Board of County Commissioners - Regular Meeting
The Board of County Commissioners approved a five-year capital improvement plan for the fire department, including new and renovated fire stations and fleet investments. The Board also approved the creation of the West Crystal Lake Management Municipal Services Benefit Unit and adopted a resolution confirming the non-ad valorem capital assessment for Rice Lake Lake Management MSBU. Additionally, the Board denied a rezone request for Sandy Lane Homes and approved the adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 40 of the Seminole County Code of Ordinances.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Board of County Commissioners
- Meeting Type
- Board Of County Commissioners
- Location
- Seminole County, FL
- Meeting Date
- May 12, 2026
Transcript
1093 sections (from 1,224 segments)
Seminole County, and welcome to the BOCC May 12 meeting. As always, we are gonna start with our invocation and pledge that will be led by elder David Ball from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints. And before he comes up, you can come up, pastor, but we wanna make sure that we give you a sincere note of appreciation for all that you do with Seminole Heart and their dedication to our community. You facilitating all of that work is fabulous on our behalf. So thank you from the citizens of Seminole County and from the Board of County Commissioners. And with that, if you'd all rise.
Thank you. They said I could take less than a minute to introduce myself. My wife and I are citizens of Utah. We're retired, and we've been called by our church to serve as missionaries here in Sanford for eighteen months. And we found it utterly delightful to live here. In fact, my wife says that because of the beauty and the weather here, she would prefer to stay. But the fact that we have 18 grandchildren living in Utah.
Wow. She
she says that's probably the only thing that'll take her back home. However, if a hurricane passes through this summer, I'll she might change her mind. But we also have 18 to 20 young missionaries, 18, 20 years old, that are here as proselyting missionaries. And their charge is to they they are assigned to work at least four hours a week as community service. So, if any of you need some young healthy volunteers, you can look us up by the website.
But, anyway, we'll say our opening prayer now. Our father in heaven, we're deemed grateful the opportunity this day to meet together as a county commissioners and county leaders and concerned citizens. And we're indeed grateful and express gratitude this day for the free land that we live in. We're grateful that two hundred and fifty years ago, wise men were raised up and gave us a free constitutional government that defines we, the people, as the sovereign. And we're grateful for this wonderful blessing and we pray that thou may bless our current national leaders that they may lead us in with wisdom and protection.
We're especially grateful for those men and women that serve us in the military. We pray at this dangerous time that they may be protected in their service. We're grateful for those that choose to be our state and local leaders here in the county in this county. And we pray for them that they may have wisdom and understanding and empathy for the citizens and to serve this growing population and the challenges that face us as we provide the necessary services for our community. We are particularly grateful for those that serve us, particularly in those that are assigned to protect us.
We're grateful for the sheriffs, the police officers, the firemen, and the other first responders. We pray for them and their protection, and particularly in dangerous situation, bless them and protect them with wisdom and skill and understanding, and particularly and most importantly, that they may always return home safely to their families. We pray for our teachers and our parents who have been who have been given the stewardship to raise our children, that we may raise our children to be responsible citizens, that someday they may carry on the duties of leading us and the blessings that we have that have been given to us. We pray for those in our community that are suffering through health, mental, physical, or financial burdens, that the ways and means may come to them, they may be lifted up and enjoy the prosperity that we've been blessed with. And again, bless us as we conduct the meeting in the business of this county to this day that we may act with respect to one another.
And although we may, as a community, be of many diverse cultures, religions, ethnicities, and different we have many differences. We pray that we all may rise to the level and live to the command of our savior that we may love one another. And these blessings we pray for and petition for thine divine help. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Thank you so much for your blessings, and welcome to Seminole County, at least for eighteen months. So we're going to move on to awards and proclamations. Some of them we're going to read fully through from the dais and some of them are going to be passed on the consent agenda. We have folks that are here to take pictures even though they're on the consent agenda. I'm going to give a call out to our EMS team who's here.
We are delighted to have you here, and we'll be doing pictures with you. The first proclamation is the proclamation for sergeant Robert Pizzurro, United States Army as Seminole County's May veteran of the month, and this will be read by commissioner Her. That's me. Commissioners, I move the following proclamation of the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners recognizing United States Army sergeant Robert Pizzurro for his outstanding service to The United States and Seminole County. Whereas the brave men and women of our army, navy, marines, air force, coast guard, and space force demonstrate a resolute spirit and unmatched selflessness reminding us there are few things more American than giving of ourselves to make a difference in the lives of others.
And whereas throughout our country's history, generations of service members have answered the call to leave their families, their jobs, and put their futures and even their lives on the line to valiantly defend our nation. And whereas for many service members, the sacrifice has ended in permanent injury or death, yet their spirit remains in the continued preservation of our freedoms and the promise of liberty. And whereas there are more than 30,000 living veterans in Seminole County who served our nation in times of peace and war, through their service, they kept America strong. And whereas before entering military service, sergeant Pizzurro had already demonstrated a profound sense of duty, disciplined, and selfless commitment to others, principles instilled through his upbringing and reinforced by a distinguished family tradition of military service, including his father, brother, and uncles. This proud legacy shaped his character and prepared him to honorably answer the call to serve his country.
And whereas, drafted in 1967, sergeant Prazurro completed basic training at Fort Gordon, Georgia and subsequently graduated from Fort Bliss, Texas as a Hawk missile and launcher mechanic. He was then assigned to b battery sixth battalion, fifty ninth mobile missile battalion in Babahessun, Germany, where he played a vital role in maintaining missile defense readiness with professionalism, technical proficiency, and unwavering dedication to duty. And whereas, following his discharge from military service in 1968, sergeant Prazurro has continued a lifetime of distinguished service through his leadership in the American Legion, where he is a fourteen year member and currently serves as the first vice president of post two forty three as well as the veteran outreach coordinator. In this role, he leads sustained efforts to visit veterans in six area nursing homes, ensuring they are honored, supported, and never forgotten. Additionally, sergeant Pizzurro has devoted more than twenty four years of volunteer service to the Seminole County Sheriff's Office as a citizen on patrol and search and rescue coordinator.
His commitment to community extends fur further through his civic leadership as past president of the Oak Forest Homeowners Association, probably the most difficult assignment of all, I would guess. Whereas sergeant Pizzurro has brought great credit and distinction upon himself, The United States Of America, the United States Army, and Seminole County. Now, therefore, be it proclaimed that we, the board of county commissioners of Seminole County, Florida, express our gratitude, admiration, and respect for sergeant Prazurro for his outstanding service to the military and the United States Army. Be it further proclaimed that this proclamation is presented to sergeant Robert Prazurro along with our sincere congratulations and recognition as Seminole County's veteran of the month adopted this May 2026.
Second. All
those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, motion passes unanimously. Sergeant, if you'd like to say a few words, we would be delighted to have you here.
Thank you. Thank you. Full house. Commissioner, staff, family, and friends, I'm deeply honored and sincerely grateful to be recognized as Seminole County's May Veteran of the Month. The values instilled in me through my family upbringing combined with discipline and a sense of duty I gained through military service have shaped the person I am today.
Those lessons did not end when I left the uniform behind. They continue to guide me in my civilian life, inspiring me to serve community with the same commitment and purpose and integrity. This recognize this recognition is not just a reflection of my journey, but the many individuals who helped supported, mentored, and stood by me along the way, especially my wife, Janice. I share this honor with them and all my colleagues. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Thank you, dear charges, and welcome, hon. Our next proclamation proclaiming 05/25/2026 is Memorial Day in Seminole County will be read by commissioner DeLaury.
Thank you, madam chair. Memorial Day, it's not just a day. It's not just a day of remembrance. It's a day of honoring those who have represented us and fought the fight and paid the ultimate price. Many times, people think about Memorial Day at times as a community events, family gatherings, the start of a season of summer or holiday, but it's much more than that.
As we honored our veteran of the month here today today, it goes a lot deeper than that. It's a debt of respect that can never really be repaid. Every one of us have someone to thank that have served in the military on different levels. All of us have individuals that have somehow touched us, touched our country, paid the ultimate price. It's truly amazing when you really start thinking about it.
So this proclamation that I've been given to read only scratches the surface of the remembrance of those individuals. So it's my great honor to read this proclamation of the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners affirming 05/25/2026 as Memorial Day here in Seminole County. And whereas on Memorial Day, we pay a solemn tribute to those brave Americans who served under the stars and stripes and laid down their lives to defend our freedom. Whereas more than a century, this holiday has been known as decoration day and originally honored those lost their lives in fighting the civil war. And whereas following Americans entering into World War one, Memorial Day was involved with decorate commemorating American military personnel who died in all wars, including World War two, Vietnam War, the Korean War, and the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan.
And whereas in 1915, after spotting a cluster of poppies, a brigade sergeant brigade surgeon was inspired to write the poem in Flanders in Flanders Field, giving a voice to service members who had died in battle and laid buried beneath the poppy covered ground. The poem initiated a movement to make poppies a symbol to tribute all those who died in wars and remain as an emblem of remembrance to this day. And whereas congress, a joint resolution approved 05/11/1950 providing Memorial Day was set aside as a day of prayer for permanent peace and respect, president Truman was issued a proclamation calling upon the people of The United States to observe each Memorial Day in a manner in this manner. And whereas on Monday, May 25 will mark the one hundred and fifty eighth anniversary of Memorial Day, and whereas more than 1,200,000 Americans service members have died in conflict and more than 8,000 were from Florida and over a 100 were residents of Seminole County with two medal of honor recipients. And whereas today, over 1,300,000 Americans serve in active duty, 66,000 of whom are from Florida, while nearly 750,000 Americans served in reserves in the National Guard.
And whereas on Memorial Day and every day, the citizens of Seminole County must remember the servicemen and women who sacrificed their lives to insure our own. Now, therefore, we proclaim that the board of Seminole County commissioners do hereby proclaim and recognize 05/25/2026 as Memorial Day. Be it further proclaim that the Board of County Commissioners request that at 3PM on Memorial Day, Seminole County residents voluntarily observe in their own way a moment of remembrance and respect and pause from whatever they're doing in honor of those heroes and their valor adopted this May 2026. Second.
Motion is second. All those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, passes unanimously. Thank you, commissioner Delore. The next proclamation will be read by commissioner Zimbauer, and it's proclaiming May 2026 as National Travel and Tourism Week in Seminole County.
Thank you, madam chair. It's with my great pleasure to enter this proclamation of the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners proclaiming May 2026 as National Travel and Tourism Week in Seminole County, Florida. Whereas the travel and tourism industry plays a vital role in strengthening Seminole County's economy, generating revenue, creating employment opportunities, and enhancing the overall quality of life for residents and visitors alike. And whereas tourism generated over 4,300,000,000 in economic impact for Seminole County and supports approximately 27,100 jobs for our local residents in 2024. And whereas Seminole County has emerged as a premier destination for sports tourism, welcoming athletes, teams, and spectators for tournaments, training, events that energize the local economy and showcase the region's top tier facilities and hospitality.
And whereas the county's abundant natural beauty, including its scenic rivers, lush parks, and protected wildlife areas, continues to draw nature enthusiasts, outdoor adventures, and eco tourists reinforcing Seminole County's reputation as Florida's natural choice. And whereas, tourism in Seminole County provided more than $334,000,000 in state and local taxes in 2024, which resulted in nearly $1,800 annuals tax savings for each family household. Whereas in 2025, Seminole County established the state's first countywide tourism improvement district, TID, as a public private partnership that was designed to create and dedicate funding mechanism that will enhance our regional sports tourism infrastructure and ensure that Seminole County remains highly competitive in attracting future sporting events to our community. Whereas the success of the TID was built on strong collaboration between Seminole County leaders, our sports tourism partners, and our local hoteliers that will drive economic growth, support tourism development, and strengthen our community for years to come. And whereas the continued partnerships between CFHLA, local businesses, government leaders, community stakeholders remains critical to fostering a thriving tourism economy and ensuring Seminole County remains a warm, inviting place for visitors year round.
Whereas the Central Florida Hotel and Lodging Association is the largest regional hospitality association in The United States, representing more than 148,000 hotel rooms throughout the Central Florida region alone, as well as nearly 500 supplier organizations that do business with hospitality and tourism industries. And whereas National Travel and Tourism Week offers a meaningful opportunity in 2026 to honor the accomplishments of Seminole County's travel and tourism community, highlight the continued efforts of c h l CFHLA and its partners, and reaffirm our dedication to growing the county's presence as a must visit destination. Now, therefore, be it proclaimed that we, the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County, Florida, do hereby proclaim May 2026, as National Travel and Tourism Week in Seminole County, Florida, and encourage our residents to support workforce development in the hospitality and tourism industries, and participate in the local initiatives highlighting travel importance to our communities, economic growth, and the quality of life here in Seminole County, adopted this twelfth day, May 2026. Second.
We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, passes unanimously. Thank you. Thank you. I think this is what we may have been waiting for by the rattles of the medals in the audience. The next one will be read by commissioner Lockhart. It's a resolution recognizing the 2026 Lake Mary High School cheerleading team as the Florida High School Athletic Association state champions. Yes.
Yay.
Awesome. Glad to have our Lake Mary Rams in
the house today. Thank you
for being here. Commissioners, I'd like to move the following resolution of the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners recognizing the twenty five-twenty six Lake Mary High School cheerleading team as state champions. Whereas Seminole County proudly recognizes the outstanding achievements of its student athletes and the positive representation they bring to our community through excellence in competition. And whereas the Lake Mary High School Rams cheerleading team achieved a historic milestone by winning the Florida High School Athletic Association Class two a competitive cheerleading state championship in 2026. And whereas the Rams have set an FHSAA record by winning 10 consecutive state competitive cheerleading championships from 2017 to '26, a milestone that has never been accomplished in the history of competitive cheerleading in the state of Florida.
And whereas the team's success reflects the leadership of former head coach Paige Black and current head coach Victoria Jones, whose commitment to excellence, character development, and community pride has played a pivotal role in the program's historic achievement. And whereas the Lake Mary High School cheerleading team overcame adversity and demonstrated resilience, determination, and composure under pressure, exemplifying the highest ideals of sportsmanship and competitive spirit. And whereas the championship reflects the dedication of the coaching staff, student athletes, their families, school administrators, and supporters whose collective efforts contributed to this remarkable season, and whereas this achievement has brought significant recognition to Seminole County and serves as an inspiration to youth throughout the community to pursue excellence. Now therefore be it resolved that we, the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County, Florida, do hereby congratulate the Lake Mary High School cheerleading team for winning the twenty five-twenty six FHSAA Class 2A State Championship and extends its sincere congratulations to the cheerleaders, coaches, families, and supporters for this historic accomplishment adopted this twelfth day of May twenty twenty six.
Thank you.
I have a motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, it passes unanimously. And now Commissioner Lockhart and I will do our chair for you.
Coach, would you like to say a word?
While Coach Black is coming forward, think yeah, while Coach Black is coming forward, I will tell you my daughter, who is now almost 30, was just blessed to have Coach Black as her coach in middle school. And so your time here has been incredibly rewarding and valuable to our kids for many, many years. So we appreciate you.
You so She's going love
that you told her age. She's
a young 30.
And I wanted to say, yes, I've had the privilege to coach the Lake Mary High School cheer team for the last twelve years. And I wanted to say on behalf of the coaches, the cheerleaders, the parents in the school, thank you for this honor, this recognition today. I really appreciate it. I think, as she just said pretty much everything about winning the state champion, that this is definitely history being made, winning ten straight years in a row. That's ten years of excellence.
And I think a lot of people, for those of you who don't know that much about cheerleading, a lot of people say, oh, it's just cheerleading. They also say, oh, Lake Mary, they've done it year after year. They're just gonna continue to do it. But, cheerleading is truly a sport, and these girls are true athletes. And they have to dedicate have dedication, hard work.
They have they put so much into this, and the pressure every single year just builds because you're expected to win now. And so I just wanna say that they stepped up and did the job that they needed to do. For those of you who don't, again, don't know that much about cheerleading, it's not like football game where you're out there for, like, two hours. It's a one time, one chance, two minute, thirty second routine that you have to hit perfectly to win. And that's just a lot of pressure on these girls.
And this year, this team has just done amazing to work hard, sacrifice in order to step up and win. But not only that, like what you were saying earlier, Amy, is that I'm not only proud of these girls as champions on the mat, but these are amazing young ladies just in general. They're teamwork, they're role models. Most of them are involved in National Honor Society at the school and, Spanish Honor Society. They're they're academic excellence, so they definitely represent Lake Mary well. So I'm super proud of them, and I definitely believe that they're never gonna be forgot forgotten for this historic day and year. Thank you. Thank you. And go rounds.
Thank you for your leadership. All right. We have one more resolution honoring the retirement of UCF Senior Associate Vice President for Government and Community Relations, Mr. Fred Kittenger. And this will be read by Commissioner Constantine.
Fred Thank you very much, Madam Chair. I would be remiss to say to the ladies of Lake Mary Lake Mary. Need to finish it.
Lee, you need to stop all your heads.
Stop. Stop. That UCF's cheerleading squad has are in the top five every single year, so I hope some of you are going there.
All right. There we go.
Thank you very much. And also, thank you very much for the pineapples from, you know, from the guys over at the tourism. Thank you very much. I am very honored make a motion to on this resolution because this has been a friend of mine for over forty years. And sit down and relax, everybody.
I hope you have a cup of coffee or whatever because we had to cut this resolution down. It didn't fit on one page. So it's a long one, but it's worthy of everything that is said in it. And so I will move the resolution to the Summit County Board of County Commissioners recognizing the retirement of Fred Kittenger. Whereas a proud alumnus of the University of Central Florida class of '80, Fred earned a bachelor's of arts with honors and later a master's of public administration from Florida State University, reflecting his long lifelong commitment to learning and leadership.
And whereas Fred Kittenger has dedicated more than four decades to public affairs, higher education, civil engagement, serving as a steadfast advocate for collaboration among government, community organizations, and the private sector. And whereas Fred served as the chief of staff for the Orlando mayor, Glenda Hood, providing eight years of exemplary leadership in municipal government and later held roles as vice president for government affairs and executive director of the small business chamber for greater Orlando chamber of commerce after beginning his public service career as a legislative aide to state senator George Stewart junior. And whereas in 2003, he was approached by senior vice president emeritus Dan Holzenbeck and board of trustees charter member Patrick Christensen regarding an opportunity at the University of Central Florida working with local governments, an opportunity that led to his long and impactful tenure at the university. And whereas throughout his career at UCF, Fred strengthened partnerships across Orange County, the city Of Orlando, Seminole County, and the broader Central Florida region, advancing collaboration among the university, local governments, public agencies, and community stakeholders to support economic development, workforce pipelines, research initiatives, and regional innovation, and played a vital role in advancing major institutional milestones, including the College of Medicine, the Florida Interactive Entertainment Academy, the UCF Downtown expansion of the Business Incubator Program, and key infrastructure investments.
And whereas Fred demonstrated a deep commitment to student success through the UCF Legislative Scholars Program, which he helped establish and guide alongside of Dan Holzenbeck and Allison Shultz, creating an immersive experience in which students gained firsthand exposure to the legislative process in Tallahassee. And since its inception in 2005, more than 320 students have participated. And whereas he further supported student achievement through his service as an adjunct instructor at the University of Central Florida's School of Public Administration and together with his wife of forty three years established the Fred and Sandra Kittenger scholarship fund in 2020 to support graduate students in public administration. And whereas his civic leadership extends across Central Florida through service on numerous boards and organizations, including Junior Achievement of Central Florida, Orange County Research and Development Authority, Orlando After School All Stars, and past leadership roles in Tiger Bay of Central Florida and the Coalition for the Homeless and the university's Alumni Association.
whereas in 04/22/2026, Fred concluded nearly twenty three years of service to the University of Central Florida as senior associate vice president for government and community relations and director of state and local government, marking the culmination of a distinguished career. And whereas he is supported by his devoted family, including his wife, Sandra B. Kittenger, their daughter, Alisa, and granddaughter, Paisley, who bring him great joy and pride. Now, therefore, be it resolved, we, the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners, hereby recognize and honor Fred Kittenger for his exceptional career in service, leadership, and dedication to the University of Central Florida and the Central Florida community, and that his legacy of collaboration, mentorship, and institutional advancement will continue to be strengthened in the region for generations to come. Second.
We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, it passes unanimously. Mister Kittenger, would you like to have a word? Thank
you so much, madam chairman. Good morning, commissioners Lockhart, Delari, commissioner Zinbauer, and, of course, the original mister UCF, Lee Constantine. Thanks, commissioner Constantine. If the good lord wants to call me home today, I think we just had eulogy read, so it's probably as good time as as any. But, madam chair, just fifteen seconds of personal privilege, especially while we have the Lake Mary state champions here. We're also lucky to have in the room some coaching loyalty that comes out of Lake Mary, probably the best known coach in the state of Florida and definitely well known to Lake Mary. That's their former soccer coach state champion, Larry McCorkle, my cousin, is here today. Larry? Oh,
yeah. There you go.
I'll probably be taken off the Christmas card list for that. Commissioners, madam chair, on the way over here today, I'm almost crossing the bridge on the 417 across Lake Jessup. It reminded me of all the times I've come up here to Seminole County, meeting with you all, your predecessors, and your staff about so many different projects and partnerships. And just for the audience, I want them to realize how closely intertwined UCF and Seminole County are together. The incubator system that was talked on earlier is recognized as the best in the state and it's best in the nation.
One of the shining jewels in that crown is the Seminole County incubator Mhmm. In a soft landing program, one of the best that you'll find in Central Florida, one of the best you'll find in the country. We've also had a long term partnership with the medical school. A lot of folks don't realize Seminole County was one of the first endorsers and funders of the UCF College of Medicine because you you realized what it meant to growing that economic sector of health care and life sciences. Just recently, when it comes to economic development, you all recognize the role that modeling simulation training takes place here in Central Florida.
We have the nation's largest cluster with envy of so many other communities, but you recognize the importance that it plays here in Central Florida. Not too long ago, you'll help support the creation and launching of LegacyPoint and now we're working with your staff as we go through the next phase of growth for LegacyPoints. And when it comes to our students, you are one of the biggest supporters of our emergency management students' internships. Every year, there are lots of our students, undergraduate and graduate students that come to your emergency management program here in Seminole County, which is one of the best run-in the state. It, I think, is a large contributor to the fact that our graduate program in emerging management is ranked number one in the nation.
My point being, these partnerships are so important to UCF and I believe to Seminole County. One of my former bosses, Jacob Stewart said, we don't do collaborations because they're easy, we do them because they make us better. And I'm convinced those collaborations, those projects, those partnerships between Seminole County and UCF had made both UCF and Seminole County better. I'm honored to be here today. I'm humbled by the proclamation. I think that I should have turned the table. The proclamation should have been given to you all for your partnerships with UCF, but I so greatly appreciate the chance to be here today. And lastly, I want to recognize your tremendous staff. Forty four years of work and I've worked with a lot of staffs around the state, state level, local, cities, counties, etcetera. You'll have one of the very, very best.
I'm known for years and worked for years with Darren Gray, with Tricia Tricia Johnson, with Kate Latour both here and in Orange County, and of course with Guy who has no last name because he's like Cher, Madonna, Bono. It's just just Guy. But your staff of public administrators and professionals, they are rock solid, and I hope your constituents appreciate just what a strong team you all built here. Again, thank you and wish you both individually as well as collectively the best as you continue to lead Seminole County and Central Florida. Thank you very much.
Thank you, sir. Thank you for your service. Commissioners, will you meet me down on the floor for pictures? Alright, gentlemen. If you want to take five minutes.
Madam chair, if I may for a moment, I don't know if Fred Kidd, you're still in the room. Fred, you still back there somewhere in the hallway?
He's saying goodbye to everybody. I
just wanna add something. You know, through the years, so many things have happened throughout Central Florida. No matter what county you are part of, either Orange, Osceola, Lake, Seminole, Volusia, even Brevard. And there's been one voice, many voices, but there's one voice many times that people don't hear but is front and center because she doesn't want the limelight. It's that quiet voice that's always getting something done, and that's Fred Kittinger.
I met Fred I met met Fred when he was with Glenda Hood a number of years ago. Sometimes it feels just like just a moment. And one thing that always impressed me about Fred Kittenger was he was always promoting other people around him. He was always promoting the issue and not himself. And Fred, I'm gonna tell you, it went very noticed, and we cannot thank you enough for all the wonderful things that you've done for this county and this region.
You are truly, truly a legend that will not be forgotten. And this is just a small thank you. We cannot even begin to say how much thank you because your fingerprint and your footsteps are on so many different places that I can remember when I was first starting out in the nineties, you were the one that actually helped me and helped make me understand what economic development was about, what partnership was about, what UCF. I mean, it just goes on and on and on and on. I cannot thank you enough for your leadership, your guidance, and your friendship. Thank you.
Thank you. Have a wonderful day. Alright, commissioners. Commissioner Lockhart stepped out for a minute. We're going to move to additions, deletions, and modifications. I'll go to the county manager first.
Thank you, madam chairman and commissioners. Just to correct changes to the consent agenda. Item number seven under the county manager's consent agenda, I'd like to move that one in our local agreements with the municipalities, move that under my report this afternoon. As you all know, there were a couple of meetings last night and we just need to update a couple of agreements, so I'll bring those back this afternoon. And then Item 12, I would like to pull and I'll be bringing that one back to the Board. And other than that, no other changes. Thank you.
Commissioner Lockhart had no nothing to pull. Commissioners, is there anything to pull?
I have nothing. No, ma'am.
With that, I'll entertain a motion.
Madam chair. No. I'm sorry.
Public comments. Public comment.
No public comment. No public comment. Thank you.
Madam chair, I'm prepared to make a motion.
Please do.
I move the approval of consent agenda for items number six, eight through eleven, thirteen through 26.
Do I have a second? Second. Any discussion? All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, the motion passes unanimously. That takes us to the regular agenda. The first up is Chief Kinley with Fire and Capital Improvement Plan.
Real quick, Madam Chairman and Commissioners, as Chief Kinley is getting prepared for his presentation, normally we would do this type of presentation during our budget work sessions. However, since this is going to be pretty lengthy, we thought that we would save some time and do it early for the commission and get your feedback on our plan.
Fabulous. Take it away, chief.
So good morning. For the record, Matt Kenley, fire chief, Sycamore County Fire Department, and we're here to talk about our five year capital improvement plan within the fire department. The purpose of this is to provide an update on SCFD's five year capital improvement plan for construction, demonstrate the return on a prior millage investment, present projects based on demand and cost escalation, and seek board approval of the CIP. You'll see the agenda will go through the background, the ten past ten years of return on your investment, call load trending, capital improvement plan for construction, and future capital improvements. So background, back in 2017 the board helped out the fire department and the citizens by raising the millage to invest in our infrastructure and our fleet.
At the time, coming out of a downturn, our facilities were in disrepair and we were having challenges with our fleet and their reliability. In that nearly ten years, the citizens return on investment has shown three new fire stations constructed, over 32 facility, major facility upgrades and projects for modernization, fleet expansion to meet the service demand along with achieving the ISO one rating. Result being faster response times, improved reliability, and enhanced public safety. Just to hit some of the highlights of the major projects, we've had eight stations with window replacements upgraded to hurricane rated windows. Obviously our firefighters are in those stations during hurricanes.
Nine bathroom upgrades are makeup of our firefighters has changed over time and having the communal bathrooms just no longer is an appropriate way of doing business. Six kitchen renovations, three HVAC system upgrades, two roof replacements, two floor and interior improvements, four stations with driveway replacements and we continue to do that. We've added two aerial style trucks in quince to our fleet that helps get the ladder service on scene in the appropriate time for ISO ratings. We've added another tower truck, aerial platform, an airboat, two engines for 39 and 29, two rescues for '39 and 29, and we've rotated through our entire fleet. We have a very, very reliable fleet.
So I want to go through our construction over the since 2017. As we're going through this, I want you to pay particular attention to the construction costs and the build times. Station 29, which was built in November 2017 in the Jamestown, Aloma area, took thirteen months of build time, dollars 3,600,000 in cost. The return on investment is a 35% improvement in response times in that area. It was definitely a hole within the county.
We have Station 11 in the Altamont area. This was a partnership with the city of Altamonte. They provided us $2,000,000 in the land, it was the old post office property, to be able to move the station over there. One of the biggest challenges we had with that station is it being two story, is in their administrative complex, and it worked. It just took a long time to get to the fire trucks.
This is one of the few stations we still had with poles and very long poles in some areas coming out of the bunk room. It just took a long time to get to the trucks. What we've seen there, a build time of three years and ten months, total cost of $5,300,000 as you can see this is starting to creep up, and an 18% improvement in turnout times. And a turnout time being from the time they get the call to the time that the truck is rolling. The third station, Station 39 out in the Payola area, build time of two years and three months, total cost almost $11,000,000, improved coverage in that area and response times, we experienced a 22% improvement in the response times.
That station added a tower truck, an engine, a rescue, and soon to be traffic attenuator, the blocking vehicle that was approved in this year's budget. We should be we've received delivery of that. We're just outfitting it with all the technology that will help to keep our firefighters safe on the roadways. I know in my twenty five years, the closest I've ever come to injury, the scaredest I've ever been as a company officer that my crew was hurt was on the roadways. Fires, we do we train for that all the time.
Roadways, we cannot control the public being safe. Our equipment. So cost of trucks across the board has nearly doubled or more. Back in 2018, we're just under $600,000 for a truck, now we're almost at $1,200,000 That's just the cost of the truck. That doesn't include the equipment.
