Planning Board - Regular Meeting

Dominic wasn't here. I was not here. So, we don't have enough members to approve those. So, skip that. We'll do that at the next meeting. Uh so, next up is going to be uh Lenuzi subdivision public hearing. I believe you're here for some completely. Um so, the fact that we don't have any other public here. Um does anybody anybody on the board have any questions? We need to open it and close it. Right. Right. Um All right. So, I'll accept a motion to open the public hearing for the Lenuzi subdivision. Motion by Dominic, second by Robert. Um all approved. I opposed. Okay. Public hearing is open. Any comments? None from the audience. Um I will accept a motion to close the public hearing. Make a motion. Motion by Dominic. Second. Second by Brad. All in favor? I I opposed. Motion carried. Are there any other questions from the board? I was not at the last meeting. You guys went through everything. You did seeker. We're at the point of doing a public hearing. No other follow-up questions. My question was that second driveway where we ended up with that. I missed the last meeting, so I wasn't totally familiar with from what I gather it went to the town to Yeah. I I can just go over what happened. That'd be great. Uh I was in contact with the highway department. Uh the highway supervisor had no issue with the driveway. He gave me a signed document stating as such. He just his only stipulation was when my client ends up actually developing the driveway just to get in contact with him to pay the fee that is involved as well as get the size of the covert that he needs for that driveway. But he said the specs for the driveway were fine for what we were planning on doing. Do you have a copy of that correspondence? Uh I I can see if I have it. Um if not, uh

could you send it to us so we can put that in the file? Yeah, if I have an extra copy, I'll Yeah, that'd be great. And is there is there a deadline on the driveway like a year, two years, 10 years? Not to my understanding, though. There was nothing stipulated by the highway superintendent about that. Is that something we should because we were concerned was the second entrance going in because of the shared shared shared driveway. Um there is an easement that goes through post an easement but that's right. They took that off. So the the ingress egress for the second property there. How are they working that out? Uh because it's not their driveway that they're going across. They're going across somebody else's property to get to their house. Correct. It it's kind of a touchy subject because they're both relatives. So, in the future, it it would be an issue if they were both separate um families, but the intent of this subdivision was to split both properties between both family members. Uh I can see that being an issue in the future if anybody decides to sell the properties, but currently it would not be an issue. I know our client is pretty eager to get this done with driveway. I know for other subdivisions, it's kind of hard to say because this one's already developed. Other sub subdivisions, they are approved with the idea that the driveway would be installed for the construction and then start developing the property. So, um, do you do you have a most current map that we can take a look at? I think the the copies that I have in the file here appear to be old because I'm not I know there was a a location for that apron to be on there. I've got them. I've got one. Yep. Okay. Does anybody else want to see a copy

just to No, I I've seen it with the second driveway. I was just curious if there was a I agree with Dorothy some sort of expectation of it being put in from a from a legal standpoint. So, what what I was thinking here is the planning board's identified a potential adverse impact when the property changes hands and it surrounds that driveway. So one condition of approval could be upon ownership that driveway is to be constructed to those standards upon new ownership upon a transfer of these properties when this deed happens of two separate. So you're talking about when this subdivision's approved. I think the concern is after this they couldn't move the driveway after it changes. What would be the stipulation? Well, then it would be filed. We would want it on the map so it's enforceable and it's part of their resolution, but obviously the enforcement gets a bit tricky on this. I'm not clear for a second driveway. Oh, because right now there's only one means of access because right now they're saying it's okay. Yeah. Essentially, there's there's some sort of relation. So, he says, "Okay, drive across my driveway to your house." So, what we're approving is permission to create a second drive. We're not approving. We're we're recommending No, we're so the the concern is that we're approving a map that that technically doesn't give access to the second lot because they're traveling across a driveway on somebody else's property and the easement was removed. Correct. The the access there was no existing easement. We had proposed an easement, but that was not accepted. So, it's just an agreement, right, that they used

