City Council - Regular Meeting

Good evening. Welcome to the store city council meeting for December 1st, 2025. This time I'll call the meeting to order and I'll ask that you all join council Harden and I in standing for the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right, counselors. First up on the agenda is the consent docket. Questions, comments, action on the consent docket. I move approval of consent. Second.

Have a motion and a second to approve consent. Please vote. Consent dockets approve the vote of four to zero. That will take us down to item six, public hearing. 6A received public comment regarding a request for a map amendment to reszone property addressed at 7-Eleven South Ramsey Street from small lot single family residential to two family and multif family district CC-25-165. Do we have good notice? Yes, we do. Mr. Beheimer.

Yes, sir. Mayor and counselors, my name is uh Henry Bbleheimimer with development services and today we're looking at a map amendment for 7-Eleven South Ramsey Street. Um, this is to reszone the property from RSS, which is small out single family residential to RTM, which is residential, two family, multif family. Here's an aerial view where you can see the property outlined in pink. This is just on the east side of Ramsey and between 7th and 8th Streets. Here's the property looking at the corner of 8th and Ramsey looking to the northeast. Um there were some existing structures on the property that have been tore down to um support the proposed multif family development that could potentially go in here. Um this is to we're reszoning the one portion of this property so that it can be combined with the three lots to the south to create one larger lot for like I said a multif family development. Um so here's that zoning map where you can see RTM to the north, south, and east of the proposed property. Again, outland in pink. On the west side of Ramsey, you can see the RSS or smalliz single family residential continues as well. Here's the future land use map which shows this property as high high density residential reszoning to RTM or residential two family multif family does align with the comprehensive plan. I'm open to answer any questions if you have any.

Counselors, any questions for staff? I'm just curious how that got left out. Any idea? I I do believe that the property to the south of this was was it it was a school I believe and I think this property was a single family house. So I think it was just a different development now proposed to be combined. It just seems strange that that little piece got left out somewhere. Yes, sir.

All right. If there's no further questions, I'll go ahead and open the public hearing. I think we have a representative from the applicant here. Good evening, mayor and counselors. Steven Ghost, Gosen Associates, 113 East 8th Avenue here on behalf of our client. Um, asking for you to approve planning commission's motion to approve this. Um, like you can see on the map, it's just this weird spot. Uh, that the house that was there was owned by the school. I don't know when it was purchased within their their time frame, but it's just this one little piece that we're trying to get to match the rest of it. So,

thank you, sir. Thanks. Any questions? Thanks. I don't have anyone else signed up for this public hearing. Was anyone here to speak on this matter? Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Henry, what was the planning commission's recommendation for this item? Yes, sir. On November 4th, 2025, with a vote of 4 to zero, planning commission recommended that the city council approve the map amendment as presented. Thank you, sir. Councilors, motion to accept planning commission recommendation. Second.

We have a motion and a second to accept the recommendation. Please vote. Let's approve with a vote of four to zero. Item 6B is received public comment regarding a request for a map amendment to reszone property addressed as 998 South Murphy Street from small lot single family residential and commercial general to commercial general CC-25-166. Did we have good notice on this item? Yes, we do. Henry.

Yes, sir. So, this is a map amendment for 998 South Murphy Street resoning from RSS and CG to CG Commercial General. Um, here's the property outlined in pink. Um, I'm going to go a little more in depth for this aerial view as the different parts become relevant in a bit. So, to the north of this property, we can see the hotel that's been developed. To the north of that, we see the Walmart that's out on Sixth Street. So, to the west of the hotel, we have a multif family development, which are apartments. And then to the west and south of that, we have a single family um neighborhood. Uh originally in 2007 there was a PUD passed or planned unit development for this property for all of it including this property to the east um to be developed under one PUD or planned unit development. Um like I said that was approved in 2007 and then this hotel was built under that PUD in 2011. There was a new preliminary PUD that was approved for this property and then that was a proposed that proposal was phased. So there has been final PUDs for different portions including this multif family development and the single family residential to the south and west of that. So those phases of that preliminary PUD were approved. Um so this portion that we're talking about right now was not a part of any of those different final PUDs. So there was not a final PUD to change this zoning. We'll get back to that in a second. So here's the street view. This is from Murphy looking west northwest. Um, so you can see that hotel we were talking about right here. And those are those apartments. We're looking at reszoning this field right here with the pond just to the west of it. And here's the original PUD, which is still regulatory for this the surrounding properties. The reason this property is zoned RSS is because it was originally proposed to be a park, a part of to support that residential development. Um, now this is not the actual layout that was built with this PUD except this hotel. Um, everything was built out with a slightly different configuration with the later PUD that was in 2011. Um, in 2011, this

portion of the property was proposed to be a commercial use, it was proposed to be zoned CG, which is what we're doing tonight to support a restaurant or office use. Um, but like I said, since there was never a final PUD to lock in that change, that never actually occurred. Um, real quick. Yep. So, the next one we're looking at zoning. Um, so this is the PUD that surrounds the property which we've discussed. Um, but this portion of the property which we're looking at resoning today, you see that little sliver right at the top which is CG or commercial general. That was likely just because the boundaries for the reasonzoning when the hotel was built didn't quite align with the boundaries for the plat that happens sometimes. So this would be cleaning that up, zoning the full property, CG or commercial general. One thing I do want to point out on this map is that the surrounding property is still a part of that PUD or planned unit development. Um since that since this was not built with the rest of the development with that PUD or plan unit development um there was a minor amendment to that PUD that was approved administratively to remove this property from the PUD or plan unit development. What that means is now we're just looking at the base zoning of RSS and CG to CG or commercial general. So that was a lot of context for this reasonzoning. Um but now to jump to the future land use map and the comprehensive plan which does call for this property to be commercial. Um resoning to commercial general does align with the comprehensive plan and I'm open to answer any questions if you have any counselors.

Um can you go back to the map? Maybe the that one. There you go. So that um land just to the east of this of this parcel is vacant still. Uh but it's part uh it is currently still part of the PUD. Yes, sir. Do you know what the PUD calls to be built there? Yes, sir. It was a commercial uh it's kind of a commercial shopping center with hotel not hotels with restaurants along that pond kind of overlooking the pond. that was what was originally proposed with the PUD um and what would be allowed if it were to be developed unless that PUD were to be amended or the zoning were to change.

And and the last time that PUD was looked at by council was 2011. Um the 2011 portion was just to the west side of Murphy. So the last time this portion I believe the last time this portion was looked at was 2007 with the original PUD. Okay. So the original called for that in 2007. And then in 2011 they changed the stuff that actually ended up getting built. Yes, sir. Was changed in a 2011 PUD. Okay. And in that 2011 PUD, this parcel was ignored as well.