This continues to escalate. As you know, we did in the past order trucks early when we were experiencing 34% increases every two to three months. We've saved a total of nearly $2,000,000 in ordering trucks early. That has stabilized. We're now experiencing across all of them about a 3% to 4% increase every year, which is normal.
That's what we've experienced in the past, but obviously it's a 3%, 4% off of a much bigger number. Rescues, an 80% increase. We will experience with our rescues, so back in 2017 when I was the EMS chief we switched to a different style of truck, the Braun truck. That box that you see where the patient compartment is at is all aluminum welded together, it's one piece. We'll experience a 20% savings.
We're looking at fiscal year twenty eight with every rescue that we get from then on because we're able to refurb. We can pull that box off of the back of that truck, re chassis it, not only saving that 20%, which is about 80,000 to $90,000 but also getting it back much quicker. We're still at two year build times on these rescues, we could get it back in six to eight months. So very, we're very much looking forward to that. Our tower trucks, which is not something we buy all the time, about every three to four years we look at replacing one instead of every year, it's doubled and then some.
Just a specialty unit that we need to have, but those costs don't stop. So what did all this get us? Outside of a great service and great response times, we've achieved every accolade that you possibly can in the fire service, and in reality, the emergency medical service. One of the goals initially was ISO one, and we have achieved that. That means to the citizen, to the businesses in Seminole County, potential of reduced insurance rates.
I know after we received an ISO one, I had one of our local citizens that comes in on a regular basis who told the story and it made my heart feel good because I was afraid he's gonna kill me, that he this ISO one and it doesn't mean anything, and then he called his insurance company and they said he was going get a reduction. And he couldn't have been more thrilled. I think his comment was the first time he's seen government do what they actually said they were going to do. So I was was very happy.
He's not here right now, that was Bill.
No, he's
not back there. So
that was great. One of our first accreditations that we got was Cass, and that's on the ambulance side of the business. And I'd like to take just a moment to announce that we have been here recently told that we have been reaccredited for the fifth time with CAS with a perfect score. That's a testament to the commitment that this board, the county manager's office, and our crews have in this organization. Without all that working together, we just can't achieve these things.
We've also and I call this getting the master's degree, the CFAI accreditation, that's the fire accreditation, one of the most difficult ones to get. It's all about continuous improvement and we continue to do that. And outside of the reaccreditation of CAST, most recently, our comm center received ACE accreditation. So CHAT GPT verified. We are the only fire department in the country that has all of those accreditation. And if you take ACE out of it, we're one of seven that have the other three. Wow. That's that's a big deal. That's a big deal. And of those seven, there's only one other county in there of our size.
It's a very difficult thing to do and it's a testament, again, to the men and women in our department and all the great things that they do. So on with the agenda, call load and trending. Obviously you know response times are one of our major drivers. Looking at the past four years, we've had a stabilization of our call load. You see we're right around 50,000 calls the last four years, our population has not stopped coming in, and we've taken some time to verify by data and also hypothesize of why this may be.
It's interesting that you look at 2022 as the year that it started to level off. That's also the same year that we instituted community paramedicine from board direction. That has been there's very few things I've seen in the fire service that are universally loved, and there's not anybody down to the ground, to the troops, that have anything negative to say. They love this program, We love this program. The citizens love this program.
What it has done is virtually, if not completely, eliminate the high utilizers of the 911 system. Our crews identify who they think needs assistance beyond just us responding to their house. And our community paramedics and crews go out there and connect them to all the phenomenal services that are within Seminole County to get them the assistance that they need, often which is not 911 or an ER. That has completely stopped our high utilizers. You get a couple of calls, they get referred, and we stop that from happening any longer and improve the quality of life for that citizen.
Other things that we, again, can use data, if you look over the span of time, we've experienced a 500 call decrease in motor vehicle accidents. We hypothesize of why that may be. We have connected vehicle technology. We have cars now that yell at you when you're about to you're getting too close to somebody I hate my wife's car and keep you within your lane. We have equipment within the trucks through a partnership with DOT, a multi million dollar project, we're utilizing the system that warns people when they're approaching an auto accident that we're at or that we're approaching behind them.
All of these different things contribute to that call load stabilizing. You start adding in the ER in every corner, telehealth, all these different ways that people can access services without calling 911, is more convenient, in the long run it's cheaper, they're utilizing that. You sprinkle in a little prevention and community outreach and that's why we believe that our call load has stabilized. So now I'm going go into our capital improvement for the next five years. This is a focus on needs, not wants.
We had a much more aggressive capital improvement plan over the years looking at call load increasing 3,000, 7,000 calls a year, that just hasn't happened. So we're resetting to go with just what we need while obviously keeping the service that we provide at the forefront. One of the biggest changes, as you saw we went through the other slides of our accomplishments, you saw those build times continuing to increase. The county has chosen to do a different way of doing construction and the construction manager at risk. Rather than hard bids, we get a relationship with the contractor with the hopes that we'll have projects on time, better cost controls, this all because we're allowing early contractor involvement.
So our first one, which we were all at the other day, Station 25 in Casselberry. We've already had the groundbreaking on that, originally built in nineteen seventy five, thirteen point nine million dollars estimated cost, estimated completion of April 2027. Partnership with the city of Casselberry, who we have the interlocal agreement that we took over fire services for them, they've donated the land, which is next to their new police headquarters, and we're putting the new fire station there. Anybody who knows this fire station, right at the end of the flyover coming onto Redbug, it's an awful spot. Old building, it's the crew is overly excited about the prospects of moving into their new building.
The next project is the fire training center living quarters. This is a two thousand two thousand five hundred square foot replacement structure. If you remember, a few years ago we had a double wide trailer that was out here. It has since was such disrepair, we had mold, there was rats, and we it has never been replaced. So we need a living quarters out there.
We have a lot of other infrastructure, we have tens of millions of dollars of apparatus and equipment out there. So one of the questions that I get asked when you start talking to 200-2500 square foot structure at 2,000,000 plus is why is this different than residential construction? So there's a lot of reasons. The one key term is an essential building. You have an essential building versus residential construction.
When you're looking at versus, residential construction has to withstand through the building code 140 mile an hour winds. That's right about the point where we stop running calls because the wind speeds have gotten so high. Commercial structure has to withstand 170 mile an hour winds. That 30 miles an hour is significant. It requires more infrastructure as far as building materials, building supplies, engineering, all of which cost more and more money.
Also with this particular project, we're having to engage with St. Johns River permitting. Again, we're early in on this, we're not even quite a 30% plan, so a lot of this is estimations of worst case scenarios. I just had a meeting here this week that we're already, okay, here's $200,000 we can knock off, here's another 150,000 But there's a lot of infrastructure that's involved with this. We may need to, again anticipating, may not have need to underground exfiltration for this particular site.
The spot where it is at is gravel, which under the previous building codes was not was considered a pervious surface, now it's not. So when we put that building there, we have to worry about stormwater. Residential doesn't have to deal with stormwater, we have to consider the stormwater. When it comes to contractors, so the contractors aren't the same. When you have residential construction versus this type of construction, it's not the same contractors.
The costing is different. The insurance requirements are different. Just working with the county, the process, paperwork, billing is all different. It adds time, it adds manpower, it just adds personnel services. And that's before we even get to design. Already talked about all the it's a much stronger building HVAC system. In your residential home, you have basically the tubing that goes in that you're able to move around. In a building like this, it has to be the the more rigid with different types of filtration. All of this drives the cost to be more. That's before design.
That's a that's after design. Because design now takes on all of those extras and even coming to a point where we can start to build the structure. On to my favorite one. Station 23 Of Howe Branch is our oldest station. It's older than I am.
If you look, I wish mister Horvath was here. This was the station when Mr. Horvath called and says he's fired back in time, this was his volunteer fire station in the Howell Branch District. If you look where the apparatus were parked, that first block parked, that was the original station, everything else we've added on. We've just recently got to a point with our fire truck design that we don't have to buy a special fire truck specifically for this station because the depth of the bay was so short.
We've, for decades, had to buy a special truck that had a shorter wheelbase. We've changed our design so we don't have to do that anymore. It floods, it's got the bathroom problem, it just doesn't meet the makeup for our workforce. So you see the wooded lock, which is directly across the street, we already have that, we've had kickoff of design of that station, we're hoping to be able to leverage bringing it right off of Howell Branch so that we can take advantage of the mast arm that is already there, that has potential to save us a half $1,000,000 in the construction of it, but we're again early in on that process. Station 36 in Heathrow, Lake Mary Boulevard, Markham Woods Road, originally built in 1985.
Small station, you see the unique design that was in collaboration with the citizens of Heathrow and that's why it looks the way that it does. I was having a very interesting conversation with Chief Kaiser the other day who oversaw the building of the station, and he just reminded me that this was designed to add a third bay, which we want to do. We also need to expand the living quarters to accommodate not only the personnel that are there today, but personnel going into the future. This one we are asking from what we currently have loaded into the budget to add $1,000,000 to the cost of renovating that. Next station is Station 24 in Winter Springs.
As you know, we have an interlocal agreement and merged with the City of Winter Springs Fire Department, built in 1975. We're looking to also add a million dollars to what's currently locked and loaded for this station. We call this one the house of doors. It's awful. It's so spread out.
This not only was their fire department, but it was also their administrative building. So going out to, if you're looking at it to the right, that was all administrative offices and there's doors absolutely everywhere. We need to gut it and reconfigure it to help not only with the living conditions but also getting them closer to the bay for their turnout times. Last, we're looking at Station 42 out in Geneva. This is currently in the current CIP as a renovation.
We've taken a long hard look at this, engaged with multiple contractors and designers trying to figure out if we can expand this to our need on the current site. And the answer is no. It's a very tight site. There's a giant retention in the back that we can't make smaller. This needs to be a rebuild and relocate.
This is what I call a specialty station that's out in the woods. This is a base of operations for everything that happens out in the rural area when we have hurricanes, flooding, brush fires, this is where everybody goes. Currently at that station we have an engine, a rescue, a tanker, a woodch truck, an airboat, and this is often where our one of our high water vehicles gets gets deployed, which ends up just pulling in on the side of on the side of the building, doesn't matter what the weather is. With all that equipment comes personnel. They're busting at the seams.
This is something that we need, we're proposing to do a relocate, rebuild rather than just renovate. There's multiple properties that are available in the area, which we're looking into, Just waiting for after this meeting to pull any triggers on those discussions. We're talking a little under $10,000,000 to add to that budget. So 5 year plan at a glance, we're looking at six projects, nearly $60,000,000, two station renovates along with relocates of three stations plus the fire training center, and a fleet investment of just under $30,000,000. So at this point, that's what we're do that's what we're proposing to do in five years.
Now looking into the future, and there's no timeline on any of this. This is just things that we anticipate as a need as our call load rises if and when it does. Land being a priority. We got to get land. So the first station, station ten out in the Altamont area.
You see out in the 434 Maitland Boulevard corridor. There used to be station ten out there back with the merger with Altamont. There was a double wide trailer, it was a rescue only that was in our local that it would go away after two years and it did. Since then, we all know the development that has gone out there. Station thirteen, what you see to the west, is the current trucks that respond into that area.
And they can get into some of that area in a reasonable amount of time. But it's not even just about that first call, it's about the second call, because once they go in there, it is completely barren on that side of the county. It takes a long time for station sixteen or twelve to respond into that area. We're often moving trucks up, which we're splitting up resources. This is a need this would be the priority need in the future as our call load rises.
Station twenty eight in Winter Springs. We currently have land at Tuskewilla and 434. Again, we all know the development that's going on around there. You drill down into Winter Springs, the call load has stabilized just like everywhere else. But as more people move into the county, again, we see that as a need going into the future.
Again, we already own that land. Station 19, unincorporated in the Longwood area at Lake Emma and Longwood Hills. We currently own land there, that's a small piece of property, it would not do our prototype three base station, we'd have to do something different. Again, looking at call load, watching the need, we're not quite there yet. Station 18 in the Rolling Hills area where our new park is going to be and that infrastructure building.
We're anticipating that with that improved infrastructure that many of those homes are going to be expanded and you're going to see newer families moving into that area, which brings more people, which brings call load. We do need land. Station 43 in Chuleoda. The other side of the other part of our rural fire stations. On a small piece of property, small station, engine, rescue, tanker, wood truck, UTV, they're all currently there.
We are at the breaking point. We start adding any additional resources there, we definitely need to expand. Again, watching the call load in the area, dependent upon just everything, all the development that's happening out there and when that happens. Station 22 in Fern Park. So if you remember, this was on a previous CIP as a much higher need.
Our intention was to replace and put a tower truck there for all the development that was looking like it was going to happen around there. And not that it's not going to, but with the movement of Station 25, which has a tower truck, and the improved road network that's happened through there, specifically on Oxford Road, Station 25 could get in there fairly quickly for a tower truck, not as a primary unit. So what we proposed and what was approved is that Station 25 in 2028 we will put an engine into service there. We can then take that tower, which is really operating as a quint right now from the merger. It's not a quint, it's a tower.
It can do what it's designed to do, which is to be a tower and the fire truck can be a fire truck. And that tower will then be available to be able to respond into that area. That keeps us from having to build a whole new fire station anytime soon. Lastly is Station 30 out in the Paola, the Northeast part or Northwest part of the county, out Yankee Lake and beyond. Again, I know in my career when I went out to 34, it was my first station, there wasn't anything.
There was a mobile gas station across the street and that was it. Wow, it's different. And as that continues to creep, more people move in, more businesses come in, we see a need in the future for station thirty. I would like to mention that we have property at Yankee Lake, would be perfect for that station. So next steps, what we're asking for is that we adopt the five year CIP as part of the fiscal year twenty seven budget process, as the county manager said, doing this now rather than doing it during that because of the length of it, provide any direction and feedback, and give us direction to continue to monitor cost escalations and needs and we'll adjust annually.
And that's all I have.
Thank you. Questions? Commissioner Zimbauer?
I move that we adopt the five year CIP with an annual update.
If we need to go to public comment.
I'll make the I'll second it for discussion and public comment.
Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any public comment? No, ma'am. So no request. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Madam chair. Yes. Thank you, madam chair. First of all, chief, I wanna say thank you to you, but I'd like to most importantly say thank you for the people behind you, not physically behind you, but actually providing all this data and analysis and all the hard work that they do, all the men and women. I think it's a good presentation.
I think the five year CIP is spot on. The only emphasis that I wanna make sure that we talk about is that, as we all know, land as we are developing does become a premium. I'd like to make sure that if there's opportunities out there that we look at that, not build them, but secure the properties so that we can make sure that we're moving forward at the appropriate time when you and your staff and the county manager staff believe that we should pull the trigger. That's just, I think, prudent because otherwise you're buying commercial property or residential property and have to take something down. I'd rather not do that. But I want to plan for the future as we've done in the past many times. And again, I commend you for the hard work and the dedication and your staff.
Further comments? Yes. Commissioner Lockhart.
Yeah. I wanted to there's two parts to this presentation, and I think that we want to make sure, at least for my purposes, the CIP that you're proposing is currently within proposed revenue estimates of the county. Is that correct?
Yes, that's correct.
So there's nothing that's being proposed in that five year capital improvement plan that a board two, three, four, five years from now will get caught unawares and go, well, wait a minute, don't have in our revenue projections the ability to pay for any of this.
It keeps us at approximately actually a little bit higher, 20% reserves.
Fabulous. I think that was important to hit on the record. I do have a question about one of the pieces of property that you have identified that we already own and if this is a follow-up answer, that's perfectly fine. The one in Longwood
Lake on Emma.
Yep. That's across from the Publix. I think we have owned that for a long, long time.
Was it originally purchased to be a fire station?
Okay. And has our prototype changed? Is that why it's not the right size?
It was never the right size and we did not have a prototype then.
I'm going to be sorry I asked that question. So how are we going to make sure we don't buy the wrong size piece of property moving forward?
We know the size that we need, which is 2.5 acres at a minimum to, again, fit our prototype. If there's so like Station 10, that's very challenging out in that area. We're looking at partnerships potentially with SSC. We'll see how those things work out. If we have to buy a smaller piece of property, it just will not we won't be able to utilize our prototype and we'll have to design something different.
We can do it. It all depends on infrastructure, like Station 11 was in reality built on just under two acres of land, but it already had storm water. And that's the key that we have to hold our own water. Depends on what the infrastructure is in the area. If there's a retention pond that's nearby that has capacity that we could potentially utilize, the land need goes down. But assuming that we need to build the station and retain our own water, two and a half acres of land is the minimum.
Okay. And then we talked about our collaboration with the cities for whom we have agreements to to do their fire for them, like Winter Springs and Castleberry and Altamont. But for cities, like Longwood, where we're talking about doing some movement of some stations in and around their area that may affect their service and and their service delivery to to the community, Are we actively engaged in conversations with them so that we are not playing in each other's sandboxes unintentionally? Where are we with those kinds of conversations moving forward?
So the fire chiefs meet every month. And, yes, we have these conversations on what we're planning to do, what is actually happening because planning and actually happening are two different things. But 100%, if somebody is putting a station or a resource somewhere, it affects everyone else and completely changes the dynamic of what is in the best interest of the county as a whole. Again, and you know this, that we work in what is a unique first response system. We don't recognize borders.
We utilize each other's apparatus by GPS location, the closest, most appropriate unit goes. So trying to put the chess pieces all in the best spot while being separate organizations takes a lot of collaboration.
We appreciate you doing it. And I think it's really important that the county manager continue those comp not just with the fire chiefs, but that the city and county managers Mhmm. Really dive deep into these conversations as we plan moving forward.
And actually I was going to comment on that and they're, you know, they have a new city manager there that just started this past year.
Who was their fire
chief? He was Maitland's fire chief.
Maitland's fire chief. Him and I have already been in some conversations about that.
Great. Thank you. Those are all my questions.
Commissioner Zinbauer, could you have your hand up?
I would yes, thank you, Madam Chair. On Station 42, and I don't need an answer from county manager right now. I would just ask that we have a very candid conversation with Volusia County Mhmm. That since we are utilizing that station to service a significant portion of their Southeastern corridor of their county, maybe they should write a check. Okay. That's a prop share. Absolutely. For us to continue down that corridor.
Good dialogue.
Yes. Otherwise, they would need to build their own station to the tune of what we're seeing here. And they and they don't have that dense population down in that corridor, so I think that's a conversation we should be having.
Absolutely. And the conversations that we had, what, a couple years ago about them increasing their funding for the operation that was responding there, you all had asked Chief and I to go and talk Doctor. Correct. They Which we did, and they were very collaborative. Yes. They need us in that area.
Correct.
That's a good point. Yeah, so.
I'll definitely do that. Thank you.
Commissioner Constantine? Thank
you very much. I just wanted to tell you, Chief, you know, the promises made, promises delivered, and I appreciate very much the it it's it I think it it's worthy to that we point out what you indicated before about the honors and the accolades, the certificates that this fire department has received. That that is unprecedented. And to be the only one in the nation, it's, you know, it's hard to put your arms around that, but I just again wanted you and everyone as Commissioner Delorey said behind you to know how important that is and how really grateful we are that you've done that. I mean, many of us were in up here on the dais when we had to ask for an increase in ad valorem when we were talking about the fire department and I recall the angst of so many individuals in the community that, oh my god, it's not going to be worth anything, the fire department's fine, we don't need anything.
I recall one person huffing and puffing, bringing thousands and thousands of petitions down, which turned out to be less than hundreds and also form letters pretty much. And today, you know, everything that you and the department said would happen has happened, including what you indicated with the individual that said that their insurance is reduced. And we tried to sell it on that, and it worked. And I just wanted to tell you, it is important when people recognize that the government does deliver. So thank you very much.
And the boots on the ground. We we have it's humbling as a fire chief to have such a dedicated workforce. They're bar none, they are phenomenal on every aspect of this all hazards fire department. So
thank you, commissioners. I do have a couple of comments. First of all, for county manager's office, I I think the if we're the only one, we need better public relations around that. And I realize that the PIO for your operation does that. We need to be doing that as well.
We this should be on every single thing we print, every single thing we put. Like, Chief Kinley, I appreciate you explaining the 2,500 feet at $2,500,000 because I think my head came unglued while we were talking about, you gotta walk me through the math. This math doesn't math. And I do understand it's commercial and I still do think there's opportunities there. I think as we're building these facilities, what I am hearing for the people that are in residence there is that appropriate tech versus high-tech needs to be analyzed.
You and I have had that conversation. I'm just getting it on the record. Every time they move, the lights come on, etcetera. So some of the stuff that we've been engaging with recently. I do think we own land in Rolling Hills, and I did bring this up in our briefing around the idea of we need to be figuring out if we have any land that we can use and then marking it for that now. Same with Yankee Lake, like let's get that dedicated. I do have a question as to whether or not we should think about a second prototype, not a new prototype, but a second prototype that as we build in more urban areas that don't take up the acreage that needs to be taken up, if it can be? And I'm not saying we have to discuss that now, but we at least need to think about it.
So there's a plan conceptually that when we do that, that would be the prototype. Once we build a once we're going to build one, we need to build one that's different, that would be our second prototype moving forward.
So on a chicken and egg conversation, I'm not sure which comes first because that means we're buying land that may or may not fit a prototype that we haven't built and we're retrofitting. I would rather have a prototype and then source the land. So for future thought. And then the last comment that I'll make is that this is a CIP. I think anything that you need to continue to shore up the paramedicine program that's clearly saving us on this is going to be in your regular budget discussion.
Okay. Just wanted that on the record. With that, commissioners, any further discussion? We've already clarified that there's no public comment. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing unopposed, it passes unanimously. Thank you so much, chief.
Thank you. Thank you.
The next item on our agenda is the indoor facility update with Rick Derr, Parks and Recreation Director at the helm.
And Chairman and Commissioners, we're going to have them sit at the table since this may be discussion. So there may be multiple speakers so they don't have to get up and down.
And how about while we're assimilating and getting ready, is there any public comment for this? I believe we do have So speaker forms for we may get you teed up to read the public comment notification and point they're ready. Efficient. Thank you.
Florida law provides that members of the public shall be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard on propositions before the Board of County Commissioners except when the board is acting on emergency or ministerial matters or conducting a meeting exempt from the requirements of the Sunshine Law. Individuals shall be permitted three minutes each for public comment or six minutes when the individual is an official representative of a formal association or group. The chairman may modify the maximum time for public comment at her sole discretion when appropriate. Public comments on quasi judicial or other public hearing items will not be heard during the board's consideration of those be heard during the board's consideration of those items this afternoon. Public comments on pending procurement matters or on non agenda items shall not be permitted at this time.
Members of the public desiring to make comment must fill out a speaker form and present the form to staff, and forms are available in the lobby. Madam Chair. Thank you so much. Mister Durer, we'll
turn it over to you.
Alright. I'll I'll actually start the
Mister Swanson.
Good morning, chairman and commissioners. Christian Swanson, Assistant County Manager.
Those you need to speak into.
Okay. Fair enough. I'll move it closer. Hopefully, that's better. I'm going to start with the agenda, and then I'll
kind of lay out, you
know, who all is here and who's speaking at what point. So, obviously, you've heard I'm here. I'm going be speaking about the recap of the retreat we had on March 10. Then Rick Durer, the Parks and Recreation Director, will be talking about item two, the potential land purchases, the building update and things like that. Guy Cunha, the Economic Development Director and Tim Jeks, the Budget Director will be talking about item three, project funding and return on investment update and then we'll just return to item four, the requested actions of the Board.
So with that, I will get started on the recap of March 10. So obviously it's a recap and a lot of this information is for the viewing public and things like that. So I apologize for the redundancy that may be with you all but for other folks it may be fresh. So I'll get started with just the site location of the facility that we're talking about. We're looking at a site for the indoor sports complex that is north and east of the Boomba Sports Complex on Lake Mary Boulevard.
So as you see in the lower left hand corner of this slide there is a kind of a hot pink color, that's the location we're talking about. It's just off of Moore Station Road. This is a facility that will host a variety of events or could host a variety of events. They will be potentially sports events such as basketball, volleyball, and other indoor events, as well as events such as graduations in the community and other special events. And I wanted to pause just briefly on the graduation aspect.
In the retreat there was a lot of discussion about what was presented, the size of the facility and things like that. What we're showing you today will accommodate the largest high school in the county and there's been a lot of conversations amongst a variety of staff even including County Manager Gray and Superintendent Beaman and a variety of other staff to make sure, you know, there's a potential for partnerships and things like that. So I just wanted to bring that right on out. So at the retreat, we talked about an approach that was multipurpose, flexible, expandable, could do a whole host of amenities, as well as accommodate things that were not just sporting events as I mentioned previously, and also kind of focus on community need events as well, things like post sheltering activities and things like that in the community. So we looked at the site and this is a closer aerial of the site.
The site that we own as a county is the site that has the yellow dash line around it, but we talked about the expandability of that potentially to the west and you'll see kind of a white block next to it with some 14 acres that was discussed as part of that conversation. We'll get into a bit more of that in a minute. Also at that retreat, we looked at three building options and they weren't static, they gave concepts so that conversations could be developed from that. So we presented an option one, which we called the Pizzuti drawing. It was a building that had multiple rooms in it and allowed multiple things to be going on at the same time, potentially more than just one event, but could expand to one large event.
Also in that concept we brought forward, it was construction, more energy efficient construction and that was to stimulate conversation. We also presented a second option which was the Lake Point Indoor Sports Complex and that was a drawing that you'd seen previously. It's a larger building, metal building type construction, arguably a little less durable, a little less energy efficient and things like that. And then the third option we discussed was a TID budget only option and we looked at backing into that program to say what would it buy. So those were the things that we discussed there.
The board in that meeting liked option one, the Pizzuti drawing and here's a picture of it. In that meeting there was a series of overlay drawings that showed how it convert for a bunch of different stuff. I'm not going to go through all that now, but as you see from the top of the drawing, the drawing allows for eight basketball courts at the top and then kind of a convertible championship area at the bottom in the bottom of the L area as well as some multi purpose rooms and things like that with it. In those conversations, we also presented a series of a la carte options. These were items that came about from the Pizzuti listening tour.
So as Pizzuti went through and they interviewed everyone, they come up with different comments and they made a list of them. We presented them. We felt that there was eight of them and I'll just run through these. We also presented the cost again and kind of give you an order of magnitude of what we were looking at. But we talked about a mezzanine parking garage overflow parking, the potential for additional beach volleyball or beach volleyball, an additional court to expand the area.
That was actually something that we spent a lot of time talking about in regard to graduation, which as I previously mentioned, we've got that sorted. And then also we talked about tilt wall construction and potentially maybe not quite a hardened building by the definition, but a close to hardened facility. We talked about that additional 14 acres of land, which was the white block I just showed you. And then we got to an option eight, which was we could expand the building with bleachers and things like that and kind of expand it out to make it larger. So looking at each one of these options and getting the board feedback, the mezzanine was an option the board liked and wanted us to investigate that and potentially use it for a walking track.
The parking garage was thought that would be maybe investigated as an alternate, also look at a return on investment for it. Overflow parking should be included in the base program. The beach volleyball was interested to be included into the base program. However, look at an ROI and make sure it made sense to go in there. So we've done that.
Also, looked at additional courses I referenced that plays into the graduation aspect of it and the flexibility, so include those. The tilt wall was desirous of the board. They liked the idea of the durability and also a more finished look to the building. The 14 acres of land, the direction was to move forward and look at the possibility of purchasing some of that land. And then the additional bleachers, just try to accommodate them where it made sense.
That was a comment there and we've done that. So the general feedback was the board wanted a facility that was flexible, could be used for local uses, hold multiple events at the same time, that was built out of a material that was durable, energy efficient, and took in maintenance costs as well as operation costs in it. And then finally, all of this, update our return on investments and look at them and make sure the numbers made sense. And it's those things today that's I'm I'm giving kind of the recap of it, but it's those things today that my colleagues are going to talk about and we'll go through these sequentially. So with that, I'm going to turn it over to Mr. Durer and he can update you on how those were incorporated into the drawings.
So, good morning Board. Excuse me. So, to orient everyone, we're looking at an aerial of the site again. The first item that we'll go ahead and report on is the adjacent land. The five acres or 4.97 acres that you see up at the top, the upper left of the drawing, that parcel is posted for sale, staff has contacted them, they are willing sellers.
That is a parcel that we could possibly move forward with in terms of looking at future expansion of the facility and or overflow parking areas. And then staff did look take a look at the balance of the properties highlighted in yellow just to the south of that, the 9.41 acres. There's 10 different parcels within that, several different owners of each of those parcels. Those are currently not posted as for sale, they would run on a much longer timeline to be determined. But at this particular point, the ones that looked primed in terms of action items would be the upper five acres.
So, in taking the building program that Christian gave you a recap on and then taking the a lot of the a la carte options if you will, and taking a look how that affected the overall building program and projected costs. This is an updated list to show you the various amenities and the sizes of the amenities that would be included in the larger footprint of the building or the adjusted footprint of the building. Right now, we're showing approximately 161,000 to 178,000 square feet as a range and there's a reason why when I show you a graphic of that, the main two volumes of the building are somewhat static and fixed based on court sizes and visitor sizes. The rest of the facilities, all of the storage, all of the multi purpose areas, all of support areas would be things that would be really refined as the project would go forward, meaning that that's where you're going to see a lot of flex maybe in the square footage, that would all flesh out in next stage of development, a design development for the building, hence the range in overall square foot of the building. But the bottom line would be is that we would look at a minimum of 12 basketball courts, that's inclusive of the championship Court, that equates to 22 volleyball indoor courts and could accommodate up to 7,500 guests for graduation in the main volume.
