City Council - Regular Meeting
The City Council approved several grants, including a $1 million Cummings Community Safety Grant and a $3,220 MassAbility/Rehabilitation Commission grant. The Council also confirmed numerous appointments to various commissions and passed several revolving fund limits for Fiscal Year 2027. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to a contentious debate and voting on budget amendments, ultimately passing an amended draft of the annual appropriation and tax order.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Council
- Meeting Type
- City Council
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Meeting Date
- June 10, 2026
Transcript
653 sections
Colleagues and those in attendance to please silence their cell phones and electronic devices. Also pursuant to rule 42, I remind all in this chamber that no demonstration of approval or disapproval from members of the public will be permitted, including but not limited to signs, placards, banners, cheering, clapping, booing, etc. And if such demonstrations are made, the gallery or public seating area will be cleared. This rule will be strictly enforced. Mr. Clerk, could you please call the roll to ascertain the presence of a quorum?
Council of Braden. Here. Council of Caleta Zapata. Council of Culpeper. Council of Durkan. Here. Council of Fitzgerald.
Here.
Council of Flynn. Here. Council of Louisiane. Council of Mejia. Here. Council of Murphy. Here. Council of Pepin.
Here.
Council of Santana.
Here.
Council of Webber. Here. And Council of Orrell. Quorum is present.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. I've been informed by the Clerk that a quorum is present. Mr. Clerk, would you do us the honor of offering an invocation for us today? And following that, we will cite the Pledge of Allegiance.
Thank you, Counselor. Good morning, everyone. Please stand. Let us pray. Somewhere at our innermost core, each of us wants to submerge self-interest so that we may do that which is right, to promulgate justice tempered by mercy. But this is not always an easy path for human, all too fallible men and women. Knowing this, we ask today for patience that we may diligently weigh conflicting evidence and find the right therein. We ask for tolerance that we may truly hear and consider opinions unlike our own. We ask for wisdom that we may recognize the face of truth when it appears before us. All this we ask in the name of that eternal creative spirit, that supreme power that guides us all, whatever our traditions, to act in ways that are loving, wise, and just. So be it forever and ever, days without end. Amen. Thank you, Mr. Clerk.
We have two presentations today, so first I will call up Councillor Santana. For your presentation, you've got five minutes, and then follow that we have Councillor Mejia.
Good afternoon. Happy Pride, everyone. I would like to be able to thank you madam president for this opportunity. I would like to call up Some of the speakers that I'll be having today Christian Tina and Ricardo if they can come up and We'll be hearing from them happy pride everyone as you all know Today alongside with 35 organizations 35 plus organizations. We're hosting a prize celebration and This is not about me. As I've mentioned it to you all, I really want to be able to hear directly from the speakers. So first, we're going to have Christian. We're going to hear from Tina, and then we'll close it out with Ricardo. And then we're going to invite all my council colleagues and everyone here celebrating Pride to come up for the picture. Without further ado, Christian.
Good morning, everyone. Greetings, earthlings. My name is Christian Gaudet, also known as stage name Freckles, which stands for freedom, recognition, compassion, knowledge, love, support, music. I'm grateful to be here today and have this opportunity to share with you some of my experiences. To start, I was born in the city of Boston. I was adopted at the age of five. I was moved to the Merrimack Valley region area and raised in that area. Upon my adolescence, I struggled very much with my identity. I struggled with connecting with my peers in many ways due to just a lot of things paired with the intersections of not having contact with biological family and things like that, which led me to a lot of stuff and wound me up at 17 incarcerated in MCI Framingham. I did about four years incarcerated there. And that's truly where I met my first transgender person, which shifted my, and shaped the way that I could start to see myself. And as I, integrated back into this community in Boston, family health was a huge resource to me. And I struggled immensely because I am a former addict. I was born addicted to substances. I am also a mental health specialist. I work with kids inpatient with McLean through Franciscan Children's. And every day that I'm seeing the things that I had experienced as a kid in my own youth and adolescence is trickling down into their lives as well through everything that's happening today. And as a queer person of color, I firsthand know how visibility and belonging are not always the same thing. That there have been times when I've been welcomed into spaces because of one part of my identity, while other parts of me remained unseen. For many BIPOC LGBT plus people, that is a reality we all know too well. We often exist in an intersection of multiple forms of marginalization, carrying experiences that are unique communities in our cultures. And my work as an artist here, a mental health specialist, a recovering addict, a formerly incarcerated individual, have been rooted in healing, storytelling, creating space for people who don't feel seen. Through my music and my art, it's not to entertain. It's to create space. It's to create a conversation. What I've learned is that being queer looks different depending on where you come from. It's not about the color of your skin. It's not just about the neighborhood you grew up in, in the culture or your faith, in your socioeconomic background. We can't talk about our experiences as LGBT individuals if we're not including all of that in a whole spectrum. Sorry, I'm neuro-spicy. Lost my space here. And this is why the representation matters, and that's why our community matters, and that's why collective consciousness matters. And every day I see young people carrying unimaginable burdens that I did not have to carry as LGBT youth. I didn't have to deal with an administration and the burdens of that in my youth. Some are struggling with anxiety, depression, trauma, family rejection, housing instability, bullying, and simply the exhaustion of feeling like they have to hide who they are to be accepted. I've sat with young people who have never heard someone tell them that their identity is not something that needs to be fixed. I watch what happens to these kids every single day in and out. And they are the reason that I drive to do what I do in this community, is the reason that I want to connect with more people. It is the reason that I need to talk to as many people as I need to, to hear where there's lack of, where there's misinformation, where people are missing missing certain very significant points when it comes to identity. These young people teach me how to refine and redefine belongingness, how to recreate that conversation, because we're all changing every single day. And the goal isn't just to be seen. It's to be supported. It's not just to make statements about support. It's to put action behind that. And the goal is to create communities where BIPOC, queer, disabled people, immigrants, all marginalized communities can have access to that safety, opportunity, mental health resources, leadership roles, spaces where they can thrive. Pride Became as a movement demanding dignity and humanity, and today that work needs to continue. It needs to continue to uplift. My hope is that young people can feel different, and every person who has questioned whether they belong can look at the people in the rooms and know that there's a place for them, not because they earned it, not because they had to prove themselves, not because they are not worthy, but because they do belong there. And I just want to say thank you for my time.
Hi, I'm Tina Jushi Caruso. I am a MassArt alum, and I am a queer BIPOC person who's an immigrant who was adopted at 11 months from China. And I just was out. I've been out and proud for two years. I went to MassArt. It was the first time I saw people like me, BIPOC and queer people. It was the first time I found community. MassArt was a pivotal moment for me. You might have seen me on Love on the Spectrum. I came out a little before that at MassArt. Through that, I realized there's a community here in Boston that I belong to. I have never felt belonging like the queer community in Boston. I grew up in Somerville, outplaced by Somerville school districts. I was placed into schools that my mom called were equivalent to Arkansas' southern Southern Arkansas is like southern schools where I was racial racially. I could not be myself. I was always targeted by teachers as well as fellow students. I got bullied for being a transracial adoptee. I could not be a BIPOC person, let alone I did not even know I was queer at the time. All I knew by high school, I was an ally to this community. I did not realize until two years ago, 2024, that I was part of this queer community, and I am so excited to be able to represent this community and I hope to uplift your voices and I want to say as a queer artist myself that funding and budgeting is very important to this community because a lot of us are also artists and we want to do the best work and when we don't have the resources we can't do what we need to do best.
Hi, everyone. Can you hear me back there? All right. Thank you, Boston City Council for making space for our community to be seen and celebrated in the city we call home. Let me just start by saying that I love queer people. I do. I love us. I love our tenacity and our creativity. I love the way that we find each other. I love chosen family. I love the way we build joy in spaces that were not built with us in mind. I love who we are and I love the license we give people to be a little bit more of themselves when we shine extra bright. I'm proud to stand here celebrating us and holding space for everything that we carry. Pride, it means different things to different people. For some, it means marching. For others, it means quiet reflection, a private accounting of how far we've come and how far we've yet to go. Pride is visibility. It is action. It is care. It is chosen family and courage that surprises you when it shows up. doesn't have to be all of those things at once and it should never come at the cost of who we are i want to be honest about what pride feels like in a moment like this we are living through a sustained and intentional attack on lgbtq plus lives on our health care on our bodies on our children's ability to learn and grow in safety our trans people's a very right to exist in public life, to be recognized, to be named, to move through the world as who they are. The cruelty is not incidental. It is the point. And what I want us to name something clearly is that is not something we brought upon ourselves. It is harm that has been forced upon us by others' obsession with our bodies, with who we love, or whether our families meet some unattainable standard. We did not choose to fight, but you better trust and believe that we know how to do it. I have always understood advocacy as personal. I think of the people that I've worked alongside in Arizona, in Texas, in Ohio, in Maine, in New York, and what I hear over and over is not a radical demand, it's a yearning. A yearning for a fair shot at a good life. the ability to marry if we choose, to build families if that's part of our path, to have identity documents that reflect who we are and let us move through daily life without unnecessary barriers, to live in cities and states with real non-discrimination protections, to have safe schools, places where young queer people have access to the same experiences as any other kid, to have childhoods that are not burdened by questions of safety, not spent calculating how much of themselves they need to hide to feel a sense of false belonging. I think about the families who left Texas, who left Florida, who found what felt like safety in cities like Boston, and who are now asking whether they need to leave this country entirely. I think about parents working deliberately, creatively to build pockets of joy for children, navigating a world that doesn't always feel that was made for them. Even here, even in Boston, what some consider a beacon of LGBTQ safety, there are queer people who do not feel seen, who do not feel heard, who are honestly not up to the task of performing resilience Many of us are tired, tired of fighting every day, tired of two step forwards and one or two steps back, tired of being asked to show up to city council pride celebrations after being cut from a budget. That exhaustion, that anger and frustration is real and it belongs in this room. It deserves to take up space so it doesn't live within us. I'll say something else that is true for me personally. I don't need everyone to accept me. I accept myself. My mother, who leads a prayer circle every week and prays for LGBTQ people, accepts me. And that is not nothing. That is everything. And I have stopped letting the people who refuse to see me determine how I see myself. That clarity, knowing who I am, knowing who you are, when others insist you are something else or something less, is not just survival. It's our superpower. It is the thing that no executive order can take away from you. And when I look around this room, that is what I see multiplied by hundredfold. I look around and I see community leaders and so many others. I see organizations across the city that have shown up for LGBTQ people, for immigrants, for people living with disabilities, for young people, for elders with consistency, love and care. Often on tiny budgets, always on behalf of people who deserve much more than they are given. The richness of what is in this room is extraordinary. You are the people who give me real confidence about the future that we are building together. And this moment is asking all of us to show up differently, with uncommon courage, with conviction, with pride in who we are and valor in what we do. It is asking our organizations to lead with authenticity, even when that is the harder path. But it is asking something of our allies and institutions too. It is asking you to meet us in the ring, to be clear-eyed about your values and the world you are helping us to create, to say the word trans, to not dodge questions about your support for our community, to be relentless in your pursuit of restoring funding to the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus Advancement, to the Office of Immigrant Advancement, to Black Male Advancement, to housing, to youth jobs. To double down on what you say you believe when the pressure is highest, not walk away from it. To fuel this necessary work with your time, your treasure, and your voice. What I want and what I've always wanted is for LGBTQ plus people and everyone in this city, regardless of who you are, regardless of where you come from, to have a real shot at a good life. That is not a radical vision, that is the baseline. But in the here and now, over the next 20 days of Pride Month, I want us to dance. I want us to rejoice. I want our doors to open wide and to fully welcome the vibrancy and difference of our community. I crave connection and joyful abandon. I crave freedom and creativity. And yes, I crave being a nuisance to everyone who refuses to see us or pretend that we don't have a rightful place in this world. Because we do. We always have. This Pride Month, choose to be whole, even in your grief, for what we are experiencing right now. and then shine, not despite everything, but because of it. Because we will persist long after this administration. We will deliver on the promise of this country for all of us. For all who came after us. We always have. We always will. Happy Pride.
I want to thank our three speakers, Christian, Tina, and Ricardo, for your thoughtful message and for bringing your lived experience here. If I can ask all my colleagues for a picture. If I can also ask anyone who wants to be part of this picture. I know community has shown out today. And please come over to the podium here. We do it every single year. We'll pack the chamber. Thank you so much for being here. But we'll now take a picture. As folks are doing that, I'll just mention, and I've said it multiple times today, I know we have declared ourselves as a sanctuary city, and we need to make sure that our policies reflect that. So I'm looking forward to working with my colleagues to push in policies to ensure that we're a sanctuary city. Thank you, everyone.
Do I have to stand on something?
Should I go up front because I'm too short?
But we got ours today. Thank you. Thank you. Happy Pride! Happy Pride! We're out. We're here. We're here. She is who you are.
Guys, you all fit. This is amazing.
Good luck today. It's been a long day.
How are you? Good, very good.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Councillor Mejia to come forward with her presentation. Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
All right, y'all, good afternoon. Okay, so I would like to invite Napoleon Jones's, Henderson's family here to the podium, please. So make your way here. Today, I am proud to recognize June the 19th, 2026 as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day in the city of Boston. That's right, occupy space, y'all, because this is what we do. That's right, let them all know that we are here. So June 19th is also Juneteenth, just in case y'all don't know. And this day is being declared as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day here in the city of Boston to honor a life that has left a lasting impact on generations of artists, students, and communities across our city. That's right. Remember, Council Braden said, no, I don't want no problems up in here, OK? Napoleon Jones Henderson was a mentor, a teacher, a builder of community who believed deeply in the power of art to uplift people and to tell our stories with dignity. We are especially proud to recognize him on June the 19th, Juneteenth, because of the role he played in helping bring the celebration of the holiday to Boston through advocacy and deep commitment to black cultural expression. Born in Chicago in 1943, he became an early member of the Afro Cobra, the groundbreaking collective rooted in black liberation and self-determination. Boston became his home for more than 50 years after he moved here in 1974. to teach at MassArt. Through his work and mentorship, he helped shape Boston's art community into a space rooted in culture and connection. He opened doors for young artists and invested in people long before institutions did. And that is why this recognition matters so much right now. At a time when we continue to see cuts and disvestments in the arts, we have to remember that art is not a luxury. They are an essential part to life and this city. When we cut arts funding, we cut spaces where young people can find their voices. Napoleon Jones Henderson's legacy lives on through the countless people he inspired and uplifted throughout his life. Today, alongside this resolution and legacy citation, we honor his extraordinary contributions to Boston. At this time, I'd like to invite Akua Holmes to speak briefly on Napoleon's legacy and his contributions to bringing Juneteenth to the city of Boston. Thank you.
Good morning, everyone. Good morning. My name is Aqua Holmes, and I was one of those young people looking for spaces as an artist back in the 70s. I was fortunate, like the person who presented earlier, to find my way to mass art. And eventually, that led me to Napoleon Jones Henderson, who came from Chicago to teach weaving. He turned our world upside down. because we had only heard about maybe two African-American artists ever. They weren't teaching it at our school, even though it was a Massachusetts College of Art and Design to represent all of the people, they weren't telling the whole story. Napoleon came and started to fill in the pieces. He taught us about an organization called the National Conference of Artists. What does that mean? It's the National Conference of Black Artists that met across the country annually to celebrate African American art, African art, writing, literature, culture. We began to go to those conferences. We met Romare Bearden. We met Elizabeth Catlett. And those people became real to us. They weren't just little postage size pictures in a book. They were real life people who were living as artists. So when I stand here today, I know that I'm standing on the shoulders of people like Napoleon Jones Henderson. To get back to Juneteenth, I never heard of Juneteenth when I was in my teens and 20s. But Napoleon had a Juneteenth celebration at his home in Roxbury every year. And his friends would come to Chicago and transform the place with music, with incense, with food, with art. And they would tell us about our own history that we did not know. He was the first one to bring it here. And eventually, the rest of us caught up with him. And that's pretty much how it was with Napoleon. He was 10 steps ahead, and we caught up with him all the time, even to the fact that he bought that mansion and envisioned it as a cultural museum for African-Americans. That was years ago, and it's happening. I also wanted to say, after he left MassArt in a couple of years, he could have gone on and done other things, gone to other institutions, left Boston. But just as we had adopted him, he adopted us. And he put down deep roots here. And that same spirit of generosity that brought Juneteenth, that he brought Juneteenth here with, he continued to keep his doors open to artists of all ages and stages. Not just young ones, but old ones too. He would always be willing to teach you about weaving, about the ceramics that he did. And he always had something good on cooking in the kitchen. Some people talk about the banana bread. Some people talk about the beans and rice. But even if you only got one shrimp, because it was kind of like Jesus and the loaves. Maybe we start out with five people, but we end up with 15. But we all left feeling fulfilled and nurtured and cared for. When I drive up Cedar Street, even to this day, I look to my left, and I know that that's Napoleon's house. And I was saying to someone today, he's still in our midst. He's still influencing us. He's still caring about us. Whatever the next realm is, I know he hasn't left us. And we will celebrate Juneteenth in a much more bold way this year because he's left us physically. And we want to honor the fact that he was the first one to teach us about it. Thank you so much.
His daughter is the reason why we're all here. She don't want to say anything. And I just want to also acknowledge that then former Councilor Campbell and myself, alongside Councilor then Kim Janey, worked on having Juneteenth be a recognized holiday here in the city of Boston. So this even means more to me here today. So I'd like to ask my colleagues to come and take a photo. And I'll read the resolution while my colleagues make their way up here. This resolution is presented by me, Boston City Councilor at large, Julia Mejia. The resolution that we're going to be passing on the city council today is recognizing June the 19th, 2026, as Napoleon Jones Henderson Day here in the city of Boston. And every year, I hope y'all are showing up in this chamber to honor his legacy. Without further ado, come take a photo.
And can we clap it up one more time?
Everybody's in? All the little shorties come up here.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you, everyone. Thank you, Councillor Mehear, Councillor Santana for your presentations. Mr. Clerk, could you please amend the attendance to recognise that Councillor Louisianne, Councillor Culpepper and Councillor Worrell have joined us? We are now on to the first order of business, which is the approval of the minutes from the meeting of June 3rd, 2026. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. The ayes have it and the minutes of the June 3rd meeting are approved. We are now on to communications from our Honourable Mayor. Mr. Clerk, could you please read docket 1181?
Docket number 1181, messaging on authorizing the City of Boston to accept and expend the amount of $1 million in a form of a grant, Cummings Community Safety Grant, awarded by Cummings Foundation Incorporated, to be administered by the Office of Human Services. The grant will fund and support the Community Safety Initiative, Public Health Initiative, Community Events Initiative, youth engagement initiative.
Thank you Mr. Clerk. Councillor Murphy, you have the floor.
Thank you Madam Chair. I just rise to share some of the information of this million dollar grant and I hope my colleagues will support in passing this today. The FY27 Cummings violence reduction gift talking points here. So the city will be receiving from the Cummings Foundation for the following violence reduction and public safety initiatives to bolster Boston's standing as the safest major city in the U.S. The Boston Public Health Commission will receive funds across three main initiatives, domestic, sexual, and gender-based violence, BPHC's data and evaluation systems, and Life Course Unit, which is a violence reduction framework that integrates age group-based initiatives. The BHA will receive some of these funds to scale Charlestown's successful adult education center and re-entry model at the Mildred C. Haley Complex in Jamaica Plain, reducing transportation barriers from neighborhoods like Mattapan and responsive to the program's oversubscribed wait list. and then a smaller portion of the funds will support a mobile intervention unit that has served as a highly visible low barrier entry for clinical navigation building on a model that has successfully placed hundreds from the mass and cast region into recovery pathways so the acceptance of these installments moves the city away from isolated reactionary programming to sustained investments in root cause violence prevention ensuring our neighborhoods and constituents remain safe
healthily and supported all year so i'm asking my colleagues to suspend and pass today thank you thank you uh councillor murphy the chair on the committee on human services seeks suspension the rules and passage of docket 1181 all those in favor say aye i doubt the vote mr clerk could you please take a roll call vote on docket 1181 council of breed
Yes. Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Kaleta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn. Yes. Councillor Lujan.
Yes.
Councillor Lujan. Yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Murphy.
Yes.
Councillor Murphy. Yes. Councillor Pepin. Yes. Councillor Pepin. Yes. Councillor Santana. Yes. Councillor Santana. Yes. Councillor Webber. Yes. Councillor Webber. Yes. And Councillor Orrell. Yes. Councillor Orrell. Yes. Docket number 1181 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Could you please read docket 1182?
Dr. Number 1182, message and order authorizing the City of Boston to accept and expend the amount of $3,220 in the form of a grant, the Mass Ability Rehabilitation Commission Grant, awarded by Mass High Department of Career Services. To be administered by the Office of Workforce Development, the grant will fund employment and training assistance, career counseling, and job search assistance for disabled individuals who are clients at Boston's Mass Hire Career Centers.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. The Chair recognizes Councillor Orrell, the Chair of the Committee on Labour and Economic Development. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. This is a very small-dollar amount grant valued at $3,220 that would provide funding to operate the two mass-hire one-stop career centres we have in Boston. So just looking to pass the small-dollar amount so we get much-needed support over to the mass-hire one-stop career centre. Thank you.
Thank you. Councillor Worrell, the Chair of the Committee on Labour and Economic Development, seeks suspension of the rules and passage of Docket 1182. All in favour say aye.
Aye.
All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1182?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Papin, yes. Councilor Papin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Orrell, yes. Councilor Orrell, yes. Docket number 1182 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Docket 1182 has passed. We are now on to reports of public officers and others. Mr. Clerk, could you please read dockets 1183 through 1185?
