Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Hello. We will hold a meeting of the City Planning Committee on September 16, 2026. The main purpose of today's meeting is to hold a study meeting on the process regulation amendment of various parts of the BOSEL draft and to hold a study meeting on the comprehensive planning update and the planning update of the urban sub-district in 2026. Before moving on to the case, we will let you know that this meeting will be conducted in a hybrid way that combines meetings and online meetings. BOSELC will provide you with an option to attend this meeting directly or to attend in person through Zoom. Those who participate in Zoom cannot use the chat and question function for public meeting rules. There is a citizen opinion hearing at the beginning of the meeting. All opinions are limited to three minutes. Please keep in mind the points when you make a statement because Bosel City does not tolerate language violence. Citizen opinion hearing is possible through face-to-face and Zoom. If you want to make a statement through Zoom, please submit the online form by 3 p.m. today. If you want to submit a written opinion, please submit it by 3 p.m. E-mail submission is also recommended, and we will send it to you after registration. Those who participated can also suggest opinions, and those who want to participate, please mark it on the list of participants. Imagine Bossel notice, city website, and information on how to submit opinions on today's meeting are all guided. This meeting video is streamed in real time and can be viewed again on the official YouTube channel of the city after the recording. You can also call the meeting through the phone number listed in the meeting case. For those who want to participate in the call, the employees will clearly guide you through the reference data. Now I will introduce the members who have attended. Canon, please. Morales, please. Mr. Wester Baek, please enter. Mr.

Lever, please enter. Mr. Solz, please enter. Please enter. And Mr. Gustafsson, please enter. Thank you. Also, today's meeting was attended by Christian Gates, a member of the regional development department, Katie Fossler, a senior city planner, Cameron Colvin, a senior city planner, Steve Morikawa, a public business manager, and Juliana Dixon, a senior city planner for Trump. Lastly, before we start the meeting, I will once again tell you the guidelines for some meetings. All attendees, please speak clearly and please stop often. Please always reveal your name before you speak. If you don't speak, please mute your microphone. If you use real-time video streaming, please turn off the sound as video delays may occur. In the middle of the presentation, I will nominate those who want to speak or ask questions. If you want to speak, please raise your hand. I will nominate in the order I nominate. This is to prevent the two of you from speaking at the same time. Please let me know who you are before you submit, submit, or participate in the debate. Please mute the microphone when you don't speak. The first case is a public speech on general matters unrelated to the public hearing. The city received the visitor's opinion in writing, and the application for those who hope to speak at the evening meeting was also received. The speech time is 3 minutes. The public opinion was submitted to the employee in charge by 3 p.m. today, and it was delivered to all members and included in the meeting log. If there is anyone who wants to speak through Zoom, please call one by one and speak for up to three minutes. Is there anyone who wants to speak through Zoom?

There is no one on the scene.

There is no one on Zoom either. All right. Then we'll move on to the next case. This is the approval of the September 2 meeting. Is there anything to be corrected in the meeting log? I don't think so. Yes. There is no correction. Is the meeting log approved as it is written? Christian, do you need to vote for this? Yes. Do you agree with the meeting log approval? Solz, I agree with the meeting log approval. Thank you. Is there anyone who re-enters?

Mr. Westberg, I agree with the approval of the meeting. I'm sorry. It's okay. I'm on vacation, so I'll check again soon.

Yes, there was no discussion or correction request, so is there anyone who would like to make a final comment? Is there anyone? All right. If you agree, please say me. I agree, too. If you disagree, please say no. Did you just say me? Mr. Sara. Mr. Grocetet. Yes, you just said me. All right. Then the meeting log is approved as it is written. All right, let's move on to the public hearing. Before we start the public hearing, to hear from the local residents, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, Hello, members of the committee. I am KT Fossler. Today, I will announce the 11th, 12th, and 14th procedures that will affect the Bo-Sel City Registration. Today, the Board of Directors is going to review two cases. The first is to hold a public hearing, and the second is to review the limited investigation results, conclusions, and recommendations, and to approve, modify, approve, or deny. To briefly explain this procedure, the procedure is a framework that shows the process that is carried out throughout the system from the first submission of the development review application to the announcement, employee review, and public hearing. Today, the purpose of this procedure is to clarify and simplify the procedure, and to eliminate or duplicate trends that fall behind the times, and to adjust the procedure to the current rules and laws. Last February, May, and two weeks ago, we held a meeting with the Board of Directors. We met with the City Council and reviewed the proposed proposal proposal and adopted both sides' opinions. I will briefly explain how the previous opinions were reflected in this proposal. First, we decided to maintain the process of the City Council and the Council of Directors. You will remember that there was an offer to reduce the public hearing to two to one. The opinion obtained through discussions with the City Planning Committee, the Judiciary Committee, and the Legal Team is that it is good to maintain all opportunities to receive opinions from the public hearing and not make two different procedures for the draft resolution and the city planning resolution. Therefore, we decided to maintain this part as it is. Second, it clearly stated that the development requirements for each stage of multi-generation housing density are applied to large-scale or step-by-step development projects, not small-scale projects. Third, we added an extension process by shortening the 90-day correction response period for the application to 181 to 91. We made it possible to extend if necessary. Finally, we made it clear that the Judiciary Committee is in favor of the change in certain subordinates, and the final decision is in the House of Representatives. We divided the proposed amendment into three categories in order of importance. The first is to organize the smallest change from the biggest change in order to the largest change. The second is to improve the existing procedures and maintain the purpose of the policy. The third is a major change in policy changes, regulations, and decision-making processes. Let's take a look at the proposed amendments that we discussed earlier. Please let me know if you want me to explain in detail by slide. We also discussed the project permit system stated in the 11.04 of the BOSEL era. This amendment updates the permit classification, changing the non-specialization change from the existing 5-type to the 4-A type, adding specific 2-type measures, including deleting non-used 4-B type permits. Therefore, if there is a change of purpose, it will be changed to 4a in the existing 5-type legislation and the final decision will be made after the evaluation of the judge, not the