Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Board of Supervisors
- Meeting Type
- Board Of Supervisors
- Location
- San Francisco, CA
- Meeting Date
- July 28, 2026
Video will appear here as soon as San Francisco Board of Supervisors posts it — usually within a day of the meeting
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
14 items on the agenda.
Sign up to highlight the topics you care about on every agenda.
Start free trialROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pursuant to Board Rule 4.7.1 the President shall present the ancestral homeland acknowledgement of the Ramaytush Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula.
COMMUNICATIONS
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Approval of the June 23, 2026, Regular Board Meeting Minutes, and the June 22, 2026, June 24, 2026, and June 25, 2026, Special Meeting Minutes at the Budget and Appropriations Committee Meetings, which constituted a quorum of the Board of Supervisors.
AGENDA CHANGES
260567 [Appropriation - Sheriff's Office - Revenue - $1,926,125 - Overtime Salaries - $14,043,516 - De-Appropriation - Retirement Fringe Benefits, Vehicles, Capital Projects, and Work Orders - $12,117,391 - FY2025-2026]
Ordinance appropriating $1,926,125 of Boarding of Prisoners revenue and $14,043,516 to overtime salaries and de-appropriating $12,117,391 from retirement fringe benefits, vehicles, and various capital projects and work orders in the Sheriff's Office to support the Department's projected increases in overtime as required per Administrative Code, Section 3.17 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026. (Sheriff) (Fiscal Impact) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260451 [Labor and Employment Code - Eligibility for Paid Parental Leave]
Sponsors: Sauter; Melgar, Walton, Sherrill, Chen, Mahmood and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Labor and Employment Code to revise the criteria for an employee in the City to qualify for parental leave benefits under the Paid Parental Leave Ordinance by reducing from 180 days to 90 days the minimum number of days that an employee must work before they are eligible to receive parental leave benefits from their employer. (Racial Equity Impact) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260591 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Pauline Silva-Re - $65,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Pauline Silva-Re against the City and County of San Francisco for $65,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 7, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-612917; entitled Silva-Re v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260669 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Robert Blaisdell and David Portales - $1,000,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Robert Blaisdell and David Portales against the City and County of San Francisco for $1,000,000; the lawsuit was filed on May 29, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-615058; entitled Robert Blaisdell and David Portales v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an alleged personal injury on a City street. (City Attorney) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260670 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Alfred Martinez Engineering - $80,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Alfred Martinez Engineering against the City and County of San Francisco, for $80,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 5, 2025, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-25-628798, entitled Alfred Martinez Engineering v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the lawsuit involves allegations of breach of contract. (City Attorney) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260671 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Anne Liao - $40,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Anne Liao against the City and County of San Francisco for $40,000; the lawsuit was filed on July 12, 2024, in San Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-616347; entitled Anne Liao v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury on a City sidewalk. (City Attorney) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260699 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Samuel Rosas - $200,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Samuel Rosas against the City and County of San Francisco for $200,000; the lawsuit was filed on December 19, 2023, in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 23-CV-04913; entitled Samuel Rosas v. Robert Glenn, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged civil rights violations. (City Attorney) 07/21/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
260592 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - Sunrise Carlisle Propco, LLC - $2,894,613.60]
Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Sunrise Carlisle Propco, LLC against the City and County of San Francisco for $2,894,613.60; the claim was filed on December 12, 2024; the claim involves a refund of real property transfer taxes. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
260690 [Settlement Agreement - Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc. - Port to Receive $3,218,996]
Sponsor: Dorsey Resolution authorizing the Port of San Francisco to execute the settlement agreement between the Port Commission and Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc. ("Bauer") to resolve outstanding claims, satisfy two terminated agreements, settle debt in excess of $6,900,982 and allow Bauer to continue and extend its tenancy under Lease No. L-15004 for premises at Pier 50 ("Premises") in exchange for Bauer: 1) paying Port $859,309; 2) installing a fire suppression sprinkler system in Pier 50, Shed C; 3) paying Port $2,430,477.56 ($2,359,687 plus finance fee equal to 3%) over 60 months; and 4) accepting the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of San Francisco County, which obligations are enforceable through a stipulated judgment. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
260700 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - Eastern Investment Management Co. - $89,946.50]
Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Eastern Investment Management Co. against the