Planning Commission & Land Use Authority - Regular Meeting

On February 2, 2026, I will begin with the prayer of Mr. Mitchell. And I will lead the oath of allegiance. Dear Heavenly Father, Thank you for letting me be with you tonight. Thank you for giving me a chance to look at today's cases one by one. We I pray that we can all share each other's thoughts and opinions in a positive atmosphere and solve each issue together. Thank you to this city where we live. Thank you to everyone who volunteers, helps, plans, and supports us. I pray that we will help each other to fulfill our roles. We thank the Lord and pray for all of this in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. Please show us the honor of the Republic of China. The Republic of China is one country, and freedom and justice are guaranteed to everyone. Good. The first item in today's case is today's case approval. You've all reviewed it, so you don't have any more questions, do you? I'm a Davis. I propose to approve today's case. I'm a Mitchell. I request. Davis and Mitchell have each agreed. Is there anyone who agrees? Yes. The second case is the approval of the meeting of the Planning Committee on August 19, 2026. This is Mr. Mitchell. I suggest that the approval of the meeting on August 19. Mr. Davis has re-appointed. Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Davis have each approved. Is there anyone who approves? The third case is an agreement or a declaration of conflict of understanding. Is there anyone who has an agreement or a conflict of understanding regarding today's case? All right. I'll go straight to the bottom. The fourth case is G1604. The request is to modify the general planning land use map with LDM-MD-MHD and CCOM from LDOS Income. The area is located in Namui 2000 and Donggyeong 20. I will deliver the application to Jason Worden and Elden. Thank you, members. Hello. At the last meeting, the planning committee considered the opinions discussed by the applicant. We have considered the case in order to give you time. The applicant did not submit updated data. However, the applicant wants to discuss the previously submitted proposal. Our committee recommends that the project promote high-density development on the outskirts of the intersection and the middle school, and place commercial facilities on the second-largest 85-feet wide 26-meter wide rail road in the city. That's all. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. As you can see, there are no changes. Yes, do you know why there are no changes? Or should we discuss with the applicant or the representative? Yes, it would be better to discuss with the applicant or the representative. All right. Do you have an applicant? Nice to meet you again. My name is Michael Adams-Otton. My mother, Michelle Adams-Otton, is the eldest daughter of Larry Adams and Masha Adams. My sister and I play the role of advisors to the family more than anything else. I'm glad to be here today. Our family feels a deep bond with the land and has a sense of responsibility. We have been looking after the land for a long time, so everything we do here and everything we plan together truly develops the city and contributes to improving the quality of life of the residents. As you can see, we have not changed the application form. I will briefly explain the reason. First of all, as you know, I'm not a developer. I've never experienced this process and I'm not used to this process. The only option I know is to be completely rejected or ignored. If I had understood this process better and knew the results that the choice would bring, I would have made the right decision. Secondly, What I want you and the residents to know is that it is only two weeks before our family started the process. About a year ago, as soon as my grandfather passed away, we contacted the city council. Because I wanted to understand three things better. First, what is the vision of the city council on this issue? Second, what is the need for the city council? Third, I wanted to know what the city and local communities and residents need. So, over the past few months, the process of jointly developing the plan with the city officials began. This plan is not our own plan, but a plan developed with the city officials. And we announced the plan two weeks ago to you and your residents. We sincerely thank you for your opinion. It was an earful of your request to soften the boundaries of certain areas and make the transition more smooth. We also heard the request to reduce the ratio of high density and medium-high density housing and carefully consider the types of commercial facilities that will enter the area. We have listened to your opinions and promise to consider all feedback and concerns in the future. Even after the last meeting, we continued to have conversations with city officials. I discussed the plan with the local residents and a few members of the city council, and I learned one clear fact through all the discussions. It means that there are various opinions and visions about how this land can be used and how it should be used. I think that this diversity is showing us a special opportunity that we are facing today. It is unusual to have the opportunity to plan using a land of about 60 hectares, 150 acres in the middle of the city of a large and mature regional society. Through this, we can build a harmonious plan that can calm the city down and develop it. Of course, There is no change in the fact that there are various visions and opinions on how to use this material. So at this point in time, we think that going to the next stage of this process and discussing directly with the Commission is the most profitable, most productive, and most efficient way for us. I know that additional discussions, more in-depth discussions are needed and corrections may be needed, but once again, I think that discussing directly with the city council is the most productive way. We respect the committee. Thank you for reviewing our plan and giving us feedback. And as I said, we think this land is very precious, This is our explanation. Thank you. Do you have any questions? Yes. Mr. Davis, we will continue the discussion. I gave you a very thorough and deep recommendation and suggestion to review the proposal to you two weeks ago. But you say this is absurd. This is the purpose of the committee. As the chairman, I completely ignore your procedure and do not accept any response or reaction to our proposal. I'm sorry to see that they don't even provide a reasonable basis. I don't think there's any more room to think about it. I don't know what kind of conversation I had with the viewers, but honestly, I feel a little bit of an indignation about the procedure in your reactions and attitudes. We gave you a very thoughtful opinion. As you know, if you are disqualified from this committee, you will be decided whether you will be approved or disqualified from the committee. However, if that is true, 2. If you think that the regional representatives are not getting the opportunity to present their opinions properly, it would be better to attend the committee meeting. Yes, the mayor is a smart, thoughtful, and reasonable person. There is a high possibility that you will listen to the residents' additional opinions. If the problem goes in that direction, What I heard today is that I am against it. Yes, of course. We know that there is a possibility that the bill will be revoked. However, this does not mean that we ignore the opinions of the residents or do not consider the recommendations. However, rather than making compromising adjustments in front of various institutions, I just judged that moving to the next stage was the most productive way. I have a question. Did you tell the staff to proceed with the next step with the same opinion? Yes, I think you should ask the staff that question.

It's a little hard for me to tell you on behalf of the staff. I see. So what I can't believe is that you turned everything around because of the staff.