per Yes. Now, without the subision being approved, the clients are both using the driveway as if they were because the whole the whole point of this to begin with was to have them both share that driveway, which is what they're doing currently right now. Uh the the way that was established by the planning board was that the driveway needed to be constructed to make these two separate lots so that one could service one house, the other could service the other house. there there was no easement on it. We had suggested an easement for that to to be a way that they can retain youways because they both lead to both houses. Um but that ement is no longer on the map. So just talking out loud here. Uh the apron coming off the highway would be installed by the town. Correct. Was that the conversation or is the is the applicant doing that to the town's specs? It is the way it was set to me by the highway department was that we could ask the highway department to help with that or we could just build it to their specs, which ultimately the only thing that the highway superintendent was concerned with was the covert, right? The culbert size. Um he just said soon as you're ready to construct, have him come out there and he would dictate the covert size. What what is the board's thought on having the apron the apron not the full driveway the apron installed so it it provides the access point as proposed as approved by the highway department. The apron gets installed. The rest of it a new person could do and bring it up to the house whenever that time was that it got sold. But in the meantime, we are providing an access point to that piece

of property off the highway. In my mind, that that's we're doing our due diligence to make sure that there's a true access point to that new that new parcel at the town's expense. Well, in in other townships, the town's always put the apron in. I don't know what I don't know what the town is. Yeah, they've always put the in when you know there's going to be a driveway coming after it, but this is not the case. true until it would change hands. But given that it's a separate they're separate parcels now, I'm I'm I'm suggesting that as an option to kind of ensure that that process is at least started that if if there is some kind of an argument or something and somebody's says, "Well, now this piece of property doesn't have a driveway on it." I guess I'm trying to trying to kind of find a what is the um the impact of of not doing it now? In other words, at some point this is going to be a future homeowners problem and they're going to want that second driveway. Correct. Why why do we need to be the one who is doing that? The concern is we can't we just can't create a landlocked parcel, right? We can't create something with no act no legal access where here the actual access is not an issue. Obviously they've been doing that again I don't know how to vocabulary here but we can stipulate we are granting permission to create the second driveway at some future point right that solves the problem and we're the map will show exactly where that driveway is going to be. In other words, it seems like a it seems weird to me to insist on putting in an apron or a driveway that may not be necessary right now, but for the purposes of making the map compliant, we want to create I think the other dilemma with that too, in my opinion, is if that person isn't the one that sells, what if

it's the other one? Yeah. Then the other one goes, "You ain't coming across my driveway." Well, his map's totally fine. But we can solve that right now by giving by by by stipulating that the map has the future homeowners permission to create it. Right. But there's a difference I'm sorry I'm not being articulate. There's a difference between you can do this in the future when conditions necessitate it and or you must do it right now and maybe you never need it. The latter seems unusual to me. No, no, not that you won't never need it. In my opinion, there should be a second driveway. Okay. In my opinion, a shared driveway is a bad idea. When that house was built, it was obviously built without permitting from the town. So on and so forth. The permitting was done after the inspections went after. That was all done without the town being involved at all. Now that town's involved, we would no matter what want two separate entrances for multiple reasons, but we're imposing a condition on the homeowner they don't want. There's two homeowners. We're imposing a condition on the homeowners plural that they don't want. Well, the dilemma is to Dominic's point. If this was a new lot, no matter what, there'd be two a new house. There's going to be a drive. And the second one doesn't have an easement. So, it's a gentleman's agreement at this point. Hey, you come across my yard. Well, when they have an issue, where does it fall? Are they coming down to Tim Liipper to come up havoc for the town or the other one does it and it's just it's saving the town in the future in my opinion? And it was all done without the town being involved whenever it was done where we would have had that in that time. allows us to grant them the the non-driveway home that we're creating that grants them permission to create a driveway in the future if they need it as opposed to you must do it now because we want it. No. So the the our our laws if you read through everything it would need to have a separate access. Okay. It would need to have separate because it's a it's a new lot. It's a new lot. needs to have its own driveway unless there was an easement going through the other

property where they're giving permission a rightaway or an easement that that says you can travel through this which they don't have that right now. Thank you. So that's going back. Yeah, we could. Right. So this lot technically does not have a driveway. Okay. To to the residence. If the situation arose where there was no other way to gain access, I would understand an easement more. But you can put a driveway. Oh, easily. That's my thought process on the whole thing. Okay. And and to that point as as kind of a middle of the road, if the apron is in in your you're 20 30 feet off the edge of the road, we've established that this is the driveway. This is the driveway location. and whether they build the rest of it to their house. We're we're given a little bit of grace here by only doing part of it, right? With the stipulation on the map that Yeah, this is where we go. Thank you. Now, yeah, that would only get stipulated on one map or both. Well, there is a map. This is single map. Single map. Single map. And and the location is here. The location is listed. It would be a condition of the approval for the if we do it that way, it would be a condition of the approval to have a driveway apron installed. And that's a valid condition because we've obviously identified the concern and the planning board's empowered to impose conditions to alleviate and mitigate these potential impacts identified. And it's it's a cost to the homeowner, but it's not a it's not substantial like you're doing the whole road. You're doing the apron piece of it with with the culvert. And and again, I don't I don't I don't know if the town has it in their regulations that they install that piece. Um it sounds