planning committee. In relation to the second step, we are planning to proceed with an administrative approval process by adding independent SAPA review and public institutions and utility exceptions to the second step. Currently, independent SAPA is already being processed in the second step, and public institutions and utility exceptions are very similar to reasonable use exceptions, and this is also being processed in the second step. Next is the approval process, which corresponds to administrative improvements. The changes, which are stated in 1106 and 1110, contain the content of shortening the period from 180 days to 90 days for the applicant to submit an answer to the opinion. However, we will prepare an extension process for projects that need additional time and set standards so that the period of 90 days can be applied to other cities in the area. Next is the accounting procedure, which is a detailed change. The accounting procedure is standardized so that the City Planning Committee can hold the City Planning Committee before submitting all the proposals to the City Council. In the case of the existing measure, the City Planning Committee omitted the City Planning Committee procedure and used the final decision-making method at the City Council. So, we are standardizing the process for all code accounting. Next is the announcement related information. This belongs to the improvement crime and updates the announcement requirements in Code 11.18 and deletes the selected announcement method that falls behind the times. The selected announcement method should not be included in the code, so the standard requirements are available, so we want to delete this part to improve the consistency of the code as a whole. In addition, detailed information including website address and phone number is also being updated. Next is the regulation for each stage of multi-generation housing density. This is also part of the improvement crime, and the low-density stage is recommended until the high-density stage is completed. For example, let's assume that there is a project with two types of density, such as apartments and townhouses. In this case, the low-density stage until the high-density stage is completely completed, and the townhouse above the townhouse is limited to at least 50% to up to 50%. Therefore, it is to check whether the code is satisfied with the minimum density requirements stated in the code by the comprehensive plan of 2024. Next is the plan review, which is an administrative change. This is to update the relevant conditions to maintain consistency with the important region standard, unit registration division, and parking permit. This is to ensure that the corresponding part of the code maintains consistency with other conditions. There is a requirement that the important area must be marked within 300 feet of the important area in the sub-area. Therefore, the area of the sub-area plan will be marked in conjunction with the sub-area plan review. However, there is no need to go through the sub-area plan review because the written division will go through the division process. Therefore, this clearly states that it is a exemption, and the minimum parking space requirement of the code is no longer there, so the requirement to mark the number of parking spaces is also deleted. This is the last main policy change. According to the 12.34 Act of the Bo-Sel-Si-Jol, a specific sub-district re-localization and a separate sub-district re-localization are divided, and a specific sub-district re-localization is approved by the judge to make the final decision, and two types of re-localization standards are set separately. A specific sub-region designation generally starts with the applicant, including one or several notes. The entire region sub-region designation starts with the general plan modification in the city, which means that a significant part of the city or the entire region is changed for use. The reason for separating these two is because the specific sub-region designation is a legal procedure that judges can review according to the law. The judge reviewed the existing criteria and conducted a public hearing. I was trained to apply the principle of fairness. Therefore, this responsibility is entrusted to the judge. The hearing maintains final decision in the non-public hearing. And we're not trying to change the legislation. The relevant case will still be held in the City Planning Committee and the City Council. Next is the TIPA, which is related to the City Planning Act. This is stated in Code Section 142,250 as an administrative summary. This section clarifies the case in which an administrative amendment can be applied to the SEPA, the Environmental Protection Act decision, and the application of an amendment according to the law. In the existing Code, it was modified because it was not clear that an administrative amendment could be applied and that it should be returned to the Growth Management Commission. Next are public institutions and public facilities exceptions. In this section, these exceptions are redefined as type 2 applications. Currently, the code requires the approval of the trustee, but this is very similar to a reasonable use exception. The main difference is who is asking for a relief for an important area or a complete area. In the case of public institutions and public facilities, public institutions ask for a relief, but in the case of a reasonable use exception, the owner of the land asks for it. Since the two application types are very similar, it is recommended to follow the same approval procedure. Next, I will explain in more detail what I did not cover in the last video. In the current order, the anti-fraud resistance is scattered in several resistance groups. We are trying to increase the flexibility by combining these resistance groups in 11.14. Next is the resumption, but additional public records can be included in the current request. Although resumption does not often occur, for example, when a judge makes a decision to apply for a three-type application such as a conditional use permit, the applicant can request a resumption or submit a resumption application. And then the judge can refuse to make a decision, modify it, or submit a written opinion. Currently, there are provisions that allow public records to be added to the regulation. The reason why we want to delete these provisions is because public records are limited to one for the application of business permission, such as a conditional use permit, according to the law. Currently, the regulations have the option to hold one more public record hearing. We are trying to allow only one public hearing to be held. In addition, this re-evaluation is to allow the judge to modify the decision, not to restart the process of the public record hearing. Therefore, the right to refuse re-election, correct original decision, or submit additional written opinion remains the same. In other words, there is still a chance for relevant parties to present their opinions or request them. As a result, this clause prevents repeated public record hearings and provides more efficient procedures for applicants by following the law. Next is a guide on how to get project approval, which I didn't mention today. This is a simple summary. Some code sections will be changed through the revision I mentioned. Therefore, some of the existing code references are no longer used. For example, we are going to delete the reference related to the optional public request, and we were referring to the relevant reference in other parts of the existing code. We plan to delete these parts as well. This is to remove interrelationship that is no longer used in the code and maintain consistency between other code sections. There are no replacement changes and it is simply a cleanup. Now, we will start the public hearing. Thank you.

