Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

e e e e

e e e e

e e e e

e e e the Planning Commission meeting of uh February 5th 2025 will come to order all rise for the Pledge of Allegiance pledge aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for it stands one nation God indivisible with liy and justice for all will the secretary please call rooll commissioner man here commissioner

Tolson here commissioner rice here Vice chairperson Kennedy here chairperson Chrisman here may I have a motion for approval of the agenda move to approve the agenda second a motion was made by commissioner rice with a second by commissioner tulson unless there are any objections the agenda stands approved may I have a motion for approval of the minutes we have no minutes we have no minutes yeah sorry the secretary will read the Declaration of conflict if any member of the Planning Commission may have a conflict of interest or any reason why that member must abstain from consideration of any matter on this agenda he or she should so declare at this time are there any Declarations of conflict this is the time allotted for public statements or comments on all items other than public hearing items is there anyone in the Chambers wishing to be heard we have one um Corey fromom can you please state your name and residence and you have three minutes Cory from seei Valley hello I'm Cory from due to a non-compliance under the Ralph m brown act I am requesting that the public hearing held on January 23rd 2025 5 regarding project title case number PDS 20234 be appealed this request for appeal of administrative decision is made on the specific grounds that the staff report which includes the notice of exemption attachment a stating the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act was not

accessible online for review 72 hours prior to the public hearing held on January 23rd 2025 as indicated in the public hearing notification which was mailed to homeowners the staff report was not available online when the link provider was clicked when clicked the website link provided rad page not found localities must be cognizant of posting each distinct cqa the California Environmental Quality act related decision discussed at public meetings on meeting agendas so as to give adequate opportunity for public participation as required under the m brown act and to avoid project risk from non-compliance also attachment a notice of exemption had already been signed in advance by the associate planner approving the project prior to the public hearing held on January 23rd 2025 it is my understanding that two Planning Commission members can request this appeal the request to appeal an administrative decision form on the SEI Valley website reads that the form must be completed and filed not later than 14 calendar days making the 14th calendar day February 6 2025 on October 21st 2019 mon homeowners voted on whether to install security gates or not it failed no Gates on April 7 2021 Mont homeowners voted on whether to install security gates or not it failed no Gates a super majority has never been reached which is my understanding which is a requirement of our ccnr the Monte was not Community was not going to be a gated community according to the developer no design was submitted nor was any approval provided for a gated community when the power goes out unexpectedly or when Southern California Edison has a public safety power shut off security gates will typically become inoperable due to the lack of electricity needed to run the

motor meaning you will need to manually Force the security gates open to gain access in another of Monti a huge inconvenience and possibly life-threatening unsafe in the event of a fire at which time the security gates would serve no purpose unfortunately the minutes from the January 23rd 2025 public hearing are unavailable however the hourlong recording is available I understand and I urge you all to take a listen to it thank you thank you any anybody else wishing to be heard is there any correspondence from the deputy director chairperson Chrisman no correspondence tonight thank you may I have a motion for approval of the consent calendar move to approve the consent calendar second a motion was made by commissioner rice with a second by commissioner tulson unless there's any objectives the consent calendar stands approved this is the time in place set for a public hearing on the cor consideration of PDs 2023 0010 TT 2023 00003 TPS 2024 00002 cups 2023 0015 and haa a aha 2023 005 are there any experte communication to report may I have an oral report on this matter by staff yes chairperson Chrisman members of the Planning Commission this is the public hearing for a long awaited um project at 4868 Cochran Street for a three-story 26 unit multif family townhouse project um proposed by City Ventures uh with the

presentation tonight is our associate planner Alex klingman good evening planning Commissioners the applicant City Ventures Home Building LLC requests approval of a plan development permit tenative tract map tenative parcel map and an affordable housing agreement to create a new parcel and construct a 26 unit multifam residential Town Home Development and a modification to the existing conditional use permit for a religious facility the affordable housing agreement falls under the city council's purview and will be reviewed at a later date the project site is located at 4 4868 Cochran Street the northern portion of the site facing Cochran Street is currently developed with a 5500t religious facility multi-purpose building and a playground the site is surrounded by a senior apartment complex to the West single family homes to the north and south and a religious facility to the east the property is owned by the Korean Baptist Church who plans to sell the vacant Southern portion of the site to the applicant outlined here in red to facilitate this the applicant proposes a tenative parcel map to divide the lot keeping the religious facility on parcel one and constructing the town homes on parcel 2 the 26 unit town home Community is proposed on the 1.2 acre Southern portion of the site which will be accessed by a shared driveway from Cochran Street the units will be spread amongst four buildings and a tenative tract map will subdivide the development to allow for the sale of the 26