Docket number 1183, notice received from the City Clerk. In accordance with Chapter 6 of the Ordinances of 1979, regarding action taken by the mayor and papers acted upon by the City Council at its meeting on May 20th, 2026. Docket number 1184, communication was received from Timothy Smith, Executive Officer of the Boston Retirement Board, regarding result of the election for for a vacant elected board seat. Dennis Callahan was elected to serve as trustee of the Boston Retirement Board for a term ending January 15, 2027. In document number 1185, communication was received from Council Flynn regarding protocol for the Boston Fire Department, Boston Police Department, and Boston Emergency Medical Services during the event of an elevator failure at Boston Housing Authority developments.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Dockets 1183 through 1185 will be placed on file. We're now on to reports of committees. Mr. Clerk, could you please read dockets 0796 through 1040 together, please?
Docket number 0796, the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation. to which was referred on April 15, 2026, document number 0796. Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of David Sampson as an alternate member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring on December 31, 2030. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 0797. The Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation, which was referred on April 15, 2026, document number 0797, message and order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Robert Weintraub as a member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring on December 31, 2029, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 0798. The Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation, to which was referred on April 15, 2026, messaged an order for the confirmation of the appointment of David Dixon as a member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30, 2028. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docket number 0799, the Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation, to which was referred on April 15, 2026. Message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Kristen Hoffman as an alternate member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30, 2026. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. DOCUMENT NUMBER 0800, THE COMMITTEE OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, TO WHICH WAS REFERRED APRIL 15, 2026. MESSAGE AND ORDER FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KRISTEN HOFFMAN AS A MEMBER OF THE FOUR POINT CHANNEL LANDMARK DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR A TERM EXPIRING ON JUNE 30TH, 2026. SUBMITS A REPORT RECOMMENDING THAT THE ORDER OUGHT TO PASS. DOCUMENT NUMBER 1037, THE COMMITTEE OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026. Message in order for the confirmation of the appointment of Vinit Gupta as an alternate member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2026. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 1038, the Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026. Message in order for the confirmation of the appointment of Susan Goganian as a member of the Boston Landmarks Commission for a term expiring June 30th, 2026, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docket number 1039, the Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation, to which was referred on May 20th, 2026. MESSAGE IN ORDER FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF SUSAN GOGANIAN AS A MEMBER OF THE FOUR POINT CHANNEL LANDMARK DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR A TIME EXPIRED ON JUNE 30, 2026. SUBMITS A REPORT RECOMMENDING THAT THE ORDER ARE TO PASS. AND DOCUMENT NUMBER 1040, THE COMMITTEE ON PLANNING DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION TO WHICH WAS REFERRED ON MAY 20, 2026. message in order for the confirmation of the reappointment of Kathleen Connor as a member of the Back Bay Architectural District Commission for a term expiring December 31st, 2026, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. The chair recognizes Councillor Durkan, the chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation. Councillor Durkan, you have the floor.
Thank you, Council President. Last Friday, June 5th, the Committee on Planning, Development, and Transportation held a hearing on these eight dockets concerning appointments and reappointments to the Boston Landmarks Commission and several historic district commissions. We were joined by Joe Cornish, Director of Design Review for the Boston Landmarks Commission, and Elizabeth Sherva from the Office of Historic Preservation. Both endorsed the nominees and spoke to the expertise and thoughtful selection process behind these appointments. We then heard from testimony from nominees regarding their experience, professional backgrounds, and interest in serving on these commissions. For the appointment of the Back Bay Architectural Commission, we heard from Rob Weintraub and David Sampson. for the appointments of the boston landmarks commission we heard from david dixon and beneath gupta we also heard from kirsten hoffman for the appointment of the to the fort point channel district landmark commission and reappointment to the blc two nominees were unable to attend this hearing in their absence we received information from the administration regarding susan goganian who is being appointed the boston landmarks commission and formerly served on the commission and the reappointment to the Fort Point Commission. We also heard from Kathleen Connor, we heard from the administration on Kathleen Connor for the reappointment to the BBAC. It was inspiring to hear from such accomplished professionals whose career spans public service, historic preservation, architecture, and urban planning. The depth of knowledge and experience they bring to these roles will be invaluable, and it is clear that Boston is fortunate to have these high-caliber individuals helping steward our historic resources. One of my favorite responsibilities as chair of the Planning, Development, and Transportation Committee is bringing forward these nominations to commissions that support historic preservation. This work is essential to protecting and preserving our history and our culture that define Boston's neighborhoods. Accordingly, I recommend that these dockets be reported out of committee to the full council for consideration and for formal action. My recommendation to the council is that these matters ought to pass. Thank you.
I beg your pardon, I'm jumping ahead. We'll start with 0796. All in favour? I'll start over again. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0796. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Councillor, Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0796?
Councillor Brayton.
Yes.
Councillor Brayton, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Councilor Culpepper? Yes. Councilor Culpepper, yes. Councilor Durkan? Yes. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald?
Yes.
Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn? Yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan? Yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia? Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy? Yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin?
Yes.
Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana? Yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber? Yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell? Yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0796. has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0796 has passed, and the appointment is confirmed. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0797?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Calazapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell, yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Token number 0797 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0797 has passed, and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0798. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0798.
Councillor Breen. Yes. Councillor Breen, yes. Councillor Collette is a part of it. Councillor Culpeper. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councilor Durkin, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell, yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0798 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0798 is passed and the appointment is confirmed. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0799? Councillor Brayden. Yes.
Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn. Yes. Councillor Louisiane. Yes. Councillor Louisiane. Yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Murphy. Councillor Murphy. Yes. Councillor Penn.
Yes.
Councillor Penn. Yes. Councillor Santana. Yes. Councillor Santana. Yes. Councillor Webber.
Yes.
Councillor Webber. Yes. Councillor Orrell. Yes. Councillor Orrell. Yes. Docket number 0799 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0799 is passed and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0800. All in favor say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0800?
Councillor Brayden.
Yes.
Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Calazza-Patta. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn.
Yes.
Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Louisianne.
Yes.
Councillor Louisianne, yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Papin, yes. Councillor Papin, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. And Councillor Orrell, yes. Councillor Orrell, yes. Docket number 0800 has received 12 votes in the chairman.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0800 has passed and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 1037. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Dirk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1037?
Councillor Braden.
Yes.
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkin. Yes. Councillor Durkin. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Orrell, yes. Councilor Orrell, yes. Dock and Enva, 1037 has received 11 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 1037 is passed and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 1038. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 1038?
Councillor Brayton. Yes. Councillor Brayton, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkin. Yes. Councillor Durkin, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald.
Yes.
Councilor Hsiao, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Orrell, yes. Councilor Orrell, yes. Dock number 1038 has received 11 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 1038 has passed, and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report in passage of docket 1039. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 1039?
Councillor Braid. Yes. Councillor Braid, yes. Councillor Collar-Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Papin, yes. Councilor Papin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Orrell, yes. Councilor Orrell, yes. Docket number 1039 has received 11 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 1039 is passed, and the appointment is confirmed. The Chair of the Committee on Planning, Development and Transportation seeks acceptance of the committee report in passage of Docket 1040. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 1040?
Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Councilor Culpepper, yes. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell, yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Document number 1040 has received 11 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 1040 has passed and the appointment is confirmed. Mr. Clerk, would you please read dockets 0741 through 0754 together? I'll give you a moment. A lot of reading today.
Dock number 0741, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026, message not approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the maintenance and repair of Boston Public School facilities, including custodial and utility costs for extended building time, floor refinishing, landscaping, and building repairs. Receipts from lease, permit for use, and parking fees for Boston Public School facilities will be deposited in the fund. Boston Public School facilities will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall not exceed $2 million. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document 0742, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8, 2026, message in order approving in order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 for Boston Public Schools transportation costs, including bus and public transportation costs. The Revolving Fund shall be credited with revenue received by the Boston Public Schools Department for the provision of transportation to groups and entities for field trips and activities other than transportation to and from school. receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $150,000, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 0743, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026, message and order approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Public Schools Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to repair and purchase Boston Public Schools computer technology including computers, mobile devices, and instructional software. This revolving fund shall be credited with any and all receipts from equipment, sales, and repair fees for Boston Public Schools technology. Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $2 million. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 0744. The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8, 2026, Message in order approving and authorizing a limit for the Environmental Conservation Commission involving fund for fiscal year 2027 for the purpose of securing outside consultants, including engineers, wetland scientists, wildlife biologists, and other experts in order to aid in the review of proposed projects to the Commission for the city ordinance protecting local wetland and promoting climate change adaptation. This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from fees imposed by the Commission for the purpose of securing outside consultants. The Environment Department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund. Such expenditures shall be capped at $50,000. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docket number 0745, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th, 2026. Message in order, approving in order, Authorizing a limit for the distributed energy resource revolving fund of fiscal year 2027 to facilitate the purchase of offsets of greenhouse gas Emissions which shall be associated with a per portion of the electricity Consumed by the city annually and to operate maintain monitor and expand the city's existing solar arrays and Boston Public Schools combined heat and power facilities This revolving fund shall be credited with ending all receipts from the sale of renewable and alternative energy certificates and demand response program revenues produced by combined heat and power unit located by Boston public school sites and solar renewable energy certificates produced by the city's photovoltaic arrays. Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $150,000. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docket number 0746, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8th, 2026, message not approving an order authorizing a limit for the equitable emissions investment revolving fund outlined in Section 1G of Berto for fiscal year 2027, pursuant to Mass General Laws Chapter 44, Section 53E and a half, to incur liabilities against and spend monies for such fund consistent with the ordinance. The revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from the alternative compliance payments. ACPs are an approved emissions mitigation pathway that consists of payments equal to the average per cost per metric ton of CO2e to decarbonize buildings. The Environment Department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $1,500,000. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docket number 0747. committee on ways and means which was referred on april 8 2026 message you know approving in order authorizing a limit for the boston center for youth and families revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to pay salaries and benefits of employees and to purchase supplies and equipment necessary to operate the city hall daycare child care this revolving fund shall be credited with any and all receipts from tuition paid by parents or guardians of children enrolled at the center. Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $1,100,000. Submits a report recommending the order ought to pass. Docket number 0748, the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred on April 8th, 2026. Message in order approving an order authorizing a limit for the law department revolving fund for fiscal year 2027. to purchase goods and services to pay for repairs to city property. This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from recoveries for damages to city property caused by third parties. The law department will be the only department authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $300,000, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Talking number 0749. The Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8th, 2026. Message not approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Police Department Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to pay salaries and benefits of employees and to purchase supplies and equipment necessary to operate the Boston Police Department Fitness Center. Revenue for this fund is derived from monthly membership fees. Receipts and resulting expenditures from this fund shall not exceed $100,000. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Document number 0750, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8th, 2026. Message not approving an order authorizing a limit for the Boston Police Department Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the canine units training programs for officers and police dogs from none City of Boston Law Enforcement Agencies. The Special Operations Division will charge tuition and other fees to outside law enforcement agencies for training with the K-9 unit. The tuition and other fees paid by outside agencies will be used to purchase training equipment, certify instructors, update facilities, and provide funds for other training needs not otherwise budgeted. The Special Operations Division will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund and such expenditures shall be capped at $100,000. Submits a report that the order ought to pass. Document 0751, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred April 8, 2026. Message in order, approving an order authorizing a limit for the Mayor's Office of Arts and Culture revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to purchase goods and services to support public art to enhance the public realm throughout the city of Boston. This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from easements within the public way granted by the Public Improvement Commission. The Mayor's Office of Arts and Culture will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $800,000, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. Docking of zero seven five to the committee on ways and means to which was referred on April 8 2026 message not approving an authorizing limit for the mayor's office of arts and culture revolving fund for fiscal year 2027 to purchase goods and services to fund the operation of Strand theater the revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from rental fees for the use of the strand theater the mayor's office of arts and culture will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditure shall be kept at $300,000, submits a report that the order ought to pass. Document number 0753, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8, 2026. Message in order, approving an order authorizing a limit for the Mayor's Office of Tourism, revolving fund for fiscal year 2027, to purchase goods and services to support events and programming on and around City Hall Plaza, to advance tourism and promote participation in public celebrations and civic and cultural events. This revolving fund shall be funded by receipts from payments for the use of City Hall Plaza pursuant to City of Boston Code Chapter 11, Section 7-14. The Mayor's Office of Tourism will be the only unit authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $150,000. Submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass. and docket number 0754, the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred April 8th, 2026. Message in on approving an order authorizing limit for the Transportation Department Revolving Fund for fiscal year 2027 to support the operation of the bike share program within the City of Boston. This revolving fund shall be funded by system generated user revenue, sponsorship revenues, and advertising revenues. the Transportation Department be the only department authorized to expend from the fund, and such expenditures shall be capped at $1,400,000, submits a report recommending that the order ought to pass.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. This is a marathon session for you today. The Chair recognizes the Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means, Councillor Weber. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you very much. I'm going to take dockets 0741 to 0745. First, these authorized annual spending limits for city revolving funds that allow departments to use revenue they generate themselves. These revolving funds include BPS revolving funds for facilities, custodial utility and transportation costs, computer repair and purchase costs for the sale of renewable and alternative energy certificates and funding for the Environment Conservation Commission. to secure outside consultants in order to aid in the review of proposed projects to the Commission per the City's ordinance protecting local wetland and promoting climate change adaptation. For these reasons, the Committee recommends passage of these five dockets, and I respectfully ask for my colleagues' support on docket numbers 0741 to 0745, and then I'll address the rest.
0741 through 0745. Can we vote on them all separately? Councillor, we've read them all into the records, so we'd probably like to go ahead and vote on them all. Pardon me. Hold on a second, Councillor. He's still in discussion of the dockets that were read into the record. Councillor Webber, you have the floor.
So that was docket number 0741 to 0745. 0746 creates a new revolving fund to support Boston's building emissions program, otherwise known as BIRDO. The fund would be paid through collection of fees from building owners who choose to make compliance payments instead of reducing admissions. The Environment Department would manage the fund with a cap of $1.5 million per year. Docket numbers 0747 to 0753 authorize annual spending limits for city revolving funds, which allow departments which allow departments to use revenue they generate themselves. These revolving funds support the Equitable Emission Investment Fund under Berto, City Hall Child Care Operations, the Police Canine Training Program, public art initiatives, operations at Strand Theatre and Tourism, and cultural and civic programs at City Hall Plaza. For these reasons, the committee recommends passage of these seven dockets, 0747 to 0753, in respect to the ask for my colleague's support. Docket number 0754 creates a new revolving fund to support Boston's bike share program. The fund would be paid by user fees, sponsorship, and advertising revenue generated by the program. The Transportation Department would manage the fund, spending capped at $1.4 million per year. I believe that's what we've read into the record. I'm recommending passage of those dockets.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. That was a lot to read through. We will now proceed to a vote on these dockets. We'll start with docket 0741. The Chair of the Committee of Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report in passage of docket 0741. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0741.
Councilor Braden?
Councilor Kaleta-Zapata? Yes. Councilor Culpepper? Yes. Councilor Culpepper, yes. Councilor Durkan? Yes. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald?
Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn? Yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan?
Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia? Yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy? Yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen?
Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Santana? Yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber?
Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Orrell?
Councillor Kaleta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Kaleta-Zapata, yes. Dock number 0741 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means—sorry, that's—thank you. The Committee report has been accepted, and Dock number 0741 has passed. And also, Mr. Clerk, could you please record that Councillor—I'm giving you a promotion—Doctor Kaleta-Zapata—Councillor Kaleta-Zapata has joined us. Thank you. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0742. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please read Docket 0742.
Councillor Breen. Yes. Councillor Breen. Yes. Councillor Kaleta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Kaleta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Councilor Durkin, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell, yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Docking number 0742 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0742 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0743. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0742 has passed. Mr. Clerk. Could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0743?
Councillor Brayton?
Councillor Brayton, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata? Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, yes. Councillor Culpepper? Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan? Yes. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald? Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn? Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Lujan, yes. Councillor Lujan, yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Le Pen, yes. Councillor Le Pen, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. And Councillor Worrell, yes. Councillor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0743 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0743 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0744. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on 0744.
Councillor Braden.
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Council Fitzgerald? Yes. Council Flynn?
Council Flynn? Yes. Council Luzon? Yes. Council Luzon? Yes. Council Mejia? Yes. Council Mejia? Yes. Council Murphy? Yes. Council Murphy? Yes. Council Pepin?
Council Pepin? Yes. Council Santana? Yes. Council Santana? Yes. Council Weber? Yes. Council Weber? Yes. And Council Worrell?
Council Worrell? Yes. Dock number 0744 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0744 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0745. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0745.
Councilor Brayton.
Councilor Brayton. Yes. Councilor Kaleta-Zapata. Councilor Kalpepper. Councilor Kalpepper. Yes. Councilor Durkan. Yes. Councilor Durkan. Yes. Councilor Fitzgerald.
Councilor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councilor Flynn. Yes. Councilor Flynn. Yes. Councilor Lujan.
Councilor Lujan. Yes. Councilor Mejia. Councilor Mejia. Yes. Councilor Murphy. Councilor Murphy. Yes. Councilor Pepin. Yes. Councilor Pepin. Yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Webber. Councillor Webber, yes. And Councillor Orrell, yes. Councillor Orrell, yes. Docket number 0745 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0745 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0746. All in favour say aye. Aye. All opposed say nay. Aye. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call? Vote on docket 0746.
Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia, Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Pepin, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell, yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0746 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0746 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means takes acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0747. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0747?
Councillor Braden.
Councillor Braden, yes. Councillor Collette is a pilot. Councilor Zapata, yes. Councilor Culpepper. Yes. Councilor Culpepper, yes. Councilor Durkan. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald.
Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn.
Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Louisian.
Councilor Louisian, yes. Councilor Mejia. Yes. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy. Yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen. Yes. Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell. Councillor O'Rourke. Yes. Docket number 0747 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0747 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0748. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Thank you. The committee report... Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0748?
Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Calata-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Calata-Zapata, yes. Councillor Culpepper. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn. Yes. Councillor Ugin.
Councillor Ugin, yes. Councillor Mejia. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy. Yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Vipendi. Councillor Papin, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Weber, yes. Councillor Weber, yes. And Councillor Orrell, yes. Docket number 0748 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0748 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0749. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Docket 0749?
Councillor Braden.
Council Braden. Yes. Council Kalazipa. Yes. Council Kalazipa. Yes. Council Culpepper. Council Culpepper. Yes. Council Durkan. Yes. Council Durkan. Yes. Council Fitzgerald. Yes. Council Fitzgerald. Yes. Council Flynn. Yes. Council Louisian. Yes. Council Louisian. Yes. Council Mejia. Yes. Council Mejia. Yes. Council Murphy. Yes. Council Murphy. Yes. Council DePenn. Yes. Council DePenn. Yes. Council Santana. Yes. Council Santana. Yes. Council Weber. Yes. Council Weber. Yes. Council Rural. Yes. Councillor Orrell, yes. Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Flynn, yes. Docket number 0749 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0749 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0750. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0750?
Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Louisianne.
Councillor Louisianne, yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy. Yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Bepin. Yes. Councillor McMahon, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Weber, yes. Councillor Weber, yes. Councillor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0750 has received a unanimous vote in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0750 has passed. Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0751. All in favor say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0751? Council of Braden. Yes.
Council of Braden, yes. Council of Coletta-Zapata, yes. Council of Coletta-Zapata, yes. Council of Culpeper, yes. Council of Culpeper, yes. Council of Durkan, yes. Council of Durkan, yes. Council of Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Michelle. Yes. Councilor Flynn.
Councilor Flynn. Yes. Councilor Lujan. Councilor Mejia. Councilor Mejia. Yes. Councilor Murphy. Yes. Councilor Murphy. Yes. Councilor Penn. Yes. Councilor Penn. Yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Weber. Yes. Councilor Weber. Yes. And Councilor Worrell. Yes. Councilor Worrell. Yes. Docket number 0751 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0751 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0752. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0752?
Councillor Braden?
Councillor Braden? Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata? Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata? Yes. Councillor Culpepper? Yes. Councillor Culpepper? Yes. Councillor Durkan? Yes. Councilor Durkin, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan. Councilor Mejia. Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen. Yes. Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Santana. Yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber. Yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell. Yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Talking number 0752 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and docket 0752 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of docket 0753. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 0753.
Councillor Brayton.
Councillor Brayton, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, yes. Councillor Calpepper, yes. Council Culpepper, yes. Council Durkan? Council Durkan, yes. Council Fitzgerald?
Council Fitzgerald, yes. Council Flynn?
Council Flynn, yes. Council Louisian? Council Mejia? Council Mejia, yes. Council Murphy? Yes. Council Murphy, yes. Council Pippen? Council Pepin, yes. Council Santana, yes. Council Santana, yes. Council Webber, yes. Council Webber, yes. And Council Worrell, yes. Council Worrell, yes. Docket number 0753 has received 12 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0752 has passed. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0753. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call? I've done it. I need to check it off. Thank you. The Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means seeks acceptance of the committee report and passage of Docket 0754. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. Thank you. The committee report has been accepted and Docket 0754 has passed.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you you you Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. you you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
What's the point of order? What rule are you bringing up?
Madam Chair, during this recess, I do understand and want to bring it to the attention that negotiations were taking place behind the scenes outside of this Ionella Chamber, which I believe potentially could be an open meeting law violation. We can't negotiate outside of this area while the body's in session. That's the rule. Thank you, Councillor Flynn.