So, again, the discussion about what's the largest graduation size here in Seminole County, as well as could it accommodate Seminole State. The championship Court itself or the events area could accommodate up to 2,500 guests with movable bleachers and we'll show you a picture of what that looks like in just a moment. The ability to go ahead and then obviously support the activities there with food service, cafe, restaurants, some type of food service concept, not just for main events or banquets, but to serve as for visitors at various tournament play there in the building. But lots of different multi purpose rooms that we call them flexible spaces right now. We know that through the design, especially the Boomba Sports Complex, the need for official space, tournament organizers, first aid spaces, team spaces, those are going to change based upon the use, so making sure that we're building in that flexibility into those support spaces is going to be something that will be focused in on as the project continues.
The mezzanine and walking track have been supported and we'll show you what that looks like in just a moment, as well as outdoor facilities to help support the beach volleyball location as well. So, not building a number of outbuildings, if you will, to facilitate other events out on-site, but to be able to house them all in one location. And then also look at, and a lot of discussion was had about the ability for local folks and residents to be able to use this seven days a week if necessary, so the idea of having walking paths and park amenities there on-site. Overall, we're looking at development of the total 28 acres. There was a lot of discussion obviously regarding the parking lot, parking garage concept, as well as do we have a pay parking option that should we want to charge for different events, we could do so, but it would be at our discretion.
And then obviously, it would require all development of all utilities and infrastructure would be required on the site. We've got 25 courts spelled out in the beach volleyball complex and then the building style description is located and Christian spoke about those as well and that's on the drawings moving forward. So, one thing to keep in mind as we look at a drawing of the site itself is that this is at concept level. I know it looks pretty some areas look pretty hard lined and well refined, this is still a concept drawing at this particular point. And the idea at this point is to do things fit on the site, how do they fit, and if we were to proceed forward with a detailed design of the project, what are some of the features that we'd like to see and give direction to an architect and a site developer to go ahead and look at moving forward.
So, first foremost, we put the position, the indoor sports complex building itself and putting that envelope on the northern part of the site. Part of that is with the adjacencies that we have with Sanford Masonry to the north and that gives us some real good accessory units or better yet more like activity going on at the northern portion of the site. The other thing that that does is as we look at the development of the overall site footprint, is it takes all of the amenities and it pushes it towards Lake Mary Boulevard. So, the idea that we're taking the investment and the core amenities of the site and really pushing those out for the public to see creates not just a sense of arrival, but it is very consistent with how we've developed the Buuma Sports Complex about three quarters of a mile to our south along the Lake Mary Boulevard. What we've also been able to show is the idea that as we develop the site, we don't want to just develop the required infrastructure, a standalone infrastructure, that there is a way to develop the infrastructure and use it as an amenity.
So, the idea of taking the required storm water that will be required on-site with any development and being able to maximize its use by including that in the site planning for beach volleyball creates that amenity. We're going to have to provide the infrastructure already, we might as well amenitize it while we're looking at that. The ability to also take and utilize the rest of that green space around the required storm water and create more of a park like setting out on Lake Mary Boulevard. So, again, it really begs for the public to be able to use this facility with a series of pavilions, even a playground, not just for special events and tournaments, but for public use three sixty five days a year. The other thing that allows us to do is it allows us to take the front door, if you will, of the indoor sports complex building itself and create a real indoor outdoor experience between the types of events that you'll have inside as well as what you could do outside.
So, the idea of having a dual event that has both indoor and outdoor beach volleyball would be a huge game changer in this particular market, for example. The other part of this, by moving the amenities up to the front is we can take a really good look at taking really the back of house and keeping it in the back of house. We can design the parking lot and the entrance and egress and ingress of the site, keep it efficient, bring it in off of Moore Station Boulevard, that's a sports station road, excuse me, on the south part of the diagram. Likely, we would need to put a traffic signal at that location, handle it, bring it into the site and then be able to distribute the vehicular circulation throughout. The idea however is we would look at streamlining how that circulation moves throughout the site.
By taking our cues from other venues in the area, convention centers, theme parks that bring you in one way and then minimize the amount of times that you have the ability to cross other folks and direction of travel and keep the flow efficient and keep it safe. We'll minimize queue let me try that again in English queue timing, as well as any other being able to bring folks in and out of the site efficiently and smoothly. We also include on the north end of the site the possibility of a write out, directional write out. So, very similar to the way we developed the Boomba Sports Complex of having multiple egress options depending on the use of the facility. The last portion of this to describe is on the upper left corner of the drawing, the proposed overflow parking that would be for a potential acquisition at that location.
That's already a cleared site, fairly flat, that could probably go into operation from day one and then obviously the potential expansion area on the western part of the drawing as well, should additional properties become available over time and should that be a focus of the board moving through. So that's outside the building. We'll show a series of diagrams and again, this looks fairly hard lined. It is very much still a conceptual plan that has been adapted per the latest development program. So, you saw a slightly larger main volume on the top of the drawing that is 10 basketball courts that equates to 20 volleyball courts within the same space.
We've got the, on the lower right portion of the drawing, we've got what we call the main event area or the championship court area. You see a lot of lines on that one that would have retractable bleachers, could be a center court, if you will, or center championship court for basketball. It could be handled other days of a tournament where you basically retract the bleachers in and you could handle two basketball courts in that same space. And then, all the other ancillary features that would go to support the functions within the building. So, food service, multi purpose rooms, and so forth.
We know that through design development, these spaces will change sizes and they will be rearranged based upon efficiencies, but right now this is really just to give you an idea of a bubble diagram, if you will, of the types of different spaces that would be required to exist to support all the functions that would occur there. So, this is the common theme of the sketches that follow. We've the upper volume and then the lower volume of the main event space. Now, that was the 1st Floor. If you look at this from the 2nd Floor, the highlighted orange area around the main volume would say be the walking trackmezzanine area.
We'd have other landing spaces that if we wanted to increase the viewer capacity in that particular space to have a viewing down into the main volume, we could do so. And that we'd have other functions up on the 2nd Floor, obviously restrooms and other support functions. So, if this is the main organization of the building itself, you start to overlay how can it be adaptable and that was a main function of the plan as discussed with the Board. So, if you wanted to convert that again, this is your main volley excuse me, basketball operation and then how that transitions into volleyball. So, the main volume then becomes 20 volleyball courts with two on the the event area and then that could transition itself over to a championship volleyball court, all within the same walls.
Graduation, this is what 7,500 floor seats might look like with a stage out on the right hand part of the drawing. Again, the idea that this could be configured in such a way to accommodate the largest of graduations and obviously as you get smaller functions and smaller areas that could maybe move to the smaller events area on this lower right part of the drawing, but it does show it would have that capacity with enhanced audio visuals and so forth, but that'd be something that we could work on as this as the project would continue through design development. Other types of events that could happen, this is a layout for a dual meet gymnastics that could be held down in the championship area and still have other activities going on in the main volume. You could reconfigure that to dance and cheer competitions, so we could possibly have Lake Mary High School winning their cheer championship here at this particular facility. We could host that venue along with other venues occurring in other portions of the building.
Flexibility as a banquet space, again, we've stated this as we've met with our hoteliers as well. This is larger than any of our existing hotel ballrooms could accommodate. So, it would accommodate really the kinds of venues that we do not have here in the county, we would not be looking to compete with them for the smaller spaces. So, as a part of that, a series of conceptual elevations were created. Then if you wanted to take a look at this for maybe a helicopter, if you will, taking an aerial view down at the site, Lake Murray Boulevard runs kind of across the bottom of this piece, so you're looking at an enhanced view of what that could be, again, a very overall concept of what that could be.
Putting an architectural feature there maybe on the corner is an idea that we could look at. And then, how the sand beach volleyball and the on-site retention could knit itself together to creating this cohesive front door look out on Lake Mary Boulevard and really putting most of the community assets right at there at the front door. Parking being in the back with all the vehicular circulation coming through sort of the middle of the site running north south. So, taking all of that into account, we have an updated cost estimates on the project. It too shows a range and there's another big reason why is as we look at the variance in square footage, number one, that's one feature.
Another feature is, is while we looked at running and updating cost estimates for not just the building, but the site development and all the planning that would have to go into this, we wanted to make sure that number one, we were all inclusive. So, every possible cost that we could possibly think of were included in these estimates. Number two is we had multiple estimates done. So, the Pizzuti team and their architect, Moody Nolan ran one set of estimates. We had a third party estimator also run another set of estimates and then staff took the best or the highlights of all of those based on our current experience of construction projects currently going on in Seminole County and created a blended approach to that.
The other thing we wanted to make sure that we did is that we are being very conservative with the numbers. So, did not want to give you a best case scenario and then all of a sudden we go we find ourselves in design and we're hitting our heads on the ceiling already before we've even gotten into the level of detail of planning and design that's going to be required for the project. So, we wanted to make sure that we had that conservative set, but we wanted to make sure that they still this is still based on a set of conceptual ideas. So, still at a concept level, even though we've seemed to have gone a long way with some of the drawings, they're still very much conceptual. So, this point, we wanted to make sure we established a good range for you and at this point forward, as we talk about cost estimates and return on investment, we start to use that upper level of the range that we showed you there.
And with that, I'm going to transition this over to Guy, to share, to talk about project funding. So,
Tim Jeks, Budget Director, and I, Guy Cunha, Economic Development and Tourism Director, will discuss the project funding and return on investment. The four key points that came out of that March 10 retreat was the updated cost estimates, as Rick just discussed, the meeting with SCPS to discuss graduation details that Christian has already briefed on, but also the Hunden report. Hunden strategic partners, the organization that we've been working with throughout this entire process dating all the way back to 2023. So they gave us updated projections on the indoor complex and also on the beach volleyball portion of the project. So when we look at the events, couple of things to keep in mind.
Whenever looking at youth sports complexes, in particular, rule of thumb, three to five years for stabilization. That's going to be a common theme. So, year one, we are expecting 32 events over sixty seven days, and we see that stabilize in year five at 63 events over one hundred and twenty six days. As a benchmark, our other six sports complexes that we utilize for the sports tourism side specific holds about 90 to 95 events on a given year, spit split 50% at the Boomba Sports Complex and the other 50% at the five other assets that we have. Now when we look at the beach volleyball events, we see that common theme of stabilization.
We look at that year one, ten events expected, and then that stabilization theme in year five at 30 events moving forward. Now, when we look at the indoor complex pro form a, a couple of key items to of note, understanding that the increase in tourist development tax is not included in the revenue line there for year one. We are expecting through 100 strategic partners, a 114,000 increase in tourist development tax, and then that will increase to 239,000 by year five. Another item of note, the net tour tournament parking row, that is based at $5 per per attendee or per vehicle. So, let's make sure we we key on the $5 there as we discuss parking moving forward.
Another item of note is the naming rights. That 100,000 in the naming rights row, that's based off our only naming rights deal for a youth sports facility, and that's an average of $100,000 a year. So, year one, we see a shortfall of 225,000. We see that stabilization by year five. If we were to look at the first three years and sum sum up all the shortfalls, that comes out to 475,000.
And similar concept for beach volleyball there. Year one, we're expecting a $112,000 shortfall and then stabilizing by year five. If you add up all the shortfalls there, it comes out to 283,000. The grand total for indoor and beach volleyball is 758,000. After reviewing with the budget department, that is a sum that we currently have in TDT reserves now and can hold it as we move through this process to cover any shortfalls that are being projected.
Now, when we look at the conceptual economic impact, before we go into the numbers, just some benchmarks to keep in mind, Indirect and induced from the last large scale investment in youth sports, the county increased a thousand over a thousand hotel rooms since Boomba opened ten years ago. At our current demand of 70% occupancy and a 100 an average of a $100 in average daily rate, which is both low and conservative estimates based on where we are today, For every new 100 hotel rooms to Seminole County, we are looking at an additional 64,000 collected in the tourism improvement district, a 128,000 in tourist development tax, and an additional 153,000 in sales tax solely associated with rooms. So, when we look at year one combining direct, indirect, and induced spending, we expect a $25,500,000 new spending. Because we don't have other indoor facilities, we don't see much overlap in spending there, so that's very good moving forward. Stabilization at year five of $53,000,000 with a grand total over the life of the asset of close to $2,200,000,000.
And then for the beach volleyball portion, this is an add on, so these numbers will be added into the indoor complex numbers that we discussed. Year one is 1,260,000 with a stabilization in year five of 4,240,000 and an additional $173,000,000 over the life of the asset for a rounded grand for a rounded grand economic impact of $2,400,000,000 to that East Lake Mary corridor, which of course has other county properties there and will increase the value and partnership opportunities.
Thank you, Guy. I'm Tim Jeks, budget director. The ROI of a government facility is calculated by dividing the total net benefits by the total amount invested. The estimated cost of the facility is $175,000,000 with approximately 40% paid by the hotels through the new tourist improvement district and the existing tourist development tax. At the end of the presentation, we'll show the ROI for the whole project as well as just the county's investment.
Each year, the facility is expected to bring to the county 322,000 attendees for indoor events plus 13,000 for beach volleyball. Those participants and their families will generate approximately 42,000 room nights. Additionally, the facility is projected to create 562 new jobs. All of that activity is projected to generate 2,400,000,000 in total economic benefit over thirty years, the largest slice being direct benefits, which includes spending at the facility and revenues for our hotels and restaurants. Indirect benefits includes business and supply chain spending in support of direct services.
And finally, induced benefits includes household spendings for new jobs created. The pro form a that Guy covered for the indoor facility excludes debt service, and you see that annual operating revenues and expenditures are projected to break even by year four. The beach volleyball pro form a shows a break even in year five. And if we focus on year two, the combined deficit from the previous indoor facility slide and this beach volleyball pro form a is $258,000 This is offset by projected year two tax revenue growth of 371,000 to county's existing sales tax and tourism tax collections. So on the left, we have the ROI for the facility based on a total investment of 175,000,000.
We expect $14 in return to the community for every $1 invested. On the right, we show the ROI if we focused on just the county's investment excluding the amounts paid by the hotels. In that case, we expect $22 for every $1 invested. And here we have a separate analysis for a parking garage based on a construction estimate of $33,000,000. This would add $2,000,000 per year in debt service Using Hunden projections of 126 event days, 900 spaces, 80% capacity, and $10 per space, we're looking at $900,000 in annual revenue.
So with that, we're going to come back with requested actions. I'll leave them up on the screen. We're looking for five requested actions from the board. So we're looking for the board to approve and authorize staff to, number one, proceed forward with the development program presented here today or an amended version by the BCC number two, to proceed forward with the solicitation of an architect and engineering services for the project number three, proceed forward with a solicitation for a construction manager at risk for this project. Number four, to present the almost five acre adjacent parcel for acquisition at an upcoming BCC meeting.
And then finally, number five, to direct staff to proceed with continued discussions on the remaining parcels not currently listed for sale with those owners potentially interested in selling and bring back any potentially viable parcels for consideration. So so with that, I'd like to open it up for questions for any of the team.
Thank you, commissioners. I have a series of questions, and I'm just gonna weigh in and tell you that I know I have been the cause of the generation of a lot of the letters that we've been getting because I've been very open about my concerns about the cost to the local taxpayer for this facility. And so I'm just gonna own that, that I have created a lot of this. And I'm also going to go on the record and say I support the facility. I am not 100% convinced I support the scaling facility that happened at our hands, not the hoteliers' hands, and not our sports experts' hands.
And so that's where I think we're going to have a lot of healthy discussion. But with that, I'll ask commissioners to weigh in, and then I'll go through a series of questions.
The public input?
No comments from anybody
Commissioner Zebner was asking if you wanted to do public input first.
I was gonna do public input after, but if you'd like to do public input first. Public
input? There are five speakers. Awesome. First is Kurt Esser, Melanie Anesh, and Kristen Oswald.
You guys were locked and loaded and ready to go, so that's fabulous. We appreciate that.
As a testament to the growth of volleyball and the excitement around the volleyball, I have to leave here. Go to a luncheon with the FIVB. We're talking about the world championships in '27 and the beach qualifier in '28 for the Olympics. So my name is Kurt Esser. I am executive director of the Florida region of USA volleyball.
Regarding a demonstrated need for the Florida region, we currently host six championship events annually with the seventh rotating every three to five years. I would strongly consider moving those events to the new indoor facility contingent upon reasonable rental income or economics. Those events include our gold series, which is the top 90 junior teams in the Florida region kicking off the indoor season each January with approximately 1,300 room nights. Our 18 regional qualifier, which is hosting 50 of the top 18 and under teams competing for USA volleyball national bids each February, That's approximately 350 room nights. Our boys regional championship, which is desperately needing a home, we've been moving around approximately a 120 boys teams competing for USA volleyball bids and preparing for AAU nationals in June, approximately 1,300 rooms for that event.
And our regions cup, which is the 40 regions of USA volleyball send their junior all stars to compete each July against each other and other international teams. Oh, by the way, Florida has won 11 of the last 14 of those. And we would love to host that on every four or five years as well. With respect to the beach facility, the Florida Region is actively refocusing on its beach efforts and we currently host an FIVB event, an event down in Pompano, Florida. However, there's a great need to expand our opportunities to both boys, girls, and adults, and we would love to be a part of that efforts in this community.
And one final focus is focus of mine since taking over is educational programming. We desperately need space to train our coaches, to train our club directors on the best and best ways to do things and sharing best practices. So we 100% support this facility, and we will back it as best we can. Thank you.
Thank you. Next speaker, name for the record.
Good morning. Melanie Anish, Central Florida Hotel and Lodging Association, 6675 Westwood Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32821. Chair Her and members of the board, on behalf of the Central Florida Hotel and Lodging Association, our president and CEO, Robert Agruza, and our board of directors, I'm here to refer to reaffirm our strong support for Seminole County's efforts to advance the construction of an indoor sports complex. As a partner of Seminole County for decades, we appreciate the county's collaborative leadership and forward thinking approach in pursuing a public private partnership that will deliver lasting economic and community wide benefits along with improving the quality of life for Seminole County residents. Without the support of well, excuse me.
Without the support, investment, and dedication of the county commission and county staff and the countless stakeholders involved throughout this process, this project would still remain only an idea. The hospitality industry has long recognized the limitations posed by the current lack of an indoor sports facility, which has constrained our ability to attract tournaments and related events to the area. This proposed complex is a significant opportunity to elevate Seminole County's competitiveness as a premier destination for sports tourism. In addition to the tourism benefits, this complex would also give the residents of Seminole County a central location to host community events such as graduations, youth sports competitions, recreational leagues, and so much more. By enabling year round events, the facility would also help support small businesses, local hotels, and restaurants, particularly during traditionally slower demand periods.
We also want to emphasize the importance of maintaining momentum on this project. Advancing construction in a timely manner will allow recruitment and business development efforts to begin promptly, ensuring Seminole County is well positioned to secure future events and bookings ahead of the facility's opening. Clear and reliable timelines are essential for attracting event organizers, investors, and complementary development opportunities. Lastly, we again thank Seminole County and its current and future visitors for their significant effort in getting this transformative project to where we are today. This would not be possible without the unique and coordinated partnership between the county, the tourist develop development council, and the tourist improvement district.
As other destinations across the state and the region continue to invest in similar multipurpose indoor sports complexes, the competitive landscape is only becoming more challenging. Let's keep the momentum moving forward and ensure Seminole County remains well positioned to compete for regional, national, and national sporting events. We sincerely appreciate your consideration and willingness to engage all stakeholders throughout this process, and we stand ready to assist Seminole County as this project moves forward. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Name and address for the record.
Good morning, Duncan Wall. I'm with the Hampton Inn and Suites and Top Place Suites Altamonte Springs. Good morning. It's good to be with you commissioners. I like today, like many of my colleagues here in the hospitality community, like I'd like to share my strong support for the county's initiative to move forward with the development of the indoor sports complex and the continued success of Seminole County tourism economy. I would like to thank you all for your hard work and time and energy that you've poured into this initiative over the last couple years and the continued partnership with the hospitality industry as a whole. I hope to count on your support of this literal game changing project with Seminole County and the positive impact that'll bring to the local economy. Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Good morning commissioners. My name is Kristen Oswald, one hundred fifty one International Parkway, Marriott Lake Mary. Again, my name is Kristen and I serve, as vice chair on the TID board. I've also had the privilege of serving on this committee for the last several years working on initiatives that support Seminole County tourism economy and helping to make this complex a reality. I have appeared before the board on behalf of the TID on prior occasions, and I want to emphasize that our message has remained consistent.
I'm here today in strong support of the Tourism Improvement District and the proposed indoor sports complex. This project directly aligns with our long standing goals of creating demand, strengthening year round business, positioning Seminole County more competitively in the sports tourism market, and establishing Seminole County as one of the top destinations for youth and amateur sports in Central Florida. I also want to acknowledge that this project has been discussed, evaluated, and debated over the last three years. During that time, there have been multiple opportunities to challenge or stop this initiative. Meanwhile, in the past year, hotels in the county have already collected the assessment dollars with the understanding that they would be used to support this project.
The hotel community has made the commitment, and we believe it's important to continue to move forward with the momentum and the trust that's already been established. As a mother of two children who participate in youth sports, this project is also personal to me. I want to continue supporting and spending in my own community instead of traveling to other counties that already have facilities like this. Seminole County has the opportunity to become that destination for other families as well. Seminole County has the opportunity to move decisively and remain competitive.
Delaying or losing momentum in this space carries real opportunity, cost both economically and strategically. On behalf of the TID, I respectfully but strongly urge support of this project. This
the defining opportunity for Seminole County's future, and I encourage you to move forward with it. Thank you for your time and consideration.
You're welcome.
Thank you, sir. Name and address for the record.
Kurt Wickston, Orlando Lake Mary. Thank you for allowing me to speak today. I am actually speaking on behalf of Skye Buckner, so she's not bringing her enthusiasm, so I'm stepping in on her behalf.
You got big shoes, Phil. That's right.
So I'll keep it very brief. From both a professional and personal perspective, it is important to recognize that our tourism industry is beginning to plateau. Without new demand generators, we risk falling behind neighboring markets that are aggressively investing in infrastructure to attract year round visitation. The proposed indoor sports complex represents a critical and timely opportunity to reinvigorate demand, support long term economic growth, and ensure Seminole County remains competitive in an increasingly saturated market. This is not another project currently positioned to deliver this level of consistent year round impact across hotels, restaurants, and local businesses.
I strongly we encourage the Board to move forward with urgency. Advancing this project without delay will allow us to begin marketing the destination, securing future business, and positioning Seminole County as a premier sports tourism area. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Manager.
Sir? We'll report back that you did a good job, and I think Commissioner Lockhart has a question.
Commissioner Lockhart question. For you. Sorry. Tell me, what is your role?
I'm the general manager. I'm so sorry.
That's alright. Well, you said you were here for Sky, and I thought, well, how fascinating. What do you do? Okay, fantastic. We've not had the pleasure of meeting before.
Sounds like Sky is the real boss.
Sky, right?
Correct. That's right.
Don't tell her that.
Corkage in the lobby, I'll leave it at that. Corkage in the lobby bar. All right, Commissioner. He laughs.
He doesn't know how serious you are.
Yeah, am dead serious. That's good. All right. So does that conclude public comment? Yes, we do. All right. We'll close public comment. Commissioners, for discussion.
We want to take it.
Yes. So a couple of things. I appreciate so much the recognition that some individual comments that were made may have presented a perception that there is somehow a chance of this project going off the rails. As every one of us will tell you, three votes beats a good argument any day on any elected board. And if the majority of the board votes to move forward with this project, the entire board will be supportive of it in whatever fashion that occurs.
I've been on the losing end of some votes before, one or two, and that's just a part of being on a collective body where you have agreements and disagreements and you move forward. This project is not languishing. I want to be really clear that the exceptional work that has been done by our team with Guy I like prints better than Cher. I feel like that's more appropriate create an entire methodology and improvement district that has never been done to scale like this has been done in this community to gain the collaborative spirit and the consensus from all of the hoteliers for the most part in in this county and the and the support. The elected body, the just it is remarkable.
The fact that we are here in three years' time is phenomenal. We're actually at a place where we're about to vote to move forward on a project that was not even conceptualized or thought of three years ago. So I give huge kudos to everyone in this room that has had something to do with this project. I take exception to the idea that this is somehow slow rolling, so kudos to everyone who has brought us this far. I would also like to point out that Boomba, Joe Abel is here, who is a former member of our team here in Seminole County, that was absolutely a game changer for this county for so many reasons, in so many ways.
Again, a conceptual idea that seemed really, really big and really, really daunting at the time, and yet had people not done that and had the vision to move forward with Boomba, we would not have seen the success through the pandemic that we did. This county was able to stay afloat and operating in ways that no other part of this country was able to do because of our focus on sports and particularly youth tourism, thanks to the Boomba complex. So I see Boomba as the method and the model to emulate. I think it was wildly more successful than we ever thought it would be. And we had no private partnership in that project.
That was that was government moving forward on our own. Talk about scary and stupid. Right? Although, in hindsight, not so much. I just I'm As concerned as Commissioner Her is on some things, I am bullish. I think this is awesome. I'm excited about it. I think the return on investment for our community is going to be exceptional. So that's my cheerleader comment for this morning. Although fun fact, I did not make the middle school cheerleading team.
I tried out and I didn't make it. So I do have a few questions. And they pertain to at what point in these requested actions we can flip different levers. Because to proceed forward with the development program presented and or as amended by the BCC well, unless you are asking for us to sit up here right now and start throwing amendments at you, which I think could be counterproductive, How do you envision those amendments occurring if they occur?
Yeah, if I may. This is not a whole lot different than any other capital projects we're doing. The County Administration Building's a good one. So you know, we can bring these things back as a staff and do a lot of charrettes and go through and vet them and go through. Those things take time and as staff we can certainly do that.
If time is if express service is great and you want it super short and you love everything's perfect on the screen and go forth, I don't want any changes, we can do it that way. So the levers I think is the direction we're looking for. If the Board wants to give that as we go through item two and three, those are relatively just flick the switch and as we get feedback from you all, then we can tailor those conversations in there. But number one, we don't know. We've got the listening tour, we've got the briefings, we've shown some ideas, but if more input is needed, we can certainly do it.
We can do as many of those things as you want. We can do them publicly, we can do it privately. That's the feedback we need, but it's not a simple yes or no answer, it's how you like it.
Okay. So I will just quickly run through mine for you, if that's okay, and then we'll see where we go from there. Again, I may be on the losing end of any one of these and that's okay. So I would proceed forward with the development program as presented with minor things that might come back to this Board for implementation in terms of value engineering when we get to that point. Proceed forward with the architectural and engineering services.
Proceed forward with the solicitation of Centimeters at risk. I would also like to see us move forward with the purchase of the additional five acres. The part that is not on okay. Number five with the additional parcels. Yes.
But as we found with the Boomba Experience. Yeah. Well, as we started to try to pull those properties together, the last man standing felt that they had quite a chip in the game, and it made it really hard to get all of the parcels needed. So I would just proceed with some thoughtfulness about how that should occur. I don't know if one by one is necessarily the best way to do that or not, or if assembling them, you know, as a collective might be more productive.
But I'll leave that to the experts to decide what's best. Are my thoughts. Commissioner Delore?
Thank you, madam chair. I wanna talk about two people that are not here, and that would be Bruce Guolo and Frank Sicion. Two stellar individuals in their own way. I'm sorry they're not name share, they're not name friends, but they are named Bruce and Frank. I will tell you that when we started talking about what is now known as BOOMBA, they saw the writing on the wall early. Was it county staff even though we all like to take credit for it?
It's probably too heavy.
And I will tell you that they said that we need to have a full master plan of what tourism would look like, not just around the airport, throughout the whole entire county. And it was clear in conversations with them and the county staff as well they presented to us is that Bloomberg was phase one because they knew that rectangular fields, outdoor fields only serve a market that was Friday or Thursday, Friday through Sunday. But to really capitalize this market to provide a demand to provide hotels because that's where not only the hoteliers make money, but we make money because of tourism tax, tourism development tax, sales tax, it just goes on and on and on. That's where the real bread and butter comes is the hotels' heads on beds. And if you don't have heads on beds, you don't have tourism.
You don't have tourism. We now become a bedroom community in many different aspects of it. Yes, we do have International Parkway. Yes, we do have been focusing since the 80s about not being a better community to Orlando, but that is only one aspect of economic development. The other aspect is sports tourism. I was here when we talked about sports tourism. I will tell you, I know I had many conversations with mister Abel as well as our county staff about what is sports tourism. We're not competing with Walt Disney World, SeaWorld, Universal Studios, Island of Adventure, go right down the list, the convention center. That ain't us. We doubled down and tripled down on sports tourism.
And by doing that, when it came to the drive market, we owned it. We defined it. People look at us, our staff, our hoteliers, our tourism groups, because regionally, if not statewide, they come to us and they ask us, how did you do it? And that was all these different studies that we're doing. In fact, I remember commissioner Konstantin, you were pushing for volleyball back then, and you're also pushing for us to move Bumba to I four.
Remember that? Four. And as commissioner Lockhart said, three votes be a good argument any day. And what I love about this group here, even though you may be on the short end of the vote, not the stick, the vote.
Mhmm. Well
Sometimes there's a stick involved.
Once the vote is cast, all five of us get behind that vote, even if you're opposed to it. That's what I love about this board. That's what I love about this county and the seven cities. We are one organization, figuratively speaking. I will tell you that when the economy went down in o eight and again in '13, what really helped us was our sports tourism.