Basically, this is what the employees want. You said this to us. The problem is that the employees don't work that way. If you are a landowner, you can say that you want to bring land and do this. Then we are reviewing various standards. By the way, This is what the city ordered. It's completely true. Wait a minute. What did I say? Shall I tell you again? We developed this plan together. This is not a developer contract. This is a simple change contract. It's not like a joint development. It's not going to work like this. Shall I use a different expression? We made this plan together. Please listen to my story for a moment. There was a process of transfer before the general plan was established. The city and land owners were very cooperative in the relocation process. The area was designated or discussed in the relocation process. It was designated as the Ariwon area at the time of relocation, and this was also done through the cooperation of the city and land owners. Therefore, it is not wrong to say that there was considerable negotiation between the city and land owners because it was a process of changing from a non-relocation area to a relocation area. When the relocation was completed, we had to prepare the following plans. This was the next step. What I want to tell you is this part. Of course, this part was a cooperative process. However, saying that it was a cooperative process sounds like persuading everyone in the city to do this. That part is true. The cooperative part is in charge of the city. Yes, we want to relocate the land and locate commercial facilities. This part is a cooperative process. But you're talking as if you're telling me to do that in the city. I think the city is trying to convince everyone that it is involved in this work, but that is a fact. I'm just trying to tell you what's happened so far. I'll tell you about the process for a moment. Um, especially when the general plan first started. If you think about it, there were two approaches, and the applicants were all right. They have the right and ability to develop their own land. So when city employees meet them, they say, At first, they come up with their ideas and land development plans that they and their team think of. Then, the city employees adjust, modify, and relocate based on their ideas and concepts. As you can see, the proposal of the applicant that is being modified reflects the recommendations of the city employees and is made to fit the city planning as much as possible. In other words, it was carried out in two stages, and both the applicant and the city were deeply involved in this process. As mentioned in the employee report, if it is not suitable for urban planning, we will not recommend approval. But what I'm curious about is that I know all of this process well. What I want to ask is that the applicant made cooperative efforts between the last city planning committee meeting and this city planning committee meeting, so he said he would not change anything. Then, I wonder if the city planning department told the applicant to leave it as it is. If so, I was very disappointed in your decision. But I don't think so. Of course, there was cooperation before that, The next step is the meeting of the city planning committee. We submit a proposal based on the opinions of the residents. And that's the step to review the proposal and modify the necessary parts. But it's a misunderstanding that you said they told you to do that. I'm telling you the situation for two weeks. I'm not telling you the situation before that. I think I misunderstood that part. I have adopted a cooperative approach, and I definitely wanted to talk to the applicant. The applicant expressed his opinion, and we decided to choose this approach, and we support it. Therefore, it is true that there was a discussion with the employees for two weeks. I'm Michelle. I fully agree with Mr. Davis. Even though the entire committee presented their opinions and listened to the opinions of the residents, I feel frustrated that those opinions seem to be ignored. Then what is the reason for our existence? Now, I will also tell you about other opinions. However, the problem is that the citizens here do not understand the procedure. To explain in more detail what Jason is saying, if we propose a refusal, he can appeal to the House of Representatives. But the problem is that the House of Representatives does not have a referendum process like this. So, His engineer ignored the city planning committee and said it would be passed right away, and then it would be passed with a 50 to 50 chance. This is what I'm angry about. I'm angry at the completely ignorant attitude of the process. This process is a part of listening to the opinions of the residents and looking at this project. This project is almost five times larger than the townhouse in Heritage Place over there. However, the harmony with the commercial facilities is not properly achieved. Do you need a commercial facility in the city? Yes. Do you need more medium density housing? Yes. But it's not that big. What we asked for was to be more careful about the size and consider the harmony with the surroundings. We listened to the residents' opinions and reviewed this project itself. If the project was right next to your engineer's project, he would have come here and made all kinds of complaints. Because it was like that in the past. There was a project that he strongly criticized because of one of the very small R18 heaters near his house. It doesn't make sense to say that it's okay to do this to you now. 당신은 정말 많은 주장을 펼쳤습니다. 이건 제이슨의 아이디어가 아니었다는 점을 바로 잡고 싶습니다. 네, 저희는 토목공학 전문가인 제이슨을 고용했습니다. 하지만 이건 그의 아이디어도, 계획도, 위도도 아니었습니다. 이건 저희의 아이디어입니다. 그러니 부분에 대해 저에게 말씀하시고 불만을 털어놓으셔도 좋지만 이건 그의 아이디어가 아닙니다. 저도 당신에게 실망했습니다. 네, 감사합니다. It's okay. I'll tell you again, but I've never revealed that I know I need additional discussion and adjustment. We don't hide that. However, I just want to move on to the next step and discuss it with the Senate. If so, I will advertise the Senate as clearly as possible. Until you come back with a plan that actually considered the things we discussed, the Senate will refuse your plan. It seems that you are just relying on the lamp construction. Please, please, please, I hope there is no reaction from the citizens. It's so interesting that we're described as villains. We're just farmers. We don't have any plans to do anything right now. We're just planning for the future. If we're white. If you're just planning for the future, why didn't you consider the things we suggested at all? This is a very specific matter. There are many details in all processes, including the transition from medium density to high density to medium density. So you don't have to be naive. There was definitely a plan in advance. There was a movement to increase the density of commercial cultivation, and it didn't happen all of a sudden. There must have been a discussion and a plan. We presented our opinions, and those opinions were ignored. Now we have attended the second meeting and are dealing with the case in two weeks. I fully agree with Anderson's recommendation. Should we proceed with the resolution here? And when should we proceed with the resolution at the hearing? Yes, I understand. Do you have any more questions for the applicant? I'll tell you a few more things. Mr. Anderson said that if it is rejected, it can be appealed to the House of Representatives, but I would like to make it clear that it is only a recommendation of all, whether it is a full-fledged approval or a full-fledged opposition vote. No matter what results come out tonight, the House of Representatives will move on to the House of Representatives. Although the Planning Committee has the right to decide, it plays a role in proposing recommendations on comprehensive plans. Your words are correct. However, you talked about the appeal, but the comprehensive plan is not a decision-making document, so please take advantage of the fact that the appeal is not allowed. The reason I am telling you this is because I deal with a lot of appeal cases in my work. The second thing I want to tell you is that the reason why comprehensive plans must be established in the city is because the main government requires a comprehensive plan of the local housing organization. Therefore, what kind of plan should be established? However, I don't think this plan is detailed. If it is really a detailed plan, there should be a point of reference, a local point of reference, and a pre-law plan. From the lawyer's point of view, this plan is not a pre-law document. This is a plan document to reveal the general concept of the use of future land in a given area to the public. Of course, what I'm saying is not to change your thoughts or opinions, but from a legal point of view, unless it is a right-of-way document, it cannot be proposed, and the Senate can decide to change it at any time. Thank you. Do you have anything more to say? No, I think it's okay. Thank you. I know this plan is not a right-of-way document, As a comprehensive plan, it was written in great detail and I think it contains a lot of concerns. In my opinion, the overall plan, which includes at least a medium density or a medium density development around the medium density area, seems to have been explained in great detail. There are no changes. This is continued. It's been postponed. I know you're all here. I know you all want to speak. I heard your opinions last week, and you'll know what's going to happen in the future. I don't think we need to discuss what I've already said at the public hearing. I don't think there's anything different from last week. Then, Should we re-open the public hearing? TED The public hearing has been postponed and the case has also been postponed. If there is no new content from the applicant, nothing will be changed, so I think it depends on your decision to hear the same opinion about the same content again. Yes, that will depend on your decision. And we heard all the opinions you gave this time again. To tell you again, this time, you will bring other people and tell the same story as last time. Of course, I don't need to repeat the same story as last time, but I would like to hear your thoughts on the fact that the applicant does not consider our opinion at all. I know for sure that the applicant is ignoring our opinion. Of course, it is a process that is carried out in various ways, and I understand that they are handling it their own way. Yes, then I will start this debate, but I would appreciate it if you could proceed briefly so that it does not take too long. You have all the materials we submitted, right? Yes.

