Planning and Zoning Meeting - Regular Meeting

Thanks for your service. You would be able to 6:00

Turn here

President speech. Speech. Speech. because amended. So action approvals were approved And then there were two var

back on their house. We were behind the properties. Yeah, because it wasn't closed.

I'll secondary to tell us what they would like to do. And also listen closely. Curious. Sorry.

We have four dogs. is going Good evening, chairman and commissioners. My name is Terry Friend, associate planner for the city of Tampa. Um the request before you tonight is for a conditional use permit for a non-commercial kennel license for four dogs in an RS6 zoning district for um Bobby Myers at 721 Sunny Lane. Um in terms of the property, it's in a medium density residential um for the comprehensive plan. The uh current zoning is RS6 single family residential. The surrounding land uses in all directions are single family detached dwellings in an RS6 zoning district and public utilities water and irrigation services are already provided to the property. This is the house itself. The front faces Sunny Lane and because of the way it's centered on property and the way Sunning Lane goes in the direction the side of the house is also facing Sunny Lane. These are the four sweet dogs we're

talking about. Willow, Kylie, Phoebe, and Mayor. Um applicable regulations. We've got quite a few of um related to animals. and the maximum of two dogs as stated here in 1021-3D. You can have up to two in combination between a pot belly pig or a dog or one age two of one any combination thereof. But if you have more of them, there is the opportunity for a conditional use permit for the nonitional non-commercial license um with CU. So the reason we do a conditional use permit is so that we can have an opportunity for a public hearing, so that we can understand any concerns that there might be about this land use um in combination with the surrounding um properties. So here we are tonight. Um the criteria to approve a conditional use permit you've seen before, but it's that the land use is supported by the comprehensive plan. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the property and the project will not adversely impact the intended character and appearance of the general vicinity. That the proposed primary land use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services. And that the proposed will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipments, and conditions um of operation that will be detrimental to any person's property or the general welfare um by reason of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, flare or odors.

Um we do know that a cup can be revoked if there was a citizen complaint or we had a um a city violation that was investigated and found to be credible and not remedyed the the C can be revoked and then in addition uh under the police regulations there are regulations relating to licensing dogs the K9 licensing regulations are Um, as the applicant stated briefly, they moved from the county with these animals. Um, they had additional animals that they were able to rehome. Um, but these ones they consider to be their beloved family members. They are all spayed female animals. They are primarily inside dogs. These are the proposed findings um related to our applications today. These are detailed in your staff report as well. Um and for conclusion, a CP is required for non-commercial kennel in a single family residential zone so that any negative impacts can be identified and reasonably mitigated. The property appears to be wellmaintained and there is no record that the are causing any concerns related to safety, smell, or noise. And although four dogs um as pets may impact neighboring facilities, in this case, it appears that um the impacts are being and will continue to be mitigated by the property owner and if necessary, code allows for city staff um the right to enforce property maintenance and animal control standards.

If you opt to approve the C today, here are some proposed conditions um that the applicant apply with all requirements imposed by any agency. There was no agency comments at this time. Um that applicant shall apply for a non-commercial panel license with the planning and zoning district or sorry planning and zoning office. The CU will only apply to these four dogs that are listed in the applicant's narrative. a mini Aussie Kyle I think that's Kylie sorry a pug fe of hug and mayor of Chihuahua the applicant will secure and maintain a dog license for each dog and the c is not to be transferable to other people's outside the immediate household or other animals or other locations they would need to reapply if they were going to do any of those things and any other conditions that you may want to And here are your presidential motions. I'd be happy to answer your question.

No, not question.

