Remarks by Donald DeLuccio
80 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 2 of 4
- Play at 1:23:56
“Because they're the ones who actually came up with the concern and wanted our opinion on that. Okay. And as far as landscaping goes, I know we've talked about landscaping a little bit, but that goes back to HLC also for the final approval. Okay. So at this time, I think we'll move on to comments. From commissioners, we'll start with Commissioner Barnwell.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:28:56
“Okay. Thank you. Um, did the city administrator want to say something? I have a city administrator as a speaker. I guess they're busy talking. So we're going to move on to Commissioner Bauke in the meantime.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:31:39
“Thank you. I thought that was the policy. That's why I brought that up, that we could It's not a recommendation. We can make a condition of that when the time comes.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:32:03
“Hours of operation, okay. Well, that's a general way of stating it. That's a good way.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:34:21
“So thank you Thank You Commissioner Peterson Thank You chair.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:35:36
“So I get to say something now, right? When you chair in the meeting, you don't have to say a lot because you're running the meeting. And this is such a wonderful project. I mean, it's like a love fest here. I think it's a great project, and I definitely support it, and I guess Paseo is going to be any place you want to make them in the city. There's so many, as we were discussing. You're going to put the gate after, because when you go through the alley, Paseo, I'll call it, you go through it, you'll first come to the entrance into the parking lot when you're coming from Cana Medillo and…”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:37:14
“One second. Could you put that up, please, on the screen? I think we'll have that in front of us. I think that was at the end of your presentation.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:38:26
“I think a commissioner was gonna beat you. Oh sure. Sorry Okay. Do you agree with the motion? Do you have anything you want to add?”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:39:07
“Yes, absolutely. Anything else? Otherwise, we'll take a vote after. Do you have a comment, Commissioner?”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:39:31
“Okay, great. Thank you for that comment. Are we ready to vote, or do you have something else?”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:39:55
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:40:33
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:40:50
“Thank you. Okay. Okay, so now we're gonna move on to the, I guess the administrative portion of the agenda today. Committee and liaison reports. I have one actually from the staff hearing officer meeting yesterday that I do wanna, I think there's something really important took place at that meeting that I wanna report on. So. It was a very lengthy meeting. It was almost three hours of meeting. There were four items. I'll talk about the first two first. Tess Harris is the steering hearing officer. Two items, I'm going to mention them because within 10 calendar days, they can be appealed to…”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:44:16
“Yes. Yes. And they're going to, there's outreach to the, uh, to the senior community there. There, there is out, they are, they're out, they're doing outreach and, and I, I, and there were some speakers, uh, who lived there and I, I thought it was, um, As far as the hearing went, I thought everything was covered very well. I'll just leave it at that. I don't think we should talk about it too much more, though. It could come before us. We don't know. I have one more question, if I may.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 1:44:57
“That's why it's called that. Okay, thank you very much. Moving on now to, are there any other, are there any other reports? Maybe someday someone will surprise us and come up with a report. So any other, is there any discussion of subcommittee workshops today? Okay, otherwise, I guess we're going to be adjourned. Everybody have a wonderful Labor Day weekend. And there's no meeting next week on the 10th. But on the 17th, we're meeting at 1230 for a lunch meeting. And then 3 o'clock, we have an item coming before us. Okay, thank you. Bye.”
Planning Commission · Sep 3, 2026
- Play at 58:36
“We should take a break after that. OK. So just to clarify a couple of things. For inclusionary housing here, when we're talking about rentals, we're talking about moderate, correct? And when we're talking about ownership, we're talking about middle. And is middle considered? market rate as far as counting toward the arena number?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 59:26
“So there's an above moderate category in the arena?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 59:38
“What are the categories in the arena? Is it low and then it's very low and it's moderate and above moderate. Gotcha. So it's counted toward above moderate. So above moderate is really almost market rate housing sometimes. It's not really, we're not providing really affordable housing at that point in a sense.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:00:03
“Okay, thank you. I thought I knew that. Okay, also a couple of other questions. For adaptive reuse, just to clarify something, one of the speakers spoke that was not a, there was an inclusionary housing component that there actually is, right? Isn't it after 49 units?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:00:25
“So it's quite an incentive, but there is an inclusionary housing component after 40. Correct. Which probably the Nordstrom's project would probably qualify for that. Correct. Can we look at... Talk about fractions for a moment. When we're talking about fractions, we're saying now for fractions... you can pay into the housing fund for that instead of providing on-site if it's over 0.5. If you have a 0.1 or 0.2, at that point, any fraction would be paying into the inclusion housing fee.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:01:24
“So the entire spectrum from 0.1 to 0.9 would be... All tractions, correct, yeah. And then the other question, I thought this was a silly question, but I'm going to ask it anyway because I got really confused. This conversation is kind of confusing sometimes. But if you use a state bonus density... Can you have to then you provide so many units on-site with that affordable units? Can you pay the in lieu fee instead of building the units on-site? Or you have to build the units in that case on-site?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:01:55
“Right, so we're not talking about the in lieu fee for that component.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:01:59
“Okay. Can we look at slide 22? Okay, slide 22, I see here The in lieu fee, this is a new one for lot only subdivision of $760,000. Can you explain that to me? You actually wouldn't be paying $760,000, would you? That's a lot of money.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:02:37
“You knew I was going to ask you this question, right?”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026
- Play at 1:03:08
“So if it's 2 to 9, it's below the 760, but if you have 10 lots, it's probably above the 760.”
Planning Commission · Aug 20, 2026