Public Utilities and Public Works Committee - Regular Meeting

Hello, everyone. My name is Naima Syed. She, her pronouns, Ward 5 city councilor, and your traffic and parking chair. I would like to call to order today's traffic and parking committee meeting of the Somerville City Council. First, they will read the legal notice that allows us to have this meeting on Zoom. Pursuant to chapter two of the act of 2023, this meeting of the city council committee will be conducted via remote participation. We will post an audio video recording, transcript, or other comprehensive record of these proceedings as soon as possible after the meeting on the City Of Somerville website and local cable access government channels. Clerk, could you please call the roll to establish a quorum?

This is roll call. Councilor Wheeler.

Here.

Councilor Mbal? And councilor Saeed? Here. Two councilors present. We have quorum.

Okay. Great. So can we scroll down? Thank you. We will we don't have minutes. We will take up the first three items together. And I just wanna clarify these items, were discussed at the last meeting, and the committee decided to keep them in committee So we can hear, from other departments, from IST and SPD. So, clerk, could you please read all the, the three items?

Agenda item one in order by councilor Ewan Campan and councilor Scott that the director of mobility update this council on the intersection improvements at Webster Avenue and Prospect Street. Agenda item two, a public communication from 64 residents submitting comments about parking on Oak, Houghton, Bolton, And Prospect Streets. And agenda item three, an order by council Wheeler that this council review construction related parking in the area of Oak Street and Bolton Street.

Thank you, clerk. So just, very briefly, at the last meeting, we heard from both engineering and, the parking department. And from that conversation, we realized that enforcement is yeah. Like, the director passed away from engineering, shared that when it comes to enforcement, we need ISD. So we think today, we wanna ask, all the questions that are related to enforcement to ISD.

And then the other component was, regarding towing and just, like, making sure, this area is a priority for, the police department. So let's start with that. I wanna make sure we don't use today's meeting to, repeat what was said. So if you have questions that I were not asked last time that are related to engineering and traffic. We also don't have the directors here today, so please yeah.

Let's make sure we keep the questions related to ISD and SPD. And with that, can we hear from Igor Rosso?

Derek, can we also just note councilor Mbaugh has joined the meeting for the record?

Okay. Councilor Mbaugh, welcome.

Yes. Good evening. Elio Russo from ISD. I am here along with Floyd Richardson also from ISD. We've had we we've had several, you know, communications with the the contractors working in in About Street, Oak Street, Bolton Street, and Prospect Streets.

And we are aware of the situation, but, obviously, it's, you know, it's it's hard for us to to really enforce what's going on down there. I mean, we we've told contractors, you know, please be respect respectful of the neighborhood. It's a congested area. And, I think the one this past winter was kinda hard because of, you know, the all the snow that we had and the snow removal, and it was difficult for our contractors to really, you know, park their vehicles without, you know, impeding, you know, the neighborhood. They're aware of its situation, and they said that they're gonna work with the neighborhood to make sure that, you know, they're not upsetting residents in the neighborhood.

Basically, they have you know, they they get parking permission from traffic and parking. They you know? And they they they park their vehicles in and about the the area. So, hopefully, with the better weather, they'll be you know, you know, that they'll they know that there's a situation, and they're gonna work on resolving it with the neighborhood.

For the record, can you just say your name and title? Thank you so much.

Elio Larusso, inspectional services, big building inspector.

Thank you so much.

Are there any questions from the committee? I see, councilor Wheeler, then councilor Baum.

Thank you, through the chair, and, thank you for being here. Mister, LaRusso, I'll call you by your title, inspector LaRusso. Just to sort of, I'll try to recap without going down the the full list of everything we talked about last time about, about the issues residents of these streets have been running into. I I appreciate your reaching out and talking to these, these contractors and and and developers. And, you know, part of the context here is I think I feel certainly, and I've heard from these residents.

I'm I'm not I'm not hearing, you know, a sense that these developers, or contractors are the enemy by any means. What what I feel like I've, you know, heard from them and read in what they've submitted, including this this communication, is trying to struggle with how when there are repeating patterns of problems, you know, feeling frustrated that those patterns aren't sort of being, picked up on and proactively addressed. That's a word that the residents have used a lot is is looking for proactive solutions. It's always easy, I think, for a counselor to sort of say, like, we should be doing we should be doing more, and hard to say exactly what that is. So I really appreciate, your expertise, the expertise we've had from people from traffic parking as well.

I'm curious about what you think are some of the sort of opportunities here either to get some of these contractors and developers, you know, in better communication with people on these blocks and to to try to look at some of our procedures to make sure that, a contractor or a developer who's really trying to sort of minimize their footprint and impact on the neighborhood is being appreciated and rewarded and, you know, getting, you know, getting the permits they need, promptly. But someone who who might be again and again and again abusing the, you know, the permissions sort of taking advantage, that that that's something that we're we're noticing and using what we can to give them a bit of a harder time about it over time.

Right. And, if I may, through the chair. So, obviously, we have we have, we have multiple projects on three separate streets, three to four ongoing construction sites. And you have multiple trades coming in the area. This this is not just this is not just this area. It's the whole city. And it's difficult at times to find parking spots, but you have to also understand that when you have multiple trades there, there's multiple vehicles.

And you have street cleaning.

And then you had throw street cleaning into the mix and makes it harder for, you know, for for everybody and, you know, and and people people people's patience sometimes are not where they should be. And but I think that the contractors are aware that there is a problem. And, before it escalates, they're they're hoping that they can come to some type of, you know, resolution with the neighborhood to to lessen the impact, and the burden of you know, to the neighborhood. Obviously, they're quite you know, their thing is, well, you know, when we work in the neighborhood, we go to traffic and parking. They issue us a decal so we could park.

Now residents come home, they don't find a place to park, and they they they get upset. I understand. I feel. I'm some of a resident myself. I mean, I have I have parking in my yard, so I don't have a problem of parking on the street. But, you know, unfortunately, Oak Street, Bolton Street I mean Then you have deliveries. Right. Then you have the deliveries that come as well. So I think the biggest problem was that there was a couple of projects on Prospect Street, and the contractors just, you know, spilled over onto Oak And Holt Street. And that that that's where that's where it escalated out of control.

I'm hoping that the contractors are aware that there is a situation, and they're gonna have to, they're gonna have to cater to the neighborhood. But, also, keep in mind that if, you know, traffic and parking keeps issuing permits to these contractors, you're gonna have you're gonna have more vehicles for the next six months, eight months, ten months, whatever it how long it takes for this, you know, for for for a for three family to go up. But there's multiple projects on one street. That is the burden that these contractors are having and the burden that the residents are having as well. You know, it's it's unfortunate that we, you know, we live we live in the city where there's construction everywhere.

There's roads being dug up. There's sidewalk's being dug up, and it's just, it's it's just it doesn't make for a pleasant, you know, a pleasant discussion for everybody involved. So, So, hopefully, there's some type of resolution to this. I don't know if Floyd wants to add. Floyd, we just send local building inspector.

The problem with Oak Street is they just they're finishing up the building at 54 Prospect Street. They're at the end of the job, and most of the contractors are parking on Oak Street while they're doing that job. That one should be done within a month or two. The one down on 118 Prospect Street, which is Houghton Street, That job is getting ready to wrap up soon also. The one at 118, that one's that one's a mess, and that's gonna be like that for a while.

Okay. Just, on what was shared, thank you both. You said you're hoping the contractors understand this issue, and, we're

trying

to do things differently. So my question is, you know, I I I don't want just hopes. Like, is ISD meeting with these contractors to when do you meet I know you meet with contractors, developers on a regular basis. So during your monthly meetings or whatever, are you discussing these issues, these specific issues that were brought up by the neighbors? If the clerk could please have the letter on the screen that was sent to this committee.

So it's the attachment 26Dash0634. So I can't see the whole number here. So that's my first question. Do we have meetings with the or the city having meetings with those developers? If yes, what is is this being discussed?

Well, we don't meet with these, these contractors and developers on a on a monthly basis. We meet with them when they call, for example, a foundation inspection or a screw inspection or, you know, a Electrical inspection. Electrical inspection. So it's not just us that meets with these contractors. It's plumbing inspectors that meets with them, electrical inspectors that meet with them.

But when, you know, we've met with them, we we've, you know, we've we've stressed the fact that, hey. You know, residents are complaining. Try to try to be more considerate of your neighbors when you're coming to, you know, to work and make sure you're not blocking driveways or parking on the sidewalk or parking, you know, at at the corner where a truck cannot make a turn coming down the street. So and they're aware of that. So, hopefully, they will, you know, they will cater to the neighborhood and make sure that they're not upsetting the neighborhood.

Obviously, people are you know, there's always gonna be one person who's gonna be upset because of the disruption that's all this construction is causing on a specific street. But, hopefully hopefully, they'll be more considerate to the to the to the matter.

Yeah. Thank you. As I said, I'm trying here to make very specific requests. So what I'm hearing is that there are no monthly meetings or, you know, not monthly, but, like, regular meetings with these developers. I understand not contractors, but developers, my understanding is that at least in my ward when we have when, you know, we have developers, you know, who are, applying for permits and all that, it was shared with me that ISD will meet with the developer and discuss, you know, the permits, but also, any concerns that are ISD is getting through three one one tickets, calls, and all that.

So if this meet if especially developers. If you have developers on this street and we this IST has not had meetings, my request is to meet with them or send them communications specifically about this matter. Because it's one thing this is coming from a neighbor. Maybe some of them are interacting with these, you know, contracts developers. It's another thing when this comes from ISD, from this city, this issue in permits, being very clear, you know, reminding them, you know, of what they committed to.

We heard from director Postalway at the last meeting that there is a traffic for all those projects. There's a traffic construction, traffic construction, plan. And if they are not respecting it, I think there should be consequences. So is this something that can happen? Reaching out, requesting a meeting, or sending communication of, like, here's what we're hearing from neighbors, and here's what you need to keep doing.

Like, it's just yeah. Like, to me, it's you just can't just, like, hope that they would just be start being, you know, thoughtful and good neighbors. This IST has to initiate this.