What really kept the hotels running and operational during the pandemic was sports tourism. We doubled down. We actually hired people that instead of going through an outside agencies like we were doing with Paradise, I don't know if people remember that. We came in house and we hired a couple of young individuals. I'm not gonna mention them by name, even though they're sitting here in the room. They knew who they are. They actually put us on the map for digital advertising. What they did with sports tourism was astronomical. What our staff has done with sports tourism is astronomical. What our hoteliers are doing is astronomical.
I fully support this project. What happens now is that when we did this 100 report and we brought in all the other consultants, they said, okay. You wanna grow tourism? You wanna put heads on beds? You wanna bring more hotels? You gotta have more demand. We're not going to survive with yeah. We could survive. It's just status quo about having what we do with EC and L, what we do with baseball, what we do with softball. We can survive just on weekends if that's what we really want.
But you wanna grow the economy, you wanna grow sports tourism, you wanna grow people to come here to actually get tourism tax, but it's also the residents helping the residents pay for that sales tax. We're getting a 30% discount or a 28% discount, plus or minus. So we have that 1¢ sales tax. We're also happy about it. We're getting a discount from our residents for our residents, from people outside the community that's paying for this. We're doubling down. Why does Orange County do so well? Because of all the hoteliers. Because they've diversified with not just theme parks, but the convention center with the airport. This goes on and on and on.
You wanna grow that sales tax where it's not on the burden of our property people? It's growing it from a tourism standpoint. I can tell you that the county manager and I were at Winter Springs last night and we're talking about the gas tax. And the first thing they asked is, well, what's in it for us? Well, you gotta grow tourism, you know, and we're gonna discuss that later. I'm sure I'm not
gonna get into Yeah.
Let's stay focused.
I know. But I mean, I'm just I'm trying to paint the picture. I'm trying to paint the picture because like when your individuals are looking for either part time jobs or trying to grow a company or trying to get a a real job either in restaurants, convenience stores, or hoteliers, this is where they this is where it's gonna happen. This is gonna grow the market from Monday through Thursday and then over the weekend. I I mean, all the reports we have, it says that this indoor sports complex is the next boomba. And, yes, when we built boomba, you know, it was like, you know, do we build it if they come? Or if they come, when they build it? You know, what's the story? What comes first? Well, now that we have history, we know how to do this.
Our staff knows how to do it, and lord knows, the hoteliers know how to do it. So I fully support this, and I know commissioner Lockhart, you did it very well going through these five different items. I'm fully supporting what you're saying on those all five different items. So if we're on the Louisiana sick, it's both of us. Okay? So I
mean Listen. Let's be clear. I'm the only one that's up here questioning this. And I'm not saying don't move forward with it.
Commissioner, I I So wherever I'm not saying Wait.
Mister George, can I finish?
Let let me just I'm not saying it's you, but there's always a lot of doubt. I want
to I'm no longer running the meeting.
Well, you can run the meeting, but I just wanted to make sure that I'm not focusing on any one individual. These are key things, and I really believe that these key things will happen because of the plan that our staff and our hoteliers have put together to move this thing forward.
So I just want to get the elephant in the room. I have never said I don't want to move this forward. What I am questioning is, and I'm going to take privilege and throw it on the table what I'm questioning. Can you pull up the a la carte document, and can somebody get it on the record what is in this 175 and what is not? Slide 10.
And now we're just crawling out.
Now it's crawling. And
so the mezzanine, 13 and a half million dollars, that's in it? The parking garage, that's in it?
No. No. It altered it.
I understand. I'm just getting it on the record, guys, because we said minor changes. So it's really important that we understand this. Eight acres?
Right now, we're I mean, bringing it forward on on the number four, whatever it is, it's number four, that's five
that's in to.
That's it. That's in the number. These numbers are all the numbers were presented to you. Maybe it's if if I may, I'll tell you what's not in it. Is that maybe a little easier?
I'm gonna go through this Okay. Fair enough. My
way. It's it's it's in it.
Because I've had this briefing three times, and I don't have this down, and I don't think we have it on the record. So that's a yes. But beach volleyball is a
yes. Yes.
Two additional, that's a yes. Tilt wise was a yes.
Additional land, 14 acres.
That's in the number as well.
Yes. That's in the $1.75. $3,275 per seat for so this is the one we got into.
And this is the one that's assort.
I can't answer the question.
Well, this is assort. That's all I explained. So that number that we've presented on there assumed making the space larger to accommodate both the space and the actual bleachers. So the conversation, it was almost kind of an, it could be an either or, so to speak, with item, I'm getting, trying to get my eyes on it, the basketball court. So both five and eight in the discussion were making the space larger.
There are different ways of doing it. So it's a no in the sense that we're not needing to add any additional space because we added number five. However, we are carrying money in the number to accommodate the actual bleachers themselves. And when you look at $3,000 per seat, you go, well, that's an expensive seat. Well, it includes a building getting bigger. So that's why it's a yesno. Bleachers are included in the program. We have that in the in the number that we gave you. We're not looking to include the building larger than what was just discussed on these other items.
And how many seats are in the bleachers?
So we know that there's 2,500. We have some generic holder places to put in there for potentially That's
all I need. I promise that's all I need.
Is the
is the 2,500, the holder numbers, etcetera. Oh, okay. So follow-up question. Because because the way you've mentioned it, it was minor, I feel compelled to go down this path because this wouldn't be minor. What added value does the mezzanine give us in terms of sports tourism and the ability to attract tourists into this location? Because I'm hearing from folks in the community that want this, that they're not sure it adds value.
We can both take this and jump in where I'm So the problem with when you look at a big space like that, can you go back to the drawing of the big space if you would. View ability gets to be a problem. If you're a scout or a parent and your child's on a different area, and a scout's probably more important. You have these big tournaments or college bound tournaments, these kind of combine ish type things, they look at a lot of kids in there. The ability to move around the space and look at it as well as provide additional space, maybe not sitting space, but standing space has has some benefit. And that's why our opinion of this was sight lines were difficult. I can tell you as a hockey parent, I'm
a I'll call it I'm
a retired hockey parent because my kids are older now. We spent a lot of time on the mezzanine looking at the kids on a rink, that was a very valuable thing on this as far as a number of facilities these mezzanines are included in them for. The walking track aspect of it gives you double duty. It gives you the ability for local residents to have something, walking clubs, things like that. We're not talking an NCAA running track, we're talking about you can take the same space and make it convertible. So the space does a couple of things. It provides better viewing access, it provides spectator access, and then it also provides the ability
to have a
localized amenity. Is there anything to add to
that, Rick?
Yeah, add the when you talk about the tournament aspect of things, what generally with the tournament folks are, and Guy you could probably speak to this as well, are looking for is the ability to take both the scouts and those officials and separate them from the rest of the spectators. And their ability to go ahead and conduct business and conduct their views separate from having to work their way through a crowd, for example. So that has almost become the standard, if you will, of a lot of the especially the high end tournaments is making sure that there's a space at which they can conduct their business and why they're there to view the games and do so without getting sort of mixed in with everybody else on the ground floor. Is that would that be fair?
So, as a proof of concept, commissioner, we we have field hockey over at BOOMBA. The difference with field hockey being a traditional event are the college coaches that are here. So, in the start of the year, that event is actually one of our premier events that runs alongside the girls soccer event at Sylvan Lake Park. So that event, because of the coaches, comes pretty close to a buyout of the Marriott. So because of that event, they actually turned into a convention that multi year, the economic impact in there, you're looking at hundreds of thousands converting into the millions.
Alright, so that's that is a fabulous answer. So increase in the TDD in the TDT, I'm switching gears just The a little increase in the TDT, are we saying that that's going to go to pay for debt service?
It certainly could. We project that year one debt service would be paid $4,000,000 from the hotels, the TID and the TDT. That's the minimum amount we would expect. And moving forward, yes, any additional revenue generated by the facility could and should be paid towards the debt service.
Well, could and should. So when does that is that part of a minor? We're deciding that. When when does that happen?
It's part of the annual budget process.
Okay. So so on the record, I am just going to say out loud so you can hear it directly from me and not through the conduits who perhaps got us down the path of I don't support this project. I do support the project, but the revenue that's being generated into these funds has to come back to support the debt service that's nowhere near supported by the money that we put into the one fund. So when we come to budgeting time, please don't be surprised by that because that's the reality. We're paying for less than 40%.
It's 37% of it. This is covered by these funds, the one fund, and the rest of it is coming through the sales tax.
Correct. Yes.
30% of which, so now 30% of which comes from outside of the county, but the majority of that is being paid for by our residents.
Correct.
And the use of these facilities by our residents is really minimal, and we all have to acknowledge It is, yes, you're going to go there with your child to a local facility, but that is a lifespan. There's a time you're a retired hockey dad. I was smart enough not to have kids that ever played sports. I was also smart enough never to try out for cheerleading, because we all know I wouldn't have been picked. Cheer for the damn team.
So I just want to get clear on the math at a later point. We're not going to talk about that today, but there's going to be an expectation around that return. All of these additions have to come back to feed this debt service. We can't be using it for something else. We can't be double committing. So and all of the performers correct me if I'm wrong none of them include the debt service?
That's correct.
I would love to see those performers redone so they include the debt service so that we can get aligned around the idea of how much that is impacting the rest of the budget. Possible?
Yes. Can do that.
I think I have gone through a good oh, graduation AV. I'm switching gears here. I heard, I think, the word, at some other point, we'll figure out graduation AV. That may have been me dreaming that. Graduation AV is programmed into this because I don't want to get down the road and we can't host graduations there because you can't see your kid graduate sitting on the floor.
So you heard it from me during the briefing, so you didn't imagine it. You heard it from me. In the conversations with the school district, The conversations have centered around flat floor versus, you know, what they have now and there. So the AV is something that we're currently discussing what their needs are. We're holding money for those kind of things.
In other briefings, we talked a little bit more in detail about the need for sound, you know, to be able to mitigate through the space for video and things like that. The numbers we're giving you are healthy numbers to make sure we have the ability to do things and make decisions. They're good planning numbers to make sure we're at this junction. If we got into discussions and, you know, they wanted something really, you know, outlandish, which I don't envision, then I don't know that I've got the numbers in there. But we are carrying numbers to handle AV stuff. We're going to need to talk as part of the design process to AV consultants and things like that to make sure everyone's expectations are met.
And I'm continuing having conversations with the superintendent as well on the needs that they need for that. So So and there could be potential partnership opportunities too in the future. So we're everything's on the table.
Absolutely. And think from the very beginning we have promised our community that this would be a facility that 's well received for It has to be as decked out for graduations as it is for Correct. The scouts.
Correct. They
they are our residents. With that, I'm gonna go down the line.
Can I continue my question? Thank you. Thank you, madam chair. So I don't know if I'm going to ask Prince or Guy or whoever. Can we talk about the $22 return on investment?
Somebody. Tim. Tim. Tim.
Tim. Tim.
Poor Tim.
Can you describe what where is that coming from?
He looks like I feel.
It's the 2,400,000,000 impact that's paid at the facility, its revenues to the hotels and the restaurants. It's a $2,400,000,000 total positive impact to the community over thirty years divided by the cost of the facility.
Okay. Great. Thank you. The one real concern I have with all of this is time to market, time to open. I know that the county manager sent us a preliminary schedule.
What I'm concerned about is know, we've been talking about this on and off for twenty some odd years. We've gotten real serious over the last two or three years. What I'm really concerned about, you know, when we first started talking about this, other people are starting to come into the market. I wanna make sure because in the conversations that I've had with our staff as well as events, e c and l, as well as field hockey, you know, they do sign long term agreements. I wanna make sure that we have an actual hard opening date so that I know and we know and staff can actually start booking events.
Yes. Because if we're gonna go past, you know, 2028, that's a totally different issue. And I wanna make sure we're opening this thing quickly enough so that we can actually gain our true market share because that's what this is about. It's about market share. And I know there's another event that's another venue happening in Orlando. It's a smaller venue. That's who's gonna be one of our competitors as well as some other folks. And so the sooner we actually decide when we're actually having a hard opening, we can actually start selling dates, that's what we need to be doing. Because if we're going to be dragging this thing out, then I'm going to need to start rethinking this thing.
So in the for the record category, the timeline that the county manager put forward in the documents yesterday starts today with this meeting, and then the timelines that I saw in there from a purchasing process were exceptionally tight.
Yes. I know they're tight, but my question is I want to make sure that we're holding it tight, and I wanna make sure that we actually know not just what purchasing, when we're actually been able to Right. Staff is gonna be marketing this thing, so we had hard opening dates.
Correct. And then when we get the team on, when we get the designer on, I architect
mean, this could something give you that more. Correct. Devil's in the details.
Right. And we'll be bringing
I that
didn't bring up the the list. I didn't put it up on the screen because I know it's still a work in progress. Right. I know that, you know, something may slip here and there. I think it can also be condensed. Correct. I'm expecting staff to bring it back to
us so
we're active. Absolutely. That's why I didn't talk about, you know, June or July or August. I didn't bring up dates.
As I bring up dates.
You can bring
up dates if you want.
Bringing dates. Mister Zimbauer, you've been very patient.
Is highly unusual.
Highly unusual, yes. I appreciate it.
To try to move this along, I'm totally okay with all five points. You know, the timing of this has a couple of things that are dependent, which happens to be item four and five. It's probably not lost on my fellow commissioners because I've made it very vocal. This is not big enough in my opinion. I think it's a good start.
We've been talking about phasing and doing it in phase one, phase two, phase three. What I've learned since I've arrived here, unless you do it all in one phase, phase two and phase three never come to fruition. You can't get it done. But this is really a piece of a puzzle of a bigger picture for this area as we have the Orlando Sanford International Airport, which is going to continue to grow. We have the connector that's going to be coming into Lake Mary Boulevard.
We are going to see all the economic development along Lake Mary Boulevard not related to this project, which is going to be housing, multifamily and single family housing. This is going to be the key piece for the county. And as I went back and and reviewed arguments and and minutes from Boomba before I was ever here, there was a lot of discussion about that's too big, that's too much money, we shouldn't do that. And then fast forward multiple years and decades and people are like, man, we should have made that bigger. We should have bought more property.
And so I would only say that based on what staff has presented to me, and I've had a lot of questions and I appreciate the ROI because, you know, I was very adamant about that, that I think we're in a good place. I think we've still got some work to do, but the fact that we're going to have that discussion continuing moving forward as we move the project forward, I think it's going be a benefit. As you're aware, one of the two things that I was very adamant about, I think we we still need to be taking a look at, is long term land leases with private entities on some of this to be help pushing the the dollars to the county and the taxpayer, but also looking at how we do get a parking garage. You've got a scenario where you may have this 4.9 or five acres, you got these other pieces that are 10 owners, you may not get that. If you don't get that, that's a whole different discussion on how this ultimately develops and it plays out that may force us to a parking garage.
So I appreciate that it's an add on consideration that we will continue to discuss. So I'm fully fine moving forward with all five with further reporting back to us and keeping us updated. Good work. Thank you very much.
Mr. Constantine? You. Start with beach volleyball, please. We're all waiting.
He was I wasn't gonna I wasn't gonna bring that up. I mean, Lee Sure you are. I mean, Lee, you
were quite the beach volleyball player back in the day. You actually were on the pro circuit, remember. Correct?
Alright. Let's get back on
the road.
Commissioner Constantine.
First of all, the excitement that I feel is the idea of Florida that we are promoting here. You could drive into that thing. You're not gonna see the beach courts. You're gonna see a beach next to a water facility. I mean, the the idea how I can I I envision this, you know, when people are coming in for the first time, they're gonna be amazed?
They're it's gonna be a beautiful facility from just that standpoint, forgetting about what the building looks like right now, just that standpoint. Because what we're trying to do is sell the facilities. People come back again and again. And when we when we're when we're bringing tourists from around the world, they're gonna come in. They don't wanna be indoor all the time in basketball and and indoor volleyball.
They wanna go out and get a beach chair and sit out there on in the in the sand. So I I'm just telling you, I I'm excited about that. It wasn't mentioned. I'm excited about that because I think that really gives people a flavor of Florida. And, you know, to use I think that the one thing that I've always said and I many of my colleagues have said, flexibility. I mean, we've got so much flexibility in this. You know, you've talked about the number of different things we can do indoors. Outdoors, yeah, mister Durer and I were talking yesterday. We've got sand soccer. We've got sand tennis. I put an overlay. Right. There is. No. There's there's big sports company to that. Yes.
Saying tennis? Yes. How does that work?
Yes. Hit it over a net. I don't know how it works. He hit it over the net. I don't play it. But but saying saying soccer is big. But here's here's and a lot of the people locally will use that. You talked about local, you know, use. They'll use the outdoor facility. Let me talk about the the flexibility, I think. We all heard how great Orlando I mean, we just got Central Florida Sports Commission just got the six qualifiers. Correct? Okay. I went back and put an overlay of that outside Camping World into this. We could do it here.
We could do it here. I was talking to, again, mister Durer about you making sure that the parking facilities were had a flexible enough surface that we could use other sports. Give an example, BMX and other things that you could use. Even, you know, another sport that's coming really exciting and people are using and could use the sand and or the cork is paintball tournaments all over the place. Firefighter challenge.
I I I was gonna just say that. No. I would say, we can move it from SSC and put it over here and and with a much, you know, easier opportunity. The greatest thing about this is an indicator of results, future results, is past results. Mhmm. The one thing I heard from these gentlemen when I was going through it is this has a better rate of return than we were talking about with Boomba. Mhmm. I mean, think of that. And Boomba escalated by far more than any of us would imagine. I see this as doing the same thing.
We've got so many opportunities here, and that's what we've done. Flexibility. Flexibility. And we wanna continue as we go forward these five things, we wanna continue in the flexibility. I I just said, I know many of you know that I I ran for thirty five years an event one day a year at the Orlando Camping World, and we had 10,000 people there, and we had 90 teams, and we had six events. I could do it here. I could have put it on here with all the six events, the exact six events.
Sounds like our first contract.
No. No. No.
That's you know, well well, maybe we'll talk about that, and maybe we'll revise it. But that's that we've got a few years in advance to get this, but let's get it done. Let's get it done. And I think that the folks here today are excited about it. I'm excited about it. I know. He listened to and my fellow commissioners. They're excited about it. I really I I I'm so impressed with the I know it's we've got a ways to go and any anything can change, but the way we're designing it so that when you're driving up, they just the the view just makes me feel like we're we're promoting Florida.
Commissioner Lockhart? Just a quick comment about the timeline. I understand there is a great sense of urgency. I want, from my perspective, we need to do it right. And I don't want to mess something up at the expense of feeling like we are moving so urgently that we miss something or don't do something well. So that would be my only
Noted.
And with that, I would be honored to make the motion to move forward with the five items as presented. Second.
No further discussion, All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, it passes unanimously. And thank you to the team for all the work that you've done that got us here. Thank you to all of you for being patient through all of the questions. And with that, we will recess the morning session. We will be call us back to order at 01:30.
Rick.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am going to call this meeting to order. Ladies and gentlemen, please be seated. Please be seated. Ma'am, please be seated. Not you. Sit down, Lockhart. Thank you. Alright. We are going to do our best to keep this train running on time, but I am gonna ask for a little bit of flexibility this afternoon. We are gonna start with public hearing legislative item number 32.
We have in house mayor Mueller and city manager Kevin Smith from Lake Mary. Laurie Bailey Brown is going to be presenting. I'm a little bit ahead of myself. I was just making the announcement that 32 is going first so that we can let them go back to running go back to work running the city of Lake Mary. So with that, we will officially convene the meeting. I'm looking for proof of publication.
So moved. Second.
Motion and seconded. All those in favor?
Aye. Hearing
none opposed, passes unanimously. Ex parte communication, mine has been submitted electronically. What I had was submitted.
Madam chair, I'll submit mine right now.
So is mine
Mine was
submitted electronically? Electronically as well, madam chair.
Alright. So on paper. So ex parte has been submitted electronically. With that, we'll go to public hearing legislative item 32, where this will be presented by Lori Bailey Brown, and this is a good news item.
Thank you. Good afternoon, Commission. Lori Bailey Brown, Administrative Services Director. The MSVU program brings this item to the board for consideration to adopt an ordinance to create the Municipal Services Benefit Unit Assessment District to provide funding for lake management services on behalf of West Crystal Lake, which is located in Commission District 4. The hearing was publicly advertised on April 10, in accordance with Florida statute.
West Crystal Lake is in the Lake Monroe Watershed and is located in the city of Lake Mary. The request for establishing the MSBU was initiated by application in November 2024 for Lake Management Services. Watershed Division of Environmental Services evaluated the overall health of the lake, and a community meeting was held in January with presentations from Seminole County staff about the plans and proposed costs of lake maintenance, followed by the petitioning process, which received 69% response in favor of creating the MSBU exceeding the required 65% threshold to move forward. The assessment boundary of the proposed MSBU consists of 51 waterfront properties located in the city of Lake Mary, 49 residential and two city owned. Each residential property is assigned one benefit unit, and two city parcels are being assigned four and a half benefit units collectively.
This MSBU will consist of only phase two services, which are ongoing indefinitely. Phase two is a variable rate assessment, subject to change annually according to site conditions and budgeted expenses. The estimated annual estimate to be levied on the annual tax bill is $675.85 per benefit unit. This is inclusive of the MSBU administrative fee of 7% and lake management start up cost of $10,000 In year two, lake management staff time is estimated at $15,000 per year, and the City Of Lake Mary included in their interlocal agreement a contribution of $5,000 towards those administrative costs. Staff requests the board approve the ordinance creating the West Crystal Lake Management MSBU.
This concludes our presentation. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Mayor Mule, yes?
Down here.
Sorry. The little table. Hi.
I couldn't tell where
it was coming from.
Announcing our deputy legal expert, deputy county attorney, Naysa Borchardt, sitting in the cheap seats.
Yes, thank you. This request is twofold. It's for the adoption of the ordinance and it's also for approval of the interlocal agreement with Lake Mary for the MSBU, which authorizes the county to create this MSBU and which also outlines our agreement that we've come to with the City of Lake Mary as far as having their city properties that are located on the lake assessed in the same manner as the other properties around the lake are
being assessed. Thank you, Ms. Borgert. Would you like to speak? Did you have your hand up? Thought it was you speaking when it was Oh, no.
I mean, would as
the district commissioner, I would love to share If you're there. Yeah. I wanna, first of all, thank the city of Lake Mary so much for your patience. And your citizens have been incredibly proactive and wanting to see the health of all of the lakes in the community be able to be managed and have a part in that. This is for those of you who are here who don't know what a lake MSBU is.
It's where a group of residents who live on a lake choose to tax themselves for the benefit of that lake and its maintenance and making sure that it is either rehabilitated or kept in some type of format that it can really be a benefit to the entire community. Because all water eventually flows somewhere in the state of Florida and water doesn't know whether it's in the city of Lake Mary or an unincorporated Seminole County. And so we are all responsible for the quality of that water, particularly when it hits water bodies like the Lockhart Smith Canal or the St. Johns River or any of those. The quality of that water is something that we are judged on, frankly, regularly.
So the fact that the community came together and initiated this and that we have been able to partner thank you to the county attorney's office and the attorneys at the city of Lake Mary for seeing past what might be conventionally something that wouldn't be able to be done. But partnerships are really good, so I'm I'm thrilled that we're here. I'm sorry it's taken so long, but thank you all for your work. Yes, commissioner.
I I would mirror that as well. I'm sorry. I I think this is what? Three years? Almost four?
It took a new county manager and a new county attorney This to do
this No.
That's not a threat, by the way.
That's No. Understood. You know, sometimes we say government works slow. This this prime example of of working slow, but I'm glad that our county attorney's office found the ability to work with the city and get this taken care of because it is the right thing to do. At the end of the day, the residents of all cities pay county taxes. So we are all in this boat, we're all in the same direction. So good to see you all here today. Thank you for your patience. Good work, commissioner Lockhart, in your district. Good work, county attorneys. This is the what these are the things we should be doing to collaborate with our cities. Good work.
In the spirit of collaboration, mayor Mueller, would you like to say anything?
Madam chair David Mueller, mayor of the city of Lake Mary. I'm gonna be very brief because I know there's a full agenda. First of all, profound thanks to all five members of this commission, especially our district commissioner, commissioner Lockhart, and our representative of this group, commissioner York, have worked for several years. They've galvanized the community, the lakefront owners. But I will tell you right now, it would not happen in isolation.
Very few things do. But the work of your county manager, the work of our city manager, both respective teams have allowed this to come together. And for that, we're forever grateful. This means so much to our community. I will have to tell you right now that I've had the opportunity to serve my community a very long time. This is something that was very, very meaningful to those residents of Lake Mary that have lived here a long time. They take this personally. Our byline is the City of Lakes. What you're doing today will allow us generationally to keep that byline active. And for that, we just simply say thank you, thank you, thank you.
Mayor Mueller, I'd be remiss if I didn't, on behalf of the BOCC, thank you for your leadership, and you're always so gracious. It is always a pleasure doing business with you, certainly on behalf of the citizens, but just generally. Miss Stryker, do we have any public comment on this? No, ma'am. We do not? Hearing none, I'll look to the district commissioner.
Thank you. I'd like to make a motion to adopt and authorize the chairman to execute the ordinance creating the West Crystal Lake MSBU, as well as approving the interlocal agreement with the city of Lake Mary.
Second.
And I see a nod from our county attorney. Any further discussion? Nope. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none. Motion passes unanimously. Congratulations, and thank you for your leadership.
Thank you all.
With that, we will go backwards to item number 29. This is a quasi judicial public hearing for LifePoint Christian Church special exception. This is a commissioner Lockhart's district and will be presented by Hillary Payton, Planner. Welcome. Madam Chair.
To interrupt. Before we start
the quasi judicial items, would you like to go over the rules of engagement for Absolutely. Quasi judicial Thank you. I don't just want to hear myself right. Speak. Just While the board welcomes comments from all persons with an interest in these proceedings, Florida law requires that the board's decision in quasi judicial actions be supported by competent, substantial evidence presented to the board during the hearings on the applications.
Competent, substantial evidence is such evidence as a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. There must be a factual basis in the record to support opinion testimony from both expert and nonexpert witnesses. Persons presenting testimony may rely on factual information that they present, information presented by county staff, information the applicant presented, or on factual information included in the county staff report to support their testimony. All persons who present written materials to the board for consideration must ensure that a copy of such materials is provided to the clerk for inclusion in the board's record of the proceedings and the official minutes. Madam chair.
Thank you so much. Go ahead.
Good afternoon. Hillary Payton, planning and development. This item is a request for a special exception for the LifePoint Christian Church to allow an existing church to expand in the a one zoning district located on 2.44 acres located on the Northwest corner of EE Williamson Road and Myrtle Lake Hills Road. The applicant is requesting approval of a special exception to expand an existing civic assembly use known as the LifePoint Christian Church on 2.44 acres. The existing church structure is approximately 7,000 square feet in size with a seating capacity of 200 seats.
The property also includes a 1,952 square foot single family residence that's utilized as an office for the church. The applicant proposes to construct a new 6,400 square foot building with a seating capacity of 250 seats to utilize for worship service. The original 7,007 square foot structure will be utilized for children's ministry activities during the worship services. The facility operates primarily on Sundays from 8AM to 2PM. The church's office hours are Monday through Thursday from 8AM to 5PM.
The parking requirement for the assembly use is 63 parking spaces. The improvements to the site will provide 65 parking spaces meeting that requirement under the Seminole County Land Development Code. The site must also meet all other regulations under the land development code at the time of site plan. This includes drainage, setbacks, buffering, site lighting, and others. In compliance with the Seminole County Land Development Code section thirty point three point five, the applicant conducted a community meeting on 02/09/2026.
Details of that meeting have been provided in your agenda. Section thirty point three point one point five of the Seminole County Land Development Code states that certain criteria must be met for the board of county commissioners to approve a special exception request. Staff finds that the request meets the criteria of the recommend with the recommended conditions as stated in the approval development order. In addition to the typical conditions of approval for special exception, staff is also recommending there be no outdoor sound amplification without a noise permit from the county. Staff has received nine letters of opposition, one of which is a petition with 47 names listed and three letters of support, which have been provided to the board for your consideration.
Those who we received letters from, who provided their address in close proximity to this the church have been shown on the support and opposition map. The planning and zoning commission met on 04/01/2026 and voted unanimously to recommend that the board of county commissioners approve the special exception based on the conditions as stated in the staff in the development order. Staff requests that the board of county commissioners approve the special exception and associated development order as per the motion on the screen. This concludes my presentation. I'm available for any questions.
Thank you very much. Commissioners, any questions so far? Is the applicant here? Name and address for the record, sir.
My name is Phil Ayers. 150SunsetDrive. I'm the pastor at Lightpoint Christian Church here representing the congregation. Good afternoon. Thank you for the opportunity to speak. Thank you for your time and your diligence and careful consideration for this matter. We're here to request a special except exception to allow a modest expansion to our existing church facility. This is, an expansion we believe is responsible in scope. It's compatible with the surrounding area, and consistent with our longstanding presence in the community. Our proposal is to construct a 6,400 square foot sanctuary for primary use on Sunday worship services.
The space will seat approximately 250 people and will replace our current worship space, which seats about 200. It will include a foyer, restrooms, a small video room, a nursing mother's room. There are no classrooms included in this new structure. For context, our existing facility is just over 7,000 square feet. So this is not a large scale expansion, but we believe it's a practical next step to better accommodate our growing congregation.
