Committees - Regular Meeting

Núcleo solo porque tenemos a Enlínea y a Matt Enlínea.

¿Alguien tiene algún comentario o cambio o algo con respecto a las actas del 13 de julio? ¿Ustedes tienen algún cambio? So, motion to accept the acts of July 13th. Second. The second. Good. The next meeting is on September 14th at 6 p.m. It's still 6 p.m. Correspondence. So, we send a letter after the last...

I'm not sure exactly.

It was in the hardware store, but you saw it in the hardware store. No, it's... Anyone else? Well, the next letter we received was from the president of the South Ferry Hills Association, David Lichtenstein. We are grateful for the time and attention that we provide to residents and their concerns and also request that a notification provision be incorporated into the code of Amarre. So I responded and told them that we are Starting to review the Amari code that I put in my list of things to address as we do it. Then I received a second letter from David Glenn from South Freehills suggesting that someone from the UAC or the city government attend their general meeting of South Freehills on Saturday, August 22 to answer questions. Estoy disponible. ¿Alguien disponible aquí? No disponible. Inexp... Bueno. Todavía no le respondí, pero mi idea es hacerle saber que estamos aquí todos los meses. Pueden contactarnos por correo electrónico. O alguien de South Prairie Hills puede venir aquí si tienen preguntas adicionales. Bueno, probablemente sea un mejor foro para cuestionar... Double Mac, since you will have a whole spectrum of answers and thoughts available instead of just one person. Therefore, it is not allowed to bring broken feathers to the conference room. I will get in touch to talk about it. Let's see. And then the last letter was from Jerry Lee. Pero pronunciarlo correctamente es sobre una solicitud que tenemos para esta noche en Five Charlies Lane, también conocida como Dark Hill Road LLC en Bang, solicitando una exención de requisito de replanteo en el código. James había respondido diciendo que no lo creía necesario. Lo revise. I don't think it's necessary either, given that the spring they're trying to install is inside a private basin. And it doesn't protrude from the basin. Therefore, the rethinking would not really provide us with more useful information. Well, I told him it would be fine and I hope no one has objections. No tenemos un capitán de puerto aquí para dar instrucciones, pero no sé si alguien se dio cuenta, pero la huella número 15 está de vuelta en South Ferry.

No estaba allí la semana pasada, pero sí.

No, creo que solo estaba allí el jueves. Ya no se hacen trampas alrededor de la isla. Es la misma huella siempre. Quiero decir, no sé dónde fue. Estaba en Sac Harbor, creo. What? I didn't realize. As if the number 7 was in Porce Point. That's a little weird. Very weird. As for the information of the president or president in functions or vice president, whatever it is here. And it's about the use of the WAC funds. I don't know if anyone else noticed in the article last week, when I read it, I found out that the planning committee of the capital of the city is considering spending $ 456,000 of the WAC funds on two separate projects. How much money? $ 456,000. That's my story, right? The last balance they gave me was at the end of the year and it was about $300,000. So I'm not sure where the other $150,000 come from, except that maybe they're anticipating a quick approval due to the higher rates. But in any case, a project is the ramp of the Congen road. As I just learned about this through the newspaper, I don't have any other detail. I suppose it's a launch ramp that would enter within the things in which they should enter. The other element was a work boat for $300,000. I don't have any more details about that, but I found it disturbing that the UAC side had to find out about these things through the reporter, instead of someone directing someone or informing someone in the UAC. It is part of our mission statement to supervise the finances of the WMEAs. Therefore, we should participate in these conversations and hopefully there will be conversations about this. There is a discussion about the ramp.

What do you want to spend the money on?

It was something about a ramp line. It was something about time.

It doesn't give you a ring. It has coercion.

