Remarks by Donald DeLuccio
80 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 3 of 4
- Play at 1:03:16
“Oh, it goes to 15 to 5 to make it below the 760.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:03:52
“I'll ask one more question. The fee out. The $3 million from the analysis. Was that based on how many units was that based on?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:04:10
“If they have to pay $3 million in new fees, how many units is that We'll calculate it on.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:04:17
“Okay, gotcha. So that was a project with 43 units.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:04:25
“And then you used, even though council went with a lower number, they would have gone with $50. You were using seven, for ownish rentals, you were using 91, right? I was curious. I mean, if that was, if you used 50, then it probably would have been a million five or something, half that. Approximately.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:04:58
“I mean, under this scenario, now that we're seeing these numbers for the fee out, would you even recommend it?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:05:11
“Do you think developers would go for that?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:05:20
“Well, those are my questions for now. Thank you, and you did a great job on this. I want you to know that. It's very, very thorough.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:12:11
“I was going to wait. I wanted to hear what my other commissions had to say, but that's fine. I think at this point we just need to move this to council. We're not the only city struggling with this. And if we don't, you know, it's like, but I think you've done a great job, staff, on this. And thank you, Commissioner Wiscombe, for helping me understand dissecting the $3 million that works out to like $738,000 a unit. So that puts it more into perspective. So I'm comfortable moving that forward to council, because I don't know what council's going to do. They may not go with it. They may lower…”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:13:19
“Middle income, we need those. obviously we need low and low the lower side also but we need to do need to balance it out so um but it is very frustrating because we're not making we're not meeting the numbers we're not the only city not meeting the numbers so um but i think if that you we're at a point i think this should just be moved on to to council at this point and we need to as we go forward we need to obviously we need to continue on looking at this at housing and how we can actually Get more units in the city that are affordable. So I think those are my comments for now.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:39:39
“I think it was $72. That was what's in the report, $72.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:41:36
“Well, I'm supportive of that being in the business district, in the 73, but the rest of the city, we're talking about the 91, correct?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:42:02
“Well, if that's your intent, then that I can go for, just, you know, in the business district, but not the entire, and the balance of the city would be the $91 million.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:46:30
“Okay. I want to make a comment We don't know what the council is going to come up with what dollar amount Okay, so that I just want to throw that out there that being said Your calculation is 580 580 $4,000 in case that'll go into the housing fund So if we give that incentive, the lower cost to put into the housing fund, when we go to use those dollars, that'll multiply. We're on it from four to maybe up to 10 times. So we can, that's another avenue in order to get us the affordable housing that we need. So I'm willing to go along with that. I'll make a substitute motion if I can. We should…”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:47:41
“I second it. Can I withdraw the second to my motion?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:48:03
“The substitute motion would be to everything that's been discussed here as part of the motion, the... The definition and all that. And also, the substitute motion would be the $73.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:48:21
“And the balance of the city would be at the $91. I'll second that.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:48:30
“Yes. And also the definition of living areas.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 2:52:09
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 17:28
“Are there other questions or comments? That's my standpoint, too. That got me going about having to get a new permit. So I'll move these minutes.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 17:38
“No, second. And the resolution also, I guess.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 45:07
“I believe it's in Exhibit C. Oh, is it? Yeah. Okay. That's what it talks about.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 45:16
“I read it yesterday. Let me find it. Tree protection. The whole thing on trees, it's like it says one-to-one.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 45:56
“It does say 1 to 1. Then it says this standard can also be increased up to 10 to 1 depending on the type of the tree removed. Yeah. lot size and size and expected survival rate of replacement trees. That's in BIO on page four of the conditions of approval.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 50:31
“Okay, thank you. vice chair delugio you have a question maybe it's for the applicant and the city attorney will tell me if i can't ask the question but um first i'm glad that bill the remedy went away okay um but these are going to be for sale no before they were going to be for sale always for rent rentals uh always for rent okay so now so you went from four to two uh low income”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026