Remarks by Jose Luis
88 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 4
- Play at 1:43:31
“So I'm gonna go back for 121 and 122. there's a question in the definitions of planning director and zoning administrator that it would include or their designee, I'm not comfortable with that. Like I would rather have it be the person who is authorized to do that should be the person authorized to do that. Because I don't know who is gonna be the designee. Okay. If we wanna have a secondary person, if we don't have one, I would say then we put in the county administrator. Sorry, Brian. And that's, yeah, I hear you.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:46:03
“I understand your... I think my problem is putting it in the defined term itself. I would rather look at specific instances where a designee would make more sense as opposed to... And that's where I'm... Because once you put it into a defined term, you're opening up... a pandora's box because it could be it could be anything and it could actually get us in trouble with some things that it may not be allowed to be assigned so i think we probably either need to review it as a text amendment afterwards or i think we leave it as is and then have the planning commission have them go through it and…”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:46:57
“Yeah, exactly. OK. So I'll put those as comments. And I think we're done.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:49:16
“Okay. I'm making a comment as the last comment to revise the UDO to add the county attorney recommended revisions.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:49:36
“I just want to make sure that phrasing it that way is going to be sufficient for the motion.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:50:04
“I think I'm going to make the motion and include the revisions. And then a second. Yes. Okay.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:51:54
“I think one of the concerns that the Planning Commission had was just making sure that all the references in tables were consistent with what was in writing in the UDO.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:02:27
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:03:29
“And I don't know if we wanna manage. I think we could. I think we could do a separate policy that's not part of the UDO that's managed then by staff. that sets apart those parameters.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:04:02
“I got a question. I knew that's where you were going, and I was OK with it.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:08:39
“Which is the benefit and the burden of a development agreement, because then you have to go back and reanalyze what those ordinances were at that time with whatever text amendments were in existence at that time.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:09:00
“So my preference is that we reserve the right to have the development agreements and add the language that we're talking about but really I think we need to go in the direction of the impact fees to have it as a whole solution as opposed to trying to go piece by piece and then putting more work on staff to then have to decipher what ordinance we were looking at, what were the applicable provisions, because I've seen some of those books, Shannon. Yeah.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 2:10:01
“Are we ready? I'm ready. Ready to make the motion. You gotta make the motion. All right. So I'm going to make a motion to approve with the following amendments revisions. revise the UDO to add the county attorney recommended revisions, add a provision to the UDO that the county may require a development agreement in accordance with applicable law, We're going to approve the general matrix revisions with the following conditions. Comment 11, Carolina Heel Splitter Overlay District, leave it in for now, create changes through text amendment later and establish the banking process and…”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026