I am Rusty Hughes, the director of the Economic Development Department. I would like to talk about the meeting with the applicant. I also attended the meeting, but I would like to say that it is absolutely not that the applicant is ignoring our opinion. Well, this is a big problem in the middle of the city. What they want is to coordinate the vision of the selected people by cooperating with the approval agencies. And they want the proposal of the planning committee to be considered along with the opinions of the citizens. They also want to cooperate with the assembly, which is because approval or refusal is part of the assembly's authority. I think there was a misunderstanding at the last meeting. Yes, that's right. Their engineer knew the truth and also worked as a member of the planning committee. Several members attended the last meeting. Do you want a recommendation at the time? Do you want to refuse? Or would you like to exchange other opinions? I heard the question. Therefore, they have the will to meet with the committee, and they are considering meeting with the planning committee and the committee to hear more citizens' opinions and discuss everything together. So they don't have any development plans at all. The developer is not yet confirmed. Again, this is not a change in the use of general planning. This is not a change in the use of general planning. And finally, we went from general planning to change the use of general planning while dealing with the change in the use of general planning. The process was confusing. So we had a meeting to prepare better procedures for the employees. I heard the opinion of the planning committee and voted. We are trying to balance everything. But I want to make it clear that the applicant is not ignoring the opinion of the planning committee. We clearly understood that in the discussion process, and they are just trying to find the most efficient way. I wanted to check this point. Yes, thank you. If you want to make a statement, we will start the public hearing. Please give a short comment. Hello, members of the committee. I am Coco Head. I am in Franklin Fields, West of the area we are discussing today. I am a local resident of Franklin Fields. I was not able to attend the last City Planning Committee meeting, but I am working at the Black Desert Resort, Black Desert Resort Management Committee. So, the City Planning Committee of Santa Clara, Evans, and Ivans, and the City Council and General Planning, We are actively cooperating with cases such as land use issues. This requires cooperative efforts because we need to consider the opinions of land owners, existing local residents, and resorts. I would like to give a specific opinion on some of the notes I have reviewed. In particular, I would like to talk about the notes right next to the middle school, Merrill, Merrill, and the southern notes. In the comprehensive plan, it is mentioned that the Merrill South Road will be converted to a medium-density commercial area. However, high-density or medium-density development is not necessary for the next road next to the middle school. St. George, St. George decided to promote high-density development in Red Cliff, Red Cliffs, and Viviano, on Route 3090. If you change the plan, the department must consider the characteristics and values of the surrounding houses and maintain the development of the density. Likewise, when considering the characteristics and value of surrounding houses, it is appropriate to maintain low-density development when considering the characteristics and value of surrounding houses that follow Mary Hill Road and Mary Hill Road, which are stretched to the east. This is because high-density development is not in line with the growth trend of the region. Of course, I understand that landowners have the right to develop their land in the way they want. However, they also need to consider the human resources development projects created around their territory. Washington also understands that more commercial facilities are needed to supply sewage, as well as all other cities. However, it is not certain that it is the right direction for commercial facilities to enter the area. And as you clearly said this morning, this committee has the authority to decide where the development of a certain type in Washington should be done. You have to decide what is most suitable for the needs and uses of the city. In my opinion, I think that development is more appropriate for high density or low density development, especially in certain areas and especially in those two areas. Therefore, I recommend rejecting the application of the applicant for just that reason. Thank you. Hello, members of the committee and employees. I am a resident of the Okhlov Medoh Development Area, or Derek Hoffman, who will soon live there. I live in a place surrounded by the two fields you just mentioned, and I fully agree with his opinion and thank you for his opinion. I am a member of the Board of Directors of the Board of Directors of the Board of Directors of the Board of Directors of the Board of Directors of First of all, I would like to talk about Gyeongcheong. Thank you very much to all of you here. At the last Gyeongcheong Assembly, you listened to the opinions of the residents and the local community. And once again, you have given very detailed and thoughtful feedback to the applicants. As someone who regularly attends these meetings, your Gyeongcheong is very fresh and grateful. Thank you very much. You may have heard that the applicant has listened to your opinion, but I don't think so. The applicant is not listening to your opinion, and you already know it, and the evidence itself tells you everything. The proposal submitted tonight has not been changed. We are listening to the same message that this is just the beginning and there will be more detailed content later. But you are right. This is the starting point of the procedure. As you have already said in the last meeting, I hope you will consider the position that you will recommend the dissolution. I think you have the will to do so tonight. When I came here tonight, I saw that the employees were recommending the approval without any changes. I thought the same thing. I think they believe that they can negotiate better with the Senate. And that's a very frustrating thing. Because as Anderson clearly said tonight, I don't think the hearing will be held at the hearing. I was wrong. I would appreciate it if you could correct me. Anyway, tonight is the public hearing. The only chance to make a comment on a specific proposal is tonight. That's why I'm here. Thank you for listening to my opinion again. Please consider the new opinions tonight. I agree with the last speaker's opinion on the appropriate density of No. 8, No. 4, No. 2, and No. 1. These notes must maintain low-density development. If you plan to build a commercial facility in No. 1, as we said in the letter, you have to build up to the maximum commercial facility. It's not criticizing anyone or driving them into evil. We would like to carefully review how this branch will be developed and consider our opinions. I will tell you one more thing tonight. We included the public record announcement of the West Bank on August 17th, but we have not received any answers yet. We requested various materials from the West Bank. For example, limited concept plans, development plans, sub-plans and design concepts, limited housing units and density, and related to the development expected according to Merrill Road, land owners, applicants, developers, consultants, or other materials submitted or submitted by the agent. We requested these materials and stated them in the letter, but we did not receive any response. So I ask you again. If there is a problem with the procedure,

I think you know how to call. There must be a problem with the procedure. I look forward to your response to the Yuta Act. No, I'm not asking you for legal advice, but on the Yuta Law website, you can check out the Government Records Access Management Act. Please submit it to the person in charge of the viewing and there is a link related to the website to protect the rights of the citizen, so you can apply for it right away through that link. However, if you were registered as a civil servant, it is possible that the form did not match and was not delivered to the record management department.

Again, we are talking about what we want as legal procedures and citizens. Also, it is important to listen to the opinions of the citizens and reveal them transparently. Thank you again for joining us tonight. Please continue to keep your opinions unchanged. Thank you.