Madam Chair, I would like... Councillor Flynn, we're moving on. Pursuant to Rule 39, each councillor will have 10 minutes to discuss the main motion, which is the full docket as presented. The assistant clerk will keep track with a stopwatch. If councillors do not use all their time in the first round, they will be able to use any remaining time they have in a second round. Pursuant to Rule 30, councillors will have a separate two minutes for each subsidiary motion meaning and including amendments for councillor will be limited to two minutes. We will be reasonably enforcing time limits in accordance with the council rules and to ensure each councillor is allotted an equal and fair amount of time. Mr. Clerk, would you please read Docket 0733? I beg I'll give you the mic. Thank you.
Docket number 0733, the Committee on Ways and Means, which was referred on April 8th. 2026. Message in order for an annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027. Submits a report recommending the order ought to pass in an amended draft.
Thank you. The Chair recognizes Councillor Webber, the Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means. Councillor Webber, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. First procedural issue, I'd like to move to substitute the committee report with a new committee report. This reflects a few changes. One, in the package has been removed $200,000 that was being pulled from Boston Public Libraries. and after feedback from my colleagues and advocates, and an increase from a poll from the execution of courts by $100,000. In addition, so the full package would be $8.1 million, and it would fund $2 million for city housing vouchers, which is still, instead of 2.1 million, which is still over the 100% of what it was last year. In addition, the original committee report sought to ensure that funds for the Office of Black Male Advancement, the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus Advancement, and the Office of Women's Advancement went directly to those offices instead of sending them to the Equity Office. While the funds for the Office of Black Male Advancement were sent directly to that office in the original tax order, there was some confusion about where the funds for the Office of Women's Advancement and the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus would end up. The substituted committee report alters the tax order to prevent any possible confusion by expressly routing directly to the Mayor's Office of Women's Advancement $100,000 and to the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus Advancement $200,000. That's in addition to the $555,000 being directly sent to the Office of Black Male Advancement. In the prior report, the funds were designated for these offices. but we're routed through the Equity Office. This change reflects what was screen-shared and discussed during the last working session, and now the tax order is updated to ensure the funding goes directly to those two offices. So I move to substitute the committee report for those reasons, and then we can discuss the merits of it.
Thank you. Absent objection, Councillor Webber's substitution is before the body. Councillor Councilor Mejia?
Sorry. I just walked in. Just so that I'm clear, are we on docket 7033? Yes. And the motion on the table is just a substitution, right? Correct. Not his...
request uh no we we will discuss the the full package after this is just to substitute the committee report uh make and and honestly most of it is just to make sure that funds that we've designated for the office of women's advancement and the office of lgbtq plus advancement will be sent directly to those offices instead of to the equity office which was in our presentation but not in the tax order
Thank you. No, and I appreciate that. I think that it's really important for those who are following us on this journey.
Councillor Mejia, are you objecting to this?
No, I just wanted to make sure that we all knew what was happening. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you very much. Councillor Coletta Zapata had her light on first.
Thank you. Thank you, Madam President. I'm going to move a motion to amend the Ways and Means Amendment Package to restore $1.2 million for the Office of Immigrant Advancement Grants.
We're not there yet.
I haven't brought the package to the floor, but I'll leave it to— Okay, after we've substituted, I believe I can make a motion to introduce that package.
Thank you. But have we substituted this motion? Okay, I'm thinking there was a second.
Hold on a second. Councillor— Councillor, are you, Councillor Mejia, are you objection? Okay, you have the floor.
No, just because I feel like right now there's a little bit of confusion creating here, and I just want to make sure. So I, if it would be helpful for me to understand, you know, because Councillor Coletta's already ready to go to amendments. I believe he's still talking about substitution. I need somebody to help me understand what is at play and at what point I can speak in regards to objecting this whole process.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. Because Councillor Mehear is objecting to the committee report, we'll be polling the committee. A yes vote means you agree with the Chair's recommendation on reporting this out. A no means that this matter should return to committee. Mr. Clerk, could you please take the poll?
Wait one second. So, Councillor Braden, if you'll recognize me, put my mic on. Thank you, Councillor Braden, for recognizing me now officially. Madam President, I object to the Chair's committee report on docket 0733. To be clear, I am not objecting to the Chair's offering a substitution. I am objecting to the Chair's reporting out on this docket so that we can move this item to the green sheets and then pull it from the green sheets to take a full vote on rejecting the budget. Community members have been actively calling for this action and it would be disrespectful to not allow Councillors to vote on it and have those votes reflected for the public record. I ask respectfully that my colleagues who are members of the Ways and Means Committee to vote no on agreeing on the Chair's reporting out when they are polled so that we can let democracy play out.
Chair recognizes Councillor Webber.
Councillor Webber, you have the floor. We're just trying to substitute the committee report so we can then bring it to the floor and have a discussion about the amendments that we're doing. People will have a full opportunity to vote for or against the amendment package, make amendments, and we'll have that discussion again. The vote is just to make two minor changes to the committee report, primarily to make sure that funds in the amendment package for the Office of Women's Advancement and the Office of LGBTQ Plus Advancement will go directly to those offices instead of through the Equity Cabinet. In addition, we did remove a cut from the Boston Public Libraries and took $100,000 from execution courts in addition. to what we'd originally proposed. But, again, voting for this or allowing this to go forward allows for a full hearing about the amendment package, and you can still vote down the amendment package, you can make amendments to the amendment package. It just brings it to the floor.
Leanne Wood AMC We're going to poll the committee. Hang on. I need to just take a breath here. We would like to poll the committee. Mr. Clerk. I have a point of order.
I just want to ask the chair a question with regard to blackmail advancement. When he talked about taking out the L... So it's still in there.
Where is it? This will all be open for discussion. We just need to bring the amended report properly before the body right now.
I just want to...
Okay. One at a time please.
In the remarks I think before you were in here, the committee report as originally filed directed $555,000 directly to the Office of Black Male Advancement. It's just that the $300,000 for the Office of Women's Advancement and the LGBTQ Plus Advancement Office were routed to them through the Equity Office. All this does is provide them with the same assurance, those two offices that we've already provided for the Office of Black Male Advancement. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper, for your question.
I have a procedural point of information, I guess, from the Clerk. My question is, was the report properly substituted on the floor? Because I made a motion first and it was seconded, isn't that motion in the sequential order should be taken first before any other motions?
It's still an outstanding motion.
It's still an outstanding motion that's on the floor. Yes. So moving forward, will that be taken first, that motion? That's my intention, yes. Okay, thank you.
If councillors want to speak, I will allow my colleagues to speak, but I want to clarify that we are only addressing the question of polling the committee for the chair's report right now. Comments and debate on the budget itself will be fully allowed later in the meeting at the appropriate time. Mr. Clerk, could you please poll the Ways and Means Committee?
Members of the Committee on Ways and Means. Councillor Webber.
Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Colletta Zapata. Yes, to bring it on the floor.
Councillor Gilliam, you need to sit down. No, you need to sit down.
I know, but there's some weird stuff happening right now.
We're trying to actually follow an order here, so please sit down. We're polling the committee. A yes vote means that you agree with the Chair's recommendation on reporting this out. A no vote means that this matter should remain in committee. hold on i'm taking a brief recess here because all of this is you We are polling the Ways and Means Committee. A yes vote means that we agree with the Chair's recommendation of the substitution, and a no vote means that this matter should return to committee. Mr. Clerk, could you please poll the Ways and Means Committee?
Councillor Webber. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Zafiropoulos? Yes. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos?
Councillor Zafiropoulos?
Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Zafiropoulos? No. Councillor Weber.
Thank you very much, Madam President. This year's budget process was exceptionally challenging. City costs, particularly for healthcare, are rising much faster than revenues, with property taxes rising at the slowest rate since 1998. As a result, the overall budget from FY26 to FY27 grew by just 2.1%, marking the slowest growth since the Great Recession in fiscal year 2010. As a result of those pressures, the Mayor's proposed budget cut many of the grants and programs that support our most vulnerable communities. In a city that must do everything it can to address gaps in wealth, health, and academic achievement that fall along racial and socioeconomic lines, we need budgets that provide real, tangible support for housing, seniors, youth, small businesses, food access, and the arts. City Councillors have heard calls to restore the cuts over the last two months in over 150 hours of budget hearings, city hall listening sessions, neighborhood town halls, and working sessions. Accordingly, my office received submissions from my colleagues about what we should fund with the amendments to the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget, and that aligned with the advocacy of our constituents. As a result, as the chair of the Ways and Means Committee of the Boston City Council, I submitted an amendment package last Wednesday and again today that restores nearly all the cuts that advocates have been fighting for in response to the Mayor's proposed fiscal year 2027 budget. The amendment package before us today totals $8.1 million and will fund the following. For the Office of Housing, approximately $3 million. That's $2 million for housing vouchers, $450,000 for access to council. $300,000 for down payment assistance, $125,000 for BHA team mentoring, and $60,000 for rent stabilization, all at 100% or above of what they were last year. For the Age Strong Commission, the amendment package restores $1.2 million for senior programming and grants. For the Office of Black Male Advancement, $555,000. For the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus Advancement, it's $200,000. And for the Office of Women's Advancement, another $100,000. For youth jobs, it adds $750,000. When added to the private funding secured by Mayor Wu for 2,000 school year youth jobs, this will supply approximately 2,225 youth jobs, more than the 1,800 jobs last year. For returning citizens and families, this package will provide $750,000. For arts and culture, $600,000. For small businesses, $600,000. And for food access and support, $400,000. This package moves more money than the Council has in recent years on a more challenging budget and with a forecast for more trouble ahead. We are under more pressure than ever to make smart decisions that are going to set up Boston for future success. Our goal was to supply a budget amendment package that would fund vital programming like housing vouchers and youth jobs without negatively impacting the services our residents rely on or create the risk of layoffs of city workers. Our process has helped us construct an amendment package that restores 100% of the cuts impacting housing vouchers, access to council, down payment assistance, rental stabilization, BHA team mentoring, the Office of LGBTQIA2S Plus Advancement, and the Mayor's Office of Women's Advancement. In addition, we have secured 89% of the grants for Age Strong, 67% of the funding for small businesses, 58% of the funding for returning citizens and their families, and 50% of the funding for arts and culture and grants to combat food security. And by adding $750,000 onto the youth jobs pool, we'll be ensuring there will be city-based jobs for our youth. And with the private funding secured by the mayor, there will be more than 500 more school year jobs than were provided last year. The council must take action today Wednesday June 10th where the mayor's budget will automatically move forward unamended Which I urge my colleagues to support this package and deliver the funds and grants our communities deserve I'd be remiss not to thank my staff and City Council central office Our central office budget staff for all the hard work They've put in over this process which has allowed us to arrive at a vote today on a package and also to thank my colleagues and who participated in this budget review process. As the chair of the Ways and Means Committee, I am seeking acceptance of this committee report and an amended draft and passage of this docket before you today. Thank you.
Thank you, Chair Weber. Chair recognizes Councillor Colletta Zapata.
You have the floor. Thank you, Councillor President. So Madam Chair, I move to amend the amendment package to restore the $1.2 million for the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Grants. This amendment would restore funding for immigrant legal services, ESOL programming, and community-based immigration support grants consistent with the funding levels previously discussed during the Council's working sessions and introduced by the Chair. I ask that that amendment be distributed and considered.
Madam President. Do you have a second? Madam President, point of information or whatever we're calling it. Just for the record, I'll be recusing myself from this discussion based on guidance I've received from the State Ethics Commission. Okay, thank you.
Thank you. Councillor Colletta, your motion is seconded. You have the floor.
Thank you so much. I rise today in support of this amendment restoring funding to the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement. This amendment restores funding that many of us discussed extensively throughout the budget process and that was originally contemplated as part of the broader restoration conversations that occurred during the working session that we all agreed that we wanted to introduce. Specifically, this amendment restores funding for immigrant legal services, ESOL programming, which is a huge need in my district. Language access and community-based grants administered through the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement. So specifically, what this amendment to the amendment package introduces is ESOL grant support to the tune of 275,000. Legal access, which is a huge necessity. during this federal administration and their horrific attacks on our immigrant brothers and sisters and folks, even with legal protected status. Diverse neighborhoods grant, $164,000, and tuition equity for $172,000, and then as well as weaving well-being at $269,517. Across Boston, immigrant families continue to navigate increasingly complex legal challenges, language barriers, and uncertainty about access to services. The legal aid funded supported through Moya helps families access qualified legal representation and trusted community-based assistance. The ESOL funding helps residents learn English, access employment opportunities, support their children's education, and fully participate in civic life. In District 1, these investments are especially important. East Boston is one of the most diverse neighborhoods in the city of Boston and home to a generation of immigrant families from around the world. Every week, our office works with residents who rely on legal aid services, language access support, and ESOL programs to navigate everyday challenges. We have seen firsthand how these investments improve economic mobility, educational outcomes, and community stability. This amendment also reflects the work already done by this council. The funding levels contained in this amendment mirror the restoration concepts previously discussed during our working session and are consistent with the priorities many colleagues expressed throughout this process. To me, this is not a partisan amendment. It is an amendment that recognises that immigrant families are a part of Boston's story, part of Boston's economy and part of Boston's future. For those reasons, I ask my colleagues to support this amendment and restore funding to the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement. Thank you.
Mr. Clerk, could you please read Councillor Colletta Zapata's... I apologize, we're getting the cart before the horse here. Could you please read Councillor Colletta Zapata's amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councillor Colletta Zapata, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows. Decrease execution of court special appropriation Increase Office for Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services $960,000 for the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding. Decrease Department of Innovation Technology Contractual Services. Increase Office for Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services $40,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding. Decrease Office of People Operations Contractual Services. Increase Office for Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services $50,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding. Decrease Labor Relations Contractual Services, Increase Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services $50,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding. Decrease Office of Financial Contractual Services. Increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services. $100,000 for Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Funding. Filed in the Council June 10.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Does anyone wish to speak on this amendment? Councillor Durkan, you have the floor.
Thank you so much. I want to begin by recognizing the work of our Ways and Means Chair, Chair Weber, the administration, all of my colleagues on this council, of course, central staff, specifically Karishma and Ryan. Over the past several months, we've been involved in many hours of hearings, working sessions, public testimony, and conversations with residents across the city. There have been significant disagreements about the best path forward, many of which remain, but I believe this amendment package before us with the included amendment reflects a thoughtful effort to address concerns while meeting the financial realities facing our city. For that, I rise today in support of both The chairs amendment package and this addition the budget as proposed by the mayor was not written using under easy circumstances It reflects the real financial constraint of the movement driven by rising cross from employee health care and public overtime safety overtime to unanticipated snow removal costs and the continued inflationary pressures affecting both municipal budgets across the country and specifically Boston In times like these, the Council is tasked with doing what responsible government must do, make decisions. Across the Commonwealth, I read in the Globe this week, cities Somerville, Malden, and New Bedford are confronting layoffs and service reductions amid significant financial challenges. Many are warning that without additional revenue measures, including against Prop 2 1⁄2 overrides, they will be forced to make additional cuts. Against that backdrop, I'm proud that this package preserves the core services that residents rely on every day while protecting filled city positions. It reflects a serious effort to live within our means while responding to priorities raised throughout the process. Across this body, there has been consensus that some of the additional reduction... California letter!
You failed us! Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. Colleagues, we're going to take a brief recess.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. . Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. United, we'll never be defeated. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Tell us where the money goes. Tell us where the money goes.
Tell us where the money goes. Tell us where the money goes. Thank you.
Excuse me, can I have silence, please? Can I have silence, please? Quiet.
Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me.
This meeting is on recess.
This meeting is recessed.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
you know
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you.
you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. It cannot be. It cannot be. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. . Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Bye. Thank you. Thank you. you you Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you
Good afternoon. We need you folks to leave because we need to continue with the business of this meeting. If we don't leave, we have a hard deadline to amend the budget.
If we reject it, then the Merit Budget stands.
Midnight tonight. Excuse me. Okay, I'm not going to debate this. That's my understanding. I'm asking you now for the last time to stand up and leave peacefully.
Otherwise, we're going to have to. This is your last warning. We're going to ask the police department to remove you. So, thank you.
And we need to get back to working business here. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you you Thank you. you Thank you.
Amen.
Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
We are back in session. As pursuant to Rule 2042, no demonstration of approval or disapproval from members of the public will be permitted, including but not limited to signs, placards, banners, cheering, clapping or booing, etc. If such demonstrations are made, the gallery or public seating area will be cleared. This rule will be strictly enforced. There will be no more warnings. If you make a disturbance or distraction, you will be escorted out. As a reminder, we are currently on docket number 0733. The motion before the body is Councillor Coletta Zapata's amendment to docket 0733 before the chair. We are currently addressing this amendment. Once we finish this amendment, we will finish addressing the other amendments. Does everybody have Councillor Colletta Zapata's amendment in front of them? It was given out earlier. If anyone hasn't got it. Given the disruption, I don't remember who is next up to speak. So in fairness to my colleagues, please refresh my memory and who is next and we will go from there. Councillor Coletta Zapata you have the floor.
Thank you, and this is actually good because After having conversations with colleagues in the spirit of collaboration Consensus and collegiality. I am going to formally withdraw the motion understanding that there's going to be a motion from one of my colleagues I think we're all here to do the work of the people and no one wants to No one wants this body to dissolve into chaos and Just for the sake of trying to figure out who's putting what up. I My motion was to fully fund immigrant advancement To be clear. I believe that that is something that is happening. That's my understanding. That's my hope That's my wish and so in the spirit again of consensus collaboration collegiality. I'm going to withdraw my motion and I do look forward to ultimately voting on this budget package presented by the chair and then look forward to hearing from my colleagues if they have other ideas of things that they want to fund and talking through those amendments in a very cordial and respectful way. Thank you.
Yes, thank you, Madam President. I'd like to thank Council Senator Coletta Zapata for withdrawing that, knowing that in an amendment package that we were going to originally propose, we will now bifurcate that, and I would like to introduce an original amendment on the floor to be voted on. And then my intent is to, after this amendment package, that we will then have a vote on the Moya amendment package as well. So I have a non-Moya package and a Moya package for evident reasons.
Do you have a motion to offer another amendment? Do you have a seconder? Thank you. We have a seconder. Mr. Clerk, could you read this amendment into the record for us? I better give you some answers here.
Amendment of Council of Fitzgerald, document number 0733. Message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended shall be amended as follows. Coordinated response team. Decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services. Increase Office of Human Services personnel services, 75,000, to be directed toward three permanent full-time employees for the citywide coordinated response team. Decrease Boston Public Health Commission special appropriation. Increase Office of Human Services personnel services, 125,000 to be directed towards three permanent full-time employees for the city-wide coordinated response team. Aid strong grants and programming. Decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services. Increase age-strong commission contractual services. $150,000 to be directed toward community grants. Office of Food Justice grants. Decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services. Increase Office of Food Justice contractual services. $50,000 to be directed toward community grants. EMS Health and Wellness grants. Decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increased Boston Public Health Commission special appropriations, $125,000 to be directed towards emergency medical services, health and wellness. Legacy business awards, decreased Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increased Office of Economic Opportunity and Inclusion Contractual Services, $300,000 to be directed toward Legacy Business Awards. MWBE Procurement Readiness Pilot, Decrease Boston Transportation Department Personnel Services, Increase Public Facilities Department Contractual Services, $200,000 to be directed toward MWBE Procurement Readiness Pilot. At Risk and Transitional Youth Jobs and Assistance, decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services $50,000 to be directed toward at-risk and transitional youth jobs and assistance. Arts and culture grants, decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increase Office of Arts and Culture contractual services $225,000 to be directed toward arts and culture grants. Human Rights Commission, decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increase Human Rights Commission personnel services $200,000 to be directed toward Human Rights Commission personnel services. Veteran Services, decrease Boston Transportation Department personnel services, increase Office of Veterans Personnel Services $25,000 to be directed toward additional supports for veteran services. Fair Housing Testing Programme. Decrease Boston Public Library personnel services. Increase Office of Fair Housing and Equity Contractual Services. $100,000 to be directed toward Fair Housing Testing Programme. Filed in the Council June 10th.
Chair recognises Councillor Fitzgerald. You may continue.
Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Mr. Clerk, for reading all that. First, I'd like to focus on where these polls are coming from so people understand. They're coming from BTD. We have 1.4 million coming from BTD personnel services. The reason we chose to focus in on the BTD personnel services is that we looked at their five-year underspend, and the average was 3.5 million. By taking 1.4 million, we believe that the department can make the necessary changes within the department to decide what they want to do with this cut, just as when we cut from any other department They have to recalibrate internally, and we believe that they have the bandwidth to do that. There are a couple other ones at BPHC and library. Those are offset by other things that will be in the substituted budget from the chair. And as you can see, originally we had some more money in this, but as things you have to work out, not everyone, there's just sometimes not enough to go around this year, right, to feed everybody. But some of the stories that does come out of this I think should be good. The coordinated response team, getting folks to help with the open congregate drug use, and that is a citywide team. And again, all of the increases we have here are really for citywide services. No one is benefiting from their district specifically. This is in collegiality with everybody. And I got to say, I have to give a personal shout out. Council Santana has been fantastic in this process in working together and making sure we get to a good thing. And I know I've really worked with all the colleagues and this is a team effort to get here. There was a lot of things we had to do and to stay by the rules and everything. We really did it and it took a lot and this process is designed to be chaotic. And so I know at times it can seem that. But what I hope folks understand is that the folks on this body care about this city, and we actually do care about one another. And I think this budget, while it isn't as strong, this amendment package, while it isn't as strong as many of us would like, we do understand the constraints with which we are operating. But CRT, we have age-strong GANs to support our seniors, the Office of Food Justice gets an increase, EMS, Health and Wellness, which I think is so important because they're often overlooked in our public safety. Legacy Business Grants, we hope to even try and get more at some point in the future to make sure this year's Legacy Business Grants winner are also made whole. There's a Procurement Readiness Pilot, and I'd like to thank Mr. Culpepper for advocating for that. We have additional at-risk and transitional youth jobs, and I know Julia Councilmejia has been a huge advocate along with Council Santana around that. The vets, I'd like to thank Councilor Ed Flynn for advocating to get veterans money in there. We have arts and culture, which I know all of our districts love and make each individual district beautiful. And so we wanted to make sure we restored more of their grants so that they can continue to do what they do. And then we have the Human Rights Commission restoration, which I think will be a vital thing when we talk about, especially we're going in the future, and the fair housing testing program. So these are the things that are increased that we were all able to build consensus around and agree that they should go forward and we should increase each of these things. And I gave you the reason of where the decrease comes from. And so with that, Madam President, I would like to conclude the summary of my $1.4 million amendment package that hopefully will gain the support of everybody here because they all had a hand in making this work. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Fitzgerald. Let me see where we're at. I should keep my list of lights here. The Chair recognizes Councillor Santana. Councillor, you have the floor. Oh, hang on. Hold on a second. Let me just check my list. Councillor Murphy, you have the floor. You're the next one.
