Remarks by Ligia Ines Labrada

93 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 4

  1. Play at 1:11:25
    “And then on your west elevation, which is another entrance, another main entrance.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  2. Play at 1:20:49
    “I'm struggling with those elevations. It is just a monolithic wall with just openings. In addition, I'm not even talking about adding a double door, articulating the main entrance. You have two main lobbies. We know what you're capable of because we just saw you present. And I also think you have language already included within your site that works. It's just a matter of kind of carrying maybe some of those details within your, to break up maybe the ground floor, to show and accentuate your amenities and your lobbies. so that you're not walking past and have to depend solely on signage. I…”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  3. Play at 1:23:14
    “And the floors above at the ends of your hallway, also by the parking garage, I'd say bring in some natural light there as well.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  4. Play at 1:23:37
    “Yes. Well, no, because you have a unit at the end on the northwest at the very top of your corridor.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  5. Play at 1:23:53
    “I think that would bring a little bit of light. I mean, that is a long corridor. How many feet are we talking?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  6. Play at 1:24:42
    “And in your elevator lobby on the south, this one south side also, I mean, that would also help your elevation.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  7. Play at 1:25:09
    “Yeah, I think you have the elements, and I know you're perfectly capable, but I would definitely study those elevations. Any other comments? Ready to make a motion?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  8. Play at 1:39:19

    Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  9. Play at 1:45:37
    “I don't have much to add. I was going to make that comment about the canopy on the north side so that you do look over something that's thoughtful. I think it'll tie the project together. The party, I think, is very simple, but really has some classic proportions, which is really nice. to see after, you know, I think we have a lot of modern buildings and you're bringing this element of classical dimension and architecture in a very light and modern take. So the way you've broken out the site and having those cross pedestrian and drive-through areas is great. The plaza is a gift to the…”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  10. Play at 1:46:57
    “All right. Thank you. We have a vote. Would someone like to make a motion?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  11. Play at 2:00:39
    “What if you discuss a past, something that we've already reviewed? Does it matter or no? Does that, like...”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  12. Play at 2:02:53
    “If you run into someone that will eventually present and they're just bringing it up like, oh, we're going to come before you, even if we don't discuss anything about the project, we don't ask any questions, but if they ask us questions of what does the board like to see as far as renderings, models,”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  13. Play at 2:06:19
    “Can you opine on, say the perfect example is a project that came before us today, the first item that was withdrawn a couple of meetings ago. If we know they're coming back with a new proposal, and what if there's a discussion of what we just saw, even if they didn't present? Is that part of the Sunshine Law, or because they've I mean, they're going to come back, like they did today. But if there's some kind of discussion of, like, you know, this... Whatever it was that we saw, even if we didn't hear the presentation, that we have a discussion of whatever was withdrawn.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  14. Play at 2:07:19
    “I'm just talking about the board members. Another example would be the two that were withdrawn today because by right, by live local. What if we would discuss, because it was withdrawn, what we saw, even if we didn't give our comments today because they didn't present. What if later staff decides they need to come back and present to us and we've had a discussion on something that we thought was withdrawn?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  15. Play at 2:08:09
    “Will we be notified? So in the next meeting, will we be notified if these two were approved by staff, or how is that communicated to us?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  16. Play at 2:18:37
    “For the conflict of interest, if a project is coming before us, and this has happened in the past, I've recused myself, but if a project is coming before us and I potentially have a client that might end up participating in the project, but it's not clear, I recuse myself, no? Or if it's not,”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  17. Play at 2:27:40
    “It's perfect. Thank you. It's a good refresher. Every how often do we need to do this? Is it every year?”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

  18. Play at 2:27:51
    “I know that. I like the ending. All right. So that concludes our meeting today.”

    Urban Development Review Board · Jan 21, 2026

Back to Ligia Ines Labrada’s profile