Now that the presentation is over, we will start the public hearing to hear from the residents of the area. I can't see anyone on the scene. Is there anyone who has logged in via Zoom? There are no residents waiting. Yes, I understand.

We will end the public hearing when there are no opinions.

Now, it's time to review the results of the investigation of the planning committee on this matter. Members, do you have any suggestions for correction, discussion, or changes to the results, conclusions, and recommendations? Mr. Morales. Mr. Morales, I have a question about the change in the position. What exactly is it? Is it a change for a specific position? Yes, it is a change for a specific position.

What changes are there in the process of appeal?

The appeal process is a 4A type of action, so there is no opportunity to appeal. Therefore, depending on the situation, it will be transferred to the L.U.P.A. . Some people are still scrolling or expanding to review their opinions. I'll give you a few more seconds. Yes. Yes, I understand. Since all the opinions have been completed, would you agree to approve the conclusion and recommendations? Yes, I'm Member Kai Rinen.

I suggest that we approve the conclusion and recommendations of the survey results submitted by us. All right. Is there anyone who agrees?

If there is anyone who agrees, please tell me. I will agree. Thank you. Yes. Are there any additional opinions or comments from the audience? Is there any? All right. Then, as the investigation results, conclusions, and recommendations are presented, a case of approval has been issued, and if you agree, please say that you agree. It seems to be a perfect match. Good. Since the case has been approved, we will move on to the next case. Thank you so much for your presentation today. I look forward to the next presentation. We will wait for the research meeting announcement for the general plan update in 2026. Thank you. Hello. I am Kitty Forsler. I am standing here to announce the general plan update that started today in 2026. There is no reason for you to be drunk tonight. We are planning to hold a research meeting to review the expected changes included in this year's general plan revision. There are two types of modifications. The first is a regular update, which is a full review of the overall plan and development regulations every 10 years. This depends on the law, and it can include large-scale use changes. For example, the work completed in 2024 is equivalent to this. The second is the annual update, which is an annual revision of the comprehensive plan, and generally includes small changes in size. In 2025, the annual update was carried out in terms of land use elements to increase the number of medium-sized homes allowed in low-income residential areas and residential preservation areas, and the annual update was limited to the same content in 2026. These amendments are divided into three categories. The first is a summary or consistent item for the clarification, modification or update of existing provisions. The second is a small-scale policy change to limit policy changes, and finally, there is a major policy change. These changes are actual changes to policy or lower areas. The first is the summary report element, and there are two summary items here. to update the growth status of the entire center of downtown county. The King County Growth Management Plan Committee will vote today to determine whether downtown will be designated as the center of the entire county. Therefore, if it is approved, the status will be updated. Currently, the regulations only indicate that downtown is a candidate for the center of the entire county, so it is necessary to update it. In addition, this summary report's urban development management plan, the climate action plan, and the house action plan that is expected to be adopted soon. Since there is a list of plans used to build and support comprehensive plans, these plans are added to the list. Next is the land use factor, and there are a few clarifications here as well. The first is similar to the content related to the economic activity center mentioned earlier. So we are going to update the exhibition to correct the boundary of the entire growth center of the county in the urban area. Recently, the boundary of the entire growth center of the urban county has been changed, so we plan to update the boundary as soon as it is approved. Next, there is still a red curve-related sign that refers to Midtown in some areas, This has been changed according to the comprehensive plan. Therefore, we want to modify all of these marks and accurately mark them as Midtown. And we are planning to add the activity center area to the area designated as a mixed-use area. The mixed-use area seems to have fallen from the designated area, but it actually matches the designated area well. Therefore, we will add it to the designated area. Lastly, the main policy change is to integrate the four designated areas of the urban area, the urban center, the urban transition area, the urban gate area, and the urban green area into one. All four of these areas will be named as urban areas. Next, the urban line rise valley view area will be re-selected as a medium-sized residential area. The two areas are very similar, so we are trying to avoid repeated land use. If I show you the map, you will be able to understand it better. On the left, there are the current and future land use maps, and there are parts marked in pink. All of these areas are planned to be integrated into the orange on the right. This is the future land use map of the city. As I mentioned earlier, the city center, the city transition area, the city clean area, and the city gate area are all included. The reason why these four regions are integrated is to simplify the future land use map. Currently, there is no plan to change the use area, so the existing use area remains the same. However, it is the use area's responsibility to reflect the characteristics of each region and adjust the regulations. In addition, these integrations provide flexibility for future development, so that there is no need to modify the comprehensive plan again when the development plan is changed. Please bear in mind that the comprehensive plan is close to the guidelines or comprehensive documents, and the future land use map does not necessarily have to be the same as the regional map. This is why we suggest these changes, and it is similar to other cities. Kirkland and Redmond also have a very similar future land use map. Next is the housing sector. These small policy changes are derived from the housing implementation plan. We clearly want to make it clear that low-income households must receive less than 80% of the regional middle-income income. In addition, we emphasize the long-term preservation of low-income households rather than the limited period of 50 years. Next is the Social Welfare Department. This is a summary work that reflects the demand evaluation and strategic planning completion in 2024. Next is the economic development section. Here, we refer to the 2025 economic vitality plan adopted and suggest minor policy changes related to the vitality plan. So, one of them is to focus on the connected campus that supports the town of Bokhabyong and supports the retail business. Next is the park, land and recreation element, that is, the advantage element. Some of the summary items are related to the 2026 advantage plan that you know well. The comprehensive planning element is It is a role to propose goals and policies, and the 2026 advantage plan is to analyze the park and greenland of the city, and to establish priority and strategy. Also, according to the 2026 advantage plan, we are updating the park list, required items, and priority ranking. And we replace one of the maps of the relevant elements itself. The new vote from the advantage plan clearly explains the use of time and non-use. So it includes this vote. Also, since there is a 2026 advantage plan, some old information related to the 2020 advantage plan will be deleted. And there are some policy changes from the PROS plan in 2026. This includes the availability of indoor recreation facilities that can be used year-round, the expansion of recreation partnerships with schools and other institutions, and the flexibility of future trail connections related to existing main golf courses. The existing policy is somewhat specific about the location of the trail connection, so it is being modified to ensure more flexibility. Next is the natural environment and climate factors. Since the changes are very similar, I mentioned the two together. We would like to reflect the climate action plan and the urban forest management plan completed and adopted by the city. We are also planning to update the water supply and rainwater gas and climate information. For example, the current comprehensive plan of water supply and rainwater is based on the 2016 analysis. We will include the information as we carried out the analysis in 2025. And we are planning to designate the Hose Creek as a hot spring for fishing. According to the new important regional information and report, the area will appear as a fishing spot, and we want to update the current situation. We are also adjusting the policy according to the adopted urban agriculture management plan and climate action plan. In particular, we are planning to strengthen the water and rain relief policy. There was a goal to achieve a 46% increase in water pollution by 2045, and based on this, the policy was strengthened and the goal of the climate action plan, that is, to achieve the goal of zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, to adjust the greenhouse gas reduction policy. Next is traffic-related information. We will discuss it in more detail tonight, but this is a major policy issue, and whether the urban area project list will remain or change, and this may affect funding support. Therefore, I said that there is a possibility that the traffic-related technology block will be revised. In the capital facility element, we would like to update the contents of the park and recreation related to the part that is currently written based on the 2020 plan according to the PROS plan in 2026. Utility elements reflect the new information of utility companies that provide CL services, focusing on improving and organizing the relationship of facts. For example, Fuse Sound Energy, Forget Sound Energy will update the long-term planning information and reflect the fact that it will be converted into a new integrated system plan in 2027. Snow Home EC County Public Business Group, Snow Home EC County POD will provide power supply by 2045. We will update the energy savings and expected demand information, and we will also reflect the content of the new contract with BPA by 2045. In addition, we will reflect the content of the new contract by 2035, which is a high-end waste management company of the city, Recology. There are implementation elements at the end of the comprehensive plan, and here are various strategy lists for each element. We do not plan to change the strategy, We would like to inform you of the completed business and the business that is still in progress by updating the progress situation through the public hearing. And the main policy change I mentioned earlier is the urban area development plan. This is to update the city's urban vision for the next 20 years, and I will tell you more about this tonight. The next stage of the year-round comprehensive plan revision in 2026 is to hold a city planning committee meeting on October 21 and have a discussion and research meeting on October 27. After that, the survey results from the city planning committee on November 4 will be announced and a resolution and recommendation will be issued, and a discussion and discussion meeting on November 17 will be held and finally adopted on December 8. I will end my presentation with this. Again, we don't need any special measures tonight. However, I was going to provide you with an estimate for the fiscal year of 2026. Thank you for your presentation. Do you have any questions? Yes. Thank you very much for both of you for your presentation. You gave me a chance to think a lot. Now, shall we start the second research meeting this evening? Let's summarize the update of the urban sub-district plan. First, I will start with the presentation of the senior planning manager, Mr. Colvin, and the director of the Public Business Department, Mr. Steve Morikawa.