Thank you. Thank you, Madam President. And before I speak to this amendment... I do just want to speak to the public. They're probably wondering why we haven't been here for a couple hours. And I do want to thank Officer Z, Sergeant Mills, the Boston Police Office who were here, all our municipal offices, and property management who worked so professionally and diligently and got us to a place where we could come back into this chamber and continue this work. Because if we don't work together and get to a vote by midnight tonight, this budget will just go into effect without our amendment process. So I just wanted to make sure we thanked everyone who came in to support our work today. So thank you, Madam President. I have serious concerns about the ethics questions surrounding this process, and I hope- Contra Murphy, Contra Murphy. I'm talking about the amendments, and I hope these concerns do not come back to harm this council or undermine the work we do today. But I'm here today to vote. I have shown up, attended the hearings and working sessions, reviewed the amendments, and advocated for the priorities I believe Boston residents deserve. I am proud that this package fully restores important funding for age strong grants. Our seniors deserve behavioral health support and opportunities to remain connected and engaged in their communities. This package gives them the dignity that they earned and deserved and Thank the advocates, Megan and Chinatown and others who have been strongly reaching out, encouraging us to continue to support our seniors. I also support the additional funding for veterans that I have strongly advocated for. We're asking and we're getting $25,000 and some may ask why do we want to fight for $25,000? But to me, it's a true placeholder in the veterans budget. Anytime something completely goes away, you often never get it back. So I'm grateful to Brighton Marine for its generous support this year, but private donations cannot replace a dependable city commitment. We should preserve this line item in the budget. Once a line disappears, it becomes much harder to bring it back, and history shows it almost never comes back. So keeping even a modest placeholder protects our ability to continue to advocate for more support next year, especially when the nonprofit partners may not be able to provide the same level of support year after year. I also support the investments in youth jobs, including the Boston Student Advisory Council positions and all the others, as well as funding for arts and culture grants, housing vouchers, returning citizens, food justice, blackmail investment. These are services residents see and fail in their neighborhoods. They support young people, seniors, veterans, families, artists, tenants, community organizations across Boston. So I hope this body can come together around this modest amendment package. And I don't believe it's modest because we didn't have the ability to fight for more. I believe it's modest because we weren't willing to use the power we have. But I'm here to support it, and I'm here to listen to what my colleagues also want to advocate for. So thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy. The chair recognizes Councillor Santana. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. I rise today, I first want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for putting this amendment package together. I think as Councillor Fitzgerald mentioned, I think we are all experiencing, this has been a very chaotic experience, but I think in listening to each other through working sessions here in the Chamber, I think that this package actually directly speaks to what many of our Councillor colleagues have been speaking about, right? So I think we really have an opportunity to be able to come together today and be able to, again, make this budget better. I don't think that anyone here is saying that this is a perfect budget or a great budget, but we have an amendment of ours to make it better. And I think that this package does that. And I think, as Councilor Fitzgerald mentioned, it's about building consensus. I support all of the amendments being put here. specifically because there are city-wide initiatives. There are city-wide initiatives that will impact all of our districts, and I think that's where we're going to be able to build consensus. So I appreciate your leadership, Councillor Fitzgerald, and I'm looking forward to supporting this package when that time comes. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you. The Chair recognises Councillor Flynn. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Yes, you've got it.
I also want to say thank you to Councillor Fitzgerald for his leadership during this challenging time. And coming up with a plan that recommendation that listened to everybody and respected everybody. A couple of the amendments, a couple of the departments that I specifically advocated for in this package included the EMS health and wellness. ensuring that EMTs, paramedics, that do an exceptional job for the residents of Boston and visitors, but they also have the health and wellness programs available for them. I think that is critical. They have a very difficult and stressful job, and we need to ensure that employee assistance programs, health and wellness programs are there for them. Oftentimes, EMS is overlooked. But I think this is a signal that we respect them and we respect the work they do and their families as well. I also highlighted and advocated for the Human Rights Commission with Reverend Culpepper. I want to say thank you to Reverend Culpepper for working with me on this recommendation. When the Human Rights Commission was first established, it really was supporting gay and lesbians at that time. that were victims of hate crime and racism. Certainly it's expanded, but we need to do the work, the important work ahead to make sure the Human Rights Commission is a place where residents feel heard and are respected. And that's what I'm committed to doing, working with my colleagues. The final point, veteran services. It's only $25,000. It's the lowest number on this recommendation. I'm supporting this proposal. I'm disappointed in that figure, but I realize this is a compromise. But I do want to point out that this figure of $25,000 is very low, and veterans need to be treated with respect and dignity. I don't necessarily think they are receiving it, but it's a step in the right direction. And I'm willing to support that because it is a step in the right direction. But next year, we have to take a strong look at that department and support it with the right resources and support that it needs and deserves. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. The Chair recognizes Councillor Mejia. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. And I want to thank the public for their persistence in asking us to go forward little bit harder and to be a little bit bolder and to actually fight a little bit harder for some of these amendments. I know when it's my turn to speak on my amendments I'll be presenting my own for consideration but for now I am rising to thank the advocates for their steadfast persistence and I will just note that the amendment package that is in front of us I don't think meets the moment and it's not going as hard as we need to and I have heard that we have not been given much to work with and we can't find any more money and I believe that there is money out there we just are afraid to ask for it and so I want to know for the record that we did receive a legal memo stating that we have the power to reject and continue with amendments. And we're not choosing to do that. What we're choosing to do is water down a process even further. And while I believe compromise is important, this moment also is asking us to demonstrate that this body can actually push the administration to tap into the Park and Media Fund to find other dollars. But we are not there in this moment. And I am very disappointed in that process. And I do want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for his leadership in really trying to bring the body together. I know it was not easy. Councillor Fitzgerald, you were able to reach across the aisle and get some folks here. So I do appreciate you doing that. and you know that I'm not happy with the youth jobs line item, and I can't in good conscience support something that does not go a little bit harder.
Thank you, Councillor Meheer. Chair recognizes Councillor Coletta Zapata. Councillor, you have the floor.
you so much madam chair i do appreciate the move to introduce this amendment package i want to thank council fitzgerald i also want to thank councillor henry santana who my understanding was integral into these conversations and trying to ensure that there was a package that helped to be representative of everybody's priorities so thank you as well to councillor santana in your work and getting that done and i want to thank councillor fitzgerald for Separating out moya from this package that we're talking about now So there's there's something said about these are necessary changes. There's an opportunity to recalibrate internally and that BTD in Particular has the bandwidth to do that one point four million dollars from the Boston Transportation Department in particular is a really tough cut for my district. We also just got a communication from the CFO that clearly states that this will result in layoffs of the transportation department. And I know for a fact that I have a lot of constituents that work in the streets cabinet, in particular in transportation. They're up in the control room. They're parking enforcement officers. And so that's that's one reason but then in addition to that The issues that BTD works on I had my team go back and check our constituent services logs They provide vital city services that are important to to my residents overwhelmingly besides public work issues so trash and or ISD issues things related to things that BTD works on or oversees are Is one of the top priorities of my constituents so parking enforcement officers We have we hear a lot from folks that we need more parking enforcement officers on the streets of East Boston because people park In Eastie and then they go to the airport. They just kind of leave their cars there. So that's just one example but for those reasons I Cannot support this particular section or this particular amendment that has been put up by Councillor Fitzgerald So I will be voting no but mainly for the personnel that are in my district that work in the Transportation Department, as well as the vital services that BTD provides my district in particular. Thank you.
Thank you. We all acknowledge how important these areas of investment are, and that's why I can see some of my advocacy in this package. But my issue with this package is that the polls from BTD will undoubtedly result in layoffs. As the Chair of Planning, Development, and Transportation, who oversaw hearings regarding the lack of movement on important transportation initiatives, I cannot fathom giving BTD less resources to make our streets safer. If this amendment is added to the package, as a point of unity, I will support the full package. But it always feels like some departments for basic city services are on the chopping block. I've heard from former employees of BTD that this will have an impact, so I plan to vote no. I acknowledge how important the areas of investment are. I just wish we were taking it from somewhere else.
Thank you. Councillor Mejia. You've already spoken, so Councillor Coletta Zapata, would you mind taking the chair for a few moments?
Councillor Braden, you now have the floor.
Thank you. I want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald and Councillor Santana in particular for leading this consensus-building effort. I think it's really important. I've been supportive of the effort to build consensus throughout the amendment process and of efforts to ensure this process reflects many community voices that we've heard. I also want to thank Councillor Webber for the work that he has done over the last two months, the extensive outreach in community and town hall meetings, et cetera, and always the challenging last lap of a budgeting process this last few weeks. I appreciate the intent behind this amendment to broaden consensus, expand the reach of our restorations, and respond to many community voices we have heard throughout this rigorous process. However, I cannot support this proposed cut to the Boston Transportation Department as Councillor for Alston Brighton. This amendment would cut £1.4 million from personnel services at BTD. It is the second largest cut the council would make to any city department. This is a targeted cut that has the potential to substantially impact our city's ability to improve the safety of our community members on city streets and conduct much-needed transportation planning. While I support restoring essential services for our communities, including housing programmes, Age Strong, youth jobs and other critical services, we have to look carefully at where the money is coming from. Transportation and street safety are one of the top issues that I hear from my constituents in District 9. In Alston Brighton, families with children, young adults, seniors, cyclists, transit riders and people with disabilities all want to move safely through our neighbourhoods. Parents should be able to walk their kids to school without worrying each time they cross the road. Last week, a neighbour of ours, an 82-year-old, was crossing on a crosswalk on Chesed Hill Ave and was struck by a truck. She is lucky to be alive. In April, the council held a hearing on delays of vital transportation projects throughout the city, and I remain deeply concerned about the city's current pattern of delay. I am focused on advancing a transportation agenda that makes Boston safer, more accessible and better connected. We cannot afford to cut the very department responsible for keeping our streets safe and our city moving. Boston needs near-term street safety improvements and a long-term vision for more equitable transportation planning. If this reduction is approved by the council, it will be up to the administration and BTD leadership to determine how to implement these cuts to this department. I urge the administration to protect BTD's transportation planning capacity, its transportation planning positions, and ensure that street safety work is not undermined. Thank you.
Yes, I have a quick point of clarification.
Yes, Councillor Mejia, you have the floor. Hang on a sec. Yeah, got it.
Yeah, thank you, Madam President. You know, there's a lot at stake here, and I want to make sure that we are all paying attention and we're getting this right. It would be helpful through the chair for me to hear from Councillor Fitzgerald the dollar. I may have missed the dollar amounts for some of his proposals, number one. And number two, this is my point of clarification, because I also have amendments and what I worry about, because for those folks, there's lots of negotiations already been happening and IGR and the administration has been very busy and really working hard at chipping away whatever votes we had. So I just want to make sure that whatever we are voting on right now, if this is going to be our last-ditch effort to at least get something for community before I make a vote on Fitzgerald's package.
And then I also want to propose my amendments for consideration, and I want to know— MS. We're taking one amendment at a time, so if you have a direct question for Councillor Fitzgerald, like a particular ask, then please ask him directly, and then he'll— MS.
So let me try this one more time in terms of what I'm trying to communicate. So that way I'm clear. What I want to make sure is that I don't kill Councilor Fitzgerald's last ditch effort to try to salvage whatever little crumbs we can get for people. Okay? I also have amendments that I want to present for consideration. And so I need you to tell me, right, procedurally, we're gonna first take a vote on Fitzgerald's amendments, and if those die, then it's a done deal for community. Because I'm sure that what I'm trying to propose, there's no appetite here to take any of these cuts?
We take one amendment at a time. We're dealing right now with Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment. We will take a vote on that, and then we'll move on to the next amendment.
Can we do a reconsideration for Councillor Fitzgerald's package, just in case, at some point in this session, so that If my amendments die, then the community does not get left without nothing. That's what I want to know.
I think the answer is if Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment stands, then we will move on and it will be included in the final package. Also, if you have amendments that you want to offer and they pass, we will have to work to get them included in the final package. But we have to take one amendment at a time. We can't muddy the water.
Could I then ask for consideration if it's possible—and maybe we might have to take a vote, and maybe the legal team here can help me with this—but is it possible for us to lay Fitzgerald's amendment on the table and then I can present my amendments.
No, that's not the way. We have to take a vote on this amendment.
But if I call to lay his amendment on the table, I could do that, right? Thank you. See, this is why I ask these questions, because knowledge is power. And there's some people in this chamber who have a lot more than others. And you are always utilizing procedural tactics to prevent things from happening. And so therefore, for the record, if I can put a motion on the table to lay Councillor Fitzgerald's amendments to—.
Jomana Musmar- So would you like to offer a supplemental amendment to his amendment? Is that how you'd like to proceed? Hold on a second. Can we take a recess? Jomana Musmar- Yeah, brief, very brief. Don't go anywhere. We're back. We're back. It didn't gavel in recess, so we're right back. Councillor Meheia has a motion to lay Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment on the table. Do you have a seconder, Councillor Meheia? Do you have a seconder, Councillor Mehear? Second. Thank you. Mr. Clerk, will you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Mehear's motion to lay Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment on the table? No. Oh, sorry. Beg your pardon.
Councilor Brayton. No. Councilor Brayton, no. Councilor Calera-Zapata. No. Councilor Calera-Zapata, no. Councilor Calvepo. No. Councilor Calvepo, no. Councilor Durkan. Yes. Councilor Durkan, yes. Councilor Fitzgerald. No. Councilor Fitzgerald, no. Councilor Flynn. Yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan.
Councilor Lujan, no. Councilor Mejia.
Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, no. Councilor Pepin.
Councilor Pepin, no. Councilor Santana. No. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Webber, no. Councillor Webber, no. And Councillor Worrell, yes. Motion to lay on the table eight in the negative and four in the affirmative.
Councillor Mehear's motion to lay on the table has not passed. Let's go. Where else were we here? Thank you, Councillor Mehear. I think the next person... who has not spoken yet is Councillor Culpepper. You have the floor. Councillor Culpepper Thank you, Madam President.
I hadn't planned to speak, but I heard Councillor here talk about this amendment. All week long we've been working on amendments. Councilor Worrell and Fitzgerald and others. And I went home pretty excited because I thought we had a pretty good amendment package. And I came back this morning and I looked and we still had a pretty good amendment package. We had some pretty good numbers in here for the Human Rights Commission, Fair Housing Testing Program, Office of Food Justice, the MWBE Procurement Readiness Program. That's a program that I started to get young folks ready for the procurement process. It felt pretty good until those young folks came in and took over. And something happened when they took over. Everybody left. And it was like smoke that came back in. Then we ended up with this. And I feel like I'm being told, take this or you don't get anything. Because this is not the package that I went to sleep with last night, excited about. But something happened when everyone went out and we came back, and this is what we have. Not only that, we got folks that said, no, they don't even want us to get this. I am amazed at what happened today. To Council Mojia's point, I'm going to vote for this. Not because I want to, but because we fought for black male advancement. That's in that other. We fought for LGBTQ advancement, that's in that other plan. We fought for women's, that's in the other plan. We fought for food justice, that's in the other plan. We fought for a lot of stuff in the other plan, but we thought we were beefing it up. And instead of beefing it up, it got beefed down. But I'm going to vote for it, because if I don't, to Constable Heal's point, we may not get anything. We do have some good stuff in the other budget that we'll talk about later, but for one who's only been here six months, I'm learning the process. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you. Chair recognizes Councillor Murphy, and then we'll go back to Councillor Fitzgerald.
Thank you.
Councillor Murphy, you have the floor.
Thank you. Through the chair to Council Fitzgerald, if I could ask a question about the pulls from transportation, please.
Council Fitzgerald, would you like to answer the question?
I think what I heard is that you said there was $3 million in underspends from transportation. Is that true? And we're only asking for how much? $1.2 million?
Council Fitzgerald, you have the floor.
Five-year historical average was $3.5 million in underspend, and we are using $1.4 of that to still allow flexibility for the department.
So a very small portion of the investment. Okay, so it seems very reasonable and there won't be actual people cut off, but just want to remind this body that eight of us voted and it passed. We just fired, laid off 400 employees in the school department last week. No one seems to be talking about that. But we're worried about a potential and I wish we could always keep jobs open and the money there to fund them and advocacy to get people hired but we know year after year that that's the whole point of the fighting about where to pull from is that all of my colleagues and they make good points that historical data has showed that department after department underspends so let's take it where it will hurt least but when it came to the bps budget we didn't care as a body we hit them where it matters most and just today in the globe another article came out about how bps is changing the way they teach their special ed students and it's not going to help and we already know we were doing a really bad job so i just want to remind everyone that we laid off four hundred City employees, so let's not confuse it. Just because the school committee has the final vote on the school budget, they are city employees. They are our colleagues and they are with our children, our students, our future every day. So I think we need to rethink whether or not we want to support this small package that we should be fighting for more. But if this is all we can get, I hope we have at least seven to support it. Thank you.
I think it does need to be addressed and said. I think it's a gross oversimplification to even compare BPS budget to the operating budget, as it's not, and I would like to respond to that directly.
In the city's operating budget, the city council has the opportunity to identify resources and make targeted investments that help preserve positions and services. Many of us have worked to restore these investments. And I think that we all want to reduce harm or do no harm where we can. I think the BPS budget presents a different challenge. The school committee, as mentioned, not the city council, has the final vote over staffing decisions. And the district is confronting long-term enrollment challenges. We lost 3,000 kids. There's rising fixed costs, transportation expenses, and state and federal funding pressures that districts across Massachusetts are facing. speech last week. While workforce reductions are deeply concerning and should be scrutinized, the question for the council was whether to fund the overall school budget that continues to educate more than 45,000 students and invest in critical services such as special education, multilingual learning, literacy, and student support. And so supporting the BPS budget is not endorsement, obviously, of every staffing decision. It is a recognition that withholding funding from the entire school system would not reverse those decisions and could create additional instability for students' families educators and so I felt like it needed to be addressed again I think it's an oversimplification to compare BPS budget to the operating budget and I'm grateful for the opportunity to directly address that thank you thank you the chair recognizes counselor friend counselor you have the floor Thank You madam chair I I voted against I voted against the BPS budget
And the reason I voted against the BPS budget, I felt that the budget really hurt our teachers and especially our paraprofessionals the hottest. Our paraprofessionals, mostly women of color, almost the lowest paid employees in the city. They're working with the teacher as a teacher's assistant, basically, trying to manage the classroom. The paraprofessionals, I tried to stress this the other day, paraprofessionals help students with disabilities. They take them to the bathroom. They help, they wash them. They help them clean up. They wash their hands. Then they come back to the classroom and they work with the other students. That is probably the most important job in the city of Boston, as far as I'm concerned. But the city council voted to cut several hundred of those positions. That was a moral vote. It wasn't a political vote, it was a moral vote. We have the ability to go to bat for people that don't have a voice in the city. and we chose not to go to bat for them. We can't deny that. We're going to have to eventually address that issue because it's not going away, and we heard a lot of low-income families in this city that supported special needs children, and that's a major stain on the city of Boston as far as I'm concerned. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. I think Councillor Culpepper, you're next. Then we'll go to Fitzgerald and then back to Councillor Mejia.
Madam Chair, I hadn't planned to say anything about that school committee budget. I thought I said what I needed to say last week. But when I heard my colleague mention that if we had not passed that budget, it would affect the stability of the Boston public school families, I thought about what about the Boston public school employees that will lose their jobs and their stability. And what bothers me the most about all of this is that many of the young folks that are now working, they don't have that three years, they're going to be laid off. It reminds me of the last hired, first fired. Because all these young folks that have been working the last couple of years trying to buy a house or take care of their families, they're now going to be out of a job. And when you think about how we encourage young folks to go to school, go to college, finish, and when you look at who gets fired, I get upset because I haven't seen any statistics, but I know my district, District 7, is going to be hit very hard with these layoffs. And what can we do about it? The vote has been taken. Folks are going to be looking for a job. September, they won't have a job. And those are the families that are going to be disabilized because they won't be able to put food on their tables. They won't be able to pay their rent. They won't be able to get gas with the way gas is going up. And we've already voted down the package. Today, the school department, BPS, still doesn't know how many folks they're going to lay off. Even today, I talked to them this morning. They still don't know. And we've already passed the budget. And we're not even thinking about looking at the folks that get laid off. how we're going to help them keep a roof over their head, food on the table and shoes on their feet.
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper. The Chair recognizes Councillor Fitzgerald and then we'll go back to Councillor Mejia.
I'd just like to make a motion to vote on the amendment package on the floor, if folks are done.
Second.
Thank you. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment? Did you get a second to move the question? Councillor Durkan.