Before I go further, I'd
like to address a concern that has been raised in the community. There's been some confusion suggesting that this project is intended to expand into a private school or a higher intensity weekday operation. I want to state clearly this is not an expansion of a school. It's a modest expansion of Sunday worship space. We do operate or excuse me, we do not operate a traditional private school.
We offer a homeschool resource program that meets only on Tuesday and Thursday mornings. It provides supplemental instruction for families who are already homeschooling their children. That program is not being expanded as a part of this proposal. From a land use perspective, this project does not increase weekday intensity, which is why it was determined during the county's pre application review that a traffic study was not required. We understand that traffic is a concern in our area, especially given the nearby elementary school and the challenges at the intersection of EE Williamson and Myrtle Lake Hills Road.
That matters to us as well. As both the pastor of LifePoint and a resident of the Shadow Hill neighborhood nearby, I personally experienced those same traffic patterns, and I share in those concerns. But this project is designed to serve our congregation primarily on Sundays and does not introduce any additional weekday demand beyond what exists already today. By a brief way of background, we began in 2002 meeting at Bentley Elementary School in Sanford. From there, we moved to a theater, and then we spent several years at the YMCA as a congregation.
In 2013, we purchased our current property in order to establish a more permanent presidents permanent presence and better serve our community. And over the past few years, we have seen steady, healthy growth, particularly among young families, which led us to begin planning for additional worship space through a capital campaign we called NEXT. Our goal has simply been to continue serving the next generation well. Over the past fifteen years, our vision has been simple, focused on Christ, faithful in the community. We take both parts of that seriously.
We are committed to not only worship and teaching, but to being a good neighbor in our community. We regularly open our facility to serve others in the community. We host other church congregations weekly. We provide space for HOA meetings. We support groups like scouts, and we serve as a polling location as well.
Plus, we also provide ongoing benevolent support for both our church members and others in the community, helping with food, rent, and other needs. We've never turned away anyone who's come to us in need. At its core then, this request is modest, clearly defined expansion to serve our existing congregation primarily on Sundays without increasing weekday intensity or altering the character of our surrounding area. We are committed to transparency, we're committed to being good neighbors, and to continue serving this community well. So we respectfully ask for your approval. Thank you for your time.
Thank you so much. Stay close. We may need you back. Not that close. You could have a seat, but stay close.
Ms. Dreger, is there public comment?
ma'am. Please call them three at a time.
Ms. James Gromlich, Steven Ducker, and Richard Hoffman.
Thank you, sir. You have three minutes, and if you would, just be mindful of the direction given to you by our county attorney. And Go Knowles. Yes, ma'am. Name and address for the record.
Yes, ma'am. James Gromlich, 382 West Wing Court, Lake Mary, Florida, 32746. Thank you for this opportunity to be heard. Now, if I can only read my writing. Good afternoon. Thank you for the opportunity oh, I just said that. As a 60 year old Florida native, I know the difference between growth for growth's sake and growth that serves public interest. I was born in Miami, moved here in the '90s, and have lived in Florida my entire life. I understand growth is an issue. Growth is a problem, but growth is also what feeds our communities.
The growth at LifePoint has happened recently over the past couple of years with families with small children. We are out of room to have classrooms for children. I have served at LifePoint since we started in 2002. I have been an elder, taught Sunday school, run sound, empty trash cans, do whatever needs doing. We just we need room for our kids' area, and to that end, we want to move our adults out of that building, move our adults to a new building on-site so that we can renovate the existing building to be children and families only.
That's for the safety of our kids. Right now, our lobby runs right through our kids area. We want to provide a more secure environment for the children and a better place for them to learn. I would encourage you to approve the special exception for LifePoint Christian Church, and thank you for your time.
Thank you. Next speaker, name and address for the record, please, sir.
Yes. Steven Ducker, 1325 Summer Tree Court, Longwood, Florida. So I was unable to attend the zoning meeting at COVID. I did go to the community meeting. I just got a few concerns to address during up.
So looking at the conceptual plan, it shows a or it says in there that it's gonna be a 30 foot height. When you look at the look at the drawing they made of it, it doesn't appear to be bigger than the other buildings, but none of them buildings are 30 foot high parking. So the parking that they're putting to accommodate is only for the new building that I can see. So the number of people attending the attending a worship, They're providing so many spaces, but that that wouldn't cover existing building, whatever you set using, kids, whatever. And the parking is gonna be shell parking.
I do appreciate the fact that that allows water to pass into the ground a little bit and not run off the property. However, it doesn't look very good. So I some of the parking they got now, they got shell on it, and of course, they're gonna be expanding the parking. Basically, the the expansion here is gonna cover the entire property with some time some kind of building parking or retention pond. Gonna lose a lot of green space.
It's a nice looking property right now. I've lived there for nearly forty years. I've lived in the Bay Lagoon neighborhood. I'm I'm in the neighborhood that actually butts up to the back of the property. So our biggest concern or one of our big concerns is the drainage.
We actually now have a problem where properties are getting flooded in the back of the property, back of the subdivision and abutting Woodlands Elementary, especially when they added the new little small subdivision there, although improving the retention pond there helped with that. Traffic. I mean, if the if traffic turns out to be a problem, maybe they put a cop out there on a weekend on Sunday to help get people in and out. I almost got hit just walking my dog at what would be what would be the most dangerous intersection there. People are looking, and they're not even looking for pedestrians.
You may have pedestrians going to the church also. And the it's a conceptual plan you got right now. It's not really a final plan. I mean, they don't wanna put the bucks into the final plan for the building and the location of everything. But I'm wondering if if there would be a hearing once they have a final plan, the actual building they intend to build. Right now, it's all conceptual. So, you know, right now, like I say, the building doesn't look any taller than the others, and it says it will be. So those are my issues.
Thank you so much for your input. Ms. Drager, next speaker.
Next is Richard Hoffman and then Ronald Stein.
Hi. My name is Richard Hoffman. I live at 1372 North Marcy Drive in Longwood. We are in the Bay Lagoon subdivision which abuts LifePoint Church. When I came in, we had a form to sign which said, are you in favor or are you against?
You need to add a checkbox. It said, maybe. And I appreciate the commissioners allowing us a little bit of time to talk about special circumstances, which I believe our neighborhood has. Our properties that abut on the Northwest Side have concerns about flooding from the current site plan. There is a retention pond that will be on the other side of my fence facing Life Point.
It's large. Take a look at the plan. Our concern is overflow, is the storage of that, and the special circumstance we have is that our properties, mister Stein, who will speak next, and I have our lawns 20 feet lower than the church property. So I'm sure that now we get some of the percolation and runoff into our backyards. But putting this large retention pond right behind the residential area is a real concern and a special need in my view.
Somebody recently said something very wise. All water in Florida eventually flows somewhere.
And What was that?
Our concern is it's going to flow into our yards and it's going to create a flooding problem. So the maybe is if they will take a look at the specific plan, the architectural contract contractor plan, and see if they can put the retention pond not up against the residential area, This church borders two roads, no residential property, but this is planned to abut residential property. And we just would request, we know this will be approved, the zoning change, that your staff take a look and work closely with the church's leadership and the contractor to see if there's an alternative to how it's currently proposed. So that's our special circumstance that we wanted you to be aware of. I do know that the county has water hydraulic engineers.
They could take a look at the property percolation and what may what you may wanna do as an alternative. Thank you very much.
Thank you for being here. Next speaker, sir. Name and address for the record.
Good afternoon. My name is Ronald Stein. I live at 1374 North Marcy Drive, which is directly behind the church. I'm a resident of the Bay Lagoon subdivision. My property is adjacent to the northwest portion of the church property.
It's important to note that my property sits as Dick mentioned, my property sits approximately 25 feet lower in elevation as compared to the church property. I do have several concerns with the current proposal, specifically the retention ponds. The new building is planned for the south side of the existing church structure. Additionally, the proposal includes a retention pond and paved parking areas. The retention pond is to be situated on the north side of the property between the existing church and my property.
I strongly object to the placement of a retention pond in the proposed location. During periods of heavy rains or storms, hundreds of gallons of water will potentially percolate down to my property and those of my neighbors, given the difference in elevation. Elevation. Heavy rainfall will cause water from the paved parking area to flow north, increasing runoff towards the proposed retention pond. Currently, rainfall is distributed evenly over the entire church property.
Water naturally percolates down towards the path of least resistance. A retention pond would more than likely direct percolation down to the adjoining properties. I would strongly request that an alternative to a retention pond be investigated before approving the project. Thank you.
Ms. Stryker, does that conclude our speakers for this item? Ms. Yes, ma'am. Ms. Thank you so much. For the applicant, would you like to respond to the concerns? Name and address for the record.
Sure. Rick Thickson, 102 South Orange Street, New Smyrna Beach. I'm the project engineer for the project and as was mentioned previously, this is just conceptual in nature, has the components that will be used for the site and the site design. At this point, you know, no detailed design has really taken place. So we will take into consideration these comments and look at, the final design to make sure it meets all of these people's concerns and the requirements that are will be pertaining to the project.
And most specifically, the elevation as it relates to the neighbors elevation? Correct. Thank you. That's right. Anything else? Yes.
Yeah. So I since since you are the engineer, I do have a question. In reviewing the community meeting questions questions and the summaries that were provided to us in our agenda packet, one of the questions is specifically, could the retention pond and building be switched in locations? The answer that was given at the community meeting was, it depends on the results of testing. Design alternatives will be developed that meet the St. John's Water Management District and Seminole County criteria. Is that still the correct answer?
Correct.
Absolutely. So if there if what is being proposed causes any type of negative impact to the neighbors, you would have to redesign it?
Correct.
Okay. Madam chair?
Yes. Mister DeLaury.
I have a question. It's not for the project engineer, but for our engineers. We had a similar project. You may not be aware of it. It happened several years ago on Tuscaloosa Road, by Aloma, where we're building a small subdivision right up to a daycare. And the pond was elevated, and it met all the code. And then a storm came through and it actually breached the wall of the pond and it flooded the neighborhood. And part of it was the construction and the way it was engineered. Met all the code requirements, but how do we ensure that this doesn't happen in this area?
I don't see the county engineer there. Somebody.
Joe's here. Joe Lafaso is here. Our assistant county engineer, he'll come up. He's taking the long walk.
Taking a long way, Joe. Thinking about it?
Well, it's such a question deserves a thoughtful answer. Absolutely.
Well said. Well said. Because the water's gotta flow.
Yes. So Joe LaFaso, assistant Seminole County engineer, public works. So, again, as you rightly mentioned, I was not at the county at time that that particular subdivision was designed, permitted, constructed. So this is why obviously we have a very great permitting staff here. We have good public work staff here. We will work with them, you know, now in the knowledge. Right? So one thing we do have is experience.
Mhmm.
So this your concern has been brought to our attention. The concerns of the residents are brought to our attention. The storm water permitting and design rules have changed since that time.
That was only about five, six years ago if I remember right.
Correct. And I think around two or three years ago, St. John's actually altered the rules in terms of the permitting requirements. So after that, you know, it was done and the rules were changed. So we're going to follow all the new rules and then obviously we're going to make sure that, okay, this is now a known scenario, right? It's not an unknown. We've had something like this happen. So how do we address it? And there's multiple techniques you could use depending upon and again what their investigation finds on the site in terms of the groundwater, the soil characteristics. So I can't make a specific diagnosis until
we I'm have
not asking you to, I just want to make sure that we're paying attention to it so that this doesn't become an issue as we move forward.
Right. And we will absolutely take all this into consideration And as we go forward, we'll look to see that that will not be an issue in this particular case.
Thank you. Thank you so much.
You're welcome.
Mister Lockhart, any other questions from our commissioners? Thank you, sir.
So you've closed public comment? I've closed public comment. Okay. With that, I would like to make a motion that based on staff's findings and the testimony and evidence received today at the hearing that the board finds the request meets portions of the land development code, and I move to approve the special exception and associated development order to allow with conditions the use of a community civic assembly church in the a one zoning district on approximately 2.44 acres located on the Northwest corner of E. E. Williamson and Myrtle Lake Hills Road.
Second. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, it passes unanimously. Thank you all for being here from your community. We did hear you, and we appreciate you doing this. Thank you. The next item is item number 30, the Sandy Lane Homes rezone. This one will be presented by Caitlin Apgar, senior planner, and she's making her way up to the podium. If you are here to speak on this item and you have not turned in a yellow form to Ms. Drager in the front, you will not be called on. So we do ask that you turn in your form.
We won't be taking forms turned in later on in the day, running up to the podium, etcetera. How many speakers do you have? I believe 16, Chairman. Okay, 16 so far. All right, thank you. Caitlin, I'll turn it over to you.
Good afternoon. Caitlin Amgar, Planning and Development Services. The applicant is requesting the approval for a rezone from A1 Agriculture and R1AA single family dwelling to Missing Middle for a proposed single family residential subdivision of 24 lots. The property currently has a zoning designation of A1 Agriculture and R1AA single family dwelling district. The subject property has a future land use of low density residential.
This future land use supports the proposed Missing Middle zoning district. The low density residential future land use allows for a maximum density of four dwelling units per net buildable acre. The applicant is proposing an overall density of 3.88 dwelling units per net buildable acre. The property is currently developed as a single family home. The applicant proposes to develop a site as a single family residential subdivision, having a maximum of 24 single family lots.
The applicant is proposing a minimum lot width of 57 feet with a minimum lot size of 6,500 feet square feet. The site is located in Seminole County's sewer utility service area and Sunshine Water's water utility service area. The site will be required to connect to public utilities. An agreement for billing of sewer will be required between the county and Sunshine Water Services during final engineering plan review and prior to their approval of the utility agreement for sewer service. The development will have a primary access onto Sandy Lane, which is classified as a local road.
A secondary write in and write out only access is proposed onto Sand Lake Road, which is classified as an urban major collector. Please advise, the previous iteration of the staff report and presentation at the planning and zoning meeting indicated incorrect information regarding the level of service for this road section. After updated staff review, it was provided that Sand Lake Road is currently operating at a level of service a to c at this roadway section. Additional improvements to Sand Lake Road may be required during the time of subdivision process. There is an existing sidewalk along the adjacent portions of Sand Lake Road and Sandy Lane, therefore the developer will be required to connect the sidewalk along both property frontages.
The missing middle zoning district requires a minimum of 8% net buildable acreage be provided as open space. Landscape buffers are not required based on the intensity of the development. Open space and buffer criteria will be evaluated further during the time of final engineering. Seminole County Public Schools provided a school impact analysis for the proposed project. The analysis concluded that the students generated by the project would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the adopted level of service at this time.
Potential constraints and obstacles of development such as grading site elevation and level of service of Sand Lake Road may present challenges. However, in staff's analysis these considerations do not preclude the site's compatibility with the overall intent of the missing middle zoning district. The development plan is subject to change and further review of required criteria during subdivision processes. Please note this slide was an addition to the original slide show, so you may not have it in your printed agenda package. The intent of the missing middle zoning district per the county's adopted land development code is as stated on the above slide.
The definition refers to the encouragement of a variety of housing choices and promoting affordability without additional subsidy. The development will be required to meet standards per the land development code as outlined in the following slides. As a summary, the applicant is providing one typology, single family, residential tract no bigger than five acres. The project is not proposed to be gated. The provided conceptual development plan proposes a minimum of 8% net buildable acres as open space and will provide pedestrian connectivity to open spaces in existing sidewalks.
The internal right of way is designed to establish connectivity from Sand Lake Road to Sandy Lane. The overall design of the development is consistent with the intent of promoting connectivity and accessibility to adjacent streets and roadways. While stub outs were not provided to the two vacant lots to the Northeast, access to those parcels are not inhibited by this development. One vacant lot retains frontage on Sand Lake Road, while the other retains frontage on both Sand Lake and Sandy Lane. While the the overall development still meets the intent of the missing middle zoning district via the implementation of the block design through connectivity to Sand Lake Road and Sandy Lane.
The applicant is aware of the two story limitation and is only proposing one typology in this development. Additional site and building requirements will be evaluated during the final engineering stage. For reference, I have included specific criteria from the code on these slides. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with the open space requirements and has made a note on the conceptual plan that references the provision of street trees. Specific site details will be evaluated during final engineering, inclusive of minimum parking requirements and building frontage.
Consistency with the comprehensive plan is achieved through comprehensive plan policies projected on the slides above. The proposed zoning is consistent with policy Flu 4.2.1 by reducing lot sizes to allow for more compact site plans while adhering to the overall density in the area, adhering to the street tree requirements, and providing for a complementary missing middle typology within existing neighborhoods. The request meets the trend of single family dwelling unit development in the surrounding neighborhoods while maximizing usable density within the allowable limit. The subject site is approximately 1,900 feet as the crow flies from the nearest boundary of the urban centers and corridors overlay. The proposed rezone supports encouraging a wider range of housing choices in and around the centers and corridors overlay, which meets the intent of flu policy 4.2.1a.
The proposed zoning classification acts as a transition in zoning for the surrounding trend of development in the area by staying consistent with both the permitted uses and density provisions of the low density future land use designation while allowing for more dwelling units to be achieved through flexible site standards. The proposed development is located within the aquifer recharge overlay and a note has been made on the development plan stating compliance with the maximum impervious surface ratio of 60% in compliance with flu policy two point three point one two b three. Staff finds the proposed missing middle zoning classification to be overall consistent with the comprehensive plan. In compliance with Seminole County Land Development Code section 30.49, community meeting procedure, the applicant conducted a community meeting on 09/23/2025. Details of the community meeting have been provided in the agenda package.
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on 04/01/2026, and voted to recommend the board deny the requested rezone. The minutes from this meeting have also been included in the agenda package. Please advise staff did also receive additional letters and communications of opposition post agenda publication. These were sent yesterday via email to commissioners aides, but a physical copy has been presented for the record. Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners adopt an ordinance enacting a rezone from A1 agriculture and R1AA single family dwelling to missing middle as per the following motion.
Based on staff's finding and the testimony and evidence received at the hearing, the board finds consistent with the comprehensive plan and meets applicable portions of the land development code and moves to adopt the ordinance enacting a rezone from A1 agriculture and R1AA single family dwelling to missing middle on approximately 7.54 acres located on the West Side Of Sandy Lane and South of Sand Lake Road. That concludes my presentation.
Thank you very much, Caitlin. Very well done. Commissioners, any questions for our team at this point? No? Is the applicant here and would he like to present? It's really a rhetorical question.
Good afternoon, madam chair, fellow commissioners. For the record, Brent Spain, Theriak in Spain, 1809 Edgewater Drive, Orlando, Florida. As I indicated, the PNC hearing want first, I wanna give my appreciation and thanks to miss Apgar, the project planner on this. As you all know, I've I've been before you many times. I've practiced around the state, and a lot of times you get a staff report that is superficial or conclusory.
And a lot of times, someone like me, my job is to go through and fly us back the staff report, try to find additional policies or provisions in the code, whether I'm representing neighbors or developers to point out to you all. And I can tell you, as I indicated at PNC, this was one of the staff reports where when I fly specked it, it matched up almost verbatim with my notes internally. So kudos to your staff on doing a thorough review. As miss Apgar indicated, the request before you this afternoon is a rezoning, taking the split zoning of a one and r one Double a and asking for or missing middle on the property. The property consists of approximately five net developable acres.
It's at the corner of Shady Lane and Sand Lake Road. And the proposal before you, as indicated on the conceptual plan, which I think this is important because there's been some misunderstanding regarding what my client is proposing, but it's 24 detached single family homes. Some of the email correspondence I saw up on the county's website suggested that it was low income, high density, affordable housing. Nothing about the request this afternoon is changing the density on the property. The density is established by the county's comprehensive plan, the future land use map, which is low density residential, which is up to four dwelling units per acre.
There also have been suggestions that we are proposing live local act housing, which is not the case. We're not proposing townhomes. We're not proposing quadplexes, triplexes, anything of the sort. In fact, we stipulated before the P and Z that we would comply with the conceptual site plan that's in the packet and was shown during Ms. Apgar's presentation, which again shows 24 detached single family lots.
In all but five of those lots, I think it's important to mention are 60 feet wide. They're not 40 foot, which some people have indicated or have expressed a concern under the missing middle regulations. Five of the lots are 57 feet wide, and that's actually stipulated as a notation on the proposed conceptual plan. The primary access, one of the issues that got brought up at PNZ was traffic, so I want to touch upon that as we walk through it. But the primary access of the project is on Shady Lane.
If we could bring up the site plan. Sandy Sandy Lane. Their Sand Lake Road is a right in right out at the north of the site plan, and the primary entrance is off to the east. A couple of the provisions Ms. Epgar indicated and touched upon, but I want to touch upon because there's several folks speaking here this afternoon, is when you look at the land development code, and unfortunately or fortunately, we're the first missing middle project that I'm aware of in the county.
This is a newer zoning district in the land development code. But you look at section thirty point eight point three and the intent, and I think it was one of miss Avgar's slide is, quote, to encourage a wider range of housing choices in central locations. And I would respectfully submit that this proposal meets that intent wholeheartedly. Secondly, section thirty point eight point three two provides a single family detached housing is allowed in missing middle, which is exactly what my client is proposing. Section thirty point eight point three three indicates that a final development plan is required.
The conceptual one is on the screen for the commission. But that section is important because it also indicates that the applicant can be held to comply with any conditions of approval. So that was one issue that got brought up at the PNZ was whether or not the county could actually condition this type of zoning approval, and I would submit under section thirty point eight point three point three that the commission can. And that's important because PNC member Richard Sherman had asked us to stipulate on the record that, in fact, it would be single family detached housing and would not be a bait and switch and suddenly become a triplex or quadplex. So I would submit I'm authorized to stipulate the same today, and we would certainly welcome that as a condition of approval.
The last land development code section I want to mention is thirty point eight point three point four, which again ties the uses that are allowed in the missing middle district to the underlying future land use category, in this case, low density residential. And there's a table in the land development code that states what's allowed. And again, detached single family housing is an allowed use in missing middle. And then briefly, I want to touch upon just a couple conference plan policies because again, my client's burden here this afternoon, as you all know, is to show that we comply with the Land Development Code and the comprehensive plan. So the first policy is feature land use policy 4.1.1 which again I think Ms.
Apgar touched upon, but that provision in part says, quote, the county shall encourage infill by maintaining future land use and zoning districts that enable compact, walkable land use patterns. And then that policy specifically mentions the missing middle zoning category. Again, we submit that this proposed development does further policy 4.1.1 by maintaining the land the LDR, future land use density, and creating a walkable area. As Ms. Efgar indicated, it's only 1,900 feet from a urban center.
Flu policy 4.2.1, which again Ms. Efgar mentioned, the whole intent of the missing middle district is to provide greater housing choices in existing neighborhoods. But one some of the language I want to emphasize is one sentence in particular because this essentially was a policy finding by the county, and I'm quoting, quote, missing middle housing complements the character of already existing neighborhoods while slightly increasing density and walkability. And again, my client's project is not actually seeking to increase any density on the property. But again, there's a finding in the county's comprehensive plan that missing middle housing actually complements the character of already existing neighborhoods.
That will turn me to the traffic issue because traffic was brought up at the hearing before the PNZ. There were some questions about why we didn't do a traffic study, and our response at the time was, quite honestly, that the county's land development code doesn't require this project to do a traffic analysis. Nonetheless, since the PNC hearing, and I hand nine copies to the clerk, We actually had Walsh Traffic Engineering do a traffic analysis of the proposed 24 unit subdivision. And the traffic study, which was completed on May 6, confirms, one, the reason why a traffic study is not required in the first place, but secondly, that the trip generation from this project is de minimis. Looking at page two on the talks about trip generation.
At 24 dwelling units, you have 16 outbound AM peak hour trips, and then you have 16 inbound PM peak hour trips. This is important. There was questions or issues raised about the school nearby. The PM peak hour trips do not coincide with when school releases. So the PM peak hour incoming trips are 16 incoming vehicles.
That's about one car every four minutes, which I would submit is de minimis when you compare it to a regular development project. Again, you heard Ms. Apgar indicate that the P and Z PowerPoint presentation unfortunately had an erroneous reference to level of service on Sand Lake Road suggesting that it was operating, I think it said at seed f during certain hours when in fact that level of service analysis has been updated in Sand Lake Road. This stretch is actually operating between A and C level of service. But we asked our traffic engineer, it's on page four of the report.
We asked the traffic engineer to look at three different things. One was the existing roadway analysis. That's the first sort of chart there on Page four and the traffic engineer confirmed that that roadway is operating within acceptable levels of service. We then asked the project engineer to project out to the anticipated build out of this project, which is 2028, and factor in background trips that are anticipated on that roadway, and that's what's in the middle of page four. And, when you add in the background trip generation onto Sand Lake Road as of 2028, the analysis confirms that Sand Lake Road is operating within its acceptable levels of service.
We then ask our traffic engineer to go one step further and take the trip generation from the '24 proposed single family dwelling units and add it into the traffic generation as of 2028, including the background trips, and that's at the bottom of page four. And you'll see again when you take the existing trips, the projected background trips, and our anticipated trips in 2028 at full build out that Sand Lake Road continues to operate within its level of service. In fact, when you look at the roadway capacity, the the complete service volume is about 19,000 vehicles, and it looks like the total background volume is at about 13,005 or so. And our trip generation, again, is only a couple of 100 trips per day. So again, with that said, I would respectfully submit that the traffic concerns that were raised at P And Z and now confirmed by city staff this afternoon that the roadway on Sand Lake operates within the level of service that our proposed 24 unit subdivision does not create any traffic problems on Sand Lake Road.
And the last thing I had mentioned before, just reserving time for rebuttal and answering any questions, is that the PNC, if you all I I know the minutes were in your guys' packet. The motion to deny was on to recommend denial was on three grounds. One was on traffic slash school safety issues. And, I'd submit we didn't have a traffic analysis then because we weren't required to do one. We have since done one.
The traffic issue that was raised was Sand Lake Road. It was not the other roadway. And the traffic analysis confirms that there is not a traffic issue on that roadway with with respect to the adopted levels of service, which is what a developer is required to comply with. I'm not suggesting that no one sits in traffic, I sit in traffic. The second issue was the concern about setting a precedent, which respectfully I would just submit is not a review criteria.
And secondly, as I indicated, we're the first missing middle project to come through the county. So inherently, the first person in the door arguably is always setting theoretically a precedent because missing middle has never been approved yet. But county staff responded to a question at the PNC hearing and indicated that they're not aware of any other surrounding properties that have asked for missing middle. There's no other application pending seeking missing middle. But then they did obviously incorrectly say that they can't state unequivocally that no one else would ever ask for missing middle.
And then the last reason for the motion to recommend denial was a concern that this project may potentially reduce the county's budget, which respectfully, presumably through decreased tax revenue, which I would just submit is not, again, a review criteria in the county's code or a comprehensive plan. And respectfully, there wasn't any evidence that this project would do that. It was simply a speculative concern. So I would respectfully ask this board, consistent with miss Apgar's staff report, to approve the rezoning. Again, our burden is to demonstrate that we're consistent with the land development code and the comprehensive plan.
I think miss Apgar's written staff report as well as her presentation demonstrates that. That, as your county attorney, can confirm is competent, substantial evidence. And then on the traffic issue, I believe the May 6 traffic study that we've submitted demonstrates that there is no level of service issue on Sand Lake Road. So I appreciate your patience as I walk through that. And myself, as well as the developer, Mr. Jordan, are here to answer any questions.
Thank you. Board members, any questions for the applicant at this time? I do
have a question about the choice of missing middle because you had R1AA. What is it that caused you or propelled you, or maybe this is a better question for the developer, to choose missing middle?
Yes. Try to respond to it, Commissioner Lockhart, because it came up at PNC, and there's a number of factors. One, in exploring potential zonings on it, the feedback we got was that a PD or planned development was not preferred to go on that property.
And I'm sorry, that you received that from whom?
Yeah. I believe my client received it.
From whom?
I I believe if I'm correct, he may have spoken with the district commissioner with regard to PDs not being desirable in the county, but I wasn't privy to that conversation. Okay. Secondly, there was a pre application meeting on this property and due to the size and limitation of the property, my understanding from the pre application meeting that staff recommended that the parcel would be suitable and ideal for missing middle. From a developer standpoint, and what we indicated to P and Z is, again, the LDR land use future land use allows up to four dwelling units per acre. None of the street zoning categories, including missing middle, can even obtain four dwelling units per acre on the property.
But missing middle can get a little closer to four dwelling units per acre, but nothing can actually get to four dwelling units per acre.
Okay, let me stop you there because I want to dig in a little deeper into that if I could. So R1AA allows you four units per acre, but the lot itself, parcels themselves, you don't believe you could get four units an acre with R1AA. So you've selected missing middle because you think you could get closer to four units an acre with that zoning.
Yes, ma'am.
I want to make sure I accurately mirrored back to you what it was that I thought I heard.
Yes, ma'am. It's the minimum lot size dimensional requirements on R1AA will not allow you to reach four dwelling units per acre. You would yield less than 24 units. 30 units is four dwelling units per acre, but you can't get that on this property.
Okay. So that was the parcel, the property itself. What about the product? Can you tell me about the product?
The product, as I indicated, is a detached single family home. So it's on a 60 foot lot. Nowadays, I would tell you that that's actually a larger lot than most developers are building. Most of my developer clients are whether it's the market driving it or the cost of development, but most of them are building 40 to 50 foot lots. Other people don't want the lawn.
Not here.