Well, that's fine. That's a good point. Well, I don't know what state he's in. I hope you join us in the conversation, especially on the ramp issue. But the one about the work boat was already mentioned in the past. And I think it could be a good idea. It's a lot of money, but if they have enough uses for him, maybe it would make sense. No sé quién más podría usarlo aparte de para fines fluviales. Quizá el departamento de policía o el departamento de carreteras, pero parece que podría haber otras fuentes de fondos. Y también lo que he estado mencionando durante unos 15 años es un barco de bombeo. Y me he puesto en contacto con los constructores de barcos de bombeo para preguntarles si podrían hacer un barco que funcionara como vaya auxiliar como barco. de trabajo y también como barco de bombeo. Y dijeron que sí. Así que con suerte, si aprobamos los fondos, podríamos obtener algún tipo de embarcación de doble propósito o multipropósito. Bueno, de todas formas, la cuestión es... Bueno, Albert no está en el Comité de Planificación de Capital. Pero sería bueno que alguien de ese comité se involucrara. Especially since, in essence, the response of this committee was quite negative. I mean, I think that when we talk about a double purpose ship, we were just trying to see if it made sense financially, you know. It seems like it's a lot of money to spend on a ship that they don't need much. I don't know.

They have the ship they have. They talked about what it cost. It seems like they spent a lot of money on a new engine, or simply...

Bueno, el barco debería estar bien.

Año pasado gastamos $18,000 para reutilizar la cubierta de ese barco.

¿Hiciste trabajo? No, no lo hicimos. No creo que sea algo habitual para nosotros.

Bueno, $18,000 el año pasado frente a $300,000 en un barco. Nuevo, nuevo.

And I don't really know what state they are in, the boats in which they invested $18,000. Pretty good. As for the power, I don't know. I have no idea. Apparently Honda, I think. But when we talk about it, Boy said he's in pretty bad shape. So I have a logistic about it. What do they use it for? A question about background. Because in fact I have una reunión que me ofrecieron la semana pasada con Amber para hablar sobre el presupuesto. Y lo que quiero decir es que, ¿cuál ha sido la práctica? En el pasado, este presupuesto suele presentarse ante el comité. No recuerdo haber hablado de ello, pero parece que probablemente no debería ser algo de lo que yo deba estar hablando así, ni con ella, ni con ninguna otra persona. I mean, it doesn't have to be ambitious, but in general, I think that budget should be presented before our committee if it's about funds that we nominally control. And I guess that's it. How do we control these funds in some way? Are they just for budget convenience? They say these are WAX funds. Well, you know, these are questions that I suppose I have for her, but I would like to hear from people who have some experience in this committee, in the past and in other committees, about how they normally work. Well, the funds that are generated, they are generated through morning rates, etc., as shipping storage rates, I think. And in general, those rates should be intended to support things related to the administration of tie-in networks and the online navigation program and all that. You know, if they get into something like a general issue, we had this conversation a couple of years ago or four, when the rates were going up and they were trying to pay for other things. You know, if they try to pay a wider spectrum of things with the rates, then it's not so much a rate. It's actually a tax. I mean, they're supposed to spend it, specifically in water quality, right? Infrastructure, access to water, things like that. With respect to the meeting that we are supposed to have with Amber, I mean the committee heads, or you know, it's what your committee needs to work, I think. Exactly. So when I had that meeting with Amber last year, the budget was like a hasty process. Well, they receive the information late and then you have to hurry to get a meeting with Amber. And since there is a lot to do, in reality we don't have any expense. Because you generate your own money. But it means that we are not even sustainable with income compared to expenses. We really don't have any expense. We just have to supervise. I think they're going to need to double the salary. I mean, but no, exactly. There is a list of things that are assigned to us in terms of expenses. It's all mainly administrative, and Matt, I can show you the information they provided me. Yes, we could definitely make all the members get involved in the committee. It would be interesting to take a look at everything. También conseguimos un pequeño fragmento de muchas cosas, por ejemplo, debido al departamento de policía, los barcos y los salarios, y ya sabes lo que hacen en lo que respecta al capitán de puerto. But there is a whole list. I have a file that I can show you.

Before you have something.