Councillor Brayden. No. Councillor Brayden, no. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. No. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, no. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. No. Councillor Durkan, no. Councillor Fitzgerald? Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn? Yes. Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Huygen? Yes. Councillor Huygen, yes. Councillor Mejia? Yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy? Yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Bippen?
Councillor Bippen, yes. Councillor Santana? Yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Weber? Yes. Councillor Weber, yes. And Councillor Orrell?
Councillor Orrell, yes. The motion to move the question passes 10-0. in the affirmative, three in the negative.
Thank you.
I'm to move the question.
Move to vote.
People got to know the rules. We vote to put it on the floor and then we vote.
Yes. Yes. Yes. OK. Yeah. Mr. I appreciate this.
Mr Chair, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Fitzgerald's amendment? No. No. No. No. No. No.
Councilor Durkan, no. Councilor Fitzgerald? Yes. Councilor Fitzgerald, yes. Councilor Flynn? Yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan?
Councilor Lujan, yes. Councilor Mejia?
Councilor Mejia, yes. Councilor Murphy? Yes. Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen?
Councilor Pippen, yes. Councilor Santana? Yes. Councilor Santana, yes. Councilor Weber? Yes. Councilor Weber, yes. And Councilor Worrell? Yes. Councilor Worrell, yes. Amendment of Councilor Fitzgerald passes. Ten votes in the affirmative, three in a negative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Now, does anyone else wish to offer an amendment? Councillor Mejia? Councillor Fitzgerald, hold on. Councillor Fitzgerald?
Yes, I was just going to offer another amendment package, if you could, procedural. Go ahead. This would be the... Yeah, I'll take five seconds. Well, I'm going to introduce a package around...
Hang on, just everybody sit down. Everybody calm down. Councillor Fitzgerald, you have the floor.
I'd like to introduce a package around reinserting the MOYA that was taken out previously in the original budget.
Councillor Webber? based on the guidance I received from the State Ethics Commission, I'll recuse myself from this discussion. Thank you.
We'll call you back when this is decided. Continue, Councillor Fitzgerald. Oh, okay. Let's get it all in order. Mr. Clerk, could you please read the second amendment from Councillor Fitzgerald?
Second amendment from Council of Fitzgerald, docket number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027. As amended, shall be amended as follows. Moya ESOL grant, decrease Office of Labor Relations contractual services, increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement contractual services $50,000 to be directed toward English for speakers, of other languages for parents and caregiver grants. Decrease Office of People Operations Contractual Services. Increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services. $50,000 be directed toward English for speakers of other languages for parents and caregiver grants. Decrease Department of Innovation and Technology Contractual Services. Increase Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement Contractual Services. $40,000 to be directed towards English for speakers of other languages for parents and caregiver grants. Decrease execution of court special appropriation. Increase mayor's officer immigrant advancement contractual services. $135,000 to be directed toward English for speakers of other languages. for parents and caregiver grants. More miscellaneous grants. Decrease the execution of court special appropriation. Increase mayor's officer immigrant advancement contractual services. $825,000 be directed toward mayor's officer immigrant advancement grants. Decrease Boston Public Library personnel services. Increase mayor's officer immigrant advancement contractual $100,000 to be directed toward Mayor's Officer Immigrant Advancement Grants.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. The Chair recognizes Councillor Fitzgerald. You have the floor. Thank you. Oh, and just to be clear, has everyone got a written copy of this amendment in front of them? Very good. Thank you. Continue.
Thank you, Madam President. As discussed yesterday, to remain far above the expectations of any advice some of our colleagues have received, the Mayor's Office of Immigration and Advancement was left out of the original budget. We had a working session yesterday where we all agreed I would put forth the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Advancement money back into that budget through an amendment process. This is it, exactly as it was taken out from the same increases and decreases, and so I look forward to a vote. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you. Councillor, do you have a second? Councillor Durkan has a second. The Chair recognises Councillor Mejia. You have the floor.
Councillor Mejia No, that was when I thought I was going to get called for my amendment.
Okay, thank you. Would anyone else like to speak on this amendment? Okay. Would anyone like to— Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Fitzgerald's second amendment?
Councillor Braden.
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Councillor Durkan. Yes. Councillor Fitzgerald.
Councillor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn. Yes. Councillor Louisianne.
Councillor Louisianne. Yes. Councillor Mejia. Yes. Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Pepin, yes. Councillor Pepin, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor O'Rourke, yes. Councillor O'Rourke, yes. The second amendment of Councillor Fitzgerald passes. Twelve votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Ron, could you—the messenger, could you ask Councillor Webber to rejoin us? So, Councillor Fitzgerald's second amendment has passed. Does anyone else wish to offer an amendment? Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Do you have written copies of your amendment?
Yes, I do. I believe Sydney's going to give them to Ron now, I believe. Excuse me, Karishma does have them.
Just bear with us for a few minutes, yeah.
Amen.
So Ryan is just giving, bringing around everyone a copy of Councillor Flynn's amendment. And then, Mr. Clerk, would you mind reading Councillor Flynn's amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councillor Flynn, document number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027, as amended, shall be amended as follows. decreased neighbourhood services personnel services, increased police department equipment, $500,000 for equipment at the Boston Police Crime Lab.
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you.
Councillor Flynn, you need a second for your amendment. Councillor Murphy is the second. Councillor Flynn, please continue.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, I've been working on crime lab-related issues for for six or seven years now. And I'm making this motion because it is my goal. It is my vision to have the best crime lab we possibly can in the country. Boston Police equipment to enable advanced DNA testing techniques, including Y screening. This is the most advanced testing on basically testing sexual assault kits for this Y screening program. These amendments for personnel and advanced testing were previously passed by the city council. However, it is still unclear if this funding was ever actually reallocated. In both 2024 and 2025, I held a hearing with my colleagues here to discuss the challenges that the Boston Police Crime Lab have and had including delays in testing of sexual assault kits that I mentioned. The city of Boston was not meeting the state requirement of testing within 30 days, and at that period had not upgraded their DNA testing techniques to Y screening, which is what the Massachusetts State Police and New York City Police have. I believe we owe it to the victims of sexual assault, their families, and the public at large to both ensure that we are testing sexual assault kits within the state-mandated 30-day requirement, which I believe we are, as well as utilizing the most advanced technology available. And with this $500,000, it could go a long way to ensuring that the Boston Police Department continues to improve their crime lab. And it's an issue I've focused on and will continue to focus on going forward. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. The Chair recognizes Councillor Papin. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. I'm rising to say that I'm going to vote no on this amendment. I completely understand the reasoning for adding the money in the line item to equipment for the BPD, because I know they need it. But where we're pulling the money from is not a good place, because the neighborhood services personnel and the work that they do. They're the ones that go to all the community meetings. They're the ones that attend all the events to make sure that if there is a department that doesn't have a community engagement team, they're the ones stepping up and filling those roles. I just don't think that this is a good poll. I recommend that my colleagues also vote no on this amendment. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Pepin. Would anyone else like to speak on this issue? Chair recognizes Councillor Durkan. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Chair. I think because this wasn't talked about during the working sessions, I have no idea the impact on current jobs. I imagine this would result in layoffs in the mayor's office. And not knowing who those people would be, I will be voting no.
Thank you. Chair recognizes Contra Mejia. You have the floor.
Yes. Thank you, Madam President. And, you know, I want to note that the reason why we may not have all of the information that is required for us to make educated decisions is because we had one real working session on Monday, and it was five hours long, but not everyone stayed. to go back and forth with the hard job of doing the amendments. So it's going to be a really interesting journey here this evening because in reality, the real work was supposed to happen during our working sessions where we were supposed to build consensus and also build consensus around what decreases we were willing to pull from which departments. But we never got to do that in a real serious way so that's why we are here today so for those who are paying attention understand that had we done our jobs the last few sessions that we've had we probably would be having a different conversation today thank you customer here the chair recognizes the chair of western means counselor weber you have the floor and then we'll go back to the uh sponsor the amendment yeah i just want to correct the record a little bit on that i believe that the working session
We asked for amendment packages, and Councillor Flynn said he did not want to disclose what he wanted to amend and where the money would come from in the working session. So we definitely had an opportunity to discuss this, and we didn't. So just to fill in people, I know it was lightly attended at the end there.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Webber. The Chair recognizes Councillor Murphy. Councillor Murphy, you have the floor.
I wasn't going to rise, but it kind of feels like it's turning into a tit for tat. But I was definitely at one of the working sessions where we weren't talking about specifically where the money would go, but Councillor Flynn gave a I thought very thorough reason why he was willing, and he even said, I know I will get flack for this. I know people will not be happy, but here are the departments I am willing to pull for. And if I remember correctly, which I think I am, it was minutes before the chair adjourned the meeting because then another amendment package was brought up. So Council of Flynn did list, and ONS was definitely one of them, and he gave his reasons why, one of them being that it has grown significantly in these past years under this new administration. So just to set the record straight, thank you.
the amendment process at the budget hearings. Where I was going to pull this from, I listed several city departments, including Office of Neighborhood Services. I didn't miss one budget meeting the entire time. I was very clear, I've said it several times, I was going to take it from Office of Neighborhood Services. I understand people may not like that, but you can't say I didn't say it on the record. I understand there's a lot of political support for the Office of Neighborhood Services. That's fine. But there also has to be support for the crime lab as well. We have to prioritize what is more important, Office of Neighborhood Services, community engagement, or crime lab. That's a fair question. That's a fair question. If you think the Office of Neighborhood Services, then that's fine. But I think the crime lab deserves equal attention than politics. And that's why I'm advocating for that. Because I believe we need to have a state of the art crime lab in Boston. We don't have it. We're currently hiring a executive director at the crime lab because the previous executive director was on leave for an extended period of time, we don't have the right management in the crime lab as well. But while we're not focused on the crime lab and it's operating itself, I'm going to do my due diligence to provide the best leadership I can for the crime lab. But this is an important vote. Do we put politics ahead of public safety? Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. Would anyone else wish to speak on this matter? We'll move to a vote then. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's First Amendment?
Councillor Brayden. No. Councillor Brayden, no. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. No. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, no. Councillor Culpeper. No. Councillor Culpeper, no. Councillor Durkan. No. Councillor Durkan, no. Councillor Fitzgerald. No. Councillor Fitzgerald, no. Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Louisianne.
Councillor Louisianne, no. Councillor Mejia. No. Councillor Mehia, no. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Pepin, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Weber, no. And Councillor Worrell, no. Amendment of Councillor Flynn, 11 votes in the negative and 2 in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Flynn's first amendment has not passed. Councillor Flynn, I understand you may have a second amendment.
Yeah, I have two more.
Chair recognizes Council. Have you got copies? We need copies. Here they come. Got somebody who's got a runner. We'll just take them. Mr. Clerk, do you have a copy?
Would you like to read Councillor Flynn's second amendment into the record, please?
Amendment of Councillor Flynn, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended, shall be amended as follows. Decreased neighbourhood services, personnel services, increased Boston Police Department contractual services, $500,000 for health and wellness services for Boston Police Department.
Thank you. Thank you. Councillor Flynn, do you have a second?
Councillor Murphy is your second. Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Health and wellness for city employees is critical. Boston police officers, in my opinion, have a very stressful job, many of them or most of them. working 16 hours a day i want to make sure that we have the necessary resources and support for officer wellness and health for police officers and their families when we send a police officer on a 16-hour a day shift for five days a week. We have a responsibility, in my opinion, we have a responsibility to ensure the mental health of the officer as well and the family. We just can't expect that a police officer is going to work 16 straight hours and then we're not going to have the necessary resources and support to support that police officer and his or her family. I do think it's an important issue. I do acknowledge that people may not support it because it's the Boston police. But let's also remember that Boston police officers are our neighbors. They're part of our community. They're engaged in after school programs. They're community activists. And they deserve a fair shake. And a fair shake to me means ensuring that when we give an assignment for someone to work 16 hours a day consistently for years, eventually they need the mental health and wellness programs. We don't have it right now. This is our opportunity, I believe, to stand with our city employees, our neighbors, to ensure that we respect the job that they're doing, but we're also providing the critical support and mental health services that they need and deserve. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. Councillor Mejia, you have the floor. Do you wish to speak to this issue?
I'm waiting my turn.
Okay. I'll switch this off then. Would anyone else like to speak on this amendment? Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's second amendment?
Councillor Braden?
Councillor Braden? No. Councillor Caleta-Zapata? No. Councillor Caleta-Zapata? No. Councillor Culpepper? No. Councillor Culpepper? No. Councillor Durkan? No. Councillor Durkan? No. Councillor Fitzgerald?
Councillor Fitzgerald? No. Councillor Flynn?
Councillor Flynn? Yes. Councillor Lujan?
Councillor Lujan? No. Councillor Mejia? No. Councillor Mejia, no. Councillor Murphy, no. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Pepin, no. Councillor Pepin, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Webber, no. Councillor Webber, no. And Councillor Worrell. Second Amendment of Councillor Flynn. Two votes in the affirmative and nine votes in the negative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Flynn's second amendment has not passed. Councillor Flynn, you have a third amendment.
I have a third one. I don't expect my colleagues will support it, but I do have a third one. It's certainly your privilege. I support their amendments, but they won't support my amendments.
Mr. Clerk, could you please read Councillor Flynn's third amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councillor Flynn, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027. as amended shall be amended as follows. Decreased neighborhood services, permanent employees, increased fire department contractual services, $500,000 for mental health services, safety, health and wellness programs, and cancer screening for Boston Fire Department.
Councillor Flynn, you need a second. Have you got a second?
Yes, I have.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy. Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
Madam Chair, many of us went to the wake in West Rocks where the firefighter killed off. Many of us went to the funeral at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross Church in the south end. We went there to pay our respects to this firefighter for the incredible service the supreme sacrifice he made to our city. At the same time, Madam Chair, is it fair for this body to ask, can we ensure that firefighters and their families have access to cancer screening, health and wellness programs, Do you know that the average, when a firefighter retires at the mandatory age, the number of years on average they live is about five years? I go to their banquet. I think Council Murphy attends and Council Fitzgerald attends. We go to the banquet and we talk and say thank you to the retirees. And at the same time, we know that they're going to collect their pension and it's likely that they're gonna live five years. with that pension. But as city councilors, can't we do something more than that, than show up to a retirement banquet? Can we put money in the budget so that they can get cancer screening? Is that a lot to ask for? That they can get health and wellness, employee assistance? They're not asking for a lot. I think they're asking for a little support here from our colleagues on the Boston City Council. This shouldn't be a political issue. This is about supporting our neighbors that are firefighters and their families. Health and wellness of firefighters is critical. Cancer screening is critical. If we help and identify cancer in one firefighter, then we've done our job. We know young men and young women are diagnosed, and firefighters have a high cancer rate. Are we willing to maybe tell the mayor's administration that we might have to cut some services at Office of Neighborhood Services? Why? Because we think, as a body, we think health and wellness of firefighters and their families is important. We know by voting yes, you might get into a little bit of trouble with the administration, but you're going to be doing the right thing. You can hold your head up high and say, I went to bat for a family that needed employee assistance. I went to bat for a firefighter's family that needed various health and wellness programs. I know because I served 24 years in the Navy. Health and wellness programs are critical. You don't just send someone into a dangerous job and then when they come home and say, oh, by the way, you're on your own. That's our job as city councilors, is to make sure that we support their families. We support firefighters. We support our first responders. That's what they ask for. That's what they ask us for. That's all I have to say on this. I do want to respectfully ask my colleagues to put politics aside and do the right thing. Do the right thing on this one. You'll be proud of your vote. I'll guarantee you that. You'll be proud of your vote.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. The chair recognizes Councillor Murphy. You have the floor, and then we'll go to Councillor Pepin and then Councillor Santana.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you. So I know we spoke about this before Thank You counsel Flynn for putting this through as an amendment I think it was in our original package that dwindled down between those hours when we needed to recess but just to be clear when the fire department came before us to talk about their budget they were concerned that this year they did not receive the 1.2 million dollar grant that they have been receiving in past years that supports a 150,000 of that did support cancer screening, but it also supports mental health, health and wellness, the employee assistance program where they support recovery services. So it was more than just cancer screenings. I know that the mayor had a press conference and Dana Fava stepped up and they gave $150,000 to make sure that the cancer screening piece will be covered this year, which is great, but we still have $1,050,000 of support that is no longer going. to our firefighters. And Council of Flynn made it clear, and I know I've said this many times on the floor, that our firefighters are at risk for so many things, like all of our first responders are. So I think it's important that we find it, and the mayor can always find a way to spend other money if needed. But if we send a message that all of us want to make sure that the firefighters get this money back into the budget, and if she does not want to take it from ONS, she can find Five hundred thousand dollars somewhere else.
So if we send the message that we don't want it vetoed we can do that So I'm hoping our colleagues join us Thank You cancer Murphy chair recognizes country pep and country pep and you have the floor Thank You madam president I rise again to say that this is not about what the amendment actually stands for but more of a concern about where we're pulling from I think we all in agreement with what council flint is saying right now their firefighters do need support and We were all at that funeral that day. We all talked to the fire union. We all talked to the commissioners and to the firefighters from our district. And I know that the firefighters and the firefighter union were also at a press conference with Dana Farber to make sure that they were getting the support that they needed in order to serve their firefighters. What I don't feel comfortable is taking away money from a department, that residents in my district, day after day, I have a vacancy right now in one of my neighborhoods, and they keep saying, when is this going to be filled? Because it is a very important decision where residents reach out for day-to-day services. And what I don't want to see is the day that Mattapan, Rossino High Park, or Southeast, South End, or Chinatown don't have a liaison that they can go to. Because at the end of the day, the services that they provide This is why it's so difficult to compare departments, because we could talk about the importance of one, not the other. But they do provide crucial services that our residents depend on, and they call on us to make sure that they also have the support. So again, I just want to make sure that I emphasize that it's not about not standing with the fire departments. It's about having a legitimate concern of where we are pulling this money from. That's why we voting no, and I recommend my colleagues do the same.
Thank you, Councillor Pepin. Anyone else wish to speak on this amendment? Councillor Flynn, since no one else wishes to speak, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
Just one minute at this stage. We're on the second round.
Madam Chair, this process is difficult. When you advocate for something, you have to pull it from another department. If someone wants to tell me where they want me to pull it from, I'll do that. But that's the process we have. I'm making a recommendation based on my experience. I think District City Councillors can also do the job of ONS as well. Thank you, Councillor Flynn. Madam Chair, I do want to continue. I do want to continue. But I... I do feel like this body is more concerned with politics than they are with helping people, helping our first responders. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you. Chair recognizes Councillor Durkan. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you so much. Our firefighters are deeply important to our city, and the idea that voting on this is political here, I mean, if it's being made political, it's being made political by the folks that are bringing it. because today we have a real opportunity here to talk about the great partnership that Dana-Farber is stepping forward. I was proud to call Dana-Farber a great partner incredible group of an incredible institution in my district who just permitted the first world-class cancer hospital in the city I was proud to be a part of that our article 97 amendment that we passed through this council with my leadership just passed the Senate so fighting occupational cancer is is a all of us have been part of that work. And so I want to thank my colleagues for their continued support to end occupational cancer. I think what's missing from this conversation as well is EMS. And so while I'll be voting no today, my work and my charge to end occupational cancer for city employees will not stop.
Thank you, Councillor Durkan. Would anyone else wish to speak who hasn't spoken? Thank you. Councillor Flynn.
Just to correct the record, we are discussing EMS. I was the one that put the money into EMS for health and wellness. So I'm not sure why that comment came out that we're not focused on EMS and health and wellness. I advocated strongly to ensure that that got into the amendment process led by Councillor Fitzgerald. But that's not the point. The point is there's a significant amount of money that was cut from the health and wellness of the Boston Fire Department. Yes, Dana-Farber contributed $200,000 to $300,000, but there's still a significant amount that was cut. And can I finish my comments, please? No, but I was being heckled.
Councillor Flynn, I've given you many times to come round, and I'd ask my colleagues not to. No comments on other people's statement right now. And, Councillor Flynn, please continue.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I do believe we can make a statement here that the life of firefighters and their families are significant. They are important. We should not overlook that. Let's do the right thing. Let's do the right moral thing today. Let's support our firefighters. They deserve it. They need it. Their families need it. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Seeing no other requests to speak on this issue, Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Flynn's third amendment?
Councillor Braden?
Councillor Braden? No. Councillor Colletta-Zapata? No. Councillor Culpepper? No. Councillor Culpepper? No. Councillor Durkan? No. Councillor Durkan? No. Councillor Fitzgerald? No. Councillor Fitzgerald? No. Councillor Flynn?
Councillor Flynn? Yes. Councillor Lujan? No. Councillor Lujan? No. Councillor Mejia? No. Councillor Mehia? No. Councillor Murphy? Yes. Councillor Pen? No. Councillor Santana? No. Councillor Weber? No. Councillor Worrell? No. Ten votes in the negative and two votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Flynn's third amendment has not passed. Councillor Flynn, I understand you have another amendment? No. The Chair recognizes Councillor Julia Mejia. You have the floor. Thank you, Madam President. Before we start, do we have copies of your amendment on the— I was told that central staff has them, allegedly. Yeah, they're coming. I don't know. The clerk didn't get one. We need to— All right, you guys, I'm making it. Here they come. Can we have one for Mr. Clark first? Did we not? Yes, it's this.
Yep, it's this one. Did we not? This one.
Good job.
I have a few. I have a few. That's fine, we'll start number. So I'm gonna let everybody know I got one, two, three. Little packages. Three little packages. So that means that three times the essential staff will come out with a piece of paper.