Yeah. If that's something that's I mean What I'd what I'd try to track. We have to I mean, maybe we have to bring in traffic and parking also on this matter and have and see what they can do to assist. I don't know.

Yeah. So

We we could talk to them as much as we can. You know? I mean, it is

So one thing is communication. At least what's happening in my ward when there are projects like that, you communicate something. You, you know, it's like it's it's written, and you say or if this keeps happening, then this is when I would like us to talk about what does ISD do when there are repeated instances of not complying with, again, traffic construction those construction I'm forgetting the word, but, like, construction project has, like, a traffic plan. And, if they're not if there is no compliance to that, we can see here from the letter, they specifically say no compliance with street closure pro protocols. Contractors frequently obstruct or close roads for extended periods without adhering to some of its procedural requirements.

Well, when

you're But yeah.

No. Sorry. Go ahead. No. Because you

So that's that's one example.

Right. You bring up street closures. I mean, usually, when the street is closed, it's either for digging up to, you know, to do, like, an electrical service or a plumbing service, which, you know, they just can't close-up the street. They have to go through the proper protocols, which is notifying, you know, the residents that on such and such a date on, you know, May 22, you have we know the street's gonna be closed for an extended period of time. Yeah. There'll be a police officer there doing a detail, but, you know, that's that's all that that's out of our control. That's up to the contractor to know that when he's you're gonna shut down the street. He's gonna have to post the street, post the neighborhood. And then Right. Talk to engineering, talk to traffic and parking, and get the police involved.

I mean, what one one one one possible solution would be to maybe, maybe designate more parking control offices in that area to To enforce. To enforce. Give tickets. Hand out tickets. As a department, we just can't put a stop order on a project if, you know, if It's not building violation.

If they yeah. Because we're we're there to we're we're we're there to enforce the the building codes, but not the parking. But, you know, we can talk to them or, you know, get traffic and parking to assign more more PCLs in the area, and they can they can enforce without, you know, one stroke of the pen issuing citations. You know? Maybe that'll be a wake up call. I'm just throwing that out there, but that could be a Yeah. Revenue.

I think what I'm hearing is that it would be a good idea to try and for the departments to meet. So parking, engineering, and ISD. You know, engineering and ISD, they you all work a lot together for, you know, approving permits and, engineering coming up with the traffic plan. But I think from what we heard, like, traffic, you know, that they have their, you know, rules and on how to on issuing tickets, and they just do that regardless of, you know, is it a contractor? No.

Is it a contractor? Like, I think we heard from director that as long as, like, the the the tickets or the violations, wherever the fines are paid, they continue to issue those tickets. So conversation needs to happen here between all the three departments. With ISD being the one ISD, you do the enforcement, reaching out to the contractors and the developers, reminding them of these things, and what will happen if they do not follow that, which we'll talk about next. So making sure everyone is on the same page and working together is important.

And if we you all determine that, okay, these folks are not following the rules, and maybe that's when you ask the trough the director to stop issuing tickets if that's a possibility. She is not here today. That's why I wanted to have everyone here at this meeting so everyone is on the same page, and we have, like, a plan. And, we mentioned just now the SPD and the role here, for street closure. I just wanna because has his hands up.

Is there anything that you wanna add before we, that's IST related before we have I am lieutenant Holland speak to the SPD part of this conversation.

Thank you, Marancia. Can you hear me okay?

Yes. Yes.

Yeah. No. I guess, you know, it is a very distinct privilege for me to sit here and watch the honorable Elo Lorusso, you know, address this committee from ISD. You know? For those of you who don't know, you know, councilor councilor Lorusso was the Ward 1 city councilor for a number of years, so I've known him as a city councilor.

So I was mostly here to listen to him because to ask for suggestion. Now that he's on the other side of the table, you know, I, first of all, wanted to congratulate him for joining the city in this capacity and ask for his advice about how we should handle a problem like this. So I was mostly curious to hear what his thing as a veteran and as a former city councilor who have served the city. So take it away, the honorable Russo.

Well, thank through the chair, thank you for the compliments, councilor Mamba. Yeah. Well, like I said, we're here to, here we're here to work. We're here to help. And, I think the the majority of the problems the the majority of the complaints was from the Prospect Street project because there's no parking on Prospect Street, and most of the contractors spilled on to to Oak Street in Bolton Street.

So I think with those with those couple of projects coming to a conclusion in the, you know, in the next, what, two months, I think you're gonna see you're you're gonna see the burden lessons on on, you know, both in Oak Street. Because, again, Prospect Street had a few substantial large projects where contractors couldn't park on Prospect Street. So they spilled into There's another Building 108. Right. There's another Building 108, and I think there's one on Webster Street as well.

Am I right? Correct. So, you know, getting all getting all the parties involved and especially traffic and parking, I I think we can definitely remedy this problem before it hopefully does not get out of control. But then again, we had a bad winter too, so, you know, that didn't help either with all these contractors just spilling into an you know, into the neighborhoods. It's unfortunate. It's it's just every neighborhood has something going on. But that said, I'll turn it back over to the chair.

Thank you, madam chair. And and, Elio, if I hear you complaining online again, because now this is now you gotta solve this problem. So congratulations for for being for being

No more complaining online.

Okay. We're gonna keep an eye on you, Elo. Okay. Thank you, madam chair. I'm all set.

Okay. So, thank you, thank you, So, yeah, So you're just reiterating what you have, shared, which is the action plan is coordinate these efforts with the traffic department, and reaching out to these especially the, you know, the streets you the street you mentioned, the developers on those on that street, reminding them, you know, of these, you know, rules and what they committed to. And and, you know, reviewing all the traffic the traffic plan and, you know, whatever purpose, you know, you issued and, you know, the importance of, like, complying to all those. So that's one action plan with ISD. You know?

I I always like to to leave a meeting with an action plan so we can reach out and ask how it's going, Go talk to neighbors there and adjust it as we go. And it sounds like right now, there's real little communication with the traffic department, so I'm excited that we're gonna be starting that. Councilor Wheeler.

Thank you, chair. Echoing some of what you were saying, before, I think there's there's real value when different parts of the city government talk to each other. And, you know, I think getting folks from ISD and folks from traffic and parking talking to each other about, you know, what are what are some of the proactive ways that we could take a look at some of our our procedures and try to figure out, you know, is there an opportunity at the point where the traffic and parking department is being asked by a contractor or developer for parking permits to, you know, for example, look at the recent history around, you know, parking rule compliance. There there are different kinds of pieces of the process that it might be that when city staff are having the chance to to talk to each other about this and and to brainstorm, that that might come up. One of the things that, one of the residents of this neighborhood suggested to me that I I thought was a really interesting, point was that, there are some different, approaches and answers that other cities around us have.

And, it sounds like there's some slight differences in how Boston approaches, these questions and also some differences in how Cambridge approaches these questions. Now we're not Boston, we're not Cambridge. But, you know, I wanna make sure that as we're thinking through tricky problems like this and it's it's tricky. You know? I I appreciate your points, mister Laruso, that, there's no easy answer here.

But, I I do think it's important for us to be, you know, talking to our peers and looking at some of the the ways that they've approached things, maybe some of the ways they've shifted over time. It it sounds like, you know, for example, there's different prices in Cambridge and Boston, for some of these, contractor parking permits. There's different kinds of limitations, and it it sounds like Boston often has has much stricter limits on on how many of these permits they issue. And that could be a reflection of the, you know, the greater ease of transportation by public transportation in Boston. But, you know, we've we've got more of that here than we used to.

And it may be that, you know, depending on the location relative to transit, we need to take that into account. I know that I'm talking more about parking and traffic aspects than about ISD aspects, but, you know, in the in the spirit of looking at this, you know, from all perspectives and getting together and putting our heads together. Thank you, chair.

Thank you, councilor Wheeler. Councilor Mbaugh?

Thank you, madam chair. To councilor Loruso. I'm gonna back also now officially as your colleague or, you know, on on the other side of the table. I think issuing I know part of your suggestion was that they should have more enforcement officer to issue more ticket. That doesn't help because it because for them, paying ticket is part of their business model, so it doesn't really help.

And if you know, this is just it we need to find, like, an alternative. I think and plus one to councilor Wheeler that there has to be some coordination. I think the residents are very thoughtful. I consider them as even technocrats because they don't just complain. They provide suggested way to kinda, like, you know, solve the problem.

And part of it, we can see that there's gap in communication. So that coordinated effort to be able to, you know, create the checks and balances, making sure that once there's a payment or, you know, it's are there any violators? Are there any, you know, stuff that can, you know, can trigger, you know, withdrawal or something. Because we can create policy. Yes.

We are inspectional services is for building code, but, again, that's why we have policies in the books. I don't think that there's any court or any judge that is gonna say, oh, you should not have you you the city could not issue a stop work order because, you know, they are not supposed to. Like, because, oh, you know, this is, a whole state mandated rules and regulations. So I guess this we we gotta find a way to move beyond issuing tickets. Either we either triple or quadruple the fines for this kind of violation, or we find another way to say first, second, third, and then we need to have some policy in the book.

So I guess I'm thinking no. Councilor Wira, I think you and I and might think about, like, a a broader policy conversation, you know, in terms of, like, you know, some new ordinance or regulation that is gonna stop this. This is where I'm thinking so that we don't go keep going around a circle and not actually getting some real concrete action, you know, and action that is impossible, that resident can see that, you know, we've actually done something. Thank you, chair.

Yes. Perfect. If I may just add to the chair, those are all valid points, councilor Mamba. I I think I think we've begun a good conversation just tonight alone with the various department heads and ask from ISCs, you know, speaking to these contractors. And, hopefully, it's a wake up call for them as well. So we're here we're here to, you know, do our part. And if we can, you know, all work together on this, I think that we can come up with some type of resolution.

Thank you.

Yeah. Thank you, for, you know, agreeing to reaching out to them and, working with the traffic department, so in order to address the situation. Now if you're ready, to move to questions related to what SPD can do, we have lieutenant Holland here. Thank you for being here. You know?