I see it as you have mentioned, two things that have caught my attention is that there is money that goes into areas in which we manage. You know, as James just pointed out, and the movement rates that go in, or you know, the spring requests or other requests that go in and those are applied in areas that are relevant to us and to the coastal area and then the real administrative costs of operation of our committee, which yes, Jessica is fantastic, she earns every penny and deserves more. Well, well, but for the rest, I don't see that she knows that we are not hiring external consultants or anything like that, nor do we have any other expense of which she is particularly aware. Apart from, yes, the assignments, that kind of thing, which are accounts of different offices that are introduced into our budget for, you know, I think some of those seem to be legitimate, you know, legitimate reasons, but I just don't see anything for what we are deciding on a budget, for example. Yes, there is Jessica, there is Linda Kass, she collects a piece of Lindy Kass for Moin's applications, and you know, you know. Some elements such as equipment for boats, buoys, lifeboats, spigots and sails, disembarkers, moorings in Condon Creek, mooring permits where we have to pay for the permits, maintenance of boats, you know, there's everything. So, agents of the bay.

Well, okay.

Y saben, nuestro porcentaje de lo que recogimos y todo ha sido la fuente de la mayor parte de la conversación. O sea, tiene sentido. Bueno, eso es todo por... Informe. Así que vamos... Nuevos asuntos.

Veamos.

Instalación de una rampa y un muelle. Quién está al otro lado de eso? Y le dieron permiso para construir un muelle de mayor tamaño. Sin embargo, este no cuenta con una rama. Quizás sí en el otro. Diagramas se muestran ambos muelles. Sí, si van a esa dársena pueden ver que sí tiene una rama. Solo que al ser una dársena privada, voy a recusarme. Voy a recusarme. Me han sugerido que me inhiba de participar en las dársenas privadas. Así que voy a hacerlo. Voy a apagar el audio y el video y cuando termine la discusión, si alguien me lo puede decir. Sal de la sala. Sí, me voy. Vete del país. Sí, claro. Pero ¿qué puedo hacer? The only thing I don't understand about this is why they don't jump directly to the ball to get on the float. Well, that's not what I mean. I mean, the floaters go up and down, but I mean, they could install the ramp from the support in a similar way to what is done on the other side. Ya sabes, sus flotares son mucho más cortos y quizá en lugar de tener el rellano, bueno, se están deshaciendo esa pequeña plataforma. Y luego están añadiendo un pequeño saliente para poner la rampa, según recuerdo haber visto. Y me pregunto por qué no la instalan directamente desde el mamparo. Probably because it is very shallow in that extreme, in that extreme. If they approached B to the southern extreme, I suppose it would be very shallow. They would lose.

I think they are like two feet. I see a foot down there.

They are like less than two feet. Pero donde se asienta el muelle seguiría estando en tres toneladas y tres cuartos de agua, incluso si lo retiraran del todo. Bueno, quiero decir, eso era lo único que me preguntaba.

El agua tiene sentido.

Creo que... Sí, al principio tenía muchas preguntas al respecto, pero ya las han respondido. Supongo que es menos profundo en ese lado, en la parte interior del muelle. Del muelle. Bastante poco profundo. Sí, porque el otro solo estoy familiarizado con el... You know, on the west side, the south side. In fact, I have a question about if there is any representative of the applicant who is there. Just to see the point of Aal. Is this really a private basin? Because by the way they look, the studies are not claiming any underwater land, as far as I know. And the edge of the property runs along the Mamparo. A kind of property divided between Bang and Tolkien. But what Matt says is that the property line is actually property. Correct. When this came, I expected to see some kind of technical study related to the underwater lands and some claims on the water. But unfortunately, the lines of said study do not show any of that. They reflect the Mamparo line and then leave the submerged areas as if they were not part of the property. Does it matter? Does it have an impact? What is the difference? Yes, actually, I don't know what difference there is. I mean, I can only answer that from a technical point of view if someone... And he left the room. I'm sorry, I heard him. I could ask a technical question, if I can... In general, in a case like that, the only way to know if it is a private basin is from the person's writing. The lagrimensor will not trace a line through the water. So you're right, Matt, there's nothing in the request that says this is a private basin.

