Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Planning Commission
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Location
Saratoga, CA
Meeting Date
May 13, 2026

Transcript

139 sections (from 155 segments)

1:51 – 2:220

This is a pack of stage. Pack of stage, not pack seats. 07:00. Yep. Yep. Alright. Alright. Commission and staff, are we ready to begin? Consider that as yes.

2:241

Someone's mic is on.

2:260

Oh, is that mic? I'm sorry.

2:30 – 2:452

Sorry. Your mic? Seems that does it any better. Yeah. Hello? We're good?

2:450

Sounds like it.

2:462

That sounds great.

2:47 – 2:590

Okay. Good. Okay. Welcome. I'd like to call the Planning Commission meeting to order and ask that we rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

3:18 – 3:310

Okay. So I will now ask staff to explain the meeting process. And we will then proceed with roll call.

3:35 – 4:023

Pursuant to Saratoga City Council's remote public participation policy, members of the public may participate in this meeting in person at the location listed on the agenda or via remote attendance using the Zoom listed on the agenda. Public attendees participating by Zoom are automatically muted and are not viewable on camera. I will now call the roll. Commissioners Cauzer? Present. Sreedharan?

4:022

Present.

4:033

Hassam?

4:043

Brownlee.

4:053

Zhang.

4:065

Present.

4:063

Vice Chair Drumarad. Present. Chair Lee.

4:09 – 4:420

Here. Thank Thank you, Cindy. All right. So I think we're now we'll start with our oral communications on non agendized items. Any member of the public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes or matters not on this agenda.

4:42 – 5:120

The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding the oral communication. At this point, I would like to open public comments on non agenda items. Staff, can we please explain the public comment process and announce our first speaker?

5:15 – 5:336

Thank you, chair Lee. Now is the time if you have comments on an item that is not on the agenda to raise your hand using the tool in Zoom. Or if you you are in the theater, come to the podium at the front of the theater. There are no hands raised online, Chair Lee.

5:34 – 6:030

Thank you. There's no one in the audience either. So this concludes our communications on non agenda items. All right. Next is the approval of minutes. Are there any additions or corrections to the minutes? No? Does any commission members wish to move approval of the minutes?

6:072

I make the motion to approve minutes.

6:090

Thank you.

6:092

I'll second the motion.

6:110

Thank you. Would the staff please conduct the roll call vote?

6:173

All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes.

6:23 – 6:580

Alright. Thank you. Report on appeal rights. Any interested person objecting to any decision on this agenda may file an appeal application with the city clerk within fifteen calendar days of the date of decision. Alright. Now we are open for public hearing. Actually, before that, we have a general business report. Right.

6:58 – 7:257

Thank you, Chair Lee. So I'm pinch hitting for the public works director tonight. So I'm going to go over their general plan conformity for the upcoming capital improvement program that they're having for the year. And so the intent is is that, you know, the general plans are a guiding document, and CIPs kind of are supposed to follow the general plan and the recommendations in those. But there is deviation at times.

7:26 – 7:557

I think there's actually three really cool projects. And I'll just give you brief overviews of those. But essentially, the three new capital projects are proposed in the upcoming fiscal year 'twenty six, 'twenty seven. The proposed projects have been reviewed by the city council as part of the annual budget process. And California government code section 65,401 states that the local planning agency should report on the conformity of the CIP with the agency's general plan.

7:56 – 8:297

However, not all projects have a relationship to a policy in the general plan, such as maintenance work and building remodels. So three projects that are pretty interesting. The Emergency Message Board project in WUI areas. And so this project will acquire and install notification systems including electronic message boards at strategic locations in the city. The intent is that these will be used to keep residents informed and provide direction and information during emergencies such as wildfire evacuations.