Thank you again for giving me a chance to hear your opinions today. Jeff Stewart, East Adam Lane, page 51, page 4, right behind. And there are a few questions. Are you saying that there are no more citizens' opinions in the hearing? That's not true. The hearing regularly listens to citizens' opinions, but it is not announced as a public hearing. Yes, that's right. The public hearing is an open meeting. The case is published according to the law, and it has been released a week ago, but it is not listed as a public hearing. The right to allow public opinion to be heard depends on the quantity of the market and the protest meeting. What I have experienced while working here for a long time is that the market and the protest meeting have always allowed public opinion to be heard at the meeting. Yes, thank you. There is another question. Is it possible to make only two decisions in this meeting, rejection or re-election? Or, Is it possible to refuse? There won't be a re-election. There won't be a re-election. Is there a reason why this case should be re-elected now? If there are more citizens' opinions, who would like to participate in the family or design process? Can we go back? As Michael explained, we are also learning the process, so I don't know when I can make a decision as a citizen. When can we no longer make opinions on issues such as individual height, completion area, parking, lighting, business hours, etc.? Many neighbors are worried about these questions. Because we don't know if the development plan will be a flat plan or a high-density development. When is the time for citizens to make suggestions about the final design? At that point, can we come up with a plan that will have a greater impact on us? That's right. This is for them to move on to the next step. Then I think I have to come back and explain all the steps again. There is a public hearing on the comprehensive plan, and there is also a public hearing on the 용도 area. There is a public hearing at the division stage. So you have to go through several stages such as height, appearance, and atmosphere. This city did not make a lot of specific requests for the exterior or use of the building, but these matters will be discussed because the division stage can confirm the size of the building and check the expected appearance of the building. Yes, there are three more council meetings until the height of the building is decided. Except for some exceptions, Washington does not regulate business hours. However, exceptions are applied to certain industries. Yes, there are many procedures to be followed in the future. This is what the residents are most curious about. If you enter the general planning stage in the Senate, will the content be maintained permanently, or will the Senate open a meeting and change at any time? I'm curious. If the land owner does not have a guaranteed right, there is no right to make a change. This is a plan document. The city council can modify the comprehensive plan as needed. Yes. The purpose of this plan is to provide the main government with the conditions to establish a comprehensive plan to let the residents know what it will be used for in the future. I'll just ask you one more question. I'm sorry for taking your time. What happens if it fails in the demonstration? What's the next step? We have to start over from the beginning. The demonstration vote is the final decision. If it fails in the demonstration, the application will be rejected and the committee will be re-elected. Yes, thank you. You did a great job. As Derek and Coco said, it would be good to break up at this point. Thank you. Thank you for giving me a chance to talk to the members and counselors. I couldn't attend the first meeting, but I heard about the meeting. I am John Oh. I work as a doctor in the local community and I am also a local resident. Among the things that happened between the last meeting and this meeting, what I want to mention is that I am in a very public position, so I meet a lot of people every day and hear a lot of spontaneous opinions, and there was one interesting opinion among them. The opinion of the committee was that the city would decide as it wanted as a land owner. It was quite interesting for me to hear such opinions from the general public. And the next step is that what I felt was strange was that the city planning team was promoting the plan. I don't know exactly who they are and what they're going through, but it's like the residents don't have any influence on the general plan. To be honest, it felt like an unimportant presence even in the city planning committee. Mr. Anderson pointed out these opinions very well. So, in addition to rejecting or recommending applications, In addition to what happened here, the city council seriously reviewed whether this was just a show or if it was genuine, and I think we should judge whether the voices of the residents and their voices are really important. I have not yet met anyone in the area who agrees to these city planning changes. I asked myself, but I have never seen anyone who supports it. I think everyone understands the goal of smart business development and the goal of satisfying various housing needs. However, there are certainly side effects that occur in the process. If the City Planning Committee does not consider these side effects at all and goes to the assembly without any discussion, what would it be like? As a doctor, I always think about side effects. I don't think the current procedures are working properly. In my opinion, there are people who understand the situation more accurately. But I know for sure that comprehensive planning changes have an important meaning. I don't have to know this fact. In particular, it is never easy to retreat in a situation where opinion presentation is limited or blocked, and in a situation where there is actually room for improvement. According to what I heard and observed, it seems to be moving in this direction. My opinion is not only against this change of plan, but also to recognize the possibility that there may be problems in the process, and to solve the problem through all legal procedures possible to restore the trust of the local community. Thank you for your time. I will also tell you my opinion. Thank you. Sir, let me add a moment. Let's listen to a theoretical example. Let's assume that the applicant goes back to the planning committee and says, let's accept another map through negotiation. Nevertheless, we have to go to the assembly, and the assembly can say, we want the map you proposed for the first time. Of course, this is a theoretical example, but there was actually a similar discussion. What should I do? If you submit various changes to the planning committee, the committee will recommend it in any direction, but in the next step, you can request the original map. Therefore, this is a process that actually exists. The purpose of the second step is to gather as many opinions as possible about the proposal through the public hearing. Also, the applicant I agree. If the committee wants something different from what we want, we understand that it can be difficult for the applicant. We make the applicant go through various procedures in that way. And maybe that's why there was a problem at the last meeting. We provided our information, and they had to ask for our recommendation. We had to ask why we had to refuse, and then we had to present our opinions. But when they told us to leave and come back, we expected something else. Yes, they said they would bring something else. Yes, and to be fair, we gave them the right to choose. Do you want to live there? I asked. No, I understand. Or do you have any changes? And you said, You're right here. What's the change? You asked. We gave you the exact list. You're good. Give me about two weeks. You said. Yes, I understand. And I understand that. But there was a little bit of communication error there. I understand that. I understand why the applicant is uncomfortable. After the applicant changes this and that, I don't want the situation to go the way I want it to. I understand the applicant's position. However, our thoughts do not change. However, I understand a little more why the change did not take place. Why didn't the change take place? I don't agree, but I think there was a miscommunication during the process of requesting a table. Yes. I think it would be helpful to acknowledge that all undeveloped areas in the Washington field are very difficult to develop and establish. There are some difficulties, but I think we need to take the time to properly develop it. Because this will be the foundation of the future. I will no longer call this place a field. Yes. Mr. Mitchell, do you have any additional opinions? 2. There have been continuous discussions over the years, but the situation remains the same. I don't mean to blame anyone, but I feel like the opinions we have provided are being ignored. I think we made good suggestions so that citizens' opinions could be heard and projects could be carried out. Um, but I really like to completely ignore opinions. I don't listen. What do other people think? Hello, I'm Michael Oten's brother, Darren Oten. Thank you to the employees, lawyer, Rusty, and everyone else for your time. I understand your frustration, but I want to tell you publicly what happened. We thought about how we should consider these opinions. But other people said, We don't agree and want to have other opinions. So rather than taking an extreme stance, 중간 입장을 취하려고 했습니다 물론 여러분이 부인하셔도 괜찮습니다 We don't ignore your opinions, we just want to get the final result, that is, the right result. And the reason I'm standing up like this is because I'm going to be in the hall after the vote is over, so please feel free to tell me. My grandmother graduated from Dixie High School. My family, my mother, and my six children are both from Dixie High School. I live in southern Utah, and I run a business in southern Utah. We are not trying to hide the identity and business content of our family. My father was a senator for 10 years at the St. Louis Legislative Council, a neighboring city. I sincerely respect the achievements you have made, and this is our overall plan. We are farming the land according to conscience. This is our future plan. As far as I know, the city did not want the land of another city that has been taxed to be annexed. So we did the annexation, but our goal is to build a farm. We're going to be in the hall for 30 minutes after the vote is over, so if you're interested, please come and talk to me anytime. I'm not trying to hide this problem. Thank you for your time. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Once again, thank you.

Hello, I'm Melissa Dickinson. I live in South 240 West, 2702, and this street is one of the places affected by the change in use. First of all, thank you so much for your time. It's a relief to hear your frustrating feelings today. We also know that Washington is growing. We do not want to interfere with growth or the land owner to develop the land. However, it requires responsible development considering the house, school, children, and already developed infrastructure. When we bought this land and started building a house, the surrounding area was a low-density residential area, and it was sold as a large house with a size of 0.5 acres and about 2,000 square meters. While we were building the house, the backyard of our house was changed to a clean commercial area. But now we're going to have CCOM, Glyn commercial area, and a high-density residential complex on the right side of our house. It's a little frustrating. And down the street, they're changing the purpose to create a high-density residential complex on the right side of the school. In the middle school class, the cars are parked in the middle of the street, so you can't get out of the neighborhood. There's nowhere to park. It's okay to park in the neighborhood, but the crossroads are completely blocked. Children try to cross the crosswalk on bicycles or walk on scooters, but it's not really safe. And on the other side of our neighborhood, there's a riverside area, and it's the same problem. So we have more houses on the roads. In particular, I don't think I have the capacity to accept housing in Gomildo. It's not for school right away. There are already a lot of housing units in Gomildo next to P.O. Baro. As a result, the amount of traffic will already increase considerably. In addition, the commercial facilities that will enter P.O. Buzi will not affect the tax revenue of Washington City, but it will still affect the transportation system around our neighborhood. And of course, there is Grovuz, Grovuz development. My biggest concern is that all this development will affect the overall impact on the safety of our school and children. The current road situation is too poor. And as the land owner said, the development of this farm is not going to happen right away. Adams plans to continue farming on the ground for the rest of his life. Then why is he hurrying to approve the development of a higher density at this point in time? I waited until the PO and the surrounding area were completed, and then the road cross. Wouldn't it be better to evaluate what effect it will actually have on school and transportation? In a situation where the road situation is already serious, Before approving the development of a higher density in this area, I think it's reasonable to properly understand what effect the development of a significant amount that has already been approved will actually have. Another concern that has already been discussed in this meeting is that the committee improved the harmony with the existing residential areas, reduced high density development, and changed it to a commercial facility with community commercial facilities. The point that the proposal was made after the concern was raised. These suggestions were reasonable, and we are satisfied with the change in the industry. There is no problem with that part. However, despite the concerns of the local community and the recommendation of the committee, the applicant did not submit a meaningful amendment. In fact, it is the same plan that was submitted again. If a proposal has been made to give the applicant a chance to resolve concerns, not only the applicant but also the staff must try their best to solve the problem and submit the same plan again. It seems that the employee in charge made the problem seriously misunderstood, and it seems that the development company is the same. We are not telling you not to develop at all. It requires careful development and rational consensus. Please consider the impact on the entire region and the region. Existing and planned commercial development, middle and high school, already alone on the peninsula, and children walking or riding bicycles. Consider the situation of going to school. The site is not going to be developed immediately, but it is said that there is no need to rush decisions that will affect the region for decades to come. So I think I've already decided to reject you. We will continue to contact the Senate and find out what we can do. Thank you so much for taking the time to deliver our opinions. We will continue to contact the Senate hoping that you will deliver strong opinions to the Senate. Thank you so much.

