Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Welcome. Good evening. On behalf of the commissioners and staff, I would like to welcome you to the 02/12/2026 City of Roseville Planning Commission meeting and just let you know that you have two more days till Valentine's Day. Please put all electronic devices on silent at this time. Agendas are on the back counter. If you plan to speak at tonight's meeting, complete a blue speaker card and return it to a staff member. As a reminder, planning commission meetings are broadcast live, replayed on Comcast fourteen, and available on the city's YouTube channel. I will now call the meeting to order. Lupi, may I have please have a roll call.

Yes. Commissioner Hagler? Here. Commissioner Chris? Here. Commissioner Meish?

Here.

Commissioner Prior?

Here.

Commissioner Unidad?

Here.

Vice chair Bashirs is absent, excused. Chair Hagenjos?

Here. Please join me in the pledge of allegiance.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Can

we please have staff introductions?

Yes. Good evening. Chair Hagen Dos and commissioners Lupi Nelson, recording secretary.

Good evening. Jonathan Levi, city attorney's office.

Good evening, chair commissioners. Greg Better, assistant director for the development services department.

Good evening, chair Hagenyos and commissioners. Derek Ogden, senior planner.

Good evening, commissioners. Sean Morales, associate planner.

And good evening, commissioners. Matt Todd, principal engineer.

Thank you. Thank you. The public comment period is a time for anyone who'd like to address the commission on any item not on tonight's agenda. When addressing the commission, please state your name for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. Is there anyone who would like to address the commission on any item not on tonight's agenda?

Hearing none, I will close the public comment period. Now we have the consent calendar, which consists of routine items that may be approved under one motion as recommended in the staff reports. However, since each routine item requires a public hearing, each and every one may be considered separately upon request by the audience, the planning commission, or the staff. Action on the consent calendar shall be considered a public hearing. Tonight's consent calendar consists of two items.

Item 5.1, the minutes from the 01/22/2026 planning commission meeting, and item 5.2, the North Roseville specific plan parcel 19 Grace Collective Church conditional use permit at 1219 Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The record that's filed PL25Dash0467. Is there anyone in the commission or in the audience who would like to pull an item off the consent calendar for separate discussion? Hearing none, may I have a motion to approve the consent calendar as listed?

I'll make a motion to approve.

I second.

Commissioner Pryor has made the motion, and commissioner May Mesh has seconded the motion. Roll call, please.

Commissioner Mesh? Aye. Commissioner Pryor? Yes. Commissioner Hagler? Yes. Commissioner Kriss? Yes. Commissioner Unidad?

Yes.

And chair Heggendreich?

Yes. The motion is approved. Thank you. There is a ten day period, ten day appeal period for item 5.2. Next on the agenda is requests and presentations.

Before we begin, I want to review the meeting procedures. Number one, we will hear the staff presentation, then I will take questions from the commission, then I will open the public hearing. The applicant will make a presentation, then I will open the public comments, and the public will have an opportunity to speak, then I will close public comment. If needed, the applicant will be given an opportunity to provide a rebuttal, then I will close the public hearing. The commission may ask questions of staff, and then finally, the commission will consider this item and make a decision based on the information provided in the report from staff and the testimony presented during tonight's hearing.

Item 6.1 is a request to approve a conditional use permit for 1376 Lead Hill Boulevard for the record file PL25Dash0668. Sean, may we have your presentation, please?

Yes. You may. Good evening again, commissioners. My name is Sean Morales. I'm here to present the 1376 Lead Hill conditional use permit project.

Project site is located in the South Placer Business Park Complex at 1376 Leadhill Boulevard in this Douglas Sunrise corridor plan area. The site has a zoning designation of community commercial with a special area overlay for Douglas Sunrise and a land use designation of Community Commercial. The South Placer Business Park was developed in 1989 and consists of six parcels that are currently developed with eight buildings occupied with a mix of office, medical, commercial, and warehouse uses. The applicant proposes to occupy the project site with a second location for the reliable Buick GMC Cadillac Automall dealership location. The site will just be to re for reconditioning, programming, and repairing vehicles.

The dealership that you can see on the screen, was established in Roseville in 1969 and was one of the founding dealerships in the auto mall. The applicant requests a conditional use permit to allow an auto use in the CC Zone District and an administrative permit for parking reduction. The auto repair use would occupy approximately 12,200 square feet of the existing building and 18,900 square feet fronts onto Leadhill Boulevard will be reserved for future non repair uses such as office. No modifications to the exterior of the building are proposed. When reviewing the conditional use permit request, staff evaluated the compatibility of the business with surrounding uses.