units a total of 59 parking spaces are provided on site 49 of those spaces will be one or two car garages provided in each unit and an additional 10 uncovered parking spaces will be provided on driveways and street parking Within the development shown in yellow the project will also add approximately 11,800 ft of new Landscaping throughout the perimeter of the site along walkways and within private yards a common outdoor space will be located at the southwest corner which will include an active lawn area barbecue picnic tables and benches the site currently has 22 mature trees and 14 of them will be be removed none of which are oak trees the applicant will mitigate the loss by planting replacement trees of equal value throughout the Project's site or pay into the city's tree mitigation fund the buildings are each three stories excuse me and 38 ft tall and the design combines early California and aenda Architectural styles with red tile roofs and light colored stucco walls the design is broken up into two schemes scheme one will have darker colored accents under windows and darker colored garages and front doors while scheme 2 will have arched doorways and woodlike balcony sighting to reduce massing the entire development will include recess windows and varied roof forms with parapets and Eaves the units will be a mix of one to four bedrooms ranging in size from 725 ft to 1,710 Ft as shown on the

table all three of the one-bedroom units will be designated for qualified moderate income home buyers in exchange for receiving a density bonus and development incentives in compliance with State density bonus law the residential high zoning on the property allows 24 units at base density the applicant is providing three affordable units to achieve a density bonus of two more units this also qualifies the project for modified parking requirements one development concession and multiple waivers as long as the waivers do not impose a life or safety hazard the applicant is requesting the following six waivers the first waiver request is to reduce the required front yard setback from 43 ft to 3.5 ft at the North property line the required front setback is shown here in blue and the requested in red the second waiver request is to reduce the required sidey yard setback from 15 ft at the East property line as shown in blue to 9.8 ft shown in red the third waiver request is to reduce the required separation between buildings from 20 ft as shown in blue to 14 ft shown in red the fourth waiver request is to reduce the required minimum width of single car garages from 12T to 10 ft and 10 in the fifth waiver request is to wave the Kadota fig specific plan requirement

that restricts structures exceeding one story in height within 150 ft of the South property line the 150 ft distance is shown here in blue the applicant proposes to construct three-story buildings within 20 ft of the South property line those buildings are shown in red and the 20ft required setback is outlined in yellow for reference the sixth and final request is to wave the specific plan requirement that a 50-ft buffer be provided at the South property line which includes a 25- ft landscaped area and no structures on the remaining 25 ft of the buffer the image on the left shows the required 50-ft buffer outlining the required landscaped area in yellow the appc proposes a three-story structure within this buffer shown in red on the right and a 6-ft landscaped area including shrubs and trees along the southern property line shown in green a modification of the existing conditional use permit for the church site is required for the lot split and to allow access to the development which requires the removal of four parking spaces and the addition of a landscaped Island Additionally the original cup for the church site required upgrades to the modular building at the rear of the property in 2014 a building permit was issued to rehabilitate the building however the changes were never completed due to financial constraints and the permit has since expired to ensure that the modular building is completed this project is conditioned to resubmit plans for reapprovals and to install the missing

window awnings lattice patio cover and Architectural details on the building the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality act pursuant to squa section 15332 for infield development we would also like to note that PD condition a19 on page 31 of the report is not applicable to this project and was left in error staff will omit this condition on the resolution to city council staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the modification of the conditional use permit and tenative parcel map for the existing religious facility site and recommend to city council approval of the plan development permit and tenative tra map for the new town home development this concludes staff's presentation and we are available for any questions thank you thank you any questions of Staff okay with your permission yes person um can you tell me the distance to the nearest um bus stop I do not have that information off hand but I can certainly get that to you okay um and um I I I see a fire hydrant on the the symbol for the fire hydrant but I couldn't find the fire hydrant actually on the blueprints so the symbol's there but I couldn't find the fire hydrant and it's probably there I just didn't see it so I may have overlooked it do you know where that is where it's located on the property and