So one way to know if they declared it and the other way is through the person's writing.

Well, what you are seeing, unless you know for sure, the applicant, who knows for sure if this is private or if it is simply... Then the limits of the agrimensor may not coincide with the limits of the writing. Correct.

I asked them, you know, why don't you make a line there?

And they said that they simply don't do it that way because we don't want it to look like there is something that is physically present in that specific place.

So that was basically the answer I got from a Grimmsor.

about a debatable point anyway, because you know, they are asking the people to do it. Well, there is no difference. There is no difference in the code for a private bank compared to any other place. In that sense, I go back to it. You have to turn off the microphone again. And my camera, whatever. Okay. Everything else that they originally had, because this has been happening for a while and they were missing things. You know, it's been like a peace dinner, putting all the pieces together. But now everything is together, from what I can see. Originally they didn't have engineers from the Army Corps. They didn't have distances there. They didn't have this material. Now it's all there. So no, I have no problem with that. Another thing that I know is that I don't remember. Maybe you already remember in Tolkien. How does he anchor his flotator?

The flotator is anchored by the pilot.

But it's okay. This shows a pretty big separation between the support and the flotator on the other side. It looks like it's against him. I don't remember if there's a space for pilots in the middle, but it's going up between the piled up pilots.

So I'm sure that's what they're going to do.

So it's going to be a little closer to what's shown here.

Yes, that's what he wants them to have so tight at the moment.

Well, he says he's going to put three pilots, but they're going to be between the pilots of the mamparo.

Yes, I imagine.

That's it. It seems that he has the pilots located in the mi just between the flotador and the mamparo. And those little dots seem to me like pilots. Yes, that's correct. He has three pilots there, and well, I don't think the scale is well represented in that part. Yes, in... Actually, I had 5 feet by 40. Anyone else? I have another comment. James Mark, are you okay?

That's been good.

Matt, are you okay? Are you okay? Yes, I think it's good now that they clarified all the little things that they didn't have.

But now that it's complete, I think it seems reasonable.

So we have 5 and 1 abstention. Or recusation. Yes, recusation. le enviaría un mensaje a alguien que está en Italia. ¿Sigues ahí? Tengo WhatsApp. Ah, si no estás escuchando, puedes volver allí. Dijo que estaba mirando por la cámara, así que le daré una de estas.

Aquí está la cámara.