8:29 – 9:077

The establishment of a $100,000 local match fund will support a grant up to $400,000 which is the estimated cost for 10 changeable message board signs. The second project is Congress Springs Park, the midfield restroom upgrades. This project would replace the existing single stall with a two with a new two unit bathroom with electric hand dryers and automated door locks. We're living in the future here. The midfield restroom at CSP helps the public from not having to walk all the way to the front of the park for restroom facilities.

9:07 – 9:467

The current single stall unit is about thirty years old and is showing signs of wear and tear. Replacement parts are difficult to find. So the estimated cost for that project is $150,000 And finally, this is an interesting project, one that we'll kind of feel the effects of, is the Costco project outside of the limits of Saratoga. So a new Costco wholesale store is planned for construction on Saratoga's Northeast border at Lawrence Expressway and Prospect Road, diagonally across from Prospect High School. In addition, a new dense housing project is also underway just one block away at the corner of Saratoga Avenue and Lawrence Expressway.

9:47 – 10:207

The project will study potential traffic impacts from these developments to the city. The city's traffic engineer will determine the baseline of current traffic patterns for neighborhoods including Brookview, Prides Crossing and Al Quito. The baseline traffic data will help determine the level of cut through traffic and help identify mitigation measures for post development once the project's open to the public. And that has an estimated cost of 40,000. So if you have any questions, I'd love to answer them. I can't expect to be the expert. But I will do my best. So, yes.

10:201

I just I'm just curious as to where these 10 electronic boards will be placed. Do you know? Is it the same place where we have the manual ones right now?

10:28 – 10:467

You know, that's a great question. I don't see a map in here. However, I think they are kind of where some of the existing notifications I don't think they're small notification signs right now. But I will find out and we can share with the planning commission the map of those signs.

10:466

Okay. That's a

10:477

great idea.

10:48 – 11:051

Yeah. Just curious to know as to where they're placed and also if they're going to be used for something besides just for emergency. Because if they're going to be around the city, you know, like we have so many meridian signs that people post. It's going on those meridian, then I don't know how big these signs are going to be.

11:057

It's a good question. I'll find that out with public works, and we'll share that with the planning commission.

11:090

Okay. Thank you.

11:107

Thank you. Yes?

11:142

Yeah. Did staff find any reason why we should not find these three projects consistent with the general plan?

11:207

No, it's a great question. We find them to be consistent with the general plan and the objectives. Thank you. Yeah.

11:300

Any other questions? So for these reports, what's the next step for the commissioner?

11:397

Yeah, we'd like a vote just to accept the report JUSTICE so we can file that into our general plan documents and provide that to the Public Works Department.

11:490

CHIEF Okay. So we need to initiate a motion to approve?

11:541

I move as presented.

11:562

I second.

11:570

Thank you. Roll call.

12:003

All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes.

12:057

Thank you so much. All right.

12:060

Thank you. All right. The next item, 2.2, is the Planning Commission upcoming calendar.

12:16 – 12:493

Yes. So the city council is taking a recess for two meetings. And we wanted to pull the Planning Commission for the July meeting because we do have a couple of items on the July meeting. And so we want to make sure that we have a quorum. So the next the July meeting is on July 8. And I know we did send an email out, but I just want to verify again that we will have a quorum. So, I think we'll have two persons out.

12:492

I'll be there.

12:513

Two persons out, and then everyone else will be here, correct?

13:050

we have five people here? So we have a call? Yes. Good.

13:11 – 13:223

And then next year, we'll probably, and earlier in the year, we'll ask if you all want to take a recess for the summer break. So you can have time to plan for that.

13:220

Okay. And so question, what about August?

13:263

Are there any planned vacations in August where you would meet the August you would miss the August 12 meeting?

13:403

So it looks like we would have a quorum for August as well. I see. Thank you.

13:43 – 13:570

So in the summer, August is set. I mean normally we meet in August, but sometimes we take summer break for July. Is that right? Okay.

13:597

Yeah. Last year I think we just decided to cancel the July meeting due to lack of items.

14:074

Yes. Just as a quick reminder, if we're not going to be there, we just email the chair and staff and say, is it possible to have an excused absence?