This parcel was in the preliminary PUD and then there were, I think, three different phases for a final PUD, but it was not included in any of those finals. So, it was in the preliminary plan to be changed, but never actually got changed with the final. And it was supposed to be a park originally in the 2007 2007 and then in the 2011 it was proposed to be restaurant or office uses.

Okay. So my I guess my concern is just that the the PUD stuff that got built, was there an expectation of what this parcel was going to be that we would now be changing from what the developer of the PUB or the people who who purchased property in that area were expecting it to be something and now we would be potentially be changing that. Does that make sense? It does. Um, that's something I might let the applicant speak to if they're here, TBD. Um, but as far as the expectation for the neighbors, um, in 2007, I think it was set that this would be a park to support the residential neighborhood. Um,

I mean, I assume this this the residential neighborhood to the south of this. The residential neighborhood was originally proposed to be closer to this in a smaller multif family portion cuz there is like a playground. There's a couple of parks and playgrounds within that residential neighborhood. Yes, sir. And then that the apartment complex has its own little wreck area, too, right? Yes, sir. Okay.

And then Yeah. So, then this this actual layout was locked in with that 2011 PUD, which did have this slated to become restaurant or office uses. So, I think the expectation when all of this was built would have been set by that 2011 PUB for this to be commercial. Um, so this does kind of align with that proposal. Is is the applicant who owns this part of the property still the same owner as the property across to the east? Yes, sir. [Music] Can you go back to the the next one? I think maybe the next one. The next that one. This map does not make I don't like this map.

I understand that.

I don't like the donut of this map. like why would we why would this not be all part of the same planned unit development? Um I mean my concern is if we reszone a commercial general right there again who who knows what gets built. Um and it was clearly planned for almost 20 years. This whole area was a planned unit development with careful or somewhat careful planning of what needed to go in there. So, it's a little concerning as to why we would have this one little freeforall in the middle of this big planned unit development, I guess. But that's probably a question for the developer, too.

Question there. What what we've been told. Do you have some You look like you might have something to say.

What? What we were told for this reasonzoning is that it's just for um the applicant to market the property easier. Um so there were discussions had of whether there were pros or cons of keeping that PUB in place for the site and just changing it to commercial uses. Um but reading through the PUD documents that were approved in 2007, um there weren't a lot of restrictions put on the commercial properties. Nothing that I could find that actually changed those base regulations. Um, I think the PUD or plan unit development was to accommodate that mixture of uses with the hotel, the multif family, the single family. So I I wasn't able to find anything that would actually change with the development of this property if it were to be developed commercially.

Okay. So like I mean would were there design standards in the surrounding PUD or setbacks or you know different like uh factors that were included in the PUD that would then not have to be followed by this parcel. all the design standards that I was looking through seemed to line up with the zoning districts. So, I think the design standards mimicked the zoning districts. It was just those mixture of uses. Um, and I can't say for sure, but that's through reading through those original staff reports and those old documents, that's what I was able to find. Okay, further questions for staff?

One quick one quick. So, there's no no current plan to do anything with this besides possibly sell it to someone else. Is that correct? None that I've been told of. Okay. [Music] A a carefully crafted response, sir. To the best of my recollection. Yep. Uh, anyone else have questions for Henry at this point? At this time, I'll open the public hearing. Do we have a representative from the applicant here? I don't have anyone else signed up to speak on this item. either. Was anybody else here to talk about this? All right, I'll close the public hearing. Henry, what was the planning commission's recommendation?

Yes, sir. So, on November 4th, 2025, planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approved the map amendment as presented. Okay. Thank you, councilors. I move approval of the planning commission recommendation.

Second. We have a motion and a second to uh approve the planning commission's recommendation. Please vote. Let's approve the vote of 4 to zero. Item 6 C, receive public comment regarding a text amendment to chapter 23, land development code, article 6, land use classifications, to amend or to add a setback exception to Division 3, residential district section 23-136 through 23-142 and 23.14 Division 4, Commercial District Section 23-150 through 23-153, Division 5, Industrial Distrial Districts section 23-160 through 23-161 and division 6 Agriculture District Public District and University District Section 23-170. This is CC-25-167. Did we have good notice on this item?

Yes, we do. Henry.

Yes, sir. This is a proposed text amendment for the setback exception which is found in that list of sections that you just read. Um, so we'll kind of get into that by just jumping right in. So, first off, this is the current list of zoning districts which allowed the setback exception, which we'll get into in just a second, but that list is uh summarized as our single family zoning districts and our commercial districts as well as RTR2 family districts and IL industrial light. So, the setback exception currently reads, "For development on property that abuts any local street that currently has 100 ft of continuous rideway for the entire block, the front yard setbacks may be reduced by up to 50%." So, what that means is um we'll kind of break that down into certain sections, but basically you can reduce your front setback by up to 50% if certain conditions are met. So, those conditions include if you live on a local street that currently has 100 foot of rightway. So just the basics there is that right ofway is the property that the city owns where streets and infrastructure are built and a local street would be a street classification. So your general classifications for streets would be like arterial, collector and local. Local is the smallest um design smallest designation for a street generally lower inensity traffic. If you were building a neighborhood generally those neighborhoods are assured by local streets. Our current code requires that local streets have 60 foot of rightway or 50 foot with additional easements. So anytime you have 100 foot of rideway, that's generally more than the city would need for a local street. But that does occur a lot, especially in our older parts of the town. So for example, um Lewis to the east, 8th to the south, and seventh to the north all are local streets that have 100t of rideway surrounding city hall. So that 100 foot of rideway generally more rideway than the city needs. So when you have your full set back, those houses are pushed pretty far back, further than you would really need them to be. And planning best practices are to try to encourage those houses to be pulled forward. Um

