Remarks by Brittany Davis
228 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 9 of 10
- Play at 2:20:48
“Okay. Did we have a record of that? I might have missed that.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:21:09
“Okay. And so you were saying the fence was right up against the property line, like at the street?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:21:51
“So by them purchasing the alley abandonments, can they basically do whatever they want to on the fencing other than not going in front of the setbacks?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:22:11
“No, just in general because obviously they put the fence maybe where it shouldn't have been. Did you guys go see the fence before when it was up?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:22:34
“So if the neighbors had issues with, or the tenants had issues with the parking, then they would be contacting code enforcement or city staff?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:22:57
“Okay. And obviously the other structures are carports, so they're corrugated metal or whatever. Do we have an idea with the fencing? I mean, it doesn't look like a compound.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:23:10
“Okay. Okay. So if there is an issue with parking for the tenant or for you as a neighbor, you would contact code compliance or the city staff. Since they are purchasing the alleys, that would give them the ability to kind of do whatever they wanted fencing-wise on their property as long as it didn't fall in, like, where that, if you look at the,”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:24:53
“And again, the fire marshal has no issues with gates because they don't like gates. Fire is here if you want to question. Sorry.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:25:25
“We have public comment if there's anything.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:26:54
“An item like that, that's not something that, unfortunately, the Planning Commission has any authority over, so that would be getting with the building owner on how that's set up, if it's an additional cost or if they're just doing it for additional safety for the residents.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:27:19
“Again, that would be taken up with the condo association. Unfortunately, there's multiple condo associations, HOAs in San Angelo. We don't have the bylaws or anything, and we're not able to act on that. All we're able to basically do today is say, yes, this makes sense to abandon the alley into the private structure or not. So any of those other concerns would be with the condo association and the owner or the... Yeah, I was going to say that I don't think we can put that as a stipulation, but it would be nice.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:28:45
“So, and I'm sure in your, and I don't know if the condo associations changed hands over the years or whatnot, but it looks like maybe there's some representatives, maybe not the owner here, that would be information that they should be able to provide you. Thank you much. Thank you so much.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:31:02
“Would one of you mind coming and just kind of answering maybe a few questions for the members that have sat here with us all morning? Good afternoon, council.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:31:46
“Can you speak a little bit more into the microphone?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:32:29
“you guys wanting to keep the property secure and your your people residents secure so as far as and i don't know if you can show us on this or not but um are you planning like from red building left to red building right putting a fence with an operational gate that people can drive through is that the plan i think it's just there there's some confusion on clarification”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:33:30
“So I think it's more the residents are concerned that the gate will not give them access to their parking space or their belongings, from what I've gathered. Is that what everyone else has understood?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:34:43
“Can you put the other aerial view of that alley on there? Because now I'm confused.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:35:16
“But somebody still could walk down the alley from Fillmore and break in, right?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:38:23
“Well, I think we're beating the deck horse right now. I think that the biggest thing is we're either allowing the alley abandonment or we're not. What is the staff's recommendation, please? Can you pull that back up? Thank you, sir. Thank you. Oh, closing public comment. Oh, ma'am, sorry.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:38:46
“Public comment again. I'm so sorry. It's so hard to hear up here.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:39:15
“Okay, that's good to know. Thank you, ma'am. So I think the width of the alley and everything is up to the owner. I think it's just the fact is, does it make sense? Is this an alley that is utilized outside of the current owners and tenants? And it doesn't appear that it should be, in my opinion. It looks like that should be. You know, that's not something that... the city needs to maintain or anything like that, I think that having the owner purchase the alley makes sense. So they've got to do the quick claim deed and all the stuff through the real estate office, correct? Okay. And then as…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:40:16
“It can't go further than the same. Okay. With that being said, can we have a motion or further discussion?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:40:47
“Yeah, because again, the applicant's only putting in for the abandonment. We don't have the ability to tell them what kind of fencing or gates or whatever you want to call it. Okay, so first from Candy. Do I have a second? Second. Second from Lyndon on both items.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:41:08
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:43:25
“No, thank you guys today. I do have a question. I did get an email in regards to the subcommittee, I think on Wednesday, Development Task Force. Am I correct or incorrect stating that there can only be so many members from council, or... THAT'S CORRECT.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026