression system for IT in the IT room and the law enforcement center. Right now, the only suppression system that we have is water. If we put water on digital equipment, what's going to happen? We're going to end up replacing anywhere from $100,000 to $175,000 in equipment.
So are you going to do like a halon system?
That is what he is going to be working on. We are going to be looking at a gas-operated system for that. Replace siding on the Parks and Veterans office building. ADA on the north and south entrances of the Parks and Rec building. ADA modifications to the public restrooms in Parks and Recreation. Prosecutor's office. Again, this covers under the fund and some of these in the bond activity as well, because I can share your sentiments, Mr. Kemp. I would love to be able to look at a $900,000 item left over and say, bang, bang, bang, bang. We have this, we have this, we have this. One of those things I would like to have that considered for is the courthouse windows, which we believe is about a quarter of a million dollars. Which one considered for what? Looking at, once we get the prosecutor's office set as far as that guaranteed maximum price, we can then go and move forward with Addressing the project of replacing the windows at the courthouse, and I believe we should do that under the bond. Demolition or find use for an existing office. We've had countless conversations as to what to do with the prosecutor's office that exists today. One of the things that we are seriously considering is actually turning it into a record storage area for the courthouse.
Not just the courthouse?
Not just the courthouse, but others. But it would be that main part.
Wouldn't that be cool? I think that's a good idea.
Not building basements.
Use it, secure it. If you can secure it.
If you can secure it. Record storage that we have to keep for a period of time, then move it on.
It's going to end up being paper storage. For example, the clerk's office has indefinite storage on certain records. You're right. That would be where that has to go. Anything that's a murder trial, anything that is a special case. Covered bridge repairs. So this is the area where we want to get creative with that. We have a healthy balance in the covered bridge. So we're looking at guard rails, removing the graffiti on the inside wall, approach ramps and things of that nature there.
Repair the drainage.
No, that's what's appropriated.
That's not the cash balance So I've already had a conversation with Kevin often These are things that I would basically like to consider and I'm putting my creative hat on the thing.
We can do a matching if we look at the grant process as it relates to the cover bridge. One of the things that I would like to see at the cover bridge is there's a continual point is there's no access to that bridge for anybody who wants to visit it. There are continual complaints about people parking in the yards and having people walking across the bridge. Right? So that's just mindset and framework. Wait, what's the solution to that? In essence, I would sit there and say we would basically acquire rights to property and potentially build a small parking area. What covered bridge have you lost?
We have a covered bridge. We get money from the state to maintain it.
So we have a meeting next week
We have a meeting with one company I couldn't get anybody to even give me quotes on the roof for that because it's the shake So we've got a I've got one quote to redo the chinking from What's that gentleman's name over there Pete? Yeah, he has a friend they they gave us a quote to do the chinking and I have this company coming in, we're having a meeting with them to talk about the roof and the chinking. Yeah, so then that was another area where I thought maybe at this point in time We can look at this as being in keepers funds because again, that is a tourism activity I pulled up the National Registry on so on the National Registry they have the jail the Gathering House and the courthouse is one unit and So I have all that paperwork and all of that documentation of what needs to be done What can be done and what don't do so if anybody wants to see that that's available and we are working with the Working with them on some cleanup projects. We're getting ready to take out some trees clean up some trees. We've taken down the fence. We've asked for Project over there
No prices. These are great. I thought I heard you say all these in 27, which I can't I mess up mister That is our plan is looking at those.
I don't think these are 27.
Some of them is 26
With what money?
It's going to be a combination of bond, once we establish what the prosecutor's office is, it's going to be the maintenance and the buildings fund, and it is going to then be working with CDC with regards to those aspects of where we have tourism and where we can either do matching or where they feel like they can step in and take on that project.
Okay, so you're not, I mean, and this is just a rough ballpark, you're not anticipating meeting with him? Yeah, and then and we've got our asset policy and
So we haven't passed it yet, but we're in the final draft. So we do have our asset policy And we have our asset database So we are currently Stacy's got the vehicles well under control and now we're working on land because our land assets are All over the place And Bev has been provided me with a lot of good data. So we're researching all that and working with them well This was a fun part of our hearing, but it was not terrible.
It was very productive. And better than normal. So, I mean, Kevin and Teresa, I appreciate kind of the way you approached this. I mean, it just is a nice, to Joel's point, I mean, there's a nice shift in the way we're working together and communicating and let's keep it up. Yes. And with that,
You guys are good. Thank you. Well done.
Good job. And we will come back to you with a corner.
Thank you.
Good job. Kevin, take the rest of the night off. Just go ahead and take the rest of it off.
Julie, do you need anything? Do I need anything? Food? Sleep? Yeah. Okay, now everybody has to hang out until I get the rest of the spreadsheet filled out.
If we lose the quorum, we can't keep meeting y'all in here.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.