And please, miss Spector, Lorisel, stay in the call, because there are some questions sent up again. Maybe we can find a way to work with SPD as well. And, yeah, lieutenant Holland. So at the last meeting, director shared that it would be important to have this area as, like, high priority, for SPD. Could you speak to how you determine an area is high priority, and it was this area has this area been a high priority for your department?

So for certain projects, they get prioritized as far as, like, detail officers being assigned to them, and that that's through the detail office, based on the street, the location, what they're gonna be doing. It doesn't sound like that's much of the complaint from the letter I was reading. It's more of the vehicles being blocking driveways and and just being in the area, which isn't really a detail officer thing. But if they would would report the violations to the police department when they like, just call when they go on, we can respond and deal with them as they go on. We don't normally tow cars for regular permit violations or things like that.

But if they're blocking a driveway within, 12 feet of an intersection or, fire fire lanes, fire hydrants, things like that, we we can address those when when we get there.

Okay. Thank you, a lieutenant. So so I'm hearing if a driveway is blocked, that's when your department can get involved?

Yes. We can. Yeah. If if someone calls, they can't get in their driveway, they can't get out of their driveway, they can call us. We'll respond, issue a citation, potentially tow the vehicle if we're not able to contact the owner and and get it moved.

Yeah. So how what's the process for that? Does, do the neigh should the neighbors just call, SPD

Yes. Just that

happens, or does it go through traffic to No.

No. Right to they can call right to us. The regular business line, (617) 625-1212 or the 1600, and just speak to a dispatch or a police officer, let them know what's going on, and we can come out and respond and and address the situation.

Okay. Thank you, lieutenant. Okay. We have another commitment. So, neighbors who are listening, going forward, this area is being prioritized. And when a neighbor calls SPD about a blocked driveway, SPD will send someone, to address that. And the other thing that I see in the letter that I think is also SPD related is the the deliveries. So when these contractors have deliveries and they're blocking the road and, yeah, it's hard for yeah. Like, the traffic, you know, is not moving. What can SPD do here?

So they're not always, assigning details to these jobs if they're not blocking the road, if they're just working on their buildings. If they're gonna be blocking the road for a period of time, they are supposed to call and let us know and hire a detail, even if it's a short time so we can have somebody go and be there. As you know, we have a lot of projects in the city, so a lot some of the jobs don't get officers assigned. But if there's an issue on a on a any street ever, construction blocking the road or any delivery truck, they can just call, and we will have an officer respond and address see if we can get the truck moved or however get get people in and out, however we can.

Okay. So, it sounds like same approach here. Neighbors should call when they see that. And since we have IST here, this is another really good reminder for these contractors and developers is to reach out beforehand so that neighbors don't have to do it and we don't get to into situation where the street is blocked, to just reach out to the police department. Now in the event where, you know, there's no police officer available, that's, you know, a different story.

But it sounds like if they do it beforehand, SPD has enough time to prepare and make sure there's someone assigned to that. Right? Like, ideally, they the developer should do that beforehand. Right?

Yes. And if if we find them in violation of that, they're not calling and letting us know. Our detail office calls and and deals with the companies, on the administrative side and, to try and keep them in compliance.

Okay. And my question there. So, yeah, when there's no compliance, does ISD and SPD is that communication that happens between ISD and SPD? Like, does ISD reach out to you saying, you know, we received the ticket. We received the call.

I'm not sure that we we kinda deal with two different things. They're more called violations and inspections and things like that, and we're more on the the outside of the house, you know, the street, public public areas. But Yeah.

In in terms of the enforcement. Right?

Yeah. So there's not really an overlap

There isn't really. With us. Okay. Okay. How do I ask this? So, you know, if, you know, I'm an abutter of these projects and you don't know who to call and you just put in a 311 because that's what I usually ask constituents to do. 311 is, you know, the road is blocked, has been blocked, whatever, for twenty, thirty minutes, and there there's no, you know, police officer there directing traffic or whatever. Where does that ticket go? To the police, to ISD? And how

I don't know how three one one handles it. Sometimes they will forward calls to us, but I I don't think they forward everyone. But if it's a, active block, road, or any anything that's actively going on, I would suggest to call the police department first. And then, they can always file the complaint with 311 so they have it on record, and they can address it on their end. But if if they're looking to get something fixed and, handled right away, then to call us right away, so we can come out.

Okay. Because very often thank you for mentioning that, lieutenant. Very often, we ask constituents to just put in a 311. But it sounds like in this scenario, it's best to just call the police department That you know, you you get the call. You you have, you know, staff, an officer available. You send them. It's faster than going through this 10311 process.

Yes.

Okay. Okay. Great. And thank you for, willing to prioritize this area. And, you know, when a call is received and especially with the Prospect Street, Now your department, they hope, is aware that this is an area that has been having a lot of these issues, to make sure we prioritize it until these two big projects, apparently, according to IST, has shared, are will be, finished in a few months.

Okay. Great. We it sounds like we have an action plan. Colleagues, do we have any other questions, to SPD?

Not necessarily to SPD. I don't know if you saw my text. You know? Just I know that one of, you know, the leaders of this, you know, group on Oak Street, are online. You know? If you can ask them, either it's Kate or Serena, whoever wants to weigh in for this conversation. This is their plot. This is their issue just so that, you know, maybe they probably have an idea about how it it's just helpful. Like, I would just add it's it's at your discretion,

Normally, we, we ask, we give constituents a heads up, so they're prepared. And my hope is that we will use the letter as a way to, you know, have this conversation. I really appreciate them taking the time to write this and offer suggestions. I think what I will say is if there's anything that is not already in this letter, and if, one of the neighbors would like to add something that is not already in the letter or comment very briefly, that would be I would be okay with that. Obviously, my colleagues are okay with it.

Looking at the attendees, again, if you'd like to speak, raise your hand. And, similar to what we did last time, maybe just one person is raised hand. So Serena Serena is, the neighbor who spoke on behalf of, everyone who signed this letter. Clerk, could you please m u, Serena?

Good evening.

Yep. Serena, we can hear you.

Alexa, evening.

First of all, I just wanna say thank you to the ISD and also to lieutenant Holland for for speaking. I'm actually really encouraged by what I was hearing, and I I think that, it's gonna be very important for for your teams to work or your your departments to work with traffic and parking. I I really think this is gonna end up being a a multi. The the solution is gonna have to be multi department. Right?

So, I just I wanna thank you for for your willingness to have this conversation. And then the other piece that I just wanted to touch on, is that really looking for for proactive solutions. I think one of the things that's extremely frustrating about this and I I understand, you know, all you could call you could call SPD about this. I have called SPD. And the response that I got was, yeah, there's a lot of traffic in your neighborhood right now.

You know, I I think so so I think, lieutenant Holland, having having you kind of elevate if they if if your team does get a call from our department, maybe to take it a little bit more seriously than just, you know, chalking it up to regular regular, you know, traffic times. But but that said, I I appreciate the the multipronged solution here, and I and I appreciate the kind of out of the box thinking. And if there's an opportunity to have any of these conversations with you further, I'd I'd welcome the opportunity to do so. So thank you for for letting me add that.

Can you just state your name and address for the record, please? Thank you.

Oh, sure. Serena Bodner. 31 Bolton Street.

Thank you, Serena. I appreciate you adding that. It's always great when we get, immediate feedback, and figure out what's missing. So, and, yeah, having lieutenant Holland here flagging this area, for his staff, I think, would, hopefully make this situation better. And, Constanza?

Thank you, madam chair, for indulging me. Thank you, Serena, for speaking. Just for the record, lieutenant Holland is, one of the finest at SPD, so just wanted to leave that out there. Thank you, madam chair. Good to see you, lieutenant.

Thank you, counselor.

Okay. Great. I you know, I love when we are all here brainstorming and, you know, together and finding solution, and we will, yeah, feel free to reach out, as Serena said, to the neighbors, to see how, like, things are going and, you know, if there are any adjustment to be made, along the way. Any other questions to ISD or SPD before we close these items. Okay.

Thanks again, inspector Laruso, for your great suggestion working together with the, you know, consolidating efforts here, and thanks, Lieutenant Holland, for being here. Madam clerk, we will mark all three items

as I made through the. I'll let well,

like Yeah. Go ahead.

Once again, we're gonna you know, we're we're always in the area. So we'll talk to the contractors, and we'll hopefully drive to them the fact that you have to be respectful to the neighborhood and don't upset the residents and see where it goes. Alright? But we'll, we'll work on that. Okay?

Okay. Thank you. It's possible, Russel.

Okay.

Appreciate your work. Okay. Great. So with that, we'll mark item one, two, and three as, work completed.

Chair, we can mark one and two work completed, but three does look at disposition. I assume, you know, you can mark it work approved or recommended to be approved.

Yeah. Referred for recommendation. Yeah. Thank you for pointing that out. So we'll mark item number three as, okay. See, before we do that, council Wheeler.

Thank you, chair. I just wanted to check about item one. I I'm not super familiar with the background context of that one, but are there any other intersection considerations for Webster and Prospect beyond the, you know, the the spillover problems that residents have been having? I just wasn't wasn't sure if there were other improvements that had been motivating counselor Scott and counselor to bring forward that order.

Yeah. Very good point, counselor. You. We have just the person for that. Director Rossin, if you are ready. I don't know if counselors, reached out to you about this specific item. There's any other aspect to it that's not related to our discussion today.

Chair, good evening. Brad Rossin, OSPC Mobility Division. Thanks for spotlighting this issue. My understanding was that this council order was actually independent of the construction impacts items that we just discussed. So I appreciate councilor Wheeler just flagging that. And, chair, I know we have a a longer form discussion on safe streets ordinance that we were hoping to get to. So if it's okay, may I offer to the committee just a very quick, you know, two minute update on where we're at with Prospect and Webster in terms of accessibility and safety updates, if that's okay with you?

Okay. And, do you suggest that after this update that we keep it in committee for a longer conversation, would this be

a transfer of

what the counselors are asking?

