Remarks by Carter Sevic
4 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 1
I think, honestly, just from this case, hearing it, it seems reasonable for approval with the caveats of following the development plan. I don't know if that's something that you necessarily are prepared to take on, if the risk is worth the reward. But I think that you have a use case, and I understand the why. I think it's reasonable for approval, I understand, but this is obviously a special case, so.
With regards to agreeing with what my fellow commissioner has stated, by following the laid out conditions in the docket here, I'll be voting yes for this.
I may be splitting hairs here. I also think this is very reasonable, but I was just wondering if you could provide some additional context on why you landed on the 135% maximum. Is that based off anything?
Understood. Thank you. And as long as staff finds that reasonable as well to not get into the oversized infill builds, I feel like that's reasonable.