decreasing those front yards, activating those um activating that rightway, like you know, encouraging that sidewalk or those front porches and stuff. So all of that to say, um that's when this comes into play is whenever you're on a local street, you can get that front setback reduced if you have 100 foot of rideway. One point of this that I'll point out is that it's a 100 foot continuous ride ofway for the entire block. So that's one of the key things that we're changing because that means if anyone on either side of the street has closed a portion of that rideway, no one for that entire block could use the exception the way it's currently written, which is a situation we've run into with multiple projects coming through the pipeline right now. So that's why we're proposing this text amendment. We'll get to the zoning districts it applies to in just a second. So jumping down halfway down the slide to the text amendment for property that for the full length of the property abuts a local street and one the ride ofway has a minimum width of 100 ft or two the center line of the platted rideway is a minimum of 50 foot from the property line the front yard setback may be reduced by up to 50%. So now the way it's it's proposed to be written, it would only be the property the right of way that's directly in front of your property that's either 100 foot or 50 foot from the center line, which means if someone across the street from me or down the street from me closed the ride of way, it wouldn't affect my ability to reduce my front setback if I were developing this. This is something we're seeing used more and more frequently, especially with infill development happening around downtown. Um, there have been a lot of infill development happening on local streets that have 100 foot of rideway that would benefit from this setback. Um, so one other point that I'll make that is specific for Enfield Development as well is the districts that it applies to. So we're expanding the districts in to include all the ones that are written above, which is basically all of the rest of the zoning districts. Um, we weren't able to find any reason why this exception wouldn't apply to any zoning district, but um, it didn't apply to any of the multif family districts right now. So we're including all those multif family districts as well as the a and

industrial general which wouldn't have many applications. Not many a or industrial general sites are on a local street with 100 foot of right away. So it wouldn't necessarily apply but without a reason to exclude it. We went ahead and included all those districts. Um I'm sure I forgot to explain something so please let me know if you have any questions. You've actually done good so far. Thank you counselors. Any questions? Um, a couple of weeks ago we talked about we approved a professional service agreement for land development code chapter 23 to be rewritten. Um, do I understand correctly that this is all part of that same chapter?

Yes, ma'am. Okay. So, is this sort of um I want to say a band-aid for something that needs fixing immediately while that chapter is being revised? Yes, ma'am. Okay. So, it's something that would affect multiple projects coming down the pipeline that we wanted to go ahead and work with to allow the exception to work for now. It also allows us to kind of see if the verbiage we have really does work or if there are other things we should fix to incorporate in that bigger picture update. But this is just one of those things we wanted to fix ahead of time, but will also be incorporated into full code update.

Thank you. And I'll I'll add on that that uh Kimberly's team, the city attorney's office spent a lot of time, her team reviewing this with us, looking at other practice or best practice and code in other communities. And this is a this was kind of a team effort and we appreciate their help. But yeah, this is a way to not incentivize developers to try to close right away. We want to protect our rideway, but allow the best practice development with the parking in the rear. So Okay. Thank you. Anything further for staff this time? I'll open the public hearing. I don't have anyone signed up for this item, but um Mr. Ghost would like to speak.

I forgot to fill out the form for this one, but again, Steven Ghost, Ghost and Associates. I just wanted to let you all know that we've worked with Henry through the builder relations committee on reviewing this and I've professionally had a lot of clients do board of adjustment applications for these kind of things but that has become more difficult in the last 6 months based on I guess some case law and things. So this is really will help like Henry said it's really west of Duck over to probably Orchard 12th up to sixth in those old original plat areas of Stillwater with the 100 footer of rideway. So I just want to from the development community and the builders that this is something that we support and are are happy with the process that's happened. So

thank you. Anyone else planning to speak on this item? Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Henry, was there a planning commission recommendation on this one? Yes, sir. On November 4th, 2025, uh, planning commission unanimously recommended that city council approve the text amendment as presented. Thank you, councilors. Motion to accept planning commission's recommendation. Second.

We have a motion and a second. Please vote. It's approved with a vote of 4 to zero. Item 6D, you receive public comment regarding the approval and adoption of the update to the city's comprehensive plan referred to as Envision Stillwater 2045 comprehensive plan CC-25-168. Did we have good notice on this item? Yes, we did. Henry.

Yes, sir. So, this is um the first public hearing for the Stillwater Envision 2045, an update to our comprehensive plan. Um no action is being taken tonight um as there will be a second public hearing on December 15th which is when a motion can be made to uh move this project forward or not. Um so this is just a public hearing to hear comments. Um both myself and the consultant are here to answer any questions if you have any. Um so for the actual presentation I'll hand it off to the consultant. Today we have Don Thomas with uh FIA Nichols to provide the presentation. Um her team was the one that rewrote the comprehensive plan for us. Good evening me. All right. All right. Good evening. Thank you all for having me this evening to present the final draft of the comprehensive plan. Um pleased to represent the project team. Um, and the project team is much larger than just those of us that were on the consulting team that worked on this project. It was um, obviously the entire community of Stillwater. Um, those of you on city council that have seen us a couple of times and participated in this process and will eventually take action on the project, the planning commission, city staff that have just stuck with us through the entire process. um the advisory committee that was um created and established um with your I guess um appointments early on and then of course those of us that worked on the consulting team to bring you the information and the things to consider as we developed the plan. Um so what I want to do tonight is give you a brief overview of the project and sort of how we got to this point. um hit on some of the key elements of public engagement as well as the chapter goals for the

various um content chapters of the plan document and then um review a little bit on the implementation element too. So the envision still water 2045 comprehensive plan consists of eight chapters that you see here. So we're beginning with an existing conditions um elements and walking through key components of the city, land use, transportation, housing and neighborhoods, economic development, community character, infrastructure and then providing a kind of wrap up on implementation with a series of recommendations. We started with a vision statement um which you see here that took a little bit of crafting but this is this is the north star for the comprehensive plan um and it is intended to be inclusive and representative of the community. Along with that north star we had guiding principles um connect thrive realize and identify still water. They have multiple meanings but these were sort of overarching concepts that helped to shape the content of the plan and to provide some structure to it as well. Uh throughout the process we brought the plan through a series of public as well as stakeholder meetings and discussions. Um those are shown here just beginning early on and I think we met five times with the um advisory committee. We conducted three large um public engagement activities in addition to an online survey and a consistent project website that remained active throughout the the course of the project. Um so that's represented here and just a little bit on the engagement. The initial public openhouse um garnered attendance of about 80 people. Uh we didn't have quite as large attendance at the land use workshop, but it was paired with an online element that provided the same information and prov and

opportunities to provide feedback. The final public openhouse, we had a little over 20 people there. Um, our survey uh garnered about 540 responses and there was an element um an uh interactive component to the project website that allowed people to put markers on a map and they provided um multiple comments there as well as free form comments on what we called an ideas wall. So all of that public engagement fed into what we know about the community, helped us understand what the community wanted, and we were able to use that to develop the um plan document. This summary shows you the contents of the snapshot chapter, which basically provides existing conditions and an understanding of the engagement and what that um resulted in, which is the vision and guiding principles. land use um was based on a series of um pieces of of engagement and um really to get information about what the community's desires are relative to mixeduse development infield development. Those are the two charts on the left. Um and then on the right um access to by either public or private services. Um this information was useful in scoping the various insights relative to um public relative to the land use components. What we learned is that people felt that mixed use in appropriate locations was supported. Infill development is a good thing and should be supported and and accommodated. Um people wanted better access to private and public services. So, there are series of goals for each chapter, and this is what we developed for the um land use chapter. I won't read all of the content on the right side of the screen, but that really gets a little bit more detail to what we're talking about on the left. Ideally,