the only reason I'm asking is just the distance for the fire hydrant to the actual I I know this has to be conditioned through the fire department but I'm just just curiosity at this point commissioner rice we could also maybe follow up with that after the speaker's presentation that's F that's fine because the the applicant may know so I and I don't want to waste too much time on that um and the other thing which I may have missed but I didn't see in there are there any bicycle racks anywhere uh there are no proposed bicycle racks uh to my knowledge at this okay and then the reason why I asked that is because just about every other project like this that I've seen has at least some bicycle racks whether it's town homes or apartments or anything like that and since this is so far away from you know a store or anything like that you know the people would have to drive um or ride a bike so that's why I was asking that question um and that's it for right now I guess okay and just to answer your question um about the distance to the bus stop it is 0.2 miles to the nearest okay so it's the one in front of um uh what was Pine CRA used to be Pine Crest on Cochran and Kadota yeah okay all right okay commissioner Kennedy yeah just a real quick question in reading through this and I may have missed it as well uh the placement of Windows on the south border there uh was there mitigation efforts uh for Invasion to those properties to the South the applicant is maintaining the

8ot tall screen wall that is already existing there and implementing Landscaping there which would include trees okay so I didn't miss it then all right thank you I'm sorry did you are there two or three units set aside for the moderate income home buyers there are three units set aside okay thank you commissioner tulson uh are the one one-bedroom units all condensed or they're spread around they're all located within one building which I can pull up for you here they would all be located within building one down here thank you any more questions we will open the public testimony portion of the hearing would the applicant like to be to present a project so Alex is going to help me with the PowerPoint can you state your name please yes thank you good evening Commissioners my name is Eric Miller I'm the director of development at City Ventures it's good to see some of you again uh I'd like to thank you for the opportunity to present and discuss our proposed development project at 4868 Cochran Street I'd also like to thank Alex for the detailed staff report now to get started I just want to provide a little history on the project as you can see we started due diligence on this just over two years ago since then we've been through a number of submittal we've met with multiple neighborhood councils and we've worked extremely hard with City staff to ensure that the project I'm presenting tonight

uh is designed in a way that exceeds City standards and expectations as a refresher City Ventures founded in 2009 is one of the leading infield development companies in the state of California we've always been a solar all El electric home builder focusing on green and efficient building features that not only benefit the homeowner but benefit the city as well these are just a few examples of past City Ventures town home projects that we've built with similar architecture style as to the one we're proposing tonight here's just an aerial view of our site uh as you can see South of Cochran Street sits just behind the SEI Valley Korean Baptist Church uh it's in close proximity to the 118 freeway SEI Valley High School the community center and the Walmart shopping center this s's a perfect opportunity for housing Redevelopment as there's residential both to the north and to the south in 2021 well before City Venture started due diligence on this project the city updated its General plan and Zoning to residential high in this area that not only includes our site but several other sites along Cochran Street to my knowledge the Lighthouse Bible Church directly to the east is currently in the entitlement process with the city to be redeveloped into housing to the West is as mentioned the Senior Living Apartment that consists of 50 thre story for rent apartments and is Zone residential high I I'd also like to point out that the city identified our site in the in its latest housing element as a residential Redevelopment opportunity here's just a couple images of what the site's current conditions look like uh as you can see that's open land uh and overgrown shrubs as mentioned in the report there are 14 trees that will be removed as part of

our development but there will be at least 14 replacement trees planted throughout the community along with many other smaller accent trees most of the project details were covered in the staff report so I don't want to be repetitive I did however want to mention uh as soon as the community is completely built out it will be managed by a homeowners association so all streets perimeter walls exteriors of the buildings roofs landscape uh will be managed and maintained by the HOA here's another image of our site plan just kind of shows you the the entrance the building layouts Landscaping open space parking again the T this is our typical elevations which is a traditional Spanish architecture the buildings were designed with elevation popouts pitch roofs and arched entryways really to try and give it more of the traditional single family detached home feel to them this is just a close-up of the common open space um and really this this area is intended to give the members of the community an area to gather play with their kids bring their dogs uh just enjoy some some time outside and the imagery below just helps you visualize what area will look like as I mentioned as an all electric homeb Builder there are many benefits to the homeowner one of the main benefits is that there will be Absolut absolutely no gas to the site so all appliances will be electric which reduce the overall utility bills on top of that the solar panels are included with the purchase of the home so there are not any additional leases or payments so the homeowners experience uh substantial savings on their electric bills on day one um some other benefits all garages come pre-wired for Ev Chargers uh drought tolerant Landscaping throughout the community and every unit comes with five-star appliances as part of our