Sure. Staff's intent would be to provide, you know, the best information that we have at this time. And then if you all want to speak about this again, my recommendation would be to, you know, submit another order in the months ahead.

Okay. Alright. Let's hear from director Rossi.

Okay. Thank you, chair. Appreciate it. So as counselors and community members will recall, the intersection of Prospect Street and Webster Street, which actually technically includes a leg with Concord Avenue, is part of the long term Union Square Streetscape And Plaza project that has been on the city's capital investment plan for a few years and that our office led a really terrific community engagement and technical engineering process for several years ago. So it is a multiphase project stretching all the way from the far side of Bow Street down to Prospect Webster, and it's gonna take many years and a lot, a lot of money.

Currently, that entire large neighborhood geography is at its 25% design milestone chair. All of the project documentation for that work that took place primarily between 2021 and 2023 is available on the city's website. Community members can find that documentation just by searching Summer Voice Union Square Streetscape. I'll quickly pivot to the phase one project chair. Because this project area is so large, our project team have recommended breaking that large area into several smaller phases, that can be designed and constructed independently.

So the first phase has been focused on Prospect Street as a corridor ranging from Prospect Webster Concord past Summerville Avenue and up to, the old post office. We have estimated share that the design budget required to advance that phase one project from its current 25% to construction drawings would take about $1,200,000. The city has secured a state grant of a little less than $800,000 in design services. So that's a great start for the fundraising and building that budget that we need to do the work. We are currently considering additional options for the remaining funding needed, and we anticipate having more information on that for the council and the community in the summertime.

Chair, we have estimated that that phase one streetscape project, which includes the big prospect Webster Intersection, would need roughly $11,000,000 for its construction budget. City secured a $1,400,000 state grant to help with that last year. So, again, that is a great start with a bigger finance plan that we will need to pull together, but I don't want to I don't wanna minimize the challenges ahead, chair. The council and the committee community know, the challenging fiscal circumstances that Somerville faces right now, and so we're working really hard with grants, developer mitigation funds, and every funding source possible to continue moving this important work forward. So if we are able to pull the design and the construction budgets together, our current assumption is that we would restart the community engagement and the technical engineering work starting from that 25% level that we achieved in 2023 and advancing it to construction documents.

Typically, that would take about eighteen months. So that would suggest, Chair, that the earliest that we could start construction on that phase would be 2028. So we're a little ways away. This schedule does have the potential to align well with an upcoming Mass DOT bridge replacement project that the council is aware of. The Webster Avenue Bridge will be fully rebuilt in the 2027 construction season.

It's gonna be hard for all of us to live through that. Many city departments have been working to coordinate with the community and with Mass DOT. But, again, in this blue sky scenario chair, we would finish that work, and we would be pivoting into the city's intersection reconstruction for Prospect and Webster consistent with those 25% designs that I've referenced a couple of times. So I realize that that is a very quick and very high level update on this wildly complex and and very important project. I hope it's somewhat satisfying to the committee, and I'm happy to answer questions you may have.

Yeah. Thank you, director, for, this update. It is, it is a lot. Thank you for noticing that. But, yeah, it sounds like, you know, we're still keeping our goals, you know, as as a city and well, also recognizing, you know, the current financial situation, but this is the plan for this intersection. And I do not have questions. My, councilor Wheeler.

Thank you, chair. I really appreciate this update and, appreciate the sense of the scope of this work. This is part of an immense project, and, I'm really excited about this project and also appreciative and humble in the face of, you know, the the depth of the planning work and the the implementation work it'll involve. One thing I know that that councilor brought up in the council session when he introduced this item was, you know, just wondering about if there's any room for, for quick build improvements. And, you know, I know there's there's plenty of trade offs with those.

Sometimes it could be easy to think something like that will improve things. Those can be surprisingly expensive and surprisingly ineffective if not thought through all the way. So, you know, not not treating that as some sort of panacea, but I'm curious if there's any opportunity for those if if that's something that your office is considering.

Chair, through you. Thanks for the question, counselor. Yes. And and counselor Ewen Camp and counselor Scott and others have consistently asked for that type of, thinking. It is part of our staff's thinking.

Currently, we are definitely focused on the larger capital projects, and yet acknowledging the complexity and the financial headwinds that we're facing, we will examine other opportunities for quick build solutions, counselor. Quick build solutions can work well for some, applications. We've had great success in the city with trimming up excessive intersection, like turning radius using FlexPost, for example, just nearby to this location actually at the corner of Webster And Newton. That was our quick build solution for many years, before the Mastod project got going. So I I hear that advocacy loud and clear.

If we can bring that kind of tool kit to the big intersection, we will start to develop those ideas. There could be signal timing changes, lane assignment changes, that could be part of a tool kit as well. And yet, one of the things that I I definitely just wanna caution council and community members with is we often just have crosswalk legs that are too long, accessible curb ramps that are too distant from one another, and quick build projects do have an Achilles heel, which is that they generally cannot accommodate accessibility upgrades. Right? So we gotta get shovels in the ground if we wanna relocate a crosswalk landing, and that's been one of the trickiest parts of of planning for this intersection.

Through the chair. Thank you, director.

Council Mba.

Thank you, madam chair. No. I just wanted to, you know, echo, you know council Wheeler, it seems like you always had act to follow these days, but, no, it's good. Is it I mean, like, it's a yeah. I appreciate, you know, director Ralson and his work. Like, it's like I was chatting with him this morning just how much we keep banging, banging him, banging his department back, and then until you go out there and they realize that, wow. Like, we other municipalities are not even doing half of what we are doing. I'm telling you. This is I just described, like, you know, like, just I was in Miami. These folks, they are going downhill.

It's like but I could not believe. I thought I was gonna go learn something from them, but I was instead the one telling them. It's like, hey. Come to some of it and learn something. You know? They are crosswalked, don't walk. Nobody crosses. It's just it's it's like a whole it's just a mess. You know? And yet we are here. You know? We just keep hitting hard, you know, saying that we don't have enough, which, of course, we always keep asking for more. But, again, I just wanna say thank you, and I told the to Russell to double down on everything he's doing because it's really humbling when you get out of your own bubble and they realize that, oh, you know, you're not. So thank you.

Chair, through you, counsel, thank you for the compliments, and we've got a great team across many departments, including mine. So thanks very much, and and please don't interpret our commentary as kicking the can down the road towards those capital projects. Will take seriously the the the the goal of trying to act sooner. We know that the existing conditions are unsafe, inaccessible, congested, chaotic, and we are actually constantly thinking about folks, like MBTA bus riders who are stuck in these intersections and thinking about signalization and other changes that we can perform perhaps earlier and try to get buses through that intersection. So, there there's plenty of homework assignments for our staff. Thank you.

Yeah. Thank you, director, and thank you, for adding, the part about, yeah, ADA. Yeah. The quick build projects, do not include ADA aspects to it, so we can't achieve ADA compliance. I think it's important to remind, you know, also, like, the public of that because it's something that we're asked very often, you know, when we have to wait our turn, and, again, you know, we, we can't just do a quick bill everywhere.

And, yeah, and I agree with concern. We have the best over here in Somerville. And, so with that, we will, mark item one. Oh, lieutenant Holland, please go ahead.

Yeah. I just wanted to add. If you can get me a list of the projects going on that are causing the issues, I have a sergeant who is in charge of details that I can give him the, companies and the addresses, and he can go by and speak to them also.

Thank you. Thank you, lieutenant. We we lost ISD here, but I will make sure after this meeting to, connect you and the ISD so, this list can be shared. I'm sure it's something they can do. I'm not gonna speak for them, but, I can make a connection after the meeting.

Thank you, lieutenant. This is great. So, again, just going back to the disposition of the items, we will mark item one as, were completed. And no further questions from the committee. And, again, for item number two and item item number three, for item number two, do you place that on file?

Item two, you can also mark work completed.

Yeah. Okay. Mark work completed. And then for item number three, as we said, this is approved.

And

so just, we're done now with the conversation, regarding, these items. So lieutenant Holland, if, you need to leave, you can certainly do that, but you're also welcome to stay if you'd like. And the the next item, clerk, could you please read that?

Agenda item four, a communication from the mayor conveying the 2026 safe streets ordinance annual report.

Okay. So we have director Rawson.

Yes, chair. Thanks again. I really appreciate you and the committee squeezing in time during this busy season to help the administration really spotlight the great work that's been done to implement the ordinance that our council passed, that our community members have demanded. So just as a quick recap before I introduce Justin Schreiber, our senior planner and, lead staff person on this work, just a quick reminder for any community members who haven't been as involved as the council. In 2024, Somerville City Council adopted Somerville's safe streets ordinance, which was intended to help accelerate safe streets projects and, crucially, improve public information sharing.

This ordinance did build on a 2014 foundation, an ordinance that our predecessors worked on, the 2014 Somerville Complete Streets ordinance, which was really progressive for its time, and yet the 2024 Safe Streets ordinance is even better. The city is required under the 2024 ordinance to publish an annual report to the city council by March 1 of every year. City staff published our first annual report in March 2025 consistent with the ordinance. And in March, we are happy to publish our second one. So both of these reports, Chair, are available online on the city's Vision Zero program homepage.

So an easy Internet search of Somerville Vision Zero, will bring you to a whole host of resources, including the very clearly labeled safe streets ordinance annual reports for '25 and '26. And although many city departments are involved in the day to day work of designing, building, and operating our safe streets, OSPC D Mobility division does serve as the lead on preparing our annual reports. So with that, I'd love to introduce, Justin Schreiber, our amazing senior planner, to provide a short summary presentation, if that's okay with you, and we can make sure that the clerks have that even though it's already online.

Thank you, director, and, thank you for joining us, Justin.

Thank you. My name is Justin Schreiber. I'm the senior transportation in the mobility division. I I do have a brief presentation if I could share my screen. I just sent that request.

Yes. Is this already attached to the item? Is it that what that's what it

is? Yes.

Okay. Perfect. Thank you so much. You should be able to present now.