we're putting together a plan that encourages and incentivizes efficient land use, a more walkable still water, so more more uh facilities for people uh pedestrians as well as bicyclists um although they're not walking. Um supporting economic development. um also to create and support iconic destinations to ensure that those serve as um key components to downtown development as well as other locations in the community that are uniquely Still Water. Um and also to prepare for modern modern regulations. You all have already talked a little bit about that this evening. Updating the development regulations to ensure that you can accomplish the things that this plan calls for is probably the most impactful first step of implementation that you can take. Um transport transportation and mobility. So this talks more uh talks about of course your um street network and how automobiles move around the community but also brings in other elements of transportation such as um walkers and bicyclists and public transit. So, should we expand or improve? Generally, yes. Um, should the city invest more in public transit? Generally, yes. Or, um, well, on this one, I would say that's a split a split um, sort of vote. So, yes and not sure were the two um, primary responses there. Relative to um, having adequate quality and accessibility of sidewalks and bike paths, the consensus was that needs some work. and relative to the quality and uh utility of public transit um looks as though that was more on the not sure or no side of things. Um but we did hear from the community um pretty soundly that they wanted to repair and reconstruct and utilize existing infrastructure before new is built. So the the focus there and I told the

planning commission this um the folks in Stillwater are very practical. they they want their facilities and the services that are provided to be solid, to be wellmaintained, and to be consistent. So, when we asked them to dream big, they're like, "We we want our streets to really work, and we want them to be efficiently utilized." Um, so it's not to say that they weren't dreaming big, but those are very practical desires for the community. Um goals relative to transportation. Maintain existing infrastructure. Manage your traffic efficiently. Serve citizens with transit. Active transportation. That means um being able to move around the community in different modes. Walk, bike, get on transit as well as move your vehicles, private vehicles. And anticipate and adapt is really a way to keep looking forward for innovative uh opportunities relative to your transportation network. housing and neighborhoods. Some of the things that we're really um focused on relative to feedback that we received was to broaden the mix of housing types that are available and supported through development regulations. Um allow for access I can't say the word accessory dwelling units ADUs where appropriate. So some people said everywhere, others said most and others said not sure. So that's um that's something that's fleshed out a little bit more within the um land develop with within the land use categories. Um and talking about how important um public and private services are to neighborhoods. Again, both of those um were identified as very important elements of uh well-rounded complete neighborhoods. So also considering the goals for housing in neighborhoods, promoting infill developments, filling in the blank, filling in the gaps. Um that kind of also speaks to the efficient use of your infrastructure. Um streamlining review and permitting processes that'll be addressed, I'm sure, through

your um code update, diversifying housing stock, improving walkability, and enhancing housing conditions. That one speaks a lot to um property maintenance and code enforcement as well as um development activity. Moving on to economic development and redevelopment. Uh we we asked people about their ideas for where mixed use would be appropriate primarily downtown and then a few other locations kind of came out fairly equally. Um how important is infill development and that was deemed to be very or somewhat important almost exclusively. Goals relative to economic development. Um there are multiple different entities that deal with economic development in the community today. Um so we have identified building a vision working together to get a clear direction that is um that is consensus built through those various partners making sure that they're aligned. Build unique places. Places that the residents want to go are also places that your visitors will want to go. So the idea is to focus on things that improve the quality of life for your residents and also will draw that tourism and other individuals to the community. Increase employment. Um that is really addressing not only retaining sort of the the high um the high level graduates that are coming out of OSU. making sure that there are opportunities for them to work here in the community and not necessarily have to take that education with them and maybe not come back. Um, but then also, you know, providing opportunities for your your general employment base as well as new graduates and investing in quality of life. That kind of goes back a little bit to the building unique places uh concept. Speaking of character, community character, arts and culture goals that we identified here, beautify Still

Water. Um, Still Water has a has great locations. There are opportunities to make improvements and things like gateways and other types of um elements or improvements to the public realm. Investing in the public realm gives you the opportunity to do that in a space that you can control. Um, so that the city is one of the biggest property owners in the city in that the right of way and public space is typically publicly owned and gives you an opportunity to make some of those enhancements. Um, unified branding and a civic identity. We know that the city has initiated some work relative to um a a branding and um wave branding and wayfinding types of um improvements. So we feel like that's that's on a good track. Empower and connect local champions. There are a lot of folks that just absolutely live and breathe Still Water. I guess you know they breathe bleed orange. Um so making sure that you have the ability to draw them in and give them things to do and ways to um engage in the community will will help. Um it just helps the stickiness of a place to give people some ways to connect that are real meaningful and improving health outcomes. We have um a section in this chapter that really talks about a healthy community and some of the ways that um Stillwater might be able to improve healthy outcomes for their citizens and visitors. Uh the last um content chapter is infrastructure, public facilities and services. And in this we had some ideas wall um that's the free form comments on the website comments there were really focused on transportation and parks largely um and then we asked if there was a need for more investment in the look and feel of streetscapes. Um 70% said yes. Um the uh chart on the right is from our initial public open house. We asked about things like the moving from the left to the

right. Um emergency services got high marks. Um good variety of art and cultural and historical facilities got pretty high marks. Um a community that uh has community centers and facilities that meet my needs got neutral to high. And then city hall is welcoming a welcoming place to visit got neutral to high remarks also. So goals relative to um infrastructure and public facilities. Maximize the use of your exist existing infrastructure. This is the theme. You've seen it and heard it before. Diversify water supply. We know that's been an issue in the city. And so we wanted to make note of that. Provide some recommendations relative to that. Create nodes of public infrastructure. This is an opportunity to use some of that public space to possibly um co- uh colllocate different public facilities. um could be a savings for the city with regard to maintenance and oversight, but also to um customers, residents who are utilizing those facilities um where possible. That that could look like a police substation in a park for instance. Ensuring that all levels of service can be met. That's that varies based upon the different utilities and services. And preparing for hazards. We know you have a hazard mitigation plan that um feeds into um making sure that your community is ready to bounce back and to bounce back better from impacts. This all culminates in the implementation section where we have kind of given you what we call a road map or an action plan for implementing your develop for implementing your comprehensive plan. There are 84 recommendations. uh they span all of the different plan chapters or topics and they're organized in what you see here uh with a recommendation number on the far left that corresponds with the chapter. So in this case, you've got three recommendations related to land