Hello, members of the planning committee. I'm Cameron Colvin, the long-term planning officer for the pre-employment. Tonight, I'm with Jillian Dixon-Crump, the pre-employment planning officer for the public business department. As I said, we will take a closer look at the update of the urban sub-district plan after the research meeting, and discuss in more detail how the urban public space network and traffic network interact. Then, let's share the screen. It's going well. First, let's start with a simple update on the project progress. After the last research meeting, we announced the draft proposal for public review, and we gathered the opinions of the local community through various participation channels to be explained in the next slide. and combined the collected opinions to strengthen the draft. Like the climate action plan, the users were able to leave their opinions directly on each page of the plan using the Engage Bossel and Conveyor platform. The meeting period was held for about a month and a half from mid-July to the end of August. through social media, media outlets, and offline events. During that time, a total of 579 people visited the site, and a total of 15 opinions were left by 11 participants, including re-visit. I printed out the opinions in today's evening's meeting and submitted them. In addition, various opinions submitted through e-mail are also included in the data. On July 22, a face-to-face public explanation meeting was held, and 34 people attended. The main purpose of this explanation meeting was to provide an opportunity for local residents to find out more about the plan, ask questions, and communicate directly with the employees. regional development, transportation, park and recreation, etc. In addition to the online opinion gathering and face-to-face explanation, in August, we held the final meeting of the downtown PR ambassador business group and reviewed the recent update of the plan and the feedback received through the online opinion gathering and public explanation. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. We also met with the D.E.I. advisory committee for diversity, fairness, and inclusiveness. I summarized a few topics that I heard in common in these participation activities that have been carried out during the summer. Overall, there were many similar topics that I heard in the previous participation stage. These topics were classified into five categories of growth and development, transportation, parking and access, regional business support, public space and land, green space, and environmental protection. In relation to growth and development, concerns about the recent development size and speed, the desire to preserve the historical characteristics of the city, parking problems, once again, and the safety of urban travelers were mainly mentioned. In particular, it was important to make it convenient for people to access the city mall, whether they drive, walk, or use other means of transportation. I want to attract more people to the city, so that more people can gather and expand the existing public art works, events, and markets to activate the city. And finally, In addition to the expected growth, it was emphasized that we want to continue to protect the natural resources of the city and maintain the approachability of nature as a key element of the city. Based on these opinions, we reviewed the plan and corrected a few key points. The main change was to simplify the existing situation and only leave the most important content to the public and decision-makers, and to effectively convey information using better graphics, maps, and photos. In addition, we redesigned the strategy and implementation plan for the seven goals you developed together last year, and these goals are well in line with the topic area we focused on. So, it wasn't such a major change, and after that, We reviewed the initial action items to clarify or reflect specific opinions. And we added a new execution section that provides detailed information on how the plan will be implemented through various budget and program of the city. 공공공간과 교통에 대한 보다 구체적인 논의로 들어가기 전에 이와 관련하여 질문이 있으신가요? 현재로서는 질문이 없는 것 같습니다. 알겠습니다. As I mentioned in the last research meeting, we are cooperating with First 40 Feet, a city design consultant, to review various issues to support the urban sub-district planning. One of them is to look at the designated opportunity areas for redevelopment. Also, the functions of the entire city, existing open space networks, and When considering the expected redevelopment, we are also looking at the potential after 20 years. So one of the topics we are reviewing through case studies is the element of creating a successful public space. So we focused our attention on the central space where there was a lot of discussion in Bossel, especially the town square and people can gather. The conditions of a successful town square are well visible and surrounded by lively surroundings and play a central role in the city. In addition, it must be able to support daily activities such as outdoor meals and recreation, as well as planning events, so that it can accept various programs. And we also looked at the pedestrian-centered distance or shared distance. The town square and the pedestrian-centered distance play similar roles, but there are some differences. The pedestrian-centered distance is generally in a linear form, and various activities are distributed along the passage, while the town square is more focused on the center. As I mentioned earlier, both spaces are dependent on a lively surrounding environment. And, especially for pedestrian streets, it is important to provide people with opportunities to stay on both ends of the road and provide them with a variety of outdoor dining and resting spaces to ensure smooth movement along the entire passage. As mentioned earlier, one of the things we looked at in the first 40 feet is what the overall public space network of our city looks like. We know that there are several key assets in the center of the city. For example, there is the Bosel Landing Park, and there are Triangle Junction, City Hall, and Main Street, which are currently in the process of environmental purification and temporary activation. So we wanted to see how we can connect these various spaces and make them function as a unified public space network. So, while reviewing this project and a few successful cases, We found that the EFG area plays an important role in connecting the park and Main Street through further redevelopment and provides a special opportunity to function as the central space of the city in the future. We also reviewed a few ways to improve the pedestrian environment on the road that passes between the city hall and commercial area and leads to the main street. And in the future, when the 3AFG area is redeveloped, We are also considering the possibility of expanding the area dedicated to pedestrians on Main Street to connect the Botel Way, Bossel Way, and the end of the road. This will be of great help for various events in the future. So this is one of the many ideas that we are considering within Triangle Junction in the first 40 feet. In particular, there are a few elements that make us very interested in this idea. One of the most common opinions in conversations with citizens is that they like pop shops. They are also interested in spaces where they can buy more agricultural direct-trade farms and outdoor agricultural products. As you know, the Safeway in downtown closed, so we need more options to buy food. So we reviewed the possibility of creating a future public market. Based on the existing pop shop, it will be able to provide commercial space for businesses and the local market. In addition, this idea provides a central pound square space. Main Street and Bossel Street are secured with outdoor seats, lighting, and space for various programs. And this space can be used as an event venue, and it is aimed to expand to the main street as needed to provide a genuine connection loop. Also, it is an important idea to stimulate people's visual interest in the park to cross Route 522 and take a step to the shops on Main Street. Creating a lively space that stands out can play such a role. Again, this is a conceptual stage as of now, This will help discuss how these spaces will be utilized in the future. Today, we are going to talk about how to connect these two ideas, that is, public space networks and transportation networks, and how the two can harmoniously harmonize for urban development. Then I will hand over the microphone to Julienne. Thank you. Cameron, Executive Director, Julienne Dixon-Crump.

