Remarks by David Estrada

66 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 3

  1. Play at 24:27
    “Any questions? We've been through the same application process constantly and this one usually falls within a duplex range. That's what we've done in the past. But you're making a good argument from my point of view.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  2. Play at 25:34
    “I recall the one on Riverside, and I think that lot size was 20,000 square feet. And so the general rule of thumb was two units per every 10,000 square feet. And so that's why I'm thinking Riverside. The other one, I don't remember.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  3. Play at 27:34
    “So it's a smaller unit, lower rent, less expensive to build.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  4. Play at 27:43
    “More affordable for people moving in. Understood, we understand. I'll tell you that I'm just trying to be fair with everything else we've seen the last, you know, whatever number of years, five years, 10 years, whatever it was, because we've tried to decide based on the code that you're reciting. And so for us, the code is open to interpretation and there's a lot of gaps in it, right? And so you do the math and yeah, you're correct. You come out with, I believe my math is 4.7, right? And so... yeah technically it's four units but in the past we've always looked at minimum lot size 10 000…”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  5. Play at 32:24
    “So, question. I'm sorry, did you get your answer? Yes, I did.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  6. Play at 32:32
    “Okay. We're going off of the existing ordinance, right, that's in place, and then understand there's a UDC that got, it's not in effect yet, is that what I heard earlier?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  7. Play at 32:48
    “It's adopted but not effective. And so is it appropriate to discuss that during, because we're not looking at that, we're not looking at that future ordinance, but I'm wondering if there's literature or, or if there's something in that ordinance that would allow what they're proposing, but that's not gonna be adopted until a future date, I guess. And is it appropriate to even discuss?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  8. Play at 34:36
    “that Tanya had an existing structure on it, I think, right?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  9. Play at 34:39
    “Existing and, okay. Okay. So I tend to agree with what the applicant is saying, right? Yeah. I'm just trying to be fair with past, but there is change involved and there's trend and housing is needed and there are a lot of these lots that are out there that need a higher density so that builders and investors come in and make it profitable. And so that's where we're at, right? And everybody here's gonna have a different opinion or a different take on it. So we're just trying to decide.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  10. Play at 36:29
    “Well, all I'll say is that the next item is also similar to this one. And so it's, and we have a room full of neighbors.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  11. Play at 36:43
    “We didn't have nobody opposed, but the next item is very similar to this, but it's a smaller lot size.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  12. Play at 36:50
    “And so, you know, it just opens up a new branch, it opens up a new, so I'm just, I'm curious to the new code, like, for example, the number of bedrooms affects your parking spaces, just straight up, the number, like this one, for example, if it was four units times three bedrooms each, that's 12 units, so you need however many parking spaces, two parking spaces per unit, so that's eight parking spaces that you need, for example, and then it reduces by, based on the number of bedrooms. So I think it's a Pandora's box if the new code doesn't address all this. We're gonna be- Right.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  13. Play at 39:19
    “Okay. I have another question. And I'm just... There's a duplex behind you, right? And so that one came through here and they were only allowed a duplex. I don't remember the details on that, but I'm wondering, you don't have to answer, right? But I'm wondering if you're the owner, if not the owner or whatever, because if I'm the owner of that duplex, right? And I wasn't allowed four units and I have to build a duplex. And now I find out there's four units come up behind me. I'm not happy. So I'm wondering, who the owner is, right? But it's what it is, right? But that's what we come up…”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  14. Play at 40:25
    “And then further on Steadham, on the other side of the block, there's another duplex on there, there's another lot.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  15. Play at 40:31
    “That other R2 is a duplex as well, so everybody's, or the people that have come in have been granted duplexes, and so we need to be able to justify why this would end up being more than just a duplex, right?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  16. Play at 41:29
    “We don't know. But what came here, they might have been advised before it got to us, you can only do a duplexer. We don't know. But that's a good point. What did they ask for? And that's what we're trying to base it.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  17. Play at 41:54
    “Yeah, and that one was 13. Oh, okay, yeah, it's a little smaller.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  18. Play at 42:54
    “Okay, so. Okay. I'm ready to like, I guess defend my opinion or my position on turning the corner and trending in a different direction going forward. Right. And that's because I see Socorro is just, my God, it's just so much is going on. So much is happening. Okay. So I'm willing to go in that direction. Okay.”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  19. Play at 46:00
    “So six bedroom is like a duplex with three bedrooms?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  20. Play at 1:30:46
    “So I'm thinking that the subdivision, when it was first platted out or whatever back whenever, that all of these lots of minimum lot size in here is 10,000 square feet, right? And so staff is saying that the property area is 10,000 square feet, but the applicant stated that it's 9,914 square feet. So I'm curious to see if the applicant has a survey or how he's determining that the lot is 9,914 square feet. On clarification, what is it actually, what the applicant is saying or what staff is saying? And again, I go back, because these subdivisions, the minimum lot size on a lot of these are…”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  21. Play at 1:31:54
    “So can the applicant tell us if there's an existing survey that they've ordered, they've recently purchased?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  22. Play at 1:32:03
    “Well, a survey by a... Do you have a survey from a licensed surveyor?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  23. Play at 1:32:24
    “I think that's important. Okay, so we're looking at the site plan. The site plan was done by but there's no... engineering seal from a licensed surveyor on here. And so I'm just going back to that these subdivisions are all minimum 10,000 square foot, right? And we're getting 9,914 off the applicant and he's getting it based off of that diagram right there, right? Done by, that's a site plan done by a draftsman. And so I think that that's, very important right there it needs to be determined exactly central appraisal district says that it's ten thousands per feet so it needs to be verified i…”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  24. Play at 1:33:52
    “So exactly, let's say, yes, you're correct. If it's 10,000 square feet and you apply the math, it comes out to like 3.44 units, maximum three units. But right now what's being stated to us is 9,914, which gives us the option of saying not even a duplex is allowed unless we do the variance, right? To get the extra 84 square feet or whatever to get to 10,000 square feet. But it's important because all these lots, minimum, when they were platted, were minimum square foot lots of 10,000 square feet. So again, I'm just trying to be fair. I think it should be, I think it should be tabled in a…”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

  25. Play at 1:35:22
    “Okay. Do you know if they placed like a pin with like a stake, a metal rod with like a little red flag or something?”

    Planning and Zoning Commission · Aug 18, 2026

Back to David Estrada’s profile