use. The action item or description, how the uh what the time frame is for implementation, the type of action that is uh called for, and then key entity or partnerships that could also be called the champion, whomever is going to kind of see through see that through to the to con conclusion. The orange numbers that you see in the middle, those indicate priorities. So time frames are outlined in short, mid, and long-term as and those things that are ongoing. Priorities one, two, and three really are intended to give you a guide as to how to focus city re resources. So priority number one, those are the things that have the most urgent need. Less urgent or secondary need falls into priority number two. and things that are least urgent for an investment focus and that probably are things that are going to be you're going to need to be a little more strategic about them and line them up over a course of probably years as opposed to months um are the things that are identified as priority number three. The action types reflect basically the kind of um action or kind of resource that you're going to need in order to accomplish the various um tasks. And so it might be updating regulations. You'll see a lot of things related to that. It might be a capital investment or an administrative action or something like a partner or partnership or a policy. And that is what I have for you as an overview of the comp plan. Um I hope that gave you a good flavor for what what we put together. Um we did present this to the planning commission on November 18th. Um they provided a unanimous recommendation. Uh, I just want to say thank you for bearing with us and working through this project. Um, we feel like we've got a good plan here for you that will carry you through the next several years, if not decade or

more. Um, but I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you so much. Counselor's questions. So, documents like this tend to resemble in many ways the prior document and the document before that. There's a lot of continuity when comprehensive plans, right? What are some of the things in this plan that are significantly different moving forward for us?

I feel like you've got a very different uh action um implementation chapter in this one. Um the previous plan uh did a pretty good job of identifying specific capital projects that were anticipated or desirable. um not a lot of them actually were done um because over the course of time it was determined that there were different priorities. Um so while some of our recommendations may be more general, they do have the ability to sort of span time a little bit probably withstand time a little bit more. Um we also really focused on giving specific direction in the land use elements. Land use categories. You've got a broader menu of land use categories that will hopefully help to guide your um compre your code update and give you the ability to be more specific as to how you reset those regulations to accomplish the things the development patterns and the type of environment that is intended to be created in response to this plan. Um so I think those are two big pieces. We we did a full housing study with this. It's an appendix to the plan. And so the housing recommendations are based not only on, you know, what we see in the community, but also on what was researched and established as market demand and supply and where you have gaps. Um, so I think those are some of the things that I'd point out.

Okay. Thank you. Um, thank you for your work on this as well. Um, I I um actually really I enjoyed reading the whole 200 and some odd pages. Um, but one of the things I one of the things I noticed and I was a little surprised by and you have done these for other municipalities and so you could speak to this. Um, in looking at all the action items and how they were ranked, more than half of them are high are priority one. Yeah.

And so I guess my question was, you know, so there's 47 priority ones of those 84 action items. Is is that common or do we do we really have that much we need to be work working on that are really high priorities and and I found myself looking at this and going okay well so what really are the really really high priorities of that group the 1A yes

the one that that's a great question we we did have a workshop session with the advisory committee and we also kind of ran this through staff and had them scrub it with regard to what they felt would be the most applicable prioritization. Um, so I won't blame them, but I will say that they contributed to the way that this that the way this kind of rolled out. Um, some of those priorities are already underway. Some of those priorities have been initiated through other projects. So, we even we talked about a couple of those tonight, but others are not real heavy lifts. they just need to be on the list and get done. Um, so it's it made it was kind of important just to get them on paper to make sure that that that became somebody's responsibility. Um, the other thing is that on an annual basis, I recommend that the council and the planning commission and staff review the comprehensive plan, make sure that you're still aligned with the direction that it's leading you and that you've got, you know, that information, policy support from from the community. Um, but you're going to be wrangling resource allocation and budgets and things like that every year. Um, so annually it's a good idea to take a look at it. every five years, it's a good idea to really consider whether or not you know your list is getting short and you may need to modify things. When you when you do any of those updates or reviews, it's a good time to take a look at the prioritization and make sure that you know you're not dropping things. Um the city can do a lot um and they they can they can walk and the staff can walk and chew gum at the same time. Um, I think that what you'll find is that a lot of these 47 priority one items are things that um kind of fall into daily operations and that will just be folded

into the way that things are done. Um, that is my hope. That is what I believe the conversation has been. So, um, hopefully that is, uh, responsive. Thank you. Yeah, I mean I'll just jump in on that because that that session we had to try to figure out how to prioritize these things was uh I think we made it through like three of them. It was hairy like we had deep discussions about deep discussion. Uh but but one of the things that you know we were focused on was trying to was because a lot of these if you you know as you read through them there's a lot of them that dovetail together

you know that that one initiative will check five or six of them off the list. Um, but we wanted to make sure I think one of the really important things for this and this speaks to the the comment you made to councelor Clark's question that there is real implementation work to be done. Um, so many of these plans that are listed at the beginning that the that we've had here over the years I think would meet the statement of there was a lot of stuff that was said that we were going to do that none of it ever really got done. Although Block 34 was in one of those plans, you know, long ago and it finally happened. Uh, so

the timelines are long. The timelines are long. But all that to say, I do I I feel good about this list of specific items because it does give us something that we as council can go to staff and say, "Okay, um, what does this initiative do for our comprehensive plan priorities?" Right? What if we're going to be talking about this chapter 23 rewrite? How many of these things is it going to address? And when we're looking at a chapter 23 rewrite, we can be looking at this list too and say, okay, how does that support low impact or, you know, low impact development patterns and preservation of natural resources? Like how's that,

you know, brought in here? And so it I think it gives us a good guide of things to be looking at as a council and it gives councils for the next 25 years things to be looking at and saying okay how does this meet the the plan in a in a much more concrete way than I feel we've had at least my time on council we've referred to the comprehensive plan by the future land use map and that was just about it and I think this list is stuff that we're going to be talking about and referring to with staff uh for many years into the future because it it does give us a more concrete um touch point on on the plan.

Yeah. where your current staff reports for zoning, for instance, the ones you've seen earlier today, have a specific reference to the comp plan, I think you could have the same references to budget requests or to policy changes and other types of actions that as a community and representing the community, you want to understand how they plug into the overall policy document for the city. Okay. Very good.