Yes, thank you. Cameron, Executive Director, Julienne Dixon-Crump. 오늘 밤에는 도심 하위구역 계획의 교통요소에 대해 논의해 보겠습니다. 음 도심 교통이란 죄송합니다. 화면이 안 나오네요. 네, 음 I think it would be helpful to see it from the point of view of connecting urban transportation from the point of view of connecting urban transportation before going into the specific content. In other words, it is to look at how the roads are connected to each other from the overall point of view, so that vehicles, pedestrians, and other means of transportation can communicate smoothly. When looking at the traffic flow, it should be noted that a change in one road can affect another road. Therefore, from a general point of view, you can secure more space for various means of transportation, such as walking, bicycle, and micro mobility. The screen shows the preferred means of transportation. As you can see, 10% of the visitors are living within 1 mile from the city. This slide provides an overview of how people currently move to the city center. 자가용 운전이 여전히 가장 흔한 통근 수단이며, 집에서 걸어서 오는 경우도 상당한 비중을 차지합니다. 도보와 대중교통을 이용한 통근은 상대적으로 적은 비중을 차지합니다. 동시에 Since 2009, traffic investment in the city has been greatly improved, and more public transport routes have been run, bicycle and pedestrian facilities have been expanded, and bus stops have been improved. When considering this situation, we need to find a way to prioritize the traffic network and ensure that various means of transportation can be operated harmoniously in the shared space. Therefore, From a general point of view, we are going to evaluate the traffic demand according to various traffic patterns that occur in the urban area by applying a flexible and success-based approach. Um, there may be micro mobility use, pedestrian movement, etc. Therefore, we carry out a purpose-oriented traffic management improvement when we consider various development patterns and safety aspects and apply analysis and conditions that need improvement. We use a few tools to effectively promote improvement. Set up signs, improve traffic, improve crossroads, and apply other changes. In the discussion on public transportation and micromobility, we aim to meet all the requirements of the entire transportation system as well as the vehicle operation. In other words, we consider stable public transportation, bicycle connectivity, and future development plans. To give you two examples, the North East 185 is particularly important, because this street has greatly improved the surrounding area by creating a road. Currently, the city is promoting a shared road and urban transportation demand management program, which is not only using parking, roadside management, and residential areas, but also helping vehicles and bicycles to operate smoothly. Yes, the core is the four things we want to focus on. First, it is to update the 2009 traffic system by reflecting the current needs and situations. Second, it is to focus on the fundamental traffic demand. 목표는 여전히 유효할 수 있지만, 원래 프로젝트 접근 방식이 달라질 수 있기 때문입니다. 예를 들어, 보도를 계획했다가 상황에 따라 산책로를 우선적으로 계획할 수도 있습니다. 즉, 다양한 It's about looking at what kind of impact the conditions can have on the project. And as I mentioned earlier, I'm also concerned about planning with a city-connected system. Lastly, it's important to maintain flexibility over time. Rather than fixed improvements, It is recommended to regularly evaluate the situation and adjust it according to the data. And the key here is that we recommend that the things that are related, preserved, and changed should be updated. In other words, it is recommended to maintain the ability to respond to all changes over time. 다시 말해, 변경사항이 발생할 때마다 대응할 수 있도록 말입니다. 다음 슬라이드에서는 2009년 도심계획의 나머지 프로젝트에 대해 설명하겠습니다. 자, 그렇다면 왜 2009년 프로젝트를 살펴보는 걸까요? 아시 As you can see, 2009 feels like a long time ago, and quite a lot of work and the region itself has changed a lot. There are two photos on my screen. The first is a photo of South Road 522, which brought a significant change in the regional network. And the next picture, at the bottom right corner, is our beautiful Botelway complex road project. This project focused on creating a safe environment for pedestrians while activating pedestrian activities along the center and operating in spaces such as various means of transportation. And the employee review framework was a process of reviewing each project remaining in the lower district plan of the city in 2009. Considering the various changes that occurred over time since 2009, we have prepared a way to evaluate whether each project's goal is still appropriate, that is, whether it meets the purpose. We also reviewed projects that were no longer relevant beyond what was proposed at the time. For example, we were going to include the city's rejuvenation center, but we ruled out that the project was no longer possible. Therefore, we suggest other networks for pedestrian facilities, bicycle roads, and other activities to complement the proposed content in the project. Here are the list of employee recommendations including the remaining projects. As I said, we reviewed whether to keep some of the projects on the screen, delete them, and update the necessary projects. I will show you one or two projects to explain in more detail how to apply the criteria of keeping, fixing, or deleting. The first is the North-East 185 and the City Exchange Center, which I briefly mentioned. Therefore, it is good to modify the project to reflect the convenience facilities that support public transportation. As I said before, the public transportation environment has changed considerably, so we must actively plan to accept public transportation in the area and secure appropriate traffic in consideration of safety. Also, the integration of various means of transportation must be done smoothly and the business should be supported. The second project case is a crosswalk report on South Road 522, 101 and the northeast intersection. In the previous urban redevelopment project, the Washington Department of Transportation, WSDOT, did not confirm the location of the pedestrian signal and crosswalk report installation, and the possibility of confirming it in the future is very low, so we recommended that the crosswalk report be removed. Um, so we recommend deleting that project. And After looking at the comprehensive plan and capital facility plan, we looked at how this is related to the 2009 city and sub-district plan. Another part of the review was to look at how the traffic goal of the 2009 plan is being achieved through the urban development project. Yes, it is being achieved. Some of the projects added to the comprehensive plan and the capital facility plan are further developing the purpose of the 2009 urban sub-district plan. For example, there are 185 projects that support the BRT, express bus, investment business. In addition, the construction team is conducting a traffic demand project to solve the wide range of traffic demand in the city. 2009, we will continue to focus and move forward with our goals. Now, let's start the debate and hand over the microphone to Chairman Cameron. Chairman Cameron will continue to tell us. Yes.

We have included four main questions to lead the discussion of the proposal in the data you have seen. Let's take a look at them one by one. The first question is to get general opinion on the regional plan update for downtown and lower areas. If there is anything that is still lacking or needs additional improvement, please let us know now.

Mr. Gannon, a few small things.

I will consider the problems for a while, but I am still concerned about how to eliminate the replacement parking lot without replacement facilities. The number of residents living in the city is too far to use public transportation. Personally, I live in a place about 91 meters high, 300 feet above the hill, and I don't want to walk home after attending a dinner event in Seattle. I don't think that will happen. In order for people to use public transportation, it is essential to secure parking spaces near public transportation facilities. I think I mentioned that before, but I still think it's okay to replace the Hwanseung parking lot with a public transportation center development, but there is no other way to replace the parking space. So I think that part is really important. Yes, that part will become clearer when the final results come out in the initial plan. Hwanseung Park is one of the potential development areas we are reviewing, but I think maintaining parking space is the core of this plan. I think we can share more details in the next few weeks. Yes, there was a proposal to build a parking lot in the early days, but the plan was canceled and since then there has been no replacement plan. So we are paying attention to that part.

I'll give you a question.

I left a few notes while reviewing today's plan. Well, to put it simply, shall we look at each part one by one? Or shall we deal with the part proposed by the camera operator and the part proposed by the traffic engineer together? How should we proceed? I'm going to talk about several pages of the plan and ideas related to each part of the plan one by one. Yes. It would be good to look at the specific parts of the plan now. And the next two questions are about public transportation. Is there anything else I'm curious about? Yes. Mr. Gustafson, hello. I'm Sara Gustafson.

I would like to ask a little more about Park & Ride, which Mr. Kihonwon mentioned. Park&Ride or Toad I'm using Park&Ride. And the connection between Park&Ride and 185 and 104 is very difficult. You have to walk up an uphill road that is very steep and slippery, or you have to go back about 4 to 5 blocks. I would like to know more about this connection improvement method. Whether it is maintained as a park and ride or changed to public transportation center development, I know that the pedestrian connection is an important problem, so the project is included. As Mr. Kim said, pedestrian connection is definitely an important task. Thank you. Who is Mr. Kim? Yes. So, we are reviewing how to improve the connection with Park&Ride to secure convenient connections for priority driving and bicycle use. As you said, it is difficult because the uphill road is steep, We are continuing to review how to solve it most effectively. We have conducted several discussions with users who want better connectivity. As I said, we are still reviewing that part. Currently, we cannot give you a definite answer, and we will report this part to the Chuo Planning Committee. Hello, I am Gus Toast. Thank you for your answer. I'm glad you talked to a lot of people. I don't know the exact answer yet, but thank you for being honest about this problem. Thank you very much.

This is Steve Marucci's opinion. I think we can consider a few additional things. Toad and parking are not necessarily one of the two. For example, Ken Moore was trying to secure parking facilities by cooperating with Sound Transit, but if the parking facility was secured, the parking lot of Toad Booz would be on top of it. Therefore, it is not only one of the two that should be chosen. For example, let's assume that you are collaborating with King County Metro to promote Toad development. But you said you want to maintain a certain amount of parking space. In this case, there is a way to build a high-rise building as Toad, set up a parking lot in the basement, install an elevator or escalator, and move to the ground. Through such cooperation, King County Metro may have the opportunity to solve the problem of not having to pay for elevators or escalators immediately. This is something worth thinking about again. Hello, thank you.

I agree with the opinion of Hansung Park. I think it's an important part to maintain. Also, discussions about lack of parking spaces are always heard. It's not a new story. But I want to take a closer look at this part. I want to know what people are actually experiencing. From my experience, I've never been able to find parking space in the city of Bosel. Yes, I go there often. Is it because people have to walk a certain distance to feel uncomfortable? 그 때문에 약속 시간에 늦은 걸까요? 아니면 특정 지역에 주차 공간이 없어서 일까요? 이런 것들을 이해하는 게 중요하다고 생각해요. 말 그대로 주차 공간이 없는 경우 보다요. 그리고 사람들이 만족할 수 있는 합리적인 기준이 무엇인지도 중요하다고. I think. There may be a difference between rational standards and realistic standards. As we've talked about so far, and as we've talked about the accessibility of pedestrians in the comments, I think it's important how well the news and the road network are planned. 예를 들어, 내 집에서 시내로 가는 자전거 도로까지 안전하게 자전거를 타고 갈 수 있을까요? 혹시 거주지에서 버스 정류장까지 안전하게 걸어갈 수 있나요? So, in my opinion, it is still important to consider how everything is connected to the city, and I think this is also related to the park and ride parking lot we are discussing. At a reasonable distance. Thank you for your conversation. and how to meet the expectations of parking problems, and I would like to better understand what the local community is actually expecting. Thank you.