like that may be a a possibility. To my understanding and to my conversations, it was if we wanted the town to do it, they they would be able to for a fee. Okay. or we could con we the client could construct it uh with the uh highway superintendent uh inspect it inspecting it just to make sure that the culvert size is correct the size all of that. Yeah. And I think it all emanates from that covert local law that we passed where you can pay the town highway department or something to come out and do the installation or you do it on your own and request a formal inspection from the highway department and they greenlight it based upon the standards. Okay. is board on board with that approach with Do you mind explaining it to me one more time because I'm trying and then how far in do you want to so it would only be to the highway right away it' be to the limits of the highway right away. Okay that's all to my understanding not to not to interrupt but I believe the roadway itself as constructed would not make it out of the rightway because I believe the rightway is 50 ft unless I'm thinking about the setback on the map. I'm not entirely sure. I think it might be the building step access, not the right way. I don't have the map in front of me. So, you're saying the property line itself is beyond the rightway, which that's not It would be one or the other. I'm just thinking cuz I haven't looked at the map for a while. So, Yep. If you don't mind, just No, you're fine. I mean, it's it's there's lines on there that just dictate where the the driveway would be. It' be the set back. So I I was thinking about the setback. So what is the front set back there? Uh I believe it's 50 ft all the way around. Okay. I have which

is quite a ways in for a normal driveway. But the setback's different than the right the public right away. So we're not saying you have to go in 50 ft. Right. Right. which was where my my confusion was. Yeah. No, no, just the so just the Yep. Okay. Yep. So, just for me clarifying this again, would this be something that needs to be addressed before approval or would this be conditional approval upon the creation of the driveway? How would we do that? I think this actual construction piece there and that would probably take a while. I think it would still be conditioned upon this happening where if it would have to set a time frame for this to happen, right? Do you have um just talking out loud here, but do you have a way to contact the applicant to possibly discuss that with them? Maybe if you stepped outside, have a discussion with them, say what we're looking at doing. And um I I I will say no. Okay. Because the applicant is is he lives in New York City and he's with his with his responses. Fair enough. I would say no. I just I hate to have you come back for something if you know project's been in front of the board for three years. So it's not I know. I know. And and a lot of it stemmed around this piece of it. This piece of it too. Um, I think we would want to have a reasonable timeline, but I don't want to set something without you discussing that with them of of when they can realistically get that piece done. The the driveway the driveway having the driveway installed because us saying the

approval is conditional on having the driveway done, it's it's approved without a condition. um we'd want to have to make sure that that piece gets installed um with the approval of of the mapping. Um so the the apron would have to be installed before the map I I think that's what we're looking for. Yeah. Are there any other notes that you would like to have on the map regarding this or is the map finding the edges? Um I think that if as long as you provide the the um correspondence that you have with the highway super email I just don't have that. Yep. No, that's fine. That that that gave their blessing on on that piece of it. Um that describes what the apron is that they said to do it within the town specs. Um, and then any subsequent correspondence that they have saying that the town's going to build it and the applicant's going to pay for it or the applicant's going to build it with town inspection. Uh, just to have that correspondence in the file and then when that piece was done, we can we can do that, right? Because not a there's not an ownership change. They own the property already, so they can they can do the work on it. It's not like they're selling it and somebody else has to do the work on on the property itself. Correct. And it it it seems to be just the apron to get it approved. Yep. Okay. Yep. And then the driveway itself would not have a timeline on that. N we just want the the the apron to provide access to the property. Okay. And and that kind of gives that good faith effort that that in the future if property changes hands, somebody coming to buy it doesn't assume that they're coming in this other driveway. They can doesn't get built. They can say, "What's that for?" And that convers Okay. Now, would it still be a stipulation on the map for the future? If it's if it's built if it's built and shown correctly on the map, then it wouldn't necess No,