Thanks so much, Don. It's been a this has been a ton of work, I know, for your team and for the staff and for lots of people over the last several months. Um, more than a year. Uh, and I I really am excited about the the product that we have at this point and, you know, the the value that it will provide uh to the city council and to the city staff moving forward. So, thank you so much for the work that you've put in. We're pleased if you're pleased. Thank you all so much.

Thank you. Well, this is a public hearing about the comprehensive plan. So, at this time, I'll open the public hearing. Um, shockingly, I don't have anyone sign up to speak on this public hearing either. Uh, but if anyone's here wanting to make public comment about the comprehensive plan, now is your time. Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing and we will have a follow-up second public hearing on this same item on the 15th, at which point um, we will potentially have action on the item. Yes, there will be a resolution for consideration of your approval to adopt the new plan at that city council meeting.

Thanks so much. All right, that takes us to item seven on our agenda. General orders 7A, airport parking lot plans discussion as presented to the store regional airport advisory board and possible action to provide direction to staff.

Good evening, mayor and council members. I'm Kelly Reid, airport director. Let me find my presentation here. All right. I would like to talk to you about our airport parking lots and u give you an airport parking overview um overall throughout the airport, show you where we've been uh where we are now, and some um plans and goals for the future. So, what you see here is a a map, an image of what airport parking looked like um for most of our commercial service of our nine years of of air service. Um you'll see multiple lots here um designated with different numbers. Um those numbers are not the numbers we're using moving forward, but what you see here is a total of 342 parking spots. Um I will say most of the time our lots are mostly full, so we do um very much use what we have and we often have a shortage of parking. Um, also you'll see there um the what we call the gravel lot. It's noted as lot five in this image. This is our shared use lot with the ball field. And here's another image of what you just saw, which is the existing terminal with the blue arrow. The new terminal is in the former hangar one location with the orange arrow. And you can see that large gravel lot. Um, one of the issues that we've had moving into the terminal construction is the condition of that gravel lot. Uh we're very thankful to public works for their outstanding support recently and helping us um provide some improvements to this lot that hadn't seen uh work in a while. So you can see in the photo on the left, there's a lot of um vegetation been growing up over time and more mud than gravel. So they've helped us bring in some new gravel, regrade those lots, and we've completed um two of the three phases for that lot. So uh next week is our final phase um and we look forward to having that improved. Um this is an aerial of what's to come with the terminal project. So again with the blue

arrow on the top left you can see the existing terminal and the new terminal is there mid left uh in white. And then here's an overview of the the new roadway that we're working on now. So we're going to relocate airport industrial access road. Um develop the four-lane drop off in front of the terminal. You see the roundabout there at the intersection of Wright Drive and Airport Road. And then in between the old road and the new road are two new parking lots. Um, one of those is an improvement to the existing lot and then the other, we'll look at those more closely. The other is the larger lot that's going to be a new addition. So, I've got the lots numbered here. I realize it's hard to see in that image, but um, we'll hone in on two of these lots. Uh, we've made some changes um, due to this new terminal layout. So, you can see the existing terminal lot, which is noted as lot one. Let me bring up a pointer here. So, lot one here had some changes to allow access to continue to be available to the existing terminal. This lot had two drives. Um, we reduced that down to one and widened it for the terminal development. The old lot here, the old access um to that lot went away. So, we did experience a slight reduction in parking in this lot. But what we have here is our existing main terminal parking lot. this um soon to be considered for development lot two. We're calling this the North Triangle parking lot. This item is also on the agenda tonight for our grant application to Oklahoma Department of Aerospace and Aeronautics who's generally offered to support 90% 95% of the funding of this lot with a 5% city match. Uh our goal if we're successful in this grant application is to have this new lot completed by terminal opening. So that's um increasing from um 43 spots to 68 spots in that lot. Uh lot three is planned to be um allocated from FAA

funding that we plan to seek next summer. Um this is an addition to our parking. U so that lot is 165 new spots. And then lot four is our gravel lot that will remain as a gravel lot. Uh and then lot five you see over here is our rental car parking. Uh so one of our goals and hopes as we move forward with this parking development overall is to consider uh revenue parking opportunities. So we're one of four commercial service airports in the state. We're the only commercial service airport that does not charge for parking. Uh so our goal is to consider developing revenue parking lots at the airport. Uh lots one and two, as you can see in the picture here, are the two lots we'd like to consider for that. lot one being the existing lot and lot two being the lot we're pursuing redeveloping with those ODA funds that we'll have for you next on the agenda. Um so traditionally airport parking is the highest revenue source for airports for non uh non-eronautical parking. So something outside the airport fence. Um so it's a significant uh monetary support for the airport revenue support to have revenue parking. Um let me go back a slide. This FAA lot is planned to be uh to continue to be a a free parking asset and the gravel lot is also expected to continue to be free into the long-term future. So while we are looking at those two developing revenue parking or looking at plans for developing revenue parking, we will still continue to offer um ample free parking in the two larger lots. Are there any questions counselors?

I do have a question. Right now you have handicap parking in in lot I think think you call it. Will that continue? Where will handicap parking go? It does. Uh so the the terminal um design engineers and architects ensure that we meet adequate ADA requirements for all the parking lots. Um so lot one or the existing terminal lot will continue to have ADA parking. Uh, lot two also has ADA parking. It has nine spots. Lot three will have six spots. Will that be free parking in in lot?

We are reviewing what that looks like in the two revenue lots. Whether or not the handicap or the ADA spots would be revenue or non-revenue. Um, we are working with the consultant to look at a revenue study overall for what this could mean for the airport in terms of revenue and whether or not those spots would be included as in that study. I remember a conversation we had some months maybe a year ago. If we have governmental funding for a parking lot that we could not charge for that lot. Is that correct? Has it changed

for FAA funding? Correct. So, uh FAA typically does not provide funding for revenue for any parking lot in an airport, but we do fall into the category of non-hub commercial service airports, which means we we're small enough to be considered for that need. Um with the caveat that it has to remain non-revenue. So that lot three, this bigger lot is planned for non-revenue for free parking. So 50 years from now, le lot three will never be revenue because it was FAA funding. Then the FAA requirement is for the useful life of the lot. So for the next 20 years after 20 years, we could consider revenue parking or uh if we wanted to reimburse the FAA for that grant. Okay. Thank you.

Did I understand correctly that lot two is the current lot and it would just be expanded. Correct. Okay, correct. So, we have to close that lot for a period of time. Current estimates are 5 weeks, 5 to 8 weeks, I think, for construction of that lot. Have we looked at for comparable airports uh what types of rates they charge for parking? We have um Tulsa and Oklahoma City are our two closest airports. So, we look closely at their rates. um they both have economy lots, short-term lots, long long-term lots at a variety of different rates. But that's one of the things we look at is if we do charge revenue being um fair and equitable with other commercial airports or sim similar airports.

