Planning & Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting

To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for it stands one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Honor flaggiance to the Texas one state and indivisible. So, we'll have the consent agenda. So, I'm going to go ahead and entertain a motion to approve the planning and zoning meeting minutes for the October 16th, 2025 motion of approve number one under consent. Second. All those in favor?

I motion passes. Okay. Now, case file number 2025-35-P in the ETJ. Okay. I'll make a motion to go to approve case number two through five under the consent. I mean, two two. We don't want to read them all. Did y'all want me to read them last time? I think they asked me to read them last time. Okay. This is a consent agenda. Okay. All right. Okay. We're going. Okay. Second approve all of these. Okay. All those in favor? Okay. Motion passes. I'm trying to save your voice.

All right. Okay. Well, then let's go all the way down to the public hearing items. Hear from staff. Go ahead.

Oh. Okay. A motion. Case number five. Motion. Case file number 2025-88-P and the ETJ. Yeah. Okay. That one's six. Oh, am I on the wrong one? Yeah. This public here. I think you're missing it here. Oh, I'm missing it. Oh, I'm on the wrong one.

Okay, there we go. I have the wrong one. That would help, wouldn't it? What do I have that one? I'm have the complete wrong one. Okay, we're going to go to case file number 2025-06- AZ. Going to open up a public hearing to consider approval of the request by LCA on behalf of Midland County and DQ DJK, Inc. for the annexation in the city limits for a vacant land being 15.87 acres of track located in a 7.16 acres portion of rightway of South County Road 7. Let me read this whole thing. Okay. 1,297 and portion of West County Road 122 as located in sections 12 and 13 block 41 T-S TNT Railroad County Survey Midland County, Texas.

Sorry, the microphone wasn't on. Uh oh. Uh so this would be for uh just to kind of go through everything. Uh there's four different tracks here. Uh this be a 7.16 acre portion of rightway at South County Road. Uh 1297 and a portion of West County Road 122 is located in sections 12 and 13 block 41T2S. TP Railway Company survey. uh 2.9 acre portion of Midway Boulevard is described in instrument 2025-12371 of the Midland County Plot Records located in section 12 block 41T2STP Railway Company survey. A 04 acre portion of Midway Boulevard is described in instrument 2025-12371 of the Midland County flat records located in section 12 41 T2STMP Railroad Company survey. Uh a 3.28 28 acre portion of Midway Boulevard is described in instrument 202512371 of the Midland County flat records and 0.58 acre portion of Yupon Road is described in 2020-11975 of the public records county Texas and finally a 2.41 41 acre parcel located in the remainder of that certain 1495.733 acre track described in volume 1218 page 564 of the Midland County deed records and remainder of that certain 23004.7 acre uh track is described in volume 2473 page 294 of Mill County deed records located in sections 11 and 12 lot 41 T2S TMP Railway Company survey all in Midland County Texas. Uh, so 13 notices were sent. Uh, one denial was received literally a few minutes ago via email, so I do not have a paper copy for y'all, but I can bring my phone if you'd like to see. Um, the applicant LCA consultant on behalf of Midland County and DJK, Inc. is requesting annexation into the city limits to uh facilitate development of a city road. Uh

land use in the general area consists of vacant land to the north and east. Uh residential uses to the south and west. And then staff does recommend approval of the original designation of future development as requested. So here's the location the near enclave. Go back to the map for that. Do you have any questions? What was the denial? What did it say? Uh, they were concerned that their property was going to be annexed into the city. Um, and as far as I'm aware, that's not the case. The rightway in front of their property, just the right way with

Yes. As I understand. So, basically, we're putting city road right away and we pay taxes. Well, so this would be this become city road. Um we are taking over a portion of uh Midland County Road. I believe they are offering us uh somewhere around $2 million for the uh upkeep on that one up front. Um and then north of that is city property city responsibility, but this will be the whole section will be one of the city. We're constructing the road north of uh county road 122. Sorry 122. apologies. So I can point it out.

This point up is new. Yeah. So basically from that intersection there north to Yukon, this will be new construction. And then down here, the county road right there. Um we'll be taking that over from uh Midland County. All right. Uh and taking over maintenance of that, but they're offering an incentive, I believe, to help uh bring it up to standards and put in Yeah, you might want to ask information. So, help me understand. So, if we are annexing from Midland County because it not bear to be county.

No, this would still be this would be in the city, but we would be the main jurisdiction maintaining but it would still be within Midland County. This would be county annex. And we actually have a portion of the rightway already in the city, but it just didn't quite line up with the previous annexation. So that's why it's the weird shape that it is, as part of the rightway is already in the city and part of it is not. If that kind of gives you any So the one that sent in the denial, what part what portion of that is what his what part is his concern? Um, I believe it's down in here. If you give me a second, I'll pull up that email.

Okay. because yeah, we barely got to look at it. So, do you want to go ahead and does anybody have any more questions? You want to go ahead and open up the public hearing. So, sorry. Oh, it's right here. So, it's not even on that.

I see. So, this is a public hearing. I think it fixed it.

Oh, we got the I don't think it's I don't think it was mine, but it's mine's back.

Mine's back. Okay, we'll go back. So, this is a public hearing. So, if anyone would like to speak on behalf or against your time, go ahead and come up and talk to us about it. Do we have someone here from LCA? You want to go ahead and come up? You can kind of see behind the Gracie Rodriguez, LCA, 521, North Texas 79761. Um, does the board have any other questions addressed?

I think the only question that kind of came up a few minutes ago was if they're putting if you're putting up a traffic light.