I think I still want the notes on the map as the map. Leave the notes on the map. I don't think we changed that because it's a proposed driveway. It's a proposed driveway location. And with other subdivisions, like I've said, this one is kind of strange because both houses are already built, right? But other subdivisions get approved with proposed roads quite often. Yep. Yeah. Other subdivision, the expectation would be a house at the end. These houses are here. I get it. You're just putting the chicken before the egg. However you want to put it, it's fine. I get it. But it's already done. That my opinion, a driveway needs to be there or some something. Yep. Okay. So, moving forward, um you'll contact the applicant um and get that information for us. Uh um Yep. I'll get you my correspondence. Uh, I will get you that signed document which I I believe I had last time, the packet that I had last time, but I will look for it. Any any subsequent correspondence with the highway superintendent on the actual building of of the apron um and then at that point um come back to us and should be able to move forward. Okay. And I remember you guys mentioning a timeline. Uh like I said, the client is pretty sporadic with his communications with me. Yep. Um, is there an expectation of a timeline that you would be interested in or is it mostly on his schedule? We've done I think the timeline would correspond with when it gets approved essentially, but the application itself, there's a timeline set now. We started to clock on the timeline. Correct. Now we have 62 days from close of public hearing being today, but we can also extend that on mutual consent if if we have to. Okay. That that's what I was mostly concerned about. I just don't want to. No, we don't we don't want to go through the whole process again. That's for sure. Okay. We just schedule a site visit when this fits in. I think as long as that's corresponding to the town, the town's going to put it in or they're going to inspect it.

Yep. Show the size of the cover at that point. So, if that's whether they build it or we inspect it, someone will have to from the top. Yep. Okay. and then we'll just leave it to you at this point to get back to us when you're ready to move forward. Okay. When those things are taken care of. Okay. All right. Okay. Thank you. Yep. Public hearing. Uh we did that already. We closed public hearing. We closed the public hearing. So the 62 days runs from now. And I put a note on my calendar. So, we'll make sure accidentally lapse or anything like that. Yeah. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Next, we have American Tower special use permit. My name is Arian Eastman. I am with Centerline Communications on behalf of American Tower. Welcome. Thank you. So, you guys are looking to co colllocate the existing tower, correct? We are. Yes. uh on behalf of T-Mobile, they would like to put in uh some equipment. So, I have the full list of what we're looking to do. Okay. Um the tower itself would receive six new antennas, six new radios, and three hybrid cables. On the ground, they're proposing a 10 by 15 foot pad with three cabinets that would house um equipment, an H frame, an ice canopy, emergency backup generator and generator. All of those components are with inside the fence that's already existing there. Yep. Uh within a 10 x 15 pad. So, oh that all of that equipment sits on that pad which is inside the fence which is inside the existing. So, there's no change to the footprint on the ground. There's no change to the tower height itself. Okay. So,

and just we for the boards to refresh our memory, I think we've dealt with one of these before and this falls under the elig and the applicant can step in wherever, but this falls under that eligible facilities request where the the key language is the state and local government unit. I mean, this planning board may not deny and shall approve any eligible facilities request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that and here's our fact for consideration does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. So that's what this board's review is kind of limited to under federal law. So with that being said, do we have to do a special use permit? We do unfortunately can't can't just skip it. Maybe if the federal law got a bit more into the weeds. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. It just takes out some of this board's discretion, right? When you say some mean all Well, to the to the extent we're looking at a substantial change, right? the footprint. The tower height doesn't get taller. It's components that get put inside of the existing fence and on the tower. Very well versed on this. The last time uh what I don't do you have a checklist for the special use permit? Would you mind grabbing one for me just so I don't miss any step as we go through this? Um, everybody got this is so the papers that you got are the very first part of the the packet that we have. There's certainly a lot more information here, including um plans that go along with

it. Um, I would invite anybody to take a look at any and all of this um as you see fit. Um, I don't know that it necessarily warrants making copies of everything. Um but this file will be here um if you do wish to look through the rest of it. Um but some of the first pieces of the application building permit application um description of the project those are in that exhibit one exhibit two. Is this the camp cast one by camp? I'm trying to think where that top [Music] road. So that's I was going to say we have two. I know that cuz they have another one that'll be coming up. Yep. That's perfect. Yeah. Yeah. This is the one up by Pondo Road back side of Rville. [Music] So we have to do public hearing and everything for this. That's been our procedure. I'm not aware of any authority to wave the public hearing unfortunately. All right. Just bear with me. I'm looking at a lot of this for the first time tonight. Yes. [Music] Building permit application. Is there a special use permit application in the packet? Let you know. I say it says a completed building permit and special application. Yeah, I