Alright. So I'm presenting here from our 2026 annual report, and just I'll briefly review the requirements and then talk about the bike facility installation and then pedestrian transit improvements as well. So just quickly go over the requirements of the report. First is to just report on what was installed in the previous year's construction season in terms of separated bike lanes, and then I'll provide a plan for the current year construction season of no less than three miles along with the forecasted expenditure, and then also to provide a multiyear plan for constructing the full priority network by the 2030, and there is a one year extension available. And then finally, it's to also report on the pedestrian and transit infrastructure, sort of what is detailed in the Vision Zero action plan and the ADA transition plan.

So, just first, a little bit of housekeeping. Shown here is the original party network of protected bike lanes, and there's just a little bit of housekeeping in terms of what defines that party network that we have to take care of. So flipping to the next slide, there's been some updates to the priority network based on decisions that were made in various project processes. So this slide reflects those changes. So first, starting from the top of the table there, the Broadway reconstruction project provided two directions of bike facility when only one was required by the plan that added some mileage.

Pearl Street provided slightly less. Medford Shoe Creek builds, but it's slightly more. And then the l Beacon Connector, just a small section of Beacon Street was added that that did not appear on the original priority network. So in summary, that means that we added a little over half a mile, removed about point two one miles, and the net is about an addition of one third of a mile. So it's approximately the same, but just to try to for clarity and transparency updating here what the priority network is.

And then, again, I I have exactly the same table that was presented in 2025 with annotations in terms of what actually happened. So this is just providing an overview of each project that we presented to be installed last year. And a lot most of them were completed. Some of them were not completed in their entirety, and some were deferred altogether. And and in the interest of time, I'm happy to come back to this, but I'm not gonna go through each one at this time.

And then this next slide is what actually took place last year. So this includes everything that was on the previous slide that was completed as well as things that were not on the previous slide that we did also complete. I'm happy to provide clarity on that if it's helpful. Next slide, we have the twenty twenty six planned installation. So this includes the Elm Beacon Connector project as well as a series of annual streets reconstruction projects, the Broadway reconstruction project, the Pearl Street project, and, a small section that is part of an intersection project on Washington Street.

Justin, you're on mute.

Yeah. You're muted, Justin.

Justin. Sorry about that.

Can you

hear me now?

Yes. We can.

Hear you now. Thank you. So here's the 2027 plan. It includes the annual streets reconstruction project as well as a series of quick builds on Foley Street, Medford Street, Summerville Ag, and Washington Street. And then this last section here is the multiyear plan for the rest of the priority network.

Again, I'm happy to talk in more specifics about any of these items, but I don't wanna go to the whole table right now. And, you know, just, again, in the interest of transparency, just pointing out this note that we've added here that, you know, given our current staff resources, we we do not anticipate that we'll be able to fully complete this list by the 2030. And then here's a summary table. I know there's a lot of tables, but this presents, you know, what was constructed pre 2025, and then each year planned, you know, actually completed and planned. And then the last section being the remaining to construct that's not included in the the two plans presented.

So that represents the the 28.79 miles of the priority network. Cost estimate. We've provided a cost estimate per quick build miles. So this doesn't include projects that are gonna be constructed by capital projects. But, approximately, again, it it does vary.

But on average, how much it costs us for for staffing consultants for planning and implementation, installations, and and operations and maintenance. So DPW staff equipments to maintain the lanes and then also the the physical materials that we assume are redone approximately every five years. And then we've taken that per mile estimate and then just applied it to the mileage totals for each year. So, you know, this this represents the same cost per mile, but you're just seeing the summary in total cost per year. And and we've just done a simple escalation of our our '22 '24 analysis to 2026.

So we're not sort of escalating at this point for future years, but, you know, as we present these, we'll we'll increase based on what we're what we're experiencing. And then lastly, the report piece about pedestrian and transit infrastructure. I promise this is the last table. The the left column here is each sort of infrastructure goal for the vision zero plan that has specific infrastructure called out. And then on the right is our 2025 progress.

They'll match up perfectly in the years since we published the plan. You know, the the ways and and what we construct has changed a lot, so we've tried to match them up in buckets as as well as we can across the two. And and generally speaking, you know, for the most part, we're we're meeting the goals that are listed in the vision zero plan. And that concludes my presentation. I'm happy to go into detail. I know there was a lot of information. Happy to go into detail on anything else that was presented here. Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks, Justin. Thanks for, yeah. I I love this time of year when we get this presentation, especially at the chair of traffic and parking because you you know, we talked a lot about you know? Like, it just feels good to see the data.

It's just like, this is completed. This is happening. So it's it's always great. And I have said this to to director Rosslyn in the past. Wouldn't it be great if, like, we started every, you know, open house or, you know, the meetings we do when to get input and feedback from the community when we you know, with these intersection improvements or whatever and just, like, start with, here's what we accomplished.

You know? Because it is it's just like you know? I think it just it's it's easy to forget. Right? Then just to focus on the one project or what didn't work and how you want the thing to be perfect, and we didn't get all the things we want. And but, yeah, looking at the big picture, this is really great. Thank you, Justin. Yeah.

No. Thank you, chair, and thank you, Justin. This is enormous amount of work and heavy lifting, so appreciate the time and the effort and, yeah, your commitment to really building an integrated city. Yeah. I have a lot of a lot of question, but I guess the first quick one I'm wondering is go to, like, I think slide number five.

You know, the updated priority network, you know, increased from, like, you know, 28.45 miles to 28.75 miles with some projects redesigned for better connectivity. So I guess, you know, like, how does the city evaluate whether these changes improve safety, you know, and usability for cyclists?

Sure. Perhaps I can offer a quick first response to that question. And counselor, you know, you're you're reading our minds. We struggle with this tension all the time between our adopted citywide bike network plan and our commitment to meaningful local engagement with every single project that we do. And as counselors will remember, when the city was preparing our bike network plan back in '21 and '22 and '23, there even community members started to talk about this tension and say, production is the most important thing.

The most important thing we can do is build the maximum mileage everywhere. And at staff level, we respectfully pushed back a little bit and said, we think that we can do both things. We can increase our production rates, and we can hold ourselves to standards of transparency and engagement street by street. And so that bike network plan really does commit us to meaningful local engagement. Typically, it takes fifteen or sixteen months for one of our projects to go through community engagement, flyering, door knocking, open houses, pop up events, surveys, public meetings, specialty outreach with priority populations, which include young people, older adults, communities of color, populations for whom English is a second language.

And we have found that that commitment to process is helping us actually with our production targets. But getting to the core of your question, counselor, in the case of West Broadway, as Justin noted, the folks who were showing up, which was a broad and representative group of West Somerville presidents, really did prioritize two directions of safe separated bike travel even though our network plan only called for one direction. And so we were responsive, and we figured out that the street was wide enough to do all the things that we wanted, in terms of prioritizing bus movements and getting safe separated bike lanes in two directions. So that's when the mileage goes up. But as Justin could tell you, and maybe I can hand the mic over to him, chair, we found something different in our local engagement process for the Western Pearl Street project that Justin managed.

Maybe, Justin, you can can summarize that one.

Sure.

Yes. You know, you I mean, they're they're very different streets, and a lot of this can be driven just by, you know, how wide the street is itself. And on Pearl Street, you know, providing the two directions for the full length would have meant eliminating all curbside access entirely along Pearl Street. And through, you know, our first meeting and and other forms of outreach. I think we, you know, we saw that that was likely to produce, you know, negative outcomes in even in terms of safety, whether that's people driving up and parking on the sidewalk or stopping in the middle of the roadway.

And we knew there was a lot of different, you know, needs for curbside parking, so not just not just resident parking, but there's very popular sort of destination restaurants there. There is the Pearl Street Park residence, which has a lot of home health care workers that come in and and are usually from outside of Somerville. And then, you know, crucially, with the the street grid itself, we had an opportunity to use the Gilman Street neighbor way, an existing popular low stress route, which largely parallels Pearl Street to, you know, replace part of that connection using those side streets, make some improvements on Skilton Ave and in Ed Brothers Park and, you know, provide what we felt was a reasonable alternative where, you know, whereas on Broadway, the street network is not quite the same, and there really was not a reasonable alternative that could be provided. And then continuing that connection up to Medford Street, even though it was it was only called for one direction in the plan, provides that continuous two way connection to the section to the the bike facility on School Street and really sort of knits together this this network around Gilman Square in the Central Hill campus.

Wow. So

it's it's pretty much project you know, it this is what we learn when we actually do the work and not we're not just drawing lines on a paper. It there's a lot lot more information that comes out.

Yeah. No. Absolutely. Yeah. No. Thank you. It's it's like these are, like, very, very complex, you know, like and also, like, boots on the ground, you learn a lot. You know? Just so when the rubber meets the road, then you see how things change. I guess, if you go one slide down, you know so in in 2025, several planned bicycle lane projects, you know, you can see that they were marked not completed, you know, including portions of Medford Street and Washington Street.

I guess, what were the main obstacles to completion, and how would those lessons inform the 2026 construction season?

Sure. I'm happy to to answer that question. So the the three towards the top, the yellow on McGrath and then the Medford Street, they're all a little bit related because they are we're we're talking about McGrath Highway and and the frontage roads from McGrath Highway. The first line, McGrath Highway from Roofer Road to Broadway, that was a part of the Mastod's, McGrath Highway resurfacing that I believe began in 2022. And, you know, essentially,

they didn't

complete about, you know, just over a third of a mile, and that's that's primarily due to bridge work that's ongoing to this day. So the the Squires Bridge that takes McGrath over into Cambridge and then also the bridge over the green green line, the low line next to Highland Ave. There remains, you know, partial closures on those bridges today because of structural issues that are being repaired. So, essentially, that resurfacing project was not quite completed by the state, and that's that's why we're left with a little bit less. And then the other two, the other this, the first one, the Medford Street, McGrath Highway ramp, Prospectilda, Somerville Ave.