The repair use is required to operate within the building and the existing dock doors face northwest toward the neighboring building's loading dock which reduces any visual or noise impacts on surrounding properties. The rear area will be secured for storage of vehicles and employee parking, but will be screened from view by the building design and the setback distance from Leadhill Blvd. Securing this area does reduce the shared parking available in the business park and creates a parking shortfall by code. The applicant requests a parking reduction to address the shortfall and justifies the reduction by requiring that all employees park within the secured storage area. Unlike a typical automotive repair business, the proposed use will have no customer interactions at the site.

Employees will bring vehicles back and forth from the dealership to the project site during typical business hours as outlined in the operations description. Staff therefore does not anticipate any noise, visual, or parking impacts from the proposed use. Early notification of the project was posted on the ARCONA website and a notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the press tribune, distributed to all properties within 300 feet and posted on the ARCONA website as well, and no public comments were received in response to the notice. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA per section 15,301 as it includes a minor interior alteration to an existing structure. In conclusion, the project is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the zoning ordinance, specific plan and general plan, and the required findings of fact can be made.

Therefore, staff recommends the Commission adopt the required findings of fact as listed and approve the conditional use permit and parking reductions subject to the recommended conditions of approval. And I'm available for any questions.

Thank you. Commissioners, are there any questions for staff at this time? Please go ahead.

Hi. How much parking reduction is gonna happen?

It's about a 30 space reduction, and there will be 30 spaces available for these employees to park in the the secure area.

I guess what I wanted to ask or to to maybe point out is that the way in which that property is laid out, the parking that's there is really designed for the buildings that are right there. And so it's not really gonna be taking any other parking away from the other uses. Correct?

Yeah. I think an additional justification for the reduction is, in all practicality, Those spaces would have been used probably for employees anyway. They're kind of tucked back there in the back of the building. I think that's true. Are

there any other questions? Just one clarification. There won't be any reliable customers over here. This is just gonna be the employees, they'll be ferrying cars back and forth. So all the customer interaction will still be over in the auto mall. So this is just a repair facility with no attracting customers over to

the site. Still have their automobile location for all the customer interactions. Is just kind of business to business operations. So

is auto repair the same as body repair?

Automotive repair is different than automotive body and equipment repairs as defined in the zoning ordinance,

and

it's allowed in more areas than the body repair.

So they cannot do body repair. Right.

So there would be no spray booth, painting type of activities happening here, which is more akin to having the auto body repair type of use that I think you're thinking of.

Thank you. I will now open the public hearing, and I would invite the project representative for this item to address the commission.

Hi there. I'm Bruce Westner.

You're a

local Cadillac Buick GMC dealer. Well, my father was the one that started in '69, so not quite old enough to have carried the torch that long. But, yeah, it's our project in Roseville, as you know, it's really hard to grow because we're so built out. And this piece of property became available at a time when Cadillac had been pushing us to build a extra showroom for their for our luxury brand, and we haven't been able to do it. This piece of property allows us to have some storage and extra shop space so that we can have our new Cadillac showroom right next to our current Buick GMC store right in Autumn Mall.

Pretty short story, lot of work, spent a lot of waiting. And that's kind of the long story. It's not going to be a body shop. It's internal. General Motors is really intent that we don't have customers over there. It's merely to do work for new car, used car preparation. And like you said, ferrying ferry cars over, all the customer facing will be where it's been for the last well, since 1990 in the Auto Mall. Okay. Thank you. Any questions?

I have one. So that your vehicle storage area, is that only for the vehicles that are going to be in the auto repair shop, or is it gonna be an overflow for new cars?

Overflow for new vehicles, it will be a really important part of it because we're losing I can't see it on that picture, but where the showroom is going go, we're losing display space. So we will have new cars, overflow new vehicles at on the Light Hill site. So those cars that are gonna be in that vehicle storage, are they still going to be

delivered in the Auto Mall? Or are you

Absolutely. All sales, all customer interaction happens on 400 Auto Mall Drive. Well, it won't

be customer interaction. I'm talking about delivery. Are the trucks going to be pulling into the complex here and unloading, or are they going to unload in the Auto Mall and you're going to ferry them over too? My concern is I don't like seeing the loaders on Lead Hill in the in the two way left turn lane trying to unload cars.

