Remarks by Brittany Davis
228 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 8 of 10
- Play at 1:51:48
“Thank you, Zane. Okay. Closing public comment and, again, opening for discussion or motion within the commission.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:52:03
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:53:52
“Do we have any questions for the commission for Austin? And again, one in support, no in opposition? Yeah. Okay. Do we have any public comment?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:54:26
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:56:17
“Okay. Do we have any public comment, Ray?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:59:04
“Can I ask a real quick question? I know you said the police were out. Were the police at the residence that's for sale currently that's applying for the... Yes. Do we have a record of any of this? No?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:59:17
“Do we know if that's currently being... I don't think it's... I think it's still for sale.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 1:59:30
“I don't believe it is transferred ownership yet, so that would have been, I believe, and don't quote me because I could be wrong, I believe it would be the current owner. Now, the jet skiers, are they, again, were they from that home, or are these just random people on the lake? Because there's a lot of random people on the lake that don't listen. No, they're not from that home.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:00:32
“And how's our clock? Okay. So do we have any other public comment? Okay. Thank you so much for your time this morning. Were you able to pull that up? Yes.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:00:50
“It's things, isn't it? Okay, so I'm going to just say this really quickly. Short-term rentals on the lake are some of the most controversial short-term rentals that we ever see. I've been on the Planning Commission for over seven years, and we have seen a lot of short-term rentals come through and a lot that haven't. One thing that we have to understand is a short-term rental falls – Under some specific guidelines set by the city, so they not only have to go through their safety inspection They have to pass a parking guideline to make sure that there's adequate parking and making sure that…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:04:00
“So Lyndon did just look on the MLS system, and it is showing active. So that does not mean that's necessarily accurate. It could have a contract on it pending approval of this. We don't have that information. But whoever is the owner of it would be the one that is responsible for whoever has been parking and causing ruckus in your neighborhood at the moment. Well, it's whoever owns the property right now. You can look that information up on the public tax record? Yes. It is not transferred ownership yet.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:04:44
“no we understand yeah no we understand we understand okay okay so we've closed public comment any other questions or is anyone ready to make a motion I just want to make a comment um I appreciate the conditional use process and the ability to review short-term short-term rentals on an annual basis”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:06:05
“But it is still actively for sale. The status of the property per what we're able to locate right now has not changed.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:06:18
“So to our knowledge right now, From the information we have, it would be the current owner that is allowing people to come there, not the applicant, I would assume, unless they have some unwritten agreement. I do agree with Liz. I feel like if you're going to operate a business, you should spend your Monday morning with us. So let's just go back to our options. We can table this until next month. We can deny it or we can approve it.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:06:49
“I'll second. Okay. I agree. And so first from Candy, second from Linden. All in favor? Aye. Okay. So CU 26-15-1706, Shad, has been tabled until the next meeting. Hopefully we have more information regarding staff. Can you work on the police phone call that apparently happened? And hopefully we can reach out to the applicant and ask them politely to come to Monday morning meeting. Wonderful. Okay. We are done with conditional uses since we have already read in the one on South Chadburn. We're going to right-of-way abandonments. Our city council has final authority for approval of right-of-way…”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:10:56
“Sorry, there's a large utility easement coming up through Dakota, right?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:13:23
“Oh, my wheels are spinning there. I definitely agree with you as far as our Master Thoroughfare needs to be reevaluated. The future roads that are all over the place cutting through people's land doesn't make a ton of sense. So hopefully that will be addressed in the near future. Any other questions or thoughts for Erin before we open up public comment, if there is any? Oh, wait, do we need to read the other one in?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:13:55
“Yes, but just in general, just so I know. Okay, okay. Okay. Sorry, you want a motion on this and then?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:14:05
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:15:02
“I think it's just the applicant. Did the applicant have anything to add? Nope. All good, Russell. Thumbs up. Closing public comment. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:15:17
“Okay. First by Candy, second by Linden for right-of-way abandonment. All in favor? Aye. And for...”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:15:33
“Okay. First by Linden. Second. Second by Candy. All in favor? Aye. All right. So we've got two more cases today on the right-of-way abandonments. ROW 26-06, Alleys Pierce and Fillmore, SMD number 5, a request for the City of St. Angela to abandon a 0.103-acre alleyway between South Pierce Street and South Fillmore Street.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:16:03
“Oh, sorry. They didn't tell me that earlier. Sorry. I apologize. Okay. And then also, ROW 26-09, alleys Fillmore and Taylor, SMD number 5, request for the City of San Angelo to abandon a 0.084 acre alley between South Taylor and South Fillmore.”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:17:22
Not quoted here: it may name a member of the public. Hear it at the meeting.
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026
- Play at 2:17:53
“So they're just wanting it for more private use than public?”
Planning Commission · Aug 17, 2026