I am Frank Martini and I live in Dixie Country Lane Estate. There is one thing that residents should know. Melode is now designated as a 5-lane highway. When I went to the Public Business Department, It is said that the speed limit of 25 miles per hour in front of the school is no longer applied. Uh, you're expecting traffic lights to reduce traffic, aren't you? But if you look at the road situation that continues to Mello Road, no one runs at a speed of 25 miles, and running at a speed of 35 miles has become worse. Because of the new roads. This is information for everyone who sends their children to school. Thank you. Thank you, members. I want to get the award because I want to say it simply. I don't want to repeat the decision. Thank you for your hard work and questions. Can you tell me your name? I'm sorry. My name is Tim Hatton. I live in P-Cent Medoh-ji, and I live in a place close to this area. If the purpose of this committee is distorted and ignored, it will be a really sad thing. That's what I feel right now. I look forward to a sincere conversation with the person you mentioned earlier, but I strongly recommend that this proposal be rejected. Thank you. 네, 공청회를 종료하겠습니다. 여러분께서 더 논의하실 사항이 없으시다면, 저는 한 가지만 말씀드리겠습니다. 이 말씀은 시위회 회의와 담당 직원 여러분께 드리는 말씀입니다. 저는 우리 시의 상업 개발 자체에 반대하는 것이 아닙니다. I know the value of commercial development well and have worked for it for years. It's not that there should be no commercial development at all. However, we need to consider the harmony with the surrounding environment better. In this case, harmony with the surrounding environment is not happening at all. The applicant will know how to do it, and it should be done in a better way. That's all. What we're talking about is not against the commercial building itself. I strongly support townhouses, and I think it's important for people to accumulate assets and start a new life through personal ownership. I prefer townhouses to apartments. However, what I am concerned about is that the harmony between townhouses and existing residential types is not properly achieved. It is recommended that townhouses be placed in small numbers all over the city to naturally harmonize with existing homes. There are not only one type of housing, but various types of housing should be harmoniously harmonized. However, this plan is not so. Two townhouses will be built, and more than 2,000 residents will live in up to 420 townhouses, and only 840 vehicles will be parked in two areas. My problem is that these facilities are too close to the small area. The city definitely needs more affordable homes and townhouses, but this close-knit shape is not desirable. It is much more efficient to distribute and develop in a wide area of ​​150 acres, about 600,000 square meters. I would have been able to think about how to develop it much more carefully, but if certain facilities are compacted into huge blocks like now, there is no consideration at all for residents or development projects. It's a wide enough area, but it's possible to develop it much better. That's what I want to say. I'm not against townhouses or commercial facilities themselves. However, it can be developed in a better way and in a way that is considerate of existing residents. Of course, we've all been active in the committee for a long time, so we know that no one wants anything to stand in the backyard of their house. But what we're trying to talk about right now is not such a problem. This is a pretty big case, so there is plenty of room for improvement in the review. It's a key part, but there's room for improvement. That's all. What I would like to ask the protestors and their employees is to not just push this matter forward, but to think about it a little bit. There is a better way. That's all. So, I will submit a consent form recommending that the use of land for the G2604 project, that is, the use of land for the general plan in low-density greenland and green industrial areas, low-density, medium-density, medium-high-density, and SACOM, about 2,000 miles to the south, and 20 miles to the east, be revoked. I will once again tell you why I mentioned it two weeks ago. The balance between residential areas and commercial areas should be better established, and the balance between middle and high-density areas should also be better established, and the middle and high-density areas are too concentrated. Mr. Davis, I agree with that. I would like to say once again that I am sure that the Senate will consider the discussions that took place this week and two weeks ago, and the opinions of others who participated in this process. I agree again. Congressman Anderson first agreed, and Congressman Davis agreed. It is an individual vote. Congressman Anderson agrees. Mr. Davis, I agree. Mr. Mitchell, I agree. Mr. Bullock, I agree, too. I hope you will all participate in the hearing and deliver your thoughts and opinions on the case. This case will be submitted to the next week's hearing. Next week, a complaint will be submitted.

나중에 날짜를 정할 수 있을까요? 신청자는 다음 주보다 조금 더 시간을 갖고 담당 직원들과 협의하여 실무회의를 진행하고 싶어 하는 것 같습니다. 날짜를 정해주시겠습니까? 어떤 날짜를 원하십니까? Rusty, 시의회의 날짜를 말씀하시는 건가요? Do I have to decide the date of the demonstration right now? I've never done that before.

Usually, it goes to the next meeting, but the applicant can have a certain amount of money. There will be a separate notice for that meeting. Yes, I see. In my opinion, I don't think the city planning committee usually decides the date of the demonstration. Then it's not next week. It's just going to be announced. It will be announced according to all standard procedures. Anything can happen. The applicant may withdraw the application tomorrow. So you may have to set a date for tonight. All possibilities are open. If a trial is held at the demonstration, it will be announced. People can come back. The mayor and the protesters can decide how long they will listen to someone's opinion. All processes may be resumed. If the application is withdrawn, it may not be returned to the demonstration. Yes, I think you've done your job for the committee. Thank you. Good. Case No. 4B is C-2608. Washington Fields Road and View, Nav Vista, Blurbard, Motungi convenience store, gas station, and car wash for conditional use. Please wait a moment. Are you ready? Yes, should we start over? 4. C-1608. View Navvista Boulevard and George Washington Parkway South East side of Motungi convenience store, gas station, and car wash for conditional use. I'll pass the time to Elden. Thank you, members. This is C2608. Did I hear it right? Yes, thank you. This is the place we're going to look at. Yes, that was a great introduction. Rather than reading the employee report in one line, I want to see the overall picture. Let's take a look at what's going on, how it goes with the surrounding area, and why the employees recommend C2608. This area is 3.69 acres, about 1.6 hectares in size, surrounded by the C3 area, and on the north side is the Centente PCD planning and development area. This complex is located in the center of the expanding commercial area on the west side of I-15, and on the east side is the recently approved Hilton Hotel Dual Brand Project. If you look at the entire EC3 area, it is about 65 acres, about 29 hectares. Therefore, more commercial facilities are expected to enter this area in the future. So what is the limited content tonight? Let's zoom in on this sub-plan. Quick Trip convenience store and gas station are expected to enter. This building has an area of ​​6,445 square feet and a height of 22 feet. It has a convenience store and 8 double-sided gas pumps. Also, there is a drive-through car washroom with a height of 23 feet and a part of the section extended to up to 40 feet. There is also a kiosk with a roof for convenience in the car washroom. From the construction and heritage side, The convenience store used a combination of a light gray aluminum finish with a brown brick and a dark stone. The washroom added a stone in the color of an almond top and added a gray sticker finish, and the roof is red. Let's take a look at the layout again. Then why do you apply for a conditional use permit? According to the business region, car service facilities must receive a conditional use permit. The purpose of the cup is very simple. This is to minimize the negative impact of a specific use on the surrounding neighborhood and evaluate whether it is suitable for the location, and if it is necessary considering the distance from the surrounding commercial facilities and residential areas, it is to provide the option of installing a safety rail. This project is perfectly integrated into the planned characteristics of the area without any additional restrictions. The staff will review the requested layout and design, The Planning Committee has proposed four things and 15 conditions to consider when submitting a proposal for the tonight's meeting. This concludes the employee report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Now, Mr. Davis, I'm not fundamentally opposed to this project or the employee. However, there is a slight discord between the main building and the washroom. I don't want to mention the aesthetic part, but it used rich colors like dark brown and red, but I don't think that part suits me well. If you look at the next washroom part, I don't think it suits me very well. I don't know if it's just a template or a special consultation or a design. I'd appreciate it if you could explain the background in more detail. Yes, that's a good idea. We're thinking the same thing. I recently talked to the applicant. It would be nice to mention the part when the applicant speaks, but I think they agree to adjust the color of the washroom according to the atmosphere of the store. However, I would like to hear the clear explanation of the applicant again. Is there anyone who has any other questions? 네, 오늘 공청회입니다. 말씀하실 분이 계시면 신청자분께서는 나중에 나와주시기 바랍니다. 네, 말씀하실 분이 없으면 공청회를 마무리하고 신청자께서 말씀하시도록 하겠습니다.