No, I'll tell you understand. Yeah. So this a 60 foot lot is actually bigger than what most people are building these days. And then when you look at it as an infill project and the fact that the county's code actually drives you to even a smaller lot size than that, I believe the county's land development code for Missing Middle would allow development of the lots to be consistent with the r one double b standards, which are 50 feet wide and 5,000 square feet. So, again, my client didn't, do this rush to the smallest lot possible.
They ended up building a larger lot, at the same time trying to honestly maximize the potential yield on the site. But I do want to mention something because you bring up a good point about the surrounding lot sizes are R1AA. If you could bring up the site plan again. When you look at the site plan, because this again has been brought up. If you look at the southern boundary, there are four existing lots on the south side.
Our project proposes five lots across the southern border. The remainder of it is open space common area. And then when you look on the western boundary, there are six existing homes in the PD to the East to the West. And then on our project, we've designed it so we have seven proposed lots on the West, and then the remainder is open space. Then we have concentrated lots on the internal part of the development.
So again, when you're looking at comparison of number of lots to number of lots, we've done our best to try to line them up. So it's six lots versus seven on the West, and there's five versus four on the South, understanding that the lot widths differ, but the number of rooftops are very similar in number.
So when I asked about the product, one of the things that always comes up in these rezonings is existing neighborhoods concerned that the product that's being built will be attracting a lower income type of buyer. Square footage, I will never forget, we had a project out near the airport. I think it was in Kentucky maybe.
My district.
Yep, I
remember it was
your district. And one of the repeated comments from neighbors was, I don't want 1,200 square foot homes. My house is 4,000 square feet. I want a more 4,000 square foot home, so it's more compatible. And I think compatible is in the eye of the beholder. But I noticed in a lot of the written comments here today, it was mostly related to this is going to lower my property value. So can you talk about the product in terms of if that was you with the existing home who was concerned about this product lowering your property value, That's why I'm asking, describe the product.
Yes. Well, I'll do some of them and then I'll have Mr. Jordan talk about it. I know it was discussed at the community meeting with respect to the single family detached houses. What they anticipate the whatever you would call it, the average sales price and the anticipated square footage.
He'd be more appropriate to direct that question to you, and I'm happy to have him answer it. My my response to it from a land use attorney perspective is I understand the desire theoretically to have like to like, you know, a versus a. But for as you indicated, for compatibility standpoint, it doesn't need to be A next to A. So it doesn't need to be 4,000 next to 4,000. In fact, I don't even believe your code requires me to build a 4,000 square foot house on R1AA.
I just threw a number
out there.
It's actually 4,000.
And I know it's a very nice surrounding area. So I understand that concern. That's why I wanted to point out ahead of the public comment the fact that the number of lots versus the number of existing homes, we did try to line it up so that it's very similar.
Yes. Did hear you say that, but I would love it if he could answer my question.
Yes. Could we have him come up to answer Thank the you. So most interested in square footage and price is what I'm hearing, Maybe number of stories. And kinda cover it?
Chair, since I I was invoked on a in one of the questions that you made, I wanted to say that, yes, in April '25, I met with miss Jordan, and I suggested that he go straight zoning, not missing middle, not not anything else, but straight zoning as what it applied to is which is r one double a.
Understood. Thank you.
Name for the name and address for the record, sir.
My name is Larry Jordan. 1507 Bluewater Run, Juliota, Florida 32766. Yes. I met with the commissioner bringing the project to his attention because it was his district and I wanted to make sure that I comply with the county's requirement. It was just a suggestion because obviously most of the developers want to go with a PD. PD accomplishes most of the time a lot more density. That's why we did it as a straight zoning because we wouldn't be able to get as much density as we can get with a PD. That's usually what happens with developers. The
other
thing is, since the first meeting, the community meeting, I always, always said that we were doing single family homes. Price point anywhere from 800,000 to $1.21300000 dollars. That the homes there sell for approximately 800 to 750,000 on up on that area, most of the homes there, because of the value of the properties there is very desirable, obviously. So that was my my always my target on what type of home we were going to build so that it would not impact any of the communities in the area. That was always the intent.
Okay. And how large a home is that for that price point?
3,000 on a so we can obviously set square footage minimum size. We usually set set we can set like a 2,500 square foot minimum on any community. If we can do that, we we will be willing to do that.
Alright. Thank you very much for answering
my question. Story?
Two stories.
Only. That's what she just said.
Alright. Thank you very much.
That's all I have for now. Any other questions, commissioners?
No. That was just clarified for me.
Alright. With that, we'll go to public comment. Miss Stryker, how many forms do we have at this point?
We have 18 forms. Alright.
We ladies and gentlemen, we have 18 forms. Time limit for this Okay. Is
You're gonna go second.
The The time limit for this is three minutes. We're going to call you up three or four at a time. I'm going to ask that you come up and stand in a line so we can go one after the other. This goes more favorably for you all if you don't repeat what the previous person said. I I kid you not because it's really hard to listen to the same thing over and over again. We wanna make sure that you make all of the points that you want to get heard Okay. The ones that are most important and not simply read us the same letter over and over again. I would also tell you that I'll ask for the audience to be very respectful so that we can hear each speaker. We know what you're all here for. We don't really need any cheering and all of that.
We'd like it to be as positive as possible so that we can get the best possible outcome for you. So with that, who are the first four speakers?
Gary Kreisler, Lee Woldridge, Sandy Shea, and Andrew Zito.
Alright, Mr. Kreisler, come up. Name and address for the record.
My name is Gary Chrysler, 386 Forest Park Circle, Longwood. I have the pleasure of being a constituent of commissioner Constantine and have known him since graduated UCF, I think, or pretty close after that. As a fifty year resident of Seminole County who's lived in several different types of homes and has bought and resold 12 homes. I currently reside in Forest Park Estates, which is directly across the street from the entrance of Shady Lane. My emphasis here is for us to remain keep our eye on quality.
I've never known any of you to violate that standard, and what I'm asking you today is to do the very same thing one more time. There's been contradictory comments being made by this developer over the past few months, And so here we are now listening to the latest version, which has promises that to me seem to not be able to be kept. You know, quality starts with leadership and we've enjoyed strong, dedicated leaders from our city, county, and school boards. We don't always agree, but we know that we're our we all wish for the same thing, and that is to create a better and safer and more environmentally safe Seminole County. We've kept a watchful eye on the environment, our safety, and services, which is why we are all here today.
Our neighborhood is positioned right across the street from Shady Lane, which I have to say is probably one of the most beautiful pieces of property there is. If you've not been down there to see that, you would see that anything less than what has already been built there is a crime. It's a crime against each of the neighbors, it's a crime against the environment, and some of the exaggerated statements such as a 1,700 foot walk or yard walk to commerce would mean that you would have to walk through a marshland with snakes and alligators, and you'd be up to your waist in muck. So I don't believe that a lot of these comments are actually legit. I do agree with the many folks that are going to follow me about safety and traffic and children and all of that, but I think that the most important thing is to understand that Shady Lane in that neighborhood has some of the most, like I mentioned, most beautiful and environmentally sensitive land.
This should not be the first example of missing middle in Seminole County. If you look at missing middle, can look at Wekiva, or you can look down the road at the end of our street where we have Wekiva Cove, and next to it apartments and townhouses and the like, that are on main roads and have access to 436. This would not be the benefit that benefit the folks that have invested in the neighborhood here. And as a builder myself, who understands the need for profit, we all have to live next to each other and protect each other and be reasonable. So I ask you all to be reasonable and to turn this down, turn missing middle down.
Missing middle should never be built on Sandy Lane. And if our folks knew well enough about it, they would know that it's not Shady Lane and it is not
relevant for this you, Mr. Kreisler. You were doing so good.
You all.
You know where I stand.
Alright, next speaker.
Hi, I'm Lee Woldridge and I live at 337 Forest Park Circle, right a couple houses down from him. It's nice to see that there's a Lee represented on the board too, so I don't want to rehash a lot of the fear that other people are going to talk about, the obvious things of traffic and so forth, but as he was saying, I built my house as well and I've lived in Orlando since the mid fifties. I grew up in Pine Hills on the corner Of Powers Of Balboa and went to Robin's Wood and made it Evans and my parents died in Pine Hills. And so I've lived here for since 1980 and this is two things. One is once you rezone this, I don't know that there's any legal way you can constrain the guy to build what he's sort of promising to build.
He can certainly sink to the lowest possible denominator, which would be plopping a lot of little tiny houses in between a whole area of custom houses that range in prices from over $1,000,000 down to maybe as little as 450,000, maybe 500,000. And then that will have a major impact on our ability to sell. I've worked with people pricing construction and pricing house sales and I know how the impact of close residents can have on your house. So and I do believe that the reduction in the value of over a 100 houses is going to probably exceed the tax base that you would get from the 25 or maybe 30 houses he's going to build there, as opposed to the 12 houses that could be built there or even the four houses that could be built there, that would be quite valuable. So that's a consideration I think that the county should think about bad planning.
And on top of that, it's again, that's those are the two points. I think the point is that if you this would be a grave mistake to make make to zone this this way and vary from the R1A and houses all the way around it, and it would be kind of a blight in the neighborhood. So I appreciate it. Thank you.
Thank you. I'll call up the next speaker and I'm just gonna give a little reminder. I know this was a long time ago when our county attorney read this, but we can only consider competence substantial, meaning it can be substantiated, and factual evidence. Please name for the record. Come on up, ma'am.
Hello. I'm Sandy Shay, and I live at 1160 Sandy Lane Road. And so first, I wanna say thanks to the board. Your dedication to work with Jordan has been great, and your dedication to work with others has been wonderful. And as a as an owner's right, rights of an owner is to comply with what you ask and to make sure that the person that is selling the property, who's purchased wanting to purchase the property, follows through with your compliance and to do the things that you have required for him to do.
And that following your advice and after meeting the requirements, that owners also have a right to to be able to sell the property, to be able to retire after many, many, many, many, many long years of work and service into the area, and that we also have enjoyed the neighborhood. And to us the neighborhood is very valuable. And the neighbors are wonderful, and the ability to be able to walk the streets and the roads and to feel great about it is great to be able to do, and I do it every day. And so we definitely do not want the neighborhood to be any less than what it is now, but only to grow with the community and with the growing, as people do. And older people come in, and they don't have any children, and they just want a little bit less land to take care of, but yet still a wonderful home to live in.
And so this was what we wanted to have built in this area, was good quality homes, and the ability to still have sidewalks to walk on and to feel you're living in a safe area and a safe neighborhood. And that was why we wanted to sell the property so that other people could enjoy living around great people and around a safeness that is in that area. And so this project has met your requirements, and we appreciate that he has met everything that you've asked to do. And we thank you for your consideration to vote yes.
Thank you very much, ma'am. Next speaker. And while you're on your way up, Ms. Dreger, will you call the next four? Thank you.
Judith Stevens, Steve Lit, Donnie Anderson, and Sherry Austin.
I think I can get six minutes to hold as
a representative of the organization. Yes.
Is a representative of the Sandy Lane HOA requesting six minutes.
And you're speak so if you're speaking on behalf of the Sandy Lane HOA, then no one else from Sandy Lane can speak if you take the six minutes, which we're good with.
So nobody none of the other homeowners from Sandy Lane?
That's how that works.
If you live in
Sandy Lane and you want to speak, raise your hand. Cool. I think we're good. I only have a few folks who were able to make it from work today. Okay. You don't
know who's in your HOA?
Excuse me?
You're trying to figure out who's in your HOA?
Who's Well, saw them when they came in. Okay. Anyway, good afternoon. My name is Andrew Zito. I am fortunately or unfortunately the president of the San Goline Homeowners Association. I took this gig because they told me it was a quiet neighborhood and nothing happened. Now I'm standing in front of the Seminole County Commission, that's fun. A little bit, let me first start by thanking you, thanking for thank you for what you do. Communicating with the Seminole County government has been great. Working with Caitlin was great. It was really refreshing and I appreciate it. So with that said, a little bit about us. If we could pull that map back up, that would be awesome. We are 23 homes on three cul de sacs. We are directly to the south of the proposed land.
We are a third of an acre to half an acre lots, all custom homes, the ones that have been discussed, a million plus dollar homes back there. What makes us a little bit more interested in this particular development is we are one way in and one way out. And that one way in and one way out is the aforementioned Shady Lane, it's actually called Sandy Lane for the record. But that is our primary road to get to the rest of the world. So the primary entrance to this development is proposed to be built right on Sandy Lane, which is between us and Sand Lake Road.
And that presents a whole bunch of different questions for us on street parking, safety, just a little bit about Sandy Lane, when there's a garbage truck on it, you have to go to one lane to get around it. It's not a big road, it's a very, very small road. And right across from the main entrance to the proposed development is a schoolyard. So there's definitely some concerns about whether the capacity on Sandy Lane is capable of handling this. I'm not going to get into the traffic study on Sand Lake Road except to say that no, that's not true at all.
Come go down Sand Lake Road with us at any point in the day, you'll see whatever happened in that traffic can't be accurate. It is an unsafe road to be on right now. Having said all that, my second point in addition to the traffic on Sandy Lane is one of equitable development. So in our neighborhood, when you invest a million or so dollars in a house, you're looking around. When I bought my house, I looked at the land around me and I saw it. It was zoned agricultural. We buy back there because it's quiet. And I think we sort of had an inkling that at some point in time somebody would build on that land. We would build houses there. I don't think we could have ever estimated that we would be building 24.
And moreover, I don't think, and I'll get to this point in a second so nobody get too upset, I don't think we knew that we could potentially be looking at condos and townhouses. And I know that's not being what's being proposed, but I have some questions about whether or not there's an opportunity for that to happen in the future. I'll get to that in a second. We are not anti development. We are anti using a mechanism to build more houses than should be built on this particular piece of land. To that end, I have done a ton of research on missing middle zoning. I know more about zoning than I ever wanted to know in my entire life.
too. Yes, I know. I apologize. I have read cover to cover your 2020 document that was published, I think, by this room on missing middle. And I've also read a whole bunch of different articles and things. And it seems as though there is a bit of a flaw in the missing middle logic. Missing middle, as I understand it, was designed to promote affordable and different types of housing, but most specifically affordable housing and connectivity. We just heard the applicant say that we're talking about $8.50 to million dollar plus homes. I don't know what the technical definition of affordable home is in Florida, but I don't think it's $8.50 to $1,000,000. So, we meet the technical requirements for a rezone here, but I think we are definitely taking advantage, and I'm not accusing the developer.
I have nothing nothing but nice things to say about him. I think we're using a mechanism in this zoning without really getting to its true intent. Right? Its intent was to create affordable housing. That's not what's being proposed here. So I think there's a mismatch. With regards to connectivity, let's be clear. We are connecting Sand Lake Road with itself about 300, 400 feet the road. There's no connectivity because our neighborhood doesn't go through. We're not connecting Sand Lake Road to 434 or 436.
We're connecting Sand Lake Road with itself. So connectivity is a questionable thing as well. Our primary concern, however, with the missing middle designation is the uncertainty that comes along with it. As has been said here, it's never been approved in Seminole County, and I think we need to think long and hard about whether this is the place that we start with that. And here's the reason.
My understanding coming into today is that once it is rezoned, missing middle allows for a bunch of different housing types, condos, duplexes, triplexes, all of these different things. If rezoned, even though the applicant is saying that he will build single family homes and he has stipulated to that, and I believe that, what happens between he doesn't own the land yet. So what happens between today when you vote and when that shovel hits the dirt? We we heard a whole bunch of different things, engineering and
all the plans that have
to be approved. What happens if this deal falls through and another developer who has not stipulated to building single family homes gets a hold of that property? Are we then looking at condos, townhouses, triplexes, and duplexes, which I don't think is the intention of the board here today or the board of commissioners here today. So in speaking while I was waiting to his attorney, I understand there may be some mechanisms that you all can employ to prevent those types of housing from being built on this land. If so, I think we really need to understand those because that's a major concern of ours in addition to the density.
But so for all those reasons, in summary, because my clock is counting down on me here, number one, traffic on Sand Lake Road and Sandy Lane, specifically Sandy Lane because it is our primary ingress and egress. Two is the equitable development and not just enfranchising existing homeowners who bought back there, understanding this land was zoned one way. And then lastly, it's just understanding the impact of missing middle, what that means, whether we're using it appropriately in this particular regard, and what protections we can get against different types of houses that we would not want to be built there. Thank you for your time, and please vote no.
Thank you so much. Next speaker, name and address for the record.
Madam Chairman, commissioners, staff, and my neighbors, I'm Steve Lit from 385 Forest Park Circle in Longwood. Six points in three minutes, point zero, there's no shady lane. And please, if you're going to make left in, left or right in, right out, don't put barriers because that's going to make Hunt Club into a U-turn nightmare. Point one, after listening to testimony and evidence received in the hearing, the planning zoning commissioners voted five to one to deny the rezoning on Sandy Lane by Sand Lake. You appointed these volunteer commissioners to evaluate what's best, so please agree with their recommendations and deny this rezoning request.
Point two, the applicant hangs his hat on the on his adherence to the comprehensive plan. But if the Florida constitution and state statutes had intended such adherence to be sufficient rather than necessary, the final decision would have been left to staff, not the county commissioners. Point three, about this supposed adherence, goal four in the future land use document of the comprehensive plan is to grow walkable active places. No matter how marvelously the applicant connects to Sand Lake sidewalks and lays down his own sidewalks, the net net effect is to trash walkability and bikeability throughout the Sand Lake corridor. Two Pace Brantley School students were hit by cars this year.
Let's not approve a nonadherent zoning change that makes it even worse. And I'd like to add that take a look at Sand Lake if you think if you believe that it's not a problem. Point four, it's not just this property, it's the precedent for all the other semi vacant properties, including the 9.65 acre Fire Creek At Lake Brantley pre application whose URL I supplied with the lists of URLs that I passed out. I passed out those URLs to give you factual evidence on everything I'm saying. Point five, I'm gonna skip for time.
Point six when deciding, please remember that I could have recited three additional important points and refuted every rebuttal to all these points. But unlike the applicant's counsel, I have only three minutes. Please deny missing middle to this property now and until the mess on Sand Lake has been completely cured. Thank you for your time and for listening to us.
Thank you for being here. Next speaker, name and address for the record, please. And you can lower that mic.
Thank you. My name is Jude Stevens. I live at 611 Andrew Street in Altamonte Springs. I've lived at that address for twenty eight years, and it is directly behind Forest City Elementary School. I try really hard to stick to facts.
The first one is that, like he said, the Board of County Commissioners voted not to recommend that we change the zoning to missing middle. Also, in the last meeting that we had, I believe miss Apgar and also the builder both said that he could build what he wanted to build without changing the zoning. Now to go back to the community meeting that was held in September, which was mobbed. I don't know if you have minutes to that. I've never seen minutes, never saw anybody take minutes at that meeting.
But we asked him that, specifically many, many people asked him that. He said if said if you can build what you say you wanna build without changing the zoning, why are we here? And his response was, he told us that in order to make money, he could not just build 24 to 26 single family homes. Nobody could. He wanted to build, in total maybe not on this particular parcel, but in total in that area between 54 to 71 total units.
Some would be single family affordable at 600 to 1,000,000. Not sure I agree with that. And then the rest would be multifamily. That, he said over and over, is his intention. He said he needed the rezoning on this parcel because otherwise, he nor any anyone else could make money and it would be easier to get other places rezoned if he could get this one rezoned.
Like everyone else with the traffic, there are times I should be able to make a straight shot out of my subdivision to Sand Lake Road, but I can't. I have to go through two other neighborhoods and turn up West Lake Brantley to get to a street to get to a traffic light to turn onto Sand Lake Road. Well, it doesn't matter usually what time of day that's happening. He also brought up the right turn in and right turn out onto Sand Lake Road. And at the very end of the last meeting, he said, I thought kind of flippantly, so I'll put in a median.
Well, it's a two lane road except for the turning lanes when you go in into other streets. You can't put a median there. Please vote no on this. He doesn't need it.
Thank you very much. I just do wanna clear up for the record. It was the planning and zoning committee that voted no. It was not the county commission. Thank you.
I just have to say
it for the record. I know. It's hard to be at that podium. Yes, sir. And while you're coming up, miss Stregor, will you call the next four?
Laurie Bartlett, Kevin Carter, Jay Kyle Jay Kyle and Cynthia Hayes.
Yes, sir. Go ahead. Name and address for the record.
Thank you. My name is Donnie Anderson. I reside at 200 Berry Court, and that's in Longwood, Florida 32779.
And are you in the subdivision?
I am in the subdivision across the street. Across the the street.
Thank you.
Yeah. That's where I reside. You could say a lot of things, but given the amount of time that we have, I have in front of you. I've sent out a lot of information and I also presented some of the things that I've created on there. There's three separate videos that you are aware of and hopefully a viewed it kind of summarizes, you know, what we're about and what the issues are.
And I would and I would just you guys are the line. We, as a homeowner, we do what we can to take care of our homes and do our kids and get them to school and all that. And so responsibility as commissioner German says, hey, look Sandy Lane and and Sand Lake Road the issues on Sand Lake Road are the the the county's fault. It was basically what he said. You go back and look at it.
The issues of traffic and everything else. So you guys are the last line of defense, and I'll go to commissioner Dolores talk about the the project that went awry. It was done by code, it was sent by code, but then it flooded everything out. And who's to say that this isn't the same thing? Promises that are made, we know the previous the person has said it before, that mister Zito, the guy doesn't own the property yet.
There's all kinds of things that could happen. The zoning is questionable. And why couldn't this do? Like like commissioner Lopez said it clearly in the last video, you think this could be done with a different type of zoning. And that's why I'm asking that this board take a look at exactly what's trying to go on because you you have you're not approving a development, you're approving the zoning. So you're the last line of defense when it comes to us. To defend us, to uphold the safety of the corridor. And I just respectfully ask that you uphold the decision of the PNC board, that there's a better way to do this. And we have to trust that you're gonna do the right thing for us. Thank you.
Thank you. Next speaker, please. Name and address for the record.
Good afternoon. I'm Sherri Austin and I live at 200 Berry Court in Forest Park Estates at 32779 in Longwood. And I, like my husband just said, we live directly across the street from Sandy Lane, and I'm probably the resident with the most years in the Sand Lake Corridor, sixty one years of my 63, so I have seen the growth. I can't even imagine what Sand Lake Road would look like if we still had to deal with Teague Middle School on Sand Lake Road. Thank God that moved to McNeil.
But the board, the commissioner board shot down a rehab center that was trying to go on that same property many years ago, and I thank you for denying that proposal, but today there will be many people discussing the traffic and safety. I'm telling you the only time Sand Lake Road is free from horrible traffic is when school's out of session, and it's in the summer. So we have those obvious concerns about traffic and safety. Others will discuss our concerns about property values and the compatibility. If I were the homeowners across the street, I certainly wouldn't want missing middle coming in.
I respectfully ask the board of commissioners to uphold the zoning and board or the zoning and planning board's decision to deny missing middle, I thank you for your decision to deny it. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, ma'am. Name and address for the record. Yes. You can lower it.
I'm Laurie Bartlett. I live at 816 Real Alamano Drive, Altamonte Springs, which is across on the other side of 434. But I have friends and used I worked at Lake Brantley for a number of years before I retired, and I have friends that live down there. So I drive Sand Lake as many people do, or evidently not many people. So why am I here? I mean, I can easily or not easily turn left and go down 436 to everything I I would like to go to. It
an easier way, except a friend's house. Because there's a sign, there's a phrase in this room in three different places. It's up there, it's behind me, and it's behind you. And it needs to be considered for what I don't remember the gentleman's name. In the future, starting today, if you approve missing middle, you are changing.
Missing middle, in this case, is being done at a builder's request. The phrase up there behind me and behind you says Seminole County. There's a flag. It goes Seminole County. And then it says Florida's natural choice. One needs to be careful how much of the natural choice you are giving to builders. Florida's natural choice could likely become Seminole County, Florida's Builders Choice.
Thank you for your
time. Thank you. Next speaker.
Hello, everyone. My name is Jake Helichimovich. If I'm having a bad hair day, let me know, I'll put this on. Otherwise, I'll get right to business.
Thank you.
I live at 215 Duncan Trail, and I understand this is supposed to be a single family home community. So as long as you guys could keep it that way, you have my support in what your decision is. The concern that people like me have is if this turns in the missing middle, he sells it off and someone else takes it over, and then this ends up just becoming a chip for him to make more money. I understand builders have to make money, but single family home community, I could say a lot here, but it's been covered by a lot of the other speakers. And that's really all I wanted to say today. Thank you for your time.
Thank you. We appreciate your brevity.
Hello. My name is Kevin Carter. I live at 201 Berry Court. I'm here as an expert licensed witness. My background is PVTI, pipe fitters, and hydro plant design. Also, licensed master plumber, and I'm also a building inspector. The problem that is not being quite or the picture not being dissolved for you is on the top left corner of the property, we have a power grid power lines, not your just basic electrical lines. This is off the power grid that is coming to that area. The builder originally wanted to build somewhat underneath that area, and the building department said, no way. You can't get close to those power lines.
So my concern is I also deal with the the the kind of basin, the aquifer underneath. Through my company, we keep track within that area of at least a dozen springs that has popped up because of construction. There's also has been 200 feet away from this particular property, a spring had popped up, which is part of the county's knowledge. The the building department and the storm water had actually took them over $2,000,000 and almost two years to cap that when it ruptured 200 feet away from this property. In the middle of this property, there was a small dwelling that was there, a house, and it had a well when they had to leave.
Our company, we actually had to go in and tap it and close it off and work with the Saint John's River management because it's an artesian well. Right below the surface is the aquifer, and scraping that area can rupture and create bigger issues. And that property is sloped like this room right here. It's one inch per 12 inch. You know, every 12 inches, it goes up an inch. So it's greatly sloped. And that whole area during hurricanes, heavy rainstorms, some of the lower dwelling neighborhoods have been flooded. There's there's a couple of schools there. There's a PACE school that gets flooded. There's also a Seventh day Adventist church and school that's there that has the ball field has numerous times been under underwater.
So, again, up to missus Lockhart, the answer is yes. Everything flows downhill. I have to work with the water department, storm water department, Sunshine Water, and I we transfer water from one reservoir, from one lake to retention ponds and stuff like that. So that way, we try to keep from having our county flooded. Just recently, over by April and April, they spent over $85,000,000 to restore some of the storm water to try to connect some of the canals, some of the lakes, some of the retention ponds to keep the water flowing, to keep from flooding.
This you know, so that has a as a county, y'all have already spent hundreds of millions of dollars, and we're worried about what we're worried about is another rupture in Wakaiwa Basin. I've asked for environmental impact. Nobody's given me one. This is something our company has to deal with because when something gets ruptured and broken, we have to come in and destroy it where builders will just pack and say, well, we'll we'll just go bankrupt and close our company and and let the county deal with our mess. And then that's when they call me in because I gotta go cap these wells, these springs.
And this was the past four or five years, big flooding that's been going on in that particular area. So and they had to downsize it because of those power lines, and that's why they u they the builder wanted a lot more homes, and now he was forced to, you know, confined to a smaller area. And they're trying to count to seven acres that's not really theirs. That's part of the utility commission's property. Thank you.
Thank you.
Next speaker, please. Do you have more? Yes. Please read their names.
Michael Heidman, Susan Montanez, Mohamed Munir, and Judy Pizzo.
And we're almost to the bottom. Almost. Please go ahead, ma'am.
I'm Cynthia Hayes, 1104 Cambridge Court, Longwood, 32779. I live in the Wekiva Hunt Club area. I did send an email in September, but I felt like I needed to update a little bit. I don't claim to understand all things about how land zoning works, but I don't believe this housing is what's best for the community. I've learned more since the original email in September, and I understand that houses will be built in this area most likely at some point with the current zoning.
But with missing middle, that means even more housing, and it's denser, just like they talked about. Once missing middle, if it's approved, they will have the green light to build whatever they want. And they can make those promises that they've made. But their experience and their business is multifamily. It's obvious on their website that's what their experience is, and that's difficult to fight.
There's one area I think that they did, single family. What they can do and what they will do may be different, and we know business and money dictate that and not community well-being. Traffic is a big concern. Just drive up and down Sand Lake Road from 06:45AM to 08:30AM. Kids getting dropped off, etcetera.
After school, there are parents out in the middle of Sand Lake Road making sure that the Pace Brantley kids don't get run over by the cars trying to go around the line of cars going into the school. And somebody mentions that kids had been hurt. The schools and their limited staff in the area. So this is going to increase students are already under stress adding students outside the zone now in addition to finding space for those in the zone. And I've worked in the so I know that is a stressor.
More people generate more general security and public safety concerns and the need for added patrols and concerns for EMS routes with delays, utility loads, etcetera. Most importantly, the students walking and biking is a huge safety issue, like I mentioned. There's obvious needs in Seminole County for crossing guards, bus drivers, sheriff department, Seminole County Public Schools, utilities. They all seem high because I keep seeing all these hiring notices going out in social media, and it's constant for all of these departments. So this is just adding to all of that for departments that apparently aren't able to fill up their spots.
This won't be the last property to build, but to double, maybe, the capacity from the current zoning seems chaotic and possibly irresponsible. Please vote no on this project. We love our community, but we start to feel squeezed out for a dollar. Thank you for your time and service.
Thank you. Next speaker. Name and address for the record, please, sir.