Don't don't see them being dropped off there. It you know, the thought had crossed our mind, but where where we're at now with the the extra storage lot behind, you know, behind the automobile where where trucks go in and out.

Lot 9?

Yeah. Didn't know you knew that. Yeah. Lot 9. It's worked well for well, since 1990.

So we're not we're not big fans of mowing and mowing in the two way turn in the middle that road either. There's there's opportunity if it happens to have

them off the road

to close in on the site closer to the actual building for security and for just less transit depending on when they're dropping off and picking up. The suicide lane, if you will, in the middle would not be an acceptable answer for us if the truckers were looking

to drop. Oh, That definitely wouldn't. As far as being able to turn one of those, turn a rig around if it came in and to go out, If that turned out to actually work in the future, take the extra shuttle of that new car away from being taken from the Alamol over to that site. But haven't confirmed that it really can even be done there.

Because I I've seen it I'm sorry. I've seen that at the Auto Mall too where they'll not your dealership yet, but I've seen other dealerships where the truck parks in the middle of the three lane roadway there.

Yeah. I've seen all sorts of stupid things happen there over the years. I got to agree. But, yeah, on Lead Hill would definitely not be the the spot. The the the parking in front, that's a it's a pretty wide pretty wide area. Don't, know, night drop there, it's like, could be a clean thing, but we wouldn't be dropping on Lead Hill.

Yes, have a question. I have a question regarding the office building that's facing the road. Is that office future office use for GMC Cadillac? Or

There will be boy, GM was really clear, and so I can be really clear. There won't be any customer facing on there.

That was my question. Yes.

Yes. There there won't be a sign that we can't even have signage on the auto repair on the bottom part that has our name on it. This is GM wants it. You know? They want the the public facing on Automall Drive, period. They don't even want us bringing a customer over to show them a new car in that backlog. They're very specific. I had to get their approval before I could get your approval. It's they're they're very protective. Thank you. Thank

you. Alright. I will now open the public comment period. Is there anyone from the public who would like to come forward and address the commission on this item? Seeing none, I will now close the public comment. Commissioners, are there any additional questions or comments for the applicant? And and I have one that I just wanted to say thank you. I know from reading the staff materials that we received that it was important to you to continue to be located in Roseville as opposed to some of the other areas that are around, and and I just wanna express my appreciation for your willingness to do so.

And I thank you back. I was a young man when the automobile got set up, but I was at all those meetings. And the working with the city, everything it took to get that done made a huge difference to, well, how garbage sold in this area. And, you know, way back before then, how the the public private partnership between Roseville allowed the growth of the Roseville dealers. You can look at Davis or Roseville.

They're both equal distance pretty much from Sacramento. And I think it was Roseville that that put the Roseville gang car dealers on the map, and we've just grown from there. And it's been a really successful partnership. So thank you.

I will now close the public comments period. Oh, I think I've done that already.

Yes.

Okay.

Is there anyone who'd like to make a motion?

I'll make a motion that we adopt the three findings effect and approve the conditional use permit subject to three conditions of approval and adopt the two findings of fact and approve the administrative permit for parking reduction subject to two conditions of approval. That's for the conditional use permit at 1376 Leadhill Boulevard for the record file number 25Dash0668.

Thank you.

Is there a second? I'd second.

Commissioner Pryor has made the motion, and commissioner Mace has seconded the motion. Roll call, please.

Commissioner Unidad? Yes. Commissioner Hagler? Yes. Commissioner Mace?

Yes.

Commissioner Pryor? Yes. Commissioner Criz?

Yes.

And chair Hagen Dazs?

Yes. The motion is approved. There's a ten day appeal period for this item. Item 6.2 is a request to approve a major project permit stage one modification, major project permit stage two, and tentative parcel map for 1470 Stonepoint Drive for the record file number PL25Dash0225. Kini, may we have your presentation, please?

Yes. Good evening, commissioners. I'm here to present the Stonepoint Hotel and Office project. The project site is located at 1470 Stonepoint Drive, which is considered Lot 4 of the Stonepoint master plan in the Northeast Roseville specific plan. The site is zoned planned development for research and development with the land use of business professional.

The parcel has been graded and is partially developed with landscaping, parking areas, and drive aisles. Surrounding uses include offices, retail, and restaurants to the West and South, the Adventist Health office building to the North, and townhomes and open space to the East. In May 2002, the Planning Commission approved a major project permit or MPP stage one, for the phase construction of the Stone Point master plan, which included a 1,600,000 square foot research and development and professional office campus. A tenant subdivision map was also approved to subdivide the site into 19 parcels. Two years later in 2004, the Planning Commission approved a MPP stage two and tenant parcel map for six office buildings and four retail buildings on Lots 1 Through 5.

