Remarks by Jose Luis
88 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 3 of 4
- Play at 1:15:54
“56. I'm in 56. 310.2, kennels outdoor, consider reducing the 500 foot separation distance.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:17:17
“60, it's saying paragraph B3 says insert graphic on site configuration, need to add graphic or delete. So that's for, yeah, that's for you all. We have a graphic that we can add there. Common 60 is add graphic. Same thing for 62. Yes. 66 instead consider adding separation distance between hives. That's where you were talking about the bees.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:19:55
“I do not wanna go down. I said everything I needed to say about chickens. All right, so we're comfortable deleting comment 66.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:20:30
“Okay. Next up is 69. It says concern that required buffers between commercial and residential uses are insufficient.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:20:59
“So just delete the requirement and let them come back and I mean, if they're gonna change something, because I don't know how to.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:22:32
“I don't recall that conversation and reducing that. during the ad hoc and maybe it was discussed. It was not discussed? This is a new topic raised by the planning committee.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:23:23
“Is that the recommendation? Add back the 20 foot option. Okay. 72 in paragraph E2, a type C buffer for manufactured home parks adjacent to other residential uses seems excessive. What's the recommendation?”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:24:09
“Okay. 75, there was a planning commission comment that the commercial development is not generally required to provide open space, but the table includes commercial requirements. This is a bit misleading. So what's the recommendation?”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:27:00
“So what I'm gonna say for 75 and 76 is add the appropriate footnote to clarify. Okay, 77 is just a consider removing the minimum sizes for the different types of open space. It's section 4.4.3.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:29:23
“I think I'd prefer to keep those minimum requirements. They're there. Are we okay with deleting that comment? Hear no objection. 82 was concerned with significant increase in parking required for single-family homes.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:30:07
“What do you think, Steve? Keep it as is?”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:30:55
“This is the one that had to do with the bedroom conversations and all that. Yeah, I think we leave it as what we had discussed during the ad hoc committee, which is what I think is in the draft. That should be the case, yes.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:31:25
“I don't think we said that. I think there was probably a cap or a limitation.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:31:57
“I don't think we had discussed the greater of. That's what I was saying.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:32:26
“I'm gonna recommend that we have it at two, then one per bedroom capped at four. Cause it's not just within the lot, but it's also off street or on street parking, right? Is that okay? The only thing we're adding there is capping it at four. Capping it at four.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:34:38
“Yep. So I think the likelihood is that not that many homes are gonna have four cars. So even if we did cap it at four, that one home that had the five, if we're requiring it and capping it at the four, they will have additional spaces somewhere. Either we did it along the roads that would then be widened or we had specific areas that would be parking areas for the community. If I recall correctly, I think that's what we had said.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:35:42
“Okay, 83. I'm just saying that we're going to go with a WSC recommendation. Yes, 84. I don't have anything there.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:38:00
“So 88 is a consideration to relocate or just reduce, eliminate conflicts. That's section 5.6, I guess.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:40:21
“I would recommend consolidating. That seems like it's probably the easiest to have it all in one section for one review. Is that?”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:40:57
“91, there is a consider prohibiting pylon signs. If they are prohibited, reconsider the setback for illuminated signs.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:41:39
“So what would be the setback that you'd recommend?”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:41:57
“Well, you could have the, it could actually be further in because the right away could actually go into the property line. So that's a lot.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:42:39
“I'm gonna suggest that we probably hold this one off for a text amendment and just delete the comment for now. Very good with that.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:43:03
“I mean, I'm okay with removing the pylon signs.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026
- Play at 1:43:11
“So delete pile on sides. 94 we've already covered.”
County Council · Sep 1, 2026