Hello, everyone. I am Kim Lee-Hon, Joanne Graham. I am the general manager of this project. Thank you for your time today. If you have any questions, I will answer them. This gas station is a high-end gas station. The headquarters is in Tulsa, Oklahoma. About a month ago, we opened our first store in Salt Lake City, Utah. We are looking forward to this project. Do you have any opinions on the beauty I just mentioned? 네, 퀵트립 측에서도 직원들과 논의한 내용이며, 앞으로 진행하면서 메인 편의점의 자제와 조화를 이루도록 수정할 예정입니다. 위견 주셔서 감사합니다. 신청자에게 질문이 있으신가요? 감사합니다. 다른 질문이나 우려사항이 없으시다면?

I think the northern highway section has been waiting for a long time. That's right. My question is whether you can enter George Washington Road. This is Washington Parkway. Washington Parkway. It comes out of Vue Vista. That's right. Yes, there is a gap where Parkway and Vue Vista meet. But they will enter Vue Vista, not Washington Parkway. Yes, that's the only thing I was worried about. If you don't have any other opinions or concerns, we'll look for a consent for this case. My kids say I go to the first gas station too often, but now I think I'm going to be added to that list. Because I drive around there often. Will the kick trip be the new first gas station? Or will it be the second gas station? Maybe I'll be the second gas station in the kick trip. It was Michelle. I will submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for permission to use the condition for the construction of the gas station in the convenience store, gas station, and parking lot located on the Washington Park Way intersection of Point of Vista Boulevard and Washington Park Way intersection. I submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for permission to use the condition for the construction of the gas station. I submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for permission to use the condition for the construction of the gas station. I submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for the construction of the gas station. I submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for the construction of the gas station. I submit a consent form to approve or approve the application for the construction of the gas station. However, I would like to add specific details about the change in the washroom to make it as similar as possible to the main convenience store building. If you use the same material, of course, shouldn't it be similar? Yes, I agree. Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Davis agreed first. This is the individual voting result. Anderson, I agree. Davis, I agree. Mitchell, I agree. I'm a bloc member. I agree, too. This case will be submitted to the House of Representatives and the House of Representatives. Z2618. About 8.23 Acre. Donggyeong 100. Namgyeong 965. Buzi's current PODC. PODR limited to the planned industrial complex area. It is a request to change to the planned industrial complex area. I'll hand it over to Mr. Elden. Thank you, members of the committee. This request is about the 8.23 Acre, Donggyeong 100, Namgyeong 965. The site is currently designated as a PUDC area, and the north and south are surrounded by PUDC areas and the west is surrounded by industrial areas. This year, the comprehensive plan of this site was changed from a medium-high density commercial unit to a residential area, allowing for the request for a change in use. The applicant is asking for a change of purpose from the PUDC area to the PUDR area, and wants to reach the PUDR area and use the housing development standards. Then, what content is limited? Let's open the sub-plan. If you zoom in, you can see that there is a single townhouse of a total of 69 generations. Of these, the 63rd generation consists of 3 bedrooms, the 6th generation consists of 2 bedrooms, and the 8.4th generation per acre is located. This is within the permissible density range of the relevant area. In addition, the design maintains public passage and passage rights for existing residential buildings that enter from Route 965 on the southern road and public passage and passage rights for city-owned sub-districts located in the east. This project is planned to create convenience facilities of a total of 14,900 square feet in size, such as playgrounds, dog resting areas, pickleball assistance facilities, barbecue spaces, and large lawns. Parking spaces meet minimum standards considering two parking spaces, entranceways, and visitor parking spaces. The required parking space is 64, and the applicant provides 65. Let's take a look at the building design. The limited design includes a 2nd and 3rd floor unit with a neat and modern appearance. The unit on the second floor is adjacent to Route 100 East and Route 965 South, and the unit on the third floor will be placed inside. If you look at the layout, you can see that the units on the left are located. All units here are on the second floor, and along Route 965 South, The height was designed to be naturally connected to the inside. The wide unit provides two parking spaces and two to three bedroom options for the two-story structure. The narrow unit with a width of 2 to 3 floors and two to three bedroom options from 101 to 106 provides two to three bedroom options for all units. What is the reason why we are here tonight? First, according to the PODR, plan, development and regulations, the application for use change must be submitted to the City Planning Committee through a meeting of the City Council. Second, the applicant requested three design changes that should be accepted by the city. First, it is applied to the 2nd and 3rd floor units as a limit violation. The applicant is planning to design this unit as high as 38 feet, which exceeds the existing 35-feet x 3-feet standard. These three-story units will be located inside the building. The second is a design change along the northern boundary line, which is adjacent to the existing storage unit. They are requesting a 10-feet difference along the boundary line of this building. And finally, the problem of building interval. We requested a 10-feet gap between the 2nd and 3rd-floor buildings. In other POD, planning and development districts, a 10-feet gap between buildings has been approved, but this is the first time to apply a 10-feet gap between 3rd-floor buildings. The employee in charge has submitted two survey results and 11 conditions to the planning committee to consider when reviewing the placement, density, and design request and to prepare the proposal tonight. This concludes the employee report. Please let me know if you have any questions. And Mr. Davis, I'm going to talk about something else for a moment, but this might not be the right place, but there's one thing I'd like to ask you on an administrative level. When providing employee reports and meeting preparation materials, it would be very helpful if you could provide us with reference materials for the meetings that were discussed before. It's familiar, so I checked it out, and it seems to have been March 18th. On this date, it was the first day that the general urban planning was listed as a project to change from a commercial area to a medium-high density development area. Since then, it has been disbanded in our meeting, and it has been approved by the City Council. However, although it is not in the document we received this week, I remember that there was a suggestion that the road should be completed to the industrial area in the approval of the City Council. I don't know if I missed anything, but I think road completion is important to discuss this problem in the future. There are many other things to discuss. If there is a data like the previous meeting, it will be of great help to find out the contents without looking at them one by one. Thank you for your good opinion.

Yes, as you can see in the first image, this lake is related to the conditions that the City Council included in the 100th East Road Development Plan. The applicants have stated the contents of the submitted image and will include it in the development plan. Yes, it's on the drawing.

That's right. And if you open the other sub-projects, we'll show you a specific part that the applicants include. You can see that this part extends from the development sub-project to the industrial drive. Again, the applicants agreed to these improvements. I'm sorry, I lost the data. 아, 자료를 잃어버렸어요. 그럼 10피트 이격 거리는 무엇을 기준으로 하는 건가요? 보통 경계선 상으로는 어느 정도의 이격 거리가 권장되나요?

It's 20 to 25 feet. The city has approved a 10-feet border line. The project we recently conducted was a volunteer support project in the south of the North Main Road. Prada Piccadena, Prada Piccadena, and Prada Piccadena are two more units.