standards uh so there are no upgrades needed for that so with all that being said it's clear that this project is a positive step forward towards addressing the city's housing needs it aligns with the city's Vision Vision when they updated the housing element to include this site as a residential opportunity uh as well as updating their General plan and Zoning to high residential high in the area and it's simply a great opportunity to bring another beautiful new home Community to the city of SEI Valley this concludes my presentation I'm happy to answer any questions thank you thank you so much is there um are there any questions for the applicant no yeah just a quick one here and looking at the uh the Landscaping plan for the trees along that South border again uh you know it I basically identified patio trees and accent trees can you define those a little closer for me yeah and you I did want to touch on your comment about the windows so for some of those units there are there is a bedroom on the third floor our architect is working on the windows to raise them so you still get natural sunlight but there's not a direct line of sight to the property to the South and then for the trees i' been working with our landscape architect because we are you know conscious of the the neighbor to the South and I didn't include it in the presentation because I wanted it to be consistent with uh the staff report but she's been working on increasing the Landscaping to add as much screening to that southern property line as well so it's it's a more dense taller tree um that goes next to the 8ot screening wall and that's a sorry and that's a yearr round type tree doesn't go correct naked in the winter and yeah it's

similar similar conditions to other properties within the area thank you any more questions I have questions uh you mentioned there was there was going to be a charcoal barbecue um uh I would I would I guess this is more of a suggestion I would strongly advise you against that I I had charcoal Barbecues in my HOA and we had multiple fires started by residents and non-residents because we're not a gated community and with all of the fires uh happening all the time I I I really I I feel strongly about that but that's I guess a more of a suggestion then um my my other question is uh did this project have to go to firewise board uh to be approved uh so to answer your first first question it I might have misspoke the the barbecues are intended to be propane so they would not be charcoal and then um sorry your second question was about fire firewise uh it's a um it's it's a fire department board I guess or committee that suggests uh uh placement of the trees and specific trees that are uh compliant with fire so that you can actually get fire Insurance easier so the site is not within a fire Zone but it was reviewed by Ventura County Fire and as we move through final engineering and construction documents they also are required to review and approve those plans so they would get uh full access to all the types of trees build building materials and we would take any any advice that they have thank you any more questions to H on what you just said in in the document that somebody your company prepared for us it shows a charcoal grill and a hot ash box okay so

that has those Been Changed ored by m stake that would be a propane barbecue and propane would that be provided by the HOA or each person would bring their own propane tank when they want to use Bara okay thank you thank you any more questions thank you thank you is there anyone in the chambers um uh wishing to be heard of of this matter thank you Cheryl fuzi Pro uh project and my window looks directly at it and I was uh enjoying the views of Simi Valley Hills and so we're the other residents who live on my side of the building and now that's going to be gone and we're going to have to sit and look at buildings instead of Hills but that's just a complaint what I really want to ask is have you done a traffic study because their exit and entrance and my exit and entrance are adjacent and someone coming out of mine going this way and someone coming out of theirs going this way eventually there's going to be an accident and I wonder if you could do anything about that whether you could do a survey that would help you decide what to do with that sort of problem you've answered all my other questions with your um pres presentation but this to me is a little more serious than barbecues so anyway thank you for listening thank you anyone else are there any comments from staff

regarding statements made during the public hearing I would like to respond to your last comment the city's traffic engineer did review the project for compliance with the city's General planned and municipal code and there was a traffic report that was prepared for the project um and all the study area intersections including the Project's driveways are anticipated to operate at accept acceptable levels of service um and the project is also conditioned to improve sorry let me double check um it's required to construct on-site traffic circulation elements and traffic control devices um and that would be on page 61 of the staff report condition B18 thank you would the applicant like to respond to any of the comments regarding statements made during the public hearing so I really just want to touch on the comment about the views um you know as you could see we we we tried to orient the buildings to limit the I guess blocking any of views um with such a tight space there's only so much we can do um but you know similar to the apartment it's it's the same height as the senior apartment complex so we we did the best we could I don't know exactly which window uh she's referring to but the intent was there thank you if there's no more questions we will close the public testimony portion of the hearing are there any comments or questions from members of the Planning Commission oh I didn't see it I guess we're going to open the public testimony of the hearing can you please come up and state your name and if you can fill up the cart after you talk