That's the down ramp from about Highlight Ave to Somerville Ave. And then the next line is the frontage road, you know, also called Medford Street from Poplar to Linwood where the Mercedes Benz dealership is. And and, again, you know, one of the reasons why this is not prioritized because of a lot of the the approvals that have to be gained by the state. It can be fairly difficult and fairly time intensive. And a decision was made probably through the year that that given McGrath Boulevard's progress that that with that project, you know, expected to break ground, hopefully, 2027, 2028, that we would, you know, pry prioritize focusing on the McGrath Boulevard project versus trying to convince the state to allow us to to remove a lane on that down ramp, which, you know, had the potential to have some traffic impacts at Washington Street and, focus on a couple other projects that appear on the next slide.

On the bottom there, the Washington Street, that that's a construction project that that just didn't make the cut last year, and you'll see it does appear, on the the next slide. I believe drainage work has already been completed. So, you that know, was just a construction project that didn't couldn't quite get completed in 2025.

Gotcha. No. That's super helpful.

Yeah.

Thank you. That's helpful information. I guess, you know, one last question that I have and then, you know, again, I mean, this we can keep going around here. There's just a lot of stuff. I'm looking, going through various slides.

It's just so much. I guess the fact that you guys, you know, you said it here, and it's also, like, in the report, you know, that, you know, the city will need to extend the timeline for completion. You know? They're completing the priority network beyond 2030 due to staffing engagement timelines and funding constraint, which, you know, makes sense. But I guess the question I have is, like, kinda like what steps or specific steps, you know, is the administration taking to avoid delays, you know, and accelerate implementation?

Because, again, this is we already know that this you've said it, but what is, like, that I just wanna understand, you know, what is that plan, you know, because you've already identified, like, you know, what the issues are. So what is your plan, you know, to be able to, you know, avoid that and accelerate implementation?

Chair, I'm happy to attempt to answer that question. And and, counselor, thanks for cutting to the heart of the matter. This is part of what keeps us up at night is knowing that we established really ambitious community goals through our vision zero action plan, through our bicycle network plan. We codified them in ordinance, and they were assuming certain resources could be available. And I do wanna identify a couple of things on your question, counselor.

Although everybody focuses on, like, mobility division staff and engineering staff who are responsible for community engagement and design development and construction management, the same logic applies to our operations partners in parking department, in DPW, in fire, and even in other parts of the city administration. We can encounter bottlenecks in communication, procurement, law, IT, in addition to those street management departments. So I just wanted to paint that broader picture for a moment, but I will also remind counselors and community members that, you know, this is not a surprise. Mobility division has used our visibility, our leadership, and our soapbox in partnership with the council to try to secure additional resources for some of our sister departments. And with your support, we've been successful.

We got an extra three laborers at the DPW to try to take care of street sweeping, snow fighting, flex post replacement. We got an extra staff person at the parking department so we could actually manage our curb spaces more effectively. We work with you all to pursue grant resources to get traffic signal upgrade resources to keep fire engines moving on our traffic calmed streets. And so those are just a couple of important examples that that's not always about the fact that mobility wasn't able to expand. And yet to cut back to the original question, chair, it has been several years since mobility has been able to expand our staff.

People are working around the clock. We all do work more than we ought to and more than most peer agencies would allow their staff to in order to try to deliver projects, and yet there are so many nonproject responsibilities that we have. So I think we're doing a better job, counselor, of telling those stories in the community than we used to be. If we were to divert all of our resources away from the analytics, from coalition building, from program management development review, then perhaps we could squeeze in a few more hours for staff planners and mobility division to try to lead a design process and prepare designs for another safe streets project. But that would not be my recommendation to the mayor or to the council or to our constituents.

We think that we've got a really good balance right now, for the staff that we have, for our community members. In terms of resource constraints, we talked earlier this evening about how we've always needed to pursue external financing knowing that the city can't pay for everything. We have an incredible track record of pursuing and winning grants, working with our congressional and state delegation partners on earmarks and other programs. And just earlier today, I was talking with some of our grants staff about, you know, yet another example of that. So I think we're doing everything that we can in this era of constrained resources to make sure that we've got the funding needed to continue building out these safe streets.

But I don't wanna shy away from the fact that that that, you know, belts are tightening right now. And we hope for better days, and we hope for stabilization of the international and national and local economies. But, yeah, we're we're not quite as unconstrained as we were just a couple years ago, and we view the value of this conversation with our partners in the city council. It's just an important opportunity, to be honest about that. We will always partner with our safe streets advocates, our residents who tell us they feel unsafe on our streets, those who are frustrated with what they perceive as slow pace of change, and we will remind them that we're all in this together. There's only so many hours in the day, so many hour and so many dollars in our budgets, and that we're gonna we're gonna keep going because this is a long term this is this is a long term coalition and a long term strategy.

Thank you. We all hope for better days, director Razin, and we all serve at the pleasure of our constituents. Thank you, madam chair.

Well, thank you, constable council Wheeler.

Thank you, chair, and thank you, director Rawson. And sorry, Justin. I didn't catch your title. Senior Transportation

Senior Transportation. Planner.

Oh, planner. Okay. Thanks. I just wanna thank you, planner Schreiber. I I appreciate so much about your work and about this presentation.

One of the things I I really appreciate your focus on the details of what's needed on this street versus this other street by these residents, these, you know, abutting businesses and facilities and buildings like Pearl Street Park. I think that that really matters. I've I've certainly heard from, many residents of of Pearl Street Park, in the past about how important it is to them to be able to have people who might be coming to, to do caregiving there, or who might be visiting people in Pearl Street Park to have parking. And and I know there's always there's always a trade off, of the different competing needs of the streets. It's never it's never an easy answer, but I I really appreciate your consideration for those needs.

I had a couple of questions about the presentation. Some of them were just my sort of understanding some of the details of what it's communicating, and I and I wonder, if I could ask a few of these. One, clerk, if you wouldn't mind going to slide six, that I think is the 2025 sort of review. So I was I was curious about this one, about the McGrath miles. Was it Summerville that that did those, 2.37 miles? Was that MassDOT?

I'm sure it's the MassDOT project of which the two point o three is what was completed.

The I see.

2.37 is what we estimate that the total would have been.

Okay.

It's a MassDOT project.

Thank you. I appreciate all of the the miles that we put in, and I

you

know, trying to trying to get a sense of what our sort of practical capacity is, for how much we're able to make, each year. With the, I think, the 2026 projection, is that, slide nine oh, yeah. Is that thank you. The the 1.96 priority miles, that's sort of the combined legs of the Elm Beacon connector. Is that is that the same kind of linear measurement that sort of anybody would do? Is that counting two different bike lane directions separately?

I'm sure through you. So we measure by bike lane centerline mile. Mhmm. So, you know, a bike lane on both sides of the street for one mile is is two bike lanes and your miles.

Thank you. I appreciate that. That helps me understand that that number. On slide 14, yeah, I'm always excited to see sidewalk and accessible curb ramp construction. I know that's something that, you know, there's so many different things that we have need for in the city, and I appreciate all the balancing that I know that your office is doing.

And I certainly hear from people, especially people who have mobility issues getting around, how important sidewalks where, you know, we're resolving cracks, we're resolving holes, are. And, you know, for people with other with who may be in wheelchairs or otherwise need, curb ramps, how important those are. And I was just curious about, you know, if there's some examples of spots in the city where that work was done at 2025.

I'd share it through you. Yes. So we're primarily not referring to DPW's repair of of individual panels and areas. Mhmm. These are projects that engineering undertakes as a part of the streets package program.

So projects that aren't categorized as complete street projects, but are are just full street reconstructions or just sidewalk reconstructions. I believe and and Brad can correct me if I'm wrong here, but in 2025, that included, Otis Street in East Summerville, which was an example of a street that was, you know, really put back as it as it exist existed previously, but with new sidewalks, and I believe that that street was paved as well. That's the first one that comes to mind.

Thank you so much. Yeah. One thing I was wondering about sort of in general is, you know, I know with streets where we're planning, much more fundamental, you know, reworking of the street and, you know, here one that comes to mind is much of Highland Ave. And I I know that's on some of these some of these charts as a as a future project. I'm curious how we approach those in the meantime.

And, you know, I I know that we don't have the resources to patch every, every area of broken asphalt in the city. But, you know, I noticed, certainly many other people, notice and and reach out to me about, the sort of broken the unusually broken state of some stretches of Highland Ave. And, you know, I'm just curious how how your office balances the sort of, you know, the the long term plans to improve, in which case, you don't necessarily want to to spend a bunch of money and time sort of patching something that we might be going to tear tear up again in six months. But, you know, taking into account, you know, some of the sort of frequency of use, taking into account the the time it may be until some of these projects. Just curious how you approach that balance.

Jerry, I'm happy to answer that question as best we can. And, our apologies that director of engineering, Brian Postalaid, who'd been a critical partner in this work, could not be here this evening with you. He sent his regrets. So Brian's team manages the city's pavement management program. And kind of a quick nutshell, counselor, as you may be familiar, is every year, Brian's staff and consultant team survey approximately one third of the entire city's street miles and sidewalk condition, and we use that data to make sure that we're calibrating our programmed spending to upgrade those sidewalks and those streets.

But asset management is not the only factor in that calculation and that multiyear investment plan. You acknowledge street usage. That is actually a really important input to Brian's model. So we look at land uses like schools. We look at pedestrian traffic generators like high frequency bus stops.

We look at parks, senior housing, grocery stores as other important components of evaluating. If you have two streets that are identical in their pavement condition, identical in their sidewalk condition, but one of them is likely to serve greater volumes of multimodal users, we will likely prioritize that one. So, just painting a quick picture on the methods. Highland Avenue is one of many streets that has been evaluated and had been identified for larger scale capital upgrades for quite some time. We were anticipating full sewer separation, water service upgrades, etcetera, as part of the Spring Hill project a couple of years ago.