In the city, it is well known that various factors are involved in parking problems. The most common story is the problem of old car parking. There are times when the vehicle is parked longer than the set time, and there are times when residents of some apartment blocks use old parking. This is one part of the problem. Um. I heard a few opinions on the approachability problem in the Main Street area. Also, lack of information, lack of road safety, and lack of awareness are problems. There are many cases where people do not know the possible time, parking space, and opening time of the parking lot. Therefore, this is a problem that affects various aspects in a complex way, and we want to solve it.

Let me ask Mr. Gustafsson and Mr. Westerbeck. Hello, I'm Sara Gustafsson. Let me briefly talk about Park & Ride. The difference between Park & Ride and the city parking lot is that Park & Ride is available for long-term parking. If you have to park your car for 5 hours to go on a business trip or to a concert in the city of Seattle, Park & Ride is a better choice. Especially when the parking management system is introduced, it will be more convenient. However, thank you very much for the opinion of the SHIELDS chairman. I think we need to dig deeper. I'm using the Hwanseung parking lot, but I think there's a better solution. If we dig deeper into these issues, we'll be able to find a better solution. Thank you. Thank you, Chairman. Now,

Mr. Gustafsson added it, and I will tell you about the parking problem raised by Mr. Shields. First of all, I 100% agree with Mr. Shields' opinion. To tell you a few things about how I've dealt with the problem for a long time, I lived in Bossel City for 11 years in a few blocks away. I've had a lot of meetings and invited my friends, but no one had a hard time with the parking problem. Um, and... Thousands of people are coming to events such as independence anniversary, Halloween, and park music festival on July 4th. No one has heard of the parking problem. People want to experience something good from other people. This problem has been discussed for years in other city planning forums. It's not a new problem, but if you make something attractive that people want to go to, you'll find a way to go anyway. Whether you ride a car, ride a electric bicycle, or ride a bus, park and walk in a place a mile away, I think our city has been doing really well for the past five to six years. I think we're doing really well in this area. So, well, I don't know. As long as there aren't a lot of complaints that we can't park on July 4th, even if thousands of people come, no one will complain. In fact, people park near the road and run away at 1 p.m. I can't even believe that the parade was held. If the parking space is so lacking, I don't think so, but I would have paid the parking fee in advance. The roadside space and sub-districts owned by our city have tremendous value. It's a very important asset. But we're actually providing it for free. If the parking space is really lacking and there's a lot of demand, I'm sure he paid for it. But that's not true. Because the people who really need it can find a parking space at any time. This is also information worth referring to. There's a parking lot for us for 10 to 11 years in the city. Wherever you go, it's a block away and it's easy to approach. You can use it until midnight or 12 to 30 minutes. I know I've been promoting it. The building I live in is a small building, so there's no parking space. People always talk about parking lots. If you can't find a place to park on the street, use the parking lot run by the city. Then a lot of people use it. It's really good. Lastly, I think we all need a long-term paradigm shift in North America. If we park our car in a street mall or a large mart, park it right in front of it, and walk 10 feet, we are used to having a buffet. I'm the same. Now we have to change our minds. For example, if I were to go to the National Assembly, I might have to change my mind. You may have to walk a little to a destination, such as Hill District, U District, Seattle Downtown, or any tourist city. As I mentioned earlier, there is a charming place I want to go to, and it is worth it. I think we are getting better and better in terms of approachability. We know that the city is trying to solve the problem of accessibility by securing more parking spaces for disabled people. We are already making efforts, and as the employees mentioned, we are looking for ways to make it easier to use existing parking facilities in the long term and to connect downtown to make it convenient to move. I think we need to seriously think about this issue. It's not easy to get millions of dollars to secure hundreds of parking spaces, but is there really a serious problem? I don't think so. If it's worth it, we need to consider the cost of it. Well, then, I have something to tell you about other parts of the code or the plan, but I won't mention that part right now. I'll wait a moment. But I wanted to tell you my opinion. Thank you.

Yes, Mr. Garrett. I'm sorry.

I'll give you a few more small opinions. There was a mention of Route 185. I don't know what the plan for the Beardsley intersection is going to be, but please consider the traffic control there. It can be quite difficult to take Route 185 and go east and then turn left. If I take Route 104 and avoid that section and go to the intersection of Main Street, It's much easier to get in. If the number of buses increases, I think the traffic will be serious. So even if it's not right now, Someday we'll need traffic control. And one more thing I'd like to tell you. As I've already said, I've talked about this before. The 527 and 522 crossroads are not pedestrian friendly. I understand 101, but it doesn't make sense to invest a lot there. But you have to feel safe at 522 and 527 crossroads. There are at least two reasons. I'm pretty fast, but I can't even go halfway across the street, so the pedestrian signal is blinking. Then you'll think it's dangerous. And it's really dangerous to turn right when it's red. When the bus passes, people are red, but they don't look at the pedestrians while turning right. You have to check who's coming with your head out. To create a friendly environment for pedestrians. And by the way, the parking lot across the street should be safe and easy to access for people to use. Thank you. Unfortunately, there's no slide. It's my story, but... Well, to put it simply, Pear and Pearce are a team of people who discuss a few things with the first 40 feet. One of them is... It is to improve the operation in a short period of time on the corresponding intersection to support pedestrian safety. To tell you about the short-term operation improvement, our traffic lights are designed to recognize pedestrians most later. The vehicle signal turns on immediately, and if you don't press the button before the pedestrian signal turns on, it will not change to the pedestrian signal. Even with the green light on all over the place, you don't know how many times you've seen you have to wait for the entire traffic light to turn on. In my opinion, all crossroads seem to be like that. I saw it at the U-Dub Bossel crossroad, and I often come to Bossel Way, but it's the same situation. So please take a look at this part as well. If you want to create a pedestrian-friendly human environment, do not convey the message that a pedestrian will come the most later on the crossroad. In addition, I'm sorry. I live in downtown and walk a lot. Every time we cross 520 or 527 roads, I think we're ignoring pedestrians. And these days, there are more people walking than before. I've been living in downtown for 11 years. has increased a lot in the last 10 years. I told this story to the deputies, and I'm sure you're having a fight with the Washington Department of Transportation, WSDOT. I have a friend who works there, but it's not his business, so I don't have to talk about it. I fully agree with Mr. Keon-won. You have to stand there for a long time, and honestly, the police may be watching. I make an indiscriminate decision when there are no people. It doesn't make sense. I'm speechless. Anyway, I walk around a lot, but I'm angry because the timing of this happening is so ridiculous. What we're saying is just Car drivers such as cars, trucks, etc. are important, but pedestrians are not. Pedestrian or bicycle users using pedestrian roads are treated like lower-class citizens. Mr. Salas, you're talking. Yes, Mr. Salas, I am.