thought he did submit uh my coworker Colin submitted it and I believe it was all together but Okay, I got building permit application. He did some of the zoning which would have had that but it may be separate. Where did that get sent? So though that piece would go to Tim. We'll need piece went to Tim. We'll need a separate special use permit application to go with this just so our our documents are complete. Okay. All right. I just want to go through the list here of what we need. Was the fee paid for special use permit? Do you know? Probably not yet. I'm guessing if you don't have the application then no. Yep. Okay. says payment checks. There were checks for that. I just don't know if there's an additional fee. Um, so we have the one for 250 that went with the zoning permit application and then we have is that I think that is the zoning permit. Okay. So, we did send in a building permit for um 150 and Okay. So, those checks were both sent. Okay. 250. So, we'll just we'll just double check and confirm and if there if just to make sure that that's all taken care of because it's 150 for the special use permit and that check did go check for 250 for the building permit. So, do you mind grabbing 10? All right. Thank you. You said you had the one for 250. This is the This is the one for 250 with

the receipt here for 250. So they also sent in the building permit application. So he sent two checks. Two checks, two applications, two files. So I don't know who has the other one. All right. So it sounds like it was submitted. We're just tracking down. Yeah. It just if it went in two different packets, it probably No, that's fine. confuses everybody. um applications that came in for the cell tower. Tim, uh building permit. Um did we get a special use permit application? I've got the building permit application here. I think what I did is forwarded you the planning board referral form. Did you get that or nothing? None of the above. Not that I'm seeing anything in the packet here. It's possible that you haven't either. Okay. I'm kind of on a transition here on clerks. That's fine. I just want to make sure we've got everything that we need. I will make sure that you do. Okay. So, things that I'm seeing here just off the top. Um we'll make sure we have a special use um permit application uh site consent form um which is also part of that packet. Um I believe you had taxes paid in here but [Music] your is there taxes for that piece? We can get that. Okay, we have that in house. Um the fee of 150 we'll double check that that is here and mapping everything else looks like would be here as part of this. Just take a quick Did you get there's two applications

two because I have it here that says that he did send his permit with that or application. Sorry. Yeah. I do have your referral for Centerline Communications LLC from C Morgan. Yep. Collocation cell tower special use permits. I just have the word doc. I don't have I don't have the PDF. I can forward it to you. Okay. Just in case you want to see it. What's the email you want it to go to? Are you taking down any equipment or just adding to? Just adding. Um, T-Mobile currently does not have equipment on the tower, so it would all be new. Email. Yeah. AEC traw.com. Okay. And that has both applications uh in that email. So that'll be coming to you. You getting those now? Yeah, I think she might take a minute. That's right. And the board just has to get it on this application because we do have to move it along. If we don't act on it within 60 days, all of this happens anyway. Yeah. All this discussion is kind of moot. Yeah. Yep. But we at least have to know where it is. Yeah. Yeah. Yep. So, we'll give that a minute and we can work off of that. Yeah. Is this institute? Yeah. Um honestly don't know where the

institute begins or ends these days in the property. Yeah. I mean that's unusual that the site is called not to interrupt you guys. Do do you want the receipts for the public hearing? Yes, please. Do you want me to hand it off or right there would be fine. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. [Music] Aec traw.com. Okay. to the scent. Let me see. Did it go to spam? Because that happens. Check. I never check mine. So, so while we're waiting for that, I'm just taking a look at the the mapping um site location map. It has all the lot lines on it. Um, I don't think we're we're too concerned about just knowing where it's an existing feature. Nothing's changing as far as the footprint. Um, the mapping certainly shows the access getting into the site and the site location. No new proposed roads. Ingress egress is the same. None of the other items apply. Oh, this is going at the top of the tree.

124 foot center line uh on the 131 ft pole. So, yes. And I just sent you an email. So if you get that respond to that one, okay? And if you don't get that, then we might have issues issues. [Music] Did you send it to the C Morgan one though? No. Okay. Just making sure. sent it to Ae a um the uh use type determination. What would this be classified as? Uh special use permit. Now, let me pull up that referral letter for communication store is it has its own designation. Yeah, that's what that's what our referral has on here. H could just be the signal isn't strong enough cuz I'm not getting your speaker. That's why we need the tower. Yeah, something just pinged on my phone. I don't know what you guys are doing. There it goes. Yep.