Thank you. Do they have any free parking at Tulsa? They do not. Neither does Lton. Sure. I mean, I I think that's a I mean, it's certainly been a selling point for the airport and

um something that's that will help us compete, helps us compete when this, you know, tell people you got to drive an hour, hour and a half to another airport, you got to pay for parking, you got to all that. And so, it's it's great that we have it and that we're planning to continue to have it. But I do also get comments from people all the time that say, "I would love to pay for parking if it was if I knew I would get a spot that's closer, if I could get covered parking, if I could get, you know, there are folks who would be willing to pay a premium, I think, to to park closer or to to have some amenity as part of the parking. And so I I think it's great for staff to continue to to look into, you know, what that might look like. um as long as and it feels very clear, you know, with the gravel lot and that that FAA lot that there will still be um a lot of free parking at So airport. I think it it makes a ton of sense for us to say, well, maybe we could research some revenue alternatives that that might uh add a little bit to the bottom line for this for the airport.

Correct. The majority of our parking would still remain free. Um, there's 210 spots in the gravel lot and then 165 planned spots in in lot 3. How many did you say we have fully now? 300. 342 preconstruction. We saw a small reduction, but we'll have about approximately 500 once we're complete with all of this. Correct. That just seems like a whole lot of spots to be as full as they are for a flight that holds 56 people. 65. There might be a reason for that. Yeah. I mean, I guess there's a lot of people who are parked there for several days while they're out, but is there I assume there's some kind of study that is done in terms of how much parking an airport this size needs.

Correct. Um, in our master plan and in the terminal development plans it was looked at to forecast what the terminal requires for the next 50 years and the parking developed in these plans meets those needs. I mean, it's most I mean, it's full. The the pave lots are almost always full. Uh, but the gravel lot's not I don't feel like it's I've never gotten into it and felt like it was all the way to the back, but I suppose it is something. We've had a lot of I have a couple of times. Oh, yeah.

I mean, I love that. That's great. That means people are using the airport. That's That's fantastic. But I'm Yeah. I mean, this looks uh to me like a a great direction that we're heading to to figure out, you know, how to serve both folks who who want to have the free parking available and those folks who would be willing to pay a little bit to to have a little bit more of a premium experience. And so, what else do you need from us? Uh we plan to come back in the future when we have uh when we've completed our revenue study and uh have more uh data and information to provide regarding revenue and what we could what projections we are expecting to see.

Sounds good. Thank you. You can stay right there because item 7B is consideration and possible action to approve the award of contracts by Seymar Liberts for project work package number five, the North Triangle parking lot. I'll let you

correct. So, this is to help us move forward with that North Triangle parking lot that we just looked at that lot two you saw in the image. Um, the Seymar is here tonight if anyone has any questions. Um, the Seymar amendment is our the Seymar agreement is our contractual document with the construction manager at risk to help us build and develop the entirety of the terminal project and all of the associated phases. So, the North Triangle parking lot is our next step in that. Uh, Libert Brothers has been helping us bid um and provided a bid recommendation for that North Triangle parking lot low bidder. And so this is project work package number five we're reviewing tonight. And I have uh Shane Van Oen from Liberts if there are any questions.

So well I mean my question is if we award this is this going to you you said that they would plan to get this done before the terminal opens. Correct. what happens with the loss of this in the meantime where I mean that's how many 40ome spots in there now correct um my understanding is we expect to close that lot for approximately 5 to 8 weeks to accommodate construction construction could begin as early as January or February um we're in the winter season so we may experience some weather delays but well I mean what happens with the parking we close that lot and rely more heavily on the the gravel lot the hope is to have that lot back open before spring break which is one of our busier seasons Okay.

Sounds like fun. Sounds like construction. Counselors, any further questions? What's your recommendation for us, Skilly?

Uh, we have a motion to approve the award of contracts by the Seymar Liippard Brothers Incorporated for project work package number five, which is the North Triangle parking lot for the Stillwater Regional Airport Terminal and Improvements Projects. Also approve amendment number five to the semar agreement which includes a partial conversion to the guaranteed maximum price in the amount of $633,38 for the relevant portion of work identified in project work package 5 and authorize the city manager to sign the amendment and related exhibits A1 and C5. Counselors. I move approval of the staff recommendation. Second. We have

a motion and a second to approve. Please vote. It's approved with a vote of four to zero. Excited to see the progress out there. It's really great. Every time I drive out to the airport, I'm I'm just anticipating more and more getting into that building and seeing the wonderful stuff. Item 8, resolutions. It's resolution number CC-2025-31, a resolution of the Sto City Council approving the submission of an application for an Oklahoma Department of Aerospace and Aeronautics Airport Construction Program grant funds for improvements at Sto Regional Airport, approving the associated budget amendments for the required sponsor match, and authorizing the mayor vice mayor to execute all necessary project documents. So, this is uh the grant that Kelly just mentioned, the ODAA airport construction program, state grant funds that the Swater Regional Airport intends to apply for in support of construction of the new North Triangle parking lot. The estimated total project cost is $680,58. The anticipated cost share is um ODA state grant funds in the amount of $646,482 and city of Stillwater 5% required sponsor match of $34,26. Um approval of this resolution um approves submission of the grant application. It approves the attached budget amendments to appropriate the required sponsor match and also authorizes the mayor or the vice mayor to execute any necessary project documents.

Counselors I move adoption of resolution CC2025-31. Second. We have a motion and a second to adopt the resolution. Please vote. Resolution is adopted with a vote 4 to zero. Item 8 B is resolution number CC-2025-32 which has sister resolutions on the other two meetings tonight. This is a resolution authorizing signatories for depositories. Yes, this resolution is just administrative in nature. Um the only changes being made is um the authorized um signitories for the municipal court. Um it's changed due to staffing changes. Counselors motion to adopt resolution CC-2025-32.

Second. We have a motion and a second to adopt the resolution. Please vote. It's adopted with a vote of 4 to zero. Item nine is ordinances on first read. Ordinance 3586, an ordinance reszoning attractive land located at 7-Eleven South Ramsey Street from small lot single family residential to two family and multif family. This is from earlier this evening. I move to advance ordinance 3586. Second.

We have a motion and a second to advance ordinance 3586 to second read. Please vote. The vote of 4 to zero. That ordinance is advanced to second reading. On first reading, we have ordinance 3587, an ordinance reszoning attractive land located at 998 South Murphy Street from small lot single family residential and commercial general to commercial general. Also from this evening motion to advance ordinance 3587.

