Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Monday, April 20, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Planning Commission
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Location
Plano, TX
Meeting Date
April 20, 2026

Transcript

17 sections

9:04 – 11:040

WELCOME T T APR 20TH, 202 CITY OF PLANO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AND CA T ORD MEETING TO ORD AT 6:00 P I YOU PLEAS RIS AND JOIN ME I T PLEDG ALLEGIAN T FLA UNITE STAT JUS THA Y VER MUC CONSEN AGEND CONSENT AGENDA. CONSE AGEND WILL ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS THAT A ROUTI AN TYPICALLY NONCONTROVERSIAL ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGEN F INDIVIDUA CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STA MISTERS WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO REMOVE AN ITEM FRO T AGEND BEFOREEO THAO WAN T RECOGNIZE THAT WE HAV COMMISSION BRO ON VIA WITH US V ZOOM TONIGHT. I GOO Y BECAUSE THEY RAISE YOUR HAND MAKE SURE YOU CAN HEAR AL RIGHTO ANYBODY LIKEO REMOVE ITE FRO T CONSENT AGENDA? COMMISSIONER BRODSKY, MOV W APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER LEONARD FELDE I' SECOND ALL RIGHT. HAV MOTIO SECON PLEA VOT THA LIN A FILT THA SECON M RUDOLPH THUMBS UP. OK YERIGH MOTION PASSESO THAN YOU ITEMS F INDIVIDUA CONSIDERATIO ITE F INDIVIDU CONSIDERATION PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE B T CHAIR O

11:02 – 13:010

SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIV APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO T TOTAL MINUT PRESENTATION TIME WITH FIV MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED. REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMON EAC TIME WIT THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER. THE PRESIDING OFFICER M N MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY ADMINISTRATIV CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIO LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEP CONSTRAINED B LEG CONSIDERATIONS NON PUBLI HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMME FO ITE O T AGENDA N POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. TH PRESIDI OFFIC WIL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS LENGT T AGENDA AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE TOTAL TIM LIM THINK Y C READ ITEM NUMBER ONE PLEASE. AGEN ITE NUMBE O SIGNATURE PLAZA BLO LOT 1R7R AND EIGHT RETAIL RESTAURANT AND HEALTH FITNE CENTER THREE LOTSN 9 ACRES LOCATED O T EAS SID COYOT ROA 625 NOR RIDGE VIEW DRIVE. ZONED REGIONA COMMERCIA A LOCATED WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY 121 AN EXPRESSWAY CORRID OVERL DISTRIC T APPLICANT IS KROGER TEX L.P TH ITE I F LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIO GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. NAM ANNA SOUTER. I PLANNER FROM T PLANNING DEPARTMEN T PURPOSE OF THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLA SHOW TO N PROPOSED RESTAURANT RETAIL BUILDIN MODIFIED LOT LINES AND IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE RE-USE OF AN EXISTIN GROCERY STORE BUILDING AS A HEALT FITNESS CENTE WI THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED RETAIL RESTAURANT BUILDIN A LOT SEVEN R AND EIGHT A REQUESTING REDUCTI T

12:58 – 14:170

REQUIRED LANDSCAPE EDG FRO 30O 19FT ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF BRIGHTER LANES ON COYOTE ROA WHE T SIT WA ORIGINALL DEVELOPED IN 2004 A 3 FOO WID LANDSCA ED W PROVIDED ALONG QUITE ROAD. HOWEVER N RETUR LAN WER REQUIRED UNDER THE STANDARDS IN EFFECT THAT TIM WHE T N BUILDINGS PROPOSE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO RIGHT TURN LAN A N REQUIRED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE LANDSCA EDG FRO 30FT TO 19FT TO ACCOMMODA T TU LAN WHI MAINTAINING CONSISTENCY WITH THE EXISTING LANDSCAP EDG T ADJACEN PROPERTIES T FIRST IMA SHOWS T EXISTING LANDSCAPE EDGE O L EIGHT WHICH IS ALREADY ESTABLISHED AND ALIGNED WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERT E SECOND IMAGE TAKEN DURING RUSH HOUR SHO T LOCATIO THE PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE TO THE HELP TO HELP REDUCE T CONGESTI A IMPRO ACCES THERE A T PROVISIONS TO ALLOW LANDSCA EDG REDUCTION.