Michael Heidman. 405 Forest Park Circle, Longwood, Florida 32779. I live in the Forest Park Estates community. I'm here to express my opposition to the missing middle zoning proposed at the Sandy Lane Homes project. I'm not opposed to development. I make a living off of development. Two thirds of the subject property is already zoned for r one a a for 90 foot lots, which is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. There's no need to rezone to missing middle for those two lots. There is an existing agriculture property which has a lovely estate on it. Riding arena, paddocks would be a a beautiful home for someone.
I don't know why the the the seller is is selling that as part of the land, but there's no need to rezone those two thirds of the property to missing middle. I would support the agriculture rezone to a r one a a, but nothing else. There's one thing I wanna make clear. We keep hearing this is a single family home development that's been proposed. Caitlin made it clear in her proposal that the development plan is subject to change. I wanna I wanna say that again. The development plan is subject to change. You're not here to vote for a development for single family homes. You're voting for missing middle. That's the concern here.
There's no guarantee of housing typology, and the county loses control of ensuring that there is, in fact, a single family home developed at this property. For that reason, I ask you to vote no. We heard the applicant state that they specifically picked missing middle to increase the density at the lot. The same concern that their commissioner had when he met with the the applicant in April was go straight to zoning. Don't do PD because that will, in fact, increase density.
There's something that hasn't been said yet. The full intent and purpose of missing middle, and I'm gonna read it out loud because it's been touched on but not read fully, The purpose of the Missing Middle district and alternative standards is to encourage a wider range of housing choices in central locations accessible to services. This includes permitting smaller units and more compact site plans to increase affordability without subsidies. Central locations to services. It's a twenty four minute walk to the closest bus stop.
It's on 436. It's over a mile away. Affordability. We've heard the applicant state today, and I've heard the applicant state repeatedly. They intend to sell these homes or townhomes or duplexes for 800,000 to 1.2 or 1,300,000 million. How is that increasing affordability in the area? It fails to meet the intent of missing middle. This is the first missing middle rezone application to come before this board. It's important that you get this right. It will set a precedent for the area.
It will set a precedent for the county for what's acceptable. I encourage you to uphold the five one denial from the board from the planning and zoning board and ask you to deny this today. Thank you.
Thank you. Next speaker, please.
Hello. I'm Susan Montanez, and I live at 3566 Tara Oaks Court in Longwood. And just wanna thank you for your time today. And, you know, when I think about this possible rezoning and how it's truly pulled our community together off Sand Lake Road in a weird sort of way, I have to say thank you to them for even bringing this forward because you can see the passion that we all have. And no disrespect to the person who did the traffic study, but I've lived there since 2000.
I work full time. Even through COVID was going in, I didn't have much traffic then. But the traffic is really bad. We have four schools, Lake Brantley High School, Forest City Elementary. We've got Forest Lake with 700 students, and Pace Brantley with, I think, a little over 100.
And neither one of those last two schools have public transportation. I personally sit in the mornings and wait. I can listen to one to two podcasts going in just on Sand Lake Road alone. The thought of rezoning to have more homes in our area is is crazy. If if you come there one morning and you drive down there when school is in, you will understand why I think there were 16 or 17 of us took off work, made a point to come here.
So you can hear from us that it's crazy to rezone in that area. If Seminole County wants to look at a project like this, pick another road that doesn't have four schools on it, because it's real. And, you know, time is valuable. And I will go brief, because time is valuable, and I hope you all don't know.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Good afternoon. My name is Mohammed Bonnir from 111 Shelly Court, Longview, Florida 32779. I just live across Sandy Lane. I'm only came for just one point, I have already sent you guys email with couple of points. I'm deeply concerned about the school impact, my family has a child with special need including autism, and multiple times he has come home from school with bruises.
And when we asked the principal and teacher about this incident, we were told that overcrowding is affecting supervision and staffing. That is not just a capacity number on the paper, is real safety issue for children who need special extra support. Therefore, I would request you to please deny this rezoning. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Sir, is that the public school that you're speaking of?
Yes. The Thayb Elementary. Okay.
You would take that up with the public school board, that would be ideal. We have no governance over that. Thank you. Could you please call the next speakers?
Pam Taipley and Gary Rathwell, the final speakers.
All right. There we go.
Okay. Well, quite a bit of what I was going to say has been said. Except, I am Judy Pizzo. My husband and I live at 255 New Waterford Place in the Wakaba Cove development, which is at the Northeast corner of Sand Lake Road and Line Drive. To say that a traffic study was done and presented or finished May 6, I know where the tubes were put on the road.
They were put where there was little traffic. And I might be wrong, and I apologize if I am wrong on that, but as a former transportation planner with the Florida Department of Transportation, I know what those things look like, and they certainly weren't at the eastern end of Sand Lake Road, which has a very high density of traffic. Even when school is out, it can be challenging. So I'm going to try to get back to my notes here. I want to recognize the commissioners for your time.
I know it's been a very long day for you. Your meeting started 09:30. I feel for you. I also want to thank those who have presented their comments ahead of me and the two that are going to be behind me. I've already mentioned the traffic study. I find it incredulous. I also question the public meeting. Gee, why didn't us at the West End Of Sand Lake Road get that invite? That would have been fun. I'm confused about what the developer, his idea of affordable housing, we've already talked about that, that is rather incredulous.
If you're putting 24 homes on this property and you're paying 800,000 to 1,000,000 for a property, you're gonna have more than two cars. So you're already putting anywhere from 48 to maybe 60 or more cars onto Sand Lake Road at any given time. So the developer's representative to say it's going to be minimal impact, I find that to be unreasonable. My point is this high density development is more in line with something you would see in Downtown Winter Park or maybe even Tri Sanford. This high density development, if this zoning change goes through, will definitely put a burden on this community and the character of our corridor.
I'm asking the the board here to understand that how you vote today. It might impact the developer, but he'll get over it. He can always go back to the drawing board and come up with something that is less invasive and less dense. But if you vote yes, it's going to impact a greater group of people, And we're already living with a high impacted road. I want to thank you for your time and for hearing us today.
Thank you for being here.
Hi there, and thank you very much for having me today. I'm Pam Tapley, Pace Brantley Preparatory School Head of School. And I just wanted to say that at Pace Brantley, we have more than 125 families in this community. And the prospect of adding additional 24 homes in this area definitely raised significant concerns for us, as well as logistical concerns. The increase in traffic, I think you've already heard that enough, and the congestion.
And it is by our school. And I do want it on record that I don't have parents in the middle of the road doing traffic. It may be myself or an employee. Also, with that, I worry about drop off and pick up. I will tell you that our school in Forest Lake Academy, our parents all do come and drop off and pick up.
We do not have any busing into our campuses. So that is a concern. I think somebody did mention from my last with the planning and zoning, we did have two students this year alone hit by a car trying to exit onto Sand Lake Road. The other is our concern with high volumes of traffic and obviously getting emergency vehicles down Sand Lake Road into our campuses or into the neighborhoods because we have the four schools. And we also have a preschool on Sand Lake Road as well.
I do want to say we're fortunate to be part of a neighborhood where families honor our mission and contribute to our calm and supportive environment for the children of our school with learning differences. The introduction of a high density housing, particularly at the scale that could result, if adjacent to the parcel follows suit, it really would disrupt the balance and create a lasting safety and quality of life challenges for everyone on this corridor. Pace Brantley Preparatory School has been part of this community for over fifty years. We have deep commitment from the families we serve and the neighborhoods that we call home. We respectfully but firmly urge you to consider the full scope of what this zoning would set in motion, not just for one parcel, but for the entire Sand Lake Road corridor before rendering a decision.
I thank you very much for your time and your consideration.
Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please.
My name is Gary Rothwell. I reside at 1433 Vivaldi Place in Longwood, 32779. I live in the subdivision of Bella Vista, which is on the other side of the Pace Brantley School from the Sandy Lane subdivision. Obviously, get very concerned regarding the possibility of the increased traffic. Right now, when school's in and out, obviously, it is very complicated getting out from our subdivision.
We're a gated community and with the right in and right out only coming from that on Sand Lake, it's going to force all traffic to make a left hand turn out of Sandy Lane onto Sand Lake Road. With a school there, the kids coming through, I walk my dog constantly back and forth through there, And it's already difficult watching traffic try to turn left, specific, you know, especially when traffic is busier. With you adding 24 homes that have to turn left from there if they're going that direction, There's a downhill that comes from Sand Lake Road down towards this area. It's already or should we say there's police often stay at the Pace Brantley watching the traffic speed past there. You had 24, you know, homes trying to turn left from there coming down this sloped road.
It's gonna add a lot of potential harm, especially the kids in that area. I also live at the in our subdivision. I'm at the back of the subdivision along the conservation area that's more like a dry lake bed. It's kind of the overflow from our community, from, the Sandy, Hill community. It's all down there.
My home resides basically at the edge of the flood zone. I do question when you start building more in this area, how much is extra water has to flow back into our area, which is the catchment area. I get concerned about that because literally the flood zone is literally sits behind my house. And, of course, I worry about property values and and getting these types of homes up. And so but I appreciate your time taking to listen to all of us. I've this is the first time I've ever been to, let alone spoken to at one of these meetings. And it's impressive to watch the community and how they pull together and what they're hoping to see out of this. But I would also ask that the rezoning doesn't seem necessary if they can do it another way. Thank you.
Thank you very much, sir. Miss Dreger, is that the last of our speakers? Yes, ma'am. With that, we'll close public comment. I'll give the applicant, the opportunity to respond. I would ask that you be as brief as you possibly can.
Thank you, madam chair, fellow commissioners. I'm gonna run through and with respect to your request be as brief as possible, but I do need to touch upon some of the things. So one, there was actually, I heard the word fear. We have a fear. And as this board knows, fears and speculation are not competent substantial evidence.
But there was a talk about pedestrian connectivity. Miss Apgar indicated our project has to connect to the existing sidewalk net network on Sandy Lane and Sand Lake Road. And I guess I'm the only one who's had a misspoken ever in this room, so I apologize for mispronouncing the name of the road. One, there's several people who comment about, well, how can we ensure that it's single family detached homes? I touched upon this earlier under your code.
My client actually has to comply with the conditions of approval. That condition of approval runs with the land, so if my client didn't close on the property, it would be binding on whoever did close on the property. So that concern, again, is addressed through the approval process. There was a suggestion that we're building more houses than allowed on the property. Again, the density is governed by the future land use map and the comp plan, not the zoning.
We are not changing the density on the property. In fact, the deputy county attorney had to indicate that on the record at the PNC hearing. There's been comments about Sand Lake Road. You heard many people talk about traffic. Again, you all have that come up. You have your own engineers. You have your own professional staff. They've confirmed that Sand Lake Road is operating at a to c level of service. My client doesn't establish the level of service on the road. The county does.
And my client's responsibility is to make sure its project doesn't trip that roadway so it fails the level of service. You have your county staff and an outside third party transportation engineer confirming that this project does not trip the level of service. In fact, there's thousands of trips available on the roadway. I understand that during school hours, I live right by Boone High School for twenty, thirty minutes a day. It gets backed up, and then it clears out.
But nobody's suggesting that Kaylee Avenue in Downtown Orlando needs to be widened to four or six lanes. So, again, we're complying with the traffic requirements. In fact, miss Apgar's report says that the county doesn't have any improvements planned on Sand Lake Road in its five year CIP. If Sand Lake Road, as commissioner German actually indicated at the PNC hearing is, it's unfair to hold the last property standing responsible for an alleged issue with the traffic circulation area. In fact, he said, if anything, it's the county's responsible for this if it's happening.
So, again, my client has done exactly what a developer needs to do. In fact, we didn't need to do the traffic study. I guess I'm reminded of what my grandmother would say, you're darned if you do, you're darned if you don't. At the P and Z, were told, oh, they didn't do a traffic study. Well, it's because the county's requirements for a subdivision with 50 or fewer homes doesn't require traffic study. We then do a traffic study, which one of the recent speakers said that we laid out tubes in all the wrong areas. The traffic study isn't based upon tubes. We use Seminole County's own traffic counts, and then the traffic engineer, what professional engineers do, they extrapolate and add a background trip generation rate to that. So there was no hiding of traffic tubes. We use the county's own numbers.
The suggestion that we would stress schools, again, your packet has a letter from the schools, school board saying that there are seats available. That's all my client can do when coming before a board with an application is go get that confirmation from Seminole County Schools. There was a flooding suggestion or concern. You all know we're not at the site plan stage final engineering, but we have to comply with St. John's requirements as well as the counties and with my experience with Mr. Potter on stormwater issues, I can assure you that the county staff holds the developers feet to the fire in that regard.
And thank you for compliment.
Yes. Trust me, sometimes to my chagrin and disagreement, but we did comply. The suggestion that somehow missing middle is not straight zoning, again, is a misnomer. Missing middle is straight zoning. The difference is that the code allows in that one provision that I referenced that the applicant has to comply with the conditions of approval. So again, we're not seeking something that's not straight zoning. Missing middle is straight zoning. And on the traffic, the last thing I would mention is the traffic study shows sixteen a. M. Peak hour trips.
The suggestion and again, I'm not stating that school traffic isn't bad at certain hours or during drop off, but the suggestion that somehow 16 trips across an hour in the morning is somehow going to make the road just completely inoperable, I would suggest, is not supported by any evidence before you, this afternoon. In fact, I would submit 16 trips, one car per every four minutes is extremely de minimis at best. And then lastly, there was a suggestion about the community meeting, and I've and there were a couple suggestions that somehow my client along the way has misrepresented this project, and it's a bait and switch. And I respectfully take exception to that. You know, I don't mind people making fun of me for mispronouncing a street name, but we have the minutes of the community meeting which are in your packet.
And I'm reading from the minutes, Developers intent, develop a single family residential subdivision, not townhomes or multifamily. Proposed density, approximately 24 homes. It goes into talking about the homes proposed minimum 3,000 square feet, two story homes, two car garages, and it gives the target price. No intention to build townhomes, duplexes, or affordable housing complexes, which affordable housing is defined by statute as you all know. So again, the suggestion that somehow my client didn't make that clear, my client is not swayed or varied from what's being proposed.
And in fact, we're willing to stipulate, as we did before, that it would be single family homes, that it would be capped at 24, that it would be substantially consistent with the conceptual site plan, which again lines up four homes next to six, and six next to seven. And my client is willing to abide by a condition that the minimum square footage on the homes be 2,500 square feet or greater. Again, I know you all understand the fine folks in Tallahassee took away your authority to sort of govern architectural standards, but we're willing to stipulate to those type of requirements on this approval. And I think the only last note I had, madam chair, was there was a suggestion. The individual had indicated he was an expert, and he was talking about electrical lines.
Those electrical lines cross in the northwest corner of the property. They actually go across the adjoining PUD, so they're not a prohibition on development. It's an easement, so it actually would be my client's property. It's not the utility company's property. They have an easement across it. And you'll see on the conceptual site plan, it actually is the open space common area in the Northwest Corner. So again, we would submit that we've met our burden, madam chair. I know you've heard from a lot of people, and I'll you know I represent neighbors at times. And I'll echo what I said at the P and Z. I don't take away from the sincerity of their comments.
They live in the area. They have a vested interest in protecting the area. But what I didn't hear today was anything about my client not meeting its burden or somehow that the staff made an error and overlooked a provision in your code or comp plan, and we haven't met those requirements. What I heard a lot about was we don't like the traffic, we're concerned or we have this fear that they won't be nice houses. We love our area.
I think quite frankly they prefer that no development go on there. In fact, don't think folks based on what they were saying would like the AM peak hour trips generation from R1A double housing on the property. But again, not a single provision of the code or comp plan was cited by anyone speaking today. So again, I would submit your professional staff's recommendation and report is the competent substantial evidence. And I would ask for this board's support and approval of our requested rezoning with the stipulated conditions on square footage, single family homes, and no more than 24 lots.
Thank you very much. Thank you. Alright. I am going to look
Oh, I'm sorry.
Pardon
me? I'm just wondering. I was asking if public hearing was now closed. Because he was part of public hearing. That's all.
Well, public comments is now closed. He was in response. Yes. So public comment is closed. I'm actually gonna ask deputy county attorney if there's anything you'd like to add at this point before we start discussing.
The only thing I'll add is that as far as the unless there's something specific you'd like me to discuss. As far as the stipulation proposed by the applicant, you know, this zoning district, we require this conceptual site plan so that we can they can show how they're meeting all the requirements as far as street trees and open space and sidewalks, you know, everything that this zoning district requires. So if the applicant's going to stipulate to it, potentially, we could add that those stipulations to the conceptual plan and state the applicants made it binding. But this is a conventional rezoning to a district, which is it's not like a PD. They're willing to stipulate to it.
We could put a stipulation on the record and and and and include it in the conceptual plan or and or make a note in the record that they've stipulated to agree to these things, and the county staff, when reviewing it, would implement those conceivably when they came into develop. So it could be done. Does it stay there in the future? Is there a chance that someone could challenge it, you know, potentially in the future, maybe the next owner? But, you know, that's that's what I'll say about the stipulation.
Alright. Thank you. Commissioner Constantine, this is your district.
It is my district. Thank you very much. You know, I I just wanna start by, you know, thanking Ms. Lockhart for clearing up something when they were said, when we were talking about a meeting that I had with the applicant back in April, and I said, stick to the zoning and you won't have a problem. And I would suggest to each and every one of you would not be here today if he had stuck to the zoning and not asked for the missing middle zoning because that is different than the zoning that is there, and that's one one one r double a or whatever.
It's something like that. Let me It's
been a long day.
Yeah, it's been a long day. So I'm going to make this very quick. I'm going to stick to the competent and substantial evidence and suggest to you that the intent and purpose of the missing middle district is to encourage a wider range of housing choices by permitting smaller units and more compact site plans to increase affordability without subsidies. That is the land development code three o point eight point three point one. This project does not meet that.
It is proposed single family residential lots, price tag 800,000 to 1,200,000 as per said by the applicant in his own words just a few minutes ago or a lot more than that, and that mister Spain clearly did not want to talk about because he talked about everything else but the price that was being suggested. These are not affordable homes. The median home price in Seminole County is 475,000. The applicant proposes prices that are more than double the median price. Thus, it seems that the real intent here is not to get smaller lots or is to get smaller lots and put large homes on them that would increase the profitability.
Nothing against profit except all of us have private property rights, and we all understand that, again, if he had stuck to the zoning, we wouldn't you all wouldn't be here. We'd still be here to rezone the other portion. And that is not consistent with the intent of the missing middle district. We are supposed to be increasing affordability, not decreasing it. The crest is also not consistent with the comp plan policy four point two point one, missing middle, which encourages increased affordability by allowing smaller units.
This project does not do that. The applicant is proposing three to 4,000 square foot homes, where the average home size in Seminole County is one point eight one thousand eight hundred square feet. Post units are not affordable and not small. We're setting a precedent here because this is the first time we're using missing middle.
Mhmm.
Let's use it for the reason that we intended it to be. This is not the location for missing middle anyway, but that's not the point here.
Commissioner Constantine, are you in the middle of a motion?
Yes. You're making a
motion. Therefore, I am yes. I am making a I'm I'm both debating and making a motion, and therefore, I wanna uphold the planning and zoning recommendation to deny this project zoning.
Second. Okay.
I have a
first and two seconds. Is there further discussion?
Well, yeah. I would like I know we want to speed this along, but I think because this is the first application for missing middle that we have had, it is incumbent upon us to have a little bit of conversation about it is that just has happened here. Because the evidence and the basis that the Planning and Zoning Commission denied this on is not the evidence and basis that we are denying this on. So let's be very clear about that. And I'm saying we because I seconded it and we haven't voted yet, but this is under discussion.
Were this a true missing middle project, we would be having a different discussion here today. I think that we need to be able to work with the county manager and have him work with staff and and the county attorney with our county attorney's team to understand. We have a recommendation from our staff for approval because whatever process that that the applicant went through, we believed with the information that was provided that this was appropriate for that zoning. So somewhere in this process, we have we have some clarification to do, some work
to do.
What's that? A disconnect.
There's a disconnect. And and I started thinking about this, this morning as I was putting my makeup on, because that's when I do some of my best thinking. Go the hours and hours and days and days of work that we did on the land development code rewrite and those work sessions that we had, and we brought in the consultants, we talked about missing middle, and we talked about we cannot start vilifying missing middle. It, in its intent, is going to be a very valuable tool for this county and for future commissioners to be able to help create variety in this community. But somehow between our board's direction and implementing that in our land development code and this application process, somehow we got sideways.
And so I just from from one commissioner who who is like, I really like missing middle. I like the intent. And thank you to whomever provided this was just passed down the diocese, this appendix with the the case studies on missing middle. Raise your hand. Who did it? Awesome. Thank you. Because we don't want this to be us. So that's just my two cents on this as we move forward and hoping that we can have some good dialogue, maybe some work sessions and further elements of talking about the code, helping to further clarify a process.
So I'm going to take it. I'm going to pick up where you left off, and then I promise I'll call on you. I think there's multiple disconnects. One is reference to compatibility with things that are surrounding, so I think we probably need another look at that. But the second piece of it that I think is the disconnect is that I I do have concern that these committees that we have, they're volunteer committees and boards that are making recommendations.
Their their rulings are not rulings. Their recommendations need training. And because I I don't necessarily feel like we did the citizens here justice, and I don't think we did our team justice, and I don't think we did the developer justice as we were going through that process. And that's on us. We pick we appoint these volunteers, and then they publicly indite us, which is interesting Mhmm.
And and not helpful to the community, quite frankly. I would also say that I think what's come to light to in this process, I think it's fabulous that the community is all joined together, but I think it's come to light that as we're approving schools on these roads that don't have transportation, we need to pay a little more attention because that hole's been dug. And we have others that continue to come through the pipeline, and now the charter schools are coming through the pipeline. We have very little to say about it. We just need to acknowledge that it's that this is going to be an ongoing challenge. But I think this is not all for naught because there are a lot of learning up exercises that have come out of this and a lot of takeaways, and I appreciate
you bringing it up.
I was actually not trying to shut down the conversation. Was trying to facilitate it, which up here is sometimes difficult, believe it or not.
And madam chair, that's that's what I said in the beginning was trying to indicate that. I am not a in fact, I support missing middle in the right place for the right reason. This is the wrong reason. This this is a reason to increase density. It is not for the missing middle to find affordability, and that needs to be sent not only to our boards but also our staff. And this is clearing up that press this precedent that we're making right now, and it is a precedent that we're saying, you know, when you're looking at missing middle, you're looking at affordability, not increased density.
And I do want to say, if I could, I'm well, no, think it's important because I just I just replayed in my head what I said earlier, and now I feel I need to clarify. I am not indicting our staff in any way, shape, and form. I said, you know, we have you know, a recommendation for approval. I I I think our staff did an excellent job. I think we have a phenomenal planning team. I just think we need we just need to work together a little
bit better.
This is new. It's new.
Heading in a different way.
It's a cool question. Hopefully.
Commissioner Zuboff
I'm good. I'm good. The answer
And the answer Laurie has just called the question.
And the answer is for
our constituents. Let's try to move it a
little farther.
All those in favor. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Hearing none opposed. It passes unanimously.
To deny.
To deny.
Deny. Not a chance. Motion is
to deny. Yeah. There was no
They were looking at us. Wait. Can we
take a break?
Let's take a No. I'm taking
a break. Please.
Sorry. Can we be back at four?
Yes. We can.
Seven minutes.
Well, that depends.
All right. I have 04:00. Calling all commissioners. Oh, we have four or five.
I'm in my seat, boss. Okay.
Alright. We're gonna move on to item 31, Rosenwald Community Center Rezone, and this will be presented by Annie Siloway, principal planner.
Silhouette with Development Services. I will be presenting the Rosenwald Rezone. The request is being presented for a rezone from r one single family dwelling and r two one and two family dwelling to PLI public lands and institutions. The rezone is is to allow for the development of a public park and a community center. Subject property has a public quasi public future land use designation, which permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.65.
This designation is intended to identify locations suitable for a range of public and quasi public uses, including but not limited to public and private recreational facilities, educational institutions, and libraries. The subject site is approximately 12 acres and was previously occupied by the historic Rosenwald School in the East Altamonte community. Seminole County acquired the property in 2019 for the purpose of redeveloping the site into a functional community asset, offering a public park with pavilions, a fishing pier, and a 6,000 square foot community center for cultural events, community services, and youth activities. The current residential zoning classification does not support the proposed use necessitating the reason. The PLI zoning is intended to include major public lands and quasi public institutional uses.
This classification may only be applied to lands that are owned and controlled by the public. Staff finds the request requested PLI zoning classification to be consistent with the Seminole County Land Development Code and the existing future land use of public quasi public and permits the proposed use of a public park and community center, which will provide a direct benefit to the community by offering accessible services and programs. The purpose and intent of the public quasi public future land use is to identify locations for a variety of public and quasi public uses transportation, communication, utilities, and in areas where public and quasi public uses are established, and in areas reserved for future public use. A community meeting regarding the overall Rosenwald Community Center was conducted on 12/09/2025, and the Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 1 and voted unanimously unanimously to recommend the Board of County Commissioners adopt a rezone ordinance. So staff request the Board of County Commissioners make the following motion, adopt upon first reading an ordinance rezoning the subject property from r one single family dwelling and r two one and two family dwelling to PLI public lands and institutions on approximately 12.98 acres located on the North Side of Merritt Street, approximately 0.25 miles east of Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
And I just wanted to inform the commissioners that the county is initiating this rezone of the property. And due to the proposed changes to the ordinance and zoning map designation, this rezone will be required to meet state statute under section 125.665 b that states the county initiated rezones require at least one of the public hearings and is to be held after 5PM on a weekday. However, the board can, by a majority, plus one, vote to have the meeting at a different time, such as before 5PM. The second public hearing is required to be held at least ten days after the first public hearing. And that concludes my presentation.
Fabulous. So how does this work? Do you, like, put on a different hat and speak as the applicant? I'm just kidding.
My niece is happy. But I will say no, we don't. But I will say that just so we're clear, because it's over 10 acres and because it's a county initiated rezoning, we have to have two public hearings for this. And so the second part of the motion needs to include the date certain for the second public hearing and the time at 01:30.
Alright. Commissioners?
I don't have any questions.
I have no questions. No questions?
No questions? Is there public comment?
Yes, ma'am. One speaker, Chris Watkins. Alright.
One's going twice. Going three times.
Good evening, everyone. Some of you long time no see. I used to be very consistent and coming. You must name is Christine Watkins. I reside at 639 Lake Mobile Drive, Altamonte Springs, 32701. I'm going to make this very brief because I'm very pleased where I understand this is going to go. It's just one question that I have. What was Rosenwald's rezoning prior to the R01? And it's at somewhere along the line. I missed that.
Was there a rezoning? What was the zoning prior to the R 1, R 2? Has it always been that when it was a school too?
We we could actually research that if Andy, do you know? Do
Yeah. So based on my research, the the land development code was established in this in
the early
seventies, and the zoning that was placed on the property is r one. And at the time, you know, that the zoning was placed on there, it did allow for schools to
be placed on the property.
Okay. So I was always sorry.
Okay. Thank No further silhouette.
Comment other than I am for it.
Thank you
very much.
Follow my lead.
You for here. Alright. Commissioners, I'll look for a motion.
Commissioner Lockhart's district.
Yeah. I would love to make a motion to adopt and act an ordinance rezoning the subject property from r one single family dwelling and r two one and two family dwellings to public lands and institutions on approximately 12.96 acres located on the North Side of Merritt Street, approximately a quarter mile east of Ronald Reagan Boulevard, and hold a second reading of the ordinance on 06/23/2026 at 01:30PM.
Second.
I have a first and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Hearing none opposed, motion passes unanimously. Thank you for being here. We've already done item number 32. That takes us to item number 33. This is a public hearing to adopt a resolution confirming the non ad valorem capital assessment for Rice Lake Management, MSVU. And this will be done by Lori Bailey Brown.
Good afternoon, commissioners. I'm Lori Bailey Brown, an administrative services director, here to present to you a resolution to authorize Phase I capital assessment for Rice Lake. Rice Lake is in the Little Wekiva Watershed, with 31 benefiting parcels District 5. The Rice Lake Management MSBU was created in 2023 and included funding for public services to be provided in two phases. The estimated phase one cost was $120,000 and phase two was implemented in 2023.
Actual project costs of $139,905 and county funding assistance of $20,000 resulted in the amount funded by the MSBU program at $119,905 This amount reflects the increases from cost estimate due to an increase in our restoration costs over that period of time. The capital assessment per assessed property is $3,867.89 per waterfront unit, and we offer a five year installment assessment at $981.73 per waterfront property. The five year installment plan includes administrative fees and interest. The owners of assessed property have an option of paying the capital assessment in full without financing fees within thirty days following the resolution or participate in the installment plan. The installment plan will be billed in five equal installments over the next five years via the tax bill beginning with the 2026 tax roll.
We request approval of the resolution confirming the assessment for Rice Lake Phase I construction services. This concludes my presentation.
Thank you very much. Is there any public comment?
Yes, ma'am. Three speakers, George Calvi, Eric Duncan, and Leo Nelson.
Can you all turn at the map of the lake? Do you have a chance if you could do that, please? Sure. Good. Hello, every name
and address for the record, sir. Sorry. Name and address for
Eric the
Duncan, 5 Stonegate North. Thank you very much for your time. Appreciate you pulling up that map. I like visuals. They really help me out. They might help you. I've lived on this lake for twenty four years. I live at the very south end of that lake and I have a home office. I've worked out of my home for many years, so I've seen a lot of what phase one was all about. I spoke to a lot of the people that worked out there.