Sorry. [Music] Okay. Probably way too much to add it up. Yeah, it's not liking it. Well, this is what I have from Tim. Just this is a referral we started. She has some of it's not as detailed, right? If she can pull it up, could she just tell you what? Do you have it there? Are you Can you access it like see and just kind of go through it with us as we go line by line? Maybe. Good idea. It's kind of a pain in the butt for you, but Yeah. I mean, I have both of them, but it's just if you need to see it. Um, what's the difference? Yeah. Do you mind if we cut it off? It's not very like easy to read on that, but So, is this the same as the This looks like it's the same as the packet, though. Yeah. Oh, you want the other one? Yes. If you have the the special use permit application, that's the one that I'm looking for. They're in the same email. That's the zoning

one. That's building [Music] permit. There we go. Okay. Special use application. Okay. Copy of that application fee. Do you know if there was a I didn't see it in here, a site consent form? I'm not I don't think anybody necessarily needs to go up to take a look at it. Um but we we should have a copy of that for the file. Okay. No, probably not. Then I if it's not in there, then we don't have it and I can get that for you. [Music] Okay. Who what is our consent for? Movement consent. It's very It's very simple. The applicant. So, if you're representing Yeah. Yep. We can do that tonight as well. Okay. Um, so the other thing I need is uh proof of taxes. Um, site consent form. We can we can establish the the type of use for a communications tower. We need a motion

for that, right? Yeah. Let's make a good record on that. Okay. I'll accept a motion to designate the use type um for this application as communications tower. We get a second. Second by Brad. Uh Dominic, I'm sorry. Motion by Brad. Second by Dom. All in favor? I opposed. Okay. Motion carried. [Music] Um, so we can't do application is complete until we do those other things. So we need proof of taxes and the site consent form we can do easily enough but we need proof of taxes for that. Um, are we okay with moving forward and checking on that? Yeah. Yeah, I think we the board should be Okay. Yeah. Um Okay. Uh I'll accept a motion to um accept the special use permit application as complete conditional on site consent form signature and uh proof of taxes. We get a motion. I'll make motion. Motion by by Dorothia. Second. Second. Second by Brad. All in favor? I opposed. Motion carried. Okay. Inspection. Do we have to go through seeker for this too? Seek here and public hearing. Yes. So we what we should do is do a motion to classify it as unlisted and declare lead set public hearing. Okay. And then at the public do form of seeker do determine and close and that should be it. Do you need two separate motions for Yeah, let's do one one seeker motion to

classify as unlisted and declare lead agency. Okay. Uh accept a motion to classify this as an unlisted action and lead agency needs to be a sec second separate motion. No, we can. and to designate the town of Rensville as lead agency. Motion motion Dominic second. Second. Second by Brad. All in favor? I post. Motion carried. Okay. And [Music] then schedule public hearing. Let's look at the calendar. Nobody else needs to review this. Correct. We need time to advertise. So, are we looking at July 3rd? Yeah, I think the turnaround would be too too short for the 19th. Yeah, July 3rd work for you for a public hearing. I'll accept a motion to schedule a public hearing for the American Tower special use permit for July 3rd at 7:00. Moved motion second. Second, second by Dominic. All in favor? I opposed. Carried. All right. So I said July 3rd. July 3rd at 7 p.m. Okay. Anything else for this at this point? Okay. As far as we can go. Yep. Um so we can check on proof of taxes for you and then the um safe visit consent form. Would you mind pulling one of them up for her before she heads out? Just so we just so

we have that. We can put that right in the file. Sounds good. And then uh the next step will be on the third for volunteering. All right. All right. Thank you. Great. Thank you. Thanks for in No problem. Anything in the meantime? Just let me know. And we have we have a copy. You guys have sent that. So we'll have a paper copy to stick in the file. Yeah. Once it comes through cyerspace, right? Forward it on. If it doesn't if we don't see it, you know, I have all your info. tomorrow. If I don't have it by then, there's issues. All right. Thank you. Okay. Do do we have any other items for business for tonight? Anything else? All right. Accept a motion to adjurnn. Motion by Robert, second by Red. All in favor? Opposed? Motion carried. Thanks for coming, everybody. We are still We're still on our recording right now, so unlisted. Well, it's either type one, type two, or unlisted. Unlisted kind of catch on. Type two is a state list of things that are the state says these efforts environmental impact. It's like things that don't really involve any change in the land use, a lot adjustment or varian home. So, those are type two. You just classify as type two and that's it. And our type one actions are the big ones big might something like that. We generate type two. Right. I don't have time. Since I started I don't think we've done one. We did adjourn. I know the recording is still going but we're all set. Thank you.