14:14 – 14:253

So the chair, if the chair is absent, the chair needs to email the mayor to get an excused absence. Everyone else can go through Brian. Thanks. Okay.

14:25 – 14:430

Thank you. So now we move on to the number three, public hearings. But two of the items have been postponed to June and July. So we'll skip.

14:43 – 14:573

So what do need to do? We want to take two separate actions, one for each item. And you'll need to open the public hearing, close the public hearing, and then vote on the continuance. So we can start with item 3.1.

14:57 – 15:160

All right. So we need to go through the whole process. Okay. So just follow the book here. Applicants or their representatives have a total of ten minutes. Do I need to go over this or not?

15:163

The applicant is aware of the continuance and it's not here this evening.

15:20 – 15:500

Okay. All right. So I will skip that. And so we will go to I don't think it's written here, but just means that for item 3.1 application, APTR two six dash zero zero zero one, I'll request our planning commission to approve the delay.

15:503

I would just open the public hearing, close the public hearing, and then ask for

15:53 – 16:260

an issue. I see. So alright. Okay. So we will open the public hearing for this item. And then, yeah, there are any speakers against this item? All right, no one is in the audience. Francis?

16:276

No. No hands raised online.

16:29 – 16:420

All right. Thank you, Francis. So now we'll close the public hearing part of this item. Now we move to the Commission discussion.

16:433

Do we have a motion to continue?

16:461

Yes, I move.

16:472

Second. I'll second.

16:490

All right.

16:513

All in favor?

16:52 – 17:210

Aye. Motion passes. Any opposed? Thank you. Alright. And so we need to go to the next item. Yes. For 3.2, now we're open the public hearing for application CPX24Dash0011. Public, is there anyone to speak about this item?

17:236

There are no hands raised online, Chair Lee.

17:26 – 17:370

Okay. There's no one in the audience either. So now we close the public hearing part of this application. Now, Commission

17:371

Pass the I make the motion to extend this as presented by the staff.

17:440

Any second?

17:455

I have

17:452

no second.

17:450

Okay. Thank you.

17:48 – 18:093

The motion is to continue the meeting. Just to be clear, the so the motion for the first motion, the motion for Pierce Road is to continue the meeting to June 10. And then the motion for the item before you is to continue the meeting to July 8.

18:098

Yes. All

18:133

in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you.

18:190

All right. So now we move to item number four. Director Items.

18:25 – 18:457

Well thank you very much Chair Lee and members of the Planning Commission. Appreciate all your, what you do. Thank you for coming to every meeting. Cindy thanks for all your work. I think maybe what's noteworthy tonight is that this might be the fastest Planning Commission meeting in history, so 16 Typically, we've been talking about Builders' Remedy projects just from a factual perspective.

18:45 – 19:297

And we like to have the project managers for those projects that are here. And so next month, we'll provide an update for you all on the Builders' Remedy projects. Last week, the Chester Allendale 52 Lot subdivision received a final map. And so that'll they will record that eventually. But we did meet with representatives today from Lennar. And so Lennar is a national builder. And so they will be purchasing the map from the entitlement company. And so that's pretty common in that line of work. And so we're looking forward to collaborating with them. They are very professional.

19:297

They do projects all over the country. And so we had a kickoff today with them. So that's all I have today. Thank you so much.

19:36 – 19:530

Thank you. Any questions for the director? Seeing none, we're moving to item five, commission items. Is there any discussions that the commissioners want to bring? Paul?

19:53 – 21:012

Yeah. After going to the Planning Commissioners Academy last March, found out that it would be important to adopt objective health and safety standards, specifically fire standards. And so what I have been doing since then, and especially after our meeting with the city council in April where we were told try not use any of your time, I've gone out and with some help put together a set of draft objective fire standards for Saratoga. And I've put together a package and what I want to request of the commission tonight is time on next month's agenda to present and review those standards and see, you know, just discuss them as a group and if we like them, modify them, whatever we do, we can then vote on a plan of action on what to do with them if they're suitable. So my request is to have time scheduled on next month's agenda to have a study session for the objective firing standards.