14:14 – 15:390

THE FIRST REQUIRES 40 FEE LANDSCAPI BETWE T BAC OF THE CURVEF T STREET INCLUDING THE RIGHT OF WAY A TH LANDSCA EDG APPLICA PROVIDE ONL 33 ST DOE N QUALIFY F AN AUTOMATIC REDUCTION. TH SECOND ALLOWS OF T 1 FOOT REDUCTION IF THE FUL REQUIREMENT WOU PREVE REASONABLE DEVELOPMENT IN A SAFE AND EFFICIENT MANNE UNDER THIS PROVISION THE APPLICANT REQUESTS REDUCTI FROM 30FT TO 19FT. APPROVE THERE WILL 19FT OF LANDSCAPE EDGE ON SIT SHOW I GREN GREENN T IMAGE ON T PREVIOU SLI A AN ADDITIONAL 14FT OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WA T REQUEST REDUCTION ACCOMMODATES THE REQUIRED TURN LANES WHILE MAINTAINI SAF AN EFFICIENT SITE CIRCULATION. IT ALIGNS WIT ADJACEN PROPERTY A PRESERVE CONSISTENT STREETSCAPE. MEETING THE SPIRI O T ORDINANC RECOMMEND F APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE REQUIRED FINDINGS BEING MET TO ALLOW A REDUCTI O T LANDSCAPE EDGE SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLA A THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I' AVAILAB F A QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE IF YOU HAV A QUESTIO F THEM.

15:36 – 17:350

THANK YOU D HAV O QUESTION. THE WORD FINDINGS H UNIQU MEANING FOR U THI ACTUA FINDING F THIS ACTIO IT' USUALLY WRITTEN INTO THE STAFF REPORT. THERE LIS T THINGS THAT THE COMMISSION NEEDS TO FIND. N THI CASE T FIN THAT T COMMISSIO I GENERAL SENSE OF THE WORD FINDINGS NOT THE FINDINGS FORMS THAT YOU'RE USED T WIT T ZONING CASES. IN THIS CASE Y NEEDED T FIN TH I NEEDED T MAINTAIN EFFICIENT CIRCULATION AN ACCES A SAFETY F T SITE. OKAY. WHAT'S NOT? WE'RE NOT FILLING OUTN ACTUA FINDINGS FOR CORRE O PROTOCOLS JUST WANT TO MAKE SU HAV T RIG DEFINITION OF THAT ITEM. SO OKAY. THAT W QUESTIO A OTHER QUESTIO STA COMMISSIONER LOL HAV TWO QUESTIONS. YOU LOOK A T DRI AISLE ARE 30 FOOT WID THE REQUIRE C THEY NARROW THEM SO THE PUS EVERYTHI EASTWAR E Y TALKING ABO T DRIV T DRIVE AISLES INSIDE THE SITE THAT Y LIK THA T LIKE THIS ONE IS T ON T EAST SID IT THR FOO WID DON'T KNO H YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT T DRIVE AISLE INSIDE T SID INSIDE T SITE. IT'S N T NORTH SID ON T EAS SID T EAS SIDE? YEAH U KNOW, LIK BEHIN T PROPOS RESTAURANT. YE TS0 REQUIRE 3R C THE PUS EVERYTHING Y LIK TH C PUS MAY LIKE S FOOT TO MAKE IT 2 S T 30FTSN EXISTING DRIVE.

17:28 – 18:070

I'L GOI T T ACTUA DEVELOPMENT IT'S EXISTING RIGHT NOW IT COULD B LESSE B T 30FT IS LIKE WHAT SAI EXISTING O EXISTIN ANY OTH QUESTION IS Y KNOW LIKE A THE PARKI SPACES T PROPOSED ONE WITH THE RESTAURANTS ARE THESE SIZE FO RESTAURANT? MEA YOU'RE LIKE THAT'S WHY THEY H THO NUMBE PARKING AND THEY CAN PRODUCE THEM TO G MOR LANDSCA T NUMBER O PARKING I ACTUALLY P SQUAR FOOT. T AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT THEY HAV A ACTUALL WHAT' REQUIRED PER SQUARE FOOTAGE.