Sí, gracias, chicos. Ya he vuelto. Muy bien. El siguiente punto es la solicitud del muelle Tropen. Este es un... muelle no conforme preexistente en Derring Harbour. Buscando una modificación. Ha habido algunas diferencias de opinión, pero... difference from others that we have seen, there is a net reduction in the area of 87.7%. Yes, about 60 square feet. It is in outer waters, an external reduction of 68 plus 68 feet. 60. Square feet of reduction in the coverage of And relocate a couple of dolphins, but basically they are, as we have commented in the past, within what I will call the shadow of the L that comes out at the end of the dock. Alguien tiene alguna... Bueno, Jack, lo siento. Quieres... Quiero decir, se han quitado dos plataformas. Volveremos a poner una plataforma estacional y una rampa estacional. Así que terminamos con una disminución del 27 al 12% en el espacio, que son 68 pies. Y la plataforma se ha vuelto estacional y se eliminará para el invierno porque no es práctico dejarlas allí. Este es probablemente uno de los peores lugares. Es como una autopista allí. It's incredible. Does anyone have any idea, James? Do you have any idea about this? No. Fuck. But, well. I... Yes, I think it's a minor request. I don't have any problem with that. Yeah. Well, I see it as if I appreciate that the square meters are decreasing, but the applicable language is that the linear squares are linear advances. Those square meters have no basis in the code, nor does it have the stationarity of any dock or element that is installed. As for the code, it is an increase in linear feet, We probably should have adjusted the meters. Historically, in terms of mitigation, we have always accepted a reduction in square meters. However, as Matt points out, in the code we only limit the length and width in some circumstances. We do not have any real-world language, but to obtain a substantial reduction, it is necessary to measure it in some way. Well, I prefer the longitude. I don't know what else. Longitude would be easier, but in a case like this, at least for me, you know. You can try to reduce the longitude of this in the area where it is and then lose a... The ship is... That you couldn't put back at the end of the day. You want to be able to use the dock. So... Sí, quiero decir, veo el enigma, pero el código no reconoce esos elementos. Pero la otra pregunta que tenía era sobre la inspección. No muestra los pilotes existentes. Ah. Quiero decir, no llegué al sitio. No, muestra los pilotes existentes. Solo muestra los pilotes propuestos y esos pilotes están al otro lado de la línea de lote extendida. Ship Five has existed. Yes, there are five shows. Because they are mentioned less. The only thing I noticed about the pilots in the two drawings is that it says they are only relocating. One of the two pilots, the dolphin, right? The one that is not moving very far. I mean, yes, I think, I think the one that is in what direction I'm looking here. North, let's see the northeast. The one that is in the northeast, I think it is staying. The one that is to the southeast. That's what it's doing, but I mean. I don't see it as material at all, because the space is of. A few feet and it's like I said inside the inside the L. And if you want to say something about the linear feet of the platforms, in reality we are decreasing them because what there are 33 feet and the float that we are putting is only 24 because we are lowering the perpendicular ramp and we have nothing more than linear equation. What do I mean? So if you look at the two platforms, they are almost 20, almost 33 feet and the float only measures 24 feet. So it's a reduction of 68 feet more. A reduction of linear feet too.

No, it's not.

It depends on which direction you look at the length and the floating spring as length. Yes, it's difficult.

That's what I mean.

I appreciate your point. But at the same time there is a length. A length is a length and... You're just ignoring it. And that's not really reasonable. Yes. I mean, the conclusion is that the main goal is to limit the amount of space that is being occupied. To make it not occupy additional space.

I mean, it's a...

But the other thing I was going to point out, Jack, is that it would be good if you included in these, you know, the length of the spring, and you would show us where the middle sea is there. I don't see any indicated on any of the plans of the site, but it's not always useful to have the length of the document there, so we don't have a scale on it, and on page 5 or 7 they indicate both the middle sea and the low sea. No pude ver mar media. Veo la baja mar media. Supongo que el mamparo tiene pleamar. No. Dice alto.

Sí tiene pleamar. La pleamar.

Mamparo, la baja mar media. Así que bien. Bueno, en lugar de hacer suposiciones, especialmente para medir el punto, tiene una pequeña... Allí.

Realmente. Where is it?

Unlike the medium, the low tide is very prominent here.

The sea tide is very acute.

Or maybe I can make them a little more obvious.

I mean the float.

So the float measures about 20 feet.

And four.

I guess the most important point I would highlight is that it is a 27.5 by itself smaller on the surface and becomes stationary. It's just that, you know, it's one of those elements that would have been fine because when we redo the code we try to collect all these things that we have done historically and that are not mentioned in the code.

It's one that I mentioned.

As far as you know, it can be used to mitigate and square meters are one of those things. So what I mean is that in practice we always practice, we always use the square meters. Yes, that's what I mean. James, is that okay? I agree. Well, that was fine. I'm fine. Matt, are you okay? Not for the reasons I said, but you know, I appreciate it being a reduction in square meters. That was a no. It's a no. It's okay. It's a 5, 4 and 1 against. Good night. Thank you. And the last one is from Pamoin. Tenemos la evaluación de Moindewo. Todo parece bien. Supongo que es el que incluyó algunas notas en la solicitud. No estoy seguro de quién escribió eso. Conducir en el lugar. Entonces no estoy seguro de qué está poniendo en un tornillo. Lo único que se me ocurre es que tiene... No sé a qué se refiere. No está poniendo un peso de anclaje en un anclaje. También se señaló en un correo electrónico que no existe ningún equipo allí y que eso se le comunicó al solicitante todo ello, a pesar de lo que ha dejado escrito en este documento. Es una adquisición y veamos. Dice que hay equipo en alguna parte. ¿Qué es? No se omisione el equipo. No estoy perdiendo. Oh, no, there's no equipment. Oh, no. You're not... asking for something. There's no equipment installed at the moment. Uh... What property of this adjunct was being repaired? Beehore. Beeshore Road. It's also on the left. The Beeshore.