Mr. Clerk, would you mind reading Councilor Mejia's first amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councilor Mejia, document number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended, shall be amended as follows. Decrease Boston Police Department personnel services increase office of food justice contractual services $50,000 for food justice grants decrease Boston Police Department personnel services increase mayor's office of housing contractual services $130,000 for grow Boston decrease Boston Police Department personnel services increase arts and cultural arts and culture contractual services $475,000 for arts and culture grants decreased Boston Police Department personnel services increased Boston veterans engagement transition and services contractual services $200,000 for veterans grants Decrease Boston Police Department personnel services. Increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services. $2,225,000 for success links grants.
Council Member Meagher, do you have a second?
Second.
Thank you.
Council Member Meagher, you have the floor. Thank you, Madam President, and I rise to make a motion to amend docket 0733 by adding additional amendments to make the funding for the Office of Food Justice, Grow Boston, Arts and Culture Whole, as well as adding $200,000 for veterans and $2.25 million for youth jobs in contractual services for a success link program. I have three amendment packages that I will be putting on the floor today, one at a time. And this is my amendment package, version two. You should have copies of this amendment in front of you, which I believe you do. So thank you, Madam President. I'm proposing this package today because the proposed amendment package in front of us is claimed to be a restoration budget, but still leaves room for half of the nearly $20 million in cuts still unresolved. And I want to note again, for the record, we had over $20 million in cuts. and lots of it is still unresolved. This package will make the funding for the Office of Food Justice, Grow Boston and Arts and Culture whole, as well as adding 200,000 for veteran services and 2.2 for youth jobs in contractual services for SuccessLink. We need to be bold and propose more than 9.4 million in amendments, and this package seeks to do just that by closing more of the gap that's still left. I tried to bring this version of this amendment forward in our working session on Monday to engage in a consensus building exercise, but my colleagues, you know, but some of them just they did not want to be fully engaged. Therefore, I'm bringing it here, this package to the floor to have a transparent debate on this proposal. This package is a win for community and this council. It takes very little from police salary savings and overtime to fully or partially restore six main priorities for this body and community. This moment is calling us to invest in community. And so, therefore, I am going to ask my colleagues for consideration.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. Would anyone like to speak on this amendment? Okay.
Okay.
Mr. Clerk, could you... You say the word. Did you—okay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Mehear's First Amendment?
Councillor Brayden?
Councillor Brayden, no. Councillor Colletta-Zapata? No. Councillor Culpepper? Yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan? No. Councillor Durkan, no. Councillor Fitzgerald?
Councillor Fitzgerald, no. Councillor Flynn?
Councillor Flynn, no. Councillor Lujan?
Councillor Lujan, no. Councillor Mehear? No. Councillor Mehia, yes. Councillor Murphy, no. Councillor Pepin, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Weber, no. And Councillor Orrell, yes. Nine votes in the negative and three votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Mehia's First Amendment has not passed. Councillor Mehia, you have your Second Amendment.
Would you... So I want to know for the record here is that we only have a little over $3 million that we're trying to tap into for the police over time and underspending in personnel. of vacancies, and we're not asking for a lot.
I would like to start by asking Mr. Clerk to please read Councillor Mejia's second amendment into the record, please.
Second Amendment of Councillor Mehear, docket number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027, as amended, shall be amended as follows. Decrease youth employment and opportunity personnel services, increase youth employment opportunity contractual services, $250,000 for success-linked grants.
Thank you. Mr. Councillor Mehear, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. Can I have a second? Do you have a second? Second.
Councillor Murphy, thank you. Please continue, Councillor Mejia.
Yes. Thank you, Madam President. I rise to make a motion to amend Docket 0733 by moving $250,000 for youth jobs funding not specified for BSAC or red shirts from personnel services, specifically emergency employees, from there to contractual services within the Chair's proposed amendments. This is so that the funding goes towards SuccessLink and so that the nonprofits receive these funded youth jobs instead of the city. As typically, SuccessLink supports approximately 70% of school year youth jobs, and this is my amendment package too. You should have copies, right? And you do. Great. As the proposed amendment from the chair for the youth job stands, all 750,000 is going towards personnel services, which they are for city jobs. Within the 750,000, it is separated out into three lines, which are general personnel services, BSAC, and red shirts. I'm proposing to move the $250,000 for generic personnel services from their two contractual services. This amendment puts this $250,000 into funding the Success Link program, which typically, like I said earlier, hosts approximately 70% of school year youth jobs. Seeing that none of the youth job funding in the Chair's proposal was allocated for Success Link, This program, I'm hosting the majority of the school year youth jobs. I want to move the proposed youth funding that was not specified. At least put some in the city funding to the program success link. Also support our nonprofits by providing them youth workers without having to fund those positions themselves. Also, we cannot rely. on promises of private corporations for the supposed 2,000 jobs. We are still waiting for an MOU regarding the mayor's youth private funding announcement. The least that we can do is shift at least 250,000 into success link from the city jobs youth so that we can please give them a few pennies. to our youth and our non-profit organisations. I just want to note for the record that as we continue to say that we deeply care about young people and that they are our future, this is our opportunity to demonstrate that we want to invest in them accordingly. I would like to see where we land with this one.
Okay. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Mejia's second amendment?
Councillor Brayden.
Councillor Brayden, no. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. No. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, no. Councillor Culpepper.
Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. No. Councillor Durkan, no. Councillor Fitzgerald. No. Councillor Fitzgerald, no. Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, no. Councillor Lujan.
Councillor Lujan, no. Councillor Mejia. No.
Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Papin, no. Councillor Papin, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Webber, no. Councillor Webber, no. Councillor Worrell, yes. Councillor Worrell, yes. Second amendment of Councillor Mejia, nine votes in the negative and four votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Meheia's second amendment has not passed. Councillor Meheia, you have a third amendment. Yes, I do. Mr. Clerk, would you mind reading Councillor Meheia's third amendment into the record?
Third amendment of Council Mejia, docket number 0733, message and order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027, as amended, shall be amended as follows. Decrease mayor's office of housing, contractual services, increase youth employment and opportunity contractual services. $250,000 for success-linked grants. Yes, sir.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Just to check, has everyone got a written copy of Councillor Mehear's third amendment in front of you? Thank you. Councillor Mehear, do you have a second?
Second.
Thank you. Councillor Mehear, you have the floor.
You know, this feels like the Hunger Games here. We're all trying to stay alive. And I am very disheartened by the fact that we can't even have the political courage and or will to just fight a little bit harder and to do a little bit more, especially for our young people. So here we go. Thank you, Madam President. And I rise to make a motion to amend docket 0733 by moving $250,000 from access to council. That's the package that we're looking at right now. and move it to youth employment and opportunity contractual services within the chair's proposed amendments. This will get us to at least a million dollars for youth jobs in the council's amendments. This is my amendment package three, and you have it in front of you. There are nearly, right now, six million dollars in cuts to youth jobs in the proposed budget. The chair's proposed amendment packages only fund 750,000 for youth jobs. I'm just seeking to add only 250,000 to go towards the city funding for youth jobs so that we can at least get to a million. Anything less is a spit in the face of community and our youth. Many of my colleagues claim to support youth jobs and our young people, and this is when we put our money where our mouth is. And I'm putting this funding into contractual services so that it can go directly to SuccessLink, And so as I explained before, these dollars can go directly to the nonprofits that are supporting our young people. And before anybody uprises, I just want to know for the record that while I understand and appreciate access to counsel being important, I'm not taking all of it. I'm taking a portion because I know that the mayor is probably tomorrow going to announce a private partnership with some legal defense fund to step in the gap of certain things. So since we're giving money away, might as well just take money from one place because we know we're probably going to fill it up with something else somewhere else. So at the very least, let's go see what happens.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. The Chair recognizes Councillor Pepin, and then we'll go to Councillor Webber. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. Again, appreciative of the amendment. However, as the Chair of Housing, I highly recommend my colleagues to not pull any money from the Department of Housing due to the fact that it is probably one of the top, if not the top issue that we're facing right now. especially something like access to council where it helps families. My understanding is actually families with BPS kids from facing evictions. Um, and I just had a meeting with housing leadership about a couple of weeks ago now where we are facing eminent threats of losing even more funding from our federal government that's supposed to go into the housing department. So I just highly recommend us do not pull any money from our housing department if it is contractual, if it is personnel, if it is for vouchers, et cetera, anything inside that department, it is crucial at the moment that we hold firm and keep that in there. So that's why I'll be voting no on this specific amendment. Thank you, Madam President.
Chair recognizes Councilor Weber. Councilor, you have the floor.
Yeah, thank you. I'm just going to stick up a little bit for the Access to Council program. Over 100 families a year are prevented from facing eviction. These are BPS families. So please do not cut the Access to Council program.
Thank you. Chair recognizes Councillor Flynn. You have the floor.
Yeah, thank you, Madam Chair. I'm undecided on this one here, but could I just ask the maker, could she just give me a little bit more background on the Access to Council program, just so I have a good idea of what I'm voting, I know what I'm voting for, but what I would be voting against.
Can I turn? Counselor, you have the floor. Thank you. For those who are tuning in, I want to be really clear. I am not cutting money from housing. There are legal defense funds, there are lots of nonprofit organizations that provide legal support to folks who are dealing with eviction. And that is a fact. OK? And because we are dealing with this budget crisis right now, all I'm asking for is a portion of the access to council line item to support youth jobs. I am not gutting it completely. All I'm trying to do is take a little bit from it to help us restore some dignity in this process to support youth jobs. Because there is this narrative here, this fear mongering going on here, that everything that we're going to do is either going to get people laid off, fired, people are going to end up in housing court without no support. That's not true. That's not true. I'm not taking all of it. I'm taking a little bit from it. So don't get it confused here. And so it is only $250,000. And if you don't like that price, let's bring it down some.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. Councillor Weber, I will actually, Councillor Durkan had her light on. I will come back to you. Are you to clarifying point? Okay. And then we'll go to Councillor Durkan.
Thank you. Okay, the access to council programs is innovative, like for the nation pilot, we funded it at 450,000. So taking 250,000 is much more, I don't know, 60%, 70% of it. And so that would gut the program that is really helping people. If you've ever been to housing court, right across the street, there's tons of folks in there who have no representation, despite the fact that there's groups that are trying to help people. This is a very valuable program that keeps our BPS kids from being homeless, being put in shelters outside the city, and having to be bused in at great cost to the city. So this is a program that has shown to work for two years that we as a council put forward. I hope we continue to support it.
Thank you, Councillor Webber. The chair recognizes Councillor Durkan.
Thank you so much, Chair. I have been a huge proponent of the Access to Council program since we originally passed it. To my chagrin and to many of our chagrin, this is something that came out of the city council that then when it sort of got piloted, we saw the mayor's team taking a lot of credit for its success. And I think I have been the first one to say thank you to Councillor Weber for putting this in place. I think that BPS families having access to council that are facing eviction is incredibly important. And so I think pitting youth jobs against BPS families facing eviction is unnecessary in this process. And I stand with the chair. I think that this, I honestly wish we could put more money into access to council than we have this year. So thank you, Councillor Weber, for your leadership. And I was surprised that it wasn't in this year's budget. So I think this is something that the council has the ability to fully restore, which we have in the initial package. And I truly believe in it. And I think that it actually will save the city a lot of money because we are every BPS family that ends up being in a homeless shelter outside of the city ends up being bused in at tremendous costs, like the chair said. So thank you, chair.
Thank you. The Chair recognizes Councillor Flynn.
Councillor Flynn, you have the floor. Thank you, Madam Chair. I do want to go on record in support of Councillor Meher's proposal. I do want to at least support one of them. I do think it's a worthy proposal. I listen to the young people across the city at every budget hearing and do want to stand up for them the best I can. The other point I do want to make is, for me, it seems like if your amendments weren't part of the official report, if you have your own individual amendments, that they're just going to get voted down. I don't know what kind of process that is. It's not even like we're voting with an open mind. We're just voting no consistently, even if we support the program. So I'm kind of discouraged that we're automatically voting. No, just because it wasn't part of the You know the the established the established docket here, so just want to highlight that Thank You madam chair Thank You councillor Flynn and catch movie.
Would you like the last word? A country comes from here. Have you got your light on? Sorry, you're standing so either Do you wish to speak? Hold on. There you go. Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
Thank you. And I do appreciate my council colleagues. As someone who dealt with housing insecurity growing up and as a BPS graduate, I know how important it is to have stable housing. And so by no means do I want to create any hardship to folks who are already experiencing further harm. And so I think it's important for us to recognize that we are in harm reduction right now. And what I'm thinking about is the fact that so many young people are usually sometimes working to help support their family so that they can stay housed. And so I'm looking at the bigger picture here. And this is a prevention and intervention amendment. But I understand the tension that exists. pitting housing versus youth jobs because both of those are equally important. And to that, if you all are not interested in taking it from housing, then I think I'm going to ask for a recess because I don't think it's just that we, like this whole entire amendment exercise that that one single dollar was approved to increase youth jobs. And so I'm going to request a recess to see where I could find another $250,000.
No, Councillor Mejia, we're going to continue. Anyone else wish to speak on Councillor Mejia's amendment? Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Mejia's third amendment?
Councillor Braden.
Councillor Braden, no. Councillor Colletta-Zapata.
Councillor Colletta-Zapata, no. Councillor Culpepper. No. Council Culpepper, no. Council Durkan, no. Council Durkan, no. Council Fitzgerald, no. Council Fitzgerald, no. Council Flynn, yes. Council Flynn, yes. Council Louis-Jean, no. Council Louis-Jean, no. Council Mejia.
You know, the state had $8 million left. Council Mejia, we're taking a vote. And $10 million of that was spent for access to council.
So there is money out there.
Councillor Mejia, yes. Councillor Murphy. Yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Penn.
Councillor Penn, no. Councillor Santana.
Councillor Santana, no. Councillor Webber.
Councillor Webber, no. And Councillor Worrell.
Councillor Worrell, yes. Nine votes in the negative and four votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Mejia's third amendment has not passed. Councillor Mejia, do you have any further amendments?
I don't think so. I think my amendments have all died. Thank you. I'll be going to a funeral.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. The Chair recognizes Councillor Culpepper. Councillor, you have the floor.
Madam Chair, I have an amendment. I move to amend Doctrine 20733 for an order regarding the Boston Fire Department. Thank you. I think it's been passed and distributed.
We'll do some business. I think it has. This is Councillor Culpepper's First Amendment. Do you have a second?
No. This is my first and last for the night.
Councillor Murphy is a second.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy.
Mr. Clerk will read it into the record and then you can speak as well. Okay. Excellent. Mr. Clerk, have you got a copy of Councillor Culpepper? Yes. Councillor Culpepper, Mr. Clerk, could you please read Councillor Culpepper's first amendment into the record?
Amendment of Councillor Mignon Culpepper, document number 0733, message in order for annual appropriation and tax order for fiscal year 2027 as amended. shall be amended as follows. Decrease Boston Transportation Department contractual services, increase Boston Fire Department supplies and materials. $200,000 for the procurement of PFAS-free turnout gear and protective equipment for firefighters.
Chair recognizes Councillor Culpepper. You have the floor. Thank you, Madam President.
Madam President, I move to make a floor amendment to the amended docket to provide $200,000 investment for PFAS free turnout gear and protected equipment for Boston firefighters. While I appreciate that this investment currently appears in Chair Weber's amended budget as a recommendation, Madam President, recommendation is not enough, especially when you're dealing with lives of the firefighters. This council believes this is a priority that we should actually fund it and incorporate it into the budget itself rather than merely expressing support for it. Boston firefighters put their lives on the line to protect our residents from immediate danger, but increasingly we are learning that many firefighters also face long-term dangers from the very equipment designed to keep them safe. Studies have consistently shown that firefighters experience disproportionately high rates of occupational cancer and PFAS chemicals have been identified as a significant concern in turnout gear and protective uniforms. Massachusetts has already taken important steps, and departments across the country are being the transition to safer alternatives. Occupational safety experts and firefighter organizations have made clear that as PFAS-free turnout gear becomes available, departments should move aggressively toward replacing legacy equipment containing harmful chemicals. This amendment is about acting on the information we have today rather than waiting until years from now to say we should have done more. We ask fighter fires to run toward danger every single day. The least we can do is ensure that the equipment we provide them does not expose them to preventable risk long after the fire is out. I respectfully ask my colleagues to support this amendment. I'd also like to read something, Madam President, exposure to PFAS is linked to cancer, including kidney and test kit, testicular cancer, thyroid disease and reproductive issues. And I think that for us not to pass something to give them at least a pilot is in some ways irresponsible. They wouldn't have to go to Dana Farber for the cancer test. If we got them the PFAS equipment, Quincy just bought many sets for their firefighters. Madam president, And my colleagues, I ask you to support this amendment to provide PFAS-free equipment as a pilot for all firefighters. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper. The Chair recognizes Councillor Flynn, and then we'll go to Councillor Murphy. Councillor, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I do want to say thank you to Councillor Culpepper for bringing this forward. I think this is the most common sense amendment and important amendment tonight, in my opinion. And for many reasons, but it's easy for us to support this. We should all be voting for it. He's not asking for a lot of money. $200,000 is not a lot of money. But the money in the... the grant, the pilot, will help so many firefighters. And this is an easy one for us to support. We should all get on board this one because it's critical, as Councilor Culpepper said, that we provide firefighters with the critical resources, support that they need to prevent, to prevent health-related issues. And I just want to, again, say thank you to Councilor Culpepper for taking the important lead on this And I do want to make one short story. My uncle Dennis Flynn was a firefighter. And he was a decorated Vietnam veteran as well, served in the Army. He died at a young age for heart-related disease. He had a heart attack at a young age. He was one of the closest people to me. But I think about him every day. And I wish these programs were available when he was around. And they were around. What Councillor Culpepper is asking for is a little bit of respect for firefighters and their families. That's the least we can do as city councillors. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you. Chair recognizes Councillor Murphy. You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. Thank you. Council Culpepper for putting this forward. I just want to go back four years ago when any of my colleagues who were with us then, and we put forth our first amendment package where I think 90% of it got vetoed. And then those that got finally passed, we realized the very important difference between an inter and Amendment and so any recommendation which is an intro within the department and it says recommendation So I appreciate the chair didn't leave that word out But we're still waiting on the answer which many of us know that even those amendments that aren't just recommendations that are inter which are pitting and it was said during the last amendment where someone was advocating for something that I don't want to pit one or Department against the other all of this amendment process is always pitting one department against each other Not just some of our moments every single time we have to pull from somewhere and there's not one department Even when money wasn't so tight departments never wanted us to pull from them. So an intra departmental Amendment is nothing Even more so than the amendments, which we know the amendments aren't really anything. They're all basically recommendations. But to say that because we voted and passed this package that the chair put forth and we have turnout gear and we have money for ISD and we put money back into the Bridge the Gap grants for Boston vets. It's just saying, you should do this. And we know they're not going to, because history and the data has shown that they haven't. So I am hoping, because it's a small amount, that if we vote, there's a better chance that it will be executed if we can get it into an actual amendment and not just an intra-departmental swap. So thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy. Would anyone else like to speak on this issue, this amendment? Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on Councillor Culpepper's First Amendment? Thank you.
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Braden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata, no. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan. Councillor Fitzgerald. Councilor Fitzgerald, no. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Flynn, yes. Councilor Lujan, no. Councilor Lujan, no. Councilor Mejia. Councilor Murphy.
Councilor Murphy, yes. Councilor Pippen. No. Councilor Pippen, no. Councilor Santana.
Councilor Santana, no. Councilor Weber. No. Councilor Weber, no. And Councilor Orrell. Yes. Councilor Orrell, yes. Five votes in the affirmative. No. Councilor Dworkin, no. Seven votes in the negative and five votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Councillor Culpepper's First Amendment has not passed. Anyone else offer an amendment? Seeing no more amendments, we're going to take a brief recess to add the amendments to the docket. So each Councillor will have it before them before we go to a final vote. So I have no idea what time it is. Seven o'clock? 15? We'll take a 15-minute recess. And thank you. Don't go too far. We'd like to keep going and get through this process. Thank you so much. Brief recess for 15 minutes.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. you Thank you. you Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you folks for back in session. Karishma is passing out the final docket of the final budget packet with the amendments.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Everyone should have the final... Is everyone back? We will now move on to the final vote on the docket 0733. Mr. Clerk, will you please call a roll call vote on docket 0733. Yes.
Roll call vote on docket number 0733. Councillor Brayden. Yes. Councillor Brayden, yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata. Yes. Councillor Colletta-Zapata.
The roll call vote has already started. Mr. Clerk, can we rewind? Councillor Mejia, you have the floor.
We're already moving for a vote.
What has happened in the recess is we consolidated all the amendments that were passed. They were merged with the original docket that the Chair offered. The amendments have been added. Now we are at the stage of holding the final vote on the docket 0733.
Passing the operating budget. Time out, because before we do that, we just received a big packet.
It's the same docket as you have this morning with the two amendments added.