Second motion and a second. Please vote. The vote of 4 to zero. Ordinance 3587 is advanced to second reading. On first reading, we have ordinance 3589, an ordinance amending chapter 23, Land Development Code, Article 6, Land Use Classifications, to amend or to add a setback exception in division 3 residential districts sections 23-136 through 23-142 and 23.144, Division 4, Commercial Districts, section 23-150 through 23-153, Division 5, Industrial Districts, section 23-160 through 23-161 and Division 6 Agricultural District. Public District and University District section 23-170. Councilors

motion to advance ordinance number 358 3589. Second have a motion a second to advance the ordinance. Please vote. Ordinance is advanced with a vote of four to zero. Item 10 is appointments. The Stillwater Airport Advisory Board who has been doing great work helping us out at the airport. There are two members on that board whose terms are expiring. Both are interested in being reappointed to new three-year terms which would expire in January 2029. So I move that we reappoint Derek Davies and Phil Thomas terms on the Starter Regional Airport Advisory Board. Second.

We have a motion and a second. Please vote. With a vote of four to zero, Derek Davies and Phil Thomas are reappointed to the airport advisory board. We thank you so much for their service. We thank them for their service and appreciate what they do. Reports from the officers of the board. Miss Carley. Nothing to report. Mr. Moore.

Yes. City clo uh city offices will be closed on Thursday, December 25th for Christmas and Thursday, January 1st for New Year's Day. Please remember um just like last week with the Thanksgiving holiday, the uh waste management calendar is adjusted for these holidays. So for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's, normal trash and recycling pickup will be delayed by one day. For example, your trash uh normal trash day is Thursday, it will now be Friday, and Friday will now be Saturday. Um also for residents who have a live Christmas tree during the holiday season after the holiday, they can bundle up their tree and place it at the curb as part of the city's regular uh yard waste collection free of charge. I think it's a great service that we provide. I do think this next note is funny. All decorations must be removed and and bundles must be less than four feet long. So maybe it was a rough Christmas. You just want to throw it all out at once. But um yeah, those decorations need to be removed. So

including all the tinsel, right? That's right. For for every single piece of tinsel. For more information uh or our collection schedule that I was talking about earlier, uh feel free to go to our website which has great information, but still okay. Management. Thank you, sir. Councelor Hawkins,

it is time to vote for your favorite utility box art program winners. The Stillwater Public Art Committee has narrowed the entries down to 10, and it is our job as a community to determine the top five. The voting period is now through the end of Sunday, December 14th. To vote, go to stillwater.org. This year's theme is Stillwater Strong and as you can see that applies in many areas throughout our community and subject to the artist's interpretation. We appreciate everyone's participation in this annual program. And I was just driving by one of our utility boxes tonight and thought this is such a great program. So everybody go vote.

Just looking at those um finalists up on the screen there, it's uh it's going to be it's going to be tough to pick. We need some more utility boxes and just put them all up. Council clerk, it is once again time to purchase rural fire service contracts if you live outside the city limits but within the Stillwater Fire Department's response area. For an annual fee of $200, the contract ensures that response fees for each fire incident on a contracted property will not exceed $2,000. Residents will still receive rural fire assistance without a contract, but we're responsible for paying the full rural fire service fee for any services rendered. All collected fees go toward training, rescue tools, and other fire equipment. To sign up or for more information, go to store.govrural fire or call 4057428308.

Thanks, sir. Councelor Harden,

this holiday season, Stillwater Animal Welfare reminds those who are considering shopping to add a furry friend. Please adopt, not shop. If you'd like to see what dogs and cats are in need of a good home, please stop by Animal Welfare Building at 1710 South Main Street or follow Still Water Animal Welfare on Facebook or call 405372334. Staff members post regular updates on Facebook about available animals, educational tips, and animal health guidance. And if you look at the website, you'll go adopt some. There's some really cute dogs out there. Thank you. Uh, I will remind you that you can join us this week at the annual Stillwater Parade of Lights on Thursday in downtown Stillwater. Festivities festivities begin at 6:30 p.m. with candy and music and then the parade will start at 7:00. Also on Saturday, December 6th from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m., we will have festive skies with our holiday hero holiday heroes drone shows at block 34. There will be so many fun activities including the Stoer High School choir carolling at 6:30 on the Kicker sound stage. Pictures with Santa after the first drone show, ice skating on Herby Lane, snow globes, and food vendors. The drone shows will be at 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. And I think there's two like slightly different drone shows, so you can stay and watch them both, which is great. Many thanks to our sponsors, Visit Stillwater and the Stillwater Chamber of Commerce for helping us with these great events. We look forward to seeing many of our residents and visitors this week for holiday fun in Still Water. Anything further? Is there a motion to adjurnn?

Motion to adjurnn. Second. We have a motion and a second to adjurnn the store city council. Please vote. [Music] With a vote of 4 to zero, the store city council is now adjourned. This time I'll call to order the sto utilities authority meeting for December 1st, 2025. Trustees, uh, is there action on the consent docket? I move approval of consent. Second. Have a motion and a second to approve consent. Please vote.

The consent docket on SUA is approved with a vote of four to zero. We have a resolution resolution SUA-2025-9. This is the sister resolution of the signatorries uh resolution. Is there action on this item? Motion to adopt uh resolution SUA-2025-9. Second. We have a motion and a second. Please vote. Resolution SUA2025-9 is adopted with a vote of 4 to zero. Any reports? Is there a motion to adjurnn? So moved. Second.

A motion. A second. Please vote. With vote four to zero, this still order utilities authority meeting is now adjourned. And at this time, I'll call to order the Stillwater Economic Development Authority meeting for December 1st, 2025. Trustees, questions, comments, or action on the consent docket? Motion to approve consent docket? Second. We have a motion and a second. Please vote. Consent dockets approved with a vote of 4 to zero. Item five is resolution CDA-2025-5. I move adoption of ordinance CEDA 2025-5. Resolution. Resolution. Resolution. What did I say? You said ordinance.

Oh, excuse me. Resolution. We know what you meant. Second, but we want it in the minutes, right? You beat me to it. We have a motion in a second to adopt resolution Ca-2025-5. Please vote. With a vote of four to zero, that resolution is adopted. Any reports? Is there a motion to adjurnn? Some moved. Second. We have a motion and a second. Please vote with a vote of four to zero. The store economic development authority is now adjourned. And that concludes our meetings for the evening.