Debbie Irish I'm the manager of the property right next door to the West um on Sundays it's already a mess she said that there was a traffic investigation or what have you on Sundays when they get out of church because our tenants turn right their people come out turn left and there are multiple almost head-on collisions right there at the driveways it happens every Sunday and if there's a property there in our property it's going to be every day it's not going to be just Sundays and on Sundays there's not as much traffic but that's what our concerns are it's a beautiful building you did a great job that's all I had to say thank you uhu would the staff like to comment comment on this um yes touching on that um I believe that the condition to improve those on-site traffic traffic circulation elements and control devices would would Aid in that issue because currently there are no um existing controls right now so this should this condition should improve that any more questions comments if there's no further questions we will close the public testimony portion of the hearing are there any comments or questions from members of the Planning Commission first of all was the traffic study was it can we tell if there was a study done on a Sunday

our traffic engineer adjusting link is not here today but uh my understanding is that traffic doesn't traffic studies don't look at particular days they look at overall traffic so they look at the projects they look at standard conditions then they look at the traffic average traffic generated by the project and um calculate it out that way commissioner Kennedy oh yeah um sorry uh again uh we've seen your projects before uh I think this one's well thought out definitely um meets the needs of our community as it's growing I like the aspect of the low income uh uh housing units there very small one car wouldn't work for me but uh I know entry level that uh that's always of concern uh thank you for a well thought out project commissioner rice sure um yeah I I do have a little concern with the width of the garage I mean a 10 foot 10-in wide garage but you know um the thing with that is is that the reality is people are only going to have one of their vehicles in the garage anyway um the other vehicle is going to be outside the garage um so that's just the way it's going to be and then the rest of it's going to be storage um no matter how wide the garage is that's just kind of the way it's going to be um that's that's what people do um so but I can't really do anything about that um I I wish there were more trees on the lot especially along the back but the applicant has already said that um he's talked to the neighbors which I think every um applicant needs

to do is talk to the neighbors and I appreciate the fact that the applicant has done that um I I wish there were some uh bike racks on the property because I think that um you know if there's 26 um town homes that at least some of those people are going to ride bikes I would think and it would be nice to have visitors or the ability to park their bikes there um um it's other than that I mean it's welld designed like the other projects that you've presented to us and I really appreciate that um it's a little close to the back of the um property line but you know I'm um inclined to say that it's okay I mean 20 feet and then you know there's room behind the wall is 8 foot high you're trying to screen it you're doing the best that you can it's a small lot um on all the other things you're meeting the standards um or you're extremely close to those like the what was it three and a half inches on one of the variances right on the side there I mean that to me is not really something to worry about so um I I think this is a pretty good project overall so commissioner man I don't know well maybe I did oh um the senior apartments that are right next door did they do get any of the bonus densities regarding the setback because if you look look at an aerial shot the whole back of the senior complex looks like it has that 150 or at least a 50 foot up to the building where this one's right on the property line so would they have been entitled to the same setback I can take a stab at that the um I believe that project did not have affordability components okay and they did comply with the setbacks they have

car ports in the rear which pretty much satisfied both the the one story one story and 150 foot setback okay uh oh the [Music] um request on the to East Side uh 9.8 ft density bonus waiver to decrease the street side yard setback is requested I'm assuming we can't just shift the buildings over to increase that because we have the dryway concern on the West Side okay that's kind of what I thought I just wanted to be sure um that's my only question at present thank you I have I have a little bit of concerns with with the setback too especially uh when it's going to maybe impact their privacy and maybe we can see what we can do with the signs on the street so that we can coordinate the traffic and not have collisions um I I still strongly suggest of not having a barbecue at all uh just I uh I mean that's just my opinion but the kids can enjoy uh a swing or something else and instead of a something that can possibly create a a very big Hazard for the whole city not just one Community I like that uh the roof has solar and that the roof from what I read was going to be maintained by the HOA um I like that part I do have a concern about the private driveway because it's so long and in case of any emergency or or fire uh that could be a liability I understand that it's all legal but that's just my opinion that's all the comments I do another question uh regarding the