Four of the six office buildings have been constructed as well as the restaurant retail buildings. The current project will develop Lot 4 with an office and hotel. This lot was previously approved for a 106,000 square foot office building as part of the 2004 MPP stage two. The requested entitlements include a MPP stage one modification to revise the site plan, a MPP stage two to review the architecture and design of the buildings, and a tentative parcel map to divide the existing parcel into two parcels. The Stone Point master plan document will be updated to reflect the proposed project.

The project will subdivide Lot 4 into two parcels as shown here in red. Parcel one is on the left and will be developed with an approximate 62,000 square foot three story office building. And Parcel 2 on the right will be developed with an approximate 56,000 square foot hotel that is four stories with a 124 rooms. The buildings meet the required setbacks from the adjacent roadways, which provide a sufficient buffer from the residential uses across Stone Point Drive. Direct access to the site will be provided by driveways located on the adjacent drive aisles to the north, and the parcels will be incorporated into the existing reciprocal access agreements for the Stone Point Center and will connect to the internal circulation system.

City engineering and fire department staff found the project complies with refuse service standards and with emergency circulation requirements. The project also includes pedestrian facilities consistent with the specific plan in Stone Point master plan. There will be new sidewalks and walkways that link the parcels within the center, allowing for connectivity between the uses. The project meets Sony Orna's parking requirements providing a total of 252 spaces and will be incorporated into the existing shared parking agreement for the center, which has over 1,400 spaces. This is the rendering of the proposed office building.

It will be three stories with the max height of 55 feet. This complies with five story height limit established in the specific plan. As shown in the bottom rendering, the office will be designed with the same colors and materials as existing office buildings in the center. The building consists of bands of green reflective glass that are separated by horizontal and grid concrete patterns. The main building entries are highlighted with the curved wall plane and granite tile veneer at the pedestrian level.

Overall, the architecture is consistent with existing office buildings and meets the intent of the original MPP approval. The hotel will be four stories and up to 47 feet tall, which is in scale with the surrounding buildings. The south elevation includes the main entrance and will be oriented internal to the site, and the north elevation will face the east west spine roadway that divides the stone point development. The building will consist of ifis in neutral shades of beige and white with stone veneer at the base. The main entrance is emphasized with the black aluminum canopy and fiber cement siding in a natural wood color.

To avoid repetition, the building has variation wall planes and roof heights, which create visual depth and movement. The color scheme is compatible with the office buildings and will cohesively tie in with the rest of the center. The proposed landscape plan includes new landscaping along the building frontages and in the parking lot. The parking lot landscaping for the hotel parcel meets the Community Design Guidelines 50% shading requirement. However, the office parcel only has a 26 and a half percent coverage due to limitations within the power line corridors.

Because of these power line corridors, the specific plan establishes only a 20% minimum coverage requirement. So given the office parcel meets this, staff supports the proposed landscape plan. Also, while there are no native oak trees on the site, the Stone Point master tree permit established a tree mitigation program for the entire Stone Point project, and all parcels are required to participate in the program. The required mitigation is allocated based on parcel acreage, and the total mitigation requirement for this project is a 159 inches, which will be met by non native tree plantings and payment of mitigation fees. Early notification of the project was posted on the Arcona website, and the public hearing notice was mailed to a 300 foot radius, published in the press tribune, and posted on the Arcona website.

And no public comments have been received. In regards to CEQUA, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to section one five three three two for infill development projects. In conclusion, staff finds the project is consistent with the MPP stage one approval and is consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the zoning ordinance, general plan, the community design guidelines, the Stone Point master plan, and the Northeast Roseville specific plan. The required findings for approval can be made. At this time, staff recommends the planning commission adopt the required finds and findings effect and approve the MPP stage one modification, the MPP stage two, and the tenant parcel map subject to the recommended conditions of approval. That concludes my presentation. I'm happy to answer any questions.

Thank you. Commissioners, are there any questions for staff at this time?

I have a question on the tree mitigation. You said that the number of inches can be replaced with non native trees. Is that what you said? Correct. Okay.

Up to 50% can be replaced.

Up to 50%. Okay. Correct. So there I see there will be some oak trees

Yeah.

In the project. Okay. Thank you.