I hear you. But before we vote on the whole package, I am looking to make my final remarks. Councillor MAHIA, you can have two minutes of final remarks. So as we take this vote today, I want to acknowledge that while some of the restorations and investments I fought for were included, the total amended budget before us now does not come close to fully addressing the extent of approximately $20 million in cuts that communities have raised concerns about. This body had an opportunity to send this budget back to the mayor and require a more collaborative process to make the changes necessary to produce a budget that better reflects the needs of our residents. we are frequently asked to accept a package that has already been negotiated without meaningful involvement from the full council. There's always been a true working, there's never really been a true working session where all councillors collectively sat down and reviewed each amendment and each poll, as we've done in previous years, and determined together where reallocation should come from and where investments were to be made. We were advised that the first iteration that we were not going to talk about where reallocations came from. The whole thing is going weird. But anyways, I know that there is a narrative that some counselors are unwilling to make difficult choices or pull funding from certain areas. But those are precisely the conversations we should be having together in a working session. That is what a legislative budget process should look like. Instead, decisions are often presented to us after the behind the scenes conversations, and then we are expected to simply accept them. I want to be clear that these comments are not directed at any individual. This is about the process itself. If we are serious about shared budget authority and meaningful oversight, then we need a budget process that allows all counselors to transparently participate in shaping priorities, not just reacting to decisions that have already been made. I voted in support of many of the amendments today, and I did so in the interest of harm reduction. I know that some of my colleagues may end up steamrolling community and passing this amendment budget, so I fought for amendments in the case that the budget is passed as amended so that we can attempt to restore more of the cuts. My colleagues and my colleagues to vote no in order to vote down the docket as amended so that we can then pull docket 0733 as originally submitted by the mayor from the green sheets so that we can put a rejection vote on the floor. as that is what community has advocated for. I know that some counselors think that we are not able to amend the budget after rejecting today, but that is not true. For the record, we all received the legal memo from the Boston Better Alliance yesterday that explained that based on ordinary meanings of phrases that are undefined in the charter, not being able to amend a rejected budget would no longer have the mayor and the council holding budgetary powers together, which is specified in the charter. The history of budget actions and legislative history. the intent of the 2021 charter amendment shown by council deliberation on the matter and the case law. We still have the ability to amend the budget even if we reject it at this time. I am calling on my council colleagues to join me in voting on this amended docket so that we can do the work of rejecting. And so that is my hope. that we can do that.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. Two minutes. Anyone else wish to speak? Mr. Clerk, will you please do a roll call vote? Oh, beg your pardon, Councillor Culpepper. I did not see your light on.
Thank you, Madam President. Well, here we are. I want to thank all the members of this council, who rolled up their sleeves, who collaborated, who refused to accept the first version of this budget as a final word. Your commitment to this city and to the people who need it most made a difference. This is what government looks like when we take our charge seriously. I want to thank Councillor Fitzgerald for his work in bringing amendment forward. And I want to thank all my colleagues, whether you agreed with each other or not, you were heard and you represented the people that sent you here to do their work. Now I want to speak directly to the advocates who are in this room and for those that are still and for those who are
Every person who is vulnerable enough to stand up, Thank you Madam Chair.
Madam President.
Thank you. Thank you. you
Thank you. Our technical difficulties seem to have been resolved, so we're back in session. I think I will return to our colleague, Councillor Culpepper. You may finish your remarks. And I've been informed by the clerk that everyone who wishes to speak can speak for 10 minutes. You have the floor, Councillor Culpepper.
Madam President, I will not take 10 minutes. I'll be ready to take up an offering after 10 minutes. I want to thank the members of this council who rolled up their sleeves, who collaborated, who refused to accept the first version of this budget as the final word. Your commitment to this city and to the people who need it most made a difference. I want to thank Councilor Fitzgerald for working to pull together that amendment. This is what government looks like when we take our charge seriously. Now I want to speak directly to the advocates who are in this room, and for those who still are, and to those who are listening. You showed up, and it mattered. Every person who was vulnerable to stand up and share their story, who trusted that their lived experience matter, that it would be heard, that it would move something, you were right to believe that. You testified, you wrote emails, You called our offices. You protested. You got arrested. You showed up to hearings in town halls when it would have been easier to stay home. I also want to thank the young activists who are part of this movement. There is something powerful about a young person who looks at the world as it is and refuses to accept the world as it must be. Never let anyone tell you that you are too young. that you are too loud or that you are too idealistic. You are not just constituents. You are Boston, and you are our partners in this work. I've carried your testimonies with me in every room. They came with me into every working session and to every answer I demanded from this administration. onto this council floor when I fought to restore these cuts. And at every moment, I refuse to let this budget move forward without accountability to the people it affects. It's undeniable that this budget season has been a fight, but your voices change how it was fought. And so I say to you, young folks, don't stop. Don't grow weary. The arc of progress does not bend on its own. It bends because people like you get up every day and push. What you have shown this city is that when the community speaks with one voice, this council must listen. This is not just a victory for this budget. This is a blueprint for every fight that comes after this one. This process brought up something that I cannot leave unsaid. This budget forced us into the deeply troubling position of choosing between communities that depend on this city the most, as if the needs of our seniors and the needs of our young people, the struggles of one neighborhood and the struggles of another were somehow in competition. That is not a choice any of us should ever have to make. And while I acknowledge the very difficulty of a tight budget like this one, The answer to a fiscal challenge can never be to place that burden on the shoulders of those who are already carrying the most. A city as well positioned and as progressive as Boston must be more creative, more innovative, more committed to finding right solutions that do not ask our most marginalized residents to fight each other for scraps. Because in fact, we are one Boston. And as Dr. King reminded us, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Just because an issue does not touch your district or your community or does not make it any less a threat to the health and the soul of this entire city. We rise together or we do not rise at all, but today, Today we are reminded that when people speak, change is possible. That when we stand together, this city can and must do better. Your power is real, your voice matters, and we will not rest, we will not waver, we will not stop until every single resident of this city can feel that same promise in their daily lives. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you, Councillor Culpepper. The Chair recognizes Councillor Mejia. I was in error when I said we could speak for two minutes. I'm assuming that you have a few more minutes that you'd like to speak. I will recognize you, and then I'll go to Councillor Pepin, and then Councillor Flynn, and then Councillor Coletta-Zapata. Councillor Mejia, you have, let's say, what is it?
I have seven minutes. Seven minutes. Excellent. Thank you. And you know I know it might look funny that I want to keep speaking, but I think it's important Because I worked really hard to be here to be the microphone for the people that I serve so I'm gonna keep on so I want to just read a few Paragraphs from the legal memo that was submitted to us, which I know you all got via email and from the the lawyer Murphy has to me and they hand and so it's Regarding the in the analysis of the Boston City Charter section 48 amended in 2021 because we received a memo from the mayor's team regarding what we could and could not do and what the ramifications of that would be and that was what was used to scare us into to behave and so Too bad we just got this when we got it, but here is a few little experts that we should be mindful of. Dear Mr. Williams, you asked us for a legal opinion concerning the meaning of certain language in Section 48 of the Boston City Charter as it was amended in 2021. The language at issues relates to the interpretation of the process for approving the annual municipal budget and the budgetary responsibilities appropriated between the city council and the mayor. As part of this analysis, you also offered a memorandum from the corporate council for our review and analysis. In preparing a response to these questions, we have received the following information. They received the Boston City Charter, dated January 2025, a prior version of the city charter as of July 2007. copies of the earlier amendments to the municipal budget provisions of the Boston City Charter, request from Councillor Edwards to the Clerk Maureen Feeney to submit a written ballot question for approval of the vote stated April 28, 2021, review of the meetings of the Boston City Council when it was voted and proposed amendments to Article 48 of the Boston City Charter on December the 9th, 2020. Let me just skip because I got a little bit of time left. The current Boston City Charter language. The Boston City Charter includes a provision entitled Creation and Approval of the Municipal Budget, section 48 of the charter. This section was amended by the acts of the legislator 1909, 1974, 1982, and 1986. So there was amendments throughout those years. Most recently, the charter was amended by ballot votes of the voters in November of 2021. The Boston City Council voted proposed charter amendments on December the 9th, 2020, and submitted them to the Attorney General for review. You guys know the history. Let me just go cut to this chase here. The current version of section 48 of the charter states as follows, underline the provisions of the new language added after 2021. The mayor and the city council of the city of Boston shall hold budgetary powers together with the power to modify in whole or in part an appropriation order or an item within an appropriation order amended, amend the budget for the Boston Public Schools consistent with the Acts of 1936. There's some language there I'm going to skip because that's a lot of numbers there. To further, so basically here, this charter clarify budgetary procedures and take such other actions as are necessary to amend, approve, or disapprove the annual budget for the city, accepting the powers to originate an appropriation order which shall be reserved for the mayor, to further public engagement and democratic involvement, which there was none, in city spending. The city of Boston shall create by city ordinance an independent office of participatory budget, which we've never really fully funded, with an extended oversight board to create and oversee an equitable participatory budgeting with the external oversight board. And so that is still yet to fully manifest. So the mayor, no later than the second Wednesday in April of each year, should submit the city council the annual budget for the current expenses of the city and county for a forthcoming fiscal year. And the mayor may submit thereafter such supplementary appropriation orders as they deem necessary. no later than the second Wednesday in June. The City Council shall take definite action on the annual budget by adopting, amending, or rejecting, provided that the amended version shall not be for a higher total budget than originally proposed. In the event their failure to act on a budget submitted by the Mayor, the items in the appropriation orders of the budget as recommended by the mayor shall be in effect as formally adopted by this council and approved by the mayor. The mayor should have seven days from the time of budgetary vote to the council to approve return said budget to the council. In the event of the failure, the mayor to act on the budget approved by the council, the budget shall be in effect as approved by the council. The mayor may modify a budget approved by the council by returning it to said council with amendments to any line item provided that a vote of two-thirds of the council should be sufficient to override any budgetary amendments in whole or in part or an overall budgetary veto of the mayor. Now, the corporate council's analysis of the new charter, there's a bit of a conflict here. Because IGR, which is the Intergovernmental Relations here in the city of Boston, which set out an analysis of the applicable procedures regarding the budget process, the mayor is required to submit a budget to the council by the second Wednesday in April for fiscal year 2027. That date is April the 8th. The council is then required to take definite action by the second Wednesday in June which for fiscal year 2027, which was today, June 10th, the mayor may then resubmit a budget to the council within seven days. Corporate council concluded that in the case where the council rejected the budget, the process had two endpoints. First, if the council rejected the budget more than seven days prior to June 10th, there would have been time for the mayor to resubmit a budget, either the same or amended. By the time the council, and in time for the council to act by approving, amending, or rejecting the budget prior to June 10th, corporate council also concluded that if the council rejected the budget less than seven days prior to June 10th, the mayor still had seven days to resubmit a budget. but that June 10th deadline still loomed and the council is likely precluded from taking definite action and the mayor budget passes. In effect, one more paragraph. In effect, corporate council concludes that any vote by the council to reject a budget must occur no later than June 3rd or the council may waive its right to vote the mayor's budget because the council vote to approve or amend a budget resubmitted by the mayor. However, corporate council thank you made it clear that the council had the right to approve amend or reject a budget resubmitted by the mayor and the rejection vote this is a long analysis i'm going to print the whole thing because obviously i'm not going to have all the entire time basically we were led to believe that um we were not going to be able to continue even if we reject and even if we reject the budget today and send it back we still have june the 17th to continue deliberation, so I don't know why we are losing hope at this moment.
Thank you, Councillor Mejia. The chair recognizes Councillor Pepin. You have the floor. And then we'll go to Councillor Collette and then Councillor Durkan. You have the floor, Councillor.
Thank you, Madam President. I'd like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude to the chair of Ways and Means, Councillor Webber, for my colleagues on the council and the administration, the advocates, department leaders, community organization the residents participated throughout this process it has not been easy it's been a long process but there's been moments where we've agreed moments where we've disagreed moments where we've challenged one another's assumptions and approaches but i ultimately believe that this is a perfect example of what a healthy democracy looks like today i'll be voting in support of amendment package because i believe it holistically captures the needs and concerns of the residents i represent and the residents of boston as a whole These amendments restore funding to programs and departments that provide life-changing services to our residents. One example is the restoration of the Age Strong grants. For many of our seniors, these programs are not simply activities on a calendar. They are lifelines. They combat isolation. They create community. They provide opportunities for engagement, wellness, and dignity. Just yesterday, I met with leadership at Ethos, and they expressed grave concerns about the potential loss of this funding. They spoke about the difficult decisions they would have to be forced to make and how reductions could limit the number of days they are able to provide services to seniors. Listening to those concerns reinforced for me that these budget decisions are not abstract. They have real consequences for real people. When we restore funding for programs like this, we are helping ensure that a senior has somewhere to go, somewhere to connect with, and something to look forward to each week. These amendments also include funding for ESOL classes. and I cannot help but think about the recent graduation ceremony at the Roslin Library that I attended. The room was packed with ABCD and casually housed celebrated adults who had successfully completed their English language courses. For many of those graduates, learning English is not just about language, it is about opportunity, it is about securing employment, supporting a family, participating more fully in civic life, and building a future in the city they call home. When we fund these programs, we are investing in people's potential. The amendment package also includes something like funding for housing vouchers. For some families, that assistance may represent the difference between remaining in Boston and being forced to leave. It may be the last lifeline available before a family runs out of options. Housing, for me, as the Chair of Housing, remains one of the greatest challenges facing our city. And while no single amendment solves that challenge, every resource we can provide matters. Every family we can help matters. That is why the work we are doing today is so important. These investments are not theoretical. They are life-changing. We have seen organizations such as Brighton Marine step forward to support programming for our veterans. We have seen agencies and partners identify opportunities to provide school year-round employment and workforce opportunities for our young people. That is a model that I strongly believe we need to continue to embrace. Government cannot solve every challenge by itself. We must continue bringing together nonprofits, businesses, educational institutions, philanthropic partners, community organizations to maximize every available resource. We need an all-hands-on-deck approach that supports residents from the oldest among us to the youngest. We all recognize that municipalities across this country face growing uncertainty. We know there are serious concerns about the future of federal funding streams that many residents depend on. Just recently, I met with leadership for our Housing Cabinet, and they shared concerns about the potential loss of federal support for transitional housing programs. These concerns are real. The threats are real. And if those resources disappear, local governments will be asked, like ourselves, to do even more with even less. The challenges ahead of us are real. remain optimistic however because i have seen what can happen when people come together i have seen it during this budget process i have seen it in our neighborhoods i see it every day in my district and i've seen it in the advocates who testified in the organizations that stepped up and the colleagues who did roll up their sleeves and worked towards solutions so today's vote for me is important but our work doesn't end just with this vote here tonight tomorrow Next week and next month, we will still be tasked with finding ways to improve public service, expand opportunities, addressing housing challenges, support seniors, invest in our youth, and ensure that every resident has a fair shot at success. That responsibility does not stop with this budget, and neither will our commitment. Our residents need us to work together. They need us to continue bringing different perspectives to the table. They need us to continue challenging one another, collaborating with one another, and ultimately, delivering the results. Because despite our differences in approach, I truly believe we all want the same thing. And it's what I want. A city where every resident has a better opportunity to succeed and a better, brighter tomorrow to look forward to. So today, that's why I'm proud to support this amendment package. I'm proud to work with you all, and I'm ready to continue partnering with my colleagues, community organizations, advocates, and residents to meet the challenges that lie ahead. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you, Councillor Pepin. Next up, Councillor Koleta Zapata, you have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. Before I begin, I do want to start with gratitude. I first want to thank Councillor Webber for your leadership throughout this process. I think you've done an incredible job with a really difficult year, and so I just want to give kudos to you. Again, you found more money this year than ever before, and we're working with less, so just congratulations on that. I think you've operated in good faith and given grace to those who have not operated in good faith, quite frankly. And I just want to give you a flower because I think that you deserve them. I also want to thank Karishma and the entire central staff team, including Ryan. I want to thank my staff who have showed up while I've been on maternity leave. I want to thank community members who showed up to all of our community budget town halls. Thank you, Council Weber, for coming to East Boston and listening to residents and advocates. I also want to thank my incredible husband Sebastian and thank Joaquin for being such a good boy today while his mom was here and mom and dad were here and I just I'm very grateful for the support that I have in my life and in my village so I can do this job. and try to represent my constituents to the best of my abilities. This process is difficult because the fiscal circumstances before us are difficult. The FY27 budget, as we all know, has only grown 2.1%, which is the smallest increase we have seen in decades. At the same time, Boston is confronting lower property tax growth, declining development activity, reduced permit revenues, increased health care costs, collective bargaining obligations, and a broader economic uncertainty. Earlier this month, the Council unanimously approved the use of nearly $70 million from reserves to close current fiscal year budget gaps. Those realities are our facts, and they require us to make hard choices. And that is why I continue to believe that the responsible pathway forward has always been to amend and not to reject. I'm happy that one of my colleagues had talked about the charter amendment. I was literally there when it was written in those rooms and in conversation with community when we brought it to the Attorney General's office to see its constitutionality and get it on the ballot. In 2021, Boston voters expanded this authority of the council because they wanted us to vote to do more than simply vote yes or no. They gave us that authority to amend the budget, establish priorities, and make difficult decisions. Today's amendment package demonstrates exactly how that authority was intended to work. The amendment package before us restores fundings, as it's been mentioned, to housing vouchers, youth jobs, access to council, age strong, arts and culture grants, food justice grants, down payment assistance, tenant stabilization, black male advancement grants, and other critical initiatives that residents across Boston rely upon. These are important investments that impact all of our districts and citywide. I also have a responsibility to listen carefully to the information we have received, both from central staff and the administration. According to the CFO letter, further reductions would result in layoffs, reductions in constituent facing services, and we've talked about this ad nauseum, but I do think, again, the amendment package brought forth by the chair is responsible, and it is something that we should all be proud of. And so that's why I support Council Weber's package, because it reflects months of work, thoughtful compromise, and a serious effort to maximize the authority voters entrusted to us while maintaining our obligation to preserve core city services. I was struck by a recent Globe editorial that made a simple point. If Councillors disagree with the Mayor's priorities, then we should use our amendment authority to change the budget. We should identify savings, reallocate resources, and take responsibility for the choices we make. That is exactly what this package does. It moves beyond symbolic disagreement and towards actual governing, not political posturing. The strongest argument for amendment over rejection has always been that amendment requires prioritization. Today, we have an opportunity to improve this budget, restore critical investments, exercise the authority Boston borders gave us, and move the city forward responsibly. And for those reasons, I will be supporting this amendment package, and I respectfully urge my colleagues to do the same. Thank you.
I just want to point to a comment from my colleague, Councillor Culpepper. I truly believe that if we all care about Boston, we all care about all of Boston's neighbourhoods.
