Remarks by Phil Schmidt
62 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 3
So just so I understand, where the yellow dots are, is that the proposed master plan road?
It's a dead end, one spot and a dead end on the other. So it doesn't go to the north at all.
And then you want to access straight south?
They've already built in an access. They traded land.
No. So you want to vacate that. That's what this meeting is for. Yes.
I agree with Robert. It doesn't go anywhere. And my thought would be continue... Beans how the 151 stops on one end, stops on the other, and as long as you have access, nobody gets landlocked. I would say continue. I don't see any reason why we can't take it up.
Right there where the 52 is on your... Right there where the 52 is and you're going west, you don't border any of that property for the first block, do you? No, that's all Tom's.
Okay, and that road's going to stay there. Is that correct?
Okay, so, and you don't own the property to the north. Just a question, why are you trying to take out this road right on the north end of your property? Here?
So with this property where that line is, you don't own the north property.
Above that property. They don't own that one or this one? The road through Tom Jett's stays there, right? It's not going to be changed.
I'm just saying, how would these people, how would they get access to their property?
Well, we have to get people up into here. I think trying to get the airport road through all this stuff, I don't want to go through the city yard. That would be a disaster. No, we're not going to do that. We're not doing that.
No, it is not right. So right now are they telling you you've got to fix the road from 52 all the way across?
You should only have to do half. The other guys can pay their other half.
I don't see where you should have to pay for the north side, maybe 12 feet past center and that'd be it. Well, that's what it would be.
We don't want to do that. It wouldn't be straight because it would interfere with the buildings.
Yeah, you you don't want to be crossing back and forth people trying to go to one side then to the other I would hate to see the road go through the middle of it. Okay.
Thank you. Okay, well, with that, though, if they defer it, there's still a certain amount of property there that they would have to hold out then. They wouldn't be able to do anything with. until whenever Well, they just the road still gets dedicated and still gets yeah, so the that doesn't have to get him You just can't do anything their portions of it.
Over the deferral like what was talked about? Work if it gets triggered you have access to Airport Road if BZI sells which I doubt it very much to them and
Okay But if you could still develop your piece, you would not be required to landscape at that point because no road would be in.
I don't think that's too bad of an idea. And I only made that...
You're going to Industrial Road anyway, right?
But you're going to have to bring water up that, right?
So in doing that, are we eliminating or are we keeping?