In addition, two other units of Prada Piccadena have been approved for easing measures. You said there is a 10-feet difference between the first and second-floor buildings, what is the difference in general, and what is the height limit? For example, if you increase it from 35 feet to 38 feet. According to the provision, the permissible height of the PUDR area is 35 feet, and the applicant can limit the higher structure through planning. Therefore, they have the option to include higher structures and request a higher limit reduction, and they actually did so. Also, the two-storey building needs at least 15 feet of two-storey. However, if there is a approved development plan and it is approved by the committee, a replacement plan can also be carried out. Mr. Elden, since we have the data you just showed us, would you please zoom in and show us the part where the input path meets the input path? Okay. Mr. and Mrs. Chairman, you will see a free entry route that ends at the 347.16ft point right next to the word Buzi Data. That boundary line is the boundary line between the city and the land of God a few years ago, the Perestrial Kingdom of God Trust. Although it is a matter of recommendation by Mr. and Mrs. Chairman tonight, I would like to make it clear to all citizens and applicants. The city attorney is going to request a conditional receipt. The owner's name is Mr. Chairman. Is there anyone in your family who can help? I'm just kidding. Maybe there's a family member here. Oh, me. I've been thinking about something else. Yes, that's the potential entrance. So, if the city receives an approval from the applicant, it will ask for the right to move to the land owned by the city as one of the approval suggestions. It doesn't have to be a public road or a public transit road, but it's asking the city to secure transit rights so that it can approach the appropriate point. So tonight's vote is just a recommendation, but I wanted to add conditions to this discussion. That's why we can raise this problem at the city council. One of the reasons is that the land owner providing the current approach law is not yet cooperative with the city. Therefore, this method will be a solution until you get your cooperation. My question is, It's about the three-story building, no, the three-story structure itself. I think the material is good and the design is good. However, if the three-story building was connected to other buildings, it wouldn't have been so high and narrow. Of course, it's not bad now. But my concern is... It allows exceptions to the 35-feet height limit. Because I'm looking at this building right now. If you look at the building, it's only 29 feet to the top. Up to the top plate on the third floor. And the roof truss there. What do you think? Including gray bricks and cobbles, it's only 32 feet to the top. But it's a huge railing because it's 6 feet above it. If you add 2 feet to the 6-feet rail, it's actually an 8-feet rail. Why do you have to do that? It's a huge rail. I think you can build it with the same design, but you won't feel any difference, and you won't have to worry about the border line. That's one reason. I don't think it's a reason to be exempted. I've built this building several times, and it's easy to build it at a height of 35 feet without changing the exterior. That's what I think. I don't think there's any reason to exempt you from unnecessary parts. Yes, I agree. It would be nice to ask the applicant. In addition, if 3ft is added, the building will look higher and narrower than it is now. I think it would be interesting to ask the applicant whether the reason is a relic or if there is another purpose. Yes, I'm curious, too. There's something 8ft high in the building to be covered. It's a pretty big building. Today is a public hearing. If you want to speak, I will give you the right to speak from now on. Yes, we will now end the public hearing. Did the applicant come? Do you have a will to speak? I am Steve Beasley of FFKR, the applicant's deputy. The reason why the building is higher is because it has to protect all mechanical equipment in Washington. So we are going to install a rooftop device at a height of 4 feet in general, and this device will be installed on top of it. We have secured some completion space in case of an accident. It's a pretty wide completion space. It's about 1.5 feet. Yes, that's how high the equipment is installed. Yes, you said it's usually 4 feet in a row. But the height of that brick pillar is only 32 feet. To raise it to 38t, you need a huge rail. The height of the brick pillar is lower. Yes, I know it's low, but I'm telling you that it's 32 feet. I've built hundreds of buildings like a townhouse, but this doesn't make sense. Okay. I was curious about the number of floors up to the top plate. The top plate is 29 feet, about 4 feet. And the truss is 2 feet, 4 feet, 5 feet, and the top of the brick pillar is about 18 inches. As I said, the height up to the top is 32 feet, or a little shorter than that, about 316 feet. If you look at the drawing, it looks less than 35 feet, but I don't know why. We want to be more relaxed. I wanted to prepare for a situation that I might not know. The exact height of the machine equipment is still unknown, so it will vary depending on the situation, but in general, the machine equipment has a chin at a height of 4 feet, and if the height is 3 feet, no one can see it beyond the chin as long as the plane does not pass over it. Yes, I don't think you need up to 38 feet. That's all. Yes, if you add 4 feet to 31 feet, it becomes 35 feet, and you need to secure enough space. With just 35 feet, the height may be insufficient. Yes. So let's consider lowering it by a few feet. I think it would be better to maintain it about 1 feet higher than the equipment. If you don't need up to 38 feet, the building can look too high and narrow. That's all. Yes, I fully agree. You have to install a fence. But you don't need up to 38 feet. I don't think it's going to be up to 38 feet. Are you asking for it in the city? Do you have to install a machine room wall on a residential building? I know you're asking for a commercial building. Do residential buildings have to expose the machine room to the roof? I don't think there's such a rule in architecture. I don't want to see the machine room. And as you can see, it says it's less than 38 feet. I don't mean to raise it to 38 feet. I think it's a good idea to ask Steve to build it as high as possible. I think he's trying to make it as small or low as possible. It's okay up to 36 feet. I think we just need to make it 1 feet higher than the equipment. Yes, I think it would be nice to have a fence. The building looks good. The more I don't think the building is too narrow and high, the better it looks. So, yes, I fully agree with your opinion. Wait a minute. Mr. Davis Elden, can you help me? Can you tell me again about the exceptions requested regarding the location where you purchased the warehouse? We simply They're not trying to secure more space. As you said, we're only trying to secure a space of about 3 meters above 10 feet. That's right.

They're asking for a 10-feet distance on the border. 20 feet, about 6 meters, is required by the construction law. This distance is right next to the warehouse.

Yes. Therefore, I think this request is appropriate when considering the population building. The staff also supports the request. However, it is to inform that we are not able to meet the technical requirements that have been stated, and to request a reduction in it. Why don't you increase it instead of reducing the completion space? Generally, multi-generation homes are associated with individual residential areas. Is the building next to the warehouse a three-story building? Oh, no. It's a two-story building. That's right. This is another reason why we support this regulation. 2. The gap is due to the fire regulations, but it also means that the fire regulations must be followed when building a building. Their request was to keep the gap between the three-story buildings 15 feet, about 4.5 meters. Another exception was to limit the building space to 10 feet, about 3 meters. That's right. It's too narrow. Especially the three-story buildings will be full of space. But I... 15 feet, about 4.5 meters. Of course, this is my personal opinion. This is the part I'm concerned about. Do you have any other development projects? For example, I'd like to take a look at buildings similar to DR IMPORTANCE BUILDINGS for a moment. I don't remember what happened between the buildings. Or there are some newly developed buildings. It's not the third floor. Oh, it's not the third floor. By the way, I was wondering how the building in Heritage Fields would be overrun. I think the area seems to have reduced the distance, but I might be wrong. Jared Bates, Rosenberg. To answer the question, these buildings are generally individual townhouses. Although it is a townhouse, it is a separate unit to provide a wider space to the owner. Usually, these buildings are 10 feet above the defense wall on both sides, about 3 meters above. There are quite a few of these buildings in St. George's Desert Color. The distance is normal. Mr. Davis, I'd like to ask you a simple question. Yes. I know that this project is aimed at cheap housing supply, but I wonder how much you expect the price to be. Oh, Mr. West Davis, as a member of the development group, I'm going to measure it as low as 400. Of course, it would be an economic factor, but I want to do it below 400. Yes, now the situation has completely changed. I don't know if you were here before this project was disbanded for the first time. Yes, that's right. It was submitted to the Senate, and several discussions were held during the meeting. It was simply passed 3 to 2. Now that stage has passed, and it seems that everyone is getting used to the fact that the surrounding area is surrounded by commercial land. Yes, our goal is to provide affordable housing. So when I came here last time, I think it was almost 80th generation. I think it was about 77th or 79th generation, but it's not even 70th generation now. So I tried to reduce the size, secure free space, increase parking space, create a park, and be connected to the city walkway system. We are considering those points very much, but we are trying to provide a reasonable price for a house that feels like an independent house without sharing the walls with other people, not like an open house. Yes, I understand. The total area is about 19 acres, and this is 8 acres, and the surrounding area is over 20 acres. It's over 20 acres. Yes, that's right. Because there's a 4 acres next to the animal shelter across the street. Yes, that's right. It's across the industrial complex. All right. Then let's stop talking about residential areas. The entire area is planned for commercial use, and it will continue to be so in the future. I don't have any detailed information on all the land. Yes, that's our intention. If there are any changes, we'll let you know here again. That's right. Yes, I see. But this is the plan you're looking at today. As I told you when we came here last time, this place is the same as the plan we had when we first opened in Kirkland and our city. Three years ago, four years ago, this was a residential area, and the rest was planned for commercial use. Therefore, we don't think we've gone too far from what we planned for the first time. Good. Yes, and I'm glad you confirmed the first EAST completion schedule. However, I wonder if there is a certain period. As you know, in the case of convenience facilities in general, there is a condition to complete one-third of the entire area and develop the rest one-third. It is known that such conditions are included in this proposal. 동쪽 첫 번째 부분은 언제까지 완료되어야 하나요? 이 프로젝트가 절반쯤 진행되기 전에 아니면 그 전에 말이죠. 저는 그 부분에 조건이 붙어 있는지 조차 모르겠네요. 어쨌든 가장 먼저 해야 할 일이죠. Yes, I understand.