18:06 – 18:170

YES OKAY. THAN YOU. THE CAN REDUCE T PARKING TO GET MORE? C B MORE B CANNO LESSER UNLESS THEY ASK FOR REDUCTION.

18:14 – 20:120

THANK YOU THAN YOU, COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS O STA OKAY. DON' HAVE A KNO T APPLICANT I HERE HAV ANY QUESTIONS. DOES ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICA NOBODY. OKAY. TH I N PUBLIC HEARI ITO N HAV PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIO M WILLIAM FELTER FIN THA THI MAKES SENSE. IT'S GOI LIN WIT T ADJOINING PROPERTIES. IT DOES SEEM LIKE IT' NECESSARY THING T F T FO THESE RIGHT TUR LANESO THA WOU DEFINITEL IMPROVE THE TRAFFIC PATTERN. SO ACTUALL RECOMME A THAT APPROVE THIS A RECOMMENDED B STA MOV THAT WE OKAY W HAV MOTIO MR THANK Y CHAIRMA WOU SECOND OKAY. MOTI DOE THAT ADDRESS T FINDINGS? QUESTION A F A T MOTION IS CONCERNED, IS THA ANSWE TH I DOE BECAUSE T RECOMMENDATION WAS WRITTEN IN A WAY THAT INCORPORATES T FINDINGS OKAY TRIEDO MAK I EASY F YOU ALL. OK SORRY, COMMISSIONER BRUNO IF I DID NOT LOOKO S Y HA YOU HANF Y H A QUESTIONS. NO. OKAY. WE HAV MOTIO I SECOND. PLEA VOT THUMBSP FRO COMMISSIONER RUNO MOTION PASSESO THANK Y EITHE NUMBE T AGENDA ITE NUMBER T DICKINSON ADDITIO BLO O LOT ONE CAR WAS O L 0.8 ACRE LOCATED AT T SOUTHWEST CORNE AVENUE AND 22ND STREET ZONED LIG

20:08 – 21:430

COMMERCIAL W SPECIFI U PERMITS NUMBER 82 FOR AUTO LEASING FACILITY A NUMBE 2 FOR LIG INTENSI INTENSI MANUFACTURING E APPLICANT IS KIA ENTERPRISE O PLA LLC TH ITE I F LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION O RESIDENTI ADJACENCY SCREENING. THA YOU GO EVENING COMMISSION I'M DESTINEE WOODS PLANN WIT T PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SO THIS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS FOR C WAS THERE I ALREADY AN EXISTING CAR WASH THI L CURRENTLY BUT THAT WILL BE DEMOLISHED A REPLAC WIT T PROPOSED CARWASH THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TODAY. T IMAGEN T LEFT SHOWS THE AREA O T LOCATIO ARE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ON THE RIG T PROPOSE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN A MIN CHANGE W MADO T PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AFTER THE ITEM WAS POSTED ONLIN A THAT CHANGE WAS ONLY T REFLE A EDIT TN TAB NOTIN TH VARIANC BEI REQUEST ARTIC 1.5F T ZONING ORDINANCE DOE ALL T PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE SCREENING FOR A C WASH WHENEVE IT' WITHI 300 OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHERE THAT SCREENING WOULD NOT NORMAL REQUIRED BY T ZONING ORDINANCE.

21:38 – 23:360

SO THE SINGL FAMIL RESIDENCE SEV DISTRIC ABO 240FT WEST OF THE C WAS FACILITI D T APPLICA PROPOSI A SIX FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL FOR OVE HAL T LENGT O T WESTERN PROPERTY LINE AND HEADLIGHT SCREENI F T REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY LINE THAT FALLS WITHIN THE FRO YA SETBA THERE' ALS T STORY OFFICE BUILDING BETWEEN THE CAR WASH AND THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRIC TH WILL ALSO SERVES BUFFER. AND STA FIN THA T SCREENING THE EXISTING TWO STOREY BUILDING A THA THOSE THINGS ARE ADEQUATE T MINIMIZ TH IMPACF T C WASHN TH RESIDENTIAL ARE THI GRAPH SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE MASONRY WALL AND T LOCATIOF T HEADLIGHT SCREENING. SO SHOWN IN YELLOW Y C S THE EXTENT OF THE WALL A RED IS T SCREENI BOT THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. SO WHERE THE R LIN END WHERE THE RIGHT OF W WIL BEGIN. SO HAVE SCREENING N BEING PROVIDED IN THA ARE THI PHO SHO T VIE ALONG 22ND STREET FROM T RESIDENTIA DISTRIC BOUNDAR FACING T SUBJE PROPERT THE BOTTOM OF THE CUR O T STRE I THI PHO SHO T VIEW ALONG 22ND STREET FROM T SUBJECT PROPERT FACIN T RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE TOP OF THE CUR T STREE S THE APPLICANT IS ALS REQUESTING VARIANCES FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMEN F VACUU AND CARPORTS EXCEEDING THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT WITHI T