So my question is more curiosity. How did you know? Did you already know that she had to come to the city for a CP for $4? And then I did notice in the letter that you wrote and put in here, you said that the Chihuahua was I don't think any appreciate and thank you for the response. Mr. Chair, I'll make motion that we approve the project as stated on the screen with recommended conditions of approval. 15 calendar days. Unless

Okay. 3-2 subdivision approval for DC. My name is Mason address It's an eight commercial subdivision half road scale commercial. For example, small fac

Good evening, Mr. Chairman, commissioners. My name is Candace, assistant for the city. The request for you this evening is a subdivisionary approval for commercial. The original concept is eight commercial and five on the property details. property is currently zone BC or community business. The surrounding zoning to the north is county subdivision. To the south is commercial and subdivision. To the east is commercial and more county property and to the west is estates commercial. The comprehensive plan that this area as commercial and the only history on this project is that it was annex in November of 2000 by the regulations for the BC zone the statis the overall site is 8.98 acres lot sizes and lotining on this in a second. There are no minimum and maximum requirements for lot sizes in PC zone. Commercial projects are exempt from open space requirements. Parking will be reviewed at the time of building permit. A preliminary landscape was submitted. A formal review will be done upon the submission of the final pl and each individual lot within the subdivision

will be landscape according to the site layout and will be reviewed at the time for correspondence. We did not receive any public comment but we did receive agency comments. The engineering department had comments on drainage utilities and access. Utilities have the capacity to serve this property. A trip generation meal was provided and will continue to be reviewed based on the proposed tenants. The fire district had comments regarding fire hydrants access and general compiance with the international fire code. Nerian irrigation district led comments regarding the train and N parks and wreck request the developer to give the city a 20 foot wide ement on the south side of the drain and construct the pathway to the standards in the state bicycle industrial master plan at the time of construction. The GIS department had comments regarding streets complex. And then the Idaho transportation department request the applicants a traffic impact study reflecting full buildout of the development. Any any mitigation identified through the traffic impact study will be the responsibility of the applicant. Here are the recommended conditions of approval. Condition number was added but it was not listed in this report but I do have it highlighted here and I will stand for questions and it says that parks department

requested I think it's been 20 foot wide and so forth request there. I knew you got to answer this question. How many times do we refuse these requests or they refuse projects like this? um you know that doesn't happen for the most part if there's a developer doing this long enough to know what our codes are like and what the expectation especially long waterways so I think those expectations are known well in advance We don't usually run into that issue if you want to all the time. I've never heard anybody say they're opposed to it.

I don't think they are. No, but they may not land for money less money for them.

Yeah. Mr. Mr. Chair, Commissioner Kman, they provided a traffic trip generation memo identifying what their anticipated uses are. Um and it fell below the threshold for requiring a traffic impact study for our um we will work with the developer and the Iowa transportation department if they ultimately do require a traffic impact study. Um I would anticipate that it would only be looking at their entrance and whether or not necessary. But we will staff generation memo that they prepared lower. Yes. already

as opposed to rent for ourselves. Sales office Our leadership question back in April. There was Well, one of them was a long time ago. I was just curious for there was no opposition. They generally wanted to know what we were

I like it so much. to approve the project as favor My name is Row. Everything about family just question really

no financial interest. and thank you Mr. Chairman for the city of Aszone from R This property is a 37 which is 16,17 that is larger stone. So in the comprehensive plan district The surrounding building to the north is resil on this particular piece of property in 2020. They applied for sewer available at this time required.

water street. So here are the regulations. These are the regulations for the artist. RS600 max. So the fire district Um building department says after seeing the comments from city engineering department building Property located agreement shall be provided to the city. These two documents report when building the department stated that right away completed and require improvements

and that fields are required on the property because they shall provide the facts for that found by staff are listed stated previously in this pres. So weighing the evidence of the facts presented, the facts support component planific. The density falls within the land that are identified as compatible resides for use that is compatible. It will provide the same land of the public as shown by the fact that will not be changing and the These are the conditions of approval. I would have I have not seen proposing. So I don't know.

We wouldn't build. So there is sewer in however that sewer is shallow enough it will not reach up to this house. The sewer that will serve this area and north is down at the dog park and would need to come up second street and then back down. It's a bit of a sewer into that area and that's really all of that area north of the church and all the way the railroad tracks has area. Yes. So res. So in this case they wanted And then the property, but

So the EU would be system No one else direct. Approve this. All those in favor. Sorry, Mr. Chair. I am so sorry. I apologize. legit.

I favor. Thank you very much.