I will now open the public hearing, and then I'd like to invite the project representative for this item to address the commission.

Good evening, commissioners. My name is Tiffany Wilson with RSC Engineering, the applicant for the project. I'd like to thank Kenny for stepping in kinda midstream with some staff turnover and and completing out the project. And just wanted to point out that, you know, the office landscape has changed, and so the owner had been looking for some alternative uses. Hotel developer has come in and is looking at this particular site for the Studio Res Marriott brand, which is kind of a newer concept.

It's an extended stay, but more of an efficient, functionable hotel brand with small kitchenettes. It's more geared towards, like, a traveling nurse or maybe the construction workers that are here long term, not necessarily people on vacations. So it doesn't have all the bells and whistles like a, you know, a fancy hotel. No restaurant, no pool, but it does have the kitchenette that somebody could stay a little bit long longer term. There is a small fitness room, guest laundry,

and

self-service food and beverage area. I do wanna point out that the intent is to construct the hotel at this point. The reason the office part is part of the entitlements is just so we can prove that the Stone Point master plan still works from a building square footage allocation and parking requirement. So that's why you see a reduced office. So at such time, you know, office comes back, that would be the size that would be built.

It wouldn't be the original five story building. And then we also are doing a parcel map, so we'll split the lot into two so then they purchase or ground lease the hotel space. And I'm here to answer any questions you guys might have.

Commissioners, anyone have any questions?

I have a question. Hi. I'm glad that you you mentioned about the current state of office. That's actually the first thing that came to my mind. Gonna build an office. Anyways, my question would be on the hotel side. If ever you get approved, do you have a timeline of when would be the break groundbreaking?

They want us to meet we're the civil engineers. They want us to get going right away. I mean, the permitting process, you know, is probably six to eight months, and they would, you know, break ground. So we're we're still probably a year and a half to two years out before it would be open.

Thank you. So the

plan is to open the hotel for build the hotel first, and then

There's no plan at this time to construct the office. It it's just part of the entitlements to show that we we can still meet the requirements in the Stone Point master plan. So I there is no time frame for the office at this point.

K. But it's a placeholder for the split Right. Split, you know, the partial shift.

And that, you would know it would be a smaller office building should it come to fruition.

Than was originally proposed on this site.

It was bigger and taller.

Anyone else? Thank you. Thank you. I will now open the public comment period. Is there anyone from the public who would like to come forward and address the commission on this item? I will now close the public comment period. Commissioners, any additional questions or comments?

I have a comment. I think it's a very smart idea to build a hotel that would cater for longer stays because I know with the medical centers, with the number of hospitals and medical facilities we have in that area, it's well needed, and and I know there is a demand pent up for it. So I think it's a good decision, and it's a it's a smart choice to to build that type of hotel in that location.

I will now close the public hearing. Would anyone like to make a motion?

I would move that we adopt two findings of fact as listed in the staff report and approve the major project permit stage one modification for the 1470 Stonepoint Drive project subject to the five conditions of approval and adopt two findings of fact as listed in the staff report for the major project permit stage two for 1470 Stonepoint Drive subject to 72 conditions of approval and dropped three findings in fact as listed in the staff report to approve the tentative parcel map for 1470 Stonepoint Drive subject to 46 conditions of approval.

Thank you. Is there a second?

I will.

I'll I'll second.

Commissioner Mace has made the motion and commissioner Hagler has seconded the motion. Roll call, please.

Commissioner Chris?

Yes.

Commissioner Unidad?

Yes.

Commissioner Pryor? Yes. Commissioner Meish?

Yes.

Commissioner Hagler?

Yes.

And chair Hagendress?

Yes. The motion is approved. There's a ten day appeal period for this item. Next on the agenda is the commissioner and staff report. And, first on there is, item 7.1, the election election of of the the design design committee committee chair. Chair. Something I have been anticipating with joy. You have somebody else agenda. I will now open public comments. Is there anyone from the public who would like to address the commission on this item?

Seeing none, I will close the public comment period. And it is my understanding that, commissioner Hagler has indicated an interest in taking the design committee chair position. Is there any discussion about that? Otherwise, I would be more than happy to nominate him for the the position.

I mean, I I'm willing to accept it. I I thought I was gonna be the the cochair, and he was still gonna be the chairman in case I'm unavailable, but unless somebody else wants to.

With me.