One of those properties on the left.

No estoy seguro de cuál. Before. Estoy seguro. Realmente la segunda. No es el final porque es... ¿Cómo se llama? Creo que es la segunda. Sí, porque está en venta. Entonces probablemente será la segunda.

La segunda es... ¿Podríamos señalarlo?

Sí, justo ahí donde está la mano. ¿Podemos acercar un poco más ese movimiento? That's the thing. Why don't we align it with those other hammers? You know, there are enough perforations in the middle of the channel. Correct, correct, correct. You go out there at night and it's like... The channel is getting a little full. I think it makes a lot of sense. I was going to say, is there enough water there? Yes. It had 11 feet, I think Bo said where he measured it, but well, you know. It's a decent channel that goes up there. It could be much closer. Did he say 100? His note is 100 feet, but I don't know if 100 can be. Or the distance from Tremblay 276 is 100. In any case, they can move that at least halfway back to the guy's spring. And what they propose.

You wanted to know? As if this were the place where they want to enter.

That seems... Yes, probably. It's the old team. Yes, we found it.

Well, I guess it's the south.

No, it has to go further. That white dot only goes up. Simply yes. That seems... It looks great right there. Maybe we could go a little further. So far is the point. Probably yes, I imagine. Do you think that white point could actually be a more existing one that is there and is not correctly labeled? I don't know. There are a couple of them there. Well, there is one that is located right in the middle of the channel and I hope that when we have the opportunity to move it a little, we will take the opportunity to do it.

Boom.

I would like to see that closer to the property of the person. I am observing that small point precisely where the pin was placed and it gives me the impression that it could be a buoy, something like a marker. I was wondering if she marked that, all that data would come back, but I don't know the system. I go directly from her spring. This is done directly. I know that point is, you know, but we were not directly... The marker now is not obvious and where we had it before was on the other side of the spring. So maybe where that little white dot is is not so bad. Maybe it's just a little darker. There is a way to know if it is an existing boring point or simply does not appear in the system right now.

I don't know what's going on, so I marked all the usual boxes, all the births and those things. I could do it in another way. I think that... If you keep moving down in places that are not marked, yes, that does it.

Oh! It's a radiation zone. Oh, but those are more... Oh, okay. And that's really in the middle of the canal. Well, that looks good.

The... ...place proposed here.

That's why... ...it's not right at the point. It seems that he's trying to get away from this kind of...

I don't know if it's still... ...that aspect.

And this is a repairer, you know? Well, one of the things about the repairer is that since it is not possible for them to have a ship and a description is not required from the ship, I wonder what type of equipment they put. Because a guy could be putting one of 16 feet when he could be putting a sailboat of 50 feet. Well, if you were to do it, I would put a pyramid of 400 if I were to do it. Then you would have flexibility to put whatever you want. But then the owner appeared and said, the only thing I'm going to do is put a small boat. Simply, I don't know if it's the best in the world. While we think about the sea code, right? Right? Not requiring any type of description of the boat. But that it enters the whole concept of repairman. He doesn't have a boat. I was going to say that he may not even have a boat. And then they can do it, right? I mean, you know, it's at your own risk. I mean, you tell your friend from Wall Street that he's going to use your boat and he goes out with his 80-foot boat and it's like a 100-lb. That's how friendships are made.

But at least the contractor, with luck, yes.