I know that one of Brian's current workflows is to reevaluate, some of those inputs and figure out if we are still planning on doing that larger scale work. Because as you acknowledged, counselor, if there is near term work happening with gas, water, or sewer, then it's really important that the city is honest about the pros and cons of investing certain amounts of money in the short term. But in our perfect workflow, which I would identify Western Washington Street as a great example near the Argenciano School, our engineering division was able to get ahead of that asset management equation. We knew that this pavement was, you know, approaching these depreciation curves where it's gonna start failing. We knew that the sidewalks were crumbling.

We knew that from a land use and a demographic standpoint, it was a priority network. And so we got ahead of things. We worked with Eversource Gas and said, please accelerate this on your investment list. We worked with city water and sewer departments to say, let's investigate and start to plan out upgrades to the water system. Our residents down in that neighborhood had to live through a couple of painful years of utility construction before mobility was able to deliver the community design process that ultimately produced the fun stuff, the widened sidewalks, the floating bus stops, the separated bike lanes, and the fresh coat asphalt, to kinda top it all off.

And so whether we are able to deliver that kind of integrated tool kit on some of our crumbling streets, you know, parts of Summer Street come to mind. It's not just Highland Avenue, even though that's one that that many of us talk about because we experience it. There are so many other corridors, that I know Brian and his team are trying to juggle. If it's okay, Cher, my recommendation would be that we speak about that with the subject matter experts in the engineering division. I don't wanna get too far far ahead of them on specific streets.

Cher, if if it's okay, I just wanted to add that, you know, for more stand alone repairs, DPW can and does, you know, repair sidewalk panels. In fact, I saw them from the bus on Highland Ave just, just, you know, a couple weeks ago in front of, the Butcher near Lowell Street. So that that's a good place for, you know, directing those those sort of one off, no matter on on what street they appear on.

Thank you, planner and director. And to the chair, if I could ask just a few more, the same family of questions. One thing, and and this also sort of, relates to the next item on the agenda. One thing I've been interested in is the question of how, how we are approaching signaling around bicycles. And, you know, for example, I've noticed that coming south on McGrath and reaching Pearl Street, there's a signal that's intended just for bicycles.

I I don't know if that's administered by MasDOT or or by us. Personally, I find it a bit confusing. It seems it seems like a red light that applies to cars. So I you know, I I'm curious about I know there's lots of different ways that signaling, to communicate to bicycles can work. I'm wondering if there is sort of a a specific approach that we are taking or converging on or we're trying a variety of different approaches to signaling.

Chair chair three. I'm happy to take the question, and that's a very good example of that bicycle signal of how, with all due respect to the state of how not to do bicycle signals. And one of the limitations we have is with the MUTCD, which is the the manual on uniform traffic control devices, which really, ensures uniformity on the streets all around the country. And a new version of that was published within the last year and, you know, really significantly tamped down on the use of those signals. You will notice that that signal is only green when it's it is the only thing that is green, and that is one of the requirements of the new MUTCD, which is that there can be no conflicts with a bike if you're gonna use a bicycle signal face.

And that, it essentially means it has to run on its own. So in terms of guidelines that we use and we're promoting the use of bicycle signals, I think it really has to add value for us to not have bicyclists use just standard vehicle signals. Some of those cases can be when we're able to offer protected concurrent signaling. So folks may be familiar with concurrent in the the form of pedestrian signals where if you're going straight, pedestrians are also going allowed to cross the street at the same time. It's very common in the city of Cambridge.

We have a couple of those as well. One of the ways we're able to improve upon that is if we do have a right turn lane, we can hold those right turns with a red with a red light and allow pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles to travel straight through an intersection all at the same time without having that conflict. So that's a very good example of good use of a bike signal. And if anyone has done, you know, some looking at what Massoud is proposing for the McGrath Boulevard project, you'll notice there are, in fact, a number of right turn lanes, and that's exactly what they intend to do is use bicycle signals in a way that makes the intersection work a little more efficiently. When we don't have space for that, you know, our recommendation for MassDOT is generally to to not use those signals.

There are some cases where a short bike signal makes sense. In many cases, what you will see is very, very poor compliance with with that sort of signal system mainly because you're forcing people on bike to wait multiple minutes and then giving them, you know, under ten seconds to get through an intersection. So we're a little restricted by the federal guidelines, and, you know, the the the engineers that design our street need to conform to that. So we're we're focused on using them really only where they add value and otherwise foregoing the use of them.

Thank you, Planner. And, just on the subject of the McGrath redesign, a following up on a conversation that we had, some meetings ago, I just really appreciate your office's communication with MasDOT about those plans and advocacy for, for sensible and safe design. It's it's very encouraging and reassuring to know that that you're having those conversations with them. Just if I could just two more little ones, one and this is something that director Ross and I have chatted with you in the past about. I'm curious about the wide variety of speed hump height in the city.

And I know there are places where there's some deliberateness around the variety, and I know there have been in the past sometimes that contractors have not quite matched what our intention was. I'm I'm curious in particular, you know, when I think of some of the the most dramatic pumps, for example, on Morrison Street, I'm just not always sure Was that a deliberate decision? We've gotta have really, really aggressive bumps here. You know, for example, it's near a school. Or is that more of a result of some leeway on the part of contractors?

Chair, through you. Thanks, counselor. And if it's okay, Justin or Maddie, it might be helpful to bring up the final slide of the safe streets ordinance presentation, which deals with traffic calming commitments in the city's visions or our action plan. So, while that comes out, you know, counselor, yeah, it's a good question. You and I have spoken about it, and many community members have as well.

The city built our first speed humps in kinda twenty nineteen, twenty twenty. And at the time, we didn't have a ton of experience. However, we did have a legitimate problem to solve. Three residents on our streets were killed crossing the street in marked crosswalks by speeding drivers in hit and run collisions. And we took those losses very, very seriously as an administration and as a community, and we began experimenting and scaling our physical traffic calming program from there.

As with any new intervention counselor, we were gonna get certain things right and certain things wrong with those first couple of efforts. And the first generation of speed humps that you're describing typically were a little bit larger than the later generations, and we did notice that we were that our contractors were also having some quality control issues in locations where after consultation with some of our operations partners, including the fire department, we were anticipating smaller profiles. We were getting larger profiles or vice versa. Working with local residents and board counselors, we were expecting larger speed ups and getting smaller ones. Slowly but surely, counselor, we have been able to improve quality control and start to get better consistency with the both the height and the shape.

I wanna be very clear, Chair. The design intent for the city's traffic calming program is to achieve a slow, safe, consistent 18 to 20 mile per hour driving speed, Posted speed limits on most of our neighborhood streets, even many of our intermediate, volume streets is 20 miles per hour, and that can be achieved with certain speed hump frequency and certain speed hump shape and profile. Think about the difference, counselor, between Western Powderhouse Boulevard, where Allison Donovan was killed on the front steps of the West Elmira neighborhood school in 2019 versus the East Side closer to the community gardens, Tufts Campus, and, Dougherty's Funeral Home. That is a perfect study in contrasts. That's my neighborhood.

I'm there all the time. I observe traffic there all the time in all modes, and a slow, consistent 18 to 20 mile per hour drive speed is achieved on the East Side closest to Dougherty's and the circle. On the West Side, closest to the school, you do have certain temptations for people to step on the gas and then mash on the brakes. And we do hear from constituents who say that the noise impacts of bottoming out vehicles is a burden and a nuisance. So I'm happy that we've been able to get better with the planning, specifications, coordination with our operations teams at DPW and fire over the years.

We've been able to get better with the coordination with our contractors. But the last story I'll tell on this topic, counselor, just to illustrate our commitment to doing this work right, just last year in 2025, our contractor was constructing speed humps on Dane Street, and Dane Street had been specifically identified by our partners in the fire department as an important response route. And as a result, the plan was for smaller, lower profile speed humps that would allow for slightly higher drive speeds. Contractor goofed up in the field. We learned about it that day, called the fire department officials that day, and we said, this is not intentional.

Our contractor will correct this error. They were directed to do something different. Within another twenty four hours, contractor was back. They were not particularly happy about it, and we had to pay for this mistake. But they removed those incorrect speed humps. And then seven days later, we got the asphalt crew back. They came back. They built them properly. And so I I I hope that those anecdotes, chair, are helpful for the committee and for our community members to understand, the intent of our speed hump program. And I do wanna end by kind of reiterating, speed humps save lives.

There's no question. Somerville has celebrated three consecutive years without a fatal crash on our streets, all of '25, all of '24, and all of '23. And the rapid scaling, but the responsible scaling of our physical traffic quality program really is the the dominant theme here. It's not about enforcement. It's not about education. It's not about individual behavior. It's about designing and building streets that really limit the opportunities for dangerous speeding behavior.

Thank you so much, director. I'll I'll, I'll stop there with a lot of appreciation. And just as a callback, I'm sure you remember the very first time you and I met was, at a community meeting where I shared with you that my daughter had been hit by a car. Thankfully, she she was okay, and she is okay. But that was, you know, on the community path crossing Cedar Street. And I I live closer to another stretch of the community path near to Sycamore and school, and I I think the speed humps that are on Sycamore make a big difference in the safety of people crossing the community path there. So thanks so much for all your work.

Yeah. Yeah. Thank you, councilor Wheeler. And, indeed, thank you, director Ross and and all your team for your hard work. And that's exactly what I tell, you know, constituents. You we're, like, sometimes, you know, frustrated with, like, the very high you know? Actually, I had no idea this was very, very informative. So it now it all makes sense that yeah. Like, so we used to construct them. Like, we used to have higher construct higher speed humps.

But, yeah, we are yeah. Like, so so nowadays more, you know, like, this analysis and checking with different departments to make sure we construct the speed hump that will meet the needs of the street. Great. But, yeah, just to say, like, I use the data. Like, that's what the data is showing.

It means that it works. Yeah. And I was gonna ask a question about Highland Highland Ave, and thank you for speaking to that. And I'm sorry for adding that. Director is the person to have with for this conversation.

Unfortunately, he's not here tonight, but maybe you can put in a different order to discuss it. I will say that that's now that the construction season has started, everyone is asking about Highland Ave. So it's important to have the, to hear from Mobility. I think hearing also from the actual from engineering would be very helpful here. I think now they've been on the council for, like, for the third year now.