Well

misunderstood. I thought maybe you

wanted to to to go ahead

and, be the I'm more

than happy to have you be the chair, and I will be happy to, to to be the alternative. Unless there's someone else who wants to be the alternate.

I can tell you, as you guys debate this and decide what who who you wanna put on the hot seat, we all we we take the for Planning Commission and Design Committee, it's our it's our practice to have the the chair the chair, vice chair for Planning Commission, the chair alternate for Design Committee, comes before the Commission every July. First meeting, the first meeting we have in July, so kind of after the fiscal year. And that's usually when commissioners rotate off, if they are on for their entire term, the terms usually end at the June. So that's the normal time to do that. So these two positions would would be in place through June.

Mhmm. I don't believe Derek can correct me if I'm wrong. We that we have any design committee items for the next couple months. There might be one or two meetings in the before July. So this is a pretty much not going to be a very stressful role for at least until the new fiscal year in July. If that has anything to do if that helps with with anybody's

What, you know, what I what I wanna offer is, I mean, I have served as the design committee chair for a couple of years now. And I am more than happy to step aside for others to to to to find that you know, to fill that role. It's a it's actually a fun thing to do. It's the you know, if you're if you're able to make the meetings, it's a it's it's an important role, and and you serve with two other, folks who are appointed, by the council. Right? Correct? And so, it's it's well worth, doing. And

if it helps if it helps for tonight, at least for the rest of the for the next, four months. If, commissioner Hagwood wants to be the alternate, then we can skip the, election of the chair and go straight to the election of an alternate. Because we do need an alternate. Commissioner Jensen would be able we're we're missing an alternate right now. Yeah. So, I mean, I can

be an alternate if you can't make it or you don't wanna do the meeting, then I I can always step

step up.

Well, then I'll stay as the chair till June, and, we'll proceed with the, so I'll take item 7.1 off of the we'll take that. What's the formal procedure I need to do here?

I know that you need to do anything.

We're not taking any action on 7.1

and Okay. So I can just go ahead with 7.2? Yes. Okay. So I'll now open public comments. Is there anyone from the public who'd like to address the commission on this item? Seeing none, I will close the public comment period. And, would anyone like to make a motion to nominate commissioner Hagler for the alternate position?

I nominate commissioner Hagler to be the co chair of the design team.

I'll second.

Okay. Commissioner, Unidad has made the motion, and was it commissioner Pryor Pryor. Who seconded the motion? Roll call, please.

Commissioner Pryor?

Yes.

Commissioner Hagler?

Yes.

Commissioner Unidad? Yes. Commissioner Mash?

Yes.

Commissioner Chris?

Yes.

And chair Hagenjos?

Yes. Congratulations.

Thank you.

And there's not a ten day appeal period for this. So you're still Are there any other reports from the staff? Yeah.

I'll just chair Eganjos. I'll just let the commission know that we won't be having a meeting on February 26, but we will for sure be having a meeting on March 12. As I mentioned at the last meeting we had in in my email last week, one of the items there there might be a consent item or a a most likely a a consent item, But there will be an opportunity, an item, an agenda item for the public to make put on the public record their comments regarding the adequacy of the Phillips Road site draft environmental impact report. So I will probably provide you some more clarifying information because this is going to be a little unique situation. It's not the normal public hearing process that you're used to where there's questions.

There will be a staff presentation, an overview of the project, an overview of kind of the significant impacts that the EIR has identified, potential significant impacts the EIR has identified. And then it's really a forum for the public to provide their oral comments so that we can record those comments. There won't be any responses to those comments at the hearing. The responses, like I said, they will be recorded, and the responses will be in writing with the final EIR that you will see later in the spring or early summer, most likely spring. And so it will be a little unique to anything that you've experienced, because I don't think we've done this for at least ten years, to my knowledge, that we brought it before the planning committee, to use the planning commission hearing as

But that

it provides a little more structure for the public. And again, I'll probably provide another email outlining what we're going to do as we get closer to it. There will be a short staff report. So there will be information.

And

then obviously, I've sent you the links to the EIR. That's all available on the city's website. So that will be on March 12. Okay. So I'm we're all looking forward to that. And that's all I have for tonight.

Any other questions or comments from the commission? May I have a motion to adjourn? To move. Second. Commissioner Mace has made the motion. Commissioner Unity had a second of the motion. All in favor? Aye. We are adjourned.

Anybody that needs signatures, we any of us can sign too, so you don't have to stand in line.

Don't worry about it.

I am not here.

Let me

just sign. It

hasn't been loading all night.