Thank you for not hitting me when a pedestrian crosses the road when I'm in the car. I shake my hand a lot, which shows that something is wrong. You don't have to do that. Of course, I know a lot of people do that. But I have to be treated equally by both pedestrians and vehicles. I fully agree that pedestrians who have to cross the road safely have to give more priority. We will adjust the timing of traffic lights to make sure that the appropriate time is distributed to both pedestrians and vehicles. We will take a closer look at the parts within the range that we can control. Let's talk about something else for time management.

교통에 대해 많이 이야기하고 있으니 두 번째와 세 번째 질문을 올려드리겠습니다. 추가적인 의견이나 생각이 있으시면 말씀해 주세요. 웨스트 브록 위원님, 제가 먼저 말씀드리겠습니다. 아, 죄송합니다. 거스 위원님, 안녕하세요. 무슨 말씀이시죠? 거스 위원님, 질문이나 말씀 있으신가요? 네, 말씀해 주세요. 저는 사라 구스타프 승입니다.

I want to take a quick look at the city's parking management plan to wrap up the last discussion. I know that a lot of good things are going on. Today, September 16, 2025, seems to be exactly one year since the first study meeting was held. I know that the demonstration business is currently underway, but I would like to hear in detail about what stage it is, whether there was a budget-related decision, whether resources such as workforce support have been invested. We are considering cooperation with employee relocation, the police station, or the introduction of external support. We are currently reviewing that part. I think it's still in the early stages. The reason I'm telling you that it's in the early stages is because we're already working on it. It wasn't included in this discussion, but I'm going to give it to the City Council and the City Planning Committee. It is currently underway, and it is known that the relevant departments are conducting area setting, investigation, and collection of background data. Therefore, we will report back later. Yes.

In addition, in addition to parking management, free movement in and out of the city is the priority task of the demonstration. This is according to the vision of the demonstration, and a significant part of what I said today was brought directly from the vision of the demonstration. Cameron and Julia we are studying how to set and implement these priority levels. How can we build such a wide-ranging general policy to lower priority levels in vehicle-centered design and include it as a major factor in the perspective of pedestrians or at least people moving to the city center? Parking management It will be discussed again at the hearing, and we will be able to provide you with detailed information. We will also find out how to receive briefings from employees in various departments such as the administration, economic development, police, and public business departments. We would like to provide you with the necessary information.

Thank you. It's more important to do it right than to finish it quickly, and thank you for your hard work.

I hope what I said earlier is not completely consistent with today's question, but I hope it was helpful. I think it will be useful data, and I will tell you as briefly as possible, but there are some things I want to point out and move on. Yes, I will tell you in order. I can tell you a few things. In page 23 of the data, there is a content about the change in urban area use mentioned in the comprehensive plan. I like that part. And now there is a land use plan over the use change. I think it is better to eliminate all use area divisions and integrate them all into the DC urban area. It's not like we're going to combine all the land use and the area of use as one, like before, but it's better to do that only in the urban area. Well, I've talked to a few lawmakers, and I think they think the same way. If you really want all the changes we're talking about, it's better to divide them into several small areas so that they don't interfere with each other. It is necessary to reduce active development in the urban area. Many people will not build a 7-story building or a 6-story building. Well, as you know, even if it is allowed. So, as I said in the previous city planning committee meeting, we are reducing friction. Reduce friction, reduce friction, make it easy and simple. It's Washington DC, so just do it. Follow the architecture law, be safe and legal, and keep it simple. Well, that was page 23. Page 230. Um, um, 40 pages, I'll talk about it later. It's about housing, um, I think it's about free and affordable housing. Um, there was something, um, as you know, as we talked about before, 5%, 10% free and affordable housing, basically, it's like a comprehensive area setting. What stands out is that when you build a complex building, you talk about 5%. Let's assume that a 5-generation project must provide affordable housing. Does that mean that at least one generation must be provided with affordable housing? 5% of 5 generations must be affordable housing, so it can be 20%. Not 5%. If 5% of 5-generation buildings cannot provide 5% of 5% as affordable housing, it means that at least one generation must be provided with affordable housing. If so, the profitability of the project will drop. And another thing I want to tell you is that if you build a complex building, it is a matter of evaluating the value of the business space. This is one of the reasons why developers are reluctant to compulsorily include commercial spaces. Not only in cases where the loan is not paid, but also in projects that I have experienced myself, there were many times when loan agencies evaluated the value of the contract at a lower level than the value stated in the contract. This happens frequently. Therefore, we consider this point and proceed with the project. Not only do we have to do retail business to someone, but when we try to do retail business, we get a separate benefit from it. It is the same as saying that a certain area of ​​sales should be built for free just because it is a retail business. In addition, we are saying that small-scale retail stores are also needed. So I think there is a bit of confusion about the impact of land use and district setting on the market and what people are trying to build. We give them profits or pay taxes so that we can build retail stores in these specific areas. It is done in a way that requires it. 제 설명이 너무 복잡하지 않아 넣으면 좋겠습니다. 단지 토지 이용과 구역 설정이 개발의 현실과 부딪히고 있다는 것입니다. 그리고 만약 If one of the five units has to be built for free, is there a program that pays for the fee instead of Seattle's free and affordable housing supply program? It has been proven to be a very difficult program that has dramatically changed the development of certain types of housing. Therefore, if we want a truly rich home, we need to be very careful before jumping into this program. Well, there's something I was thinking about moving on to the topic here, and the package's 452-page plan is also on page 63. I personally sketched the EFG buzzi several times, and I thought there was a big possibility there. So I'm really happy to know that the first 40-feet section contains the same idea. I wanted to make something like a town square there. If I can swing a magic wand, I want to make a parking lot in the basement and an Italian restaurant on the ground to surround the surrounding buildings. As you can see in Germany or France or Italy, thin and long buildings, buildings with only one entrance or buildings with only one staircase. That's it. Make a square in the middle, install a fountain, whatever. But the first 40 feet, about 12 meters, is the same idea. It's just a little bit of work on the edge. It's a very good job. And what I want to say here is not my idea, but I'm talking about the problem with a few members of the city council. We're here. It's the last chance to avoid what happened in the D branch. Like in Europe or Asia, the program is like this by opening a design contest. You need a public square. It doesn't matter if it's in the middle or in the middle. But here's the standard. It has to be a certain size and it has to have a small business space. Developers don't necessarily want to do it, but these buzis are really attractive places. We can tell developers what we want. Because we own buzis. Let's do what we want. Let's be honest about what we want. Please build a building. Me. Then there will be another Mercury store. Here's a new store. D parking lot, etc. It's all the same. It's a building with a lot of parking lots on the lower floor of a Texas donut-shaped building. It's going to be a spread-sheet building that maximizes the profits of developers. It's not going to be urban-friendly. I don't care about that. We have to say what we want. In order to do that, we have to own the property. Tell us what we want. Open a design contest. Let's make a better city as a result. Or invite developers and bring the best idea. Think about the next five things. What do you think? It must be there. Well, let's wrap it up at this point. Anyway, First 40 Feet is doing a really great job. They're doing really well. It's a really good thing you hired them. Well, I talked a little bit, but this is what I saw while reading the proposal today. It doesn't exactly match the content of the question. Thank you. I was going to answer the question about the obligation to provide free housing, but I can't find the exact page date right now, but it is known that commercial or complex use also has a minimum standard for buildings. I don't know if the 5th generation house exceeds that standard. No. 522 of the housing regulation applies to non-residential buildings with 5 or more residential buildings or 2100 sq ft of refrigeration facilities. I agree with the purpose itself, but if they apply this regulation, as you know, a considerable amount of non-residential buildings will be like that, and it will cost more to do so. And there are some parts that are generally 5% or at least 1%. Because, because the work will be 20%. And these are just recognizing the current situation. I'm not suggesting any changes here. I'm just telling you what stands out. There's this in the current law, and I may have participated in making this law. I'm just trying to catch my error right away. No, no, no. We just want to clearly show the content and the standards of each area in the current law. It can be simplified to avoid confusion. whether this is legal or showing the current situation. And when we make the final decision, I hope that the policy of the document will be reflected in the Zoning Code Update standard meeting next year. Yes, I understand. Yes. Going back to the main point, 도심지역이라는 명칭은 가장 낮은 곳에서 가장 높은 곳까지를 의미하는 것 같습니다. 네. 그리고 우리가 그 구역들을 하나로 통합하든 여러 개로 통합하든 You can say that it is possible to reach the maximum level according to the policy. I like that. It makes it possible to do so without reopening the plan. The content you explained was very good. It was a good reason to separate the use of land from the setting of the area. My point is that if we want to promote everything as quickly as possible, it seems to be worse than the 10 or 20 years requested by the state. I think we need to take more bold measures than now. In 2027, we're going to dig into everything from housing to design and what a temporary stop will look like. Yes. And the reason Cameron is talking here is because there is a very approximate concept of design for other sub-districts such as the City Council. Yes, I see. Yes. In order to move on to the next stage of this conversation, we will help you to get a sense of what we are thinking, at least to create a public space. It's about thinking about how to use it, whether it's a square or a flexible street. So when we work on the architecture next year, what shape would be good to make a small, large, or medium-sized space around this building? You can draw a rough picture like this. Yes, this is simply a problem that is closer to urban planning beyond public space requirements. Urban planning is not a simple plan, but it is to specifically decide how you want to develop this block. You can say it's a bit old-fashioned. It's a side management. Yes, this is rare. A lot of people still have complaints about what happened in Dvz. We've been claiming that we want a food store, a food store, and a retail center for years. Some developers even suggested that the plan was a bit of a surprise, so it didn't come true. In fact, the developer was in 2007, not 2017, but more recently, he proposed a building at the center of the city to the local construction company in order to fulfill the sales contract with the city officials at the time. But as soon as a good proposal came in, the sales contract was signed, and as soon as all the procedures were completed, they completely changed the building and the concept. At that time, I think that many people are still collapsing because of it. People are asking why we can't set the conditions when we own the land. Do you have any other opinions or questions?