And representing District 8 is the greatest honor of my life. The West End, Beacon Hill, Back Bay, Fenway and Mission Hill are so unique in their own ways. And so being able to vote on an amendment package that serves the entire city is of utmost importance because we really do all rise or fall together. And like Councilor Claudio Zapata said, this is the biggest amendment package ever under the 2021 Charter Amendment with even less resources. This amendment process required partnership. And I want to thank Councilor Weber for his leadership. I know this has not been easy, but for those of us that attended the majority of the 40 plus ways and means hearings, we saw your leadership and we saw what you brought to the table every single day. I think the budget, and it's clear, the budget is our core responsibility as city councilors so it's not a surprise that we're here late on a Wednesday to get this done. We've seen the importance of partnerships in moments like these and private public collaborations to strengthen city services, particularly when federal and state funding becomes uncertain or reduced. I'm proud to have worked with Dana-Farber Cancer Institute to help provide and fund cancer screenings for our firefighters following federal cuts. In addition, the administration expanded youth employment opportunities and strengthened services for veterans who have served our country and deserve reliable support from our city. I look forward to continuing this work together as the chair of pilot and asking our institutions to continue to step up. I think through this budget, we're saying that arts and culture are not optional in our city, that small businesses are valued, that our aging population deserves support and programming. That our BPS families deserve access to council when they're being evicted. That black men in our city deserve investment. Yes, this year is challenging and next year is going to be even harder. Costs will continue to rise and slowing housing production and decreasing revenue, we are going to face similar choices. Meanwhile, residents are leaving Boston because they can no longer afford to live here. We must do everything we can to support housing growth in our city. Truly, the reason why this budget is smaller than in previous years is because we haven't seen the same level of growth. We must do everything we can to support and sustain our tax base over the long term. And this remains one of my top priorities. And by working together as a body, we can advance policies that would make a true impact. Last year, I introduced a zoning amendment that universally passed the council to make housing an allowed use in the Bullfinch Triangle. today there's a proposal at 222 friend street that was previously planned as lab that will now deliver over 200 new homes in the west end that's exactly why we should support eliminating costly parking mandates to make housing less expensive to build and ultimately Right now, these are making rentals and to buy more expensive in our city. And if we're serious about addressing our housing crisis and ensuring Boston remains a city where everyone can afford, we actually have to remove barriers to housing. The challenges we face during this budget cycle have only underscored how urgent this work is more growth equals a bigger budget so i think we need our money to be where our mouth is on these issues because the reality is we can't afford to live in a city that is unaffordable for every family that's struggling to stay and survive we have a responsibility to them we're all sitting in these seats because we care deeply about our city and the people who call this beautiful city home And I believe this budget reflects our shared responsibility to be good stewards of our public resources, we're protecting city of Boston jobs, and we're investing in what matters most to our residents. And for that reason, I'll be voting in support. But I can't look at all of you today and not see that every single decision we make, whether it's at licensing, at ZBA, at the BPDA board, They all impact our city budget. And I think that we need to view those conflicts as things we have to address in order to get to a bigger budget next year. Because we can't continue to ask, I mean, the idea of, oh, we're asking for crumbs. It's really important here that we realize that we have a role to play in the revenue streams that exist in the city. And so I will continue to lead that charge as our housing advocate and as our growth advocate on the city council. And I hope that my colleagues will join me in that fight. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Durkan. The chair recognizes Councillor Worrell. You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. I just want to thank everyone who participated in this process. One quote or phrase that comes to my mind is, difficult times do not relieve us of our responsibility, they clarify our mission. And one thing I just do want to correct the record for, I know I've heard this a couple times, is that the FY26 operating budget only grew by 2%, which is $96 million, and the FY27 budget grew by $99 million. It's only a small difference. But the FY26 operating budget did grow by less. Time and time again, we hear the same message. There's no money, it's going to get worse. Do not ask for more, do not expect more, and don't even imagine more. But in one of the wealthiest cities in the country, with a $4.9 billion budget, nearly 2 billion in reserves, and a track record of collecting more than 200 million above projected revenue. I have to ask, who says there's no money? Who gets hurt when the public is told that less is the only option? Who gets left behind when communities are trained to believe that asking for investment is asking for too much? We should plan for uncertainty. We should protect the long term fiscal health of the city. But we cannot confuse fiscal discipline with disinvestment. Because if our caution always leads us to cuts in the same communities, then we are not just budgeting carefully. We are choosing who has to wait. I want to now take the time to thank all the residents who engage in this process. When residents organize, provide remarks, and let us know what their priorities, that is not anger, that is democracy at work. When advocates challenge us to do better, that is not theater, that is accountability. When counselors use all the tools voters gave us in the charter, hearings, amendments, overrides, questions, debates, amending, and rejecting the budget, that is not obstruction, that is representation. When a community is not the one losing programs, it can be easier to mistake urgency for anger. When a neighborhood is not the one being disinvested, it can be easier to call patience a virtue. I don't want to get into people's politics. However, the people of Boston are ready for this council to start doing more. They want us to use every lever of government to make this city more fair, more affordable, and more inclusive. If we're going to be a city for everyone, we have to be willing to push every lever to make it one. It is 2026. Our disparities are real because our unwillingness to change has also been real. At some point, we have to stop measuring progress by what we call ourselves and start measuring it by what impact we have made. So the work ahead is bigger than any single amendment package. We have to change the process itself. The council needs real power over how revenue gets set and how the budget gets built. And that's not just the ability to react to what lands on our desk. That is the next fight. Making sure this council is not just hearing residents' concerns, but has real power in all the information needed to act on them. To the advocates and residents who made your priorities clear at every step, today is not the end of anything. is to begin into the next phase and we'll continue taking it on together. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Worrell. The chair recognizes Councillor Flynn. Councillor, you have the floor. Thank you. Then we'll go to Councillor Murphy.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I was thinking most of the day about what residents of Boston are doing, watching this program on cable television watching this debate take place, but I was thinking especially about the paraprofessionals, and I was thinking about our lost public school teachers that will not be returning in August or September to their classes that they love, to the students that they love. I'm thinking about them and wondering what are they thinking of what's happening today on the Boston City Council. Do they think we're effectively advocating for them? And I think the answer is no. When the Boston City Council, the city of Boston, does not provide justice to teachers, to paraprofessionals, most women of color, low wage workers, when we don't provide justice for them, we've lost our way. And we can't tackle big issues when we treat people so disrespectfully, in my opinion. I think we have to have a serious conversation going forward on this body about what we're going to do in terms of supporting the lowest wage city workers, which are paraprofessionals and our teachers. We talk about supporting our city employees. And that's what we should be doing. But we didn't support all city employees. We didn't support paraprofessionals. And when we see them over the summertime as they're looking for a job in another field maybe, and we talk to them, we look them in the eye, and we say to them, We cut your $35,000 a year job because we didn't think you were important. We didn't value you. There were more important issues for us to deal with than supporting paraprofessionals. Can you believe that argument that we made? We balanced the budget on the backs of paraprofessionals. Yes, there are other issues, people will say. Ed, focus on other issues. Well, I have. I focused on public safety. I focused on human rights. I focused on quality of life issues. I focused on neighborhood services. I constantly focus on fixing elevators in the BHA system. But I still come back to this issue. In the most progressive city in America, probably the most progressive body in America, the Boston City Council, We still turned our back on paraprofessionals. But what can we do now? We all acknowledge now that we screwed them. But what can we do now to make it up to them? Can we help them find a job? Can we help them with food access? Can we help them with childcare, with daycare? Can we improve their life just a little bit? Because they're struggling right now. They're without a paycheck. In the most wealthy city in America, we have people that are going without food. We talk about food access. Well, these paraprofessionals won't have food access because we just gave them a pink slip. We gave them a city council resolution. We shook their hand. And after we shook their hand, we gave them a pink slip. That's not the Boston I was raised in. That's not the Boston I'm from. The Boston I'm from was always about social and economic justice, social, economic, and racial justice. We've lost our way. What do we do to make it up? What do we do to make it up to those families that lost their job, and special needs children that rely on that incredible service those teachers provided, those paraprofessionals provided. Who's going to go into those classrooms and help manage the classroom? Ensure each child gets the right amount of time so that they can figure out how to fix a puzzle, make a puzzle. maybe do a little bit of reading, maybe escort the child when the child needs to go to the bathroom, help them wash their hands. Who's going to do that work? Are we going to ask the teacher to do that work, to add more duties onto his or her assignment? And what about the child, the disabled student that has less support now in the classroom, what do we say to the parent? That we're cutting the programs and services your child desperately needed? Is that social and economic justice? Is that what we're about in this city? I think we're at this position now based on overspending for so many years. We didn't practice fiscal discipline, fiscal responsibility, accountability, transparency. We all know that this budget process wasn't fair. We didn't really have a voice in the budget process. We saw young kids here, they got arrested. Today, they were fighting for summer jobs and year-round jobs, but we all know that there was little to be done for them, but we went through the process anyway. But I think when people come to the city council, they come here because it's the last resort. This is the body that has always listened to people that didn't have a voice in government. You could come to the city council and explain your case and tell why we need more services for youth, why we need more recovery services for people in need. But now the city council doesn't focus on those quality of life issues anymore, neighborhood services anymore. We're not attached to the people like we should be. We also have ethics related issues on the Boston City Council as well. I just sent a letter to the city council president. I sent a letter to the mayor. I don't think we conducted ourselves with integrity and honesty. That's my opinion. People might disagree with me, but I don't think we conducted ourselves in a good manner for the residents of Boston. We let a lot of people down by our actions, by our votes, by our unwillingness to listen, by our disregard for common sense and fighting for people in need. My commitment as a city council going forward is to still focus on those quality of life issues, those neighborhood services that are a big part of being a district city councilor, especially. But never giving up on residents, especially residents in need, residents in public housing, residents that are struggling. I told you about my friend Steve that had a double amputee, a disabled veteran, living at Ruth Barclay Apartments. He couldn't access his apartment. He slept at Salt Station. What do we say to Steve when we see him on the street? Thank you for your service as a veteran, but by the way, Steve, the elevator's been always busted. You're just gonna have to sleep on Salt Station tonight? Is that about social and economic justice? I think the City Council has lost its way. I'm still willing to work with everybody to address these quality of life issues, these critical issues about social, economic, racial justice, but we have to acknowledge residents of Boston have lost faith in us as a body. And we need to demonstrate a willingness to treat people with respect and dignity going forward. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Councillor Flynn. The chair recognizes Councillor Murphy. You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam President. And I did speak earlier on why I was supporting not just this amendment package, but if it passed the vote. So I don't have to get back into all of that. But one of the things I did say was I'm proud that this package fully restores important funding for our age strong. Our seniors deserve the behavioral health support. expanded engagement grant that was cut from many centers across the city and opportunities to remain connected and engaged in their communities and that this reinstatement I believed restored the dignity that our seniors deserve and earned but I know we just got this printed out and thank you to Ryan and Karishma for working through that last break to get all the numbers done. But when I was just reading through these pages, I do just have a question through the chair. to the chair on Age Strong Expanding Engagement Grant. This amendment seeks to restore $500,000 to the Age Strong Expanding Engagement Grant within the expanding engagement. Funds are specifically intended to support continued senior programming in West Roxbury. I just noticed that. And as an at-large city councilor, Of course, I care about all of my seniors in the parkway. I've been to the Elks and was there when we were happy and supporting expanding to a third full day, or not full day, but of programming, paying ethos. But I also know that I heard directly, and we did, from seniors at the Golden Age Center in Chinatown. We know that in Mattapan, in Grove Hall, and in neighborhoods all across the city of Austin, expanding engagement grant was supporting so many of our seniors so i do have a question because i was not aware that that five hundred thousand dollars was only going to go to support west roxbury so if maybe that's not true so if someone could just explain to me if that is true thank you the chair recognizes counselor weber and the chair of west means i believe the package i put forward was 1.2 million for age strong
There was a bunch of grants that were cut. That's one of the grants that was cut. And there are other cuts that are restored in that package.
Oh, no, I see that. The behavioral access grant is. And then there's a third one that says 250 to programming. But specifically to the expanding engagement grant, because I know more than one center was receiving that. Is it true that our... Putting back these grants will only support the West Roxbury Center I know there are two others, but they're specific to let me just read the other one where it says this one will be specific to retaining multilingual clinicians across the city including Spanish language clinicians in East Boston and Then the third one was just a generic $250 and it says a previous City Council amendment so specific to the expanded grant, because I spoke with Emily Shea, I spoke with Megan over at the Golden Age when they first received the letter. So just want to have clarification on that, please.
That's from Webber. Yeah, the expanding engagement grant is fully restored, including Chinatown and the Golden Age grant in Chinatown. And the Spanish language services has been stationed in East Boston because it's a heavily Spanish speaking. So there was a call to have that restored also. Thank you.
Just making sure, because it does specifically say West Roxbury, so making sure that others are receiving it. Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Murphy. Would anyone else wish to speak? We will now move to the final vote. Mr. Clerk, will you please call a roll call vote on docket 0733?
Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Braden. Yes. Councillor Colletta Zapata. Yes. Councillor Colletta Zapata. Yes. Councillor Culpepper. Councillor Culpepper, yes. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Durkan, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Fitzgerald, yes. Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Flynn, yes. Councillor Lujan, yes. Councillor Lujan, yes. Councillor Mejia, no. Councillor Mejia, no. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Murphy, yes. Councillor Pepin, yes. Councillor Pepin, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Weber, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor Worrell, yes. Docket number 0733 has received 12 votes in the affirmative and one negative.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Docket 0733 has passed in an amended draft and is further amended. Thank you. Guess what we have to do now? We're on to a regular meeting. We are now on to motions, orders and resolutions. Okay, we're on to... Thank you, Councillor Culpepper. Given the lateness of the day, Councillor Culpepper, please, you have the floor.
Madam President, I move the table and move to adjourn for tonight.
No, no, hold on a minute. We have got some business that we need to attend to tonight. We can't just adjourn and go home. We have things to do. We have late files that are personnel orders. Thank you, Councillor Culpepper. I appreciate your concern. It is getting late, but we've been here longer than this. Councillor Durkan.
Can I amend the motion to table 1186 through 1191, and then 1193 through 1196, and add in I think that we should vote on the 17F matter? And then move to personnel and late files and green sheets. Do we have a second?
No, Madam Chair.
Can you repeat what she said?
I can repeat it.
She admitted the motion.
Hold on, Councillor. It's very late. It's not very late. It's only quarter to nine. We have been here to quarter to one, so it's early. Given the length of deliberation and the long day that we've had, there is a motion on the floor that we table some of these dockets, that we will bring them back on another date. There's a suggestion that we vote to pass the 17F and then that we could move on to deal with the pressing issues of some of the late files. We have a bundle of late files. It's coming up to the end of the financial year, and we have to pass late files at this moment. Councillor Durkan has a motion to— Sorry, it's Councillor Councillor Durkan's, no, Councillor Culpepper's motion and Councillor Durkan's seconded. Amending your motion. Hold on a minute. Councillor Murphy.
So just to clarify what Councillor Flynn was asking, he was well aware what happened, but Councillor Durkan, you spoke too quick, at least for myself, and we just want to know exactly. So if you could, because I'm trying to circle and see if I agree with all of them, and I may want to add one or two more. So if you could start at the beginning and we could see, because we understood what was happening, but we're not just sure which number she was saying.
Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Murphy, for that suggestion. Councillor Durkan, would you mind repeating your—Councillor Culpepper has made a motion, and you are offering a— Friendly amendment. A friendly amendment to Councillor Culpepper's motion. So please continue.
So under motion, orders and resolutions, those are dockets 1186 through one— Sorry. Page nine of the agenda. Page nine of the agenda. So dockets 1186 through 1196, which are all of the motions, orders, and resolutions, except for the 117F, which is 1192. I think that we should vote on 1192 and the rest should be tabled. I was just saying motion, orders, and resolutions.
Constable Mejia, you have the floor.
No, I understand that. Thank you, Madam President. We've been asked to do our jobs. And it's almost like 9 o'clock, and we're already done for the day when we still have business to do. I can't believe that that's the call to action right now. We've been asked to do our jobs, and now we're trying to end the meeting, so we won't do it. I understand that we've been here all day. I'm a single mom. It is not easy being away from my family all day either. But at the end of the day, we can't pick and choose when we want to show up for work. So we walked in here knowing that it was going to be a long day. And if the narrative is that we're not doing our jobs and that we're not showing up and then we're not— Thank you, Councillor Meher.
Thank you. I take your point taken. So there is a motion on the floor and a friendly amendment. Let me see. Second, Mr Clerk, can you guide me on this? Do we take a vote to accept the motion on the floor, and then we have a proper vote to pass it? The first movement is to take a vote to accept Councillor Culpepper's motion and Councillor Durkan's friendly amendment. A yes would be to say yes, we will Somebody's going to give me the correct language here. Oh yes, we've accepted the friendly amendment, so we don't need to vote on it. So we go straight to a vote on the motion. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on the motion to table The dockets 1186 through 1196, with the exception of 1192, which is the 17F. Is everyone clear? So a yes is that we will table these dockets until the next meeting. Yes.
Councilor Brayton. Yes. Councilor Kalata-Zapata. Councilor Culpepper. Yes. Councilor Culpepper. Yes. Councilor Durkan. Yes. Councilor Durkan. Yes. Councilor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councilor Fitzgerald. Yes. Councilor Flynn.
Councilor Flynn. Yes. Councilor Lujan.
Councilor Lujan. Yes. Councilor Mejia.
Councilor Mejia. No. Councilor Murphy. No. Councilor Murphy. Yes. Councilor Pepin.
Councillor Penn, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Santana, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor Webber, yes. Councillor Worrell. Ten votes in the affirmative and one no.
Thank you. The motion to table dockets 1186 through 1196, with the exception of 1191, has passed. Sorry, I've marked the wrong one. 1192. I've highlighted the wrong docket there. I beg your pardon. So we're now on to the Councillor Flynn.
last week when i filed the motion to postpone the vote and we also voted and approved that we added next week's meeting on the 17th the only thing on that agenda was going to be the budget that comes back we now have added these docket numbers are we allowed between now and monday attend to add other agenda items to next wednesday's meeting now that we've just added a majority of this agenda on to next week's meeting
I think given that we were planning to—next week's meeting is solely for the purpose of accepting back the Mayor's report.
But it's not anymore. Now we have all of these.
No, no. We can table these to the full meeting on the 24th.
Well, could you clarify what is happening if we just voted to bump it to the 24th or if we voted to bump it to the 17th?
Thank you, Councillor Murphy. Just give me a moment to clarify. Sure.
Thank you.
Just bear with us. We're going to have a 30-second recess just to sort this out. Thank you.
you you Thank you.
Thank you, we're back in session. Thank you Councillor Murphy for requesting that clarification. I think the intent is to table these dockets to our next regular meeting, which is June 26th. 24th, sorry. This is what happens when I get down. June 24th. And that's for the vote. Then so we would, you would file any further new filings would go, would be filed for Wednesday the 24th. and the next batch of personnel orders would be filed for June 24th, and that's the last personnel filing opportunity for the financial year. So we're at a vote. Yes. Councillor Flynn, you have a... Mr. Clerk, could you please read docket 1192 into the record?
Docket number 1192. Councillor Flynn offered the following. Order requesting certain information under Section 17F relative to the number of units and affordable units approved in the City of Boston over the last 10 years by neighbourhood and City Council districts.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. The Chair recognizes Councillor Flynn. You have the floor.
Thank you, Madam Chair. General information, I filed the 17F seeking data on housing units approved in Boston over the past 10 years. I think it's important to evaluate the data and information. I am seeking not only the number of total housing units and affordable housing units approved each year, But I also requested that these units that were approved be broken down annually by both the neighborhood in Boston and by the city council district of where the approved products are located. This data is important and relevant to evaluate as part of our housing crisis. Madam Chair, I do want to mention one other point. I'm still waiting for outstanding. data on a 17F as it relates to the Ruth Barclay BHA elevator situation that's been several months. For some reason, the BHA administrator is not providing that information to me, and I need to do my due diligence to ensure my constituents living in public housing are treated with respect and dignity, and they live in a safe environment. and they're currently not living in a safe environment when the elevator system is broken down. Minister Block is not providing that information, and I want to ask if you can help me get that from Minister Block, because for some reason she is not providing it to us.
We'll certainly look into that. Thank you. So this is 17F. Councillor Flynn seeks suspension of the rules and passage of Docket 1192. All in favour say aye. Aye. All opposed say nay. Councillor Murphy.
Yes, thank you. I'll be quick.
I just want to— Just as a—the 17F, it's usually just the person who's a sponsor.
I just want to also advocate that we still have 11 outstanding 17Fs that are past due.
Thank you. Julie noted. Councillor Flynn seeks suspension of the rules and passage of docket 1192. All in favour say aye. All opposed say no. Mr. Clerk, could you please take a roll call vote on docket 1192.
Councillor Braden.
Councillor Braden, yes. Councillor Colletta Zapata. Councillor Culpepper. Yes. Council Culpepper, yes. Council Durkan, yes. Council Fitzgerald, yes. Council Fitzgerald, yes. Council Flynn, yes. Council Flynn, yes. Council Lujan, yes. Council Lujan, yes. Council Mejia, yes. Council Murphy, yes. Council Murphy, yes. Council Pippen, yes. Council Pippen, yes. Council Santana, yes. Council Santana, yes. Council Weber, yes. Council Weber, yes. And Council Orrell. 10 votes in the affirmative.
Thank you, Mr Clerk. Docket 1192 has passed. We're now on to—does anyone wish to pull anything from the green sheets? Okay. We're now on to late files. Mr Clerk, do we have— We have 10 personnel orders. I've been informed by the Clerk that there are 10 late files, which include 10— Late-files absent objection. These late-file matters will be added. Mr Clerk, would you please read the late-file matters into the record?
Firstly, I'm a council of brain for council. Let me hear second late-file matter council brain for City Council staff Third late-file matter council brain for council or else fourth late-file matter council of brain for office staff Fifth, late file matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Pappin. Sixth, late file matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Culpepper. Seventh, late file matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Santana. Eighth file, late matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Culpepper. Ninth, late file matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Durkan. And 10th, late file matter, Councilor Braden for Councilor Lujan.
Thank you, Mr. Clerk. The Chair moves for passage of these late-file matters. All in favour say aye. All opposed say nay. The ayes have it. Thank you. These late-file matters have passed. We're now moving on to the consent agenda. I've been informed by the Clerk that there are no additions to the consent agenda. The question now comes on approval of the various matters contained within the consent agenda. All those in favour say aye. Thank you. The consent agenda has been approved. We are now on to announcements. Please remember that these are for upcoming dates and events. Does anyone have any announcements? Put your light on if you've got any announcements. We all want to wish happy birthday to Elsa Flores of Councillor Mejia's office. Tariq Myers of Councillor Culpepper's office, Sydney Scanlon of Councillor Flynn's office, Timothy Guillemonde and Stephen Clarke, and Angelo Yard of Councillor Worrell's office. Wow, everybody in that office is having a birthday. Eddie Connolly of Councillor Pepin's office, and our very own Michelle Goldberg. Your birthday. Is it your birthday today? Oh, good. I'm glad. Any additional? The Chair recognises Councillor Durkan and then Councillor Culpepper. Okay, thank you. Let's just settle.
I'll get myself centred here.
Now moving on to memorials. Would anyone like to uplift a name? The Chair recognises Councillor Durkan.
you have the floor thank you so much chair and i know it's been a long meeting but um mildred millie driscoll who is the the mom of our beloved police captain a1 captain rich driscoll passed away last week and so just wanted to read her name into the record she's a paraprofessional with the boston public schools and it's it's really sad that she is gone and i know that she means so much to her family and to our wonderful Captain Driscoll. So thank you.
Chair recognizes Constable Culpepper. You have the floor.
Just one announcement. This Sunday, 3 o'clock, 30 years. Celebrating. Thank you. For those that do want to come, let me know if you're going to come so we can make sure that you have special seating. Thank you.
Thank you. Anyone else? Councillor Flynn, you have the floor.
I just heard of a recent death of a friend of mine. His mother passed away, but my friend's name is Tim McDonagh of Dorchester. The wake was tonight in Dorchester. Tim is a probation officer. His mother passed away, but I just want to say condolences to the McDonagh family, to Mrs. McDonagh. We're praying for you. Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to uplift the memory of William Billy Michael Sullivan Sr., who is the father of Jake Sullivan, who is at BU. We send our condolences to his family. On behalf of Councillor Fitzgerald, William Sullivan. On behalf of Councillor Flynn, Helene L. Betsy McDonagh. On behalf of Councillor Louis Jain, Richard Sullivan. On behalf of Councillor Durkan, Mildred Millie Driscoll. On behalf of Councillor Braden and the Council staff, William Billy William Sullivan Senior. The Chair moves that when the Council adjourns today, it does so in memory of the aforementioned individuals. A moment of silence, please. The Council is scheduled to meet again in the Ionella Chamber on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at 10 a.m. Thank you to my colleagues, central staff, the Clerk, the Clerk's Office, and the council stenographer. And a special shout out to Karishma and Ryan and the folks who helped with the budget. All in favour of adjournment, please say aye. Aye. This council meeting is adjourned.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.