So here's what I'm asking you to do, to consider putting off the decision tonight and pushing this off to reassess the east side of the lake. When phase one started, if you can imagine the clock at 02:00, look at the, if you would, the map. At 02:00, that crew of people, I would say they were for three weeks with a bot with a front end loader on cat tracks floating out in the lake for about three weeks is my estimate. They started going counterclockwise at the 02:00 position and they finished down there at about between the five and 06:00. I live just to the right at, say, you know, 06:30, let's say.
So here's what happened. Phase one was mechanical removal of a lot of the vegetation. Phase one was mechanical removal. The mechanical removal never did continue on covering the 13 houses on the East Side, which I live, including my neighbors to my left. The mechanical removal did not continue all the way up the East Side.
Okay? For for for the reasons that they had chosen. My point is, if you came today, the majority of the houses had vegetation so high, so thick that it to not have part of that removed does not seem fair to those of us paying this initial cost. So what what I'd like for you to do is to push off your decision. I'm not saying we don't want to pay.
I want to say to push off your decision to let the MSBU reassess that East side to see what more could do to be equal to the phase one on the West side of the lake. Okay? If you're looking across the East side to the West side of the lake, you can see a lot of a clean lakeshore around there, which most of us were hoping that would happen to us. But if you look at your home where we're at on the East Side and you come at, there's a lot of green vegetation that was never touched. No mechanical removal, only spraying was done according to my assessment. Okay?
I don't
see any lake staff here.
Yeah. Thomas is here. Yeah. Thomas.
I got him. Yep.
So that's all I'm asking, please, just to delay your decision until that's reassessed.
Thank you.
So I'm I'm gonna just stop. Are you three neighbors? Are you all on the same side of the lake?
One's at 06:30, one's at seven, and one's at 07:15 on the clock.
Oh, there you go. All right. Thank you. Thanks.
So I would like for the first of all, I wanna make sure that I we're clear on this. This is a financial decision, not a how we're managing the lake decision that's before us today. That being said, if there's reason for us to put this off, we can put this off. That's but the assessment well, I'm not having a discussion just for the record. I'm I'm actually looking behind you. So I'm gonna look to the county manager to get the right person up to address the management of the lake piece, and then to you to give advice on moving forward or not moving forward based on what we hear. So let's take that step before everyone else speaks if we're all saying the same thing. Is that fair? I'm looking at you two. Alright. Let's learn more.
I and I I can have oh, are you do you want me to call the staff? Yes. Thomas, do you wanna come up and give a status of phase one? And if it is complete?
Thomas Calhoun, watershed management division. Yes. This project was completed about over a year ago. The project consisted of removing invasive vegetation around the lake and the associated material sediment with it. A lot of that work was confined in some areas along the south shoreline, there was a lot of native vegetation there, so we didn't do as much work.
Some people say we haven't done any work out there. We also had conservation easements to work around, so I'll also say that when we do these like management plans and put the budget together, also put it in a contingency reserve. So when situations like this arise, we do have funding to address it. So closing the phase one does not prevent us from addressing the concerns of these residents.
So delaying the vote today is not necessarily the step that needs to be taken to do this. But with that, I think we'll hear the rest of the public comment. Is that fair?
Correct.
Thank you so much for coming up and being called. You we may need you again. Sir, name and address for the record.
Good afternoon. My name is George Calvi. I've lived at 23 Stonegate North, Longwood 32779 in the Ravensbruck subdivision for thirty two years. I love the lake, but unfortunately, I wouldn't know the difference between an invasive and non invasive plant than I would an organic or standard banana. Yeah.
So when we were given a presentation back in February 2023, it was this beautiful, colorful, almost like, you know, hypnotic type of presentation that our lake was going to be something like we never saw before. And in fact, we were provided with a picture of Myrtle Lake restoration, which I'm sure we can put up if you like, but it's really quite simple. Here was the lake before, it was a total mess, and here was the lake after, and it was absolutely perfect. So now, I'll give you just one simple example. Picture Rice Lake, it's like a kidney.
Right? So they started counterclockwise. And the reason they started about, oh, 200 yards east of my house because that's where we have the access for boats and things to get in and out of. So it made sense. So they went counterclockwise. While the workers were there, I approached them a couple of times. Said, hey, how you doing? What's going on? And they said, well, obviously, you're over here and we're going counterclockwise wise and we're here. And eventually, we're gonna make it to you.
And I said, great, because I think the hurricane that happened, I don't know, six months before that or a year before that, whatever, and the lake was kind of the highest it's ever been. So you can imagine the vegetation went with it. Okay? So I'm figuring, okay, they're get around because as Eric, my neighbor, pointed out, I mean, we had stuff that was three and four feet high. So I'm thinking, this is gonna get all cleaned up like it is on the other side, which looks perfect.
It's wonderful. Except they never got there. So then I went and saw the guy again. And then he says to me, I tell you what, I'll make sure the supervisor comes over your house and will knock on the door and will go out to the lake and he'll tell you exactly what we're gonna do and give you an idea of what things will wind up looking like. So, obviously, I have to move along. The problem was you take something like a lily pad. Eric did the research. If I showed you these two lily pads, again, like a banana, you couldn't tell the difference. One's invasive, one noninvasive. Except here's the problem.
Now all the lily pads are gone. And obviously, the fish love the lily pads. So you you could imagine that we're missing a ton of stuff that was supposed to be replanted that hasn't been done. Parts of the bottom of the lake are just mushed where I used to walk out on the lake all the time and you just can't right now. I mean, you get tangled.
Okay. So the the whole idea of what we're saying is we were given this grandiose commitment and then we get a letter telling us what the assessment is and if we don't pay it, there's a lien on the house, Never saying anything about what was supposed to be done that has yet to be done. And and that's our main argument and that's why we wanna have another meeting, get this thing delayed so we can get it straight. So what they they promised us Thank you. Promised us in February
Your time is
they del I know. I just wanna say what they promised us in February 20 No. Three
No. No.
That they delivered. No. Okay. Thank you. Alright.
Good afternoon. My name is Leo Nelson, and I reside at 21 Stonegate North, next door to George. I was given the yeah, God bless me. But at any rate, I was told the same story that George was about across the way from us, they did a grand job of beautifying the shoreline, etcetera, and they never came our way. The sprayers came our way, in fact, my phone went dead, I was going to show you some pictures, and the guy with the airboat came out there with his sprayer, and I have a small floating dock and I have a small bass that boat was fairly new at the time when I put it there, and I asked the guy to be careful about spraying the thing, and he made some sarcastic remark to me.
And I made several phone calls to try to get someone to call me back about what they sprayed on the dock as well as my boat. And it's got cloth seats in it. The money is not the issue, but the chemical that they sprayed on the dock as well as the boat deteriorated the seats. I mean, granted the sun has a lot to do with it, but I fold them down. But the chemical, number one, that they sprayed on the dock as well as the boat did something to both.
But getting back to the main deal with all the vegetation on our side of the lake is a complete opposite of what you see across the lake. And like George said, the water in front of our house, you go into the water and it's muck. It's not dirt or mud, it's mush. I mean, the plants below the surface is nothing but much. But at any rate, I just think it's some questions need to be answered as far as what we're paying versus what we're getting.
All right. Thank you very much. So this is my district.
Is that a question?
And just not getting any correspondence
Thank you. And not getting a Understood. Call Understood.
So what what I would propose that we do, gentlemen, is that I hear you loud and clear, this is my district. I have not heard about this before now. We should we can work this together through my office. I will will work with you and our team and the county manager, and I think somebody from the county manager's office was up here already proposing something. So we will figure this out. I am also gonna make the motion to pass this because the MSBU
is Second.
The MSBU is the technical side of this that has to happen regardless, but us getting it right is the second is the next piece of And the first thing to get it right is to help me know that it's not going right. So that's the commitment. I'm glad you were here. I'm glad we gave you the time to speak. You matter and so does the lake. And I am also very familiar with the homes on one side of that lake versus the homes on the other side of that lake. This is my neighborhood, so I get it. I understand. I hear you. So with that, I'm gonna move to adopt upon first reading an ordinance reason.
No, I'm not. Is that the right one? Requested action. I'm gonna approve and authorize the chairman execute a final rate resolution confirming the Nod Ad Valorum Capital Assessment for Rice Lake Lake Management Services MSBU for completed phase one services.
Second.
Any further discussion? Hearing no further discussion. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? No. Passes unanimously. One of you needs to reach out to my office, or I can get your name off of the sign in sheet. Thank you very much for being here.
And we'll follow-up with you, madam chairman.
Alright. Here comes Guy, the man with one name. Item number 34.
Sir, it's been so successful today thinking he wouldn't have not come back.
For the record, Guy Cunha, director director of economic development and tourism for Seminole County. For So per the tourism improvement district ordinance 2024 dash 12 enacted in May 2024, I present to you the TID resolution assessment. So, excuse me, assessment resolution. So total qualified rooms is 5,077 with a term of ten years unless tied to a bond. The estimated gross TID revenue is still $3,200,000 The assessment per room per day is $1.75 The assessment began on 04/01/2025, with the first collection on 05/20/2025.
TID and TDT are collected at the same time on a monthly schedule per the Seminole County tax collector. So requested action is adopt the Seminole County Tourism Improvement District assessment resolution.
Commissioners?
Do we
hear from the public?
Oh, public comment. Clearly, we don't have anybody for this. Yes, we do. We do. Yay. It's John Doan.
John Doan?
What time do you
it is? 05:15.
Hello, guys.
My name is John Doan. I am speaking on behalf of the Days Inn Infern Park. We're located on 8245 South US Highway 1792. We are a family owned hotel and I appreciate the opportunity to speak today regarding the proposed Seminole County Tourism Improvement District assessment. First, I do want to say that we support responsible tourism growth and economic development in Seminole County.
We understand the vision behind investing in sports tourism and future projects. However, we are deeply concerned about how this assessment is structured and disproportionate bur and the disproportionate burden it places on smaller independent hotels like ours. According to notice provided by the county, the proposed assessment is a fixed charge of a dollar 75 per night per room available for occupancy. The key issue is that this assessment applies regardless of whether whether rooms are actually occupied or generating revenue. Our hotel has 75 total rooms.
Under the current structure, our family hotel is projected to pay nearly 48,000 annually based on our total room in inventory. Despite operating at only approximately 40% occupancy, That equals to nearly 4,000 per month additional costs for a small independent hotel already struggling with rising operational expenses. In 2025, we had approximately 10,923 occupied room nights out of approximately 27,000 available room nights for the year, which equals to roughly about 40 occupancy. In 2024, we had approximately 11,000 occupied rooms out of approximately twenty seven four hundred fifty available rooms, still around 4041% occupancy. That means nearly 60% of our rooms remained vacant throughout much of the year.
Despite that reality, our hotel is still being assessed based largely on total room inventory rather than actual occupancy performance or revenue generation. Another major concern is low is location and actual economic benefit. As shown, I don't know if you guys have the map of of the SCT ID, but our hotel is located at the very very southeast corner where we're right on the border of Orange County and Seminole County. Our property is about 20 miles away from the Sanford And Lake Mary sports tourism corridor where the county's sports tourism investments and proposed developments are centered. Hotels located directly near those venues are much more more likely to to benefit from the tourism traffic.
Our hotel located near the outer edge of the district will likely only receive limited overflow, if any at all. Yet yet under the current structure, smaller family owned hotels like ours are effectively being assessed similarly despite very different levels of expected economic benefit. We are not asking to avoid contributing to the community. We are simply asking for a fair and balanced approach. This notice states that the board may approve the assessment with such amendments as it deems just and right.
We respectfully respectfully ask the board to consider amendments such as occupancy based adjustments, relief for vacant rooms, and reduced rates for smaller independent hotels or geographically consideration for hotels located outside the primary tourism.
Thank you for being here. Thank you for being here, commissioner How
many rooms do you have?
75. 75.
Hey, you just went over the consent of if it's what's it? 60 or below. Yeah.
Don't have a comment for it.
Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you.
Are there any other public comments? No, ma'am. We'll close public comment.
Madam chair, I move a motion to adopt the Seminole County Tourism Improvement District assessment resolution. Second.
I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, it passes unanimously. That would be fabulous. So I think Mr. Cunha is coming over to meet with you gentlemen. Thank you. Alright. Item number 35, approve the adoption of the ordinance amending chapter 40. This will be presented by Mike Rhodes, who's ready to go. Good
afternoon, commissioners. For the sake of brevity, I know you've all had an opportunity to be briefed. We are certainly capable of going through the presentation and hitting any high points, or I can offer up mister Kersey to or I to answer any questions you might have if you'd like to do that.
Madam chair, I believe we've all been briefed extensively.
Mr. Constantine, are you good?
Yes. Anybody from Great
briefing. Answered all of my questions. I'm comfortable with where we are. I'm in the same position.
Great work. We all hate it. So
commissioners, I'll look for motion.
Motion to approve the adoption of the ordinance amending chapter 40, building and construction of the Seminole County Code of Ordinances by amending the chapter to provide uniformity and code enforcement application, adjusting to align the statutory languages, providing clarity to the building code board of appeals, providing alignment with senate bill one eighty, and providing an effective date.
Second. And a second. Is there any public comment on this? No, ma'am. Okay. Closed public comment. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, it passes unanimously.
Thank you.
Thank you for your offer.
Phil's dressed up for nothing. Can I just point that out?
We were wondering. I I asked him if he was selling something today, he did say yes.
I was just so proud to hear from both of our county attorney's offices as well as their offices that they are not going to We are
not close here.
They're not they were gonna not reduce oh, never mind. Okay. I I I was gonna say something important. Okay?
I know. But we'll wait for that. Okay. Item number 36, we have mister Jeks ready to present. Yes, I'm The mid year BAR.
Thank you. I'm Timothy Jeks with the Office of Management and Budget. Item number 36 is our annual mid year BAR to true up countywide fund balances. This item was publicly advertised on the county's website on Thursday, May 7. The primary purpose of this BAR is to reconcile budgeted FY '26 beginning fund balances to the actual final fund equities reported in the 2025 ACFR.
The total amount of the BAR is 61,800,000, which includes 35,000,000 in countywide fund balance adjustments. That's 2% of the total countywide budget. There's also 23,000,000 in interfund transfers, the largest of which is $15,000,000 within the water and sewer capital fund. And we have $3,800,000 related to budgets for grant agreements and public works and water utilities. That concludes our presentation.
Thank you very much. Commissioner Zinbauer.
I move to approve and authorize the chairman to execute a fiscal year twenty five-twenty six mid year budget amendment resolution twenty six-twenty eight in the amount of $61,854,398.04 to adjust to fiscal year twenty six countywide beginning fund balances to match to fiscal year twenty five audited ending fund balance countywide.
Second. Motion and a second. Is there any public comment? No, ma'am. Alright. Commissioners, all those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, it passes unanimously, and public comments closed. How about that? Alright. That takes us to the county attorney's report.
Thank you, chairman. As listed on the agenda, I wanted to discuss the canvassing board with the board today. The, election season is upon us, and so we need to, designate who from the board is going to serve. The canvassing board is the composition of it is dictated by statute. It's the supervisor of elections, a county court judge, and then it defaults to the chairman of the board of county commissioners if they're able to serve.
If they're not able to serve or they're disqualified because they're up for reelection, then an alternate member from the board is selected. So because Chairman Her is not up for reelection this year and she does not have an intent to be involved in any candidate or campaign of any candidate that's on the ballot, I believe she is qualified to serve on the canvassing board. And so I wanted to have that discussion on whether you're, intending to serve.
I am intending to serve.
Okay. Approve approval. Second.
There's no approval required, but that's that's agreed. It wasn't needed. And then also she needs to select an alternate. If she's unable to attend a meeting, she is charged with picking a member of the BCC to be her alternate.
And commissioner Constantine has gracious ly agreed to be the alternate.
You'll love it, Lee.
And has also asked that I attend everything. Yes. Okay. Alright.
Don't miss along it. To the supervisor of elections, and you all will have to complete some training within the next month or so.
I might have left that out of the ass. There's a mandatory training.
But it's cool because you'll learn how to like analyze handwriting. It's very, very interesting.
Had been on the canvassing board before. I just wanted you all to know. So do I have to go through
Yes, it you do have
to go through the hearing.
Thank you, Chairman and Commissioners. Just a couple items. One, I'd like to address item number seven that was moved from the consent under my report. You should have an updated packet in front of you with
the amendments
that were made on the interlocals and this is for the 5¢ gas tax that was recently approved by the board last summer. And you have interlocals with all seven cities in your packet as well. I'm pleased to announce and it's been quite a, you know, a journey over the last couple of months that both Lake Mary and the City of Sanford have agreed to partner with us and contribute their 5¢ local option gas tax towards the Seminole Connector and they've actually named that the State Road 452, so we do have a name for that road. As you all know, we also went and visited the city of Oviedo in Winter Springs. They have not closed the door.
They are willing to still talk to us and partner, just not there yet. So the other five cities that you will see on here, including Elvita, Winter Springs, Altamonte Springs, Longwood, Casselberry did I hit them all far? Thank They are not changing their distribution, so they will still get their distribution to each of the cities. The reason we have to do those is that the State Department of Revenue is requiring us because we have a couple cities dedicating their distributions to us. They want all seven cities to have an interlocal deciding like where their distributions will be going to.
So, all of this has been updated. All of the cities have voted on this except for Winter Springs because we were with them last night. They decided to put that one on hold. So we will need an interlocal that they will sign that they will keep the distribution the same as it has been that their gas tax will go directly to the city of Winter Springs.
But they're still working with us?
Yes, they're still working with us. So we could still work with any of the cities for, you know, ongoing, but the State Department of Revenue needs all this by June 1 in order to for the city of Lake Mary and Sanford for for their distributions to come to us starting in January 2027.
And I do wanna clarify, it's up to 5¢ for Lake Mary and Sanford.
It is 5¢. I would not it's it's the 5¢ local option
gas This is all 7 at the 5¢ local. The up to 5¢ is still being worked on.
I don't I don't understand what the 5 up to 5¢.
So the piece of it that were with regard to the connector, that if we get grants, it was the conflicting language that was asked to be fixed.
Yeah. Oh, you're talking about for the city of Sanford last night. Yeah. That was a little confusing.
So the statute allows the board to impose the tax up to 5%. So the board could have imposed a three three cent fuel tax, but the board imposed a 5¢ So fuel the city of Sanford's agreement reflects that they will be giving 100% of their
5¢ fuel tax to the county.
Up to because we committed to go out and get grants.
Yes. And the agreement also provides that if the grants are obtained, that that money will be put towards the city's contributions first in a pro rata share to what they contributed. Exactly.
The initial distribution, because I don't want them to say that we're doing something different here than we said we would do, the initial distribution will be the $05 And then should we get grants, there would be pro rata
credit
reduction to it back. Correct.
That is correct, and that's what the
agreement That does align with what was voted Yes. On last
Sorry, didn't understand up to 5¢. The request from staff would be for the board to approve and authorize the chairman to execute the seven interlocal agreements with the municipalities of Seminole County regarding the assignment and distribution of the 5¢ local option fuel tax proceeds.
So moved.
Second. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Thank you, madam chair. Darren, I know that we were at Winter Springs yesterday. I know this has to go to Winter Springs, and then we're gonna continue working with them. Can we let the city manager know that even though we're still working with them, they still have to sign this so that there's no confusion?
Yes. I already have. I've already talked to the city manager.
I think we need to put that in writing. Yeah. Okay.
I concur.
Okay. I'll I'll I'll I'll
put in writing so that we when we get a copy of it, we can show it to the other elected officials in that city.
Okay. Absolutely. I'll make sure I do that. Okay.
It's my only comment.
Alright. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Hearing none, passes unanimously.
And then just the last thing, I just want to recognize the success of this year's Citizens Academy. We just finished up our last one last weekend. I want to thank all of our departments and especially the communications team with Mr. Patton down there that led the charge. We had over 700 residents attend this time, citizens for our academy. Last year was 600 and something, so we were up. So this has been proven to be a very successful and informative academy, and we're all excited about doing this again next year. So thank you. And thank you, Chris, and all the departments. Thank you.
Thank you. Commissioner Delari, District 1.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I first want to thank everyone that worked hard putting the best appreciation lunch on last week. I think it was a huge success. And for those who may not be aware of it, the speaker we had, we focused on the Korean War. And the speaker we had that spoke at first wasn't gonna speak until he realized his son didn't hear his story.
And so he had his son come down to hear the whole story. And so I think it was a success in many different ways. And he was blown away as well as folks that were with him about how big of a of a a lunch it was. I did attend the Calinor meeting for commissioner Constantine, and was in the city of Oviedo. And we did talk about storm water.
I thought that was rather interesting. And then there was also DOT safety summit last Friday about Vision Zero that was in Saint Cloud. And then tomorrow at Metro Plan, we have on our agenda, just wanna hand this out so everyone's aware of it, if I may, A revision to our TIP, transportation improvement plan, and on that is what Lynx is getting a grant for their bus shelters of $850,000. And then they're gonna get a federal acquisition for buses for $500,000. Then they're get digital signage for capital for 25 for $250,000 for a total of $1,600,000.
Just wanna make sure everybody was aware of that.
Sir, does that 850,000 can be used to take down bus shelters? No.
No. But I just make sure that everybody's
that question tomorrow.
That's ending my report, madam chair.
Thank you. Commissioner Zinbauer.
Thank you very much. Of course, reminder, this May is National Mental Awareness Health Week. Also, a quick reminder, and I'll wrap it up quick, the McCullough Road PD and E study. I think most everybody got a notice of that just so the public is aware. Public hearings is Thursday, 05/21/2026, and then the BCC hearing is Tuesday, 06/02/2026.
That'll be at on the twenty first at 9AM and Tuesday at 9AM, at the Orange County Commission Chambers, 201 South Roslyn Avenue. I know that's a a very important thing for a lot of people in our rural area. So just a heads up on that. Outside of that, everything else is perfect. No EMU is loose in my district right now.
It's good.
Thank you. Commissioner Constantine, we're on
a roll.
Yes, we are. Okay. I want to congratulate both Bob and Jay on their events on April 30. They were great. Did want to let you know at the National Association of Counties Board of Directors meeting that a lot of interest was met with other counties on our trails and our TID, So I've let our staff know to get back to those counties to talk to them.
And one thing that myself and others have talked about in the past for a benefit to our employees that we should look at as child care. And I want you to know that Pasco County is now implementing that in their in in their offices, you know, in their administrative offices. And with us building a new complex. I, you know, I've talked to the county manager about looking into that possibility and bringing it back if, you know, if there's if it's feasible. Also, would like to let you know that Orlando Health is going to have a behavioral hospital ribbon cutting on the fifteenth.
Leadership Seminole is also having a celebration, as we all know, on the fifteenth. The runway for hope that we did give a proclamation to is having their runway on the sixteenth, this Saturday. And just an update on the sloths. We almost lost one this morning, but we did not. She rallied or he rallied. I can't tell.
It rallied.
There it's called Ginger. And Ginger rallied. And and I will tell you, one hits on this worldwide, 1,400,000,000
hits They all sent
you a dollar.
Yeah. Yeah. Wouldn't that be nice? In addition, we were also having a memorial ceremony at Crane's Roost this year on the twentieth. And I wanted to thank, as Darren said, the staff did a great job on the Citizens Academy.
And I I do have a sad note that a fellow state legislator that I served both in the house and the and the house and the senate, Bill Posey, Sixteen years I served with him. He passed away. That he has an incredible family, and I can give I I've all my condolences to the family and prayers. And to the two ladies on the board, I hope
you had great Mother's Days.
Well, thank you. Thank you. Does that conclude your question?
Yep. Alright.
I think that leaves it to commissioner Lockhart to round this up.
Yeah. So I wanted to let you all know you know about Kelly's ice cream. Kelly's is no secret. Commissioner Her is a huge fan. But what you may not know is that Kelly's has moved their manufacturing facility from Orange County to Seminole County recently.
I did not know that.
I know. We're super users.
It's a huge get, and, the Seminole Chamber has done a little, a video welcoming them to the county and highlighting them and what have you. And so their newest location is actually in my district on Lake Mary Boulevard in the, HomeGoods TJ Maxx shopping center. So that's incredibly, convenient. So, anyway, I had a great time, welcoming them and and doing a quick little video. A great veterans luncheon.
Shout out to everybody involved in putting that together. It's fantastic. The America two fifty truck tour that was in Winter Springs, I wasn't quite sure what I was going to walk into for that with that event. But it really if if you have an opportunity and you're somewhere in Florida and you see that there are eight or nine of these trucks around the country, they're 18 it's an 18 wheeler that has been converted into the with a side pop out that you can walk through it and get, like, a a very high-tech, cool experience tour of this of the forming of our country for America February, and it's just very well done. I it was very cool.
I wasn't sure what to expect. Congratulations to everyone at Seminole State. We had our spring commencement, highest graduation attendance ever. 763 graduates actually walked. It's harder at some of our state colleges to encourage people to walk, but they had it was just fantastic.
The celebration was great. Attended the Foundation for Seminole County Public Schools Donor Appreciation Event, another great collaboration. Speaking of the possibility of doing a daycare type facility, that was something we had talked about years ago when we had imagined creating our 5 Points Admin Building in conjunction with the school district that we could have a co located I would thinking now, we didn't have then, but Seminole State now has a an early childhood elementary education program that could be a nice little synergistic opportunity there. So thank you for bringing that up. National day of prayer was held last week.
I had the honor of offering a prayer at the community church in Casselberry for local, state, and national governments. Such a neat group of people in our community. Also attended the ribbon cutting for at the national national entrepreneur center down at UCF Creative Village. I had no idea what a phenomenal facility that was, that campus down there. Admittedly, it's my first time down at that Creative Village area, but I got my first city of Orlando parking ticket there. So heads up. Congratulations. Any of you who park down there. Street parking is not free. It did it didn't dawn on
me that I'd have to pay to park on the street.
I know. I promptly paid my ticket. You're welcome, buddy. But it was a great event other than getting a parking ticket. The the county
do have a red light
ticket. Right.
No. It was a nonmoving violation. I just parked in the wrong spot. The county manager and members of his team, we and Kate Latour, and and we met with the sheriff and members of his team and the state attorney the assistant state attorney to talk about where things are with the medical examiner process, just to make sure that everybody is connected, we're all on the same page, we have open dialogue going forward. I know everyone is going to be updated on important points moving forward, but it was a great meeting.
Both the sheriff and the state attorney are very supportive of what we are doing. They are glad that we have made the decision that we have made and are, I would say, fully fully on board. Agree. Attended the Lake Mary City Commission meeting. What a pleasure it is to work with that city.
This their city manager was just fully engaged and involved, and their commissioners were just are just such a delight. So shout out to the city of Lake Mary. I've not attended very many of our city various city commission meetings, but they they did a very good job. Later this week, I will be in South Florida speaking with our emergency manager, Alan Harris, on a panel at the governor's, hurricane conference. I have not attended that conference before, but I'm excited about that.
And, hoping that it's all for naught that we have a conference this year and we have no storms. That would be lovely. But just in case, people are going to convene and have some good dialogue. Also, for anyone who is interested in attending the rural boundary town hall that was being set up not by us, but by members of the community. That is being rescheduled. It was going to be held, I believe, this Thursday or Friday night, and it is now being rescheduled, a date yet to be determined. That's the end of my report. Awesome.
Thank you. I'm gonna give a big shout out to the library who hosted the Citizens Academy. I know we've talked about this before. I have to tell you, I was a little hesitant to pick the I picked the library on purpose as the one I went to, I wanted to see how they made that super cool and interesting. I would rather probably be riding a dump truck or jumping around on a dump truck if I were a kid. But 100% of the kids that were there were fully engaged. The parents were exceptionally relaxed. They were enjoying an afternoon and touring through the facility and doing all sorts of stuff. So they did a fabulous job. We have the air show is coming to the airport in Sanford on September.
This year it will be demo jets, an F-twenty two, an F-eighteen, and an F-sixteen. This is an off year, so it won't be the Blue Angels. I will also tell you that you may have heard through the grapevine that we have interacted with the facilitator of this. This is a for profit operation, and historically we have just somebody has, between the sheriff and the city of Sanford, paid for all of the security. And this year, we're doing a shared arrangement where they are chipping in an equal share to the rest of us, including the airport who cannot pay for things like that, but they will lean in with us somewhere else, and the city of Sanford and the sheriff's office.
So it was an aligned collaboration to move this into the future that the idea that this can't all be on the taxpayer. I did attend the Rising Achievers Awards. This was something that was put together years ago by Didi Schaffner. The Lake Mary Rotary, Karen Elman is still doing it. Lake Mary Rotary is the former South Seminole Rotary is folded into the Lake Mary Rotary, so they're still doing it.
It was really remarkable. I felt akin to the a lot of the kids that were there. They were very clear to mention that their GPAs are not all four point fives or whatever the scores are that you can get these days, but these were good solid C students and I truly do believe that we run the world. And so, I thought it was really cool that there's a scholarship opportunity for those of us that didn't actually buy all of our books. I also did a I read our proclamation at the Sheriff's Office National Day of Prayer event, is hosted by Nancy Acevedo.
She had a wonderful turnout. There were 13 different prayer leaders there, all from the denominations around the county, and it was it's really cool to see that all come together. It is a rare place to live where we get that to happen. And I'm gonna give shout out for the Veterans Luncheon, but also congratulations to the veteran of the year, US Army Sergeant Brian Ortiz. Yes. We're super proud of you. And that does conclude my report, which I think allows us to adjourn this meeting.
I don't see any citizens.
You got anything hidden back there? No public comment. Meeting adjourned.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.