And how do you organize Route 965? Route 965? It's a private road.

It's like a private road now. There are a few houses in the back, but there's only one house. Yes, Kirkland House 2. Yes, that's just the main entrance to Anpak-gu. So there's no way to develop that side without making a road. That's the main entrance to the project. I see. And there is one question about the conditions you mentioned. Is the branch connected to it owned by the city? Or is it owned by Kirkland TKOG? It is a branch that was purchased from the city from the Tritial Kingdom of God Trust. So that land over there is owned by the city. The first land that goes inside the valley. I thought that land was still owned by John. Can you show me the county map? I'll show you if it's owned by the city. John has never owned that land. I see. Just kidding. It's half-truth, half-truth, but it's one of the conflicts that have been going on between families for several years. Johnny now owns some of that land, but if you come in here, you'll be able to see how the boundary line is different. Is that county owned? Is that city owned? Can you show me? Yes, that land is owned by the city. I understand that the point I mentioned is the upper corner between the pond and the border. Would you like to go back to the other Elden map for a moment? I'll show you a little bit. As you can see, it's not this side that's straight, it's this side. This line is the border. And you can see that there is a passageway at a width of 20 feet. Oh, I see. So you're not going to go back to your house and come back, are you? Yes, I understand. I understood. And was there anything about the park access road that goes to the walkway system over there? Or is it completely different from Elden? There is a road on the land owned by John, but it is not a public road, and John is not allowed to enter it from the city. So we are trying to allow vehicles to enter the city, but until that happens. Yes, I understand. Thank you. Do you have any other questions? I will answer you. I like this plan. As I said before, townhouses are in a small area. The project we reviewed before was six times larger than the plan. So I think it's a good example of placing townhouses all over the place. There are no more questions. Let's go to the case. Yes Mr. Davis, I will submit an agreement to approve the Z26-18 case, that is, the case that requests a change from the PUDC area to the PUDR area. This case can be changed according to the advice and investigation results of the employee report, which is the target of Route 965 on the east 100th street, about 8.23 acres. I think it's okay to limit the height of about 15 feet, 15-feet insulation is not allowed. I'm sorry. There is no 15-feet insulation. It is allowed twice per 10-feet. I'm asking for 10-feet, but it should be 15-feet. I'm asking you to change it to 10-feet instead of 15-feet. And the other 10-feet back is okay. It's okay for the storage installation part. I don't think it's necessary to allow up to 39-feet. They'll be able to solve it on their own. We have to exempt them, but yes, as I said, we can't stop at 35. We just have to review and see if they cover it, and we have to review it without overdoing it like he said. Yes. That's right. Good. Don't make it too high. And However, we must ensure that the east road is completed 100 times, regardless of whether it is approved or not. However, we must ensure that the east road is completed 100 times, regardless of whether it is approved or not. I hope it will be resolved well. I agree. Davis and Mitchell each agreed. Individual vote. Anderson, I agree. Davis, I agree. Mitchell, I agree. And Block, I agree. I will submit a petition for approval. No. 5 case is terminated. It was Mr. Mitchell. I propose to postpone the meeting. I request. I request. Both in favor and in opposition have been completed. Does anyone agree? The meeting has been postponed. 9. month 2.

1. land

이용, 이용 회의 land use 계획 Let's get started. The first case is the approval of today's meeting. It's Mr. Mitchell. I propose to approve the meeting on September 2nd. Mr. Davis requests. Mr. Mitchell requests and Mr. Davis requests. Is there anyone who agrees? The second case is the approval of the meeting on August 19, 2026. I propose to approve the meeting of the Land Use Committee on August 19 as a member of Davis. Thank you for watching. Section 4A is Chaparral Heights, located in East Lost Ridge Drive, 1164. Chaparral Heights is the final blueprint of the residential area. The applicant is Ryan L. Ray. The owner is Greg Robinson. Greg Robinson. I'll hand over the microphone to Sebastian. Yes, this blueprint is very simple. Basically, the applicant re-adjusts the boundary of the 3rd field to match the existing soil water level better. Yes, this is the existing drawing. As you can see, only the boundary line of the container is horizontal. If you go to the next page, you can see the modified drawing. The boundary line of the container no longer horizontalizes the container, and there is a gap between the containers, making the current soil condition more accurate. There is no other reason to modify the drawing. If you have any other questions, I will answer them. I do not know if the applicant has attended. Thank you, Sebastian. This is an open hearing. If anyone wants to speak, I'll give you the right to speak. Yes, I'll end the open hearing here. If you have any more questions for employees or applicants, please let me know. If not, I'll look for a consent. My question is just one. Why is this important? The right side is a slope, and the right side is a slope. I wonder why this is a problem. Are you trying to cut off the slope and build a structure on it? That's right. You can't build a structure on the slope. As far as I know, the right side of the slope is steep, and you have to dig up the soil, and there are also potholes. I'm not against it, I'm just curious why. It's a good question. If you're here, you'll be able to answer. To answer.

In my opinion, there is no special reason.

Thank you for your time. Mr. Bob Hermansen. Yes, what we are trying to do is to match the actual construction of the road surface. There is a whole wall there, and at the time of the construction of the wall, there was a drain that was made to drain the water, but the location was slightly off. So it is better to grab this part and get rid of the existing drain. Because the existing drain was about 10 to 15 feet from the actual location. The drain did not actually collapse. So we're trying to get rid of the existing drainage system as it was built. It's a simple cleanup. Yes. Do you have any more questions? Let's look for consent. Congressman Anderson. Brough Heights, address, 1164 East, Lost Ridge Drive. Final development plan of residential complex, PL. We present the case of approval according to the survey results and conditions submitted by the employees who revised the part. Mr. Davis agreed. I first presented it in favor of Mr. Anderson, and Mr. Davis agreed again. Individual vote. Mr. Anderson, I agree. Mr. Davis, I agree. Mr. Mitchell, I agree. Mr. Block, I agree, too. This case has been approved. This is the fifth case. If there is nothing more to discuss, I will close the meeting. There is nothing. I propose a case to close the meeting. I agree. With the approval of Mr. Davis, Mr. Mitchell agreed again. Is there anyone who approves? Approve. The meeting is over. Thank you.