Yes, the last question is about the traffic project list shared by Gillian.

I think there were some opinions about some of the previous projects. I'll ask if you have any additional opinions on certain projects.

Mr. Cannon, go back to the previous question and tell me. Would you like to? That's it.

Yes, that's the question. Oh, I see. I gave you a few opinions on this part. How about the others? Do you have an opinion? No, I don't.

You mean you already have an opinion.

But I think it would be helpful to ask you a question. Yes, maybe. I'll ask you if anyone else has an opinion. What happened to the crossroads at No. 522 and No. 101? I heard that it was not approved. Could you explain in more detail? Yes.

With the work of the downtown redevelopment project, the downtown redevelopment project that was held in the past, I tried to set up a crosswalk report there in cooperation with the Washington Department of Transportation, WSDOT. Three of the sections were approved, but the last one was not approved by WSDOT. The cross-sectional report was not approved because I didn't like it. There is a low possibility that it will be approved in the future. So we recommended the removal based on such discussions. Yes, Mr. Colonel. Me too.

I agree. All right. As I said, there's a bridge at 5, 22, 5, 27. There's a crosswalk at 102. There are crosswalks and crosswalks. I think we need to make it stand out more. And another thing is that it's good to walk on that bridge sometimes. Sometimes when I walk, I look a little empty. That makes me feel a little more at ease. Yes, so? We succeeded in receiving a fee for the replacement of the bridge. That bridge is too old. So, as part of that process, we are going to select a council consultant this fall, and in 2027, we will be able to release a report on which parts of the bridge work well and which parts do not work well. The plan is type, size, It's because we're setting the location. And then when we're selected, if we figure out what the bridge is and where it should be, we'll probably put it in its place. But as you know, these opportunities don't come often. So I have to ask the same question. Is something going well? Is something going wrong? Is the location right? You have to consider everything. In this way, you will be able to complete a plan that will help you decide where to move forward. You can plan specifically how to arrange the funds needed for the replacement of the bridge, how long it will take, what the new bridge will look like, and how much it will cost. The bridge plays an important role in connecting Bossel Landing and the city. In my opinion, I think it would be better to promote it more and make it stand out more.

Likewise, it is very important to connect both sidewalks. I hope to hear more details about the project. Do you have any opinions or questions from other members? Yes, do you have any opinions or comments from the presenters? Yes. I'm sorry I couldn't make it clear. Is there anything else in the presentation? Or is this the end? Yes, thank you for letting me know.

Lastly, I will tell you about the next step. The next schedule is... It is a public meeting on the downtown lower region plan. It will be held on October 21st. And on the 27th, we will have a trial and follow-up study meeting. On November 4th, I will let you know the results and confirm the conclusion and recommendations. I hope that the trial and follow-up study meeting will be held on November 17th and the meeting will be reopened on December 8th. Most of the dates I emphasized are carried out with the compensation plan update that KT announced this morning. Therefore, it will be carried out at the same time as the same case.

Yes, thank you. Thank you so much for your announcement. I'll let you know if there's any more news. The next case is a committee report. You were all quiet tonight. I see. I don't think there's a committee report. It's an employee report. There are only a few items in the employee report.

It's a budget case. The next city planning committee meeting is scheduled for October 7th. There will be a brief training session on public meeting law and public record law. I'll give you a brief update. The auditorium decided that it would be better for all committees and members to carry out the training. Rather than individually distributing the data to check if everyone is familiar with the latest training content. There will also be a public meeting on the study meeting and bicycle parking regulations for the sub-area plan update of Canyon Park. After that, there will be a annual event on October 21st. I'm sorry, the date is confusing. I'll let you know what day the 21st is. Other things to mention are the Sustainable City Sustain Me event held on the 26th. The regional development department is planning to run the booth. At the event, we reserved a few tables to discuss the project we are working on. And lastly, there is something I need to let you know once again at the committee meeting. On September 29, two weeks later, all the committees and the assembly will hold a joint meeting. Invite everyone. Please join us all. The assembly will acknowledge your efforts in this meeting and review the things that the assembly is primarily promoting. It will clearly convey the goals that all the committees are trying to achieve and the goals that we want to achieve together. That's all. But is there a cake? Just kidding. Yes, that's right.

There are no more cases, so would you like to end the meeting? Yes, Mr. Tiernan, I suggest the end of the meeting. Is there anyone who wants to resume? Oh, I'm sorry. I stepped on it. I'll tell you again. I suggest the end of the meeting. Is there anyone who wants to resume?

Mr. Westbreaker, the meeting is over. All right. Agree 1. Request 1.

Those who agree will end the meeting at 7.50 p.m. All right. Please say yes. All right. The next meeting is on October 7th. Today's meeting is over. Thank you.