I ask, what kind of tie is he putting on? Because you know, he doesn't have weight or reach or anything. Yes, I don't hate those screws. Well, as for the location, it seems that we could get it. I mean, look at this. We should be able to. I don't know if we can go here or we can get closer.

Get a little closer and a little closer in front of his dock.

More around, like there. We stay here. It's a big circle. Synthesize. You click there and it will tell you. It should. Me pregunto si eso es un velero gigante allá abajo en un momento dado.

¿Verdad?

Sabes, pero está más lejos. ¿Es esa una especie de sombra de un barco anclado en el fondo de...? Velero grande de 57 pies. Ese es tu gran velero. El pie es un hombre, pero... Doctor legal. Un velero bastante grande. ¿Sabes, Bill, sobre lo que dices sobre qué hay? Ya sabes que hay lo que... Intentas que la gente registre qué tipo de barco es, incluso si es ribereño. Quiero decir, ¿qué tal si solo tienes algún tipo de indicación de cómo se construyó? Ya sabes, ¿qué es lo que realmente pusiste allí para que, ya sabes, estén aguas del pueblo? ¿Qué es lo que hay en nuestras aguas? El igual que puedes registrar, oye, esto es lo que pusimos. Ya sabes, puedes poner, ya sabes, estás reparando, puedes poner lo que quieras. Pero dinos qué es. No, creo que es válido. Eso. ¿Sabes? Y por la forma en que lo he escrito, no es difícil decir que es. Vale. Bueno.

¿Queréis confirmar la ubicación que queréis?

Creo que donde la tenéis, ¿no?

Justo ahí. Es esto.

¿Puedes darnos una distancia del muelle? Tiene que ser de 100 pies. I don't know if I'm doing it right.

Vomit.

I think we can. I have to put the... The past. Do you want to put the past again? Do you need the side launch? That's what I was going to try to get.

Do you want to go if you put the thing, Manu?

We have the back part more or less.

Do you want to get a little closer?

En un momento. Yo diría que justo... Esa cosa tiene un tick. ¿Quieres que lea la línea de latitud y longitud?

Sí, la veo aquí.

Tienes. Yes, I'm fine with the new location. Vale, 60 con la nueva ubicación. Bueno, último punto, otros asuntos. Realmente, ya sabes, solo quiero comentar dónde podríamos estar. ¿Alguien ha tenido la oportunidad de leer lo que nos envió Bo? O, si no lo has hecho, simplemente echa un vistazo a lo que nos envió Bo. Tiene sus comentarios, nos los envió por correo electrónico. Personally, I started, you know, with the first word of the code in the morning and I still haven't reached the comments of Bo. It hasn't come out of definition. I've just gone through the definitions and I've already filled a couple of pages. So, well, you know, how can you keep working on it? Make the comments you have so that we can, well, at some point, start reviewing it piece by piece. As I said, I think there are many problems in the definitions up to where I have come. We will have to read them carefully because they were tracing. It's good. I had a problem with the definition, like the way they were defining the tie itself. I thought there was some. Problem like between the. Linea Vandrick. La línea de andering.

Exact.

La línea de amarre que va desde la boya hasta el ancla. Bueno, creo que dijeron que incluía la cadena. Bueno, creo que la intención era, obviamente, referirse a toda la longitud de lo que sea. Eso es lo que cuando se vuelve a utilizar más adelante en el código. Ni siquiera traje mis notas sobre ello. Pero se refirieron a ello más adelante en el código y si usas la definición que proporcionaron para la línea penal. Es incorrecta. So it's full of things like that. It's crazy. It gives me a post-traumatic stress disorder when I see it. I'm starting to tremble a little myself. Because... Anyway, there's something we have to do, so we'll do it. Well, since it's colder, I'm sure we'll have more time to analyze it. Tom is not here, so I feel safe asking if anyone else has anything else to say. If it's not a postponement, so... Second. Thank you. Thank you all.

Thank you all. Back to the room.

I'll be there for the next meeting. Okay. I thought you had come back.