23:34 – 25:300

FRONT YARD SETBACK. BUT THOSE VARIANCES ARE O THE SCOPE F THI PRESENTATIO AN THIS ITE RECOMMEND FO APPROVAL SUBJECT TO T FOLLOWING STIPULATION T FIRST THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE T SUBSECTI 13.50 ALL FRON YARDOE INSTRUCTED TEN FEET ABOVE THE GENER GROUN LEVE BOARDF ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL FOR VARIANC SUBSECTION 13.903O ALL CARPO WITH T FRONT YAR SETBACK THE CONSTRUCTION OF S FOO MASONRY SCREENING WALL TO SCREEN THE SITE FROM T RESIDENTIA DISTRIC HEADLIGHT SCREENING CONSISTING OF EVERGREEN SHRUB ALO T WESTERN PROPERTY LINE WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND ADDITI O ALTERATIOO T ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERI DEPARTMENT. M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS ALS HER F QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY O QUICK QUESTION FOR M S A BETWEEN THIS SITE AND T RESIDENTIAL I N JUST T STORY OFFICE BUILDING, IT'S ALSO THE DART RAIL CORRIDOR, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRE BECAU KNOW ONE OF O ISSUES WITH CARWASHES IS IS NOI S IT' NOT JUS BUILDING. ALSO HAVA RAIL LINE ACTIVE RAIL LINE. YES, THAT'S RIG GREAT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER KLINEFELTER, I JUST HAD QUESTIO ABO W DID THE N EXTEN THA MASONR WAL THROUGH THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF T SIT N O IT'S EXTENDED I'LL BRING THAT VIEW BACK UP. I T WAL I EXTENDE INTO WHE T R I I WOULD BE I T FRONT YAR SETBA WHICH WOU REQUI MOR VARIANCES FOR T SIT A THEN IT ALSO POSED CHALLENGES WIT TOPOGRAPHY A BEI ABLE SE COMIN O 22ND AROUN

25:22 – 26:500

TH CUR COMMISSION A JUS O THE IS IT O C WASN SITE HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED. WHAT WAS T SCREENI F THA ON W I PLACE T C WASH HASN'T BEEN DEMOLISHED YET BUT IT WIL THERE CURRENTLY SHRUBBERY ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LIN B ONLY EXTENDS UP TO ABO WHE TH WALSS BEING PROPOSED. DOESN'T EXTEN TO T PROPERTY LINE. IT'S J SHRUB N EXCEEDING THE TYPICAL HEIGHT OF HEADLIGHTS SCREENI FRO REQUIREMENT PERSPECTI CORRE I I WRONG THI T REQUIREMEN T HEIGHT O THE SCREENING, NOT NECESSARILY ON THE TYPE OF T SCREENI W S FOO LIVING SCREEN WOULD THA SUFFI THINK IT'S ACTUALLY BACKWARDS I I UNDERSTANDING YOUR QUESTION CORRECTLY THERE THERE IS NO REQUIREME MEA FOR SCREENING. IT'S JUST THAT IF THI COMMISSION SEE THA SCREENING SHOULD BE PROVIDED THEN Y C RECOMMEND SOME SORT OF SCREENING. THEY' PROVIDI S FOOT MASONRY WALL BECAUSE THAT'S TYPICALLY WHAT WE SEE T SCREE JUST YOU KNOW, F SCREENING WALL. BUT THAT'S N NECESSARI REQUIRED.