I don't have any information on the traffic light. This particular project has a lot of moving parts to it. Um, and I don't have that information at the moment, but I'm more than happy to send that over to the planning department in the event it comes up. Well, if it if it comes to light that it is going to be that there is going to be a light pit. Anyone else want anyone else want to speak? Go ahead and close the public hearing on move for approval. Second.

All those in favor? I motion passes. Bar your sorry.

All right. So, now we're going to go ahead and go on to case file number 2025-27- C. open a public hearing to consider approval of the request by Leo Properties Incorporated for a zone change from FD Future Development to LC Light Commercial on a 20.18 acre track in section 1 block 42 T-2S TNP Railroad County Survey City Odessa County Texas located on the west side of Johnson Shepard Parkway and approximately 1890 ft north of East 52nd Street Council District 4. Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh, so Leo Properties owner and LCA agent are requesting original zoning of light commercial on 20.18 acres located in section 1 block 42 T2S TMP Railway Company survey, city of Odessa, Ector County, Texas to facilitate commercial development. Uh, surrounding land use in the area consists of future development to the north and east. Uh, ETJ with a pending annexation and zoning for SPD to the west and retail one zoning to the south. Uh the property involved in this request is located on the west side of JBS Parkway approximately 1890 ft north of 52nd Street. The site is within the city of Odessa and is currently designated as future development and is vacant land. Uh surrounding land uses in the area include retail commercial uses and vacant land and the applicants are requesting the reszone to facilitate commercial development. Uh the proposed zoning change is consistent with the retail corridor featured in this area uh in the Envision Odessa comprehensive plan. Uh the property will be used for commercial uses in the area. It is worth noting however that there are less intensive zoning districts that would meet the Envision Odessa plan retail and retail one, but there is precedent for like commercial corridor already. The proposed zoning would not have a negative impact on this site or surrounding properties and would extend the existing retail corridor that exists

along JVS Parkway to 42nd Street. The zone change is consistent with uh surrounding existing and proposed zoning districts and is appropriate for the proposed retail use in the comprehensive plan will not disrupt the character of the area and is compatible with adjacent zoning and land use patterns. Based on that analysis, staff does recommend approval of the zone change request as presented. This is a public hearing. Does anybody want to speak on behalf of this project? Hearing it's since it's not residential, we didn't send out notices, right?

So, we did send out notices. All zone change have to do that. I apologize. that was sent off to you. But we only sent out I believe two. Yes, two were sent and none were received back. Okay. Thank you. So move. Second. I'll second. All in

favor. Go on. Case file number 2025-06 in the SCP and open up a public hearing to consider a request by Maverick Engineering for a specific use permit for workforce housing on lot one block one workforce housing Odessa being a 3 0 acre in the city Odessa the city of Odessa extra county Texas generally located on the south side of East Pearl Street approximately 1.665 665 west of 3 Avenue District 1.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh, one quick correction from the uh front page of the uh agenda. Uh, the addition or the subdivision for that uh was renamed to the Redstone Ridge edition. Other than that, everything was the same. Uh, seven notices were sent out and none were received back. So, no protests, no apples, uh, no returns. Uh the applicants Kashi hospitality owner and Maverick Engineering agent are requesting a specific use permit to allow workforce housing in a light industrial zoning district. Uh surrounding land uses in the area future development to the northeast and west and ETJ to the south with an industrial. Uh the purpose of the request is to facilitate development of a workforce housing site. Staff has reviewed the application from Kashi Hospitality for completeness and found that the application is complete. Lonnie's comments reflect his review. Uh just kind of a short summary of everything. A total of 121 parking spaces have been uh shown on the site plan exceeding the required 105 spaces. Uh that they are showing the building pad locations for all the units. Um access is from East Pearl Street. Existing utility lines and basic topographic information have been provided. Um and then have a type there. Um but based on the findings that were submitted to you guys in the packet, um staff does recommend approval of the requested workforce housing SGP with the following conditions. That the occupancy of the units be limited to the number of parking spaces on site uh per city of Odessa's zoning ordinance. Uh any changes in the site plan or layout will require another SUP process to amend the adopted site plan. Uh continued compliance with all of section 14-2-7 of the city of Odessa zoning ordinance and then adoption of respects policies and information submitted by the applicants that modular homes.

It looks like they're going to be um pre-fabricated homes. They're going to be on um yeah similar to like a mobile home. So once it's done

Yes sir. And part of the submission packet is for a uh plan for reclamation. So they have uh given us a time frame of what they would or how long they think it would take to return the site to uh natural conditions. Uh they also um have given us a list of what they would do to return that site back. Anybody have any more questions for chat? This is a public hearing. Would anyone want to open up the public hearing? Does anyone have any um questions or want to speak on behalf or against this project? Seeing none, I'm going to

move for approval. Two seconds. All those in favor? I motion. I'm going to go on to the miscellaneous on to case file number 2025-135-P and the ETJ. A motion to approve with staff recommendations the preliminary plat of opportunia. What is it? Autia. Acres being a one.

Autia. Acres being a 1 acre tract of section 37 block 44T-2-s TNT railroad county survey county, Texas. is generally located on the west side of S. War Admiral Drive, 950 ft north of West Driver's Hall of Fame Street, exterial jurisdiction.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh so the applicant in Three Breto LLC and owner Sylvia Curio are seeking a plat uh to create a 1acre track for development purposes. Uh staff does recommend approval of the preliminary plan of Auntia acres as presented. That questions. Can I entertain a motion? So move. All those in favor entertain a motion to make a motion to adjurnn. Second. All those in favor? Let's have a Christmas holiday.

Absolutely. Merry Christmas.