concern for the two driveways hitting each other the the on page 34 B17 where it says traffic devices can be used is there any way that we could make this project that it's a right-hand Turn Only onto Cochran to avoid the cars turning left or that be overreaching uh we would need to discuss that with the city traffic engineer because um they have very specific requirements um which as a planner I the engineers were different worlds so um we need to discuss that with him okay thank you and commissioner Man part of the situation is these are existing uh relatively narrow Lots existing driveways um so there's not a lot of leeway around exiting I think eliminating a left turn requirement at this point um could be problematic uh because it's already allowed to do left turn right exits and I think as Miss clay mentioned earlier the um traffic study was prepared in general um I understand there's uh occasional potential conflicts uh not unlike many other driveways in the in the community so I think and as far as traffic control devices we may be just looking at probably a physical stop sign it's not like a signalized signals going up as far as that condition goes but um that's what I would project if anything is at it okay thank you is that it I got a couple comments um great presentation by Miss klingman uh and Mr Miller um I like the articulation of Spanish architecture is great uh I'm okay with the waivers I

think the waivers five and six are unfortunately pretty close but uh I'm okay with it um I like the fact that the developers are going to fix the module building and uh kind of make that whole for the church it's a wonderful use of the property and helps us with our housing element and uh it's interesting that the uh name of the street is named after one of our planning Commissioners but uh I have a friend who would like to name it klipper way but uh whatever whatever we can do there um and you know along that street there's uh driveways whether it's uh Phoenix Ranch and the church right next door where they have entrances and exits that's just the nature of those lots I think unfortunately but I I think this is a good project any other comments rice yeah just real quick we touched on those uh the architectural design of those windows on that southide like you see definitely pursue that and I just wanted to the chairperson brought up the the exit and the concern about having a single L uh Lane as an emergency exent and I I agree that's that was definitely a concern to mine but it's really in an emergency it's two lanes out so that's that's why I that I don't have a problem with it now because of that it's that's a difference so 26 units 75 cars maybe something like that you know uh that's probably being generous but I think that's doable and the fire department's okay with it so yeah I actually drove there um on a s Saturday morning and I I I had a pleasure of speaking to one of the representatives from the Korean church and they they are actually really excited I know they're selling a part of their property so maybe that's why they were excited too but they they seem genuine and very excited and they they

shared that they have a good relationship with the senior community and they actually got a couple of parishioners by sharing the parking lot so in that regard that's that's really nice to have nice Neighbors any more comments may I please have a reading of the resolution resolution number svpc 05 2025 a resolution of the Planning Commission of the city of SEI Valley recommending to the city council approval of plan development permit PDS 2023 0010 tenative track map TT 2023 003 and affordable housing agreement aha 2023 005 for 26 unit Town Home Development and a determination that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality act and resolution number svpc 0622 a resolution of the Planning Commission of the city of seimi Valley approving a conditional use permit modification cups 2023 0015 and a tenative parcel map TPS 2024 002 for a religious facility and a determination that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality act thank you the chair will now entertain a motion I move to adopt the resolution approving cup- s- 223-0015 [Music] and tp- s-202 24-2 and adopt the resolution recommending to the city council approval of pd-

s-223 0010 and tt- 2023 d003 a motion was made by commissioner tulson may I have a second I second call for vote motion passes unanimously there is no appeal period for the plan development perit tentative tra map or affordable housing agreement and the items will proceed to the city council with a planning commissioner's recommendation oral Communications and reports does staff have anything to report yes chairman chair pres Chrisman the um regarding the email I provided to you regarding the legal California City's conference in Canta Rosa I received maybe one and a half responses from the five of you um subsequent to that if um if you want to make take a straw pull if anyone would like to go however we determined today that the conference has sold out there's only a Statewide waiting list so if anyone is still interested we could either not do it or we could try to get you on the waiting list put me on the weight list so we one waiting list I think that's that will be the resolution then thank you and the second item is we have

a Planning Commission uh hearing scheduled for February 19th uh we expect to have a um legislative update for one of our city attorneys thank you do any Commissioners have anything to report uh mobile home rent mediation board does staff have anything anything to report no items tonight tree Advisory Board does staff have anything to report yes we are we are scheduling a presentation of the tree City USA award that should be in April thank you this concludes the meeting of February 5th 2025 the next scheduled meeting will be February 19th 2025 for