26:49 – 28:470

OKA THANK YOU RIGHT. OTH QUESTIO STAFF NONE. O MICHAEL. SORRY. COMMISSIONER BERNOFF. YES. THANK YOU. CAN Y HEA YES OKAY. HAVE THERE BEE A COMPLAIN FRO T RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS WITH REGARD TO THE PRESENT CARWA O THERE'S BEEN NO COMPLAINTS THAT I'V RECEIV SIN THIS H BEE POSTED BUT W C CONFI THA WITH THE PROPERTY STANDARDS DIVISION AFTER THI OKA THA I T N CARWA EXPECT PRODU LIKE GREATER IMPACT ON O T RESIDENTIA NEIGHBORHOOD I TERMS OF NOISE O LIG THA TH THA T EXISTIN O DOE TH ONLY IMPACT THAT C S BEING GREATER WOULD BE T VACUUM PUM THA A STATIONED CLOSER TO THE WESTERN PROPERT LI T OTH THAN THAT DON ANTICIPATE A OTH OKA B TH T APPLICAS PROPOSING AND IS WILLING TO PUT IN THE WALL A T HEADLIG SCREENIN THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THAN YOU THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS O STA MR LANE FILTER Y C Y DEFINE THE HEA HEADLIG SCREENIN LIK T HEIGHT O THE SHRUBS OR WHAT WHAT DO IT SOUNDS LIK IT' JUS GOI UP TO ABOVE T BUMPER ABOVE THE HOOD OF CAR, RIGHT? IT' IT' TYPICALLY ABOUT 18IN OFF THE GROUND I SOMEO COUL VERIF THAT F M T YES TYPICAL WOU JUST BE SCREENING THE HEADLIGHTS OF A VEHICLE AND N NECESSARILY COMI HIGHS SCREENING WALL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT COULD B LIK T SAM HEIGHT OF AS WING WALL THAT WERE IF THA WER THE T IT'S REALLY JUSTO A JU A A EXTRA BARRI THAT'S FEASIBLE THA

28:42 – 30:410

LOCATION, WOULD IT B FEASIBL WH WITH T BEING THIS THAT FRONT SID SETBA FRO YA SETBACK UOO MAY SOMETHING LIKE A LIVING SCREE TH MATCH T HEIGHT OF T WALL SO IT A JUST KINDF A LITTL MOR CONTINUOU ACROS I N SUREF LIVIN SCRE WOU HAVE T SAM CONCERNS FOR VISIBILITY A LIKE TOPOGRAPHY CHANGIN CAN ANSWER THAT ONE FOR YOU THERE'S VISIBILIT TRIANGL YO C SN T PLAN A YOUR YES, Y Y CAN P ANYTHING THAT TALL IN THAT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE B A Y TALKING ABOUT THE STRIPING THERE? YEAH, THAT'S NOT VISIBILIT TRIANGLE. IT JUST STRIPING FOR LIKEO GET PEOPLE TO N DRI OVER. WE FROM T SAFETY PERSPECTIVE THAT SHOULD BE VISIBILI TRIANGL OKAY JUO CLARIFY T LINKN T LANDSCAPE LIG SCREE A REQUIRES THAT THEY BE FIVE GALLON MINIMUM SHRUBS THA MUS BE MATUR HEIGH JUS HAD IT HERE IT' LIK T 40 RIG I SOR0 42IN. OKAY. MOR 4 I THI THANK YOU OKAY. Y OTH QUESTIO STA LEAVE T APPLICANT IS HERE. ANYBODY HAVE A QUESTIO T APPLICA I' N SEEIN A COMMISSIO BRONS MOVEE APPROVE THIS AGENDA ITEM AS RECOMMENDED B STA COMMISSIONER LALLY. I' SECON RIG MOTIO A SECON PLEASE VOT . BRUNO O H THUMB MOTI PASSE T AL RIGHT. THAT'S EVERYTHING ON O POS

30:39 – 31:290

AGEN THERE A OTH BUSINESS BEFORE THE COMMISSION THIS EVENING? N THI MEETI WIL STA ADJOURNED A 6:2 P.M OKAY, I LOOKING AROUND. THISS GOI TE FUTUR PA THERE W NOTHING HERE, Y KNOW, BUT TREES AND T CRE AN G

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.