21:03 – 21:187

I think what we would like to do, vice chair, is talk to our acting city manager to ensure that that is okay to do. So we might want to talk to her first before we put that back on the agenda.

21:19 – 21:332

Do we require the my understanding from the Planning Commissioner's Academy is we did not need approval from a city official to have a study session. Is there is this a courtesy thing or is Saratoga somehow different?

21:35 – 21:463

This isn't in the Commission's work plan so we just want to just, you know, talk to the city manager just to make sure that everyone is aware of what's going on.

21:467

Okay. Great.

21:490

I'd like to hear from our fellow commissioners.

21:520

Or is this something that we're willing to do? So any

21:58 – 22:215

Yeah. My understanding is this kind of requirements it requires the city staff involvement. I think not only the planning commission, right? We cannot just do on our own. So that's why we need to get it approved from the city managers and see, see maybe we'll assign a specific person to review maybe with us, then before the study session. That's my understanding.

22:210

Is that the reason?

22:233

So we'll get back to you on what we find out.

22:270

Okay. Any

22:311

other questions? Oh, this is a very different question. Every year, usually in May, have a commissioner's dinner. Has that been off the budget this year?

22:433

The mayor always

22:451

hosts commissioners.

22:480

The appreciation. Yes. You mean appreciation dinner.

22:521

Right.

22:567

You know, thank you for that question. We're curious if that was taken out of the budget. But what we will do is find out.

23:037

But we will provide an update on that as well.

23:051

Yeah. We thought maybe that's what happened. Because usually by now we hear about it.

23:097

Well, thank you for that. We will follow-up on that.

23:120

Thank you. Thank you.

23:151

And just

23:15 – 23:492

to follow-up on the previous agenda item, what I will do with your permission is I will send, what would be the, I would like to send to all commissioners the draft studies that, you know, the proposals that I have. It involves, you know, how we would share it with the fire department, how we'd share it with city council, what standards we have to meet as a group. I'll share my document package with the planning commission and with staff. And can you redistribute it? I mean, for the distribution

23:490

should send it to to follow the Brown Act?

23:522

Would send it out to all commissioners I for

23:55 – 24:097

would ask that you go through the chair. Yeah. And so the chair will work with staff on that. I don't know if Gabe, if you're on the call. Is Gabe Ross on the call? He's not.

24:178

Hi. I'm on the panel now.

24:187

Hi. Sorry, Gabe, to put you on the spot.

24:208

No problem.

24:217

It would be good to maybe have your perspective of of this request. And so did you hear the request from the vice chair?

24:328

Regarding the study session, yes.

24:347

The the objective design standards for fire safety? Correct. Fire safety. Yes. Yeah.

24:40 – 25:218

So I I I don't have any particular opinion about having a study session. I don't think there's any legal bar to that. So that's sort of, as staff said, a question of notice and ensuring that it's within existing work plan. But we can go ahead with that. I do want staff and the city attorney to be able to have a close look at the objective, at the proposed objective standards before we go ahead with adopting anything. I can think of any number of things that I will want to review that for and so on.

25:237

All right. Thank you.

25:24 – 25:378

But I think that fits with what Mahesh Chiragaramarat proposed of having a study session and then moving into that staff and city attorney review. Correct.

25:397

Yeah. It just goes to the chair and then the chair will provide that to

25:420

us. Okay.

25:432

Will work

25:447

with our internal team.

25:45 – 26:200

Okay. Sounds good. And I do have another question. So just say if it is approved that we're going to add it to June meetings agenda, will public also be invited for the workshop? Right? This is a workshop. This is open to everyone. Public meeting. Okay. I think we are good? Any other commissioner item? Hearing none, then meeting adjourned. Thank you.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.