I understand the challenges. That's something we, as a council, have always pushed for, which is coordinating all these projects. It makes sense financially, but, also, you know, we can't be, you know, digging up the street over and over and over. So, again, that's, we will make sure to have that conversation with director post await, a later time. Counselor Mbah.

Oh, thank you, Maratia. I know the. I just wanted to double down on the the the expression that speed home saves lives, because I have heard that a lot, and I've also heard people criticizing that. And so I I feel like we should have, like, a billboard in Davis Square. So welcome to speed city. You know? Something just you know, we gotta celebrate something, you know, because it's it's something that we have to be proud of. You know? I know somebody, even my own neighbor, they came and knocked on my door and said, like, when are we gonna change some of it to Spear Home City or something? Like, I I don't know.

I wasn't sure if I should take that as a compliment or something. You know? It's like, sometime, I I'm never I I so I I try not to ask, and then I say, oh, thank you for bringing it to my attention. And then I and then I cannot because you can tell, like, I can tell that it you know, they don't bike or something. Right? And I'm not sure. Like, don't quote me. But it the question I wanted to ask is, did you get signed up from the firefighters, you know, when you're building these speed homes?

Chair, through you, I think there's a longer conversation coming, and I'm happy to provide just a very quick answer on this important topic. The quick answer is that the city works through all of its departments on interdepartmental review for all of our street designs. That coordination work occurs with relevant department heads and division heads from many departments, including fire, DPW, parking, engineering, and others. And I did not mention it in my answer previously, chair, but I will quickly note, that there are streets where city staff have evaluated traffic data and speeds and constituent complaints and concerns and recommended higher, more aggressive speed humps. And our partners at the fire department have asked us to use smaller, shorter ones because of the importance of that specific street on their day to day operations.

It is not the intent of city staff from one department to make another department's life harder. It is the intent of mobility division, engineering division, and all of us to save lives in all of our own ways and respect on how hard everybody's job is in this process. So, again, we look forward to those longer conversations, but we approach them with humility.

Understood. Thank you. And I thought so too. I will leave it there. Thank you, doctor Rasen.

Yeah. Thank you, director. Are there any other questions before we mark this work as we're completed? Okay. Seeing none. We will mark this item as, work completed.

Sure. Thanks to you and the committee. I know that discussion got heavy and deep. And if anybody wants to, you know, find some of the the happier statistics, again, that City Vision Zero web page has crash statistics, speed statistics, engagement statistics. Thank you as always for your partnership on this committee to help us do this work.

Okay. Great. And now our next item, clerk, could you please read item number five?

Agenda item five, a resolution by councilor Ewan Campan that the director of mobility pilot the installation of dedicated bicycle yield signals to operate during the walk cycle at several intersections throughout the city, including Washington Street and Somerville Avenue and Prospect Street and Somerville Avenue.

Chair, through you, Justin answered this question a little bit in our last discussion after one of councilor Wheeler's questions. So just to reiterate, city does follow federal guidelines. Those federal guidelines changed recently, and and the federal guidelines really make it hard for, staff engineers or consulting engineers to formally sign off on this specific signal pattern, that this council order requests. As a result, city staff from engineering, from mobility, are looking at other ways to try to provide better mobility at intersections for people biking. But at this time, we do not anticipate a path forward to pursue this type of signal strategy.

Great. Are there any questions about this update? So Wheeler.

Thank you, chair. I just feel, you know, the awareness sometimes of not knowing enough to be able to ask a good question. This is something where I'm not familiar with what these yield signals would be like exactly. You know? So I yeah.

I'm appreciating the answer, that, you both, director and planner, gave to my question about the sort of overall approach before. I'm just sort of curious to to know a little bit more and not knowing quite what questions to ask about this. If there are yield signals like the one that counselor Ewenkampin described that are anywhere else in the Boston area sorry. I don't have a better question to ask.

No. No. Please, through your chair, we are always looking at our peer cities to figure out where creative solutions can be brought to the table even if federal guidance is less progressive or or or just a little little out of step with what we're all trying to achieve. I do not know any examples, counselor, of that specific type of application. I think we have all seen lots of behavior in Somerville and elsewhere where people biking sometimes come to a complete stop and then advance cautiously and respectfully during a pedestrian walk phase.

We understand this order to be requesting the installation of an extra signal head It specifically says that bike riders may heel may proceed while yielding to pedestrians. But, again, that is the type of signal that is prohibited under current federal guidance.

Thanks. And if you don't mind a sort of connected question, I I know we've also chatted in the past about the sort of delicate question of the the minority of, ebikes on the community path that go, dangerously fast relative to the the density of other people walking on the path. I'm just curious to to hear if you have any thoughts on any signaling sort of in the spirit of this resolution that that could or or couldn't be useful.

Sure. If it's okay, I guess I would respectfully recommend that we tackle this question, in the context to one of the other orders that this committee has in the box at a future meeting related

to I was just sharing the past. Director. Yeah. That's great. I do appreciate that. Yeah. We actually, constantly will have an item in committee, where we get updates from, from the mobility division regarding, yeah, like, the improvements on the community path. So I think it's a different conversation. It's not you know?

Thank you, Sarah. Yeah.

It's related, obviously, but I think just, yeah, looking at the time, I'm happy to try and, schedule it before we go on recess so we can, get an update on that.

And, Cher, and we will make sure to have another one of our amazing senior planners in the mobility division, Viola Augustine, who's been leading a a team working on community path safety improvements. So not not trying to avoid your question, counselor. Just hoping to have it in a longer form. Thanks.

Yeah. We always like when city staff come prepared and, you know, ready for us to ask questions. So that's the format we use. Alright. So with that, we'll mark if I know oh, is he coming back?

Thank you, Marache. I think this is gonna be much more of a broader conversation down the road because I just want us to, I mean, to ask director Rosson. I mean, like, for the longest time, I've just been wondering the concept of us of, like, this unit flow with cars and bike in one direction and just how dangerous it could be that you're biking and you're trying to look around, put your hand in this way instead of biking in the opposite direction where you can see a car and kind of, like, really know how to avert an accident. Like so is that something, you know, for a future consideration for us to start thinking about, like, what is, like, the the appropriate safe way? You know?

Just remember when we're kids, you don't bike in front of cars.

Chair, for you, yes, that does also sound like a timely and helpful conversation. It reminds me of the neighbor way street type that our bike network plan identifies, in terms of lower volume, lower speed streets where folks can share a little bit more safely. So that's one example of that. Another example, as the counselor and I were were speaking about at school drop off, this morning, was time restricted, one way conversions that several of our streets have to try to try to organize traffic and reduce conflicts with kiddos, who are walking or biking or scooting or or driving and getting dropped off to schools. So, again, longer conversation, and and we'd love to be able

to have that with you all.

Alright. Great. Thanks, director. So with that, we'll mark this item as we're completed. And, that brings us to our last item, item number six. Clerk, could you please read that item?

Yes. Agenda item six, a resolution by councilor Clayton that the director of mobility evaluate opportunities for improved pedestrian safety at the intersection of Broadway and Main Street.

Chair, thank you for you. This is something that councilor Klingon and I and other councilors at large have spoken about many times over the years. We definitely appreciate the order. We definitely feel president's pain in terms of some of these bigger intersections on higher volume, higher speed streets like Broadway. As many of you know, that is a really unique and challenging intersection in part because of the angle at which Main Street hits Broadway.

In recent years, Chair, our your recent months, I should say, our work is actually focused on improving safety through small scale traffic signal tweaks and operations and equipment upgrades that would actually reduce the wait times. One of the things that we have identified at that location is that there is has been an excessively long signal cycle, partly because there is a private driveway for an apartment building that enters into the middle of the intersection, and we get triggered every time even if nobody was using it. When long signal cycles exist, you can create incentives for motorists to run red lights, to take illegal right turns on red, which are particularly dangerous and uncomfortable at a elongated intersection like this one. And you can create incentives for people walking and wheeling, you know, pedestrians to cross against a signal. So I'm really happy to report, Chair, that just a couple of months ago, our engineering and mobility staff were able to work with our DPW teams, spend a little bit of money, upgrade some of our equipment at this intersection, and change out that operation so that driveway no longer gets called every cycle, which shortens the entire thing.

So small but meaningful, improvement in safety and accessibility and congestion relief at that neighborhood. But I don't want to, avoid talking about the the longer term challenges. We are interested in more substantial redesigns at this intersection that would truly reconfigure the intersection to make it work better for people walking, people biking, people catching a bus, and people driving. That would probably involve taking kind of that y shaped intersection and turning it into more of a t shaped intersection, but there's a long engineering and, process and a construction budget needed to do so. So this section of Broadway Chair is part of the city's five year street and sidewalk reconstruction plan that we mentioned earlier.

There is a great website that Brian's team maintains for that five year street sidewalk plan, where folks can look interactively at streets all over the city, and you'll see Broadway, around Main Street listed on there. We do not have a specific timeline within that five year plan for when that work would be scheduled, but it is our hope to get to that section of Broadway after we finish the current one, which is focused on that Magoon Square up to, Central Street section. So we will keep this location on our evaluation list. If opportunities to pursue changes sooner rather than later develop, we can update the councilor playing in and the whole council. But, again, just wanted to quickly respond to the order and set expectations for the time being. So happy to answer any questions. Thanks.

Okay. Thanks, director. Any questions from, my colleagues? Alright. Thanks, director, for, reaching out to the counselor, see if he has any further questions after this update. Alright. I see no questions. I will mark this item as we're completed. That brings us to the end of the agenda.

Care, if I may, just before you adjourn, we do need a roll call on agenda item three.

Okay. So can we do a roll call for to approve item three and adjourn at the same time?

Absolutely. So on approval for agenda item three that this council review construction related parking in the area of Oak Street and Bolton Street and on adjournment. Councilor Wheeler? Yes. Councilor Amba? Yes. Councilor Saeed?

Yes. We are adjourned. Alright. Thanks, everyone.

Thank you all. Much appreciated. Yep.